Purpose:

The study was undertaken to develop and evaluate the potential of an integrin αvβ6-binding peptide (αvβ6-BP) for noninvasive imaging of a diverse range of malignancies with PET.

Experimental Design:

The peptide αvβ6-BP was prepared on solid phase and radiolabeled with 4-[18F]fluorobenzoic acid. In vitro testing included ELISA, serum stability, and cell binding studies using paired αvβ6-expressing and αvβ6-null cell lines. In vivo evaluation (PET/CT, biodistribution, and autoradiography) was performed in a mouse model bearing the same paired αvβ6-expressing and αvβ6-null cell xenografts. A first-in-human PET/CT imaging study was performed in patients with metastatic lung, colon, breast, or pancreatic cancer.

Results:

[18F]αvβ6-BP displayed excellent affinity and selectivity for the integrin αvβ6in vitro [IC50vβ6) = 1.2 nmol/L vs IC50vβ3) >10 μmol/L] in addition to rapid target-specific cell binding and internalization (72.5% ± 0.9% binding and 52.5% ± 1.8%, respectively). Favorable tumor affinity and selectivity were retained in the mouse model and excretion of unbound [18F]αvβ6-BP was rapid, primarily via the kidneys. In patients, [18F]αvβ6-BP was well tolerated without noticeable adverse side effects. PET images showed significant uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in both the primary lesion and metastases, including metastasis to brain, bone, liver, and lung.

Conclusions:

The clinical impact of [18F]αvβ6-BP PET imaging demonstrated in this first-in-human study is immediate for a broad spectrum of malignancies.

Translational Relevance

The integrin αvβ6 is an epithelial-specific cell surface receptor that is undetectable in healthy adult epithelium but significantly upregulated in a wide range of epithelial-derived cancers. We developed and characterized the [18F]αvβ6-BP PET imaging probe that demonstrated high affinity and selectivity for the integrin αvβ6 and was translated into a first-in-human study demonstrating the ability to image both primary and metastatic disease. PET images showed low background uptake in normal brain, lungs, liver, and osseous skeleton which are common sites of metastatic disease. Furthermore, subcentimeter metastasis to these organs from a variety of diverse malignancies including breast, colon, lung and pancreas cancer were detected. The clinical impact of this study is immediate for pretreatment molecular imaging of a broad spectrum of malignancies; furthermore, this ligand may serve as a cancer-specific delivery platform for the treatment of some of the most lethal malignancies facing patients today.

A central tenet for the delivery of personalized therapy in the treatment of patients with cancer is the accurate evaluation of the extent of disease, which has primarily relied on a variety of radiologic studies (1, 2). [18F]FDG-PET/CT allows whole body imaging and has been incorporated into clinical practice for both initial evaluation of disease sites as well as a surrogate for response to therapy. Yet significant limitations exist for [18F]FDG-PET/CT including the lack of a target that is specific and biologically relevant to cancer cells (2–5). There is a significant and rapidly growing body of literature that has identified the integrin αvβ6 as one such target. This integrin is an epithelial-specific cell surface receptor that is usually undetectable in healthy adult epithelium but is significantly upregulated in a wide range of epithelial-derived cancers including breast, colon, non–small cell lung, oral squamous cell carcinoma, ovarian, and pancreas cancer (6–15). Furthermore, higher levels of expression have been correlated with invasiveness and clinically this has been correlated with metastatic progression and poor patient survival (10, 14–20). The preferential expression of this integrin in neoplastic tissues as well as the scope of malignancies overexpressing this integrin suggests that agents specifically targeting αvβ6 have significant potential in the evaluation, treatment, and management of multiple types of solid organ malignancies. Given the impact of molecular imaging in oncology, our group and others have chosen to develop αvβ6 specific PET molecular imaging agents (21–23).

The prototypical structure of αvβ6 integrin–binding agents has been based on the RG/TDLXXL motif (24), and these agents have undergone extensive preclinical evaluation. Several molecular imaging agents, including those identified using phage display (8) and cystine knot peptides (25), have been investigated. Our efforts have focused primarily on the 20-amino acid peptide A20FMDV2 that was first identified from the GH-loop of the VP1 protein of foot and mouth disease virus, which uses the αvβ6 integrin to mediate host cell infection (23). Building upon the information obtained using our first-generation peptide, [18F]FBA-A20FMDV2, and through subsequent structure–activity studies, derivatization through the addition of PEG modifiers, and in vitro and in vivo mouse studies, we developed [18F]αvβ6-BP.

Herein, we present the development of our lead candidate [18F]αvβ6-BP, including the in vitro testing, in vivo evaluation in mouse xenograft models of human cancer, and ultimately the first-in-human PET imaging in patients with a diagnosis of breast, colon, lung, or pancreas cancer. The data demonstrate the potential for molecular imaging of a broad spectrum of malignancies using [18F]αvβ6-BP.

General

The general reagents and consumables for the synthesis of the peptides used in the preclinical and clinical studies, and the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and analytic methods used, are described in the Supplementary Data.

Preclinical studies: Chemistry, radiochemistry, in vitro, and in vivo studies

Chemistry and radiochemistry.

Peptide synthesis and radiolabeling were performed on solid support and the radiotracer formulated in serum-free DMEM (for in vitro studies) or PBS (for in vivo studies; ref. 26). The cold standard [19F]αvβ6-BP was prepared by coupling 4-fluorobenzoic acid, pre-activated with 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxid hexafluorophosphate (HATU) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA), to the H2N-peptidyl-resin; cleavage, purification, analysis, and storage followed procedures described previously (27, 28). Radiosynthesis of [18F]αvβ6-BP on solid support was done by coupling 4-[18F]fluorobenzoic acid (FBA; ref. 29), preactivated with HATU and DIPEA, to 5 mg of preswollen H2N-peptidyl-resin in a 1-mL fritted syringe reactor; following cleavage with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)/water/triisopropylsilane (TIPS) 95/2.5/2.5 (v/v/v; 2 × 0.5 mL; 15 minutes/each), [18F]αvβ6-BP was purified by HPLC and formulated (27).

In vitro evaluation

ELISA.

Competitive binding ELISAs for integrins αvβ6 and αvβ3 were performed with [19F]αvβ6-BP as previously described and analyzed using Prism software (GraphPad Software; ref. 23).

Cell binding.

The cell lines DX3puroβ6 (αvβ6 positive) and DX3puro (αvβ6 negative) were cultured at 37°C under 5% CO2 in DMEM containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% PSG (26, 27). Expression levels of αvβ6 were confirmed by flow cytometry prior to the experiment. Binding of [18F]αvβ6-BP to and internalization into DX3puroβ6 and DX3puro cells were determined as described previously (26, 27). Cell-binding samples were counted on a Wizard 1470 γ-counter (PerkinElmer).

Serum stability.

