To explore the effects of early region 1A (E1A) carried by superparamagnetic dextran iron oxide nanoparticles (SDION) on the radiosensitivity of human cervical cancer. The xenograft mice with cervical cancer received weekly intratumoral SDION-E1A injection and a subsequent 50-Gy irradiation. The weekly relative tumor volume and the final tumor volume were compared among different experimental groups. p53 and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2)/Neu expression in final tumor tissue was detected by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot. The relative tumor volume and the final tissue volume in the SDION-E1A group was significantly smaller than that in Sham and SDION-Vector groups at each time points after irradiation (P < 0.05). Exogenous E1A expression by SDION delivery significantly increased p53 expression, but inhibited HER-2/Neu expression in tumor tissue (P < 0.05). The intratumoral delivery of exogenous E1A carried by SDION increases p53 expression but inhibits HER-2/neu expression, and enhances the radiosensitivity of human cervical cancer in xenograft mice. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(7); 2123–30. ©2010 AACR.

Carcinoma of the cervix is a common malignant tumor and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among women in the world. Despite the widespread use of cytologic screening and improvements in early diagnosis, mortality rates have changed little over the past 25 years (1). Radiotherapy may be applied to all stages of cervical cancer in disease control and survival, and it is the most effective treatment for the middle and advanced stage patients. However, the resistance of tumor to radiation caused by intrinsic factors remains a major therapeutic hurdle (2), and a high proportion (50%) of these patients die from local recurrences as well as regional and distant metastases despite the first-line radiation therapy. There is an unmet need for the exploration of new approaches to enhance response to radiation therapy leading to improved survival rate of cervical cancer (3).

Given that cancer is ultimately a genetic disease, it has long been the hope of researchers to use gene therapy to enhance the radiosensitivity in which they might be most susceptible. Human adenovirus type 5 early region 1A (E1A) can result in an increase of the intracellular concentration of p53 protein (4). Moreover, E1A gene can induce transcriptional repression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) /Neu oncogene in ovarian cancer (5) and downregulate the expression of the HER-2/Neu in human cervical cancer cells (6). Interestingly, HER-2/Neu is known as a poor prognostic factor in human cervical cancers and is currently considered as a target for cervical cancer therapy (79). In gynecologic malignancies, 36.6% of nontreated human squamous cervical cancers have an amplified or overexpressed HER-2/Neu gene (10). Given the close association between p53/HER-2 and the radiosensitivity in human cancer, as well as the regulation effects of E1A on these antioncogene and oncogene, E1A could be logically applied as a radiosensitizer to decrease the radioresistance in human cervical cancer.

Although gene therapy provides a promising approach to enhanced radiation sensitivity and abolish acquired resistance to radiation in human cancer (11, 12), the lack of safe and efficient gene delivery vectors has largely reduced the potential of gene therapy in the clinic. Most of the previous attempts at cancer gene therapy had used adenovirus vectors to deliver the therapeutic gene, but nonviral and noninfectious nanoparticle delivery systems are currently under intensive investigation to improve the curative effects and relieve the cytotoxicity (13, 14). The application of superparamagnetic dextran iron oxide nanoparticles (SDION) as gene carrier in gene therapy of tumor has been developed quickly in recent years with great experimental and clinical significance because it is convenient for preparation and can drive target gene to express highly and stably (15). The present study was designed to explore the enhancement effects of E1A carried by SDION on the radiosensitivity of human cervical cancer in nude mice. At the same time, the mechanism of E1A gene on radiotherapy sensitization by its regulation of HER-2/Neu and p53 expression is also investigated.

Materials

HeLa cell line of human squamous carcinoma of the cervix was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. PRMI-1640 culture medium, fetal bovine serum, Trizol Reagent, the plasmid of pcDNA3.1, and DH5α-competent cells were from Invitrogen. Mouse monoclonal IgG2a against adenovirus-5 E1A, p53, and HER-2/Neu were purchased from Pharmingen Biosciences. Horseradish peroxidase–conjugated anti-mouse IgG and enhanced chemiluminescence kit for Western blot were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Advantage RT-for-PCR kit and Advantage cDNA PCR kit were purchased from Clontech Laboratories, Inc. Mouse monoclonal antibody against β-actin and other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Ltd. unless otherwise indicated.

E1A plasmid construction and SDION-E1A preparation

Employing two restriction enzymes of EcoR I and BamH I, the full coding sequence of E1A gene was cut from pUC119-E1A plasmid (Promega Corp.). The 1,170-bp DNA fragment with the full open reading frame of E1A gene was inserted into pcDNA3.1 plasmid by T4 DNA ligase (Invitrogen), cloned into DH5α competent cells, subsequently amplified, and purified with the Wizard Plus Minipreps kit (Promega Corp.).

