Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most common fatal cancers worldwide, and north central China has some of the highest rates in the world. Previous studies from tumors in this area of China have shown high frequencies of allelic loss on chromosome 17p13–11, which includes the region where the TP53 gene is found. We examined 56 ESCC patients using single-strand conformation polymorphism and DNA sequencing to assess the frequency and spectrum of TP53 mutation and the association between allelic loss at microsatellite marker TP53 and TP53 mutations. Ninety-six % of cases were found to have at least one genetic alteration, including TP53 mutation (77%), allelic loss within the TP53 gene (73%), and/or loss of heterozygosity at the TP53 microsatellite marker (80%); 75% had two or more such alterations, including 59% with both a point mutation and an intragenic allelic loss (“two hits”). The majority of mutations observed were in exon 5, where the most common type of nucleotide substitution was a G:C→A:T or C:G→T:A transition, including half that occurred at CpG sites. Allelic loss was most commonly found in exon 4 but was very common in exon 5 as well. Taken together, the multiple genetic alterations of TP53 in this population at high risk for ESCC indicate that there is a very high degree of genetic instability in these tumors, that TP53 is a primary target for inactivation, and that this tumor suppressor gene plays a critical role in the carcinogenesis process for ESCC.
INTRODUCTION
ESCC3 is one of the most common fatal cancers worldwide. There is great geographic variation in the occurrence of this tumor, including exceptional high-risk areas such as Shanxi province, a region in north central China with some of the highest esophageal cancer rates in the world (1, 2, 3, 4). Although epidemiological studies indicate that tobacco and alcohol are the major risk factors for esophageal cancer in the low-risk regions of Europe and North America, the etiology in high-risk areas remains less clear. Several possibilities, including nitrosamines, nutritional deficiencies, fermented and moldy foods, and exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons have been considered, but none have been convincingly linked to Shanxi’s high rates of esophageal cancer (5). Previous studies in this high-risk region do, however, show a strong tendency toward familial aggregation with a consistent association between positive family history and increased risk (6, 7, 8, 9, 10), suggesting that genetic susceptibility may play a role in the etiology of esophageal cancer.
It is now well established that cancer development results from accumulated genetic alterations that disrupt the control of cell growth and terminal differentiation. The TP53 gene is a critical regulator of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis through its actions in cell cycle checkpoint control (11). It is also well known that mutations in TP53 are the most common genetic alterations in human cancer. The mutational spectrum of TP53 varies by type of cancer, and for some cancer types, frequencies and/or spectra vary by different ethnic groups and nationalities (11, 12). Different carcinogens have also been associated with mutational fingerprints in TP53. For example, aflatoxin B1 is associated with mutations at codon 249 in TP53 in hepatocellular carcinoma (11). In Europe and North America, TP53 mutations are strongly associated with tobacco smoking in esophageal cancer (13), whereas studies in China do not show elevated TP53 mutation rates in smokers (14).
Since Mollstein et al. (15) first reported in 1990 that inactivation of TP53 contributed to the development of ESCC, numerous studies have found TP53 mutations in ESCC worldwide, including several areas of China (16, 17, 18). Only one study to date, however, has assessed the mutation frequency and spectrum of TP53 in Shanxi, an area with exceptionally high ESCC incidence rates (18), and no one has yet reported on the association between TP53 mutation and cancer risk factors in this population.
In previous studies on ESCC in Shanxi province, we found frequent LOH in nearly all 30 microsatellite markers evaluated on chromosome 17p13.3–p11.2 (19, 20). The highest frequencies of allelic loss could be separated into three regions on the short arm of chromosome 17p, including 17p13.2–p13.1, where the TP53 gene is located (21). The goals of this study were to assess the frequency and spectrum of TP53 mutations, the association between LOH at microsatellite marker TP53 and TP53 gene mutations, and the relation between the genetic alterations of TP53 and cancer lifestyle risk factors and clinical/pathological characteristics in this high-risk population. Given the high frequency of LOH in the TP53 region and previous evidence for TP53 inactivation in ESCC, we used SSCP and DNA sequencing to examine genetic alterations of TP53 in ESCC patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient Selection.
Patients presenting in 1995 and 1996 to the Shanxi Cancer Hospital in Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, who were diagnosed with ESCC and considered candidates for curative surgical resection were identified and recruited to participate in this study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Shanxi Cancer Hospital and the United States National Cancer Institute. A total of 56 patients with ESCC were selected who had a histological diagnosis of ESCC confirmed by pathologists at both the Shanxi Cancer Hospital and the National Cancer Institute. None of the patients had prior therapy, and Shanxi was the ancestral home for all.
