Purpose:LISCH7 is a gene potentially regulated by p53 that is up-regulated in metastasis development. Our hypothesis was that the expression of LISCH7 in primary colorectal tumors determined certain characteristics of the tumors, as well as their behavior, and that its identification in plasma could serve as a prognostic marker.

Experimental Design: We tested this hypothesis in a series of 115 tumors and normal tissues and in 83 plasmas from patients with sporadic colorectal carcinomas, as well as in 20 healthy control plasmas in which the expression levels of the gene were measured by real-time PCR. The expression data were contrasted with clinicopathologic variables.

Results: Although LISCH7 expression was not detected in any control plasma samples, it was positive in 25 (30.1%) plasmas from patients (P = 0.002). LISCH7 mRNA in plasma was significantly associated with the pathologic stage (P = 0.019), with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.008) and with vascular invasion (P = 0.005). Expression was not detected in any normal tissues but was detected in 80 tumor tissues, with a clear association found with vascular invasion (P = 0.027). Moreover, we show that LISCH7 was specifically expressed by the epithelial tumor cells. The adjusted overall survival study showed independent prognostic values for LISCH7 expression levels in tumor tissues (hazard ratio, 3.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-9.98).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that LISCH7 is a good tumor marker whose expression levels could be considered as a poor prognosis factor in human colon cancer. Furthermore, plasma is suggested as a feasible source of nucleic acids for subsequent noninvasive prognostic studies.

Tumor metastases are the final consequence of tumor progression and the most common cause of death in cancer patients. The first step in the development of metastasis is invasion of the adjacent tissue; then, in the second step, intravasation, the neoplastic cells enter the blood or lymph vessels, and some survive to the next step, extravasation at distal sites, where a subset of such metastasizing cells will form a tumor metastasis (1).

Experimental animal models have been successfully used to identify molecular elements during metastasis in melanoma and breast cancer (2, 3). Recently, Yang et al. (4) have studied a mouse mammary tumor model, in which a set of otherwise isogenic tumor cell populations completed distinct steps of metastasis when implanted into the mammary glands of BALB/c mice. One of the most up-regulated genes related to development of visible metastasis was LISCH7, liver-specific bHLH-Zip transcription factor, which is involved in the regulation of transcriptional processes. In addition, Kannan et al. (5) have proposed that LISCH7 could be a primary target of p53, although transactivation of LISCH7 by stress conditions is not discarded.

The search for new methods to detect metastatic or recurrent disease at preclinical or presymptomatic stages may contribute to improved patient survival. Cancer patients have higher concentrations of circulating nucleic acids in plasma and serum, and patients with metastasis have still higher levels (6, 7). Moreover, tumor alterations in DNA and RNA have been detected in plasma of patients with various types of cancer (818) and are associated with poor prognosis (1417, 1922). Nevertheless, mRNA-based amplification methods can offer greater specificity and sensitivity than DNA alteration detection (23). These data suggest the possibility of developing a noninvasive diagnostic and prognostic method by measurement of tumor RNA in plasma, which would be useful during the follow-up of patients.

Based on such evidence, we studied the presence of the LISCH7 mRNA in plasma from colorectal patients and healthy blood donors to examine its specificity for the disease and to search its possible prognosis value. Finally, the expression levels of this gene in primary tumors were also studied to infer a possible relationship with survival or the behavior of the disease, as well as its cellular origin.

Patients, samples, and RNA extraction. The study was approved by the research ethics board of our hospital and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Between January 2005 and June 2006, blood samples (20 mL) were taken from 83 patients with colorectal carcinoma by venipuncture before intervention on the day of surgery. Blood samples from 20 healthy blood donors were also obtained at the hematology unit of our hospital. Plasma was prepared by centrifugation of peripheral blood at 2,500 rpm for 25 min and snap frozen at −80°C until processing. Tissue samples were also obtained from 20 of the colorectal carcinoma patients immediately after surgery, immersed in RNA later (Ambion, Inc.), snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C until processing. Normal tissues were taken from a noncancerous region of the colon mucosa at least 3 cm from the outer tumor margin.

Between June 1999 and December 2000, we recruited 95 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer. They were included in a prospective study to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Tissue samples from these patients were obtained, as mentioned above.

RNA of plasma samples was obtained from 1 mL of plasma by the Dynabeads mRNA DIRECT kit (Dynal Biotech ASA). RNA from tissue samples was extracted from ∼30 mg of tumor and normal samples, using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Inc.).

