Purpose: Epigenetic events are a critical factor contributing to cancer development. The purpose of this study was to identify tumor suppressor genes silenced by DNA methylation and histone deacetylation in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Experimental Design: We used microarray analysis to screen for tumor suppressor genes.

Results: We identified Per1, a core circadian gene, as a candidate tumor suppressor in lung cancer. Although Per1 levels were high in normal lung, its expression was low in a large panel of NSCLC patient samples and cell lines. Forced expression of Per1 in NSCLC cell lines led to significant growth reduction and loss of clonogenic survival. Recent studies showed that epigenetic regulation, particularly histone H3 acetylation, is essential for circadian function. Using bisulfite sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation, we found that DNA hypermethylation and histone H3 acetylation are potential mechanisms for silencing Per1 expression NSCLC.

Conclusions: These results support the hypothesis that disruption of circadian rhythms plays an important role in lung tumorigenesis. Moreover, our findings suggest a novel link between circadian epigenetic regulation and cancer development.

Lung caner is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States (1, 2). Prevention, screening, and treatment of this cancer are all problematic, emphasizing the need for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Epigenetic events are an important normal cellular function and, as evident from recent research, are a critical force driving initiation and progression of cancer (3, 4). Recent studies show that silencing of tumor suppressor genes, resulting from epigenetic alterations, are an early event in many human malignancies, including non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; refs. 3, 4). Epigenetic interventions, particularly those targeting histone deacetylase are among the most promising therapies for cancer, and histone deacetylase inhibitors are already being used in the clinic (5, 6). Moreover, because epigenetic changes occur early in tumorigenesis and are associated with distinctive cancer types, they could represent targets for chemoprevention and early diagnosis. These recognitions have prompted extensive research aimed at discovering silenced tumor suppressors.

In the present study, we used a combined treatment of NSCLC cells with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-dC) that reverses DNA methylation and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) that inhibits histone deacetylases followed by microarray analysis to identify additional tumor suppressor genes in lung cancer. After screening over 22,000 genes, we focused on Per1 for additional studies. Reduced expression of Per1 was found in a large collection of NSCLC samples. Epigenetic silencing of Per1 promoter was detected in NSCLC cell lines and overexpression of Per1 was associated with growth inhibition in these cells. The results suggest that Per1 is an epigenetically silenced tumor suppressor in lung cancer.

Patients and samples. Under an existing approved Institutional Review Board, lung cancer tissues and adjacent normal lung tissues were obtained from lung cancer surgical specimens. Tissue samples were collected immediately after surgical resection, quick frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored in −80°C until their use.

Cell culture and transfections. Cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and grown in the recommended medium and conditions. Per1 expression vector (pCDNA3.1-Per1) was described previously (7). Transfections were done using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

Western blot analysis. Cell lysates were prepared using the lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% NP40]. Immunoblots were incubated with the following antibodies: Per1 and PARP antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); β-actin antibody was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Western blots were stripped between hybridizations with stripping buffer [10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 2.3), 150 mmol/L NaCl].

Microarray analysis. H520 cells were cultured either in the presence of 5-Aza-dC (1 μmol/L 72 h) in combination with SAHA (2.5 μmol/L for the last 24 h) or left untreated. The experiments were done in triplicates. Biotinylated cRNAs were prepared and hybridized to Human U133A microarrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), which contains ∼22,000 genes. Array hybridization and scanning were done at the University of California at Los Angeles Microarray Core Facility (Los Angeles, CA). Data analysis was done with the GeneSpring software version 5.0 (Silicon Genetics, San Carlos, CA).

Real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis. Total RNA from tissue and cultured cells was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Real-time reverse transcription-PCR was done in triplicates using gene-specific primers with an iCycler iQ system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Expression levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and 18S were used as internal controls.