To evaluate serum stability, mouse serum (Sigma Aldrich) was combined with the [18F]αvβ6-BP, incubated at 37°C for various amounts of time, and, following precipitation of serum proteins with ethanol, analyzed by HPLC as described previously (26).

In vivo studies in mice.

All animal procedures conformed to the Animal Welfare Act and were approved by the university's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Female athymic nude mice (Charles River Laboratories) were inoculated subcutaneously with 3 × 106 DX3puro and 3 × 106 DX3puroβ6 cells on opposite flanks. Studies commenced once tumors reached a maximum diameter of approximately 0.5 cm (range, 43–225 mg).

The [18F]αvβ6-BP was injected into the tail vein of mice (imaging: 9.0–9.5 MBq/animal; biodistribution: 1.5–2.0 MBq/animal; autoradiography: 37 MBq/animal). For imaging, 2 mice/scan were placed side-by-side in a feet-first, prone position [n = 4 total; anesthesia: 1.5%–2.0% isoflurane); PET/CT scans (dynamic 4 × 15-minute PET emission scan starting 15 minutes postinjection (p.i.), single-frame 15-minute PET emission scans at 2 and 4 hours p.i.] were acquired using Inveon scanners (Inveon DPET scanner and Inveon SPECT/CT scanner, Siemens Medical Solutions) and analyzed as previously described using Inveon Research Workplace software (Siemens; ref. 26).

For biodistribution studies, mice were euthanized and dissected 1, 2, and 4 hours (n = 3/time point) following injection of [18F]αvβ6-BP; blocking studies were conducted by preadministration with [19F]FBA-PEG28-A20FMDV2 (30 mg/kg, 10 mg/mL in saline, intravenously 10 minutes before the [18F]αvβ6-BP; ref. 30). Tissues were collected, rinsed, and radioactivity measured in a γ-counter; calibrated, decay-corrected radioactivity concentrations are expressed as percent of injected dose per gram of sample (% ID/g). For autoradiography of [18F]αvβ6-BP tumor uptake and correlation to integrin αvβ6-expression by IHC, one animal was injected with [18F]αvβ6-BP and tumor tissue collected (1 h p.i.), embedded in freezing medium (Tissue-Tek, Sakura), and sectioned (CM 1850 cryostat, Leica Biosystems). Autoradiography sections (20 μm) were exposed to a storage phosphor-screen overnight and the screen read on a STORM 860 phosphor imager at 50 μm resolution (GE Healthcare). For integrin αvβ6 IHC, adjacent sections (5 μm) were cut and fixed for staining (26).

IHC.

IHC sections were stained using anti-integrin β6 antibody (Calbiochem Clone 442.5C4, 1:200 dilution) on a DAKO link autostainer (Agilent). The same method was used for assessment of β6 expression of human samples.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data are reported as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was done using a paired two-tailed Student t tests to evaluate statistical significance, where P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

First-in-human clinical study: Chemistry, radiochemistry, quality assurance, animal toxicity study

GLP synthesis of precursor peptide, animal toxicity study.

The GLP synthesis of the precursor peptide H2N-αvβ6-BP, and single-dose acute toxicity study of the [19F]αvβ6-BP are described in the Supplementary Methods.

[18F]αvβ6-BP synthesis, purification, and quality assurance for human use.

[18F]αvβ6-BP was manufactured in compliance with current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) under the guidelines of USP Chapter <823> for administration to human subjects as a single intravenous dose under the auspices of a FDA-approved exploratory investigational new drug (eIND #124336).

[18F]SFB synthesis and purification.

The N-succinimidyl 4-[18F]fluorobenzoate ([18F]SFB) was prepared on the GE TracerLab FX-FN one-pot automated synthesizer (GE Healthcare) from azeotropically dried [18F]fluoride in Kryptofix (10 mg/mL)/potassium carbonate (2 mg/mL) solution (acetonitrile/water 94/6 v/v) and 4-(ethoxycarbonyl)-N,N,N-trimethylbenzenaminium triflate (5 mg; 90°C, 10 minutes, acetonitrile), followed by saponification with tetraproplyammonium hydroxide (20 μL of 25% aq solution; 120°C, 1 minute, acetonitrile) and subsequent activation using O-(N-succinimidyl-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate (TSTU; 12 mg; 90°C, 5 minutes, acetonitrile) to yield [18F]SFB. The crude [18F]SFB was purified by HPLC (Jupiter Proteo 10 μm 90 Å column, 250 × 10 mm; isocratic 10 mmol/L phosphoric acid/acetonitrile 67/33 v/v, 5 mL/minute). The HPLC fraction containing the [18F]SFB was trapped on a Sep-Pak C18 Plus cartridge, washed with water (5 mL), eluted with acetonitrile (1.5 mL), and dried by passing over a Sep-Pak Dry Sodium Sulfate Plus cartridge.

[18F]αvβ6-BP synthesis and purification.

Following evaporation of the solvent (50°C, 10 minutes), the [18F]SFB was reconstituted with DMSO (245 μL) containing the precursor peptide H2N-αvβ6-BP (0.5 mg) and DIPEA (5 μL). The coupling reaction was allowed to proceed for 30 minutes (15 minutes at ambient temperature, followed by 15 minutes at 50°C), quenched with phosphoric acid (10 mmol/L, 0.75 mL), and purified by semipreparative HPLC. The fraction containing pure [18F]αvβ6-BP was collected (≤3 mL) through a sterile 0.22 μm filter (SLGVM33RS; MilliporeSigma), formulated by dilution with saline (to a final volume of 20 mL) and dispensed through a sterile 0.22 μm filter (SLGVM33RS; MilliporeSigma) to yield [18F]αvβ6-BP in a ≤10% ethanolic v/v solution in saline.

[18F]αvβ6-BP quality assurance.

Prior to injection, quality testing including visual clarity, filter integrity, pH, radionuclidic identity, purity and radiochemical identity via analytical HPLC, residual solvent analysis via gas chromatography, residual Kryptofix spot test, and pyrogenicity via limulus amebocyte lysate test (Charles River Laboratories) were performed. The full list of release criteria is given in Supplementary Table S1 in the Supplementary Data; they also included a postrelease 14-day sterility test using the direct inoculation of media method described in USP <71>.

First-in-human clinical study with [18F]αvβ6-BP: IRB approval and patient consent

This study protocol was approved by the UC Davis Institutional Review Board (FWA00004557), and written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03164486). All subjects enrolled in this study signed a consent form that provided their consent for the testing of the [18F]αvβ6-BP and the analysis of biopsy material for research purposes. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study are provided in the Supplementary Data. The studies were conducted following U.S. Common Rule.

First-in-human clinical study: Data acquisition and data analysis

Scanning protocol for PET/CT acquisition and image analysis.

Imaging was performed on a General Electric 690 time-of-flight PET scanner fitted with a 16-slice CT. Up to 370 MBq (326 ± 44 MBq, in up to 10 mL) of [18F]αvβ6-BP were injected (intravenously) over 1 minute. Immediately after the injection, vital signs (heart rate, pulse oximetry value, body temperature, EKG) were measured. Patients underwent PET/CT scanning from the apex of the skull to the proximal thighs with arms raised, using two minutes per bed position starting at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 3 hours postinjection.