After obtaining informed consent, patients were interviewed to obtain information on demographic and cancer lifestyle risk factors, including tobacco use, frequency of alcohol, pickled vegetable and scalding hot food consumption, and a detailed family history of cancer (including all cancers in first-, second-, and third-degree relatives). Data were also recorded concerning the clinical/pathological characteristics of the patients’ tumors, including location (upper, middle, lower third), pathological grade (G1, well differentiated; G2, moderately differentiated; G3, poorly differentiated), pathological Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage (I–IV), and lymph node metastasis (yes or no).
A total of 56 ESCC patients, including 34 males and 22 females, were evaluated (Table 1). Details on these ESCC patients have been described previously (21). Briefly, the mean age of the study group was 54 years (range, 39–65); 52, 57, 88, and 75% of patients reported smoking, drinking, pickled vegetable consumption, and consumption of calorically hot food, respectively. Seventy-seven % of the tumors were located in the middle third; 39% of patients had lymph node metastases; 80% of tumors were diagnosed as grade 2; and 96% of patients were Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage III at diagnosis. Thirty-four of the 56 patients had a family history of upper gastrointestinal cancer, including 24 with cancer in a first-degree relative, 8 in a second-degree relative, and 2 in a third-degree relative.
Biological Specimen Collection and Processing.
Ten ml of venous blood were taken from each patient prior to surgery, and genomic DNA was extracted and purified. Tumor tissue obtained during surgery was fixed in ethanol and embedded in paraffin.
Laser Microdissection and Extraction of DNA.
Tumor cells were obtained by laser capture microdissection (Pixcell 100; Arcturus Engineering, Mountain View, CA) using methods described previously (22, 23). Briefly, unstained, ethanol-fixed, paraffin-embedded, 5-μm histological tissue sections were prepared on glass slides, deparaffinized twice with xylene, rinsed twice with 95% ethanol, stained with eosin, and air-dried. Specific cells of interest were selected from the eosin-stained slides and microdissected by laser capture microdissection. Procured cells were immediately resuspended in a 50-μl solution containing 0.01 m Tris-HCl, 1 mm EDTA, 1% Tween 20, and 0.4 mg/ml proteinase K (pH 8.0) and incubated two nights at 37°C. The mixture was then boiled for 5 min to inactive the proteinase K. Two μl of this solution were used for each PCR reaction.
PCR.
DNA extracted from tumor cells microdissected from the resection specimen, and genomic DNA extracted from venous blood was used for each patient. PCR primer sets for the TP53 gene were designed according to the nucleotide sequences obtained from the GenBank database. Nucleotide sequences of the primer sets were as follows: 5′-TCC TCT GAC TGC TCT TTT C-3′ and 5′-GAA GGG ACA GAA GAT GAC AG-3′ for exon 4A; 5′-CTC CTG GCC CCT GTT ATC TT-3′ and 5′-CAG GCA TTG AAG TCT CAT GG-3′ for exon 4B; 5′-GCC CTG ACT TTC AAC TCT GT-3′ and 5′-CAG TGA GGA ATC AGA GGC-3′ for exon 5; 5′-TGG TTG CCC AGG GTC CCC AG-3′ and 5′-GGA GGG CCA CTG ACA ACC A-3′ for exon 6; 5′-AGG CGC ACT GGC CTC ATC TT-3′ and 5′-AGG GGT CAG CGG CAA GCA GA-3′ for exon 7; 5′-TTG GGA GTA GAT GGA GCC T-3′ and 5′-AGG CAT AAC TGC ACC CTT GG-3′ for exon 8; and 5′-GCA GTT ATG CCT CAG ATT CA-3′ and 5′-GGC ATT TTG AGT GTT AGA CT-3′ for exon 9. The PCR primers amplified the splicing donor and acceptor sites for all exons examined. PCR reactions were carried out using a 10-μl final volume containing 1.0 μl of 10× PCR buffer I [100 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 500 mm KCl, and 15 mm MgCl2], 1.0 μl of 2.5 mm deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 2 μl of DNA extraction buffer, 0.2 μl of each primer, 0.09 μl of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer), and 1 μCi of [α-32P]dCT. Typical PCR conditions were as follows: 10 min of denaturation at 94°C, then 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min. An elongation step at 72°C for 10 min was added to the final cycle for exons 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 and at 60°C for exon 7.
SSCP Analysis.
The labeled PCR products were mixed with 10 μl of formamide loading dye (95% formamide, 20 mm EDTA, 0.05% bromphenol blue, and 0.05% xylene cyanol) and were denatured for 10 min at 95°C and chilled on ice until loading. A 5-μl aliquot of each sample was loaded onto a 0.5× MDE gel (AT Biochem, Malvern, PA) containing 5% glycerol and run at 6W for 14–18 h at room temperature. The gel was dried on filter papers and autographed for 1–2 days using Kodak BioMax MR films.
DNA Sequencing.
