Adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is gaining momentum and demonstrating durable responses in patients with advanced melanoma. Although increasingly considered as a treatment option for select patients with melanoma, TIL therapy is not yet approved by any regulatory agency. Pioneering studies with first-generation TIL therapy, undertaken before the advent of modern melanoma therapeutics, demonstrated clinical efficacy and remarkable long-term overall survival, reaching beyond 20 months for responding patients. TIL therapy is a multistep process of harvesting patient-specific tumor-resident T cells from tumors, ex vivo T-cell expansion, and re-infusion into the same patient after a lymphodepleting preparative regimen, with subsequent supportive IL2 administration. Objective response rates between 30% and 50% have consistently been observed in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma, including those who have progressed after modern immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF targeted agents, a population with high unmet medical need. Although significant strides have been made in modern TIL therapeutics, refinement strategies to optimize patient selection, enhance TIL production, and improve efficacy are being explored. Here, we review past and present experience, current challenges, practical considerations, and future aspirations in the evolution of TIL therapy for the treatment of melanoma as well as other solid tumors.

In the last decade, the melanoma treatment landscape has dramatically transformed with approvals for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) antibodies targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1), as well as small-molecule inhibitors targeting the B-Raf proto-oncogene (1, 2). These treatment modalities improve long-term survival of patients and reduce the risk of relapse in the adjuvant setting (3). Unfortunately, despite these advances, most patients experience disease progression (4). As such, there remains a substantial unmet need to identify effective therapies for treatment-refractory disease.

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has emerged as an alternative immunotherapy strategy in melanoma that focuses on harnessing the antitumor abilities of tumor-resident antigen-specific T cells (5–7). The highest overall response rate (ORR, 49%) among patients with advanced melanoma after failure of an approved front-line therapy has been demonstrated with TIL therapy (8). Single-center studies have been critical in laying the foundation for TIL therapy in advanced melanoma (9). Historically, these trials were undertaken in specialized institutions with on-site cell therapy manufacturing facilities (10, 11). Recently, with the expansion of cell therapy technologies, commercial enterprises have established off-site manufacturing facilities that have widened access to TIL therapy with the potential to benefit more patients (12). Accumulated data generated from multicenter, international programs support commercial approval of TIL therapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma, shifting this intervention from an academic pursuit offered at a few select centers to a viable therapeutic option available internationally. Here, we discuss clinical experiences with TIL therapy, the rationale to support future combination with ICIs and other agents, practical considerations for an approved TIL product, and the next generation of therapeutic TILs.

Intrinsic and acquired resistance to front-line ICIs is common and driven by multiple factors (13). Resistance, with a high likelihood of recurrent disease in patients receiving adjuvant ICIs, further emphasizes the need for effective treatments in this ICI-refractory population (14). A variety of immune-activating adoptive cell therapy approaches are being tested in the hope of overcoming these resistance mechanisms (15, 16).

TIL therapy requires harvest of autologous T cells from tumor material by surgical resection, stimulation ex vivo by coculture with cytokines and expansion, to generate the TIL infusion product (15). TILs are infused back into the same patient after non-myeloablative lymphodepletion (NMA-LD) with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, enabling preferential engraftment of the TIL population (17). Post-TIL infusion, IL2 is administered to facilitate in vivo expansion of the infused T cells (18), followed by a short recovery period to support resolution of IL2-related toxicities (Fig. 1; ref. 19).

Figure 1.

Overview of TIL therapy. Current TIL therapy begins with physician consultation, patient identification, and tumor procurement through surgical resection (step 1). Tumors are then transported centrally to a manufacturing facility or processing hub. TILs are manufactured beginning with digestion and culture or fragmentation of tumors, which yields a suspension of T cells, followed by stimulation and rapid expansion. Manufacturing of unmodified TIL is relatively quick (3 weeks) compared with modified or neoantigen-enriched TIL, which could take several months. The final TIL product is cryopreserved (step 2). TILs are held for later use or immediately transferred to the treatment site. The patient receives NMA-LD for 5 to 7 days, followed by a one-time intravenous infusion of TILs, and supportive IL2 therapy for 3 to 5 days (step 3 A, B, C). The patient is discharged following resolution of chemotherapy and IL2-related toxicity before being evaluated for response (step 4).

Figure 1.

Overview of TIL therapy. Current TIL therapy begins with physician consultation, patient identification, and tumor procurement through surgical resection (step 1). Tumors are then transported centrally to a manufacturing facility or processing hub. TILs are manufactured beginning with digestion and culture or fragmentation of tumors, which yields a suspension of T cells, followed by stimulation and rapid expansion. Manufacturing of unmodified TIL is relatively quick (3 weeks) compared with modified or neoantigen-enriched TIL, which could take several months. The final TIL product is cryopreserved (step 2). TILs are held for later use or immediately transferred to the treatment site. The patient receives NMA-LD for 5 to 7 days, followed by a one-time intravenous infusion of TILs, and supportive IL2 therapy for 3 to 5 days (step 3 A, B, C). The patient is discharged following resolution of chemotherapy and IL2-related toxicity before being evaluated for response (step 4).

Close modal

Pioneering work in this field was performed by Rosenberg and colleagues beginning in the 1980s, demonstrating the patient-specific antitumor activity of cultured TILs in vivo (20), with clinical effectiveness in diverse cancers (21). Because of the first signal of clinical responses (22, 23), a series of single-center phase I to III clinical trials have demonstrated reproducible efficacy (ORRs, 34%–56%; PFS, 3.7–7.5 months; OS, 15.9–21.8 months) of TIL therapy in metastatic melanoma despite differences in patient characteristics, lymphodepletion regimens, IL2 administration, TIL manufacturing process, and TIL dose (refs. 8, 10, 11, 19, 24–27; Table 1). These encouraging results have stimulated centers worldwide to conduct studies which define the role of TIL therapy in melanoma management and have been summarized previously (15, 16). Here, we focus on the studies that have shifted from an academic single center institution to a centralized manufacturing process to enable broad access to TIL therapy through registrational studies with the intent for regulatory approval.

Table 1.

Clinical efficacy of select TIL therapy trials in melanoma.

TrialNo. of prior therapies, %Intervention/Pts, n/ disease stageLymphodepletion/ IL2 regimenTIL preparationTIL product/ IL2 doses receivedEfficacy outcomes
Rosenberg et al. 1994 (127
  • Surgery, 80%

  • IO, 43%

  • Chemotherapy, 20%

  • Radiotherapy, 10%

  • None, 3%

  • Hormonal therapy, 1%

 
  • TIL + IL2±Cy

  • 86

  • Metastatic disease

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy: 25 mg/kg

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr max 15 doses

 
  • Minced into 3- to 5-mm fragments and digested overnight in an enzyme medium

 
  • TIL:

    • >1011 cells in cycle 1 (85% of pts)

    • >2 × 1011 cells in cycle 1 (48% of pts)

 
  • ORR:

    • IL2 alone: 35% (n = 29)

    • IL2 + Cy: 35% (n = 57)

    • All: 34% (n = 86)

 
Schwartzentruber et al. 1994 (128
  • Surgery, 95%

  • Chemotherapy, 29%

  • Radiation, 7%

  • Hormonal/non–IL2 IO, 67%

  • IL2-based therapy, 49%

  • TIL therapy, 14%

 
  • TIL + IL2 (±IFN-α) ±Cy

  • 43

  • Stage IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy: 25 mg/kg

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg IV every 8 hr OR 216,000 IU/kg and IFN-α: 3 × 106 U/m2 IV every 8 hr

 
  • Minced and enzymatically digested

  • Cells were cultured in IL2–containing media for 28 to 84 d

 
  • TIL (mean ± SEM):

    • Cycle 1: responders: 1.9 ±0.1×10−11; nonresponders: 1.5 ± 0.1×10−11

    • Cycle 1 + 2: responders: 3.2 ± 0.3×10−11; nonresponders: 2.4±0.2×10−11

  • IL2 doses (mean ± SEM):

    • Cycle 1: responders: 2.6 ±0.4 × 10−6 IU/kg; Cycle 1: nonresponders: 2.5 ±0.3 × 10−6 IU/kg

    • Cycle 1 + 2: responders: 5.8 ±0.9×10−6 IU/kg; nonresponders: 4.9 ± 0.5×10−6

 
  • ORR: 21%

 
Dudley et al. 2002 (23
  • IL2, 100%

  • Chemotherapy, 62%

 
  • TIL+ Cy/Flu + IL2

  • 13

  • HLA-A2+ metastatic melanoma

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy: 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable toxicity

 
  • Small (2 mm3) tumor fragments or enzymatically digested tumor tissue

  • TIL cultures screened for autologous tumor cell and HLA-A2+ reactivity

  • Expanded to ≥5×107 cells (3–6 weeks)

 
  • TIL (average, range):

    • 7.8×1010 (2.3×1010 – 13.7×1010)

  • IL2 (average, range):

    • 9 (5 – 12)

 
  • ORR: 46% (n = 6)

 
Dudley et al. 2010 (129
  • IL2, 62%

 
  • Lymphodepletion±TBI + TIL + HD IL2

  • 56

  • M1a-M1c

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cohort 1: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d (n = 33)

    • Cohort 2: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d (n = 33) + TBI 3×2 Gy (n = 23)

 
  • CD8+ enriched young TILa

 
  • TILb (average± standard error):

    • Cohort 1: 47.7 ±3.3×109

    • Cohort 2: 43.1 ± 7.5×109

  • IL2:

    • Cohort 1: 6.3 ± 0.3

    • Cohort 2: 7.5 ± 0.5

 
  • ORR:

    • Cohort 1: 58%

    • Cohort 2: 48%

    • All: 54%

 
Rosenberg et al. 2011 (9
  • Median = 2 (mean ± SEM = 2 ±0.2)

  • IL2, 83%

  • IFN, 56%

  • Chemotherapy, 43%

  • IL2+Chemotherapy, 40%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 12%

  • IL2+anti–CTLA-4, 9%

  • IL2+anti–CTLA-4 + chemotherapy, 7%

  • None, 5%

 
  • Lymphodepletion±TBI + TIL + HD IL2

  • 93

  • M1a-M1c

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cohort 1: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d (n = 43)

    • Cohort 2: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d + TBI 2 Gy (n = 25)

    • Cohort 3: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d +12 TBI (TBI 2 × 2 Gy/d for 3 d) (n = 25)

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable toxicity, max 15 doses

    • Cohort 2/3 received ≤2 × 106/kg of CD34+ HPSCs

 
  • Single-cell suspensions or 1–2 mm3 fragments in 24-well cultures plates

  • Lesion size >2 cm in diameter

 
  • TIL (mean ± SEM):

    • CR (n = 20): 6.5 ± 0.7 × 10−10

    • PR (n = 32): 6.1 ± 0.5 × 10−10

    • NR (n = 41): 5.5 ± 0.6 × 10−10

  • IL2 (mean ± SEM):

    • CR: 7.1 ± 0.4

    • PR: 7.7 ± 0.5

    • NR: 8.8 ± 0.4

 
  • ORR:

    • Cohort 1: 49% (n = 43); (CR, 12%)

    • Cohort 2: 52% (n = 25); (CR, 20%)

    • Cohort 3: 72% (n = 25); (CR, 40%)

    • All: 56% (n = 93)

  • 3-yr OS rate:

    • CR: 100%

    • PR: 31%

    • NR: 7%

    • All: 36%

  • 5-yr OS rate:

    • CR: 93%

    • PR: 21%

    • NR: 5%

    • All: 29%

 
Radvanyi et al. 2012 (130)
 
  • Chemotherapy, 29%

  • Biochemotherapy, 29%

  • IO, 39%

  • Unknown, 3%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + 2 cycles HD IL2

  • 31

  • Stage IIIc, IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d (on d −7 and −6) + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d from d −5 to −1

  • IL2:

    • 1st dose: 720,000 IU/kg until tolerable toxicity, max 15 doses; 2nd dose: 21 d post TIL

 
  • 1 lesion used in most cases, in some cases two to three smaller nodules

  • 3 to 5 mm3 cut fragments; manual dissection; pre-REP TIL cryopreserved (5 wk), thawed, further expanded to post-REP TIL

  • Treatment: post-REP TIL

 
  • TIL (range):

    • 8 to 150×109

  • IL2:

    • 2 cycles (n = 28/31 pts)

 
  • mOS: NR

  • mPFS: 7.6 mo (95% CI, 4.1 mo -22.2 mo)

 
Besser et al. 2013 (38
  • Previous therapy, 100%

  • IL2-based therapy, 95%

  • Ipilimumab therapy, 23%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • 80

  • Stage IV (M1a-M1b)

  • BRAFV600/E mutations (n = 34/80)

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg until tolerable toxicity, max 15 doses

 
  • Fragmentation, enzymatic digestion, and cell remnants

  • Young-TIL Pre-REP cultures (2 wk), cryopreserved or expanded (14 d)

  • Treatment: young TIL (n = 57)

 
  • TIL (total cell number, n = 57): 52 ± 24 × 109

 
  • ORR:

    • 40% (n = 57); (CR, 6%; PR, 23%)

    • 29% (n = 80); (CR, 9%; PR, 32%)

  • Treated pts (n = 57)

    • mOS: 15.2 mo

    • mPFS: 4 mo

  • 1-yr PFS rate: 42%

  • 1-yr OS rate: 50%

  • 2-yr OS rate: 45%

  • 3-yr OS rate: 42%

 
Anderson et al. 2016 (25
  • IL2-based, 96%

  • Ipilimumab-based, 80%

  • Responders: median 2 (range, 1–4)

  • Nonresponders: median 2 (range, 2–4)

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + LD IL2

  • 25

  • Stage IIIc, IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d (d −7 and −6) + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5d (d −5 to −1)

  • IL2:

    • Decrescendo regimen (18 MIU/m2 for 6 hr, 18 MIU/ m2 for 12 hr, 18 MIU/ m2 for 24 hr followed by 4.5 MIU/ m2 for another 3×24 hr) (prescheduled IL2 dose was reduced by 25%–50% in 4 pts)

 
  • Lesions ≤1 cm3 were surgically resected and cut into 2 to 3 mm3 fragments

  • Pre-REP/ young TIL in 21 d (range, 13–36) were cryopreserved or entered REP

 
  • TIL (median):

    • 98 × 109 (range 61–20 × 109)

  • IL2 (median):

    • 112 MIU dose

 
  • ORR: 42% (n = 25)

  • mPFS: All: 3.9 mo

  • mOS: All: 21.8 mo

  • 1-yr OS rate: 72%

  • 3-yr OS rate: 40.8%

 
Goff et al. 2016 (24
  • None, 26%

  • HD IL2, 29%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 31%

  • Anti–PD-1, 3%

  • Anti–CTLA-4 and anti–PD-1, 8%

  • Adjuvant (IFNα, vaccine, etc.), 38%

  • Chemotherapy, 11%

  • BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor, 9%

  • Other (including biochemotherapy), 10%

 
  • NMA-lymphodepletion ±TBI + TIL + HD IL2

  • 101c

  • Advanced disease (76%, M1c)

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Arm 1: NMA, Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d

    • Arm 2: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d + TBI 2 Gy 2×/d (total of 1200 TBI)

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable

  • Cohort 2 received ≤2×106/kg of CD34+ HPSCs

 
  • Single fragments of 2 to 3 mm2 were enzymatically digested and cryopreserved

  • Autologous reactive or actively growing cells were cryopreserved and/or selected for REP

 
  • IL2 median (range):

    • Arm 1: 6 (4–7)

    • Arm 2: 5 (3.3–6)

 
  • ORR: 54% (n = 54)

    • Arm 1: 45% (n = 23); (CR, 24%; PR, 22%)

    • Arm 2: 62% (n = 31); (CR, 24%; PR, 38%)

  • mPFS

    • Arm 1: 7.5 mo

    • Arm 2: 9.6 mo

  • mOS

    • Arm 1: 36.6 mo

    • Arm 2: 38.2 mo

 
van den Berg et al. 2020 (26
  • Chemotherapy, 70%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 100%

  • Adjuvant (IFNα, vaccine, etc.), 40%

  • BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor, 40%

 
  • NMA-lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • 10

  • Stage IIIc/ IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable toxicity, max 15 doses

 
  • Enzymatic digestion

  • Growth 2–4 weeks to reach ≥1×108 cells followed by cryopreservation or REP

  • TILs harvested additional 14 days after growth

 
  • TIL (range):

    • 1.7 – 19.6 × 1010

  • IL2 median (range):

    • 3.5 (1–9)

 
  • ORR: 50% (n = 5)

    • CR, 20%

    • PR, 30%

 
Sarnaik et al. 2021 (12
  • Mean = 3.3 (range, 1–9)

  • Anti–PD-1 or PD-L1, 100%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 80%

  • Anti–PD-1+ CTLA-4, 52%

  • BRAF ± MEK, 88%

  • IL2, 11%

  • Surgery, 99%

  • Radiotherapy, 52%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • 66

  • Stage IIIc, IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg every 8 to 12 hr for up to 6 doses, starting within 3 to 24 hr after TIL infusion

 
  • At least one resectable lesion (or aggregate of lesions) measuring a minimum of 1.5 cm in diameter postresection

  • Mean target lesion diameter = 106 mm

  • Centralized 22-d process and cryopreserved product

 
  • TIL administered:

    • Total: >1 × 109 – <150 × 109

    • Mean: 27.3 × 109 (range, 1.2 × 109–99.5 × 109)

  • IL2:

    • Median 5.5 (range 1–6)

 
  • ORR: 36% (n = 24)

    • (CR, n = 2; PR, n = 22)

  • DCR: 80% (n = 53)

  • mOS: 17.4 mo (95% CI, 11.0-Not reached)

  • 1-yr OS rate: 58% (95% CI, 45%-69%)

 
Seitter et al. 2021 (10
  • ≥1 prior systemic therapy, 83%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 30%

  • Anti–PD-1+, 12%

  • Anti–PD-1+ CTLA-4, 4%

  • BRAF±MEK, 8%

  • IL2, 46%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • 226

  • Metastatic melanoma

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable

 
  • Multiple fragments of 2 to 3 mm2 placed into a single well of a 24-well tissue culture plate, supplemented with media with HD IL2 followed by REP or cryopreserved

 
  • TIL administered:

    • Maximum: 2 × 1011

  • IL2:

    • Median 6 (range 5–8)

 
  • ORR: 51% (n = 116)

    • (CR, n = 49; PR, n = 67)

  • mOS: 20.6 mo (95% CI, 15.2–29.9)

