Purpose: The identification of new drugs is strongly needed for bone tumors.Ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743), a highly promising antitumor agent isolated from the marine tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata, is currently under Phase II clinical investigation in Europe and the United States for treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. In this study, we analyzed the preclinical effectiveness of this drug in osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma.

Experimental Design: The effects of ET-743 were evaluated against a panel of human osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines characterized by different drug responsiveness and compared with the effects of standard anticancer agents. In addition, combination treatments with ET-743 and the other standard chemotherapy agents for sarcoma were analyzed to highlight the best drug-to-drug interaction

Results: A potent activity of ET-743 was clearly observed against both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant (multidrug-resistant, methotrexate- and cisplatin-resistant) bone tumor cells at concentrations that are easily achievable in patients (pm to nm range). Ewing’s sarcoma cells appeared to be particularly sensitive to the effects of this drug. The analysis of the effects of ET-743 on cell cycle, apoptosis, and differentiation indicated that both osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells had a slower progression through the different phases of the cell cycle after treatment with ET-743. However, the drug was able to induce a massive apoptosis in Ewing’s sarcoma but not in osteosarcoma cells. In the latter neoplasm, ET-743 showed a differential effect, as indicated by the significant increase in the expression and activity of alkaline phosphatase, a marker of osteoblastic differentiation. Concurrent exposure of cells to ET-743 and other chemotherapeutic agents resulted in greater than additive interactions when doxorubicin and cisplatin were used, whereas subadditive effects were observed with methotrexate, vincristine, and actinomycin D.

Conclusions: Overall, these results encourage the inclusion of this drug in the treatment of patients with bone tumors, although a careful design of new regimens is required to identify the best therapeutic conditions.

Osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma are the two most frequent bone tumors (1). Although the two neoplasms show several differences with respect to their origin and biological and molecular features, they share a similar clinical history. Both are very aggressive tumors with a marked tendency to recur and metastasize to the lungs and/or the skeleton (1). The introduction of chemotherapy has significantly improved the chance of survival of nonmetastatic patients with bone tumors, shifting the 5-year survival rate to around 50–60% (2, 3, 4, 5). However, despite advances in therapy, one-third of patients with nonmetastatic disease and the great majority of patients with metastases at diagnosis do not survive, regardless of therapy (6, 7). Furthermore, recent clinical studies have indicated that the survival rate of osteosarcoma or Ewing’s sarcoma patients has reached a plateau phase and has possibly reached the highest levels achievable by conventional regimens (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Successful treatment of therapy-resistant disease therefore requires new strategies as well as novel drugs from natural and other sources that are potently effective against bone tumor cells.

ET-743,3 a marine-derived agent isolated from Ecteinascidia turbinata, is a novel, potent cytotoxic agent currently under Phase II clinical trails in Europe and in the United States. The mechanisms by which ET-743 exerts its cytotoxic effects have not yet been elucidated, but studies in several laboratories suggest a novel spectrum of activities, including binding to the minor groove of DNA and alkylation of the N2 position of guanine, lower effectiveness in cells that are defective in nucleotide excision repair, and blockage of transcriptional activation (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). ET-743 is active against a variety of human tumor cell lines in the nanomolar to subnanomolar range (20, 21, 22, 23), in concentrations that have been found to be clinically feasible (24). Preclinical and early clinical studies have shown a particularly strong activity of ET-743 in soft tissue sarcoma cell lines (25, 26) and patients (27), raising new hopes for the treatment of these tumors. In this study, we examined the in vitro effects of ET-743 (cytotoxicity and effects on cell cycle and apoptosis) by using a panel of 13 osteosarcoma cell lines and 8 Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines. Cytotoxicity effects were analyzed in comparison with the other conventional anticancer agents currently used in the treatment of patients with bone tumors. Moreover, ET-743 activity was tested against MDR cells and osteosarcoma cells resistant to MTX or CDDP. Finally, combined treatments with ET-743 and the other standard chemotherapy agents for sarcoma (DXR, MTX, CDDP, VCR, and ACT-D) were analyzed to highlight the best drug-to-drug interactions and help design new multidrug chemotherapeutic regimens for patients with bone tumors.

### Cell Lines.

The osteosarcoma cell lines Saos-2, U-2 OS, and MG-63 and the Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines SK-ES-1 and SK-N-MC were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). The TC-71 and 6647 Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines were a kind gift from T. J. Triche (Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, CA). The other osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines were established in our laboratory and have been characterized previously (28, 29). The MDR clones U2/DOXO35, Sa/DOXO26, and TC/DOXO8 were obtained by transfection of the parental osteosarcoma U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells and Ewing’s sarcoma TC-71 cells with an expression vector containing full-length MDR1 cDNA and selected in DXR (30); the MDR clones U2/MDR117.1 and U2/MDR117.2 were obtained by cotransfection of the U-2 OS cell line with the MDR1 gene and the neomycin resistance neo gene as described previously (30). The U-2/MTX300, Saos-2/MTX300, and the U-2/CDDP300 and Saos-2/CDDP300 cell variants were obtained in our laboratory by stepwise increasing concentrations of MTX and CDDP up to 300 ng/ml MTX and CDDP, respectively, starting from the parental U-2OS and Saos-2 osteosarcoma cell lines. For all of the following experiments reported, the cell lines were maintained in IMDM supplemented with penicillin (100 units/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml; Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, Scotland, United Kingdom), and 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Biowhittaker Europe, Verviers, Belgium) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

### Drugs.

ET-743 was kindly provided by Pharma Mar, S.A. (Tres Cantos, Spain). The stock solution of this drug was prepared in DMSO and stored at −20°C. DXR, CDDP, MTX, VCR, and ACT-D were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Working dilutions of all drugs were prepared immediately before use.

### In Vitro Cytotoxicity.

The IC50 and IC70 (drug concentration resulting in 50% and 70% inhibition of growth, respectively) values were determined by seeding 20,000 cells/cm2 in IMDM + 10% FBS. After 24 h, medium was changed in IMDM with 10% FBS, without (control) or with increasing doses of the drugs. After 72 h for Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines and 96 h for osteosarcoma cell lines, cells were harvested with 0.25% trypsin-0.02% EDTA (Sigma) and counted by trypan blue vital cell count to estimate the percentage of growth inhibition compared with the appropriate controls.

### Combined in Vitro Treatments with ET-743 and DXR, MTX, CDDP, VCR, and ACT-D.

Cells (20,000 cells/cm2) of the U-2 OS and Saos-2 osteosarcoma cell lines were seeded in IMDM + 10% FBS. After 24 h, cells were treated with varying concentrations of DXR (range, 0.3–10 ng/ml), MTX (range, 0.1–10 ng/ml), CDDP (range, 0.1–300 ng/ml), VCR (range, 0.1–3 ng/ml) and ACT-D (range, 10 pg/ml to 3 ng/ml) without (control) or with ET-743 [300 pm for U-2 OS cell line and 100 pm for Saos-2 cell line (doses corresponding to the dose that gives around 30% growth inhibition in each cell line)]. After 96 h of treatment, cell growth was evaluated on harvested cultures by trypan blue vital cell count.