Epithelial cell selection/purification. Normal and tumor fresh samples from five patients were disaggregated in a Medimachine instrument (DAKOCytomation). Cell viability was evaluated by trypan blue exclusion, all (>95%) of the cells in this fraction being viable. Epithelial cells were immunomagnetically purified from 2 × 106 total cells using superparamagnetic polystyrene beads coated with the Ber-EP4 antibody (Dynabeads Epithelial Enrich, Dynal Biotech ASA). mRNA was extracted from the epithelial cell–enriched fraction (>97%) and from the supernatant containing nonepithelial cells. Cellular nuclei were labeled with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Sigma). Monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratin 8, 18, 19, conjugated with FITC, were used to label and to visualize epithelial cells specifically (DAKOCytomation) under the fluorescence microscope.

Real-time PCR. Because LISCH7 mRNA was not detected in plasma of healthy donors, or in normal tissue from patients, two methods for expression analysis were used in the study. First, LISCH7 mRNA expression was measured only in plasma and tumor tissue samples in a relative quantification in samples in which its detection was possible. When LISCH7 expression was not detected in tumor tissues, half the minimum value detected in the series was assigned (this value was 0.01). Second, as there were some patients in whom LISCH7 mRNA in plasma was not detected, LISCH7 expression in plasma was also evaluated as present or absent.

LISCH7 mRNA expression in each sample was measured as a ratio against the geometric average of three reference housekeeping genes, succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit A, TATA binding protein, and ubiquitin C (24). The relative concentrations of the target and the reference genes were calculated by interpolation using a standard curve of each gene plotted from the same serial dilution of cDNA from tumor tissue. The quantitative mRNA analysis was done in duplicate. Primers are shown in Supplementary Table (Supplementary Materials and Methods). For the synthesis of cDNA, RNA was retrotranscribed using the Gold RNA PCR Core kit (PE Biosystems).

Real-time PCR was done in a LightCycler apparatus (Roche Diagnostics) using the LightCycler FastStartPLUS DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche Diagnostics).

Clinicopathologic variables. Clinicopathologic variables, listed in Table 1, were obtained from the medical records of the 178 patients. Pathologic stage was assessed using the tumor-node-metastases classification. Presence of lymph node metastases (LNM) was evaluated by optical microscopy.

Table 1.

Association of clinicopathologic characteristics among qualitative and quantitative LISCH7 mRNA data in plasma and quantitative LISCH7 mRNA data in tumors

CharacteristicsTotal (%), plasma samplesLISCH7 mRNA in plasma
Total (%), tumor samplesLISCH7 expression in tumors
Presence
Relative amount
Median/minimum/maximum (relative amount)P*
NoYesPGeometric averageP
Patients 83 — — — —  115 —  
Median age (y) 70 ± 11    —  70 ± 11 —  
Sex          
    Male 49 (59) 35 14 NS NS 72 (62.6) 0.89/0.01/28 NS 
    Female 34 (41) 23 11  1.2  43 (37.4) 1.22/0.01/28  
Tumor side          
    Right 28 (33.7) 18 10 0.103 1.2 NS 34 (29.6) 0.66/0.01/8.84 NS 
    Left-sigma 34 (41) 28  1.1  37 (32.2) 1.15/0.01/28  
    Rectum 21 (25.3) 12  2.5  44 (38.2) 1.05/0.01/28  
Stage          
    I 7 (8.5)  0.5  12 (10.4) 0.67/0.01/4  
    II 31 (37.3) 26 0.019 0.4 0.056 55 (47.8) 0.79/0.01/28 NS 
    III 23 (27.7) 16 0.012§ 2.7 0.005§ 42 (36.5) 1.01/0.01/7.94 NS§ 
    IV 22 (26.5) 10 12  2.3  6 (5.2) 0.89/0.01/28  
Vascular invasion          
    Yes 25 (30.1) 12 13 0.005 NS 45 (39.1) 0.89/0.01/28 0.027 
    No 58 (69.9) 46 12  2.5  70 (60.9) 0.21/0.01/14  
LNM          
    Positive 45 (54.2) 26 19 0.008 2.5 0.005 45 (39.1) 0.89/0.01/28 NS 
    Negative 38 (45.8) 32  0.4  70 (60.9) 1.11/0.01/28  
Tumor differentiation          
    Well 30 (36.2) 24 NS 0.6 NS 33 (28.7) 0.45/0.01/14 NS 
    Moderate 43 (51.8) 28 15  2.7  61 (53.0) 1.37/0.01/8.84  
    Poor 10 (12)  0.9  21 (18.3) 0.89/0.01/28  
CharacteristicsTotal (%), plasma samplesLISCH7 mRNA in plasma
Total (%), tumor samplesLISCH7 expression in tumors
Presence
Relative amount
Median/minimum/maximum (relative amount)P*
NoYesPGeometric averageP
Patients 83 — — — —  115 —  
Median age (y) 70 ± 11    —  70 ± 11 —  
Sex          
    Male 49 (59) 35 14 NS NS 72 (62.6) 0.89/0.01/28 NS 
    Female 34 (41) 23 11  1.2  43 (37.4) 1.22/0.01/28  
Tumor side          
    Right 28 (33.7) 18 10 0.103 1.2 NS 34 (29.6) 0.66/0.01/8.84 NS 
    Left-sigma 34 (41) 28  1.1  37 (32.2) 1.15/0.01/28  
    Rectum 21 (25.3) 12  2.5  44 (38.2) 1.05/0.01/28  
Stage          
    I 7 (8.5)  0.5  12 (10.4) 0.67/0.01/4  
    II 31 (37.3) 26 0.019 0.4 0.056 55 (47.8) 0.79/0.01/28 NS 
    III 23 (27.7) 16 0.012§ 2.7 0.005§ 42 (36.5) 1.01/0.01/7.94 NS§ 
    IV 22 (26.5) 10 12  2.3  6 (5.2) 0.89/0.01/28  
Vascular invasion          
    Yes 25 (30.1) 12 13 0.005 NS 45 (39.1) 0.89/0.01/28 0.027 
    No 58 (69.9) 46 12  2.5  70 (60.9) 0.21/0.01/14  
LNM          
    Positive 45 (54.2) 26 19 0.008 2.5 0.005 45 (39.1) 0.89/0.01/28 NS 
    Negative 38 (45.8) 32  0.4  70 (60.9) 1.11/0.01/28  
Tumor differentiation          
    Well 30 (36.2) 24 NS 0.6 NS 33 (28.7) 0.45/0.01/14 NS 
    Moderate 43 (51.8) 28 15  2.7  61 (53.0) 1.37/0.01/8.84  
    Poor 10 (12)  0.9  21 (18.3) 0.89/0.01/28  

