Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) and Survivin are constitutively up-regulated in various human tumor cells. We previously found Survivin to be significantly reduced in response to radiation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) but not in tumor cell lines. In this study, we examined the effect of Stat3 on Survivin expression in irradiated HUVECs and breast cancer cells. We also studied how inhibition of Stat3 and Survivin activity affects cell survival and angiogenesis following irradiation. We determined that Survivin was significantly increased by overexpression of an active Stat3 (Stat3-C). Following irradiation, the level of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705, but not phospho-Stat3 Ser727, was reduced in HUVECs, whereas it remained unchanged in irradiated breast cancer cells. Correspondingly, Stat3 DNA-binding activity following irradiation was specifically down-regulated in HUVECs but not in breast cancer cells. Mutation of Tyr705 abolished radiation-induced down-regulation of Survivin. Clonogenic and endothelial cell morphogenesis assays suggested that DN-Stat3 and DN-Survivin together resulted in the greatest radiosensitization of MDA-MB-231, decreasing angiogenesis and cell survival. In summary, Stat3 modulates Survivin, and both are potential therapeutic targets for radiation sensitization in breast cancer. [Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5(11):2659–65]

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) was originally identified as an acute-phase response factor that responds to stimulation by interleukin-6. One of seven members of the STAT family of proteins, it transduces cytokine and growth factor receptor signaling from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, activating expression of many targeted genes (1, 2), and also plays an important role in several pathologic events in oncogenesis, including cell transformation, cell cycle progression, cell survival, and angiogenesis (3, 4). In these processes, persistent transcriptional activity of Stat3 results from phosphorylation of a single tyrosine residue (Tyr705) by overactive receptor-associated tyrosine kinases, such as Janus-activated kinase family members or non–receptor-associated tyrosine kinases like SRC (5, 6). Constitutive Stat3 activation occurs frequently in a variety of human tumor cell lines, including solid tumors, such as breast, gastric, and prostate cancer along with several leukemias and lymphomas (69). A gene therapy vector in murine melanoma tumors in nude mice originally validated the potential targeting of Stat3 in cancer therapy, and strategies inhibiting this protein have been shown to promote cell death in several human cancer cell lines (1017).

There is mounting evidence that Stat3 may mediate the expression of Survivin, the smallest member of the inhibitor of apoptosis gene family and a suppressor of caspases. Survivin is overexpressed in most human cancers (18) and plays a critical role as a factor mediating radiation resistance (19). Recent studies have shown that activation of Stat3 supports cell survival in association with Survivin expression in gastric cancer cells, whereas inhibition of Stat3 decreases Survivin expression and induces apoptosis in primary effusion lymphoma and breast cancer cells (9, 12, 20, 21). Like novel strategies targeting Stat3, several studies have shown that down-regulation of Survivin through methods like ASO, dominant-negative mutants, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, and ribozymes can be effective at inhibiting tumor growth and enhancing more traditional therapeutics in human tumor cell models (2226).

Radiation induces expression of a variety of transcription factors, such as activator protein, Sp-1, p53, and nuclear factor-κB in the rat brain (27). We have previously found that 3 Gy significantly reduced both protein and mRNA levels of Survivin in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) but not in tumor cell lines (28). There is much to be known, however, regarding regulation of Stat3 by irradiation. In the present study, we examined how Stat3 activity affects Survivin expression following irradiation in HUVECs and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. We also investigated whether inhibition of Survivin and Stat3 through the use of dominant-negative mutants could radiosensitize breast cancer cells.

Cell Culture

HUVECs were cultured in endothelial basal medium-2 supplemented with endothelial growth medium MV single aliquots (Bio Whittaker, Walkersville, MD). MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in BMEM (DMEM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C and humidified 5% CO2. Primary human mammary epithelial cells overexpressing wild-type or Y705F mutant Stat3 were provided by Dr. George R. Stark (New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY) and grown in Mammary Endothelial Cell Growth Medium (Cell Applications, Inc., San Diego, CA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C and humidified 5% CO2 (29).

Adenovirus

Adenoviruses pAdCMVpLPA(−)Xop-SSP (vector control), Stat3-C (constitutively active Stat3), and mutant Stat3Y705F were provided by Dr. Beverly L. Davidson (Gene Transfer Vector Core, University of Iowa). The procedures of the infection were as described previously (30). Cells (0.5 × 106) were plated into 10-cm culture dish 2 days before infection. The cells were infected with adenoviruses overexpressing a control empty vector (Stat3-C) or Stat3Y705F, respectively, at a multiplicity of infection of 100 plaque-forming units/cell. After 5 hours of incubation, the culture medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium. The cells were harvested and analyzed after 24 hours.