### Cell Cycle Analysis.

U2-OS, U2/DOXO35, Saos-2, TC-71, and TC/DOXO8 cells (20,000 cells/cm2) were seeded in IMDM + 10% FBS. The next day, medium was changed in IMDM + 10% FBS without (control) or with the IC50 dose of each cell line. After 24, 48, and 72 h, cell cultures were incubated with 10 μm bromodeoxyuridine (Sigma) for 1 h in CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. Harvested cells were fixed in 70% ethanol for 30 min. After DNA denaturation with 2N HCl, 1 × 106 cells were processed for indirect immunofluorescence staining using α-bromodeoxyuridine MAb diluted 1:4 as a primary antibody (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACScan; Becton Dickinson). For the analysis of DNA content, cells were fixed with cold 70% ethanol, treated with 0.5 mg/ml RNase, and stained with 20 μg/ml propidium iodide.

### Morphological Assessment of Apoptotic Nuclei.

U2-OS, U2/DOXO35, Saos-2, TC-71, and TC/DOXO8 cells were seeded in IMDM + 10% FBS in 60-mm Petri dishes and treated the next day with the ET-743 IC50 doses for each cell line. At 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment, cells were fixed in methanol/acetic acid (3:1) for 15 min and stained with 50 ng/ml Hoechst 33258 (Sigma). Cells with three or more chromatin fragments were considered apoptotic. The percentage of apoptotic nuclei was evaluated out of 1000 nuclei.

### Liver/Bone/Kidney ALP Activity.

The percentage of osteosarcoma cells displaying ALP activity at their cell surface was evaluated by using the Sigma ALP kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, on cytospins obtained from cells treated for 96 h with 500 pm ET-743. The percentage was calculated out of 300 cells. In addition, ALP activity in the conditioned medium of osteosarcoma cells was also measured by using p-nitrophenylphosphate as a substrate, in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer (Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).

### Expression and Activity of P-Glycoprotein in Cells after Treatment with ET-743.

The cell surface expression of P-glycoprotein in cells treated or not treated (control) with ET-743 (IC50 values) for 96 h was analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson) using the MRK-16 MAb (dilution, 1:100; Kamiya, Thousand Oaks, CA). To evaluate the extrusion activity of P-glycoprotein after ET-743 treatment, cells were exposed to the drug for 96 h, incubated in medium containing 10 μg/ml DXR, and washed twice with PBS solution before observation and measurement of DXR intracellular fluorescence by cytofluorometry (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson). The analysis was performed on vital cells identified through fluorescein diacetate staining (1 mg/ml, 10-min incubation).

### Expression of P-Glycoprotein, Rb, p53, and MDM2 in Osteosarcoma Cell Lines.

P-glycoprotein and p53 expression was evaluated flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson) using the MRK-16 (dilution, 1:100; Kamiya) and pAb1801 (dilution, 1:1500; Calbiochem-Novabiochem Co., San Diego, CA) MAbs, respectively. Rb and MDM2 expression was analyzed on methanol-acetone-fixed cells by indirect immunofluorescence by using the anti-Rb G3–245 (dilution, 1:40; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and anti-MDM2 IF2 (dilution, 1:20; Calbiochem-Novabiochem Co.) MAbs.

### Statistical Analysis.

Differences among means were analyzed using a two-sided Student’s t test. The IC50 for each particular drug was defined as the concentration of drug that reduces growth of 50% of untreated control cells and was calculated from linear transformation of the dose-response curves. A relative resistance index was expressed as the ratio of the IC50 of the drug-resistant cells to the IC50 of the drug-sensitive parental cell line. The analysis of drug combination effects was performed by using the fractional product method and the Chou-Talalay equation for the determination of synergism and antagonism and construction of isobolograms. This last statistical method takes into account both potency and the shape of the dose-effect curve (31, 32). The general equation for the classic isobologram (CI = 1) is given by:

$\frac{(\mathrm{D})_{1}}{(\mathrm{D}x)_{1}}\ {+}\ \frac{(\mathrm{D})_{2}}{(\mathrm{D}x)_{2}}$

where (Dx)1 and (Dx)2 in the denominators are the doses (or concentrations) for D1 (ET-743) and D2 (another drug) alone that give x% inhibition, whereas (D)1 and (D)2 in the numerators are the doses of ET-743 and another drug in combination that also inhibited x%. CI < 1, CI = 1, and CI > 1 indicate synergism, additive effect, and antagonism, respectively. For conservative, mutually nonexclusive isobolograms of two agents, a third term (as shown below) is added to the previously reported equation.

$\frac{(\mathrm{D}1)\ (\mathrm{D}2)}{(\mathrm{D}x)_{1}(\mathrm{D}x)_{2}}$

For simplicity, however, the third term of the Chou-Talalay equation is usually omitted (25). Only the CI values obtained from the classic (mutually exclusive) calculation are therefore given in the “Results.” However, similar results were also obtained when the complete equation was used for combination studies with ET-743 and DXR or CDDP (data not shown).

### Activity of ET-743 against Drug-sensitive and -resistant Osteosarcoma and Ewing’s Sarcoma Cells.

The in vitro cytotoxic effects of ET-743 were examined, after long continuous drug exposure (72 h for Ewing’s sarcoma cells and 96 h for osteosarcoma cell lines; differences are due to the different mean doubling times of the different tumors), on two osteosarcoma cell lines, one Ewing’s sarcoma cell line, and different drug-resistant variants obtained from the parental cells according to the procedure described in “Materials and Methods.” Table 1 shows the IC50 values obtained for all these cells. The sensitivity of the U-2 OS and Saos-2 osteosarcoma cells and the TC-71 Ewing’s sarcoma cell line to ET-743 was in the pm range, confirming the potent activity of ET-743 against sarcoma cells (25). The analyses of resistant variants indicated that ET-743 was able to completely abrogate resistance to MTX and CDDP; MTX-resistant cells showed a level of sensitivity comparable with that of parental cell lines, and CDDP-resistant cells were even more sensitive to ET-743 than parental cell lines. With respect to MDR cells, ET-743 was dramatically more active in comparison with DXR, although a low level of resistance was maintained in MDR cells with respect to their parental cell lines (Fig. 1). The activity of ET-743 appeared to be slightly reduced in relation to the level of MDR and expression of P-glycoprotein (30), confirming that ET-743 may be partially affected by the P-glycoprotein phenotype (33). Nevertheless, the IC50 values of MDR osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells were still in nm range (1.2–3.3 nm), lower than that obtained in drug-sensitive nonsarcoma cells, such as colon and breast cancer cell lines (25). Exposure of MDR cells to ET-743 for 72 h did not modulate the expression of P-glycoprotein on the surface of these cells (Fig. 2), whereas a slight reduction of the DXR extrusion activity of P-glycoprotein was observed (Fig. 3). Increased intracellular DXR accumulation was observed in all three MDR cell lines and in U-2 OS parental cells, which showed a low level of P-glycoprotein expression, but was not observed in the two P-glycoprotein-negative parental cells after ET-743 treatment.

