Purpose: Mortality of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is primarily driven by tumor cell radioresistance leading to locoregional recurrence (LRR). In this study, we use a classification of TP53 mutation (disruptive vs. nondisruptive) and examine impact on clinical outcomes and radiation sensitivity.

Experimental Design: Seventy-four patients with HNSCC treated with surgery and postoperative radiation and 38 HNSCC cell lines were assembled; for each, TP53 was sequenced and the in vitro radioresistance measured using clonogenic assays. p53 protein expression was inhibited using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and overexpressed using a retrovirus. Radiation-induced apoptosis, mitotic cell death, senescence, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) assays were carried out. The effect of the drug metformin on overcoming mutant p53-associated radiation resistance was examined in vitro as well as in vivo, using an orthotopic xenograft model.

Results: Mutant TP53 alone was not predictive of LRR; however, disruptive TP53 mutation strongly predicted LRR (P = 0.03). Cell lines with disruptive mutations were significantly more radioresistant (P < 0.05). Expression of disruptive TP53 mutations significantly decreased radiation-induced senescence, as measured by SA-β-gal staining, p21 expression, and release of ROS. The mitochondrial agent metformin potentiated the effects of radiation in the presence of a disruptive TP53 mutation partially via senescence. Examination of our patient cohort showed that LRR was decreased in patients taking metformin.

Conclusions: Disruptive TP53 mutations in HNSCC tumors predicts for LRR, because of increased radioresistance via the inhibition of senescence. Metformin can serve as a radiosensitizer for HNSCC with disruptive TP53, presaging the possibility of personalizing HNSCC treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 18(1); 290–300. ©2011 AACR.

This article is featured in Highlights of This Issue, p. 1

Translational Relevance

The lack of clinically used biomarkers in head and neck cancer is a significant problem in moving toward more individualized therapy. TP53, the gene that encodes the protein p53, is by far the most commonly mutated gene found in head and neck cancer. However, this finding has not been clinically useful in guiding therapy. We have used a method of grading TP53 mutation based on predicted functionality of the resultant protein and shown that a particular class of mutation has a much higher rate of locoregional failure following radiotherapy as well as a much higher rate of in vitro radioresistance by inhibiting radiation-induced cellular senescence. Furthermore, we show that these resistant cells can be selectively radiosensitized through the use of the antidiabetic drug metformin. Finally, we show significant decreases in locoregional failure following radiation as well as improved survival in patients taking metformin. Thus, we provide a common marker for poor outcome in head and neck cancer as well as a novel means by which to target these aggressive tumors.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer worldwide, with an estimated 49,260 diagnoses each year in the United States alone (1). Although multimodality therapy is important in the management of HNSCC, the eradication of locoregional disease in the primary or postoperative setting is primarily achieved by external beam radiation. As the vast majority of patient deaths from HNSCC are due to locoregional recurrence (LRR), the survival of the patient largely depends on the radiosensitivity the tumor. Unfortunately, there are few biomarkers to determine radioresistance in HNSCC.

One candidate biomarker is TP53, which encodes the p53 protein and is the most commonly altered gene in HNSCC, as shown most recently by our group and others through whole exomic sequencing of a large panel of HNSCC tumors (2). TP53 has been previously investigated as a biomarker for LRR following radiotherapy in HNSCC with mixed results (3–6). A possible explanation for this finding is mutation-specific functionality of the p53 protein. One large study classifying TP53 mutations in HNSCC described TP53 mutation as “disruptive” or “nondisruptive” on the basis of alteration of DNA binding (7). Any mutation in either the L2 or L3 loop of the DNA-binding domain, resulting in a polarity change within the protein, or any stop codon, was classified as disruptive. In that study, the presence of a disruptive mutation was associated with poor survival in a heterogeneously treated patient population. Other studies have examined alternative classifications of TP53, which were also prognostic of survival in HNSCC (8; 9). Despite these results, there has been little study of the relationship between TP53 classification and LRR following radiotherapy.

The role of TP53 in in vitro radiosensitivity is also an area of active investigation, with many of the previous studies producing contradictory results (10–16). Radiation is known to result in p53 activation and apoptosis; however, the contribution of radiation-induced apoptosis to tumor response is not clear, and there are strong arguments that, for most tumor cells, apoptosis plays a minimal role in the radiation response (17; 18). In contrast, it has been hypothesized that mitotic death is the primary mechanism of radiation-induced cell death (19). In this process, abnormal cell division due to DNA damage leads to the formation of large cells with multiple micronuclei (20). It is unclear whether this form of cell death is associated with TP53 (21–24). Furthermore, emerging data indicate that senescence may play a role in the radiation response, which, in some models, is dependent upon wild-type TP53 (25). Regardless, the role of TP53 in radiosensitivity is far from clear.

To investigate the role of TP53 in radiosensitivity, the present study was done to determine whether a classification of TP53 (wild-type, nondisruptive, or disruptive mutation) predicts for radiosensitivity in vitro as well as in the clinical setting. Furthermore, we wished to determine the mechanisms involved in the observed radiation response in vitro and use this knowledge to preferentially radiosensitize HNSCC cells.

Clinical samples

All clinical studies reported in this study have been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Seventy-four snap-frozen, pretreatment tumor samples were collected from patients with HNSCC at high risk for LRR treated with surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy from 1992 to 2003. Exons 2-12 of the TP53 gene were sequenced using genomic DNA. Standard Sanger sequencing using BigDye Terminator chemistry (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies) was performed by Beckman Coulter Genomics (Beckman Coulter). Mutations were then classified according to the method of Poeta and colleagues (7). Patients were evaluated every 2 to 3 months for 1 year following treatment, every 3 to 4 months the following year, and every 6 months thereafter.

Cell culture and constructs

HNSCC cells were cultured in a 37°C incubator in 5% CO2 atmosphere for this study as described previously (26). Cells stably expressing short-hairpin RNA (shRNA) specific for p53 (shp53) were generated as described previously (27). Briefly, after infection with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged empty lentiviral vector (LVTHM) or encoding an shRNA against p53 (LVUH-shp53; Addgene), cells were cultured for several passages, and then sorted using flow cytometry. GFP-positive cells were cultured normally. TP53 constructs (C176F, R282W, R175H, and E336X) were generated by extracting RNA from cell lines known to express these mutants. Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was then carried out using TP53-specific primers. The resulting product was purified and inserted into a pBABE retroviral vector containing a puromycin-resistance insert (pBABE-puro; Addgene) using standard cloning techniques. The resulting vectors were verified by Sanger sequencing at the MD Anderson Cancer Center DNA core facility. After transfection and packaging in 293T cells, the viral supernatant was centrifuged at 1,000 rpm to remove cellular debris and added to UMSCC1 cells in combination with polybrene. After 1 passage, the cells underwent selection with puromycin. All cell lines used in this study have been authenticated against the parental recipient cell line via short tandem repeat (STR) analysis.