Western Immunoblots

Cells (0.5 × 106) were treated with various doses of radiation and collected at various time points. The cells were harvested and washed with ice cold PBS twice before the addition of lysis buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 20 mmol/L EDTA, 1% NP40, 50 mmol/L NaF, 1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 1 mmol/L NaMO4, and cocktail inhibitor (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; 5 μL/mL)]. Protein concentration was quantified by the Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA) method. Equal amounts of protein were loaded into each well and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE gel followed by transfer onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked by use 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS-T for 1 hour at room temperature. The blots were then incubated with the rabbit Survivin (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705, Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA and Ser727, MBL, Woburn, MA), and Stat3 (BD Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) antibodies. Goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was incubated for 45 minutes at room temperature. Immunoblots were developed by using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and autoradiography.

Preparation of Nuclear Extracts and Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays

Cells (3 × 106) were harvested and washed with cold PBS and resuspended in 50 μL of lysis buffer [10 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.9), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L KCl, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, and cocktail inhibitor (Sigma; 5 μL/mL)]. The cells were allowed to swell on ice for 10 minutes, after which the cells were resuspended in 30 μL of lysis buffer containing 0.05% NP40. The tube was then was vigorously mixed on a vortex machine thrice for 10 seconds, and the homogenate was centrifuged at 250 × g for 10 minutes to pellet the nuclei. The nuclear pellet was resuspended in 40 μL of ice-cold nuclear extraction buffer [5 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.9), 26% glycerol (v/v), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L EDTA, 422 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, and cocktail inhibitor (Sigma; 5 μL/mL)], incubated on ice for 30 minutes with intermittent mixing, and centrifuged at 24,000 × g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The nuclear extract was either used immediately or stored at −80°C. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay was done by incubating 5 μg of nuclear extract for 20 minutes at room temperature with 17.5 fmol of 32P-end labeled 24-mer double-stranded STAT3 oligonucleotide (5′-GATCCTTCTGGGATTTCCTAGATC-3′; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in binding buffer [10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 50 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, 4% glycerol] containing 50 μg/mL of poly(deoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic acid). The DNA-protein complex form was separated from free oligonucleotide on 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel using 0.5× Tris-borate EDTA buffer [44.5 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8), 44.5 mmol/L boric acid, 1 mmol/L EDTA]. For gel mobility supershift assay, 1 μg of anti-Stat3 antibody was incubated with nuclear extracts on ice for 30 minutes before Stat3 (C20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) binding reaction.

Clonogenic Assay

MDA-MB-231 cells were infected with adenoviruses overexpressing a control empty vector LacZ, DN-Survivin, or DN-Stat3, respectively, at a multiplicity of infection of 100 plaque-forming units/cell for 4 hours. The transfected cells were radiated with 0, 2, 4, or 6 Gy, given from a cobalt source. After 8 to 10 days, cells were fixed for 15 minutes with 3:1 methanol/acetic acid and stained for 15 minutes with 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma) in methanol. After staining, colonies were counted using a cutoff of 50 viable cells. Surviving fraction was calculated as (mean colony counts / cells inoculated) × plating efficiency, where plating efficiency was defined as mean colony counts divided by cells inoculated for nonirradiated controls.

Endothelial Cell Morphogenesis Assay: Tube Formation

HUVECs were infected with adenoviruses overexpressing the control empty vector LacZ, DN-Survivin, or DN-Stat3, respectively, at a multiplicity of infection of 100 plaque-forming units/cell for 4 hours. Medium was changed, and cells were treated with 3 Gy. Cells were trypsinized and counted. They were seeded at 48,000 per well on 24-well plates coated with 300 μL of Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). These cells undergo differentiation into capillary-like tube structures and were periodically observed by microscope. One day later, cells were stained with H&E, and photographs were taken via microscope. The average number of tubes for three separate microscopic fields (×100) and representative photographs were taken.

