Purpose: Prevention or treatment of relapsed lymphoid malignancies after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) requires novel strategies. We hypothesized that antitumor–cell responses could be enhanced by the addition of lenalidomide to the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 inhibitor ipilimumab.

Experimental Design: We conducted a phase II investigator-initiated trial to assess the safety and activity of ipilimumab and lenalidomide in patients with lymphoid malignancies that relapsed after allogeneic HSCT and in high-risk patients after autologous HSCT. Patients received 10 mg of oral lenalidomide daily for 21 days followed by intravenous ipilimumab at 3 mg/kg bodyweight. The regimen was repeated 4 weeks later for a total of four treatments.

Results: We enrolled 17 patients (10 allogeneic and seven autologous transplant recipients). Immune-mediated toxicity was limited to one patient with asymptomatic hypothyroidism and one with dermatitis in the allogeneic and autologous groups, respectively. One allogeneic transplant recipient had a flare of prior GVHD while taking lenalidomide that precluded further treatment. All others finished treatment without GVHD. Four of 10 patients in the allogeneic group had complete responses (three of which were durable at 19+, 21+, and 32+ months), and three had partial responses. The disease in six of seven patients in the autologous group remains in remission. The groups had similar immune responses, including a two- to threefold increase in inducible ICOS+CD4+FoxP3 T-cell number.

Conclusions: Our early-phase data suggested that ipilimumab plus lenalidomide is well tolerated after HSCT. Adverse events did not differ significantly between the allogeneic and autologous groups. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1011–8. ©2017 AACR.

This article is featured in Highlights of This Issue, p. 987

Translational Relevance

Clinical trials using ipilimumab in patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have disappointing results when the drug is administered at the conventional dose of 3 mg/kg intravenously. Higher doses are associated with a higher risk of immune-mediated toxicity, GVHD, and death. There is a paucity of information about the use of ipilimumab after autologous HSCT to decrease the risk of relapse in high-risk patients. On the basis of its immunomodulatory properties, we hypothesized that lenalidomide can harness the immune effect of ipilimumab to combat lymphomas, at a standard dose with a reduced risk of toxic effects. In this trial, we show that this strategy is safe, with no severe treatment-related toxicities, minimal immune-mediated toxicity, and no GVHD. Surprisingly, our preliminary data indicate similar immune responses in allogeneic and autologous transplant recipients. A greater than expected and durable observed response rate of 70% with just two doses of ipilimumab in patients who relapsed after allogeneic HSCT suggests that this finding may be related to the addition of lenalidomide to ipilimumab. This impact is also suggested by the additive increased numbers of inducible costimulator+CD4+ T cells by lenalidomide. Findings from our study support further investigation of this combination in this setting.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can produce long-term disease control and cure of various lymphoid malignancies (1, 2). However, despite improvements in conditioning regimens and supportive care (3), relapse remains a risk in 40% to 80% of transplant recipients, with a disappointing prognosis (4, 5). To date, no therapy has improved overall survival durations after HSCT failure, and novel strategies are needed to prevent relapse in high-risk patients after autologous HSCT. Advances in the understanding of immunoregulatory mechanisms have led to the design of new strategies to generate more effective antitumor immune responses in these patients.

A novel therapeutic approach consists of targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), one of the primary immune checkpoint molecules (6, 7). Inadequate T-cell antitumor responses may be one mechanism triggering failure of HSCT. The inhibitory immune checkpoint CTLA-4 competes with the costimulatory receptor CD28 for the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86, which leads to abrogation of T-cell responses (8). CTLA-4 blockade therefore functions to remove inhibitory signals and enhance antitumor T-cell responses (7).

Ipilimumab is a fully human antibody against CTLA-4 (9, 10) that has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with various cancers (11), including lymphomas (12). In a randomized trial, patients with advanced melanoma exhibited a dose-dependent increase in immune-related adverse events with increasing ipilimumab doses, as the incidence of grade 3 to 4 events was 3.5-fold higher in patients receiving it at 10 mg/kg compared with those receiving it at 3 mg/kg (13). Researchers confirmed this finding in two clinical trials using ipilimumab in patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic HSCT (14, 15). Specifically, Davids and colleagues observed a 23% risk of GVHD and immune-related events when they gave patients 10 mg/kg of ipilimumab (15).

Combination strategies for treatment of lymphoid malignancies with targeted agents, such as the addition of lenalidomide to ipilimumab, may result in the release of tumor antigens from cancerous lymphoid cells, which then become presented by antigen-presenting cells to tumor-specific T cells and enhance the activity of ipilimumab (16). Moreover, lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent that can enhance immune responses both in vitro (17, 18) and in patients with advanced tumors (19, 20). Lenalidomide use has been shown to augment vaccine responses and endogenous antitumor immunity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (21). We therefore hypothesized that lenalidomide can enhance the immunomodulatory effect of ipilimumab by harnessing the immune system to eradicate residual disease and decrease the risk of recurrence after autologous HSCT, and combat relapsed lymphoma after allogeneic HSCT with a reduced risk of toxic effects and GVHD at a standard dose of 3 mg/kg. The primary objective of this study was to assess the safety of treatment with lenalidomide alternating with ipilimumab after autologous and allogeneic HSCT in patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Study design and eligibility criteria

Patients at our institution who underwent allogeneic HSCT were included if they had persistent or relapsed lymphoid disease after their transplant, had engrafted donor cells, and had been off immunosuppression for 3 to 4 weeks without symptoms of GVHD.

