Purpose: To investigate the safety, dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the smoothened inhibitor vismodegib in children with refractory or relapsed medulloblastoma.

Experimental design: Initially, vismodegib was administered daily at 85 mg/m2 and escalated to 170 mg/m2. The study was then revised to investigate a flat-dosing schedule of 150 mg for patients with small body surface area (BSA, 0.67–1.32 m2) or 300 mg for those who were larger (BSA, 1.33–2.20 m2). Pharmacokinetics were performed during the first course of therapy, and the right knees of all patients were imaged to monitor bone toxicity. Immunohistochemical analysis was done to identify patients with Sonic Hedgehog (SHH)-subtype medulloblastoma.

Results: Thirteen eligible patients were enrolled in the initial study: 6 received 85 mg/m2 vismodegib, and 7 received 170 mg/m2. Twenty eligible patients were enrolled in the flat-dosing part of the study: 10 at each dosage level. Three dose-limiting toxicities were observed, but no drug-related bone toxicity was documented. The median (range) vismodegib penetration in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was 0.53 (0.26–0.78), when expressed as a ratio of the concentration of vismodegib in the CSF to that of the unbound drug in plasma. Antitumor activity was seen in 1 of 3 patients with SHH-subtype disease whose tumors were evaluable, and in none of the patients in the other subgroups.

Conclusions: Vismodegib was well tolerated in children with recurrent or refractory medulloblastoma; only two dose-limiting toxicities were observed with flat dosing. The recommended phase II study dose is 150 or 300 mg, depending on the patient's BSA. Clin Cancer Res; 19(22); 6305–12. ©2013 AACR.

Translational Relevance

The smoothened inhibitor vismodegib has antitumor activity in adults. However, its effects in children have not been thoroughly assessed, and preclinical results suggest that the drug may cause growth defects in bone and teeth. In this phase I study, we examined the safety, efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of vismodegib in pediatric patients with recurrent medulloblastoma. Molecular heterogeneity within the SHH medulloblastoma subtype—namely GLI or MYCN amplifications or SUFU, MLL2, P53, and SMO mutations—may have resulted in the observed variable efficacy of vismodegib. We detected no deleterious effects on bone growth. Ongoing phase II studies of recurrent SHH medulloblastoma in adults and children will further elucidate the efficacy and chronic toxicity of vismodegib.

The Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) pathway is activated in some familial and sporadic medulloblastomas; thus, stratifying this molecular subtype for targeted therapies may be possible (1). SHH-subtype medulloblastoma was distinguished on the basis of the presence of RNAs whose expression increases after SHH-pathway activation (2, 3). A set of mutations, primarily loss of patched-1 (PTCH1), gain-of-function in smoothened (SMO), and loss of suppressor-of-fused (SUFU), account for approximately half of SHH-medulloblastoma cases. In contrast, WNT-subtype medulloblastoma expresses target genes characteristic of the WNT-pathway activation, and most harbor activating mutations in β-catenin (4, 5). Recently, DNA-sequencing approaches identified many other, sometimes overlapping, mutations in medulloblastoma (6–9).

The first small-molecule inhibitor of the SHH pathway identified was the teratogen cyclopamine, which causes developmental abnormalities by inhibiting SMO, a membrane-associated protein that functions downstream of PTCH1 in the SHH pathway (10, 11). This led to cell-based screens for other SMO inhibitors with greater efficacy and reduced toxicity that could be developed as potential therapeutics (12, 13). The generation of a mouse model of Gorlin syndrome (14) and that of a high-incidence, early-onset model of medulloblastoma (15) permitted preclinical studies that demonstrated remarkable efficacy of the tool compound HhAntag (16). These findings stimulated further medicinal chemistry, leading to the first-in-class compound GDC-0449 (vismodegib; ref. 17) that was entered into advanced solid tumor clinical trials (18). Several SMO inhibitors are currently being tested in the phase I and II settings against various tumor types (1, 19).

In a phase I trial of vismodegib for advanced, metastatic solid tumors, patients with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) showed a 60% response rate (18). The only other response, albeit transient and incomplete, occurred in a patient with metastatic medulloblastoma (20). The common feature of these tumors is the presence of activating mutations in the SHH pathway (1). The metastatic medulloblastoma eventually relapsed due to a SMO mutation that abrogated vismodegib binding (21). On the basis of these data, we designed a phase I trial to determine the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase II dosage of vismodegib in pediatric patients with refractory or recurrent medulloblastoma. In light of preclinical data indicating that SMO inhibitors cause growth defects in the bones and teeth of mice (22, 23), this trial was designed to detect developmental toxicities that are unique to children.

