Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common cancer arising from the kidney in adults, with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) representing the majority of all RCCs. Expression of a human HIF1α triple-mutant (P402A, P564A, and N803A) construct in the proximal tubule cells of C57BL/6 mice [TRAnsgenic model of Cancer of the Kidney (TRACK); ref. 1] mimics the histologic changes found in early stage human ccRCC. To better understand the genomic landscape, a high-throughput sequence analysis was performed with cDNA libraries (RNAseq) derived from TRACK transgenic positive (TG+) kidney cortex along with human ccRCC transcripts from the Oncomine and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases. Importantly, the expression profiles of TRACK TG+ kidneys show significant similarities with those observed in human ccRCC, including increased expression of genes involved in glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Some of the transcripts overexpressed in both the TRACK mouse model and human ccRCC include ANKRD37, CA9, EGLN3, HK2, NDUFA4L2, and SLC16A3. These data suggest that constitutive activation of HIF1α in kidney proximal tubule cells transcriptionally reprograms the regulation of metabolic pathways in the kidney and that HIF1α is a major contributor to the altered metabolism observed in human ccRCC.

Implications: TRACK (GGT-HIF1αM3) kidney mRNA profiles show similarities to human ccRCC transcriptome and phenotypes associated with the Warburg effect. Mol Cancer Res; 13(5); 870–8. ©2015 AACR.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common primary cancer arising from the kidney in adults, with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) representing approximately 75% of all RCCs (2, 3). Histologically, ccRCC cells are characterized by a transparent cytoplasm caused by deposition of glycogen, phospholipids, and neutral lipids, including cholesterol esters (4, 5). This phenotype suggests that there are metabolic changes in ccRCC cells, resulting in abnormal deposition of glycogen and lipids. Seven genes commonly mutated in human kidney cancer, including VHL (NCBI Gene ID: 7428), MET (4233), FLCN (201163), TSC1 (7248), TSC2 (7249), FH (2271), and SDH (6390, 6391, and 6392), have been identified to date (6). Interestingly, all seven genes are involved in the regulation of metabolic pathways (6). These data support the theory that kidney cancer is a metabolic disease (6, 7).

Loss of expression or mutation of the von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) tumor suppressor gene is found in hereditary and most sporadic ccRCCs (2, 8). This suggests an etiological role for VHL gene loss in renal carcinogenesis. However, the exact pathway by which loss of VHL leads to ccRCC has not been definitively elucidated. The best studied and likely most important effect of VHL loss is the resulting increase in expression of the alpha subunits of hypoxia-inducible factors 1 (HIF1α) and 2 (HIF2α; refs. 9–11). Increased expression of these two transcription factors has been proposed as a key step in ccRCC carcinogenesis (refs. 9, 10; for review, see ref. 12). We previously generated the murine TRAnsgenic model of Cancer of the Kidney (TRACK) that expresses a triple-mutant (P402A, P564A, and N803A) human HIF1α construct in murine proximal tubule cells (PTCs) and showed that this model mimics the histologic alterations found in early stage human ccRCC (1). The cellular histologies displayed in TRACK mice are also similar to those observed in the kidneys of individuals with VHL disease, including areas of distorted tubular structure, cells with clear cytoplasm and increased glycogen and lipid deposition, multiple renal cysts, and areas of multifocal ccRCC (1).

To delineate the gene expression pattern in TRACK transgenic positive (TG+) kidneys, we sequenced the entire transcriptome of the TRACK TG+ kidney cortex by high-throughput sequencing of cDNA libraries (RNAseq) and compared it with both the gene expression profile in WT/transgenic negative (TG) kidneys and the gene expression profile observed in sporadic human ccRCC using the Oncomine database (Compendia Bioscience) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We report that the pattern of gene expression in TRACK TG+ kidneys is similar to that of human ccRCC, including expression of transcripts associated with glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, the pentose phosphate pathway, and the lipid metabolism pathway. These data provide evidence that constitutive activation of HIF1α in kidney PTCs transcriptionally reprograms the regulation of metabolic pathways in a manner similar to that observed in human ccRCC.

Animals

TRACK TG+ and TG mice were housed five per cage in a 12-hour light/dark cycle in the Research Animal Resource Center of Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC). The care and use of animals in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of WCMC.

Whole transcriptome RNA sequencing

Total RNA from one thin, outer slice of kidney cortex per kidney was used for whole transcriptome sequencing. Total RNA was extracted using mini-RNAeasy columns (Qiagen). The complete transcriptomes of kidney cortices from three γ-HIF1αM3 TRACK (#43 line) TG+ and three γ-HIF1αM3 TG male C57BL/6 mice (about 13 months old) were sequenced (51-bp single-end reads) on an Illumina HiSeq2000 Sequencer following standard protocols in the Genomics Resources Core Facility at WCMC. Three lanes were used to sequence all 12 samples (4 samples/lane, 2 kidney samples/mouse). The TRACK RNAseq data have been deposited in the GEO database (accession no. GSE54390).

Data analysis

Data analysis was mainly performed with the Tuxedo tools software (13). In brief, the RNAseq reads were first aligned to the Mus musculus genome (UCSC version mm10) using Tophat version 2.0.6 (13, 14). The aligned reads were assembled into transcripts, their abundance was estimated, and they were tested for differential expression using Cufflinks version 2.1.1 (13, 15). CummeRbund version 2.0.0 (13) was used to analyze the differential expression analysis results. To identify pathways changed in the TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys, functional enrichment analysis was performed using the goseq package in R software (16). A stringent threshold in selecting differentially expressed (DE) genes (fold change > 3, q < 0.01) was used to reduce the false positive ratio. Heatmaps of log2 transformed RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase per Million mapped reads) values were created in R using the heatmap.2 command of the gplots package.

Human ccRCC data retrieval

Human ccRCC gene expression changes were retrieved from Oncomine (Compendia Bioscience) by combining five different datasets of human ccRCC patient samples (17–20). The same five Oncomine datasets of Cancer versus Normal Analysis of ccRCC that we used in the γ-HIF2αM3 TG+ RNAseq analysis (21) were used in this analysis.

Human ccRCC mRNA data were downloaded from TCGA (http://cancergenome.nih.gov/). Only tumor patient data with matched normal and normal patient data with matched tumor were downloaded. All data satisfying this requirement were downloaded, including a total of 470 tumor samples and 68 normal samples. Differential expression between ccRCC and normal kidneys was calculated using the downloaded RPKM values. Statistical analyses were performed by the Student t test followed by FDR adjustment (q value). Statistical significance was defined as q < 0.05.