Data were reconstructed using the Ordered Subsets – Expectation Maximization (OSEM) algorithm, with 24 subsets and 2 iterations, and reviewed in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. A 6.4-mm filter was used transaxially and the manufacturer's “standard” filter was used axially. Image review was performed using GE Advantage Workstation software version 4.5. SUVmax values were obtained for lesions using manual sizing of rectangular ROI and standard 42% threshold.

Adverse event monitoring.

Vital signs were checked at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, 165, and 180 minutes. In addition, vital signs and blood samples were obtained and checked 1 and 7 days after injection of [18F]αvβ6-BP to ensure no changes or abnormalities occurred. Preinjection and follow-up blood draws were assessed for complete metabolic panel including liver function tests.

Serum stability and clearance of [18F]αvβ6-BP in humans.

Blood samples (1 mL) were taken throughout the imaging period (1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes), collected in heparinized tubes, and immediately stored on ice and processed.

Stability

The 30-minute blood sample was centrifuged (1,130 × g, 10 minutes; 4°C), proteins precipitated from the supernatant with an equal volume of ethanol, and removed by centrifugation (11,160 × g, 3 minutes; 4°C). The protein removal process was repeated with a half-volume of ethanol. The final supernatant was diluted with an equal volume water/TFA (0.05% v/v)/glacial acetic acid (2% v/v) for HPLC analysis.

Clearance

At each collection time point a whole-blood aliquot (200 μL) was transferred to a γ-counter tube; cells were precipitated in the remaining sample by centrifugation (1,130 × g, 10 minutes; 4°C) and a plasma aliquot (200 μL) was transferred to a γ-counter tube. Samples were counted on a γ-counter and radioactivity concentrations calculated as decay-corrected percent of injected dose per gram of sample (dc % ID/g).

Chemistry and radiochemistry

Nonradioactive [19F]αvβ6-BP was obtained in >98% purity after HPLC purification; [19F]αvβ6-BP: MS (MALDI) m/z = 4,919.9564 [M+H]+, calculated M (FBA-PEG-NAVPNLRGDLQVLAQRVARTPEG; C218H401FN36O86) = 4,918.8096, 4919.8174 [M+H]+. For preclinical studies, the radiotracer [18F]αvβ6-BP was prepared by solid-phase radiolabeling with [18F]FBA and obtained in 98.1 ± 1.0% radiochemical purity with a molar activity of 65 ± 25 GBq/μmol and a decay-corrected radiochemical yield of 6.6% ± 1.0% from [18F]FBA (n = 10). For clinical production, [18F]αvβ6-BP was prepared in solution with [18F]SFB in radiochemical purity ≥99% with molar activity ≥37 GBq/μmol, mass dose ≤50 μg/patient dose, and 15.1% ± 1.7% decay-corrected radiochemical yield from [18F]SFB (n = 18).

Preclinical in vitro studies

In vitro affinity and selectivity were evaluated by competitive ELISA against the biotinylated natural ligands and by cell-binding studies using the integrin αvβ6-expressing cell line DX3puroβ6 and the paired non-αvβ6-expressing DX3puro control; affinity (IC50) of [19F]αvβ6-BP for integrin αvβ6 was 1.2 nmol/L, whereas no binding was observed to integrin αvβ3 at concentrations up to 10 μmol/L (Fig. 1A). Cell-binding studies with [18F]αvβ6-BP resulted in 72.5 ± 0.9% of total radioactivity bound to DX3puroβ6 cells at 1 hour, with 52.5% ± 1.8% of total radioactivity internalized (corresponding to 72.4% ± 2.5% of bound radioactivity; Fig. 1B); binding to and internalization in DX3puro cells was 3.5% ± 1.4% and 1.0% ± 0.1% of total radioactivity, respectively. Therefore, the ratios of αvβ6-expressing cell line compared with the nonexpressing cell line (DX3puroβ6/DX3puro) were 21/1 and 54/1, respectively, for total bound and internalized radioactivity (P = 2 × 10−10, P = 1 × 10−8). In mouse serum, [18F]αvβ6-BP remained 98.3% intact at 30 minutes at 37°C; with minimal metabolism at 60 and 120 minutes (93.3% and 88.9% intact, respectively).

Figure 1.

In vitro affinity and selectivity studies and in vivo mouse studies with [18F]αvβ6-BP. A, ELISA binding curves of [18F]αvβ6-BP for integrins αvβ6 and αvβ3 against biotinylated fibronectin and vitronectin, respectively (n = 3/integrin/concentration; bars: SD). B, Cell binding and internalization for [18F]αvβ6-BP using the paired integrin αvβ6-expressing DX3puroβ6 cells (+) and αvβ6-null DX3puro control (−). Filled columns: fraction of total radioactivity (n = 4/cell line/condition; 60 minutes); bars: SD. C, Representative coronal (top) and transaxial (bottom) cross-sections of PET/CT images obtained after injection of [18F]αvβ6-BP (10 MBq) in mouse bearing paired DX3puroβ6/DX3puro xenografts (112 and 225 mg, blue and red ellipses, respectively). PET: red, CT: gray, K = kidneys, B = bladder. D, Autoradiography image of DX3puroβ6 (top) and DX3puro (bottom) tumors harvested 1 hour after injection of [18F]αvβ6-BP (37 MBq; left) and matched adjacent IHC sections stained for integrin αvβ6 expression (middle, right: magnified sections).

Figure 1.

In vitro affinity and selectivity studies and in vivo mouse studies with [18F]αvβ6-BP. A, ELISA binding curves of [18F]αvβ6-BP for integrins αvβ6 and αvβ3 against biotinylated fibronectin and vitronectin, respectively (n = 3/integrin/concentration; bars: SD). B, Cell binding and internalization for [18F]αvβ6-BP using the paired integrin αvβ6-expressing DX3puroβ6 cells (+) and αvβ6-null DX3puro control (−). Filled columns: fraction of total radioactivity (n = 4/cell line/condition; 60 minutes); bars: SD. C, Representative coronal (top) and transaxial (bottom) cross-sections of PET/CT images obtained after injection of [18F]αvβ6-BP (10 MBq) in mouse bearing paired DX3puroβ6/DX3puro xenografts (112 and 225 mg, blue and red ellipses, respectively). PET: red, CT: gray, K = kidneys, B = bladder. D, Autoradiography image of DX3puroβ6 (top) and DX3puro (bottom) tumors harvested 1 hour after injection of [18F]αvβ6-BP (37 MBq; left) and matched adjacent IHC sections stained for integrin αvβ6 expression (middle, right: magnified sections).

