Thymidylate synthase (TS) is responsible for the de novo synthesis of thymidylate, which is required for DNA synthesis and repair and which is an important target for fluoropyrimidines such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and antifolates such as Tomudex (TDX), ZD9331, and multitargeted antifolate (MTA). To study the importance of TS expression in determining resistance to these agents, we have developed an MDA435 breast cancer-derived cell line with tetracycline-regulated expression of TS termed MTS-5. We have demonstrated that inducible expression of TS increased the IC50 dose of the TS-targeted therapeutic agents 5-FU, TDX, and ZD9331 by 2-, 9- and 24-fold respectively. An IC50 dose for MTA was unobtainable when TS was overexpressed in these cells, which indicated that MTA toxicity is highly sensitive to increased TS expression levels. The growth inhibitory effects of the chemotherapeutic agents CPT-11, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and Taxol were unaffected by TS up-regulation. Cell cycle analyses revealed that IC50 doses of 5-FU, TDX and MTA caused an S-phase arrest in cells that did not overexpress TS, and this arrest was overcome when TS was up-regulated. Furthermore, the S-phase arrest was accompanied by 2- to 4-fold increased expression of the cell cycle regulatory genes cyclin E, cyclin A, and cyclin dependent kinase 2 (cdk2). These results indicate that acute increases in TS expression levels play a key role in determining cellular sensitivity to TS-directed chemotherapeutic drugs by modulating the degree of S-phase arrest caused by these agents. Moreover, CPT-11, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and Taxol remain highly cytotoxic in cells that overexpress TS.

TS3 is a folate-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of dUMP and 5,10-methylene tetrahydrofolate to dTMP and dihydrofolate, providing the sole intracellular source of dTMP, which is essential for DNA replication and repair (1, 2, 3). Because of its central importance to DNA replication, TS has become an important target for fluoropyrimidine drugs, such as 5-FU, used in the treatment of gastrointestinal, breast, and head and neck cancers (2, 3, 4). More recently, inhibitors of TS have been designed that have high affinity for the folate binding site of TS, TDX, MTA, and ZD9331 (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). TDX and ZD9331 are TS specific, but MTA is also able to inhibit dihydrofolate reductase, as well as the purine biosynthetic enzyme glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (10). Intracellularly, MTA and TDX become polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamate synthase, which increases their potency as TS inhibitors by prolonging their cellular retention (5, 8). Because ZD9331 contains moieties that mimic glutamate residues, it does not require polyglutamation, which makes it more active than TDX and MTA in tumors that express low levels of folylpolyglutamate synthase (11).

In vitro and in vivo studies have shown a strong association between increased TS expression and the development of 5-FU and TDX resistance (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). The molecular basis for the elevation in TS protein levels after 5-FU treatment was found to be the inhibition of a TS autoregulatory translational feedback loop (18, 19). TS is now known to form ribonucleoprotein complexes with a number of other mRNAs including p53 and c-myc (20, 21, 22). Increased TS expression also appears to play a significant role in the development of resistance to the folate-based TS inhibitors (15, 16). Taken together, these observations support a critical role for TS in defining the activity of fluoropyrimidines and antifolate-based TS inhibitors in cancer cells.

In this study, we have developed a tet-inducible TS expression system to examine the effect of specifically up-regulating TS expression on the response of malignant cells to the TS inhibitors 5-FU, TDX, ZD9331, and MTA, and the non-TS-specific chemotherapeutic agents cisplatin, oxaliplatin, CPT-11, and Taxol, which are commonly used in patient treatment in conjunction with 5-FU.

Generation of a TS-inducible Construct.

The TS coding region was PCR amplified from the pMHTS-1 construct (Ref. 23; a kind gift from Dr. K. Takeishi, Department of Immunology and Virology and Department of Biochemistry, Saitama Cancer Research Institute, Japan) with the introduction of SacII restriction sites at the 5′ and 3′ ends. The 3′-oligonucleotide primer was designed so that six extra codons that specify the Hemagglutinin (HA) epitope are translated at the COOH terminus. The modified TS coding region was ligated into the pUHD10-3 tet-inducible expression vector (Ref. 24; Clontech Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA) to generate a TS-inducible construct.

Generation of a TS-inducible Cell Line.