Stat3 Positively Regulates Survivin in HUVECs

As noted above, Stat3 activation has been shown to be associated with Survivin expression in various malignant cell lines. We previously showed that Survivin is transcriptionally down-regulated by radiation in HUVECs (28). To determine whether Stat3 regulates the expression of Survivin in HUVECs, we transduced HUVECs with three different adenovirus vectors. We transduced HUVECs with a constitutively active Stat3 vector (Stat3-C) that is capable of dimerizing and constitutively binding DNA without undergoing phosphorylation of the Tyr705 site (31). A second adenovirus vector, a dominant-negative mutant form of Stat3, inhibits Stat3 activity. We also transduced a control empty vector [pAdCMVpLPA(−)Xop-SSP]. We found the expression of Survivin to be positively correlated with the level of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 (Fig. 1). The level of Survivin protein detected by Western immunoblot was increased by 85% in the cells with constitutively active Stat3-C and decreased in the DN-Stat3–expressing mutant cells in comparison with the control. Consistently, phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 was increased in the constitutively active Stat3-C cells and decreased in DN-Stat3 relative to control. The measured total Stat3 level was elevated in cells with both DN-Stat3 and Stat3-C activity because the antibody employed exhibited equal binding affinity for both DN-Stat3 and constitutively active Stat3-C.

Figure 1.

Effect of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 on Survivin in HUVECs. HUVECs were transduced with adenoviral vector control (NCV), constitutively active Stat3 (Stat3-C), and DN-Stat3. Twenty-four hours following infection, the cells were harvested, and 50 μg of total protein per lane were loaded on 15% SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western blot analysis using various antibodies. Actin was probed to show equal loading.

Figure 1.

Effect of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 on Survivin in HUVECs. HUVECs were transduced with adenoviral vector control (NCV), constitutively active Stat3 (Stat3-C), and DN-Stat3. Twenty-four hours following infection, the cells were harvested, and 50 μg of total protein per lane were loaded on 15% SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western blot analysis using various antibodies. Actin was probed to show equal loading.

Close modal

Irradiation Attenuates Phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 and DNA-Binding Activity of Stat3 in HUVECs

After showing that Stat3 was positively correlated with Survivin expression in endothelial cells, we next sought to investigate the effects of irradiation on Stat3 activation and DNA-binding capability in these cells (Fig. 2A–C). In our Western immunoblots, we set the ratio of phosphorylated Stat3 to total Stat3 of our control to 1. The ensuing data represent the relative difference of phosphorylated Stat3 to total Stat3 from the control. In HUVECs, phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 was reduced by 73% following irradiation at 30 minutes. Levels of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 remained depressed at 60 minutes but had mostly recovered by 240 minutes (Fig. 2A). Irradiation did not, however, significantly affect the level of phospho-Stat3 Ser727. There was a small increase in phosphorylation at this site following irradiation (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.

Phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 and Stat3 DNA-binding activity are down-regulated by irradiation in HUVECs. HUVECs were irradiated with 3 Gy. Fifty micrograms of total protein per lane were immunoblotted for phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705 and Ser727) and total Stat3. A, phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705). B, phospho-Stat3 (Ser727). C, following irradiation of HUVECs, nuclear extracts were prepared at indicated time points: 5 μg of nuclear extracts were used for mobility shift assay; 1 μg of anti-Stat3 antibody was incubated with nuclear extracts on ice for 30 min before Stat3 (C20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) binding reaction. Competitor assay was also done using a specific cold probe.

Figure 2.

Phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 and Stat3 DNA-binding activity are down-regulated by irradiation in HUVECs. HUVECs were irradiated with 3 Gy. Fifty micrograms of total protein per lane were immunoblotted for phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705 and Ser727) and total Stat3. A, phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705). B, phospho-Stat3 (Ser727). C, following irradiation of HUVECs, nuclear extracts were prepared at indicated time points: 5 μg of nuclear extracts were used for mobility shift assay; 1 μg of anti-Stat3 antibody was incubated with nuclear extracts on ice for 30 min before Stat3 (C20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) binding reaction. Competitor assay was also done using a specific cold probe.

Close modal

Stats induce gene expression by physically binding with specific sequences in the promoter regions of responsive genes. We used electrophoretic mobility shift assay to determine whether DNA-binding activity of Stat3 in HUVECs is reduced following irradiation. We observed that Stat3 DNA binding was markedly reduced at 30 minutes following irradiation, was still decreased at 60 minutes, and had returned to baseline after 240 minutes (Fig. 2C).

