Purpose: In neuroblastoma, activating ALK receptor tyrosine kinase point mutations play a major role in oncogenesis. We explored the potential occurrence of ALK mutations at a subclonal level using targeted deep sequencing.

Experimental Design: In a clinically representative series of 276 diagnostic neuroblastoma samples, exons 23 and 25 of the ALK gene, containing the F1174 and R1275 mutation hotspots, respectively, were resequenced with an extremely high depth of coverage.

Results: At the F1174 hotspot (exon 23), mutations were observed in 15 of 277 samples (range of fraction of mutated allele per sample: 0.562%–40.409%). At the R1275 hotspot (exon 25), ALK mutations were detected in 12 of 276 samples (range of fraction of mutated allele: 0.811%–73.001%). Altogether, subclonal events with a mutated allele fraction below 20% were observed in 15/27 ALK-mutated samples. The presence of an ALK mutation was associated with poorer 5-year overall survival (OS: 75% vs. 57%, P = 0.0212 log-rank test), with a strong correlation between F1174 ALK mutations and MYCN amplification being observed.

Conclusions: In this series, deep sequencing allows the detection of F1174 and R1275 ALK mutational events at diagnosis in 10% of cases, with subclonal events in more than half of these, which would have gone undetected by Sanger sequencing. These findings are of clinical importance given the potential role of ALK mutations in clonal evolution and relapse. These findings also demonstrate the importance of deep sequencing techniques for the identification of patients especially when considering targeted therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 21(21); 4913–21. ©2015 AACR.

See related commentary by George, p. 4747

Translational Relevance

In neuroblastoma, conventional sequencing techniques allowed the detection of ALK gene mutations in familiar and sporadic cases. In this study, we search for ALK mutations in neuroblastoma samples at diagnosis by using high sensitivity next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods. ALK mutations were observed at diagnosis in 10% of cases, with ALK mutational events showing a fraction of mutated alleles lower than 20%, at the subclonal level, in more than half of these samples. This study provides important evidence for the usefulness of deep-sequencing NGS methods to reveal the presence of very low mutated allele fractions undetectable with conventional Sanger sequencing, and demonstrates the importance of deep-sequencing techniques in particular in the context of potential identification of predictive biomarkers when considering target therapy.

Intratumor heterogeneity has been shown to occur in the majority of human malignancies, including chromosomal alterations or gene mutations, and has been shown to play a role in clonal evolution (1–6).

With fractions of mutated alleles evolving over time, the study of the exact mutated allele fractions, of their subclonal distribution and possible role in clonal evolution gains more importance (7–9).

In neuroblastoma, the most frequent extracranial solid cancer of early childhood, efforts to develop improved therapies must also take into account its molecular heterogeneity. Genetic alterations in neuroblastoma at diagnosis mainly concern copy number alterations, with MYCN amplification in 20% to 25% of cases, and segmental copy number alterations involving more extensive chromosome regions (10–14). Genome sequencing studies of neuroblastoma at diagnosis have revealed a low mutation rate involving only few recurrently altered genes mainly involved in chromatin-remodeling or neuritogenesis (15–17).

Activating anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations have been shown to occur in both familial and sporadic cases of neuroblastoma, with somatically acquired ALK mutations observed in 6% to 12% of sporadic neuroblastomas (15, 16, 18–21). The most frequent substitutions, observed in approximately 85% of mutant ALK in neuroblastoma, are localized within the kinase domain of ALK at the F1174 (mutated to L, S, I, C, or V) and R1275 (mutated to Q or L) hotspots (12, 21). In neuroblastoma, ALK can also be activated by genomic amplification (approximately 1%–2% of neuroblastomas) or more rarely following structural rearrangements (22).

Activating ALK mutations are thought to play a role in neuroblastoma oncogenesis based on in vitro and in vivo observations, in some instances through collaboration with MYCN (23–25). Thus, ALK might represent a bone fide target in neuroblastoma therapy. We have recently used deep sequencing to search for ALK mutations in neuroblastoma relapse samples (26). Furthermore, in a recent study, the feasibility of a new method of ALK mutations detection in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been described. This method showed the presence of the F1174L and R1275Q ALK mutations in circulating DNA from 21% of neuroblastoma patients at diagnosis (27). Altogether, these studies highlight the importance of next-generation deep sequencing techniques when determining the genetic status of this predictive biomarker.

In order to detect ALK mutations with a high sensitivity and to determine the frequency of subclonal events in neuroblastoma, we have now analyzed a series of 276 diagnostic neuroblastoma samples using targeted deep sequencing.

Patients and samples

Patients with neuroblastoma for whom a tumor sample was addressed to the laboratory for diagnostic molecular analysis were included in this study to constitute a representative neuroblastoma patient cohort. For a total of 276 patients, 125 patients with stage IV disease (46%), 123 with localized disease (44%), 25 with stage 4s disease (9%), and 55 patients with MYCN amplification (20%) were included (Supplementary Table S1). Pathologic examination by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining method documented at least 50% of tumor cells in all samples.

MYCN status and tumor genomic copy number profiles were determined as described previously, using an in-house 4k or a commercial 72k platform (Nimblegen; ref. 6).

Patients were treated in French centers according to the relevant national or international protocols. Written informed consent was obtained from parents according to national law and Ethics approval of protocols was obtained according to national guidelines. This study was authorized by the ethics committees “Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est IV,” references L07–95/L12–171, and “Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France,” reference 0811728.

Twenty-four germline genomic DNAs from CEPH (Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain) from healthy donors served as controls.

Library preparation

For sequencing library construction, 50 ng of genomic DNA from each sample were used to amplify the ALK regions of interest (exon 23:chr2:29443647–29443776; exon 25: chr2:29432603–29432704). The regions containing ALK hotspots F1174 (exon 23) and R1275 (exon 25) were amplified in a two-step PCR procedure using the Phusion Hot Start II high fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific). During the first PCR round, region-specific primers with adapter overhang on both forward and reverse primers (Supplementary Table S2) were used for a total of 10 cycles. The second PCR round, for a total of 30 cycles, attached Illumina single direction primers at the ends of amplicons. The adapter sequences and the unique barcodes contained in the Illumina primers were added at the 3′ and 5′ ends, respectively [Access Array Barcode Library for Illumina Sequencers 384 (Single direction) P/N 100-4876]. Following clean-up using the vacuum ultrafiltration kit (Macherey Nagel), control of size range using LabChip devices (Caliper, PerkinElmer) and Qubit quantification, PCR products of all samples were then pooled together in an equimolar solution: the cases to be studied, the germline controls, and negative controls. The final pooled library was then loaded on the HiSeq2500 flow cell.