In the absence of the graft-versus-malignancy effect to prevent disease relapse after autologous transplantation, and the lack of risk for GVHD, patients with lymphoma who underwent autologous HSCT were included in this study anytime within 6 months of undergoing their transplantation if they had no signs of progression.

Other inclusion criteria assessed at study entry for both autologous and allogeneic groups included: age 18 to 70 years; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 to 2; adequate liver (bilirubin and liver enzyme concentrations up to two times the upper limit of normal), renal (serum creatinine <1.6 mg/dL and creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/minute according to the Cockcroft–Gault equation), cardiac (ejection fraction ≥45%), and pulmonary (diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ≥40% of predictive value) function; no active infections; an absolute neutrophil count of at least 1.5 × 109 cells per L; and a platelet count of at least 75 × 109 cells per L in the peripheral blood.

This investigator-initiated pilot trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01919619) was conducted at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) from February 2014 to July 2016. The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

Procedures

Patients received lenalidomide for 21 days (cycle 1), then within 3 days after the last dose of lenalidomide, one dose of ipilimumab was administered (cycle 2). Thirty days after the cycle 2 ipilimumab dose, the treatment was repeated with lenalidomide (cycle 3) followed by ipilimumab (cycle 4; Fig. 1). This schedule was chosen for the purpose of avoiding overlapping toxicity between the two drugs. The starting and highest allowable dose of lenalidomide in this study was 10 mg given orally daily. This dose was chosen in accordance with other published reports using maintenance lenalidomide after autologous HSCT (22). Higher doses of lenalidomide have been associated with unacceptable toxicity after allogeneic HSCT (23). Dose reduction to 5 mg within patient was permitted for later cycles based on clinical practice. The ipilimumab dose was fixed at 3 mg/kg actual weight and given intravenously over 90 minutes.

Figure 1.

Ipilimumab and lenalidomide dosing schedule after HSCT.

Figure 1.

Ipilimumab and lenalidomide dosing schedule after HSCT.

Close modal

Acute and chronic GVHD in the study patients were assessed according to standard criteria (24, 25). Patients underwent evaluation for toxicity at the end of each cycle.

Clinical responses were scored using standard criteria for patients with lymphoma (26). Responses in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia were scored according to the recommendations of the NCI-Sponsored Working Group (27). Disease extent was further assessed by CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. In addition, functional imaging with 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose PET scans was repeated during follow-ups in patients with avid scans at study entry. Initial responses were assessed after 12 weeks of induction therapy and every 12 weeks for 2 years, and then every 6 months thereafter.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from the study patients were analyzed by members of the MD Anderson Immunotherapy Platform. Blood samples were drawn for immunophenotypic analysis of PBMCs at baseline and before and after administration of lenalidomide and ipilimumab. Following whole blood collection, PBMCs were separated using a Ficoll gradient at room temperature.

Multiparametric flow cytometry analysis of PBMCs was performed using fluorescently conjugated mAbs recognizing: CD4 AF532 (SK3, eBioscience), CD3 PerCP-Cy5.5 (UCHT1, BioLegend), CD8 AF700 (RPA-T8, BD Biosciences), CD127 BV711 (HIL-7R-M21, BD Biosciences), ICOS PE-Cy7 (ISA-3, eBioscience), and FoxP3 PE-e610 (PCH101; eBioscience). Live/Dead fixable yellow stain was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Samples were run using an LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using the FlowJo software program. After appropriate forward/side scatter and live cell gating, we determined the frequency of total CD3+ T cells, CD8+ T cells (CD3+CD8+), and CD4+ T cells (CD3+CD4+). ICOS expression was evaluated within CD4+ effector T cells (CD3+CD4+FoxP3).

Statistical analysis

All patients who received the study drugs were included in safety and efficacy analyses. Both transplant groups were monitored separately for toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). A Bayesian sequential monitoring scheme was employed for interim safety monitoring, separately targeting a toxicity rate of less than 30% at 30 days following cycle 4 of treatment in both groups. Toxic effects were (i) any grade 4 hematologic toxic effect of a study drug that did not resolve within 2 weeks; (ii) any immune-mediated reaction to ipilimumab that required permanent cessation of administration of the drug; (iii) any other grade 3 to 5 organ toxic effect of a study drug; and (iv) grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD in the allogeneic transplant group.

Patients were monitored in cohorts of one separately by study group. We assumed a beta (0.6, 1.4) prior distribution for the toxicity rate in each group, which has a mean of 0.30 corresponding to the 30% target toxicity rate. Accrual into either study group would have been stopped if at any time during the study the probability that the toxicity rate at day 30 in that arm exceeded 0.30 was greater than 0.95.