Close modal

Preclinical in vivo studies

Evaluation of [18F]αvβ6-BP in the paired DX3puroβ6/DX3puro tumor mouse model showed DX3puroβ6-tumor uptake of 2.51 ± 0.48% ID/g at 1 hour and good retention (2.64 ± 1.23% ID/g at 4 hours), while uptake and retention in the αvβ6-negative DX3puro control tumor were low (1 hour: 0.35 ± 0.14% ID/g; 4 hour: 0.21 ± 0.15% ID/g; Supplementary Table S2). This resulted in a steady increase in DX3puroβ6-to-DX3puro tumor ratio from 8.3 ± 4.2/1 at 1 hour to 18.3 ± 11.7/1 at 4 hours (Supplementary Table S2). When αvβ6-blocking peptide was preadministered 10 minutes before the radiotracer, DX3puroβ6 tumor uptake was reduced by 90% to 0.28 ± 0.07% ID/g (1 hour; P = 0.001), a level comparable with uptake in the DX3puro control tumor (0.26 ± 0.03% ID/g).

IHC staining for integrin αvβ6 confirmed expression in DX3puroβ6 tumors, and the distribution of integrin αvβ6 corresponded to the distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP as determined by autoradiography. In comparison, both staining for integrin αvβ6 and uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP were at background levels for the DX3puro control tumors (Fig. 1D).

PET/CT imaging correlated with the biodistribution data, clearly visualizing the DX3puroβ6 tumor while showing no uptake in the DX3puro tumor (Fig. 1C). Imaging and biodistribution demonstrated rapid renal clearance as the major route of elimination, with minor hepatobiliary contribution (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table S2). Highest uptake was seen for kidneys at 1 hour (22.9 ± 8.9% ID/g), rapidly clearing to 7.9 ± 2.1% ID/g at 4 hours; all other organs showed <8% ID/g at 1 hour and <6% ID/g at 4 hours, with stomach, gallbladder, lung, and bladder being 5.6 ± 1.6, 4.5 ± 3.0, 2.3 ± 0.2, and 1.8 ± 1.8% ID/g, respectively, at 4 hours (Supplementary Table S2).

First-in-human clinical study with [18F]αvβ6-BP

Patients with a prior diagnosis of breast, colon, lung, or pancreas cancer were recruited to the study (18 patients to date). The mean injected dose of [18F]αvβ6-BP was 326 ± 44 MBq (range: 220–364 MBq) with a mass dose ≤50 μg/patient dose. No noticeable changes in vital signs, on electrocardiograms, or in blood laboratory results were observed during the study, and no adverse side effects were noted at the 7-day follow-up after injection of the radiotracer.

Stability of [18F]αvβ6-BP in human blood, blood clearance, and general biodistribution

[18F]αvβ6-BP was rapidly cleared from the blood stream (Supplementary Fig. S1); radio-HPLC of blood samples taken 30 minutes after injection showed no metabolite peaks and indicated that [18F]αvβ6-BP remained intact (Supplementary Fig. S2). PET images demonstrated significant uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in the primary and metastatic lesions, including subcentimeter lesions in adrenal glands, bone, brain, liver, and lung (Figs. 26; Supplementary Table S4). For example, for subject #1 the primary tumor to background ratio was 17.3:1 and right iliac wing lesion to background ratio was 67.5:1. For subject #2, the primary tumor to background ratio was 19.5:1 and the left iliac bone lesion to background ratio was 43.7:1. Concordant with the murine data, renal excretion of [18F]αvβ6-BP was observed with minimal uptake in normal bone, brain liver, or lung (i.e., major sites of metastasis). Evaluation of specific tissues demonstrated low to mild activity in the pituitary, lacrimal, and salivary glands where it decreased during the imaging timeframe, and in the thyroid where it appeared stable (Supplementary Table S3). High uptake was seen in the kidneys and was stable over the imaging timeframe whereas the bladder demonstrated low to moderate and variable activity depending on fluid and voiding status. The average radioactivity uptake in the entire stomach was moderate and steady throughout the imaging timeframe; however, uptake observed in the fundus overall minimally decreased over time. The average radioactivity uptake in the entire small bowel was moderate and increased over time. The ascending and descending colon demonstrated overall mild to moderate activity that increased over time to moderate activity. Initial impression of bowel activity and distribution pattern suggests uptake and secretion from the stomach and anterograde movement of activity over time in the bowel lumen. A summary of the SUVmax data at the 1 and 3-hour time points for the 5 patients presented here is listed in the Supplementary Table S3.

Figure 2.

Representative PET, CT, and PET/CT images and IHC staining for subject 1. Subject 1 was a 53-year-old female never-smoker with no significant past medical history diagnosed 20 months prior to study enrollment with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung. A, Coronal maximum intensity projection PET image (scaled to SUVmax 15.0) shows distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP 1 hour after intravenous administration. Red arrow indicates uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in primary lung lesion (SUVmax 5.2) and green arrow in the right iliac wing metastasis (SUVmax 13.5). B, Corresponding axial CT (left) and PET/CT (right) images (scaled to SUVmax 7.0) show distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP in lung mass (top) and right Iliac bone metastasis (bottom). C, IHC section of sample obtained from pleural fluid (a; no tissue available for the primary tumor or the right iliac wing metastasis) stained for integrin αvβ6-expression and corresponding H&E staining (b).

Figure 2.

Representative PET, CT, and PET/CT images and IHC staining for subject 1. Subject 1 was a 53-year-old female never-smoker with no significant past medical history diagnosed 20 months prior to study enrollment with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung. A, Coronal maximum intensity projection PET image (scaled to SUVmax 15.0) shows distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP 1 hour after intravenous administration. Red arrow indicates uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in primary lung lesion (SUVmax 5.2) and green arrow in the right iliac wing metastasis (SUVmax 13.5). B, Corresponding axial CT (left) and PET/CT (right) images (scaled to SUVmax 7.0) show distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP in lung mass (top) and right Iliac bone metastasis (bottom). C, IHC section of sample obtained from pleural fluid (a; no tissue available for the primary tumor or the right iliac wing metastasis) stained for integrin αvβ6-expression and corresponding H&E staining (b).

Close modal
Figure 3.

Representative PET and PET/CT images, and IHC staining for subject 2. Subject 2 was a 59-year-old female diagnosed with stage IV invasive mammary carcinoma. A, Coronal maximum intensity projection PET image (scaled to SUVmax 15) shows distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP 1 hour after intravenous administration. Red arrow indicates uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in primary breast lesion and green arrow in the left iliac metastasis. B, Corresponding axial CT (left) and PET/CT (right) images (scaled to SUVmax 7) show distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP in breast mass (SUVmax 3.9) and left Iliac bone metastasis (SUVmax 13.1). C, IHC section stained for integrin αvβ6-expression and corresponding H&E staining of primary breast tumor (a and b), respectively, and left Iliac metastasis (c and d), respectively.

Figure 3.