Clonogenic assay

HNSCC cells were seeded in 12-well plates at predetermined densities for different radiation doses to allow for an approximately equal number of resultant colonies. The next day, cells were irradiated using a high-dose-rate 137Cs irradiator (4.5 Gy/min) and cultured for 10 to 14 days to allow for colony formation. Cells were then fixed in a 3% crystal violet/10% formalin solution. Colonies of more than 50 cells were then counted and survival fraction was determined. All treatments were in triplicate or greater. For metformin (Sigma-Aldrich) or z-Vad-fmk (BD Pharmingen) treatment, cells were pretreated for 2 hours before radiation with either drug or vehicle [PBS and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), respectively] and drug treatment was continued overnight. For N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) treatment, the cells were treated starting 2 hours following radiation and the drug treatment was continued overnight. The cells were then washed and cultured in fresh media for the remainder of the experiment.

Immunofluorescence

HNSCC cells were plated on coverslips and treated as indicated. Cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed using a 1:1 mixture of methanol and acetone for 10 minutes. Cells were then washed in TBS–Tween (TBST) and permeabilized using 0.1% Triton-X for 5 minutes. Cells were again washed with TBST and incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–Phalloidin for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were washed with TBST and mounted on standard glass slides using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)–Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). For assessment of mitotic death, the number of cells with 1 or more micronucleus per high-power field were counted and reported as a percentage of total cells per field. Images were taken from 5 quadrants, in duplicate, and pooled.

Senescence-associated-β-gal staining

Senescence-associated (SA)-β-gal staining was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions (Cell Signaling). Briefly, HNSCC cells plated in 6-well plates were irradiated with 4 to 6 Gy on the next day. Cells were cultured normally until the indicated times post treatment. Cells were then fixed for 10 minutes and stained overnight for SA-β-gal activity at 37°C. Blue-staining cells were scored as senescent and reported as a percentage of all the cells observed per high power field.

Annexin V staining

Annexin V staining was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions (BD Pharmingen). Briefly, HNSCC cells were cultured normally and treated as indicated. Media was collected, and adherent cells were briefly trypsinized and added to the previously collected media. The cells were then centrifuged, the supernatant was removed, and the cells were washed in PBS. The cells were then re-suspended in Annexin V binding buffer, and Annexin V and 7-AAD were added. Samples were mixed gently and incubated at room temperature. Samples were then analyzed for Annexin V and 7-AAD staining using a Beckman Coulter XL 4 color cytometer (Beckman Coulter), and the data were analyzed using Flo-Jo software (FloJo). Early apoptosis was determined by the proportion of cells that were Annexin V positive and 7-AAD negative.

Cell-cycle analysis

HNSCC cells were seeded in a 6-well plate and incubated for the indicated time. Media was collected; cells were washed twice in PBS and trypsinized. The resulting cell suspension was washed in PBS and fixed with 70% ethanol at room temperature for 30 minutes. Cells were then washed in PBS and stained with propidium iodide. Cell-cycle detection was then conducted using a Beckman Coulter XL 4 color cytometer, (Beckman Coulter) and the data were analyzed using Flo-Jo software (FloJo).

Reactive oxygen species measurement

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels were measured according to previously published protocols using 5-(and-6)-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (CM-H2DCFDA) dye (28). Briefly, cells were loaded with CM-H2DCFDA for 60 minutes in culture media. Media was changed before irradiation to remove excess dye. Fluorescence was measured at various times following irradiation using a standard spectrophotometer, normalized to the control condition and total amount of DNA (29). For flow cytometric experiments, cells were incubated with CM-H2DCFDA dye as described and trypsinized, and fluorescence was analyzed using flow cytometry as described above.

Immunoblotting

Cells were treated as indicated and washed 3 times with cold PBS. Standard lysis buffer was then added to each plate and incubated on ice for 15 minutes. Cells were then collected using a plastic scraper and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm at 4ºC for 10 minutes. The supernatant was removed, and total protein concentration was then calculated using Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad). Immunoblot analysis was carried out as described previously (26). Membranes were blocked for 1 hour at room temperature using 1% powdered milk in 0.1% Tween 20 in TBS, then incubated overnight with anti-p53 DO-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-β actin (Cell Signalling), or anti-p21 (BD Pharmingen) at 4ºC. The following day, membranes were washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in TBS and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with species-specific secondary antibody. For p53 and actin, fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen) were used and signal was analyzed using an Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences) and the associated software (v3.0). For p21, horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used and signal was generated using the SuperSignal West chemiluminescent system (Pierce Biotechnology).

p21 transcription

Induction of p21 transcription was measured through luciferase reporter activity using a vector containing the 2.4-kb p21 promoter and firefly luciferase (pWWP-Luc; ref. 30; Addgene). UMSCC1 (p53-null) cells expressing various TP53 constructs were co-transfected with pWWP-Luc and a constitutively active Renilla luciferase construct using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Cells were irradiated the following day at the indicated doses and incubated for 24 hours before collection. Luciferase activity was measured with the Promega Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System.

Orthotopic mouse model

All animal experimentation was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC) of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. The orthotopic mouse model has been previously described (31). Briefly, mice were injected with 100,000 HN 31 cells in the anterior half of the oral tongue on day 0. After tumor growth was noted, tumors were treated with radiation using a Co60 irradiator and custom lead blocks (5 Gy) on day 8 post-injection and/or metformin [250 mg/kg daily, intraperitoneal (IP)]. Each treatment group comprised 10 mice. Mice received a total of 8 daily metformin treatments during the experimental period. Tumor measurements were obtained on days 6, 13, 16, and 20 post injection. Tumor volume was calculated as previously described (31).