Patients

Eligible patients were 3 to 21 years of age, had a histologically verified diagnosis of medulloblastoma that was recurrent, progressive, or refractory to standard therapy, and had a Karnofsky or Lansky score of 60 or higher documented within 2 weeks of registration. The initial trial required a body surface area (BSA) that was no more than 2.0 m2; the flat-dosing trial required that BSA be 0.67 to 2.5 m2. Patients were eligible if they had stable neurologic deficits for at least 1 week before enrolling, had recovered from previous treatment-related toxicity, and had not received any of the following treatments during the given period before study entry: growth factors within 1 week, myelosuppressive chemotherapy or immunotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks if nitrosourea), craniospinal irradiation within 3 months, local radiotherapy to the primary tumor within 8 weeks, or focal irradiation for symptomatic metastatic sites within 2 weeks.

Pregnant patients and those with clinically significant, unrelated systemic illness were excluded. Patients were not allowed to take any other anticancer or investigational drug while on the study. Other requirements included adequate functioning of bone marrow (peripheral ANC ≥1,000/μL, platelet count ≥100,000/μL, and transfusion-independent hemoglobin ≥8.0 g/dL), kidneys (serum creatinine ≤1.5× upper-normal limit [UNL] for age or GFR ≥70 mL/min per 1.73 m2), and liver (total bilirubin ≤1.5× institutional UNL for age, ALT and AST, ≤2.5× institutional UNL for age, and albumin ≥2.5 g/dL). All patients with child-bearing potential were required to use two forms of contraception, including one barrier method, during their participation in the study and for 12 months thereafter. Informed consent was obtained from patients, parents, or guardians; assent was obtained, as appropriate, at the time of enrollment. The institutional review boards of each Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC) institution approved the protocol before patient enrollment, and continuing approval was maintained throughout the study. All data were managed as per the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

Study design

Vismodegib was supplied by Genentech and distributed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Initially, Genentech produced vismodegib as 25 and 150 mg capsules. In the initial study, two dosages were used: 85 and 170 mg/m2 (rounded to the nearest 25 mg), and each course was 28 days long. Genentech then ceased to manufacture the 25-mg capsule, so we revised the protocol. In the second study, a flat-dosing schema was used: smaller patients (BSA, 0.67–1.32 m2) received 150 mg/day, and larger patients (BSA, 1.33–2.2 m2) received 300 mg/day.

The original PBTC025 (NCT00822458) study was designed to determine a dosage for the subsequent phase II trial based on a comparison of the 95% confidence interval estimated for the day 21 mean steady-state concentration (Css) of total vismodegib (protein-bound and unbound) in plasma of each cohort, provided that both dosages were safe. Once the 25 mg capsules were no longer available, the recommended BSA-adjusted dosages were not identical to their assigned dosages, and large deviations from the targeted level of 170 mg/m2 were unavoidable (Fig. 1). Our flat-dosing strategy (Supplementary Table S1) was devised to minimize this deviation. Patients could receive as many as 26 courses in the absence of disease progression.

Figure 1.

Variations in target dosages of vismodegib reflect interpatient differences in body surface area (BSA). Deliverable doses vary from targeted doses due to BSA-based dosing and limited drug formulation. Orange symbols (+) represent the initial cohort who received 25-mg capsules, and the black symbols (○) represent the flat-dosing cohort who received 150-mg capsules. Dosing strategy was based on minimizing the difference between the deliverable and targeted doses. Variation from the targeted doses was substantially less in the initial study than in the flat-dosing trial due to the initial availability of the 25-mg capsules. With a targeted dose of 170 mg/m2 in the flat-dosing cohort, BSA ranges were chosen to minimize the difference between the targeted and the deliverable doses. Individual patient BSAs are plotted just above the x-axis.

Figure 1.

Variations in target dosages of vismodegib reflect interpatient differences in body surface area (BSA). Deliverable doses vary from targeted doses due to BSA-based dosing and limited drug formulation. Orange symbols (+) represent the initial cohort who received 25-mg capsules, and the black symbols (○) represent the flat-dosing cohort who received 150-mg capsules. Dosing strategy was based on minimizing the difference between the deliverable and targeted doses. Variation from the targeted doses was substantially less in the initial study than in the flat-dosing trial due to the initial availability of the 25-mg capsules. With a targeted dose of 170 mg/m2 in the flat-dosing cohort, BSA ranges were chosen to minimize the difference between the targeted and the deliverable doses. Individual patient BSAs are plotted just above the x-axis.

Close modal

Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any of the following events that were at least possibly related to the study drug and occurred during the first 28 days on study. Hematologic DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, or grade 3 thrombocytopenia requiring transfusions on more than two occasions during a treatment course. Nonhematologic DLT was defined as any grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity attributable to vismodegib treatment and most grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities, excluding the following conditions: grade 3 nausea and vomiting for 5 days or less despite treatment with appropriate antiemetics, grade 3 ALT or AST that returns to levels that meet eligibility criteria within 5 days of vismodegib interruption and do not recur upon rechallenge, grade 3 fever or infection for no more than 5 days, grade 3 hypophosphatemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, or hypomagnesemia responsive to oral supplementation. DLTs were graded according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).

