Purpose: Serum β2 microglobulin (β2M) is prognostic in other hematologic malignancies; therefore, we evaluated its prognostic significance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Experimental Design: Multivariate analyses were used to examine the effect of pretreatment serum β2M levels on clinical outcomes in patients with AML. β2M was associated with poorer survival in older but not younger patients. We thus fit separate Cox survival models in patients above and below age 60 years treated with remission induction therapy containing high-dose cytarabine (n = 1,280). In each age group, 50% of the patients were used to develop the model, which was tested in the other 50%. Resampling methods were also used to validate the independent prognostic significance of covariates.

Results: In patients 60 years or older (n = 591), poorer risk cytogenetics; poorer performance status; and higher levels of β2M, uric acid, and lactate dehydrogenase were each found to independently predict shorter survival and formed the basis of a scoring system. A similar approach was used in patients younger than 60 years (n = 589), with poorer risk cytogenetics, poorer performance status, older age, higher hemoglobin level, and higher leukocyte count predicting a shorter survival and forming the basis of the scoring system. Higher β2M levels were an adverse independent factor for response, survival, relapse-free survival, and event-free survival in older but not in younger patients.

Conclusions: Serum β2M levels can help predict outcome in patients ≥60 years with untreated AML, and their use is strongly encouraged.

β2 microglobulin (β2M) is a 12-kDa light chain protein that binds to the α chain of class I MHC (MHC1) molecules [e.g., human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C; ref. 1]. β2M has been described as playing a dual role in MHC1 molecules. It is a structural subunit of the assembled complex. It is also a chaperone, with a direct effect on the folding of the MHC1 heavy chain by facilitating the interaction of MHC1 heavy chain with other chaperones, such as calreticulin, tapasin, transporters associated with antigen processing, and others (2). With physiologic concentrations of high-affinity peptides or any concentration of lower-affinity peptides, β2M levels limit the folding of MHC1 molecules (3). In the absence of β2M, most MHC1 molecules are not expressed efficiently on the surface of cells (4, 5). Upon metabolism and degradation of HLA, β2M is dissociated from the heavy chain and is released in its free form into the extracellular fluids (6). β2M is filtered almost exclusively by the glomerulus and is most efficiently reabsorbed by the cells of the proximal tubules under diverse physiologic conditions (6).

Serum β2M levels are known to reflect renal function and membrane turnover, which is associated with tumor mass and growth rate (710). Elevated serum β2M levels are reported to predict poor survival in several hematologic malignancies, which include multiple myeloma (11), low-grade lymphomas (12), large-cell lymphomas (1315), Hodgkin's lymphoma (16, 17), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (18), Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia (19), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (20, 21), and myelodysplastic syndromes (22, 23).

The prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) varies. Older age, poor risk cytogenetics, and performance status (2435) are most commonly used to predict clinical outcomes. However, prognostic heterogeneity still exists and novel prognostic factors are being developed. Although some reports on the prognostic significance of β2M in AML have been published (23, 36, 37), the independent prognostic role of β2M in AML has not been established. Here, we examine whether β2M level is an independent prognostic factor in untreated AML that could be added to known prognostic factors to reduce prognostic variation.

Patients. We searched the AML database for patients who presented to The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center with newly diagnosed AML (≥20% myeloblasts) from 1990 through 2005. This database includes consecutive patients with AML or MDS seen at M. D. Anderson in the Department of Leukemia since 1985. Patients previously classified with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation were reclassified as AML. A total of 2,014 patients were identified, and pretreatment levels of β2M were available in 64% (i.e., 1,293 patients). Serum β2M levels were quantified by RIA (Pharmacia β-2 Micro Ria; Pharmacia Diagnostic; reference range, 0.7-2.0 mg/L). Treatment for AML varied during the 16 years depicted here, and for convenience we divided the patients into those who were given 1-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C) and those who were not. All patients included in the prognostic models received remission induction therapy with high-dose ara-C, defined as >0.5 g daily for 3 to 6 days for patients younger than 60 years and for 2 to 3 days for patients 60 years or older. Responders were to receive high-dose ara-C as maintenance therapy. All protocol patients gave informed consent. The study was approved by the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Board and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Diagnosis. The diagnosis of AML was confirmed at M. D. Anderson by an M. D. Anderson hematopathologist after review of bone marrow aspiration and/or peripheral blood smear. Conventional cytogenetic studies were done on bone marrow aspirate material using standard G-banding techniques. FLT3 analysis was done using a fluorescent multiplex PCR and restriction digestion method followed by capillary electrophoresis to detect internal tandem duplications and D835Y point mutations in the FLT3 gene. FLT3 was positive if either internal tandem duplication or D835Y mutation was identified.

Endpoints and statistical methods. We were primarily interested in the association between β2M levels and survival time. To feel more confident that any relationship between β2M and survival did not reflect differences in therapy given after relapse between patients with higher and lower β2M levels, we also analyzed event-free survival (EFS; i.e., survival from the start of treatment until relapse or death). Complete remission (CR) was defined using standard criteria, for example, a morphologically leukemia-free state, including evidence of normal erythropoiesis, granulopoiesis, and megakaryocytopoiesis; and <5% blasts in bone marrow aspirate, an absolute neutrophil count >1 × 109/L, and platelets ≥100 × 109/L (38). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was measured from the CR date until relapse or death.

Initially, we assessed the association between β2M levels and CR, overall survival, EFS, and RFS by dividing the patients into four groups with β2M levels of <1, 1-1.5, 1.5-2.0, and >2.0 times the upper limit of normal. The relationship between β2M levels and other covariates was examined using the t test, ANOVA, or the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, as appropriate. Overall survival, EFS, and RFS curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses used the Cox model for overall survival, EFS, and RFS and logistic regression for CR and included the following covariates: age; sex; race; performance status; cytogenetics; WBC count; hemoglobin level; platelet count; absolute neutrophil count; proportion of circulating monocytes, neutrophils, blasts, metamyelocytes, and myelocytes; creatinine clearance; levels of serum creatinine, bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), β2M, albumin, uric acid, glucose, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, and fibrinogen; prothrombin time and partial prothrombin time; FLT-3 and RAS mutations; French-American-British subtype; proportion of bone marrow blasts; proportion of CD2, CD33, and CD56 in bone marrow blasts by immunophenotyping; secondary versus de novo AML; history of antecedent hematologic disorder (history of a hemoglobin level <12 g/dL, a platelet count <150,000/μL, a neutrophil count <1,500/μL, or a WBC count >20,000/μL for at least 1 month before M. D. Anderson presentation) or other malignancy; presence of infection; ara-C–containing therapy; and days from diagnosis to treatment. A stepwise variable selection procedure was done to identify independent variables, which determined the final model. Patients with missing data were excluded from the multivariate analyses; in these analyses, numerical covariates (age, β2M, hemoglobin, WBC, etc.) were considered as such.