Statistics

LRR and overall survival (OS) for the patient population was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons between groups were determined using log-rank statistics. Multivariate analysis for LRR was carried out using forward step-wise Cox regression analysis. Variables included tumor and nodal stage, surgical margin status or extracapsular extension, site, gender, smoking history, and TP53 status. ANOVA with post hoc analysis or Student t tests were carried out to analyze in vitro data and tumor volume. All P values are 2-sided. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Disruptive TP53 mutations are associated with increased LRR following PORT

Disruptive TP53 is associated with decreased survival in HNSCC, which we hypothesized was due to higher rates of LRR following PORT. To explore this hypothesis, we sequenced TP53 in HNSCC tumors from 74 patients treated with PORT. Patient characteristics were similar among different TP53 classification groups (Supplementary Table S1). Median follow-up of surviving patients was 154 months (range 82–185). No significant difference in LRR was found between patients with wild-type TP53 and any mutant TP53 (Fig. 1A). However, classification of TP53 as disruptive, nondisruptive, or wild-type, showed that disruptive TP53 is an independent predictor of LRR on multivariate analysis (P = 0.022). Patients with disruptive TP53 had a 5-year freedom from LRR of 41% compared with 64% and 76% in patients with wild-type and nondisruptive TP53, respectively (P = 0.03; Fig. 1B). No significant difference in LRR was seen between patients with wild-type and nondisruptive TP53 (P = 0.48; Fig. 1B). Similarly, the OS rates for patients in this study were predicted by TP53 classification. Specifically, 5-year OS rate for patients with disruptive TP53 mutations was 19% compared with 52% in patients with wild-type TP53 and 41% in patients with nondisruptive TP53 (P = 0.031).

Figure 1.

LRR occurs more frequently in patients with tumors expressing TP53 disruptive mutations. A, LRR in the study population in patients with either wild-type TP53 or any TP53 mutation (P = 0.9). B, LRR in the same group of patients with the indicated TP53 status. NR, no result.

Figure 1.

LRR occurs more frequently in patients with tumors expressing TP53 disruptive mutations. A, LRR in the study population in patients with either wild-type TP53 or any TP53 mutation (P = 0.9). B, LRR in the same group of patients with the indicated TP53 status. NR, no result.

Close modal

Disruptive TP53 mutations are associated with p53-mediated radioresistance

The finding that disruptive TP53 mutations are associated with a high rate of LRR resulted in the hypothesis that HNSCC tumor cells with disruptive TP53 are intrinsically more radioresistant. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the radiosensitivity of a panel of 38 HNSCC cell lines of known TP53 status (Supplementary Table S3) and found that cell lines harboring disruptive TP53 mutations were significantly more radioresistant than those with either nondisruptive or wild-type TP53 (Fig. 2A).

Figure 2.

In vitro radiosensitivity is modulated by p53 expression depending on TP53 classification. A, a panel of 38 HNSCC cell lines was sequenced for TP53 status and evaluated for radiosensitivity using standard clonogenic assays. Each cell line was then grouped by TP53 status, and the average clonogenic survival data for each group are shown. B, the effect of stable inhibition of wild-type p53 expression (shp53) on radiosensitivity in HN 30 and UMSCC1 17A cells. C, the effect of forced expression of wild-type, R175H, R282W, or C176F TP53 in p53-null UMSCC1 cells on radiosensitivity. D, the effect of stable inhibition of p53 expression (shp53) on radiosensitivity in FADU and HN 31 cells (disruptive TP53).

Figure 2.

In vitro radiosensitivity is modulated by p53 expression depending on TP53 classification. A, a panel of 38 HNSCC cell lines was sequenced for TP53 status and evaluated for radiosensitivity using standard clonogenic assays. Each cell line was then grouped by TP53 status, and the average clonogenic survival data for each group are shown. B, the effect of stable inhibition of wild-type p53 expression (shp53) on radiosensitivity in HN 30 and UMSCC1 17A cells. C, the effect of forced expression of wild-type, R175H, R282W, or C176F TP53 in p53-null UMSCC1 cells on radiosensitivity. D, the effect of stable inhibition of p53 expression (shp53) on radiosensitivity in FADU and HN 31 cells (disruptive TP53).

Close modal

To determine whether this observed correlation was due to p53 expression, p53 was silenced using stably expressed shRNA (shp53) in the following HNSCC cell lines: (i) UMSCC1 17A and HN 30 (wild-type TP53); (ii) Detroit (R175H, nondisruptive TP53); and (iii) HN 31 (C176F) and FADU (R248L; disruptive TP53). Inhibition of p53 expression in cell lines expressing wild-type or nondisruptive TP53 rendered cells more radioresistant (Fig. 2B; Supplementary Table S2). However, inhibition of p53 expression in cell lines expressing disruptive TP53 rendered these cells more radiosensitive (Fig. 2D; Supplementary Table S2). Conversely, UMSCC1 cells, which have no endogenous p53, were engineered to express: (i) wild-type TP53; (ii) nondisruptive TP53 (R175H and R282W); or (iii) disruptive TP53 (C176F and E336X). Disruptive TP53-expressing UMSCC1 cells were found to be radioresistant relative to wild-type TP53- and nondisruptive TP53-expressing cells (Fig. 2C; Supplementary Table S2).

Alteration of p53 expression does not affect radiation-induced mitotic death or apoptosis

To explore the means by which disruptive TP53 mutation confers radioresistance in HNSCC cells, we evaluated several modes of cellular response to radiation. Initially, we examined mitotic death, thought to be one of the primary modes of cell death following radiation (19). Mitotic death, as measured by the presence of micronuclei, was significant following radiation, with all HNSCC cell lines tested exhibiting mitotic death in 20% to 30% of irradiated cells. However, there was no correlation between micronuclei formation, TP53 expression, and relative radiosensitivity (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Furthermore, when either annexin V or sub-G1 staining were analyzed, neither of these measures of apoptosis were related to TP53 status (Supplementary Fig. S3). In fact, only a very small proportion of apoptotic cells were observed (∼1%–5%), including in those cells shown to be radiosensitive in the clonogenic survival assay. As radiation-induced apoptosis is thought to be caspase-dependent (32), we also treated cells with a pan-caspase inhibitor (z-vad-fmk; BD Pharmingen) to determine the role of apoptosis in this model. Inhibition of caspase activity had almost no effect on clonogenic survival following radiation (Supplementary Fig. S3), supporting the hypothesis that apoptosis does not play a major role in the radiation response.

