In this study, we screened 19 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) for the detection of genetic alterations using inter-simple sequence repeat PCR, a DNA fingerprinting approach. Three simple repetitive unanchored primers representing tri- and tetranucleotide repeats [(GTG)5, (GACA)4, and (GATA)4] were used, and evidence of gains and losses of chromosomal sequences were detected in all tumors (19 of 19 cases) for at least one of the primers. In 13 of these cases, apparently normal marginal epithelia adjacent to the tumors were also collected and examined. Eight of the 13 (62%) patients showed matching somatic mutations in the marginal epithelia adjacent to the tumors. Five of these 8 (63%) marginal epithelial samples were histologically normal, two were dysplastic, and one had extremely rare tumor cells. In 3 of these 13 (23%) cases, the profile bands were also seen to quantitatively increase in intensity, progressing from normal epithelia to marginal epithelia to tumors. Ten profile bands showing gains and one profile band showing loss in tumors compared with the corresponding normal epithelia were cloned, and their origins were determined by sequencing. The DNA sequence of one of the profile bands showing gain in the tumor could be matched to an expressed sequence tag sequence that has been mapped to the 7q22 region, a genomic amplification novel to ESCC. The sequence of the other profile band showing gain in the tumor could be matched to a nonexonic sequence of chromosome 20, whereas the sequences of the remaining profile bands could not be matched with any known sequences after comparison with the genomic sequence data in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory and GenBank databases. The bona fide nature of the gains or losses of 11 profile bands in the original cases was confirmed by direct genomic PCR amplification. The frequencies of these specific gene alterations in tumors were then analyzed in a total of 60 ESCCs, which included 41 additional cases of ESCC. Significantly, 26 of 60 (43%) tumors showed the DNA amplification for the expressed sequence tag sequence of chromosome 7, whereas the frequency of other individual gene alterations ranged from 7% to 15%. It is concluded that the inter-simple sequence repeat PCR strategy is adequate for the detection of somatic mutations in tumors, most of which are quantitative alterations in anonymous genomic sequences. This approach is also suitable for detection of somatic mutations preceding the onset of morphologically detectable neoplasia in ESCC.

Tumors are composed of populations of abnormal cells capable of altering their genomes in response to changes in their milieu (1, 2). The abnormal biological properties of tumor cells are acquired by a microevolutionary process that can enhance their overall growth, survival, and metastatic potential (1). Tumor progression is driven by clonal evolution in which a few neoplastic clones are selected from a variety of randomly generated cell variants. Rather than a few specific mutations leading to genetic instability, mechanisms of somatic mutation generate an evolutionary diversity, resulting in tumor heterogeneity, and eventually clonal predominance can be observed (1, 2). Thus, the critical genetic alterations are those that facilitate tumor heterogeneity, and these are necessary for tumor progression and development (3). Subsequently, or concurrently, a set of mutations necessary for malignancy is generated and expanded by clonal selection. For gastrointestinal cancers, tumor progression has been proposed to follow a stepwise acquisition of multiple changes that involve multiple oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and cell cycle-regulating genes (4, 5).

Different methods have been used to examine the alterations of cancer genomes. Typical examples are the observation of clonal cytogenetic abnormalities (6), detection of amplifications and/or deletions at the gene or transcript level (7), localization of point mutations for cancer-related genes (4), and examination of allelic losses or replication error phenotypes at microsatellite loci that are relevant to carcinogenesis (8). Another approach to detect the alterations of cancer genomes is the generation of DNA fingerprint profiles that can be produced by PCR-based methods. Examples include the detection of genetic alterations in colorectal, lung, and ovarian cancers by arbitrarily primed PCR genomic fingerprinting (9, 10, 11) and the application of ISSR-PCR3 analysis on sporadic colorectal cancer (12).

ISSR-PCR has also been described as microsatellite-primed PCR in the literature (13, 14) because it specifically amplifies regions of the genome between microsatellites. The method of comparing inter-repeat profiles from the whole genome was first used in the identification and differentiation of different eukaryotic species because of its accuracy and reproducibility (13, 14). The significance of the changes in the inter-repeat sequences for carcinogenesis was subsequently suggested by Basik et al.(12). In the present study, ISSR-PCR was applied to ESCC and premalignant lesions. By observing the fingerprinting profiles generated from the malignant and premalignant populations compared with the normal genomes, we hoped to follow the process of tumor progression in ESCC and compare the observable alterations at the genome level with the clinicopathological features of the disease.

Collection of Samples and DNA Extraction.

For the initial ISSR-PCR DNA fingerprint profiling, ESCC samples with gross tumor appearance were collected prospectively from 19 surgically resected specimens after esophagectomy between June 1996 and March 1997 in Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong. All of the selected ESCC samples had more than 80% viable tumor cells as shown by histological assessment. Morphologically normal epithelial tissues at least 10 cm away from the tumors were also sampled from each patient. Apparently normal marginal epithelia that were adjacent to the tumors by 1 cm were collected from 13 patients. Sterile equipment was used for every sampling of tumor, normal, and marginal epithelia. One-half of each sample was fixed in 10% formalin for histological assessment as described previously (15), and the other half was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −85°C for later DNA extraction using the method described previously (16). For every five cryostat sections cut from the frozen blocks for DNA extraction, an additional H&E-stained section was prepared for histological assessment to confirm the presence or absence of tumor cells. To determine the frequency of occurrence of the specific gene alterations by direct genomic PCR analysis for the ISSR-PCR profile bands in ESCC, an additional batch of 41 archival ESCCs collected between 1989 and 1993 in Queen Mary Hospital that were not pretreated with chemoradiotherapy were also included in the present study. All these ESCC samples had more than 80% viable tumor cells as shown by histological assessment.

