Purpose: To evaluate the nature of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) hyperactivity in pancreatic cancer progression.

Experimental Design: We used genetic, biochemical, and molecular biology methods to investigate the nature and function of overexpression of CDK5 and its activators p35 and p39 during the progression of pancreatic cancer.

Results: Amplification of the CDK5 gene or either of its main activators, p35 and p39, was observed in 67% of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). CDK5, p35, and p39 were rarely expressed in pancreatic ducts whereas more than 90% of PDACs had increased levels of CDK5 and p35. Increased levels of CDK5, p35, and p39 protein were observed in several pancreatic cancer cell lines. Inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity using a CDK5 dominant-negative mutant or the drug roscovitine significantly decreased the migration and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Increased CDK5 kinase activity was also observed in immortalized human pancreatic nestin-expressing (HPNE) cells expressing a mutant form of K-Ras (G12D) compared with HPNE cells expressing native K-Ras. G12D K-Ras increased cleavage of p35 to p25, a stable and greater activator of CDK5, thus implicating a role for CDK5 in early progression of PDAC. Inhibition of the signaling cascade downstream of mutant K-Ras (G12D) that involves mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal–regulated kinase, phosphoinositide 3-kinase, or CDK5 decreased p25 protein levels.

Conclusion: These results suggest that mutant K-Ras acts in concert with CDK5 and its activators to increase malignant progression, migration, and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res; 17(19); 6140–50. ©2011 AACR.

Translational Relevance

We show that cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK5) or its coactivators p35 and p39 are significantly overexpressed in more than 90%, 94%, and 75% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), respectively, compared with normal pancreases, in part, because of genomic amplification, as genes for CDK5, p35, or p39 were amplified in 67% (n = 39) of tumors analyzed. CDK5 is hyperactivated by signaling downstream of mutant K-Ras, resulting in increased tumor migration and invasive properties. CDK5 represents a novel and unexplored therapeutic target for both early- and late-stage PDACs and should be investigated in solid tumors that harbor K-Ras mutations including those of pancreas, lung, and colon.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) are lethal tumors that result in a median survival of less than 6 months from time of diagnosis and a 5-year survival rate of less than 5% (http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/280605-overview). The poor survival is largely attributed to aggressive growth, advanced stage at diagnosis, and local recurrence. Activating mutations in K-Ras are nearly universal in PDACs and common in precursor pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions (1). The identification of effectors downstream of K-Ras that modulate growth, cell migration, and invasion will help understand the process of disease progression and enable the development of novel therapeutic targets for patients with PDACs.

Perineural invasion (PNI) is a hallmark of pancreatic cancer (2, 3). Pancreatic innervation includes enteric nervous connections to spinal cord and brain that mediate pancreatic exocrine and endocrine functions (4). An extensive neural network surrounding the pancreas coupled with the frequent PNI observed in pancreatic cancer led us to investigate molecules expressed in pancreatic cancer cells that are also involved in cellular migration during neural development. Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5) is necessary for proper cortical neuronal migration and patterning. CDK5−/− (deficient) mice die in the perinatal period because of the congenital loss of 4 of 6 cortical layers in the brain (5). CDK5-catalyzed phosphorylation of p21-activated kinase (PAK1) and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is required for proper neuronal migration (6, 7). PAK1 and FAK are also implicated in regulating cytoskeletal organization during tumor cell migration (8–10). Recently, CDK5 kinase activity has been correlated with increased invasion in prostate carcinomas and glioblastoma multiforme (11, 12).

CDK5 is the only known CDK to become activated through binding noncyclin molecules (13). The best characterized CDK5 activators, p35 and p39, have C-terminal regions that contain cyclin box folds that bind and activate CDK5 (14). In neural cells, calpain-mediated cleavage of p35 and p39 to p25 and p29, respectively, yields activators with greater stability, increased CDK5 kinase activation, and altered localization and substrate specificity as compared with the full-length p35 and p39 forms (15, 16). In this report, we investigated the expression and function of CDK5 and 2 of its activators, p35 and p39, during the pathogenesis of PDACs.

Cells, antibodies, and reagents

S2-013 cells are a cloned subline of a human pancreatic tumor cell line SUIT-2 derived from a liver metastasis (17). HPAF2 is a human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line derived from peritoneal ascitic fluid (18). T3M4 cells are a human carcinoembryonic antigen–producing cell line established from a primary PDAC transplanted into nude mice and then cultured (18). FG cells are a fast-growing clone established from the Colo-357 PDAC cell line (19). Human pancreatic nestin-expressing (HPNE) cells are a human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT; active telomerase)-immortalized HPNE ductal progenitor cell line (20). tHPNE cells are HPNE cells transduced with mutant K-Ras (G12D), E6/E7, and SV40 small t antigen (20–22).

The rabbit polyclonal antibodies to p35, p39, and CDK5 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); p44/p42 MAPK monoclonal antibodies (Cell Signaling); FAK, CDK5, and phospho PAK1 Abs (Abcam); mAB β-Actin (Sigma); mAB CDK5 (Upstate); and the horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat α-mouse and α-rabbit (Pierce) were used at concentrations recommended by the manufacturer. The CDK5 inhibitor R-roscovitine was purchased from Calbiochem.

Comparative genomic hybridization

We selected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks from pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens carried out for PDAC at University of California, San Francisco, between 1993 and 2004. Tissue blocks were reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist and confirmed to be PDAC. Dissection was carried out; genomic DNA was isolated by a proprietary phenol-chloroform–based extraction procedure at Response Genetics. Extracted genomic DNA (70 ng) was subjected to genome-wide allele-specific copy number analysis on a molecular inversion probe platform as described (23). Molecular inversion probe copy number was assessed by using the Nexus Software (BioDiscovery).

Cell culture

All cell lines were maintained in RPMI supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and ciprofloxacin. Stably transfected/transduced cell lines were maintained with the appropriate selection as indicated in the next section.