Irradiation Does Not Significantly Affect Phospho-Stat3 or DNA-Binding Activity of Stat3 in MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells

Although irradiation down-regulates Survivin in HUVECs, we previously showed that 3 Gy failed to down-regulate Survivin in MDA-MB-231 breast and other cancer cell lines (28). We used Western immunoblotting and electrophoretic mobility shift assay to investigate the level of phosphorylated Stat3 (Tyr705 and Ser727) and DNA binding activity of Stat3 following 3 Gy in breast cancer cells. Again, we set the ratio of phosphorylated Stat3 to total Stat3 in our control to 1 with the subsequent data representing the relative difference of phosphorylated Stat3 to total Stat3 from the control. Phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 was unchanged at 30 minutes following irradiation (Fig. 3A). There was a slight decrease at 60 and 240 minutes. No significant change in phospho-Stat3 Ser727 levels was detected following irradiation at 30 and 60 minutes, although an 11% increase was noted at 240 minutes (Fig. 3B). Figure 3C shows no differences in Stat3 DNA-binding activity accompanied following irradiation of MDA-MB-231 cells.

Figure 3.

Irradiation does not affect phosphorylated Stat3, Stat3 DNA-binding activity, or surviving levels in breast cancer cells. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were irradiated with 3 Gy. Total cell lysates were extracted at indicated time points. Fifty micrograms of total proteins per lane were immunoblotted for phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705 and Ser727), total Stat3, and Survivin. A, phospho-Stat3 Tyr705. B, phospho-Stat3 Ser727. C, Survivin. D, following irradiation of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, nuclear extracts were prepared at indicated time points: 5 μg of nuclear extracts were used for mobility shift assay. Competitor assay was also done using a specific cold probe.

Figure 3.

Irradiation does not affect phosphorylated Stat3, Stat3 DNA-binding activity, or surviving levels in breast cancer cells. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were irradiated with 3 Gy. Total cell lysates were extracted at indicated time points. Fifty micrograms of total proteins per lane were immunoblotted for phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705 and Ser727), total Stat3, and Survivin. A, phospho-Stat3 Tyr705. B, phospho-Stat3 Ser727. C, Survivin. D, following irradiation of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, nuclear extracts were prepared at indicated time points: 5 μg of nuclear extracts were used for mobility shift assay. Competitor assay was also done using a specific cold probe.

Close modal

Mutation of Stat3 Tyr705 Abolished Radiation-Induced Down-Regulation of Survivin

To determine whether dephosphorylation of Stat3 Tyr705 is essential for radiation-induced down-regulation of Survivin, we subjected primary human mammary epithelial cells overexpressing either wild-type Stat3 or mutant Y705F Stat3 to 3 Gy. Mutant Y705F Stat3 cannot be phosphorylated on residue 705. Survivin expression was determined by Western blotting following irradiation. The ratio of Survivin to actin in the control was set to 1, and the data represented relative changes in this ratio from the control. Following irradiation, Survivin levels were decreased by nearly 70% in the wild-type cells at 6 hours and remained depressed at 12 hours. In contrast, Survivin levels were unchanged by irradiation in the mutant Y705F Stat3 cells at both 6 and 12 hours, respectively (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Stat3 Tyr705 is required for radiation-induced down-regulation of Survivin. HME1 cells stably were transfected with wild-type (WT) Stat3 or mutant Stat3Y705F expression plasmids and were treated with 3 Gy. Protein extracts were collected at 0, 6, and 12 h following irradiation. Survivin and β-actin were probed by Western immunoblot analyses.

Figure 4.

Stat3 Tyr705 is required for radiation-induced down-regulation of Survivin. HME1 cells stably were transfected with wild-type (WT) Stat3 or mutant Stat3Y705F expression plasmids and were treated with 3 Gy. Protein extracts were collected at 0, 6, and 12 h following irradiation. Survivin and β-actin were probed by Western immunoblot analyses.

Close modal

Combined Inhibition of Stat3 and Survivin with Dominant-Negative Mutants Increases Radiation Sensitization in MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells and Decreases Angiogenesis in Irradiated HUVECs

To investigate the effects of inhibition of Stat3 and Survivin on MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells subjected to varying doses of radiotherapy, we did clonogenic assays. Cells transfected with DN-Stat3 treated with irradiation downshifted the survival curve compared with control with a dose-enhancing ratio of 1.18 (Fig. 5). Cells transfected with DN-Survivin were also sensitized to radiotherapy with a dose-enhancing ratio of 1.26. Inhibition of both Survivin and Stat3 together resulted in the greatest radiation sensitization of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells after 2, 4, and 6 Gy. The dose-enhancing ratio for this last assay was 1.65, a 2- to 3-fold reduction of cell viability compared with inhibition of either Survivin or Stat3 individually.