Representative PET and PET/CT images, and IHC staining for subject 2. Subject 2 was a 59-year-old female diagnosed with stage IV invasive mammary carcinoma. A, Coronal maximum intensity projection PET image (scaled to SUVmax 15) shows distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP 1 hour after intravenous administration. Red arrow indicates uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in primary breast lesion and green arrow in the left iliac metastasis. B, Corresponding axial CT (left) and PET/CT (right) images (scaled to SUVmax 7) show distribution of [18F]αvβ6-BP in breast mass (SUVmax 3.9) and left Iliac bone metastasis (SUVmax 13.1). C, IHC section stained for integrin αvβ6-expression and corresponding H&E staining of primary breast tumor (a and b), respectively, and left Iliac metastasis (c and d), respectively.

Close modal
Figure 4.

Representative MRI, PET, and PET/MRI images of brain for subject 3. Subject 3 was a 56-year-old female diagnosed with moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the lung. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI demonstrating multiple bilateral metastases (top row). [18F]αvβ6-BP PET images of the brain 1 hour after intravenous administration [18F]αvβ6-BP demonstrating multifocal elevated activity (scaled to SUVmax 2.0; middle row). Coregistered fusion images of [18F]αvβ6-BP PET and MRI demonstrating PET activity matched to enhancing lesions (scaled to SUVmax 2.0; bottom row).

Figure 4.

Representative MRI, PET, and PET/MRI images of brain for subject 3. Subject 3 was a 56-year-old female diagnosed with moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the lung. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI demonstrating multiple bilateral metastases (top row). [18F]αvβ6-BP PET images of the brain 1 hour after intravenous administration [18F]αvβ6-BP demonstrating multifocal elevated activity (scaled to SUVmax 2.0; middle row). Coregistered fusion images of [18F]αvβ6-BP PET and MRI demonstrating PET activity matched to enhancing lesions (scaled to SUVmax 2.0; bottom row).

Close modal
Figure 5.

Representative fused PET/CT for subject 4. Subject 4 was a 51-year-old female diagnosed with initial stage IV adenocarcinoma of the colon with metastases to liver, lungs, and abdominal lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. [18F]αvβ6-BP PET/CT images of the upper liver demonstrate elevated activity in the upper left hepatic lobe (scaled to SUVmax 3.0; green arrow).

Figure 5.

Representative fused PET/CT for subject 4. Subject 4 was a 51-year-old female diagnosed with initial stage IV adenocarcinoma of the colon with metastases to liver, lungs, and abdominal lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. [18F]αvβ6-BP PET/CT images of the upper liver demonstrate elevated activity in the upper left hepatic lobe (scaled to SUVmax 3.0; green arrow).

Close modal
Figure 6.

Representative CT, PET, and fused PET/CT images for subject 5. Subject 5 was a 78-year-old male diagnosed with initial stage IV adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with metastases to the lung at the time of diagnosis. Noncontrast CT scan of the chest demonstrates small pulmonary density in the right lower lobe of the lung (left, green arrow). Corresponding [18F]αvβ6-BP PET image of the chest demonstrates elevated activity in the right lower lobe of the lung (scaled to SUVmax 5.0; middle, green arrow). Corresponding [18F]αvβ6-BP fused PET/CT image of the chest demonstrates elevated activity in the right lower lobe of the lung (scaled to SUVmax 5.0; right, green arrow).

Figure 6.

Representative CT, PET, and fused PET/CT images for subject 5. Subject 5 was a 78-year-old male diagnosed with initial stage IV adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with metastases to the lung at the time of diagnosis. Noncontrast CT scan of the chest demonstrates small pulmonary density in the right lower lobe of the lung (left, green arrow). Corresponding [18F]αvβ6-BP PET image of the chest demonstrates elevated activity in the right lower lobe of the lung (scaled to SUVmax 5.0; middle, green arrow). Corresponding [18F]αvβ6-BP fused PET/CT image of the chest demonstrates elevated activity in the right lower lobe of the lung (scaled to SUVmax 5.0; right, green arrow).

Close modal

Representative individual observations

Subject 1 was a 53-year-old female diagnosed with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the lung. Uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP was observed in both the primary lung lesion and a right iliac wing bone metastasis (Fig. 2A and B). At the 1-hour scan, a SUVmax of 5.2 and 13.5 was observed for the primary lung lesion and right iliac wing metastasis, respectively (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table S4). Analysis of a sample of a malignant pleural effusion demonstrated strong expression of the integrin αvβ6 (Fig. 2C a-b).

Subject 2 was a 59-year-old female diagnosed with stage IV invasive mammary carcinoma. Uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP was observed in the primary breast lesion as well as in metastases in multiple lymph nodes in the right axilla and mediastinum, and multiple osseous sites. At the 1-hour scan, a SUVmax of 3.9 was observed in the primary lesion and SUVmax ranged from 4.4 to 13.1 in the lymph nodes and metastases (Fig. 3; Supplementary Table S4). Tissue from the primary lesion and the left iliac osseous metastasis were available and demonstrated high levels of αvβ6 expression (Fig. 3C a-d).

Subject 3 was a 56-year-old female diagnosed with initial stage IIIB adenocarcinoma of the lung, subsequently metastatic. Uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP was observed in the primary lung lesion in addition to multiple sites of metastases including brain, right adrenal gland, perifacial lymph node, and osseous sites. At the 1-hour scan, a SUVmax of 10.6 was observed in the consolidated mass in the lung and the SUVmax ranged from 1.0 to 7.3 in the lymph node, right adrenal, and osseous metastasis (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4. The [18F]αvβ6-BP PET images revealed numerous brain metastases, in the right and left parietal, left frontal and occipital lobes, with SUVmax of 2.7, 2.4, 2.4, and 1.0, respectively. Representative axial images are shown in Fig. 4, middle row); all regions demonstrating increased SUVmax, were clearly visualized against a brain background SUVmax of 0.1, and correlated with the known brain metastases visualized on MRI (Fig. 4, upper row).

Subject 4 was a 51-year-old female diagnosed with initial stage IV adenocarcinoma of the colon with metastases to liver, lungs, and abdominal lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis. Uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP was observed in two sites in the left lobe of the liver (Fig. 5), bilateral lobes of the lungs, and lymph nodes of the thorax/low neck. At the 1-hour scan, a SUVmax of 2.3 was observed in an upper left hepatic lobe lesion (Fig. 5; Supplementary Table S4), 3.4 in a lower lateral left hepatic lobe lesion, a range of 0.6 to 0.9 for the right and left pulmonary lesions and a range of 1.4–1.7 for the thoracic and low neck lymph nodes (Supplementary Table S4).

Subject 5 was a 78-year-old male diagnosed with initial stage IV adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with metastases to the lung at time of diagnosis. Uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP was observed in multiple small right lower lobe pulmonary densities (example depicted in Fig. 6). At the 1-hour scan, a SUVmax range of 0.6 to 1.4 (Supplementary Table S4) was seen in the pulmonary densities ranging in size from 0.6 to 0.8 cm.

