Purpose: Advanced metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is a fatal disease, with only palliative therapeutic options. Though almost 80% of cases of metastatic PCa present bone metastasis, our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern this metastatic dissemination remains fragmentary. The main objective of the present study was to identify microRNA (miRNA) genes that regulate metastatic PCa.

Experimental Design: miRNA expression profiling was done in human prostate cell lines to identify dysregulated miRNA components of advanced PCa. miR-203 expression was assessed in prostate carcinoma cell lines and clinical specimens by real-time PCR and in situ hybridization. To assess the biological significance of miR-203, miR-203 was reexpressed in bone metastatic PCa cell lines followed by in vitro and in vivo functional assays.

Results: miR-203 expression is specifically attenuated in bone metastatic PCa suggesting a fundamental antimetastatic role for this miRNA. Reintroduction of miR-203 in bone metastatic PCa cell lines suppresses metastasis via inhibition of several critical steps of the metastatic cascade including epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion, and motility. Ectopic miR-203 significantly attenuated the development of metastasis in a bone metastatic model of PCa. Importantly, miR-203 regulates a cohort of pro-metastatic genes including ZEB2, Bmi, survivin, and bone-specific effectors including Runx2, a master regulator of bone metastasis.

Conclusions: miR-203 is an “antimetastatic” miRNA in PCa that acts at multiple steps of the PCa metastatic cascade via repression of a cohort of prometastatic targets. miR-203 may be an attractive target for therapeutic intervention in advanced PCa. Clin Cancer Res; 17(16); 5287–98. ©2011 AACR.

Translational Relevance

Metastatic prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men. At present, this disease has limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis, as the underlying molecular mechanisms driving prostate cancer metastasis are not completely understood. In this study, we have shown that miR-203 suppresses prostate cancer progression and metastasis via repression of a cohort of prometastatic targets. miR-203 expression is specifically attenuated in bone metastatic cell lines and clinical specimens supporting a fundamental “antimetastatic” role of this miRNA. Further, miR-203 regulates survivin expression that has prognostic significance and is associated with unfavorable outcome in prostate cancer. Also, our study suggests that miR-203 regulates the expression of several bone-specific effectors including Runx2, a master regulator of bone metastasis. In view of these results, we propose that miR-203 may be an attractive target for the designing of improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for advanced prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common male malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death among men in the United States. Although significant gains have been made in the management of the early phases of PCa, the evolution of PCa to a hormone-independent stage invariably signals advanced metastatic disease, with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis (1). Metastasis involves multiple sequential steps including the escape of neoplastic cells from a primary tumor (local invasion), intravasation into the systemic circulation, survival during transit through the vasculature, extravasation into distant tissues, and finally, proliferation at a new site (2). The most critical step in invasion and metastases is attributed to the process known as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT; ref 3), in which epithelial cells lose adhesion and cytoskeletal components concomintant with a gain of mesenchymal components and the initiation of a migratory phenotype. Advanced PCa is mostly associated with metastatic dissemination, typically to the bones (4), causing both osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions (5). The mechanisms by which PCa cells selectively metastasize to the bone remain largely unknown. Understanding molecular controls that signal PCa progression and metastasis is a key to develop better therapeutic and diagnostic interventions for the disease.

MicroRNAs (miRNA) constitute an evolutionarily conserved class of small RNAs that suppress gene expression posttranscriptionally via sequence-specific interactions with the 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of cognate mRNA targets (6). In mammalian cells, miRNAs affect gene silencing via both translational inhibition and mRNA degradation; an individual miRNA is capable of regulating dozens of distinct mRNAs. It has been estimated that miRNAs regulate ∼30% of the human genome (6). Dysregulation of miRNA expression has been identified in various cancers, and accumulating data suggest that miRNAs function as classical oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes (7). In addition, recently miRNAs have been discovered to have a role in progression and metastasis of human cancers (8, 9). More than 20 miRNAs have been shown to impact critical steps in the metastatic cascade, such as EMT, apoptosis, and angiogenesis by acting on multiple signaling pathways and targeting various proteins that are major players in this process. Furthermore, several clinical studies have identified correlations between miRNA expression and recurrence, development of metastases and/or survival (8, 9).

An expansive body of literature shows that miRNAs are significantly altered in PCa suggesting that miRNAs act as key regulators of prostate carcinogenesis (10). Several studies have been conducted to identify the PCa-specific miRNA signature. However, no consensus has been reached on which miRNAs are relevant for development and progression of this malignancy. In this context, the main objective of the present study was to identify miRNAs that regulate prostate carcinogenesis. Toward this, we performed miRNA expression profiling in human prostate cell lines. In this effort, we identified that miR-203 is progressively lost in advanced metastatic PCa. miR-203 has been reported to be epigenetically silenced in hematopoietic malignancies and hepatocellular carcinomas (11, 12). However, there is no study demonstrating the role of this miRNA in PCa. Here we provide evidence that miR-203 is a crucial component of the complex circuitry that regulates PCa progression and metastasis. To our knowledge, this is the first report that directly demonstrates a role of miR-203 in PCa disease progression.