  • 3-yr OS rate: 41%

  • 5-yr OS rate: 35%

  • 10-yr OS rate: 32%

 
Levi et al. 2022 (33
  • Anti–PD-1+, 38%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 31%

  • Anti–PD-1+ CTLA-4, 93%

  • BRAF±MEK, 13%

  • HD IL2, 31%

  • IFNα, 30%

  • Chemotherapy, 14%

 
  • Lymphodepletion ± TBI + TIL + HD IL2 ± pembrolizumab

  • 181

  • Metastatic melanoma

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Arm 1: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d

    • Arm 2: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d + 1,200 TBI cGy for 3 d

    • Arm 3: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d + 2 mg/kg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for total of 4 doses

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable

 
  • At least one resectable lesion measuring ≥1 cm

  • REP with irradiated PBMC feeder cells, anti-CD3 antibody and IL2

 
  • TIL administered:

    • Total not reported

  • IL2:

    • Median not reported

 
  • ORR:

    • Anti–PD-1 naïve: 55% (CR, 51%)

    • Prior anti–PD-1 therapy: 26% (CR, 8%)

 
Haanen et al. 2022 (8
  • None, 11%

  • Anti–PD-1, 86%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2 OR ipilimumab

  • 168 (84 per arm)

  • Unresectable stage IIIc to IV melanoma

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg/d for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2/d for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg every 8 hr

 
  • Tumor digested and/or fragmentated for initial outgrowth

  • REP with anti-CD3 antibody, feeder cells, and IL2

 
  • TIL administered:

    • Total: 5×109 – 2×1011

  • IL2:

    • Median not reported

 
  • ORR:

    • TIL: 49% (CR, 20%)

    • Ipi: 21% (CR, 7%)

  • mPFS:

    • TIL: 7.2 mo

    • Ipi: 3.1 mo

  • mOS:

    • TIL: 25.8 mo

    • Ipi: 18.9 mo

  • 6-mo PFS rate:

    • TIL: 53%

    • Ipi: 21%

  • 2-yr OS rate:

    • TIL: 54%

    • Ipi: 44%

 
TrialNo. of prior therapies, %Intervention/Pts, n/ disease stageLymphodepletion/ IL2 regimenTIL preparationTIL product/ IL2 doses receivedEfficacy outcomes
Rosenberg et al. 1994 (127
  • Surgery, 80%

  • IO, 43%

  • Chemotherapy, 20%

  • Radiotherapy, 10%

  • None, 3%

  • Hormonal therapy, 1%

 
  • TIL + IL2±Cy

  • 86

  • Metastatic disease

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy: 25 mg/kg

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr max 15 doses

 
  • Minced into 3- to 5-mm fragments and digested overnight in an enzyme medium

 
  • TIL:

    • >1011 cells in cycle 1 (85% of pts)

    • >2 × 1011 cells in cycle 1 (48% of pts)

 
  • ORR:

    • IL2 alone: 35% (n = 29)

    • IL2 + Cy: 35% (n = 57)

    • All: 34% (n = 86)

 
Schwartzentruber et al. 1994 (128
  • Surgery, 95%

  • Chemotherapy, 29%

  • Radiation, 7%

  • Hormonal/non–IL2 IO, 67%

  • IL2-based therapy, 49%

  • TIL therapy, 14%

 
  • TIL + IL2 (±IFN-α) ±Cy

  • 43

  • Stage IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy: 25 mg/kg

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg IV every 8 hr OR 216,000 IU/kg and IFN-α: 3 × 106 U/m2 IV every 8 hr

 
  • Minced and enzymatically digested

  • Cells were cultured in IL2–containing media for 28 to 84 d

 
  • TIL (mean ± SEM):

    • Cycle 1: responders: 1.9 ±0.1×10−11; nonresponders: 1.5 ± 0.1×10−11

    • Cycle 1 + 2: responders: 3.2 ± 0.3×10−11; nonresponders: 2.4±0.2×10−11

  • IL2 doses (mean ± SEM):

    • Cycle 1: responders: 2.6 ±0.4 × 10−6 IU/kg; Cycle 1: nonresponders: 2.5 ±0.3 × 10−6 IU/kg

    • Cycle 1 + 2: responders: 5.8 ±0.9×10−6 IU/kg; nonresponders: 4.9 ± 0.5×10−6

 
  • ORR: 21%

 
Dudley et al. 2002 (23
  • IL2, 100%

  • Chemotherapy, 62%

 
  • TIL+ Cy/Flu + IL2

  • 13

  • HLA-A2+ metastatic melanoma

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy: 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable toxicity

 
  • Small (2 mm3) tumor fragments or enzymatically digested tumor tissue

  • TIL cultures screened for autologous tumor cell and HLA-A2+ reactivity

  • Expanded to ≥5×107 cells (3–6 weeks)

 
  • TIL (average, range):

    • 7.8×1010 (2.3×1010 – 13.7×1010)

  • IL2 (average, range):

    • 9 (5 – 12)

 
  • ORR: 46% (n = 6)

 
Dudley et al. 2010 (129
  • IL2, 62%

 
  • Lymphodepletion±TBI + TIL + HD IL2

  • 56

  • M1a-M1c

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cohort 1: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d (n = 33)

    • Cohort 2: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d (n = 33) + TBI 3×2 Gy (n = 23)

 
  • CD8+ enriched young TILa

 
  • TILb (average± standard error):

    • Cohort 1: 47.7 ±3.3×109

    • Cohort 2: 43.1 ± 7.5×109

  • IL2:

    • Cohort 1: 6.3 ± 0.3

    • Cohort 2: 7.5 ± 0.5

 
  • ORR:

    • Cohort 1: 58%

    • Cohort 2: 48%

    • All: 54%

 
Rosenberg et al. 2011 (9
  • Median = 2 (mean ± SEM = 2 ±0.2)

  • IL2, 83%

  • IFN, 56%

  • Chemotherapy, 43%

  • IL2+Chemotherapy, 40%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 12%

  • IL2+anti–CTLA-4, 9%

  • IL2+anti–CTLA-4 + chemotherapy, 7%

  • None, 5%

 
  • Lymphodepletion±TBI + TIL + HD IL2

  • 93

  • M1a-M1c

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cohort 1: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d (n = 43)

    • Cohort 2: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d + TBI 2 Gy (n = 25)

    • Cohort 3: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d +12 TBI (TBI 2 × 2 Gy/d for 3 d) (n = 25)

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable toxicity, max 15 doses

    • Cohort 2/3 received ≤2 × 106/kg of CD34+ HPSCs

 
  • Single-cell suspensions or 1–2 mm3 fragments in 24-well cultures plates

  • Lesion size >2 cm in diameter

 
  • TIL (mean ± SEM):

    • CR (n = 20): 6.5 ± 0.7 × 10−10

    • PR (n = 32): 6.1 ± 0.5 × 10−10

    • NR (n = 41): 5.5 ± 0.6 × 10−10

  • IL2 (mean ± SEM):

    • CR: 7.1 ± 0.4

    • PR: 7.7 ± 0.5

    • NR: 8.8 ± 0.4

 
  • ORR:

    • Cohort 1: 49% (n = 43); (CR, 12%)

    • Cohort 2: 52% (n = 25); (CR, 20%)

    • Cohort 3: 72% (n = 25); (CR, 40%)

    • All: 56% (n = 93)

  • 3-yr OS rate:

    • CR: 100%

    • PR: 31%

    • NR: 7%

    • All: 36%

  • 5-yr OS rate:

    • CR: 93%

    • PR: 21%

    • NR: 5%

    • All: 29%

 
Radvanyi et al. 2012 (130)
 
  • Chemotherapy, 29%

  • Biochemotherapy, 29%

  • IO, 39%

  • Unknown, 3%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + 2 cycles HD IL2

  • 31

  • Stage IIIc, IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d (on d −7 and −6) + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d from d −5 to −1

  • IL2:

    • 1st dose: 720,000 IU/kg until tolerable toxicity, max 15 doses; 2nd dose: 21 d post TIL

 
  • 1 lesion used in most cases, in some cases two to three smaller nodules

  • 3 to 5 mm3 cut fragments; manual dissection; pre-REP TIL cryopreserved (5 wk), thawed, further expanded to post-REP TIL

  • Treatment: post-REP TIL

 
  • TIL (range):

    • 8 to 150×109

  • IL2:

    • 2 cycles (n = 28/31 pts)

 
  • mOS: NR

  • mPFS: 7.6 mo (95% CI, 4.1 mo -22.2 mo)

 
Besser et al. 2013 (38
  • Previous therapy, 100%

  • IL2-based therapy, 95%

  • Ipilimumab therapy, 23%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • 80

  • Stage IV (M1a-M1b)

  • BRAFV600/E mutations (n = 34/80)

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg until tolerable toxicity, max 15 doses

 
  • Fragmentation, enzymatic digestion, and cell remnants

  • Young-TIL Pre-REP cultures (2 wk), cryopreserved or expanded (14 d)

  • Treatment: young TIL (n = 57)

 
  • TIL (total cell number, n = 57): 52 ± 24 × 109

 
  • ORR:

    • 40% (n = 57); (CR, 6%; PR, 23%)

    • 29% (n = 80); (CR, 9%; PR, 32%)

  • Treated pts (n = 57)

    • mOS: 15.2 mo

    • mPFS: 4 mo

  • 1-yr PFS rate: 42%

  • 1-yr OS rate: 50%

  • 2-yr OS rate: 45%

  • 3-yr OS rate: 42%

 
Anderson et al. 2016 (25
  • IL2-based, 96%

  • Ipilimumab-based, 80%

  • Responders: median 2 (range, 1–4)

  • Nonresponders: median 2 (range, 2–4)

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + LD IL2

  • 25

  • Stage IIIc, IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d (d −7 and −6) + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5d (d −5 to −1)

  • IL2:

    • Decrescendo regimen (18 MIU/m2 for 6 hr, 18 MIU/ m2 for 12 hr, 18 MIU/ m2 for 24 hr followed by 4.5 MIU/ m2 for another 3×24 hr) (prescheduled IL2 dose was reduced by 25%–50% in 4 pts)

 
  • Lesions ≤1 cm3 were surgically resected and cut into 2 to 3 mm3 fragments

  • Pre-REP/ young TIL in 21 d (range, 13–36) were cryopreserved or entered REP

 
  • TIL (median):

    • 98 × 109 (range 61–20 × 109)

  • IL2 (median):

    • 112 MIU dose

 
  • ORR: 42% (n = 25)

  • mPFS: All: 3.9 mo

  • mOS: All: 21.8 mo

  • 1-yr OS rate: 72%

  • 3-yr OS rate: 40.8%

 
Goff et al. 2016 (24
  • None, 26%

  • HD IL2, 29%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 31%

  • Anti–PD-1, 3%

  • Anti–CTLA-4 and anti–PD-1, 8%

  • Adjuvant (IFNα, vaccine, etc.), 38%

  • Chemotherapy, 11%

  • BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor, 9%

  • Other (including biochemotherapy), 10%

 
  • NMA-lymphodepletion ±TBI + TIL + HD IL2

  • 101c

  • Advanced disease (76%, M1c)

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Arm 1: NMA, Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d

    • Arm 2: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d + TBI 2 Gy 2×/d (total of 1200 TBI)

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable

  • Cohort 2 received ≤2×106/kg of CD34+ HPSCs

 
  • Single fragments of 2 to 3 mm2 were enzymatically digested and cryopreserved

  • Autologous reactive or actively growing cells were cryopreserved and/or selected for REP

 
  • IL2 median (range):

    • Arm 1: 6 (4–7)

    • Arm 2: 5 (3.3–6)

 
  • ORR: 54% (n = 54)

    • Arm 1: 45% (n = 23); (CR, 24%; PR, 22%)

    • Arm 2: 62% (n = 31); (CR, 24%; PR, 38%)

  • mPFS

    • Arm 1: 7.5 mo

    • Arm 2: 9.6 mo

  • mOS

    • Arm 1: 36.6 mo

    • Arm 2: 38.2 mo

 
van den Berg et al. 2020 (26
  • Chemotherapy, 70%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 100%

  • Adjuvant (IFNα, vaccine, etc.), 40%

  • BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor, 40%

 
  • NMA-lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • 10

  • Stage IIIc/ IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable toxicity, max 15 doses

 
  • Enzymatic digestion

  • Growth 2–4 weeks to reach ≥1×108 cells followed by cryopreservation or REP

  • TILs harvested additional 14 days after growth

 
  • TIL (range):

    • 1.7 – 19.6 × 1010

  • IL2 median (range):

    • 3.5 (1–9)

 
  • ORR: 50% (n = 5)

    • CR, 20%

    • PR, 30%

 
Sarnaik et al. 2021 (12
  • Mean = 3.3 (range, 1–9)

  • Anti–PD-1 or PD-L1, 100%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 80%

  • Anti–PD-1+ CTLA-4, 52%

  • BRAF ± MEK, 88%

  • IL2, 11%

  • Surgery, 99%

  • Radiotherapy, 52%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • 66

  • Stage IIIc, IV

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg every 8 to 12 hr for up to 6 doses, starting within 3 to 24 hr after TIL infusion

 
  • At least one resectable lesion (or aggregate of lesions) measuring a minimum of 1.5 cm in diameter postresection

  • Mean target lesion diameter = 106 mm

  • Centralized 22-d process and cryopreserved product

 
  • TIL administered:

    • Total: >1 × 109 – <150 × 109

    • Mean: 27.3 × 109 (range, 1.2 × 109–99.5 × 109)

  • IL2:

    • Median 5.5 (range 1–6)

 
  • ORR: 36% (n = 24)

    • (CR, n = 2; PR, n = 22)

  • DCR: 80% (n = 53)

  • mOS: 17.4 mo (95% CI, 11.0-Not reached)

  • 1-yr OS rate: 58% (95% CI, 45%-69%)

 
Seitter et al. 2021 (10
  • ≥1 prior systemic therapy, 83%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 30%

  • Anti–PD-1+, 12%

  • Anti–PD-1+ CTLA-4, 4%

  • BRAF±MEK, 8%

  • IL2, 46%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • 226

  • Metastatic melanoma

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/ m2 for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable

 
  • Multiple fragments of 2 to 3 mm2 placed into a single well of a 24-well tissue culture plate, supplemented with media with HD IL2 followed by REP or cryopreserved

 
  • TIL administered:

    • Maximum: 2 × 1011

  • IL2:

    • Median 6 (range 5–8)

 
  • ORR: 51% (n = 116)

    • (CR, n = 49; PR, n = 67)

  • mOS: 20.6 mo (95% CI, 15.2–29.9)

  • 3-yr OS rate: 41%

  • 5-yr OS rate: 35%

  • 10-yr OS rate: 32%

 
Levi et al. 2022 (33
  • Anti–PD-1+, 38%

  • Anti–CTLA-4, 31%

  • Anti–PD-1+ CTLA-4, 93%

  • BRAF±MEK, 13%

  • HD IL2, 31%

  • IFNα, 30%

  • Chemotherapy, 14%

 
  • Lymphodepletion ± TBI + TIL + HD IL2 ± pembrolizumab

  • 181

  • Metastatic melanoma

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Arm 1: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d

    • Arm 2: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d + 1,200 TBI cGy for 3 d

    • Arm 3: Cy 60 mg/kg for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2 for 5 d + 2 mg/kg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks for total of 4 doses

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg every 8 hr until tolerable

 
  • At least one resectable lesion measuring ≥1 cm

  • REP with irradiated PBMC feeder cells, anti-CD3 antibody and IL2

 
  • TIL administered:

    • Total not reported

  • IL2:

    • Median not reported

 
  • ORR:

    • Anti–PD-1 naïve: 55% (CR, 51%)

    • Prior anti–PD-1 therapy: 26% (CR, 8%)

 
Haanen et al. 2022 (8
  • None, 11%

  • Anti–PD-1, 86%

 
  • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2 OR ipilimumab

  • 168 (84 per arm)

  • Unresectable stage IIIc to IV melanoma

 
  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy 60 mg/kg/d for 2 d + Flu 25 mg/m2/d for 5 d

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg every 8 hr

 
  • Tumor digested and/or fragmentated for initial outgrowth

  • REP with anti-CD3 antibody, feeder cells, and IL2

 
  • TIL administered:

    • Total: 5×109 – 2×1011

  • IL2:

    • Median not reported

 
  • ORR:

    • TIL: 49% (CR, 20%)

    • Ipi: 21% (CR, 7%)

  • mPFS:

    • TIL: 7.2 mo

    • Ipi: 3.1 mo

  • mOS:

    • TIL: 25.8 mo

    • Ipi: 18.9 mo

  • 6-mo PFS rate:

    • TIL: 53%

    • Ipi: 21%

  • 2-yr OS rate:

    • TIL: 54%

    • Ipi: 44%

 

Abbreviations: BRAF, B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase; CD, cluster of differentiation; CR, complete response; Cy, cyclophosphamide; d, day; Flu, fludarabine; HD, high-dose; hr, hour; IO, immunotherapy; LD, low-dose; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; mo, months; NE, not estimable; NR, nonresponder; OS, overall survival; s.c., subcutaneous; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; pts, patients; RFS, relapse-free survival; TBI, total body irradiation; wk, week, yr, year.

aIn the cohorts treated in this report, there was no difference between the age of CD8+ enriched young TIL cultures for responding and nonresponding patients.

bThree additional patients received cryopreserved TIL from prior resections.

cOf 101 patients randomly assigned to cohorts 1 or 2, all completed their planned treatment course except two patients in cohort 2 (TBI arm), whose treatment was aborted for progressive disease.

In today's modern era of TIL therapy, studies have incorporated efficiencies in production, treatment, and product characterization. Recently, lifileucel (LN-144), comprising autologous, unmodified TIL infusion, has demonstrated encouraging results in patients with unresectable stage III and IV melanoma in the post–PD-1 inhibitor setting (NCT02360579; ref. 12; Table 1). In this multicenter, international, single-arm phase II multicohort study, TILs were unmodified and centrally manufactured in approximately 3 weeks (12). In cohort 2, nearly all 66 patients had progressive disease despite prior anti–PD(L)-1 exposure; the mean number of prior therapies was 3.3; 17 patients were B-RafV600 mutation–positive, of whom 88% had progressed on BRAF targeted agents; 34 patients previously received combination anti–PD-1/anti–CTLA-4, either as front-line therapy (23%) or after failing front-line therapy (29%; ref. 12). For all patients, the ORR was 36% (mOS, 17.4 months), with two complete responses (CR) and 22 partial responses. The best ORR was observed in patients with progressive disease after initial anti–PD(L)-1 therapy (n = 42, ORR = 41%) and was consistent after anti–lymphocyte-activation gene (LAG) 3-containing regimens (12, 28). Recent results from the pivotal cohort 4 of the study (n = 87) demonstrated an ORR of 29% (29). When analyzed together, cohorts 2 and 4 led to a combined ORR of 31%, providing an effective and durable (12-month response rate, 54%) treatment option for heavily pretreated patients with PD-1 refractory melanoma (29). Collectively, lifileucel demonstrated meaningful responses in advanced melanoma and may become the first TIL therapy approved in this setting.