Pretreatment evaluations included a history, physical examination, dental evaluation, knee MRI, performance status, disease evaluation, complete blood count (CBC), electrolyte measurement, renal and liver function tests, and pregnancy tests for female patients of childbearing age. CBC, electrolytes, and renal and liver functions were tested weekly during the first course and monthly before starting subsequent courses. History and physical examination were obtained before each course. Disease evaluations, dental evaluation, and MRIs of the knee were performed every 3 months and at the end of therapy. Contraceptive methods were confirmed and documented, and the teratogenic potential of vismodegib was explained before each course.

Tumor responses were defined as follows: Complete response—no measureable lesions on MRI. If disease was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) before treatment, the CSF must be negative. Partial response—at least 50% reduction in tumor area compared with baseline measurements. Stable disease—MRI features that do not meet the criteria for partial response or progressive disease. Progressive disease—more than 25% increase in tumor area compared with the smallest area measured since protocol therapy initiation or the detection of a new lesion. Patients whose disease response was based on imaging received a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids, had to show improved neurologic function, and the response had to be maintained for at least 8 weeks.

Pharmacokinetics

Mandatory pharmacokinetics were conducted in all patients, beginning on day 1 of the first course: blood samples were collected before the first vismodegib dose and at 2, 8, 24, 48, 72, and either 96, 120, or 144 hours thereafter. Vismodegib was withheld on days 2 and 3 to obtain samples for pharmacokinetic analysis. In addition, blood samples were obtained prior to the vismodegib dose on days 14 and 21 of the first course. Blood samples were centrifuged, and the plasma was stored at −80 °C until the total- and unbound-drug concentrations were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (24). Plasma samples were prepared for unbound-drug analysis using a 96-well equilibrium dialyzer (Harvard Apparatus). Pharmacokinetics of total and unbound drug consisted of time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) on day 1, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0→72), and the Css which was obtained prior to the dose on day 21 (i.e., Css trough). Apparent oral clearance was estimated using standard, noncompartmental methods. Consenting patients with ventricular-access devices provided simultaneous ventricular CSF and plasma samples at 1, 3, and 8 hours after the first vismodegib dose. CSF vismodegib concentrations were analyzed via the same method as plasma vismodegib concentrations (24). The ratio of vismodegib AUC0→8 in CSF to that in plasma (total or unbound) was used as a measure of drug penetration.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) was performed according to established protocols with antibodies against GFAP (M0761; 1:250; Dako), synaptophysin (NCL-L-Synap-299; 1:400; Leica Microsystems), NEU-N (MAB377; 1:10,000; Chemicon), p27Kip1 (M7203; 1:50; Dako), and Ki-67 (M7240; 1:200; Dako). Molecular subgroups of disease (SHH, WNT, and non-SHH/WNT) were disclosed using four antibodies, as described previously (25).

MRI

A noncontrast MRI of the right knee was obtained within 4 weeks of starting therapy, every 3 months thereafter, and at the end of therapy to assess drug-related bone toxicity. The following MRI sequences were used: coronal fat-saturated T1 spin echo, sagittal fat-saturated proton density, and three-dimensional (3D) double-echo steady state.

Patient characteristics

Of the 34 patients who enrolled, 33 met the eligibility criteria (Table 1). Thirteen patients participated in the initial cohort, and 20 in the flat-dosing cohort. The median number of courses administered was two (range, 1–26).

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with medulloblastoma in a phase I trial of vismodegib

CharacteristicInitial cohort (n = 13)Flat-dosing cohort (n = 20)
Sex ratio (male:female) 10:3 15:5 
Age at study entry, y 
 Median 11.6 14.5 
 Range 4.4–21 3.9–20.3 
Histologic features 
 Classic 
 Desmoplastic/nodular 
 Anaplastic 
 Large cell 
 Not specified 
 Inadequate tumor sample 
Prior therapy 
 Chemotherapy and RT 13 18 
 Chemotherapy, RT, and BMT 
No. of courses of vismodegib 
 Median 1.5 
 Range 1–26 1–8 
CharacteristicInitial cohort (n = 13)Flat-dosing cohort (n = 20)
Sex ratio (male:female) 10:3 15:5 
Age at study entry, y 
 Median 11.6 14.5 
 Range 4.4–21 3.9–20.3 
Histologic features 
 Classic 
 Desmoplastic/nodular 
 Anaplastic 
 Large cell 
 Not specified 
 Inadequate tumor sample 
Prior therapy 
 Chemotherapy and RT 13 18 
 Chemotherapy, RT, and BMT 
No. of courses of vismodegib 
 Median 1.5 
 Range 1–26 1–8 

Abbreviations: BMT, bone marrow transplantation; RT, radiotherapy.

Toxicity

Twenty-seven of 33 (81.8%) patients were evaluable for DLT (Table 2). A list of adverse events and toxicities that occurred in more than 20% of the patients is provided (Supplementary Table S2). Of the 6 patients who were not evaluable, 5 experienced progressive disease during the first course, and 1 withdrew from the study. No drug-related dental abnormalities were observed.