Expression of a mutated, constitutively active HIF1α in the PTCs of the γ-HIF1αM3 TRACK mice results in early stage tumors morphologically similar to human ccRCC (1). To identify changes in gene expression associated with ccRCC carcinogenesis, we examined the whole transcriptome from cells in TRACK kidney cortex slices compared with TG controls. At the time of sacrifice (∼13 months old), about 50% of the proximal tubules in TRACK mice show clear cell abnormalities. However, further abnormalities, e.g., carcinoma in situ, are not ubiquitously seen in the kidney cortex. The average number of reads per sample was approximately 45.6 million, and approximately 96% of reads mapped to the Mus musculus genome (Supplementary Table S1). A scatter plot of the RPKM values of TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys shows that the majority of transcripts evaluated display no change between these two samples (Fig. 1A), but there are transcripts that show increased or decreased levels in the TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys (Fig. 1A). Changes in some of these transcripts have been confirmed by semiquantitative RT-PCR (ref. 1 and Supplementary Fig. S1). Principal component analysis shows that there is a clear distinction between TRACK TG+ and TG kidneys (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Global plotting of TRACK TG+ versus TG kidney RNAseq result. A scatter plot of the RPKM values between TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys (A) and a principal component analysis result (B) are shown. The majority of transcripts show no differences in levels between TRACK TG+ versus TG. There are transcripts that show increased (dots in the bottom right part of A) or decreased (dots in the top left part of A) levels in the TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys. Principal component analysis shows that there is a clear distinction between TRACK TG+ and TG kidneys (B).

Figure 1.

Global plotting of TRACK TG+ versus TG kidney RNAseq result. A scatter plot of the RPKM values between TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys (A) and a principal component analysis result (B) are shown. The majority of transcripts show no differences in levels between TRACK TG+ versus TG. There are transcripts that show increased (dots in the bottom right part of A) or decreased (dots in the top left part of A) levels in the TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys. Principal component analysis shows that there is a clear distinction between TRACK TG+ and TG kidneys (B).

Close modal

We have shown that the high expression of CA-IX, Glut1, and VEGF proteins in the TRACK kidneys is mainly localized in the clear cell proximal tubules (1). Here, we also used immunohistochemistry to examine the protein levels of NDUFA4L2, SLC16A3, and HK2, three of the top genes overexpressed in TRACK kidneys by RNAseq. We detected high expression of NDUFA4L2, SLC16A3, and HK2 primarily in the clear cell proximal tubules (Supplementary Fig. S2). These transcripts are also highly expressed in human ccRCC (see next section).

Certain metabolic pathways are overrepresented among DE genes in TRACK TG+ kidneys

We first examined the overrepresentation of 274 DE genes (259 overexpressed and 15 underexpressed) in KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes). KEGG is a database resource for understanding high-level functions and utilities of biologic systems (22, 23). The KEGG PATHWAY is a collection of manually drawn pathway maps of molecular interactions and reaction networks. The 274 DE genes are overrepresented in 5 KEGG pathways (q < 0.05, top 10 pathways are shown in Table 1). Interestingly, seven of the 10 KEGG pathways are related to metabolism, and five of these seven KEGG pathways have the lowest P values in the list (Table 1), indicating that metabolic changes are the most prominent changes in TRACK TG+ kidneys. The most significant KEGG pathway is mmu00010: glycolysis/gluconeogenesis (P = 3.87E−06). The pentose phosphate and PPAR signaling pathways are also emphasized.

Table 1.

Ten most significant KEGG pathways that are overrepresented among the DE genes

P valueq valueKEGG IDKEGG pathway
3.87E−06 8.70E−04 mmu00010 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis 
2.27E−05 2.55E−03 mmu00051 Fructose and mannose metabolism 
2.36E−04 1.77E−02 mmu03320 PPAR signaling pathway 
6.70E−04 3.77E−02 mmu00052 Galactose metabolism 
8.91E−04 4.01E−02 mmu00030 Pentose phosphate pathway 
1.40E−03 5.24E−02 mmu04060 Cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction 
2.59E−03 8.32E−02 mmu00670 One carbon pool by folate 
3.50E−03 8.97E−02 mmu01100 Metabolic pathways 
3.59E−03 8.97E−02 mmu00750 Vitamin B6 metabolism 
4.27E−03 9.60E−02 mmu04672 Intestinal immune network for IgA production 
P valueq valueKEGG IDKEGG pathway
3.87E−06 8.70E−04 mmu00010 Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis 
2.27E−05 2.55E−03 mmu00051 Fructose and mannose metabolism 
2.36E−04 1.77E−02 mmu03320 PPAR signaling pathway 
6.70E−04 3.77E−02 mmu00052 Galactose metabolism 
8.91E−04 4.01E−02 mmu00030 Pentose phosphate pathway 
1.40E−03 5.24E−02 mmu04060 Cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction 
2.59E−03 8.32E−02 mmu00670 One carbon pool by folate 
3.50E−03 8.97E−02 mmu01100 Metabolic pathways 
3.59E−03 8.97E−02 mmu00750 Vitamin B6 metabolism 
4.27E−03 9.60E−02 mmu04672 Intestinal immune network for IgA production 

We also examined the overrepresentation of DE genes in the Gene Ontology (GO) consortium (24). The GO covers three domains: cellular component, molecular function, and biologic process, and we focused on the biologic process domain. The 274 DE genes are overrepresented in 98 GO biologic process ontologies (q < 0.05; Supplementary Table S2). Similar to the KEGG pathway analysis, seven of the top ten overrepresented GO ontologies are metabolism related, e.g., glucose metabolic process (P = 3.57E−10), glucose catabolic process (P = 2.36E−08).

Metabolic changes in ccRCC can be explained by gene expression changes observed in TRACK TG+ kidneys

The most significant metabolic change that occurs in ccRCC, and probably in most cancers, is the shift from oxidative phosphorylation of glucose to glycolysis under normoxic conditions, known as the Warburg effect (25). We examined the transcript levels of key genes involved in glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in the TRACK TG+ kidneys versus TG kidneys (Fig. 2). Most glycolysis gene transcripts are increased in the TRACK TG+ kidneys compared with the TG kidneys, e.g., hexokinase, phosphofructokinase, and pyruvate kinase. TCA cycle genes do not show large decreases in transcript levels in TRACK TG+ kidneys compared with TG kidneys (fold change between 0.8 and 0.9), presumably as a result of the presence of nontransformed cells in the cortex samples. Transcripts encoding pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, the enzyme that inactivates pyruvate dehydrogenase through phosphorylation (26), are increased in the TRACK TG+ kidneys compared with TG kidneys (fold change = 7.8). Inactivation of pyruvate dehydrogenase by pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase prevents the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA (26), which is oxidized in mitochondria in the TCA cycle. The lower level of acetyl-CoA thereby inhibits the TCA cycle. Consistent with this, the transcript for lactate dehydrogenase, which converts pyruvate to lactate, is increased in the TRACK TG+ relative to TG kidneys. All of these changes indicate an important role for HIF1α in changing the metabolism of kidney cells to glycolysis under normoxic conditions. Heatmaps created from genes involved in glycolysis and in the TCA cycle also confirmed these changes (Fig. 3).

Figure 2.