The MDA47 founder cell line was generated by the stable transfection of the human MDA435 breast cancer cell line with the pUHD15-1 tet transactivator construct (Clontech Laboratories) under selection with Geneticin (G418) as described previously (25). Ten μg of the TS-inducible construct and 1 μg of a plasmid that expresses the puromycin resistance gene were cotransfected into the MDA47 cell line using the lipofectin reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies, Inc., Paisley, Scotland). Transfected cells were selected in 1 μg/ml puromycin, and resistant colonies were isolated. Inducible expression of the TS trans-gene was assessed by Northern blotting, and the MTS-5 clone was selected.

Cell Culture.

MTS-5 cells were maintained in 5% CO2/37°C in DMEM with 10% dialyzed bovine calf serum (both from Life Technologies, Inc.), supplemented with 1 mm sodium pyruvate, 2 mml-glutamine, 50 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 50 μg/ml G418 (all from Life Technologies, Inc.), 1 μg/ml puromycin, and 1 μg/ml tet (both from Sigma Chemical Co., Poole, Dorset, England). To induce expression of the TS trans-gene, MTS-5 cells were washed three times with 1× PBS and incubated in culture-medium lacking tet.

Northern Blotting.

RNA was extracted from cultured cells using RNAStat60 (Biogenesis, Poole, Dorset, England) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Twenty μg of each RNA sample was size fractionated on a 1% agarose formaldehyde gel, transferred to nitrocellulose filters (Hybond-N, Amersham, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, England), and UV cross-linked. The resulting blot was hybridized overnight at 65°C in 7% SDS, 250 mm Na2HPO4 with an [α-32P]-radiolabeled probe complementary to the entire TS coding region, which was obtained by SacII restriction digestion of the TS-inducible construct. The membrane was washed at 65°C twice in 5% SDS/20 mm Na2HPO4, and twice in 1% SDS/20 mm Na2HPO4 for 20 min each time, prior to detection.

Western Blotting.

Cells were washed twice in ice-cold 1× PBS, harvested, and resuspended in 20 mm Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mm NaCl, 1 mm EDTA (pH 8.0), 1% Triton X-100, and 0.1% SDS. Cells were then lysed by sonication using three 2-to-3-s bursts and were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min to remove cell debris. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA Protein Assay Reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Fifty μg of each protein sample were resolved by SDS-PAGE (10%) according to the method of Laemmli (26). The gels were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-P, Amersham). Antibody staining was performed with a chemiluminescence detection system (ECL+, Amersham), using a 1:200 dilution of the mouse TS106 monoclonal primary antibody (NeoMarkers, Fremont, CA) and 1:1000 dilutions of cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 mouse monoclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) in conjunction with a 1:2000 dilution of a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep antimouse secondary antibody (Amersham). Membranes were stripped in 0.3% glycine-HCl (pH 2.8), 1 m NaCl for 1 h prior to reprobing with a 1:1000 dilution of a β-tubulin primary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.) followed by a 1:2000 of the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep antimouse secondary antibody.

TS Biochemical Assay.

Cells were harvested from T175 tissue culture flasks, washed three times in 1× PBS and resuspended in 230 μl of 80 mm KH2PO4/20 mm K2HPO4 prior to being lysed by sonication as described above. FdUMP binding activities were determined as described previously (4).

Drug Sensitivity Assays.

MTS-5 cells were seeded onto 24-well tissue culture plates at 1× 105 cells per well. After 24 h, cells were washed three times in 1× PBS and incubated in either +tet or −tet culture medium, supplemented with the described concentrations of 5-FU, TDX, ZD9331, MTA, cisplatin, oxaliplatin, CPT11, and Taxol. After 72 h of continuous drug exposure, cells were harvested and counted using a Z2 particle and size analyzer (Coulter, Miami, Fl).

Flow Cytometry Analysis.

MTS-5 cells were seeded at 5× 105 per well of 6-well tissue culture plates. After 24 h, cells were washed three times in 1× PBS and incubated in either +tet or −tet culture medium, supplemented with no drug or with 2.6 μm 5-FU, 2 nm TDX, 32 nm MTA, 2.2 μm oxaliplatin, or 140 nm CPT11. Triplicate samples were harvested after 24, 48, and 72 h, and the DNA content was evaluated after propidium iodide staining of cells as described previously (27). Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was carried out using an EPICS XL flow cytometer (Coulter).

Modulation of TS Expression Levels Using the tet-inducible Expression System.

