XRCC2 has an important role in repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination. Adult Apcmin/+ (min, multiple intestinal neoplasia) mice, wild-type or heterozygous for Xrcc2 deficiency, were sham-irradiated or 2-Gy X-irradiated. Spontaneous mammary and intestinal tumor incidences are lower in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice than in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice (mammary tumors: 14% and 38%, respectively, χ2P = 0.03; intestinal adenomas in mice reaching full life span: 108.6 and 130.1, respectively, t-test P = 0.005). Following irradiation, the increase in mammary tumors was greatest in female mice heterozygous for Xrcc2 (7.25 ± 0.50-fold in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice compared with 2.57 ± 0.35-fold in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice; t-test P < 0.001). The increase in intestinal tumor multiplicity following irradiation was significantly greater in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice (Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/−, 4.14 ± 0.05-fold, versus Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+, 3.30 ± 0.05-fold; t-test P < 0.001). Loss of heterozygosity of all chromosome 18 markers was greater in intestinal tumors from Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice than in tumors from Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice. These findings indicate that Xrcc2 haploinsufficiency reduces spontaneous tumor incidence on an Apcmin/+ background but increases the tumorigenic response to radiation. Mol Cancer Res; 8(9); 1227–33. ©2010 AACR.

Double-strand breaks (DSB) are processed by one of two pathways: homologous recombination (HR) or nonhomologous end joining. The formation of chromosomal rearrangements caused by misrepair of ionizing radiation–induced DSBs is a hallmark of radiation damage (e.g., ref. 1). The RecA/RAD51 gene family plays an essential role in HR repair in all organisms, promoting chromosome stability and protecting against DNA DSBs, cross-links, and other forms of damage. Whereas RAD51 has the central role of facilitating exchange between homologous DNA strands, RAD51-like proteins such as XRCC2 have important but as yet poorly defined roles in HR. For example, the complete knockout of Xrcc2 in mice is lethal (2) and the accumulation of Rad51 at sites of DNA damage is compromised in the absence of Xrcc2 (3).

Importantly, it has been found that the human breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 have a role in the HR pathway. The homozygous loss of either gene leads to a severe reduction in HR repair of DNA damage and to the accumulation of chromosomal aberrations (4, 5). Germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for less than 2% of human breast cancer cases (6), and it is speculated that familial risk is associated with a large number of genetic components, each contributing a small effect (7). Given the association of the BRCA genes and HR repair, it is possible that other HR genes are candidates for this role in breast cancer.

XRCC2 has been shown to interact with other proteins involved in the DNA damage response, such as the Bloom's syndrome protein (8). When mice heterozygous for disruption of the Blm gene were crossed to mice heterozygous for a mutant form of the Apc tumor suppressor gene (important for the suppression of colorectal and other cancers), a 2-fold increase in the average number of spontaneous intestinal tumors was found (9).

Here, we aimed to investigate the effect of Xrcc2 deficiency on cancer susceptibility by introducing Xrcc2 heterozygosity onto the cancer-susceptible Apcmin/+ background (10). Female Apcmin/+ mice also have a susceptibility to the formation of mammary tumors (11). The Apcmin/+ mouse model has proved valuable for the verification of genes as cancer risk modifiers (e.g., refs. 9, 12, 13). The main focus of this study was to examine the incidence of cancers, particularly breast cancer, in mice with one or two copies of Xrcc2, with and without 2-Gy X-irradiation.

Mouse models and husbandry

A 129/Sv heterozygous Xrcc2 knockout mouse strain has been described previously (2). Xrcc2 deficiency was bred onto a C57BL/6J background for five successive backcross generations. Xrcc2+/− mice were subsequently crossed with Apcmin(Mom3R)/+ (Mom3, modifier of min 3; R, resistant) mice (14), which have a variant C57BL/6 background. The F1 generation yielded four genotypes: Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/−, Apc+/+Xrcc2+/−, Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+, and Apc+/+Xrcc2+/+. Mice were housed in conventional cages, with a standard maintenance diet and water provided ad libitum. All procedures involving animals were carried out in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and with guidance from the local Ethical Review Committee on animal experiments.