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, cell cycle, apoptosis assays, and clonogenic assays. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays (Roche Diagnostics, Almeda, CA) were done according to the manufacturer's protocol. For cell cycle analysis, transfected cells were fixed in cold ethanol, stained with 50 μg/mL propidium iodide, and analyzed by FACScan and CellFit programs (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Apoptosis studies were done with Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit I (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For clonogenic assays, cells (3 × 104 per well) were plated into 12-well plates using a two-layer soft agar system. After 14 days of incubation, the colonies were counted. Experiments were done in triplicates and repeated at least twice.

Bisulfite sequencing. Bisulfite modification of DNA was done with the EZ DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research Corp., Orange, CA). The following primers were used for PCR (−1670 to −1475): TTGGGAAGAGATTTTTAGTTAAT and CCACAAAAATACCTACCTAATC. PCR products (195 bp) were cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen), and two clones from each sample were sequenced.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay kit (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol. The following Per1 promoter-specific primers were used: TGTCTCTCCCCTCCTCTCAA and AGATACGCTGCGCCTCTTTA.

Identification of genes induced by 5-Aza-dC and SAHA in the NSCLC cell line, H520. To identify candidate tumor suppressor genes silenced by DNA methylation and/or histone deacetylation, we did microarray analysis with H520 cells either untreated or treated with 5-Aza-dC and SAHA. Analyzing the microarray data, we identified 149 genes whose expression increased >2-fold in the treated cells compared with the nontreated cells. To generate a list of genes with potential biological relevance, we used in silico analysis to search for genes that are expressed in normal adult lung and not in NSCLC. We also excluded from our list genes that do not have CpG islands in their promoter region (i.e., FABP4, SCYA20, and STC1), established oncogenes (i.e., v-jun, AML1, and EGFR), already identified as potential tumor suppressor genes (i.e., p19, CYR61, and CTGF), or unknown genes (data not shown). Seven genes (Per1, GADD45β, RAI3, DSIPI, ATF3, NDRG1, and SNN) met these criteria (Table 1). To confirm the microarray data, we did real-time reverse transcription-PCR using cell lines representing the major histologic subtypes of NSCLC. Following treatment with 5-Aza-dC and SAHA, expression of six of the seven genes increased 2-fold or more in at least one of the cell lines, showing that our microarray analysis was reliable (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Candidate tumor suppressor genes epigenetically silenced in H520 cells

Fold changeGeneAccession no.
3.9 Per1; period homologue 1 (Drosophila) NM_002616.1 
3.2 RAI3; retinoic acid induced 3 NM_003979.2 
2.6 ATF3; activating transcription factor 3 NM_001674.1 
2.5 SNN; stannin AF070673.1 
2.4 GADD45β; growth arrest and DNA damage–inducible, β AF087853.1 
2.2 DSIPI; δ sleep-inducing peptide, immunoreactor AL110191.1 
2.1 NDRG1; N-myc downstream regulated way NM_006096.1 
Fold changeGeneAccession no.
3.9 Per1; period homologue 1 (Drosophila) NM_002616.1 
3.2 RAI3; retinoic acid induced 3 NM_003979.2 
2.6 ATF3; activating transcription factor 3 NM_001674.1 
2.5 SNN; stannin AF070673.1 
2.4 GADD45β; growth arrest and DNA damage–inducible, β AF087853.1 
2.2 DSIPI; δ sleep-inducing peptide, immunoreactor AL110191.1 
2.1 NDRG1; N-myc downstream regulated way NM_006096.1 
Fig. 1.

Verification of microarray analysis. Four NSCLC cell lines, H520 (squamous cell), H460 (large cell), H522 (adenocarcinoma), and Calu6 (anaplastic) were treated with 5-Aza-dC (1 μmol/L, 72 h) and SAHA (2.5 μmol/L, added for the last 24 h). The expression of the indicated genes was measured by real-time PCR. Levels of 18S were used as internal controls. Fold change was calculated compared with nontreated cells, which were considered to be 1. Columns, mean of three measurements of each sample; bars, SD.