We have generated a tet-inducible (tet off) TS expression system in the p53 mutant MDA435 breast cancer cell line called MTS-5. Northern blot analysis demonstrated that removal of tet from the MTS-5 culture medium caused rapid transcriptional activation of the TS trans-gene, and TS mRNA levels continued to rise throughout the time course (Fig. 1,A). Western blot analysis of TS protein expression indicated that the trans-gene product migrated more slowly than endogenous TS because of the additional amino acid residues of the Hemagglutinin (HA) epitope (Fig. 1,B, −tet lanes). Exogenous TS protein levels were not significantly elevated until 12 h postinduction, and the maximum induction of exogenous TS protein was attained 48 h after the removal of tet, with levels 6-fold higher than those of control (Fig. 1,B). To assess the biological activity of the trans-gene product, we measured the capacities of lysates obtained from TS-induced and -uninduced cells to bind radiolabeled FdUMP (Fig. 1,C). The maximum binding capacity was observed at 24 h after TS induction, with 3.6 ± 0.2 pmol of FdUMP bound per mg of protein, compared with 1.1 ± 0.1 pmol/mg in the uninduced cells. Comparison of the growth rates of TS-induced and -uninduced cells indicated that TS overexpression in itself did not significantly alter the rate of cellular proliferation (data not shown). Examination of p53mut levels in the MTS-5 cell line revealed that TS overexpression did not affect p53mut expression (Fig. 1,D). Baseline p53mut levels were found to be high in this cell line, and exposure to 20 J/m2 UV radiation failed to enhance p53mut expression (Fig. 1 D), both of which are indicative of mutant p53.

Drug Sensitivity of MTS-5 Cells in the Presence and Absence of TS Overexpression.

We assessed the impact of inducible TS expression on the sensitivity of MTS-5 cells to a range of chemotherapeutic agents including: the TS inhibitors 5-FU, TDX, ZD9331, and MTA; the DNA damaging agents cisplatin and oxaliplatin (28); the topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT-11, which inhibits DNA repair (29); and Taxol, which arrests cells during mitosis by binding to the dynamic microtubules (30). The growth of TS-induced (−tet) and -uninduced (+tet) cells was assessed after cotreatment with a range of concentrations of each of these drugs (Fig. 2).

The 5-FU IC50 dose increased from 2.6 μm to 4.7 μm after inducible expression of TS (Fig. 2,A). For TDX and ZD9331, TS overexpression increased the IC50 doses by 9- and 24-fold, respectively (Fig. 2, B and C). The IC50 dose for MTA could not be determined after induction of TS because of insufficient growth inhibition at the highest concentration used (10 μm; Fig. 2,D). In the absence of TS trans-gene activation, the IC50 doses of MTA and ZD9331 were very similar (32 nm and 39 nm, respectively). Our analysis of the DNA-damaging agents cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and the topoisomerase I inhibitor CPT-11 indicated that TS overexpression had no significant impact on cellular sensitivity to these drugs (Fig. 2, E and F). Similarly, the cytotoxic effect of Taxol was identical in TS-induced and -uninduced populations of MTS-5 cells (Fig. 2 G). Clonogenic assays confirmed that TS overexpression conferred increased resistance to TS-targeted therapies, but not to agents that did not inhibit TS (data not shown).

Effect of TS Overexpression on Cell Cycle Distribution.

To investigate the effect of TS expression on cell cycle progression, we analyzed the cell cycle profiles of MTS-5 cells in which the TS trans-gene was inactive or active after treatment with no drug or with 5-FU, TDX, MTA, oxaliplatin, and CPT-11. Each drug was administered at a concentration corresponding to the IC50 dose in TS-uninduced MTS-5 cells. Representative cell cycle profiles 48 h posttreatment are shown in Fig. 3. In the absence of drug, up-regulation of TS caused no significant change in the cell cycle profile (Fig. 3,A), with 16.6 ± 0.4% of TS-uninduced (+tet) cells and 16.4 ± 1.4% of TS-induced (−tet) cells in S phase. Treatment with 5-FU resulted in an accumulation of cells in S phase, such that 26.1 ± 1.5% of cells were in S phase (Fig. 3,B, +tet). This arrest was completely abrogated when the TS trans-gene was activated, with 15.5 ± 2.0% of cells in S phase (Fig. 3,B, −tet), similar to the S-phase percentages in the control populations (Fig. 3,A). Treatment of TS-uninduced cells with TDX and MTA also resulted in a dramatic S-phase arrest with 32.8 ± 3.4% and 31.9 ± 2.5% of cells, respectively, accumulating in S phase (Fig. 3, C and D, +tet). However, as with 5-FU, overexpression of TS caused complete abrogation of the TDX- and MTA-induced S-phase arrests (Fig. 3, C and D, −tet). In contrast, treatment with oxaliplatin resulted in equal S-phase accumulation in TS-induced (34.8 ± 1.0%) and -uninduced (35.1 ± 2.6%) cells (Fig. 3,E). Treatment with CPT-11 resulted in no change in the S-phase distribution; however, a significant similar number of TS-induced and -uninduced cells did arrest in G2-M phase (Fig. 3 F). The magnitude of the CPT-11-induced G2-M arrest was the same in the TS-uninduced (33.8 ± 1.6%) and -induced (34.3 ± 1.3%) populations.