Abbreviation: NS, not significant.

*

P was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis test.

P was calculated by χ2 test.

P was calculated by ANOVA test with positive LISCH7 expression cases.

§

Statistical analysis of early stages (I + II) relating to advanced stages (III + IV).

Patient follow-up. Clinical follow-up after surgery and diagnosis was based on periodic visits and biochemical and imaging techniques (chest X-ray, endoscopy, bone scan, and other areas as clinically indicated). Ultrasonic study was done when liver function was impaired. OS and DFS were defined as the period from time of diagnosis until death and the interval between diagnosis and first recurrence, respectively.

Statistical analysis. Association between presence or absence of LISCH7 mRNA in plasma and presence or absence in healthy donors and clinicopathologic variables of the tumor or LISCH7 expression in tumors were contrasted by the χ2 test.

LISCH7 mRNA data in plasma was not normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Lilliefors correction). We standardized data distribution by using log10 for statistical analysis and we also used the geometric average to describe expression gene data and association between LISCH7 mRNA in plasma and clinicopathologic characteristics were contrasted by the one-way ANOVA test.

LISCH7 expression data in tumors were not normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), although log10 was used, so the geometric average was used to describe the gene expression, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to contrast expression data with clinicopathologic variables.

To study OS and DFS, the expression data of LISCH7 were divided by tertiles. The expression levels defining the three groups were 0.05 (33%) and 2.24 (66%). The relationship between the cumulative probability of OS and DFS, as well as analyzed predictors, was calculated following the Kaplan-Meier method (25), whereas significant differences between curves were evaluated with Mantel's log-rank test (26). To identify factors that might be of independent significance in influencing OS and DFS, multivariate analysis (Cox proportional risk regression model) was applied (27). ‘Confuser’ and interacting variables were analyzed. The model's basic assumptions (proportional hazards) were evaluated.

In all statistical tests, two-tailed P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using version 11.0 of the SPSS.

LISCH7 expression in plasma and tumor samples. Of the 83 plasma samples analyzed from colorectal cancer patients, 25 (30.1%) showed presence of LISCH7 mRNA. However, it was not detected in any of the 20 plasma samples from healthy donors (P = 0.002). The quantification of LISCH7 mRNA in plasma showed a median of 1.45 (minimum, 0.05; maximum, 9.55).

There were 115 tumor and normal counterpart tissue samples. LISCH7 expression was not detected in any normal samples. However, 80 (69.6%) adenocarcinomas showed LISCH7 expression. The quantification of LISCH7 expression in tumor tissue showed a median expression of 2.46 (minimum, 0.02; maximum, 28.00).