Transcript changes for glycolysis and TCA cycle transcripts in TRACK+/TG kidney cells. Simplified pathway maps of glycolysis (A) and the TCA cycle (B) with mRNA changes are shown. Un-boxed inputs are the gene names. Genes that are overexpressed (fold change > 2) in the TRACK TG+ kidneys are indicated by ↑, whereas genes that are underexpressed (fold change < 0.9) in the TRACK TG+ kidneys are indicated by ↓. Because the underexpressed genes are potentially underestimated in the RNAseq results, the fold change threshold for underexpressed genes is set at <0.90. *, both isocitrate dehydrogenase and succinate dehydrogenase complexes contain more than 2 transcripts that are significantly decreased in TRACK TG+ kidneys. The fold change and q value shown are the least significant ones in these two complexes.

Figure 2.

Transcript changes for glycolysis and TCA cycle transcripts in TRACK+/TG kidney cells. Simplified pathway maps of glycolysis (A) and the TCA cycle (B) with mRNA changes are shown. Un-boxed inputs are the gene names. Genes that are overexpressed (fold change > 2) in the TRACK TG+ kidneys are indicated by ↑, whereas genes that are underexpressed (fold change < 0.9) in the TRACK TG+ kidneys are indicated by ↓. Because the underexpressed genes are potentially underestimated in the RNAseq results, the fold change threshold for underexpressed genes is set at <0.90. *, both isocitrate dehydrogenase and succinate dehydrogenase complexes contain more than 2 transcripts that are significantly decreased in TRACK TG+ kidneys. The fold change and q value shown are the least significant ones in these two complexes.

Close modal
Figure 3.

Heatmaps of transcripts encoded by genes involved in glycolysis and the TCA cycle, TRACK+/TG−. Heatmaps of genes involved in glycolysis (A) and the TCA cycle (B). Log2-transformed RPKM values of 61 and 31 genes involved in glycolysis and TCA cycle pathways were used to create these heatmaps. The animal identity is indicated by the colored rows on top of the heatmap matrix. The magenta color indicates TRACK TG+ mice. The yellow color indicates TRACK TG mice. The blue color in the heatmap matrix indicates relatively decreased transcript levels, and the red color indicates relatively increased transcript levels compared with the mean transcript level for each gene. Brighter blue or red color indicates a greater fold change. The glycolysis genes listed in Fig. 2 show increased transcript levels in the TRACK TG+ kidneys (red color) compared with TG kidneys (A). The TCA cycle genes generally show decreased transcript levels in the TRACK TG+ kidneys (blue colored) compared with TG kidneys (B).

Figure 3.

Heatmaps of transcripts encoded by genes involved in glycolysis and the TCA cycle, TRACK+/TG−. Heatmaps of genes involved in glycolysis (A) and the TCA cycle (B). Log2-transformed RPKM values of 61 and 31 genes involved in glycolysis and TCA cycle pathways were used to create these heatmaps. The animal identity is indicated by the colored rows on top of the heatmap matrix. The magenta color indicates TRACK TG+ mice. The yellow color indicates TRACK TG mice. The blue color in the heatmap matrix indicates relatively decreased transcript levels, and the red color indicates relatively increased transcript levels compared with the mean transcript level for each gene. Brighter blue or red color indicates a greater fold change. The glycolysis genes listed in Fig. 2 show increased transcript levels in the TRACK TG+ kidneys (red color) compared with TG kidneys (A). The TCA cycle genes generally show decreased transcript levels in the TRACK TG+ kidneys (blue colored) compared with TG kidneys (B).

Close modal

The TRACK/HIF1α kidney transcriptome shows similarities with the human ccRCC transcriptome

Using a fold-expression change of >2 or < 0.5 and q < 0.05, 655 genes showed increased mRNA levels and 55 genes showed decreased mRNA levels in TRACK TG+ kidney samples compared with the TG control kidney cortex samples. As expected, several HIF1α target genes were highly expressed at the transcript level in TRACK kidney samples, including hexokinase 2 (HK2, 70X), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX, 9.3X), glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1 or Slc2a1, 4.8X) etc., which were confirmed by semiquantitative RT-PCR (ref. 1; Supplementary Fig. S1).

We first compared the expression profiles of human ccRCC, as reported in the Oncomine database (27), with our Track TG+ expression profile. We identified the 20 genes most highly overexpressed and 20 genes most highly underexpressed at the RNA level in human ccRCC by combining five different datasets of human ccRCC patient samples (17–20). The total number of ccRCC patients in all five data sets is 175. Five of the 20 genes most highly overexpressed in human ccRCC were similarly expressed in TRACK TG+ kidneys (fold change > 2; Table 2): NDUFA4L2, C7ORF68, EGLN3, SLC16A3, and CA-IX. None of the 20 genes highly underexpressed in human ccRCC shows significant downregulation in our TRACK TG+ kidneys (fold change < 0.5; Table 2). However, the number of genes that shows reduced expression in TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys is most likely an underestimate because only 30% to 50% of PTs in TRACK TG+ kidneys demonstrate morphologic changes (1).

Table 2.

Twenty genes that show the highest fold increases or decreases in transcript levels in human ccRCC compared with normal human kidney from the Oncomine database