Plasmids and stable transfections and transductions

The reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA, “tet-on,” kindly provided by Kay Uwe Wagner, University of Nebraska Medical Center; ref. 24) was transfected into S2-013 cells and selected with G418 at 600 μg/mL. After stable selection with G418, the pBI (Clontech) vector with a zeocin-resistant gene (kindly provided by Barry Nelkin, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD) was transfected, and stable expressing cell lines were selected with zeocin at 200 μg/mL (11). Clones expressing the CDK5 dominant-negative (CDK5DN) insert were selected if there was more than a 2-fold increase in the CDK5 protein expression after addition of 3 μg/mL doxycycline, thus indicating induced expression of CDK5DN. The clones were sorted for enhanced green fluorescent protein to isolate a high level CDK5DN-expressing population.

All stable transfections used Genporter2 (Genlantis) as per the manufacturer's recommendations.

Western blotting and immunoprecipitation

Briefly and as previously described (25), cell lysate proteins were resolved on 12% or 4% to 20% Novex Tris-Glycine denaturing polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen) in a 1× SDS-PAGE buffer. Blocking and primary antibody incubation was carried out overnight at 4°C or for 1 hour at room temperature. Secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Primary and secondary antibody incubations were followed with five 3-minute washes in PBS. All incubations were carried out in PBS containing 3% dried milk.

Immunohistochemistry

CDK5, p35, and p39 were investigated for frequency of expression in PDACs, metastases from PDACs, and normal pancreases. Briefly and as previously described (26), 5 μmol/L thick, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were immunostained. The tissue sections in paraffin were rehydrated through incubations in xylene and then an alcohol gradient from 100% to 70% followed by an H2O incubation. Antigen retrieval using Antigen Unmasking Solution (Vector Labs) was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. The sections were blocked in Dako Blocking Solution (Dako) for 30 minutes at 24°C. The primary antibodies were incubated for 45 minutes at 24°C. CDK5 (Abcam), p35 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), p39 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and rabbit IgG (Sigma) were used at 1:70, 1:100, 1:100, and 2 μg/mL, respectively, and the secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG (Dako) for 30 minutes at 24°C with 3 PBS washes between each Ab/staining step. Positive staining was visualized with a 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate solution (Vector Labs) for 2 to 5 minutes and then slides were counterstained in hematoxylin. All slides were analyzed by 2 individuals trained in immunohistochemistry and interpretations confirmed by a pathologist.

Migration assay

Cells were grown to 90% confluence on 6-well plates and placed in RPMI containing 0.5% FBS. Twenty-four hours later, a scratch was made with either a p20 or p1000 pipette tip. Using a colony marker, areas of similar cell density and scratch characteristics were marked and photographed. S2-013 cells were grown for 24 hours and HPNE cells for 18 hours and then photographed again in the same field. The photographs were imported into Microsoft PowerPoint and analyzed for percentage migration into the scratch. The results are reported in fold migration relative to that of the control. TScratch (27) was used to analyze the total area of migration by HPNE cells. Results are reported in total area covered by migrated cells. Indicated cell treatments were initiated at time of making the scratch.

Matrigel invasion assay

In vitro analysis of invasion was measured by seeding cells on the upper chamber of a Matrigel-coated Boyden chamber in serum-free media with the lower chamber containing media with 10% FBS. T3M4, HPAF2, and S2-013 cells were seeded at 5 × 104 cells per filter. tHPNE and FG cells were seeded at 1 × 104 and 1 × 106 cells per filter, respectively. Roscovitine (10 μmol/L) was added just before cell seeding. After a 24-hour incubation using 10% FBS as the chemoattractant in the lower chamber, the upper chamber was cleaned. The filter was stained with Diff-Quick staining kit (Allegiance), and the invading cells were counted.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using paired Student's t test or χ2 test as indicated with P < 0.05 being statistically significant. The data were analyzed with PROC GLIMMIX of SAS, version 9.2. Data entered directly as percentages (migration) were evaluated with a regression model on the basis of the β distribution.

CDK5, p35, and p39 expression in nontransformed pancreas

We determined the expression pattern of CDK5, p35, and p39 in 9 different normal pancreatic tissue samples. Consistent with previous reports, CDK5, p35, and p39 were highly expressed in islet β cells (28, 29). We extend this finding to show that CDK5, p35, and p39 were rarely visualized in ductal cells (Fig. 1A). Only 2 of 9 samples expressed detectable CDK5 in a few ductal cells and weak staining in adjoining acinar cells. Ductal cells positive for CDK5 also expressed p35, which was independently expressed sporadically in more than half of the normal samples; however, only 3 of 9 samples showed more than 25% of the ducts staining positive for p35 (Table 1). p39 was only expressed in 38% of normal ducts, and only 1 sample had greater than 10% of the ducts staining positive for p39 (Table 1).

Figure 1.

CDK5 and p35 expression in normal pancreas and PDACs. A, most normal pancreatic ductal cells are negative for CDK5 and p35 in most ducts (row 1). p35 detected within a pancreatic duct whereas an adjacent duct is negative for p35 and the corresponding staining for CDK5 is negative in both ducts (row 2). B, CDK5 and 2 of its activators, p35 and p39, and their cleavage products, p25 and p29, respectively, are expressed in multiple PDAC cell lines. Increased levels of S732 FAK (CDK5 phosphorylation site) were observed in the PDAC cell lines. C, immunohistochemical analysis of primary pancreatic cancer samples shows expression of CDK5, p35, and p39 in a primary pancreatic cancer exhibiting PNI. D, comparative genomic hybridization of PDACs (n = 39) shows genomic amplification for CDK5, p35, and p39. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Figure 1.

CDK5 and p35 expression in normal pancreas and PDACs. A, most normal pancreatic ductal cells are negative for CDK5 and p35 in most ducts (row 1). p35 detected within a pancreatic duct whereas an adjacent duct is negative for p35 and the corresponding staining for CDK5 is negative in both ducts (row 2). B, CDK5 and 2 of its activators, p35 and p39, and their cleavage products, p25 and p29, respectively, are expressed in multiple PDAC cell lines. Increased levels of S732 FAK (CDK5 phosphorylation site) were observed in the PDAC cell lines. C, immunohistochemical analysis of primary pancreatic cancer samples shows expression of CDK5, p35, and p39 in a primary pancreatic cancer exhibiting PNI. D, comparative genomic hybridization of PDACs (n = 39) shows genomic amplification for CDK5, p35, and p39. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

Close modal
Table 1.