### Activity of ET-743 in Osteosarcoma and Ewing’s Sarcoma Cells in Comparison with Other Chemotherapeutic Drugs.

Thirteen osteosarcoma cell lines and eight Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines were analyzed to evaluate their sensitivity to ET-743 and to the other drugs that are currently included in the chemotherapeutic regimens of osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma patients (DXR, MTX, and CDDP for osteosarcoma; DXR, VCR, and ACT-D for Ewing’s sarcoma). Cells were exposed to a concentration of chemotherapeutic agent that was able to give a 70% growth inhibition in U-2 OS and TC-71 cells, used as reference for osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines, respectively. Almost none of the cell lines express P-glycoprotein, with the exceptions of U-2 OS and IOR/OS-17, which did express a low level of the protein (data not shown). With regard to osteosarcoma, Fig. 4 reveals that the sensitivity of the 13 cell lines to DXR, MTX, and CDDP varied considerably, illustrating the heterogeneity of these tumor cells in their response to the agents that are usually given in osteosarcoma chemotherapy. In particular, 5 cell lines were resistant to DXR, 10 were resistant to MTX, and only 2 were resistant to CDDP. With respect to ET-743, eight cell lines were clearly sensitive, two were marginally resistant, and three markedly resistant. Exposure of these three cell lines to a higher concentration of ET-743 (1 nm) confirmed their relative level of resistance because the percentage of growth inhibition at this dose was still well below 50% (data not shown). No correlation was seen between ET-743 sensitivity and sensitivity to DXR, MTX, and CDDP. Nor did we observe any relationship between drug sensitivity of osteosarcoma cell lines and the expression of genes such as p53, Rb, and MDM2 (data not shown), in agreement with other reports (18, 24). With regard to Ewing’s sarcoma, heterogeneity was observed for ACT-D and VCR, whereas all eight cell lines appeared to be sensitive to DXR and ET-743 (Fig. 5). For ET-743, in particular, all cell lines considered here were highly sensitive (growth inhibition higher than 70%) at a very low concentration of 400 pm.

### Effects of ET-743 on Cell Cycle, Apoptosis, and Differentiation.

The analyses of cell cycle phase perturbations induced by ET-743 were examined in two osteosarcoma cell lines (U-2 OS and Saos-2) and one Ewing’s sarcoma cell line (TC-71). In addition, we also examined the U2/DOXO35 and TC/DOXO8 MDR subline variants. Fig. 6 shows the percentage of cells in the different cell cycle phases after different time exposures to ET-743. Treatment of the cells with IC50 doses of ET-743 induced a marked accumulation of cells in the S phase after 24 h and in G2-M after 48 h. However, after 72 h of exposure, although a blockade in G2-M was still evident, particularly for MDR cells, we also observed that the percentage of cells in G1 phase shifted back toward the levels of the controls. These data suggested that ET-743 induces a delay of cell progression from G1 to G2-M rather than a permanent blockade of the cells in the different cell cycle phases. The effects were similar in both osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells. However, when we analyzed the effects of ET-743 on apoptosis, a marked difference was observed between osteosarcoma cells and Ewing’s sarcoma cells. In fact, the morphological evaluation of cells exposed to IC50 doses of ET-743 for 24–72 h showed a significant induction of apoptosis in Ewing’s sarcoma cells, both in TC-71 and TC/DOXO8, whereas no differences were observed in osteosarcoma (Fig. 7, A and B), suggesting a cytostatic rather than a cytotoxic effect of ET-743 in these cells. As a consequence, we decided to evaluate the possibility that this agent may act as a differentiating drug in osteosarcoma. Indeed, the expression and activity of bone/liver/kidney ALP, a marker of osteoblastic differentiation (34), were significantly enhanced by treatment with ET-743 in several osteosarcoma cell lines (Table 2). This effect appeared to be more evident in the cells most sensitive to the drug.

### Cytotoxicity of Combined in Vitro Treatments.

Experiments were carried out to determine the effects on the growth of bone tumor cells of conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (DXR, MTX, CDDP, ACT-D, and VCR) with ET-743. U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells were simultaneously exposed to increasing concentrations of conventional agents and to a concentration of ET-743 that gave a 30% growth inhibition after 96 h (300 pm for U-2 OS and 100 pm for Saos-2 cells). The combined treatment with ET-743 and DXR or CDDP resulted in a significantly enhanced inhibition of cell growth with respect to the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs alone (Fig. 8). In contrast, when cells were exposed to ET-743 and VCR, ACT-D, or MTX concomitantly, a subadditive cytotoxic effect was generally observed. Construction of isobolograms substantially confirmed the additive/synergistic cytotoxic effect when cells were treated with ET-743 and DXR or CDDP (CI ≤ 1), whereas antagonism was observed when cells were treated with ET-743 and VCR, ACT-D, or MTX concomitantly (CI > 1). The mutually exclusive CI values of U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells simultaneously exposed to ET-743 and one of the other drugs are shown in Table 3.

The identification of novel therapeutic strategies and new potent drugs effective against sarcomas is a high-priority goal. In fact, since the identification of ifosfamide, no new agents for sarcoma therapy have proved to be effective. Moreover, recent clinical studies have indicated that the survival rate of sarcoma patients has reached a plateau phase, and no significant improvements have been obtained in the last few years (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). In this study, we investigated the in vitro effectiveness of ET-743, a very promising agent discovered in 1990 (35) and recently entered in several clinical studies against solid tumors (24, 27, 36, 37, 38, 39), on drug-sensitive and drug-resistant bone tumor cells. In addition, we analyzed whether ET-743 enhances cytotoxicity of the other antineoplastic agents that are currently used in the treatment of osteosarcoma and/or Ewing’s sarcoma patients to identify the best drug-drug combinations.

ET-743 showed a remarkable activity not only on drug-sensitive osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells but also on drug-resistant cell variants. Although the effectiveness of this compound against tumors resistant to chemotherapy has been observed previously in xenografts (21), this is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that the activity of ET-743 was analyzed in a wide spectrum of well-characterized cell lines with different sensitivities to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. ET-743 was extremely active on CDDP-resistant cell lines, showing even greater effectiveness in these cells than in parental cell lines. MTX-resistant variants were found to be equally sensitive to ET-743 with respect to parental cells. These data are consistent with the findings that ET-743 acts by a different mechanism of action from that of CDDP (21) and MTX. Because CDDP-resistant cells appeared to be more sensitive to ET-743 than parental cell lines, it would be interesting to verify whether this phenomenon was due to the alterations in the DNA mismatch repair proteins that have been associated with an increased resistance of many cancer cell lines to CDDP. With regard to MDR, P-glycoprotein-expressing cell lines, we found that ET-743 was slightly less effective against these cells with respect to their parental cell lines. The level of resistance appears to be enhanced according to the increase in MDR and P-glycoprotein expression level, substantially confirming the idea that the activity of ET-743 may be partly affected by the presence of P-glycoprotein on the cell surface (33). However, the levels of resistance to ET-743 of MDR cells were remarkably lower than those observed for DXR (7–8-fold in comparison with more than 100-fold), and the IC50 values of these highly resistant cells were still as low as 1–4 nm, a concentration that is normally achieved and maintained in the plasma of patients treated with ET-743 (24). Exposure of MDR cells to equally toxic ET-743 doses did not modulate the expression of P-glycoprotein on their cell surface. This is in agreement with previous studies reporting only a minimal, if any, effect of ET-743 on constitutive MDR1 expression (40, 41). On the contrary, these studies indicated that nanomolar concentrations of ET-743 (25–50 nm) inhibited transcriptional activation of the MDR1 promoter by multiple inducers (40, 41). Although the mechanisms responsible for the block of the MDR1 promoter are still under investigation, with the steroid and xenobiotic receptor as well as the minor groove-interacting transcription factor NF-Y proposed as candidate target genes of ET-743, these data and our findings have important clinical implications. In fact, ET-743 may be the first pharmacologically relevant agent that prevents activation of MDR1 transcription by multiple stress inducers, including toxic agents such as chemotherapy and radiation, which were reported to rapidly enhance tumor MDR1 RNA levels during the course of cytotoxic therapy (42). ET-743 is therefore the first agent with the potential for blocking this activation. Its effectiveness against cells that are resistant to the principal drugs currently used in chemotherapy further increases the clinical attractiveness of this drug. Furthermore, we showed, in agreement with a previous observation (26), that treatment with ET-743 slightly reduced the extrusion activity of P-glycoprotein against DXR, indicating that ET-743 may increase the effectiveness of this drug also on MDR cells. All these aspects appear to be particularly important for osteosarcoma, in which around a third of patients overexpress P-glycoprotein at the onset and for whom expression of this protein has been significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence and development of metachronous metastases (43, 44, 45).