ISSR-PCR DNA Fingerprint Profiling.

For ISSR-PCR DNA fingerprint profiling, 50 ng of genomic DNA were used in each 10-μl reaction as the template. The sequences of the three primers are as follows: (a) (GTG)5, 5′-GTGGTGGTGGTGGTG-3′; (b) (GACA)4, 5′-GACAGACAGACAGACA-3′; and (c) (GATA)4, 5′-GATAGATAGATAGATA-3′. In each reaction, 0.2 μm each primer was end-labeled with [γ-33P]ATP (Amersham, Aylesbury, United Kingdom) using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Promega, Madison, WI). Each PCR reaction contained the same amount of labeled and unlabeled primer. The PCR protocol (with an annealing temperature of 56°C) and the procedures for electrophoresis and autoradiography were as described previously (12). 33P-end-labeled molecular weight markers (HaeIII-cut φ174 DNA) were also run on the side lanes of the gels for the size comparison.

DNA Sequencing of Selected ISSR-PCR Profile Bands.

Eleven selected bands from the ISSR-PCR profiles were cut out of the polyacrylamide gel based on their discrete and nonoverlapping appearance with other bands in the autoradiographs. DNA was extracted by boiling the gel slices in 30 μl of water for 10 min. Eight μl of each DNA fragment were then cloned into 1 μg of pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega). Cycle sequencing was done with the Big-Dye sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer) using the forward and reverse primers as suggested by the supplier of the vector, and the sequences were then analyzed by an ABI 310 Genetic Analyzer (Perkin-Elmer). The sequences were matched against the genomic sequence data in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory and GenBank databases.

Direct Genomic PCR Analysis of ISSR-PCR Profile Bands.

Two specific primers were designed for the direct genomic PCR analysis of the 11 ISSR-PCR profile bands in 60 ESCCs. The primer sequences for the amplification of selected profile bands by PCR are summarized in Table 2. Patient DNA (30 ng) was used for each 20-μl PCR reaction with 10 pmol of each primer, 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Promega), 0.2 mm each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and 2 mm MgCl2. The reaction was carried out for 35 cycles after an initial denaturation at 95°C for 4 min under the following conditions: 95°C for 30 s; 52°C for 30 s; and 72°C for 30 s. In addition, the β-globin gene sequences (17) were also amplified simultaneously in the same reaction tube as the internal PCR controls to normalize the amount of DNA of each sample analyzed. The products of the multiplex PCR amplification were run in a 3% agarose gel and visualized under UV light after staining with ethidium bromide (Fig. 2). Molecular weight markers (HaeIII-cut φ174 DNA) were run on the side lanes of the gels for the size comparison.

ISSR-PCR DNA Fingerprint Profiling of ESCC Tumors and Adjacent Normal Epithelia.

First, to ensure the reproducibility of ISSR-PCR DNA fingerprint profiling in our laboratory, the method was performed on two independent DNA preparations from the normal esophageal epithelia of the same patient. Identical profiles were generated from the two independent DNA preparations from the same patient (Fig. 1). Tissue samples collected from 19 patients with ESCC were then analyzed by ISSR-PCR. The clinicopathological features of these patients are summarized in Table 1. In the 13 apparently normal marginal epithelia collected, extremely rare tumor cells were found in 2 samples (patients 2 and 7) by histological assessment, dysplasia was noted in 2 other samples (patients 5 and 17), and the rest were histologically normal. The profiles generated by ISSR-PCR for each individual patient, using each of the three repeating primers, were aligned together with those generated from the corresponding normal epithelium. Evidence of amplification and/or deletion of chromosomal sequences was observed as shown by changes in intensities or gains and/or losses of profile bands of tumors compared with the corresponding normal epithelia. All of the 19 ESCCs showed evidence of genetic alteration compared with their normal epithelia controls using at least one of the repeating primers (Table 1). Six of the 19 patients (patients 2, 5, 6, 17, 18, and 19; 32%) showed abnormal profile bands for all three primers. Representative examples of autoradiographs are shown in Fig. 2 I.

Analysis of Selected ISSR-PCR Profile Bands.

Ten profile bands showing gains and one profile band showing loss in tumors compared with the corresponding normal epithelia were cloned, and their origins were determined by sequencing (Table 2). Profile band A from patient 6 shows 98% homology to the GenBank sequence that can be matched against a nonexonic genomic sequence (97% homology) with accession number AL050325 isolated from chromosome 20. Profile band C showing gain in the tumor specimen from patient 19 shows 98% homology to an expressed sequence tag sequence with accession number AA078562 that has been mapped to the chromosome 7q22 region. The other profile bands were anonymous and could not be matched significantly with any known sequences in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory and GenBank databases.