Table 2.

Dose-limiting toxicity of vismodegib in patients with medulloblastoma

Cohort/doseNo. patients enrolledNo. patients evaluable for DLTNo. patients with DLTDLT
Initial cohort 
 85 mg/m2  
 170 mg/m2 Grade-3 γ-glutamyl transferase 
Flat-dosing cohort 
 150 mg 10 Grade-4 hypokalemia 
 300 mg 10 Grade-3 thrombocytopenia 
Cohort/doseNo. patients enrolledNo. patients evaluable for DLTNo. patients with DLTDLT
Initial cohort 
 85 mg/m2  
 170 mg/m2 Grade-3 γ-glutamyl transferase 
Flat-dosing cohort 
 150 mg 10 Grade-4 hypokalemia 
 300 mg 10 Grade-3 thrombocytopenia 

MRI

Thirty-three patients underwent 72 MRIs of their knees. All studies were centrally reviewed; 1 was deemed nonanalyzable. Thirteen patients underwent one study, and 20 completed multiple studies (range, 2–10 studies). The median MRI follow-up was 8 months (range, 0.5–26 months). At baseline, 23 patients were classified as Laor grade 1 (immature skeletal stage); 3 as Laor grade 2; 5 as Laor grade 3; 1 as Laor grade 4; and 1 patient lacked baseline information (26).

At the time of initial MRI, femoral cartilaginous clefts were identified in 6 patients; two developed after study enrollment. Tibial cartilaginous clefts were noted in 3 patients; two were present at study entry, and one was transient. Femoral bone bridges were noted in 4 patients: two were present at study entry, and two developed during follow-up at 2 and 13 months, respectively. Tibial bone bridges were noted in 5 patients: three were present at study entry, and two were seen on follow-up MRIs. Focal physeal thickening was present in 2 patients at study entry; one had the appearance of possible prior trauma. Focal femoral physeal thickness increased by 2 mm medially in 1 patient.

Additional baseline findings were as follows. Six patients had femoral osteonecrosis in the following regions: epiphyseal (n = 4), metaphyseal (n = 3), and diaphyseal (n = 3). Four patients also had tibial osteonecrosis in the same regions: epiphyseal (n = 2), metaphyseal (n = 1), and diaphyseal (n = 1). Four patients had nonossifying fibromas (2 were present at study entry; 1 showed evidence of healing; and 1 progressed over time). One patient had widespread metastatic disease at baseline. Six patients had increased joint fluid, which was present in 3 patients at study entry. Two patients had intraarticular inflammation, which was present in 1 patient at study entry.

Pharmacokinetics

Serial plasma samples were collected from all patients. Day 21 vismodegib Css differed between the two initial dosage groups (Fig. 2E and F). The vismodegib AUC0→72 data are provided (Supplementary Fig. S1), as are the pharmacokinetics for total vismodegib (Table 3) and unbound vismodegib (Supplementary Table S3).

Figure 2.

Pharmacokinetics of vismodegib after a 28-day administration of 85 or 170 mg/m2. Plasma concentrations of total vismodegib after 85 mg/m2 (A) or 170 mg/m2 (C) and unbound vismodegib after 85 mg/m2 (B) or 170 mg/m2 (D) are shown for each patient. E, the medians and scatter of steady-state plasma concentration (Css) were also measured on day 21. The total vismodegib Css (E) and unbound vismodegib Css (F) significantly differed between the two groups (Mann–Whitney; P = 0.026 and P = 0.022, respectively).

Figure 2.

Pharmacokinetics of vismodegib after a 28-day administration of 85 or 170 mg/m2. Plasma concentrations of total vismodegib after 85 mg/m2 (A) or 170 mg/m2 (C) and unbound vismodegib after 85 mg/m2 (B) or 170 mg/m2 (D) are shown for each patient. E, the medians and scatter of steady-state plasma concentration (Css) were also measured on day 21. The total vismodegib Css (E) and unbound vismodegib Css (F) significantly differed between the two groups (Mann–Whitney; P = 0.026 and P = 0.022, respectively).

Close modal
Table 3.

Pharmacokinetics of total plasma vismodegib in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma

Pharmacokinetic parameters median (range)
DoseNo. of patientsActual dosage (mg/m2/d)Tmax (h)Cmaxa (μmol/L)AUC0→72 (μmol/L•h)Cssb (μmol/L)CL/F (L/h/m2)
85 mg/m2/d 80 (77–92) 59.8 (8.2–75.7) 6.3 (1.9–10.2) 394 (134–564) 12.9 (11.6–24.2) 0.62 (0.38–0.67) 
170 mg/m2/d 163 (154–170) 8.1 (1.0–74.4) 10.4 (4.9–20.9) 660 (255–1336) 19.5 (18.4–36.5) 0.83 (0.44–0.86) 
150 mg/d 10 158 (130–221) 23.5 (1.9–75.0) 8.8 (4.8–27.2) 501 (315–1644) 16.8 (12.5–38.4) 0.84 (0.48–1.43) 
300 mg/d 183 (149–222) 37.3 (2.1–71.7) 7.0 (2.1–22.0) 460 (77–1022) 24.4 (11.4–41.9) 0.77 (0.42–1.38) 
Pharmacokinetic parameters median (range)
DoseNo. of patientsActual dosage (mg/m2/d)Tmax (h)Cmaxa (μmol/L)AUC0→72 (μmol/L•h)Cssb (μmol/L)CL/F (L/h/m2)
85 mg/m2/d 80 (77–92) 59.8 (8.2–75.7) 6.3 (1.9–10.2) 394 (134–564) 12.9 (11.6–24.2) 0.62 (0.38–0.67) 
170 mg/m2/d 163 (154–170) 8.1 (1.0–74.4) 10.4 (4.9–20.9) 660 (255–1336) 19.5 (18.4–36.5) 0.83 (0.44–0.86) 
150 mg/d 10 158 (130–221) 23.5 (1.9–75.0) 8.8 (4.8–27.2) 501 (315–1644) 16.8 (12.5–38.4) 0.84 (0.48–1.43) 
300 mg/d 183 (149–222) 37.3 (2.1–71.7) 7.0 (2.1–22.0) 460 (77–1022) 24.4 (11.4–41.9) 0.77 (0.42–1.38) 

Abbreviations: AUC0→72, area under the plasma concentration–time curve during the first 72 hours after administration; CL/F, apparent oral clearance of total drug from plasma; Cmax, maximum drug concentration in plasma; Css, steady-state concentration of drug in plasma; Tmax, time to reach maximum drug concentration in plasma after administration.

aCmax was measured on day 1 of vismodegib course.

bCss was measured on day 21 of vismodegib course.

In the CSF samples available from 3 patients, the median (range) of drug penetration was 0.0026 (0.0014–0.0062), when expressed as a ratio of CSF vismodegib to the total concentration in plasma and 0.53 (0.26–0.78), when expressed as a ratio of CSF vismodegib to that of unbound drug in plasma. Total vismodegib plasma concentrations were correlated with α-1-acid glycoprotein (AAGP) concentrations measured in the same sample (R2 = 0.38; Supplementary Fig. S2).

Identification of SHH-subtype medulloblastoma

Four patients had inadequate tissue available to determine their medulloblastoma subtype. Analysis of the 29 tissue samples identified SHH (n = 7), WNT (n = 1), and non-SHH/WNT (n = 21) medulloblastomas (Fig. 3). Classic, anaplastic, and large-cell histologic features were found in WNT and non-SHH/WNT medulloblastomas (25). Nodular desmoplastic histology was present only in the SHH subgroup.

Figure 3.

Diagram of medulloblastoma characteristics, as determined by immunohistochemical and histologic analyses. Immunohistochemical analysis grouped samples as SHH, WNT, or non-SSH/WNT tumors. Histologic categories included anaplastic (AN), classic (CL), desmoplastic nodular (D/N), large-cell (LC), or nonspecified (ns) tumors.

Figure 3.

Diagram of medulloblastoma characteristics, as determined by immunohistochemical and histologic analyses. Immunohistochemical analysis grouped samples as SHH, WNT, or non-SSH/WNT tumors. Histologic categories included anaplastic (AN), classic (CL), desmoplastic nodular (D/N), large-cell (LC), or nonspecified (ns) tumors.

Close modal

Tumor response

Of the 7 patients with SHH medulloblastoma, 3 had evaluable disease and were treated with the recommended phase II study dosage. One patient had a complete response, which was not sustained for 8 weeks; the other 2 experienced no response. Their durations of therapy were 22, 25, and 168 days, respectively. Of the remaining patients with SHH medulloblastoma, 3 had evaluable disease and were treated in the initial cohort for 7, 52, and 500 days, respectively. One patient with SHH-subtype did not have evaluable disease and was on therapy for 92 days. None of the 13 patients in the other medulloblastoma subgroups who were evaluable and treated with the phase II study dosage responded; their median duration of therapy was 41 days (range, 6–217 days).

Targeted anticancer therapies induce remission or prolong stabilization of disease with less toxicity than conventional chemotherapy (27, 28). PTCH mutations leading to constitutive activation of the SHH pathway are present in a subgroup of SHH medulloblastoma (7). Agents that specifically block downstream signaling of this pathway could regress tumors, thereby resulting in a novel approach to treat this SHH subtype (29). Such therapy could ameliorate the late toxicities of current treatments that use craniospinal irradiation in conjunction with cytotoxic chemotherapy (30).