Effect of TS Inhibitors on Expression of Cyclin E, Cyclin A, and cdk2.

To begin to characterize the molecular events underlying the S-phase arrest we assessed the expression of the key cell cycle genes cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 in the MTS-5 system after treatment for 48 h with IC50 doses of 5-FU, TDX, MTA, CPT-11, and oxaliplatin. Western blot analysis indicated that, in the absence of drug, cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 were expressed at the same level in TS-uninduced (+tet) and -induced (−tet) cell populations (Fig. 4). Treatment with 5-FU in the absence of inducible TS expression resulted in increased levels of cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 of ∼1.7-, 2.3-, and 3.9-fold, respectively, compared with TS-induced cells. Similarly, treatment of TS-uninduced cells with TDX resulted in increased expression of cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 of ∼2.9-, 1.9-, and 3.4-fold respectively compared with cells expressing the TS trans-gene. Furthermore, treatment with MTA also resulted in increased expression of cyclin E by 3.4-fold, cyclin A by 3.3-fold, and cdk2 by 3.4-fold in TS-uninduced cells compared with induced cells. In contrast, after treatment with CPT-11 and oxaliplatin, the expression levels of cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 did not alter between the TS -uninduced and -induced populations.

We have successfully generated a tet-inducible cell line, MTS-5, in which we can control expression of a TS trans-gene. Our analysis of the TS-inducible MTS-5 cell line has confirmed its usefulness as a physiologically relevant reagent with which to study the effects of elevated TS expression on the sensitivity of malignant cells to a wide range of chemotherapeutic compounds. Treatment of MTS-5 cells with 5-FU and antifolate-based chemotherapeutic inhibitors of TS demonstrated that up-regulation of TS significantly decreased cellular sensitivity to these agents. We found that the protective effect of TS overexpression was greater for TDX and ZD9331 than for 5-FU. MTA toxicity was significantly more sensitive to increased TS levels than that of either TDX or ZD9331, which is somewhat surprising because MTA can inhibit several other folate-dependent enzymes (10). However, the results of this study suggest that TS is the main target for MTA in this cell line.

We also analyzed the effect of TS overexpression on the toxicity of the chemotherapeutic agents cisplatin, oxaliplatin, CPT-11, and Taxol, which do not directly inhibit TS enzyme function. These agents are often used as second-line agents to treat tumors, such as colorectal cancer, that are refractory to 5-FU. Our data suggest that TS up-regulation does not affect the toxicity of cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and CPT-11, and that TS overexpression does not confer cross-resistance to these drugs.

Cell cycle analysis of MTS-5 cells treated with IC50 doses of 5-FU, TDX, and MTA (and with ZD9331, data not shown) demonstrated that, in the absence of TS trans-gene expression, significant numbers of cells arrested in S phase 48 h posttreatment. When the TS trans-gene was activated, the S-phase arrest caused by each drug was completely abrogated, which indicated that TS overexpression was able to circumvent the S-phase block. The proportion of TS-uninduced cells in S phase after 5-FU treatment decreased to control levels 72 h posttreatment, whereas the arrests caused by TDX and MTA were sustained at this time point (data not shown), which indicated that the antifolates produce a more potent and sustained S-phase arrest than does 5-FU. This is likely to be the cause of the smaller increase in IC50 dosage observed in TS-overexpressing cells treated with 5-FU compared with those treated with antifolates. Treatment with oxaliplatin resulted in equal levels of TS-induced and -uninduced cells accumulating in S phase, which indicated that TS overexpression is not able to overcome the S-phase arrest caused by this drug. Treatment with an IC50 dose of CPT-11 did not cause an accumulation of cells in S phase; however, a significant G2-M arrest was observed in TS-induced and -uninduced populations, which suggested that TS overexpression does not influence the cycling of CPT-11-treated MTS-5 cells.