Genotyping and irradiations

Genotyping of mice to detect both mutant and wild-type alleles was carried out as previously described for Apc (15) and Xrcc2 (16). Groups of at least 25 female and 10 male mice per genotype were irradiated with a single whole-body dose of 2-Gy X-rays at 35 days of age. Concurrent sham-irradiated control groups were also examined from the same litter where possible to minimize genetic bias. Irradiations were done at the Medical Research Council (Harwell, Oxon, United Kingdom) using a Siemens Stabiliplan X-ray machine (Siemens AG) operating at 250-kV constant potential and 14 mA (half value layer, 1.23 mm and 3.65 mm Cu) at a dose rate equal to 0.48 Gy min−1.

Postmortem analysis and adenoma quantification

Mammary tumors and gastrointestinal tracts were routinely sampled from all mice. These were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 hours and subsequently stored in 70% ethanol. Other tissues were sampled from mice where abnormalities presented. Preparation of intestinal tracts and quantification of adenomas were previously described (14).

Loss of heterozygosity analysis

PCR was performed using 1 μL of DNA prepared (17) from approximately 10 to 20 mg of tissue dissected from fixed mammary tumors or single intestinal adenomas, approximately 0.5 to 1 mm in diameter, dissected from the third segment of the small intestine (ileum). All PCR products were run on 3% agarose gels and some were labeled with fluorescent dyes and analyzed using a GeXP genetic analyzer (Beckman Coulter). A loss of heterozygosity (LOH) screen was done using a marker for Xrcc2 (16) and an RFLP marker for Apc (15). Four distal chromosome 18 markers, polymorphic between C57BL/6J and the Apcmin(Mom3R)/+ strain, were also used. Three of these were located within genes known to have a role in tumorigenesis: D18mit207, D18mit33 (Tcf4), D18mit186 (Dcc), and a sequence-tagged site marker for Smad4 (F 5′-tcacggatgtcttggatctgg, R 5′-tgagggctgttattcctggg). Primers and WellRED fluorescently labeled primers were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd.

Fluorescently labeled PCR products were analyzed using peak height ratios to determine allelic imbalance, LOH, or homozygous loss in tumor tissue. Contamination with normal tissue is difficult to eliminate in solid tumors, and therefore, a product of less than 20% of the signal seen for normal tissue was considered to represent allelic loss. Allelic imbalance was scored when the sample peak was less than 80% of normal and homozygous loss was scored when the sample peak height was less than 20% of a control marker in the same sample. Verification of homozygous loss was done in two ways: by either multiplexing two markers and running products on agarose gels or combining fluorescently labeled sample and control marker products for a single tumor (pool-plex) and analyzing as a single sample by capillary electrophoresis compared with normal genomic DNA.

Statistical analysis

The difference between the percentage mammary tumor incidence for sham-irradiated Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− and Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice was determined using the χ2 test. The sham-irradiated mammary tumor incidence was subtracted from the incidence following 2-Gy irradiation in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− and Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice, yielding the excess incidence due to irradiation. The binomial distribution of mammary tumor data was used to obtain SEs. The difference between the two Xrcc2 genotypes was calculated using Fisher's exact test. A one-way ANOVA was also done on the percentage incidence of mammary tumors in the sham and irradiated groups of Apcmin/+ mice for the two Xrcc2 genotypes using Minitab 15 software (Minitab, Inc.).

Differences between mammary and intestinal tumor multiplicities and fold changes in Apcmin/+ and Apc+/+ mice, for both Xrcc2 genotypes, were calculated using Minitab 15 software (Minitab).

The average life span of 2 Gy–irradiated Apcmin/+ mice was 116.5 days and that of sham-irradiated controls was 144.5 days. Apc+/+ mice were postmortem examined at 285 days old, which was in excess of the maximum life span of Apcmin/+ mice of 196 days.