We analyzed patients ≥60 years separately from those younger than 60 years. Given the large number of tests of significance done and the risk of false-positive results, we divided our patients into two independent groups, using the first (training) to derive and the second (validation) to test the model. We also used a “bootstrapping” method in which we repeatedly (100 times) randomly selected 50% of the total population and assessed in which proportion of the 100 samples the Cox model identified a covariate as having independent prognostic significance. Those covariates found to be significant in the training and validation sets and/or noted to be independently significant at P < 0.05 in ≥40% of the randomly selected 100 bootstrapping sets were used to derive a scoring algorithm that can be used to predict a given patient's risk of death. In general, the scores assigned the different covariates were determined using the estimated coefficients from the fitted Cox model. Because such a scoring system assumes arbitrarily that there are cutoffs for numerical variables, we also used a method to validate the scoring system in which a continuous range of scores is generated (39).

Statistical analyses were carried out using SAS 8.2 and SPLUS 2000 (Insightful Corporation).

Correlation of β2M levels with other covariates. High β2M levels were correlated with male gender (P < 0.0001), intermediate and poor-risk cytogenetics (P = 0.03), presence of RAS mutations (P = 0.003), baseline infection (P = 0.04), and secondary AML (P = 0.01; Table 1). High β2M levels also were associated with older age (P < 0.0001) and other factors. Table 1 also illustrates these associations in patients 60 years or older.

Table 1.

Association between β2M and major patient characteristics in 1,293 patients with β2M measurements and in patients ≥60 y

Variablen = 1,293 (any age)
n = 703 (age ≥60 y)
β2M (mg/L)
β2M (mg/L)
nMeanSDPnMeanSDP
Sex    <0.0001    0.002 
    Female 552 3.10 2.12  262 3.61 2.64  
    Male 741 3.91 3.08  441 4.35 3.33  
Race    0.45    0.69 
    African-American 93 3.79 3.10  38 4.7 4.01  
    Caucasian 1,041 3.58 2.65  609 4.04 3.06  
    Hispanic 128 3.43 3.24  44 4.02 2.86  
    Other 31 2.93 2.42  12 4.04 3.46  
Cytogenetics, risk    0.03    0.02 
    Favorable 87 2.93 1.82  14 4.08 3.73  
    Intermediate 781 3.68 2.87  431 4.33 3.42  
    Poor 374 3.56 2.70  235 3.73 2.46  
    Insufficient metaphases 51 2.93 2.02  23 2.78 1.75  
RAS mutation    0.003    0.01 
    No 228 3.19 1.85  124 3.63 2.08  
    Yes 44 4.19 2.54  21 4.93 2.71  
Baseline infection    0.04    0.04 
    No 844 3.45 2.80  497 3.92 3.08  
    Yes 449 3.78 2.62  206 4.45 3.15  
Secondary AML    0.01    0.59 
    No 978 3.46 2.41  470 4.03 2.86  
    Yes 312 3.91 3.57  230 4.17 3.59  
Prior chemotherapy    0.29    0.59 
    No 1,098 3.53 2.65  568 4.04 2.97  
    Yes 195 3.76 3.23  135 4.20 3.65  
         
Continuous variables
 
Spearman correlation (any age)*
 
P
 
Spearman correlation (age ≥60 y)*
 
P
 
Age 0.30 <0.0001 0.16 <0.0001 
Zubrod performance status 0.29 <0.0001 0.27 <0.0001 
WBC 0.33 <0.0001 0.44 <0.0001 
Creatinine 0.52 <0.0001 0.54 <0.0001 
Creatinine clearance −0.46 <0.0001 −0.45 <0.0001 
Albumin −0.29 <0.0001 −0.25 <0.0001 
LDH 0.29 <0.0001 0.37 <0.0001 
Alkaline phosphatase 0.21 <0.0001 0.19 <0.0001 
Uric acid 0.39 <0.0001 0.40 <0.0001 
ANC 0.25 <0.0001 0.34 <0.0001 
Prothrombin time 0.35 <0.0001 0.37 <0.0001 
Circulating blasts 0.15 <0.0001 0.23 <0.0001 
Circulating monocytes 0.25 <0.0001 0.23 <0.0001 
Variablen = 1,293 (any age)
n = 703 (age ≥60 y)
β2M (mg/L)
β2M (mg/L)
nMeanSDPnMeanSDP
Sex    <0.0001    0.002 
    Female 552 3.10 2.12  262 3.61 2.64  
    Male 741 3.91 3.08  441 4.35 3.33  
Race    0.45    0.69 
    African-American 93 3.79 3.10  38 4.7 4.01  
    Caucasian 1,041 3.58 2.65  609 4.04 3.06  
    Hispanic 128 3.43 3.24  44 4.02 2.86  
    Other 31 2.93 2.42  12 4.04 3.46  
Cytogenetics, risk    0.03    0.02 
    Favorable 87 2.93 1.82  14 4.08 3.73  
    Intermediate 781 3.68 2.87  431 4.33 3.42  
    Poor 374 3.56 2.70  235 3.73 2.46  
    Insufficient metaphases 51 2.93 2.02  23 2.78 1.75  
RAS mutation    0.003    0.01 
    No 228 3.19 1.85  124 3.63 2.08  
    Yes 44 4.19 2.54  21 4.93 2.71  
Baseline infection    0.04    0.04 
    No 844 3.45 2.80  497 3.92 3.08  
    Yes 449 3.78 2.62  206 4.45 3.15  
Secondary AML    0.01    0.59 
    No 978 3.46 2.41  470 4.03 2.86  
    Yes 312 3.91 3.57  230 4.17 3.59  
Prior chemotherapy    0.29    0.59 
    No 1,098 3.53 2.65  568 4.04 2.97  
    Yes 195 3.76 3.23  135 4.20 3.65  
         
Continuous variables
 
Spearman correlation (any age)*
 
P
 
Spearman correlation (age ≥60 y)*
 
P
 
Age 0.30 <0.0001 0.16 <0.0001 
Zubrod performance status 0.29 <0.0001 0.27 <0.0001 
WBC 0.33 <0.0001 0.44 <0.0001 
Creatinine 0.52 <0.0001 0.54 <0.0001 
Creatinine clearance −0.46 <0.0001 −0.45 <0.0001 
Albumin −0.29 <0.0001 −0.25 <0.0001 
LDH 0.29 <0.0001 0.37 <0.0001 
Alkaline phosphatase 0.21 <0.0001 0.19 <0.0001 
Uric acid 0.39 <0.0001 0.40 <0.0001 
ANC 0.25 <0.0001 0.34 <0.0001 
Prothrombin time 0.35 <0.0001 0.37 <0.0001 
Circulating blasts 0.15 <0.0001 0.23 <0.0001 
Circulating monocytes 0.25 <0.0001 0.23 <0.0001 

NOTE: Associations of β2M levels with other pretreatment characteristics were assessed by t test if two categories were present and by ANOVA test if more than two categories were present for each variable.

*

Spearman rank correlation coefficient assesses associations between β2M levels and other continuous variables.

Patient characteristics of patients with untreated AML with and without measurements of serum β2M levels are shown in Table 2. After adjusting for covariates (cytogenetics, age, Zubrod performance status, secondary versus de novo AML, history of antecedent hematologic disorder, levels of hemoglobin, prothrombin time, LDH, uric acid, and creatinine and ara-C–containing therapy versus therapy without ara-C), patients in whom β2M levels were measured had longer survival, reflecting that failure to measure β2M levels was frequently due to the need to treat a sick patient on an emergency basis.