The library was sequenced using the paired-end procedure on the Illumina Hiseq2500 according to the manufacturer. Sample barcoding enabled 384 individual samples to be sequenced on each lane, aiming for a depth of coverage of at least 16,000X for the amplicons in every sample (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Boxplots showing the overall depth of coverage achieved by Hiseq2500 Illumina deep-sequencing of ALK targeted regions. The boxplot depicts the distribution of mean depth of coverage of H2O negative controls, germline controls, and neuroblastoma samples over the exon 23 (A) and exon 25 (B) targeted regions. This representation shows the very high depth of coverage achieved for neuroblastoma samples (at least 16000X). The mean overall coverage in the germline controls is 33000X and 41000X for F1174 and R1275 hotspots, respectively. H2O negative controls show an extremely low depth of coverage (mean = 58X for F1174 and 85X for R1275).

Figure 1.

Boxplots showing the overall depth of coverage achieved by Hiseq2500 Illumina deep-sequencing of ALK targeted regions. The boxplot depicts the distribution of mean depth of coverage of H2O negative controls, germline controls, and neuroblastoma samples over the exon 23 (A) and exon 25 (B) targeted regions. This representation shows the very high depth of coverage achieved for neuroblastoma samples (at least 16000X). The mean overall coverage in the germline controls is 33000X and 41000X for F1174 and R1275 hotspots, respectively. H2O negative controls show an extremely low depth of coverage (mean = 58X for F1174 and 85X for R1275).

Close modal

Bioinformatics detection of variations

Once paired-end reads merged and adaptors trimmed by SeqPrep with default parameters, merged reads were aligned via BWA allowing up to one difference in the 22-base-long seeds and reporting only unique alignments (26).

Variant calling software was not used, since we aimed to predict also variations at low frequencies. Such variants require a custom approach using DepthOfCoverage functions of the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) v2.13.2 and additional statistical analysis (28).

In order to focus on high-quality data, only reads with a mapping quality of >20 and a base quality of >10 were considered for the determination of the depth of coverage. First, in order to analyze the noise and to determine the background level of variability over the studied regions, the entire amplicons chr2:29443647–29443776 and chr2:29432603–29432704 (Human Genome Browser, http://genome.ucsc.edu/; hg19) were analyzed in 24 germline control samples. Next, in order to highlight variants in the neuroblastoma samples, for each sample the frequencies of each base at each position were compared with those observed in the germline controls. Statistical analyses were performed with the R statistical software (http://www.R-project.org). Fisher exact two-side tests with a Bonferroni correction were performed to compare percentages of base frequencies (allele fractions) between the datasets, that is, for a given base between a case and the controls. It takes into account for each coordinate and each base the impact of its environment since controls were sequenced together with cases for comparison. In complement, in order to limit false-positive predictions of variants, we kept as P value threshold the lowest one within intronic regions of the amplicons once polymorphisms filtered, since no causal variants were expected in those regions (exon 23: 1.1E−154 and exon 25: 6.1E−193, respectively). Finally, significant variations were filtered-in once (i) a significant increase in the percentage of variant base and (ii) a significant decrease in the percentage of its reference base following our P values criteria were observed.

The experiments were performed twice in an independent manner with the same approach. Only results predicted twice were considered.

Statistical analysis

Correlation analyses using χ2 test and survival analysis using multivariate logistic regression analysis were done with MedCalc (Medical Calculator) software (version 13.3.0.0). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons were made using log-rank tests.

In order to determine the frequency of ALK mutations with a higher sensitivity than conventional Sanger sequencing, we sequenced the ALK F1174 and R1275 hotspots in a series of 276 neuroblastoma samples in a two-step PCR procedure using HiSeq technology with a very high depth of coverage (Supplementary Table S1).

Background variability

In a first step, the sensitivity of the technique across a series of 24 germline controls was determined. The mean overall depth of coverage for the germline controls was 33,000X (range, 25069–56620) for the exon23 and 41,000X (range, 25062–56639) for the exon25 amplified region, respectively (Fig. 1). At this deep coverage, within targeted regions, the mean overall background variability, or noise, was 0.014% ± 0.031% in the germline controls (Supplementary Fig. S1).

To determine the expected sensitivity, we then calculated for each position the number of variation-supporting reads that would result in a statistically significant difference from the background noise. Bonferroni correction was applied, as multiple tests were performed for each base at each position. Considering a mean coverage of 33,000X, a variation supported by 688 reads or more, or observed with a frequency higher than 0.21%, would result in a statistically significant difference from the controls (two-sided Fisher exact test; details in Materials and Methods).

In the studied neuroblastoma samples, the depth of coverage and the overall background variability was not different from that observed in the germline controls. Furthermore, except a variant reported in dbSNP and in the 1000Genomes project (PMID:11125122) as a polymorphism (rs3738868) observed in more than 1% of the population (chr2:29432625, G>T), no variants outside the studied hotspots were observed in the targeted regions.

Mutations detected in exons 23 and 25

In a next step, the mutational status of the ALK gene within exons 23 and 25 at the hotspots F1174 and R1275 was analyzed. At positions chr2:29443695–29443697 (F1174 hotspot), ALK mutations were observed in 15 cases: 13 cases harbored a mutation leading to the amino acid change F1174L; F1174C and F1174V were each detected in one case, with a range of fractions of the mutated allele of 0.562% to 40.409% (Table 1, panel A). At position chr2:29432664 (R1275 hotspot), ALK mutations were detected in 12 cases: 11 samples showed the R1275Q mutation and one case showed the R1275L mutation, with a range of mutated allele fractions from 0.811% to 73.001% (Table 1, panel B).

Table 1.

Base frequencies (mutated allele fractions) at the F1174 (A) and R1275 (B) hotspots in samples analyzed by targeted deep sequencing