Mammary tumorigenesis

Mammary tumors presenting in these mice were classified as adenocarcinoma with squamous cell differentiation. For female sham-irradiated Apcmin/+ mice, the incidence of mammary tumors was lower in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice (14%; n = 28) than in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice (35%; n = 26; Table 1). This difference only approached significance due to relatively small numbers of mice and, therefore, small statistical power (χ2, P = 0.08). The addition of 13 Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice from a parallel experiment increased the statistical power (n = 39; difference between the two Xrcc2+/+ groups indistinguishable; χ2 test, P = 0.739) and showed a significantly reduced incidence of mammary tumors in the Xrcc2+/− mice (14% versus 38%; χ2 test, P = 0.03). The sham-irradiated mammary tumor incidence was subtracted from the incidence following 2-Gy X-irradiation, giving a background corrected incidence for X-irradiation–induced tumors in the Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− group of 57 ± 11% compared with 17 ± 13% in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice (excluding additional mice described above) and this difference was significant (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.001; data not shown). Inclusion of the larger Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ group gave a greater significance. The increase in incidence between the sham and irradiated groups of Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice was 1.50-fold, which was not significantly different, but the increase following X-irradiation in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice was 4.99-fold (ANOVA, P < 0.001; Table 1).

Table 1.

Percentage mammary tumor incidence and multiplicity (mean ± SEM) in female Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ or Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− sham- or 2-Gy X-irradiated mice showing statistical significance of differences between groups

Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ (control)Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/−
2 GySham2 GySham
Percentage mammary tumor incidence 51.85 ± 9.60 (14/27) 34.62 ± 9.30 (9/26) 71.43 ± 8.50 (20/28) 14.28 ± 6.60 (4/28) 
Statistical significance of difference between Xrcc2+/− and Xrcc2+/+ Sham; χ2P = 0.08 (additional Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+n = 39, P = 0.03) 
X-ray–induced fold increase 1.50 ± 0.33 (ns)* 4.99 ± 0.48 (P < 0.001)* 
Statistical significance of difference between Xrcc2+/− and Xrcc2+/+ t test, P < 0.001 
Multiplicity per mouse 0.88 ± 0.19 (24/27) 0.35 ± 0.10 (9/26) 1.04 ± 0.16 (29/28) 0.14 ± 0.07 (4/28) 
Statistical significance of difference between Xrcc2+/− and Xrcc2+/+ Sham; t-test P = 0.08 (additional Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+n = 39, P = 0.05) 
X-ray–induced fold increase 2.57 ± 0.35 (t test, P = 0.017) 7.25 ± 0.50 (t test, P < <0.001) 
Statistical significance of difference between Xrcc2+/− and Xrcc2+/+ t-test P < 0.001 
Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ (control)Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/−
2 GySham2 GySham
Percentage mammary tumor incidence 51.85 ± 9.60 (14/27) 34.62 ± 9.30 (9/26) 71.43 ± 8.50 (20/28) 14.28 ± 6.60 (4/28) 
Statistical significance of difference between Xrcc2+/− and Xrcc2+/+ Sham; χ2P = 0.08 (additional Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+n = 39, P = 0.03) 
X-ray–induced fold increase 1.50 ± 0.33 (ns)* 4.99 ± 0.48 (P < 0.001)* 
Statistical significance of difference between Xrcc2+/− and Xrcc2+/+ t test, P < 0.001 
Multiplicity per mouse 0.88 ± 0.19 (24/27) 0.35 ± 0.10 (9/26) 1.04 ± 0.16 (29/28) 0.14 ± 0.07 (4/28) 
Statistical significance of difference between Xrcc2+/− and Xrcc2+/+ Sham; t-test P = 0.08 (additional Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+n = 39, P = 0.05) 
X-ray–induced fold increase 2.57 ± 0.35 (t test, P = 0.017) 7.25 ± 0.50 (t test, P < <0.001) 
Statistical significance of difference between Xrcc2+/− and Xrcc2+/+ t-test P < 0.001 

*Difference in increase in incidence between sham- and X-irradiated mice for the two Xrcc2 genotypes (ANOVA).