Expression of CDK5, p35, or p39 in normal pancreatic ducts

Normal pancreases% of ducts in sample with at least 1 cell positive
Protein% samples positive in ducts01–1010–2525–50>50
CDK5 (n = 9) 22 78 11 11 
P35 (n = 9) 67 44 22 11 33 
P39 (n = 8) 38 75 13 13 
Normal pancreases% of ducts in sample with at least 1 cell positive
Protein% samples positive in ducts01–1010–2525–50>50
CDK5 (n = 9) 22 78 11 11 
P35 (n = 9) 67 44 22 11 33 
P39 (n = 8) 38 75 13 13 

CDK5 and two of its activators, p35 and p39, are expressed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines, tumors, and metastases

CDK5, p25 (the cleavage product of p35 with higher capacity for activating CDK5), and p29 (the cleavage product of p39 with a higher capacity for activating CDK5) were expressed in 10 of 10 PDAC cell lines tested, ranging from poorly to well differentiated (Fig. 1B), all expressing mutant K-Ras except T3M4 cells (18, 30, 31). Thus, the predominant forms of p35 and p39 observed in these cell lines were their activated N-terminal cleavage products, p25 and p29 (15, 16).

Examination of CDK5, p35, and p39 expression in primary PDACs and liver and lung metastases by immunohistochemistry revealed CDK5 expression in more than 90% of primary PDACs with similar expression of p35 and less for p39 (Fig. 1C and Table 2). CDK5, p35, and p39 were observed in all 6 examples of PNI that were examined (Fig. 1C and Table 2). CDK5 was significantly (P < 0.0005) overexpressed in primary PDACs compared with normal pancreases (Tables 1 and 2). CDK5, p35, and p39 expression was especially evident at the leading front of tumors (Fig. 1C).

Table 2.

Expression of CDK5, p35, or p39 in pancreatic tumors, liver and lung metastases, and during PNI

CDK5 positiveCDK5 negative% positivep35 positivep35 negative% positivep39 positivep39 negative% positive
Primary pancreatic tumor 22 92 15 94 75 
Liver metastases 70 83 40 
Lung metastases 86 100 60 
PNI 100 100 100 
CDK5 positiveCDK5 negative% positivep35 positivep35 negative% positivep39 positivep39 negative% positive
Primary pancreatic tumor 22 92 15 94 75 
Liver metastases 70 83 40 
Lung metastases 86 100 60 
PNI 100 100 100 

Genomic amplification of CDK5, p35, and p39 in PDACs

CDK5, p35, and p39 were individually amplified in approximately 33% of PDACs (n = 39; Fig. 1D). Interestingly, 67% of 39 pancreatic tumors examined exhibited amplification of at least one of these genes (Fig. 1D). A few deletions were noted (approximately 10%, data not shown); however, almost all (3 of 4) tumor samples with deletions in either p35 or p39 had a concomitant amplification in the reciprocal gene (p35 or 39).

K-Ras increased CDK5 kinase activity

We investigated the expression and activity of CDK5, p35, and p39 during the premalignant and malignant transformation of pancreatic epithelial cells by using an immortalized human pancreatic ductal progenitor cell line (HPNE; ref. 20), which was transduced independently and in combination with retroviruses expressing mutant active K-Ras (G12D; kras), human papillomavirus E6 and E7 (E6/7) to inhibit Rb and p53, and SV40 small t antigen to inhibit protein phosphatase 2A (St; refs. 20, 21). The utility of these cells for investigating relevant signaling pathways downstream of mutant K-Ras has been established (32). HPNE.kras cells had slightly higher p35 mRNA and protein levels than HPNE parental cells (Fig. 3, data not shown). K-Ras–transformed cells showed significantly elevated levels of the p35 cleavage product, p25, (Fig. 2A) and enhanced CDK5 kinase activation, as evidenced by increased phosphorylation of the CDK5 substrates FAK at serine 732 (6) and PAK1 at threonine 212 (ref. 7; Fig. 2A). Inhibiting CDK5 kinase activity with R-roscovitine (>4-fold specificity for CDK5 compared with CDK2; ref. 33) for 24 hours in serum-containing media abolished S732 FAK phosphorylation in HPNE.kras cells and markedly reduced S732 phosphorylation in HPNE.kras.E6/7.St cells (Fig. 2B). Inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity also decreased S732 phosphorylation in S2-013, HPAF, tHPNE, and HPNE.kras cells when introduced under growth factor stimulation during a 6-hour stimulation with 10% FBS after an 18-hour serum starvation (Fig. 2D). We did not observe a difference in p29 (the cleavage product of p39) expression in concert with expression of mutant K-Ras (Fig. 2A); thus, we focused on the correlation between mutant K-Ras expression and the subsequent increased p25 expression and CDK5 kinase activity.

Figure 2.

Mutant K-Ras increases CDK5 kinase activity. A, HPNE cells with the indicated oncogenic insults (K-Ras, E6/E7, and small t) were examined for expression of CDK5, p35, p25, p29, phospho-T212PAK1, PAK1, phospho-S732 FAK, FAK, and β-actin as a loading control. B, HPNE.kras and tHPNE (HPNE.kras.E6/7.St) cells were investigated for expression of CDK5, p25, phospho-S732 FAK, FAK, p29, and β-actin with and without inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity by treatment with roscovitine for 24 hours in serum-containing media. C, CDK5, p35, p25, and β-actin expression in HPNE.kras cells after incubation for 24 hours with vehicle, CDK5 inhibitor (roscovitine), MEK inhibitor (U0126), PI3K inhibitor (LY290027), caspase inhibitor, protease inhibitors (MG132, protease inh 1, lactacystin, and ALLN), and calpain inhibitors (calpeptin, calpain inh 3, PD, EST) compared with HPNE cells without mutant active K-Ras. D, S2-013, HPAF, tHPNE, and HPNE.kras cells were serum starved for 18 hours followed by stimulation with 10% FBS for 6 hours with roscovitine or the vehicle control: the results show levels of phospho S732 FAK, FAK, p25, p35, CDK5, and β-actin expression as determined by Western blotting.