The E1A-carrying vector of SDION was prepared as previously described (16). Briefly, 1.5 g of dextran T-40 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), 0.234 g of FeCl3·6H2O, and 0.086 g of FeCl2·4H2O dissolved in 3 mL of deionized water was mixed with magnetic force stirring at 800 rpm/min. Following an addition of ammonia at 8.5% weight ratio, the temperature was rapidly increased and kept at 60°C for 30 minutes. The pH value was adjusted to 7.0 by glacial acetic acid, and the accumulation of large particles was removed by 1,500 rpm/min centrifugation. The supernatant was loaded on a gel-filtration chromatography column (2.6 cm × 40 cm) of Sephacryl S-300HR (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The first PBS-elution peak was collected and dialyzed at 4°C for 24 hours, and the vacuum freeze drying products were dissolved in 10 mL deionized water to make the SDION.

Fifty milligrams of SDION were dissolved in sodium periodate at the final concentration of 20 mmol/L and stirred at 4°C in darkness for1 hour. Following an adequate hemodialysis and vacuum freeze drying, the lyophilized products was dissolved in 10 mL of PBS, mixed thoroughly with 1 mg E1A plasmid, and reacted at 4°C in darkness for 24 hours. The mixture was reduced at 4°C for 1 hour by sodium borohydride at the concentration of 1 mol/L and subsequently centrifuged at 1,500 rpm/min for 15 minutes. The supernatant was loaded on a Sephacryl S-300HR gel chromatography column, and the first PBS-elution peak was collected and applied as SDION-E1A ready for further use.

Experimental cervical cancer xenograft model

HeLa cells were cultured in PRMI-1640 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 100 IU penicillin, 100 μg/mL of streptomycin, and 2 mmol/L l-glutamine at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2.

A suspension of HeLa cells (5 × 106 cells in 200 μL PRMI-1640) in log-phase growth was s.c. inoculated into both lower limbs of 6-week-old nu/nu BALB/c mice (Central Animal Care Unit, Central South University, China). The mice were maintained under 12-hour light/dark cycles with food and water ad libitum. All animals received humane care in compliance with the university's guidelines. After inoculation, the tumors were measured weekly in two perpendicular diameters using a caliper and the tumor volume was determined by using the following formula: V = π/6 × [large diameter × (short diameter)2] (17). When the tumor xenografts developed to ∼300 mm3, the tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into three groups maintaining a similar tumor size distribution: (a) the Sham group receiving irradiation with PBS injection in tumor, (b) irradiation treatment with blank SDION vector intratumoral injection, and (c) irradiation with intratumoral SDION-E1A injection.

SDION-E1A treatment and radiotherapy

One hundred micrograms of E1A plasmid carried by SDION were injected directly into the tumor mass weekly. The tumors were exposed to nominal 2.5 Gy entrance doses on a 6MV X-ray linear accelerator (Varian Clinac 2100 C/D System, Varian Medical Systems), 5 d/wk, to complete 50 Gy in accordance with an irradiation protocol similar to clinical patient treatment (17). The lower limbs were selected as the tumor xenograft sites, and all the tumor-bearing mice were shielded with a specially designed lead apparatus allowing local irradiation to minimize irradiation to other body organs. The tumor volumes were measured weekly as described above, and a relative tumor volume (RTV) was determined using the relation: RTV = Vi/V0, in which Vi was the weekly measured tumor volume and V0 was the initial tumor volume at the beginning of the treatment. All the mice were sacrificed 30 days after the initial irradiation treatment and the tumor mass was collected.

RNA extraction and real-time reverse transcription-PCR quantitation

Total RNA was isolated from the tumor tissue using Trizol reagent per the manufacturer's instruction. The first strand cDNA synthesis was done using the Advantage RT-for-PCR kit as previously described (18). The specific primers for p53, HER-2/Neu, and β-actin were designed from the respective Genbank sequence, synthesized by Bio Basic, Inc., and listed in Table 1. The regular PCR amplification for E1A was carried out by applying 28 cycles comprising the following: denaturation at 94°C for 20 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds, elongation at 72°C for 1 minute, followed by a final elongation at 72°C for 4 minutes on an Eppendorf MasterCycler (Eppendorf). The real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) quantitation for p53 and HER-2/Neu mRNA expression was done on an ABI Model 7500 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems) using a TaKaRa real-time PCR kit (TaKaRa Biotechnology). The amplified PCR products were quantified by measuring the target and β-actin mRNA calculated cycle thresholds. The amount of specific mRNA in each sample was calculated from the standard curve and normalized with the β-actin mRNA. The comparative 2−ΔΔCT method was used for relative quantification and statistical analysis, and the results were expressed as a n-fold difference relative to Sham controls (19).