Figure 5.

Inhibition of Stat3 and Survivin sensitizes breast cancer cells to irradiation and decreases angiogenesis. A, MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were transfected with empty vector LacZ, DN-Survivin, or DN-Stat3. They were then treated with 0, 2, 4, or 6 Gy. After 10 d, colonies were stained and counted. The surviving cell fraction and dose-enhancing ratio were calculated, with the surviving cell fraction being calculated as the percentage of cells originally plated that survived irradiation. Points, mean; bars, SD. B and C, HUVECs were infected with adenoviruses overexpressing a control empty vector LacZ, DN-Survivin, or DN-Stat3. These cells were treated with 3 Gy. B, representative HUVECs at varying levels of differentiation under microscope (H&E stain). C, average number of tubes for three separate microscopic fields (×100; Y-axis).

Figure 5.

Inhibition of Stat3 and Survivin sensitizes breast cancer cells to irradiation and decreases angiogenesis. A, MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were transfected with empty vector LacZ, DN-Survivin, or DN-Stat3. They were then treated with 0, 2, 4, or 6 Gy. After 10 d, colonies were stained and counted. The surviving cell fraction and dose-enhancing ratio were calculated, with the surviving cell fraction being calculated as the percentage of cells originally plated that survived irradiation. Points, mean; bars, SD. B and C, HUVECs were infected with adenoviruses overexpressing a control empty vector LacZ, DN-Survivin, or DN-Stat3. These cells were treated with 3 Gy. B, representative HUVECs at varying levels of differentiation under microscope (H&E stain). C, average number of tubes for three separate microscopic fields (×100; Y-axis).

Close modal

After detecting the potential efficacy of DN-Stat3 and DN-Survivin in increasing radiation sensitivity of breast cancer cells (Fig. 5), we next sought to determine what effect inhibition of these proteins would have in combination with irradiation on angiogenesis. We subjected HUVECs infected with DN-Stat3, DN-Survivin, and LacZ control vectors to irradiation, stained the cells, and examined their differentiation into capillary-like tube structures under the microscope. Without irradiation, DN-Survivin and DN-Stat3 vectors each individually decreased differentiation of HUVECs into tubules, but DN-Survivin and DN-Stat3 together were more effective. Inhibition of Stat3 or Survivin with their dominant-negative mutants even more markedly decreased angiogenesis along with 3 Gy. However, the combination of DN-Survivin, DN-Stat3, and irradiation resulted in maximum inhibition of angiogenesis, decreasing the number of tube structures formed by ∼7-fold relative to treatment with 3 Gy alone.

Previously, we showed that irradiation (3 Gy) significantly reduced both protein and mRNA levels of Survivin in HUVECs by decreasing the promoter activity and down-regulating transcription of the Survivin gene. This down-regulating effect of radiation was not observed in malignant cell lines (3). In this study, we further explored the mechanism of how radiation induces down-regulation of Survivin to better understand the different molecular response of HUVECs and malignant cells to radiation. It is generally accepted that COOH-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation of Stat3 is required for its dimerization, nuclear translocation, and ability to bind DNA, whereas phosphorylation of Ser727 enhances Stat3-mediated transcriptional activity (32, 33). We have shown for the first time, to our knowledge, that dephosphorylation of the Tyr705 site of Stat3 is required for radiation induced down-regulation of Survivin. Furthermore, we have shown that phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 may mediate radiation resistance in breast cancer cells by up-regulating Survivin.

Stat3 has previously been shown to regulate Survivin in various cell lines. Gritsko et al. found that Stat3 activation and elevated Survivin levels occurred concurrently in high-risk breast tumors that were resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, highlighting the importance of better understanding the relationship and regulation of these two proteins (20). Here, we showed that expression of Survivin was positively correlated with the level of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 in HUVECs (Fig. 1). We detected the level of Survivin to be increased by nearly 2-fold in cells with constitutively active Stat3-C relative to control. This increase in Survivin paralleled the increase in phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 in cells expressing constitutively active Stat3-C. We showed that 3 Gy caused over a 70% decrease in the ratio of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 to total Stat3 relative to control in HUVECs (Fig. 2). In contrast to what was observed in HUVECs, irradiation caused no change in phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 at 30 minutes and only a small, insignificant reduction at 60 and 240 minutes in the malignant MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line (Fig. 3). These data corresponded with our electrophoretic mobility shift assay results. There was diminished Stat3 DNA-binding activity following irradiation in HUVECs at 30 and 60 minutes. In contrast to HUVECs, no change in the DNA-binding activity of Stat3 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells was detected. We have previously shown that 3 Gy does not alter Survivin levels in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (28). We were subsequently able to confirm that dephosphorylation of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 is essential for radiation induced down-regulation of Survivin because 3 Gy failed to down-regulate Survivin in cells expressing Stat3 with a mutant Tyr705 phosphorylation site. Of note, Mahboubi et al. previously found that Stat3 was required for interleukin-11 induced up-regulation of Survivin expression in HUVECs (34). Our results are consistent with their work, and we show here the novel observation that phosphorylation of the Tyr705 site of Stat3 regulates Survivin expression in response to irradiation.