TP53 PCR products that exhibited altered mobility on SSCP gels compared with normal controls were excised from the gels and eluted in 50 μl of distilled water overnight at room temperature. A 2-μl aliquot was used for PCR amplification with the same primer pair and PCR conditions used in the original PCR reaction (except without radioactivity). The second PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.0% agarose gel at 100 V for 30 min, visualized by staining with ethidium bromide, and DNA purified with the Qiaquick extraction kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA). DNA was sequenced with the Amplicycle sequencing kit from Perkin-Elmer (Branchburg, NJ) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All mutations were confirmed by repeating the entire procedure as mentioned above. Subcloning was performed in 1 case (SHE235) using the TOPO cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical Analysis.
All statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Systems (SAS Corp., Cary, NC). The t test (for continuous variables) and χ2 or Mantel-Haenszel χ2 or Fisher’s exact test (for nominal variables) were used for statistical analysis of the relationship between the genetic alterations of the TP53 gene and lifestyle risk factors as well as clinical/pathological characteristics. All Ps were two-sided and considered statistically significant if P < 0.05.
RESULTS
TP53 Mutations and Allelic Loss in ESCC Patients.
Exons 4–9 of the TP53 gene were analyzed by PCR-SSCP for all 56 ESCC patients. Forty-five anomalous bands from tumor DNA from 43 ESCC patients were observed on SSCP gels in exons 4–8 (Fig. 1), but none were observed in exon 9. One case showed an anomalous band in DNA from both normal constitutional DNA as well as tumor DNA.
Sequence analysis of the abnormal bands found on SSCP revealed 45 mutations in TP53, including 2 patients with 2 different mutations each and 1 patient with the same mutation in both germ-line and tumor DNA (Table 1). The distribution of the mutations identified by location and type is summarized in Table 2. Mutations were demonstrated throughout all of the exons examined except exon 9, with the majority of mutations found in exon 5. Single mutations were also identified in introns 4, 6, and 7. Sixty-four % of the mutations were point mutations, and most of these were missense mutations (Table 2; Fig. 2,A). A single silent point mutation was found in both the germ-line and tumor DNA in patient SHE083. Two of the three point mutations in introns 6 and 7 were located at splice acceptor sites that may affect RNA splicing. Deletions were also common (n = 10 or 22%; Fig. 2,B) and ranged from 1 to 45 bp in length. Six of the 10 deletions resulted in a truncated protein. Six of the mutations (13%) were insertions (Fig. 2 C), and all caused frameshifts in the TP53 protein coding sequence.
Among the 29 point mutations, the most common type of nucleotide substitutions were G:C→A:T and C:G→T:A transitions (55%; Table 2). Eight of these transitions were at CpG sites. G→T transversions were also common (21%), but the remainder of the substitutions varied with each type being ≤10% of the observed total.
No especially prominent pattern was seen with regard to mutations at specific codons. Three mutations were observed at codon 273, and two mutations each were found in codons 173, 175, 176, and 248. The codon 173, 175, 248, and 273 mutations occurred at CpG sites.
Overall, wild-type allelic loss was observed in 30 subjects who also had a mutation in the TP53 gene (54% of cases). Of these 30 allelic losses, 3 occurred in exon 4, 17 in exon 5 (Fig. 1,B), one in exon 6, four in exon 7 (Fig. 1,C), and five in exon 8 (Fig. 1 D).
No significant associations between TP53 mutational status and cancer lifestyle risk factors or clinical/pathological characteristics were seen (data not shown).
Polymorphism and Allelic Loss at Codon 72 in Exon 4 of the TP53 Gene.
Sequence analysis of exon 4 products revealed a previously identified polymorphism4 resulting from a single nucleotide substitution at codon 72 from G (Arg, upper band) to C (Pro, lower band; Fig. 1,A). Of the 56 cases studied, 13 (23%) were homozygous for Arg, 29 (52%) were heterozygous (Arg/Pro), and 14 (25%) were homozygous for Pro (Table 1) with resultant allele frequencies of 0.49 and 0.51 for Arg and Pro, respectively.
Among the 29 informative cases (Arg/Pro heterozygotes), 22 (76%) were found to have lost an allele in the tumor, including 10 having lost Arg alleles and 12 having lost Pro alleles. Three cases with allelic loss in exon 4 of the polymorphic site also had a TP53 mutation in another exon (one each in exons 5, 7, and 8). However, allelic loss at the polymorphic site was not significantly associated with either the presence of a TP53 mutation (P = 0.10) or LOH at the TP53 microsatellite marker (P = 0.11). Nor were any of the cancer lifestyle risk factors or clinical/pathological characteristics we evaluated significantly associated with allelic loss at this exon 4 polymorphic site (data not shown).
Genetic Alterations in the TP53 Gene and LOH at the TP53 Marker.