A
TGCA
Chr position/patient no.Number of reads%P%P%P%PCodon changeAA change
chr2:29443695 
 NB0012T 31,826 0.006 NS 0.000 NS 92.336 <1E−200 7.657 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0014T 34,146 0.015 NS 0.003 NS 99.239 2.20E−227 0.744 7.55E−266 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0183T 91,783 0.007 NS 0.004 NS 99.202 <1E−200 0.787 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0186T 34,516 0.012 NS 0.003 NS 89.289 <1E−200 10.691 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0194T 87,354 0.003 NS 0.002 NS 95.075 <1E−200 4.914 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0230T 31,837 0.003 NS 0.000 NS 99.435 3.76E−143 0.562 5.21E−178 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0231T 29,605 0.003 NS 0.000 NS 97.247 <1E−200 2.75 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0284T 34,364 0.017 NS 0.917 <1E-200 99.057 1.83E−301 0.009 NS TTC>TTG F1174L 
 NB0366T 38,842 0.013 NS 0.003 NS 77.957 <1E−200 22.025 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0824T 38,744 0.003 NS 0.008 NS 76.19 <1E−200 23.795 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB1244T 32,971 0.012 NS 0.003 NS 86.521 <1E−200 13.46 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 Controls (ALL) 796,066 0.009 NS 0.003 NS 99.976 NS 0.011 NS — — 
chr2:29443696 
 NB0920T 31,033 59.585 <1E−200 40.409 <1E−200 0.006 NS 0.000 NS TTC>TGF1174C 
 Controls (ALL) 796,952 99.987 NS 0.000 NS 0.009 NS 0.004 NS — — 
chr2:29443697 
 NB0535T 36,776 78.116 <1E−200 21.772 <1E−200 0.111 3.94E−20 0.000 NS TTC>GTC F1174V 
 NB0789T 29,509 76.963 <1E−200 0.000 NS 23.037 <1E−200 0.000 NS TTC>CTC F1174L 
 NB1253T 33,950 94.677 <1E−200 0.000 NS 5.323 <1E−200 0.000 NS TTC>CTC F1174L 
 Controls (ALL) 79,7051 99.987 NS 0.000 NS 0.01 NS 0.003 NS — — 
B
TGCA
Chr position/patient no.Number of reads%P%P%P%PCodon changeAA change
chr2:29432664 
 NB0085T 54,995 0.004 NS 38.267 <1E−200 0.004 NS 61.722 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0211T 48,445 0.014 NS 71.335 <1E−200 0.004 NS 28.647 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0222T 54,010 49.206 <1E−200 50.737 <1E−200 0.007 NS 0.046 NS CGA>CTR1275L 
 NB0233T 41,581 0.019 NS 96.325 <1E−200 0.002 NS 3.648 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0308T 31,473 0.000 NS 85.581 <1E−200 0.000 NS 14.419 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0372T 18,256 0.011 NS 38.541 <1E−200 0.005 NS 61.443 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0540T 30,453 0.013 NS 99.176 1.48E−189 0.000 NS 0.811 1.03E−222 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0984T 16,681 0.006 NS 54.865 <1E−200 0.000 NS 45.123 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB1001T 35,339 0.025 NS 64.47 <1E−200 0.006 NS 35.499 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB1057T 30,841 0.003 NS 96.887 <1E−200 0.000 NS 3.109 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB1129T 27,138 0.000 NS 96.002 <1E−200 0.004 NS 3.994 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB1418T 48,236 0.012 NS 26.976 <1E−200 0.004 NS 73.001 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 Controls (ALL) 100,586,7 0.016 NS 99.956 NS 0.001 NS 0.027 NS — — 
A
TGCA
Chr position/patient no.Number of reads%P%P%P%PCodon changeAA change
chr2:29443695 
 NB0012T 31,826 0.006 NS 0.000 NS 92.336 <1E−200 7.657 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0014T 34,146 0.015 NS 0.003 NS 99.239 2.20E−227 0.744 7.55E−266 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0183T 91,783 0.007 NS 0.004 NS 99.202 <1E−200 0.787 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0186T 34,516 0.012 NS 0.003 NS 89.289 <1E−200 10.691 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0194T 87,354 0.003 NS 0.002 NS 95.075 <1E−200 4.914 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0230T 31,837 0.003 NS 0.000 NS 99.435 3.76E−143 0.562 5.21E−178 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0231T 29,605 0.003 NS 0.000 NS 97.247 <1E−200 2.75 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0284T 34,364 0.017 NS 0.917 <1E-200 99.057 1.83E−301 0.009 NS TTC>TTG F1174L 
 NB0366T 38,842 0.013 NS 0.003 NS 77.957 <1E−200 22.025 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB0824T 38,744 0.003 NS 0.008 NS 76.19 <1E−200 23.795 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 NB1244T 32,971 0.012 NS 0.003 NS 86.521 <1E−200 13.46 <1E−200 TTC>TTA F1174L 
 Controls (ALL) 796,066 0.009 NS 0.003 NS 99.976 NS 0.011 NS — — 
chr2:29443696 
 NB0920T 31,033 59.585 <1E−200 40.409 <1E−200 0.006 NS 0.000 NS TTC>TGF1174C 
 Controls (ALL) 796,952 99.987 NS 0.000 NS 0.009 NS 0.004 NS — — 
chr2:29443697 
 NB0535T 36,776 78.116 <1E−200 21.772 <1E−200 0.111 3.94E−20 0.000 NS TTC>GTC F1174V 
 NB0789T 29,509 76.963 <1E−200 0.000 NS 23.037 <1E−200 0.000 NS TTC>CTC F1174L 
 NB1253T 33,950 94.677 <1E−200 0.000 NS 5.323 <1E−200 0.000 NS TTC>CTC F1174L 
 Controls (ALL) 79,7051 99.987 NS 0.000 NS 0.01 NS 0.003 NS — — 
B
TGCA
Chr position/patient no.Number of reads%P%P%P%PCodon changeAA change
chr2:29432664 
 NB0085T 54,995 0.004 NS 38.267 <1E−200 0.004 NS 61.722 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0211T 48,445 0.014 NS 71.335 <1E−200 0.004 NS 28.647 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0222T 54,010 49.206 <1E−200 50.737 <1E−200 0.007 NS 0.046 NS CGA>CTR1275L 
 NB0233T 41,581 0.019 NS 96.325 <1E−200 0.002 NS 3.648 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0308T 31,473 0.000 NS 85.581 <1E−200 0.000 NS 14.419 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0372T 18,256 0.011 NS 38.541 <1E−200 0.005 NS 61.443 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0540T 30,453 0.013 NS 99.176 1.48E−189 0.000 NS 0.811 1.03E−222 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB0984T 16,681 0.006 NS 54.865 <1E−200 0.000 NS 45.123 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB1001T 35,339 0.025 NS 64.47 <1E−200 0.006 NS 35.499 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB1057T 30,841 0.003 NS 96.887 <1E−200 0.000 NS 3.109 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB1129T 27,138 0.000 NS 96.002 <1E−200 0.004 NS 3.994 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 NB1418T 48,236 0.012 NS 26.976 <1E−200 0.004 NS 73.001 <1E−200 CGA>CAR1275Q 
 Controls (ALL) 100,586,7 0.016 NS 99.956 NS 0.001 NS 0.027 NS — — 

NOTE: The base corresponding to the reference genome (Human Genome Browser, http://genome.ucsc.edu/; hg19) is indicated at a given coordinate. For a sample to be analyzed, the total number of high-quality reads obtained by Hiseq deep sequencing is indicated, and the percentage of reads supporting each base (A, C, G, T) is shown. Values reported for controls are calculated from the total number of reads for germline controls at the given position. The mean base frequencies observed in the control set is also indicated. For each case, the P value refers to the comparison (two-sided Fisher exact test) of the base frequency observed in the studied sample to that observed in the controls. Statistically relevant differences are indicated in bold.

Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; NS, not statistically significant.

Altogether, deep sequencing revealed the presence of ALK mutations at the two hotspots F1174 and R1275 in 27/276 (9.8%) samples (Fig. 2; Table 2), with a wide range of mutated allele fractions (range: 0.562%–73.001%), even when corrected for tumor cell content and chr2p copy number status (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S1).

Figure 2.

Mutated allele fractions (frequency distribution of mutated ALK allele) at the ALK F1174 and R1275 hotspots detected in 27 samples. The x-axis represents the genomic coordinates of the targeted region, the y-axis represents the percentage of high quality reads supporting each base (logarithmic scale). Bases A, C, G, and T are represented with green, blue, yellow, and red colors, respectively, and the base corresponding to the reference genome sequence is reported above the graph, for the forward strand. A, chr2:29443689–29443702 region encompassing the exon 23 hotspot F1174 (positions 29443695–29443697) ±5 bases. Eleven mutations are detected at the position 29443695 (G>T), one detected at the position 29443696 (A>C) and three detected at the position 29443697 (A>C/G). B, chr2:29432658–29432669 region encompassing the exon 25 hotspot R1275 (position 29432664) ± 5 bases. Twelve mutations are detected at the position 29432664 (C>T/A).

Figure 2.

Mutated allele fractions (frequency distribution of mutated ALK allele) at the ALK F1174 and R1275 hotspots detected in 27 samples. The x-axis represents the genomic coordinates of the targeted region, the y-axis represents the percentage of high quality reads supporting each base (logarithmic scale). Bases A, C, G, and T are represented with green, blue, yellow, and red colors, respectively, and the base corresponding to the reference genome sequence is reported above the graph, for the forward strand. A, chr2:29443689–29443702 region encompassing the exon 23 hotspot F1174 (positions 29443695–29443697) ±5 bases. Eleven mutations are detected at the position 29443695 (G>T), one detected at the position 29443696 (A>C) and three detected at the position 29443697 (A>C/G). B, chr2:29432658–29432669 region encompassing the exon 25 hotspot R1275 (position 29432664) ± 5 bases. Twelve mutations are detected at the position 29432664 (C>T/A).

Close modal
Table 2.

Clinical and tumor genetic data of patients harboring ALK mutations

SampleAge at diagnosis (mo)INSS stageRelapse (yes or no)Follow-up (mo)StatusInterval diagnosis-relapse (mo)Tumoral cells (%)chr 2p copy number at ALK locusMYCN statusALK amplification statusALK F1174 status as detected by Hiseq (% of mutated allele)ALK R1275 status as detected by Hiseq (% of mutated allele)
NB0211T 20 Loc No 155 Alive NA 90 MN-NA ALK-NA 28.647 
NB0824T Yes 13 DOD 95 MN-NA ALK-NA 22.957 
NB0366T Loc No 98 Alive NA 80 MN-NA ALK-NA 20.899 
NB0183T 35 No 109 Alive NA 90 MNA ALK-NA 0.787 
NB0194T 40 Yes 10 DOD >50 2–3 MNA ALK-NA 4.914 
NB0085T 4s No 61 Alive NA 100 MN-NA ALK-NA 61.722 
NB0222T Loc No 63 Alive NA >50 MN-NA ALK-NA 49.206 
NB0230T 43 Yes 21 DOD 11 >50 MNA ALK-NA 0.562 
NB0789T 33 Loc No 56 Alive NA 80 MN-NA ALK-NA 22.854 
NB0233T 34 No 49 Alive NA >50 MNA ALK-NA 3.648 
NB0012T 13 Yes DOD 90 MNA ALK-NA 7.657 
NB0372T 10 Loc No 24 Alive NA 90 MN-NA ALK-NA 61.443 
NB1244T 13 No 40 DOD NA 90 MNA ALK-NA 13.46 
NB0308T Loc Yes 92 Alive 21 >50 MN-NA ALK-NA 14.419 
NB0186T 10 No DOD NA 80 MNA ALK-NA 10.534 
NB0231T 50 Yes 27 DOD 19 90 MNA ALK-NA 2.750 
NB1129T 31 No 33 Alive NA 95 MNA ALK-NA 3.994 
NB0535T Loc Yes 210 Alive 80 2–3 MN-NA ALK-NA 21.198 
NB0014T Yes 10 DOD 10 90 MNA ALK-NA 0.744 
NB0540T 10 No 235 Alive NA 70 3–4 MN-NA ALK-NA 0.811 
NB1057T 35 No 39 Alive NA 50 MNA ALK-NA 3.109 
NB0284T 44 Loc Yes DOD 90 MNA ALK-NA 0.917 
NB0920T Yes 51 Alive 14 90 MN-NA ALK-NA 38.955 
NB0984T 24 Yes 14 DOD 11 >50 MNA ALK-NA 45.123 
NB1001T 12 Loc No Alive NA 90 MN-NA ALK-NA 35.499 
NB1418T 15 Yes DOD 95 MNA ALK-A 73.001 
NB1253T 17 No 140 Alive NA >60 MNA ALK-NA 5.323 
SampleAge at diagnosis (mo)INSS stageRelapse (yes or no)Follow-up (mo)StatusInterval diagnosis-relapse (mo)Tumoral cells (%)chr 2p copy number at ALK locusMYCN statusALK amplification statusALK F1174 status as detected by Hiseq (% of mutated allele)ALK R1275 status as detected by Hiseq (% of mutated allele)
NB0211T 20 Loc No 155 Alive NA 90 MN-NA ALK-NA 28.647 
NB0824T Yes 13 DOD 95 MN-NA ALK-NA 22.957 
NB0366T Loc No 98 Alive NA 80 MN-NA ALK-NA 20.899 
NB0183T 35 No 109 Alive NA 90 MNA ALK-NA 0.787 
NB0194T 40 Yes 10 DOD >50 2–3 MNA ALK-NA 4.914 
NB0085T 4s No 61 Alive NA 100 MN-NA ALK-NA 61.722 
NB0222T Loc No 63 Alive NA >50 MN-NA ALK-NA 49.206 
NB0230T 43 Yes 21 DOD 11 >50 MNA ALK-NA 0.562 
NB0789T 33 Loc No 56 Alive NA 80 MN-NA ALK-NA 22.854 
NB0233T 34 No 49 Alive NA >50 MNA ALK-NA 3.648 
NB0012T 13 Yes DOD 90 MNA ALK-NA 7.657 
NB0372T 10 Loc No 24 Alive NA 90 MN-NA ALK-NA 61.443 
NB1244T 13 No 40 DOD NA 90 MNA ALK-NA 13.46 
NB0308T Loc Yes 92 Alive 21 >50 MN-NA ALK-NA 14.419 
NB0186T 10 No DOD NA 80 MNA ALK-NA 10.534 
NB0231T 50 Yes 27 DOD 19 90 MNA ALK-NA 2.750 
NB1129T 31 No 33 Alive NA 95 MNA ALK-NA 3.994 
NB0535T Loc Yes 210 Alive 80 2–3 MN-NA ALK-NA 21.198 
NB0014T Yes 10 DOD 10 90 MNA ALK-NA 0.744 
NB0540T 10 No 235 Alive NA 70 3–4 MN-NA ALK-NA 0.811 
NB1057T 35 No 39 Alive NA 50 MNA ALK-NA 3.109 
NB0284T 44 Loc Yes DOD 90 MNA ALK-NA 0.917 
NB0920T Yes 51 Alive 14 90 MN-NA ALK-NA 38.955 
NB0984T 24 Yes 14 DOD 11 >50 MNA ALK-NA 45.123 
NB1001T 12 Loc No Alive NA 90 MN-NA ALK-NA 35.499 
NB1418T 15 Yes DOD 95 MNA ALK-A 73.001 
NB1253T 17 No 140 Alive NA >60 MNA ALK-NA 5.323 