Cell culture and miRNA transfection

Nonmalignant epithelial prostate cell lines (RWPE-1 and PWR-1E) and prostate carcinoma cell lines (LNCaP, Du145, PC3, VCaP, and MDA-PCa-2b) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. Cell lines RWPE-1 and PWR-1E were cultured in keratinocyte growth medium, supplemented with 5 ng/mL human recombinant epidermal growth factor, 0.05 mg/mL bovine pituitary extract (Invitrogen). PCa cell lines LNCaP, Du145, and PC3 were maintained in RPMI 1640 media (UCSF cell culture facility) and VCaP cells were cultured in DMEM media, each supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta biologicals) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (UCSF cell culture facility). MDA-PCa-2b cells were maintained in BRFF-HPCI (AthenaES), 20% FBS, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. The cell lines were maintained in an incubator with a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C. For miRNA transfections, cells (early passages) were plated in growth medium without antibiotics ∼24 hours before transfections. miRNA precursors were purchased from Ambion and transient transfection of miR-203 precursor (PM10152) or negative control (miR-CON; AM17110) was carried out by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. All miRNA transfections were for 72 hours.

Tissue samples

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) PCa samples were obtained from the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (San Francisco). All slides were reviewed by a board certified pathologist for the identification of PCa foci as well as adjacent normal glandular epithelium. Also, prostate adenocarcinoma tissue microarray (US Biomax) consisting of human normal adjacent prostate tissue samples (n = 8) and primary PCa tissues of various pathological stages (pT2, n = 7; pT3, n = 21; pT4, n = 8) and metastatic (n = 8) carcinomas was used for miR-203 ISH analysis.

Experimental metastasis model

To generate metastases, groups of 6 male nude mice (strain BALB/c nu/nu; Charles River Laboratories), 4 to 5 weeks old, received intracardiac injections of 1 × 106 PC-3M-luc cells overexpressing control miR or miR-203 in a volume of 100 μL. Successful intracardiac injections were confirmed by immediate whole body bioluminescence imaging. Development of metastases was monitored via bioluminescence imaging at regular intervals.

Luciferase assays

Control constructs and various 3′-UTR reporter constructs (0.2 μg) were cotransfected into PC3 cells cultured in 24-well plates along with 50 nmol/L miR-203 or miR-CON (Ambion) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). 48 hour post-transfection, firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured by using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Firefly luciferase was normalized to Renilla luciferase activity.

Statistical analyses

Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. A 2-tailed Student's t test was used for comparisons, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

miR-203 expression is attenuated in bone metastatic prostate cancer

To evaluate the role of miR-203 in PCa, miR-203 expression was assayed in human prostate cell lines, which included normal epithelial prostate cell lines (RWPE-1 and PWR-1E) and prostate carcinoma cell lines (LNCaP, Du145, PC3, VCaP, and MDA-PCa-2b). It was consistently observed that relative miR-203 expression is specifically attenuated in PCa cell lines derived from bone metastasis (PC3, VCaP, and MDA-PCa-2b; Fig. 1A). We extended our analysis to clinical malignancies by assessing miR-203 levels by in situ hybridization (ISH) analysis of a prostate adenocarcinoma tissue microarray with normal adjacent tissues and metastatic bone tissues (Fig. 1B–C). miR-203 expression was significantly attenuated in bone metastatic tissues compared with normal tissues.

Figure 1.

miR-203 expression is attenuated in bone metastatic PCa. A, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of relative miR-203 expression levels in human PCa and nonmalignant cell lines. Data were normalized to the RNA control RNU48 and are represented as mean ± SEM. B, ISH analysis of relative miR-203 expression levels in bone metastatic PCa tissues and normal prostate tissues. Tissues were hybridized with DIG-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA)-based probes for mir-203 and U6 (control). miR-203 expression was scored and normalized to U6 scores. The average value for each group is represented by the horizontal line. C, representative examples of ISH analysis of miR-203 expression in normal prostate and bone metastatic tissues (left). U6 staining confirmed the preservation of intact small RNAs in the same cases (middle); H&E-stained sections allowed the identification of tumors (right).

Figure 1.

miR-203 expression is attenuated in bone metastatic PCa. A, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of relative miR-203 expression levels in human PCa and nonmalignant cell lines. Data were normalized to the RNA control RNU48 and are represented as mean ± SEM. B, ISH analysis of relative miR-203 expression levels in bone metastatic PCa tissues and normal prostate tissues. Tissues were hybridized with DIG-labeled locked nucleic acid (LNA)-based probes for mir-203 and U6 (control). miR-203 expression was scored and normalized to U6 scores. The average value for each group is represented by the horizontal line. C, representative examples of ISH analysis of miR-203 expression in normal prostate and bone metastatic tissues (left). U6 staining confirmed the preservation of intact small RNAs in the same cases (middle); H&E-stained sections allowed the identification of tumors (right).

Close modal

miR-203 expression is progressively lost in primary tumors

We examined the expression levels of miR-203 in laser capture-microdissected (LCM) PCa tissues (n = 22) and matched adjacent normal regions by real-time PCR. Relative to matched normal tissues, 11/22 (50%) tissues showed lower miR-203 levels (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, ISH was performed on prostate adenocarcinoma tissue microarray with 36 cases of PCa-8 of which had matched normal adjacent tissue. This analysis showed that miR-203 expression is downregulated progressively in tumor tissues compared with adjacent normal tissue (Fig. 2B–D). Collectively, the data suggest that average expression of miR-203 was attenuated in tumor tissues compared with normal prostatic tissues. We further assessed if miR-203 expression in clinical tissues correlated with clinicopathological characteristics such as pathological stage and Gleason score (Fig. 2D). It was observed that cases with advanced prostatic disease had decreased miR-203 expression compared with adjacent normal tissues.