Overall, genetic alterations in these ESCC patients were extremely common. These included TP53 mutation(s) in 43 of 56 (77%) patients, wild-type allelic loss in TP53 in 30 of 56 (54%), allelic loss at the polymorphic site in exon 4 in 22 of 29 informative cases (76%), and allelic loss at the TP53 marker in 33 of 41 informative cases (80%; Table 1). All but 2 patients (96%) had at least one alteration and 42 of 56 (75%) had multiple alterations: 7 patients had 4 such alterations, 18 patients had 3 alterations, and 17 patients had 2 alterations.
Because the TP53 marker is much simpler to examine than performing SSCP or sequencing for the TP53 gene, we used any mutation in exons 4–9 as our gold standard to compare with the TP53 marker as a screening test for TP53 mutation in ESCC. The TP53 marker was positive in 33 of 41 informative cases (sensitivity, 80%), but false positives were common (of 11 cases that were mutation negative, 9 were positive on TP53; specificity, 18%). Although sensitivity was reasonably high, the TP53 marker is potentially useful as a screening test only in patients who are heterozygotes for the marker, which here eliminated just over one-fourth of cases. Also, although LOH in TP53 may be a marker of TP53 mutation, it may be a marker of another early gene.
DISCUSSION
Ninety-six % of this group of ESCC patients were found to have at least one genetic alteration, and 75% had two or more such alterations, including TP53 mutation, allelic loss within the TP53 gene, and/or LOH at the TP53 microsatellite marker. Two kinds of allelic loss within the TP53 gene were detected, wild-type allelic loss and allelic loss at a polymorphic site. To our knowledge, this is the first report to simultaneously describe TP53 mutations, allelic loss within TP53, and LOH at the TP53 marker in patients with ESCC. All of the observed changes, including loss of one allele and nonsense or missense mutations in the second allele, can reduce the concentration of TP53 tetramers. Although the changes may not cause tumors, they most likely contribute to tumor progression (24, 25). Allelic loss of TP53 can also cause abnormally amplified centrosomes that profoundly affect mitotic fidelity and result in unequal segregation of chromosomes and enhanced genetic instability (26). Sixteen deletions and insertions were also found in this group of patients (36% of observed mutations, compared with 18–19% in other studies; Refs. 11 and 27). Deletions and insertions are more detrimental mutagenic mechanisms than single point mutations for disrupting NH2-terminal and COOH-terminal functional domains (28). Taken together, the multiple genetic alterations of TP53 that we detected imply that these ESCC patients had a very high degree of genetic instability and that the TP53 tumor suppressor gene plays a critical role in ESCC carcinogenesis.
We detected TP53 gene mutations in 77% of tumors in ESCC patients from this high-risk Chinese population, consistent with results from other studies of ESCC worldwide that have shown a range of TP53 mutations from 20 to 84% (18, 29, 30, 31). The frequency of TP53 mutations we observed was much higher than that of the only previously reported study from this same region of China (18). Lung et al. (18) reported TP53 mutations in ESCC from five different geographical locals in China and found the lowest frequency (9 of 46; 20%) in Shanxi. The most common TP53 point mutations in our study (55% of all point mutations identified) were G:C→A:T or C:G→T:A transitions. This prevalence is similar to studies of ESCC in several areas of China and India (11, 31, 32) but different from other studies in China as well as Thailand (13). No hotspot codons in TP53 were found in our study, although two or more mutations were found in four different codons (175, 176, 248, and 273), and three of them were at CpG sites. The transitions observed were not associated with any of the risk factors examined in the present study. Differences in the results of our study compared with others who have examined TP53 mutations in ESCC are likely attributable to several factors, including technical issues (e.g., we used microdissection and examined six exons), differences in populations and/or cases studied (e.g., unique or different exposures, other factors in high-risk versus low-risk populations, stage differences in cases studied), and the relatively small numbers of cases studied in all reports. Our small sample size is particularly relevant to our inability to find associations between mutations and risk factors.
A known TP53 genetic polymorphism is the C→G transversion that leads to an arginine to proline change at codon 72. Several studies suggest that TP53 polymorphisms may be associated with differences in risk for several major cancer sites, including lung, breast, and cervix, and may also affect survival (33, 34). Other studies, however, did not reach similar conclusions (35). In the present study, codon 72 arginine and proline allele frequency was 0.49 and 0.51, respectively. These prevalences are similar to those observed in a previous study from Linxian, another ESCC high-risk area in China, where Arg/Arg, Arg/Pro, and Pro/Pro genotypes were 12, 65, and 23%, respectively (31), but are different from other populations (Arg and Pro allele frequencies are approximately 0.70 and 0.30; Refs. 33, 34, 35). Of the 29 informative patients for this polymorphism, 10 had an Arg allele loss, and 12 patients had a Pro loss. The significance, if any, of these allelic losses remains unclear.
