Purpose: The aim of the present study was to analyze the expression of Centromere protein H (CENP-H), one of the fundamental components of the human active kinetochore, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and to correlate it with clinicopathologic data, including patient survival.

Experimental Design: Using reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot, we detected the expression of CENP-H in normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cells, immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines, and NPC cell lines. Using immunohistochemistry, we analyzed CENP-H protein expression in 160 clinicopathologically characterized NPC cases. Statistical analyses were applied to test for prognostic and diagnostic associations.

Results: Reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot showed that the expression level of CENP-H was higher in NPC cell lines and in immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cells than in the normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell line at both transcriptional and translational levels. By immunohistochemical analysis, we found that 76 of 160 (47.5%) paraffin-embedded archival NPC biopsies showed high expression of CENP-H. Statistical analysis showed that there was a significant difference of CENP-H expression in patients categorized according to clinical stage (P = 0.024) and T classification (P = 0.027). Patients with higher CENP-H expression had shorter overall survival time, whereas patients with lower CENP-H expression had better survival. A prognostic value of CENP-H was also found of the subgroup of N0-N1 tumor classification. Multivariate analysis showed that CENP-H expression was an independent prognostic indicator for patient's survival.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that CENP-H protein is a valuable marker of NPC progression. High CENP-H expression is associated with poor overall survival in NPC patients.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an EBV-associated cancer (1), which is highly prevalent in Southeast Asia. The incidence of NPC in South China, especially in the Cantonese region around Guangzhou, is ∼100-fold higher compared with populations in Europe and North America (2). Numerous studies indicate that the etiology of NPC includes viral, genetic, and environmental factors. However, the molecular mechanism of the development and progression of NPC is still poorly understood. It is of great clinical value to further understand the molecular mechanism of this cancer and find valuable early diagnostic markers as well as novel therapeutic strategies.

A large number of human cancers have an abnormal number of chromosomes, a feature referred to as aneuploidy, which often develops during the early stage of tumorigenesis (3, 4). Several studies have shown that aneuploidy is necessary in neoplastic transformation (5, 6). Recently, it was shown that chromosome missegregation during mitosis is one of the main causes of aneuploidy and contributes to tumorigenesis. Potential mitotic defects such as sister chromatid cohesion, kinetochore assembly, centrosome duplication, microtubule dynamics, and checkpoints of the cell cycle have been shown to play important roles in the induction of aneuploidy and carcinogenesis (79). Previous research has shown that p53 and Rb mutations were not as common in NPC as in other solid tumors (10, 11). However NPC progressively gains widespread genomic imbalances which possibly occur before and during carcinogenesis (12). Evidence of consistent chromosomal gains and losses during the progression of this disease has been shown by different strategies of comparative genomic hybridization (1316).

The kinetochore is a large multiprotein complex that is assembled on centromeric DNA. It serves as the attachment site for spindle microtubules, which play an essential role for proper chromosome segregation during mitosis (17). Several kinetochore proteins have been identified in humans, and the list of kinetochore associated proteins continues to grow, including centromere protein (CENP)-A, CENP-B, CENP-C, CENP-E, CENP-F, CENP-H, CENP-I, and INCENP (1721). Studies have shown that kinetochore malfunction is a major cause of aneuploidy and is closely associated with carcinogenesis. Normal expression of core kinetochore components is essential to prevent chromosome instability and carcinogenesis. Recently, it was reported that CENP-A, which was one of the first kinetochore components identified in humans, is overexpressed and mistargeted in colorectal cancer tissues (22). CENP-H was initially identified as a component of the mouse centromere. Human CENP-H protein was recently isolated and shown to localize in the inner plate together with CENP-A and CENP-C (19, 23) and is a fundamental component of the active centromere complex (24). Studies using budding yeast have shown that a molecular core consisting of CENP-A, CENP-C, CENP-H, and Ndc80/HEC plays a central role in linking centromeres to the spindle microtubule (25). Recent research has shown that CENP-H is up-regulated in most colorectal cancers, and ectopic overexpression of CENP-H induces chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy in a diploid cell lines (26).