Figure 2.

miR-203 expression is progressively lost in primary tumors. A, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of relative miR-203 expression in LCM-PCa tissues (n = 22) and the matched adjacent normal regions. B, ISH analysis of relative miR-203 expression levels in primary PCa and normal prostate tissues. Horizontal line represents the average value for each group. C, representative examples of ISH analysis of miR-203 (left) and U6 expression (middle) along with H&E-stained sections (right) in matched normal and primary PCa tissues. D, correlation of miR-203 expression with clinicopathological stage (left) and Gleason score (right) of PCa tissues used for miR-203 expression analysis.

Figure 2.

miR-203 expression is progressively lost in primary tumors. A, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of relative miR-203 expression in LCM-PCa tissues (n = 22) and the matched adjacent normal regions. B, ISH analysis of relative miR-203 expression levels in primary PCa and normal prostate tissues. Horizontal line represents the average value for each group. C, representative examples of ISH analysis of miR-203 (left) and U6 expression (middle) along with H&E-stained sections (right) in matched normal and primary PCa tissues. D, correlation of miR-203 expression with clinicopathological stage (left) and Gleason score (right) of PCa tissues used for miR-203 expression analysis.

Close modal

Reexpression of miR-203 suppresses metastasis-relevant traits in vitro

In view of the observed inverse correlations between miR-203 expression and bone metastasis in cell lines and clinical malignancies, we assessed the potential for an antimetastatic role of miR-203. Thus, miR-203 was reintroduced in metastatic PC3 human PCa cells followed by functional assays. miR-203 transfection resulted in miR-203 levels comparable to those in nonmalignant prostate epithelial cell lines (Fig. 3A). Reexpression of miR-203 led to marked morphological changes suggesting transition from a fibroblast- to epithelial-like phenotype (Fig. 3B). Specifically, a pronounced decrease in the fraction of cells with an elongated, spindle shape was paralleled by an increase in that of rounded cells. Wound healing assay, transwell migration and invasion assays were carried out to evaluate the effects of miR-203 on the migratory and invasive behavior of PCa cells (Fig. 3C-E). miR-203 overexpressing cells were less proficient than equivalent control miR (miR-CON)-transfected cells at closing an artificial wound created over a confluent monolayer (Fig. 3C). Also, transwell assays showed that miR-203 reintroduction decreases the migration (Fig. 3D) and invasion (Fig. 3E) by ∼50% suggesting that miR-203 reexpression suppresses invasiveness and motility of PCa cells.

Figure 3.

Reexpression of miR-203 suppresses PCa metastasis. A, PC3 cells were mock transfected or transfected with a control miR (miR-CON) or miR-203 at 50 nmol/L concentration for 72 hours followed by various functional assays. Relative miR-203 expression levels in PC3 cells after transfection with miR-203 precursor as determined by real-time PCR. B, morphological alterations in PC3 cells upon miR-203 restoration assessed by phase-contrast microsopy. miR-203–transfected cells display a more rounded, epithelial morphology (right) compared with control cells (left). C, wound-healing assay after transfection of PC3 cells with miR-CON (left) or miR-203 (right). Cells were examined by light microscopy at indicated time points. D, Transwell-migration assay and E, invasion assay after indicated transfections showing that miR-203 reexpression impairs the migratory and invasive behavior of PC3 cells. F, immunoblotting of PC3 cells for epithelial (E-cadherin) and mesenchymal markers (vimentin, fibronectin) after the indicated transfections (top). E-cadherin immunostaining (green) and DAPI counterstain (blue) in PC3 cells after transfections with miR-CON or miR-203. Scale bar, 10 μm (bottom). miR-203 rexpression causes a reversal of EMT. G, miR-203 reexpression suppresses PCa metastasis in vivo. Following intracardiac injection of control miR or miR-203 expressing PC3M-luc cells in nude mice, metastasis was evaluated at the indicated time points by in vivo bioluminescent imaging. Representative bioluminescence images from the 2 groups are shown. The scale bar on the right is the relative intensity of bioluminescence. H, quantitation of bioluminescence emitted from whole body of mice on day 30. Data represent the mean of each group ± SD.

Figure 3.

Reexpression of miR-203 suppresses PCa metastasis. A, PC3 cells were mock transfected or transfected with a control miR (miR-CON) or miR-203 at 50 nmol/L concentration for 72 hours followed by various functional assays. Relative miR-203 expression levels in PC3 cells after transfection with miR-203 precursor as determined by real-time PCR. B, morphological alterations in PC3 cells upon miR-203 restoration assessed by phase-contrast microsopy. miR-203–transfected cells display a more rounded, epithelial morphology (right) compared with control cells (left). C, wound-healing assay after transfection of PC3 cells with miR-CON (left) or miR-203 (right). Cells were examined by light microscopy at indicated time points. D, Transwell-migration assay and E, invasion assay after indicated transfections showing that miR-203 reexpression impairs the migratory and invasive behavior of PC3 cells. F, immunoblotting of PC3 cells for epithelial (E-cadherin) and mesenchymal markers (vimentin, fibronectin) after the indicated transfections (top). E-cadherin immunostaining (green) and DAPI counterstain (blue) in PC3 cells after transfections with miR-CON or miR-203. Scale bar, 10 μm (bottom). miR-203 rexpression causes a reversal of EMT. G, miR-203 reexpression suppresses PCa metastasis in vivo. Following intracardiac injection of control miR or miR-203 expressing PC3M-luc cells in nude mice, metastasis was evaluated at the indicated time points by in vivo bioluminescent imaging. Representative bioluminescence images from the 2 groups are shown. The scale bar on the right is the relative intensity of bioluminescence. H, quantitation of bioluminescence emitted from whole body of mice on day 30. Data represent the mean of each group ± SD.