Multiplicity = total number of mammary tumors / total number of mice.

Difference in multiplicity between sham- and X-irradiated mice (t test).

Both Apcmin/+ Xrcc2 genotypes spontaneously presented with single mammary tumors and multiplicity increased following X-irradiation. The difference in sham-irradiated multiplicity for the two Apcmin/+ Xrcc2 genotypes approached statistical significance at P = 0.08, and addition of 13 Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice, described above, gave a significant difference (t test, P = 0.05). For female Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice, the increase in multiplicity following 2-Gy X-ray exposure was significant, increasing by a factor of 2.57 (Table 1). The corresponding change in the Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− groups was greater with an increase of 7.25-fold (Table 1). The fold increase in multiplicity following X-irradiation was significantly different between the two genotypes (t test, P < 0.001; Table 1).

No mammary tumors were found in sham-irradiated Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ male mice, and one presented in an Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− male mouse. For X-irradiated mice, the majority of mammary tumors were seen in females; only one Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ male mouse and two Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− males presented with a mammary tumor (data not shown). No Apc+/+ mice presented with mammary tumors.

Intestinal tumorigenesis

Following sham irradiation, the mean intestinal adenoma multiplicity was 105.8 for Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice and 116.9 for Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice and this difference was not statistically significant. Some mice were killed prematurely due to other causes, such as development of a mammary tumor, and omission of these mice gave significantly lower intestinal adenoma multiplicities in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice than in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice (t test, P = 0.005; Table 2). For mice given 2-Gy X-rays, there was a large variation in the intestinal adenoma multiplicity and the differences between Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− and Apcmin/+Xrcc2+/+ mice were not statistically significant. However, the increase in adenoma multiplicity following X-irradiation was 4.14 ± 0.05-fold in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice and 3.30 ± 0.05-fold in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice and this difference was statistically significant (t-test P < 0.001; Table 2).

Table 2.

Incidence and multiplicity of intestinal adenomas in Apcmin/+ or Apc+/+Xrcc2+/+ and Apcmin/+ or Apc+/+Xrcc2+/− sham- and X-irradiated mice

Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ (control)Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/−
Incidence (%)Multiplicity (mean ± SEM)Incidence (%)Multiplicity (mean ± SEM)
Sham 100 130.1 ± 5.4 (n = 21) 100 108.6 ± 4.8* (n = 24) 
2-Gy excess 100 298.6 ± 30.9 (n = 20) 100 341.2 ± 25.2 (n = 18) 
X-ray–induced fold increase  3.30 ± 0.05  4.14 ± 0.05 
 
 Apc+/+ Xrcc2+/+ (control) Apc+/+ Xrcc2+/− 
Incidence (%) Multiplicity (mean ± SEM) Incidence (%) Multiplicity (mean ± SEM) 
Sham 9/35 (26) 0.257 ± 0.075 (n = 35) 6/40 (15) 0.175 ± 0.071 (n = 40) 
2-Gy irradiation 20/37 (54) 1.050 ± 0.190 (n = 37) 13/37 (35) 1.000 ± 0.250 (n = 37) 
X-ray–induced fold increase  4.1 ± 0.3  5.7 ± 0.5 
Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ (control)Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/−
Incidence (%)Multiplicity (mean ± SEM)Incidence (%)Multiplicity (mean ± SEM)
Sham 100 130.1 ± 5.4 (n = 21) 100 108.6 ± 4.8* (n = 24) 
2-Gy excess 100 298.6 ± 30.9 (n = 20) 100 341.2 ± 25.2 (n = 18) 
X-ray–induced fold increase  3.30 ± 0.05  4.14 ± 0.05 
 
 Apc+/+ Xrcc2+/+ (control) Apc+/+ Xrcc2+/− 
Incidence (%) Multiplicity (mean ± SEM) Incidence (%) Multiplicity (mean ± SEM) 
Sham 9/35 (26) 0.257 ± 0.075 (n = 35) 6/40 (15) 0.175 ± 0.071 (n = 40) 
2-Gy irradiation 20/37 (54) 1.050 ± 0.190 (n = 37) 13/37 (35) 1.000 ± 0.250 (n = 37) 
X-ray–induced fold increase  4.1 ± 0.3  5.7 ± 0.5 

*Significantly different from Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ (t test, P = 0.005).