Validation of ISSR-PCR Results and Frequency of Individual Gene Alterations of ISSR-PCR Profile Bands in ESCC.

To show that the genetic alterations observed by ISSR-PCR are true somatic mutations occurring in the tumors and represent true amplifications in the genome, specific primers were designed for 11 ISSR-PCR profile bands based on the sequencing results (Table 2). Using the primers specific for these gene alterations, direct genomic PCR amplification was performed on the original patient DNA samples and confirmed the bona fide nature of the gains or losses of 11 profile bands in the original cases. Selected examples are shown in Fig. 2 II.

To determine the frequency of occurrence of these specific gene alterations in ESCC, DNA from the tumor and the corresponding normal epithelium from 60 ESCCs, including 41 additional cases of ESCC, was analyzed by direct genomic PCR using the specific PCR primers for ISSR-PCR profile bands (Table 2). For normalization of the DNA quantity of the tumor and the corresponding normal epithelium samples for the PCR analysis, β-globin gene amplification was used as the internal control (17). The frequencies of the occurrence of these specific gene alterations are summarized in Table 3. Significantly, 26 of 60 (43%) tumors showed DNA amplification for the expressed sequence tag sequence of chromosome 7 (the band intensity was at least two times stronger than that of the corresponding normal control), whereas the frequency of other individual gene alterations ranged from 7% to 15%.

The three repeating primers [(GTG)5, (GACA)4, and (GATA)4] were chosen for ISSR-PCR profiling because these repeating sequences are somatically stable in normal human genomes (18, 19), and they are diverse because they can be found in both autosomes and sex chromosomes (20, 21). ISSR-PCR amplifies the inter-repeat sequences (13, 14), and the observed alterations of the profiles from tumors in the present study and in that of Basik et al.(12) include changes in intensities, gains and/or losses, which, as shown here, correlate with deletions and amplifications of genomic fragments. The profile bands with increased or decreased intensities in tumor specimens must reflect spontaneous somatic mutations consisting of gains and losses of chromosomal sequences occurring in tumors that became detectable by tumor clonality. These genetic alterations can be regarded as markers for the clonal evolution of tumor progression, showing the emergence and/or deletion of tumor clones (1, 2, 16).

Eight of 13 patients (patients 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 17, 18, and 19; 62%) were found to have matching gains or losses of profiling bands in the ESCC and the corresponding apparently normal marginal epithelia adjacent to the tumors for at least one primer used. For the marginal epithelia of these eight patients, two patients (patients 5 and 17) had dysplastic epithelia, one patient (patient 7) had extremely rare tumor cells, and the other five patients were histologically normal. This observation suggests that the generation of widespread genetic alterations can be an early event in tumor progression and that these alterations can be detected by ISSR-PCR in premalignant stages. However, it should be pointed out that although all of the necessary precautions were taken to avoid any contamination of histologically normal marginal epithelia with tumor, one could never be sure that absolutely no tumor cells were present in the nontumorous sample. PCR reactions are very sensitive, almost certainly more sensitive than histopathological assessment. Nevertheless, our findings are consistent with previous reports showing the presence of genomic abnormalities in premalignant lesions before they are morphologically recognized (22, 23) and the concept of field cancerization, by which early genetic events are shared by cells in a local anatomical area before they appear to be morphologically neoplastic (24).

Of the 13 patients providing marginal epithelia, spectra of increasing intensities were noted in 3 patients (patients 1, 2, and 5; 23%). The intensities of the amplified bands in a fingerprinting profile are semiquantitative, and the intensity of an amplified band is proportional to the concentration of its corresponding template sequence (12). For patients 1 and 5, the extra bands were detected in their marginal epithelia, and the intensities of the bands were further increased in their tumor samples (Table 1), indicating further genomic amplification in tumors. It is worth noting that the marginal epithelia of patients 1 and 5 were histologically normal and dysplastic, respectively. Thus, the observed genetic alterations preceded even the appearance of premalignant lesions in patient 1. For patient 2, the spectrum of increasing intensity was observed in the normal, marginal, and tumor samples. Because squamous cell carcinoma was also present in the marginal epithelium of patient 2 (Table 1), such an increased band intensity in the tumor profile might be related to either an increased amount of tumor genomes in the tumor sample or an increase in the copy number of certain genomic sequences.

The finding of genetic alterations in all of the ESCC tumors and 62% of epithelia surrounding ESCC derives from the ability of the ISSR-PCR method to detect abnormalities in one reaction, throughout the genome, and in the absence of any information about loci-specific sequences. Moreover, the comparative DNA profiling analysis appears to be more sensitive than histological assessments in showing early genetic alterations in preneoplastic epithelia because five of eight (63%) samples of the marginal epithelia that matched tumor abnormalities are histologically normal. The sensitivity and reproducibility of the method suggest the application of ISSR-PCR for early detection of ESCC and also for the detection of early tumor recurrence. Another interesting means to test the usefulness of ISSR-PCR for early detection of cancer would be to investigate Barrett’s esophageal tissues, Barrett’s dysplasia, and adenocarcinomas (25).