Close modal

miR-203 reexpression induces mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in metastatic prostate cancer cells

As the phenotype of miR-203–transfected cells, including change in morphology, reduced migration/invasion was reminiscent of a reverse transition from a mesenchymal-to-epithelial state (MET), we asked whether miR-203 introduction could influence marker expression in a way consistent with MET induction. Immunoblotting of PC-3 cells showed that ectopic miR-203 expression resulted in a net increase in epithelial marker E-cadherin with a concomitant decrease in mesenchymal markers vimentin and fibronectin (Fig. 3F, top). Immunofluorescent staining of cells for E-cadherin revealed expression was induced and E-cadherin localized to the plasma membrane, typical of the pattern observed in epithelial cells (Fig. 3F, bottom).

miR-203 reexpression suppresses prostate cancer metastasis in vivo

We next asked if ectopic miR-203 could inhibit PCa metastasis in vivo. Bioluminescent human prostate carcinoma cell line PC-3M-luc was stably transfected with control miR or miR-203 (Fig. S1). As an experimental bone metastasis model, stable clones were injected into the left ventricle of the heart followed by periodic monitoring of the development of tumors in vivo by bioluminescent imaging (Fig. 3G). A successful intracardiac injection was indicated by day 0 images showing a systemic bioluminescence distributed throughout the animal. Representative bioluminescence images of mice from the 2 experimental groups, taken at days 16, 23, and 30 after intracardiac injection of PC-3M-luc cells indicated that miR-203 reexpression decreases the metastatic lesions. Quantification of whole-animal bioluminescence (Fig. 3H) on day 30 showed that miR-203 reexpression had a negative effect on the development of metastases.

miR-203 influences cellular proliferation and apoptosis in prostate cancer cells

Cell proliferation, survival, and migration are among the common functions required by tumor cells for metastatic progression in target microenvironments. Restoration of miR-203 in metastatic PCa cell line PC3 also led to decreased cell growth (Fig. 4A), clonability (Fig. 4B), and induced cell-cycle arrest at the G0-G1 phase of the cell cycle (Fig. 4C). Along with the growth arrest, miR-203 induced a senescent-like phenotype in PC-3 cells, as determined by senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity (Fig. S2). Also, the apoptotic cell fractions (Early apoptotic + apoptotic) were significantly increased upon miR-203 reexpression (19% + 5%) compared with control cells (3% + 1%) with a concomitant decrease in the viable cell population (Fig. 4D). miR-203, therefore, suppressed tumorigenesis and metastasis, in part, through an inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis.

Figure 4.

miR-203 influences cellular proliferation and apoptosis in PCa cells. A cellular viability assay showing that miR-203 reexpression significantly decreases the viability of PC3 cells (*P < 0.05). B, miR-203 overexpression significantly inhibits the colony formation ability of PC3 cells. C, cell-cycle assay in PC3 cells after mock (left), miR-CON (middle), or miR-203 (right) treatments showing induction of G0/G1 cell-cycle arrest by miR-203. D, apoptosis assay in PC3 cells showing induction of apoptosis by miR-203 overexpression. The biparametric histogram shows cells in early (bottom right quadrant) and late apoptotic states (upper right quadrant). Viable cells are double negative (bottom left quadrant).

Figure 4.

miR-203 influences cellular proliferation and apoptosis in PCa cells. A cellular viability assay showing that miR-203 reexpression significantly decreases the viability of PC3 cells (*P < 0.05). B, miR-203 overexpression significantly inhibits the colony formation ability of PC3 cells. C, cell-cycle assay in PC3 cells after mock (left), miR-CON (middle), or miR-203 (right) treatments showing induction of G0/G1 cell-cycle arrest by miR-203. D, apoptosis assay in PC3 cells showing induction of apoptosis by miR-203 overexpression. The biparametric histogram shows cells in early (bottom right quadrant) and late apoptotic states (upper right quadrant). Viable cells are double negative (bottom left quadrant).

Close modal

Survivin is a direct target of miR-203

The ability of miR-203 to impede multiple steps in the progression and metastasis of PCa might derive from its ability to pleiotropically regulate genes involved in diverse aspects of metastatic dissemination. To identify effectors of miR-203, we used 2 algorithms that predict the mRNA targets of a miRNA, miRANDA (13), and TargetScan (14). Guided by the target prediction algorithms, we found that miR-203 regulates a cohort of genes that play a role in cellular proliferation, survival, invasion, and metastasis (Figs. 5 and 6). Of significance, we found that miR-203 targets survivin/BIRC5, a small inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) protein that is differentially expressed in cancer (15) and plays a pivotal role in PCa progression and metastasis (16, 17). miR-203 significantly reduced the endogenous protein (Fig. 5A) and mRNA level (Fig. 5B) of Survivin in PC3 cells. The 3′-UTR of survivin mRNA has a highly conserved putative miR-203 binding site (Fig. 5C). Luciferase reporter assays with increasing concentrations of the Survivin 3′-UTR construct in miR-203/miR-CON expressing or mock-transfected PC3 cells (Fig. 5C) showed that miR-203 represses survivin directly. Survivin is a regulator of cellular homeostasis, with functions in modulation of cell death and survival, regulation of cell cycle, and microtubule dynamics (15). Immunofluorescence staining for survivin confirmed that miR-203 expression dramatically downregulates the expression of survivin, and co-staining with α-tubulin in the transfectants revealed a disorganized tubulin cytoskeleton in the miR-203 expressing cells compared with control cells (Fig. 5D).

Figure 5.