An adult phase I study of vismodegib, which included 33 patients with BCC and 1 with medulloblastoma, used 3 dosage levels: 150, 270, and 540 mg/day. Six patients experienced grade 4 toxicity, and 19 experienced grade 3 events most commonly involving hyponatremia, fatigue, and abdominal pain. The recommended phase II dosage was 150 mg/d; tumor responses were seen in 19 patients with BCC and in the patient with medulloblastoma (unconfirmed). The investigators demonstrated GLI1 downmodulation in noninvolved skin, and concluded that vismodegib had an acceptable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity in BCC (31, 32). A subsequent multicenter, two-cohort, nonrandomized phase II study enrolled patients with metastatic or locally advanced BCC. The response rates of the two cohorts were 30% and 43%. Adverse events occurred in more than 30% of patients, and serious adverse events occurred in 25%; grade 3 or 4 adverse events included muscle spasms, weight loss, fatigue, and loss of appetite (33).

Here, we showed that treatment with vismodegib is safe and feasible in pediatric patients. Only 3 patients experienced DLTs. Despite the preclinical model's prediction of bone and dental toxicity, neither was detected. Several patients were exposed to steroids during the perioperative period, and baseline MRIs showed osteonecrotic changes due to prior therapy. We will continue to document the effects of prolonged exposure to vismodegib in our ongoing phase II studies.

The pharmacokinetics of vismodegib in children is comparable with that in adults. In our study, vismodegib had a unique oral absorption characterized by little decline in the plasma concentrations over 72 hours after a single dose. A recent study by Graham and colleagues showed that the primary determinants of vismodegib disposition in adults include solubility-limited absorption after oral administration, limited metabolic elimination, and interactions with AAGP (34). We also observed a relationship between AAGP and total plasma vismodegib concentrations. Unlike what was observed in adults, the vismodegib systemic exposure in pediatric patients, whether measured by AUC0→72, Cmax, or day 21 Css, was higher in those who received the 170 mg/m2 dosage. Wong and colleagues conducted preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies of vismodegib and set a target unbound concentration in plasma (0.042–0.068 μmol/L) to meet or exceed the free IC95 for GLI1 inhibition and ensure maximal clinical benefit (35). At day 21, the median concentration in each of our dosage groups exceeded that target; with a CSF penetration of 0.53, CSF vismodegib concentrations probably did as well. However, we observed substantial interpatient variability in all aspects of vismodegib disposition, including CSF penetration.

Prospectively selecting patients for targeted therapies is a challenge, especially patients with CNS tumors. The most accurate method to classify tumors is RNA-expression profiling, yet fresh tumor samples are not always available at diagnosis or relapse. We used IHC to detect proteins encoded by genes that would be expressed based on the RNA-expression data. IHC is a robust approach to distinguishing WNT and SHH medulloblastomas, but it cannot reliably distinguish Groups 3 and 4, which we pooled as non-SHH/WNT subtype (25). Further confirmation by other methods is required in prospective studies (3). The ideal method would be one that uses fixed tissues to ensure the inclusion of all patients.

Vismodegib demonstrated antitumor activity in 1 patient with SHH medulloblastoma and evaluable disease treated with the phase II dosage. This finding is consistent with responses seen in adults with BCC and a single case of an adult with metastatic medulloblastoma outside the CNS (18, 20). The mechanism of resistance was an acquired mutation in the SMO receptor that prevented binding of vismodegib (21). The lack of tumor tissue at the time of disease progression prevented us from studying the mechanism of resistance in our patients. Rapidly evolving data from recent whole–genome-sequencing studies suggest molecular heterogeneity within SHH medulloblastoma: GLI or MYCN amplifications or SUFU, MLL2, P53, and SMO mutations could explain the lack of efficacy seen with vismodegib in all SHH medulloblastomas (7–9, 36).

Our data demonstrate the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics, and early efficacy of vismodegib in pediatric patients with recurrent medulloblastoma. Ongoing phase II studies of recurrent SHH medulloblastoma in adults and children will further elucidate the efficacy and chronic toxicity of vismodegib. Further understanding of the biology of SHH medulloblastoma may justify combination of SMO antagonists with conventional chemotherapy or other targeted agents in future clinical protocols.

D.W. Ellison has ownership interests, including patents. S. Goldman has a consultant/Advisory Board relationship with Novartis. T. Curran has a consultant/Advisory Board relationship with Redx Pharma Ltd. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Conception and design: A. Gajjar, C.F. Stewart, D.W. Ellison, L.E. Kun, R. Packer, N. Takebe, J.M. Boyett, T. Curran

Development of methodology: A. Gajjar, C.F. Stewart, D.W. Ellison, S.C. Kaste, T. Curran

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): C.F. Stewart, D.W. Ellison, S.C. Kaste, R. Packer, S. Goldman, M. Chintagumpala, N. Takebe

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): A. Gajjar, C.F. Stewart, D.W. Ellison, S.C. Kaste, R. Packer, D. Wallace, N. Takebe, J.M. Boyett, T. Curran

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: A. Gajjar, C.F. Stewart, D.W. Ellison, S.C. Kaste, L.E. Kun, R. Packer, S. Goldman, M. Chintagumpala, D. Wallace, N. Takebe, J.M. Boyett, R.J. Gilbertson, T. Curran

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): A. Gajjar, D.W. Ellison, L.E. Kun, N. Takebe, J.M. Boyett

Study supervision: A. Gajjar, L.E. Kun, N. Takebe

The authors thank Angela McArthur for editing the manuscript and Arzu Onar-Thomas for developing the dosing strategy.