Figure 2.

Mutant K-Ras increases CDK5 kinase activity. A, HPNE cells with the indicated oncogenic insults (K-Ras, E6/E7, and small t) were examined for expression of CDK5, p35, p25, p29, phospho-T212PAK1, PAK1, phospho-S732 FAK, FAK, and β-actin as a loading control. B, HPNE.kras and tHPNE (HPNE.kras.E6/7.St) cells were investigated for expression of CDK5, p25, phospho-S732 FAK, FAK, p29, and β-actin with and without inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity by treatment with roscovitine for 24 hours in serum-containing media. C, CDK5, p35, p25, and β-actin expression in HPNE.kras cells after incubation for 24 hours with vehicle, CDK5 inhibitor (roscovitine), MEK inhibitor (U0126), PI3K inhibitor (LY290027), caspase inhibitor, protease inhibitors (MG132, protease inh 1, lactacystin, and ALLN), and calpain inhibitors (calpeptin, calpain inh 3, PD, EST) compared with HPNE cells without mutant active K-Ras. D, S2-013, HPAF, tHPNE, and HPNE.kras cells were serum starved for 18 hours followed by stimulation with 10% FBS for 6 hours with roscovitine or the vehicle control: the results show levels of phospho S732 FAK, FAK, p25, p35, CDK5, and β-actin expression as determined by Western blotting.

Close modal
Figure 3.

CDK5 kinase activity increases migration. A, inhibition of CDK5 in S2-013 cells, with roscovitine or under a doxycycline (dox)-inducible CDK5DN construct, significantly decreased cell migration as determined with scratch assays. B, quantification of the total area of migration using TScratch, a program that analyzes area occupied by cells, for each HPNE permutation and treatment to assess the differences in migration conveyed through mutant K-Ras and CDK5 kinase activity. Inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity, significantly reduced migration in HPNE.kras and tHPNE (HPNE.kras.E6/7.St) cells while showing minimal differences in cells lacking mutant K-Ras, HPNE.E6/7.St. (column 4 or 6 compared with 1). *, P < 0.005; **, P < 0.02.

Figure 3.

CDK5 kinase activity increases migration. A, inhibition of CDK5 in S2-013 cells, with roscovitine or under a doxycycline (dox)-inducible CDK5DN construct, significantly decreased cell migration as determined with scratch assays. B, quantification of the total area of migration using TScratch, a program that analyzes area occupied by cells, for each HPNE permutation and treatment to assess the differences in migration conveyed through mutant K-Ras and CDK5 kinase activity. Inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity, significantly reduced migration in HPNE.kras and tHPNE (HPNE.kras.E6/7.St) cells while showing minimal differences in cells lacking mutant K-Ras, HPNE.E6/7.St. (column 4 or 6 compared with 1). *, P < 0.005; **, P < 0.02.

Close modal

We investigated other signaling pathways that may regulate p35 cleavage to p25 in HPNE.kras cells. Inhibition (24 hours) of mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (MEK; U0126), phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K; LY290027), and CDK5 (roscovitine) inhibited p35 cleavage to p25 (Fig. 2C). Inhibition of calpain had a minimal decrease in p35 cleavage to p25 whereas other protease inhibitors including MG132, protease inhibitor 1, and lactacystin had no effect on p25 levels (Fig. 2C). All HPNE cells with mutated K-Ras had similar levels of p35 protein, indicating that the changes in p25 protein expression are likely the result of proteolytic processing. Therefore, cleavage of p35 to p25 in the context of mutant active K-Ras is influenced by MEK, PI3K, and CDK5 signaling and regulatory pathways (Fig. 2C).

CDK5 kinase activity increases cell migration

S2-013 cells, a cloned pancreatic tumor cell line derived from a PDAC liver metastasis, displayed significantly reduced migration when treated with the CDK5 inhibitor roscovitine (Fig. 3A). S2-013 cells expressing the rtTA, tet-on, and the CDK5DN construct under the tetracycline-responsive element had significantly reduced migration compared with the S2-013 control cell lines when expression was induced by treatment with doxycycline (Fig. 3A).

The effects of CDK5 kinase activity on cellular motility in the context of mutant K-Ras activity were investigated at the different stages of transformation in HPNE cells. Expression of mutant K-Ras in HPNE.kras and HPNE.kras.E6/7.St significantly increased migration compared with HPNE.E6/7.St cells lacking mutant K-Ras (Fig. 3B), thus confirming prior reports of mutant K-Ras increasing cellular migration (34, 35). CDK5 inhibition with roscovitine in HPNE.kras and HPNE.kras.E6/7.St cells resulted in a similar reduction of total migration, 18% of the total area, in both cell lines and correlated to a 38% and 35% decrease in total migration with CDK5 inhibition, respectively (Fig. 3B). HPNE.E6/7.St cells had significantly less migration than cells containing mutant K-Ras, and in these cells, inhibition of CDK5 kinase with roscovitine did not significantly affect migration into the total area (3.6% reduction) as compared with both cell lines tested expressing mutant K-Ras (18% reduction; Fig. 3B). The smaller decrease in HPNE.E6/7.St migration following roscovitine treatment is due to minimal CDK5 activity in these cells, which expresses p35 and very little p25 (Fig. 2A).

CDK5 kinase activity increases invasion in vitro through a Matrigel-coated Boyden chamber

Inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity with roscovitine in PDAC cell lines S2-013, T3M4, FG, HPAF2, HPNE.kras.E6/7.St (tHPNE), and HPNE.kras cells reduced invasion through a Matrigel-coated Boyden chamber by 60%, 37%, 49%, 60%, 47%, and 47%, respectively (Fig. 4A).

Figure 4.