Fig. 1.

Verification of microarray analysis. Four NSCLC cell lines, H520 (squamous cell), H460 (large cell), H522 (adenocarcinoma), and Calu6 (anaplastic) were treated with 5-Aza-dC (1 μmol/L, 72 h) and SAHA (2.5 μmol/L, added for the last 24 h). The expression of the indicated genes was measured by real-time PCR. Levels of 18S were used as internal controls. Fold change was calculated compared with nontreated cells, which were considered to be 1. Columns, mean of three measurements of each sample; bars, SD.

Close modal

Expression of target genes in NSCLC tissue. To determine the clinical significance of the microarray data, we used real-time PCR to analyze the expression of three of the identified genes (Per1, RAI3, and ATF3) in NSCLC and matched normal tissues. The expression levels of all three genes were low (≥2-fold) in a large percentage (61% Per1, n = 77; 48% RAI3, n = 25; and 60% ATF3, n = 25) of cancer samples compared with matched normal controls (Table 2). These results suggest that the genes identified by our analysis are good candidates to act as tumor suppressor genes in NSCLC. Per1 is one of a set of core clock genes that regulate circadian rhythms. Recent studies suggested that disruption of circadian rhythms may increase susceptibility to cancer development (8, 9). Moreover, deregulation of Per1, as well as other clock genes, has been reported in several malignancies (7, 1012). Yet, the functional significance of Per1 in lung tissue is mostly unknown. Thus, additional experiments focused on Per1.

Table 2.

Expression of candidate tumor suppressor genes in NSCLC tissue samples

GeneTotal no. samplesExpression level (tumor/normal)
Fold change, ≤0.5, no. samples (%)Fold change, 0.5-2.0, no. samples (%)Fold change, ≥2-fold, no. samples (%)
Per1 77 47 (61) 19 (25) 11 (14) 
RAI3 25 12 (48) 9 (36) 4 (16) 
ATF3 25 15 (60) 6 (24) 4 (16) 
GeneTotal no. samplesExpression level (tumor/normal)
Fold change, ≤0.5, no. samples (%)Fold change, 0.5-2.0, no. samples (%)Fold change, ≥2-fold, no. samples (%)
Per1 77 47 (61) 19 (25) 11 (14) 
RAI3 25 12 (48) 9 (36) 4 (16) 
ATF3 25 15 (60) 6 (24) 4 (16) 

NOTE: Expression of the listed genes was examined in a panel of NSCLC and matched normal tissues by real-time PCR.

Per1 inhibits growth in NSCLC cell lines. We used real-time PCR to determine the expression of Per1 in lung cancer cell lines from different histologic subtypes of NSCLC. Although Per1 was highly expressed in normal lung, its expression was low in the cell lines examined (Fig. 2A). Western blotting showed a correlation between Per1 mRNA expression and protein levels (Fig. 2B). Next, we assessed the consequence of Per1 expression on the growth rate of NSCLC cell lines. Four NSCLC cell lines were transfected with either the Per1 expression vector (pcDNA3.1-Per1) or a control empty vector (pcDNA3.1). Per1 expression was determined by Western blot analysis (Fig. 2C). Two days after transfection, cells were placed in selection medium for 5 days, and cell proliferation was analyzed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays (Fig. 2D). Per1 expression substantially decreased the growth of all four cell lines, although the range of inhibition varied. The most profound effect was seen in the Calu3 cells. Two days after starting antibiotic selection, no additional increase in cell numbers occurred; by day 4, no viable cells were present. We, therefore, chose the Calu3 cell line for additional experiments.

Fig. 2.