Oncomine median rankOncomine P valueOncomine median fold changeGeneFold change TRACK TG+/TGP valueq value
Increased in ccRCC 
 7 5.55E−23 53.9 NDUFA4L2 67.92514 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 14 3.91E−13 16.5 C7ORF68 2.824433 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 14 2.82E−11 12.5 ENO2 1.668066 1e−04 5.27e−04 
 16 9.50E−19 12.2 EGLN3 30.98842 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 21 1.73E−14 11.0 IGFBP3 1.572941 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 25 1.23E−10 12.2 SPAG4 1.174346 
 28 2.83E−17 15.0 AHNAK2 Not found   
 30 3.79E−7 8.4 TMCC1 1.04368 0.60145 0.754576 
 36 2.19E−16 8.6 RNASET2 1.048042 0.62605 0.774746 
 38 1.93E−13 8.2 CAV1 1.385522 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 41 2.54E−13 7.1 SLC16A3 114.6301 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 46 6.8E−10 4.6 LCP2 1.774849 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 47 6.92E−16 18.0 CA-IX 9.340484 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 48 7.84E−10 15.4 NETO2 1.513053 
 49 8.25E−10 2.6 IFNGR2 1.242553 1e−04 5.27e−04 
 57 3.12E−15 4.9 ABCG1 1.500543 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 57 1.37E−12 2.3 UBE2L6 1.62286 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 59 1.59E−10 3.2 DIAPH2 1.001564 0.97995 0.988178 
 59 1.50E−9 2.4 ALDOA 1.840662 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 59 1.69E−8 3.4 SLC15A4 1.107461 0.28295 0.453989 
Decreased in ccRCC 
 4 1.41E−019 −283.867 UMOD 1.038859 0.5042 0.675799 
 4 2.63E−019 −44.184 SFRP1 1.029511 0.5378 0.705209 
 22 1.38E−012 −6.616 TFCP2L1 1.343029 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 36 1.40E−006 −72.014 SLC12A1 1.020973 0.9791 0.987744 
 41 9.48E−011 −14.893 GATA3 1.078646 0.2454 0.410806 
 44 3.25E−012 −51.115 CLDN8 1.038964 0.44125 0.618216 
 44 6.68E−011 −20.454 LPPR1 No mouse homolog   
 45 2.75E−013 −10.533 ALDH6A1 0.7895559 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 45 3.32E−012 −223.376 CALB1 1.019128 0.69485 0.821341 
 47 4.80E−013 −8.431 DCN 2.206112 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 51 3.67E−010 −47.197 ATP6V0A4 0.7976494 1e−04 5.27e−04 
 51 2.65E−006 −172.954 KNG1 1.283858 0.10715 0.217875 
 54 1.82E−012 −34.705 ALDOB HIDATA 
 56 2.08E−012 −7.697 TCF21 1.3445 4e−04 1.86e−03 
 57 3.71E−006 −17.206 MAL 1.11156 0.02155 0.0601907 
 61 7.17E−010 −16.262 PTH1R 0.7618173 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 65 1.17E−009 −3.402 GABARAPL3 No mouse homolog   
 68 1.45E−009 −3.413 PROSAPIP1 0.6268898 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 77 2.44E−009 −50.953 KCNJ1 1.030991 0.51935 0.689311 
 79 1.87E−011 −17.438 ERBB4 1.001307 0.9846 0.990418 
Oncomine median rankOncomine P valueOncomine median fold changeGeneFold change TRACK TG+/TGP valueq value
Increased in ccRCC 
 7 5.55E−23 53.9 NDUFA4L2 67.92514 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 14 3.91E−13 16.5 C7ORF68 2.824433 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 14 2.82E−11 12.5 ENO2 1.668066 1e−04 5.27e−04 
 16 9.50E−19 12.2 EGLN3 30.98842 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 21 1.73E−14 11.0 IGFBP3 1.572941 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 25 1.23E−10 12.2 SPAG4 1.174346 
 28 2.83E−17 15.0 AHNAK2 Not found   
 30 3.79E−7 8.4 TMCC1 1.04368 0.60145 0.754576 
 36 2.19E−16 8.6 RNASET2 1.048042 0.62605 0.774746 
 38 1.93E−13 8.2 CAV1 1.385522 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 41 2.54E−13 7.1 SLC16A3 114.6301 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 46 6.8E−10 4.6 LCP2 1.774849 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 47 6.92E−16 18.0 CA-IX 9.340484 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 48 7.84E−10 15.4 NETO2 1.513053 
 49 8.25E−10 2.6 IFNGR2 1.242553 1e−04 5.27e−04 
 57 3.12E−15 4.9 ABCG1 1.500543 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 57 1.37E−12 2.3 UBE2L6 1.62286 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 59 1.59E−10 3.2 DIAPH2 1.001564 0.97995 0.988178 
 59 1.50E−9 2.4 ALDOA 1.840662 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 59 1.69E−8 3.4 SLC15A4 1.107461 0.28295 0.453989 
Decreased in ccRCC 
 4 1.41E−019 −283.867 UMOD 1.038859 0.5042 0.675799 
 4 2.63E−019 −44.184 SFRP1 1.029511 0.5378 0.705209 
 22 1.38E−012 −6.616 TFCP2L1 1.343029 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 36 1.40E−006 −72.014 SLC12A1 1.020973 0.9791 0.987744 
 41 9.48E−011 −14.893 GATA3 1.078646 0.2454 0.410806 
 44 3.25E−012 −51.115 CLDN8 1.038964 0.44125 0.618216 
 44 6.68E−011 −20.454 LPPR1 No mouse homolog   
 45 2.75E−013 −10.533 ALDH6A1 0.7895559 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 45 3.32E−012 −223.376 CALB1 1.019128 0.69485 0.821341 
 47 4.80E−013 −8.431 DCN 2.206112 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 51 3.67E−010 −47.197 ATP6V0A4 0.7976494 1e−04 5.27e−04 
 51 2.65E−006 −172.954 KNG1 1.283858 0.10715 0.217875 
 54 1.82E−012 −34.705 ALDOB HIDATA 
 56 2.08E−012 −7.697 TCF21 1.3445 4e−04 1.86e−03 
 57 3.71E−006 −17.206 MAL 1.11156 0.02155 0.0601907 
 61 7.17E−010 −16.262 PTH1R 0.7618173 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 65 1.17E−009 −3.402 GABARAPL3 No mouse homolog   
 68 1.45E−009 −3.413 PROSAPIP1 0.6268898 5e−05 2.77e−04 
 77 2.44E−009 −50.953 KCNJ1 1.030991 0.51935 0.689311 
 79 1.87E−011 −17.438 ERBB4 1.001307 0.9846 0.990418 

NOTE: The list of the top 20 genes that show elevated or decreased transcript levels in human ccRCC was retrieved from Oncomine by combining five different datasets of human ccRCC patient samples, totaling 175 patients. These five datasets are the same as those discussed in ref. 21. The fold changes in mRNA levels in these genes in TRACK TG+ mice versus TG kidneys are listed.

We also compared the expression profiles of human ccRCC mRNA downloaded from the TCGA database with our Track TG+ expression profile. We identified the 20 genes most highly overexpressed and the 20 genes most highly underexpressed at the RNA level in human ccRCC from the TCGA data. Five of the 20 genes most highly overexpressed in human ccRCC were similarly expressed in TRACK TG+ kidneys (fold change > 2; Table 3). None of the 20 genes highly underexpressed in human ccRCC shows significant downregulation in our TRACK TG+ kidneys (fold change < 0.5; Table 3).

Table 3.

Twenty genes that show the highest fold increases or decreases in transcript levels in human ccRCC compared with normal human kidney from TCGA