There were 20 colorectal cancer patients in whom tumor and plasma samples were available. Among these 20 patients, only 1 was a stage I patient and both plasma and tumor tissue were LISCH7 mRNA negative; 10 were patients at stage II, in 7 of whom LISCH7 mRNA was detected in tissues samples and 2 plasmas of these showed positive presence of the target gene; 3 cases of the 8 patients at stage III had LISCH7 mRNA in tumors and 2 of them also had it in plasma. Finally, there was 1 patient at stage IV, and LISCH7 mRNA was only detected in the plasma sample. In other words, of the 5 patients with LISCH7 mRNA in plasma, 4 also showed it in tumor tissues.

LISCH7 cellular expression origin. We tested the possibility that the expression of LISCH7 could correspond to stromal cells rather than carcinoma cells in the biopsies. Nonepithelial cytokeratin-negative cells constituted 5% to 15% of the whole tumor sample disaggregates but were absent in epithelial-enriched fractions following separation with paramagnetic beads (Fig. 1). LISCH7 mRNA was detected specifically in epithelial fraction from three of the five tumoral samples (data not shown).

Fig. 1.

Images under the fluorescence microscope of the different cellular fractions. A, whole disaggregated sample in which a nonepithelial cell [4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) positive and cytokeratin (CK) negatives; arrow] and an epithelial cell (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and cytokeratin positives) are shown. The nonepithelial cell is not joined to the magnetic beads. B, epithelial-enriched fraction where all the cells observed were epithelial cells. C, supernatant fraction where epithelial cells were not observed.

Fig. 1.

Images under the fluorescence microscope of the different cellular fractions. A, whole disaggregated sample in which a nonepithelial cell [4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) positive and cytokeratin (CK) negatives; arrow] and an epithelial cell (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and cytokeratin positives) are shown. The nonepithelial cell is not joined to the magnetic beads. B, epithelial-enriched fraction where all the cells observed were epithelial cells. C, supernatant fraction where epithelial cells were not observed.

Close modal

LISCH7 mRNA and pathologic data in plasma samples. Presence of LISCH7 mRNA in plasma was associated with stage, LNM, and vascular invasion (Table 1). A difference toward statistical significance was observed for the tumor side because the presence of LISCH7 mRNA was greater in patients with a rectum cancer.

In the plasma samples in which LISCH7 mRNA was detected, the amounts of it were contrasted with pathologic variables, and some associations were found. Thus, it was associated with presence of LNM (Fig. 2C; Table 1). However, no association was found with vascular invasion. For the stage, a difference close to statistical significance was found (P = 0.056), but this difference was clearly significant when the stages were grouped in early (I + II) and advanced (III + IV) stages (P = 0.005; Fig. 2A and B; Table 1).

Fig. 2.

Box plots showing relationships between some tumor characteristics and relative amounts of LISCH7 mRNA in plasma or in tumor samples. A, pathologic stage and LISCH7 mRNA in plasma. B, pathologic stage grouped in early and advanced stages and LISCH7 mRNA in plasma. C, LNM and LISCH7 mRNA in plasma. D, vascular invasion and LISCH7 expression in tumors. Circles represent outliers.

Fig. 2.

Box plots showing relationships between some tumor characteristics and relative amounts of LISCH7 mRNA in plasma or in tumor samples. A, pathologic stage and LISCH7 mRNA in plasma. B, pathologic stage grouped in early and advanced stages and LISCH7 mRNA in plasma. C, LNM and LISCH7 mRNA in plasma. D, vascular invasion and LISCH7 expression in tumors. Circles represent outliers.

Close modal

LISCH7 expression and pathologic data in tumor samples. In tumors, an association between up-regulation of LISCH7 expression and vascular invasion was observed (Fig. 2D; Table 1). Although no association was found between LISCH7 expression and stage, a similar scenario to those for plasma LISCH7 mRNA was observed. Therefore, there were 7 (58%) patients with LISCH7 expression at stage I, 39 (71%) with it at stage II, 29 (69%) with it at stage III, and, again, the highest proportion of patients with LISCH7 expression was at stage IV, 5 (83%).

Overall survival. The 5-year OS for patients was 63% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 52-74%].

Patients were divided into tertiles based on LISCH7 expression. When OS was analyzed for LISCH7 expression, a significant difference was observed (P = 0.018; Fig. 3I, A). The Kaplan-Meier graph revealed similar behavior of the medium- and high-level tertiles. Thus, these patients were grouped as a high expression group and additional analysis of LISCH7 expression was carried out with only two categories, low- and high-expression levels of LISCH7. In this analysis, the significant difference is clearer than in the previous one (P = 0.008; Fig. 3I, B).