Statistical significant differences in flow cytometry data, between allogeneic and autologous groups, were analyzed using nonparametric two-tailed tests: Wilcoxon signed-rank test (paired) and Mann–Whitney U test (unpaired). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Allogeneic group

We enrolled a total of 10 patients in the allogeneic HSCT group. Patient characteristics at study entry are listed in Tables 1 and 2A. All patients had biopsy-proven relapsed aggressive (n = 6) or indolent (n = 4) lymphoid malignancies after receiving matched unrelated (n = 7), matched related (n = 2), or syngeneic (n = 1) transplants.

Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics

AllogeneicAutologous
Characteristics(n = 10)(n = 7)
Male sex, No. (%) 5 (50) 5 (71) 
Median age (range) at enrollment, years 54.5 (44–66) 56 (33–68) 
HCT-CI, No. (%) 
 0–2 4 (40) N/A 
 ≥3 6 (60) N/A 
Donor type 
 Unrelated 7 (70%) N/A 
 Related 2 (20%) N/A 
 Syngeneic 1 (10%) N/A 
Graft source 
 Peripheral blood 10 (100%) 7 (100%) 
Conditioning intensity 
 Myeloablative 1 (10%) 7 (100%) 
 Nonmyeloablative 8 (80%)  
 Reduced intensity 1 (10%)  
PET-positive before immunotherapy 4/7 (57%) 1 (14%) 
Median (range) % donor T cells at SE 100 (31–100) N/A 
Prior GVHD cases 
 Acute 0/9 (0%) N/A 
 Chronic, extensive 4/9 (44%) N/A 
AllogeneicAutologous
Characteristics(n = 10)(n = 7)
Male sex, No. (%) 5 (50) 5 (71) 
Median age (range) at enrollment, years 54.5 (44–66) 56 (33–68) 
HCT-CI, No. (%) 
 0–2 4 (40) N/A 
 ≥3 6 (60) N/A 
Donor type 
 Unrelated 7 (70%) N/A 
 Related 2 (20%) N/A 
 Syngeneic 1 (10%) N/A 
Graft source 
 Peripheral blood 10 (100%) 7 (100%) 
Conditioning intensity 
 Myeloablative 1 (10%) 7 (100%) 
 Nonmyeloablative 8 (80%)  
 Reduced intensity 1 (10%)  
PET-positive before immunotherapy 4/7 (57%) 1 (14%) 
Median (range) % donor T cells at SE 100 (31–100) N/A 
Prior GVHD cases 
 Acute 0/9 (0%) N/A 
 Chronic, extensive 4/9 (44%) N/A 

Abbreviations: HCT-CI, hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index; N/A, not applicable; SE, study entry.

Table 2A.

Clinical outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Patient No.HistologyTherapies prior alloSCTResponse to lenalidomide and ipilimumabCurrent statusa
FL CR Alive, CR, 32 months 
MCL CR, 12 months Alive, PD, 31 months 
FL PR, 5 months Alive, PD, 28 months 
THL 4, ASCT CR Alive, CR, 21 months 
MCL 3, 2 prior alloSCT PR Dead, PR, 21 months 
MCL 2, syngeneic SCT CR Alive, CR, 19 months 
DLBCL 4, ASCT PR Alive, PD, 19 months 
CLL SD Alive, PD, 18 months 
CLL SD Alive, SD, 17 months 
10 ALCL NE Alive, 3 monthsb 
Patient No.HistologyTherapies prior alloSCTResponse to lenalidomide and ipilimumabCurrent statusa
FL CR Alive, CR, 32 months 
MCL CR, 12 months Alive, PD, 31 months 
FL PR, 5 months Alive, PD, 28 months 
THL 4, ASCT CR Alive, CR, 21 months 
MCL 3, 2 prior alloSCT PR Dead, PR, 21 months 
MCL 2, syngeneic SCT CR Alive, CR, 19 months 
DLBCL 4, ASCT PR Alive, PD, 19 months 
CLL SD Alive, PD, 18 months 
CLL SD Alive, SD, 17 months 
10 ALCL NE Alive, 3 monthsb 

Abbreviations: ALCL, anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma; AlloSCT, allogeneic stem cell transplantation; ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; FL, follicular lymphoma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease; SCT, stem cell transplantation; THL, triple-hit lymphoma.

aTime from initiation of treatment.

bLost follow-up after 3 months.

The median time since HSCT and study entry was 29 months in patients with aggressive histologies. The median time that these patients were off immunosuppressive therapy prior to study enrollment was 1 month. This included two patients who had prior extensive GVHD and were off systemic immunosuppressive therapy for 4 and 6 weeks, respectively.

A longer median time since HSCT and study entry of 52 months was observed in patients with indolent histologies. The median time that these patients were off immunosuppressive therapy prior to study enrollment was 36 months. This was expected, considering the delayed patterns of relapses that these patients experience after allogeneic HSCT compared with patients with aggressive lymphoma histologies. Furthermore, the standard therapeutic approach of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) in these patients further contributed to this longer time interval between relapse after allogeneic HSCT to study entry. Patients with indolent histologies who were enrolled on this study have all received DLIs after their last recurrence prior study entry, with no clinical response.