Significantly different from Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ (t test, P < 0.001).

Significantly different from the respective sham (t test, P = 0.003, Xrcc2+/−; P < 0.001, Xrcc2+/+).

Other neoplasms

Three irradiated Apc+/+Xrcc2+/− female mice were killed at or before 285 days (152-250 days) of age due to similar signs of ill health. A full pathologic analysis on one of these mice confirmed a diagnosis of systemic lymphoma. Two irradiated Apc+/+Xrcc2+/− female mice presented with ovarian tumors at postmortem as did one Apc+/+Xrcc2+/+ mouse. Another irradiated female Apc+/+Xrcc2+/+ mouse presented with a liver tumor. Two sham-irradiated Apc+/+Xrcc2+/+ mice were postmortem examined before 285 days but no neoplastic changes were seen.

LOH analysis

To assess the effect of Xrcc2 deficiency on mutational mechanisms operating in tumorigenesis, LOH analysis was done on mammary and intestinal tumors from Apcmin/+ mice. Results for mammary tumors were complex, with some tumors in sham- and X-irradiated mice for both Apcmin/+ Xrcc2 genotypes showing homozygous losses, and these, together with allelic imbalances, were more common events than LOH (Fig. 1A). For intestinal tumors, patterns of LOH were less complex and allelic imbalance was only seen in sham-irradiated tumors (Fig. 1B).

FIGURE 1.

Patterns of LOH on chromosomes 5 and 18 in mammary tumors (A) and intestinal adenomas (B) from sham- or 2-Gy X-irradiated Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ and Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice. •, both alleles retained; ○, loss of one allele (<20% of normal); AI, allelic imbalance (<80% of normal); HL, loss of both alleles (<20% of a “control” marker in the same sample compared with normal); NP, no polymorphism. STS, sequence-tagged site.

FIGURE 1.

Patterns of LOH on chromosomes 5 and 18 in mammary tumors (A) and intestinal adenomas (B) from sham- or 2-Gy X-irradiated Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ and Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice. •, both alleles retained; ○, loss of one allele (<20% of normal); AI, allelic imbalance (<80% of normal); HL, loss of both alleles (<20% of a “control” marker in the same sample compared with normal); NP, no polymorphism. STS, sequence-tagged site.

Close modal

LOH of the Xrcc2 marker was seen in 25% of sham-irradiated mammary tumors from Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice, and 23% of X-irradiated mammary tumors showed LOH or homozygous loss (Fig. 1A). Xrcc2 was retained in all intestinal tumors from Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice (Fig. 1B).

Homozygous loss of Apc was identified in 14% of mammary tumors from X-irradiated Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice that had also lost one or both copies of Xrcc2. Apc was retained in all other mammary tumors (Fig. 1A). LOH of Apc in intestinal tumors was similar for both Apcmin/+ Xrcc2 genotypes (Fig. 1B).

The marker for Dcc (D18mit186) was the most commonly lost chromosome 18 marker in mammary and intestinal tumors (Fig. 1A and B). Loss of all chromosome 18 markers was seen in approximately 23% of intestinal tumors from sham- and X-irradiated Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice, in only one intestinal tumor (4%) from sham-irradiated Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice (Fig. 1B), and in none of the mammary tumors screened (Fig. 1A).