Table 2.

Pretreatment characteristics in patients with untreated AML with and without measurements of serum β2M levels

With β2M measurement (n = 1,293)Without β2M measurement (n = 721)
Value, median   
Age, y 61 59 
Bilirubin, mg/dL 0.6 0.6 
Creatinine, mg/dL 0.9 1.0 
Leukocyte count, ×109/L 7.9 11.7 
Platelet count, ×109/L 52 44 
Hemoglobin, g/dL 8.2 
Lactate dehydrogenase, units/L 897 1106 
Uric acid, mg/dL 4.8 4.4 
Cytogenetics, risk, %   
    Favorable 
    Intermediate 60 69 
    Poor 29 22 
    NA 
Performance status, %   
    0 14 
    1 59 57 
    2 20 22 
    3 
    4 
Complete remission, n (%) 537 (57) 401 (57) 
   

 
Median (95% CI)
 
Median (95% CI)
 
Follow-up, y 2.23 3.8 
Survival, y 0.83 (0.77-0.92) 0.73 (0.65-0.85) 
Event-free survival, y 0.35 (0.31-0.40) 0.29 (0.23-0.42) 
RFS, y 0.92 (0.81-1.04) 0.87 (0.79-1.04) 
With β2M measurement (n = 1,293)Without β2M measurement (n = 721)
Value, median   
Age, y 61 59 
Bilirubin, mg/dL 0.6 0.6 
Creatinine, mg/dL 0.9 1.0 
Leukocyte count, ×109/L 7.9 11.7 
Platelet count, ×109/L 52 44 
Hemoglobin, g/dL 8.2 
Lactate dehydrogenase, units/L 897 1106 
Uric acid, mg/dL 4.8 4.4 
Cytogenetics, risk, %   
    Favorable 
    Intermediate 60 69 
    Poor 29 22 
    NA 
Performance status, %   
    0 14 
    1 59 57 
    2 20 22 
    3 
    4 
Complete remission, n (%) 537 (57) 401 (57) 
   

 
Median (95% CI)
 
Median (95% CI)
 
Follow-up, y 2.23 3.8 
Survival, y 0.83 (0.77-0.92) 0.73 (0.65-0.85) 
Event-free survival, y 0.35 (0.31-0.40) 0.29 (0.23-0.42) 
RFS, y 0.92 (0.81-1.04) 0.87 (0.79-1.04) 

Abbreviation: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Patient characteristics. We focused on the 1,293 patients whose β2M levels were measured. The median age of these patients was 61 years (range, 16-89 years). Zubrod performance status was 0 in 13.8%, 1 in 59.5%, 2 in 19.7%, 3 in 5%, and 4 in 2%. The distribution of French-American-British subtypes was as follows: M0, 7.5%; M1, 17%; M2, 33%; M4, 22%; M5, 10%; M6, 6%; M7, 2.5%; and other, 2%. The median β2M level was 2.8 mg/L (range, 0.7-31.3 mg/L). Overall, 541 of the 1,293 (42%) patients had a history of antecedent hematologic disorder. In patients with such a history, the mean duration of antecedent hematologic disorder was 0.75 years (SD, 2.6 years). Of the patients, 96% received cytotoxic chemotherapy, which contained ara-C in 91% of these cases, and 4% of patients received “targeted therapy.” The CR rate was 57%. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 27 months (range, 1-145 months). The median overall survival, RFS, and EFS durations were 9.9, 12.2, and 4.2 months, respectively.

Response.Table 3 shows CR rates according to pretreatment characteristics, including β2M levels. In multivariate analysis, independent factors predicting response were younger age (P < 0.0001), better-risk cytogenetics (P < 0.0001), lower β2M levels (P < 0.0001), lower creatinine clearance levels (P < 0.0001), de novo (versus secondary) AML (P = 0.01), and better Zubrod performance status (P = 0.02).

Table 3.

Response, overall survival, and RFS by pretreatment characteristics

nCR, %PMedian survival, moPMedian RFS, moP
Age, y   <0.0001  <0.0001  <0.0001 
    <60 590 69  17  12  
    ≥60 703 47    
Cytogenetics, risk   <0.0001  <0.0001  <0.0001 
    Favorable 87 91  56  29  
    Intermediate 781 60  13  12  
    Poor 374 42    
β2M (mg/L)   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.001 
    <2.0 251 67  16  14  
    2.0-2.9 448 66  14  11  
    3.0-3.9 260 54    
    ≥4.0 334 39    
PS   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.04 
    0-1 947 61  13  12  
    >1 346 44    
LDH   0.02  0.0009  0.18 
    <1.5 × ULN 661 60  12  13  
    ≥1.5 × ULN 624 54    
Prior cancer   <0.0001  0.0001  0.01 
    Yes 312 46    
    No 978 60  11  12  
Creatinine, mg/dL   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.09 
    ≤1.6 1191 59  11  11  
    >1.6 101 30    
Creatinine clearance, mL/min*   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.08 
    ≥70 647 51  7.2  10.4  
    <70 646 63  13.2  11.3  
Leukocytes, ×109/L   0.01  0.01  0.59 
    <10 709 60  12  12  
    ≥10 584 53    
Albumin, g/dL   0.002  <0.0001  0.09 
    <3.5 713 53    
    ≥3.5 578 62  14  12  
PT, s   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.37 
    ≤Median 613 64  14  12  
    >Median 661 51    
Bilirubin, g/dL   0.01  0.009  0.80 
    <1 1059 58  10  11  
    ≥1 233 49   10  
Alkaline phosphatase, IU/L   0.12  0.007  0.92 
    <126 1079 58  11  11  
    ≥126 208 52   10  
FAB subtype   0.03  0.62  0.68 
    AMOL+AMML 355 62   10  
    Other 938 55  10  11  
FLT-3 mutations   0.67  0.02  0.009 
    Yes 134 58    
    No 428 56  14  12  
nCR, %PMedian survival, moPMedian RFS, moP
Age, y   <0.0001  <0.0001  <0.0001 
    <60 590 69  17  12  
    ≥60 703 47    
Cytogenetics, risk   <0.0001  <0.0001  <0.0001 
    Favorable 87 91  56  29  
    Intermediate 781 60  13  12  
    Poor 374 42    
β2M (mg/L)   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.001 
    <2.0 251 67  16  14  
    2.0-2.9 448 66  14  11  
    3.0-3.9 260 54    
    ≥4.0 334 39    
PS   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.04 
    0-1 947 61  13  12  
    >1 346 44    
LDH   0.02  0.0009  0.18 
    <1.5 × ULN 661 60  12  13  
    ≥1.5 × ULN 624 54    
Prior cancer   <0.0001  0.0001  0.01 
    Yes 312 46    
    No 978 60  11  12  
Creatinine, mg/dL   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.09 
    ≤1.6 1191 59  11  11  
    >1.6 101 30    
Creatinine clearance, mL/min*   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.08 
    ≥70 647 51  7.2  10.4  
    <70 646 63  13.2  11.3  
Leukocytes, ×109/L   0.01  0.01  0.59 
    <10 709 60  12  12  
    ≥10 584 53    
Albumin, g/dL   0.002  <0.0001  0.09 
    <3.5 713 53    
    ≥3.5 578 62  14  12  
PT, s   <0.0001  <0.0001  0.37 
    ≤Median 613 64  14  12  
    >Median 661 51    
Bilirubin, g/dL   0.01  0.009  0.80 
    <1 1059 58  10  11  
    ≥1 233 49   10  
Alkaline phosphatase, IU/L   0.12  0.007  0.92 
    <126 1079 58  11  11  
    ≥126 208 52   10  
FAB subtype   0.03  0.62  0.68 
    AMOL+AMML 355 62   10  
    Other 938 55  10  11  
FLT-3 mutations   0.67  0.02  0.009 
    Yes 134 58    
    No 428 56  14  12  

Abbreviations: PS, performance status; ULN, upper limit of normal; PT, prothrombin time; FAB, French-American-British; AMOL, acute monocytic leukemia; AMML, acute myelomonocytic leukemia.