TCGA q valueTCGA fold changeGeneFold change TRACK TG+/TGP valueq value
Increased in ccRCC 
 2.85E−02 140.62 HP 4.47 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 2.59E−10 81.87 GUCA2B 0.88 7.30E−03 2.41E−02 
 1.74E−122 54.30 CA9 9.34 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 6.09E−28 51.35 FABP7 0.82 1.47E−02 4.36E−02 
 1.21E−23 47.63 MCHR1 0.69 2.35E−03 9.01E−03 
 3.19E−02 45.56 HHATL 0.88 8.02E−02 1.73E−01 
 3.06E−105 44.88 NDUFA4L2 67.93 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 6.80E−48 44.07 HSF4 1.78 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 1.82E−45 34.72 KISS1R 1.06 9.80E−01 9.88E−01 
 9.17E−61 34.31 CYP2J2 0.93 8.85E−01 9.38E−01 
 2.65E−41 31.87 PNCK 1.71 8.10E−03 2.63E−02 
 2.15E−33 31.45 APOC1 1.62 4.45E−02 1.08E−01 
 5.89E−17 29.99 CD5L 0.39 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 2.20E−110 29.31 ANGPTL4 0.76 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 1.34E−94 28.73 COL23A1 1.34 2.23E−02 6.19E−02 
 2.92E−06 24.59 LBP 1.73 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 1.39E−91 21.66 ENPP3 0.99 9.10E−01 9.52E−01 
 7.13E−94 20.73 C7orf68 2.82 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 2.51E−26 19.66 KCNN1 0.78 1.07E−02 3.34E−02 
 5.94E−44 19.58 NXPH4 10.02 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
Decreased in ccRCC 
 9.67E−16 0.002 AQP2 1.260 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 3.20E−14 0.002 UMOD 1.039 5.04E−01 6.76E−01 
 5.23E−16 0.003 SLC12A1 1.021 9.79E−01 9.88E−01 
 5.73E−13 0.004 TMEM207 0.888 2.22E−01 3.80E−01 
 3.09E−11 0.005 FXYD4 1.055 4.58E−01 6.34E−01 
 6.23E−12 0.006 CALB1 1.019 6.95E−01 8.21E−01 
 2.95E−12 0.008 NPHS2 1.249 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 1.70E−18 0.009 DUSP9 1.043 5.90E−01 7.47E−01 
 1.18E−11 0.009 SOST 1.091 4.90E−01 6.64E−01 
 1.07E−20 0.013 KNG1 1.284 1.07E−01 2.18E−01 
 5.63E−21 0.013 HS6ST2 1.724 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 5.46E−12 0.014 DDN 1.071 3.69E−01 5.48E−01 
 3.20E−17 0.014 CLDN16 1.068 4.52E−01 6.29E−01 
 1.07E−24 0.015 KCNJ1 1.066 8.46E−01 9.18E−01 
 1.07E−24 0.015 KCNJ1 1.031 5.19E−01 6.89E−01 
 1.05E−13 0.015 ESRRB 0.884 4.01E−02 9.96E−02 
 6.04E−24 0.016 KCNJ10 1.113 2.36E−02 6.49E−02 
 1.22E−09 0.016 SLC22A8 0.549 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 4.49E−24 0.016 TFAP2B 1.055 3.23E−01 4.99E−01 
 3.08E−21 0.017 RALYL 1.488 2.81E−02 7.49E−02 
TCGA q valueTCGA fold changeGeneFold change TRACK TG+/TGP valueq value
Increased in ccRCC 
 2.85E−02 140.62 HP 4.47 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 2.59E−10 81.87 GUCA2B 0.88 7.30E−03 2.41E−02 
 1.74E−122 54.30 CA9 9.34 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 6.09E−28 51.35 FABP7 0.82 1.47E−02 4.36E−02 
 1.21E−23 47.63 MCHR1 0.69 2.35E−03 9.01E−03 
 3.19E−02 45.56 HHATL 0.88 8.02E−02 1.73E−01 
 3.06E−105 44.88 NDUFA4L2 67.93 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 6.80E−48 44.07 HSF4 1.78 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 1.82E−45 34.72 KISS1R 1.06 9.80E−01 9.88E−01 
 9.17E−61 34.31 CYP2J2 0.93 8.85E−01 9.38E−01 
 2.65E−41 31.87 PNCK 1.71 8.10E−03 2.63E−02 
 2.15E−33 31.45 APOC1 1.62 4.45E−02 1.08E−01 
 5.89E−17 29.99 CD5L 0.39 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 2.20E−110 29.31 ANGPTL4 0.76 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 1.34E−94 28.73 COL23A1 1.34 2.23E−02 6.19E−02 
 2.92E−06 24.59 LBP 1.73 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 1.39E−91 21.66 ENPP3 0.99 9.10E−01 9.52E−01 
 7.13E−94 20.73 C7orf68 2.82 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 2.51E−26 19.66 KCNN1 0.78 1.07E−02 3.34E−02 
 5.94E−44 19.58 NXPH4 10.02 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
Decreased in ccRCC 
 9.67E−16 0.002 AQP2 1.260 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 3.20E−14 0.002 UMOD 1.039 5.04E−01 6.76E−01 
 5.23E−16 0.003 SLC12A1 1.021 9.79E−01 9.88E−01 
 5.73E−13 0.004 TMEM207 0.888 2.22E−01 3.80E−01 
 3.09E−11 0.005 FXYD4 1.055 4.58E−01 6.34E−01 
 6.23E−12 0.006 CALB1 1.019 6.95E−01 8.21E−01 
 2.95E−12 0.008 NPHS2 1.249 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 1.70E−18 0.009 DUSP9 1.043 5.90E−01 7.47E−01 
 1.18E−11 0.009 SOST 1.091 4.90E−01 6.64E−01 
 1.07E−20 0.013 KNG1 1.284 1.07E−01 2.18E−01 
 5.63E−21 0.013 HS6ST2 1.724 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 5.46E−12 0.014 DDN 1.071 3.69E−01 5.48E−01 
 3.20E−17 0.014 CLDN16 1.068 4.52E−01 6.29E−01 
 1.07E−24 0.015 KCNJ1 1.066 8.46E−01 9.18E−01 
 1.07E−24 0.015 KCNJ1 1.031 5.19E−01 6.89E−01 
 1.05E−13 0.015 ESRRB 0.884 4.01E−02 9.96E−02 
 6.04E−24 0.016 KCNJ10 1.113 2.36E−02 6.49E−02 
 1.22E−09 0.016 SLC22A8 0.549 5.00E−05 2.77E−04 
 4.49E−24 0.016 TFAP2B 1.055 3.23E−01 4.99E−01 
 3.08E−21 0.017 RALYL 1.488 2.81E−02 7.49E−02 

NOTE: The list of the top 20 genes that show elevated or decreased transcript levels in human ccRCC was retrieved from TCGA. The fold changes in mRNA levels in these genes in TRACK TG+ mice versus TG kidneys are listed.

We then performed the reverse comparison by identifying the top genes overexpressed or underexpressed at the mRNA level in the TRACK TG+ versus TG WT kidneys and comparing these transcripts to those in the TCGA database and the combined Oncomine human ccRCC datasets. Eleven of the 20 genes highly overexpressed in TRACK TG+ kidneys show overexpression (fold change > 2) in the TCGA data (Table 4). Ten of the 20 genes highly underexpressed in TRACK TG+ kidneys show underexpression (fold change < 0.5) in the TCGA dataset (Table 4). Four of the 20 genes highly overexpressed in TRACK TG+ kidneys show overexpression (fold change > 2) in the combined Oncomine datasets (Table 4). Eight of the 20 genes highly underexpressed in TRACK TG+ kidneys show underexpression (fold change < −2) in the combined Oncomine datasets (Table 4). We conclude from analysis of these data that expression of a mutant, constitutively active HIF1α protein in kidney PTs results in a transcriptome that partially resembles those of human ccRCCs.

Table 4.