Although CENP-H may play an important role in chromosome instability and carcinogenesis, there are no reports on its role in tumorigenesis and progression of NPC. In this study, we characterize CENP-H expression in human NPC.

Cell lines. A normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell line (NPEC) was established in our lab and was cultured in Keratinocyte-SFM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with antibiotics (120 μg/mL streptomycin and 120 μg/mL penicillin) and bovine pituitary extract. The NP69 cell line was obtained from the University of Hong Kong, PR China (27), and was also cultured in Keratinocyte-SFM. Two immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines were induced by the oncogene Bmi-1 and the human telomerase gene (hTERT), respectively, and maintained in Keratinocyte-SFM in our laboratory (28). The NPC cell lines SUNE-1, 6-10B, and 5-8F were established in our lab and maintained in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FCS (29). C666, CNE1, CNE2, and Hone1 were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS.

Patients and tissue specimens. This study was conducted on a total of 160 paraffin-embedded NPC samples, which were histologically and clinically diagnosed from the Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, between 1999 and 2002. For the use of these clinical materials for research purposes, prior patient's consent and approval from the Institute Research Ethics Committee were obtained. The disease stages of all the patients were classified or reclassified according to the 1992 NPC staging system of China as mentioned before (30), which was described in Table 1 (31). Clinical information of the samples is described in detail in Table 2. Patients included 117 males and 43 females, of ages ranging from 14 to 72 years (mean, 47.2 years). All cases were with no metastasis at its presence at original presentation with NPC. The figures on metastasis pertain to its presence at any time in follow-up. The median follow-up time for overall survival was 61.7 months for patients still alive at the time of analysis, and ranged from 11 to 79 months. A total of 64 (40%) patients died during follow-up and 40 (25%) patients experienced metastasis.

Table 1.

The Chinese 1992 staging system

T1 Tumor confined to the nasopharynx 
T2 Involvement of nasal cavity, oropharynx, soft palatine, anterior cervical vertebrae soft tissue, and parapharyngeal space extension before SO line 
T3 Extension over SO line, involvement of anterior or posterior cranial nerves alone, skull base, pterygoprocess zone, and pterygopalatine fossa 
T4 Involvement of both anterior and posterior cranial nerves, paranasal sinus, cavernous sinus, orbit, infratemporal fossa, and direct invasion of first or second cervical vertebra 
N0 No enlarged lymph node 
N1 The diameter of upper neck lymph node, 4 cm; movable 
N2 Lower neck lymph node or the diameter between 4 and 7 cm 
N3 Supraclavicular lymph node or the diameter 7 cm, or fixed or skin infiltration 
M0 Absence of distant metastasis 
M1 Presence of distant metastasis 
Stage I T1N0M0 
Stage II T2N0-1M0 to T1-2N1M0 
Stage III T3N0-2M0 to T1-3N2M0 
Stage IVA T4N0-3M0 to T1-4N3M0 
Stage IVB Any T any N M1 
T1 Tumor confined to the nasopharynx 
T2 Involvement of nasal cavity, oropharynx, soft palatine, anterior cervical vertebrae soft tissue, and parapharyngeal space extension before SO line 
T3 Extension over SO line, involvement of anterior or posterior cranial nerves alone, skull base, pterygoprocess zone, and pterygopalatine fossa 
T4 Involvement of both anterior and posterior cranial nerves, paranasal sinus, cavernous sinus, orbit, infratemporal fossa, and direct invasion of first or second cervical vertebra 
N0 No enlarged lymph node 
N1 The diameter of upper neck lymph node, 4 cm; movable 
N2 Lower neck lymph node or the diameter between 4 and 7 cm 
N3 Supraclavicular lymph node or the diameter 7 cm, or fixed or skin infiltration 
M0 Absence of distant metastasis 
M1 Presence of distant metastasis 
Stage I T1N0M0 
Stage II T2N0-1M0 to T1-2N1M0 
Stage III T3N0-2M0 to T1-3N2M0 
Stage IVA T4N0-3M0 to T1-4N3M0 
Stage IVB Any T any N M1 

NOTE: The SO line is the line connected from the styloid process to the midpoint on the posterior edge of the great occipital foramen. The border between upper and lower neck is the lower margin of the cricoid cartilage.