There is increasing evidence of the important role of integrin αvβ6 in cancer, its suitability as a prognostic biomarker (linked to poor disease-free and overall survival), and the promise of an αvβ6-targeted clinical diagnostic tool for in vivo detection, patient stratification, as well as monitoring of response to treatment (31–33). The high contrast in signal gained due to aberrant, but specific expression of αvβ6 suggests that αvβ6-targeted agents have significant potential in the treatment and management of a multitude of malignancies. This has led to the development of several preclinical PET and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) radiotracers and, most recently, clinical reports in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and NSCLC (34).

The integrin αvβ6 is a receptor for fibronectin, tenascin, vitronectin, the latency associated peptide (LAP) of the TGFβ, and the VP1 coat protein of foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV). Our first generation αvβ6-targeting peptide was A20FMDV2, a 20 amino acid peptide (NAVPNLRGDLQVLAQKVART), from the sequence of the GH-loop of the VP1 protein from FMDV (35, 36). We initially demonstrated the promise of A20FMDV2 as an in vivo imaging agent for αvβ6 with the 4-[18F]fluorobenzoyl labeled [18F]FBA-A20FMDV2 (23). Although αvβ6-specific targeting in vivo was observed in murine xenograft models, rapid tumor wash out (0.66% ID/g at 1 hour, down to 0.06% ID/g at 4 hours) and poor in vivo stability precluded its further application. This motivated us to investigate a series of improvements (mainly through the size and locations of PEG modifiers and subsequent confirmation by structure–activity studies), culminating in [18F]αvβ6-BP as the lead compound for translation to a human clinical trial.

In vitro affinity and selectivity of [18F]αvβ6-BP for integrin αvβ6 were excellent and compared favorably with those reported by Altmann and colleagues for their SFTI-1 derivatives; however, it is noted that the experimental methods were somewhat different, and different cells lines with varying expression levels of the integrin αvβ6 were used (37). In vivo studies using the paired DX3puroβ6/DX3puro cell xenograft mouse model confirmed that [18F]αvβ6-BP met expectations for αvβ6 targeting and overall pharmacokinetics, with good tumor retention and kidney clearance. The tumor uptake values were similar to those noted by Altmann and colleagues for their SFITGv6 peptide which demonstrated good binding in mice bearing HNO97 xenografts (37).

Given these favorable in vitro and in vivo results of [18F]αvβ6-BP, we proceeded with our first-in-human microdose study to evaluate the safety and in vivo behavior of [18F]αvβ6-BP (exploratory Investigational New Drug [eIND] # 124336, NCT03164486). The evaluation of the overall pharmacokinetics revealed that [18F]αvβ6-BP was predominantly excreted renally, with moderate transient activity in the gastrointestinal tract and mild activity in the pituitary, lacrimal, salivary glands, and the thyroid. Minimal uptake was found in the four common sites of metastatic disease, namely bone, brain, liver, and lung.

Our observations align closely with those described by Keat and colleagues who recently reported a microdose study in four healthy subjects using our first generation compound [18F]FBA-A20FMDV2 (38). Similar uptake in the thyroid, salivary glands, kidney, and stomach was noted; however, they also observed additional significant uptake in the gallbladder, liver, and spleen. The lack of uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in these organs is due to the peptide modifications introduced; this improvement on biodistribution does provide lower background uptake and thus increases sensitivity for the detection of disease, as the liver is a frequent site of metastases. Recently, Altmann and colleagues reported the results of PET/CT scans performed in a compassionate use setting in 2 patients with [68Ga]-DOTA-SFITGv6, a SFTI-1 derived peptide targeting αvβ6, which was identified using phage display (37). They describe a general biodistribution of their gallium-68 tracer similar to that of [18F]αvβ6-BP, revealing accumulation in the kidneys, with gastrointestinal secretion followed by an intraluminal transport to the terminal ileum and cecum. They concluded that these challenges could be overcome by the use of diuretics and laxatives, respectively.

Although [18F]FDG-PET/CT plays a crucial role in the staging of patients with a wide range of malignancies, its well-known limitations include uptake in inflamed or infected tissues and poor signal-to-noise ratio in the brain and liver (1, 2, 4, 5). This limits the detection of primary and metastatic disease in these organs and highlights the need for cancer-specific imaging agents such as [18F]αvβ6-BP. The integrin αvβ6 is often localized to the invasive front and infiltrating edges of tumors, plays a key role in invasion and metastases, and has been closely correlated with distant metastasis in breast, lung, and colon cancer as well as lymph node metastasis in pancreas cancer (31). Notably, the low nonspecific uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in normal bone, brain, liver, and lung suggest [18F]αvβ6-BP as a promising imaging agent to detect metastases. Uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP was observed in several subcentimeter metastases in the lung of a patient with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (subject 5). This observation begins to address the issue of size threshold for detection of disease. In this respect, our data for [18F]αvβ6-BP indicate a very favorable performance characteristic for identification of small lesions that may be indeterminate on traditional thoracic CT imaging. The fact that pancreas cancer is one of the most lethal cancers in the United States, that the majority of patients present with metastatic disease, and that detection of metastases markedly alters treatment amplifies the need for accurate noninvasive imaging (39). Our preliminary data strongly demonstrate that [18F]αvβ6-BP holds tremendous promise to meet this need for accurate determination of the extent of disease.

This was further observed in the patient with stage IV invasive mammary carcinoma (subject 2) where uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP was observed in the primary breast lesion as well as metastases in multiple lymph nodes. The uptake in the primary lesion and the left iliac osseous metastasis was subsequently confirmed by IHC to correlate with αvβ6 expression. Numerous reports have demonstrated that tumors originating from the breast express high levels of αvβ6 and suggests that there may be potential for broad utility in staging of breast cancer. Here, [18F]αvβ6-BP also demonstrated great promise to guide the staging and treatment of these patients as the identification of occult metastatic disease significantly alters the intent of therapy.

In subject 3, [18F]αvβ6-BP clearly identified known brain metastases as small as 0.5 cm with low background uptake in the brain parenchyma. These images demonstrated that [18F]αvβ6-BP enters the brain, targets metastases, and suggest that this radiotracer could provide combined staging of the brain and body within a single imaging study. To our knowledge, this case is the first to demonstrate PET imaging of brain metastases using an αvβ6 targeting peptide and suggests an exciting opportunity for high-resolution systemic staging and patient selection for novel therapeutics using [18F]αvβ6-BP PET/CT.