A retrospective analysis of an independent single-site compassionate use program with an alternative unmodified TIL product currently under commercial development reported a response rate of 67% in 21 patients (mOS 21.3 months); the median number of prior therapies was 2 (30). For the 12 patients who received prior anti–PD-1 and anti–CTLA-4 therapy, the response rate was 58% (30). Although responses were rigorously collected with RECIST-compatible assessments in the majority of patients, retrospective analyses of overall response rates in nontrial settings do have limitations. A large-scale, international phase II study (NCT05050006) is currently evaluating an updated version of the manufacturing process for that product, ITIL-168, in patients with advanced melanoma relapsed or refractory to anti–PD-1 therapy (31). Hannen and colleagues reported the first multicenter phase III study of TIL therapy (NCT02278887) where patients with unresectable stage IIIC to IV melanoma were randomized to receive TIL therapy (n = 84) or ipilimumab (n = 84; ref. 8). The majority of patients (86%) were refractory to anti–PD-1 therapy. TIL therapy resulted in improved PFS (median, 7.2 months vs. 3.1 months, respectively), ORR (49% vs. 21%), and OS (median, 25.8 months vs. 18.9 months) compared with ipilimumab (Table 1). Taken together, these results, and the aforementioned findings, support a new era of cell-based personalized therapeutics, demonstrating feasibility of TIL therapy with consistent response rates and opportunities for paradigm-shifting approaches to treating melanoma.

Despite new standards of care (32), retrospective analyses suggest that PD-1 experienced patients may be less responsive to TIL therapy than PD-1 naive patients (10, 33). Among 112 anti–PD-1 naive and 69 anti–PD-1 experienced patients with metastatic melanoma who responded to TIL therapy, those with T cells that recognized at least one tumor neoantigen demonstrated response rates of 56% (CR, 51%) and 41% (CR, 8%), respectively (33). In another retrospective analysis of the experience at the NCI, Seitter and colleagues demonstrated response rates of 56% (mPFS 6.5 months) in PD-1 naive patients and 24% (mPFS 3.2 months) in PD-1 refractory patients (all patients, mOS 20.6 months; ref. 10). Prospective trials are needed to confirm these differences. Given the higher response rates in PD-1 naive patients (Table 1), TIL therapy administered earlier in the treatment sequence may provide a greater benefit. It is unknown whether patients who progress after first-line anti-PD-1 inhibition should consider TIL as a second-line option rather than proceeding immediately to combination ipilimumab/nivolumab therapy. Cumulatively, efficacy of TIL therapy in the setting of anti–PD-1 refractory disease compares favorably to other immunotherapy options which may provide a lower ORR (range, 13%–31%) and shorter PFS (range, 2–5 months; refs. 30, 34–37). Although initial indications suggest that anti–PD-1, anti–LAG-3, and anti–CTLA-4-refractory tumors respond to TIL therapy (9, 28, 38), this question will need to be supported with further research, such as differences in T-cell functionality (39).

Adverse events

Administration of TIL requires trained, experienced staff and access to intensive care unit support (40, 41). The most common toxicities during TIL therapy are attributable to NMA-LD and/or IL2 (15, 16, 41, 42). Expected treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) from NMA-LD include grade 3 or 4 cytopenias in most patients (12, 16), whereas toxicities associated with IL2 are dose- and schedule-dependent (25). IL2-related toxicities are generally predictable, manageable, and transient (11, 42, 43). Administration of supportive high-dose IL2 therapy is medically challenging, and the optimal IL2 dose and schedule is as yet undefined (16, 44). The lifileucel regimen incorporates intravenous bolus IL2 (600,000 IU/kg) every 8 to 12 hours for up to six doses (12), whereas other protocols are utilizing lower doses of IL2 (Table 2). Even so, the T-cell supportive role that IL2 plays in TIL therapy, rather than a directly therapeutic intent, allows for the avoidance of severe IL2-related toxicities through the discontinuation of IL2 at the earliest sign of significant toxicity (12, 42). TIL infusion itself is generally uneventful (41). Rarely, administration can be associated with dyspnea, chills, and fever in the brief period following infusion (15). These AEs have not been correlated with high serum levels of circulating cytokines and should not be confused with cytokine release syndrome commonly reported with other cell therapies like chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (45). Given the theoretical risk of TIL-mediated neurologic events from infiltration into the central nervous system and complications of IL2 administration for patients with active brain lesions (46), the safety of TILs in patients with brain metastasis is currently being addressed in clinical trials, although early evidence of CNS response has been seen (47).

Table 2.

Select accruing trials of TILs in solid tumors.

Type of TIL/trial numberPhase/study start date/estimated enrollment, n/sponsorTumor type(s)Select eligibility criteriaSelect treatment detailsSelect primary outcome measures
  • ITIL168, unmodified TIL

  • NCT05393635a

 
  • Phase I

  • June 2022

  • n = 27

  • Instil Bio, Inc.

 
  • CC

  • HNSCC

  • NSCLC

 
  • Cohort 1: CC, progressive disease during or after platinum-based chemotherapy; CPS ≥1 with progression during or after CPI

  • Cohort 2: HNSCC, progressive disease during or after platinum-based chemotherapy

  • Cohort 3: NSCLC, progressive disease during or after platinum-based chemotherapy and CPI

  • Symptomatic and/or untreated CNS metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + ITIL-168 + IL2 + pembrolizumab

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu × 5 d

  • TILb:

    • ITIL-168, autologous TIL

  • IL2b:

    • ≤8 doses

  • Pembrolizumabb:

    • 1 dose after tumor resection prior to ITIL-168, ≤1 year

 
  • Frequency and severity of TEAEs, serious AEs, and AEs of special interest

 
  • ITIL-306, modified TIL

  • NCT05397093a

 
  • Phase Ia/b

  • June 2022

  • n = 51

  • Instil Bio, Inc.

 
  • OC

  • NSCLC

  • RCC

 
  • Cohort 1: High-grade serous, endometrioid, or clear cell epithelial carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum (phase I only); progressive disease during or after 1 prior line of chemotherapy

  • Cohort 2: Squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the lung (phase I only); progressed after 1 prior line of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and a CPI

  • Cohort 3: Clear cell or papillary RCC (phase I only); progressed after 1 prior line of antiangiogenic therapy and a PD-1 axis inhibitor

  • Symptomatic and/or untreated CNS metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + ITIL-306

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu × 3 d

  • TILb:

    • ITIL-306, autologous TIL

 
  • Frequency and severity of TEAEs, serious AEs, and AEs of special interest

 
  • IOV-4001, modified TIL

  • NCT05361174a

 
  • Phase I/II

  • June 2022

  • n = 53

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

  • NSCLC

 
  • Cohort 1: Stage IIIc, IIId, or IV unresectable or metastatic melanoma; progressed within 12 weeks of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 txt

  • Cohort 2: Stage III or IV NSCLC; ≤3 prior lines

  • Symptomatic untreated brain metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort 1,2: Lymphodepletion + IOV-4001 + IL2

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu

  • TILb:

    • IOV-4001

 
  • Phase 1: Safety

  • Phase 2: ORR

 
  • Lifileucel, unmodified TIL

  • NCT05398640

 
  • N/A; expanded access

  • June 2022

  • Intermediate size population

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Progressed on or did not achieve a response or were intolerant due to toxicity after one to four prior lines of therapy

  • Uveal or ocular melanoma is excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + lifileucel + IL2

  • TILb:

    • Lifileucel, autologous TIL

 
  • N/A

 
  • De-TIL-0255, modified TIL (131)

  • NCT05107739

 
  • Phase I

  • December 2021

  • n = 54

  • Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.

 
  • PROC

  • EC

  • CC

 
  • Recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), including primary peritoneal and fallopian tube carcinoma

  • Recurrent, metastatic, or persistent cervical carcinoma with progression after treatment with taxane-containing regimen

  • Advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer after ≥2 prior lines of therapy

  • Known untreated brain metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • De-TIL-0255

  • TIL:

    • De-TIL-0255

    • DLT period: 1×109 - 150×109, modified TIL

 
  • Safety

  • Tolerability

  • Preliminary antitumor activity

 
  • ITIL168, unmodified TIL (31)

  • NCT05050006

 
  • Phase II

  • October 2021

  • n = 130

  • Instil Bio, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Cohort 1: R/R to ≥1 prior line including a PD-1iCohort 2: Intolerant to a PD-1i and have persistent disease after PD-1i

  • Cohort 3: Stable disease after ≤4 doses of a PD-1i

  • Noncutaneous melanoma and symptomatic/ untreated CNS metastasis are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + ITIL-168 + IL2

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu × 5 d

  • TIL:

    • 5×109 autologous TIL

  • IL2b:

    • HD, ≤ 8 doses

 
  • ORR

 
  • TIL, unmodified

  • NCT05098184

 
  • Phase I

  • September 2021

  • n = 50

  • Shanghai Gencells Therapeutics Co., Ltd.

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Primary, relapsed (failed standard txt or lacks standard regimens), or metastasized melanoma

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + TIL

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu

  • TIL:

    • 1×109 - 5×1010 autologous TIL

 
  • AE

  • ORR

  • DCR

  • DOR

  • PFS

  • OS

 
  • MASE-T cells, modified

  • NCT04904185

 
  • Phase I

  • August 2021

  • n = 12

  • National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK)

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • HLA-A2 positive melanoma

  • Progressive disease on or after anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L1 ± anti–CTLA-4 therapy

  • CNS metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Arm A: Lymphodepletion+ MASE-T

    • Arm B: Lymphodepletion+ MASE-T + pembrolizumab

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (500 mg/m2/day) and Flu (30 mg/m2/day)

  • T cellsb:

    • Antigen specific, ex vivo expanded T cells from peripheral blood T cells

  • Pembrolizumab:

    • 2 mg/kg on day −1 and day +21

 
  • Tolerability of the treatment

  • Number of patients excluded due to feasibility issues

  • Number of patients excluded due to feasibility issues

 
  • LN-145, unmodified TIL

  • NCT04614103

 
  • Phase II

  • May 2021

  • n = 95

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • NSCLC

 
  • PD-L1 negative (TPS <1%) prior to their CPI treatment (cohort 1)

  • PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥1%) prior to their CPI treatment (cohort 2)

  • PD-L1 negative (TPS <1%) and unable to undergo surgical harvest for TIL generation (cohort 3)

  • Retreatment (cohort 4)

  • CNS metastases excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + LN-145 + LD IL2

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg × 2 doses) + Flu (25 mg/m2 × 5 doses)

  • TILb:

    • LN-145, autologous TIL

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg, ≤6 doses

 
  • ORR

 
  • RPTR-168, modified TIL

  • NCT04762225

 
  • Phase 1/2

  • May 2021

  • n = 24

  • Repertoire Immune Medicines

 
  • Melanoma

  • HNSCC

  • CC

 
  • Melanoma

    • R/R or metastatic disease

    • Patients with noncutaneous melanoma must have PRAME+ tumor

  • HNSCC

    • Relapsed/refractory to anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L and/or cetuximab

    • HPV-16 E6/E7 positivity

  • CC

    • Relapsed/refractory to platinum-based chemo or anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L1

    • HPV-16 E6/E7 positivity

  • Active CNS disease and/or carcinomatous meningitis are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • RPTR-168

  • T cellsb:

    • Autologous multitargeted T cells

 
  • Number of DLT

  • Frequency of dose interruptions

 
  • GEN-011, modified T cells (92)

  • NCT04596033

 
  • Phase I

  • November 2020

  • n = 24

  • Genocea Biosciences, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

  • NSCLC

  • SCCHN

  • Urothelial carcinoma

  • RCC

  • SCLC

  • CSCC

  • ASCC

 
  • Received, been intolerant of, or been ineligible to receive standard-of-care treatment regimen

  • Sufficient stimulatory neoantigens identified in ATLAS

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort 1: Multiple LD of GEN-011 + IL2

    • Cohort 2: Lymphodepletion + single HD of GEN-011 + IL2

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy + Flu

  • T cellsb:

    • ≤5 doses without lymphodepletion

 
  • Incidence of treatment-related AEs

 
  • TIL, unmodified

  • NCT04165967

 
  • Phase 1

  • September 2020

  • n = 9

  • University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, GMP network of Basel

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Measurable unresectable or metastatic melanoma with ≥ 1 PD-1 targeted IO

  • Noncutaneous melanoma and uncontrolled CNS metastasis are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + TIL + LD IL2 + nivolumab

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy + Flu

  • TIL:

    • 5×109 - 2×1011 TIL

  • IL2:

    • 125,000 IU/kg/d ≤10d

  • Nivolumab:

    • 3 mg/kg i.v. 1q2 starts 2 wk before TIL

 
  • Number of AEs, body temperature, blood pressure, heartbeat, respiratory frequency, and full blood counts

 
  • CISH CRISPR TIL, modified TIL

  • NCT04426669

 
  • Phase 1/2

  • May 2020

  • n = 20

  • Intima Bioscience, Inc.

  • Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

 
  • GI cancer

 
  • Metastatic progressive gastrointestinal epithelial cancer with progressive disease following ≥1 line standard therapy

  • Patients with ≤3 brain metastases that are less than 1 cm in diameter and asymptomatic are eligible

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + CISH CRISPR TIL + IL2

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg) + Flu (25 mg/m2)

  • TILb:

    • CISH-inactivated autologous TIL

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg/d ≤6 doses

 
  • MTD

  • Efficacy

  • Incidence of AEs

 
  • TILT-123, oncolytic adenovirus (132, 133)

  • NCT04217473

 
  • Phase I

  • February 2020

  • n = 15

  • TILT Biotherapeutics, Ltd.

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • R/R (stage III/IV) melanoma

  • ≥1 prior line of treatment

  • Treated brain metastases that have not progressed in 3 mo before screening are allowed

 
  • Regimen:

    • 6 doses of TILT-123 prior to, during, and after TIL administration

  • TILb:

    • Autologous TIL

 
  • AEs (serious, nonserious) prior to TIL administration

 
  • ATL001, modified T cells

  • NCT03997474

 
  • Phase I/II

  • August 2019

  • n = 40

  • Achilles Therapeutics

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Metastatic or recurrent melanoma with prior PD-1/PD-L1i

  • CNS metastases excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort A: Lymphodepletion +ATL001 + LD-IL2

    • Cohort B: Lymphodepletion + ATL001/ICI + LD-IL2

    • Cohort C: Lymphodepletion + ATL001 + HD-IL2

  • T cellsb:

    • Autologous clonal neoantigen reactive T cells (cNeT)

 
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events and serious AEs to evaluate safety and tolerability

 
  • ATL001, modified T cells (134)

  • NCT04032847

 
  • Phase I/II

  • July 2019

  • n = 40

  • Achilles Therapeutics

 
  • NSCLC

 
  • Advanced NSCLC with prior PD-1/PD-L1i

  • CNS metastases excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort A: NMA-LD + ATL001 + IL2

    • Cohort B: NMA-LD + ATL001 + checkpoint inhibitor

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy + Flu

  • T cellsb:

    • Autologous clonal neoantigen reactive T cells (cNeT)

  • IL2b:

    • ≤10 doses

  • Pembrolizumabb:

    • Prior to and after ATL001, ≤12 mo

    • Cohort B only

 
  • Safety

  • Tolerability

 
  • Lifileucel (LN-144) or LN-145, unmodified TIL (53)

  • NCT03645928

 
  • Phase II

  • May 2019

  • n = 135

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

  • HNSCC

  • NSCLC

 
  • Unresectable or metastatic melanoma (stage IIIC or IV) with ≤3 prior lines excluding CPIs (cohort 1A) or previous anti–PD-1 therapy (cohorts 1B,C)

  • Uveal/ocular melanoma are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort 1A: NMA-LD+ lifileucel + IL2+ pembrolizumab

    • Cohort 1B/3B: NMA-LD + LN-145 + IL2

    • Cohort 1C: NMA-LD+ lifileucel + IL2

    • Cohort 2A/3A: NMA-LD + LN-145 + IL2 + pembrolizumab

    • Cohort 3C: NMA-LD+ LN-145+ IL2+ ipilimumab + nivolumab

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg × 2 doses) + Flu (25 mg/m2 × 5 doses)

  • TIL:

    • 1×109 - 150×109, autologous TIL

  • IL2:

    • ≤6 doses 600,000 IU/kg

  • Pembrolizumab:

    • 400 mg, once after resection and continued after IL2 for ≤24 mo (cohorts 1A/2A/3A)

  • Ipilimumab:

    • Once prior to resection

  • Nivolumab:

    • Once prior to resection, prior to TIL administration, and up to 24 mo (cohort 3C)

 
  • ORR and safety profile measured by grade ≥3 TEAEs

 
  • RPTR-147, modified T cell (91)

  • NCT03815682

 
  • Phase I/II

  • October 2018

  • n = 240

  • Repertoire Immune Medicines

  • Merck Sharp & Dohme, LLC

 
  • Solid tumors

  • Lymphomas

  • HPV-16 positive tumors

 
  • Relapsed/refractory metastatic or locally-advanced solid tumor

  • Patient must have documented HLA-typing results that meet the study requirements

  • Arm B: PD-1 progression

  • Arm C: HPV-16 positive tumors

 
  • Regimen:

    • Arm A: RPTR-147:1

    • Arm B: RPTR-147:1+ pembrolizumab

    • Arm C: RPTR-147:2

  • TILb:

    • Autologous anti-TAA associated antigen T cells loaded with an IL15-Fc nanogel

 
  • Number of DLT

  • Frequency of dose interruptions

 
  • TIL, unmodified (135)

  • NCT03638375

 
  • Phase I/II

  • July 2018

  • n = 34

  • Leiden University Medical Center

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Stage III or IV melanoma; must have failed on standard txt options

  • Progressive disease on prior txt

  • Stable (≥2 mo) brain metastases with no prior dexamethasone txt are allowed

 
  • Regimen:

    • Arm A: TIL + nivolumab

    • Arm B: TIL + nivolumab + IFNα

  • TIL:

    • 2.5 × 108 to 7.5 × 108 TIL

  • Nivolumab:

    • 3 mg/kg i.v. prior to TIL txt

  • PEG-IFNα:

    • 1 μg/kg/week ≤90 μg/week

 
  • Incidence of treatment-related serious AEs

 
  • TIL, unmodified

  • NCT03467516

 
  • Phase II

  • May 2018

  • n = 47

  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Measurable metastatic uveal melanoma and co-enrollment in companion protocol

  • ≤3 brain metastases that are <1 cm are eligible

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy + Flu

  • TIL:

    • 1×109 - 2×1011 TIL

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg every 8 hr ≤6 doses

 
  • ORR

 
  • TIL, unmodified

  • NCT03374839

 
  • Phase I/II

  • February 2018

  • n = 11

  • Nantes University Hospital

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Patients with stage IIIb, IIIc, or IV melanoma

  • ≤2 lines of prior txt

  • Brain or bone metastasis and ocular melanoma are not eligible

 
  • Regimen:

    • TIL + IL2 + nivolumab

  • TIL:

    • Phase 1: 5 × 108 TIL, 2 doses

    • Phase 2: 1 to 2 × 108 TIL, 2 doses

  • IL2:

    • 6,00,000 IU/d ×5 d

  • Nivolumab:

    • 3 mg/kg every 2 wk ≤52 wk

 
  • Incidence of TEAEs

 
  • LN-145, unmodified TIL (53)

  • NCT03108495

 
  • Phase II

  • June 2017

  • n = 138

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • CC

 
  • Recurrent, metastatic, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix that is not amenable to curative treatment with surgery and/or radiation therapy

  • Cohort 1 and Cohort 2: progression during or following 1–3 prior systemic chemotherapeutic treatments

  • Cohort 2: Previously received treatment with an ICI

  • Cohort 3: Only received prior chemoradiation or surgery for loco-regional disease

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + LN-145 + LD IL2 + pembrolizumab

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg × 2 doses) + Flu (25 mg/m2 × 5 doses)

  • TIL:

    • 1 × 109 to 150 × 109, autologous TIL

  • IL2:

    • ≤6 doses 600,000 IU/kg

  • Pembrolizumab:

    • 200 mg, once after resection and continued after IL2 for ≤24 mo

 
  • ORR

  • AEs

  • Efficacy

 
  • T cells, unmodified

  • NCT02133196

 
  • Phase II

  • October 2014

  • n = 85

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

 
  • NSCLC

 
  • Measurable metastatic (stage IV) or unresectable NSCLC (including but not limited to squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinomas)

  • ≥1 appropriate 1 L systemic therapy and progressed

  • Neuroendocrine tumors are not eligible

  • Patients with ≤3 brain metastases that are ≤1 cm in diameter and asymptomatic are eligible

 
  • Regimen:

    • Arm 1: NMA-LD+ young TIL + HD aldesleukin

    • Arm 2: NMA-LD+ young TIL + LD aldesleukin

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg/d) + Flu (25 mg/m2/d)

  • TIL:

    • Young TILb

  • Aldesleukin:

    • Arm 1: 720,000 IU/kg ≤ 9 doses

    • Arm 2: 72,000 IU/kg ≤ 12 doses

 
  • Response rate

 
  • TIL, unmodified (136)

  • NCT02278887

 
  • Phase III

  • September 2014

  • n = 168

  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Unresectable stage III/IV melanoma

  • Received ≤1 prior line, excluding ipilimumab

  • Noncutaneous melanoma, adjuvant ipilimumab within 6 mo from randomization, >2 CNS lesions are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + TIL + HD IL2

    • Ipilimumab

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg/d × 2d) + Flu (50 mg/m2 × 5d)

  • TIL:

    • 5×109 - 2×1011 TIL

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg/d every 8h ≤15 doses

  • Ipilimumab:

    • 3 mg/kg IV every 3 wk ≤4 doses

 
  • PFS at 6 months

 
  • TIL + DC vaccine (137)

  • NCT01946373

 
  • Phase I

  • October 2013

  • n = 15

  • Karolinska University Hospital

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Stage III or IV malignant, progressive, melanoma

  • Uveal melanoma included

  • Active CNS metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort A: NMA-LD + T cells + IL2

    • Cohort B: NMA-LD + T cells + IL2 + DC vaccinations

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg/d × 2 d) + Flu (25 mg/m2 × 5 d)

  • TIL:

    • ≤5×1010 TIL

  • IL2:

    • 100,000 IU/kg as IV bolus over 15-minute period every 8h ≤14 doses

  • DC:

    • 5 injections with up to 1.5×107 of DC pulsed with autologous tumor lysate and NY-ESO-1 peptide

 
  • Safety

 
Type of TIL/trial numberPhase/study start date/estimated enrollment, n/sponsorTumor type(s)Select eligibility criteriaSelect treatment detailsSelect primary outcome measures
  • ITIL168, unmodified TIL

  • NCT05393635a

 
  • Phase I

  • June 2022

  • n = 27

  • Instil Bio, Inc.

 
  • CC

  • HNSCC

  • NSCLC

 
  • Cohort 1: CC, progressive disease during or after platinum-based chemotherapy; CPS ≥1 with progression during or after CPI

  • Cohort 2: HNSCC, progressive disease during or after platinum-based chemotherapy

  • Cohort 3: NSCLC, progressive disease during or after platinum-based chemotherapy and CPI

  • Symptomatic and/or untreated CNS metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + ITIL-168 + IL2 + pembrolizumab

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu × 5 d

  • TILb:

    • ITIL-168, autologous TIL

  • IL2b:

    • ≤8 doses

  • Pembrolizumabb:

    • 1 dose after tumor resection prior to ITIL-168, ≤1 year

 
  • Frequency and severity of TEAEs, serious AEs, and AEs of special interest

 
  • ITIL-306, modified TIL

  • NCT05397093a

 
  • Phase Ia/b

  • June 2022

  • n = 51

  • Instil Bio, Inc.

 
  • OC

  • NSCLC

  • RCC

 
  • Cohort 1: High-grade serous, endometrioid, or clear cell epithelial carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum (phase I only); progressive disease during or after 1 prior line of chemotherapy

  • Cohort 2: Squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the lung (phase I only); progressed after 1 prior line of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and a CPI

  • Cohort 3: Clear cell or papillary RCC (phase I only); progressed after 1 prior line of antiangiogenic therapy and a PD-1 axis inhibitor

  • Symptomatic and/or untreated CNS metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + ITIL-306

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu × 3 d

  • TILb:

    • ITIL-306, autologous TIL

 
  • Frequency and severity of TEAEs, serious AEs, and AEs of special interest

 
  • IOV-4001, modified TIL

  • NCT05361174a

 
  • Phase I/II

  • June 2022

  • n = 53

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

  • NSCLC

 
  • Cohort 1: Stage IIIc, IIId, or IV unresectable or metastatic melanoma; progressed within 12 weeks of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 txt

  • Cohort 2: Stage III or IV NSCLC; ≤3 prior lines

  • Symptomatic untreated brain metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort 1,2: Lymphodepletion + IOV-4001 + IL2

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu

  • TILb:

    • IOV-4001

 
  • Phase 1: Safety

  • Phase 2: ORR

 
  • Lifileucel, unmodified TIL

  • NCT05398640

 
  • N/A; expanded access

  • June 2022

  • Intermediate size population

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Progressed on or did not achieve a response or were intolerant due to toxicity after one to four prior lines of therapy

  • Uveal or ocular melanoma is excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + lifileucel + IL2

  • TILb:

    • Lifileucel, autologous TIL

 
  • N/A

 
  • De-TIL-0255, modified TIL (131)

  • NCT05107739

 
  • Phase I

  • December 2021

  • n = 54

  • Nurix Therapeutics, Inc.

 
  • PROC

  • EC

  • CC

 
  • Recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), including primary peritoneal and fallopian tube carcinoma

  • Recurrent, metastatic, or persistent cervical carcinoma with progression after treatment with taxane-containing regimen

  • Advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer after ≥2 prior lines of therapy

  • Known untreated brain metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • De-TIL-0255

  • TIL:

    • De-TIL-0255

    • DLT period: 1×109 - 150×109, modified TIL

 
  • Safety

  • Tolerability

  • Preliminary antitumor activity

 
  • ITIL168, unmodified TIL (31)

  • NCT05050006

 
  • Phase II

  • October 2021

  • n = 130

  • Instil Bio, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Cohort 1: R/R to ≥1 prior line including a PD-1iCohort 2: Intolerant to a PD-1i and have persistent disease after PD-1i

  • Cohort 3: Stable disease after ≤4 doses of a PD-1i

  • Noncutaneous melanoma and symptomatic/ untreated CNS metastasis are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + ITIL-168 + IL2

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu × 5 d

  • TIL:

    • 5×109 autologous TIL

  • IL2b:

    • HD, ≤ 8 doses

 
  • ORR

 
  • TIL, unmodified

  • NCT05098184

 
  • Phase I

  • September 2021

  • n = 50

  • Shanghai Gencells Therapeutics Co., Ltd.

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Primary, relapsed (failed standard txt or lacks standard regimens), or metastasized melanoma

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + TIL

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy and Flu

  • TIL:

    • 1×109 - 5×1010 autologous TIL

 
  • AE

  • ORR

  • DCR

  • DOR

  • PFS

  • OS

 
  • MASE-T cells, modified

  • NCT04904185

 
  • Phase I

  • August 2021

  • n = 12

  • National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK)

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • HLA-A2 positive melanoma

  • Progressive disease on or after anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L1 ± anti–CTLA-4 therapy

  • CNS metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Arm A: Lymphodepletion+ MASE-T

    • Arm B: Lymphodepletion+ MASE-T + pembrolizumab

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (500 mg/m2/day) and Flu (30 mg/m2/day)

  • T cellsb:

    • Antigen specific, ex vivo expanded T cells from peripheral blood T cells

  • Pembrolizumab:

    • 2 mg/kg on day −1 and day +21

 
  • Tolerability of the treatment

  • Number of patients excluded due to feasibility issues

  • Number of patients excluded due to feasibility issues

 
  • LN-145, unmodified TIL

  • NCT04614103

 
  • Phase II

  • May 2021

  • n = 95

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • NSCLC

 
  • PD-L1 negative (TPS <1%) prior to their CPI treatment (cohort 1)

  • PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥1%) prior to their CPI treatment (cohort 2)

  • PD-L1 negative (TPS <1%) and unable to undergo surgical harvest for TIL generation (cohort 3)

  • Retreatment (cohort 4)

  • CNS metastases excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + LN-145 + LD IL2

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg × 2 doses) + Flu (25 mg/m2 × 5 doses)

  • TILb:

    • LN-145, autologous TIL

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg, ≤6 doses

 
  • ORR

 
  • RPTR-168, modified TIL

  • NCT04762225

 
  • Phase 1/2

  • May 2021

  • n = 24

  • Repertoire Immune Medicines

 
  • Melanoma

  • HNSCC

  • CC

 
  • Melanoma

    • R/R or metastatic disease

    • Patients with noncutaneous melanoma must have PRAME+ tumor

  • HNSCC

    • Relapsed/refractory to anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L and/or cetuximab

    • HPV-16 E6/E7 positivity

  • CC

    • Relapsed/refractory to platinum-based chemo or anti–PD-1/anti–PD-L1

    • HPV-16 E6/E7 positivity

  • Active CNS disease and/or carcinomatous meningitis are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • RPTR-168

  • T cellsb:

    • Autologous multitargeted T cells

 
  • Number of DLT

  • Frequency of dose interruptions

 
  • GEN-011, modified T cells (92)

  • NCT04596033

 
  • Phase I

  • November 2020

  • n = 24

  • Genocea Biosciences, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

  • NSCLC

  • SCCHN

  • Urothelial carcinoma

  • RCC

  • SCLC

  • CSCC

  • ASCC

 
  • Received, been intolerant of, or been ineligible to receive standard-of-care treatment regimen

  • Sufficient stimulatory neoantigens identified in ATLAS

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort 1: Multiple LD of GEN-011 + IL2

    • Cohort 2: Lymphodepletion + single HD of GEN-011 + IL2

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy + Flu

  • T cellsb:

    • ≤5 doses without lymphodepletion

 
  • Incidence of treatment-related AEs

 
  • TIL, unmodified

  • NCT04165967

 
  • Phase 1

  • September 2020

  • n = 9

  • University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, GMP network of Basel

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Measurable unresectable or metastatic melanoma with ≥ 1 PD-1 targeted IO

  • Noncutaneous melanoma and uncontrolled CNS metastasis are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + TIL + LD IL2 + nivolumab

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy + Flu

  • TIL:

    • 5×109 - 2×1011 TIL

  • IL2:

    • 125,000 IU/kg/d ≤10d

  • Nivolumab:

    • 3 mg/kg i.v. 1q2 starts 2 wk before TIL

 
  • Number of AEs, body temperature, blood pressure, heartbeat, respiratory frequency, and full blood counts

 
  • CISH CRISPR TIL, modified TIL

  • NCT04426669

 
  • Phase 1/2

  • May 2020

  • n = 20

  • Intima Bioscience, Inc.

  • Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota

 
  • GI cancer

 
  • Metastatic progressive gastrointestinal epithelial cancer with progressive disease following ≥1 line standard therapy

  • Patients with ≤3 brain metastases that are less than 1 cm in diameter and asymptomatic are eligible

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + CISH CRISPR TIL + IL2

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg) + Flu (25 mg/m2)

  • TILb:

    • CISH-inactivated autologous TIL

  • IL2:

    • 720,000 IU/kg/d ≤6 doses

 
  • MTD

  • Efficacy

  • Incidence of AEs

 
  • TILT-123, oncolytic adenovirus (132, 133)

  • NCT04217473

 
  • Phase I

  • February 2020

  • n = 15

  • TILT Biotherapeutics, Ltd.

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • R/R (stage III/IV) melanoma

  • ≥1 prior line of treatment

  • Treated brain metastases that have not progressed in 3 mo before screening are allowed

 
  • Regimen:

    • 6 doses of TILT-123 prior to, during, and after TIL administration

  • TILb:

    • Autologous TIL

 
  • AEs (serious, nonserious) prior to TIL administration

 
  • ATL001, modified T cells

  • NCT03997474

 
  • Phase I/II

  • August 2019

  • n = 40

  • Achilles Therapeutics

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Metastatic or recurrent melanoma with prior PD-1/PD-L1i

  • CNS metastases excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort A: Lymphodepletion +ATL001 + LD-IL2

    • Cohort B: Lymphodepletion + ATL001/ICI + LD-IL2

    • Cohort C: Lymphodepletion + ATL001 + HD-IL2

  • T cellsb:

    • Autologous clonal neoantigen reactive T cells (cNeT)

 
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events and serious AEs to evaluate safety and tolerability

 
  • ATL001, modified T cells (134)

  • NCT04032847

 
  • Phase I/II

  • July 2019

  • n = 40

  • Achilles Therapeutics

 
  • NSCLC

 
  • Advanced NSCLC with prior PD-1/PD-L1i

  • CNS metastases excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort A: NMA-LD + ATL001 + IL2

    • Cohort B: NMA-LD + ATL001 + checkpoint inhibitor

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy + Flu

  • T cellsb:

    • Autologous clonal neoantigen reactive T cells (cNeT)

  • IL2b:

    • ≤10 doses

  • Pembrolizumabb:

    • Prior to and after ATL001, ≤12 mo

    • Cohort B only

 
  • Safety

  • Tolerability

 
  • Lifileucel (LN-144) or LN-145, unmodified TIL (53)

  • NCT03645928

 
  • Phase II

  • May 2019

  • n = 135

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • Melanoma

  • HNSCC

  • NSCLC

 
  • Unresectable or metastatic melanoma (stage IIIC or IV) with ≤3 prior lines excluding CPIs (cohort 1A) or previous anti–PD-1 therapy (cohorts 1B,C)

  • Uveal/ocular melanoma are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort 1A: NMA-LD+ lifileucel + IL2+ pembrolizumab

    • Cohort 1B/3B: NMA-LD + LN-145 + IL2

    • Cohort 1C: NMA-LD+ lifileucel + IL2

    • Cohort 2A/3A: NMA-LD + LN-145 + IL2 + pembrolizumab

    • Cohort 3C: NMA-LD+ LN-145+ IL2+ ipilimumab + nivolumab

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg × 2 doses) + Flu (25 mg/m2 × 5 doses)

  • TIL:

    • 1×109 - 150×109, autologous TIL

  • IL2:

    • ≤6 doses 600,000 IU/kg

  • Pembrolizumab:

    • 400 mg, once after resection and continued after IL2 for ≤24 mo (cohorts 1A/2A/3A)

  • Ipilimumab:

    • Once prior to resection

  • Nivolumab:

    • Once prior to resection, prior to TIL administration, and up to 24 mo (cohort 3C)

 
  • ORR and safety profile measured by grade ≥3 TEAEs

 
  • RPTR-147, modified T cell (91)

  • NCT03815682

 
  • Phase I/II

  • October 2018

  • n = 240

  • Repertoire Immune Medicines

  • Merck Sharp & Dohme, LLC

 
  • Solid tumors

  • Lymphomas

  • HPV-16 positive tumors

 
  • Relapsed/refractory metastatic or locally-advanced solid tumor

  • Patient must have documented HLA-typing results that meet the study requirements

  • Arm B: PD-1 progression

  • Arm C: HPV-16 positive tumors

 
  • Regimen:

    • Arm A: RPTR-147:1

    • Arm B: RPTR-147:1+ pembrolizumab

    • Arm C: RPTR-147:2

  • TILb:

    • Autologous anti-TAA associated antigen T cells loaded with an IL15-Fc nanogel

 
  • Number of DLT

  • Frequency of dose interruptions

 
  • TIL, unmodified (135)

  • NCT03638375

 
  • Phase I/II

  • July 2018

  • n = 34

  • Leiden University Medical Center

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Stage III or IV melanoma; must have failed on standard txt options

  • Progressive disease on prior txt

  • Stable (≥2 mo) brain metastases with no prior dexamethasone txt are allowed

 
  • Regimen:

    • Arm A: TIL + nivolumab

    • Arm B: TIL + nivolumab + IFNα

  • TIL:

    • 2.5 × 108 to 7.5 × 108 TIL

  • Nivolumab:

    • 3 mg/kg i.v. prior to TIL txt

  • PEG-IFNα:

    • 1 μg/kg/week ≤90 μg/week

 
  • Incidence of treatment-related serious AEs

 
  • TIL, unmodified

  • NCT03467516

 
  • Phase II

  • May 2018

  • n = 47

  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Measurable metastatic uveal melanoma and co-enrollment in companion protocol

  • ≤3 brain metastases that are <1 cm are eligible

 
  • Regimen:

    • Lymphodepletion + TIL + HD IL2

  • Lymphodepletionb:

    • Cy + Flu

  • TIL:

    • 1×109 - 2×1011 TIL

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg every 8 hr ≤6 doses

 
  • ORR

 
  • TIL, unmodified

  • NCT03374839

 
  • Phase I/II

  • February 2018

  • n = 11

  • Nantes University Hospital

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Patients with stage IIIb, IIIc, or IV melanoma

  • ≤2 lines of prior txt

  • Brain or bone metastasis and ocular melanoma are not eligible

 
  • Regimen:

    • TIL + IL2 + nivolumab

  • TIL:

    • Phase 1: 5 × 108 TIL, 2 doses

    • Phase 2: 1 to 2 × 108 TIL, 2 doses

  • IL2:

    • 6,00,000 IU/d ×5 d

  • Nivolumab:

    • 3 mg/kg every 2 wk ≤52 wk

 
  • Incidence of TEAEs

 
  • LN-145, unmodified TIL (53)

  • NCT03108495

 
  • Phase II

  • June 2017

  • n = 138

  • Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

 
  • CC

 
  • Recurrent, metastatic, or persistent squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix that is not amenable to curative treatment with surgery and/or radiation therapy

  • Cohort 1 and Cohort 2: progression during or following 1–3 prior systemic chemotherapeutic treatments

  • Cohort 2: Previously received treatment with an ICI

  • Cohort 3: Only received prior chemoradiation or surgery for loco-regional disease

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + LN-145 + LD IL2 + pembrolizumab

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg × 2 doses) + Flu (25 mg/m2 × 5 doses)

  • TIL:

    • 1 × 109 to 150 × 109, autologous TIL

  • IL2:

    • ≤6 doses 600,000 IU/kg

  • Pembrolizumab:

    • 200 mg, once after resection and continued after IL2 for ≤24 mo

 
  • ORR

  • AEs

  • Efficacy

 
  • T cells, unmodified

  • NCT02133196

 
  • Phase II

  • October 2014

  • n = 85

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

 
  • NSCLC

 
  • Measurable metastatic (stage IV) or unresectable NSCLC (including but not limited to squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinomas)

  • ≥1 appropriate 1 L systemic therapy and progressed

  • Neuroendocrine tumors are not eligible

  • Patients with ≤3 brain metastases that are ≤1 cm in diameter and asymptomatic are eligible

 
  • Regimen:

    • Arm 1: NMA-LD+ young TIL + HD aldesleukin

    • Arm 2: NMA-LD+ young TIL + LD aldesleukin

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg/d) + Flu (25 mg/m2/d)

  • TIL:

    • Young TILb

  • Aldesleukin:

    • Arm 1: 720,000 IU/kg ≤ 9 doses

    • Arm 2: 72,000 IU/kg ≤ 12 doses

 
  • Response rate

 
  • TIL, unmodified (136)

  • NCT02278887

 
  • Phase III

  • September 2014

  • n = 168

  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Unresectable stage III/IV melanoma

  • Received ≤1 prior line, excluding ipilimumab

  • Noncutaneous melanoma, adjuvant ipilimumab within 6 mo from randomization, >2 CNS lesions are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • NMA-LD + TIL + HD IL2

    • Ipilimumab

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg/d × 2d) + Flu (50 mg/m2 × 5d)

  • TIL:

    • 5×109 - 2×1011 TIL

  • IL2:

    • 600,000 IU/kg/d every 8h ≤15 doses

  • Ipilimumab:

    • 3 mg/kg IV every 3 wk ≤4 doses

 
  • PFS at 6 months

 
  • TIL + DC vaccine (137)

  • NCT01946373

 
  • Phase I

  • October 2013

  • n = 15

  • Karolinska University Hospital

 
  • Melanoma

 
  • Stage III or IV malignant, progressive, melanoma

  • Uveal melanoma included

  • Active CNS metastases are excluded

 
  • Regimen:

    • Cohort A: NMA-LD + T cells + IL2

    • Cohort B: NMA-LD + T cells + IL2 + DC vaccinations

  • Lymphodepletion:

    • Cy (60 mg/kg/d × 2 d) + Flu (25 mg/m2 × 5 d)

  • TIL:

    • ≤5×1010 TIL

  • IL2:

    • 100,000 IU/kg as IV bolus over 15-minute period every 8h ≤14 doses

  • DC:

    • 5 injections with up to 1.5×107 of DC pulsed with autologous tumor lysate and NY-ESO-1 peptide

 
  • Safety

 

Abbreviations: 1L, first-line; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; ASCC, anal squamous cell carcinoma; ATLAS, Antigen Lead Acquisition System; BRAF, B-raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase; CNS, central nervous system; CPI, checkpoint inhibitor; CSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; Cy, cyclophosphamide; d, day; DC, dendritic cell; DCR, disease control rate; DLT, dose-limiting toxicities; DOR, duration of response; ECGs, electrocardiograms; EC, endometrial cancer; Flu, fludarabine; GI, gastrointestinal; HD, high-dose; HLA, human leukocyte antigens; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HPV, human papillomavirus; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; i.d., intradermal; IO, immunotherapy; IV, intravenous; LD, low-dose; MASE, multiple antigen specific endogenously derived; NY-ESO-1, New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PARPi, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor; PD-1, programmed cell death protein-1; PD-L1, programmed cell death protein-ligand 1; PFS, progression-free survival; PROC, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer; q, every; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; ROS, c-ROS oncogene 1; R/R, relapsed/refractory; sc, subcutaneous; SCCHN, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; SCLC, small cell lung cancer; TEAE, treatment-related adverse events; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TPS, tumor proportion score; txt, treatment; UC, urothelial carcinoma; US, United States; wk, week; yr, year.

Trial identification and information compiled from ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed June 3, 2022). Trials are placed in order of the most recent study start date.

aTrial is open and not yet enrolling.

bDose level was not specified.

An appealing therapeutic approach to melanoma treatment is the possibility of combining TIL therapy with anti–PD-1 to enhance efficacy and durability of response (48). Evidence indicates that PD-1 regulates the interaction between tumors and autologous T cells, thus, the effects of TIL therapy may be enhanced by blocking immunosuppressive signals in the tumor microenvironment (TME) through checkpoint blockade (49). High PD-1 expression has been observed in tumor-reactive CD8+ T-cell subsets post-TIL therapy (50). Tumor-expressed PD-L1 binds to PD-1 on TILs, which counteracts the T-cell receptor (TCR)-signaling cascade and impairs T-cell activation (51). Inhibiting the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling axis is a feasible strategy to restore and reset immune responses in the TME (52). At a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the phase II IOV-COM-202 study (NCT03645928) of combination lifileucel and pembrolizumab in 10 patients with ICI-naive metastatic melanoma recently reported OR and CR rates of 60% and 30%, respectively (53). Although more patients need to be treated before efficacy can be reliably assessed, this combination is feasible without significant increases in toxicity (53). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs were manageable and consistent with those expected from pembrolizumab, NMA-LD, and IL2 (53). One downside to this approach is that it shifts TIL therapy from a one-time dosing strategy to require long-term administration of pembrolizumab (≤2 years; ref. 53). Preclinical (54) and ongoing clinical studies (NCT03374839, NCT02621021) suggest that there are multiple mechanisms by which PD-1 blockade may enhance outcomes with ACT, including effects on both the endogenous T-cell response as well as the cell therapy product.

Blockade of CTLA-4 with ipilimumab promotes antigen presenting cell (APC)-mediated T-cell activation and antitumor responses (55). Compared with patients who do not receive anti–CTLA-4, ipilimumab induces broad and frequent T-cell responses against common tumor antigens and may induce naïve-like tumor-infiltrating T cells (56). A small pilot study (NCT01701674) of combination TIL and ipilimumab for n = 13 patients with metastatic melanoma reported an ORR of 38% with median progression-free survival of 7.3 months (57). As new ICIs are being developed, including the recent approval of the LAG-3 inhibitor relatlimab for melanoma (58), opportunities for combination studies with TIL therapy will expand.

Patient selection

Selecting patients likely to benefit from TILs is an area of high interest. As with ICIs, patients who appear to benefit most from TILs have slowly progressing soft tissue disease (59). Anecdotally, Mehta and colleagues reported that patients with high disease burden, including disease in sanctuary sites like the brain, have responded to TILs (47), although these patients are typically excluded from TIL trials. Moreover, shorter exposure to prior anti–PD-1 therapy may maximize the duration of response to TIL treatment (60). Prognostic factors, such as serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase, disease burden, and specific organ involvement (e.g., soft tissue disease versus liver, brain, bone metastases), may ultimately be used to identify patients most likely to achieve additional benefit and long-term survival from TIL therapy (4). Emerging biomarkers may predict response to TIL, including checkpoint expression and tumor mutational burden/tumor recognition, which are currently under investigation (61). In light of the recent data that ICIs should be considered before targeted therapy for BRAF-mutated melanoma (62, 63), on-treatment biomarkers [liquid biopsies, circulating tumor DNA (or ctDNA) monitoring, and immune profiling] may help provide the basis for rational treatment sequencing and optimal patient selection (64).

Banking models

One of the largest challenges of TIL therapy is the time needed to harvest and expand the T-cell population, which inevitably generates delays for patient intervention (65). Typical manufacturing times are currently around 3 weeks (12) to 3 months (66). As such, there is great interest in shortening the wait time from clinical decision to treat with TIL until the product is available for infusion. One approach is TIL harvest at an earlier time point prior to when the product might actually be needed (67). TILs might be stored either as the frozen tumor sample or a manufacturing intermediate and the sample will be ready for rapid completion of manufacturing at the time when clinically indicated (68, 69). Best practices and optimal patients to consider for tumor banking have yet to be established (70). The implications of utilizing TIL banked earlier in the patent's course of disease for subsequent treatment of a dynamic and progressing disease remain unknown. Banking may preserve tumor reactive T cells, however the efficacy of TIL products made from banked tumors could be impacted by changes to the patient's tumor during disease progression or intercurrent anticancer therapies. As access to TIL therapy is anticipated to increase in the near future, a comprehensive effort and approach to establish tumor bank initiatives are warranted (71).

Bridging therapy

A strategy to decrease drop-out rates due to disease progression during TIL production includes the administration of “bridging therapies,” allowing systemic therapy to be given between the time of TIL harvest and lymphodepleting chemotherapy (57, 72). Historically, this has not been built into TIL trial protocols, as dropout rates between 12% and 21.9% demonstrate that some patients experienced disease progression that precluded them from receiving TIL after successful harvest and manufacturing (25, 38, 73). However, groups evaluating modified TIL products requiring a protracted manufacturing period of several months are building the option for bridging into their protocols. To mimic expected clinical practice upon approval, the lifileucel expanded access program is allowing bridging therapy for patients with melanoma (NCT05398640) and so will patients with solid tumors receiving ITIL-168 (NCT05393635). For BRAF-mutant melanoma, BRAF-targeted agents are an attractive bridging option, as they have high response rates but with typically limited durability (74). Stopping these agents, even for patients who are experiencing clinical progression, can lead to tumor flare (75), so bridging with BRAF-targeted agents is an appealing option. For BRAF-wild type disease, while driven by prolonged T-cell activation and restored T-cell proliferation needed for T-cell–mediated immunity, CTLA-4 bridging or priming approaches may be limited by the relatively high incidence of long-lasting toxicity (76). A single cycle of cytotoxic chemotherapy may be an alternative, viable option for these patients (77). Furthermore, particularly in BRAF-wild-type disease, a banking approach before embarking on front-line anti–PD-1-based therapy may be preferable.

Cost and centralization of TIL therapy

Costs of manufacturing and administration of TIL is clearly a major concern for healthcare providers and payers (78). It is anticipated that commercial TIL products will have high overhead costs as a result of start-up activities of a TIL therapy program (79). In the context of other therapies that require chronic administration sometimes over years (78), TIL therapy may potentially offer a cost-effective addition to the melanoma armamentarium as it is a personalized, one-time treatment approach (65). With growing experience, delivering some elements of TIL therapy in an out-patient setting may be feasible and reduce high in-patient costs, but will require a multidisciplinary approach and coordination, especially for logistical and reimbursement issues (80). Current models established by approved cell therapies provide the opportunity to leverage and expand upon such successful programs (81).

Other considerations

Clinical and commercial cell therapy products must meet regulatory requirements of safety, purity, and potency prior to manufacturing release. Of the numerous product release assays, potency assays have attracted significant attention due to the complex and/or not fully characterized mechanisms of action for TIL therapy (82). Clinical activity of a TIL product likely depends on several factors including the diversity and functional avidity of the TCR repertoire, the frequency of antitumor clonotypes in the final product, ability of the infused cells to efficiently traffic to tumors, and the phenotypic differentiation and state of exhaustion of antitumor clones (83). Patient-related factors including the status of the endogenous immune system, performance status, and comorbidities, as well as tumor burden and disease sites may well influence response to therapy (6). Furthermore, features of the tumor itself, including dynamic and heterogenous tumor antigen expression (84), complicates the routine assessment of antitumor activity of TIL products since practicalities of tumor procurement may limit capturing the full spectrum of antigens present in the patient (85). Thus, some tumor-specific T-cell clones present in the TIL product may be improperly designated tumor nonreactive. Finally, a potency assay must be robust, rapid, and reproducible within a GMP quality control environment (82). Common components of modern potency assays designed for products made from bulk, unselected TIL include nonspecific, or, less commonly, tumor-specific activation of TIL assessed by multiparametric assays including cytokine expression, upregulation of surface markers of activation and TIL-mediated tumor cell death (86). Although these assays are tuned to describe a TIL product's functionality in vitro, correlation with clinical responses have yet to be confirmed in prospective clinical trials (9, 12, 87, 88). In summary, given these constraints, development of potency assessment to support registrational trials, commercialization, and licensing of these products lags behind the reproducible clinical efficacy of TIL in melanoma, including in multicenter trials designed to lead to regulatory approval.

Next-generation TILs

As the field of TIL therapy rapidly evolves, technologic advances are being developed to enhance the antitumor efficacy of the TIL product. The next generation of TILs (Table 3) are based on the pillars of effective immune activation (89). First, TCR recognition of the intratumor clonal neoantigen heterogeneity is a determinant of the adaptive immune response to cancer (Fig. 2, strategy 1; ref. 90). TIL therapies, such as lifileucel and ITIL-168, have shown that an unrestricted TCR repertoire in TIL products can counter tumor heterogeneity and deliver clinical responses (ORRs 36%–67%; refs. 12, 31). Moreover, neoantigen-specific TILs have demonstrated persistence lasting nearly 3 years after TIL infusion (26). Clinical studies of predefined, neoantigen-specific TIL infusion products are underway to create TIL and TCR therapy products with a higher fraction of tumor-specific TCRs (66, 91–94). The possibility to select specific TIL subsets enriched for tumor/neoantigen recognition is a potential strategy to generate specific tumor-reactive TIL (10, 25, 33); trials are ongoing, and data will be forthcoming (Table 2). Phenotypically characterizing the most tumor-reactive cell types to include in TIL products based on surface markers (e.g., PD-1 and CD137; refs. 95, 96) to identify a narrow T-cell subset for TIL therapy use (97) are additional strategies early in development. However, increasing the complexity of the manufacturing process prolongs manufacturing times and risks disease progression and patient withdrawal before accessing treatment (98). The cost–benefit balance to both patients and payers will need to be carefully assessed in prospective studies.

Table 3.

Select list of next-generation therapies targeting T-cell activation.

TIL therapies
TreatmentCategoryMOACompanyStrategy
  • ATL001 (66)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • Using the VELOS manufacturing process, cNETs that target clonal neoantigens unique to each patient's tumor, and blood sample are manufactured from TILs cocultured with neoantigen peptide-pulsed dendritic cells

 
Achilles Therapeutics 
  • 1

 
 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • ITIL-168: An autologous TIL cell therapy made from digested and cryopreserved tumors; offers an unrestricted TCR repertoire

  • ITIL-306: Novel CoStAR molecule encoding an extracellular FRα-targeting scFv and intracellular CD28 and CD40 signaling sequences transduced into autologous TILs

 
Instil Bio, Inc. 
  • 1

  • 1, 2

 
  • CISH CRISPR TIL(bioRxiv 2021.08.17.456714) (139)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • Genetically engineered, neoantigen-specific TIL in which the intracellular immune checkpoint CISH has been inhibited using CRISPR/Cas9-gene editing

 
Intima Bioscience, Inc. 
  • 1

 
 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • Lifileucel: Cryopreserved TIL infusion products

  • LN-145: Cryopreserved TIL infusion products

  • IOV-4001: TALEN-mediated PDCD-1 knockout TIL cell therapy; abrogates the need for anti-PD-1 therapy

 
Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. 
  • 1

  • 4

  • 4

 
 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • INTASYL-mediated gene silencing of PD-1 in TIL

 
Phio Pharmaceuticals 
  • 4

 
  • KSQ-001 (eTIL) (116)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • eTILTM therapy created via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of the novel gene target CT-1, which was identified using a CRISPRomics discovery platform

 
KSQ Therapeutics 
  • 4

 
  • DeTIL-0255 (117)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • DeTIL cell therapy derived via ex vivo treatment of autologous-derived TILs with a potent, small-molecule inhibitor of CBL-B known as NX-0255

 
Nurix Therapeutics, Inc. 
  • 4

 
  • cytoTIL15 (OBX-115) (102)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • Genetically engineered TILs that express a regulated form of mbIL15 under the control of carbonic-anhydrase-2 DRDs, controlled by the ligand ACZ

 
Obsidian Therapeutics 
  • 3

 
  • ADP-TILIL7 (140)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • ADP-TILIL7: Autologous TILs transduced with human IL7 under the control of a NFAT inducible promoter

 
Adaptimmune Therapeutics 
  • 3

 
TCR-T therapies 
  • SPEAR T-cell therapy (104)

 
  • TCR-T therapy

 
  • SPEAR T-cell therapy engineered to target MAGE-A4, with the ability to incorporate IL7 and CCL19, which increases migration of SPEAR T cells into tumors

 
Adaptimmune Therapeutics 
  • 1, 3

 
  • GEN-011 (92)

 
  • TCR-T therapy

 
  • NPT that uses ATLAS to identify immunogenic neoantigens in NPTs and excludes Inhibigens, antigen targets of T cells that promote tumor growth

 
Genocea Biosciences, Inc. 
  • 1

 
  • NeoTCR-T cells (NeoTCR-P1) (93, 94)

 
  • TCR-T therapy

 
  • Cancer-specific CD8 T cells derived using the imPACT Isolation Technology platform (potential HLA-binding neoAg in context of the patient's HLA class I haplotype are predicted), TCRs from antigen-experienced CD8 T cells are functionally validated by generating T cells expressing neoTCRs using non-viral precision genome engineering to insert the transgenic TCR chains into the endogenous TRAC locus.