We have noted in Introduction that the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in the HR damage response pathway, which led to the anticipation that other HR genes might play a role in the suppression of certain types of cancer. Very recently, analyses of germline mutations of RAD51C in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees have established this HR repair gene as a cancer susceptibility gene (18). A marginally significant association of breast cancer susceptibility has also been found with a rare variant of XRCC2 (19, 20), as well as a potential link to ionizing radiation exposure (21). Earlier studies using Brca1 heterozygous knockout mice showed small increases in incidence of mammary tumors when Trp53 was also compromised, and this was further increased by irradiation (22). Similarly, we found that Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice showed an increased incidence of mammary tumors after irradiation when compared with Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice, although the spontaneous frequency in the two genotypes also varied (see below). The main type of mammary tumor found in the Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice was adenocarcinoma with squamous cell differentiation; similarly, this type of tumor was found in Brca1- or Brca2-compromised mice (23, 24). These data suggest that Xrcc2 may act as a tumor suppressor following radiation damage, but in parallel to studies of mouse mutants of the Brca genes (25, 26), further development of conditional and tissue-specific mouse Xrcc2 mutants would be required to support this finding.

The reduction in spontaneous incidence of mammary cancers in the Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice relative to the Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice, which was not significantly different unless supplementary mice were included in the analysis, was surprising given the role of Xrcc2 in the repair of DNA damage and the increase in spontaneous adenomas in Apcmin/+ mice carrying the Blm mutation (9). However, haploinsufficiency of Xrcc2 showed no life shortening in Xrcc2+/−p53−/− mice compared with Xrcc2+/+p53−/− littermates, indicating that the tumor incidence was similar (27). Although chance or genetic background may have played a role in our result, the small reduction in the spontaneous incidence of intestinal adenomas is consistent with it (Table 2). Why should the spontaneous incidence of cancer reduce while the X-ray–induced incidence increases with Xrcc2 hemizygosity? It seems unlikely that this difference is simply due to an overall reduction in mitotic recombination (including interhomologue recombination potentially leading to LOH) because this should similarly affect both spontaneous and X-ray–induced events. However, it is likely that the misrepair of a subset of spontaneous DNA damage contributes to cancer formation, and this damage type may differ from the damage induced by radiation. Obviously, the level of DNA damage will be much higher in irradiated than in unirradiated mice, and whereas it is expected that damage repair in general will be reduced in mice with compromised HR repair functions, little is known about the misrepair of different damage types in these circumstances. It is therefore possible that in the Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice, a decreased incidence of misrepair of a subset of spontaneous damage may occur while increased misrepair of radiation damage arises, due partly to the utilization of the nonhomologous end joining pathway.

The data for mammary and intestinal tumor multiplicity in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice give an indication that Xrcc2 deficiency may differentially modify mechanisms of tumor initiation and/or progression following X-irradiation in different tissues. The fold increase in mammary tumor multiplicity following X-irradiation was significantly greater than the fold increase in intestinal tumor multiplicity for the same genotype (t test, P < 0.001). This suggests that HR has a greater role in the repair of X-ray–induced DSB in mammary than in intestinal tissue. Tissue-, region-, or age-specific effects following ionizing irradiation have been shown for different loci in mouse models previously (2831).

In addition to tissue differences in tumor multiplicity determined by Xrcc2 deficiency, the LOH data suggest differences in the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis between tissue types. LOH analysis identified loss of the functional copy of Xrcc2 in mammary tumors, but not in intestinal tumors, from Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice, indicating that the role of Xrcc2 may differ in the two tissue types. Furthermore, homozygous loss of Apc was only seen in mammary tumors from X-irradiated Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− mice that had also lost Xrcc2 function, suggesting that lack of Xrcc2 function influences efficiency of DNA repair on chromosome 18 following X-irradiation in mammary tissue. Intestinal tumors, however, showed a higher frequency of loss of all chromosome 18 markers in Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/− compared with Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ mice, indicating that Xrcc2 heterozygosity leads to a difference in HR-mediated LOH or possible nondisjunction (32), and further suggesting that there are tissue preferences for the molecular mechanisms that operate in Xrcc2-deficient mice.