Previously, UV B light has been shown to dephosphorylate phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 in cultured keratinocytes (35). These authors showed that vanadate-treated keratinocytes were resistant to UV B–induced apoptosis. Vanadate is a phosphatase inhibitor, suggesting that a tyrosine phosphatase was responsible for UV B–induced dephosphorylation and inactivation of Stat3. Our group is currently conducting ongoing studies directed at identifying the tyrosine phosphatase that mediates the dephosphorylation of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 by irradiation in HUVECs.

In brief, our data provide a molecular understanding of why HUVECs respond to radiotherapy, whereas MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells do not. We showed in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells that like Survivin expression, Stat3 activity (as measured by phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 levels and ability to bind DNA) does not decrease in response to radiation therapy. This is in stark contrast to the drop in Stat3 activity following 3 Gy in HUVECs we show here, as well as the decrease in Survivin following irradiation in HUVECs we have previously shown (28). Furthermore, we show that phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 activity is required to down-regulate Survivin. These results are consistent with prior studies showing Survivin's regulation by Stat3, as well as the role of these two proteins in promoting cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis.

Having established that dephosphorylation of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705–mediated down-regulation of Survivin following irradiation, we hypothesized that inhibiting both Survivin and Stat3 together would promote radiation sensitivity in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. In prior studies, independent inhibition of Stat3 or Survivin using various techniques, including dominant-negative mutant proteins, has promoted apoptosis in various malignant and nonmalignant cell lines. Although DN-Survivin and DN-Stat3 proteins were each effective at promoting radiation sensitivity, to our knowledge, this is the first report of successful targeting of both Stat3 and Survivin to promote radiation sensitization.

We provided further support for the potential targeting of Survivin and Stat3 together to promote radiation sensitization in an endothelial cell angiogenesis model. Vascular endothelial growth factor is produced in greater-than-normal amounts by cancer cells. It binds to tyrosine kinase receptors on endothelial cells and stimulates growth of blood vessels. Along with hypoxia-inducible factor-1, Stat3 has been shown to be one of the most important transcription factors that regulate vascular endothelial growth factor (36, 37). Moreover, Stat3 participates in cell signaling involving the basic fibroblast growth factor receptor, which also leads to blood vessel proliferation and migration (6). Prior studies have also established the importance of Survivin in tumor formation and extension through angiogenesis (26, 32), and vascular endothelial growth factor, in turn, has been shown to regulate Survivin in endothelial cells (38). Here, we showed that inhibition of Survivin and Stat3 with their dominant-negative mutants in combination with irradiation resulted in a severalfold greater inhibition of angiogenesis than radiotherapy alone.

It is noteworthy that in our electrophoretic mobility shift assay experiment (Fig. 2C), we observed that the DNA-binding activity of Stat3, although still depressed, seemed to recover more quickly at 60 minutes than had the level of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705. It is possible that the action of protein inhibitors of activated STATs, which interact with STATs and block DNA binding, could be altered by irradiation in HUVECs, resulting in mildly increased DNA binding despite a still low level of tyrosine phosphorylation (6). We were not surprised to detect similar levels of Survivin expression in human primary mammary epithelial cells expressing Stat3 with mutated Tyr705 and wild-type Stat3 before 3 Gy (Fig. 4). Besides STAT activation, other non cell cycle–dependent pathways have been shown to up-regulate Survivin, including growth factor receptor signaling, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling, and Ras expression (32).