Table 1.

Primers and reaction conditions of regular and real-time RT-PCR

GenesGenbank accession no.PrimersTemperature (°C)Size (bp)
E1A 
    Sense AY339865 5′-TATGATTTAGACGTGACG-3′ 60 267 
    Anti-sense  5′-CTCGTCGTCACTGGG-3′   
p53 
    Sense M14694 5′-CATCTACAAGCAGTCACAGCA-3′ 61 186 
    Anti-sense  5′-GGCGGCTCATAGGGCACCACCACA-3′   
HER-2/Neu 
    Sense M12036 5′-CATGGGAGAACTCTGAGTG-3′ 62 182 
    Anti-sense  5′-CTCCTCACCCACCCCTCCCAACAC-3′   
β-Actin 
    Sense EF156276 5′-ACCACACTTTCTACAATGA-3 60 178 
    Anti-sense  5′-CCAGAGGCATACAGGGACAACACA-3′   
GenesGenbank accession no.PrimersTemperature (°C)Size (bp)
E1A 
    Sense AY339865 5′-TATGATTTAGACGTGACG-3′ 60 267 
    Anti-sense  5′-CTCGTCGTCACTGGG-3′   
p53 
    Sense M14694 5′-CATCTACAAGCAGTCACAGCA-3′ 61 186 
    Anti-sense  5′-GGCGGCTCATAGGGCACCACCACA-3′   
HER-2/Neu 
    Sense M12036 5′-CATGGGAGAACTCTGAGTG-3′ 62 182 
    Anti-sense  5′-CTCCTCACCCACCCCTCCCAACAC-3′   
β-Actin 
    Sense EF156276 5′-ACCACACTTTCTACAATGA-3 60 178 
    Anti-sense  5′-CCAGAGGCATACAGGGACAACACA-3′   

Western blot analyses of E1A, p53, and HER-2/Neu protein expression

Total protein was lysed in protein extract solution, and the protein concentration in lysates was calculated by the Lowry method. Twenty five micrograms of total protein extracted from the tumor tissue were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions and were transferred to Nitroplus-2000 membrane (Micron Separations, Inc.). Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked by preincubation of the membranes with 5% skim milk in 1× TBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against respective target protein at a dilution of 1:1,000 in 1× TBS containing 2% skim milk, and were subsequently incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated sheep anti-mouse IgG at 1:1,000 dilutions for 1 hour at room temperature. Bands were visualized by using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit according to the manufacturer's instruction (20).

Statistical analyses

To evaluate the value differences given as means ± SEM among different groups, the ANOVA and Fisher's protected least significant difference test were done using StatView software (version 5.0, SAS Institute, Inc.). The differences with P values of <0.05 were defined as statistically significant.

The effects of SDION-E1A on tumor growth of xenografts treated with irradiation

Ten to 12 days after HeLa inoculation, most of the xenograft mice developed tumor mass that reached ∼300 mm3, and were administered the first SDION-E1A intratumor injection and a subsequent entrance irradiation 72 hours later. The index of RTV was used to reflect the effects of SDION-E1A on tumor size reduction in the nude mice. As shown in Fig. 1, the RTV in Sham group injected with PBS in tumor at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after the first radiotherapy was 0.816 ± 0.103, 0.6333 ± 0.061, 0.554 ± 0.115, and 0.486 ± 0.128; 0.798 ± 0.096, 0.626 ± 0.089, 0.539 ± 0.106, and 0.472 ± 0.105 the in SDION-Vector group; and 0.687 ± 0.094, 0.452 ± 0.083, 0.305 ± 0.077, and 0.227 ± 0.058 in the SDION-E1A group, respectively. The statistical analyses did not show any significant difference of RTV between the groups of Sham and SDION-Vector at different time points (P > 0.05). However, the RTV in SDION-E1A group was significant lower than that in Sham and SDION-Vector groups at each time points from the 1st to the 4th week of irradiation, respectively (P < 0.05).

Figure 1.

The RTV in xenograft mice following intratumoral injection of SDION-E1A. The mice tumors in the groups SDION-Vector and SDION-E1A were respectively injected with SDION carrying blank plasmid without E1A insert and SDION carrying E1A plasmid, and followed by radiotherapy. The mice in Sham group received PBS intratumoral injection and subsequent irradiation as the control. The entrance radiotherapy was applied 72 h after the first SDION-E1A injection. The value 0 on the abscissa indicates the time point of the first irradiation treatment.

Figure 1.

The RTV in xenograft mice following intratumoral injection of SDION-E1A. The mice tumors in the groups SDION-Vector and SDION-E1A were respectively injected with SDION carrying blank plasmid without E1A insert and SDION carrying E1A plasmid, and followed by radiotherapy. The mice in Sham group received PBS intratumoral injection and subsequent irradiation as the control. The entrance radiotherapy was applied 72 h after the first SDION-E1A injection. The value 0 on the abscissa indicates the time point of the first irradiation treatment.

Close modal

Thirty days after the first radiotreatment, the final tumor mass in xenograft mice was dissected and the representative fresh samples were presented in Fig. 2A. As shown in the histogram of Fig. 2B, the final tumor volume in the groups of Sham, SDION-Vector, and SDION-E1A was 141.9 ± 23.4 mm3, 137.3 ± 19.8 mm3, and 66.7 ± 12.1 mm3, respectively. The mass volume in SDION-E1A group was significantly smaller than that in Sham and SDION-Vector groups (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistical difference of the final tumor volume between the groups of Sham and SDION-Vector (P > 0.05).

Figure 2.

The final tumor volume in cervical cancer xenograft mice 30 days after the initial irradiation treatment. A, representative fresh tumor mass; B, the statistical histogram of the real tumor volume in different groups of sacrificed mice (n = 10). *, the statistical expression difference of final xenograft tumor volume between Sham control and SDION-E1A (P < 0.05).

Figure 2.

The final tumor volume in cervical cancer xenograft mice 30 days after the initial irradiation treatment. A, representative fresh tumor mass; B, the statistical histogram of the real tumor volume in different groups of sacrificed mice (n = 10). *, the statistical expression difference of final xenograft tumor volume between Sham control and SDION-E1A (P < 0.05).

Close modal

The effects of SDION-E1A on the mRNA and protein expression of p53 and HER-2/Neu in tumor tissue

The mRNA expression of p53 and HER-2/Neu in fresh tumor tissue, which was collected 30 days after the initial radiotherapy, was quantitatively analyzed by real-time RT-PCR, and the statistical results were shown in Fig. 3. As compared with that in Sham group (setting at 1), p53 mRNA levels were 1.04 ± 0.17 and 1.89 ± 0.37, and HER-2/Neu mRNA levels were 0.97 ± 0.21 and 0.29 ± 0.11 in the groups of SDION-Vector and SDION-E1A, respectively. No statistical difference of p53 and HER-2/Neu mRNA expression was shown between the Sham and SDION-Vector groups (P > 0.05). However, p53 and HER-2/Neu mRNA levels in SDION-E1A group, respectively, were significantly higher and lower than that in control groups of Sham and SDION-Vector (P < 0.05).

Figure 3.

mRNA expression of p53 and HER-2/Neu in xenograft tumor tissue (n = 10) identified by real-time RT-PCR. Applying β-actin as the internal loading control in three independent experiments, the mRNA expression levels of target genes in Sham group were set as 1. *, the significantly different expression levels of p53 and HER-2/Neu between Sham control and SDION-E1A (P < 0.05).

Figure 3.

mRNA expression of p53 and HER-2/Neu in xenograft tumor tissue (n = 10) identified by real-time RT-PCR. Applying β-actin as the internal loading control in three independent experiments, the mRNA expression levels of target genes in Sham group were set as 1. *, the significantly different expression levels of p53 and HER-2/Neu between Sham control and SDION-E1A (P < 0.05).

Close modal

As shown in Fig. 4, both mRNA and protein expression was shown to some extent in Sham and SDION-Vector groups applied as the experimental control. However, much more efficient E1A mRNA and protein was stably expressed in SDION-E1A using SDION as the E1A gene carrier (Fig. 4A). As compared with the gray scales of the electrophoretic gels representing target protein expression levels in the Sham group (setting at 1), that of p53 were 1.42 ± 0.69 and 2.57 ± 0.73, and that of HER-2/Neu were 1.05 ± 0.41 and 0.36 ± 0.13 in the groups of SDION-Vector and SDION-E1A, respectively. No statistical difference of p53 and HER-2/Neu protein expression was identified between Sham and SDION-Vector groups (P > 0.05). However, p53 and HER-2/Neu protein levels in the SDION-E1A group, respectively, were significantly higher and lower than that in the control groups of Sham and SDION-Vector (P < 0.05; Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.

Expression of E1A, p53, and HER-2/Neu in different experimental groups. E1A mRNA expression in tumor tissue was identified by regular RT-PCR, and protein expression of p53 and HER-2/Neu was shown by Western blot. A, representative electrophoretic gels; B, statistical analysis results of gray scale scanning with the gray scales in Sham group as the evaluation standard value of 1. β-Actin was used as the internal loading control in three independent experiments. *, the significantly different protein expression levels of p53 and HER-2/Neu between experimental control and SDION-E1A treatment groups.

Figure 4.

Expression of E1A, p53, and HER-2/Neu in different experimental groups. E1A mRNA expression in tumor tissue was identified by regular RT-PCR, and protein expression of p53 and HER-2/Neu was shown by Western blot. A, representative electrophoretic gels; B, statistical analysis results of gray scale scanning with the gray scales in Sham group as the evaluation standard value of 1. β-Actin was used as the internal loading control in three independent experiments. *, the significantly different protein expression levels of p53 and HER-2/Neu between experimental control and SDION-E1A treatment groups.

Close modal

Currently, gene therapy is a major focus in many kinds of cancer therapy, including cervical cancer (21). The goal of gene therapy is to alter the expression of a given protein resulting in therapeutic benefit by the delivery of polynucleotides to the cells and target tissue. However, no great progress and true treatment benefits can be realized until effective gene carrier and delivery systems have been developed. The viral vectors used as the gene carrier, which account for ∼75% of all conducted clinical trials, are highly efficient as viruses have a highly evolved and specific mechanism for inserting their genome into that of host cell. On the other hand, incidences of severe adverse reactions using viral vectors during clinical trials, which are induced by viral pathogenicity, immunogenicity, and potential for insertional mutagenesis, have caused a gradual shift toward nonviral vectors in gene therapy (21).

Nanomaterials have been extensively investigated and have been at the forefront of gene delivery in the last few years. Meanwhile, more and more evidence has shown the nanogene delivery systems' advantages in cancer treatment due to their particular physicochemical and biological properties, including sustained gene delivery and prolonged release, high transfection efficiency, highly inert, low toxicity, and easy and cheap preparation (22). SDION is a kind of nonpolymeric but superparamagnetic dextran iron nanoparticles, which has 45% transfection efficiency as gene carrier in vitro higher than 30% of liposome. The large gene loading of SDION is implemented by the oxidation-reduction reaction in preparation and the tight connection with plasmid by the polymeric dextran surrounding SDION nanoparticles (16). As compared with the vectors of rival and liposome, another advantage of SDION is its nanodiameter, which is small enough to avoid macrophage phagocytosis and to achieve a prolonged circulating and functioning period (23). In the present project, E1A carried by SDION was efficiently and stably expressed by intratumoral injection weekly, even 30 days after the first procedure. In general, nonviral gene delivery vectors, including nanoparticles, have a potential deficiency of lower efficiency compared with viral vector. However, the important characteristic of superparamagnetic of SDION could potentiate the efficacy of magnetic nanoparticle up to several hundred-fold under a magnetic-guided field (24). Moreover, the application of SDION for specific targeting in systemic delivery guided by magnetic field and the magnetic hyperthermia cancer therapy is of considerable clinical significance and worthy of more attention in further investigations.

E1A is documented to function as a tumor suppressor gene in an independent manner in the tumor to inhibit the oncogenes of HER-2/Neu (25, 26). A series of gene therapy research of E1A focuses on breast and ovarian tumor with positive HER-2/Neu expression, and some encouraging preclinical trial results have been reported (27, 28). Gene therapy allowing for regional delivery of E1A is a clinical challenge and an attractive modality for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer, which expresses HER-2/Neu also and has a close correlation with tumor radiosensitivity. Rat embryo cells transfected with E1A were relatively radiation sensitive and nonmetastatic in vitro (29). E1A gene could significantly inhibit the growth rate of lymph node metastasis cell line 686LN-1 of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and enhance the cell sensitivity to irradiation, which is consistent with our findings in an experimental animal model of human cervical cancer. These functions of E1A gene were assumed to be associated with its ability to suppress the HER-2/neu expression and to arrest the cell at G2/M phase (30). HER2 has been shown to activate NF-κB; some data suggest a loop-like HER2-NF-κB-HER2 pathway in radiation-induced adaptive resistance in breast cancer cells (31). An anti–HER-2/neu antibody trastuzumab at the dose of 10 μg/mL increased the irradiation response for the treatment of esophageal cancers, including adenocarcinoma and squamous cell cancer with HER-2/neu expression (32). An anti–HER2-antibody is also considered as an irradiation enhancement agent in human head and neck squamous carcinoma cells and breast cancer cells. Moreover, the upregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors by HER2 antibody may occur upstream of irradiation-induced p53 upregulation (33). In clinical practice, HER-2/neu oncoprotein expression detected by immunostaining is useful for the prediction of chemoradioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (34). We previously reported that E1A inhibited the proliferation of human cervical cancer HeLa cells through activation of the HER-2/Neu/caspase-3 pathway (6). The present data support that the downregulated HER-2/Neu expression by SDION-E1A regional delivery contributes to the radiosensitivity of human cervical cancer in vivo.

The tumor suppressor gene of p53, which is investigated in the present project, is also an important radiosensitizer and can be regulated by E1A. E1A was reported to facilitate Mdm4 binding to p53 and inhibit Mdm2 binding to Mdm4, so as to result in decreased nuclear exportation of p53 and stabilize the p53 through targeting Mdm4 in a p14(ARF)-independent manner (4). During the infection of human cells, E1A expression may trigger redundant p53-independent and p53-dependent apoptotic pathways by binding to pRb− and/or p300 (35). Consequently, the intracellular accumulation of p53 is assumed to be the result of the induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis by E1A proteins and that increased levels of p53 then activate cell death pathways (36). p53 coding for positive signal transduction factors acts as a central mediator of the cellular response to stressful stimuli and can influence transit through cell cycle checkpoints to further confer radiosensitivity upon tumor cells. p53 is suggested to have a cooperative role with RAF1 protein in determining cellular radiosensitivity in human cells, which involves control of the G2-M checkpoint (37). A large amount of evidence over the last two decades have shown that p53 expression is required for the efficacy of radiation and has led to considerable interest in the development of strategies to restore normal p53 function in tumors with defective p53-dependent signaling (38, 39). p53 activation has been proven to be an effective radiosensitizer, which is entirely attributable to an increased induction of p53-dependent cellular senescence, in some human cancers (40). It is also believed that p53-dependent signaling pathways are one of the central molecular mechanisms involved in a cell's response to irradiation and play the key role as a radiation sensitivity biomarker in clinical radiation oncology practice (41). Our experimental results suggest that p53 expression can be stimulated and accumulated in human cervical cancer tissue in nude mice by SDION-E1A regional injection, so as to achieve a radiosensitization of xenograft tumor. On the other hand, there was some evidence also supporting the potent radiosensitivity inducer of E1A in a p53-dependent and p53-independent manner (42). Some murine and human malignant tumors, when expressing adenovirus E1A, were very sensitive to irradiation treatment in vivo, regardless of the p53 status of the tumors (43). The most obvious hypothesis for the discrepancy in E1A function is that the specific cellular factors involved in the induction of apoptosis by E1A may be cell type dependent.

In conclusion, the intratumoral delivery of exogenous E1A carried by SDION increases p53 expression but inhibits HER-2/neu expression, and enhances the radiosensitivity of human cervical cancer in xenograft mice.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support: Grant from National 863 Program of China (no. 2002AA214011) and a grant from Science Foundation of the Health Department of Hunan Province (no. B2005-035).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Jemal
A
,
Thomas
A
,
Murray
T
,
Thun
M
. 
Cancer statistics, 2002
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2002
;
52
:
23
47
.
2
Kim
TJ
,
Lee
JW
,
Song
SY
, et al
. 
Increased expression of pAKT is associated with radiation resistance in cervical cancer
.
Br J Cancer
2006
;
94
:
1678
82
.
3
Weibo
Yin
,
Xizhi
Gu
.
Therapeutic radiology of tumor
. pp.
889
933
Beijing (China)
:
Medical University of Union, Press
; 
2003
.
4
Li
Z
,
Day
CP
,
Yang
JY
, et al
. 
Adenoviral E1A targets Mdm4 to stabilize tumor suppressor p53
.
Cancer Res
2004
;
64
:
9080
5
.
5
Chen
H
,
Hung
MC
. 
Involvement of co-activator p300 in the transcriptional regulation of the HER-2/neu gene
.
J Biol Chem
1997
;
272
:
6101
4
.
6
Shen
L
,
Zeng
S
,
Chen
J
, et al
. 
E1A inhibits the proliferation of human cervical cancer cells (HeLa cells) by apoptosis induction through activation of HER-2/Neu/Caspase-3 pathway
.
Med Oncol
2008
;
25
:
222
8
.
7
Serrano-Olvera
A
,
Duenas-Gonzalez
A
,
Gallardo-Rincon
D
,
Candelaria
M
,
De la Garza-Salazar
J
. 
Prognostic, predictive and therapeutic implications of HER2 in invasive epithelial ovarian cancer
.
Cancer Treat Rev
2006
;
32
:
180
90
.
8
Shen
L
,
Shui
Y
,
Wang
X
, et al
. 
EGFR and HER2 expression in primary cervical cancers and corresponding lymph node metastases: implications for targeted radiotherapy
.
BMC Cancer
2008
;
8
:
232
.
9
Chavez-Blanco
A
,
Perez-Sanchez
V
,
Gonzalez-Fierro
A
, et al
. 
HER2 expression in cervical cancer as a potential therapeutic target
.
BMC Cancer
2004
;
4
:
59
.
10
Sharma
A
,
Pratap
M
,
Sawhney
VM
,
Khan
IU
,
Bhambhani
S
,
Mitra
AB
. 
Frequent amplification of C-erbB2 (HER-2/Neu) oncogene in cervical carcinoma as detected by non-fluorescence in situ hybridization technique on paraffin sections
.
Oncology
1999
;
56
:
83
7
.
11
Lee
CT
,
Park
MY
,
Kim
DR
, et al
. 
Blockade of NF-κB activation by IκB-gene therapy enhances radiation sensitivity and abolishes acquired resistance to radiation
.
Molecular Medicine
2009
;
2
:
471
5
.
12
Guha
C
,
Guha
U
,
Tribius
S
, et al
. 
Antisense ATM gene therapy: a strategy to increase the radiosensitivity of human tumors
.
Gene Ther
2000
;
7
:
852
8
.
13
Zhang
G
,
Liu
T
,
Chen
YH
, et al
. 
Tissue specific cytotoxicity of colon cancer cells mediated by nanoparticle-delivered suicide gene in vitro and in vivo
.
Clin Cancer Res
2009
;
15
:
201
7
.
14
Li
Z
,
Xiang
J
,
Zhang
W
, et al
. 
Nanoparticle delivery of anti-metastatic NM23-1 gene improves chemotherapy in a mouse tumor model
.
Cancer Gene Ther
2009
;
16
:
423
9
.
15
Ma
HL
,
Qi
XR
,
Maitani
Y
,
Nagai
T
. 
Preparation and characterization of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles stabilized by alginate
.
Int J Pharm
2007
;
333
:
177
86
.
16
Cao
ZG
,
Zhou
SW
,
Sun
K
,
Lu
XB
,
Luo
G
,
Liu
JH
. 
Preparation and feasibility of superparamagnetic dextran iron oxide nanoparticles as gene carrier
.
Ai Zheng
2004
;
23
:
1105
9
.
17
Medina
LA
,
Herrera-Penilla
BI
,
Castro-Morales
MA
, et al
. 
Use of an orthovoltage X-ray treatment unit as a radiation research system in a small-animal cancer model
.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res
2008
;
27
:
57
.
18
Shen
H
,
Huang
G
,
Hadi
M
, et al
. 
Transforming growth factor-β1 downregulation of Smad1 gene expression in rat hepatic stellate cells
.
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol
2003
;
285
:
G539
46
.
19
Peng
ZZ
,
Hu
GY
,
Shen
H
, et al
. 
Fluorofenidone attenuates collagen I and transforming growth factor-β1 expression through a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase-dependent way in NRK-52E cells
.
Nephrology (Carlton)
2009
;
14
:
565
72
.
20
Shen
H
,
Zhang
M
,
Minuk
GY
,
Gong
Y
. 
Different effects of rat interferon α, β and γ on rat hepatic stellate cell proliferation and activation
.
BMC Cell Biol
2002
;
3
:
9
.
21
Basarkar
A
,
Singh
J
. 
Nanoparticulate systems for polynucleotide delivery
.
Int J Nanomedicine
2007
;
2
:
353
60
.
22
Jabr-Milane