Patients were heavily pretreated prior to their allogeneic HSCT. The median number of therapies received, outside their transplant, was 3. Prior autologous transplants failed in two patients, a prior syngeneic transplant failed in one patient, and two prior matched unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplants failed in one patient. The median hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbity index at study entry was 3 (range, 0–10).

Four patients had a history of extensive chronic GVHD. One case each involved the liver and gastrointestinal tract, skin and gastrointestinal tract, and skin and joints. The fourth patient had liver, skin, and mouth GVHD involvement. Steroid-based therapy was discontinued for this patient just 4 weeks prior to study entry.

Autologous group

We enrolled a total of seven patients in the autologous HSCT group. Their characteristics at study entry are listed in Tables 1 and 2B. All had high-risk disease, with three patients having double-/triple-hit lymphoma including one with relapsed disease who received four lines of prior therapy; two others received their transplants in first complete remission following completion of first-line therapy with a conventional regimen of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), rather than a more intensive first-line therapy. Two patients had Mantle cell lymphoma with an elevated proliferation index (Ki67 > 30%), including one patient who twice underwent prior autologous HSCT. One patient with Hodgkin disease experienced disease progression 1 month after standard first-line chemotherapy and then received salvage chemotherapy, with maintenance of stable disease (SD) prior to transplant. After transplantation, the patient had a positive PET imaging. One patient had follicular lymphoma grade 3 who initially presented with bulky disease and superior vena cava syndrome; this patient was refractory to R-CHOP, lenalidomide plus obinutuzumab, R-bendamustine; the patient then received R-GDP (gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin) prior to having a partial response (PR) along with maintenance of persistent PET positivity before transplantation.

Table 2B.

Clinical outcomes in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Patient No.HistologyPrior therapiesCurrent status†
11 THL Alive, CR, 38 months 
12 DHL Alive, PD, 28 months 
13 MCL 3, 2 ASCT Alive, CR, 27 months 
14 HD 2, PET+ post-ASCT Alive, CR, 17 months 
15 DHL Alive, CR, 15 months 
16 MCL Alive, CR, 14 months 
17 FL Alive, CR, 10 months 
Patient No.HistologyPrior therapiesCurrent status†
11 THL Alive, CR, 38 months 
12 DHL Alive, PD, 28 months 
13 MCL 3, 2 ASCT Alive, CR, 27 months 
14 HD 2, PET+ post-ASCT Alive, CR, 17 months 
15 DHL Alive, CR, 15 months 
16 MCL Alive, CR, 14 months 
17 FL Alive, CR, 10 months 

Abbreviations: ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; DHL, double-hit lymphoma; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; FL, follicular lymphoma; HD, Hodgkin disease; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; PD, progressive disease; THL, triple-hit lymphoma.

aTime from initiation of treatment.

Safety

In the allogeneic group, all patients completed treatment with the exception of one patient who had a flare of chronic liver and mouth GVHD 1 week after starting the first cycle of lenalidomide. The patient's steroid-based therapy for chronic GVHD was tapered 3 weeks earlier. This precluded further treatment, and this patient was discontinued from the study without exposure to ipilimumab. The remaining nine patients finished the study treatment without any cases of GVHD. Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects (Table 3) were limited to four episodes of neutropenia (two at grade 3 and 2 at grade 4), requiring a reduction of the lenalidomide dose in the second cycle of lenalidomide in one patient to 5 mg. Immune-mediated toxicity was limited to one patient with asymptomatic grade 2 hypothyroidism. All toxic effects were resolved.

Table 3.

Adverse events

No. of episodes
VariableAllogeneicAutologous
GVHD 
 Chronic GVHD of liver, mouth N/A 
Immune-related adverse events 
 Dermatitis, grade 2 — 
 Hypothyroid, grade 2 — 
 Hyperthyroid, grade 1 — 
Other hematologic toxic effects 
 Neutropenia   
  Grade 4 
  Grade 3 
  Grade 2 
 Thrombocytopenia, grade 2 — 
 Anemia, grade 2 
Other adverse events 
 Pulmonary embolism, grade 3 — 
 Nausea, grade 2 — 
 Headache, grade 2 — 
 Diarrhea, grade 2 
 Elevated transaminase, grade 2 — 
 Hypertension, grade 2 — 
No. of episodes
VariableAllogeneicAutologous
GVHD 
 Chronic GVHD of liver, mouth N/A 
Immune-related adverse events 
 Dermatitis, grade 2 — 
 Hypothyroid, grade 2 — 
 Hyperthyroid, grade 1 — 
Other hematologic toxic effects 
 Neutropenia   
  Grade 4 
  Grade 3 
  Grade 2 
 Thrombocytopenia, grade 2 — 
 Anemia, grade 2 
Other adverse events 
 Pulmonary embolism, grade 3 — 
 Nausea, grade 2 — 
 Headache, grade 2 — 
 Diarrhea, grade 2 
 Elevated transaminase, grade 2 — 
 Hypertension, grade 2 — 

Abbreviation: N/A, not applicable.