Table 2.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patient samples and expression of CENP-H in NPC

n (%)
Sex  
    Male 117 (73.1) 
    Female 43 (26.9) 
Age (y)  
    ≤45 76 (47.5) 
    >45 84 (52.5) 
Histologic classification (WHO)  
    Type II 41 (25.6) 
    Type III 119 (74.4) 
Clinical stage  
    I 6 (3.8) 
    II 46 (28.8) 
    III 61 (38.1) 
    IV 47 (29.4) 
T classification  
    1 20 (12.5) 
    2 49 (30.6) 
    3 57 (35.6) 
    4 34 (21.3) 
N classification  
    0 35 (21.9) 
    1 71 (44.4) 
    2 39 (24.4) 
    3 15 (9.4) 
Distant metastasis  
    Yes 38 (23.8) 
    No 122 (76.3) 
Vital status (at follow-up)  
    Alive 107 (66.9) 
    Death because of NPC 37 (23.1) 
    Death because of unknown cancer or other than NPC 16 (10) 
Expression of CENP-H  
    Negative  7 (4.4) 
    Positive 153 (95.6) 
    Low expression 76 (47.5) 
        Median 45.1% 
        Mean 50% 
    High expression 84 (52.5) 
        Median 91.9% 
        Mean 90% 
n (%)
Sex  
    Male 117 (73.1) 
    Female 43 (26.9) 
Age (y)  
    ≤45 76 (47.5) 
    >45 84 (52.5) 
Histologic classification (WHO)  
    Type II 41 (25.6) 
    Type III 119 (74.4) 
Clinical stage  
    I 6 (3.8) 
    II 46 (28.8) 
    III 61 (38.1) 
    IV 47 (29.4) 
T classification  
    1 20 (12.5) 
    2 49 (30.6) 
    3 57 (35.6) 
    4 34 (21.3) 
N classification  
    0 35 (21.9) 
    1 71 (44.4) 
    2 39 (24.4) 
    3 15 (9.4) 
Distant metastasis  
    Yes 38 (23.8) 
    No 122 (76.3) 
Vital status (at follow-up)  
    Alive 107 (66.9) 
    Death because of NPC 37 (23.1) 
    Death because of unknown cancer or other than NPC 16 (10) 
Expression of CENP-H  
    Negative  7 (4.4) 
    Positive 153 (95.6) 
    Low expression 76 (47.5) 
        Median 45.1% 
        Mean 50% 
    High expression 84 (52.5) 
        Median 91.9% 
        Mean 90% 

RNA extraction and reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA from cells was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA was pretreated with DNase and used for cDNA synthesis with random hexamers. The full-length open reading frame of CENP-H was PCR amplified from cDNA samples of non-NPC and NPC cell lines. The following primers were used for amplification of CENP-H: sense primer, 5-TGCAAGAAAAGCAAATCGAA-3; antisense primer, 5-ATCCCAAGATTCCTGCTGTG-3. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was amplified as an internal control using sense primer, 5′-AATCCCATCACCATCTTCCA-3′, and antisense primer, 5′-CCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTG-3′. The appropriate size of PCR products was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Western blotting. Sample preparation for immunoblotting was done as previously described (30). Briefly, cells were harvested in 1× SDS sample buffer [62.5 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, and 5% 2-mercaptoethanol] and were heated for 5 min at 100°C. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Equal amounts of proteins were separated electrophoretically on 12% SDS/polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The membrane was probed with an anti-CENP-H rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1,000; Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX). Expression of CENP-H was determined with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated antirabbit immunoglobulin G (1:3,000; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's suggested protocols. An anti–α-tubulin mouse monoclonal antibody (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was used to confirm equal loading.

Immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry was done to study altered protein expression in 160 human NPC tissues. The procedures were done similarly to previously described methods (30). In brief, paraffin-embedded specimens were cut into 4-μm sections and baked at 65°C for 30 min. The sections were deparaffinized with xylenes and rehydrated. Sections were submerged into EDTA antigenic retrieval buffer and microwaved for antigenic retrieval. The sections were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol to quench the endogenous peroxidase activity, followed by incubation with 1% bovine serum albumin to block the nonspecific binding. Rabbit polyclonal anti-CENP-H (1:500; Bethyl Laboratories) was incubated with the sections overnight at 4°C. For negative controls, the primary antibody was replaced by normal goat serum. After washing, the tissue sections were treated with biotinylated antirabbit secondary antibody (Zymed, San Francisco, CA), followed by further incubation with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase complex (Zymed). The tissue sections were immersed in 3-amino-9-ethyl carbazole and counterstained with 10% Mayer's hematoxylin, dehydrated, and mounted in Crystal Mount. The degree of immunostaining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections was reviewed and scored by two independent observers. The proportion of CENP-H-expressing cells varied from 0% to 100%, and the intensity of nuclear staining varied from weak to strong. The cells at each intensity of staining were recorded on a scale of 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining, light yellow), 2 (moderate staining, yellowish brown), and 3 (strong staining, brown). Using this method of assessment, we evaluated the expression of CENP-H in benign nasopharyngeal epithelium and malignant lesions using a method that is similar with the Allred 8-unit system (32), which is also used by Coppola et al. (33). Cutoff values for CENP-H were chosen on the basis of a measure of heterogeneity with the log-rank test statistic with respect to overall survival. An optimal cutoff value was identified. An intensity score of ≥2 with at least 50% of malignant cells with positive CENP-H staining was used to classify tumors with high expression, and <50% of malignant cells with nuclear staining or <2 intensity score classified tumors with low expression of CENP-H antigen.

Statistical analysis. All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS 10.0 statistical software package. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the relationship between CENP-H expression and clinicopathologic characteristics. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The significance of various variables for survival was analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model in the multivariate analysis. P < 0.05 in all cases was considered statistically significant.

Expression analysis of CENP-H by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blot. To investigate the expression levels of CENP-H transcripts and protein in nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines, semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis and Western blotting analysis were done in the following cell lines: primary nasopharyngeal epithelial cells (NPEC), NPC cells (6-10B, C666, CNE1, CNE2, SUNE-1, 5-8F, and Hone1), and three immortalized primary nasopharyngeal epithelial cells (Bmi-1/NPEC, hTERT/NPEC, and NP69). All seven NPC cell lines and the immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines showed higher level expression of CENP-H mRNA in comparison with the normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell line NPEC (Fig. 1A and B). Western blotting analysis shows that CENP-H protein was highly expressed in all NPC cell lines as well as the immortalized cell lines, whereas it was weakly detected in NPEC (Fig. 1C and D).

Fig. 1.

Expression analysis of CENP-H mRNA and protein in normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NPEC), immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines, and NPC cells by reverse transcription-PCR (A and B) and Western blotting (C and D). A and C, expression of CENP-H in the primary nasopharyngeal epithelial cell line and NPC (6-10B, C666, CNE1, CNE2, SUNE-1, 5-8F, and Hone1) cell lines. B and D, expression of CENP-H in NPEC and immortalized nasopharyngeal cell lines (Bmi-1, hTERT, and NP69).

Fig. 1.

Expression analysis of CENP-H mRNA and protein in normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines (NPEC), immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines, and NPC cells by reverse transcription-PCR (A and B) and Western blotting (C and D). A and C, expression of CENP-H in the primary nasopharyngeal epithelial cell line and NPC (6-10B, C666, CNE1, CNE2, SUNE-1, 5-8F, and Hone1) cell lines. B and D, expression of CENP-H in NPEC and immortalized nasopharyngeal cell lines (Bmi-1, hTERT, and NP69).