CDK5 kinase activity increases in vitro invasion and enhances cell spreading in the context of mutant K-Ras. A, invasion in vitro through a Matrigel-coated Boyden chamber by S2-013, tHPNE, FG, HPAF2, T3M4, and HPNE.kras cells following inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity with roscovitine compared with the vehicle control. B, HPNE cells incubated with roscovitine for 72 hours did not result in altered cellular morphology. C, HPNE.kras cells incubated with roscovitine for 72 hours resulted in enhanced spreading as evidenced by a more flattened appearance with shorter cellular processes. D, HPNE.kras cells transduced with a CDK5DN construct, HPNE.kras.CDK5DN, also displayed enhanced spreading compared with the control cell line, HPNE.kras.Control. *, P < 0.007; **, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.02.

Figure 4.

CDK5 kinase activity increases in vitro invasion and enhances cell spreading in the context of mutant K-Ras. A, invasion in vitro through a Matrigel-coated Boyden chamber by S2-013, tHPNE, FG, HPAF2, T3M4, and HPNE.kras cells following inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity with roscovitine compared with the vehicle control. B, HPNE cells incubated with roscovitine for 72 hours did not result in altered cellular morphology. C, HPNE.kras cells incubated with roscovitine for 72 hours resulted in enhanced spreading as evidenced by a more flattened appearance with shorter cellular processes. D, HPNE.kras cells transduced with a CDK5DN construct, HPNE.kras.CDK5DN, also displayed enhanced spreading compared with the control cell line, HPNE.kras.Control. *, P < 0.007; **, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.02.

Close modal

Inhibition of CDK5 kinase alters cell morphology in HPNE cells expressing mutant K-Ras

We sought to investigate the role of CDK5 kinase activity on cell morphology in the context of mutant K-Ras expression in HPNE cells. Parental HPNE cells treated with roscovitine for 3 days showed no observable changes in cellular morphology (Fig. 4B). HPNE.kras cells treated with roscovitine for 3 days displayed enhanced spreading upon culture in plastic, as evidenced by a more flattened appearance with shorter cellular processes compared with cells with the vehicle control (Fig. 4C). HPNE.kras cells transduced with the CDK5DN construct had a cellular phenotype similar to HPNE.kras cells treated with roscovitine (Fig. 4D). Thus, inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity increased spreading of HPNE cells but only in the context of mutant K-Ras.

We report for the first time that CDK5 or its activators are overexpressed in PDACs (Fig. 1B–D and Table 2) compared with normal pancreatic ducts (Fig. 1A and Table 1; P < 0.0005). Primary human PDACs exhibit frequent amplification of the genes encoding p35, p39, or CDK5. Each of these genes is individually amplified in about 33% of tumors, and collectively one or more of these genes is amplified in approximately 67% of tumor samples (Fig. 1D, n = 39). Results presented by Harada and colleagues (that did not address or discuss CDK5, p35, and p39 directly) are consistent with our results, except p39 was not as frequently amplified (36). Overexpression of any of these (p35, p39, or CDK5) is predicted to result in enhanced activation of CDK5 kinase activity. This supports the hypothesis that activation of CDK5, in part, through gene amplification and commensurate overexpression of CDK5, p35, or p39, contributes to the progression of pancreatic cancer. Our results also shed light on the types of cells within the pancreas that express CDK5, which is widely reported to be “ubiquitously” expressed in all organs. Within the pancreas, expression of CDK5 is highest in islets, but we find that there is little or only sporadic expression of CDK5, p35, or p39 in normal acinar or ductal cells in the pancreas.

The known contribution of CDK5 to neuronal migration and patterning (5) suggested to us a link between CDK5 expression and PNI, a prominent feature of PDACs. Sustained activation of phospho-Erk1/2 was achieved through stimulation by nerve growth factor in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells, which resulted in Egr1 binding and activation of the p35 promoter and a subsequent increase of p35 transcript and protein (37). Nerve growth factor–induced upregulation of p35 protein levels may explain, in part, the high p35 levels observed in PNI (Fig. 1C and Table 2), and we propose that the microenvironment around the nerves, where physiologically normal CDK5 expression is highest (38, 39), induces or selects for increased CDK5 and p39 levels in PDACs undergoing PNI.

We sought to determine whether CDK5 activation contributed to pancreatic cancer progression in the context of known early transforming events (40). Analysis of variants of HPNE, a normal pancreatic cell line immortalized with hTERT, that was subsequently transduced with retroviruses expressing mutant active K-Ras (G12D; HPNE.kras) showed higher p35 or p39 mRNA and protein levels in response to activated K-Ras whereas CDK5 levels remained constant in HPNE.kras cells (Fig. 3, data not shown). Differences in CDK5 expression between normal pancreas (Fig. 1 and Table 1) and immortalized but nontransformed HPNE cells (Fig. 2A) could be attributed to the expression of nestin, which HPNE cells express, as nestin expression has been correlated to CDK5 expression in differentiating myoblasts and in regenerating muscle tissue (41). Alternatively, CDK5 may be expressed in pancreatic ductal progenitor cells, which would also explain CDK5 expression in HPNE cells, which are derived from progenitors of ductal cells (20).

There were increased p25 levels in HPNE.kras cells, a stable cleavage product of p35 that is highly activating for CDK5 (Fig. 2A). p25 lacks the N-terminal myristoylation sequence of p35, which causes relocalization from the cell membrane to cytoplasm and potentiates its capacity to bind and activate CDK5 (13). p25 expression is likely responsible for increased CDK5 kinase activity in HPNE.kras cells compared with HPNE parental cells (Fig. 2A). Similar to SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells (42) and in contrast to normal neuronal cells (43), we found that CDK5 kinase activity in the context of mutant K-Ras (HPNE.kras cells) increased p25 levels (Fig. 2B) whereas inhibition of CDK5 kinase had no effect on p25 levels in the context of the additional oncogenic effects of E6/7 and small t antigen (Fig. 2B). This supports the hypothesis that CDK5 hyperactivation contributes to tumor progression especially in the context of early mutant K-Ras expression. We further show that signaling through MEK and PI3K increased p25 expression (Fig. 2C). This leads us to propose that signaling from activated mutant K-Ras (G12D) through MEK and PI3K enhance p25 expression, which in turn increases CDK5 kinase activity (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S1).

