In this article (Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:4811–8), which was published in the November 1, 2015, issue of Clinical Cancer Research (1), the grant support is listed incorrectly. It should read as follows: “This work has been partially funded by the ISCIII through the project PI13/00230 (Health Strategic Action included in the State Plan for Research and Innovation, MINECO), which is cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). Additional funding for this work was provided by Celgene Corporation and by a Stand Up To Cancer Dream Team Translational Research Grant, Grant Number SU2C-AACR-DT0509. Stand Up To Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation administered by the American Association for Cancer Research.” The authors regret this error.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Corrections|
December 15 2016
Correction: SPARC Expression Did Not Predict Efficacy of nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine or Gemcitabine Alone for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in an Exploratory Analysis of the Phase III MPACT Trial
Online Issn: 1557-3265
Print Issn: 1078-0432
©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.
2016
American Association for Cancer Research.
Clin Cancer Res (2016) 22 (24): 6302.
- Split-Screen
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
-
Tools Icon
Tools
- Search Site
-
Article Versions Icon
Versions
- Version of Record December 15 2016
Citation
Correction: SPARC Expression Did Not Predict Efficacy of nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine or Gemcitabine Alone for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in an Exploratory Analysis of the Phase III MPACT Trial. Clin Cancer Res 15 December 2016; 22 (24): 6302. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2536
Download citation file:
17
Views
0
Citations
Citing articles via
Advertisement