The analyses of a panel of 13 osteosarcoma and 8 Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines have pointed out a higher sensitivity of Ewing’s sarcoma in comparison with osteosarcoma cells to ET-743. In particular, all Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines were found to be highly sensitive to 400 pm ET-743, whereas in osteosarcoma, a higher heterogeneity was generally observed, with at least three cell lines being markedly resistant to the concentration of 1 nm. As also found previously by others (18, 25), the differences in the level of sensitivity among osteosarcoma cell lines were not correlated with the expression of other proteins, such as wild-type p53, Rb, MRP, and MDM2. The analyses of the effects of ET-743 on cell cycle and apoptosis have indicated that both osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells progressed more slowly through the different phases of the cell cycle. However, when we analyzed the effects of ET-743 on apoptosis, we observed an important difference between Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma cells. In fact, prolonged exposure to the drug induced a significant apoptotic effect in Ewing’s sarcoma but not in osteosarcoma. A differentiative effect was observed in the latter cells, as shown by the significant increase in bone/liver/kidney ALP expression and activity, a marker of osteoblastic differentiation (34), after treatment with 500 pm ET-743. These findings may indicate that, besides the cytostatic effect, ET-743 is able to induce different intracellular signals in different cell histotypes (i.e., an apoptotic signal in Ewing’s sarcoma cells and a differentiative one in osteosarcoma), further supporting the idea that this agent is a promoter-specific, transcription-interfering drug (16). Microarray studies are in progress to highlight the molecular mechanisms that may be differentially induced by the drug in Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma cells. Very preliminary results confirmed a differential genetic induction of a series of genes involved in apoptosis in the two different neoplasms. A detailed and functional analysis of these genes will follow.

Finally, because from a clinical point of view, to be of significant therapeutic value, any new drug should be effectively combined with conventional anticancer agents in mediating their antitumor activity, we investigated whether ET-743 enhances the cytotoxicity of the other chemotherapeutic drugs that are currently used in the treatment of patients with bone tumors. Synergistic effects between ET-743 and DXR as well as CDDP were clearly observed in two cell lines, whereas a subadditive action was observed when cells were concomitantly exposed to ET-743 and VCR, ACT-D, or MTX. Our data partly confirmed the data reported on soft tissue sarcomas by Takahashi et al.(26) with respect to DXR and MTX.

Taken together, our findings further support the clinical attractiveness of ET-743 in the treatment of sarcomas. Its potent activity against drug-sensitive and -resistant cells renders this drug worthy of being included in the chemotherapeutic regimens against these neoplasms. Encouraging preliminary results have been reported in sarcoma patients treated with ET-743 (27, 36, 37). However, particular attention should be paid in the design of clinical protocols, due to the subadditive effect of ET-743 with several drugs that are currently and commonly used for bone tumor patients.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1

Supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research, the Italian Ministry of Health, and the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research. V. C. is the recipient of a Fellowship from the Italian Foundation for Cancer Research.

3

The abbreviations used are: ET-743, ectenascidin-743; MDR, multidrug resistant; DXR, doxorubicin; MTX, methotrexate; CDDP, cisplatin; VCR, vincristine; ACT-D, actinomycin-D; MAb, monoclonal antibody; IMDM, Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; CI, coefficent of interaction.

Fig. 1.

Level of drug resistance of bone tumor cells to DXR (□), ET-743 (▪), MTX (gray bars), and CDDP (dotted bars). The Y axis shows the relative resistance index expressed for each particular drug as the ratio of the IC50 value of the drug-resistant cells to the IC50 value of the drug-sensitive parental cell line.

Fig. 1.

Level of drug resistance of bone tumor cells to DXR (□), ET-743 (▪), MTX (gray bars), and CDDP (dotted bars). The Y axis shows the relative resistance index expressed for each particular drug as the ratio of the IC50 value of the drug-resistant cells to the IC50 value of the drug-sensitive parental cell line.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

Flow cytometric expression of P-glycoprotein in parental and MDR osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells after 72 h of treatment with the corresponding IC50 dose of ET-743 (400 pm for U-2 OS, 4 nm for U2/DOXO35, 150 pm for Saos-1, 1 nm for Sa/DOXO26 and TC/DOXO8, and 300 pm for TC-71). Open profile represents cells stained with secondary antibody alone; solid profile represents cells stained with the anti-P-glycoprotein antibody. Data from an experiment representative of at least two similar experiments are shown.

Fig. 2.

Flow cytometric expression of P-glycoprotein in parental and MDR osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells after 72 h of treatment with the corresponding IC50 dose of ET-743 (400 pm for U-2 OS, 4 nm for U2/DOXO35, 150 pm for Saos-1, 1 nm for Sa/DOXO26 and TC/DOXO8, and 300 pm for TC-71). Open profile represents cells stained with secondary antibody alone; solid profile represents cells stained with the anti-P-glycoprotein antibody. Data from an experiment representative of at least two similar experiments are shown.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

Flow cytometric analysis of DXR (10 μg/ml) intracellular incorporation in drug-sensitive and MDR sarcoma cells after 72 h of treatment with ET-743. Broken line represents negative control; Thin black linerepresents DXR incorporation in cells not exposed to ET-743; Thick black line represents DXR incorporation in cells exposed to ET-743 (400 pm for U-2 OS, 4 nm for U2/DOXO35, 150 pm for Saos-1, 1 nm for Sa/DOXO26 and TC/DOXO8, and 250 pm for TC-71). Data are from one experiment representative of two similar experiments.

Fig. 3.

Flow cytometric analysis of DXR (10 μg/ml) intracellular incorporation in drug-sensitive and MDR sarcoma cells after 72 h of treatment with ET-743. Broken line represents negative control; Thin black linerepresents DXR incorporation in cells not exposed to ET-743; Thick black line represents DXR incorporation in cells exposed to ET-743 (400 pm for U-2 OS, 4 nm for U2/DOXO35, 150 pm for Saos-1, 1 nm for Sa/DOXO26 and TC/DOXO8, and 250 pm for TC-71). Data are from one experiment representative of two similar experiments.