Fig. 3.

I, influence of colon carcinoma mRNA levels of LISCH7 gene on OS and DFS, Kaplan-Meier curves, and P values. A, LISCH7 expression in tumors distributed by tertiles: low, showing a 5-y OS rate of 84% (95% CI, 70-98%); medium, 43% (95% CI, 23-63%); and high, 61% (95% CI, 43-79%). B, comparison between high LISCH7 expressions, taking as high expression, medium and high subgroups with a 5-year OS rate of 53% (95% CI, 39-67%), and low, with a rate of 84% (95% CI, 70-98%). C, low expression levels with 5-y DFS of LISCH7 analysis. Low levels, 73% (95% CI, 55-91%); high levels, 60% (95% CI, 46-74%). II, Kaplan-Meier OS (A and B) and DFS (C and D) curves analyzed by stages. A, no difference in stages I + II for LISCH7 expression. B, difference in stages III + IV and LISCH7 mRNA level: low LISCH7 expression levels with a 5-year OS rate of 75% (95% CI, 46-100%); high, 32% (95% CI, 12-51%). C, no difference between LISCH7 expressions at stages I + II. D, tendency to significance in LISCH7 expressions at stages III: low, 75% (95% CI, 46-100%); high, 41% (95% CI, 19-63%).

Fig. 3.

I, influence of colon carcinoma mRNA levels of LISCH7 gene on OS and DFS, Kaplan-Meier curves, and P values. A, LISCH7 expression in tumors distributed by tertiles: low, showing a 5-y OS rate of 84% (95% CI, 70-98%); medium, 43% (95% CI, 23-63%); and high, 61% (95% CI, 43-79%). B, comparison between high LISCH7 expressions, taking as high expression, medium and high subgroups with a 5-year OS rate of 53% (95% CI, 39-67%), and low, with a rate of 84% (95% CI, 70-98%). C, low expression levels with 5-y DFS of LISCH7 analysis. Low levels, 73% (95% CI, 55-91%); high levels, 60% (95% CI, 46-74%). II, Kaplan-Meier OS (A and B) and DFS (C and D) curves analyzed by stages. A, no difference in stages I + II for LISCH7 expression. B, difference in stages III + IV and LISCH7 mRNA level: low LISCH7 expression levels with a 5-year OS rate of 75% (95% CI, 46-100%); high, 32% (95% CI, 12-51%). C, no difference between LISCH7 expressions at stages I + II. D, tendency to significance in LISCH7 expressions at stages III: low, 75% (95% CI, 46-100%); high, 41% (95% CI, 19-63%).

Close modal

The univariate analysis showed that variables that could be regarded as statistically supported factors in OS prediction were sex of patients, vascular invasion, LNM, stage (III and IV versus I and II), and LISCH7 expression. Multivariate analysis showed that sex, stage, and LISCH7 expression [hazard ratio (HR), 3.45; 95% CI, 1.19-9.98] had independent relations to OS (Table 2A).

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association between LISCH7 expression and OS (A) as well as DFS (B) of colon cancer patients with a median follow-up of 47 mo

VariableCategoryUnadjusted analysis
Adjusted analysis
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
A.      
Age at diagnosis (y) <71 vs ≥71 1.83 (0.83-4.02) 0.132   
Sex of patients Male vs female 2.25 (0.96-5.27) 0.062 2.28 (0.97-5.36) 0.058 
LNM Yes vs No 3.20 (1.53-6.73) 0.002   
Vascular invasion Yes vs No 2.46 (1.18-5.12) 0.017   
Stage I + II vs III + IV 3.70 (1.71-7.96) 0.001 3.45 (1.60-7.51) 0.002 
Histologic grade 2 vs 1 1.91 (0.76-4.77) 0.167   
 3 vs 1 0.79 (0.20-3.17) 0.741   
Tumor side Left-sigma vs right 1.48 (0.53-4.17) 0.456   
 Rectum vs right 1.81 (0.70-4.72) 0.224   
LISCH7 expression High vs low 3.80 (1.32-10.93) 0.013 3.45 (1.19-9.98) 0.022 
      