Survivin is a direct target of miR-203. A, immunoblot for endogenous survivin in PC3 cells that were mock transfected or transfected with miR-CON or miR-203 for 72 hours. GAPDH was used as a loading control. B, real-time PCR showing miR-203 expression decreases Survivin mRNA. C, schematic representation of Survivin 3′-UTR showing putative miR-203 target site and luciferase activity assay with increasing concentrations of Survivin 3′ UTR construct or control luciferase construct contranfected with mock, miR-CON/miR-203. Firefly luciferase values were normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and plotted as relative luciferase activity (*, P < 0.05 as compared with miR-CON). D, immunofluorescence staining for survivin (red) and α-tubulin (green) in PC3 cells expressing miR-CON (upper panels) or miR-203 (lower panels). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). The right side indicates the merged survivin, tubulin, and DAPI-stained images.

Figure 5.

Survivin is a direct target of miR-203. A, immunoblot for endogenous survivin in PC3 cells that were mock transfected or transfected with miR-CON or miR-203 for 72 hours. GAPDH was used as a loading control. B, real-time PCR showing miR-203 expression decreases Survivin mRNA. C, schematic representation of Survivin 3′-UTR showing putative miR-203 target site and luciferase activity assay with increasing concentrations of Survivin 3′ UTR construct or control luciferase construct contranfected with mock, miR-CON/miR-203. Firefly luciferase values were normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and plotted as relative luciferase activity (*, P < 0.05 as compared with miR-CON). D, immunofluorescence staining for survivin (red) and α-tubulin (green) in PC3 cells expressing miR-CON (upper panels) or miR-203 (lower panels). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). The right side indicates the merged survivin, tubulin, and DAPI-stained images.

Close modal
Figure 6.

miR-203 regulates a cohort of metastatic genes. A, immunoblot analysis showing that miR-203 introduction leads to decreased protein levels of endogenous Zeb2, Bmi1, Runx2, Dlx5, Smad4, MMP10, and E2F1 protein in PC3 cells. GAPDH was used as a loading control. B to E, schematic representation of 3′-UTRs of ZEB2, Runx2, Dlx5, and Smad4 showing putative miR-203 target site/sites and luciferase activity assays with the indicated 3′ UTR construct or control luciferase construct contranfected with mock, miR-CON/miR-203. Firefly luciferase values were normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and plotted as relative luciferase activity (*, P < 0.05 as compared with miR-CON). F, real-time PCR analysis of OP and OC expression in miR-CON or miR-203–transfected PC3 cells.

Figure 6.

miR-203 regulates a cohort of metastatic genes. A, immunoblot analysis showing that miR-203 introduction leads to decreased protein levels of endogenous Zeb2, Bmi1, Runx2, Dlx5, Smad4, MMP10, and E2F1 protein in PC3 cells. GAPDH was used as a loading control. B to E, schematic representation of 3′-UTRs of ZEB2, Runx2, Dlx5, and Smad4 showing putative miR-203 target site/sites and luciferase activity assays with the indicated 3′ UTR construct or control luciferase construct contranfected with mock, miR-CON/miR-203. Firefly luciferase values were normalized to Renilla luciferase activity and plotted as relative luciferase activity (*, P < 0.05 as compared with miR-CON). F, real-time PCR analysis of OP and OC expression in miR-CON or miR-203–transfected PC3 cells.

Close modal

miR-203 regulates a cohort of metastatic genes

We performed Western blot analysis for other putative miR-203 targets in PC3 cells that were either mock transfected or transfected with miR-203 or miR-CON (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, miR-203 repressed the protein levels of E-box-binding transcription factor ZEB2, also known as Smad-interacting protein 1 (SIP1), a transcriptional repressor that regulates the expression of E-cadherin and EMT (18, 19). Also, miR-203 inhibited the expression of polycomb repressor, Bmi1. Importantly, ectopic miR-203 repressed the expression of bone-specific transcriptional regulators, Runx2 and Dlx5, that are involved in homing of PCa cells to bone. In addition, we found that Smad4, a central mediator of TGF-β intracellular signaling, is regulated by miR-203. Also, miR-203 repressed endogenous levels of transcription factor E2F1, which has been reported to be elevated in metastatic hormone-resistant PCa (20). In agreement with the inhibitory effects of miR-203 on migration and invasion, we found decreased MMP10 expression in cells overexpressing miR-203. We cloned the 3′- UTRs of the targets that are potential mediators of the effects of miR-203 on PCa progression and metastasis, namely, ZEB2, Runx2, Dlx5, and Smad4 into a luciferase construct. Reporter assays with PC3 cells revealed that miR-203 repressed these 4 validated targets directly (Fig. 6 B–E).

It has been proposed that metastatic PCa cells must be osteomimetic to metastasize, grow, and survive in the skeleton (21). In view of our present evidence suggesting the specific attenuation of miR-203 in bone metastatic PCa cell lines and clinical specimens and the potential regulation of Runx2 and Dlx5, we asked if alteration of miR-203 levels affects the osteomimetic properties of PCa cells. It has been suggested that altering the expression of certain critical transcription factors, such as Runx2 in PCa cells, can confer profiles of gene expression, such as osteopontin (OP), osteocalcin (OC), that mimic that of osteoblasts (21). We analyzed the expression of OP and OC in miR-203 expressing PC3 cells (Fig. 6F) and found decreased expression of these 2 key osteoblastic genes suggesting that miR-203 may regulate the osteomimetic properties of PCa cells.

Here we demonstrate that miR-203 expression is specifically attenuated in bone metastatic PCa cell lines and clinical specimens suggesting a fundamental antimetastatic role for this miRNA. Further, miR-203 expression profiling in archived primary tumors points to a progressive decline of this miRNA in advanced prostatic disease. However, because of the limited follow-up data on these prostatic cases, we could not correlate miR-203 levels with metastatic recurrence.