Close modal
Fig. 4.

In vitro sensitivity of 13 osteosarcoma cell lines to DXR, MTX, CDDP, and ET-743. Cells were exposed for 96 h to the IC70 dose calculated on U-2 OS cells, used as reference. Results are the mean of three independent experiments ± SE.

Fig. 4.

In vitro sensitivity of 13 osteosarcoma cell lines to DXR, MTX, CDDP, and ET-743. Cells were exposed for 96 h to the IC70 dose calculated on U-2 OS cells, used as reference. Results are the mean of three independent experiments ± SE.

Close modal
Fig. 5.

In vitro sensitivity of eight Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines to DXR, ACT-D, VCR, and ET-743. Cells were exposed for 72 h to the IC70 dose calculated on TC-71 cells used as a reference. Results are the mean of three independent experiments ± SE.

Fig. 5.

In vitro sensitivity of eight Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines to DXR, ACT-D, VCR, and ET-743. Cells were exposed for 72 h to the IC70 dose calculated on TC-71 cells used as a reference. Results are the mean of three independent experiments ± SE.

Close modal
Fig. 6.

Effects of ET-743 treatment on the cell cycle distribution of Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma cells. Cells were exposed to the corresponding ET-743 IC50 dose (250 pm for TC-71, 1 nm for TC/DOXO8, 400 pm for U-2 OS, 4 nm for U2/DOXO35, and 150 pm for Saos-2). Results are the means of two independent experiments and are expressed as the percentage of cells in the different cell cycle phases as determined by flow cytometry.

Fig. 6.

Effects of ET-743 treatment on the cell cycle distribution of Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma cells. Cells were exposed to the corresponding ET-743 IC50 dose (250 pm for TC-71, 1 nm for TC/DOXO8, 400 pm for U-2 OS, 4 nm for U2/DOXO35, and 150 pm for Saos-2). Results are the means of two independent experiments and are expressed as the percentage of cells in the different cell cycle phases as determined by flow cytometry.

Close modal
Fig. 7.

ET-743 significantly induces apoptosis in Ewing’s sarcoma cells but not in osteosarcoma cells, as indicated by the morphological analyses of apoptotic nuclei after different time exposure to ET-743. Cells were plated on plastic dishes and exposed 24 h later to the corresponding IC50 dose of the drug (250 pm for TC-71, 1 nm for TC/DOXO8, 400 pm for U-2 OS, 4 nm for U2/DOXO35, and 150 pm for Saos-2). A, Morphological appearance of osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma nuclei stained with Hoechst 33258 after ET-743 treatment. B, percentage of apoptotic nuclei at different time exposure to the drug. Results are expressed as means of triplicate plates ± SE. P < 0.05, Student’s t test.

Fig. 7.

ET-743 significantly induces apoptosis in Ewing’s sarcoma cells but not in osteosarcoma cells, as indicated by the morphological analyses of apoptotic nuclei after different time exposure to ET-743. Cells were plated on plastic dishes and exposed 24 h later to the corresponding IC50 dose of the drug (250 pm for TC-71, 1 nm for TC/DOXO8, 400 pm for U-2 OS, 4 nm for U2/DOXO35, and 150 pm for Saos-2). A, Morphological appearance of osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma nuclei stained with Hoechst 33258 after ET-743 treatment. B, percentage of apoptotic nuclei at different time exposure to the drug. Results are expressed as means of triplicate plates ± SE. P < 0.05, Student’s t test.

Close modal
Fig. 8.

Inhibitory effects of DXR, CDDP, MTX, VCR, or ACT-D in combination with ET-743 (300 pm for U-2 OS cells, 100 pm for Saos-2 cells) after simultaneous and continuous treatments. Cells were treated with the drugs at the indicated concentrations alone or in association with ET-743 on the first day after cell seeding for a total of 96 h. Results represent the mean ± SE of duplicate or triplicate experiments.

Fig. 8.

Inhibitory effects of DXR, CDDP, MTX, VCR, or ACT-D in combination with ET-743 (300 pm for U-2 OS cells, 100 pm for Saos-2 cells) after simultaneous and continuous treatments. Cells were treated with the drugs at the indicated concentrations alone or in association with ET-743 on the first day after cell seeding for a total of 96 h. Results represent the mean ± SE of duplicate or triplicate experiments.

Close modal
Table 1

Sensitivity of parental and resistant osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma cells to ET-743a

IC50, concentration of the drug resulting in 50% inhibition of cell growth. Results are the mean of three different experiments.

Cell linesIC50 (nm)
ET-743DXRMTXCDDP
U-2 OS 0.42 ± 0.02 10.31 ± 2.93 13.80 ± 1.56 581.67 ± 54.33
U-2/MDR 117.2 1.20 ± 0.20 79.14 ± 17.93 21.23 ± 8.49 570.00 ± 110.00
U-2/MDR 117.1 2.50 ± 1.10 259.14 ± 2.93 25.48 ± 4.32 610.00 ± 76.67
U-2/DOXO35 3.27 ± 1.47 1796.55 ± 503.62 29.72 ± 2.33 483.33 ± 135.67
U-2/MTX300 0.34 ± 0.07 6.72 ± 2.59 1000.00 ± 21.23 534.00 ± 74.33
U-2/CDDP300 0.08 ± 0.01 NDb ND 3733.33 ± 208.67
Saos-2 0.15 ± 0.01 12.93 ± 0.17 28.24 ± 6.37 506.67 ± 186.66
Sa/DOXO26 0.92 ± 0.10 1008.28 ± 25.52 33.97 ± 4.13 743.33 ± 290.00
Sa/MTX300 0.17 ± 0.02 11.90 ± 1.56 3087.47 ± 88.11 592.67 ± 168.00
Sa/CDDP300 0.04 ± 0.01 ND ND 6333.33 ± 447.00
TC-71 0.23 ± 0.05 22.76 ± 2.07 9.77 ± 1.23 733.33 ± 66.66
TC/DOXO8 0.70 ± 0.28 1372.41 ± 175.86 11.25 ± 3.45 940.00 ± 246.66
Cell linesIC50 (nm)
ET-743DXRMTXCDDP
U-2 OS 0.42 ± 0.02 10.31 ± 2.93 13.80 ± 1.56 581.67 ± 54.33
U-2/MDR 117.2 1.20 ± 0.20 79.14 ± 17.93 21.23 ± 8.49 570.00 ± 110.00
U-2/MDR 117.1 2.50 ± 1.10 259.14 ± 2.93 25.48 ± 4.32 610.00 ± 76.67
U-2/DOXO35 3.27 ± 1.47 1796.55 ± 503.62 29.72 ± 2.33 483.33 ± 135.67
U-2/MTX300 0.34 ± 0.07 6.72 ± 2.59 1000.00 ± 21.23 534.00 ± 74.33
U-2/CDDP300 0.08 ± 0.01 NDb ND 3733.33 ± 208.67
Saos-2 0.15 ± 0.01 12.93 ± 0.17 28.24 ± 6.37 506.67 ± 186.66
Sa/DOXO26 0.92 ± 0.10 1008.28 ± 25.52 33.97 ± 4.13 743.33 ± 290.00
Sa/MTX300 0.17 ± 0.02 11.90 ± 1.56 3087.47 ± 88.11 592.67 ± 168.00
Sa/CDDP300 0.04 ± 0.01 ND ND 6333.33 ± 447.00
TC-71 0.23 ± 0.05 22.76 ± 2.07 9.77 ± 1.23 733.33 ± 66.66
TC/DOXO8 0.70 ± 0.28 1372.41 ± 175.86 11.25 ± 3.45 940.00 ± 246.66
a

Cells were treated with different drugs for 72 h for Ewing’s sarcoma cell line (TC-71 and TC/DOXO8) or for 96 h for osteosarcoma cells (U-2 OS and Saos-2 parental cell lines and resistant variants; see “Materials and Methods” for details).

b

ND, not determined.