As shown in the present study, the ISSR-PCR method also offers an opportunity to identify the genomic fragments that show amplifications or deletions in ESCC. Several amplified chromosomal regions and genes in ESCC have been implicated in the development and progression of ESCC, such as chromosomal regions 11q13 (5) and 13q34 (26), c-myc oncogene, and epidermal growth factor receptor genes (27). The overexpressions of these genes have also been suggested to be involved in tumorigenesis (4). In the present study, the detections of amplified exonic fragments of 7q22 from patient 19 with a high frequency (43%) are novel to ESCC. The chromosomal overrepresentation of 7q22 has also been shown by comparative genomic hybridization to be involved in pancreatic carcinomas (28) and nonpapillary renal cell carcinomas (29). The involvement of exonic amplification in carcinogenesis of ESCC is currently being investigated and will be reported later.

In summary, here we describe our results of the application of ISSR-PCR to detect somatic mutations in different tissues from ESCC patients including tumor and marginal epithelia in comparison with the corresponding normal epithelium, and we show that ISSR-PCR profiling offers a powerful approach to identify novel genomic fragments that may be involved in the carcinogenesis of esophageal cancers. Analysis of 19 ESCCs by this technique detected frequent changes in the intensities of the profile bands not only in tumor samples but also in apparently normal marginal epithelia. From these data, it is concluded that (a) widespread genetic alterations can be an early event in tumor progression in ESCC, and these alterations can be detected by ISSR-PCR in tumors and premalignant stages; and (b) the observed genetic alterations can be detected before the appearance of premalignant lesions and may provide the basis for a general screening method for predisposition to the development of patent disease.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

        
1

Supported by Grant CRCG 335/046/0086 from The University of Hong Kong.

                
3

The abbreviations used are: ISSR-PCR, inter-simple sequence repeat PCR; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Fig. 1.

Reproducibility of ISSR-PCR DNA fingerprint profiles. Identical profiles were generated by ISSR-PCR performed on two independent DNA preparations (I and II) from the normal esophageal epithelia of the same patient using the (GATA)4, (GACA)4, and (GTG)5 repeat primers. The sequence of the tri- or tetranucleotide repeat primer used is shown below each block. 33P-end-labeled molecular weight markers (HaeIII-cut φ174 DNA) were run on the side lanes of the gels for the size comparison, and the molecular size ranges of the profiles are shown on the left of each panel.

Fig. 1.

Reproducibility of ISSR-PCR DNA fingerprint profiles. Identical profiles were generated by ISSR-PCR performed on two independent DNA preparations (I and II) from the normal esophageal epithelia of the same patient using the (GATA)4, (GACA)4, and (GTG)5 repeat primers. The sequence of the tri- or tetranucleotide repeat primer used is shown below each block. 33P-end-labeled molecular weight markers (HaeIII-cut φ174 DNA) were run on the side lanes of the gels for the size comparison, and the molecular size ranges of the profiles are shown on the left of each panel.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

I, comparative DNA profiling analysis using ISSR-PCR to detect genetic alterations in ESCC patients. A, comparison between the profiles of normal epithelium (N) and tumor (T). B, comparison between the normal epithelium (N), marginal epithelium (M), and tumor (T). The sequence of the PCR primer used is shown below each block. Arrowheads indicate the abnormal positions of the bands in the fingerprinting profiles when compared with normal epithelium. In patient 9, genetic alteration of the tumor sample was shown by the loss of a band (arrowhead) in the profile compared with the normal epithelium. In patients 12 and 18, genetic alterations of tumor samples were detected by both gains and losses of bands (arrowheads). Intensity changes of bands in the profiles were found in patients 2 and 17, and the alterations were shown by the spectra of changes (arrowheads) from normal epithelia to marginal epithelia to tumors. 33P-end-labeled molecular weight markers (HaeIII-cut φ174 DNA) were run on the side lanes of the gels for size comparison, and the molecular size ranges of the profiles are shown on the left of each panel. II, direct genomic PCR analysis for the ISSR-PCR profile bands. The primer sequences for the PCR amplifications are shown in Table 2. a, a 520-bp fragment (A) was isolated from the tumor profile of patient 6 that shows a gain using (GACA)4 as the PCR profiling primer compared with the corresponding normal epithelium. Band A from tumor (T) shows an increase in copy number compared with the normal epithelium (N). b, a 580-bp fragment (B) was isolated from the profile of normal epithelium of patient 11 that shows a loss using (GTG)5 as the PCR profiling primer compared with the corresponding tumor. Band B in tumor (T) shows a decrease in copy number compared with the normal epithelium (N). c, a 270-bp fragment (C) was isolated from the tumor profile of patient 19 that shows a gain using (GTG)5 as the PCR profiling primer compared with the corresponding normal epithelium. Band C in tumor (T) shows an increase in copy number compared with the normal epithelium (N). The β-globin sequences G1 (268 bp) and G2 (110 bp) were also amplified simultaneously in the same reaction tube as the internal PCR controls to normalize the amount of DNA in each sample analyzed. The products of the multiplex PCR amplification were run in a 3% agarose gel and visualized under UV light after staining with ethidium bromide. Molecular weight markers (HaeIII-cut φ174 DNA) were run on the side lanes of the gels for size comparison, and selected molecular sizes are shown on the left of each panel.