Close modal

Immunohistochemical analysis. Expression and subcellular localization of CENP-H protein was determined by immunohistochemistry in 160 paraffin-embedded, archival NPC tissues. CENP-H protein was detected in 153 of 160 (95.6%) cases. Specific CENP-H staining was mostly found in the nuclei of carcinoma cells, in some areas of metaplasia with atypical hyperplasia, and in a few scattered infiltrating lymphocytes in the form of yellow-brown granules (Fig. 2B-D). No specific CENP-H staining was observed in normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cells (Fig. 2A) and in the surrounding stroma cells.

Fig. 2.

Expression analysis of CENP-H protein by immunohistochemistry. CENP-H expression was mainly localized within nuclei, and its expression was observed in cancer cells and areas of metaplasia. CENP-H is not expressed in normal epithelial cells. A, CENP-H staining of normal nasopharyngeal epithelial tissue (arrow, normal epithelial cells). B, positive expression of CENP-H in areas of metaplasia (arrow). C and D, positive expression of CENP-H in NPC (×200 and ×400, respectively).

Fig. 2.

Expression analysis of CENP-H protein by immunohistochemistry. CENP-H expression was mainly localized within nuclei, and its expression was observed in cancer cells and areas of metaplasia. CENP-H is not expressed in normal epithelial cells. A, CENP-H staining of normal nasopharyngeal epithelial tissue (arrow, normal epithelial cells). B, positive expression of CENP-H in areas of metaplasia (arrow). C and D, positive expression of CENP-H in NPC (×200 and ×400, respectively).

Close modal

Correlation between CENP-H protein expression and clinicopathologic features.Table 3 shows the relationship between the expression of CENP-H protein and clinical characteristics. There was no significant correlation between the expression level of CENP-H protein and age, gender, histologic classification, N classification, or distant metastasis of NPC patients. However, the expression of CENP-H is closely associated with clinical stage of NPC patients (P = 0.024). In addition, there was a significant difference of CENP-H expression in patients categorized according to T classification (P = 0.027). The expression of CENP-H protein was positively correlated with clinical staging and T classification (Table 3). Higher clinical staging and T classification correlated with higher CENP-H expression.

Table 3.

Correlation between the clinicopathologic features and expression of CENP-H protein

CharacteristicsCENP-H (%)
P
Low expressionHigh expression
Age (y)    
    ≤45 43 (55.8) 34 (44.2) 0.507 
    >45 41 (49.4) 42 (50.6)  
Gender    
    Male 63 (53.8) 54 (46.2) 0.575 
    Female 21 (48.8) 22 (51.2)  
Histologic classification    
    Type II 21 (51.2) 20 (48.8) 0.849 
    Type III 63 (52.9) 56 (47.1)  
Clinical stage    
    I-II 34 (65.4) 18 (34.6) 0.024 
    III-IV 50 (46.3) 58 (53.7)  
T classification    
    T1-T2 43 (62.3) 26 (37.7) 0.027 
    T3-T4 41 (45.1) 50 (54.9)  
N classification    
    N0 17 (48.6) 18 (51.4) 0.582 
    N1-N3 67 (53.6) 58 (46.4)  
Metastasis    
    Yes 18 (47.4) 20 (52.6) 0.577 
    No 66 (54.1) 56 (45.9)  
CharacteristicsCENP-H (%)
P
Low expressionHigh expression
Age (y)    
    ≤45 43 (55.8) 34 (44.2) 0.507 
    >45 41 (49.4) 42 (50.6)  
Gender    
    Male 63 (53.8) 54 (46.2) 0.575 
    Female 21 (48.8) 22 (51.2)  
Histologic classification    
    Type II 21 (51.2) 20 (48.8) 0.849 
    Type III 63 (52.9) 56 (47.1)  
Clinical stage    
    I-II 34 (65.4) 18 (34.6) 0.024 
    III-IV 50 (46.3) 58 (53.7)  
T classification    
    T1-T2 43 (62.3) 26 (37.7) 0.027 
    T3-T4 41 (45.1) 50 (54.9)  
N classification    
    N0 17 (48.6) 18 (51.4) 0.582 
    N1-N3 67 (53.6) 58 (46.4)  
Metastasis    
    Yes 18 (47.4) 20 (52.6) 0.577 
    No 66 (54.1) 56 (45.9)  

