Skip to Main Content
Table 2.

Association between relative telomere length and female bladder cancer risk

Relative telomere lengthCases, n (%)Controls, n (%)OR (95% CI)*OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
3rd tertile 16 (26.2) 23 (34.3) 1.00 ref 1.00 ref 1.00 ref 
2nd tertile 11 (18.0) 23 (34.3) 0.69 (0.26, 1.80) 0.67 (0.25, 1.77) 0.78 (0.29, 2.11) 
1st tertile 34 (55.7) 21 (31.3) 2.33 (1.01, 5.38) 2.34 (1.00, 5.49) 2.67 (1.11, 6.40) 
   Ptrend = 0.05 Ptrend = 0.06 Ptrend = 0.03 
Relative telomere lengthCases, n (%)Controls, n (%)OR (95% CI)*OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
3rd tertile 16 (26.2) 23 (34.3) 1.00 ref 1.00 ref 1.00 ref 
2nd tertile 11 (18.0) 23 (34.3) 0.69 (0.26, 1.80) 0.67 (0.25, 1.77) 0.78 (0.29, 2.11) 
1st tertile 34 (55.7) 21 (31.3) 2.33 (1.01, 5.38) 2.34 (1.00, 5.49) 2.67 (1.11, 6.40) 
   Ptrend = 0.05 Ptrend = 0.06 Ptrend = 0.03 
*

Crude unconditional logistic regression.

Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for the matching factors (age and smoking status).

Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for the matching factors (age, smoking status) and pack-years of smoking.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal