Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are associated with the therapeutic response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The response rate to these drugs remains low, however, in NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR alleles. Combination therapies with EGFR-TKIs and cytotoxic agents are considered a therapeutic option for patients with NSCLC expressing wild-type EGFR. We investigated the antiproliferative effect of the combination of the oral fluorouracil S-1 and the EGFR-TKI gefitinib in NSCLC cells of differing EGFR status. The combination of 5-fluorouracil and gefitinib showed a synergistic antiproliferative effect in vitro in all NSCLC cell lines tested. Combination chemotherapy with S-1 and gefitinib in vivo also had a synergistic antitumor effect on NSCLC xenografts regardless of the absence or presence of EGFR mutations. Gefitinib inhibited the expression of the transcription factor E2F-1, resulting in the down-regulation of thymidylate synthase at the mRNA and protein levels. These observations suggest that gefitinib-induced down-regulation of thymidylate synthase is responsible, at least in part, for the synergistic antitumor effect of combined treatment with S-1 and gefitinib and provide a basis for clinical evaluation of combination chemotherapy with S-1 and EGFR-TKIs in patients with solid tumors. [Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7(3):599–606]

Targeted therapy in the treatment of cancer has made substantial progress over the last few years. The ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases includes the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; ErbB1), ErbB2 (HER2/neu), ErbB3, and ErbB4 and is important for normal development as a result of its roles in cell proliferation and differentiation (13). Aberrant expression of EGFR has been detected in a wide range of human epithelial malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and is correlated with poor prognosis and reduced survival time (4, 5). Agents that specifically target EGFR are therefore under development as anticancer drugs. Indeed, two inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR (EGFR-TKI), gefitinib and erlotinib, both of which compete with ATP for binding to the catalytic pocket of the receptor, have been extensively studied in individuals with NSCLC (69). Somatic mutations in the region of EGFR that encodes the tyrosine kinase domain have been associated with tumor responsiveness to EGFR-TKIs in a subset of NSCLC patients (1017). In contrast, achievement of a clinical benefit of these drugs in NSCLC patients who express wild-type EGFR has been problematic.

S-1 (Taiho Pharmaceutical) is an oral anticancer agent composed of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and potassium oxonate in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1 (18). Tegafur is a prodrug that generates 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in blood largely as a result of its metabolism by cytochrome P450 in the liver. CDHP increases the plasma concentration of 5-FU through competitive inhibition of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which catalyzes 5-FU catabolism (19). Oxonate reduces the gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-FU (20). A response rate of 22% and a median survival time of 10.2 months were obtained in a clinical trial of S-1 in patients with advanced NSCLC not subjected previously to chemotherapy (21). Few severe gastrointestinal or hematologic adverse events were reported. Moreover, a phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in NSCLC patients revealed a 47% response rate and an acceptable safety profile (22).

Based on this background, we examined the anticancer effect of the combination of S-1 and gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines of differing EGFR status. We found that the combination of S-1 (or 5-FU) and gefitinib exhibited a marked and synergistic antiproliferative effect both in vivo and in vitro in cells regardless of the absence or presence of EGFR mutations. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of gefitinib on the expression of enzymes that function in 5-FU metabolism, including thymidylate synthase (TS), DPD, and orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), to gain insight into the mechanism underlying the synergistic effect of combination therapy with S-1 and gefitinib.

Cell Lines and Reagents

The human NSCLC cell lines NCI-H460 (H460), Ma-1, Ma-25, Ma-31, Ma-45, and Ma-53 were obtained as described previously (23). MiaPaca-2 cells were obtained from Japan Health Sciences Foundation. These cell lines were cultured under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C in RPMI 1640 (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Gefitinib was provided by AstraZeneca. S-1 and CDHP were provided by Taiho Pharmaceutical. 5-FU was obtained from Wako.

Growth Inhibition Assay In vitro

Cells (2.0 × 103) were plated in 96-well flat-bottomed plates and cultured for 24 h before the addition of various concentrations of 5-FU and gefitinib and incubation for an additional 72 h. Cell Counting Kit-8 solution (Dojindo) was then added to each well, and the cells were incubated for 3 h at 37°C before measurement of absorbance at 450 nm. Absorbance values were expressed as a percentage of that for untreated cells, and the concentration of 5-FU or gefitinib resulting in 50% growth inhibition (IC50) was calculated. The effect of combining 5-FU and gefitinib was classified as additive, synergistic, or antagonistic with the Bliss additivism model (2426). A theoretical curve was calculated for combined inhibition with the equation: Ebliss = EA + EB - (EA × EB), where EA and EB are the fractional inhibitory effects of drug A alone and drug B alone at specific concentrations. Ebliss is then the fractional inhibition that would be expected if the effect of the combination of the two drugs was exactly additive. In this study, the Bliss variable is expressed as percentage decrease in cell growth above what would be expected for the combination. Bliss = 0 indicates that the effect of the combination is additive; Bliss > 0 is indicative of synergy; and Bliss < 0 indicates antagonism.

Animals

Male athymic nude mice were exposed to a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle and provided with food and water ad libitum in a barrier facility. All experiments were done in compliance with the regulations of the Animal Experimentation Committee of Taiho Pharmaceutical.

Growth Inhibition Assay In vivo

Cubic fragments of tumor tissue (∼2 × 2 × 2 mm) were implanted s.c. into the axilla of 5- to 6-week-old male athymic nude mice. Treatment was initiated when tumors in each group achieved an average volume of 100 to 150 mm3. Treatment groups consisted of control, S-1 alone, gefitinib alone, and the combination of S-1 and gefitinib. Each treatment group contained seven mice. S-1 (10 mg/kg body mass) and gefitinib (50 or 3 mg/kg) were administered by oral gavage once a day for 14 days; control animals received 0.5% (w/v) hydroxypropylmethylcellulose as vehicle. Tumor volume was determined from caliper measurements of tumor length (L) and width (W) according to the formula LW2 / 2. Both tumor size and body weight were measured two or three times per week.

Immunoblot Analysis

Cell lysates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE on 12% gels (NuPAGE Bis-Tris Gels; Invitrogen), and the separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking of nonspecific sites with 5% skim milk, the membrane was incubated overnight at room temperature with primary antibodies. Antibodies to DPD, OPRT, and TS were obtained from Taiho Pharmaceutical; those to E2F-1 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; and those to β-actin (loading control) were from Sigma. Immune complexes were detected by incubation of the membrane for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat antibodies to mouse or rabbit immunoglobulin and by subsequent exposure to enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Pierce).

Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Immunoprecipitation of EGFR was done according to standard procedures. Whole-cell lysates (800 μg protein) were incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies to EGFR (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), after which Protein G Plus/Protein A-Agarose Suspension (Calbiochem) was added and the mixtures were incubated for an additional 1 h at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were isolated, washed, resolved by SDS-PAGE on a 7.5% gel (Bio-Rad), and subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to phosphotyrosine (PY20) and EGFR (Zymed).

Reverse Transcription and Real-time PCR Analysis

Total RNA (1 μg) extracted from cells with the use of an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) was subjected to reverse transcription with the use of a SuperScript Preamplification System (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The resulting cDNA was then subjected to real-time PCR analysis with the use of a TaqMan PCR Reagent Kit and a Gene Amp 5700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). The forward and reverse primers and TaqMan probe for TS cDNA were 5-GCCTCGGTGTGCCTTTCA-3 and 5-CCCGTGATGTGCGCAAT-3 and 6-FAM-5′-TCGCCAGCTACGCCCTGCTCA-3′-TAMRA, respectively. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA were used as an internal standard.

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SE and were analyzed by the Aspin-Welch t test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Effect of the Combination of 5-FU and Gefitinib on NSCLC Cell Growth In vitro

Tegafur, which is a component of S-1, is metabolized to 5-FU in the liver and exerts antitumor effects. We first examined the antiproliferative activity of the combination of 5-FU and gefitinib in six NSCLC cell lines. Five of the cell lines (H460, Ma-53, Ma-45, Ma-31, and Ma-25) possess wild-type EGFR alleles, whereas Ma-1 cells harbor an EGFR mutation (E746_A750del) that is associated with a high response rate to the EGFR-TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib in individuals with advanced NSCLC. We assessed whether 5-FU and gefitinib showed additivity, synergy, or antagonism based on the Bliss additivism model (2426). We chose this model rather than isobologram or combination index analysis because it would allow us to evaluate the nature of drug interactions even in instances in which the maximal inhibition by 5-FU or gefitinib alone was too low to obtain a reliable IC50 value. The six test concentrations for each agent were chosen after first determining the corresponding IC50 values. The IC50 values for 5-FU chemosensitivity were not associated with EGFR status and ranged from 7 to 11 μmol/L. The effect of combined treatment with 5-FU and gefitinib on the proliferation of the six NSCLC cell lines was tested in triplicate in a 6 × 6 concentration matrix. Calculation of the percentage inhibition in excess of that predicted by the Bliss additivism model revealed synergistic effects of Bliss > 0 for 5-FU and gefitinib in all of the six cell lines tested (Fig. 1). These results suggested that 5-FU and gefitinib act synergistically to inhibit cell growth in NSCLC cells.

Figure 1.

Inhibition of NSCLC cell growth by the combination of 5-FU and gefitinib in vitro. Cells with wild-type (H460, Ma-53, Ma-45, Ma-31, and Ma-25) or mutant (Ma-1) EGFR alleles were exposed for 72 h to 5-FU and gefitinib at the indicated concentrations, after which cell viability was measured with a colorimetric assay. The observed excess inhibition (%) relative to that predicted by the Bliss additivism model is shown color-coded in a drug concentration matrix for each cell line. Yellow, orange, pink, and red, synergy; light and dark blue, antagonism. Mean of triplicates from a representative experiment.

Figure 1.

Inhibition of NSCLC cell growth by the combination of 5-FU and gefitinib in vitro. Cells with wild-type (H460, Ma-53, Ma-45, Ma-31, and Ma-25) or mutant (Ma-1) EGFR alleles were exposed for 72 h to 5-FU and gefitinib at the indicated concentrations, after which cell viability was measured with a colorimetric assay. The observed excess inhibition (%) relative to that predicted by the Bliss additivism model is shown color-coded in a drug concentration matrix for each cell line. Yellow, orange, pink, and red, synergy; light and dark blue, antagonism. Mean of triplicates from a representative experiment.

Close modal

Effect of Combined Treatment with S-1 and Gefitinib on NSCLC Cell Growth In vivo

We therefore next investigated whether combined treatment with S-1 and gefitinib might also exert a synergistic effect on NSCLC cell growth in vivo. Doses of both agents were selected so that their independent effects on tumor growth would be moderate. Nude mice were implanted s.c. with H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 tumor fragments to establish tumor xenografts. When the H460 or Ma-53 tumors, which harbor wild-type EGFR, became palpable (100-150 mm3), the mice were divided into four groups for daily treatment with vehicle, S-1 (10 mg/kg), gefitinib (50 mg/kg), or both drugs by oral gavage over 2 weeks. For xenografts formed by H460 or Ma-53 cells, combination therapy with S-1 and gefitinib resulted in a significant reduction in tumor size compared with that apparent in animals treated with S-1 or gefitinib alone (Fig. 2A and B). Mice bearing Ma-1 tumors, which express mutant EGFR, were treated with vehicle, S-1 (10 mg/kg), gefitinib (3 mg/kg), or both agents daily over 2 weeks. Combination treatment with S-1 and gefitinib significantly inhibited the growth of Ma-1 xenografts relative to that apparent in mice treated with either agent alone (Fig. 2C). None of the drug treatments induced a weight loss of >20% during the 2-week period, and no signs of overt drug toxicity were apparent (data not shown). These results thus suggested that combination chemotherapy with S-1 and gefitinib in vivo had a synergistic antitumor effect on NSCLC xenografts regardless of the absence or presence of EGFR mutations, consistent with our results in vitro.

Figure 2.

Antitumor activity of the combination of S-1 and gefitinib in vivo. A and B, nude mice with tumor xenografts established by s.c. implantation of NSCLC cells (H460 and Ma-53) possessing wild-type EGFR were treated daily for 2 wk with vehicle (control), S-1 (10 mg/kg), gefitinib (50 mg/kg), or both drugs by oral gavage. C, nude mice with tumor xenografts derived from NSCLC cells (Ma-1) expressing mutant EGFR were treated daily for 2 weeks with vehicle (control), S-1 (10 mg/kg), gefitinib (3 mg/kg), or both drugs by oral gavage. Tumor volume in all animals was determined at the indicated times after the onset of treatment. Mean ± SE of values from seven mice per group. *, P < 0.05 versus control; **, P < 0.05 versus S-1 or gefitinib alone for values 15 d after treatment onset (Aspin-Welch t test).

Figure 2.

Antitumor activity of the combination of S-1 and gefitinib in vivo. A and B, nude mice with tumor xenografts established by s.c. implantation of NSCLC cells (H460 and Ma-53) possessing wild-type EGFR were treated daily for 2 wk with vehicle (control), S-1 (10 mg/kg), gefitinib (50 mg/kg), or both drugs by oral gavage. C, nude mice with tumor xenografts derived from NSCLC cells (Ma-1) expressing mutant EGFR were treated daily for 2 weeks with vehicle (control), S-1 (10 mg/kg), gefitinib (3 mg/kg), or both drugs by oral gavage. Tumor volume in all animals was determined at the indicated times after the onset of treatment. Mean ± SE of values from seven mice per group. *, P < 0.05 versus control; **, P < 0.05 versus S-1 or gefitinib alone for values 15 d after treatment onset (Aspin-Welch t test).

Close modal

Effects of 5-FU and CDHP on EGFR Phosphorylation in NSCLC Cell Lines

To investigate the mechanism responsible for the observed interaction between S-1 and gefitinib, we examined the effect of 5-FU on EGFR signal transduction in NSCLC cells expressing wild-type (H460 and Ma-53) or mutant (Ma-1) EGFR. Immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that exposure of H460 or Ma-53 cells to 5-FU (10 μmol/L) for 24 h had no effect on the basal level of EGFR phosphorylation (Fig. 3). We have shown previously that EGFR is constitutively phosphorylated in Ma-1 cells maintained in serum-free medium (23). Exposure of Ma-1 cells to 5-FU for 24 h did not affect this constitutive level of EGFR phosphorylation (Fig. 3). We next examined the effects of both CDHP, which is a component of S-1, and the combination of CDHP and 5-FU on EGFR phosphorylation in H460, Ma-53, and Ma-1 cells. Neither CDHP alone nor the combination of CDHP and 5-FU affected the level of EGFR phosphorylation in any of these three cell lines (Fig. 3). These results thus indicated that 5-FU and CDHP have no effect on EGFR signal transduction.

Figure 3.

Lack of effect of 5-FU and CDHP on EGFR phosphorylation in NSCLC cell lines. NSCLC cells (H460, Ma-53, and Ma-1) were incubated for 24 h in medium supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum and with 5-FU (10 μmol/L), CDHP (3 μmol/L), or gefitinib (5 μmol/L). Cell lysates were then prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with antibodies to EGFR, and the resulting precipitates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to phosphotyrosine (for detection of phosphorylated EGFR) and with antibodies to EGFR. The intensity of the phosphorylated EGFR band relative to that of the EGFR band was determined by densitometry and is expressed as a percentage below each lane.

Figure 3.

Lack of effect of 5-FU and CDHP on EGFR phosphorylation in NSCLC cell lines. NSCLC cells (H460, Ma-53, and Ma-1) were incubated for 24 h in medium supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum and with 5-FU (10 μmol/L), CDHP (3 μmol/L), or gefitinib (5 μmol/L). Cell lysates were then prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with antibodies to EGFR, and the resulting precipitates were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to phosphotyrosine (for detection of phosphorylated EGFR) and with antibodies to EGFR. The intensity of the phosphorylated EGFR band relative to that of the EGFR band was determined by densitometry and is expressed as a percentage below each lane.

Close modal

Effects of Gefitinib on the Expression of DPD, OPRT, and TS in NSCLC Cell Lines

We next investigated whether gefitinib might affect the expression of DPD, OPRT, or TS, enzymes that are major determinants of the sensitivity of cells to 5-FU. We first examined the abundance of these enzymes in the NSCLC cell lines H460, Ma-53, and Ma-1 by immunoblot analysis. The expression of DPD was detected in MiaPaca-2 cells (positive control) but not in H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 cells (Fig. 4A). In contrast, OPRT and TS were detected in all three NSCLC cell lines and their abundance did not appear related to EGFR status (Fig. 4A). Treatment of H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 cells with gefitinib (5 μmol/L) for up to 48 h resulted in a time-dependent decrease in the amount of TS, whereas that of OPRT or DPD remained unaffected (Fig. 4B). A reduced level of TS expression in tumors has been associated previously with a higher response rate to 5-FU-based chemotherapy (27, 28). Our data thus suggested that the suppression of TS expression by gefitinib might increase the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to 5-FU.

Figure 4.

Effects of gefitinib on the expression of E2F-1, DPD, OPRT, and TS in NSCLC cell lines. A, lysates of H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 cells were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to DPD, OPRT, TS, or β-actin (loading control). MiaPaca-2 cells were also examined as a positive control for DPD expression. B, NSCLC cells were incubated with gefitinib (5 μmol/L) for the indicated times in medium containing 10% serum, after which cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis as in A, with the addition that E2F-1 expression was also examined.

Figure 4.

Effects of gefitinib on the expression of E2F-1, DPD, OPRT, and TS in NSCLC cell lines. A, lysates of H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 cells were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to DPD, OPRT, TS, or β-actin (loading control). MiaPaca-2 cells were also examined as a positive control for DPD expression. B, NSCLC cells were incubated with gefitinib (5 μmol/L) for the indicated times in medium containing 10% serum, after which cell lysates were subjected to immunoblot analysis as in A, with the addition that E2F-1 expression was also examined.

Close modal

The transcription factor E2F-1 regulates expression of the TS gene (2931). We therefore examined the possible effect of gefitinib on E2F-1 expression in NSCLC cell lines. Incubation of H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 cells with gefitinib for up to 48 h also induced a time-dependent decrease in the amount of E2F-1 (Fig. 4B), suggesting that this effect might contribute to the down-regulation of TS expression by gefitinib in these cell lines.

Effect of Gefitinib on TS mRNA Abundance in NSCLC Cell Lines

The abundance of TS mRNA would be expected to be decreased if the down-regulation of E2F-1 expression by gefitinib was responsible for the reduced level of TS. We determined the amount of TS mRNA in H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 cells at various times after exposure to gefitinib with the use of reverse transcription and real-time PCR analysis. Gefitinib indeed induced a time-dependent decrease in the amount of TS mRNA in all three NSCLC cell lines (Fig. 5), suggesting that the down-regulation of TS expression by gefitinib occurs at the transcriptional level and may be due to suppression of E2F-1 expression.

Figure 5.

Down-regulation of TS mRNA by gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines. H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 cells were incubated with gefitinib (5 μmol/L) for the indicated times in medium containing 10% serum, after which total RNA was extracted from the cells and subjected to reverse transcription and real-time PCR analysis of TS mRNA. The amount of TS mRNA was normalized by that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA. Mean ± SE of values from three separate experiments.

Figure 5.

Down-regulation of TS mRNA by gefitinib in NSCLC cell lines. H460, Ma-53, or Ma-1 cells were incubated with gefitinib (5 μmol/L) for the indicated times in medium containing 10% serum, after which total RNA was extracted from the cells and subjected to reverse transcription and real-time PCR analysis of TS mRNA. The amount of TS mRNA was normalized by that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA. Mean ± SE of values from three separate experiments.

Close modal

The recent identification of activating somatic mutations of EGFR in NSCLC and their relevance to prediction of the therapeutic response to EGFR-TKIs such as gefitinib and erlotinib have had a major effect on NSCLC treatment (1017). The response rate to these drugs remains low, however, in NSCLC patients with wild-tye EGFR alleles. Combination therapy with EGFR-TKIs and cytotoxic agents is a potential alternative strategy for NSCLC expressing wild-type EGFR. In the present study, we have evaluated the potential cooperative antiproliferative effect of combined treatment with the EGFR-TKI gefitinib and the new oral fluorouracil S-1 in NSCLC cell lines of differing EGFR status. We found that S-1 (or 5-FU) and gefitinib exert a synergistic antiproliferative effect on NSCLC cells both in vivo and in vitro regardless of the absence or presence of EGFR mutation. We chose a gefitinib dose of 50 mg/kg for treatment of mice bearing H460 or Ma-53 tumors. The median effective dose of gefitinib was shown previously to be ∼50 mg/kg in athymic nude mice bearing A431 cell-derived xenografts (32). A gefitinib dose of 50 mg/kg has therefore subsequently been widely used in tumor xenograft studies (3336). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends that drug doses in animals be converted to those in humans based on body surface area (37). According to this guideline, a gefitinib dose of 50 mg/kg in mouse xenograft models is approximately equivalent to the therapeutic dose (250 mg/d) of the drug in humans. In addition, the tumor concentrations of gefitinib in NSCLC xenografts of mice treated with this drug (50 mg/kg) ranged from 9.7 to 13.3 μg/g, values that were similar to the achievable concentrations of gefitinib in tumor tissues of treated humans (34). These observations suggest that a gefitinib dose of 50 mg/kg in mouse xenograft models is appropriate for mimicking the therapeutic dose in humans.

EGFR-TKIs have been shown previously to act synergistically with radiation or cytotoxic agents such as cisplatin, paclitaxel, and irinotecan (3840). These cytotoxic agents and radiation have been shown to increase the phosphorylation level of EGFR, possibly reflecting the activation of prosurvival signaling, and this effect is blocked by EGFR-TKIs, resulting in the synergistic antitumor effects of the combination therapies. Such a synergistic effect of 5-FU and gefitinib was attributed to 5-FU-induced EGFR phosphorylation in colorectal cancer cells (41). In contrast, we found that 5-FU had no effect on the level of EGFR phosphorylation in NSCLC cell lines. Further examination of different concentrations of 5-FU and different exposure times also failed to reveal an effect of 5-FU on EGFR phosphorylation in these cells (data not shown). These findings indicate that NSCLC cell lines respond differently to 5-FU than do colorectal cancer cells and that the synergistic antiproliferative effect of 5-FU and gefitinib in NSCLC cells is not mediated at the level of EGFR phosphorylation.

Our results indicate that the synergistic interaction of 5-FU (or S-1) and gefitinib is attributable, at least in part, to down-regulation of TS expression by gefitinib. The active metabolite of 5-FU, FdUMP, forms a covalent ternary complex with 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate and TS, resulting in inhibition of DNA synthesis (42). TS is thus an important therapeutic target of 5-FU. The amount of TS in neoplastic cells has been found to increase after exposure to 5-FU, resulting in the maintenance of free enzyme in excess of that bound to 5-FU (4347). Such an increase in TS expression and activity has been viewed as a mechanistic driver of 5-FU resistance in cancer cells (4850). The development of a new therapeutic strategy that reduces TS expression would therefore be of interest. Indeed, preclinical studies have shown that the down-regulation of TS by antisense oligonucleotides or other means enhances the efficacy of 5-FU (5154). Down-regulation of TS would be expected to enhance the cytotoxicity of 5-FU as a result of the decrease in the amount of its protein target (55). Consistent with these preclinical data, an inverse relation between TS expression and 5-FU sensitivity has been shown in various human solid tumors (27, 28, 5660). We have now shown that gefitinib alone induced down-regulation of TS expression, suggesting that this effect of gefitinib contributes to its synergistic interaction with 5-FU (or S-1) in NSCLC cell lines.

We further explored the molecular mechanism by which gefitinib induces down-regulation of TS expression in NSCLC cells. Given that EGFR signal transduction has been shown to be involved in activity of E2F-1 that regulates the expression of several genes including TS (61, 62), which controls the expression of several genes including that for TS, we examined the possible effects of gefitinib on E2F-1 expression and on the abundance of TS mRNA. Gefitinib induced down-regulation of E2F-1 in NSCLC cell lines harboring wild-type EGFR, consistent with previous observations (63), as well as in those expressing mutant EGFR. In addition, gefitinib reduced the amount of TS mRNA in NSCLC cells, consistent with the notion that the suppression of TS expression by gefitinib is attributable to inhibition of gene transcription as a result of down-regulation of E2F-1. For our experiments examining the effects of gefitinib on TS and E2F-1 expression, we used a drug concentration of 5 μmol/L. The concentration of gefitinib in tumor xenografts was shown previously to be 5 to 14 times that in the plasma concentration of the mouse hosts (34). Daily oral administration of gefitinib (250 mg) in patients also gave rise to a drug concentration in tumor tissue that was substantially higher (mean, 42-fold) than that in plasma concentration (34). We showed previously that the maximal concentration of gefitinib in the plasma of patients with advanced solid tumors had a mean value of 0.76 μmol/L at a daily dose of 225 mg (64). Based on these data, we considered that a gefitinib concentration of 5 μmol/L was appropriate for our analyses of TS and E2F-1 expression. Together, our present findings suggest that down-regulation of E2F-1 and consequently that of TS by gefitinib is responsible, at least in part, for the synergistic antitumor effect of combined treatment with S-1 and gefitinib.