Fig. 2.

I, comparative DNA profiling analysis using ISSR-PCR to detect genetic alterations in ESCC patients. A, comparison between the profiles of normal epithelium (N) and tumor (T). B, comparison between the normal epithelium (N), marginal epithelium (M), and tumor (T). The sequence of the PCR primer used is shown below each block. Arrowheads indicate the abnormal positions of the bands in the fingerprinting profiles when compared with normal epithelium. In patient 9, genetic alteration of the tumor sample was shown by the loss of a band (arrowhead) in the profile compared with the normal epithelium. In patients 12 and 18, genetic alterations of tumor samples were detected by both gains and losses of bands (arrowheads). Intensity changes of bands in the profiles were found in patients 2 and 17, and the alterations were shown by the spectra of changes (arrowheads) from normal epithelia to marginal epithelia to tumors. 33P-end-labeled molecular weight markers (HaeIII-cut φ174 DNA) were run on the side lanes of the gels for size comparison, and the molecular size ranges of the profiles are shown on the left of each panel. II, direct genomic PCR analysis for the ISSR-PCR profile bands. The primer sequences for the PCR amplifications are shown in Table 2. a, a 520-bp fragment (A) was isolated from the tumor profile of patient 6 that shows a gain using (GACA)4 as the PCR profiling primer compared with the corresponding normal epithelium. Band A from tumor (T) shows an increase in copy number compared with the normal epithelium (N). b, a 580-bp fragment (B) was isolated from the profile of normal epithelium of patient 11 that shows a loss using (GTG)5 as the PCR profiling primer compared with the corresponding tumor. Band B in tumor (T) shows a decrease in copy number compared with the normal epithelium (N). c, a 270-bp fragment (C) was isolated from the tumor profile of patient 19 that shows a gain using (GTG)5 as the PCR profiling primer compared with the corresponding normal epithelium. Band C in tumor (T) shows an increase in copy number compared with the normal epithelium (N). The β-globin sequences G1 (268 bp) and G2 (110 bp) were also amplified simultaneously in the same reaction tube as the internal PCR controls to normalize the amount of DNA in each sample analyzed. The products of the multiplex PCR amplification were run in a 3% agarose gel and visualized under UV light after staining with ethidium bromide. Molecular weight markers (HaeIII-cut φ174 DNA) were run on the side lanes of the gels for size comparison, and selected molecular sizes are shown on the left of each panel.

Close modal
Table 1

Summary of ISSR-PCR analysis and clinical data of ESCC patients

Patient no.Age/sexHistopathological typesTumor stageHistological stagePreoperative chemoradio-therapy receivedTypes of repeating primers useda
(GTG)5(GACA)4(GATA)4
NMTMTMTMT
63/M NT NT SCC (M)* T3N1M0 III None Gain Gain ++ 
47/M NT SCC SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None ++ Gain Loss Gain 
59/M NT NT SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None Loss Gain Loss 
68/M NT – SCC (M) T3N1M0 III Received – – Loss – 
68/M NT SCC (M) T3N0M0 IIA None Gain Gain ++, Loss Loss Loss Loss 
66/M NT – SCC (M) T3N1M0 III Received – Loss – Gain – Loss 
66/M NT SCC SCC (P) T3N1M1 IV None Gain Gain Gain 
64/M NT NT SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None Gain Gain 
68/M NT – SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None – – – Loss 
10 58/M NT – SCC (M) T2N0M0 IIA Received – Gain, Loss – – Gain 
11 66/M NT – SCC (M) T3N0M0 IIA Received – Loss – Gain – 
12 70/M NT – SCC (W) T3N1M1 IV None – – – Gain, Loss 
13 63/M NT NT SCC (W) T3N1M0 III None Gain Gain Loss 
14 70/F NT NT SCC (M) T2N0M0 IIA Received Gain Gain Loss Loss 
15 48/F NT NT SCC (W) T3N1M0 III None Loss 
16 57/M NT NT SCC (W) T3N1M0 III None Gain Loss 
17 70/M NT SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None Loss Loss – Loss Gain Gain 
18 49/M NT NT SCC (M) T4N1M1 IV Received Loss Loss Gain, Loss Gain 
19 72/F NT NT SCC (W) T3N1M0 III None Gain Loss Loss Loss 
Patient no.Age/sexHistopathological typesTumor stageHistological stagePreoperative chemoradio-therapy receivedTypes of repeating primers useda
(GTG)5(GACA)4(GATA)4
NMTMTMTMT
63/M NT NT SCC (M)* T3N1M0 III None Gain Gain ++ 
47/M NT SCC SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None ++ Gain Loss Gain 
59/M NT NT SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None Loss Gain Loss 
68/M NT – SCC (M) T3N1M0 III Received – – Loss – 
68/M NT SCC (M) T3N0M0 IIA None Gain Gain ++, Loss Loss Loss Loss 
66/M NT – SCC (M) T3N1M0 III Received – Loss – Gain – Loss 
66/M NT SCC SCC (P) T3N1M1 IV None Gain Gain Gain 
64/M NT NT SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None Gain Gain 
68/M NT – SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None – – – Loss 
10 58/M NT – SCC (M) T2N0M0 IIA Received – Gain, Loss – – Gain 
11 66/M NT – SCC (M) T3N0M0 IIA Received – Loss – Gain – 
12 70/M NT – SCC (W) T3N1M1 IV None – – – Gain, Loss 
13 63/M NT NT SCC (W) T3N1M0 III None Gain Gain Loss 
14 70/F NT NT SCC (M) T2N0M0 IIA Received Gain Gain Loss Loss 
15 48/F NT NT SCC (W) T3N1M0 III None Loss 
16 57/M NT NT SCC (W) T3N1M0 III None Gain Loss 
17 70/M NT SCC (M) T3N1M0 III None Loss Loss – Loss Gain Gain 
18 49/M NT NT SCC (M) T4N1M1 IV Received Loss Loss Gain, Loss Gain 
19 72/F NT NT SCC (W) T3N1M0 III None Gain Loss Loss Loss 
a