Table 2

In vitro ALP activity of osteosarcoma cells after 96 h of treatment with ET-743a

Cell linesExpression of membrane-bound ALP (% positive cells)ALP activity in conditioned medium (mU/ml/106 cells)IC50 value ET-743 (nm)b
ControlET-743ControlET-743
Saos-2 100 100 73 ± 5 374 ± 5c 0.15
SARG 100 100 357 ± 64 1072 ± 45d 0.10
IOR/OS-7 100 100 123 ± 11 789 ± 130d 0.30
IOR/OS-14 35 ± 8 83 ± 5 28 ± 6 86 ± 10d 0.56
IOR/OS-17 40 ± 2 70 ± 8 38 ± 11 76 ± 33 1.28
Cell linesExpression of membrane-bound ALP (% positive cells)ALP activity in conditioned medium (mU/ml/106 cells)IC50 value ET-743 (nm)b
ControlET-743ControlET-743
Saos-2 100 100 73 ± 5 374 ± 5c 0.15
SARG 100 100 357 ± 64 1072 ± 45d 0.10
IOR/OS-7 100 100 123 ± 11 789 ± 130d 0.30
IOR/OS-14 35 ± 8 83 ± 5 28 ± 6 86 ± 10d 0.56
IOR/OS-17 40 ± 2 70 ± 8 38 ± 11 76 ± 33 1.28
a

Cells were treated with 500 pm ET-743 for 96 h. Cytospins were prepared to evaluate the expression of ALP on the cell surface. Conditioned medium was collected, and ALP activity was measured by using p-nitrophenylphosphate as a substrate.

b

Concentration of ET-743 resulting in 50% inhibition of cell growth. Results of individual experiments, representative of two similar experiments, are shown.

c

P < 0.001, Student’s t test.

d

P < 0.05, Student’s t test.

Table 3

The effect of simultaneous exposure to ET-743 and chemotherapeutic agents in two osteosarcoma cell lines evaluated by Chou-Talalay equation (31, 32)

Cells were treated with different doses of DXR, CDDP, MTX, VCR, or ACT-D alone or in association with ET-743 on the first day after cell seeding, for a total of 96 h. Results represent the mean of duplicate or triplicate experiments.

U-2 OS DXR 0.23 0.3 0.23 4.90 1.06 Additive
0.23 0.38 7.76 0.73 Synergy
0.23 0.92 16.98 0.43 Synergy
0.23 10 7.03 105.00 0.13 Synergy
CDDP 0.23 10 0.28 245.50 0.86 Synergy
0.23 30 0.39 446.70 0.66 Synergy
0.23 100 0.85 1584.90 0.33 Synergy
0.23 300 6.46 42658.00 0.04 Synergy
MTX 0.23 0.17 3.89 1.61 Antagonism
0.23 0.19 4.27 1.91 Antagonism
0.23 0.38 6.02 1.60 Antagonism
0.23 10 1.12 10.72 1.14 Antagonism
VCR 0.23 0.1 0.08 0.62 2.93 Antagonism
0.23 0.3 0.11 0.81 2.46 Antagonism
0.23 0.19 1.50 1.88 Antagonism
0.23 0.45 3.63 1.34 Antagonism
ACT-D 0.23 0.01 0.10 0.16 2.36 Antagonism
0.23 0.1 0.13 0.22 2.22 Antagonism
0.23 0.3 0.20 0.36 1.98 Antagonism
0.23 1.05 2.30 0.65 Synergism
Saos-2 DXR 0.08 0.3 0.06 8.91 1.45 Antagonism
0.08 0.09 13.80 0.96 Synergy
0.08 0.14 19.95 0.72 Synergy
0.08 10 0.26 33.10 0.61 Synergy
CDDP 0.08 10 0.08 169.82 1.08 Additive
0.08 30 0.11 269.15 0.84 Synergy
0.08 100 0.23 851.13 0.47 Synergy
0.08 300 0.32 1380.38 0.46 Synergy
MTX 0.08 0.03 14.45 2.42 Antagonism
0.08 0.04 15.85 2.35 Antagonism
0.08 0.04 16.60 2.42 Antagonism
0.08 10 0.05 20.42 2.19 Antagonism
VCR 0.08 0.1 0.02 0.16 4.10 Antagonism
0.08 0.3 0.12 0.51 1.25 Antagonism
0.08 0.31 1.05 1.21 Antagonism
ACT-D 0.08 0.1 0.02 0.40 4.46 Antagonism
0.08 0.3 0.04 1.12 2.43 Antagonism
0.08 0.07 2.82 1.59 Antagonism
0.08 0.11 6.92 1.15 Antagonism
U-2 OS DXR 0.23 0.3 0.23 4.90 1.06 Additive
0.23 0.38 7.76 0.73 Synergy
0.23 0.92 16.98 0.43 Synergy
0.23 10 7.03 105.00 0.13 Synergy
CDDP 0.23 10 0.28 245.50 0.86 Synergy
0.23 30 0.39 446.70 0.66 Synergy
0.23 100 0.85 1584.90 0.33 Synergy
0.23 300 6.46 42658.00 0.04 Synergy
MTX 0.23 0.17 3.89 1.61 Antagonism
0.23 0.19 4.27 1.91 Antagonism
0.23 0.38 6.02 1.60 Antagonism
0.23 10 1.12 10.72 1.14 Antagonism
VCR 0.23 0.1 0.08 0.62 2.93 Antagonism
0.23 0.3 0.11 0.81 2.46 Antagonism
0.23 0.19 1.50 1.88 Antagonism
0.23 0.45 3.63 1.34 Antagonism
ACT-D 0.23 0.01 0.10 0.16 2.36 Antagonism
0.23 0.1 0.13 0.22 2.22 Antagonism
0.23 0.3 0.20 0.36 1.98 Antagonism
0.23 1.05 2.30 0.65 Synergism
Saos-2 DXR 0.08 0.3 0.06 8.91 1.45 Antagonism
0.08 0.09 13.80 0.96 Synergy
0.08 0.14 19.95 0.72 Synergy
0.08 10 0.26 33.10 0.61 Synergy
CDDP 0.08 10 0.08 169.82 1.08 Additive
0.08 30 0.11 269.15 0.84 Synergy
0.08 100 0.23 851.13 0.47 Synergy
0.08 300 0.32 1380.38 0.46 Synergy
MTX 0.08 0.03 14.45 2.42 Antagonism
0.08 0.04 15.85 2.35 Antagonism
0.08 0.04 16.60 2.42 Antagonism
0.08 10 0.05 20.42 2.19 Antagonism
VCR 0.08 0.1 0.02 0.16 4.10 Antagonism
0.08 0.3 0.12 0.51 1.25 Antagonism
0.08 0.31 1.05 1.21 Antagonism
ACT-D 0.08 0.1 0.02 0.40 4.46 Antagonism
0.08 0.3 0.04 1.12 2.43 Antagonism
0.08 0.07 2.82 1.59 Antagonism
0.08 0.11 6.92 1.15 Antagonism
a

D1, doses of ET-743, expressed in ng/ml, used for combined treatments; D2, doses of other drugs, expressed in ng/ml, used for combined treatment; (Dx)1, doses of ET-743 that alone gives the same percentages of inhibition recorded in combined treatments; (Dx)2, doses of other drugs that alone give the same percentages of inhibition recorded in combined treatments.