*

Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft and Gault equation.

Overall survival. When categorized in relation to the upper limit of normal, as described above, lower serum β2M levels predicted longer survival (Fig. 1A). Figure 1B shows survival by serum β2M levels in patients 60 years or older. Survival by age, cytogenetic risk group, and performance status is shown in Fig. 1C to E. Among patients younger than 60 years, with elevated B2 microglobulin (>2 mg/dL), 15 of 299 (5%) underwent stem cell transplantation as maintenance therapy in first CR. The median follow-up is 2.94 years for transplanted patients and 3.27 years for nontransplanted. Six of the 15 patients who underwent stem cell transplantation and 158 of the 284 who did not receive stem cell transplantation have died. The median survival of the 15 patients was 2.58 years compared with 1.96 years in the 284 patients who did not undergo stem cell transplantation (P = 0.37).

Fig. 1.

Survival in patients with AML by (A) β2M levels (n = 1,293); (B) β2M levels in patients 60 y or older (n = 703); (C) age; (D) cytogenetic risk: favorable, intermediate, poor, or unknown; (E) performance status; and (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curves by prognostic score in patients ≥60 y. The risk of death could be determined by summing the scores present at diagnosis, and ranged from 0 to 6. Cytogenetics (0, 1, or 2); performance status (0 or 1); and levels of β2M (0 or 1), uric acid (0 or 1), and LDH (0 or 1), formed the basis of a scoring system (Table 5A). At 1 y, 63%, 46%, 41%, 30%, 17%, and 4% of patients with scores 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to 6, respectively, are expected to be alive. G, Kaplan-Meier survival curves by prognostic score in patients <60 y. The risk of death could be determined by summing the scores present at diagnosis, and ranged from 0 to 8. In patients younger than 60 y, cytogenetics (0, 2, or 4), performance status (0 or 1), age (0 or 1), hemoglobin level (0 or 1), and leukocyte count (0 or 1) were used to determine a patient's score (Table 6). At 1 y, 95%, 76%, 71%, 66%, 39%, and 24% of patients with scores 0-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-8, respectively, are expected to be alive.

Fig. 1.

Survival in patients with AML by (A) β2M levels (n = 1,293); (B) β2M levels in patients 60 y or older (n = 703); (C) age; (D) cytogenetic risk: favorable, intermediate, poor, or unknown; (E) performance status; and (F) Kaplan-Meier survival curves by prognostic score in patients ≥60 y. The risk of death could be determined by summing the scores present at diagnosis, and ranged from 0 to 6. Cytogenetics (0, 1, or 2); performance status (0 or 1); and levels of β2M (0 or 1), uric acid (0 or 1), and LDH (0 or 1), formed the basis of a scoring system (Table 5A). At 1 y, 63%, 46%, 41%, 30%, 17%, and 4% of patients with scores 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to 6, respectively, are expected to be alive. G, Kaplan-Meier survival curves by prognostic score in patients <60 y. The risk of death could be determined by summing the scores present at diagnosis, and ranged from 0 to 8. In patients younger than 60 y, cytogenetics (0, 2, or 4), performance status (0 or 1), age (0 or 1), hemoglobin level (0 or 1), and leukocyte count (0 or 1) were used to determine a patient's score (Table 6). At 1 y, 95%, 76%, 71%, 66%, 39%, and 24% of patients with scores 0-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-8, respectively, are expected to be alive.

Close modal

Event-free survival. Serum β2M levels also were associated with the duration of EFS (n = 1,293). In multivariate analysis, independent factors predicting longer EFS were better-risk cytogenetics (P < 0.0001), younger age (P < 0.0001), lower β2M levels (P = 0.0002), de novo (versus secondary) AML (P = 0.0002), lower uric acid levels (P = 0.0004), higher hemoglobin levels (P = 0.002), lower LDH levels (P = 0.003), better performance status (P = 0.007), shorter prothrombin time (P = 0.01), and absence of baseline infection (P = 0.04).

Relapse-free survival. Serum levels of β2M were also associated with duration of RFS (Table 3). Patients with β2M levels >4 mg/L had inferior rates of RFS, although the RFS curves of the other β2M groups started to overlap after 1 to 2 years. Independent factors predicting longer RFS were better-risk cytogenetics (P < 0.0001), younger age (P < 0.0001), higher hemoglobin levels (P = 0.01), lower β2M levels (P = 0.001), and de novo (versus secondary) AML (P = 0.01).

Prognostic interaction between β2M levels and age. The associations between β2M level and many of the factors that were also related to survival prompted us to perform a multivariate analysis and fit a multivariate model, which included the interaction between β2M and age. According to this analysis, the prognostic significance of β2M increased with age, as evidenced by the P value of 0.04 for the interaction between age and β2M (Table 4). The P value of 0.20 for β2M reflects the fact that β2M was not prognostically significant in younger patients. The interaction between β2M and age led us to develop separate models for patients <60 and ≥60 years. Because ara-C–treated patients had longer survival (Table 4), each of these models was restricted to ara-C–treated patients.

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis using Cox model showing interaction between age and β2M in 1,293 patients

VariableRR (95% CI)Z scoreP
Worsening-risk CG 2.06 (1.82-2.34) 11.33 <0.0001 
Performance status 1.24 (1.14-1.35) 4.86 <0.0001 
Secondary vs de novo AML 1.50 (1.26-1.79) 4.54 <0.0001 
Uric acid 1.03 (1.01-1.04) 4.10 <0.0001 
Prothrombin time 1.08 (1.06-1.13) 3.59 0.0003 
LDH 1.06 (1.03-1.10) 3.57 0.0004 
Hemoglobin 0.94 (0.91-0.98) −3.06 0.002 
Ara-C–containing therapy 0.77 (0.63-0.94) −2.56 0.01 
Presence of infection 1.20 (1.04-1.39) 2.45 0.01 
Age 1.02 (1.01-1.02) 4.02 0.0001 
β20.93 (0.82-1.04) −1.27 0.20 
Age: β21.00 (1.00-1.00) 2.03 0.04 
VariableRR (95% CI)Z scoreP
Worsening-risk CG 2.06 (1.82-2.34) 11.33 <0.0001 
Performance status 1.24 (1.14-1.35) 4.86 <0.0001 
Secondary vs de novo AML 1.50 (1.26-1.79) 4.54 <0.0001 
Uric acid 1.03 (1.01-1.04) 4.10 <0.0001 
Prothrombin time 1.08 (1.06-1.13) 3.59 0.0003 
LDH 1.06 (1.03-1.10) 3.57 0.0004 
Hemoglobin 0.94 (0.91-0.98) −3.06 0.002 
Ara-C–containing therapy 0.77 (0.63-0.94) −2.56 0.01 
Presence of infection 1.20 (1.04-1.39) 2.45 0.01 
Age 1.02 (1.01-1.02) 4.02 0.0001 
β20.93 (0.82-1.04) −1.27 0.20 
Age: β21.00 (1.00-1.00) 2.03 0.04 

Abbreviation: RR, risk ratio.