NOTE: For 27 patients, ALK mutations were detected at diagnosis by deep sequencing.

Abbreviations: ALK-A, ALK amplified; ALK-NA, ALK not-amplified; D, diagnosis; DOD, dead of disease; INSS, International Neuroblastoma Staging System; Loc, local tumor (stages 1, 2a, 2b or 3); MNA, MYCN amplification; MN-NA, MYCN non-amplified; NA, Not-applicable; /: not applicable.

Indeed, in this study, contamination with normal cells should be considered. For this study, contamination of tumor samples by normal cells of up to 50% was tolerated, and thus it is expected that in these samples heterozygous mutations would be present in 25% of all analyzed DNA fragments in a diploid context when occurring in all tumor cells. Thus, we use the term “clonal” for a mutated allele fraction > 20%, which would most likely concern a majority of tumor cells, and the term “subclonal” for a mutated allele fraction < 20%, which would most likely concern a smaller tumor cell population. On the basis of this definition and on the deep-sequencing results, 12 ALK mutations observed with an allele fraction higher than 20% might be considered as clonal, whereas 15 ALK mutations detected with an allele fraction of lower than 20% might be considered as subclonal events.

All deep-sequencing results were validated in a second independent experiment. Concordance between the first and second experiments was documented by (i) concordance of mutated allele fractions in the neuroblastoma samples between the two separate experiments and by (ii) concordance of frequencies of the allele of the rs3738868 polymorphism (Supplementary Fig. S2). Only in two of 276 cases was a discordance observed between the first and the second experiment and these cases were excluded from the analysis, both detected at very low mutated allele fractions in one experiment but not the other. These results indicate a very low false discovery rate of 2/276 (0.7%).

In addition, in two of 257 (0.8%) samples with available genomic copy number profiles, an ALK gene amplification was detected. One of these samples (NB1418T) also showed a R1275Q mutation (mutated allele fraction 73%; Table 2).

All ALK mutated samples were also tested by Sanger sequencing which confirmed all ALK mutations occurring at a clonal level with a mutated allele fraction >20%. Because of the limits of detection and due to the background noise generally present in the Sanger elecropherograms, ALK mutations would not have been retained by Sanger sequencing in subclonal cases.

Correlation of ALK aberrations (mutations and/or amplification) with clinical parameters in neuroblastoma

A correlation between the presence of an ALK aberration (mutations and/or amplification) and MYCN amplification was observed (Table 3, panel A), with an enrichment of F1174 ALK mutations in tumors harboring MYCN amplification (P < 0.0001). There were no other statistically significant correlations with clinical parameters (Table 3, panel A).

Table 3.

Correlation between ALK status and main clinical factors in neuroblastoma (A) and multivariate analysis (B; N = 276)

A
ALK status
Alteration of ALKχ2 Test
Age at the diagnosisALK WTAll ALK alterationsClonalSubclonalF1174 mutR1275 mutAmplificationP value
 <18 months 141 17 7a 2a NS 
 ≥18 months 107 11  
INSS stage 
 4 107 18 13 11 6a 2a NS 
 Loc or 4s 138 10  
 MD  
MYCN status 
 MYCN amp 39 16 13 10 5a 2a P < 0.0001 
 MYCN non-ampl 209 12 10  
B  
 Multivariate analysis       
Variables HR (95% CI) P       
INSS stage (unfavorable vs. favorable) 7.62 (3.82–15.16) <0.0001       
MYCN (amplified vs. nonamplified) 3.85 (2.38–6.21) <0.0001       
age at diagnosis (>18 mo vs. <18 mo) NS NS       
ALK (mutated vs. nonmutated) NS NS       
A
ALK status
Alteration of ALKχ2 Test
Age at the diagnosisALK WTAll ALK alterationsClonalSubclonalF1174 mutR1275 mutAmplificationP value
 <18 months 141 17 7a 2a NS 
 ≥18 months 107 11  
INSS stage 
 4 107 18 13 11 6a 2a NS 
 Loc or 4s 138 10  
 MD  
MYCN status 
 MYCN amp 39 16 13 10 5a 2a P < 0.0001 
 MYCN non-ampl 209 12 10  
B  
 Multivariate analysis       
Variables HR (95% CI) P       
INSS stage (unfavorable vs. favorable) 7.62 (3.82–15.16) <0.0001       
MYCN (amplified vs. nonamplified) 3.85 (2.38–6.21) <0.0001       
age at diagnosis (>18 mo vs. <18 mo) NS NS       
ALK (mutated vs. nonmutated) NS NS       

aBoth ALK amplification and R1275 mutation detected in one tumor.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; clonal, allele frequency >20%; INSS, International Neuroblastoma Staging System; MD, missing data; NS, not significant; subclonal, allele frequency <20%.

Furthermore, no statistically significant correlations between the ALK status and main clinical parameters were observed among patients whose tumors harbored ALK mutations either at a clonal or subclonal level, respectively.

FISH analysis of MYCN status correlated with the tumor cell content determined by H&E staining, and in no instance was heterogeneous MYCN amplification observed. In particular, in cases with ALK mutations detected at a subclonal level, MYCN status determined by FISH was homogeneous throughout all tumor cells, and in amplified cases concerned all tumor cells (>50% of cells in the sample).