 
PACT Pharma 
  • 1,4

 
  • IL12-tethered T cells (RPTR-168) (105, 106)

  • PRIME IL15 (RPTR-147) (91)

 
  • TCR-T therapy

 
  • RPTR-168: Using the Deep Primed platform, IL12 is tethered to the surface of adoptively transferred T cells

  • RPTR-147: Autologous anti-TAA T cells generated with a proprietary dendritic cell priming process and loaded with an IL15-Fc nanogel; TAAs used included PRAME, NY-ESO-1, SSX2, Survivin, and WT1

 
Repertoire Immune Medicines 
  • 3

  • 3

 
TIL therapies
TreatmentCategoryMOACompanyStrategy
  • ATL001 (66)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • Using the VELOS manufacturing process, cNETs that target clonal neoantigens unique to each patient's tumor, and blood sample are manufactured from TILs cocultured with neoantigen peptide-pulsed dendritic cells

 
Achilles Therapeutics 
  • 1

 
 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • ITIL-168: An autologous TIL cell therapy made from digested and cryopreserved tumors; offers an unrestricted TCR repertoire

  • ITIL-306: Novel CoStAR molecule encoding an extracellular FRα-targeting scFv and intracellular CD28 and CD40 signaling sequences transduced into autologous TILs

 
Instil Bio, Inc. 
  • 1

  • 1, 2

 
  • CISH CRISPR TIL(bioRxiv 2021.08.17.456714) (139)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • Genetically engineered, neoantigen-specific TIL in which the intracellular immune checkpoint CISH has been inhibited using CRISPR/Cas9-gene editing

 
Intima Bioscience, Inc. 
  • 1

 
 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • Lifileucel: Cryopreserved TIL infusion products

  • LN-145: Cryopreserved TIL infusion products

  • IOV-4001: TALEN-mediated PDCD-1 knockout TIL cell therapy; abrogates the need for anti-PD-1 therapy

 
Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. 
  • 1

  • 4

  • 4

 
 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • INTASYL-mediated gene silencing of PD-1 in TIL

 
Phio Pharmaceuticals 
  • 4

 
  • KSQ-001 (eTIL) (116)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • eTILTM therapy created via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of the novel gene target CT-1, which was identified using a CRISPRomics discovery platform

 
KSQ Therapeutics 
  • 4

 
  • DeTIL-0255 (117)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • DeTIL cell therapy derived via ex vivo treatment of autologous-derived TILs with a potent, small-molecule inhibitor of CBL-B known as NX-0255

 
Nurix Therapeutics, Inc. 
  • 4

 
  • cytoTIL15 (OBX-115) (102)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • Genetically engineered TILs that express a regulated form of mbIL15 under the control of carbonic-anhydrase-2 DRDs, controlled by the ligand ACZ

 
Obsidian Therapeutics 
  • 3

 
  • ADP-TILIL7 (140)

 
  • TIL therapy

 
  • ADP-TILIL7: Autologous TILs transduced with human IL7 under the control of a NFAT inducible promoter

 
Adaptimmune Therapeutics 
  • 3

 
TCR-T therapies 
  • SPEAR T-cell therapy (104)

 
  • TCR-T therapy

 
  • SPEAR T-cell therapy engineered to target MAGE-A4, with the ability to incorporate IL7 and CCL19, which increases migration of SPEAR T cells into tumors

 
Adaptimmune Therapeutics 
  • 1, 3

 
  • GEN-011 (92)

 
  • TCR-T therapy

 
  • NPT that uses ATLAS to identify immunogenic neoantigens in NPTs and excludes Inhibigens, antigen targets of T cells that promote tumor growth

 
Genocea Biosciences, Inc. 
  • 1

 
  • NeoTCR-T cells (NeoTCR-P1) (93, 94)

 
  • TCR-T therapy

 
  • Cancer-specific CD8 T cells derived using the imPACT Isolation Technology platform (potential HLA-binding neoAg in context of the patient's HLA class I haplotype are predicted), TCRs from antigen-experienced CD8 T cells are functionally validated by generating T cells expressing neoTCRs using non-viral precision genome engineering to insert the transgenic TCR chains into the endogenous TRAC locus.

 
PACT Pharma 
  • 1,4

 
  • IL12-tethered T cells (RPTR-168) (105, 106)

  • PRIME IL15 (RPTR-147) (91)

 
  • TCR-T therapy

 
  • RPTR-168: Using the Deep Primed platform, IL12 is tethered to the surface of adoptively transferred T cells

  • RPTR-147: Autologous anti-TAA T cells generated with a proprietary dendritic cell priming process and loaded with an IL15-Fc nanogel; TAAs used included PRAME, NY-ESO-1, SSX2, Survivin, and WT1

 
Repertoire Immune Medicines 
  • 3

  • 3

 

Abbreviations: ACZ, acetazolamide; ATLAS, antigen lead acquisition system; CCL19, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 19; CISH, cytokine induced SH2 protein; DRD, drug response domains; DeTIL, drug enhanced TIL; eTIL, engineered TIL; Fc, fragment crystallizable; FRα, folate receptor alpha; MAGE-A4, melanoma-associated antigen-A; mb, membrane bound; neoAg, neoantigens; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; NPT, neoantigen-targeted autologous peripheral T-cell therapy; NY-ESO-1, New York esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 1; PDCD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PRAME, preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma; scFv, single-chain fragment variable; TAA, tumor-associated antigens; TCR-T, TCR-engineered T cell; WT1, Wilms tumor 1.

Figure 2.

Strategies to optimize T-cell activation in next-generation TIL. Immune-modulation strategies involve improvements in intracellular and extracellular signaling. Strategy 1. Extracellular T-cell activation occurs via TCR/neoTCR-mediated recognition of TAA or neoAg peptides. Novel therapeutic products select and enrich for pre-existing tumor antigen-specific T cells. Strategy 2. Intracellular and extracellular enhancements of T-cell activation and effector function occur through dual CD28 and CD40 intracellular signaling domain-mediated costimulation upon TCR-mediated antigen recognition. Strategy 3. Extracellular T-cell activation through the local delivery of immunomodulatory molecules such as IL7 and CCL19, as well as cell-anchored IL12, or drug-inducible membrane-bound IL15 expression. Strategy 4. Increasing T-cell fitness and reducing T-cell exhaustion with intracellular strategies such as PDCD-1 knockout with TALEN, and CT-1 knockout with CRISPR/Cas9. CCL, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand; FRα, folate receptor alpha; neoAg, neoantigens; TAA, tumor-associated antigens.

Figure 2.

Strategies to optimize T-cell activation in next-generation TIL. Immune-modulation strategies involve improvements in intracellular and extracellular signaling. Strategy 1. Extracellular T-cell activation occurs via TCR/neoTCR-mediated recognition of TAA or neoAg peptides. Novel therapeutic products select and enrich for pre-existing tumor antigen-specific T cells. Strategy 2. Intracellular and extracellular enhancements of T-cell activation and effector function occur through dual CD28 and CD40 intracellular signaling domain-mediated costimulation upon TCR-mediated antigen recognition. Strategy 3. Extracellular T-cell activation through the local delivery of immunomodulatory molecules such as IL7 and CCL19, as well as cell-anchored IL12, or drug-inducible membrane-bound IL15 expression. Strategy 4. Increasing T-cell fitness and reducing T-cell exhaustion with intracellular strategies such as PDCD-1 knockout with TALEN, and CT-1 knockout with CRISPR/Cas9. CCL, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand; FRα, folate receptor alpha; neoAg, neoantigens; TAA, tumor-associated antigens.

Close modal

Improved TIL function through synthetic costimulation may mitigate known mechanisms of immune escape and resistance to TIL therapy (Fig. 2, strategy 2; ref. 27). Including a synthetic costimulatory antigen receptor (CoStAR) molecule with dual CD28 and CD40 domains on healthy donor T cells targeting the tumor-associated antigen CEA led to increased T-cell activation and long-term proliferation even in the absence of IL2 (99, 100). Furthermore, the enhancement of cytokine-induced immune activation may be accomplished through the local delivery of cytokines outside of IL2 (Fig. 2, strategy 3; ref. 101). Inclusion of growth-promoting cytokines with TIL products is also being examined. The genetically engineered TIL cytoTIL15 expresses a regulated form of membrane-bound IL15 under the control of carbonic-anhydrase-2 drug response domains, activated by acetazolamide (102). Although the regulated expression of IL15 allows for tunable antigen-independent long-term TIL persistence in a dose-dependent manner (102), secondary effector memory T-cell differentiation may be impaired (103). In addition, T cells with membrane bound IL15 (91), IL7/CCL19 expressing specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor (SPEAR) T cells targeting the tumor antigen MAGE-4 (104), and T cells anchored with IL12 (105, 106) are also under investigation.

Although pitfalls have been encountered when investigating alternative cytokines (107, 108), new therapies may reduce T-cell exhaustion in the TME, which is a defining feature in many cancer types (Fig. 2, strategy 4; ref. 109). To simulate therapeutic effects of PD-1 inhibition, PD-1 silencing with INTASYL-mediated self-delivering siRNA (or PH-762) in TIL products was efficient (85% knockdown), and TILs displayed an activated and improved effector phenotype (110). When using transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN)-based gene knockout of the PD-1 gene PDCD-1 in TILs (IOV-4001), T cells exhibited improved in vivo effector function (111, 112); these results prompted clinical investigation in metastatic melanoma (NCT05361174).

Furthermore, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based knockout of the negative TCR-signaling regulator cytokine-induced SH2 (CISH) protein in TIL led to increased TCR avidity, neoantigen recognition, and tumor cytolysis (bioRxiv 2021.08.17.456714; refs. 113–115). KSQ-001, an engineered TIL therapy, was created via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of a novel, and yet undisclosed, intracellular immune checkpoint (cell therapy-1, CT-1) identified in peripheral T cells (116), resulting in polyfunctional and proliferative T cells, which are under clinical development (NCT04426669). Ex vivo treatment of autologous TILs with NX-0255, a potent, small-molecule inhibitor of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Casitas B-lineage lymphoma proto-oncogene-B (CBL-B), resulted in drug enhanced TILs (DeTIL-0255) that were less exhaustive and showed enhanced cytolytic T-cell activity (117), which is being tested in gynecologic malignancies (NCT05107739).

Application beyond melanoma

TIL therapy, with its broad and patient-specific polyclonality (15, 26), has exciting potential to overcome clonal tumor heterogeneity and induce deep and durable remissions in a growing list of treatment-refractory cancers other than melanoma (Table 2). In a single-site phase I study, patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; including 4 patients with EGFR mutations), who progressed after nivolumab monotherapy received TIL followed by maintenance nivolumab for up to a year and reached an ORR of 23% (118). Twenty-seven patients with cervical carcinoma (CC) who had progressed on standard of care treatments received TIL and achieved an ORR of 44.4% (119). Lifileucel and LN-145, in combination with pembrolizumab, have also shown promise in advanced ICI-naive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC; n = 18, ORR = 38.9%) and advanced untreated CC (n = 14, ORR = 57.1%), respectively (53). The effectiveness of unmodified TILs in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), gynecologic malignancies, and gastrointestinal cancers have shown mixed results, due to difficulties in TIL manufacturing (120, 121), changes in subclonal tumor heterogeneity after prior treatment exposure (122), or a low frequency of tumor reactive TILs (123). In preclinical models, preferential expansion of CD137/PD-1+ TIL may select for rare tumor-reactive TIL, thereby making this treatment modality potentially relevant for cancer types that have not previously demonstrated efficacy with nonselected TIL therapies, including myeloma and colorectal cancer (95, 96, 124, 125). Furthermore, enriched neoantigen-specific TILs have shown promise in treatment-refractory breast cancer when combined with pembrolizumab (n = 6, ORR = 50%; ref. 126). Despite these challenges, TILs are currently being explored in these indications and it is hoped that novel approaches such as those summarized in Table 3 may prove beneficial over time.

TIL therapy is a rapidly evolving modality, which is expected to take its place alongside ICI as part of the growing immunotherapy toolkit used to treat melanoma and other cancer types. In melanoma, data are accumulating that demonstrate significant antitumor efficacy with unmodified TILs. Advancements in our understanding of the TME provide the opportunity to enhance the therapeutic window to achieve the true potential of TIL therapy. Numerous paths to this outcome exist, including process improvements, cell engineering, and combinations with other available agents. Encouragingly, several next-generation cellular therapies are currently under or are rapidly headed for clinical evaluation. The optimal timing and sequencing of TIL therapy needed to maximize efficacy will continue to emerge as a focus in anticipation of TIL approvals. Although challenges exist, attention must focus on achieving regulatory approval of TIL therapy in melanoma and further optimizing this approach, including thorough product manufacturing and characterization, to help establish a new option to extend long-term survival in this disease.

A. Betof Warner reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, BluePath Solutions, Instil Bio, Lyell Immunopharma, Immatics, Novartis, and Pfizer and personal fees and other support from Iovance Biotherapeutics outside the submitted work. P.G. Corrie reports other support from Instil Bio and Iovance outside the submitted work. O. Hamid reports personal fees from Instil Bio during the conduct of the study as well as personal fees from Alkermes, Amgen, Beigene, Bioatla, BMS, Eisai, Roche Genentech, Georgiaimune, Giga Gen, Grit Bio, GSK, Idera, Immunocore, Incyte, IO Biotech, Iovance, Janssen, Merck, Moderna, Novartis, Obsidian, Pfizer, Regeneron Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Tempus, Vial, and Zelluna and personal fees and other support from Bactonix outside the submitted work; in addition, O. Hamid's institution has research contracts with Arcus, Aduro, Akeso, Amgen, Bioatla, BMS, Cytomx, Exelixis, Roche Genentech, GSK, Immunocore, Idera, Inyte, Iovance, Merck, Moderna, Merck Serono, Nextcure, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Seattle Genetics, Torque, and Zelluna.

This work was financially supported by Instil Bio, Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Phylicia Aaron, PhD, of Nexus Global Group Science with funding from Instil Bio, Inc.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of publication fees. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