Progression through the cell cycle is regulated by the coordinate action of cdks and their associated regulatory subunits, cyclins (31). Cyclin E-cdk2 activity is maximal near the G1-S boundary (32) and is required for G1 to S-phase transition (33). Once in S phase, cyclin E is degraded, and cyclin A becomes the principle cyclin associated with cdk2; cyclin A-cdk2 activity is required for S-phase progression (34). We analyzed the expression of these important regulatory proteins after treatment of MTS-5 cells with TS inhibitors. We found that in cells that did not overexpress TS and that significantly accumulated in S phase, expression of cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 proteins was elevated by between 2- and 4-fold after treatment with IC50 doses of 5-FU, TDX, and MTA compared with cells in which TS was overexpressed. In contrast, treatment with CPT-11 and oxaliplatin did not result in differential expression of these proteins in the TS-induced and -uninduced populations. Cyclin A-cdk2 can form stable complexes with the E2F-1 transcription factor, which eliminates E2F-1-dependent DNA binding and transactivation function (35). High cyclin A-cdk2 activity in S-phase arrested cells may act to inhibit the activity of E2F-1, which is required for S-phase traversal. In addition, because cyclin E-cdk2 and cyclin A-cdk2 have been shown to limit DNA replication to a single round per cell cycle (36), it is possible that elevated cdk2 activity inhibits reinitiation of interrupted DNA replication in S-phase arrested cells.

We found that TS overexpression did not affect expression of mutant p53 in the MTS-5 cell line. Ju et al. have reported that TS protein inhibits translation of p53 mRNA (37). It is possible that the high levels of mutant p53 in the MTS-5 cell line masks the negative effect of high TS levels on p53 expression, or that the extent to which TS is up-regulated in this cell line is not sufficient to significantly down-regulate p53 mRNA translation.

In conclusion, we have developed a TS-inducible system with which to study the patterns of sensitivity to various commonly used anticancer drugs. We have demonstrated a direct correlation between the levels of TS expression and the development of resistance to TS targeted drugs. We have also demonstrated that TS overexpression confers increased resistance to TS inhibitors by abrogating an S-phase arrest. Furthermore, the S-phase arrest induced by TS inhibitors is accompanied by increased expression of several key cell cycle proteins: cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2. In addition, we have identified other non-TS-targeted drugs to which TS induction does not confer resistance and that may be useful in tumors resistant to fluoropyrimidines or antifolates.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

        
1

Supported by the Ulster Cancer Foundation and Action Cancer.

                
3

The abbreviations used are: TS, thymidylate synthase; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; TDX, Tomudex; MTA, multitargeted antifolate; FdUMP, fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate; tet, tetracycline; cdk2, cyclin-dependent kinase 2.

Fig. 1.

A, Northern blot analysis of TS mRNA in uninduced (+tet) and induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells. TS mRNA was detected using a DNA probe complementary to the TS coding region. B, Western blot analysis of TS protein in uninduced (+tet) and induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells. TS protein was detected using the mouse TS106 monoclonal primary antibody (NeoMarkers). The exogenous TS protein migrates more slowly than endogenous TS because of six additional amino acids at its COOH terminus that specify the Hemagglutinin (HA) epitope. C, total TS protein levels in uninduced (+tet) and induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells assessed using a FdUMP-binding assay. D, p53 expression in control and UV-treated TS-uninduced (+tet) and -induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells. Samples were harvested 48 h after TS induction and 6 h after exposure to 20 J/m2 UV. p53 was detected using a mouse monoclonal primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Equal lane loading was confirmed using a β-tubulin mouse monoclonal primary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.).

Fig. 1.

A, Northern blot analysis of TS mRNA in uninduced (+tet) and induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells. TS mRNA was detected using a DNA probe complementary to the TS coding region. B, Western blot analysis of TS protein in uninduced (+tet) and induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells. TS protein was detected using the mouse TS106 monoclonal primary antibody (NeoMarkers). The exogenous TS protein migrates more slowly than endogenous TS because of six additional amino acids at its COOH terminus that specify the Hemagglutinin (HA) epitope. C, total TS protein levels in uninduced (+tet) and induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells assessed using a FdUMP-binding assay. D, p53 expression in control and UV-treated TS-uninduced (+tet) and -induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells. Samples were harvested 48 h after TS induction and 6 h after exposure to 20 J/m2 UV. p53 was detected using a mouse monoclonal primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Equal lane loading was confirmed using a β-tubulin mouse monoclonal primary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.).