B.      
Age at diagnosis (y) <71 vs ≥71 1.68 (0.75-3.76) 0.211   
Sex of patients Male vs female 2.51 (1.01-6.26) 0.048 2.77 (1.11-6.93) 0.030 
LNM Yes vs No 2.20 (1.02-4.77) 0.045   
Vascular invasion Yes vs No 2.32 (1.07-5.02) 0.032   
Stage I + II vs III 2.50 (1.15-5.41) 0.020 2.73 (1.27-5.94) 0.011 
Histologic grade 2 vs 1 2.04 (0.76-5.47) 0.156   
 3 vs 1 0.62 (0.12-3.20) 0.567   
Tumor side Left-sigma vs right 0.91 (0.34-2.44) 0.858   
 Rectum vs right 1.02 (0.40-2.39) 0.965   
LISCH7 expression High vs low 1.57 (0.66-3.74) 0.308   
VariableCategoryUnadjusted analysis
Adjusted analysis
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
A.      
Age at diagnosis (y) <71 vs ≥71 1.83 (0.83-4.02) 0.132   
Sex of patients Male vs female 2.25 (0.96-5.27) 0.062 2.28 (0.97-5.36) 0.058 
LNM Yes vs No 3.20 (1.53-6.73) 0.002   
Vascular invasion Yes vs No 2.46 (1.18-5.12) 0.017   
Stage I + II vs III + IV 3.70 (1.71-7.96) 0.001 3.45 (1.60-7.51) 0.002 
Histologic grade 2 vs 1 1.91 (0.76-4.77) 0.167   
 3 vs 1 0.79 (0.20-3.17) 0.741   
Tumor side Left-sigma vs right 1.48 (0.53-4.17) 0.456   
 Rectum vs right 1.81 (0.70-4.72) 0.224   
LISCH7 expression High vs low 3.80 (1.32-10.93) 0.013 3.45 (1.19-9.98) 0.022 
      
B.      
Age at diagnosis (y) <71 vs ≥71 1.68 (0.75-3.76) 0.211   
Sex of patients Male vs female 2.51 (1.01-6.26) 0.048 2.77 (1.11-6.93) 0.030 
LNM Yes vs No 2.20 (1.02-4.77) 0.045   
Vascular invasion Yes vs No 2.32 (1.07-5.02) 0.032   
Stage I + II vs III 2.50 (1.15-5.41) 0.020 2.73 (1.27-5.94) 0.011 
Histologic grade 2 vs 1 2.04 (0.76-5.47) 0.156   
 3 vs 1 0.62 (0.12-3.20) 0.567   
Tumor side Left-sigma vs right 0.91 (0.34-2.44) 0.858   
 Rectum vs right 1.02 (0.40-2.39) 0.965   
LISCH7 expression High vs low 1.57 (0.66-3.74) 0.308   

NOTE: The blank cells correspond to variables that showed no independent relations to OS in the multivariate analysis.

The correlation between overall survival and LISCH7 expression was analyzed separately in stages I + II and in III + IV. A significant difference was found for LISCH7 expression at stages III + IV (P = 0.043), but not at stages I + II (Fig. 3II, A and B).

The multivariate analysis with the series stratified according to stage confirmed that LISCH7 expression had clearer independent relations to OS at stages III + IV (HR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.83-15.89; Table 3A) than at stages I + II.

Table 3.

Analysis of the association between LISCH7 expression and OS (A) as well as DFS (B) in colon cancer patients regarding pathologic stages

VariableCategoryMultivariate analysis (stages I + II)
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
A.    Stages III + IV  
Sex of patients Male vs female 1.91 (0.49-7.50) 0.352 2.46 (0.81-7.47) 0.112 
LISCH7 expression High vs low 2.99 (0.63-14.24) 0.169 3.63 (0.83-15.89) 0.087 
      
B.    Stage III  
Sex of patients Male vs female 2.04 (0.55-7.60) 0.290 3.36 (0.91-12.34) 0.068 
LISCH7 expression High vs low 0.95 (0.30-3.03) 0.934 2.42 (0.54-10.92) 0.251 
VariableCategoryMultivariate analysis (stages I + II)
Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
A.    Stages III + IV  
Sex of patients Male vs female 1.91 (0.49-7.50) 0.352 2.46 (0.81-7.47) 0.112 
LISCH7 expression High vs low 2.99 (0.63-14.24) 0.169 3.63 (0.83-15.89) 0.087 
      
B.    Stage III  
Sex of patients Male vs female 2.04 (0.55-7.60) 0.290 3.36 (0.91-12.34) 0.068 
LISCH7 expression High vs low 0.95 (0.30-3.03) 0.934 2.42 (0.54-10.92) 0.251 

Disease-free survival. During follow-up, 32 (33.7%) relapses were observed.

No clear differences in DFS for LISCH7 expression were observed (Fig. 3I, C).

The univariate analysis showed that sex, vascular invasion, LNM, and stage could be regarded as statistically supported factors in DFS. Multivariate analysis showed that sex and stage had independent relations with DFS (Table 2B).