Radiation robustly induces SA-β-gal activity in HNSCC cells which is strongly associated with TP53 status and correlates with clonogenic survival

In cells with wild-type or nondisruptive TP53, treatment with radiation resulted in a decrease in the proportion of cells in S phase and a less prominent G1 arrest (Supplementary Fig. S4). Furthermore, inhibition of p53 expression in HN 30 (wild-type TP53) cells partially abrogated the observed inability to progress through S phase. Because this phenomenon has been previously linked to cellular senescence, we hypothesized a role for altered senescence in the observed differences in radiosensitivity. To evaluate cellular senescence, cells were treated with radiation and stained for the SA-β-gal. As shown in Fig. 3, radiation treatment resulted in significant levels of SA-β-gal activity in cell lines expressing either wild-type (HN 30) or nondisruptive mutant TP53 (Detroit, R175H). Furthermore, in these cells with SA-β-gal staining, morphologic characteristics of cellular senescence were observed, specifically a large, flattened cell with the classic “fried egg” appearance on microscopy. Inhibition of p53 expression in both of these cell lines significantly reduced levels of radiation-induced SA-β-gal activity. However, in HN 31 (C176F, disruptive TP53) cells, which have disruptive TP53 and are otherwise isogenic with the HN 30 (wild-type TP53) cell line, inhibition of p53 expression was associated with elevated levels of radiation-induced SA-β-gal activity. Forced expression of wild-type, as well as 2 nondisruptive, TP53 mutations (R175H and R282W) in p53-null cells, increased radiation-induced SA-β-gal activity; conversely, expression of disruptive TP53 mutations (C176F and E336X) led to decreased SA-β-gal activity compared with empty vector control (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, in experiments comparing micronuclei formation and SA-β-gal staining in the same cell, the main differences between cells of different TP53 statuses appeared to be within the cells staining positive for SA-β-gal alone (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.

TP53 modulates radiation-induced senescence, which correlates with radiosensitivity. A, representative light microscopy showing SA-gal staining. B, percentage of SA-gal–positive cells per total number of cells in a high-power field (hpf) after 4 Gy of radiation for the times indicated in UMSCC1 cells expressing representative wild-type and mutant TP53 constructs and HN 30 (WT), Detroit (R175H), and HN 31 (C176F) where p53 is inhibited. C, representative microscopy showing SA-gal staining, DAPI fluorescence, and GFP. D, percentage of cells SA-gal–positive (S alone), exhibiting micronuclei (M alone), or both at 4 days after 4 Gy of radiation in HN 30 and HN 31 cells where p53 expression is inhibited and UMSCC1 cells are expressing representative wild-type and mutant TP53 constructs. *, significantly elevated over baseline (P < 0.05); +, significantly different from null at the indicated time point (P < 0.05); and #, significantly different from HN 30 control. XRT, X-ray therapy.

Figure 3.

TP53 modulates radiation-induced senescence, which correlates with radiosensitivity. A, representative light microscopy showing SA-gal staining. B, percentage of SA-gal–positive cells per total number of cells in a high-power field (hpf) after 4 Gy of radiation for the times indicated in UMSCC1 cells expressing representative wild-type and mutant TP53 constructs and HN 30 (WT), Detroit (R175H), and HN 31 (C176F) where p53 is inhibited. C, representative microscopy showing SA-gal staining, DAPI fluorescence, and GFP. D, percentage of cells SA-gal–positive (S alone), exhibiting micronuclei (M alone), or both at 4 days after 4 Gy of radiation in HN 30 and HN 31 cells where p53 expression is inhibited and UMSCC1 cells are expressing representative wild-type and mutant TP53 constructs. *, significantly elevated over baseline (P < 0.05); +, significantly different from null at the indicated time point (P < 0.05); and #, significantly different from HN 30 control. XRT, X-ray therapy.

Close modal

The effects of TP53 status on radiation-induced SA-β-gal activity are correlated with p21 expression and mediated by ROS production

In addition to SA-β-gal activity, senescence has been previously linked to induction of p21 expression and ROS production, both of which are believed to be necessary for maintenance of the senescent phenotype (33–36). To determine whether radiation-induced p21 expression correlates with TP53 classification, we assayed p21 protein levels following radiation in cell lines expressing representative TP53 mutations. In cells expressing wild-type TP53 or a nondisruptive TP53 mutation, p21 protein and reporter activity were induced by radiation treatment (Fig. 4A). In contrast, cells expressing disruptive TP53 (C176F) had no induction of p21.

Figure 4.

Radiation-induced senescence is associated with p21 expression and dependent on prolonged ROS production. A, p21 protein expression and p21 luciferase reporter activity in UMSCC1 cells expressing the indicated TP53 constructs treated with the indicated doses of radiation for 24 hours unless otherwise stated. B, ROS production measured as indicated in the Materials and Methods section after 2 Gy of radiation. C, percentage of cells SA-Gal positive (S alone), exhibiting micronuclei (MC alone), or both at 4 days after 4 Gy of radiation. Cells were treated with the indicated dose of NAC starting 2 hours after radiation and treatment was continued overnight. D, clonogenic survival after 2 Gy of radiation. Cells were treated with NAC in an identical manner to (C). *, significantly increased over unirradiated control (P < 0.05); +, significantly different from UMSCC1 wild-type in the same group (P < 0.05); and #, significantly increased compared with non–NAC-treated group (P < 0.001). hpf, high-power field; XRT, X-ray therapy.

Figure 4.

Radiation-induced senescence is associated with p21 expression and dependent on prolonged ROS production. A, p21 protein expression and p21 luciferase reporter activity in UMSCC1 cells expressing the indicated TP53 constructs treated with the indicated doses of radiation for 24 hours unless otherwise stated. B, ROS production measured as indicated in the Materials and Methods section after 2 Gy of radiation. C, percentage of cells SA-Gal positive (S alone), exhibiting micronuclei (MC alone), or both at 4 days after 4 Gy of radiation. Cells were treated with the indicated dose of NAC starting 2 hours after radiation and treatment was continued overnight. D, clonogenic survival after 2 Gy of radiation. Cells were treated with NAC in an identical manner to (C). *, significantly increased over unirradiated control (P < 0.05); +, significantly different from UMSCC1 wild-type in the same group (P < 0.05); and #, significantly increased compared with non–NAC-treated group (P < 0.001). hpf, high-power field; XRT, X-ray therapy.