Close modal
Fig. 2.

Growth inhibition of TS-induced (−tet) and -uninduced (+tet) MTS-5 cells after continuous treatment for 72 h with A, 5-FU; B, TDX; C, ZD9331; D, MTA; E, cisplatin; F, oxaliplatin; G, CPT-11; and H, Taxol. Cells were counted in triplicate for each treatment using a Z2 particle and size analyzer (Coulter). The IC50 doses in the presence and absence of TS induction are given.

Fig. 2.

Growth inhibition of TS-induced (−tet) and -uninduced (+tet) MTS-5 cells after continuous treatment for 72 h with A, 5-FU; B, TDX; C, ZD9331; D, MTA; E, cisplatin; F, oxaliplatin; G, CPT-11; and H, Taxol. Cells were counted in triplicate for each treatment using a Z2 particle and size analyzer (Coulter). The IC50 doses in the presence and absence of TS induction are given.

Close modal
Fig. 3.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of propidium iodide-stained TS-uninduced (+tet) and -induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells harvested after 48 h exposure to: A, no drug; B, 2.6 μm 5-FU; C, 2 nm TDX; D, 32 nm MTA; E, 2.2 μm oxaliplatin; and F, 140 nm CPT-11. The drug concentrations used correspond to IC50 doses in uninduced cells. The analysis was carried out on an EPICS XL flow cytometer (Coulter). Mean S-phase percentages were calculated from triplicate samples.

Fig. 3.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of propidium iodide-stained TS-uninduced (+tet) and -induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells harvested after 48 h exposure to: A, no drug; B, 2.6 μm 5-FU; C, 2 nm TDX; D, 32 nm MTA; E, 2.2 μm oxaliplatin; and F, 140 nm CPT-11. The drug concentrations used correspond to IC50 doses in uninduced cells. The analysis was carried out on an EPICS XL flow cytometer (Coulter). Mean S-phase percentages were calculated from triplicate samples.

Close modal
Fig. 4.

Western blot analysis of cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 in TS-uninduced (+tet) and -induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells after 48-h treatment with no drug (control), 2.6 μm 5-FU, 2 nm TDX, 32 nm MTA, and 140 nm CPT-11 (each concentration corresponds to the IC50 dose in uninduced cells). Cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 were detected using mouse monoclonal primary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Equal lane loading was confirmed using a β-tubulin mouse monoclonal primary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.). The changes in cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 expression were reproducible in three separate experiments.

Fig. 4.

Western blot analysis of cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 in TS-uninduced (+tet) and -induced (−tet) MTS-5 cells after 48-h treatment with no drug (control), 2.6 μm 5-FU, 2 nm TDX, 32 nm MTA, and 140 nm CPT-11 (each concentration corresponds to the IC50 dose in uninduced cells). Cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 were detected using mouse monoclonal primary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Equal lane loading was confirmed using a β-tubulin mouse monoclonal primary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.). The changes in cyclin E, cyclin A, and cdk2 expression were reproducible in three separate experiments.