Although the Kaplan-Meier test revealed no difference in DFS for LISCH7 expression in stage groups, the same tendency that LISCH7 expression showed better OS prognosis value in advanced than in early stages was seen (Fig. 3II, C and D). The multivariate analysis according to stage did not confirm this fact. However, the same tendency could be observed. Thus, LISCH7 expression had a HR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.30-3.03; P = 0.921) at stages I + II and 2.42 (95% CI, 0.54-10.92; P = 0.251) at stage III (Table 3B).

The presence of LISCH7 mRNA in plasma from patients with colorectal cancer was studied to validate its disease-predictive value because it could then be used as a noninvasive tool in prognosis. An association between the presence of extracellular plasma RNA of specific genes and poor prognosis has been reported in some cancer types (14, 16, 17). Our results are consistent with these findings because LISCH7 mRNA in plasma was associated with presence of LNM, advanced stages, and vascular invasion, as well as a trend to tumor side in rectum, all of which suggest that it could be used as a prognosis factor.

LISCH7 mRNA was detected in 30.1% of plasmas from cancer patients. However, neither plasma from healthy control nor normal tissue samples showed the presence of LISCH7 mRNA. These results suggest that LISCH7 mRNA detected in plasma from patients with CC could have its origin in epithelial tumor cells, as it was observed with RNA isolated from the disaggregate tumor tissue and thus could be a specific tumor marker.

Interestingly, among patients with tumor and plasma samples, it was observed that LISCH7 mRNA was detected in plasma from a cancer patient in whom expression of LISCH7 was not detected in tumor tissue. We showed in a previous study that the presence of heterogeneous clones in the tumor samples could explain some nonmatched alterations between plasma and tumor (28). Additionally, in the current series, we observed that the detection of LISCH7 in plasma is increasingly related to the presence of LISCH7 in advanced-stage tumors. Thus, the LISCH7 mRNA detected in plasma may be related to metastases because the up-regulation of this gene has been documented in cells able to develop metastasis, at least in animal models (4).

The follow-up of plasma samples was too short to carry out a survival study. However, our results in a long series of human colon cancer support the previous results because expressions of LISCH7 were associated with a poor outcome of the disease and with more aggressive pathologic characteristics.

The finding that high levels of LISCH7 predicted OS but not DFS in patients suggests that this gene could specifically confer advantage on metastasis enlargement (4). In fact, LISCH7 expression levels are more clearly associated with poor prognosis for OS in advanced stages than in early stages, and the same tendency was observed for DFS. Therefore, for advanced stages (stage III in this case), 5-year DFS ran at 75% in patients with low LISCH7 expression levels versus 40% in patients with high levels. This marked difference between the two groups was not statistically significant, probably due to the insufficient number of patients included in the study.

An association between the presence of LISCH7 mRNA in plasma and advanced stages was found, but not clearly between the LISCH7 expression in tumors and advanced stages. This might be due to the distribution of the patients in the series, as the plasma series contained proportionally more patients at stage IV than the tumor series did. However, it might also be because LISCH7 mRNA in plasma is detected mainly at advanced stages. In this context, the detection of LISCH7 mRNA in plasma could be a better prognostic tool than tumor samples because plasma data could be the surrogate for the LISCH7 mRNA of primary tumor as well as of the metastatic tumor cells. Thus, hypothetically, it could have a possible clinical use as a serologic marker during the outcome of the patients.

Given the association between LISCH7 mRNA in plasma and several poor prognosis factors and because LISCH7 expression in tumors clearly influences disease outcome and given the high association between positive plasma and tumors, the value of LISCH7 mRNA in the plasma of colorectal cancer patients can be considered a marker of poor prognosis and one that can be obtained by a noninvasive method.

Grant support: SAF2004-01002 and FIS-PI040053 and Fundación MMA.

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Clinical Cancer Research Online (http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

J.M. García and C. Peña contributed equally to this work.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank M. Eaude for help with the English manuscript and I. Alonso for blood sample collection.