All seven patients in the autologous group finished their planned treatment. In this group, we observed three episodes of grade 4 neutropenia, requiring a reduction in the lenalidomide dose to 5 mg in one patient. The other two episodes occurred after ipilimumab use and resolved. Another patient had an incidental pulmonary embolism detected using routine computed tomographic imaging of the chest, which was managed with anticoagulation without any complications. One patient had immune-mediated dermatitis, which resolved promptly with steroid-based therapy.

Clinical outcomes

Four patients (40%) and three patients (30%) in the allogeneic group had complete responses (CRs) and PRs, respectively, after just two cycles of lenalidomide and two cycles of ipilimumab, resulting in an overall response rate of 70%. One patient was not evaluable for response, and two patients had SD. These responses were irrespective of the percentage of donor T cells in blood at the time of therapy initiation, as one patient had 31% donor cells and is now in continuous CR.

At a median follow-up time of 20.5 (range, 3–32) months, 90% of allogeneic patients are alive (Fig. 2A). CRs in three patients and a PR in one patient continued at 21, 19, 32, and 21 months, respectively, after initiation of therapy (Table 2A). The PR patient died due to an unrelated cause. Four other patients had recurrent or progressive disease after therapy initiation: one patient with SD experienced progression at 4.6 months; two patients with PRs relapsed at 5.4 months and 10 months; and one CR patient experienced a relapse at 12 months. For this allogeneic cohort, the 4- and 12-month relapse-free survival rates were 100% and 56%, respectively.

Figure 2.

Treatment with ipilimumab and lenalidomide after HSCT: overall survival and relapse-free survival in patients who received ipilimumab and lenalidomide as therapy for relapsed lymphoid malignancies after allogeneic HSCT (A) or to prevent relapse after autologous transplantation (B).

Figure 2.

Treatment with ipilimumab and lenalidomide after HSCT: overall survival and relapse-free survival in patients who received ipilimumab and lenalidomide as therapy for relapsed lymphoid malignancies after allogeneic HSCT (A) or to prevent relapse after autologous transplantation (B).

Close modal

All patients in the autologous group are alive with a median follow-up duration of 17 (range, 10–39) months (Fig. 2B). One patient with double-hit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Table 2B, patient 12) experienced a relapse after one cycle of lenalidomide and 2 weeks after the first cycle of ipilimumab and did not receive further study treatment but continued to be followed. All other patients remain in remission. For this autologous cohort, the 4- and 12-month relapse-free survival rates were both 86% (Fig. 2B).

Immunologic effects

We conducted multiparametric flow cytometric analyses of PBMCs before and after treatment, including after monotherapy with lenalidomide and after combination therapy with lenalidomide plus ipilimumab. We did not observe any significant differences in the frequency of CD3+ (Fig. 3A), CD4+ (Fig. 3B), and CD8+ (Fig. 3C) T cells during treatment in the autologous or allogeneic group.

Figure 3.

T-cell immune responses to treatment. Distributions of CD3+ (A), CD4+ (B), CD8+ (C), and number of ICOS+CD4+FoxP3 (D) T cells, in PBMCs of study patients after the first cycles of lenalidomide (Len) and ipilimumab (Ipi).

Figure 3.

T-cell immune responses to treatment. Distributions of CD3+ (A), CD4+ (B), CD8+ (C), and number of ICOS+CD4+FoxP3 (D) T cells, in PBMCs of study patients after the first cycles of lenalidomide (Len) and ipilimumab (Ipi).

Close modal

We previously identified an increase in the number of inducible costimulatory (ICOS)+CD4+ T cells as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for ipilimumab-based therapy (28). In the current trial, we observed a statistically significant increase in the number of ICOS+CD4+FoxP3 T-cell number in both the autologous and allogeneic group, with a notable increase after the first cycle of lenalidomide and a further increase after the first dose of ipilimumab, suggesting an additive effect to these two agents when combined together (P = 0.007; Fig. 3D).

Prevention and treatment of relapse of a lymphoid malignancy after HSCT requires novel strategies. Unpublished analysis from our center showed a median OS rate of less than 1 year in 95 patients with aggressive lymphomas who experienced a relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. One remarkable advance in cancer immunotherapy has been immune checkpoint blockade. Targeting CTLA-4 with ipilimumab at the conventional dose of 3 mg/kg in patients who have relapses after allogeneic HSCT have not resulted in CRs for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (14, 15). In addition, this strategy has yet to be tested after autologous HSCT to prevent relapse of lymphoid malignancies in high-risk patients. We hypothesized that combination therapy with ipilimumab and lenalidomide could enhance the immune activity of ipilimumab via its known immunomodulatory effect.

In our trial, alternating lenalidomide (10 mg daily for 21 days) and ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) resulted in no significant autoimmune toxic effects, and no new cases of GVHD. One patient with a known history of GVHD had a flare of his symptoms after the first cycle of lenalidomide and did not receive ipilimumab. The overall response rate was 70% in patients with active disease in the allogeneic group after two cycles of both ipilimumab and lenalidomide. Four of these responses were durable beyond 1 year.