Close modal
1
Danenberg P. V. Thymidylate synthase—a target enzyme in cancer chemotherapy.
Biochem. Biophys. Acta
,
473
:
73
-92,  
1997
.
2
Grem J. L. Fluorinated pyrimidines Chabner B. A. Collins J. M. eds. .
Cancer Chemotherapy, Principles and Practice
,
:
180
-224, Lippincott Co. Philadelphia  
1990
.
3
Johnston P. G., Takimoto C. H., Grem J. L., Chabner B. A., Allegra C. J., Chu E. Antimetabolites Pinedo H. M. Longo D. L. Chabner B. A. eds. .
Cancer Chemotherapy and Biological Response Modifiers
,
:
1
-39, Elsevier Amsterdam  
1997
.
4
Pestalozzi B. C., Mc Ginn C. J., Kinsella T. J., Drake J. C., Glennon C., Allegra C. J., Johnston P. G. Increased thymidylate synthase protein levels are principally associated with proliferation but not cell cycle phase in asynchronous human cancer cells.
Br. J. Cancer
,
71
:
1151
-1157,  
1995
.
5
Jackman A. L., Taylor G. A., Gibson W., Kimbell R., Brown M., Calvert A. H., Judson I. R., Hughes L. R. ICI D1694, a quinazoline antifolate thymidylate synthase inhibitor that is a potent inhibitor of L1210 tumor growth in vitro and in vivo: a new agent for clinical study.
Cancer Res.
,
51
:
5579
-5586,  
1991
.
6
Zalcberg J. R., Cunningham D., Van Cutsern E., Francois E., Schornagel J., Adenis A., Green M., Iveson A., Azab M., Seymour I. ZD 1694: a novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor with substantial activity in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
14
:
716
-721,  
1996
.
7
Dixon K. H., Mulligan T., Chung K. N., Elwood P. C., Cowan K. H. Effects of folate receptor expression following stable transfection into wild-type and methotrexate transport-deficient ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
,
267
:
24140
-24147,  
1992
.
8
Habeck L. L., Mendesohn L. G., Shih C., Taylor E. C., Colman P. D., Gossett L. S., Leitner T. A., Schultz R. M., Andis S. L., Moran R. G. Substrate-specificity of mammalian folypolyglutamate synthase for 5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolate analogs.
Mol. Pharmacol.
,
48
:
326
-333,  
1995
.
9
Jackman A. L., Kimbell R., Aherne G. W., Brunton L., Jansen G., Stephens T. C., Smith M. N., Wardleworth J. M., Boyle F. T. Cellular pharmacology and in vivo activity of a new anticancer agent ZD9331: a water soluble, nonpolyglutamatable, quinazoline-based inhibitor of thymidylate synthase.
Clin. Cancer Res.
,
3
:
911
-921,  
1997
.
10
Shih C., Chen V. J., Gossett L. S., Gates S. B., MacKellar W. C., Habeck L. L., Shackelford K. A., Mendelsohn L. G., Soose D. J., Patel V. F., Andis S. L., Bewley J. R., Rayl E. A., Moroson B. A., Beardsley G. P., Kohler W., Ratnam M., Scultz R. M. LY231514, a pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine based antifolate that inhibits multiple folate requiring enzymes.
Cancer Res.
,
57
:
1116
-1123,  
1997
.
11
Jackman, A. L., Melin, C., Brunton, L., Kimbell, R., Aherne, G. W., and Walton, M. Some determinants of response to folate-based thymidylate synthase inhibitors in human colon and ovarian tumour cell lines. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 39: 434, Abstract 2957, 1998.
12
Washtien W. L. Increased levels of thymidylate synthase in cells exposed to 5-fluorouracil.
Mol. Pharmacol.
,
25
:
171
-177,  
1984
.
13
Johnston P. G., Drake J. C., Trepel J., Allegra C. J. Immunological quantitation of thymidylate synthase using the monoclonal antibody TS106 in 5-fluorouracil sensitive and resistant human cancer cell lines.
Cancer Res.
,
52
:
4306
-4312,  
1992
.
14
Swain S. M., Lippman M. E., Egan E. F., Drake J. C., Steinberg S. M., Allegra C. J. Fluorouracil and high dose leucovorin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
7
:
890
-899,  
1989
.
15
Jackman A. L., Kelland L. R., Kimbell R., Brown M., Gibson W., Aherne G. W., Hardcastle A., Boyle F. T. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to the quinazoline thymidylate synthase inhibitor ZD1694 (Tomudex) in one mouse and three human cell lines.
Br. J. Cancer
,
71
:
914
-924,  
1995
.
16
Drake J. C., Allegra C. J., Moran R. G., Johnston P. G. Resistance to Tomudex (ZD1694): multifactorial in human breast and colon carcinoma cell lines.
Biochem. Pharmacol.
,
51
:
1349
-1355,  
1996
.
17