Close modal

In addition, ROS play a key role in senescence and radiation effect. In the present study, radiation-induced ROS levels correlated with p21 expression, SA-β-gal activity, and relative radiosensitivity. Specifically, ROS were most highly induced in cells which had greater levels of radiation-induced SA-β-gal activity (wild type and R175H), whereas little or no ROS induction was seen in cells with disruptive TP53 (C176F; Fig. 4B). Inhibition of ROS using NAC 2 hours following radiation treatment, designed to inhibit secondary ROS production following the initial radiation insult, dramatically decreased senescence in cell lines with normally high levels of radiation-induced SA-β-gal, but had no effect on cells with disruptive TP53 (Fig. 4C). These results closely correlated with the observed effects of NAC on clonogenic survival following radiation (Fig. 4D).

Metformin preferentially potentiates the effects of radiation in HNSCC cells partially via increased senescence

On the basis of the combined morphologic appearance of irradiated cells, the presence of SA-β-gal staining, the characteristic induction of p21 and ROS, and the lack of apoptosis, cells with either wild-type or nondisruptive TP53 mutation appear to be undergoing radiation-induced senescence, whereas cells with a disruptive TP53 mutation are not. Because the induction of senescence may be clinically beneficial, we intended to investigate drug-based therapies designed to this end. As there are no specific senescence-inducing agents currently available, we examined metformin, an antidiabetic agent with minimal clinical toxicity, that has been shown to both induce ROS in some cellular contexts (37) as well as preferentially target cell lines with mutant TP53 (38). In the present study, concurrent radiation and metformin treatment was active against HNSCC cell lines that harbored disruptive TP53 (Supplementary Fig. S5). Conversely, no effect of metformin was seen in cells expressing wild-type TP53 (HN 30 and MCF-7). Furthermore, the addition of metformin dramatically increased ROS in HN 31 cells, which have a disruptive (C176F) TP53 mutation, but had much less effect in HN 30 cells, their wild-type TP53 isogenic counterpart (Supplementary Fig. S5). Similarly, metformin decreased clonogenic survival following radiation and increased radiation-induced SA-β-gal activity in HN 31 cells (C176F, disruptive TP53), but had little effect in HN 30 cells (wild-type TP53; Fig. 5A and B). Furthermore, after inhibition of wild-type p53 expression, metformin was found to potentiate SA-β-gal activity and decrease clonogenic survival (Fig. 5A and B).

Figure 5.

Metformin selectively radiosensitizes cells with disruptive TP53 mutations, partially due to altered senescence. A, clonogenic survival after treatment with radiation at the indicated doses together with metformin for 24 hours in HN 30 and HN 31 cells in which p53 expression is inhibited using shRNA (shp53). B, percentage of SA-β-gal–positive cells per total number of cells in a high-power field (hpf) 4 days following 4 Gy of radiation and the indicated doses of metformin. *, significantly different from unirradiated control (P < 0.05); +, significantly changed compared with no metformin treatment (P < 0.05). C, tumor volume in mice with orthotopic tumors derived from HN 31 cells (C176F) after treatment with radiation (6 Gy), metformin (250 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), or both. *, significantly different from radiation alone (P < 0.05); +, significantly different from metformin treatment alone (P < 0.05). D, LRR in patients taking metformin during treatment compared with the remainder of the study population as well as patients matched for tumor and nodal stage, surgical margin status, and TP53 status to the metformin-treated group (P = 0.04).

Figure 5.

Metformin selectively radiosensitizes cells with disruptive TP53 mutations, partially due to altered senescence. A, clonogenic survival after treatment with radiation at the indicated doses together with metformin for 24 hours in HN 30 and HN 31 cells in which p53 expression is inhibited using shRNA (shp53). B, percentage of SA-β-gal–positive cells per total number of cells in a high-power field (hpf) 4 days following 4 Gy of radiation and the indicated doses of metformin. *, significantly different from unirradiated control (P < 0.05); +, significantly changed compared with no metformin treatment (P < 0.05). C, tumor volume in mice with orthotopic tumors derived from HN 31 cells (C176F) after treatment with radiation (6 Gy), metformin (250 mg/kg, intraperitoneal), or both. *, significantly different from radiation alone (P < 0.05); +, significantly different from metformin treatment alone (P < 0.05). D, LRR in patients taking metformin during treatment compared with the remainder of the study population as well as patients matched for tumor and nodal stage, surgical margin status, and TP53 status to the metformin-treated group (P = 0.04).

Close modal

Given the above findings, we examined the effect of metformin treatment on tumor response to radiation in an orthotopic model of HNSCC described previously (26, 31). As seen in Fig. 5C, the addition of metformin to radiation dramatically decreased tumor growth compared with either radiation alone (P = 0.015) or metformin alone (P = 0.008).

To further investigate the clinical use of metformin, a cohort of patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for HNSCC was identified and the impact of concurrent metformin use was investigated. In addition to the patients in the current study, an additional 30 patients with similar disease characteristics and treatment as well as known TP53 status were evaluated. Although only 10 patients were taking metformin at the time of radiation, these patients had a dramatically lower LRR rate than controls matched for tumor and nodal stage, surgical margin status, and TP53 status (P = 0.04; Fig. 5D). On multivariate analysis controlling for TP53 classification, tumor stage, and surgical margin positivity, metformin use was significantly associated with decreased LRR (P = 0.04) as well as improved OS (P = 0.01). Specifically, 5-year OS rate was 87% in the patients taking metformin compared with 41% in the remaining patients (P = 0.04).

In HNSCC, the majority of patient deaths result from LRR, with up to 60% to 75% dying of their disease (39). The primary method of treating advanced HNSCC involves radiation, either in the definitive or postoperative setting. To date, there are few clinically useful predictive indicators of LRR following radiotherapy. In the current study, we examined LRR in HNSCC and, for the first time, showed that the disruptive classification of TP53 is predictive of poor response to a specific therapy, namely PORT. Interestingly, mutant TP53 alone was not predictive for LRR, arguing for the use of a TP53 mutation classification scheme that can show differential function between TP53 mutants with regard to radioresistance.

Because the goal of PORT is to eradicate microscopic residual disease, we hypothesized that LRR would primarily result from intrinsically radioresistant cells. To investigate this, we used an in vitro approach, combining silencing of endogenous p53 expression with genetically engineered expression of different TP53 mutations; this approach showed that HNSCC cells with disruptive TP53 exhibited a radioprotective effect of p53 expression, arguing for a “gain of function” (GOF) with regard to radiosensitivity. These GOF mutations in TP53 have been shown previously for other cellular processes; however, this report is one of the first to do so for in vitro radiosensitivity. Furthermore, we found that 2 types of cell death most commonly associated with radiation, namely apoptosis and mitotic death, were either not present and/or unaffected by TP53 status. In fact, the main response to radiation affected by TP53 status in this model was cellular senescence.