Patients ≥60 years. The 591 ara-C–treated patients ≥60 years had a median age of 70 years. Fifty percent of the patients (n = 296) were used to develop a model and the remaining 50% (n = 295) to validate the model. Cytogenetics, performance status, and β2M and uric acid levels were each an independent factor in both the training and validation sets (Table 5A), whereas LDH was prognostic only in the population used to develop, not test, the model. Next, we resampled 100 times the 591 patients to obtain separate 296-patient data sets, in each of which we fit a Cox model. Cytogenetics and performance status were independently significant in 100% and 98% of these sets. Corresponding figures for β2M, LDH, and uric acid were 48%, 45%, and 42%. In contrast, age above and below the median of 70 years was independently significant in only 15 of the 100 samples; corresponding values for secondary (versus de novo) AML, hemoglobin, bilirubin, WBC, infection, albumin, and creatinine were 39%, 25%, 13%, 10%, 5%, 4%, and 4%, respectively.

Table 5.

Factors independently prognostic of survival and scoring system in ara-G treated patients ≥60 y

A. Factors independently prognostic of survival and scoring system in Ara-C–treated patients ≥60 y
RR (95% CI)Z scoreP
Training sample (n = 296)    
    Worse-risk cytogenetics 2.32 (1.74-3.09) 5.77 <0.0001 
    Poorer performance status 1.61 (1.37-1.90) 5.82 <0.0001 
    β21.07 (1.03-1.12) 3.35 0.0008 
    LDH 1.11 (1.01-1.22) 2.27 0.02 
    Uric acid 1.05 (1.00-1.10) 2.11 0.04 
Validation sample (n = 295)    
    Worse-risk cytogenetics 2.06 (1.56-2.74) 5.05 <0.0001 
    Uric acid 1.04 (1.01-1.07) 2.75 0.006 
    β21.05 (1.01-1.10) 2.63 0.009 
    Poorer performance status 1.20 (1.03-1.39) 2.36 0.02 
    LDH ≥1.5× ULN 1.08 (0.96-1.22) 1.26 0.21 
All patients (n = 591)    
    Poor vs other cytogenetics 2.08 (1.71-2.52) 7.44 <0.0001 
    PS 2 vs 0-1 1.71 (1.39-2.10) 5.04 <0.0001 
    PS 3-4 vs 0-1 1.65 (1.19-2.29) 2.99 0.003 
    β2M ≥3 mg/dL 1.42 (1.17-1.73) 3.54 0.0004 
    Uric acid >ULN 1.42 (1.11-1.80) 2.84 0.005 
    
Scoring system for survival model
 
  
Covariate
 
Relative risk
 
Score
 
Cytogenetic, risk   
    Poor 2.08 
    Other 1.00 
Performance status   
    >1 1.70 
    0-1 1.00 
β2M, mg/dL   
    >3 1.42 
    <3 1.00 
Uric acid   
    >ULN 1.42 
    <ULN 1.00  
LDH   
    >1.5× ULN 1.28 
    <1.5× ULN 1.00 
   
B. Factors (without cytogenetics) independently prognostic of survival in 591 patients ≥60 y with newly diagnosed AML
 
   

 
RR (95% CI)
 
Z score
 
P
 
PS 2 vs 0-1 1.73 (1.40-2.13) 5.15 <0.0001 
PS 3-4 vs 0-1 1.70 (1.22-2.36) 3.16 0.002 
Secondary vs de novo AML 1.38 (1.10-1.74) 2.77 0.006 
β2M ≥3 mg/dL 1.30 (1.07-1.58) 2.58 0.0097 
Uric acid >ULN 1.36 (1.07-1.74) 2.51 0.012 
LDH ≥1.5× ULN 1.28 (1.05-1.56) 2.46 0.014 
Age >70 y 1.23 (1.03-1.48) 2.24 0.025 
A. Factors independently prognostic of survival and scoring system in Ara-C–treated patients ≥60 y
RR (95% CI)Z scoreP
Training sample (n = 296)    
    Worse-risk cytogenetics 2.32 (1.74-3.09) 5.77 <0.0001 
    Poorer performance status 1.61 (1.37-1.90) 5.82 <0.0001 
    β21.07 (1.03-1.12) 3.35 0.0008 
    LDH 1.11 (1.01-1.22) 2.27 0.02 
    Uric acid 1.05 (1.00-1.10) 2.11 0.04 
Validation sample (n = 295)    
    Worse-risk cytogenetics 2.06 (1.56-2.74) 5.05 <0.0001 
    Uric acid 1.04 (1.01-1.07) 2.75 0.006 
    β21.05 (1.01-1.10) 2.63 0.009 
    Poorer performance status 1.20 (1.03-1.39) 2.36 0.02 
    LDH ≥1.5× ULN 1.08 (0.96-1.22) 1.26 0.21 
All patients (n = 591)    
    Poor vs other cytogenetics 2.08 (1.71-2.52) 7.44 <0.0001 
    PS 2 vs 0-1 1.71 (1.39-2.10) 5.04 <0.0001 
    PS 3-4 vs 0-1 1.65 (1.19-2.29) 2.99 0.003 
    β2M ≥3 mg/dL 1.42 (1.17-1.73) 3.54 0.0004 
    Uric acid >ULN 1.42 (1.11-1.80) 2.84 0.005 
    
Scoring system for survival model
 
  
Covariate
 
Relative risk
 
Score
 
Cytogenetic, risk   
    Poor 2.08 
    Other 1.00 
Performance status   
    >1 1.70 
    0-1 1.00 
β2M, mg/dL   
    >3 1.42 
    <3 1.00 
Uric acid   
    >ULN 1.42 
    <ULN 1.00  
LDH   
    >1.5× ULN 1.28 
    <1.5× ULN 1.00 
   
B. Factors (without cytogenetics) independently prognostic of survival in 591 patients ≥60 y with newly diagnosed AML
 
   

 
RR (95% CI)
 
Z score
 
P
 
PS 2 vs 0-1 1.73 (1.40-2.13) 5.15 <0.0001 
PS 3-4 vs 0-1 1.70 (1.22-2.36) 3.16 0.002 
Secondary vs de novo AML 1.38 (1.10-1.74) 2.77 0.006 
β2M ≥3 mg/dL 1.30 (1.07-1.58) 2.58 0.0097 
Uric acid >ULN 1.36 (1.07-1.74) 2.51 0.012 
LDH ≥1.5× ULN 1.28 (1.05-1.56) 2.46 0.014 
Age >70 y 1.23 (1.03-1.48) 2.24 0.025 

To determine a scoring system, we included those covariates that were predictive in >40% of the 100 repeated samples. Four of these five covariates (performance status, cytogenetics, β2M, and uric acid) were also predictive in the 295-patient test set (Table 5A). Having selected our covariates, we included all 591 patients age ≥60 years (Table 5A) to develop the scoring system, using the relative risk from the Cox model to define the score, which could range from 0 to 6.