Seven patients received the combination after autologous HSCT. These patients had a high risk of relapse at the study entry. We have previously reported on the negative prognostic significance of an elevated Ki67 in patients with Mantle cell lymphoma (29) and the poor outcomes in patients with this disease undertaking an autologous HSCT beyond first remission (30). Two patients in our study fall within this category. Poor outcomes have also been reported in patients with follicular lymphoma who are refractory to conventional chemotherapy (31), or in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who experienced early posttransplantation PET positivity after HSCT (one patient in our study falls within each of these two categories, respectively; ref. 32). Recent reports also described inferior outcomes in patients with double-hit lymphoma who were treated with R-CHOP compared with those who received intensive first-line chemotherapy to achieve a first CR prior autologous HSCT consolidation, or those who have been heavily pretreated (two and one patient in our study fall within these categories, respectively; ref. 33). As most relapses after autologous HSCT usually occur within 18 months of transplantation, we are encouraged that with a median follow-up duration of 17 (range, 10–39) months, only one progression was observed at the time of this analysis. This also occurred in a patient in whom the full efficacy of the treatment could not have been fully accessed as relapse was experienced immediately after the first dose of ipilimumab. Accrual continues at our center to validate these early data in a larger number of patients.

Although we expected to see significant differences in the immunologic impact of ipilimumab-based therapy in allogeneic and autologous transplant recipients, our preliminary data indicated similar immune responses in the two groups. Specifically, our immunologic analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the numbers of ICOS+CD4+FoxP3 T cells after combination therapy with ipilimumab and lenalidomide in both groups. ICOS, a member of the immunoglobulin gene family, is structurally related to CD28 and CTLA-4. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express ICOS on their surface following activation (34). ICOS functions as a costimulatory molecule on activated T cells, and its expression has been associated with increased effector T-cell survival (35). A retrospective analysis of melanoma patients given ipilimumab identified increased frequency of CD4+ T cells with high ICOS expression that was sustained over 7 weeks and correlated with overall survival (36). The additive impact of lenalidomide on the increased ICOS+CD4+ T cells may also explain the higher than expected clinical responses to just two doses of 3 mg/kg of ipilimumab observed in our trial. Although lenalidomide has a known clinical activity as a single agent in relapsed aggressive lymphomas (37), the CR rates were 12% when the drug was given at a daily dose of 25 mg; the median time to achieve CR was 4.3 months. The lower dose of lenalidomide used in our trial for just two cycles makes it unlikely that the responses observed were due to lenalidomide alone. These initial observations need to be verified in a larger cohort of patients.

Single-agent ipilimumab was given at the conventional dose of 3 mg/kg after allogeneic HSCT in two other trials (14, 15). The median intervals from allogeneic HSCT to initiation of therapy in these two trials were 21 (14, 38), and 22.5 months (15), respectively, compared with 29 months in our trial for patients with aggressive histologies. Neither of these two other trials reported, however, clinical CRs in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. To improve responses, Davids and colleagues (15) increased the ipilimumab dose to 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, with additional doses every 12 weeks for 60 weeks in patients who exhibited clinical benefit of the treatment. Of the 22 patients treated at such dose and schedule, immune-related adverse events occurred in five patients (23%), one of whom died 42 days after receiving the initial dose of ipilimumab. Five patients (23%) also had severe GVHD. Higher clinical response rates were described in patients with myeloid disease but not in those with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Our data lead us to believe that selectively activating the antitumor immunity effect without precipitating clinically significant GVHD is possible.

Given its favorable safety profile, treatment with ipilimumab and lenalidomide is a promising approach to preventing relapse of high-risk lymphoma after autologous HSCT and to treating recurrent disease after allogeneic HSCT. Because duration of therapy may be important to ensure optimal clinical effect and longer lasting antitumor activity, the protocol has been amended to provide patients four cycles of each drug.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: I.F. Khouri, R.L. Bassett Jr, L.M. Vence, A.M. Gulbis

Development of methodology: I.F. Khouri, R.L. Bassett Jr, P. Sharma

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): I.F. Khouri, I.F. Curbelo, P. Sharma

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): I.F. Khouri, I.F. Curbelo, D.R. Milton, R.L. Bassett Jr, L.M. Vence, J.P. Allison, P. Sharma, F. Turturro

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: I.F. Khouri, I.F. Curbelo, E.J. Jabbour, D.R. Milton, R.L. Bassett Jr, L.M. Vence, A.M. Gulbis, P. Sharma

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): I.F. Khouri, P. Sharma, F. Turroturo