To assess the biological significance of decreased miR-203 expression, we reexpressed miR-203 in bone metastatic PCa cell line followed by in vitro and in vivo functional assays. Our results suggest that miR-203 reexpression decreased motility and invasiveness. Our in vivo data suggest that ectopic miR-203 significantly attenuated the development of metastasis in a bone metastatic model of PCa. Significantly, increasing miR-203 expression in metastatic PCa cells induced morphological and molecular alterations consistent with MET. miR-203 overexpression induced the expression of E-cadherin, whereas concomitantly attenuated the expression of mesenchymal markers, vimentin and fibronectin. Altogether, our findings suggest a reversal of EMT and the acquisition of a less invasive phenotype upon miR-203 reexpression. The EMT process requires a complex genetic program coordinated in a large part by transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin, such as ZEB1 and ZEB2. We showed that ectopic expression of miR-203 in PCa cells reduced ZEB2 protein levels. Several recent studies have reported that the miR-200 family and miR-205 regulates EMT through direct targeting of ZEB1 and ZEB2 (22–24). Here we provide evidence that miR-203 is another miRNA that regulates EMT by directly targeting ZEB2, that in turn regulates invasion and metastasis of PCa.

Metastasis reflects the acquisition of multiple molecular traits by tumor cells, including the ability to counteract anoikis (25), migrate, invade, survive (26), and proliferate in unrelated microenvironments. In the present study, we demonstrated that miR-203 plays pleiotropic roles where it affects multiple steps of the metastatic cascade including invasion, motility, cellular survival, and proliferation that contribute to the metastatic dissemination of PCa cells. As loss of miR-203 expression is a late event in PCa progression, we propose that its effects on cellular proliferation and apoptosis may be relevant to the development of distant metastases.

Further, we demonstrate that miR-203 can pleiotropically regulate a cohort of metastatic effectors that includes apart from ZEB2, Bmi1, and survivin. miR-203 represents a “stemness-inhibiting miRNA” as it was shown to control the properties of skin stem cells through inhibition of the stem cell factor p63 (27, 28). Another recent study shows that ZEB1 regulates tumorigenesis by repressing stemness-inhibiting miRNAs, including miR-203 in pancreatic cancer (29). It has been suggested that the same miRNAs may be involved in invasion and metastasis of tumor cells and in maintenance of the cancer stem cell phenotype, possibly accounting for the thread of malignancy connecting primary to metastatic tumors (8). In view of our present results suggesting a role of miR-203 in metastasis and miR-203–mediated inhibition of stem cell factor, Bmi1, we hypothesize that miR-203 supports metastasis not only by promoting metastasis relevant traits; but also by maintaining a stem cell phenotype, which is necessary for the formation of metastasis from disseminated tumor cells.

miR-203–mediated regulation of survivin is a highly significant finding as this nodal protein orchestrates extensive, tumor-specific signaling networks and is an attractive drug target (30). Recent studies suggest a direct role of survivin in cancer progression and metastasis (16, 17). In PCa, survivin is a significant contributor to the development of hormone resistance in PCa and is associated with unfavorable outcome. It has been hypothesized that targeting survivin and blocking it would enhance PCa cell susceptibility to antiandrogen therapy (31).

In addition, miR-203 regulates bone-specific effectors including Runx2, Dlx5, and Smad4. Considerable effort has been devoted to map the requirements of bone lesions in prostate tumors. It has been proposed that PCa cells are osteomimetic in their ability to thrive and grow in the bone milieu (21). In concordance with this idea, PCa cells that metastasize to bone express several classes of bone matrix and signaling proteins involved in adhesion and migration (32). Runx2, a transcription factor essential for osteogenesis, becomes highly activated in PCa cells that metastasize to bone, and is detected in human and mouse PCa tissue, but not normal prostate, in vivo (33, 34). Nonmetastatic cells exhibit low levels of Runx2 (32, 34, 35). Recent studies have identified Runx2 as a crucial regulator of prostate bone metastasis (36). Runx2 has been associated with the osteomimetic properties of bone metastatic PCa cells, via transcription of genes implicated in osteoblastic lesions such as bone matrix proteins (OC and OP) and enzymes involved in bone turnover (32, 35). Also, Runx2 mediates the response of cells to signaling pathways hyperactive in tumors, including BMP/TGF-β signaling. Interestingly, ectopic miR-203 repressed the expression of Runx2 and also decreased the expression of the osteoblastic genes, OC and OP, suggesting that miR-203 is a critical determinant of the osteomimetic properties of PCa cells. OC and OP have been implicated in the selective affinity of cancer cells for bone and have prognostic significance (37–39). We also observed miR-203–mediated repression of a homeodomain protein, Dlx5, an activator of Runx2, which is an important regulator of bone formation (40). In light of these results, it seems reasonable to suggest that downregulation of miR-203 in bone metastatic PCa leads to an augmentation of expression of Runx2 and Dlx5 and hence, increased prostate bone metastasis. We also observed repression of Smad4, a central mediator of TGF-β signaling, by miR-203 in bone metastatic PCa cell line. TGF-β plays a dual role in PCa, being a tumor suppressor in early stages and a tumor promoter in advanced metastatic PCa (41). Smad4 is required for TGF-β–induced EMT and bone metastasis of breast cancer cells (42, 43). In view of the observed effects of miR-203 on Runx2, Dlx5, and Smad4 along with effects on invasion-metastasis of PCa, it can be envisaged that communication of PCa cells with the bone microenvironment, which is needed for optimal tumor cell growth and metastasis, may be affected in tumors that display attenuated miR-203 expression.