L
,
van Vlerken
L
,
Devalapally
H
, et al
. 
Multi-functional nanocarriers for targeted delivery of drugs and genes
.
J Control Release
2008
;
130
:
121
8
.
23
Moghimi
SM
,
Hunter
AC
,
Murray
JC
. 
Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice
.
Pharmacol Rev
2001
;
53
:
283
318
.
24
Scherer
F
,
Anton
M
,
Schillinger
U
, et al
. 
Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo
.
Gene Ther
2002
;
9
:
102
9
.
25
Madhusudan
S
,
Tamir
A
,
Bates
N
, et al
. 
A multicenter phase I gene therapy clinical trial involving intraperitoneal administration of E1A-lipid complex in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer overexpressing HER-2/neu oncogene
.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
2986
96
.
26
Frisch
SM
. 
E1A as a tumor suppressor gene: commentary re S. Madhusudan et al. A multicenter phase I gene therapy clinical trial involving intraperitoneal administration of E1A-lipid complex in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer overexpressing HER-2/neu oncogene
.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
2905
7
.
27
Hortobagyi
GN
,
Ueno
NT
,
Xia
W
, et al
. 
Cationic liposome-mediated E1A gene transfer to human breast and ovarian cancer cells and its biologic effects: a phase I clinical trial
.
J Clin Oncol
2001
;
19
:
3422
33
.
28
Ueno
NT
,
Bartholomeusz
C
,
Herrmann
JL
, et al
. 
E1A-mediated paclitaxel sensitization in HER-2/neu-overexpressing ovarian cancer SKOV3.ip1 through apoptosis involving the caspase-3 pathway
.
Clin Cancer Res
2000
;
6
:
250
9
.
29
Lewis
AM
,
Su
M
,
Doty
J
,
Chen
Y
,
Pardo
FS
. 
Relationship between intrinsic radiation sensitivity and metastatic potential
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
1996
;
34
:
103
10
.
30
Wang
XL
,
Qian
XL
,
Zhao
QZ
,
Xu
ZG
,
Tang
PZ
. 
[Effect of E1A gene on in vitro growth inhibition and radiochemosensitivity of lymph node metastasis cells of human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma]
.
Ai Zheng
2003
;
22
:
1140
6
.
31
Cao
N
,
Li
S
,
Wang
Z
, et al
. 
NF-κB-mediated HER2 overexpression in radiation-adaptive resistance
.
Radiat Res
2009
;
171
:
9
21
.
32
Sato
S
,
Kajiyama
Y
,
Sugano
M
, et al
. 
Monoclonal antibody to HER-2/neu receptor enhances radiosensitivity of esophageal cancer cell lines expressing HER-2/neu oncoprotein
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2005
;
61
:
203
11
.
33
Uno
M
,
Otsuki
T
,
Kurebayashi
J
, et al
. 
Anti-HER2-antibody enhances irradiation-induced growth inhibition in head and neck carcinoma
.
Int J Cancer
2001
;
94
:
474
9
.
34
Akamatsu
M
,
Matsumoto
T
,
Oka
K
, et al
. 
c-erbB-2 oncoprotein expression related to chemoradioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2003
;
57
:
1323
7
.
35
Chiou
SK
,
White
E
. 
p300 binding by E1A cosegregates with p53 induction but is dispensable for apoptosis
.
J Virol
1997
;
71
:
3515
25
.
36
Querido
E
,
Teodoro
JG
,
Branton
PE
. 
Accumulation of p53 induced by the adenovirus E1A protein requires regions involved in the stimulation of DNA synthesis
.
J Virol
1997
;
71
:
3526
33
.
37
Warenius
HM
,
Jones
M
,
Gorman
T
, et al
. 
Combined RAF1 protein expression and p53 mutational status provides a strong predictor of cellular radiosensitivity
.
Br J Cancer
2000
;
83
:
1084
95
.
38
Lu
C
,
El-Deiry
WS
. 
Targeting p53 for enhanced radio- and chemo-sensitivity
.
Apoptosis
2009
;
14
:
597
606
.
39
Gudkov
AV
,
Komarova
EA
. 
The role of p53 in determining sensitivity to radiotherapy
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2003
;
3
:
117
29
.
40
Lehmann
BD
,
McCubrey
JA
,
Jefferson
HS
,
Paine
MS
,
Chappell
WH
,
Terrian
DM
. 
A dominant role for p53-dependent cellular senescence in radiosensitization of human prostate cancer cells
.
Cell Cycle
2007
;
6
:
595
605
.
41
Eschrich
S
,
Zhang
H
,
Zhao
H
, et al
. 
Systems biology modeling of the radiation sensitivity network: a biomarker discovery platform
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2009
;
75
:
497
505
.
42
Chen
Y
,
DeWeese
T
,
Dilley
J
, et al
. 
CV706, a prostate cancer-specific adenovirus variant, in combination with radiotherapy produces synergistic antitumor efficacy without increasing toxicity
.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
5453
60
.
43
Martin-Duque
P
,
Sanchez-Prieto
R
,
Romero
J
, et al
. 
In vivo radiosensitizing effect of the adenovirus E1A gene in murine and human malignant tumors
.
Int J Oncol
1999
;
15
:
1163
8
.