In conclusion, [18F]αvβ6-BP demonstrated high affinity and selectivity for integrin αvβ6in vitro and in vivo, along with significantly improved pharmacokinetics over previous generations. [18F]αvβ6-BP can be prepared reliably for clinical imaging and is well tolerated by patients. Significant uptake of [18F]αvβ6-BP in both the primary lesion and in metastases in a variety of cancers was observed, and uptake correlated with αvβ6 expression as shown by IHC for all available specimen samples. Although preliminary, these results are very promising, are in concurrence with the preclinical observations, and demonstrate the ability to successfully image lesions well under 1 cm. Furthermore, a variety of sites of metastases including lung, liver, bone, and brain were imaged as a result of the favorable pharmacokinetics coupled with the low background affinity in these common sites of metastasis. The clinical impact of this first-in-human study is immediate for a broad spectrum of malignancies. This approach facilitates precision medicine, with αvβ6-directed imaging allowing the early detection and monitoring of response to therapy, thus enabling prediction of outcome and optimized treatment regimes.

S. Hausner is a co-inventor of intellectual property related to [18F]αvβ6-BP. M.E. Daly reports receiving commercial research grants from EMD Serono, and is a consultant/advisory board member for Boston Scientific. J.L. Sutcliffe is an employee of and holds ownership interest (including patents) in Luminance Biosciences, Inc., and is a co-inventor of intellectual property related to [18F]αvβ6-BP. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Conception and design: S.H. Hausner, R.J. Bold, C.C. Foster, J.L. Sutcliffe

Development of methodology: S.H. Hausner, R.J. Bold, R.A. Davis, C.C. Foster, J.L. Sutcliffe

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): S.H. Hausner, R.J. Bold, L.Y. Cheuy, H.K. Chew, M.E. Daly, C.C. Foster, E.J. Kim, J.L. Sutcliffe

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): S.H. Hausner, R.J. Bold, L.Y. Cheuy, C.C. Foster, J.L. Sutcliffe

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: S.H. Hausner, R.J. Bold, H.K. Chew, M.E. Daly, C.C. Foster, E.J. Kim, J.L. Sutcliffe

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): C.C. Foster, J.L. Sutcliffe

Study supervision: C.C. Foster, J.L. Sutcliffe

Other (characterization and quality control analysis of compounds and final radiopharmaceutical product): R.A. Davis