Twenty genes that show the greatest increases or decreases in transcript levels in the TRACK TG+ versus WT kidneys by RNAseq

Fold change TRACK TG+/TGP valueq valueGeneTCGA human ccRCC/normal kidney fold changeOncomine human ccRCC/normal kidney median fold change
Increased in TRACK 
 260.2342364 5e−05 2.77e−04 F2 11.76 1.008 
 241.0075905 5e−05 2.77e−04 IGFBP2 0.29 −5.309 
 212.4951738 5e−05 2.77e−04 GRIN1 2.67 1.342 
 208.5679355 5e−05 2.77e−04 AIRE 2.06 −1.075 
 196.9580885 5e−05 2.77e−04 APOA4 244.29 −1.227 
 158.8470346 5e−05 2.77e−04 RBP4 1.11 −1.13 
 148.1545998 5e−05 2.77e−04 APOC3 3.61 −1.815 
 127.8628806 5e−05 2.77e−04 A2M 1.16 1.809 
 114.6301281 5e−05 2.77e−04 SLC16A3 8.15 7.132 
 97.86820107 5e−05 2.77e−04 ADAM7 7.79 1.07 
 86.29550828 5e−05 2.77e−04 ZFP92 0.74 −0.0815 
 78.7336936 6e−04 0.00266966 CRISP1 0.21 −1.003 
 77.00377581 5e−05 2.77e−04 AREG 1.43 1.312 
 70.96599132 5e−05 2.77e−04 RASGRF2 1.10 1.568 
 70.39792583 5e−05 2.77e−04 NLRP10 0.29 −1.286 
 70.39041145 5e−05 2.77e−04 HK2 10.17 13.568 
 67.9251413 5e−05 2.77e−04 NDUFA4L2 44.88 53.935 
 50.96140222 0.00015 0.000762465 CPB2 8.97 1.035 
 42.27652553 5e−05 2.77e−04 ANKRD37 2.15 3.846 
 38.17346108 5e−05 2.77e−04 DKK1 1.51 −1.058 
Decreased in TRACK 
 0.03993031 0.0145 0.0431824 DIO3OS 5.18 −1.025 
 0.042320553 5e−05 2.77e−04 SOX2OT 0.38 −2.8495 
 0.112181952 0.0017 0.0067467 KRT13 0.37 −1.020 
 0.122714679 5e−05 2.77e−04 HPD 0.04 −79.57 
 0.196070105 5e−05 2.77e−04 IDO2 1.58 1.019 
 0.215859171 5e−05 2.77e−04 C4A 3.40 2.176 
 0.218647669 5e−05 2.77e−04 HRG 0.24 −14.081 
 0.251872656 5e−05 2.77e−04 AZGP1 0.29 −12.585 
 0.312454798 5e−05 2.77e−04 NLRC4 3.32 −1.0665 
 0.31642082 5e−05 2.77e−04 PZP 1.14 1.012 
 0.327772061 5e−05 2.77e−04 CTXN3 0.10 −7.343 
 0.331900011 5e−05 2.77e−04 ANXA13 3.27 1.971 
 0.361353874 5e−05 2.77e−04 UPP2 0.04 −5.804 
 0.378206047 5e−05 2.77e−04 APOH 1.23 −6.871 
 0.39051491 5e−05 2.77e−04 CD5L 29.99 −1.017 
 0.409784094 5e−05 2.77e−04 TMEM28 0.60 −1.095 
 0.426331824 5e−05 2.77e−04 CNDP2 1.59 1.185 
 0.42792761 5e−05 2.77e−04 FCAMR 0.37 −2.2115 
 0.429718771 0.0156 0.0459592 ANGPTL7 0.34 −1.049 
 0.436898506 0.0156 0.0459592 GPT 0.71 −1.344 
Fold change TRACK TG+/TGP valueq valueGeneTCGA human ccRCC/normal kidney fold changeOncomine human ccRCC/normal kidney median fold change
Increased in TRACK 
 260.2342364 5e−05 2.77e−04 F2 11.76 1.008 
 241.0075905 5e−05 2.77e−04 IGFBP2 0.29 −5.309 
 212.4951738 5e−05 2.77e−04 GRIN1 2.67 1.342 
 208.5679355 5e−05 2.77e−04 AIRE 2.06 −1.075 
 196.9580885 5e−05 2.77e−04 APOA4 244.29 −1.227 
 158.8470346 5e−05 2.77e−04 RBP4 1.11 −1.13 
 148.1545998 5e−05 2.77e−04 APOC3 3.61 −1.815 
 127.8628806 5e−05 2.77e−04 A2M 1.16 1.809 
 114.6301281 5e−05 2.77e−04 SLC16A3 8.15 7.132 
 97.86820107 5e−05 2.77e−04 ADAM7 7.79 1.07 
 86.29550828 5e−05 2.77e−04 ZFP92 0.74 −0.0815 
 78.7336936 6e−04 0.00266966 CRISP1 0.21 −1.003 
 77.00377581 5e−05 2.77e−04 AREG 1.43 1.312 
 70.96599132 5e−05 2.77e−04 RASGRF2 1.10 1.568 
 70.39792583 5e−05 2.77e−04 NLRP10 0.29 −1.286 
 70.39041145 5e−05 2.77e−04 HK2 10.17 13.568 
 67.9251413 5e−05 2.77e−04 NDUFA4L2 44.88 53.935 
 50.96140222 0.00015 0.000762465 CPB2 8.97 1.035 
 42.27652553 5e−05 2.77e−04 ANKRD37 2.15 3.846 
 38.17346108 5e−05 2.77e−04 DKK1 1.51 −1.058 
Decreased in TRACK 
 0.03993031 0.0145 0.0431824 DIO3OS 5.18 −1.025 
 0.042320553 5e−05 2.77e−04 SOX2OT 0.38 −2.8495 
 0.112181952 0.0017 0.0067467 KRT13 0.37 −1.020 
 0.122714679 5e−05 2.77e−04 HPD 0.04 −79.57 
 0.196070105 5e−05 2.77e−04 IDO2 1.58 1.019 
 0.215859171 5e−05 2.77e−04 C4A 3.40 2.176 
 0.218647669 5e−05 2.77e−04 HRG 0.24 −14.081 
 0.251872656 5e−05 2.77e−04 AZGP1 0.29 −12.585 
 0.312454798 5e−05 2.77e−04 NLRC4 3.32 −1.0665 
 0.31642082 5e−05 2.77e−04 PZP 1.14 1.012 
 0.327772061 5e−05 2.77e−04 CTXN3 0.10 −7.343 
 0.331900011 5e−05 2.77e−04 ANXA13 3.27 1.971 
 0.361353874 5e−05 2.77e−04 UPP2 0.04 −5.804 
 0.378206047 5e−05 2.77e−04 APOH 1.23 −6.871 
 0.39051491 5e−05 2.77e−04 CD5L 29.99 −1.017 
 0.409784094 5e−05 2.77e−04 TMEM28 0.60 −1.095 
 0.426331824 5e−05 2.77e−04 CNDP2 1.59 1.185 
 0.42792761 5e−05 2.77e−04 FCAMR 0.37 −2.2115 
 0.429718771 0.0156 0.0459592 ANGPTL7 0.34 −1.049 
 0.436898506 0.0156 0.0459592 GPT 0.71 −1.344 

NOTE: The list of the top 20 genes that show elevated or decreased transcript levels in the TRACK TG+ versus TG kidneys was compiled from the RNAseq results. The fold changes in mRNA levels of these genes in human ccRCC were compiled from Oncomine (median fold changes are used here) by combining five different sets of human ccRCC patient samples (see Table 1 for more information) or from TCGA. Genes that have no measurements in all five datasets were excluded from this list.