1
Campanacci M. .
Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors
, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag Wien, Austria
1999
.
2
Bramwell V. H. The role of chemotherapy in the management of non-metastatic operable extremity osteosarcoma.
Semin. Oncol.
,
24
:
561
-571,
1997
.
3
Bacci G., Toni A., Avella M., Manfrini M., Sudanese A., Ciaroni D., Boriani S., Emiliani E., Campanacci M. Long-term results in 144 localized Ewing’s sarcoma patients treated with combined therapy.
Cancer (Phila.)
,
63
:
1477
-1486,
1988
.
4
Burgert E. O., Nesbit M. E., Garnsey L. A., Gehan E. A., Herrmann J., Vietti T. J., Cangir A., Tefft M., Evans R., Thomas P., Askin F. B., Kissane J. M., Pritchard D. J., Neff J., Makley J. T., Gilula L. Multimodal therapy for the management of nonpelvic, localized Ewing’s sarcoma of bone: intergroup study IESS-II.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
8
:
1514
-1524,
1990
.
5
Paulussen M., Ahrens S., Dunst J., Winkelmann W., Exner G. U., Kotz R., Amann G., Dockhorn-Dworniczak B., Harms D., Müller-Weihrich S., Welte K., Kornhuber B., Janka-Schaub G., Göbel U., Treuner J., Voûte P. A., Zoubek A., Gadner H., Jürgens H. Localized Ewing tumor of bone: final results of the cooperative Ewing’s sarcoma study CESS 86.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
19
:
1818
-1829,
2001
.
6
Harris M. B., Gieser P., Goorin A. M., Ayala A., Shochat S. J., Ferguson W. S., Holbrook T., Link M. P. Treatment of metastatic osteosarcoma at diagnosis: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
16
:
3641
-3648,
1998
.
7
Paulussen M., Ahrens S., Craft A. W., Dunst J., Frohlich B., Jabar S., Rube C., Winkelmann W., Wissing S., Zoubek A., Jürgens H. Ewing’s tumors with primary lung metastases: survival analysis of 114 (European Intergroup) Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Studies patients.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
16
:
3044
-3052,
1998
.
8
Souhami R. L., Craft A. W., Van der Eijken J. W., Nooij M., Spooner D., Bramwell V. H., Wierzbicki R., Malcom A. J., Kirkpatrick A., Uscinska B. M., Van Glabbeke M., Machin D. Randomised trial of two regimens of chemotherapy in operable osteosarcoma: a study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.
Lancet
,
350
:
911
-917,
1997
.
9
Bruland Ø. S., Pihl A. On the current management of osteosarcoma: a critical evaluation and a proposal for a modified treatment strategy.
Eur. J. Cancer
,
11
:
1725
-1731,
1997
.
10
Ferguson W. S., Goorin A. M. Current treatment of osteosarcoma.
Cancer Investig.
,
19
:
292
-315,
2001
.
11
Bacci G., Picci P., Ferrari S., Mercuri M., Brach del Prever A., Rosito P., Barbieri E., Tienghi A., Forni C. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Ewing’s sarcoma of bone. No benefit observed after adding iphosphamide and etoposide to vincristine, actinomycin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin in the maintenance phase. Results of two sequential studies.
Cancer (Phila.)
,
6
:
1174
-1183,
1998
.
12
Craft A., Cotterill S., Malcolm A., Spooner D., Grimer R., Souhami R., Imeson J., Lewis I. Ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy in Ewing’s sarcoma: the Second United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group and the Medical Research Council Ewing’s Tumor Study.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
16
:
3628
-3633,
1998
.
13
Meyers P. A., Krailo M. D., Ladnyi M., Chan K-W., Sailer S. L., Dickman P. S., Baker D. L., Davis J. H., Gerbing R. B., Grovas A., Herzog C. E., Lindsley K. L., Liu-Mares W., Nachman J. B., Sieger L., Wadman J., Gorlick R. G. High-dose melphalan, etoposide, total-body irradiation, and autologous stem-cell reconstitution as consolidation therapy for high-risk Ewing’s sarcoma does not improve prognosis.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
19
:
2812
-2820,
2001
.
14
Pommier Y., Kohlhagen G., Bailly C., Waring M., Mazumder A., Kohn K. W. DANN sequence- and structure-selective alkylation of guanine N2 in the DANN minor groove by ecteinascidin 743, a potent antitumor compound from the Caribbean tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata.
Biochemistry
,
35
:
13303
-13309,
1996
.
15
Takebayashi Y., Pourquier P., Yoshida A., Kohlhagen G., Pommier Y. Poisoning of human DNA topoisomerase I by ecteinascidin 743, an anticancer drug that selectively alkylates DNA in the minor groove.
,
96
:
7196
-7201,
1999
.
16
Minuzzo M., Marchini S., Broggini M., Faircloth G., D’Incalci M., Mantovani R. Interference of transcriptional activation by the antineoplastic drug ecteinascidin-743.
,
97
:
6780
-6784,
2000
.
17
Takebayashi Y., Pourquier P., Zimonjic D. B., Nakayama K., Emmert S., Ueda T., Urasaki Y., Kanzaki A., Akiyama S-I., Popescu N., Kraemer K. H., Pommier Y. Antiproliferative activity of ectinascidin 743 is dependent upon transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair.
Nat. Med.
,
7
:
961
-966,
2001
.
18
Erba E., Bergamaschi D., Bassano L., Damia G., Ronzoni S., Faircloth G. T., D’Incalci M. Ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743), a natural marine compound, with a unique mechanism of action.
Eur. J. Cancer
,
37
:
97
-105,
2001
.
19
Damia G., Silvestri S., Carcassa L., Filiberti L., Faircloth G. T., Liberi G., Foiani M., D’Incalci M. Unique pattern of ET-743 activity in different cellular systems with defined deficiencies in DNA-repair pathways.
Int. J. Cancer
,
92
:
583
-588,
2001
.
20
Izbicka E., Lawrence R., Raymond E., Eckhardt G., Faircloth G., Jimeno J., Clark G., Von Hoff D. D. In vitro antitumor activity of the novel marine agent ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743, NSC-648766) against human tumors explanted from patients.
Ann. Oncol.
,
9
:
981
-987,
1998
.
21
Valoti G., Nicoletti M. I., Pellegrino A., Jimeno J., Hendriks H., D’Incalci M., Faircloth G., Gavazzi R. Ecteinascidin-743, a new marine natural product with potent antitumor activity on human ovarian carcinoma xenografts.
Clin. Cancer Res.
,
4
:
1977
-1983,
1998
.
22