Impact of ALK mutations on survival

The overall survival of patients with ALK wild-type versus ALK-mutated and/or ALK-amplified tumors was compared, and Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a statistically significant poorer OS in patients whose tumors harbored an ALK aberration (P < 0.02; Fig. 3A). However, no statistically significant differences were found in PFS between these two patient groups. A statistically significant difference in OS was observed between patients with ALK F1174-mutated tumors versus all other patients (P = 0.0014; Fig. 3B). The comparison of survival of patients with ALK wild-type or ALK aberrations, with or without MYCN amplification showed a poorer OS in patients whose tumors harbor MYCN amplification, with or without ALK aberration (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.

OS analysis. A, OS according to the presence or absence of somatic ALK aberrations. Neuroblastoma patients whose tumors harbor an ALK alteration (ALK mutations and/or amplification) show a decreased overall survival (5-year OS 54% ±9.8% versus 75% ±2.9%; log-rank test, P = 0.0182). B, OS according to the presence or absence of the F1174 mutation. Neuroblastoma patients whose tumor show a F1174 mutation show a poorer OS (5-year OS 40% ±12.6% versus 75% ±2.8%; log-rank test, P = 0.0014). C, OS according to MYCN and ALK status (MYCN amplification vs. no amplification; ALK alteration versus no alteration). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicates that the poorer OS observed in patients with tumors showing an ALK alteration is dependent on MYCN amplification (5-year OS 90% ±8.6%, 83% ±2.8%, 30% ±8.5%, 28% ±12.2%, respectively; log-rank test, P < 0.0001).

Figure 3.

OS analysis. A, OS according to the presence or absence of somatic ALK aberrations. Neuroblastoma patients whose tumors harbor an ALK alteration (ALK mutations and/or amplification) show a decreased overall survival (5-year OS 54% ±9.8% versus 75% ±2.9%; log-rank test, P = 0.0182). B, OS according to the presence or absence of the F1174 mutation. Neuroblastoma patients whose tumor show a F1174 mutation show a poorer OS (5-year OS 40% ±12.6% versus 75% ±2.8%; log-rank test, P = 0.0014). C, OS according to MYCN and ALK status (MYCN amplification vs. no amplification; ALK alteration versus no alteration). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicates that the poorer OS observed in patients with tumors showing an ALK alteration is dependent on MYCN amplification (5-year OS 90% ±8.6%, 83% ±2.8%, 30% ±8.5%, 28% ±12.2%, respectively; log-rank test, P < 0.0001).

Close modal

Multivariate analysis of OS using a Cox's regression model further confirmed that in this series, independent predictors of poor outcome are INSS stage IV disease and MYCN amplification, and that ALK mutational status does not add prognostic information to the clinical parameters “INSS stage” and “MYCN status” (Table 3, panel B). No statistically significant differences of OS and PFS in patients with ALK mutations at a clonal versus subclonal level were observed (log-rank test: P = 0.2 and P = 0.98, respectively).

In order to determine the frequency of ALK mutations in diagnostic neuroblastoma samples with a higher sensitivity than conventional sequencing methods, we have used ultra-deep sequencing to analyze a large series of representative neuroblastoma samples (Supplementary Table S1).

Traditional Sanger sequencing has been widely used in clinical laboratories for mutation testing, but the sensitivity is limited to the detection of 20% to 30% of mutated alleles in a wild-type background (25). A higher sensitivity has been shown for droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and NGS techniques (25, 27). Indeed, a limit of detection of 2% of mutated allele fractions has been evidenced for BRAF mutations using NGS methods (29). We have reported on a sensitivity limit of 0.17% using PGM technology for detection of ALK mutations in a series of diagnostic and relapse neuroblastoma samples (30).

Different algorithms, such as ABSOLUTE, have been described to detect mutations with low mutated allele fractions (31). However, these algorithms have not been developed specifically for ultra-deep sequencing data. Thus, in this study, a custom approach has been used to define mutations with very low mutated allele fractions in deep-sequencing data.

In this study, the targeted sequencing method achieved a very high depth of coverage over the region of interest (mean coverage 33,000X). On the basis of this coverage, a mutated allele fraction of 0.21% or more was considered significantly different from the germline controls, which is well below the lower limit defined in the technical specifications of Hiseq Illumina. This calculated sensitivity is considered relevant only if (i) analyzed data correspond to similar depth of coverage, (ii) sequencing is performed with the same technology, (iii) controls show similar low variability, and (iv) the targeted region has a base environment similar to the regions analyzed in this experiment. This detection limit also corresponds to the theoretical limit of detection based on the DNA input for one experiment (50 ng of DNA, equivalent to approximately 5,000 diploid genomes).

Between the different mutation types, a higher mean mutated allele fraction was observed in the R1275 cases (mean of mutated allele fractions: 11.6 vs. 29.5 in F1174 vs. R1275 cases, respectively; P = 0.02, t test). When considering chr2p status, in cases with three copies of chr2, the mutated allele most likely concerns the non-duplicated chr2p for F1174, and the duplicated chr2p for R1275 (Table 2). This might further support the hypothesis that R1275 mutations are less aggressive than F1174 mutations, and that more copies of the R1275 mutated allele are necessary to transfer selective advantage to the tumor cells, as previously suggested (32, 33).

Previous studies describing ALK mutations in neuroblastoma samples, frequently analyzing the whole tyrosine kinase domain, have used conventional sequencing methods, such as Sanger sequencing, or whole-genome/whole-exome sequencing with standard resolution. The incidence of ALK mutations observed in these studies varies from 6% to 12% of all neuroblastoma cases (15, 16, 18–21). In our cohort, studying only exons 23 and 25 of the ALK gene, 27 of 276 neuroblastoma (9.8%) presented an ALK mutation. An incidence of only 4.3% would have been observed by Sanger sequencing, with the incidence doubling when moving to ultra-sensitive deep sequencing.

To date, in neuroblastoma, the co-occurrence of an ALK hotspot mutation and amplification has been reported only for a cell line: CLB-GE harbors both the F1174V mutation and an ALK high level amplification (15). In this series, one sample had both ALK amplification and a R1275 mutation, indicating that, although rare, these alterations are not mutually exclusive (Table 2). A mutated allele fraction of 73% in the context of a genomic amplification of >10 copies suggested that the ALK gene underwent amplification before an R1275 mutational event with subsequent further amplification rounds.

ALK F1174L mutations have been reported in a higher frequency in MYCN-amplified tumors (19). The co-occurrence of ALK F1174L and MYCN amplification probably represents a cooperative effect between both alterations in neuroblastoma, which might explain the particularly poor survival of these patients (33, 34).