To summarize, Xrcc2 hemizygosity on an Apcmin/+ background has a spontaneous tumor risk–modifying effect, reducing mammary and intestinal tumorigenesis and increasing radiation risk compared with the Apcmin/+ Xrcc2+/+ genotype. Additionally, Xrcc2 hemizygosity seems to show some tissue preference–modifying effect, shown by a significantly greater increase in radiation-induced mammary tumorigenesis.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

We thank Kevin Whitehill for animal husbandry and Dr. Rosie Finnon for assistance with GM regulations and risk assessment.

Grant Support: EC RISC RAD contract FI6R-CT-2003-508842.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Mullenders
L
,
Atkinson
M
,
Paretzke
H
,
Sabatier
L
,
Bouffler
S
. 
Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2009
;
9
:
596
604
.
2
Deans
B
,
Griffin
CS
,
Maconochie
M
,
Thacker
J
. 
Xrcc2 is required for genetic stability, embryonic neurogenesis and viability in mice
.
EMBO J
2000
;
19
:
6675
85
.
3
O'Regan
P
,
Wilson
C
,
Townsend
S
,
Thacker
J
. 
XRCC2 is a nuclear RAD51-like protein required for damage-dependent RAD51 focus formation without the need for ATP binding
.
J Biol Chem
2001
;
276
:
22148
53
.
4
Venkitaraman
AR
. 
Functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the biological response to DNA damage
.
J Cell Sci
2001
;
114
:
3591
8
.
5
Jasin
M
. 
Homologous repair of DNA damage and tumorigenesis: the BRCA connection
.
Oncogene
2002
;
21
:
8981
93
.
6
Anglian Breast Cancer Study Group
. 
Prevalence and penetrance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population based series of breast cancer cases
.
Br J Cancer
2000
;
83
:
1301
8
.
7
Antoniou
AC
,
Pharoah
PDP
,
McMullen
G
,
Day
NE
,
Ponder
BAJ
,
Easton
DF
. 
Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population based study
.
Genet Epidemiol
2001
;
21
:
1
18
.
8
Braybrooke
JP
,
Li
J-L
,
Wu
L
,
Caple
F
,
Benson
FE
,
Hickson
ID
. 
Functional interaction between the Bloom's syndrome helicase and the RAD51 paralog, RAD51L3 (RAD51D)
.
J Biol Chem
2003
;
278
:
48357
66
.
9
Goss
KH
,
Risinger
MA
,
Kordich
JJ
, et al
. 
Enhanced tumor formation in mice heterozygous for Blm mutation
.
Science
2002
;
297
:
2051
3
.
10
Moser
AR
,
Pitot
HC
,
Dove
WF
. 
A dominant mutation that predisposes to multiple intestinal neoplasia in the mouse
.
Science
1990
;
247
:
322
4
.
11
Moser
AR
,
Mattes
EM
,
Dove
WF
,
Lindstrom
MJ
,
Haag
JD
,
Gould
MN
. 
ApcMin, a mutation in the murine Apc gene, predisposes to mammary carcinomas and focal alveolar hyperplasias
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1993
;
90
:
8977
81
.
12
Trasler
J
,
Deng
L
,
Melnyk
S
, et al
. 
Impact of Dnmt1 deficiency, with and without low folate diets, on tumor numbers and DNA methylation in Min mice
.
Carcinogenesis
2003
;
24
:
39
45
.
13
Cho
NL
,
Javid
SH
,
Carothers
AM
,
Redston
M
,
Bertagnolli
MM
. 
Estrogen receptors α and β are inhibitory modifiers of Apc-dependent tumorigenesis in the proximal colon of Min/+ mice
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
2366
72
.
14
Haines
J
,
Johnson
V
,
Pack
K
, et al
. 
Genetic basis of variation in adenoma multiplicity in Apcmin/+ Mom1S mice
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2005
;
102
:
2868
73
.
15
Luongo
C
,
Moser
AR
,
Gledhill
S
,
Dove
WF
. 
Loss of Apc+ in intestinal adenomas from Min mice