Application of this scoring system is shown in Table 5A and Fig. 1F. We compared the scoring system with a more formal system defined without using a cutoff for numerical values, such as β2M, as previously described (39). The more informal and the formal methods gave similar results.

Because the results of cytogenetic analysis are not often available when a treatment decision must be made, we also did a multivariate analysis for survival without including cytogenetics. Independent factors predicting longer survival were performance status 0 to 1 (P < 0.0001), de novo (versus secondary) AML (P = 0.006), β2M <3 mg/dL (P = 0.0097), uric acid less than the upper limit of normal (P = 0.012), LDH <1.5 times the upper limit of normal (P = 0.014), and age <70 years (P = 0.025; Table 5B).

Patients <60 years. Among 589 ara-C–treated patients <60 years, the median age was 48 years. Fifty percent of the patients (n = 295) were used to develop a training set and the remaining 50% (n = 294) to validate the model. Cytogenetics, performance status, older age, and higher WBC counts each independently affected survival in both the training and validation sets (Table 6), whereas lower hemoglobin level was prognostic in the training but not in the validation set. When the 589 patients were resampled to obtain 100 separate 295-patient data sets, in each of which we fit a Cox model, cytogenetics were independently significant in 99% of the samples, age in 83%, hemoglobin in 53%, WBC in 52%, and performance status >1 in 45%. β2M levels were significant in only 8% of the samples. The respective proportions for LDH, infection, creatinine, prothrombin time, and history of cancer were 39%, 22%, 4%, 3%, and 1%. On the basis of the results of the resamples, and the relative risk from the Cox model, which included all 589 patients (Table 6), poor-risk cytogenetics, age ≥48 years, performance status >1, WBC counts ≥10 × 109/L, and hemoglobin <8 g/dL were used to develop a scoring system for patients <60 years old (Table 6). Patient scores can range from 0 to 8. Application of this scoring system is shown in Fig. 1G.

Table 6.

Factors independently prognostic of survival and scoring system in Ara-C–treated patients <60 y

CovariateRR (95% CI)Z scoreP
Training sample (n = 295)    
    Worse-risk cytogenetics 2.12 (1.63-2.76) 5.60 <0.0001 
    Hemoglobin 0.88 (0.81-0.96) −3.08 0.002 
    Performance status >1 1.63 (1.13-2.33) 2.64 0.008 
    Age 1.02 (1.00-1.03) 2.30 0.02 
    WBC 1.00 (1.00-1.006) 2.30 0.02 
Validation sample (n = 294)    
    Worse-risk cytogenetics 2.70 (2.03-3.59) 6.81 <0.0001 
    WBC 1.00 (1.00-1.01) 2.99 0.003 
    Age 1.01 (1.00-1.03) 2.10 0.04 
    Performance status >1 1.58 (1.12-2.23) 2.58 0.009 
    Hemoglobin 0.97 (0.90-1.04) −0.87 0.38 
All patients (n = 589)    
    Poor- vs favorable-risk cytogenetics 5.44 (3.49-8.45) 7.51 <0.0001 
    Intermediate- vs favorable-risk cytogenetics 2.23 (1.48-3.37) 3.83 0.0001 
    Age ≥48 y 1.38 (1.12-1.71) 2.97 0.003 
    PS 2 vs 0-1 1.71 (1.31-2.23) 3.92 0.0001 
    PS 3-4 vs 0-1 1.54 (1.02-2.32) 2.05 0.04 
    Hemoglobin <8 g/dL 1.31 (1.05-1.62) 2.45 0.01 
    
Scoring system for survival model
 
  
Covariate
 
Relative risk
 
Score
 
Cytogenetic, risk   
    Poor 5.44 
    Intermediate 2.23 
    Favorable 1.00 
Performance status   
    >1 1.71 
    0-1 1.00 
Age, y   
    ≥48 1.38 
    <48 1.00 
Hemoglobin, g/dL   
    <8 1.31 
    ≥8 1.00 
WBC, ×109/L   
    ≥10 1.28 
    <10 1.00 
CovariateRR (95% CI)Z scoreP
Training sample (n = 295)    
    Worse-risk cytogenetics 2.12 (1.63-2.76) 5.60 <0.0001 
    Hemoglobin 0.88 (0.81-0.96) −3.08 0.002 
    Performance status >1 1.63 (1.13-2.33) 2.64 0.008 
    Age 1.02 (1.00-1.03) 2.30 0.02 
    WBC 1.00 (1.00-1.006) 2.30 0.02 
Validation sample (n = 294)    
    Worse-risk cytogenetics 2.70 (2.03-3.59) 6.81 <0.0001 
    WBC 1.00 (1.00-1.01) 2.99 0.003 
    Age 1.01 (1.00-1.03) 2.10 0.04 
    Performance status >1 1.58 (1.12-2.23) 2.58 0.009 
    Hemoglobin 0.97 (0.90-1.04) −0.87 0.38 
All patients (n = 589)    
    Poor- vs favorable-risk cytogenetics 5.44 (3.49-8.45) 7.51 <0.0001 
    Intermediate- vs favorable-risk cytogenetics 2.23 (1.48-3.37) 3.83 0.0001 
    Age ≥48 y 1.38 (1.12-1.71) 2.97 0.003 
    PS 2 vs 0-1 1.71 (1.31-2.23) 3.92 0.0001 
    PS 3-4 vs 0-1 1.54 (1.02-2.32) 2.05 0.04 
    Hemoglobin <8 g/dL 1.31 (1.05-1.62) 2.45 0.01 
    
Scoring system for survival model
 
  
Covariate
 
Relative risk
 
Score
 
Cytogenetic, risk   
    Poor 5.44 
    Intermediate 2.23 
    Favorable 1.00 
Performance status   
    >1 1.71 
    0-1 1.00 
Age, y   
    ≥48 1.38 
    <48 1.00 
Hemoglobin, g/dL   
    <8 1.31 
    ≥8 1.00 
WBC, ×109/L   
    ≥10 1.28 
    <10 1.00 

This is the first study to explore whether serum β2M levels are an independent risk factor in AML, as is the case in various other hematologic malignancies. Our data strongly support the independent prognostic role of uncorrected pretreatment serum β2M levels in patients with AML who are ≥60 years old and are given ara-C–containing therapy. Notably, β2M levels did not predict survival in patients younger than 60 years. This observation is consistent with qualitative differences in the AML of older and younger patients.

In multivariate analysis using training, validation, and resampling sets, poor-risk cytogenetics, performance status >1, β2M >3 mg/dL, uric acid greater than the upper limit of normal, and LDH >1.5× the upper limit of normal were the top five adverse independent factors predicting survival in patients >60 years. Similarly, poor-risk cytogenetics, performance status >1, age ≥48 years, hemoglobin <8 g/dL, and leukocyte count ≥10 × 109/L were the top five adverse independent factors predicting survival in patients <60 years. To optimize the clinical use of these findings, two simple prognostic scores were developed, one for patients ≥60 years and another for patients <60 years.