Chu E., Koeller D., Johnston P. G., Zinn S., Allegra C. J. Regulation of thymidylate synthase in human colon cancer cells treated with 5-fluorouracil and interferon γ.
Mol. Pharmacol.
,
43
:
527
-533,  
1993
.
18
Chu E., Drake J. C., Koeller D. M., Zinn S., Jamis-Dow C. A., Yeh G. C., Allegra C. J. Autoregulation of human thymidylate synthase messenger RNA translation by thymidylate synthase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
,
88
:
8977
-8981,  
1991
.
19
Keyomarsi K., Samet J., Molnar G., Pardee A. B. The thymidylate synthase inhibitor ICI D1694 overcomes translational detainment of the enzyme.
J. Biol. Chem.
,
268
:
15142
-15149,  
1993
.
20
Chu E., Voeller D., Koeller D. M., Drake J. C., Takimoto C., Maley G. F., Maley F., Allegra C. J. Identification of an RNA binding site for human thymidylate synthase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
,
90
:
517
-521,  
1993
.
21
Chu E., Takechi T., Jones K. L., Voeller D. M., Copur S. M., Maley G. F., Maley F., Segal S., Allegra C. J. Thymidylate synthase binds to c-myc RNA in human colon cancer cells and in vitro.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
,
15
:
179
-185,  
1995
.
22
Chu E., Copur S. M., Ju J., Chen T. M., Kleif S., Voeller D. M., Mizunuma N., Patel M., Maley G. F., Maley F., Allegra C. J. Thymidylate synthase protein and p53 mRNA form an in vivo ribonucleoprotein complex.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
,
19
:
1582
-1594,  
1999
.
23
Kaneda S., Nalbantoglu J., Takeishi K., Shimizu K., Gotoh O., Seno T., Ayusawa D. Structural and functional analysis of the human thymidylate synthase gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
,
265
:
20277
-20284,  
1990
.
24
Gossen M., Bujard H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
,
89
:
5547
-5552,  
1992
.
25
Harkin D. P., Bean J. M., Miklos D., Song Y-H., Truong V. B., Englert C., Christians F. C., Ellisen L. W., Maheswaran S., Oliner J. D., Haber D. A. Induction of GADD45 and JNK/SAPK-dependent apoptosis following inducible expression of BRCA1.
Cell
,
97
:
575
-586,  
1999
.
26
Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
Nature (Lond.)
,
227
:
1986, 1986
680
-685,
27
Fan Z., Lu Y., Wu X., DeBlasio A., Koff A., Mendelsohn J. Prolonged induction of p21Cip1/WAF1/CDK2/PCNA complex by epidermal growth factor receptor activation mediates ligand-induced A431 cell growth inhibition.
J. Cell Biol.
,
131
:
235
-242,  
1995
.
28
Roberts J. J., Thomson A. J. Mechanism of action of antitumour platinum compounds.
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
,
22
:
71
-133,  
1979
.
29
Eng W. K., Faucette L., Johnson R. K., Sternglanz R. Evidence that DNA topoisomerase I is necessary for the cytotoxic effects of camptothecin.
Mol. Pharmacol.
,
34
:
755
-760,  
1988
.
30
Dumontet C., Sikic B. I. Mechanisms of action of and resistance to antitubulin agents: microtubule dynamics, drug transport and cell death.
J. Clin. Oncol.
,
3
:
1061
-1070,  
1999
.
31
Sherr C. J. G1 phase progression: cycling on cue.
Cell
,
79
:
551
-555,  
1994
.
32
Koff A., Giordano A., Desai D., Yamashita K., Harper J. W., Elledge S., Nishimoto T., Morgan D. O., Franza B. R., Roberts J. M. Formation and activation of a cyclin E-cdk2 complex during the G1 phase of the human cell cycle.
Science (Wash. DC)
,
257
:
1689
-1694,  
1992
.
33
Ohtsubo M, Theodoras A. M., Schumacher J., Roberts J. M., Pagano M. Human cyclin E, a nuclear protein essential for the G1-to-S phase transition.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
,
15
:
2612
-2624,  
1995
.
34
Pagano M., Pepperkok R., Verde F., Ansorge W., Draetta G. Cyclin A is required at two points in the human cell cycle.
EMBO J.
,
11
:
961
-971,  
1992
.
35
Krek W., Xu G., Livingston D. M. Cyclin A-kinase regulation of E2F-1 DNA binding function underlies suppression of an S phase checkpoint.
Cell
,
83
:
1149
-1158,  
1995
.
36
Hua X. H., Yan H., Newport J. A role for Cdk2 kinase in negatively regulating DNA replication during S phase of the cell cycle.
J. Cell Biol.
,
137
:
183
-192,  
1997
.
37
Ju J., Pedersen-Lane J., Maley F., Chu E. Regulation of p53 expression by thymidylate synthase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
,
96
:
3769
-3774,  
1999
.