All the gains, losses, or increase in intensity of bands reported in both marginal epithelium and tumor of the same patient are of the same sizes; D, dysplasia; Gain, gain of an extra band compared to normal epithelium; Loss, loss of a band compared to normal epithelium; (M), moderately differentiated type of tumor; M, marginal epithelium; n, same pattern as that found in normal epithelium; N, normal epithelium; NT, no tumor; (P), poorly differentiated type of tumor; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; T, tumor; (W), well differentiated type of tumor; -, decreased intensity of a band compared to normal epithelium; –, unavailable; +, increased intensity of a band compared to normal epithelium; ++, increased intensity of a band compared to marginal epithelium;

*

with mucin-producing component.

Table 2

Sequences of the primers used for direct genomic PCR analysis of the 11 ISSR-PCR profile bands in 60 ESCCs

ISSR-PCR profile bands (direct PCR product size)PCR primersPrimer sequences (5′ to 3′)
A (520 bp) A1 ATG-AAT-TCT-CCA-GAT-GCA-CA 
 A2 TAC-GGA-GGG-TAA-AGC-AAG-AC 
B (580 bp) B1 TAT-GGT-CAT-GTT-GGG-ACT-CA 
 B2 ACC-CAG-CCA-CCT-AAT-GAC-TT 
C (270 bp) C1 GGA-AGA-ACA-AGT-TCC-AGG-AG 
 C2 GCT-TCC-TCC-TTT-CTT-CCC-TA 
D (380 bp) D1 ATG-CAG-ACT-GAC-TCC-GAT-TT 
 D2 CAA-AGG-CAG-CAA-GGT-GAG 
E (353 bp) E1 TGT-TCT-TCC-TTC-CCC-TCA-C 
 E2 TGA-TGC-CAA-GCA-CTC-ATA-TC 
F (989 bp) F1 TTT-GAG-ATA-CGA-CAC-CTG-GA 
 F2 TCG-CAT-CAC-CAT-AAC-TGA-CT 
G (341 bp) G1 AAC-AGG-GGA-CCC-AAT-GAC 
 G2 AAG-TAG-CGA-GCA-ACA-GGA-AG 
H (626 bp) H1 CTC-GGA-TTA-CTG-GGA-GTG-AC 
 H2 CTA-CTG-TTG-CAC-CGA-GCA-T 
I (477 bp) I1 AAG-TAG-CGA-GCA-ACA-GGA-AG 
 I2 CTC-CAG-ATG-CAA-ACA-GTG-AC 
J (469 bp) J1 ACA-CAC-TAG-GTT-GGG-TAG-GG 
 J2 AAT-GCA-GGA-AAA-GGA-GAG-TG 
K (954 bp) K1 ACG-TTT-GAT-GGG-TTG-AGT-CT 
 K2 GCA-GAT-TCA-ATG-TCT-CCA-CA 
G1 (268 bp) Globin-1 GAA-GAG-CCA-AGG-ACA-GGT-AC 
 Globin-2 CAA-CTT-CAT-CCA-CGT-TCA-CC 
G2 (110 bp) Globin-3 ACA-CAA-CTG-TGT-TCA-CTA-GC 
 Globin-2 CAA-CTT-CAT-CCA-CGT-TCA-CC 
ISSR-PCR profile bands (direct PCR product size)PCR primersPrimer sequences (5′ to 3′)
A (520 bp) A1 ATG-AAT-TCT-CCA-GAT-GCA-CA 
 A2 TAC-GGA-GGG-TAA-AGC-AAG-AC 
B (580 bp) B1 TAT-GGT-CAT-GTT-GGG-ACT-CA 
 B2 ACC-CAG-CCA-CCT-AAT-GAC-TT 
C (270 bp) C1 GGA-AGA-ACA-AGT-TCC-AGG-AG 
 C2 GCT-TCC-TCC-TTT-CTT-CCC-TA 
D (380 bp) D1 ATG-CAG-ACT-GAC-TCC-GAT-TT 
 D2 CAA-AGG-CAG-CAA-GGT-GAG 
E (353 bp) E1 TGT-TCT-TCC-TTC-CCC-TCA-C 
 E2 TGA-TGC-CAA-GCA-CTC-ATA-TC 
F (989 bp) F1 TTT-GAG-ATA-CGA-CAC-CTG-GA 
 F2 TCG-CAT-CAC-CAT-AAC-TGA-CT 
G (341 bp) G1 AAC-AGG-GGA-CCC-AAT-GAC 
 G2 AAG-TAG-CGA-GCA-ACA-GGA-AG 
H (626 bp) H1 CTC-GGA-TTA-CTG-GGA-GTG-AC 
 H2 CTA-CTG-TTG-CAC-CGA-GCA-T 
I (477 bp) I1 AAG-TAG-CGA-GCA-ACA-GGA-AG 
 I2 CTC-CAG-ATG-CAA-ACA-GTG-AC 
J (469 bp) J1 ACA-CAC-TAG-GTT-GGG-TAG-GG 
 J2 AAT-GCA-GGA-AAA-GGA-GAG-TG 
K (954 bp) K1 ACG-TTT-GAT-GGG-TTG-AGT-CT 
 K2 GCA-GAT-TCA-ATG-TCT-CCA-CA 
G1 (268 bp) Globin-1 GAA-GAG-CCA-AGG-ACA-GGT-AC 
 Globin-2 CAA-CTT-CAT-CCA-CGT-TCA-CC 
G2 (110 bp) Globin-3 ACA-CAA-CTG-TGT-TCA-CTA-GC 
 Globin-2 CAA-CTT-CAT-CCA-CGT-TCA-CC 
Table 3