Our results allowed us to simultaneously examine mutations and intragenic allelic loss within the TP53 gene to determine which of our cases had two hits, in accord with the Knudsen hypothesis. We identified at least one intragenic alteration in all but 5 of the 56 cases, including 30 (54%) with both a point mutation and an intragenic wild-type allelic loss in the same exon, thus fulfilling the classic two-hit paradigm. In addition, three cases with allelic loss in the exon 4 polymorphic site also had a mutation, but in a different exon. Although the significance of these nonclassic two-hits is unknown, because we did not confirm that the allelic losses and mutations occurred on different alleles, it seems probable that both alleles were involved with consequent loss of function. Overall, a total of 33 cases (59%) had an intragenic allelic loss coupled with a mutation.
The TP53 microsatellite marker is often used as a simple screen for genetic alterations in the TP53 gene. When we compared this marker to our SSCP and sequencing results, however, we found that the TP53 marker was reasonably sensitive in identifying cases with a mutation (80%) but was not particularly specific, testing positive in 9 cases where no mutation was identified. Possible explanations for the apparent false-positive results for the TP53 marker test include insensitivity in the SSCP test (11, 36), genetic alterations in exons or introns of the TP53 gene that we did not examine, and that the TP53 gene is not the sole target of the TP53 marker (37).
In summary, high frequencies of mutations and allelic loss of TP53 were detected in 56 high-risk ESCC patients. The majority of mutations observed were in exon 5, where the most common type of nucleotide substitution was a G:C→A:T or C:G→ transition, including half that occurred at CpG sites. Allelic loss was most commonly found in exon 4. Three-quarters of these patients were found to have two or more genetic alterations. None of the cancer risk factors or clinical/pathological characteristics we evaluated was significantly associated with genetic alterations of TP53, although these evaluations had very low power because of our small numbers. The multiple genetic alterations of TP53 we observed in ESCC patients from this high-risk population in Shanxi China indicate that there is a very high degree of genetic instability in these tumors and that the TP53 gene is a primary target of LOH on 17p. Taken together, these data suggest a critical role for this tumor suppressor gene in the multistep carcinogenesis process for ESCC.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are: ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; SSCP, single-strand conformation polymorphism.
Internet address: http://www.iarc.fr/p53/poly.htm.
No. . | Patient ID . | Age/Sex . | TP53 mutation . | . | . | . | . | Lost wild-type allele within TP53 in tumor (exon) . | Genotype of TP53 codon 72 . | Allelic loss (and amino acid lost) in exon 4 of TP53 in tumor . | LOH on TP53 marker . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | Exon/Codon . | CpG site . | Base change . | Amino acid substitution . | Designation . | . | . | . | . | ||||
1 | SHE066 | 51/M | 7/245 | No | GGC→GTC | Gly→Val | Missense | Ya (7) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
2 | SHE083 | 64/M | 5/136 | No | CAA→CAG | Gln→Gln | Silent mutation in both germ-line and somatic DNA | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
3 | SHE216 | 43/F | 5/176 | No | TGC→TTC | Cys→Phe | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
4 | SHE235 | 59/F | 6/127 and intron 6 | 45-bp deletion AGTGTG (gtggtgccctatgagccgcctgag-intron 6-gtctggtttgcaactggggtc) TCTGGGA | Y (6) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | |||||||
5 | SHE480 | 65/M | 5/133–135 | 8-bp deletion AAG (atgttttg) CCAA | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 145 | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | |||||
6 | SHE516 | 58/M | 5/175 | Yes | CGC→CAC | Arg→His | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
7 | SHE340 | 50/M | 8/273 | Yes | CGT→CAT | Arg→His | Missense | Y (8) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
8 | SHE057 | 50/F | 5/143 | No | GTG→ATG | Val→Met | Missense | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y | ||||
9 | SHE081 | 58/M | 5/146 | No | TGG→TAG | Trp→Stop | Nonsense | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y | ||||
10 | SHE384 | 53/F | 5/166 | No | TCA→TGA | Ser→Stop | Nonsense | Y (5) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
11 | SHE052 | 57/M | Intron 6 | CCT (AG→GG)-exon 7 GTT | At splice acceptor site | Y (intron 6) | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y | ||||||