Our results complement and extend recently published findings by Feldman and colleagues (44), which showed that inhibition of CDK5 in pancreatic cancer cell lines by the dominant-negative construct decreased signaling through the RalA and RalB pathways that are downstream of activated Ras, and that commensurate inhibition of MEK and PI3K pathways reinforced these effects. The Ral pathways were shown to contribute to anchorage-independent growth and tumorigenicity of these tumor cells lines, and their results suggest that these effects are downstream of CDK5. Our results are consistent with these findings and extend them by showing that K-Ras signaling enhances the activity of CDK5 by increasing the steady-state levels of p25 upstream of the Ral pathways.

The influence of mutant K-Ras and CDK5 kinase activity on migration was investigated in HPNE cells bearing selected mutations and transforming insults. CDK5 is necessary for proper neuronal cortical layering, a process that requires CDK5-mediated phosphorylation of FAK at S732 and probably PAK1 at T212 (6, 7). We found that increased CDK5 activity and p25 expression in HPNE cells expressing mutant K-Ras increased phosphorylation of S732 FAK and T212 PAK1 (Fig. 2A). We propose that PDACs have appropriated these phosphorylation events to alter cell morphology and increase cellular migration. Inhibition of CDK5 with roscovitine or the CDK5 dominant-negative construct enhanced spreading in HPNE.kras cells, as evidenced by a more flattened appearance with shorter cellular processes than in the respective controls (Fig. 4C and D) whereas there was no change in cellular morphology in parental HPNE cells with CDK5 inhibition (Fig. 4B). Our results support the proposal that CDK5 has a role in modulating cell morphology and cytoskeletal reorganization that has been presented by Mao and Hinds (45) and Alexander and colleagues (46), even though the precise morphologic findings are not entirely congruent because they were obtained in different cell types and experimental systems that were evaluating morphologic changes associated with senescence, which were not investigated in our experimental system.

Along with increased p25 expression and CDK5 kinase activity, mutant K-Ras increased migration of HPNE.kras and HPNE.kras.E6/7.St cells as compared with HPNE.E6/7.St cells lacking mutant K-Ras (Fig. 3B). The increase of migration in the HPNE.kras.E6/7.St cells relative to HPNE.kras cells suggested that the transforming insults introduced by E6/7 and small t antigen had little effect on migration (Fig. 3B). Inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity significantly reduced migration of HPNE cells expressing mutant K-Ras (HPNE.kras and HPNE.kras.E6/7.St cells) whereas it had little effect on cells lacking mutant K-Ras (HPNE.E6/7.St cells; Fig. 3B). Inhibiting CDK5 kinase activity with a CDK5 dominant-negative construct or roscovitine also significantly decreased migration of S2-013 cells (Fig. 3A).

CDK5 inhibition with roscovitine reduced invasion by 37% to 60% in S2-013, tHPNE, FG, HPAF2, and T3M4 PDAC cell lines (Fig. 4A). These results are consistent with previous findings in neuroblastoma, prostate cancer, and other pancreatic cancer cell lines, where inhibition of CDK5 kinase activity reduced invasion in vitro (11, 12).

In summary, we show that CDK5 or its activators p35 and p39 are overexpressed in more than 90% PDACs (Table 2) compared with normal pancreases (Table 1). CDK5, p35, and p39 expression in PDACs can be attributed, in part, to genomic amplification, as CDK5, p35, or p39 was amplified in 67% (n = 39) of tumors analyzed (Fig. 1D). Furthermore, CDK5 is hyperactivated downstream of mutant K-Ras signaling, resulting in increased phosphorylation of CDK5 substrates, increased p35 mRNA and protein expression, increased p35 cleavage to p25 (which is dependent on MEK, PI3K, calpain, and CDK5 signaling), decreased cell spreading, and increased cell migration (Figs. 3 and 5 and Supplementary Fig. S1, data not shown). We confirm prior reports that CDK5 inhibition can decrease migration and invasion in vitro (Fig. 4A).