Ghielmini M., Colli E., Erba E., Bergamaschi D., Pampallona S., Jimeno J., Faircloth G., Sessa. C. In vitro schedule-dependency of myelotoxicity and cytotoxicity of ecteinascidin 743 (ET-743).
Ann. Oncol.
,
9
:
989
-993,
1998
.
23
Hendriks H. R., Fiebig H. H., Giavazzi R., Langdon S. P., Jimeno J. M., Faircloth G. T. High antitumor activity of ET743 against human tumor xenografts from melanoma, non-small-cell lung and ovarian cancer.
Ann. Oncol.
,
10
:
1233
-1240,
1999
.
24
van Kesteren C., Cvitkovic E., Taamma A., Lopez-Lazaro L., Jimeno J. M., Guzman C., Mathot R. A. A., Schellens J. H. M., Misset J-L., Brain E., Hillebrand M. J. X., Rosing H., Beijnen J. H. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel marine-derived anticancer agent ecteinascidin 743 in a Phase I dose-finding study.
Clin. Cancer Res.
,
6
:
4725
-4732,
2000
.
25
Li W. W., Takahashi N., Jhanwar S., Cordon-Cardo C., Elisseyeff Y., Jimeno J., Faircloth G., Bertino J. R. Sensitivity of soft tissue sarcoma cell lines to chemotherapeutic agents: identification of ecteinascidin-743 as a potent cytotoxic agent.
Clin. Cancer Res.
,
7
:
2908
-2911,
2001
.
26
Takahashi N., Li W. W., Banerjee D., Scotto K. W., Bertino J. R. Sequence-dependent enhancement of cytotoxicity produced by ecteinascidin 743 (ET-743) with doxorubicin or paclitaxel in soft tissue sarcoma cells.
Clin. Cancer Res.
,
7
:
3251
-3257,
2001
.
27
Maki R. Sarcoma.
Oncologist
,
6
:
333
-337,
2001
.
28
Benini S., Baldini N., Manara M. C., Chano T., Serra M., Rizzi S., Lollini P-L., Picci P., Scotlandi K. Redundancy of autocrine loops in human osteosarcoma cells.
Int. J. Cancer
,
80
:
581
-588,
1999
.
29
Manara M. C., Perbal B., Benini S., Strammiello R., Cerisano V., Perdichizzi S., Serra M., Astolfi A., Bertoni F., Alami J., Yeger H., Picci P., Scotlandi K. The expression of ccn3(nov) gene in musculoskeletal tumors.
Am. J. Pathol.
,
160
:
849
-859,
2002
.
30
Scotlandi K., Manara M. C., Serra M., Benini S., Maurici D., Caputo A., De Giovanni C., Lollini P-L., Nanni P., Picci P., Campanacci M., Baldini N. The expression of P-glycoprotein is causally related to a less aggressive phenotype in human osteosarcoma cells.
Oncogene
,
18
:
739
-746,
1999
.
31
Chou T. C., Talalay P. Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors.
,
22
:
27
-55,
1984
.
32
Chou T. C., Riedeout D., Chou J., Bertino J. R. Chemotherapeutic synergism, potential and antagonism Dulbecco R. eds. .
Encyclopedia of Human Biology
,
Vol. 2
:
371
-379, Academic Press San Diego, CA
1991
.
33
Erba E., Bergamaschi D., Bassano L., Ronzoni S., Di Liberti G., Muradore I., Vignati S., Faircloth G., Jimeno J., D’Incalci M. Isolation and characterization of an IGROV-1 human ovarian cancer cell line made resistant to ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743).
Br. J. Cancer
,
82
:
1732
-1739,
2000
.
34
Stein G. S., Lian J. B., Owen T. A. Relationship of cell growth to the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression during osteoblast differentiation.
FASEB J.
,
4
:
3111
-3123,
1990
.
35
Rinehart K. L., Holt T. G., Fregeau N. L., Stroh J. G., Keifer P. A., Li L. H., Martin D. G. Ecteinascidins 729, 743, 745, 759A, 759B and 770: potent antitumor agents from the Caribbean tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata.
J. Org. Chem.
,
55
:
4512
-4515,
1990
.
36
Delaloge S., Yovine A., Taamma A., Riofrio M., Brain E., Raymond E., Cottu P., Goldwasser F., Jimeno J., Misset J. L., Marty M., Cvitkovic E. Ecteinascidin-743: a marine-derived compound in advanced, pretreated sarcoma patients-preliminary evidence of activity.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
19
:
1248
-1255,
2001
.
37
Taamma A., Misset J. L., Riofrio M., Guzman C., Brain E., Lopez Labaro L., Rosine H., Jimeno J. M., Cvitkovic E. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ecteinascidin-743, a new marine compound, administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion in patients with solid tumors.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
19
:
1256
-1265,
2001
.
38
Ryan D. P., Supko J. G., Eder J. P., Seiden M. V., Demetri G., Lynch T. J., Fischman A. J., Davis J., Jimeno J., Clark J. W. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ecteinascidin 743 administered as a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion in patients with solid malignancies.
Clin. Cancer Res.
,
7
:
231
-242,
2001
.
39
Villalona-Calero M. A., Eckhardt S. G., Weiss G., Hidalgo M., Beijnen J. H., van Kesteren C., Rosing H., Campbell E., Kraynak M., Lopez-Lazaro L., Guzman C., Von Hoff D. D., Jimeno J., Rowinsky E. K. A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ecteinascidin-743 on a daily × 5 schedule in patients with solid malignancies.
Clin. Cancer Res.
,
8
:
75
-85,
2002
.
40
Jin S., Gorfajn B., Faircloth G., Scotto K. W. Ecteinascidin 743, a transcription-targeted chemotherapeutic that inhibits MDR1 activation.
,
97
:
6775
-6779,
2000
.
41
Synold T. W., Dussault I., Forman B. M. The orphan nuclear receptor SXR co-ordinately regulates drug metabolism and efflux.
Nat. Med.
,
7
:
584
-590,
2001
.
42
Abolhoda A., Wilson A. E., Ross H., Danenberg P. V., Burt M., Scotto K. W. Rapid activation of MDR1 gene expression in human metastatic sarcoma after in vivo exposure to doxorubicin.
Clin. Cancer Res.
,
5
:
3353
-3356,
1999
.
43
Baldini N., Scotlandi K., Barbanti-Brodano G., Manara M. C., Maurici D., Bacci G., Bertoni F., Picci P., Sottili S., Campanacci M., Serra M. Expression of P-glycoprotein in high grade osteosarcomas in relation to clinical outcome.
N. Engl. J. Med.
,
333
:
1380
-1385,
1995
.
44
Chan H. S., Grogan T. M., Haddad G., DeBoer G., Ling V. P-glycoprotein expression: critical determinant in the response to osteosarcoma chemotherapy.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda)
,
89
:
1706
-1715,
1997
.
45
Baldini N., Scotlandi K., Serra M., Picci P., Bacci G., Sottili S., Campanacci M. P-glycoprotein expression in osteosarcoma: a basis for risk-adapted adjuvant chemotherapy.
J. Orthop. Res.
,
17
:
629
-632,
1999
.