Per1 is down-regulated in NSCLC cell lines and Per1 expression leads to growth inhibition. A, real-time PCR analysis of Per1 expression in normal lung tissue, the indicated NSCLC cell lines, and the HCT116 cell line. Per1 levels are expressed in arbitrary units as a ratio of the Per1 transcripts to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase transcripts. Columns, mean of three measurements of each sample; bars, SD. B, Western blot analysis of Per1 expression in the indicated NSCLC cell lines. The colon cancer cell line, HCT116, was used as a positive control; β-actin was the control for equal loading. C and D, NSCLC cell lines, H520 (squamous cell carcinoma), H1299 (large cell carcinoma), as well as H125 and Calu3 (adenocarcinoma) were transfected with either Per1 expression vector (Per1) or empty vector (EV). C, Per1 expression was analyzed by Western blot. β-Actin levels are shown as loading controls. D, 2 d after transfection, cells were plated in G418 selection medium and proliferation was measured using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays. Experiments were done in quadruplicate samples and repeated at least twice. Points, mean of representative experiments; bars, SD.

Fig. 2.

Per1 is down-regulated in NSCLC cell lines and Per1 expression leads to growth inhibition. A, real-time PCR analysis of Per1 expression in normal lung tissue, the indicated NSCLC cell lines, and the HCT116 cell line. Per1 levels are expressed in arbitrary units as a ratio of the Per1 transcripts to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase transcripts. Columns, mean of three measurements of each sample; bars, SD. B, Western blot analysis of Per1 expression in the indicated NSCLC cell lines. The colon cancer cell line, HCT116, was used as a positive control; β-actin was the control for equal loading. C and D, NSCLC cell lines, H520 (squamous cell carcinoma), H1299 (large cell carcinoma), as well as H125 and Calu3 (adenocarcinoma) were transfected with either Per1 expression vector (Per1) or empty vector (EV). C, Per1 expression was analyzed by Western blot. β-Actin levels are shown as loading controls. D, 2 d after transfection, cells were plated in G418 selection medium and proliferation was measured using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays. Experiments were done in quadruplicate samples and repeated at least twice. Points, mean of representative experiments; bars, SD.

Close modal

Cell cycle and apoptosis analysis were done to determine whether growth inhibition by Per1 is a result of either cell cycle arrest or induction of cell death. Calu3 cells transfected with either Per1 or empty vector were selected with G418 for 3 days. Cell cycle analysis showed that Per1 expression led to a significant increase in the number of cells in the G2-M phase (Fig. 3A). An increase in the apoptosis rate, measured by Annexin V, was also noted in the Per1-transfected cells (Fig. 3B). Apoptosis was confirmed by cleavage of PARP, a marker of activated caspases (Fig. 3D). Thus, both cell cycle arrest and apoptosis contribute to Per1-mediated growth inhibition in NSCLC cells. Per1 expression also led to a substantial reduction in the colony-forming ability of Calu3 cells (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3.

Per1 expression leads to cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and reduced clonogenic potential. Calu3 cells were transfected with either the Per1 expression vector or empty vector followed by a brief antibiotic selection. Resistant cells were harvested at days 2 and 3 and used in subsequent assays. A, cell cycle analysis with propidium iodide (PI) staining. B, apoptosis analysis with Annexin/propidium iodide staining. Columns, mean of three experiments; bars, SD. C, Western analysis for PARP expression. β-Actin was used as loading control. D, clonogenic assays. Cells were cultured in soft agar. Colonies containing ∼1,000 cells or more were counted on day 14. Columns, mean of three independent experiments; bars, SD.

Fig. 3.

Per1 expression leads to cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and reduced clonogenic potential. Calu3 cells were transfected with either the Per1 expression vector or empty vector followed by a brief antibiotic selection. Resistant cells were harvested at days 2 and 3 and used in subsequent assays. A, cell cycle analysis with propidium iodide (PI) staining. B, apoptosis analysis with Annexin/propidium iodide staining. Columns, mean of three experiments; bars, SD. C, Western analysis for PARP expression. β-Actin was used as loading control. D, clonogenic assays. Cells were cultured in soft agar. Colonies containing ∼1,000 cells or more were counted on day 14. Columns, mean of three independent experiments; bars, SD.