Senescence is a form of cell arrest in which cells remain metabolically active, but lack replicative potential. Several recent studies have linked response to chemotherapy and radiation to this process; however, the exact role of senescence in the response to radiation is far from clear (17, 18, 40). In the present study, we found radiation-induced senescence correlated strongly with in vitro radiosensitivity and was inhibited in the presence of a disruptive TP53 mutant, again arguing for a GOF by at least a subset of TP53 mutations within the disruptive category, driving resistance to radiotherapy.

Induction of both p21 and ROS appear to be critical mediators of cellular senescence. Induction of p21 alone can lead to increased ROS production (34), and ROS inhibition can reverse senescence in this context. Conversely, ROS have been linked to induction of p21, and a feedback loop between ROS and p21 is proposed to be required for DNA damage-induced senescence (35, 41).

In the proposed model, we found radiation-induced ROS and p21 only in HNSCC cells with wild-type and nondisruptive TP53. Specifically, p21 expression was increased in response to radiation in the context of the nondisruptive TP53 mutation R175H. Previously, R175H has been shown to have little remnant p53-driven transcription (42, 43). Furthermore, in one report, the disruptive mutation, C176F, has been shown to have some p53-dependent transcriptional activity in a yeast-based assay (43); however, this has not been observed in other studies (44, 45). Nonetheless, in the current model, both protein expression and transcription of p21 is induced by radiation in cells expressing either wild-type or R175H TP53. This could be attributable to p53 transcription independent induction of p21 similar to that seen in other models (46, 47) or it could result from residual p53 transcriptional activity. It has been shown recently that only a small subset of p53 transcriptional targets are necessary for induction of senescence; thus, even a small remnant of transcriptional function may be sufficient (48). Further studies are in progress to discern the mechanism behind this phenomenon.

Furthermore, radiation-induced ROS production was inhibited by disruptive TP53. In our study, inhibition of secondary ROS production several hours after the initial cellular insult by radiation had a dramatic effect on cellular senescence. This argues for prolonged ROS production following radiation playing a key role in the maintenance of the senescent phenotype. These ROS are most likely derived from the mitochondria and, in fact, we have previously observed decreased baseline mitochondrial complex activity in cells expressing C176F compared with wild-type TP53 (27). This argues for a suppressive effect on the mitochondria of disruptive TP53, which is relieved by inhibition of p53 expression. This offers a possible link between disruptive TP53 mutations GOF and the inhibition of radiation-induced ROS and senescence. Theoretically, disruptive p53 could interact with known targets of wild-type p53 involved in mitochondrial function, exerting an inhibitory function as opposed to the stimulation seen with wild-type or some nondisruptive forms of TP53.

Our data strongly indicate that disruptive TP53 portends poor clinical outcome in HNSCC associated with increased radioresistance. Parallel work in our laboratory has showed that cells with disruptive TP53 exhibit a therapeutically exploitable decrease in metabolic flexibility (27). One agent that can target this process is metformin. Recently, it has been shown that patients taking metformin have improved responses following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (49) and that metformin is a radiosensitizer in vitro (50). Metformin is hypothesized to affect mitochondrial function, and several studies have shown that it induces ROS in certain cellular backgrounds (37). In addition, it has been hypothesized that metformin may induce senescence in cells that are “senescence prone” (51). Interestingly, when we examined the effects of metformin in vitro, radiation-induced senescence and toxicity were potentiated only in cells expressing disruptive TP53, an effect that was modulated by altering p53 expression. This dramatic effect on the efficacy of radiation was also seen in our in vivo orthotopic model, as well as in patients taking metformin at the time of PORT. Although this only included 10 patients in the metformin group, the reduction in LRR was profound and argues for the possibility of a dramatic clinical benefit with targeting of radiation-induced senescence.

The present study is limited by its retrospective nature, although the patient cohort includes a homogenous group of patients treated uniformly with surgery and PORT. Furthermore, the in vitro studies are limited by the analysis of a subset of disruptive and nondisruptive TP53 mutations, and the possibility exists that other disruptive TP53 mutations may behave differently. However, examination of a large panel of HNSCC cell lines confirmed the in vitro predictive value of the disruptive classification. In addition, clinical data showing dramatically increased LRR in patients with disruptive TP53 mutations supports the overall hypothesis. Although the disruptive category is empiric in nature, the fact that senescence appears to be strongly inhibited by these mutations allows further refinement. Specifically, testing of TP53 mutants' ability to induce senescence could be carried out, refining an already clinically predictive model. Finally, although the clinical data regarding the benefit of metformin is compelling, only a small number of patients were treated with the drug at the time of radiation. Despite the intriguing in vitro, in vivo, and clinical finding of radiation potentiation by metformin, these findings do not provide a definitive conclusion, but rather are hypothesis-generating and require additional validation.

Despite these limitations, we have shown for the first time that disruptive TP53 mutation predicts both LRR following PORT and in vitro response to radiation in HNSCC. In addition, we have shown that this effect is due to altered senescence and can be overcome using metformin, which appears to have dramatic clinical benefit.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

The authors thank Mei Zhou and Samar Jasser for their assistance with basic laboratory work and logistics. The authors also thank Christina Dodge for her assistance with the in vivo experiments.