Frequencies of the specific gene alterations detected by direct genomic PCR for the 11 ISSR-PCR profile bands in ESCCs

ISSR-PCR profile bandsPatient no.ISSR-PCR primer sequences usedSizes of direct PCR products (bp)No. of ESCCs with gainsor losses of the profile band (n = 60)
(GACA)4 520 4 (7)a 
Bb 11 (GTG)5 580 4 (7) 
19 (GTG)5 270 26 (43) 
11 (GACA)4 380 5 (8) 
13 (GACA)4 353 4 (7) 
16 (GATA)4 989 7 (11) 
(GATA)4 341 8 (13) 
10 (GTG)5 626 5 (8) 
(GTG)5 477 9 (15) 
14 (GACA)4 469 4 (7) 
17 (GATA)4 954 4 (7) 
ISSR-PCR profile bandsPatient no.ISSR-PCR primer sequences usedSizes of direct PCR products (bp)No. of ESCCs with gainsor losses of the profile band (n = 60)
(GACA)4 520 4 (7)a 
Bb 11 (GTG)5 580 4 (7) 
19 (GTG)5 270 26 (43) 
11 (GACA)4 380 5 (8) 
13 (GACA)4 353 4 (7) 
16 (GATA)4 989 7 (11) 
(GATA)4 341 8 (13) 
10 (GTG)5 626 5 (8) 
(GTG)5 477 9 (15) 
14 (GACA)4 469 4 (7) 
17 (GATA)4 954 4 (7) 
a

Data are numbers, with percentages in parentheses.

b

The profile band showed loss, whereas all other profile bands showed gains in tumor compared with corresponding normal epithelia.