Close modal

Methylation and acetylation of Per1 promoter. Combined treatment with 5-Aza-dC and SAHA induced Per1 expression in H520 cells (Fig. 1). To determine which compound was most effective, the cells were treated with either 5-Aza-dC or SAHA, and Per1 expression was measured by real-time PCR (Fig. 4A). SAHA treatment markedly increased Per1 levels (22-fold), whereas 5-Aza-dC treatment led to a moderate increase in its levels (5-fold). Surprisingly, combined treatment of both drugs led to an intermediate induction of Per1 expression (9-fold). Most likely, this can be explained by an event downstream of epigenetic modulations, such as reactivation of an inhibitory transcription factor, reduced RNA stability, or an induction of a negative signal transduction pathway.

Fig. 4.

Induction of Per1 expression and increased acetylation of histone H3 in the Per1 promoter by SAHA. A, real-time PCR analysis of Per1 expression in H520 cells after culture with either 5-Aza-dC (1 μmol/L, 72 h), SAHA (2.5 μmol/L, 24 h), both drugs, or no treatment (control). B, chromatin immunoprecipitation was done using H520 and H522 cells cultured either without (control) or with SAHA (2.5 μmol/L, 24 h) using acetylated histone H3 (AcH3) antibody. Samples were analyzed by PCR with Per1 promoter-specific primers. Input chromatin was included as a positive control; immunoprecipitations with IgG antibody were the negative control. C, cancer cell lines were cultured with SAHA at the indicted concentrations for 24 h. NSCLC: H460 (2.5 μmol/L), H522 (2.5 μmol/L), A549 (5 μmol/L), and Calu3 (2.5 μmol/L); breast: MCF-7 (2.5 μmol/L) and MDA-231 (5 μmol/L); endometrial: Ishikawa (2.5 μmol/L), AN3CA (2.5 μmol/L), RL95-2 (2.5 μmol/L), and HEC59 (2.5 μmol/L); and colon: HCT116 (5 μmol/L). Per1 expression was measured by real-time PCR. 18S levels were used as internal controls (A and C). Fold change was calculated compared with nontreated cells, which were considered to be 1. Columns, mean of three measurements of each sample; bars, SD.

Fig. 4.

Induction of Per1 expression and increased acetylation of histone H3 in the Per1 promoter by SAHA. A, real-time PCR analysis of Per1 expression in H520 cells after culture with either 5-Aza-dC (1 μmol/L, 72 h), SAHA (2.5 μmol/L, 24 h), both drugs, or no treatment (control). B, chromatin immunoprecipitation was done using H520 and H522 cells cultured either without (control) or with SAHA (2.5 μmol/L, 24 h) using acetylated histone H3 (AcH3) antibody. Samples were analyzed by PCR with Per1 promoter-specific primers. Input chromatin was included as a positive control; immunoprecipitations with IgG antibody were the negative control. C, cancer cell lines were cultured with SAHA at the indicted concentrations for 24 h. NSCLC: H460 (2.5 μmol/L), H522 (2.5 μmol/L), A549 (5 μmol/L), and Calu3 (2.5 μmol/L); breast: MCF-7 (2.5 μmol/L) and MDA-231 (5 μmol/L); endometrial: Ishikawa (2.5 μmol/L), AN3CA (2.5 μmol/L), RL95-2 (2.5 μmol/L), and HEC59 (2.5 μmol/L); and colon: HCT116 (5 μmol/L). Per1 expression was measured by real-time PCR. 18S levels were used as internal controls (A and C). Fold change was calculated compared with nontreated cells, which were considered to be 1. Columns, mean of three measurements of each sample; bars, SD.