This work was partially supported by an American Society of Radiation Oncology Resident Seed Award; the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center PANTHEON program; NIH Specialized Program of Research Excellence (grant P50CA097007; RO1 DE14613 NIH); National Research Science Award Institutional Research Training (grant T32CA60374); and NIH Program Project (grant CA06294) and Cancer Center Support (grant CA016672).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Jemal
A
,
Bray
F
,
Center
MM
,
Ferlay
J
,
Ward
E
,
Forman
D
. 
Global cancer statistics
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2011
;
61
:
69
90
.
2.
Agrawal
N
,
Frederick
MJ
,
Pickering
CR
,
Bettegowda
C
,
Chang
K
,
Li
RJ
, et al
Exome sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma reveals inactivating mutations in NOTCH1
.
Science
2011
;
333
:
1154
57
.
3.
Alsner
J
,
Sørensen
SB
,
Overgaard
J
. 
TP53 mutation is related to poor prognosis after radiotherapy, but not surgery, in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
.
Radiother Oncol
2001
;
59
:
179
85
.
4.
Koch
WM
,
Brennan
JA
,
Zahurak
M
,
Goodman
SN
,
Westra
WH
,
Schwab
D
, et al
p53 mutation and locoregional treatment failure in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1996
;
88
:
1580
6
.
5.
Thames
HD
,
Petersen
C
,
Petersen
S
,
Nieder
C
,
Baumann
M
. 
Immunohistochemically detected p53 mutations in epithelial tumors and results of treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A treatment-specific overview of the clinical data
.
Strahlenther Onkol
2002
;
178
:
411
21
.
6.
Fallai
C
,
Perrone
F
,
Licitra
L
,
Pilotti
S
,
Locati
L
,
Bossi
P
, et al
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: prognostic role of TP53 and HPV status
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2009
;
75
:
1053
9
.
7.
Poeta
ML
,
Manola
J
,
Goldwasser
MA
,
Forastiere
A
,
Benoit
N
,
Califano
JA
, et al
TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck
.
N Engl J Med
2007
;
357
:
2552
61
.
8.
Perrone
F
,
Bossi
P
,
Cortelazzi
B
,
Locati
L
,
Quattrone
P
,
Pierotti
MA
, et al
TP53 mutations and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy in resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
.
J Clin Oncol
2010
;
28
:
761
6
.
9.
Erber
R
,
Conradt
C
,
Homann
N
,
Enders
C
,
Finckh
M
,
Dietz
A
, et al
TP53 DNA contact mutations are selectively associated with allelic loss and have a strong clinical impact in head and neck cancer
.
Oncogene
1998
;
16
:
1671
9
.
10.
Williams
JR
,
Zhang
Y
,
Zhou
H
,
Gridley
DS
,
Koch
CJ
,
Russell
J
, et al
A quantitative overview of radiosensitivity of human tumor cells across histological type and TP53 status
.
Int J Radiat Biol
2008
;
84
:
253
64
.
11.
Cuddihy
AR
,
Bristow
RG
. 
The p53 protein family and radiation sensitivity: yes or no?
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2004
;
23
:
237
57
.
12.
Gupta
N
,
Vij
R
,
Haas-Kogan
DA
,
Israel
MA
,
Deen
DF
,
Morgan
WF
. 
Cytogenetic damage and the radiation-induced G1-phase checkpoint
.
Radiat Res
1996
;
145
:
289
98
.
13.
Kawashima
K
,
Mihara
K
,
Usuki
H
,
Shimizu
N
,
Namba
M
. 
Transfected mutant p53 gene increases X-ray-induced cell killing and mutation in human fibroblasts immortalized with 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide but does not induce neoplastic transformation of the cells
.
Int J Cancer
1995
;
61
:
76
9
.
14.
Strasser
A
,
Harris
AW
,
Jacks
T
,
Cory
S
. 
DNA damage can induce apoptosis in proliferating lymphoid cells via p53-independent mechanisms inhibitable by Bcl-2
.
Cell
1994
;
79
:
329
39
.
15.
Pardo
FS
,
Su
M
,
Borek
C
,
Preffer
F
,
Dombkowski
D
,
Gerweck
L
, et al
Transfection of rat embryo cells with mutant p53 increases the intrinsic radiation resistance
.
Radiat Res
1994
;
140
:
180
5
.
16.
Biard
DS
,
Martin
M
,
Rhun
YL
,
Duthu
A
,
Lefaix
JL
,
May
E
, et al
Concomitant p53 gene mutation and increased radiosensitivity in rat lung embryo epithelial cells during neoplastic development
.
Cancer Res
1994
;
54
:
3361
4
.
17.
Eriksson
D
,
Stigbrand
T
. 
Radiation-induced cell death mechanisms
.
Tumour Biol
2010
;
31
:
363
72
.
18.
Brown
JM
,
Attardi
LD
. 
The role of apoptosis in cancer development and treatment response
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2005
;
5
:
231
7
.
19.
Vakifahmetoglu
H
,
Olsson
M
,
Zhivotovsky
B
. 
Death through a tragedy: mitotic catastrophe
.
Cell Death Differ
2008
;
15
:
1153
62
.
20.
Roninson
IB
,
Broude
EV
,
Chang
BD
. 
If not apoptosis, then what? Treatment-induced senescence and mitotic catastrophe in tumor cells
.
Drug Resist Updat
2001
;
4
:
303
13
.
21.
Gudkov
AV
,
Komarova
EA
. 
The role of p53 in determining sensitivity to radiotherapy
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2003
;
3
:
117
29
.
22.
Castedo
M
,
Perfettini
J-L
,
Roumier
T
,
Valent
A
,
Raslova
H
,
Yakushijin
K
, et al
Mitotic catastrophe constitutes a special case of apoptosis whose suppression entails aneuploidy
.
Oncogene
2004
;
23
:
4362
70
.
23.
Ianzini
F
,
Bertoldo
A
,
Kosmacek
EA
,
Phillips
SL
,
Mackey
MA
. 
Lack of p53 function promotes radiation-induced mitotic catastrophe in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells
.
Cancer Cell Int
2006
;
6
:
11
.
24.
Merritt
AJ
,
Allen
TD
,
Potten
CS
,
Hickman
JA
. 
Apoptosis in small intestinal epithelial from p53-null mice: evidence for a delayed, p53-independent G2/M-associated cell death after gamma-irradiation
.
Oncogene
1997
;
14
:
2759
66
.
25.
Lehmann
BD
,
McCubrey
JA
,
Jefferson
HS
,
Paine
MS
,
Chappell
WH
,
Terrian
DM
. 