Somatic mutations of EGFR have been associated with sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC (1316). However, although most NSCLCs with EGFR mutations initially respond to EGFR-TKIs, the vast majority of these tumors ultimately develop resistance to the drug. In the present study, the synergistic effect of combination chemotherapy with S-1 and gefitinib was observed even in EGFR mutant cells. Our findings thus suggest that the addition of S-1 (or 5-FU) to EGFR-TKIs might overcome chemoresistance to EGFR-TKIs and that exploration of the effect of such combination therapy in cells resistant to EGFR-TKIs is warranted. EGFR mutations appear to be largely limited to lung cancer, with few such mutations having been detected in other types of cancer (6567). 5-FU is widely used as an anticancer agent and is considered a key drug in chemotherapy for solid tumors such as gastrointestinal and cervical cancer (6870). Our present results show that gefitinib suppressed the expression of TS in NSCLC cell lines regardless of the absence or presence of EGFR mutations, suggesting that the addition of EGFR-TKIs to a 5-FU-containing regimen might increase the effectiveness of such treatment for solid cancers without EGFR mutations. Oral combined chemotherapy with drugs, such as S-1 and gefitinib, may also prove to be of low toxicity and therefore maintain quality of life. Our preclinical results provide a basis for future clinical investigations of combination chemotherapy with S-1 and EGFR-TKIs in patients with solid tumors.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Mendelsohn J, Baselga J. The EGF receptor family as targets for cancer therapy.
Oncogene
2000
;
19
:
6550
–65.
2
Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases.
Cell
2000
;
103
:
211
–25.
3
Hynes NE, Lane HA. ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors.
Nat Rev Cancer
2005
;
5
:
341
–54.
4
Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Bunn PA, Jr., et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis.
J Clin Oncol
2003
;
21
:
3798
–807.
5
Suzuki S, Dobashi Y, Sakurai H, Nishikawa K, Hanawa M, Ooi A. Protein overexpression and gene amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor in nonsmall cell lung carcinomas. An immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization study.
Cancer
2005
;
103
:
1265
–73.
6
Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, et al. Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected].
J Clin Oncol
2003
;
21
:
2237
–46.
7
Perez-Soler R, Chachoua A, Hammond LA, et al. Determinants of tumor response and survival with erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
J Clin Oncol
2004
;
22
:
3238
–47.
8
Thatcher N, Chang A, Parikh P, et al. Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer).
Lancet
2005
;
366
:
1527
–37.
9
Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
353
:
123
–32.
10
Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib.
N Engl J Med
2004
;
350
:
2129
–39.
11
Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.
Science
2004
;
304
:
1497
–500.
12
Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2004
;
101
:
13306
–11.
13
Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H, et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
2513
–20.
14
Takano T, Ohe Y, Sakamoto H, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations and increased copy numbers predict gefitinib sensitivity in patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
6829
–37.
15
Han SW, Kim TY, Hwang PG, et al. Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
2493
–501.
16
Tsao MS, Sakurada A, Cutz JC, et al. Erlotinib in lung cancer—molecular and clinical predictors of outcome.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
353
:
133
–44.
17
Tokumo M, Toyooka S, Kiura K, et al. The relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and clinicopathologic features in non-small cell lung cancers.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
1167
–73.
18
Shirasaka T, Shimamoto Y, Fukushima M. Inhibition by oxonic acid of gastrointestinal toxicity of 5-fluorouracil without loss of its antitumor activity in rats.
Cancer Res
1993
;
53
:
4004
–9.
19
Tatsumi K, Fukushima M, Shirasaka T, Fujii S. Inhibitory effects of pyrimidine, barbituric acid and pyridine derivatives on 5-fluorouracil degradation in rat liver extracts.
Jpn J Cancer Res
1987
;
78
:
748
–55.
20
Shirasaka T, Shimamato Y, Ohshimo H, et al. Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators.
Anticancer Drugs
1996
;
7
:
548
–57.
21
Kawahara M, Furuse K, Segawa Y, et al. Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluorouracil, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
Br J Cancer
2001
;
85
:
939
–43.
22
Ichinose Y, Yoshimori K, Sakai H, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional phase II trial.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
7860
–4.
23
Okabe T, Okamoto I, Tamura K, et al. Differential constitutive activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cells bearing EGFR gene mutation and amplification.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
2046
–53.
24
Berenbaum MC. Criteria for analyzing interactions between biologically active agents.
Adv Cancer Res
1981
;
35
:
269
–335.
25
Borisy AA, Elliott PJ, Hurst NW, et al. Systematic discovery of multicomponent therapeutics.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003
;
100
:
7977
–82. Epub 2003 Jun 10.
26
Buck E, Eyzaguirre A, Brown E, et al. Rapamycin synergizes with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib in non-small-cell lung, pancreatic, colon, and breast tumors.
Mol Cancer Ther
2006
;
5
:
2676
–84.
27
Ichikawa W, Uetake H, Shirota Y, et al. Combination of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase gene expressions in primary tumors as predictive parameters for the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Clin Cancer Res
2003
;
9
:
786
–91.
28
Salonga D, Danenberg KD, Johnson M, et al. Colorectal tumors responding to 5-fluorouracil have low gene expression levels of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidylate synthase, and thymidine phosphorylase.
Clin Cancer Res
2000
;
6
:
1322
–7.
29
DeGregori J, Kowalik T, Nevins JR. Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesis- and G1/S-regulatory genes.
Mol Cell Biol
1995
;
15
:
4215
–24.
30
Dyson N. The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins.
Genes Dev
1998
;
12
:
2245
–62.
31
Trimarchi JM, Lees JA. Sibling rivalry in the E2F family.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
2002
;
3
:
11
–20.
32
Wakeling AE, Guy SP, Woodburn JR, et al. ZD1839 (Iressa): an orally active inhibitor of epidermal growth factor signaling with potential for cancer therapy.
Cancer Res
2002
;
62
:
5749
–54.
33
Matar P, Rojo F, Cassia R, et al. Combined epidermal growth factor receptor targeting with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (ZD1839) and the monoclonal antibody cetuximab (IMC-C225): superiority over single-agent receptor targeting.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
6487
–501.
34