We previously established the TRACK model, which mimics early stage human ccRCC through expression of a mutated, constitutively active human HIF1α construct in the PTCs (1). Here, we present genome-wide transcriptome analysis of the TRACK TG+ kidney cortex cells, which are mainly PTCs. We identified 655 upregulated genes and 55 downregulated genes that are differentially expressed in the TRACK TG+ kidneys compared with the TG kidneys (fold change > 2). Some of these genes also show increased or decreased transcript levels in human ccRCC specimens compared with normal kidneys, respectively (Table 4). For example, NDUFA4L2 is the gene overexpressed to the greatest extent in the human ccRCC datasets in Oncomine. The median fold change in human ccRCC compared with normal kidney from all 5 datasets is 53.9 (Table 2). Similarly, NDUFA4L2 transcript levels are about 68-fold higher in TRACK TG+ kidneys compared with TG kidneys (Table 2). Similarities can also be seen in genes that are downregulated in TRACK TG+ versus TG and human ccRCC versus normal kidneys, e.g., 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid dioxygenase (HPD; Table 4). These results suggest that the transcriptome of the TRACK TG+ kidneys partially resembles that of human ccRCC cells. Furthermore, we have examined the expression patterns of some of these top genes overexpressed in the TRACK kidneys by immunohistochemistry (ref. 1; Supplementary Fig. S2). The high expression of these proteins occurs primarily in the clear cell proximal tubules. These data support our contention that the changes in the transcriptome of TRACK kidneys that we have seen by RNAseq are mainly, if not all, caused by changes in these clear cell proximal tubules.

New evidence suggests that ccRCC is a metabolic disease (6, 7). All known kidney cancer susceptible genes are involved in the regulation of metabolic pathways (6). ccRCC cells contain increased amounts of glycogen and lipid in their cytoplasm (4, 5). Increased glycogen and lipid are also seen in the TRACK TG+ kidney cells (1). Our analysis of the entire transcriptome of the TRACK TG+ kidney PTCs identified some altered metabolic pathways, including increased transcript levels of genes involved in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis (Fig. 2A) and decreased transcript levels of genes involved in the TCA cycle (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, increased mRNA levels of the protein pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase can inactivate pyruvate dehydrogenase, which converts pyruvate to acetyl-CoA (26). Decreased levels of acetyl-CoA, together with decreased transcript levels of genes involved in the TCA cycle, should result in decreased activity of the TCA cycle. The products of the TCA cycle, NADH and succinate, are used in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway. Decreased TCA cycle activity and decreased levels of NADH and succinate should result in lower levels of substrates, and as a result, decreased oxidative phosphorylation. This phenotype recapitulates much of what is described for the Warburg effect in tumor cells (25). HIF1α, rather than HIF2α, is the main regulator of these pathways (28, 29), further emphasizing the importance of HIF1α in modulating the metabolic alterations in ccRCC.

The histone deacetylase, Sirtuin-6 (SIRT6), can suppress the transcription of the HIF1α gene (30). Increased glucose uptake and increased HIF1α activity were shown in SIRT6-deficient cells and mice, and this increase in HIF1α activity was sufficient to cause tumorigenesis (30). SIRT6 has been reported to be a potential tumor suppressor gene (31, 32). Thus, either the absence of VHL or the lack of SIRT6 can result in an increase in HIF1α activity and tumorigenesis. In summary, our results suggest that constitutive activation of HIF1α in kidney PTCs in our TRACK model induces a phenotype similar to the tumor phenotype associated with the Warburg effect (25).

In addition to inactivating mutations in the VHL gene, inactivating mutations in other genes, e.g., PBRM1 (33), SETD2 (34), etc., are commonly seen in patients with advanced ccRCC (35–38). Mutations and/or changes in the expression of these genes probably play important roles in the development of advanced ccRCC. This might explain why TRACK mice only mimic early stage ccRCC. This hypothesis is being tested in the TRACK mouse model by mutation/knockout of additional genes, such as PBRM1 and SETD2.

Importantly, the transgenic mice we generated that overexpress a constitutively active HIF2α do not show major transcript changes that reflect those in human ccRCC (21). Thus, our data reported here and those of many other researchers (reviewed in ref. 12) indicate that the activity of HIF1α is more closely linked to ccRCC tumorigenesis than the activity of HIF2α.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: L. Fu, D.R. Minton, D.M. Nanus, L.J. Gudas

Development of methodology: L. Fu, L.J. Gudas

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): L. Fu, D.R. Minton, L.J. Gudas

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): L. Fu, T. Zhang, L.J. Gudas

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: L. Fu, D.R. Minton, T. Zhang, D.M. Nanus, L.J. Gudas

Study supervision: D.M. Nanus, L.J. Gudas

The authors thank Daniel Stummer for editorial assistance and the Gudas and Nanus labs for thoughtful discussions of data.