12 | SHE118 | 56/F | 7/251 | No | ATC→AAC | Ile→Asn | Missense | Y (7) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
13 | SHE123 | 56/M | 5/153 | 1-bp insertion CCG (g) CCC | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 80 | Y (5) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | |||||
14 | SHE186 | 43/M | 5/179 | No | CAT→TAT | His→Tyr | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
15 | SHE240 | 51/M | 5/127 | No | TCC→TTC | Cys→Phe | Missense | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
8/273 | Yes | CGT→CAT | Arg→His | Missense | Y (8) | ||||||||||
16 | SHE328 | 50/F | 4/75 | No | CCT→TCT | Pro→Ser | Missense | Y (4) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
4/116 | 1-bp deletion CAT (t) CT | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 122 | Y (4) | |||||||||||
17 | SHE263 | 50/M | 4/55 | 22-bp insertion TTCA (gacgatattgaacaatggttca) CT | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 58 | Y (4) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | |||||
18 | SHE488 | 48/F | 5/173 | No | GTG→TTG | Val→leu | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | N | Y | ||||
19 | SHE444 | 65/M | Intron 7 | TCCTGAGT (AG→AT)-exon 8 | Splice acceptor site | Y (intron 7) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | HZ | ||||||
20 | SHE507 | 47/M | 5/173 | No | GTG→TTG | Val→Leu | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | NA | ||||
21 | SHE495 | 54/M | 5/185–186 | 6-bp deletion GA (tagcga) TGGT | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | |||||||
22 | SHE198 | 53/M | Intron 4 | 1-bp insertion CCTAC (g) AG-exon 5 TAC | Y (intron 4) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | HZ | |||||||
23 | SHE096 | 57/M | 7/248 | Yes | CGG→TGG | Arg→Trp | Missense | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
24 | SHE252 | 57/F | 8/289 | No | AGA→TGA | Arg→Stop | Nonsense | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
25 | SHE322 | 50/F | 5/135 | 4-bp insertion TTTTG (tttt) CCAA | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 149 | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | |||||
26 | SHE080 | 39/F | 4/106 | 1-bp deletion GCC (a) GC | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 112 | Y (4) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | |||||
27 | SHE152 | 44/F | 5/167 | No | CAG→TAG | Gln→Stop | Nonsense | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | ||||
28 | SHE265 | 49/F | 8/282 | Yes | CGG→TGG | Arg→Trp | Missense | Y (8) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | ||||
29 | SHE459 | 43/F | 7/248 | Yes | CGG→CAG | Arg→Gln | Missense | Y (7) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | ||||
30 | SHE495 | 54/M | 5/185–186 | 6-bp deletion GA (tagcga) TGGT | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | |||||||
31 | SHE308 | 58/F | 5/135 | No | TGC→TGG | Cys→Trp | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Arg | HZ | HZ | ||||
32 | SHE095 | 58/M | 8/279 | No | GGG→GAG | Gly→Glu | Missense | Y (8) | Arg/Arg | HZ | N |
No. . | Patient ID . | Age/Sex . | TP53 mutation . | . | . | . | . | Lost wild-type allele within TP53 in tumor (exon) . | Genotype of TP53 codon 72 . | Allelic loss (and amino acid lost) in exon 4 of TP53 in tumor . | LOH on TP53 marker . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | Exon/Codon . | CpG site . | Base change . | Amino acid substitution . | Designation . | . | . | . | . | ||||
1 | SHE066 | 51/M | 7/245 | No | GGC→GTC | Gly→Val | Missense | Ya (7) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
2 | SHE083 | 64/M | 5/136 | No | CAA→CAG | Gln→Gln | Silent mutation in both germ-line and somatic DNA | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
3 | SHE216 | 43/F | 5/176 | No | TGC→TTC | Cys→Phe | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
4 | SHE235 | 59/F | 6/127 and intron 6 | 45-bp deletion AGTGTG (gtggtgccctatgagccgcctgag-intron 6-gtctggtttgcaactggggtc) TCTGGGA | Y (6) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | |||||||
5 | SHE480 | 65/M | 5/133–135 | 8-bp deletion AAG (atgttttg) CCAA | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 145 | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | |||||
6 | SHE516 | 58/M | 5/175 | Yes | CGC→CAC | Arg→His | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
7 | SHE340 | 50/M | 8/273 | Yes | CGT→CAT | Arg→His | Missense | Y (8) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
8 | SHE057 | 50/F | 5/143 | No | GTG→ATG | Val→Met | Missense | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y | ||||
9 | SHE081 | 58/M | 5/146 | No | TGG→TAG | Trp→Stop | Nonsense | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y | ||||