A fundamental question is whether our results can be generalized to other patients with AML. The other covariates that predicted outcome in our patients were, by and large, those noted in many other series, and the outcomes themselves (median survival, long-term survival, etc.) were similar to those often reported elsewhere. On the other hand, it is important to bear in mind that β2M measurement was an independent prognostic factor; that is, our patients in whom β2M was not measured did worse than patients in whom β2M was measured. This observation presumably reflects the “sicker” nature of the former patients and suggests caution in the application of our system to such patients.

Another potential problem with generalizing our findings relates to the many tests of statistical significance we did and the consequent possibility of false-positive results. Indeed, whereas the use of multivariate models is common, they are often not validated. The prognostic models presented here were validated in two ways: training and validation sets (50% each) and multiple resampling (“bootstrapping”). Although it could be argued that the decision to select only those factors that were found to be independently prognostic at P < 0.05 in at least 40% of the resamples is arbitrary, we would point out that in general these factors were also found to be significant in the validation set, which used two totally independent populations.

Another observation that emerged from the current study is the association between elevated serum levels of β2M and other covariates. These observations are in line with previous reports showing that β2M levels are elevated in normal individuals who are older, male, and have elevated creatinine levels. Although no association between β2M levels and monocytic AML by the French-American-British classification was noted, as previously described (13, 36, 37, 4042), we found that elevated β2M levels were correlated with increased numbers of monocytes. Several of the correlations, such as those between β2M levels and leukocyte counts, circulating blasts or monocytes, and LDH indicate that β2M levels are a marker of increased turnover. These correlations were also significant in patients 60 years or older.

The clinical significance of serum β2M levels in AML may be explained as previously described in non–Hodgkin's lymphoma (14). β2M and HLA molecules are variably expressed on the surface of tumor cells (4346). Poor expression of MHC class I molecules is considered an adverse prognostic factor in lymphomas (4749). Because the HLA class I antigens are key components of the immune system, the recognition of tumor-specific antigens by cytotoxic T cells is dependent on intact HLA expression. Malignant cells with modified or lacking HLA expression may escape from the normal host immune response and proliferate uncontrollably (5052). A structural defect of the HLA complex may also result in changes in epitope expression and increased release of β2M in serum (8, 9, 53, 54). This mechanism is consistent with the observation that serum β2M levels reflect tumor burden and cell turnover (710).

The prognostic significance of serum β2M levels has particular interest in light of recent studies in mouse models that showed that monoclonal antibodies specific to human β2M induced apoptosis in vitro and had antitumor activity against multiple myeloma, Burkitt's lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, T-cell leukemia, and myeloid leukemia (55). These effects had selective antitumor activity without damaging marrow hematopoietic cells of implanted human bone or murine organs that express human β2M/HLA-A2 molecules, providing a potential therapeutic approach for patients with AML or other hematologic malignancies with elevated serum β2M levels (55). The absence of damage to normal hematopoietic cells may be explained by the activity of the monoclonal antibody against cells with structural defects of the HLA complex, such as tumor cells, but not against normal cells with intact HLA structure.

In conclusion, our data show that serum β2M levels are highly predictive for clinical outcomes in patients ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML. Given this observation and the relative ease with which β2M can be assessed, the proposed scoring system seems to represent a significant advantage in staging these patients to recognize those who may benefit from different treatment approaches and to allow a more accurate comparison between different therapeutic approaches.

Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants P01CA108631, P01CA55164, U01HL069334, R01CA085843, R01CA092115, R01CA083932, P50CA100632, and P50CA100632 (E.H. Estey); and American Society of Clinical Oncology career development award (A.M. Tsimberidou).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Bjorkman PJ, Saper MA, Samraoui B, et al. Structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen, HLA-A2.
Nature
1987
;
329
:
506
–12.
2
Cresswell P, Ackerman AL, Giodini A, et al. Mechanisms of MHC class I-restricted antigen processing and cross-presentation.
Immunol Rev
2005
;
207
:
145
–57.
3
Hill DM, Kasliwal T, Schwarz E, et al. A dominant negative mutant β2 microglobulin blocks the extracellular folding of a major histocompatibility complex class I heavy chain.
J Biol Chem
2003
;
278
:
5630
–8.
4
Seong RH, Clayberger CA, Krensky AM, et al. Rescue of Daudi cell HLA expression by transfection of the mouse β2-microglobulin gene.
J Exp Med
1988
;
167
:
288
–99.
5
Zijlstra M, Bix M, Simister NE, et al. β2-microglobulin deficient mice lack CD4-8+ cytolytic T cells.
Nature
1990
;
344
:
742
–6.
6
Schardijn GH, Statius van Eps LW. β2-microglobulin: its significance in the evaluation of renal function.
Kidney Int
1987
;
32
:
635
–41.
7
Cresswell P, Springer T, Strominger JL, et al. Immunological identity of the small subunit of HL-A antigens and β2-microglobulin and its turnover on the cell membrane.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1974
;
71
:
2123
–7.
8
Kahn-Perles B, Boyer C, Arnold B, et al. Acquisition of HLA class I W6/32 defined antigenic determinant by heavy chains from different species following association with bovine β2-microglobulin.
J Immunol
1987
;
138
:
2190
–6.
9
Ferrier P, Layet C, Caillol DH, et al. The association between murine β2 microglobulin and HLA class I heavy chains results in serologically detectable conformational changes of both chains.
J Immunol
1985
;
135
:
1281
–7.
10
Plesner T, Karle H, Rubin B, et al. Evidence for a change in the expression of β2-microglobulin-assoicated membrane structures on leukaemic human cells.
Clin Exp Immunol
1978
;
31
:
269
–75.
11
Durie BG, Stock-Novack D, Salmon SE, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment serum β2 microglobulin in myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.
Blood
1990
;
75
:
823
–30.
12
Litam P, Swan F, Cabanillas F, et al. Prognostic value of serum β-2 microglobulin in low-grade lymphoma.
Ann Intern Med
1991
;
114
:
855
–60.
13
Melillo L, Musto P, Tomasi P, et al. Serum β2-microglobulin in malignant lymphoproliferative disorders.
Tumori
1988
;
74
:
129
–35.
14
Swan F, Jr., Velasquez WS, Tucker S, et al. A new serologic staging system for large-cell lymphomas based on initial β2-microglobulin and lactate dehydrogenase levels.
J Clin Oncol
1989
;
7
:
1518
–27.
15
Aviles A, Zepeda G, Diaz-Maqueo JC, et al. β2 microglobulin level as an indicator of prognosis in diffuse large cell lymphoma.
Leuk Lymphoma
1992
;
7
:
135
–8.
16
Chronowski GM, Wilder RB, Tucker SL, et al. An elevated serum β-2-microglobulin level is an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with early-stage Hodgkin disease.
Cancer
2002
;
95
:
2534
–8.
17
Dimopoulos MA, Cabanillas F, Lee JJ, et al. Prognostic role of serum β2 microglobulin in Hodgkin's disease.
J Clin Oncol
1993
;
11
:
1108
–11.
18
Kantarjian HM, Smith T, Estey E, et al. Prognostic significance of elevated serum β2-microglobulin levels in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia.
Am J Med
1992
;
93
:
599
–604.
19
Rodriguez J, Cortes J, Talpaz M, et al. Serum β-2 microglobulin levels are a significant prognostic factor in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Clin Cancer Res
2000
;
6
:
147
–52.
20
Keating MJ, Lerner S, Kantarjian H, et al. The serum β2-microglobulin level is more powerful than stage in predicting response and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Paper presented the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting.
Blood
1998
;
86
:
606a
.
21
Molica S, Levato D, Cascavilla N, et al. Clinico-prognostic implications of simultaneous increased serum levels of soluble CD23 and β2-microglobulin in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Eur J Haematol
1999
;
62
:
117
–22.
22
Gatto S, Ball G, Onida F, et al. Contribution of β-2 microglobulin levels to the prognostic stratification of survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
Blood
2003
;
102
:
1622
–5.
23
Albitar M, Johnson M, Do KA, et al. Levels of soluble HLA-I and β2M in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and advanced myelodysplastic syndrome: association with clinical behavior and outcome of induction therapy.
Leukemia
2007
;
21
:
480
–8.
24
Keating MJ, Smith TL, Kantarjian H, et al. Cytogenetic pattern in acute myelogenous leukemia: a major reproducible determinant of outcome.
Leukemia
1988
;
2
:
403
–12.
25
Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Lai JL, et al. Cytogenetics and their prognostic value in de novo acute myeloid leukaemia: a report on 283 cases.
Br J Haematol
1989
;
73
:
61
–7.
26
Bloomfield CD, Shuma C, Regal L, et al. Long-term survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a third follow-up of the Fourth International Workshop on Chromosomes in Leukemia.
Cancer
1997
;
80
:
2191
–8.
27
Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, et al.; The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial.
Blood
1998
;
92
:
2322
–33.
28
Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Cassileth PA, et al. Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study.
Blood
2000
;
96
:
4075
–83.
29
Byrd JC, Mrozek K, Dodge RK, et al. Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461).
Blood
2002
;
100
:
4325
–36.
30
Grimwade D, Walker H, Harrison G, et al. The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial.
Blood
2001
;
98
:
1312
–20.
31
Berger R, Flandrin G, Bernheim A, et al. Cytogenetic studies on 519 consecutive de novo acute nonlymphocytic leukemias.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
1987
;
29
:
9
–21.
32
Arthur DC, Berger R, Golomb HM, et al. The clinical significance of karyotype in acute myelogenous leukemia.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
1989
;
40
:
203
–16.
33
Marosi C, Koller U, Koller-Weber E, et al. Prognostic impact of karyotype and immunologic phenotype in 125 adult patients with de novo AML.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
1992
;
61
:
14
–25.
34
Swansbury GJ, Lawler SD, Alimena G, et al. Long-term survival in acute myelogenous leukemia: a second follow-up of the Fourth International Workshop on Chromosomes in Leukemia.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
1994
;
73
:
1
–7.
35
Dastugue N, Payen C, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, et al.; The BGMT group. Prognostic significance of karyotype in de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia.
Leukemia
1995
;
9
:
1491
–8.
36
Melillo L, Cascavilla N, Lombardi G, et al. Prognostic relevance of serum β2 microglobulin in acute myeloid leukemia.
Leukemia
1992
;
6
:
1076
–8.
37
Scott CS, Stark AN, Limbert HJ, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic factors in acute monocytic leukaemia: an analysis of 51 cases.
Br J Haematol
1988
;
69
:
247
–52.
38
Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
J Clin Oncol
2003
;
21
:
4642
–9.
39
Huang X, Biswas S, Estey EH, et al. Building and validating a prognostic index for biomarker studies.
Cancer Biomark
2006
;
2
:
97
–101.
40
Norfolk DR, Child JA, Roberts BE, et al. Serum β-2-microglobulin in disorders of myeloid proliferation.
Acta Haematol
1983
;
69
:
361
–8.
41
Ellegaard J, Mogensen CE, Kragballe K. Serum β2-microglobulin in acute and chronic leukaemia.
Scand J Haematol
1980
;
25
:
275
–85.
42
Schena FP, Liso V, Losuriello V, et al. The behaviour of β-2-microglobulin in acute and chronic leukaemias.
Biomedicine
1980
;
33
:
12
–5.
43
Csiba A, Whitwell HL, Moore M. Distribution of histocompatibility and leucocyte differentiation antigens in normal human colon and in benign and malignant colonic neoplasms.
Br J Cancer
1984
;
50
:
699
–709.
44
Fleming KA, McMichael A, Morton JA, et al. Distribution of HLA class 1 antigens in normal human tissue and in mammary cancer.
J Clin Pathol
1981
;
34
:
779
–84.
45
Turbitt ML, Mackie RM. Loss of β2 microglobulin from the cell surface of cutaneous malignant and premalignant lesions.
Br J Dermatol
1981
;
104
:
507
–13.
46
Walton GR, McCue PA, Graham SD, Jr. β-2-microglobulins as a differentiation marker in bladder cancer.
J Urol
1986
;
136
:
1197
–200.
47
Moller P, Herrmann B, Moldenhauer G, et al. Defective expression of MHC class I antigens is frequent in B-cell lymphomas of high-grade malignancy.
Int J Cancer
1987
;
40
:
32
–9.
48
Moller P, Lammler B, Herrmann B, et al. The primary mediastinal clear cell lymphoma of B-cell type has variable defects in MHC antigen expression.
Immunology
1986
;
59
:
411
–7.
49
Woda BA, Racklin B, Rappaport H. Altered expression of histocompatibility antigens on “B” large cell lymphomas.
Blood
1981
;
57
:
802
–4.
50
Hui K, Grosveld F, Festenstein H. Rejection of transplantable AKR leukaemia cells following MHC DNA-mediated cell transformation.
Nature
1984
;
311
:
750
–2.
51
Tanaka K, Isselbacher KJ, Khoury G, et al. Reversal of oncogenesis by the expression of a major histocompatibility complex class I gene.
Science
1985
;
228
:
26
–30.
52
Zinkernagel RM, Doherty PC. MHC-restricted cytotoxic T cells: studies on the biological role of polymorphic major transplantation antigens determining T-cell restriction-specificity, function, and responsiveness.
Adv Immunol
1979
;
27
:
51
–177.
53
Rein RS, Seemann GH, Neefjes JJ, et al. Association with β2-microglobulin controls the expression of transfected human class I genes.
J Immunol
1987
;
138
:
1178
–83.
54
Santos-Aguado J, Biro PA, Fuhrmann U, et al. Amino acid sequences in the α 1 domain and not glycosylation are important in HLA-A2/β2 microglobulin association and cell surface expression.
Mol Cell Biol
1987
;
7
:
982
–90.
55
Yang J, Qian J, Wezeman M, et al. Targeting β2-microglobulin for induction of tumor apoptosis in human hematological malignancies.
Cancer Cell
2006
;
10
:
295
–307.