Study supervision: I.F. Khouri

This work was supported by the NIH/NCI under award number P30CA016672.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Khouri
IF
,
McLaughlin
P
,
Saliba
RM
,
Hosing
C
,
Korbling
M
,
Lee
MS
, et al
Eight-year experience with allogeneic stem cell transplantation for relapsed follicular lymphoma after nonmyeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab
.
Blood
2008
;
111
:
5530
6
.
2.
Khouri
IF
,
Saliba
RM
,
Hosing
C
,
Okoroji
GJ
,
Acholonu
S
,
Anderlini
P
, et al
Concurrent administration of high-dose rituximab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas
.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
2240
7
.
3.
Khouri
IF
,
Wei
W
,
Korbling
M
,
Turturro
F
,
Ahmed
S
,
Alousi
A
, et al
BFR (bendamustine, fludarabine and rituximab) allogeneic conditioning for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma: reduced risk of myelosuppression and severe graft-versus-host disease
.
Blood
2014
;
124
:
2306
12
.
4.
Van Den Neste
E
,
Schmitz
N
,
Mounier
N
,
Gill
D
,
Linch
D
,
Trneny
M
, et al
Outcomes in diffuse large b-cell lymphoma patients relapsing after autologous stem cell transplantation: an analysis of patients included in the Coral Study
.
Bone Marrow Transplant
2017
;
52
:
216
21
.
5.
Giralt
SA
,
van Besien
K
. 
Treatment of relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
.
Cancer Treat Res
1996
;
84
:
279
90
.
6.
Callahan
MK
,
Wolchok
JD
,
Allison
JP
. 
Anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy: immune monitoring during clinical development of a novel immunotherapy
.
Semin Oncol
2010
;
37
:
473
84
.
7.
Leach
DR
,
Krummel
MF
,
Allison
JP
. 
Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade
.
Science
1996
;
271
:
1734
6
.
8.
Sharma
P
,
Wagner
K
,
Wolchok
JD
,
Allison
JP
. 
Novel cancer immunotherapy agents with survival benefit: recent successes and next steps
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2011
;
11
:
805
11
.
9.
Phan
GQ
,
Yang
JC
,
Sherry
RM
,
Hwu
P
,
Topalian
SL
,
Schwartzentruber
DJ
, et al
Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003
;
100
:
8372
7
.
10.
Fong
L
,
Small
EJ
. 
Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody: the first in an emerging class of immunomodulatory antibodies for cancer treatment
.
J Clin Oncol
2008
;
26
:
5275
83
.
11.
Hodi
FS
,
O'Day
SJ
,
McDermott
DF
,
Weber
RW
,
Sosman
JA
,
Haanen
JB
, et al
Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
.
N Engl J Med
2010
;
363
:
711
23
.
12.
Ansell
SM
,
Hurvitz
SA
,
Koenig
PA
,
LaPlant
BR
,
Kabat
BF
,
Fernando
D
, et al
Phase I study of ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
.
Clin Cancer Res
2009
;
15
:
6446
53
.
13.
Wolchok
JD
,
Neyns
B
,
Linette
G
,
Negrier
S
,
Lutzky
J
,
Thomas
L
, et al
Ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2, dose-ranging study
.
Lancet Oncol
2010
;
11
:
155
64
.
14.
Bashey
A
,
Medina
B
,
Corringham
S
,
Pasek
M
,
Carrier
E
,
Vrooman
L
, et al
CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab to treat relapse of malignancy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation
.
Blood
2009
;
113
:
1581
8
.
15.
Davids
MS
,
Kim
HT
,
Bachireddy
P
,
Costello
C
,
Liguori
R
,
Savell
A
, et al
Ipilimumab for patients with relapse after allogeneic transplantation
.
N Engl J Med
2016
;
375
:
143
53
.
16.
Sharma
P
,
Allison
JP
. 
Immune checkpoint targeting in cancer therapy: toward combination strategies with curative potential
.
Cell
2015
;
161
:
2015
24
.
17.
Wu
L
,
Adams
M
,
Carter
T
,
Chen
R
,
Muller
G
,
Stirling
D
, et al
Lenalidomide enhances natural killer cell and monocyte-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of rituximab-treated CD20+ tumor cells
.
Clin Cancer Res
2008
;
14
:
4650
7
.
18.
Dredge
K
,
Marriott
JB
,
Todryk
SM
,
Muller
GW
,
Chen
R
,
Stirling
DI
, et al
Protective antitumor immunity induced by a costimulatory thalidomide analog in conjunction with whole tumor cell vaccination is mediated by increased Th1-type immunity
.
J Immunol
2002
;
168
:
4914
9
.
19.
Bartlett
JB
,
Michael
A
,
Clarke
IA
,
Dredge
K
,
Nicholson
S
,
Kristeleit
H
, et al
Phase I study to determine the safety, tolerability and immunostimulatory activity of thalidomide analogue CC-5013 in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and other advanced cancers
.
Br J Cancer
2004
;
90
:
955
61
.
20.
Berg
SL
,
Cairo
MS
,
Russell
H
,
Ayello
J
,
Ingle
AM
,
Lau
H
, et al
Safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide in children and adolescents with relapsed/refractory solid tumors or myelodysplastic syndrome: a Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium report
.
J Clin Oncol
2011
;
29
:
316
23
.
21.
Noonan
K
,
Rudraraju
L
,
Ferguson
A
,
Emerling
A
,
Pasetti
MF
,
Huff
CA
, et al
Lenalidomide-induced immunomodulation in multiple myeloma: impact on vaccines and antitumor responses
.
Clin Cancer Res
2012
;
18
:
1426
34
.
22.
McCarthy
PL
,
Owzar
K
,
Hofmeister
CC
,
Hurd
DD
,
Hassoun
H
,
Richardson
PG
, et al
Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
366
:
1770
81
.
23.
Wolschke
C
,
Stübig
T
,
Hegenbart
U
,
Schönland
S
,
Heinzelmann
M
,
Hildebrandt
Y
, et al
Postallograft lenalidomide induces strong NK cell-mediated antimyeloma activity and risk for T cell-mediated GvHD: Results from a phase I/II dose-finding study
.
Exp Hematol
2013
;
41
:
134
42
.
24.
Przepiorka
D
,
Weisdorf
D
,
Martin
P
,
Klingemann
HG
,
Beatty
P
,
Hows
J
, et al
1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading
.
Bone Marrow Transplant
1995
;
15
:
825
8
.
25.
Filipovich
AH
,
Weisdorf
D
,
Pavletic
S
,
Socie
G
,
Wingard
JR
,
Lee
SJ
, et al
National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease. I. Diagnosis and staging working group report
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
2005
;
11
:
945
56
.
26.
Cheson
BD
,
Pfistner
B
,
Juweid
ME
,
Gascoyne
RD
,
Specht
L
,
Horning
SJ
, et al
International Harmonization Project on Lymphoma. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2007
;
25
:
579
86
.
27.
Hallek
M
,
Cheson
BD
,
Catovsky
D
,
Caligaris-Cappio
F
,
Dighiero
G
,
Döhner
H
, et al
International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines
.
Blood
2008
;
111
:
5446
56
.
28.
Ng Tang
D
,
Shen
Y
,
Sun
J
,
Wen
S
,
Wolchok
JD
,
Yuan
J
, et al
Increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy
.
Cancer Immunol Res
2013
;
1
:
229
34
.
29.
Chakhachiro
ZI
,
Saliba
RM
,
Okoroji
GJ
,
Korbling
M
,
Alousi
AM
,
Betul
O
, et al
Cytarabine, Ki-67, and SOX11 in patients with mantle cell lymphoma receiving rituximab-containing autologous stem cell transplantation during first remission
.
Cancer
2013
;
119
:
3318
25
.
30.
Tam
CS
,
Bassett
R
,
Ledesma
C
,
Korbling
M
,
Alousi
A
,
Hosing
C
, et al
Mature results of the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center risk-adapted transplantation strategy in mantle cell lymphoma
.
Blood
2009
;
113
:
4144
52
.
31.
Casulo
C
,
Byrtek
M
,
Dawson
KL
,
Zhou
X
,
Farber
CM
,
Flowers
CR
, et al
Early relapse of follicular lymphoma after rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone defines patients at high risk for death: an analysis from the National LymphoCare Study
.
J Clin Oncol
2015
;
33
:
2516
22
.
32.
Sucak
GT
,
Özkurt
ZN
,
Suyani
E
,
Yaşar
DG
,
Akdemir
ÖÜ
,
Aki
Z
, et al
Early post- transplantation positron emission tomography in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma is an independent prognostic factor with an impact on overall survival
.
Ann Hematol
2011
;
90
:
1329
36
.
33.
Landsburg
DJ
,
Falkiewicz
MK
,
Maly
J
,
Blum
KA
,
Howlett
C
,
Feldman
T
, et al
Outcomes of patients with double-hit lymphoma who achieve first complete remission
.
J Clin Oncol
2017
;
35
:
2260
7
.
34.
Zitvogel
L
,
Galluzzi
L
,
Smyth
MJ
,
Kroemer
G
. 
Mechanism of action of conventional and targeted anticancer therapies: reinstating immunosurveillance
.
Immunity
2013
;
39
:
74
88
.
35.
Burmeister
Y
,
Lischke
T
,
Dahler
AC
,
Mages
HW
,
Lam
KP
,
Coyle
AJ
, et al
ICOS controls the pool size of effector-memory and regulatory T cells
.
J Immunol
2008
;
180
:
774
82
.
36.
Di Giacomo
AM
,
Calabrò
L
,
Danielli
R
,
Fonsatti
E
,
Bertocci
E
,
Pesce
I
, et al
Long- term survival and immunological parameters in metastatic melanoma patients who responded to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg within an expanded access programme
.
Cancer Immunol Immunother
2013
;
62
:
1021
8
.
37.
Wiernik
PH
,
Lossos
IS
,
Tuscano
JM
,
Justice
G
,
Vose
JM
,
Cole
CE
, et al
Lenalidomide monotherapy in relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2008
;
26
:
4952
7
.
38.
Zhou
J
,
Bashey
A
,
Zhong
R
,
Corringham
S
,
Messer
K
,
Pu
M
, et al
CTLA-4 blockade following relapse of malignancy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with T cell activation but not with increased levels of T regulatory cells
.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
2011
;
17
:
682
92
.