Although unlike the dramatic change seen in phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 secondary to irradiation in HUVECs, we did detect a small trend of increased phosphorylation at the Ser727 site of Stat3 over time in both HUVECs and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells following 3 Gy. Phosphorylation of Ser727 of Stat3 can be caused by stressors, such as UV irradiation, hyperosmolality, or exposure to inflammatory mediators like tumor necrosis factor-α and lipopolysaccharide, and may actually decrease the rate of tyrosine phosphorylation in some instances (33). Several groups have shown that serine phosphorylation of Stat3 has no influence on DNA-binding activity of the protein (39, 40). Furthermore, phosphorylation of Stat3 Ser727 does not enhance tyrosine phosphorylation (33). Our findings in both HUVECs and breast cancer cells of a small increase in phospho-Stat3 Ser727 over time following 3 Gy occurring independently of tyrosine phosphorylation correlates well with these prior reports, as does our data showing that radiation-induced down-regulation of Stat3 DNA-binding activity is dependent on dephosphorylation of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705.

In conclusion, this study notably showed that irradiation stimulates dephosphorylation of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 in endothelial but not breast cancer cells. Dephosphorylation of Stat3 Tyr705 is an essential step in down-regulating Survivin. These results suggest that the persistence of phospho-Stat3 Tyr705 may lead to radiation resistance in breast cancer cells. Therefore, targeting Stat3 and Survivin with dominant-negative mutant proteins may sensitize breast cancer and its vasculature to radiation therapy.