In vitro and in vivo studies have indicated the efficacy of ALK inhibitors on cells harboring ALK mutations at a clonal level (21, 28). It now remains to be determined whether tumor populations composed of subclones harboring ALK R1275 or F1174 mutations have different growth properties and different responses to ALK inhibitors in in vitro and in vivo experimental systems.

The observation of ALK-mutated subclones at diagnosis suggests the coexistence of ALK nonmutated and ALK-mutated cells, which might coexist in an advantageous equilibrium and might crucially affect the dynamics of cancer progression at a later stage. Cooperation of different tumor cell subsets has been reported to contribute to the malignant cancer phenotype (30, 32). Single cell experiments and in situ approaches will enable to elucidate how ALK-mutated cells are distributed throughout a neuroblastoma tumor and how these cells might potentially collaborate with cells with different genetic alterations.

A higher frequency of ALK mutations at relapse of neuroblastoma has recently been reported, with the possibility of expansion of a minor ALK-mutated subclone at diagnosis to a dominant ALK-mutated clone at relapse (26). Further detailed sequencing studies in larger series of diagnosis-relapse samples will be required to elucidate the role of subclonal ALK mutations in clonal evolution and progression of neuroblastoma.

In conclusion, given the oncogenic role of ALK, the possibility of evolution of ALK mutated clones from diagnosis to relapse and the possibility to target ALK mutations with ALK inhibitors such as crizotinib (PF-02341066) or other second-generation ALK inhibitors such as LDK378 (Novartis Pharmaceuticals), the determination of the exact genetic ALK status in all neuroblastoma is crucial (21, 29). We clearly demonstrate the advantages of deep-sequencing NGS technology for the detection of mutational events in a common pediatric cancer. Our approach, relative to conventional methods, has shown several advantages, including (i) in vitro library construction of a large number of samples, (ii) high resolution, (iii) short time analysis, and (iv) high accuracy. Owing to the higher sensitivity of deep sequencing, it is very likely that, in the near future and with growing experience, these techniques will replace conventional methods for mutation detection.

The high-resolution technique identifies clonal and subclonal mutational events, thus doubling the number of identified ALK mutation events compared with those detected with conventional sequencing techniques. To date, no formal recommendation for targeted therapy in a context of low subclonal events can be given. Indeed, in other pathologies, targeted therapies such as dabrafenib for V600E/K mutations in melanoma are most frequently proposed in a context of mutation detection using standard resolution techniques which do not reveal lower mutated allele fractions below 5% to 10% (35). Our findings now highlight the importance of further functional studies analyzing the interactions between ALK-mutated and nonmutated subclones on the one hand, and the possibilities of clonal evolution on the other hand. Such studies should especially focus on the analysis of readily accessible surrogate samples, such as serial blood samples for the study of ctDNA.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: D. Valteau-Couanet, O. Delattre, G. Schleiermacher

Development of methodology: A. Bellini, Q. Leroy, T. Rio Frio, G. Schleiermacher

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): Q. Leroy, G. Pierron, V. Combaret, E. Lapouble, H. Rubie, E. Thebaud, C. Bergeron, N. Buchbinder, S. Taque, A. Auvrignon, J. Michon, I. Janoueix-Lerosey, G. Schleiermacher

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): A. Bellini, V. Bernard, C. Bergeron, I. Janoueix-Lerosey, G. Schleiermacher

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: A. Bellini, V. Bernard, G. Pierron, V. Combaret, P. Chastagner, A.S. Defachelles, C. Bergeron, D. Valteau-Couanet, O. Delattre, G. Schleiermacher

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): A. Bellini, G. Pierron, E. Lapouble, N. Clement, O. Delattre, G. Schleiermacher

Study supervision: G. Schleiermacher

The authors thank the following colleagues for their contribution to this study: Catherine Devoldere, Paul Fréneaux, Vannina Giacobbi-Milet, Hayet Hanbli, Philippe Le Moine, Odile Minckes, Isabelle Pellier, Michel Peuchmaur, Dominique Plantaz, Emmanuel Plouvier, and Nicolas Sirvent.