This work was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. U01 CA 81457 to the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium; grant no. P01 CA 096832 to T. Curran and R. Gilbertson), the Cancer Center CORE (grant no. CA 21765), the Noyes Brain Tumor Foundation, Musicians Against Childhood Cancer (MACC), and the America Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Ng
JM
,
Curran
T
. 
The Hedgehog's tale: developing strategies for targeting cancer
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2011
;
11
:
493
501
.
2.
Pomeroy
SL
,
Tamayo
P
,
Gaasenbeek
M
,
Sturla
LM
,
Angelo
M
,
McLaughlin
ME
, et al
Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression
.
Nature
2002
;
415
:
436
42
.
3.
Northcott
PA
,
Shih
DJ
,
Remke
M
,
Cho
Yj
,
Kool
M
,
Hawkins
C
, et al
Rapid, reliable, and reproducible molecular sub-grouping of clinical medulloblastoma samples
.
Acta Neuropathol
2012
;
123
:
615
26
.
4.
Thompson
MC
,
Fuller
C
,
Hogg
TL
,
Dalton
J
,
Finkelstein
D
,
Lau
CC
, et al
Genomics identifies medulloblastoma subgroups that are enriched for specific genetic alterations
.
J Clin Oncol
2006
;
24
:
1924
31
.
5.
Northcott
PA
,
Korshunov
A
,
Witt
H
,
Hielscher
T
,
Eberhart
CG
,
Mack
S
, et al
Medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular variants
.
J Clin Oncol
2011
;
29
:
1408
14
.
6.
Parsons
DW
,
Li
M
,
Zhang
X
,
Jones
S
,
Leary
RJ
,
Lin
JC
, et al
The genetic landscape of the childhood cancer medulloblastoma
.
Science
2011
;
331
:
435
9
.
7.
Robinson
G
,
Parker
M
,
Kranenburg
TA
,
Lu
C
,
Chen
X
,
Ding
L
, et al
Novel mutations target distinct subgroups of medulloblastoma
.
Nature
2012
;
488
:
43
8
.
8.
Jones
DT
,
Jager
N
,
Kool
M
,
Zichner
T
,
Hutter
B
,
Sultan
M
, et al
Dissecting the genomic complexity underlying medulloblastoma
.
Nature
2012
;
488
:
100
5
.
9.
Pugh
TJ
,
Weeraratne
SD
,
Archer
TC
,
Pomeranz
Krummel DA
,
Auclair
D
,
Bochicchio
J
, et al
Medulloblastoma exome sequencing uncovers subtype-specific somatic mutations
.
Nature
2012
;
488
:
106
10
.
10.
Cooper
MK
,
Porter
JA
,
Young
KE
,
Beachy
PA
. 
Teratogen-mediated inhibition of target tissue response to Shh signaling
.
Science
1998
;
280
:
1603
7
.
11.
Chen
JK
,
Taipale
J
,
Cooper
MK
,
Beachy
PA
. 
Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling by direct binding of cyclopamine to Smoothened
.
Genes Dev
2002
;
16
:
2743
8
.
12.
Frank-Kamenetsky
M
,
Zhang
XM
,
Bottega
S
,
Guicherit
O
,
Wichterle
H
,
Dudek
H
, et al
Small-molecule modulators of Hedgehog signaling: identification and characterization of Smoothened agonists and antagonists
.
J Biol
2002
;
1
:
10
.
13.
Mas
C
,
Ruiz i Altaba
A
. 
Small molecule modulation of HH-GLI signaling: current leads, trials and tribulations
.
Biochem Pharmacol
2010
;
80
:
712
23
.
14.
Goodrich
LV
,
Milenkovic
L
,
Higgins
KM
,
Scott
MP
. 
Altered neural cell fates and medulloblastoma in mouse patched mutants
.
Science
1997
;
277
:
1109
13
.
15.
Wetmore
C
,
Eberhart
DE
,
Curran
T
. 
Loss of p53 but not ARF accelerates medulloblastoma in mice heterozygous for patched
.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
513
6
.
16.
Romer
JT
,
Kimura
H
,
Magdaleno
S
,
Sasai
K
,
Fuller
C
,
Baines
H
, et al
Suppression of the Shh pathway using a small molecule inhibitor eliminates medulloblastoma in Ptc1(+/−)p53(−/−) mice
.
Cancer Cell
2004
;
6
:
229
40
.
17.
Robarge
KD
,
Brunton
SA
,
Castanedo
GM
,
Cui
Y
,
Dina
MS
,
Goldsmith
R
, et al
GDC-0449-a potent inhibitor of the hedgehog pathway
.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett
2009
;
19
:
5576
81
.
18.
Von Hoff
DD
,
LoRusso
PM
,
Rudin
CM
,
Reddy
JC
,
Yauch
RL
,
Tibes
R
, et al
Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma
.
N Engl J Med
2009
;
361
:
1164
72
.
19.
Low
JA
,