McKillop D, Partridge EA, Kemp JV, et al. Tumor penetration of gefitinib (Iressa), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Mol Cancer Ther
2005
;
4
:
641
–9.
35
Zhang X, Chen ZG, Choe MS, et al. Tumor growth inhibition by simultaneously blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and cyclooxygenase-2 in a xenograft model.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
6261
–9.
36
Haura EB, Zheng Z, Song L, Cantor A, Bepler G. Activated epidermal growth factor receptor-Stat-3 signaling promotes tumor survival in vivo in non-small cell lung cancer.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
8288
–94.
37
U S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for industry, estimating the maximum safe starting dose in initial clinical trials for therapeutics in adult healthy volunteers; 2005. p. 1–27.
38
Koizumi F, Kanzawa F, Ueda Y, et al. Synergistic interaction between the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (“Iressa”) and the DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT-11 (irinotecan) in human colorectal cancer cells.
Int J Cancer
2004
;
108
:
464
–72.
39
Chinnaiyan P, Huang S, Vallabhaneni G, et al. Mechanisms of enhanced radiation response following epidermal growth factor receptor signaling inhibition by erlotinib (Tarceva).
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
3328
–35.
40
Van Schaeybroeck S, Kyula J, Kelly DM, et al. Chemotherapy-induced epidermal growth factor receptor activation determines response to combined gefitinib/chemotherapy treatment in non-small cell lung cancer cells.
Mol Cancer Ther
2006
;
5
:
1154
–65.
41
Van Schaeybroeck S, Karaiskou-McCaul A, Kelly D, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor activity determines response of colorectal cancer cells to gefitinib alone and in combination with chemotherapy.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
7480
–9.
42
Peters GJ, van der Wilt CL, van Triest B, et al. Thymidylate synthase and drug resistance.
Eur J Cancer
1995
;
31A
:
1299
–305.
43
Spears CP, Shahinian AH, Moran RG, Heidelberger C, Corbett TH. In vivo kinetics of thymidylate synthetase inhibition of 5-fluorouracil-sensitive and -resistant murine colon adenocarcinomas.
Cancer Res
1982
;
42
:
450
–6.
44
Washtien WL. Increased levels of thymidylate synthetase in cells exposed to 5-fluorouracil.
Mol Pharmacol
1984
;
25
:
171
–7.
45
Spears CP, Gustavsson BG, Berne M, Frosing R, Bernstein L, Hayes AA. Mechanisms of innate resistance to thymidylate synthase inhibition after 5-fluorouracil.
Cancer Res
1988
;
48
:
5894
–900.
46
Swain SM, Lippman ME, Egan EF, Drake JC, Steinberg SM, Allegra CJ. Fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol
1989
;
7
:
890
–9.
47
Chu E, Zinn S, Boarman D, Allegra CJ. Interaction of γ interferon and 5-fluorouracil in the H630 human colon carcinoma cell line.
Cancer Res
1990
;
50
:
5834
–40.
48
Johnston PG, Drake JC, Trepel J, Allegra CJ. Immunological quantitation of thymidylate synthase using the monoclonal antibody TS 106 in 5-fluorouracil-sensitive and -resistant human cancer cell lines.
Cancer Res
1992
;
52
:
4306
–12.
49
Copur S, Aiba K, Drake JC, Allegra CJ, Chu E. Thymidylate synthase gene amplification in human colon cancer cell lines resistant to 5-fluorouracil.
Biochem Pharmacol
1995
;
49
:
1419
–26.
50
Kawate H, Landis DM, Loeb LA. Distribution of mutations in human thymidylate synthase yielding resistance to 5-fluorodeoxyuridine.
J Biol Chem
2002
;
277
:
36304
–11. Epub 2002 Jul 29.
51
Hsueh CT, Kelsen D, Schwartz GK. UCN-01 suppresses thymidylate synthase gene expression and enhances 5-fluorouracil-induced apoptosis in a sequence-dependent manner.
Clin Cancer Res
1998
;
4
:
2201
–6.
52
Ju J, Kane SE, Lenz HJ, Danenberg KD, Chu E, Danenberg PV. Desensitization and sensitization of cells to fluoropyrimidines with different antisenses directed against thymidylate synthase messenger RNA.
Clin Cancer Res
1998
;
4
:
2229
–36.
53
Lee JH, Park JH, Jung Y, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor enhances 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity by down-regulating thymidylate synthase in human cancer cells.
Mol Cancer Ther
2006
;
5
:
3085
–95.
54
Wada Y, Yoshida K, Suzuki T, et al. Synergistic effects of docetaxel and S-1 by modulating the expression of metabolic enzymes of 5-fluorouracil in human gastric cancer cell lines.
Int J Cancer
2006
;
119
:
783
–91.
55
Ferguson PJ, Collins O, Dean NM, et al. Antisense down-regulation of thymidylate synthase to suppress growth and enhance cytotoxicity of 5-FUdR, 5-FU and Tomudex in HeLa cells.
Br J Pharmacol
1999
;
127
:
1777
–86.
56
Aaronson SA. Growth factors and cancer.
Science
1991
;
254
:
1146
–53.
57
Johnston PG, Lenz HJ, Leichman CG, et al. Thymidylate synthase gene and protein expression correlate and are associated with response to 5-fluorouracil in human colorectal and gastric tumors.
Cancer Res
1995
;
55
:
1407
–12.
58
Leichman CG, Lenz HJ, Leichman L, et al. Quantitation of intratumoral thymidylate synthase expression predicts for disseminated colorectal cancer response and resistance to protracted-infusion fluorouracil and weekly leucovorin.
J Clin Oncol
1997
;
15
:
3223
–9.
59
Pestalozzi BC, Peterson HF, Gelber RD, et al. Prognostic importance of thymidylate synthase expression in early breast cancer.
J Clin Oncol
1997
;
15
:
1923
–31.
60
Johnston PG, Mick R, Recant W, et al. Thymidylate synthase expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1997
;
89
:
308
–13.
61
Hanada N, Lo HW, Day CP, Pan Y, Nakajima Y, Hung MC. Co-regulation of B-Myb expression by E2F1 and EGF receptor.
Mol Carcinog
2006
;
45
:
10
–7.
62
Ginsberg D. EGFR signaling inhibits E2F1-induced apoptosis in vivo: implications for cancer therapy. Sci STKE 2007;pe4.
63
Suenaga M, Yamaguchi A, Soda H, et al. Antiproliferative effects of gefitinib are associated with suppression of E2F-1 expression and telomerase activity.
Anticancer Res
2006
;
26
:
3387
–91.
64
Nakagawa K, Tamura T, Negoro S, et al. Phase I pharmacokinetic trial of the selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (“Iressa,” ZD1839) in Japanese patients with solid malignant tumors.
Ann Oncol
2003
;
14
:
922
–30.
65
Barber TD, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE. Somatic mutations of EGFR in colorectal cancers and glioblastomas.
N Engl J Med
2004
;
351
:
2883
.
66
Lee JW, Soung YH, Kim SY, et al. Absence of EGFR mutation in the kinase domain in common human cancers besides non-small cell lung cancer.
Int J Cancer
2005
;
113
:
510
–1.
67
Shigematsu H, Gazdar AF. Somatic mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in lung cancers.
Int J Cancer
2006
;
118
:
257
–62.
68
Herskovic A, Martz K, al-Sarraf M, et al. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus.
N Engl J Med
1992
;
326
:
1593
–8.
69
Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H, et al. Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.
J Clin Oncol
2000
;
18
:
2648
–57.
70
Gibson MK, Li Y, Murphy B, et al. Randomized phase III evaluation of cisplatin plus fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced head and neck cancer (E1395): an Intergroup Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
3562
–7.