10 | SHE384 | 53/F | 5/166 | No | TCA→TGA | Ser→Stop | Nonsense | Y (5) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
11 | SHE052 | 57/M | Intron 6 | CCT (AG→GG)-exon 7 GTT | At splice acceptor site | Y (intron 6) | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y | ||||||
12 | SHE118 | 56/F | 7/251 | No | ATC→AAC | Ile→Asn | Missense | Y (7) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
13 | SHE123 | 56/M | 5/153 | 1-bp insertion CCG (g) CCC | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 80 | Y (5) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | |||||
14 | SHE186 | 43/M | 5/179 | No | CAT→TAT | His→Tyr | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
15 | SHE240 | 51/M | 5/127 | No | TCC→TTC | Cys→Phe | Missense | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
8/273 | Yes | CGT→CAT | Arg→His | Missense | Y (8) | ||||||||||
16 | SHE328 | 50/F | 4/75 | No | CCT→TCT | Pro→Ser | Missense | Y (4) | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
4/116 | 1-bp deletion CAT (t) CT | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 122 | Y (4) | |||||||||||
17 | SHE263 | 50/M | 4/55 | 22-bp insertion TTCA (gacgatattgaacaatggttca) CT | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 58 | Y (4) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | |||||
18 | SHE488 | 48/F | 5/173 | No | GTG→TTG | Val→leu | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | N | Y | ||||
19 | SHE444 | 65/M | Intron 7 | TCCTGAGT (AG→AT)-exon 8 | Splice acceptor site | Y (intron 7) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | HZ | ||||||
20 | SHE507 | 47/M | 5/173 | No | GTG→TTG | Val→Leu | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | NA | ||||
21 | SHE495 | 54/M | 5/185–186 | 6-bp deletion GA (tagcga) TGGT | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | |||||||
22 | SHE198 | 53/M | Intron 4 | 1-bp insertion CCTAC (g) AG-exon 5 TAC | Y (intron 4) | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | HZ | |||||||
23 | SHE096 | 57/M | 7/248 | Yes | CGG→TGG | Arg→Trp | Missense | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
24 | SHE252 | 57/F | 8/289 | No | AGA→TGA | Arg→Stop | Nonsense | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
25 | SHE322 | 50/F | 5/135 | 4-bp insertion TTTTG (tttt) CCAA | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 149 | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | |||||
26 | SHE080 | 39/F | 4/106 | 1-bp deletion GCC (a) GC | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 112 | Y (4) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | |||||
27 | SHE152 | 44/F | 5/167 | No | CAG→TAG | Gln→Stop | Nonsense | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | ||||
28 | SHE265 | 49/F | 8/282 | Yes | CGG→TGG | Arg→Trp | Missense | Y (8) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | ||||
29 | SHE459 | 43/F | 7/248 | Yes | CGG→CAG | Arg→Gln | Missense | Y (7) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | ||||
30 | SHE495 | 54/M | 5/185–186 | 6-bp deletion GA (tagcga) TGGT | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | |||||||
31 | SHE308 | 58/F | 5/135 | No | TGC→TGG | Cys→Trp | Missense | Y (5) | Arg/Arg | HZ | HZ | ||||
32 | SHE095 | 58/M | 8/279 | No | GGG→GAG | Gly→Glu | Missense | Y (8) | Arg/Arg | HZ | N |
33 | SHE497 | 60/M | 5/175 | Yes | CGC→CAC | Arg→His | Missense | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | N |
34 | SHE069 | 48/M | 8/273 | Yes | CGT→CAT | Arg→His | Missense | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y |
35 | SHE247 | 45/M | 4/69 | 2-bp deletion GAG (gc) TGCT | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 121 | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | |
36 | SHE408 | 65/M | 8/298 | 1-bp deletion GA (g) CTG | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 344 | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | |
37 | SHE510 | 59/M | 5/182 | 18-bp insertion ATGTT (tggccaactggccaagac) CTGC | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | |||
38 | SHE109 | 59/F | 4/106 | No | AGC→AGG | Ser→Arg | Missense | N | Arg/Pro | N | HZ |
39 | SHE027 | 59/M | 5/176 | No | TGC→TTC | Cys→Phe | Missense | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | N |
40 | SHE261 | 57/M | 8/269–270 | 3-bp insertion AGC (aga) TTT | N | Arg/Pro | N | N | |||
41 | SHE437 | 47/F | 5/134–140 | 18-bp deletion ATGTT (ttgccaactggccaagac) CTGC | Reading frame shift | N | Arg/Pro | N | N | ||
42 | SHE034 | 63/M | 5/164–165 | 4-bp deletion TACT (agca) GTCA | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 168 | N | Arg/Pro | N | NA | |
43 | SHE138 | 55/F | 5/174 | 12-bp deletion GTGAG (gcgctgccccca) CCAT | Reading frame shift | N | Arg/Pro | N | N | ||