A dominant role for p53-dependent cellular senescence in radiosensitization of human prostate cancer cells
.
Cell Cycle
2007
;
6
:
595
605
.
26.
Yigitbasi
OG
,
Younes
MN
,
Doan
D
,
Jasser
SA
,
Schiff
BA
,
Bucana
CD
, et al
Tumor cell and endothelial cell therapy of oral cancer by dual tyrosine kinase receptor blockade
.
Cancer Res
2004
;
64
:
7977
84
.
27.
Sandulache
VC
,
Skinner
HD
,
Ow
TJ
,
Zhang
A
,
Xia
X
,
Luchak
JM
, et al
Individualizing anti-metabolic treatment strategies for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma based on TP53 mutational status
.
Cancer
2011
Jun 30.
[Epub ahead of print]
.
28.
Eruslanov
E
,
Kusmartsev
S
. 
Identification of ROS using oxidized DCFDA and flow-cytometry
.
Methods Mol Biol
2010
;
594
:
57
72
.
29.
Rago
R
,
Mitchen
J
,
Wilding
G
. 
DNA fluorometric assay in 96-well tissue culture plates using Hoechst 33258 after cell lysis by freezing in distilled water
.
Anal Biochem
1990
;
191
:
31
4
.
30.
el-Deiry
WS
,
Tokino
T
,
Velculescu
VE
,
Levy
DB
,
Parsons
R
,
Trent
JM
, et al
WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression
.
Cell
1993
;
75
:
817
25
.
31.
Sano
D
,
Matsumoto
F
,
Valdecanas
DR
,
Zhao
M
,
Molkentine
DP
,
Takahashi
Y
, et al
Vandetanib restores head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells' sensitivity to cisplatin and radiation in vivo and in vitro
.
Clin Cancer Res
2011
;
17
:
1815
27
.
32.
Verheij
M
,
Bartelink
H
. 
Radiation-induced apoptosis
.
Cell Tissue Res
2000
;
301
:
133
42
.
33.
Catalano
A
,
Rodilossi
S
,
Caprari
P
,
Coppola
V
,
Procopio
A
. 
5-Lipoxygenase regulates senescence-like growth arrest by promoting ROS-dependent p53 activation
.
EMBO J
2005
;
24
:
170
9
.
34.
Macip
S
,
Igarashi
M
,
Fang
L
,
Chen
A
,
Pan
Z-Q
,
Lee
SW
, et al
Inhibition of p21-mediated ROS accumulation can rescue p21-induced senescence
.
EMBO J
2002
;
21
:
2180
8
.
35.
Passos
JF
,
Nelson
G
,
Wang
C
,
Richter
T
,
Simillion
C
,
Proctor
CJ
, et al
Feedback between p21 and reactive oxygen production is necessary for cell senescence
.
Mol Syst Biol
2010
;
6
:
347
.
36.
Inoue
T
,
Kato
K
,
Kato
H
,
Asanoma
K
,
Kuboyama
A
,
Ueoka
Y
, et al
Level of reactive oxygen species induced by p21Waf1/CIP1 is critical for the determination of cell fate
.
Cancer Sci
2009
;
100
:
1275
83
.
37.
Anedda
A
,
Rial
E
,
González-Barroso
MM
. 
Metformin induces oxidative stress in white adipocytes and raises uncoupling protein 2 levels
.
J Endocrinol
2008
;
199
:
33
40
.
38.
Buzzai
M
,
Jones
RG
,
Amaravadi
RK
,
Lum
JJ
,
DeBerardinis
RJ
,
Zhao
F
, et al
Systemic treatment with the antidiabetic drug metformin selectively impairs p53-deficient tumor cell growth
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
6745
52
.
39.
Goodwin
WJ
. 
Salvage surgery for patients with recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: when do the ends justify the means?
Laryngoscope
2000
;
110
:
1
18
.
40.
Ewald
JA
,
Desotelle
JA
,
Wilding
G
,
Jarrard
DF
. 
Therapy-induced senescence in cancer
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2010
;
102
:
1536
46
.
41.
Mattera
L
,
Courilleau
C
,
Legube
G
,
Ueda
T
,
Fukunaga
R
,
Chevillard-Briet
M
, et al
The E1A-associated p400 protein modulates cell fate decisions by the regulation of ROS homeostasis
.
PLoS Genet
2010
;
6
:
e1000983
.
42.
Wang
B
,
Xiao
Z
,
Ren
EC
. 
Redefining the p53 response element
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2009
;
106
:
14373
8
.
43.
Kato
S
,
Han
S-Y
,
Liu
W
,
Otsuka
K
,
Shibata
H
,
Kanamaru
R
, et al
Understanding the function–structure and function–mutation relationships of p53 tumor suppressor protein by high-resolution missense mutation analysis
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003
;
100
:
8424
9
.
44.
Jordan
JJ
,
Inga
A
,
Conway
K
,
Edmiston
S
,
Carey
LA
,
Wu
L
, et al
Altered-function p53 missense mutations identified in breast cancers can have subtle effects on transactivation
.
Mol Cancer Res
2010
;
8
:
701
16
.
45.
Dearth
LR
,
Qian
H
,
Wang
T
,
Baroni
TE
,
Zeng
J
,
Chen
SW
, et al
Inactive full-length p53 mutants lacking dominant wild-type p53 inhibition highlight loss of heterozygosity as an important aspect of p53 status in human cancers
.
Carcinogenesis
2006
;
28
:
289
98
.
46.
Jung
Y-S
,
Qian
Y
,
Chen
X
. 
Examination of the expanding pathways for the regulation of p21 expression and activity
.
Cell Signal
2010
;
22
:
1003
12
.
47.
Back
JH
,
Rezvani
HR
,
Zhu
Y
,
Guyonnet-Duperat
V
,
Athar
M
,
Ratner
D
, et al
Cancer cell survival following DNA damage-mediated premature senescence is regulated by mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent inhibition of sirtuin 1
.
J Biol Chem
2011
;
286
:
19100
8
.
48.
Brady
CA
,
Jiang
D
,
Mello
SS
,
Johnson
TM
,
Jarvis
LA
,
Kozak
MM
, et al
Distinct p53 transcriptional programs dictate acute DNA-damage responses and tumor suppression
.
Cell
2011
;
145
:
571
83
.
49.
Jiralerspong
S
,
Palla
SL
,
Giordano
SH
,
Meric-Bernstam
F
,
Liedtke
C
,
Barnett
CM
, et al
Metformin and pathologic complete responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in diabetic patients with breast cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
2009
;
27
:
3297
302
.
50.
Sanli
T
,
Rashid
A
,
Liu
C
,
Harding
S
,
Bristow
RG
,
Cutz
J-C
, et al
Ionizing radiation activates AMP-activated kinase (AMPK): a target for radiosensitization of human cancer cells
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2010
;
78
:
221
9
.
51.
Menendez
JA
,
Cufí
S
,
Oliveras-Ferraros
C
,
Vellon
L
,
Joven
J
,
Vazquez-Martin
A
. 
Gerosuppressant metformin: less is more
.
Aging (Albany NY)
2011
;
3
:
348
62
.