This research was supported by WCMC, the Genitourinary Oncology Research Fund, and the Turobiner Kidney Cancer Research Fund. L. Fu held the Robert H. McCooey Genitourinary Oncology Research Fellowship and is supported by NCI grant NIH T32 CA062948. D.R. Minton is supported by an NIH T32 Training Grant (5T32CA062948). The results published here are in part based upon data generated by the TCGA Research Network: http://cancergenome.nih.gov/.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Fu
L
,
Wang
G
,
Shevchuk
MM
,
Nanus
DM
,
Gudas
LJ
. 
Generation of a mouse model of Von Hippel-Lindau kidney disease leading to renal cancers by expression of a constitutively active mutant of HIF1alpha
.
Cancer Res
2011
;
71
:
6848
56
.
2.
Maher
ER
,
Kaelin
WG
 Jr
. 
Von Hippel-Lindau disease
.
Medicine (Baltimore)
1997
;
76
:
381
91
.
3.
Patard
JJ
,
Leray
E
,
Rioux-Leclercq
N
,
Cindolo
L
,
Ficarra
V
,
Zisman
A
, et al
Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience
.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
2763
71
.
4.
Gebhard
RL
,
Clayman
RV
,
Prigge
WF
,
Figenshau
R
,
Staley
NA
,
Reesey
C
, et al
Abnormal cholesterol metabolism in renal clear cell carcinoma
.
J Lipid Res
1987
;
28
:
1177
84
.
5.
Krishnan
B
,
Truong
LD
. 
Renal epithelial neoplasms: the diagnostic implications of electron microscopic study in 55 cases
.
Hum Pathol
2002
;
33
:
68
79
.
6.
Linehan
WM
,
Srinivasan
R
,
Schmidt
LS
. 
The genetic basis of kidney cancer: a metabolic disease
.
Nat Rev Urol
2010
;
7
:
277
85
.
7.
Pinthus
JH
,
Whelan
KF
,
Gallino
D
,
Lu
JP
,
Rothschild
N
. 
Metabolic features of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: mechanisms and clinical implications
.
Can Urol Assoc J
2011
;
5
:
274
82
.
8.
Linehan
WM
,
Pinto
PA
,
Srinivasan
R
,
Merino
M
,
Choyke
P
,
Choyke
L
, et al
Identification of the genes for kidney cancer: opportunity for disease-specific targeted therapeutics
.
Clin Cancer Res
2007
;
13
:
671s
9s
.
9.
Kaelin
WG
 Jr
. 
The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein and clear cell renal carcinoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2007
;
13
:
680s
4s
.
10.
Semenza
GL
. 
Defining the role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in cancer biology and therapeutics
.
Oncogene
2010
;
29
:
625
34
.
11.
Gordan
JD
,
Simon
MC
. 
Hypoxia-inducible factors: central regulators of the tumor phenotype
.
Curr Opin Genet Dev
2007
;
17
:
71
7
.
12.
Gudas
LJ
,
Fu
L
,
Minton
DR
,
Mongan
NP
,
Nanus
DM
. 
The role of HIF1α in renal cell carcinoma tumorigenesis
.
J Mol Med (Berl)
2014
;
92
:
825
36
.
13.
Trapnell
C
,
Roberts
A
,
Goff
L
,
Pertea
G
,
Kim
D
,
Kelley
DR
, et al
Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks
.
Nat Protoc
2012
;
7
:
562
78
.
14.
Trapnell
C
,
Pachter
L
,
Salzberg
SL
. 
TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq
.
Bioinformatics
2009
;
25
:
1105
11
.
15.
Trapnell
C
,
Williams
BA
,
Pertea
G
,
Mortazavi
A
,
Kwan
G
,
van Baren
MJ
, et al
Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation
.
Nat Biotechnol
2010
;
28
:
511
5
.
16.
Young
MD
,
Wakefield
MJ
,
Smyth
GK
,
Oshlack
A
. 
Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias
.
Genome Biol
2010
;
11
:
R14
.
17.
Beroukhim
R
,
Brunet
JP
,
Di Napoli
A
,
Mertz
KD
,
Seeley
A
,
Pires
MM
, et al
Patterns of gene expression and copy-number alterations in Von-Hippel Lindau disease-associated and sporadic clear cell carcinoma of the kidney
.
Cancer Res
2009
;
69
:
4674
81
.
18.
Gumz
ML
,
Zou
H
,
Kreinest
PA
,
Childs
AC
,
Belmonte
LS
,
LeGrand
SN
, et al
Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 loss contributes to tumor phenotype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2007
;
13
:
4740
9
.
19.
Lenburg
ME
,
Liou
LS
,
Gerry
NP
,
Frampton
GM
,
Cohen
HT
,
Christman
MF
. 
Previously unidentified changes in renal cell carcinoma gene expression identified by parametric analysis of microarray data
.
BMC Cancer
2003
;
3
:
31
.
20.
Yusenko
MV
,
Kuiper
RP
,
Boethe
T
,
Ljungberg
B
,
van Kessel
AG
,
Kovacs
G
. 
High-resolution DNA copy number and gene expression analyses distinguish chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas
.
BMC Cancer
2009
;
9
:
152
.
21.
Fu
L
,
Wang
G
,
Shevchuk
MM
,
Nanus
DM
,
Gudas
LJ
. 
Activation of HIF2α in kidney proximal tubule cells causes abnormal glycogen deposition but not tumorigenesis
.
Cancer Res
2013
;
73
:
2916
25
.
22.
Kanehisa
M
,
Goto
S
. 
KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
.
Nucleic Acids Res
2000
;
28
:
27
30
.
23.
Kanehisa
M
,
Goto
S
,
Sato
Y
,
Furumichi
M
,
Tanabe
M
. 
KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets
.
Nucleic Acids Res
2012
;
40
:
D109
14
.
24.
Ashburner
M
,
Ball
CA
,
Blake
JA
,
Botstein
D
,
Butler
H
,
Cherry
JM
, et al
Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium
.
Nat Genet
2000
;
25
:
25
9
.
25.
Warburg
O
. 
On respiratory impairment in cancer cells
.
Science
1956
;
124
:
269
70
.
26.
Yeaman
SJ
,
Hutcheson
ET
,
Roche
TE
,
Pettit
FH
,
Brown
JR
,
Reed
LJ
, et al
Sites of phosphorylation on pyruvate dehydrogenase from bovine kidney and heart
.
Biochemistry
1978
;
17
:
2364
70
.
27.
Rhodes
DR
,
Yu
J
,
Shanker
K
,
Deshpande
N
,
Varambally
R
,
Ghosh
D
, et al
ONCOMINE: a cancer microarray database and integrated data-mining platform
.
Neoplasia
2004
;
6
:
1
6
.
28.
Semenza
GL
. 
HIF-1 and human disease: one highly involved factor
.
Genes Dev
2000
;
14
:
1983
91
.
29.
Kim
JW
,
Tchernyshyov
I
,
Semenza
GL
,
Dang
CV
. 
HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia
.
Cell Metab
2006
;
3
:
177
85
.
30.
Zhong
L
,
D'Urso
A
,
Toiber
D
,
Sebastian
C
,
Henry
RE
,
Vadysirisack
DD
, et al
The histone deacetylase Sirt6 regulates glucose homeostasis via Hif1alpha
.
Cell
2010
;
140
:
280
93
.
31.
Sebastián
C
,
Zwaans
BM
,
Silberman
DM
,
Gymrek
M
,
Goren
A
,
Zhong
L
, et al
The histone deacetylase SIRT6 is a tumor suppressor that controls cancer metabolism
.
Cell
2012
;
151
:
1185
99
.
32.
Zhong
L
,
Mostoslavsky
R
. 
SIRT6: a master epigenetic gatekeeper of glucose metabolism
.
Transcription
2010
;
1
:
17
21
.
33.
Varela
I
,
Tarpey
P
,
Raine
K
,
Huang
D
,
Ong
CK
,
Stephens
P
, et al
Exome sequencing identifies frequent mutation of the SWI/SNF complex gene PBRM1 in renal carcinoma
.
Nature
2011
;
469
:
539
42
.
34.
Duns
G
,
van den Berg
E
,
van Duivenbode
I
,
Osinga
J
,
Hollema
H
,
Hofstra
RM
, et al
Histone methyltransferase gene SETD2 is a novel tumor suppressor gene in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
.
Cancer Res
2010
;
70
:
4287
91
.
35.
Gerlinger
M
,
Horswell
S
,
Larkin
J
,
Rowan
AJ
,
Salm
MP
,
Varela
I
, et al
Genomic architecture and evolution of clear cell renal cell carcinomas defined by multiregion sequencing
.
Nat Genet
2014
;
46
:
225
33
.
36.
Gerlinger
M
,
Rowan
AJ
,
Horswell
S
,
Larkin
J
,
Endesfelder
D
,
Gronroos
E
, et al
Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
366
:
883
92
.
37.
Creighton
CJ
,
Morgan
M
,
Gunaratne
PH
,
Wheeler
DA
,
Gibbs
RA
,
Gordon Robertson
A
, et al
Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
.
Nature
2013
;
499
:
43
9
.
38.
Sato
Y
,
Yoshizato
T
,
Shiraishi
Y
,
Maekawa
S
,
Okuno
Y
,
Kamura
T
, et al
Integrated molecular analysis of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma
.
Nat Genet
2013
;
45
:
860
7
.