Grant support: Vanderbilt Discovery Grant, Vanderbilt Physician Scientist Grant, Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, and Department of Defense grants PC031161 and DOD BC030542.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Akira S, Nishio Y, Inoue M, et al. Molecular cloning of APRF, a novel IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 p91-related transcription factor involved in the gp130-mediated signaling pathway.
Cell
1994
;
77
:
63
–71.
2
Ihle JN. The Stat family in cytokine signaling.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2001
;
13
:
211
–7.
3
Calo V, Migliavacca M, Bazan V, et al. STAT proteins: from normal control of cellular events to tumorigenesis.
J Cell Physiol
2003
;
197
:
157
–68.
4
Bowman T, Garcia R, Turkson J, Jove R. STATs in oncogenesis.
Oncogene
2000
;
19
:
2474
–88.
5
Ihle JN. STATs: signal transducers and activators of transcription.
Cell
1996
;
84
:
331
–4.
6
Yu H, Jove R. The STATs of cancer: new molecular targets come of age.
Nat Rev Cancer
2004
;
4
:
97
–105.
7
Burke WM, Jin X, Lin HJ, et al. Inhibition of constitutively active Stat3 suppresses growth of human ovarian and breast cancer cells.
Oncogene
2001
;
20
:
7925
–34.
8
Mora LB, Buettner R, Seigne J, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 in human prostate tumors and cell lines: direct inhibition of Stat3 signaling induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells.
Cancer Res
2002
;
62
:
6659
–66.
9
Kanda N, Seno H, Konda Y, et al. STAT3 is constitutively activated and supports cell survival in association with survivin expression in gastric cancer cells.
Oncogene
2004
;
23
:
4921
–9.
10
Niu G, Heller R, Catlett-Falcone R, et al. Gene therapy with dominant-negative Stat3 suppresses growth of the murine melanoma B16 tumor in vivo.
Cancer Res
1999
;
59
:
5059
–63.
11
Catlett-Falcone R, Landowski TH, Oshiro MM, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling confers resistance to apoptosis in human U266 myeloma cells.
Immunity
1999
;
10
:
105
–15.
12
Aoki Y, Feldman GM, Tosato G. Inhibition of STAT3 signaling induces apoptosis and decreases survivin expression in primary effusion lymphoma.
Blood
2003
;
101
:
1535
–42.
13
Proietti C, Salatino M, Rosemblit C, et al. Progestins induce transcriptional activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) via a Jak- and Src-dependent mechanism in breast cancer cells.
Mol Cell Biol
2005
;
25
:
4826
–40.
14
Barton BE, Karras JG, Murphy TF, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activation in prostate cancer: direct STAT3 inhibition induces apoptosis in prostate cancer lines.
Mol Cancer Ther
2004
;
3
:
11
–20.
15
Grandis JR, Drenning SD, Zeng Q, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling abrogates apoptosis in squamous cell carcinogenesis in vivo.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2000
;
97
:
4227
–32.
16
Ling X, Arlinghaus RB. Knockdown of STAT3 expression by RNA interference inhibits the induction of breast tumors in immunocompetent mice.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
2532
–6.
17
Konnikova L, Kotecki M, Kruger MM, et al. Knockdown of STAT3 expression by RNAi induces apoptosis in astrocytoma cells.
BMC Cancer
2003
;
3
:
23
.
18
Li F. Survivin study: what is the next wave?
J Cell Physiol
2003
;
197
:
8
–29.
19
Asanuma K, Kobayashi D, Furuya D, et al. A role for survivin in radioresistance of pancreatic cancer cells.
Jpn J Cancer Res
2002
;
93
:
1057
–62.
20
Gritsko T, Williams A, Turkson J, et al. Persistent activation of stat3 signaling induces survivin gene expression and confers resistance to apoptosis in human breast cancer cells.
Clin Cancer Res
2006
;
12
:
11
–9.
21
Nam S, Buettner R, Turkson J, et al. Indirubin derivatives inhibit Stat3 signaling and induce apoptosis in human cancer cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2005
;
102
:
5998
–6003.
22
Zaffaroni N, Pennati M, Daidone MG, et al. Survivin as a target for new anticancer interventions.
J Cell Mol Med
2005
;
9
:
360
–72.
23
Yamamoto T, Manome Y, Nakamura M, et al. Downregulation of survivin expression by induction of the effector cell protease receptor-1 reduces tumor growth potential and results in an increased sensitivity to anticancer agents in human colon cancer.
Eur J Cancer
2002
;
38
:
2316
–24.
24
Kanwar JR, Shen WP, Kanwar RK, et al. Effects of survivin antagonists on growth of established tumors and B7–1 immunogene therapy.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2001
;
93
:
1541
–52.
25
Grossman D, McNiff JM, Li F, et al. Expression and targeting of the apoptosis inhibitor, survivin, in human melanoma.
J Invest Dermatol
1999
;
113
:
1076
–81.
26
Mesri M, Wall NR, Li J, et al. Cancer gene therapy using a survivin mutant adenovirus.
J Clin Invest
2001
;
108
:
981
–90.
27
Raju U, Gumin GJ, Tofilon PJ. Radiation-induced transcription factor activation in the rat cerebral cortex.
Int J Radiat Biol
2000
;
76
:
1045
–53.
28
Lu B, Mu Y, Cao C, et al. Survivin as a therapeutic target for radiation sensitization in lung cancer.
Cancer Res
2004
;
64
:
2840
–5.
29
Yang J, Chatterjee-Kishore M, Staugaitis SM, et al. Novel roles of unphosphorylated STAT3 in oncogenesis and transcriptional regulation.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
939
–47.
30
Song H, Jin X, Lin J. Stat3 upregulates MEK5 expression in human breast cancer cells.
Oncogene
2004
;
23
:
8301
–9.
31
Bromberg JF, Wrzeszczynska MH, Devgan G, et al. Stat3 as an oncogene.
Cell
1999
;
98
:
295
–303.
32
Turkson J, Jove R. STAT proteins: novel molecular targets for cancer drug discovery.
Oncogene
2000
;
19
:
6613
–26.
33
Decker T, Kovarik P. Serine phosphorylation of STATs.
Oncogene
2000
;
19
:
2628
–37.
34
Mahboubi K, Li F, Plescia J, et al. Interleukin-11 up-regulates surviving expression in endothelial cells through a signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 pathway.
Lab Invest
2001
;
81
:
327
–34.
35
Sano S, Chan KS, Kira M, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 is a key regulator of keratinocyte survival and proliferation following UV irradiation.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
5720
–9.
36
Niu G, Wright KL, Huang M, et al. Constitutive Stat3 activity up-regulates VEGF expression and tumor angiogenesis.
Oncogene
2000
;
21
:
2000
–8.
37
Semenza GL. Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy.
Nat Rev Cancer
2003
;
3
:
721
–32.
38
O'Connor DS, Grossman D, Plescia J, et al. Regulation of apoptosis at cell division by p34cdc2 phosphorylation of survivin.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2000
;
97
:
13103
–7.
39
Wen Z, Darnell JE. Mapping of Stat3 serine phosphorylation to a single residue (727) and evidence that serine phosphorylation has no influence on DNA binding of Stat1 and Stat3.
Nucleic Acids Res
1997
;
25
:
2062
–7.
40
Ceresa BP, Horvath CM, Pessin JE, et al. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 serine phosphorylation by insulin is mediated by a Ras/Raf/MEK-dependent pathway.
Endocrinology
1997
;
138
:
4131
–7.