1.
Dummer
R
,
Flaherty
K
,
Robert
C
,
Arance
AM
,
G
JWd
,
Garbe
C
, et al
.
Five-year overall survival (OS) in COLUMBUS: a randomized phase 3 trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients (pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
.
J Clin Oncol
39
:
15s
,
2021
: (
suppl. abstr. 9507
).
2.
Ugurel
S
,
Röhmel
J
,
Ascierto
PA
,
Becker
JC
,
Flaherty
KT
,
Grob
JJ
, et al
.
Survival of patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: the impact of MAP kinase pathway inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibition-Update 2019
.
Eur J Cancer
2020
;
130
:
126
38
.
3.
Curti
BD
,
Faries
MB
.
Recent advances in the treatment of melanoma
.
N Engl J Med
2021
;
384
:
2229
40
.
4.
Michielin
O
,
Atkins
MB
,
Koon
HB
,
Dummer
R
,
Ascierto
PA
.
Evolving impact of long-term survival results on metastatic melanoma treatment
.
J Immunother Cancer
2020
;
8
:
e000948
.
5.
Weiss
SA
,
Wolchok
JD
,
Sznol
M
.
Immunotherapy of melanoma: facts and hopes
.
Clin Cancer Res
2019
;
25
:
5191
201
.
6.
Kumar
A
,
Watkins
R
,
Vilgelm
AE
.
Cell therapy with TILs: training and taming T cells to fight cancer
.
Front Immunol
2021
;
12
:
690499
.
7.
Lee
S
,
Margolin
K
.
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in melanoma
.
Curr Oncol Rep
2012
;
14
:
468
74
.
8.
Rohaan
MW
,
Borch
TH
,
van den Berg
JH
,
Met
Ö
,
Kessels
R
,
Geukes Foppen
MH
et al
.
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy or ipilimumab in advanced melanoma
.
N Engl J Med
2022
;
387
:
2113
25
.
9.
Rosenberg
SA
,
Yang
JC
,
Sherry
RM
,
Kammula
US
,
Hughes
MS
,
Phan
GQ
, et al
.
Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy
.
Clin Cancer Res
2011
;
17
:
4550
7
.
10.
Seitter
SJ
,
Sherry
RM
,
Yang
JC
,
Robbins
PF
,
Shindorf
ML
,
Copeland
AR
, et al
.
Impact of prior treatment on the efficacy of adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2021
;
27
:
5289
98
.
11.
Borch
TH
,
Andersen
R
,
Ellebaek
E
,
Met
O
,
Donia
M
,
Svane
I
.
Future role for adoptive T-cell therapy in checkpoint inhibitor-resistant metastatic melanoma
.
J Immunother Cancer
2020
;
8
:
e000668
.
12.
Sarnaik
AA
,
Hamid
O
,
Khushalani
NI
,
Lewis
KD
,
Medina
T
,
Kluger
HM
, et al
.
Lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, in metastatic melanoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2021
;
39
:
2656
66
.
13.
Schoenfeld
AJ
,
Hellmann
MD
.
Acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors
.
Cancer Cell
2020
;
37
:
443
55
.
14.
Comito
F
,
Pagani
R
,
Grilli
G
,
Sperandi
F
,
Ardizzoni
A
,
Melotti
B
.
Emerging novel therapeutic approaches for treatment of advanced cutaneous melanoma
.
Cancers
2022
;
14
:
271
.
15.
Rohaan
MW
,
van den Berg
JH
,
Kvistborg
P
,
Haanen
J
.
Adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in melanoma: a viable treatment option
.
J Immunother Cancer
2018
;
6
:
102
.
16.
Dafni
U
,
Michielin
O
,
Lluesma
SM
,
Tsourti
Z
,
Polydoropoulou
V
,
Karlis
D
, et al
.
Efficacy of adoptive therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and recombinant interleukin-2 in advanced cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ann Oncol
2019
;
30
:
1902
13
.
17.
Antony
PA
,
Piccirillo
CA
,
Akpinarli
A
,
Finkelstein
SE
,
Speiss
PJ
,
Surman
DR
, et al
.
CD8+ T cell immunity against a tumor/self-antigen is augmented by CD4+ T helper cells and hindered by naturally occurring T regulatory cells
.
J Immunol
2005
;
174
:
2591
601
.
18.
Atkins
MB
,
Lotze
MT
,
Dutcher
JP
,
Fisher
RI
,
Weiss
G
,
Margolin
K
, et al
.
High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and 1993
.
J Clin Oncol
1999
;
17
:
2105
16
.
19.
Foppen
MHG
,
Donia
M
,
Svane
IM
,
Haanen
JBAG
.
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for the treatment of metastatic cancer
.
Mol Oncol
2015
;
9
:
1918
35
.
20.
Rosenberg
SA
,
Lotze
MT
,
Muul
LM
,
Leitman
S
,
Chang
AE
,
Vetto
JT
, et al
.
A new approach to the therapy of cancer based on the systemic administration of autologous lymphokine-activated killer cells and recombinant interleukin-2
.
Surgery
1986
;
100
:
262
72
.
21.
Rosenberg
SA
,
Lotze
MT
,
Muul
LM
,
Leitman
S
,
Chang
AE
,
Ettinghausen
SE
, et al
.
Observations on the systemic administration of autologous lymphokine-activated killer cells and recombinant interleukin-2 to patients with metastatic cancer
.
N Engl J Med
1985
;
313
:
1485
92
.
22.
Topalian
SL
,
Solomon
D
,
Avis
FP
,
Chang
AE
,
Freerksen
DL
,
Linehan
WM
, et al
.
Immunotherapy of patients with advanced cancer using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and recombinant interleukin-2: a pilot study
.
J Clin Oncol
1988
;
6
:
839
53
.
23.
Dudley
ME
,
Wunderlich
JR
,
Robbins
PF
,
Yang
JC
,
Hwu
P
,
Schwartzentruber
DJ
, et al
.
Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes
.
Science
2002
;
298
:
850
4
.
24.
Goff
SL
,
Dudley
ME
,
Citrin
DE
,
Somerville
RP
,
Wunderlich
JR
,
Danforth
DN
, et al
.
Randomized, prospective evaluation comparing intensity of lymphodepletion before adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for patients with metastatic melanoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2016
;
34
:
2389
97
.
25.
Andersen
R
,
Donia
M
,
Ellebaek
E
,
Borch
TH
,
Kongsted
P
,
Iversen
TZ
, et al
.
Long-lasting complete responses in patients with metastatic melanoma after adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and an attenuated IL2 regimen
.
Clin Cancer Res
2016
;
22
:
3734
45
.
26.
van den Berg
JH
,
Heemskerk
B
,
van Rooij
N
,
Gomez-Eerland
R
,
Michels
S
,
van Zon
M
, et al
.
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) therapy in metastatic melanoma: boosting of neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity and long-term follow-up
.
J Immunother Cancer
2020
;
8
:
e000848
.
27.
Tucci
M
,
Passarelli
A
,
Mannavola
F
,
Felici
C
,
Stucci
LS
,
Cives
M
, et al
.
Immune system evasion as hallmark of melanoma progression: the role of dendritic cells
.
Front Oncol
2019
;
9
:
1148
.
28.
Larkin
J
,
Dalle
S
,
Sanmamed
MF
,
Wilson
M
,
Hassel
JC
,
Kluger
H
, et al
.
Efficacy and safety of lifileucel, an investigational autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy in patients with advanced melanoma previously treated with anti-LAG3 antibody. Poster presented at: European Society for Medical Oncology Congress
;
September 9–13, 2022
;
Paris, France
.
29.
Warner
AB
.
The clinical potential of cellular therapeutics
.
The American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting
.
June 3–7, 2022
;
Chicago, IL
.
30.
Pillai
M
,
Jiang
Y
,
Hawkins
RE
,
Lorigan
PC
,
Thistlethwaite
F
,
Thomas
M
, et al
.
Clinical feasibility and treatment outcomes with nonselected autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma
.
Am J Cancer Res
2022
;
12
:
3967
84
.
31.
Gastman
B
,
Hamid
O
,
Corrie
P
,
Gibney
G
,
Daniels
G
,
Chmielowski
B
, et al
.
544 DELTA-1: A global, multicenter phase 2 study of ITIL-168, an unrestricted autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy, in adult patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma
.
J Immunother Cancer
2021
;
9
(
Suppl 2
):
A573
A
.
32.
Tawbi
HA
,
Schadendorf
D
,
Lipson
EJ
,
Ascierto
PA
,
Matamala
L
,
Gutiérrez
EC
, et al
.
Relatlimab and nivolumab versus nivolumab in untreated advanced melanoma
.
N Engl J Med
2022
;
386
:
24
34
.
33.
Levi
ST
,
Copeland
AR
,
Nah
S
,
Crystal
JS
,
Ivey
GD
,
Lalani
A
, et al
.
Neoantigen identification and response to adoptive cell transfer in anti-PD-1 naive and experienced patients with metastatic melanoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2022
;
28
:
3042
52
.
34.
Buchbinder
EI
,
Dutcher
JP
,
Daniels
GA
,
Curti
BD
,
Patel
SP
,
Holtan
SG
, et al
.
Therapy with high-dose Interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) in metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma following PD1 or PDL1 inhibition
.
J Immunother Cancer
2019
;
7
:
49
.
35.
Olson
DJ
,
Eroglu
Z
,
Brockstein
B
,
Poklepovic
AS
,
Bajaj
M
,
Babu
S
, et al
.
Pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab following anti-PD-1/L1 failure in melanoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2021
;
39
:
2647
55
.
36.
da Silva
IP
,
Ahmed
T
,
Reijers
ILM
,
Weppler
AM
,
Warner
AB
,
Patrinely
JR
, et al
.
Ipilimumab alone or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study
.
Lancet Oncol
2021
;
22
:
836
47
.
37.
Zimmer
L
,
Apuri
S
,
Eroglu
Z
,
Kottschade
LA
,
Forschner
A
,
Gutzmer
R
, et al
.
Ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after progression on anti-PD-1 therapy in advanced melanoma
.
Eur J Cancer
2017
;
75
:
47
55
.
38.
Besser
MJ
,
Shapira-Frommer
R
,
Itzhaki
O
,
Treves
AJ
,
Zippel
DB
,
Levy
D
, et al
.
Adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma: intent-to-treat analysis and efficacy after failure to prior immunotherapies
.
Clin Cancer Res
2013
;
19
:
4792
800
.
39.
Andersen
R
,
Borch
TH
,
Draghi
A
,
Gokuldass
A
,
Rana
MAH
,
Pedersen
M
, et al
.
T cells isolated from patients with checkpoint inhibitor-resistant melanoma are functional and can mediate tumor regression
.
Ann Oncol
2018
;
29
:
1575
81
.
40.
Fradley
MG
,
Damrongwatanasuk
R
,
Chandrasekhar
S
,
Alomar
M
,
Kip
KE
,
Sarnaik
AA
.
Cardiovascular toxicity and mortality associated with adoptive cell therapy and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for advanced stage melanoma
.
J Immunother
2021
;
44
:
86
9
.
41.
Wolf
B
,
Zimmermann
S
,
Arber
C
,
Irving
M
,
Trueb
L
,
Coukos
G
.
Safety and tolerability of adoptive cell therapy in cancer
.
Drug Saf
2019
;
42
:
315
34
.
42.
Yang
JC
.
Toxicities associated with adoptive t-cell transfer for cancer
.
Cancer J
2015
;
21
:
506
9
.
43.
Weber
JS
,
Yang
JC
,
Atkins
MB
,
Disis
ML
.
Toxicities of immunotherapy for the practitioner
.
J Clin Oncol
2015
;
33
:
2092
9
.
44.
Pachella
LA
,
Madsen
LT
,
Dains
JE
.
The toxicity and benefit of various dosing strategies for interleukin-2 in metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma
.
J Advan Pract Oncol
2015
;
6
:
212
21
.
45.
Santomasso
B
,
Bachier
C
,
Westin
J
,
Rezvani
K
,
Shpall
EJ
.
The other side of CAR T-cell therapy: cytokine release syndrome, neurologic toxicity, and financial burden
.
Am Soc Clin Educ Book
2019
;
39
:
433
44
.
46.
Guirguis
LM
,
Yang
JC
,
White
DE
,
Steinberg
SM
,
Liewehr
DJ
,
Rosenberg
SA
, et al
.
Safety and efficacy of high-dose interleukin-2 therapy in patients with brain metastases
.
J Immunother
2002
;
25
:
82
7
.
47.
Mehta
GU
,
Malekzadeh
P
,
Shelton
T
,
White
DE
,
Butman
JA
,
Yang
JC
, et al
.
Outcomes of adoptive cell transfer with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for metastatic melanoma patients with and without brain metastases
.
J Immunother
2018
;
41
:
241
7
.
48.
Khair
DO
,
Bax
HJ
,
Mele
S
,
Crescioli
S
,
Pellizzari
G
,
Khiabany
A
, et al
.
Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors: established and emerging targets and strategies to improve outcomes in melanoma
.
Front Immunol
2019
;
10
:
453
.
49.
Gestermann
N
,
Saugy
D
,
Martignier
C
,
Tillé
L
,
Marraco
SAF
,
Zettl
M
, et al
.
LAG-3 and PD-1+LAG-3 inhibition promote anti-tumor immune responses in human autologous melanoma/T cell co-cultures
.
Oncoimmunol
2020
;
9
:
1736792
.
50.
Donia
M
,
Kjeldsen
JW
,
Andersen
R
,
Westergaard
MCW
,
Bianchi
V
,
Legut
M
, et al
.
PD-1+ polyfunctional T cells dominate the periphery after tumor-Infiltrating lymphocyte therapy for cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
2017
;
23
:
5779
88
.
51.
Yi
M
,
Niu
M
,
Xu
L
,
Luo
S
,
Wu
K
.
Regulation of PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenvironment
.
J Hematol Oncol
2021
;
14
:
10
.
52.
Sanmamed
MF
,
Chen
L
.
A paradigm shift in cancer immunotherapy: from enhancement to normalization
.
Cell
2018
;
175
:
313
26
.
53.
O'Malley
D
,
Lee
S
,
Psyrri
A
,
Sukari
A
,
Thomas
S
,
Wenham
R
, et al
.
Phase 2 efficacy and safety of autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy in combination with pembrolizumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced cancers. Oral presentation at: Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Annual Meeting
.
November 10–14, 2021
;
Washington, DC
.
54.
Davies
JS
,
Karimipour
F
,
Zhang
L
,
Nagarsheth
N
,
Norberg
S
,
Serna
C
, et al
.
Non-synergy of PD-1 blockade with T-cell therapy in solid tumors
.
J Immunother Cancer
2022
;
10
:
e004906
.
55.
Leach
DR
,
Krummel
MF
,
Allison
JP
.
Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade
.
Science
1996
;
271
:
1734
6
.
56.
Bjoern
J
,
Lyngaa
R
,
Andersen
R
,
Hölmich
LR
,
Hadrup
SR
,
Donia
M
, et al
.
Influence of ipilimumab on expanded tumour derived T cells from patients with metastatic melanoma
.
Oncotarget
2017
;
8
:
27062
74
.
57.
Mullinax
JE
,
Hall
M
,
Prabhakaran
S
,
Weber
J
,
Khushalani
N
,
Eroglu
Z
, et al
.
Combination of ipilimumab and adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for patients with metastatic melanoma
.
Front Oncol
2018
;
8
:
44
.
58.
Paik
J
.
Nivolumab plus Relatlimab: First approval
.
Drugs
2022
;
82
:
925
31
.
59.
Balch
CM
,
Soong
S-J
,
Gershenwald
JE
,
Thompson
JF
,
Reintgen
DS
,
Cascinelli
N
, et al
.
Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the american joint committee on cancer melanoma staging system
.
J Clin Oncol
2001
;
19
:
3622
34
.
60.
Larkin
J
,
Sarnaik
A
,
Chesney
JA
,
Khushalani
N
,
Kirkwood
JM
,
Weber
JS
, et al
.
Lifileucel (LN-144), a cryopreserved autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy in patients with advanced melanoma: evaluation of impact of prior anti–PD-1 therapy. Oral presentation at: American Society of Clinical Oncology
.
June 4–8, 2021
;
Virtual
.
61.
Sha
D
,
Jin
Z
,
Budczies
J
,
Kluck
K
,
Stenzinger
A
,
Sinicrope
FA
.
Tumor mutational burden as a predictive biomarker in solid tumors
.
Cancer Discov
2020
;
10
:
1808
25
.
62.
Ascierto
PA
,
Mandala
M
,
Ferrucci
PF
,
Rutkowski
P
,
Guidoboni
M
,
Arance
AM
, et al
.
SECOMBIT: The best sequential approach with combo immunotherapy [ipilimumab (I) /nivolumab (N)] and combo target therapy [encorafenib (E)/binimetinib (B)] in patients with BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma: a phase II randomized study
.
Ann Oncol
2021
;
32
:
S1283
S346
.
63.
Atkins
MB
,
Lee
SJ
,
Chmielowski
B
,
Ribas
A
,
Tarhini
AA
,
Truong
T-G
, et al
.
DREAMseq (doublet, randomized evaluation in advanced melanoma sequencing): a phase III trial—ECOG-ACRIN EA6134
.
J Clin Oncol
2021
;
39
:
36s
, (
suppl. abstr. 356154
).
64.
Tarhini
A
,
Kudchadkar
RR
.
Predictive and on-treatment monitoring biomarkers in advanced melanoma: moving toward personalized medicine
.
Cancer Treat Rev
2018
;
71
:
8
18
.
65.
Lindenberg
MA
,
Retèl
VP
,
van den Berg
JH
,
Geukes Foppen
MH
,
Haanen
JB
,
van Harten
WH
.
Treatment with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in advanced melanoma: evaluation of early clinical implementation of an advanced therapy medicinal product
.
J Immunother
2018
;
41
:
413
25
.
66.
Epstein
M
,
Pike
R
,
Leire
E
,
Middleton
J
,
Wileman
M
,
Ouboussad
L
, et al
.
Abstract 1508: Characterization of a novel clonal neoantigen reactive T cell (cNeT) product through a comprehensive translational research program
.
Cancer Res
2021
;
81
:
1508
.
67.
Zippel
D
,
Friedman-Eldar
O
,
Rayman
S
,
Hazzan
D
,
Nissan
A
,
Schtrechman
G
, et al
.
Tissue harvesting for adoptive tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in metastatic melanoma
.
Anticancer Res
2019
;
39
:
4995
5001
.
68.
Forget
MA
,
Haymaker
C
,
Hess
KR
,
Meng
YJ
,
Creasy
C
,
Karpinets
T
, et al
.
Prospective analysis of adoptive TIL therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: response, impact of anti-CTLA4, and biomarkers to predict clinical outcome
.
Clin Cancer Res
2018
;
24
:
4416
28
.
69.
Li
R
,
Johnson
R
,
Yu
G
,
McKenna
DH
,
Hubel
A
.
Preservation of cell-based immunotherapies for clinical trials
.
Cytotherapy
2019
;
21
:
943
57
.
70.
Gastman
B
,
Agarwal
PK
,
Berger
A
,
Boland
G
,
Broderick
S
,
Butterfield
LH
, et al
.
Defining best practices for tissue procurement in immuno-oncology clinical trials: consensus statement from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Surgery Committee
.
J Immunother Cancer
2020
;
8
:
e001583
.
71.
Watson
P
.
The importance of tumor banking: bridging no-mans-land in cancer research
.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther
2002
;
2
:
1
3
.
72.
Deniger
DC
,
Kwong
ML
,
Pasetto
A
,
Dudley
ME
,
Wunderlich
JR
,
Langhan
MM
, et al
.
A pilot trial of the combination of vemurafenib with adoptive cell therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2017
;
23
:
351
62
.
73.
Dudley
ME
,
Gross
CA
,
Somerville
RP
,
Hong
Y
,
Schaub
NP
,
Rosati
SF
, et al
.
Randomized selection design trial evaluating CD8+-enriched versus unselected tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for adoptive cell therapy for patients with melanoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2013
;
31
:
2152
9
.
74.
Goff
SL
,
Rosenberg
SA
.
BRAF inhibition: bridge or boost to T-cell therapy?
Clin Cancer Res
2019
;
25
:
2682
4