de Sauvage
FJ
. 
Clinical experience with Hedgehog pathway inhibitors
.
J Clin Oncol
2010
;
28
:
5321
6
.
20.
Rudin
CM
,
Hann
CL
,
Laterra
J
,
Yauch
RL
,
Callahan
CA
,
Fu
L
, et al
Treatment of medulloblastoma with hedgehog pathway inhibitor GDC-0449
.
N Engl J Med
2009
;
361
:
1173
8
.
21.
Yauch
RL
,
Dijkgraaf
GJ
,
Alicke
B
,
Januario
T
,
Ahn
CP
,
Holcomb
T
, et al
Smoothened mutation confers resistance to a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor in medulloblastoma
.
Science
2009
;
326
:
572
4
.
22.
Kimura
H
,
Ng
JM
,
Curran
T
. 
Transient inhibition of the Hedgehog pathway in young mice causes permanent defects in bone structure
.
Cancer Cell
2008
;
13
:
249
60
.
23.
Seidel
K
,
Ahn
CP
,
Lyons
D
,
Nee
A
,
Ting
K
,
Brownell
I
, et al
Hedgehog signaling regulates the generation of ameloblast progenitors in the continuously growing mouse incisor
.
Development
2010
;
137
:
3753
61
.
24.
Ding
X
,
Chou
B
,
Graham
RA
,
Cheeti
S
,
Percey
S
,
Matassa
LC
, et al
Determination of GDC-0449, a small-molecule inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, in human plasma by solid phase extraction-liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometry
.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci
2010
;
878
:
785
90
.
25.
Ellison
DW
,
Dalton
J
,
Kocak
M
,
Nicholson
SL
,
Fraga
C
,
Neale
G
, et al
Medulloblastoma: clinicopathological correlates of SHH, WNT, and non-SHH/WNT molecular subgroups
.
Acta Neuropathol
2011
;
121
:
381
96
.
26.
Laor
T
,
Chun
GF
,
Dardzinski
BJ
,
Bean
JA
,
Witte
DP
. 
Posterior distal femoral and proximal tibial metaphyseal stripes at MR imaging in children and young adults
.
Radiology
2002
;
224
:
669
74
.
27.
Zhang
J
,
Yang
PL
,
Gray
NS
. 
Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2009
;
9
:
28
39
.
28.
Janne
PA
,
Gray
N
,
Settleman
J
. 
Factors underlying sensitivity of cancers to small-molecule kinase inhibitors
.
Nat Rev Drug Discov
2009
;
8
:
709
23
.
29.
Rubin
LL
,
de Sauvage
FJ
. 
Targeting the Hedgehog pathway in cancer
.
Nat Rev Drug Discov
2006
;
5
:
1026
33
.
30.
Mulhern
RK
,
Merchant
TE
,
Gajjar
A
,
Reddick
WE
,
Kun
LE
. 
Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood
.
Lancet Oncol
2004
;
5
:
399
408
.
31.
LoRusso
PM
,
Rudin
CM
,
Reddy
JC
,
Tibes
R
,
Weiss
GJ
,
Borad
MJ
, et al
Phase I trial of hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib (GDC-0449) in patients with refractory, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors
.
Clin Cancer Res
2011
;
17
:
2502
11
.
32.
Lorusso
PM
,
Jimeno
A
,
Dy
G
,
Adjei
A
,
Berlin
J
,
Leichman
L
, et al
Pharmacokinetic dose-scheduling study of hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib (GDC-0449) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors
.
Clin Cancer Res
2011
;
17
:
5774
82
.
33.
Sekulic
A
,
Migden
MR
,
Oro
AE
,
Dirix
L
,
Lewis
KD
,
Hainsworth
JD
, et al
Efficacy and safety of vismodegib in advanced basal-cell carcinoma
.
N Engl J Med
2012
;
366
:
2171
9
.
34.
Graham
RA
,
Lum
BL
,
Cheeti
S
,
Jin
JY
,
Jorga
K
,
Von Hoff
DD
, et al
Pharmacokinetics of hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib (GDC-0449) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors: the role of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein binding
.
Clin Cancer Res
2011
;
17
:
2512
20
.
35.
Wong
H
,
Alicke
B
,
West
KA
,
Pacheco
P
,
La
H
,
Januario
T
, et al
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of vismodegib in preclinical models of mutational and ligand-dependent Hedgehog pathway activation
.
Clin Cancer Res
2011
;
17
:
4682
92
.
36.
Northcott
PA
,
Shih
DJ
,
Peacock
J
,
Garzia
L
,
Morrissy
AS
,
Zichner
T
, et al
Subgroup-specific structural variation across 1,000 medulloblastoma genomes
.
Nature
2012
;
488
:
49
56
.