1
Fidler IJ. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the 'seed and soil' hypothesis revisited.
Nat Rev Cancer
2003
;
3
:
453
–8.
2
Clark EA, Golub TR, Lander ES, Hynes RO. Genomic analysis of metastasis reveals an essential role for RhoC.
Nature
2000
;
406
:
532
–5.
3
Kang Y, Siegel PM, Shu W, et al. A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone.
Cancer Cell
2003
;
3
:
537
–49.
4
Yang J, Mani SA, Donaher JL, et al. Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis.
Cell
2004
;
117
:
927
–39.
5
Kannan K, Kaminski N, Rechavi G, Jakob-Hirsch J, Amariglio N, Givol D. DNA microarrays identification of primary and secondary target genes regulated by p53.
Oncogene
2001
;
20
:
2225
–34.
6
Leon SA, Shapiro B, Sklaroff DM, Yaros MJ. Free DNA in the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy.
Cancer Res
1976
;
37
:
646
–50.
7
Shapiro B, Chakrabarty M, Cohn EM, Leon SA. Determination of circulating DNA levels in patients with benign or malignant gastrointestinal disease.
Cancer
1983
;
51
:
2116
–20.
8
Anker P, Lefort F, Vasioukhin V, et al. K-ras mutations are found in DNA extracted from the plasma of patients with colorectal cancer.
Gastroenterology
1997
;
112
:
1114
–20.
9
Silva JM, Gonzalez R, Dominguez G, Garcia JM, España P, Bonilla F. TP53 gene mutations in plasma DNA of cancer patients.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
1999
;
24
:
160
–1.
10
Chen XQ, Stroun M, Magnenat JL, et al. Microsatellite alterations in plasma DNA of small cell lung cancer patients.
Nat Med
1996
;
2
:
1033
–5.
11
Lo YM, Chan LY, Lo KW, et al. Quantitative analysis of cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA in plasma of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Cancer Res
1999
;
59
:
1188
–91.
12
Kopreski MS, Benko FA, Kwak LW, Gocke CD. Detection of tumor messenger RNA in serum of patients with malignant melanoma.
Clin Cancer Res
1999
;
5
:
1961
–5.
13
Chen XQ, Bonnefoi H, Pelte MF, et al. Telomerase RNA as a detection marker in the serum of breast cancer patients.
Clin Cancer Res
2000
;
6
:
3823
–6.
14
Silva JM, Dominguez G, Silva J, et al. Detection of epithelial messenger RNA in the plasma of breast cancer patients is associated with poor prognosis tumor characteristics.
Clin Cancer Res
2001
;
7
:
2821
–5.
15
Dasi F, Lledo S, Garcia-Granero E, et al. Real-time quantification in plasma of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA: a simple blood test to monitor disease in cancer patients.
Lab Invest
2001
;
81
:
767
–9.
16
Silva JM, Rodriguez R, Garcia JM, et al. Detection of epithelial tumor RNA in the plasma of colon cancer patients is associated with advanced stages and circulating tumour cells.
Gut
2002
;
50
:
530
–4.
17
Wong SC, Lo SF, Cheung MT, et al. Quantification of plasma β-catenin mRNA in colorectal cancer and adenoma patients.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
1613
–7.
18
Lo KW, Lo YM, Leung SF, et al. Analysis of cell-free Epstein-Barr virus-associated RNA in the plasma of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Clin Chem
1999
;
45
:
1292
–4.
19
Silva JM, Dominguez G, Garcia JM, et al. Presence of tumor DNA in plasma of breast cancer patients: clinicopathological correlations.
Cancer Res
1999
;
59
:
3251
–6.
20
Silva JM, Silva J, Sanchez A, et al. Tumor DNA in plasma at diagnosis of breast cancer patients is a valuable predictor for disease-free survival.
Clin Cancer Res
2002
;
8
:
3761
–6.
21
Taback B, Fujiwara Y, Wang HJ, Foshag LJ, Morton DL, Hoon DS. Prognostic significance of circulating microsatellite markers in the plasma of melanoma patients.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
5723
–6.
22
Shao ZM, Wu J, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M. p53 mutations in plasma DNA and its prognostic value in breast cancer patients.
Clin Cancer Res
2001
;
7
:
2222
–7.
23
Silva J, Silva JM, Garcia V, Garcia JM, Dominguez G, Bonilla F. RNA is more sensitive than DNA in identification of breast cancer patients bearing tumor nucleic acids in plasma.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
2002
;
35
:
375
–6.
24
Vandesompele J, de Preter K, Pattyn F, et al. Accurate normalization or real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes.
Genome Biol
2002
;
3
:
research0034.1
.
25
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations.
J Am Stat Assoc
1958
;
53
:
457
–81.
26
Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observations of each patients: II. Analysis and examples.
Br J Cancer
1977
;
35
:
1
–39.
27
Cox DR. Regression models and life tables.
JR Stat Soc B
1972
;
34
:
187
–20.
28
Garcia JM, Silva JM, Dominguez G, Silva J, Bonilla F. Heterogeneous tumor clones as an explanation of discordance between plasma DNA, tumor DNA. alterations.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
2001
;
31
:
300
–1.

Supplementary data