44 | SHE021 | 57/F | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
45 | SHE093 | 55/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
46 | SHE098 | 53/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
47 | SHE200 | 59/F | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
48 | SHE360 | 55/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
49 | SHE391 | 55/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
50 | SHE113 | 43/F | ND | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
51 | SHE150 | 57/M | ND | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y | ||||
52 | SHE409 | 42/M | ND | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
53 | SHE108 | 47/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | NA | ||||
54 | SHE208 | 56/F | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | N | ||||
55 | SHE273 | 62/M | ND | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | ||||
56 | SHE170 | 52/F | ND | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | N |
33 | SHE497 | 60/M | 5/175 | Yes | CGC→CAC | Arg→His | Missense | Y (5) | Pro/Pro | HZ | N |
34 | SHE069 | 48/M | 8/273 | Yes | CGT→CAT | Arg→His | Missense | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y |
35 | SHE247 | 45/M | 4/69 | 2-bp deletion GAG (gc) TGCT | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 121 | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | |
36 | SHE408 | 65/M | 8/298 | 1-bp deletion GA (g) CTG | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 344 | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | |
37 | SHE510 | 59/M | 5/182 | 18-bp insertion ATGTT (tggccaactggccaagac) CTGC | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | |||
38 | SHE109 | 59/F | 4/106 | No | AGC→AGG | Ser→Arg | Missense | N | Arg/Pro | N | HZ |
39 | SHE027 | 59/M | 5/176 | No | TGC→TTC | Cys→Phe | Missense | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | N |
40 | SHE261 | 57/M | 8/269–270 | 3-bp insertion AGC (aga) TTT | N | Arg/Pro | N | N | |||
41 | SHE437 | 47/F | 5/134–140 | 18-bp deletion ATGTT (ttgccaactggccaagac) CTGC | Reading frame shift | N | Arg/Pro | N | N | ||
42 | SHE034 | 63/M | 5/164–165 | 4-bp deletion TACT (agca) GTCA | Reading frame shift | Resulting in a stop at codon 168 | N | Arg/Pro | N | NA | |
43 | SHE138 | 55/F | 5/174 | 12-bp deletion GTGAG (gcgctgccccca) CCAT | Reading frame shift | N | Arg/Pro | N | N | ||
44 | SHE021 | 57/F | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
45 | SHE093 | 55/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
46 | SHE098 | 53/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
47 | SHE200 | 59/F | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | Y | ||||
48 | SHE360 | 55/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
49 | SHE391 | 55/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | Y | ||||
50 | SHE113 | 43/F | ND | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
51 | SHE150 | 57/M | ND | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | Y | ||||
52 | SHE409 | 42/M | ND | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | Y | ||||
53 | SHE108 | 47/M | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Arg) | NA | ||||
54 | SHE208 | 56/F | ND | N | Arg/Pro | Y (Pro) | N | ||||
55 | SHE273 | 62/M | ND | N | Pro/Pro | HZ | HZ | ||||
56 | SHE170 | 52/F | ND | N | Arg/Arg | HZ | N |
Y, allele loss; N, retention; HZ, homozygous; NA, data not available; ND, no mutation detected.
. | No. of mutations . | % . |
---|---|---|
Location of mutations | ||
Exon 4 | 6 | 13 |
Exon 5 | 23 | 51 |
Exon 6 | 1 | 2 |
Exon 7 | 4 | 9 |
Exon 8 | 8 | 18 |
Exon 9 | 0 | 0 |
Introns 4, 6, 7 | 3 | 7 |
Total | 45 | 100 |
Type of mutation | ||
Point mutation | 29 | 64 |
Missense | 24 | |
Nonsense | 4 | |
Silent | 1 | |
Deletion | 10 | 22 |
Insertion | 6 | 13 |
Total | 45 | 100 |
Nucleotide substitutions (point mutations only) | ||
Transitions | ||
G:C→A:T/C:G→T:A | 16 | 55 |
G→A | 10 | |
C→T | 6 | |
Transversions | ||
G→T | 6 | 21 |
Other | 7 | 33 |
C→G | 3 | |
A→G | 2 | |
T→A | 1 | |
A→T | 1 | |
Total | 29 | 100 |
. | No. of mutations . | % . |
---|---|---|
Location of mutations | ||
Exon 4 | 6 | 13 |
Exon 5 | 23 | 51 |
Exon 6 | 1 | 2 |
Exon 7 | 4 | 9 |
Exon 8 | 8 | 18 |
Exon 9 | 0 | 0 |
Introns 4, 6, 7 | 3 | 7 |
Total | 45 | 100 |
Type of mutation | ||
Point mutation | 29 | 64 |
Missense | 24 | |
Nonsense | 4 | |
Silent | 1 | |
Deletion | 10 | 22 |
Insertion | 6 | 13 |
Total | 45 | 100 |
Nucleotide substitutions (point mutations only) | ||
Transitions | ||
G:C→A:T/C:G→T:A | 16 | 55 |
G→A | 10 | |
C→T | 6 | |
Transversions | ||
G→T | 6 | 21 |
Other | 7 | 33 |
C→G | 3 | |
A→G | 2 | |
T→A | 1 | |
A→T | 1 | |
Total | 29 | 100 |