CDK5 represents a novel and unexplored therapeutic target for both early- and late-stage PDACs and should be investigated in other solid tumors that harbor K-Ras mutations including those of lung and colon. R-roscovitine (Selicilib) has been investigated in phase I clinical trials, with minimal toxicity at lower doses, supporting the feasibility of using a CDK5 inhibitor in the clinic (47). More potent CDK5 kinase inhibitors have been developed as potential therapies for Alzheimer's disease, in an attempt to downregulate hyperactive CDK5 kinase activity associated with p25 expression that is observed in that disease (15). We are currently investigating the use of such inhibitors in xenograft and other animal models of pancreatic cancer. It is also possible that CDK5 inhibitors may reduce pain in pancreatic cancer patients with PNI. CDK5 has previously been shown to reduce thermal afferent nociceptive pain signaling (48). Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is observed in the majority of PDACs (49), and increased CDK5 kinase activity is known to increase glucotoxicity and independently decrease insulin synthesis and secretion (50, 51). Thus, inhibiting CDK5 kinase activity with molecular inhibitors may also improve the associated T2DM in PDAC.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (R01CA57362, U01CA111294, and P50 CA127297), National Cancer Institute (NCI) training grant (CA09476), and student assistantship awards from the University of Nebraska and NCI Cancer Center Grant P30CA36727.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Kern
SE
. 
Molecular genetic alterations in ductal pancreatic adenocarcinomas
.
Med Clin North Am
2000
;
84
:
691
5
,
xi
.
2.
Nagakawa
T
,
Mori
K
,
Nakano
T
,
Kadoya
M
,
Kobayashi
H
,
Akiyama
T
, et al
Perineural invasion of carcinoma of the pancreas and biliary tract
.
Br J Surg
1993
;
80
:
619
21
.
3.
Nakao
A
,
Harada
A
,
Nonami
T
,
Kaneko
T
,
Takagi
H
. 
Clinical significance of carcinoma invasion of the extrapancreatic nerve plexus in pancreatic cancer
.
Pancreas
1996
;
12
:
357
61
.
4.
Bockman
DE
. 
Nerves in the pancreas: what are they for?
Am J Surg
2007
;
194
:
S61
4
.
5.
Ohshima
T
,
Ward
JM
,
Huh
CG
,
Longenecker
G
,
Veeranna
,
Pant
HC
, et al
Targeted disruption of the cyclin-dependent kinase 5 gene results in abnormal corticogenesis, neuronal pathology and perinatal death
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1996
;
93
:
11173
8
.
6.
Xie
Z
,
Sanada
K
,
Samuels
BA
,
Shih
H
,
Tsai
LH
. 
Serine 732 phosphorylation of FAK by Cdk5 is important for microtubule organization, nuclear movement, and neuronal migration
.
Cell
2003
;
114
:
469
82
.
7.
Rashid
T
,
Banerjee
M
,
Nikolic
M
. 
Phosphorylation of Pak1 by the p35/Cdk5 kinase affects neuronal morphology
.
J Biol Chem
2001
;
276
:
49043
52
.
8.
Sawai
H
,
Okada
Y
,
Funahashi
H
,
Matsuo
Y
,
Takahashi
H
,
Takeyama
H
, et al
Activation of focal adhesion kinase enhances the adhesion and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells via extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 signaling pathway activation
.
Mol Cancer
2005
;
4
:
37
.
9.
Zhao
J
,
Guan
JL
. 
Signal transduction by focal adhesion kinase in cancer
.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2009
;
28
:
35
49
.
10.
Dummler
B
,
Ohshiro
K
,
Kumar
R
,
Field
J
. 
Pak protein kinases and their role in cancer
.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2009
;
28
:
51
63
.
11.
Strock
CJ
,
Park
JI
,
Nakakura
EK
,
Bova
GS
,
Isaacs
JT
,
Ball
DW
, et al
Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activity controls cell motility and metastatic potential of prostate cancer cells
.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
7509
15
.
12.
Liu
R
,
Tian
B
,
Gearing
M
,
Hunter
S
,
Ye
K
,
Mao
Z
. 
Cdk5-mediated regulation of the PIKE-A-Akt pathway and glioblastoma cell invasion
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2008
;
105
:
7570
5
.
13.
Dhariwala
FA
,
Rajadhyaksha
MS
. 
An unusual member of the Cdk family: Cdk5
.
Cell Mol Neurobiol
2008
;
28
:
351
69
.
14.
Mapelli
M
,
Musacchio
A
. 
The structural perspective on CDK5
.
Neurosignals
2003
;
12
:
164
72
.
15.
Patrick
GN
,
Zukerberg
L
,
Nikolic
M
,
de la Monte
S
,
Dikkes
P
,
Tsai
LH
. 
Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration
.
Nature
1999
;
402
:
615
22
.
16.
Hisanaga
S
,
Saito
T
. 
The regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activity through the metabolism of p35 or p39 Cdk5 activator
.
Neurosignals
2003
;
12
:
221
9
.
17.
Iwamura
T
,
Taniguchi
S
,
Kitamura
N
,
Yamanari
H
,
Kojima
A
,
Hidaka
K
, et al
Correlation between CA19-9 production in vitro and histological grades of differentiation in vivo in clones isolated from a human pancreatic cancer cell line (SUIT-2)
.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
1992
;
7
:
512
9
.
18.
Moore
PS
,
Sipos
B
,
Orlandini
S
,
Sorio
C
,
Real
FX
,
Lemoine
NR
, et al
Genetic profile of 22 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Analysis of K-ras, p53, p16 and DPC4/Smad4
.
Virchows Arch
2001
;
439
:
798
802
.
19.
Vezeridis
MP
,
Tzanakakis
GN
,
Meitner
PA
,
Doremus
CM
,
Tibbetts
LM
,
Calabresi
P
. 
In vivo selection of a highly metastatic cell line from a human pancreatic carcinoma in the nude mouse
.
Cancer
1992
;
69
:
2060
3
.
20.
Lee
KM
,
Yasuda
H
,
Hollingsworth
MA
,
Ouellette
MM
. 
Notch 2-positive progenitors with the intrinsic ability to give rise to pancreatic ductal cells
.
Lab Invest
2005
;
85
:
1003
12
.
21.
Campbell
PM
,
Lee
KM
,
Ouellette
MM
,
Kim
HJ
,
Groehler
AL
,
Khazak
V
, et al
Ras-driven transformation of human nestin-positive pancreatic epithelial cells
.
Methods Enzymol
2008
;
439
:
451
65
.
22.
Lee
KM
,
Nguyen
C
,
Ulrich
AB
,
Pour
PM
,
Ouellette
MM
. 
Immortalization with telomerase of the Nestin-positive cells of the human pancreas
.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
2003
;
301
:
1038
44
.
23.
Bracci
PM
,
Wang
F
,
Hassan
MM
,
Gupta
S
,
Li
D
,
Holly
EA
. 
Pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in two large pooled case-control studies
.
Cancer Causes Control