.
Cancer Res
1994
;
54
:
5947
52
.
16
Adam
J
,
Deans
B
,
Thacker
J
. 
A role for Xrcc2 in the early stages of mouse development
.
DNA Repair (Amst)
2007
;
6
:
224
34
.
17
Haines
J
,
Dunford
R
,
Moody
J
,
Ellender
M
,
Cox
R
,
Silver
A
. 
Loss of heterozygosity in spontaneous and X-ray-induced intestinal tumors arising in F1 hybrid min mice: evidence for sequential loss of APC(+) and Dpc4 in tumor development
.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
2000
;
28
:
387
94
.
18
Meindl
A
,
Hellebrand
H
,
Wiek
C
, et al
. 
Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene
.
Nat Genet
2010
;
42
:
410
4
.
19
Rafii
S
,
O'Regan
P
,
Xinarianos
G
, et al
. 
A potential role for the XRCC2 R188H polymorphic site in DNA-damage repair and breast cancer
.
Hum Mol Genet
2002
;
11
:
1433
8
.
20
Kuschel
B
,
Auranen
A
,
McBride
S
, et al
. 
Variants in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility
.
Hum Mol Genet
2002
;
11
:
1399
407
.
21
Millikan
RC
,
Player
JS
,
Decotret
AR
,
Tse
CK
,
Keku
T
. 
Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, medical exposure to ionizing radiation, and breast cancer risk
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
;
14
:
2326
34
.
22
Cressman
VL
,
Backlund
DC
,
Hicks
EM
,
Gowen
LC
,
Godfrey
V
,
Koller
BH
. 
Mammary tumor formation in p53- and BRCA1-deficient mice
.
Cell Growth Differ
1999
;
10
:
1
10
.
23
Ludwig
T
,
Fisher
P
,
Ganesan
S
,
Efstratiadis
A
. 
Tumorigenesis in mice carrying a truncating Brca1 mutation
.
Genes Dev
2001
;
15
:
1188
93
.
24
McAllister
KA
,
Bennett
LM
,
Houle
CD
, et al
. 
Cancer susceptibility of mice with a homozygous deletion in the COOH-terminal domain of the Brca2 gene
.
Cancer Res
2002
;
62
:
990
4
.
25
Liu
X
,
Holstege
H
,
van der Gulden
H
, et al
. 
Somatic loss of BRCA1 and p53 in mice induces mammary tumors with features of human BRCA1-mutated basal-like breast cancer
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2007
;
104
:
12111
6
.
26
Herschkowitz
JI
,
Simin
K
,
Weigman
VJ
, et al
. 
Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors
.
Genome Biol
2007
;
8
:
R76
.
27
Orii
KE
,
Lee
Y
,
Kondo
N
,
McKinnon
PJ
. 
Selective utilization of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways during nervous system development
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2006
;
103
:
10017
22
.
28
van der Houven van Oordt
CW
,
Smits
R
,
Williamson
SL
, et al
. 
Intestinal and extra-intestinal tumor multiplicities in the Apc1638N mouse model after exposure to X-rays
.
Carcinogenesis
1997
;
18
:
2197
203
.
29
Degg
NL
,
Weil
MM
,
Edwards
A
, et al
. 
Adenoma multiplicity in irradiated Apc(Min) mice is modified by chromosome 16 segments from BALB/c
.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
2361
3
.
30
Elahi
E
,
Suraweera
N
,
Volikos
E
, et al
. 
Five quantitative trait loci control radiation-induced adenoma multiplicity in Mom1R Apcmin/+ mice
.
PLoS One
2009
;
4
:
e4388
.
31
Imaoka
T
,
Okamoto
M
,
Nishimura
M
, et al
. 
Mammary tumorigenesis in ApcMin/+ mice is enhanced by X irradiation with a characteristic age dependence
.
Radiat Res
2006
;
165
:
165
73
.
32
Griffin
CS
,
Simpson
PJ
,
Wilson
CR
,
Thacker
J
. 
Mammalian recombination-repair genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 promote correct chromosome segregation
.
Nat Cell Biol
2000
;
2
:
757
61
.