The authors acknowledge the nuclear medicine staff Denise Caudle, Heather Hunt, and Kristen McBride for taking care of the patients and performing the PET/CT imaging, Dr. Abimbola Olusanya for consenting patients enrolled in this study, Regina Gandour-Edwards for performing the IHC staining, Jennifer Fung, Charles Smith, and David Kukis of the Center for Molecular and Genomic Imaging as well as David Boucher for support of the preclinical studies. Last but not least, we thank all of our patient volunteers for selflessly dedicating their time. This work was funded in part through Department of Energy, Office of Science, award #DE-SC0008385 NIH R01CA211554-01 and UC Davis Research in Science and Engineering grant.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Choudhury
P
,
Gupta
M
. 
Personalized & precision medicine in cancer: a theranostic approach
.
Curr Radiopharm
2017
;
10
:
166
70
.
2.
Mahajan
A
,
Goh
V
,
Basu
S
,
Vaish
R
,
Weeks
AJ
,
Thakur
MH
, et al
Bench to bedside molecular functional imaging in translational cancer medicine: to image or to imagine?
Clin Radiol
2015
;
70
:
1060
82
.
3.
Huo
E
,
Wilson
DM
,
Eisenmenger
L
,
Hope
TA
. 
The role of PET/MR imaging in precision medicine
.
PET Clin
2017
;
12
:
489
501
.
4.
Tagliabue
L
,
Del Sole
A
. 
Appropriate use of positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of oncology patients
.
Eur J Intern Med
2014
;
25
:
6
11
.
5.
Salmon
E
,
Bernard Ir
C
,
Hustinx
R
. 
Pitfalls and limitations of PET/CT in brain imaging
.
Semin Nucl Med
2015
;
45
:
541
51
.
6.
Bandyopadhyay
A
,
Raghavan
S
. 
Defining the role of integrin alpha(v)beta(6) in cancer
.
Curr Drug Targets
2009
;
10
:
645
52
.
7.
Ahmed
N
,
Pansino
F
,
Clyde
R
,
Murthi
P
,
Quinn
MA
,
Rice
GE
, et al
Overexpression of alpha(v)beta(6) integrin in serous epithelial ovarian cancer regulates extracellular matrix degradation via the plasminogen activation cascade
.
Carcinogenesis
2002
;
23
:
237
44
.
8.
Elayadi
AN
,
Samli
KN
,
Prudkin
L
,
Liu
YH
,
Bian
A
,
Xie
XJ
, et al
A peptide selected by biopanning identifies the integrin alpha(v)beta(6) as a prognostic biomarker for nonsmall cell lung cancer
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
5889
95
.
9.
Moore
KM
,
Thomas
GJ
,
Duffy
SW
,
Warwick
J
,
Gabe
R
,
Chou
P
, et al
Therapeutic targeting of integrin alpha(v)beta(6) in breast cancer
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2014
;
106
:
1
14
10.
Zhang
ZY
,
Xu
KS
,
Wang
JS
,
Yang
GY
,
Wang
W
,
Wang
JY
, et al
Integrin alpha(v)beta(6) acts as a prognostic indicator in gastric carcinoma
.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
2008
;
20
:
61
6
.
11.
Hsiao
JR
,
Chang
Y
,
Chen
YL
,
Hsieh
SH
,
Hsu
KF
,
Wang
CF
, et al
Cyclic alpha(v)beta(6)-targeting peptide selected from biopanning with clinical potential for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
.
Head Neck
2010
;
32
:
160
72
.
12.
Bates
RC
. 
The alpha(v)beta(6) integrin as a novel molecular target for colorectal cancer
.
Future Oncol
2005
;
1
:
821
8
.
13.
Bates
RC
,
Mercurio
AM
. 
The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and colorectal cancer progression
.
Cancer Biol Ther
2005
;
4
:
365
70
.
14.
Berghoff
AS
,
Kovanda
AK
,
Melchardt
T
,
Bartsch
R
,
Hainfellner
JA
,
Sipos
B
, et al
alpha(v)beta(3), alpha(v)beta(5), and alpha(v)beta(6) integrins in brain metastases of lung cancer
.
Clin Exp Metastasis
2014
;
31
:
841
51
.
15.
Sipos
B
,
Hahn
D
,
Carceller
A
,
Piulats
J
,
Hedderich
J
,
Kalthoff
H
, et al
Immunohistochemical screening for beta(6)-integrin subunit expression in adenocarcinomas using a novel monoclonal antibody reveals strong up-regulation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in vivo and in vitro
.
Histopathology
2004
;
45
:
226
36
.
16.
Thomas
GJ
,
Nystrom
ML
,
Marshall
JF
. 
Alpha(v)beta(6) integrin in wound healing and cancer of the oral cavity
.
J Oral Pathol Med
2006
;
35
:
1
10
.
17.
Allen
MD
,
Thomas
GJ
,
Clark
S
,
Dawoud
MM
,
Vallath
S
,
Payne
SJ
, et al
Altered microenvironment promotes progression of preinvasive breast cancer: myoepithelial expression of alpha(v)beta(6) integrin in DCIS identifies high-risk patients and predicts recurrence
.
Clin Cancer Res
2014
;
20
:
344
57
.
18.
Ramos
DM
,
But
M
,
Regezi
J
,
Schmidt
BL
,
Atakilit
A
,
Dang
D
, et al
Expression of integrin beta(6) enhances invasive behavior in oral squamous cell carcinoma
.
Matrix Biol
2002
;
21
:
297
307
.
19.
Bates
RC
. 
Colorectal cancer progression: integrin alpha(v)beta(6) and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)
.
Cell Cycle
2005
;
4
:
1350
2
.
20.
Hazelbag
S
,
Kenter
GG
,
Gorter
A
,
Dreef
EJ
,
Koopman
LA
,
Violette
SM
, et al
Overexpression of the alpha(v)beta(6) integrin in cervical squamous cell carcinoma is a prognostic factor for decreased survival
.
J Pathol
2007
;
212
:
316
24
.
21.
Hackel
BJ
,
Kimura
RH
,
Miao
Z
,
Liu
H
,
Sathirachinda
A
,
Cheng
Z
, et al
18F-Fluorobenzoate-labeled cystine knot peptides for PET imaging of integrin alpha(v)beta(6)
.
J Nucl Med
2013
;
54
:
1101
5
.
22.
Li
S
,
McGuire
MJ
,
Lin
M
,
Liu
YH
,
Oyama
T
,
Sun
X
, et al
Synthesis and characterization of a high-affinity alpha(v)beta(6)-specific ligand for in vitro and in vivo applications
.
Mol Cancer Ther
2009
;
8
:
1239
49
.
23.
Hausner
SH
,
DiCara
D
,
Marik
J
,
Marshall
JF
,
Sutcliffe
JL
. 
Use of a peptide derived from foot-and-mouth disease virus for the noninvasive imaging of human cancer: Generation and evaluation of 4-[18F]fluorobenzoyl A20FMDV2 for in vivo imaging of integrin alpha(v)beta(6) expression with positron emission tomography
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
7833
40
.
24.
Kraft
S
,
Diefenbach
B
,
Mehta
R
,
Jonczyk
A
,
Luckenbach
GA
,
Goodman
SL
. 
Definition of an unexpected ligand recognition motif for alpha(v)beta(6) integrin
.
J Biol Chem
1999
;
274
:
1979
85
.
25.
Kimura
RH
,
Teed
R
,
Hackel
BJ
,
Pysz
MA
,
Chuang
CZ
,
Sathirachinda
A
, et al
Pharmacokinetically stabilized cystine knot peptides that bind alpha(v)beta(6) integrin with single-digit nanomolar affinities for detection of pancreatic cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
2012
;
18
:
839
49
.
26.
Hausner
SH
,
Bauer
N
,
Sutcliffe
JL
. 
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the effects of aluminum [18F]fluoride radiolabeling on an integrin alpha(v)beta(6)-specific peptide
.
Nucl Med Biol
2014
;
41
:
43
50
.
27.
Hausner
SH
,
Kukis
DL
,
Gagnon
MK
,
Stanecki
CE
,
Ferdani
R
,
Marshall
JF
, et al
Evaluation of [64Cu]Cu-DOTA and [64Cu]Cu-CB-TE2A chelates for targeted positron emission tomography with an alpha(v)beta(6)-specific peptide
.
Mol Imaging
2009
;
8
:
111
21
.
28.
Hausner
SH
,
Bauer
N
,
Hu
LY
,
Knight
LM
,
Sutcliffe
JL
. 
The effect of bi-terminal PEGylation of an integrin alpha(v)beta(6)-targeted 18F peptide on pharmacokinetics and tumor uptake
.
J Nucl Med
2015
;
56
:
784
90
.
29.
Davis
RA
,
Lau
K
,
Hausner
SH
,
Sutcliffe
JL
. 
Solid-phase synthesis and fluorine-18 radiolabeling of cycloRGDyK
.
Org Biomol Chem
2016
;
14
:
8659
63
.
30.
Hausner
SH
,
Abbey
CK
,
Bold
RJ
,
Gagnon
MK
,
Marik
J
,
Marshall
JF
, et al
Targeted in vivo imaging of integrin alpha(v)beta(6) with an improved radiotracer and its relevance in a pancreatic tumor model
.
Cancer Res
2009
;
69
:
5843
50
.
31.
Niu
J
,
Li
Z
. 
The roles of integrin alpha(v)beta(6) in cancer
.
Cancer Lett
2017
;
403
:
128
37
.
32.
Koivisto
L
,
Bi
J
,
Häkkinen
L
,
Larjava
H
. 
Integrin alpha(v)beta(6): Structure, function and role in health and disease
.
Int J Biochem Cell Biol
2018
;
99
:
186
96
.
33.
Färber
SF
,
Wurzer
A
,
Reichart
F
,
Beck
R
,
Kessler
H
,
Wester
HJ
, et al
Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals targeting integrin alphavbeta6
.
ACS Omega
2018
;
3
:
2428
36
.
34.
Roesch
S
,
Lindner
T
,
Sauter
M
,
Loktev
A
,
Flechsig
P
,
Müller
M
, et al
Comparison of the RGD motif-containing alpha(v)beta(6) integrin-binding peptides SFLAP3 and SFITGv6 for diagnostic application in HNSCC
.
J Nucl Med
2018
;
59
:
1679
85
.
35.
Logan
D
,
Abu-Ghazaleh
R
,
Blakemore
W
,
Curry
S
,
Jackson
T
,
King
A
, et al
Structure of a major immunogenic site on foot-and-mouth-disease virus
.
Nature
1993
;
362
:
566
8
.
36.
Jackson
T
,
Sheppard
D
,
Denyer
M
,
Blakemore
W
,
King
AM
. 
The epithelial integrin alpha(v)beta(6) is a receptor for foot-and-mouth disease virus
.
J Virol
2000
;
74
:
4949
56
.
37.
Altmann
A
,
Sauter
M
,
Roesch
S
,
Mier
W
,
Warta
R
,
Debus
J
, et al
Identification of a novel ITGalpha(v)beta(6)-Binding peptide using protein separation and phage display
.
Clin Cancer Res
2017
;
23
:
4170
80
.
38.
Keat
N
,
Kenny
J
,
Chen
K
,
Onega
M
,
Garman
N
,
Slack
RJ
, et al
A microdose PET study of the safety, immunogenicity, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry of (18)F-FB-A20FMDV2 for imaging the integrin alpha(v)beta(6)
.
J Nucl Med Technol
2018
;
46
:
136
43
.
39.
Tummers
WS
,
Farina-Sarasqueta
A
,
Boonstra
MC
,
Prevoo
HA
,
Sier
CF
,
Mieog
JS
, et al
Selection of optimal molecular targets for tumor-specific imaging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
.
Oncotarget
2017
;
8
:
56816
28
.