.
75.
Chaft
JE
,
Oxnard
GR
,
Sima
CS
,
Kris
MG
,
Miller
VA
,
Riely
GJ
.
Disease flare after tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib: implications for clinical trial design
.
Clin Cancer Res
2011
;
17
:
6298
303
.
76.
Guo
C-Y
,
Jiang
S-C
,
Kuang
Y-K
,
Hu
H
.
Incidence of ipilimumab-related serious adverse events in patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis
.
J Cancer
2019
;
10
:
120
30
.
77.
Shah
S
,
Raskin
L
,
Cohan
D
,
Hamid
O
,
Freeman
ML
.
Treatment patterns of melanoma by BRAF mutation status in the USA from 2011 to 2017: a retrospective cohort study
.
Melanoma Manag
2019
;
6
:
MMT31
MMT
.
78.
Khushalani
NI
,
Truong
T-G
,
Thompson
JF
.
Current challenges in access to melanoma care: a multidisciplinary perspective
.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book
2021
e295
303
.
79.
Kaiser
AD
,
Assenmacher
M
,
Schröder
B
,
Meyer
M
,
Orentas
R
,
Bethke
U
, et al
.
Towards a commercial process for the manufacture of genetically modified T cells for therapy
.
Cancer Gene Ther
2015
;
22
:
72
8
.
80.
Berdeja
JG
.
Practical aspects of building a new immunotherapy program: the future of cell therapy
.
Hematology
2020
;
2020
:
579
84
.
81.
Titov
A
,
Zmievskaya
E
,
Ganeeva
I
,
Valiullina
A
,
Petukhov
A
,
Rakhmatullina
A
, et al
.
Adoptive immunotherapy beyond CAR T-cells
.
Cancers
2021
;
13
:
743
.
82.
Guidance for Industry Potency Tests for Cellular and Gene Therapy Products
. (
January 2011
).
Available from
: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/potency-tests-cellular-and-gene-therapy-products,
Accessed August 17, 2022
.
83.
Wang
S
,
Sun
J
,
Chen
K
,
Ma
P
,
Lei
Q
,
Xing
S
, et al
.
Perspectives of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte treatment in solid tumors
.
BMC Medicine
2021
;
19
:
140
.
84.
Jacquemin
V
,
Antoine
M
,
Dom
G
,
Detours
V
,
Maenhaut
C
,
Dumont
JE
.
Dynamic cancer cell heterogeneity: diagnostic and therapeutic implications
.
Cancers (Basel)
2022
;
14
:
280
.
85.
Lee
MY
,
Jeon
JW
,
Sievers
C
,
Allen
CT
.
Antigen processing and presentation in cancer immunotherapy
.
J Immunother Cancer
2020
;
8
:
e001111
.
86.
de Wolf
C
,
van de Bovenkamp
M
,
Hoefnagel
M
.
Regulatory perspective on in vitro potency assays for human T cells used in anti-tumor immunotherapy
.
Cytotherapy
2018
;
20
:
601
22
.
87.
Besser
MJ
,
Shapira-Frommer
R
,
Treves
AJ
,
Zippel
D
,
Itzhaki
O
,
Hershkovitz
L
, et al
.
Clinical responses in a phase II study using adoptive transfer of short-term cultured tumor infiltration lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients
.
Clin Cancer Res
2010
;
16
:
2646
55
.
88.
Goff
SL
,
Smith
FO
,
Klapper
JA
,
Sherry
R
,
Wunderlich
JR
,
Steinberg
SM
, et al
.
Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy for metastatic melanoma: analysis of tumors resected for TIL
.
J Immunother
2010
;
33
:
840
7
.
89.
Etxeberria
I
,
Olivera
I
,
Bolaños
E
,
Cirella
A
,
Teijeira
Á
,
Berraondo
P
, et al
.
Engineering bionic T cells: signal 1, signal 2, signal 3, reprogramming and the removal of inhibitory mechanisms
.
Cell Mol Immunol
2020
;
17
:
576
86
.
90.
Guo
W
,
Wang
H
,
Li
C
.
Signal pathways of melanoma and targeted therapy
.
Signal Transduct Target Ther
2021
;
6
:
424
.
91.
Hamilton
E
,
Nikiforow
S
,
Bardwell
P
,
McInnis
C
,
Zhang
J
,
Blumenschein
G
, et al
.
801 PRIME™ IL-15 (RPTR-147): Preliminary clinical results and biomarker analysis from a first-in-human Phase 1 study of IL-15 loaded peripherally-derived autologous T cell therapy in solid tumor patients
.
J Immunother Cancer
2020
;
8
(
Suppl 3
):
A479
A80
.
92.
Gillison
MNJ
,
Ulrickson
M
,
Olson
D
,
Stein
M
,
Aggen
D
, et al
.
Preliminary data from TiTAN: a study of GEN-011, a neoantigen-targeted peripheral blood-derived T cell therapy with broad neoantigen targeting
.
Poster presented at
:
American Association for Cancer Research
;
April 8–13, 2022
;
New Orleans, LA
.
93.
Sennino
BCA
,
Huang
E
,
Mathur
J
,
Ting
M
,
Yuen
B
, et al
.
Circulating tumor-specific T cells preferentially recognize patient-specific mutational neoantigens and infrequently recognize shared cancer driver mutations
.
Poster presented at
:
American Association for Cancer Research
;
April 8–13, 2022
;
New Orleans, LA
.
94.
Chmielowski
B
,
Ejadi
S
,
Funke
R
,
Stallings-Schmitt
T
,
Denker
M
,
Frohlich
MW
, et al
.
A phase Ia/Ib, open-label first-in-human study of the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of gene-edited autologous NeoTCR-T cells (NeoTCR-P1) administered to patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors
.
J Clin Oncol
2020
;
38
:
TPS3151
.
95.
Gros
A
,
Robbins
PF
,
Yao
X
,
Li
YF
,
Turcotte
S
,
Tran
E
, et al
.
PD-1 identifies the patient-specific CD8+ tumor-reactive repertoire infiltrating human tumors
.
J Clin Invest
2014
;
124
:
2246
59
.
96.
Ye
Q
,
Song
DG
,
Poussin
M
,
Yamamoto
T
,
Best
A
,
Li
C
, et al
.
CD137 accurately identifies and enriches for naturally occurring tumor-reactive T cells in tumor
.
Clin Cancer Res
2014
;
20
:
44
55
.
97.
Anadon
CM
,
Yu
X
,
Hänggi
K
,
Biswas
S
,
Chaurio
RA
,
Martin
A
, et al
.
Ovarian cancer immunogenicity is governed by a narrow subset of progenitor tissue-resident memory T cells
.
Cancer Cell
2022
;
40
:
545
57
.
98.
Bianchi
V
,
Harari
A
,
Coukos
G
.
Neoantigen-specific adoptive cell therapies for cancer: making T-cell products more personal
.
Front Immunol
2020
;
11
:
1215
.
99.
Moon
OR
,
Qu
Y
,
King
MG
,
Mojadidi
M
,
Chauvin-Fleurence
C
,
Yarka
C
, et al
.
Antitumor activity of T cells expressing a novel anti-folate receptor alpha (FOLR1) costimulatory antigen receptor (CoStAR) in a human xenograft murine solid tumor model and implications for in-human studies
.
J Clin Oncol
2022
;
40
(
16_suppl
):
2535
.
100.
Sykorova
M
,
Bao
L
,
Chauvin-Fleurence
C
,
Kalaitsidou
M
,
Brocq
ML
,
Hawkins
R
, et al
.
199 Potent T cell costimulation mediated by a novel costimulatory antigen receptor (CoStAR) with dual CD28/CD40 signaling domains to improve adoptive cell therapies
.
J Immunother Cancer
2021
;
9
(
Suppl 2
):
A210
A
.
101.
Bonati
L
,
Tang
L
.
Cytokine engineering for targeted cancer immunotherapy
.
Curr Opin Chem Biol
2021
;
62
:
43
52
.
102.
Burga
R
,
Khattar
M
,
Lajoie
S
,
Pedro
K
,
Foley
C
,
Ocando
AV
, et al
.
166 Genetically engineered tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (cytoTIL15) exhibit IL-2-independent persistence and anti-tumor efficacy against melanoma in vivo
.
J Immunother Cancer
2021
;
9
(
Suppl 2
):
A176
A
.
103.
Mitchell
DM
,
Ravkov
EV
,
Williams
MA
.
Distinct roles for IL-2 and IL-15 in the differentiation and survival of CD8+ effector and memory T cells
.
J Immunol
2010
;
184
:
6719
30
.
104.
Wang
TNJ-M
,
Rafail
S
,
Carroll
M
,
Wang
R
,
McAlpine
C
, et al
.
Identifying MAGE-A4–positive tumors for SPEAR T-Cell therapies in HLA-A*02– eligible patients
.
Poster presented at
:
American Association for Cancer Research
;
April 8–13, 2022
;
New Orleans, LA
.
105.
Jones
DS
, 2nd,
Nardozzi
JD
,
Sackton
KL
,
Ahmad
G
,
Christensen
E
,
Ringgaard
L
, et al
.
Cell surface-tethered IL-12 repolarizes the tumor immune microenvironment to enhance the efficacy of adoptive T cell therapy
.
Sci Adv
2022
;
8
:
eabi8075
.
106.
Ahmad
GNJ
,
Ringgaard
L
,
Christensen
E
,
Jaegher
D
,
Suchy
J
, et al
.
Adoptive transfer of deep IL-12 primed™ T-cells increases sensitivity to PD-L1 blockade for superior efficacy in checkpoint refractory tumors
;
J Immunother Cancer
2019
;
7
(
Suppl 1
):
P473
.
107.
Heemskerk
B
,
Liu
K
,
Dudley
ME
,
Johnson
LA
,
Kaiser
A
,
Downey
S
, et al
.
Adoptive cell therapy for patients with melanoma, using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes genetically engineered to secrete interleukin-2
.
Hum Gen Ther
2008
;
19
:
496
510
.
108.
Zhang
L
,
Morgan
RA
,
Beane
JD
,
Zheng
Z
,
Dudley
ME
,
Kassim
SH
, et al
.
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes genetically engineered with an inducible gene encoding interleukin-12 for the immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2015
;
21
:
2278
88
.
109.
Jiang
Y
,
Li
Y
,
Zhu
B
.
T-cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment
.
Cell Death Dis
2015
;
6
:
e1792
.
110.
Azoulay-Alfaguter
I
,
Abelson
M
,
Ritthipichai
K
,
D'Arigo
K
,
Hilton
F
,
Machin
M
, et al
.
Silencing PD-1 using self-delivering RNAi PH-762- to improve Iovance TIL effector function using Gen 2 manufacturing method
.
J Immunother Cancer
2019
;
7
(
Suppl 1
):
P149
.
111.
Natarajan
AVA
,
Wells
A
,
Herman
C
,
Gontcharova
V
,
Onimus
K
, et al
.
Preclinical activity and manufacturing feasibility of genetically modified PDCD-1 knockout (KO) tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy. Poster presented at
:
American Association for Cancer Research
;
April 8–13, 2022
;
New Orleans, LA
.
112.
Ritthipichai
K
,
Machin
M
,
Juillerat
A
,
Poriot
L
,
Fardis
M
,
Chartier
C
.
Abstract 1052P: Genetic modification of Iovance's TIL through TALEN-mediated knockout of PD-1 as a strategy to empower TIL therapy for cancer
.
Ann Oncol
2020
;
31
:
S645
S71
.
113.
Palmer
DC
,
Webber
BR
,
Patel
Y
,
Johnson
MJ
,
Kariya
CM
,
Lahr
WS
, et al
.
Internal checkpoint regulates T cell neoantigen reactivity and susceptibility to PD1 blockade
.
Med (N Y)
2022
;
3
:
682
704
.
114.
Guittard
G
,
Dios-Esponera
A
,
Palmer
DC
,
Akpan
I
,
Barr
VA
,
Manna
A
, et al
.
The CISH SH2 domain is essential for PLC-γ1 regulation in TCR stimulated CD8(+) T cells
.
Sci Rep
2018
;
8
:
5336
.
115.
Palmer
DC
,
Guittard
GC
,
Franco
Z
,
Crompton
JG
,
Eil
RL
,
Patel
SJ
, et al
.
Cish actively silences TCR signaling in CD8+ T cells to maintain tumor tolerance
.
J Exp Med
2015
;
212
:
2095
113
.
116.
Schlabach
M
,
Colletti
N
,
Hohmann
A
,
Wrocklage
C
,
Gannon
H
,
Falla
A
, et al
.
Abstract 2175: KSQ-001: A CRISPR/Cas9-engineered tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (eTILTM) therapy for solid tumors
.
Cancer Res
2020
;
80
:
2175
.
117.
Whelan
S
,
Gosling
J
,
Mani
M
,
Cohen
F
,
Tenn-McClellan
A
,
Powers
J
, et al
.
98 NX-0255, a small molecule CBL-B inhibitor, expands and enhances tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) for use in adoptive cancer immunotherapy
.
J Immunother Cancer
2021
;
9
(
Suppl 2
):
A107
A
.
118.
Creelan
BC
,
Wang
C
,
Teer
JK
,
Toloza
EM
,
Yao
J
,
Kim
S
, et al
.
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte treatment for anti-PD-1-resistant metastatic lung cancer: a phase 1 trial
.
Nat Med
2021
;
27
:
1410
8
.
119.
Jazaeri
AA
,
Zsiros
E
,
Amaria
RN
,
Artz
AS
,
Edwards
RP
,
Wenham
RM
, et al
.
Safety and efficacy of adoptive cell transfer using autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (LN-145) for treatment of recurrent, metastatic, or persistent cervical carcinoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2019
;
37
:
2538
.
120.
Figlin
RA
,
Thompson
JA
,
Bukowski
RM
,
Vogelzang
NJ
,
Novick
AC
,
Lange
P
, et al
.
Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial of CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in combination with recombinant interleukin-2 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma
.
J Clin Oncol
1999
;
17
:
2521
9
.
121.
Freedman
RS
,
Edwards
CL
,
Kavanagh
JJ
,
Kudelka
AP
,
Katz
RL
,
Carrasco
CH
, et al
.
Intraperitoneal adoptive immunotherapy of ovarian carcinoma with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and low-dose recombinant interleukin-2: a pilot trial
.
J Immunother Emphasis Tumor Immunol
1994
;
16
:
198
210
.
122.
Pich
O
,
Muiños
F
,
Lolkema
MP
,
Steeghs
N
,
Gonzalez-Perez
A
,
Lopez-Bigas
N
.
The mutational footprints of cancer therapies
.
Nat Genet
2019
;
51
:
1732
40
.
123.
Turcotte
S
,
Gros
A
,
Hogan
K
,
Tran
E
,
Hinrichs
CS
,
Wunderlich
JR
, et al
.
Phenotype and function of T cells infiltrating visceral metastases from gastrointestinal cancers and melanoma: implications for adoptive cell transfer therapy
.
J Immunol
2013
;
191
:
2217
25
.
124.
Fernandez-Poma
SM
,
Salas-Benito
D
,
Lozano
T
,
Casares
N
,
Riezu-Boj
JI
,
Mancheño
U
, et al
.
Expansion of Tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells expressing PD-1 improves the efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapy
.
Cancer Res
2017
;
77
:
3672
84
.
125.
Jing
W
,
Gershan
JA
,
Blitzer
GC
,
Palen
K
,
Weber
J
,
McOlash
L
, et al
.
Adoptive cell therapy using PD-1(+) myeloma-reactive T cells eliminates established myeloma in mice
.
J Immunother Cancer
2017
;
5
:
51
.
126.
Zacharakis
N
,
Huq
LM
,
Seitter
SJ
,
Kim
SP
,
Gartner
JJ
,
Sindiri
S
, et al
.
Breast cancers are immunogenic: immunologic analyses and a phase II pilot clinical trial using mutation-reactive autologous lymphocytes
.
J Clin Oncol
2022
;
40
:
1741
54
.
127.
Rosenberg
SA
,
Yannelli
JR
,
Yang
JC
,
Topalian
SL
,
Schwartzentruber
DJ
,
Weber
JS
, et al
.
Treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin 2
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1994
;
86
:
1159
66
.
128.
Schwartzentruber
DJ
,
Hom
SS
,
Dadmarz
R
,
White
DE
,
Yannelli
JR
,
Steinberg
SM
, et al
.
In vitro predictors of therapeutic response in melanoma patients receiving tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin-2
.
J Clin Oncol
1994
;
12
:
1475
83
.
129.
Dudley
ME
,
Gross
CA
,
Langhan
MM
,
Garcia
MR
,
Sherry
RM
,
Yang
JC
, et al
.
CD8+ enriched "young" tumor infiltrating lymphocytes can mediate regression of metastatic melanoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2010
;
16
:
6122
31
.
130.
Radvanyi
LG
,
Bernatchez
C
,
Zhang
M
,
Fox
PS
,
Miller
P
,
Chacon
J
, et al
.
Specific lymphocyte subsets predict response to adoptive cell therapy using expanded autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in metastatic melanoma patients
.
Clin Cancer Res
2012
;
18
:
6758
70
.
131.
Girda
E
,
Zsiros
E
,
Nakayama
J
,
Whelan
S
,
Nandakumar
S
,
Rogers
S
, et al
.
A phase 1 adoptive cell therapy using drug-enhanced, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, DeTIL-0255, in adults with advanced malignancies
.
J Clin Oncol
2022
;
40
:
TPS5602
.
132.
Svane
IM
,
Cervera-Carrascon
V
,
Santos
JM
,
Havunen
R
,
Sorsa
S
,
Donia
M
, et al
.
First-in-human clinical trial of an oncolytic adenovirus armed with TNFa and IL-2 in patients with advanced melanoma receiving adoptive cell transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
.
J Clin Oncol
2022
;
40
:
TPS9590
.
133.
Svane
IM
,
Cervera-Carrascon
V
,
Santos
JM
,
Havunen
R
,
Sorsa
S
,
Donia
M
, et al
.
First-in-human- clinical trial of an oncolytic adenovirus armed with TNFa and IL-2 in patients with advanced melanoma receiving adoptive cell transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
.
Poster presented at
:
The American Society of Clinical Oncology
.
June 3–7, 2022
,
Chicago, IL
.
134.
Jamal-Hanjani
M
,
Greystoke
A
,
Thistlethwaite
F
,
Summers
YJ
,
Allison
J
,
Cave
J
, et al
.
An open-label, multicenter phase I/IIa study evaluating the safety and clinical activity of clonal neoantigen reactive T cells in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (CHIRON)
.
J Clin Oncol
2021
;
39
:
TPS9138
.
135.
van der Kooij
MK
,
Verdegaal
EME
,
Visser
M
,
de Bruin
L
,
van der Minne
CE
,
Meij
PM
, et al
.
Phase I/II study protocol to assess safety and efficacy of adoptive cell therapy with anti-PD-1 plus low-dose pegylated-interferon-alpha in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to standard of care treatments: the ACTME trial
.
BMJ Open
2020
;
10
:
e044036
.
136.
Geukes Foppen
MH
,
Donia
M
,
Borch
TH
,
Met
Ö
,
Blank
CU
,
Pronk
L
, et al
.
Randomized phase III study comparing non-myeloablative lymphocyte depleting regimen of chemotherapy followed by infusion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interleukin-2 to standard ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2016
;
34
:
TPS9592
.
137.
Lövgren
T
,
Wolodarski
M
,
Wickström
S
,
Edbäck
U
,
Wallin
M
,
Martell
E
, et al
.
Complete and long-lasting clinical responses in immune checkpoint inhibitor-resistant, metastasized melanoma treated with adoptive T cell transfer combined with DC vaccination
.
Oncoimmunol
2020
;
9
:
1792058
.
138.
Sukumaran
S
,
Kalaitsidou
M
,
Mojadidi
M
,
Yarka
C
,
Ouyang
Y
,
Gschweng
E
, et al
.
198 Costimulatory antigen receptor (CoStAR): a novel platform that enhances the activity of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)
.
J Immunother Cancer
2021
;
9
(
Suppl 2
):
A209
.
139.
Palmer
D
,
Webber
B
,
Patel
Y
,
Johnson
M
,
Kariya
C
,
Lahr
W
, et al
.
333 Targeting the apical intracellular checkpoint CISH unleashes T cell neoantigen reactivity and effector program
.
J Immunother Cancer
2020
;
8
(
Suppl 3
):
A204
.
140.
Crowther
MD
,
Westergaard
MCW
,
Debnam
P
,
Anderson
V
,
Pope
GR
,
Schmidt
E
, et al
.
Next-generation, inducible IL-7–expressing, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes by lentiviral vector genetic modification for clinical application. Poster presented at: American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
;
May 16–19
,
2022
;
Hybrid
,
Washington DC, USA
.
This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.