Close modal

Deregulation of Per1 expression associated with promoter hypermethylation was reported in breast and endometrial cancers (10, 12). Bisulfite sequencing was done in the lung cancer cell lines H520 and H522 and identified methylation in H520 cells (Table 3). The methylation status of the Per1 promoter was also analyzed in six pairs of NSCLC and matched normal tissues (Table 3). In the tumor tissues, two of four cases with reduced Per1 mRNA expression showed methylation in the Per1 promoter; no methylation was detected in either two other cases where Per1 mRNA levels were not down-regulated or in any of the normal lung samples (Table 4). Appropriate transcription of circadian genes depends on rhythmic changes of histone H3 acetylation in their promoters (13). Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays using the NSCLC cell lines, H520 and H522, showed that the increase of Per1 induced by SAHA is associated with an increase in acetylated histone H3 binding to the Per1 promoter (Fig. 4B). Next, we examined the effect of SAHA on Per1 expression in additional NSCLC cell lines (H460, H522, A459, and Calu3), as well as endometrial (Ishikawa, AN3CA, RL95-2, and HEC59), breast (MCF-7 and MDA-231), and colon (HCT116) cancer cell line. Levels of Per1 were significantly induced by SAHA in 7 of the 11 cell lines (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that hypermethylation and acetylation of the Per1 promoter are putative mechanisms for down-regulation of Per1 in NSCLC.

Table 3.

Per1 promoter methylation in NSCLC

Sample*CpG no.
010203040506070809101112131415161718
H520 ○ • • • ○ ○ ○ ○ • • ○ ○ ○ • • • • • 
 ○ • • • ○ ○ ○ ○ • ○ ○ ○ • • • • • • 
N#1 ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 
 ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ • ○ ○ ○ ○ 
T#1 ○ ○ • • ○ • ○ • • • ○ • ○ • • • ○ • 
 ○ ○ • • ○ ○ ○ • • • • • ○ ○ • • • ○ 
N#3 ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 
 ○ • ○ • ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 
T#3 ○ ○ ○ • ○ • • ○ • • ○ ○ • • • • ○ • 
 ○ • ○ • • • • ○ • • ○ • • • • ○ ○ • 
Sample*CpG no.
010203040506070809101112131415161718
H520 ○ • • • ○ ○ ○ ○ • • ○ ○ ○ • • • • • 
 ○ • • • ○ ○ ○ ○ • ○ ○ ○ • • • • • • 
N#1 ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 
 ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ • ○ ○ ○ ○ 
T#1 ○ ○ • • ○ • ○ • • • ○ • ○ • • • ○ • 
 ○ ○ • • ○ ○ ○ • • • • • ○ ○ • • • ○ 
N#3 ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 
 ○ • ○ • ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ 
T#3 ○ ○ ○ • ○ • • ○ • • ○ ○ • • • • ○ • 
 ○ • ○ • • • • ○ • • ○ • • • • ○ ○ • 

Abbreviations: N, normal; T, tumor.

*

Allelic patterns of CpG sites in the H520 NSCLC cell line and in two NSCLC patient samples. No methylation was detected in four other patient samples.

Methylated CpG sites are marked as filled circles (•) and unmethylated sites as open circles (○).

Table 4.

Per1 promoter methylation and mRNA expression in NSCLC and matched normal tissues

Paired samplesCpG methylation*Per1 down-regulation
− 
  
− 
 −  
− 
  
− 
 −  
− − 
 −  
− − 
 −  
Paired samplesCpG methylation*Per1 down-regulation
− 
  
− 
 −  
− 
  
− 
 −  
− − 
 −  
− − 
 −  
*

Methylation status was determined using bisulfite sequencing. Two clones from each sample were sequenced.

≥2-Fold change in Per1 expression between NSCLC samples and matched normal controls. Per1 expression was determined by real-time PCR.

In the present study, we did microarray analysis to screen for tumor suppressors silenced in NSCLC. The genes that we identified have been implicated in growth, apoptosis, and/or differentiation in various tissues, and therefore, they have a high potential to be involved in lung tumorigenesis. Several earlier reports have used microarray approaches to identify tumor suppressor genes in lung carcinoma (14, 15). Together, the information emerging from these studies will provide a comprehensive view of the epigenetic changes characterizing NCLCS; this may yield benefits in earlier detection and in the design of better antitumor interventions. Down-regulation of three genes from our list, Per1, RAI3, and ATF3, was found in a large percentage of NSCLC patient samples. Recently, RAI3 and ATF3 have been shown to play a role in breast and prostate epithelial cancers (16, 17). Further studies are needed to evaluate the involvement of these genes in NSCLC and whether their loss occurs independently or as a result of a common pathway dysregulated in the NSCLC cells.

Between 2% to 10% of genes in any given tissue are under circadian control; some of theses genes regulate key steps in metabolic pathways and the cell cycle, showing the significance of the clock system in many physiologic and pathologic conditions, including cancer (1821). Indeed, disruption of circadian rhythms has been associated with human tumorigenesis and with poor prognosis (8). In the present study, we identified the circadian gene Per1 as a potential tumor suppressor in the lung. Per1 levels were low in a large panel of NSCLC patient samples and in NSCLC cell lines compared with normal lung tissue. In addition, ectopic expression of Per1 in NSCLC cell lines led to growth inhibition, G2-M cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and reduced clonogenic potential. Thus, our findings support the hypothesis that the circadian system is involved in tumor suppression. Earlier studies suggested that influence of Per2 on cell proliferation is p53 dependent (9). We found that Per1 inhibited growth of both wild-type (H520) and mutant (H125 and H1299) p53 NSCLC cell lines, suggesting that, in NSCLC, at least some of Per1 activities are p53 independent. In addition, in the cell lines examined, Per1 levels did not correlate with p53 status. Similarly, no association was found between Per1 and p53 in a panel of endometrial carcinoma samples (12). Further experiments are needed to determine the molecular mechanisms by which Per1 inhibits cell growth.

In mammalian cells, circadian rhythms are maintained by transcriptional feedback loops (22, 23). Two transcription factors, Clock and Bmal1, bind E-box motifs in target genes, including Per and Cry, to activate transcription. Per and Cry then interfere with Bmal1:Clock activity, thereby inhibiting their own expression. Binding of the Bmal1:Clock complex to E-box motifs correlates with rhythmic changes in acetylation and methylation of the surrounding DNA (24). Moreover, Clock itself displays histone acetyltransferase activity that is essential for the circadian regulation of clock genes, such as Per1 (25). Our results suggest a role for promoter methylation and histone deacetylation, in the silencing of Per1 expression in NSCLC. Together, these data suggest a model wherein rhythmic epigenetic changes in the promoters of clock genes are a normal cellular function. Variation in this process could disrupt not only the expression of core clock genes but also the web of genes and cellular pathways that are under circadian control. Elucidating the role of clock genes in cancer may help the development of new therapeutic strategies and shed light into chronotherapy as a way to maximize the effectiveness of current therapies.

Grant support: George Harrison Fund, Cindy and Alan Horn Trust, and Parker Hughes Fund. H.P. Koeffler holds the Mark Goodson Endowed Chair of Oncology Research and is a member of the Jonsson Cancer Center and the Molecular Biology Institute of University of California at Los Angeles.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: S. Gery and N. Komatsu contributed equally to this work.