Collectively, the findings of the present study suggest that miR-203 is an “antimetastatic” miRNA and this miRNA acts at multiple steps of the PCa progression and metastasis cascade via repression of a cohort of prometastatic targets. Advanced metastatic PCa is a fatal phase of the disease, with only palliative therapeutic options, and an area in urgent need of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. With the realization of the extreme molecular complexity of advanced PCa, therapeutic strategies are being envisioned to disable multiple networks of tumor maintenance, rather than individual signaling pathways (32). In our present study, we identified a miR-203 regulatory network that plays a pivotal role in the progression and metastasis of PCa by affecting an array of effectors. miR-203 potentially targets pleiotropic signaling pathways via these effectors and therefore, we envision that miR-203 may be an attractive target for therapeutic intervention.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

We thank Dr. Roger Erickson for his assistance with the preparation of the manuscript.

This study was supported by Grants RO1CA138642 and T32DK007790 (NIH), VA Research Enhancement Award Program, and Merit Review grants.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Damber
JE
,
Aus
G
. 
Prostate cancer
.
Lancet
2008
;
371
:
1710
21
.
2.
Fidler
IJ
. 
The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ‘seed and soil' hypothesis revisited
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2003
;
3
:
453
8
.
3.
Thiery
JP
. 
Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2002
;
2
:
442
54
.
4.
Koutsilieris
M
. 
Osteoblastic metastasis in advanced prostate cancer
.
Anticancer Res
1993
;
13
:
443
9
.
5.
Loberg
RD
,
Logothetis
CJ
,
Keller
ET
,
Pienta
KJ
. 
Pathogenesis and treatment of prostate cancer bone metastases: targeting the lethal phenotype
.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
8232
41
.
6.
Bartel
DP
. 
MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions
.
Cell
2009
;
136
:
215
33
.
7.
Ventura
A
,
Jacks
T
. 
MicroRNAs and cancer: short RNAs go a long way
.
Cell
2009
;
136
:
586
91
.
8.
Nicoloso
MS
,
Spizzo
R
,
Shimizu
M
,
Rossi
S
,
Calin
GA
. 
MicroRNAs–the micro steering wheel of tumour metastases
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2009
;
9
:
293
302
.
9.
Hurst
DR
,
Edmonds
MD
,
Welch
DR
. 
Metastamir: the field of metastasis-regulatory microRNA is spreading
.
Cancer Res
2009
;
69
:
7495
8
.
10.
Saini
S
,
Majid
S
,
Dahiya
R
. 
Diet, microRNAs and prostate cancer
.
Pharm Res
2010
;
27
:
1014
26
.
11.
Furuta
M
,
Kozaki
KI
,
Tanaka
S
,
Arii
S
,
Imoto
I
,
Inazawa
J
. 
miR-124 and miR-203 are epigenetically silenced tumor-suppressive microRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma
.
Carcinogenesis
2010
;
31
:
766
76
.
12.
Bueno
MJ
,
Perez de Castro
I
,
Gomez de Cedron
M
,
Santos
J
,
Calin
GA
,
Cigudosa
JC
, et al
. 
Genetic and epigenetic silencing of microRNA-203 enhances ABL1 and BCR-ABL1 oncogene expression
.
Cancer Cell
2008
;
13
:
496
506
.
13.
Betel
D
,
Wilson
M
,
Gabow
A
,
Marks
DS
,
Sander
C
. 
The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression
.
Nucleic Acids Res
2008
;
36
:
D149
53
.
14.
Grimson
A
,
Farh
KK
,
Johnston
WK
,
Garrett-Engele
P
,
Lim
LP
,
Bartel
DP
. 
MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing
.
Mol Cell
2007
;
27
:
91
105
.
15.
Altieri
DC
. 
The case for survivin as a regulator of microtubule dynamics and cell-death decisions
.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2006
;
18
:
609
15
.
16.
Mehrotra
S
,
Languino
LR
,
Raskett
CM
,
Mercurio
AM
,
Dohi
T
,
Altieri
DC
. 
IAP regulation of metastasis
.
Cancer Cell
2010
;
17
:
53
64
.
17.
Zhang
M
,
Coen
JJ
,
Suzuki
Y
,
Siedow
MR
,
Niemierko
A
,
Khor
LY
, et al
. 
Survivin is a potential mediator of prostate cancer metastasis
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2010
;
78
:
1095
103
.
18.
Vandewalle
C
,
Comijn
J
,
De
Craene B
,
Vermassen
P
,
Bruyneel
E
,
Andersen
H
, et al
. 
SIP1/ZEB2 induces EMT by repressing genes of different epithelial cell-cell junctions
.
Nucleic Acids Res
2005
;
33
:
6566
78
.
19.
Comijn
J
,
Berx
G
,
Vermassen
P
,
Verschueren
K
,
van Grunsven
L
,
Bruyneel
E
, et al
. 
The two-handed E box binding zinc finger protein SIP1 downregulates E-cadherin and induces invasion
.
Mol Cell
2001
;
7
:
1267
78
.
20.
Davis
JN
,
Wojno
KJ
,
Daignault
S
,
Hofer
MD
,
Kuefer
R
,
Rubin
MA
, et al
. 
Elevated E2F1 inhibits transcription of the androgen receptor in metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer
.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
11897
906
.
21.
Koeneman
KS
,
Yeung
F
,
Chung
LW
. 
Osteomimetic properties of prostate cancer cells: a hypothesis supporting the predilection of prostate cancer metastasis and growth in the bone environment
.
Prostate
1999
;
39
:
246
61
.
22.
Gregory
PA
,
Bracken
CP
,
Bert
AG
,
Goodall
GJ
. 
MicroRNAs as regulators of epithelial-mesenchymal transition
.
Cell Cycle
2008
;
7
:
3112
8
.
23.
Gregory
PA
,
Bert
AG
,
Paterson
EL
,
Barry
SC
,
Tsykin
A
,
Farshid
G
, et al
. 
The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1
.
Nat Cell Biol
2008
;
10
:
593
601
.
24.
Bracken
CP
,
Gregory
PA
,
Khew-Goodall
Y
,
Goodall
GJ
. 
The role of microRNAs in metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition
.
Cell Mol Life Sci
2009
;
66
:
1682
99
.
25.
Frisch
SM
,
Screaton
RA
. 
Anoikis mechanisms
.
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2001
;
13
:
555
62
.
26.
Mehlen
P
,
Puisieux
A
. 
Metastasis: a question of life or death
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2006
;
6
:
449
58
.
27.
Yi
R
,
Poy
MN
,
Stoffel
M
,
Fuchs
E
. 
A skin microRNA promotes differentiation by repressing ‘stemness'
.
Nature
2008
;
452
:
225
9
.
28.
Lena
AM
,
Shalom-Feuerstein
R
,
Rivetti di Val
Cervo P
,
Aberdam
D
,
Knight
RA
,
Melino
G
, et al
. 
miR-203 represses ‘stemness' by repressing DeltaNp63
.
Cell Death Differ
2008
;
15
:
1187
95
.
29.
Wellner
U
,
Schubert
J
,
Burk
UC
,
Schmalhofer
O
,
Zhu
F
,
Sonntag
A
, et al
. 
The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs
.
Nat Cell Biol
2009
;
11
:
1487
95
.
30.
Altieri
DC
. 
Survivin, cancer networks and pathway-directed drug discovery
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2008
;
8
:
61
70
.
31.
Zhang
M
,
Latham
DE
,
Delaney
MA
,
Chakravarti
A
. 
Survivin mediates resistance to antiandrogen therapy in prostate cancer
.
Oncogene
2005
;
24
:
2474
82
.
32.
Altieri
DC
,
Languino
LR
,
Lian
JB
,
Stein
JL
,
Leav
I
,
van Wijnen
AJ
, et al
. 
Prostate cancer regulatory networks
.
J Cell Biochem
2009
;
107
:
845
52
.
33.
Yang
J
,
Fizazi
K
,
Peleg
S
,
Sikes
CR
,
Raymond
AK
,
Jamal
N
, et al
. 
Prostate cancer cells induce osteoblast differentiation through a Cbfa1-dependent pathway
.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
5652
9
.
34.
Brubaker
KD
,
Vessella
RL
,
Brown
LG
,
Corey
E
. 
Prostate cancer expression of runt-domain transcription factor Runx2, a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation and function
.
Prostate
2003
;
56
:
13
22
.
35.
Pratap
J
,
Lian
JB
,
Javed
A
,
Barnes
GL
,
van Wijnen
AJ
,
Stein
JL
, et al
. 
Regulatory roles of Runx2 in metastatic tumor and cancer cell interactions with bone
.
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2006
;
25
:
589
600
.
36.
Akech
J
,
Wixted
JJ
,
Bedard
K
,
van der Deen
M
,
Hussain
S
,
Guise
TA
, et al
. 
Runx2 association with progression of prostate cancer in patients: mechanisms mediating bone osteolysis and osteoblastic metastatic lesions
.
Oncogene
2009
;
29
:
811
21
.
37.
Huang
WC
,
Xie
Z
,
Konaka
H
,
Sodek
J
,
Zhau
HE
,
Chung
LW
. 
Human osteocalcin and bone sialoprotein mediating osteomimicry of prostate cancer cells: role of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A signaling pathway
.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
2303
13
.
38.
Desai
B
,
Rogers
MJ
,
Chellaiah
MA
. 
Mechanisms of osteopontin and CD44 as metastatic principles in prostate cancer cells
.
Mol Cancer
2007
;
6
:
18
.
39.
Curatolo
C
,
Ludovico
GM
,
Correale
M
,
Pagliarulo
A
,
Abbate
I
,
Cirrillo
Marucco E
, et al
. 
Advanced prostate cancer follow-up with prostate-specific antigen, prostatic acid phosphatase, osteocalcin and bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase
.
Eur Urol
1992
;
21
Suppl 1
:
105
7
.
40.
Yang
X
,
Karsenty
G
. 
Transcription factors in bone: developmental and pathological aspects
.
Trends Mol Med
2002
;
8
:
340
5
.
41.
Bello-DeOcampo
D
,
Tindall
DJ
. 
TGF-betal/Smad signaling in prostate cancer
.
Curr Drug Targets
2003
;
4
:
197
207
.
42.
Kang
Y
,
He
W
,
Tulley
S
,
Gupta
GP
,
Serganova
I
,
Chen
CR
, et al
. 
Breast cancer bone metastasis mediated by the Smad tumor suppressor pathway
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2005
;
102
:
13909
14
.
43.
Deckers
M
,
van Dinther
M
,
Buijs
J
,
Que
I
,
Löwik
C
,
van der Pluijm
G
, et al
. 
The tumor suppressor Smad4 is required for transforming growth factor beta-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and bone metastasis of breast cancer cells
.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
2202
9
.