1
Nowell P. C. Mechanisms of tumor progression.
Cancer Res.
,
46
:
2203
-2207,  
1986
.
2
Tang J. C. O., Ho F. C. S., Chan A. C. L., Chow E. Y. W., Srivastava G. Progression of spontaneous lymphomas in SJL mice: monitoring in vivo clonal evolution with molecular markers in sequential splenic samples.
Lab. Investig.
,
78
:
1459
-1466,  
1998
.
3
Ionov Y., Peinado M. A., Malkhosyan S., Shibata D., Perucho M. Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis.
Nature (Lond.)
,
363
:
558
-561,  
1993
.
4
Tahara E. Genetic alterations in human gastrointestinal cancers: the application to molecular diagnosis.
Cancer (Phila.)
,
75
:
1410
-1417,  
1995
.
5
Schuuring E. The involvement of the chromosome 11q13 region in human malignancies. Cyclin D1 and EMS1 are 2 new candidate oncogenes: a review.
Gene (Amst.)
,
159
:
83
-96,  
1995
.
6
Nowell P. C. Cytogenetic approaches to human cancer genes.
FASEB J.
,
8
:
408
-413,  
1994
.
7
Maelandsmo G. M., Berner J. M., Florenes V. A., Forus A., Hovig E., Fodstad O., Myklebost O. Homozygous deletion frequency and expression levels of the cdkn2 gene in human sarcomas: relationship to amplification and messenger RNA levels of CDK4 and CCND1.
Br. J. Cancer
,
72
:
393
-398,  
1995
.
8
Nawroz H., Koch W., Anker P., Stroun M., Sidransky D. Microsatellite alterations in serum DNA of head and neck cancer patients.
Nat. Med.
,
2
:
1035
-1037,  
1996
.
9
Peinado M. A., Malkhosyan S., Velazquez A., Perucho M. Isolation and characterization of allelic losses and gains in colorectal tumors by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
,
89
:
10065
-10069,  
1992
.
10
Sood A. K., Buller R. E. Genomic instability in ovarian cancer: a reassessment using an arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction.
Oncogene
,
13
:
2499
-2504,  
1996
.
11
De Juan C., Iniesta P., Cruces J., Sanchez A., Massa M. J., Gonzalez-Quevedo R., Torres A. J., Balibrea J. L., Benito M. DNA amplification on chromosome 6p12 in non-small cell lung cancer detected by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction.
Int. J. Cancer
,
84
:
344
-349,  
1999
.
12
Basik M., Stoler D. L., Kontzoglou K. C., Rodriguez Bigas M. A., Petrelli N. J., Anderson G. R. Genomic instability in sporadic colorectal cancer quantitated by inter-simple sequence repeat PCR analysis.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
,
18
:
19
-29,  
1997
.
13
Perring T. M., Cooper A. D., Rodriguez R. J., Farrar C. A., Bellows T. S. Identification of a whitefly species by genomic and behavioral studies.
Science (Wash. DC)
,
259
:
74
-77,  
1993
.
14
Weising K., Atkinson R. G., Gardner R. C. Genomic fingerprinting by microsatellite-primed PCR: a critical evaluation.
PCR Methods Applications
,
4
:
249
-255,  
1995
.
15
Lam K. Y., Law S., Ma L. T., Ong S. K., Wong J. Pre-operative chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: do histological assessment and p53 overexpression predict chemo-responsiveness?.
Eur. J. Cancer
,
33
:
1221
-1225,  
1997
.
16
Tang J. C. O., Ho F. C. S., Chan A. C. L., Srivastava G. Clonality of lymphomas at multiple sites in SJL mice.
Lab. Investig.
,
78
:
205
-212,  
1998
.
17
Greer C. E., Peterson S. L., Kiviat N. B., Manos M. M. PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues: effects of fixative and fixation time.
Am. J. Clin. Pathol.
,
95
:
117
-124,  
1991
.
18
Nurnberg P., Roewer L., Neitzel H., Sperling K., Popperl A., Hundrieser J., Poche H., Epplen C., Zischler H., Epplen J. T. DNA fingerprinting with the oligonucleotide probe (CAC)5/(GTG)5: somatic stability and germline mutations.
Hum. Genet.
,
84
:
75
-78,  
1989
.
19
Epplen J. T. On simple repeated GA-C-T-A sequences in animal genomes: a critical reappraisal.
J. Hered.
,
79
:
409
-417,  
1988
.
20
Schafer R., Ali S., Epplen J. T. The organization of the evolutionarily conserved GATA/GACA repeats in the mouse genome.
Chromosoma (Berl.)
,
93
:
502
-510,  
1986
.
21
Zischler H., Nanda I., Schafer R., Schmid M., Epplen J. T. Digoxigenated oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repeats in DNA fingerprinting and hybridization in situ.
Hum. Genet.
,
82
:
227
-233,  
1989
.
22
Shimada M., Yanagisawa A., Kato Y., Inoue M., Shiozaki H., Monden M., Nakamura Y. Genetic mechanisms in esophageal carcinogenesis: frequent deletion of 3p and 17p in premalignant lesions.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
,
15
:
165
-169,  
1996
.
23
O’Connell P., Pekkel V., Fuqua S. W., Osborne C. K., Clark G. M., Allred D. C. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in 399 premalignant breast lesions at 15 genetic loci.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda)
,
90
:
697
-703,  
1998
.
24
Califano J., van der Riet P., Westra W., Nawroz H., Clayman G., Piantadosi S., Corio R., Lee D., Greenberg B., Koch W., Sidransky D. Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization.
Cancer Res.
,
56
:
2488
-2492,  
1996
.
25
Reid B. J. Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am.
,
20
:
817
-834,  
1991
.
26
Shinomiya T., Mori T., Ariyama Y., Sakabe T., Fukuda Y., Murakami Y., Nakamura Y., Inazawa J. Comparative genomic hybridization of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: the possible involvement of the DPI gene in the 13q34 amplicon.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
,
24
:
337
-344,  
1999
.
27
Lu S. H., Hsieh L. L., Luo F. C., Weinstein I. B. Amplification of the EGF receptor and c-myc genes in human esophageal cancers.
Int. J. Cancer
,
42
:
502
-505,  
1988
.
28
Solinas Toldo S., Wallrapp C., Muller Pillasch F., Bentz M., Gress T., Lichter P. Mapping of chromosomal imbalances in pancreatic carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization.
Cancer Res.
,
56
:
3803
-3807,  
1996
.
29
Yang Z. Q., Yoshida M. A., Fukuda Y., Kurihara N., Nakamura Y., Inazawa J. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of 17 renal cancer cell lines: increased copy number at 5q31–33 in cell lines from nonpapillary carcinomas.
Jpn. J. Cancer Res.
,
91
:
156
-163,  
2000
.