1
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002.
CA Cancer J Clin
2005
;
55
:
74
–108.
2
Sekido Y, Fong KM, Minna JD. Molecular genetics of lung cancer.
Annu Rev Med
2003
;
54
:
73
–87.
3
Baylin SB, Ohm JE. Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer—a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction?
Nat Rev Cancer
2006
;
6
:
107
–16.
4
Feinberg AP, Ohlsson R, Henikoff S. The epigenetic progenitor origin of human cancer.
Nat Rev Genet
2006
;
7
:
21
–33.
5
Yoo CB, Jones PA. Epigenetic therapy of cancer: past, present, and future.
Nat Rev Drug Discov
2006
;
5
:
37
–50.
6
Minucci S, Pelicci PG. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and the promise of epigenetic (and more) treatments for cancer.
Nat Rev Cancer
2006
;
6
:
38
–51.
7
Gery S, Komatsu N, Baldjyan L, Yu A, Koo D, Koeffler HP. The circadian gene per1 plays an important role in cell growth and DNA damage control in human cancer cells.
Mol Cell
2006
;
22
:
375
–82.
8
Filipski E, Li XM, Levi F. Disruption of circadian coordination and malignant growth.
Cancer Causes Control
2006
;
17
:
509
–14.
9
Fu L, Pelicano H, Liu J, Huang P, Lee C. The circadian gene Period2 plays an important role in tumor suppression and DNA damage response in vivo.
Cell
2002
;
111
:
41
–50.
10
Chen ST, Choo KB, Hou MF, Yeh KT, Kuo SJ, Chang JG. Deregulated expression of the PER1, PER2, and PER3 genes in breast cancers.
Carcinogenesis
2005
;
26
:
1241
–6.
11
Gery S, Gombart AF, Yi WS, Koeffler C, Hofmann WK, Koeffler HP. Transcription profiling of C/EBP targets identifies Per2 as a gene implicated in myeloid leukemia.
Blood
2005
;
106
:
2827
–36.
12
Yeh KT, Yang MY, Liu TC, et al. Abnormal expression of period 1 (PER1) in endometrial carcinoma.
J Pathol
2005
;
206
:
111
–20.
13
Etchegaray JP, Lee C, Wade PA, Reppert SM. Rhythmic histone acetylation underlies transcription in the mammalian circadian clock.
Nature
2003
;
421
:
177
–82.
14
Dammann R, Strunnikova M, Schagdarsurengin U, et al. CpG island methylation and expression of tumour-associated genes in lung carcinoma.
Eur J Cancer
2005
;
41
:
1223
–36.
15
Field JK, Liloglou T, Warrak S, et al. Methylation discriminators in NSCLC identified by a microarray based approach.
Int J Oncol
2005
;
27
:
105
–11.
16
Pelzer AE, Bektic J, Haag P, et al. The expression of transcription factor activating transcription factor 3 in the human prostate and its regulation by androgen in prostate cancer.
J Urol
2006
;
175
:
1517
–22.
17
Wu Q, Ding W, Mirza A, et al. Integrative genomics revealed RAI3 is a cell growth-promoting gene and a novel p53 transcriptional target.
J Biol Chem
2005
;
280
:
12935
–43.
18
Panda S, Antoch MP, Miller BH, et al. Coordinated transcription of key pathways in the mouse by the circadian clock.
Cell
2002
;
109
:
307
–20.
19
Matsuo T, Yamaguchi S, Mitsui S, Emi A, Shimoda F, Okamura H. Control mechanism of the circadian clock for timing of cell division in vivo.
Science
2003
;
302
:
255
–9.
20
Storch KF, Lipan O, Leykin I, et al. Extensive and divergent circadian gene expression in liver and heart.
Nature
2002
;
417
:
78
–83.
21
Fu L, Lee CC. The circadian clock: pacemaker and tumour suppressor.
Nat Rev Cancer
2003
;
3
:
350
–61.
22
Lowrey PL, Takahashi JS. Mammalian circadian biology: elucidating genome-wide levels of temporal organization.
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet
2004
;
5
:
407
–41.
23
Reppert SM, Weaver DR. Coordination of circadian timing in mammals.
Nature
2002
;
418
:
935
–41.
24
Ripperger JA, Schibler U. Rhythmic CLOCK-BMAL1 binding to multiple E-box motifs drives circadian Dbp transcription and chromatin transitions.
Nat Genet
2006
;
38
:
369
–74.
25
Doi M, Hirayama J, Sassone-Corsi P. Circadian Regulator CLOCK is a histone acetyltransferase.
Cell
2006
;
125
:
497
–508.