This work was supported by the Annenberg foundation and the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (équipe labellisée). Funding was also obtained from SiRIC/INCa (Grant INCa-DGOS-4654) and from the CEST of Institute Curie and by the Associations Enfants et Santé, Association Hubert Gouin Enfance et Cancer, Les Bagouz à Manon, Les amis de Claire. Next generation experiments (NGS) were conducted on the Institute Curie's ICGex NGS platform funded by the EQUIPEX “investissements d'avenir” program (ANR-10-EQPX-03) and ANR10-IneuroblastomaS-09-08 from the Agence Nationale de le Recherche, and by the Canceropôle Ile de-France.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Gerlinger
M
,
Rowan
AJ
,
Horswell
S
,
Larkin
J
,
Endesfelder
D
,
Gronroos
E
, et al
Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
366
:
883
92
.
2.
Swanton
C
. 
Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time
.
Cancer Res
2012
;
72
:
4875
82
.
3.
Anderson
K
,
Lutz
C
,
van Delft
FW
,
Bateman
CM
,
Guo
Y
,
Colman
SM
, et al
Genetic variegation of clonal architecture and propagating cells in leukaemia
.
Nature
2011
;
469
:
356
61
.
4.
Burrell
RA
,
McGranahan
N
,
Bartek
J
,
Swanton
C
. 
The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution
.
Nature
2013
;
501
:
338
45
.
5.
Crockford
A
,
Jamal-Hanjani
M
,
Hicks
J
,
Swanton
C
. 
Implications of intratumour heterogeneity for treatment stratification
.
J Pathol
2014
;
232
:
264
73
.
6.
Greaves
M
,
Maley
CC
. 
Clonal evolution in cancer
.
Nature
2012
;
481
:
306
13
.
7.
Newburger
DE
,
Kashef-Haghighi
D
,
Weng
Z
,
Salari
R
,
Sweeney
RT
,
Brunner
AL
, et al
Genome evolution during progression to breast cancer
.
Genome Res
2013
;
23
:
1097
108
.
8.
Eirew
P
,
Steif
A
,
Khattra
J
,
Ha
G
,
Yap
D
,
Farahani
H
, et al
Dynamics of genomic clones in breast cancer patient xenografts at single-cell resolution
.
Nature
2015
;
518
:
422
6
.
9.
Landau
DA
,
Carter
SL
,
Stojanov
P
,
McKenna
A
,
Stevenson
K
,
Lawrence
MS
, et al
Evolution and impact of subclonal mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia
.
Cell
2013
;
152
:
714
26
.
10.
Janoueix-Lerosey
I
,
Schleiermacher
G
,
Michels
E
,
Mosseri
V
,
Ribeiro
A
,
Lequin
D
, et al
Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2009
;
27
:
1026
33
.
11.
Molenaar
JJ
,
Koster
J
,
Zwijnenburg
DA
,
van Sluis
P
,
Valentijn
LJ
,
van der Ploeg
I
, et al
Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes
.
Nature
2012
;
483
:
589
93
.
12.
Pugh
TJ
,
Morozova
O
,
Attiyeh
EF
,
Asgharzadeh
S
,
Wei
JS
,
Auclair
D
, et al
The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma
.
Nat Genet
2013
;
45
:
279
84
.
13.
Sausen
M
,
Leary
RJ
,
Jones
S
,
Wu
J
,
Reynolds
CP
,
Liu
X
, et al
Integrated genomic analyses identify ARID1A and ARID1B alterations in the childhood cancer neuroblastoma
.
Nat Genet
2013
;
45
:
12
7
.
14.
Schleiermacher
G
,
Janoueix-Lerosey
I
,
Ribeiro
A
,
Klijanienko
J
,
Couturier
J
,
Pierron
G
, et al
Accumulation of segmental alterations determines progression in neuroblastoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2010
;
28
:
3122
30
.
15.
Janoueix-Lerosey
I
,
Lequin
D
,
Brugières
L
,
Ribeiro
A
,
de Pontual
L
,
Combaret
V
, et al
Somatic and germline activating mutations of the ALK kinase receptor in neuroblastoma
.
Nature
2008
;
455
:
967
70
.
16.
Mossé
YP
,
Laudenslager
M
,
Longo
L
,
Cole
KA
,
Wood
A
,
Attiyeh
EF
, et al
Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene
.
Nature
2008
;
455
:
930
5
.
17.
Schleiermacher
G
,
Janoueix-Lerosey
I
,
Delattre
O
. 
Recent insights into the biology of neuroblastoma
.
Int J Cancer
2014
;
135
:
2249
61
.
18.
Chen
Y
,
Takita
J
,
Choi
YL
,
Kato
M
,
Ohira
M
,
Sanada
M
, et al
Oncogenic mutations of ALK kinase in neuroblastoma
.
Nature
2008
;
455
:
971
4
.
19.
De Brouwer
S
,
De Preter
K
,
Kumps
C
,
Zabrocki
P
,
Porcu
M
,
Westerhout
EM
, et al
Meta-analysis of neuroblastomas reveals a skewed ALK mutation spectrum in tumors with MYCN amplification
.
Clin Cancer Res
2010
;
16
:
4353
62
.
20.
Carén
H
,
Abel
F
,
Kogner
P
,
Martinsson
T
. 
High incidence of DNA mutations and gene amplifications of the ALK gene in advanced sporadic neuroblastoma tumours
.
Biochem J
2008
;
416
:
153
9
.
21.
Bresler
SC
,
Weiser
DA
,
Huwe
PJ
,
Park
JH
,
Krytska
K
,
Ryles
H
, et al
ALK mutations confer differential oncogenic activation and sensitivity to ALK inhibition therapy in neuroblastoma
.
Cancer Cell
2014
;
26
:
682
94
.
22.
Cazes
A
,
Louis-Brennetot
C
,
Mazot
P
,
Dingli
F
,
Lombard
B
,
Boeva
V
, et al
Characterization of rearrangements involving the ALK gene reveals a novel truncated form associated with tumor aggressiveness in neuroblastoma
.
Cancer Res
2013
;
73
:
195
204
.
23.
Li
H
,
Durbin
R
. 
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
.
Bioinformatics
2009
;
25
:
1754
60
.
24.
McKenna
A
,
Hanna
M
,
Banks
E
,
Sivachenko
A
,
Cibulskis
K
,
Kernytsky
A
, et al
The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data
.
Genome Res
2010
;
20
:
1297
303
.
25.
Ihle
MA
,
Fassunke
J
,
König
K
,
Grünewald
I
,
Schlaak
M
,
Kreuzberg
N
, et al
Comparison of high resolution melting analysis, pyrosequencing, next generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry to conventional Sanger sequencing for the detection of p.V600E and non-p.V600E BRAF mutations
.
BMC Cancer
2014
;
14
:
13
.
26.
Schleiermacher
G
,
Javanmardi
N
,
Bernard
V
,
Leroy
Q
,
Cappo
J
,
Rio Frio
T
, et al
Emergence of new ALK mutations at relapse of neuroblastoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2014
;
32
:
2727
34
.
27.
Combaret
V
,
Iacono
I
,
Bellini
A
,
Bréjon
S
,
Bernard
V
,
Marabelle
A
, et al
Detection of tumor ALK status in neuroblastoma patients using peripheral blood
.
Cancer Med
2015
;
4
:
540
50
.
28.
Bresler
SC
,
Wood
AC
,
Haglund
EA
,
Courtright
J
,
Belcastro
LT
,
Plegaria
JS
, et al
Differential inhibitor sensitivity of anaplastic lymphoma kinase variants found in neuroblastoma
.
Sci Transl Med
2011
;
3
:
108ra114
.
29.
Barone
G
,
Anderson
J
,
Pearson
ADJ
,
Petrie
K
,
Chesler
L
. 
New strategies in neuroblastoma: therapeutic targeting of MYCN and ALK
.
Clin Cancer Res
2013
;
19
:
5814
21
.
30.
Axelrod
R
,
Axelrod
DE
,
Pienta
KJ
. 
Evolution of cooperation among tumor cells
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2006
;
103
:
13474
9
.
31.
Carter
SL
,
Cibulskis
K
,
Helman
E
,
McKenna
A
,
Shen
H
,
Zack
T
, et al
Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer
.
Nat Biotechnol
2012
;
30
:
413
21
.
32.
Cleary
AS
,
Leonard
TL
,
Gestl
SA
,
Gunther
EJ
. 
Tumour cell heterogeneity maintained by cooperating subclones in Wnt-driven mammary cancers
.
Nature
2014
;
508
:
113
7
.
33.
Berry
T
,
Luther
W
,
Bhatnagar
N
,
Jamin
Y
,
Poon
E
,
Sanda
T
, et al
The ALK(F1174L) mutation potentiates the oncogenic activity of MYCN in neuroblastoma
.
Cancer Cell
2012
;
22
:
117
30
.
34.
Zhu
S
,
Lee
J-S
,
Guo
F
,
Shin
J
,
Perez-Atayde
AR
,
Kutok
JL
, et al
Activated ALK collaborates with MYCN in neuroblastoma pathogenesis
.
Cancer Cell
2012
;
21
:
362
73
.
35.
Robert
C
,
Karaszewska
B
,
Schachter
J
,
Rutkowski
P
,
Mackiewicz
A
,
Stroiakovski
D
, et al
Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib
.
N Engl J Med
2015
;
372
:
30
9
.