2009
;
20
:
1723
31
.
24.
Gossen
M
,
Freundlieb
S
,
Bender
G
,
Muller
G
,
Hillen
W
,
Bujard
H
. 
Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells
.
Science
1995
;
268
:
1766
9
.
25.
Singh
PK
,
Wen
Y
,
Swanson
BJ
,
Shanmugam
K
,
Kazlauskas
A
,
Cerny
RL
, et al
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta-mediated phosphorylation of MUC1 enhances invasiveness in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
5201
10
.
26.
Swanson
BJ
,
McDermott
KM
,
Singh
PK
,
Eggers
JP
,
Crocker
PR
,
Hollingsworth
MA
. 
MUC1 is a counter-receptor for myelin-associated glycoprotein (Siglec-4a) and their interaction contributes to adhesion in pancreatic cancer perineural invasion
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
10222
9
.
27.
Geback
T
,
Schulz
MM
,
Koumoutsakos
P
,
Detmar
M
. 
TScratch: a novel and simple software tool for automated analysis of monolayer wound healing assays
.
Biotechniques
2009
;
46
:
265
74
.
28.
Ubeda
M
,
Kemp
DM
,
Habener
JF
. 
Glucose-induced expression of the cyclin-dependent protein kinase 5 activator p35 involved in Alzheimer's disease regulates insulin gene transcription in pancreatic beta-cells
.
Endocrinology
2004
;
145
:
3023
31
.
29.
Lilja
L
,
Johansson
JU
,
Gromada
J
,
Mandic
SA
,
Fried
G
,
Berggren
PO
, et al
Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 associated with p39 promotes Munc18-1 phosphorylation and Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis
.
J Biol Chem
2004
;
279
:
29534
41
.
30.
Domagk
D
,
Schaefer
KL
,
Eisenacher
M
,
Braun
Y
,
Wai
DH
,
Schleicher
C
, et al
Expression analysis of pancreatic cancer cell lines reveals association of enhanced gene transcription and genomic amplifications at the 8q22.1 and 8q24.22 loci
.
Oncol Rep
2007
;
17
:
399
407
.
31.
Sipos
B
,
Moser
S
,
Kalthoff
H
,
Torok
V
,
Lohr
M
,
Kloppel
G
. 
A comprehensive characterization of pancreatic ductal carcinoma cell lines: towards the establishment of an in vitro research platform
.
Virchows Arch
2003
;
442
:
444
52
.
32.
Campbell
PM
,
Groehler
AL
,
Lee
KM
,
Ouellette
MM
,
Khazak
V
,
Der
CJ
. 
K-Ras promotes growth transformation and invasion of immortalized human pancreatic cells by Raf and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling
.
Cancer Res
2007
;
67
:
2098
106
.
33.
Meijer
L
,
Bettayeb
K
,
Galons
H
. 
Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases as anti-tumor agents
.
Boca Raton (FL)
:
CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group
; 
2007
.
34.
Fleming
JB
,
Shen
GL
,
Holloway
SE
,
Davis
M
,
Brekken
RA
. 
Molecular consequences of silencing mutant K-ras in pancreatic cancer cells: justification for K-ras-directed therapy
.
Mol Cancer Res
2005
;
3
:
413
23
.
35.
Dreissigacker
U
,
Mueller
MS
,
Unger
M
,
Siegert
P
,
Genze
F
,
Gierschik
P
, et al
Oncogenic K-Ras down-regulates Rac1 and RhoA activity and enhances migration and invasion of pancreatic carcinoma cells through activation of p38
.
Cell Signal
2006
;
18
:
1156
68
.
36.
Harada
T
,
Chelala
C
,
Bhakta
V
,
Chaplin
T
,
Caulee
K
,
Baril
P
, et al
Genome-wide DNA copy number analysis in pancreatic cancer using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays
.
Oncogene
2008
;
27
:
1951
60
.
37.
Harada
T
,
Morooka
T
,
Ogawa
S
,
Nishida
E
. 
ERK induces p35, a neuron-specific activator of Cdk5, through induction of Egr1
.
Nat Cell Biol
2001
;
3
:
453
9
.
38.
van denHeuvel
S
,
Harlow
E
. 
Distinct roles for cyclin-dependent kinases in cell cycle control
.
Science
1993
;
262
:
2050
4
.
39.
Dhavan
R
,
Tsai
LH
. 
A decade of CDK5
.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
2001
;
2
:
749
59
.
40.
Tuveson
DA
,
Hingorani
SR
. 
Ductal pancreatic cancer in humans and mice
.
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol
2005
;
70
:
65
72
.
41.
Sahlgren
CM
,
Mikhailov
A
,
Vaittinen
S
,
Pallari
HM
,
Kalimo
H
,
Pant
HC
, et al
Cdk5 regulates the organization of Nestin and its association with p35
.
Mol Cell Biol
2003
;
23
:
5090
106
.
42.
Jamsa
A
,
Backstrom
A
,
Gustafsson
E
,
Dehvari
N
,
Hiller
G
,
Cowburn
RF
, et al
Glutamate treatment and p25 transfection increase Cdk5 mediated tau phosphorylation in SH-SY5Y cells
.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
2006
;
345
:
324
31
.
43.
Kamei
H
,
Saito
T
,
Ozawa
M
,
Fujita
Y
,
Asada
A
,
Bibb
JA
, et al
Suppression of calpain-dependent cleavage of the CDK5 activator p35 to p25 by site-specific phosphorylation
.
J Biol Chem
2007
;
282
:
1687
94
.
44.
Feldmann
G
,
Mishra
A
,
Hong
SM
,
Bisht
S
,
Strock
CJ
,
Ball
DW
, et al
Inhibiting the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK5 blocks pancreatic cancer formation and progression through the suppression of Ras-Ral signaling
.
Cancer Res
2010
;
70
:
4460
9
.
45.
Mao
D
,
Hinds
PW
. 
p35 is required for CDK5 activation in cellular senescence
.
J Biol Chem
2010
;
285
:
14671
80
.
46.
Alexander
K
,
Yang
HS
,
Hinds
PW
. 
Cellular senescence requires CDK5 repression of Rac1 activity
.
Mol Cell Biol
2004
;
24
:
2808
19
.
47.
Benson
C
,
White
J
,
De Bono
J
,
O'Donnell
A
,
Raynaud
F
,
Cruickshank
C
, et al
A phase I trial of the selective oral cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor seliciclib (CYC202; R-Roscovitine), administered twice daily for 7 days every 21 days
.
Br J Cancer
2007
;
96
:
29
37
.
48.
Pareek
TK
,
Keller
J
,
Kesavapany
S
,
Agarwal
N
,
Kuner
R
,
Pant
HC
, et al
Cyclin-dependent kinase 5 modulates nociceptive signaling through direct phosphorylation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2007
;
104
:
660
5
.
49.
Pannala
R
,
Basu
A
,
Petersen
GM
,
Chari
ST
. 
New-onset diabetes: a potential clue to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
.
Lancet Oncol
2009
;
10
:
88
95
.
50.
Ubeda
M
,
Rukstalis
JM
,
Habener
JF
. 
Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activity protects pancreatic beta cells from glucotoxicity
.
J Biol Chem
2006
;
281
:
28858
64
.
51.
Wei
FY
,
Nagashima
K
,
Ohshima
T
,
Saheki
Y
,
Lu
YF
,
Matsushita
M
, et al
Cdk5-dependent regulation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion
.
Nat Med
2005
;
11
:
1104
8
.

Supplementary data