Survival analysis. The expression level of CENP-H protein in NPC was significantly correlated with patients' survival time (P < 0.001); the correlation coefficient was −0.27, indicating that higher levels of CENP-H expression was correlated with shorter survival time. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to calculate the effect of classic clinicopathologic characteristics (including age, gender, histologic classification, clinical stage, T classification, N classification, and distant metastasis) and CENP-H expression on survival. The log-rank test showed that the survival time was significantly different between these two groups (P = 0.0197). The low CENP-H expression group had better survival, whereas the high CENP-H expression group had shorter survival (Fig. 3). The cumulative 5-year survival rate was 76.02% (95% confidence interval, 0.668-0.852) in the low CENP-H expression group, whereas it was only 58.78% (95% confidence interval, 0.476-0.699) in the high CENP-H expression group.

Fig. 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves with univariate analyses (log-rank) for patients with low CENP-H expression (bold line) versus high CENP-H-expressing tumors (dotted line). The cumulative 5-y survival rate was 76.02% in the low CENP-H protein expression group (n = 84) but it was only 58.78% in the high expression group (n = 76).

Fig. 3.

Kaplan-Meier curves with univariate analyses (log-rank) for patients with low CENP-H expression (bold line) versus high CENP-H-expressing tumors (dotted line). The cumulative 5-y survival rate was 76.02% in the low CENP-H protein expression group (n = 84) but it was only 58.78% in the high expression group (n = 76).

Close modal

In addition, T classification, N classification, clinical stage, and histologic classification were also significantly correlated with survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test (for T classification, P = 0.002; for N classification, clinical stage, and histologic classification, P < 0.0001). We did multivariate survival analysis, which included CENP-H expression level, histologic classification, clinical stage, and N classification, to determine if CENP-H expression level is an independent prognostic factor of outcomes. In this analysis, clinical stage, N classification, histologic classification, and CENP-H expression were recognized as independent prognostic factors (Table 4). Thus, our findings indicate that CENP-H protein expression level has a significant correlation with prognosis of NPC.

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of different prognostic variables in patients with NPC by Cox regression analysis

Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
No. patientsPRegression coefficient (SE)PRelative risk (95% confidence interval)
Histologic classification      
    Type II 41 0.000 −1.080 (0.267) 0.001 0.386 (0.225-0.660) 
    Type III 119     
Clinical stage      
    I-II 52 0.000 1.733 (0.431) 0.007 3.519 (1.412-8.775) 
    III-IV 108     
N classification      
    N0-N1 106 0.000 1.175 (0.263) 0.006 2.175 (1.224-3.802) 
    N2-N3 54     
CENP-H      
    Low 84 0.021 0.609 (0.265) 0.047 1.709 (1.007-2.889) 
    High 76     
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
No. patientsPRegression coefficient (SE)PRelative risk (95% confidence interval)
Histologic classification      
    Type II 41 0.000 −1.080 (0.267) 0.001 0.386 (0.225-0.660) 
    Type III 119     
Clinical stage      
    I-II 52 0.000 1.733 (0.431) 0.007 3.519 (1.412-8.775) 
    III-IV 108     
N classification      
    N0-N1 106 0.000 1.175 (0.263) 0.006 2.175 (1.224-3.802) 
    N2-N3 54     
CENP-H      
    Low 84 0.021 0.609 (0.265) 0.047 1.709 (1.007-2.889) 
    High 76     

We also analyzed the prognostic value of CENP-H expression in selective patient subgroups stratified according to the tumor clinical stage, T classification, N classification, and distant metastasis, respectively. A trend toward shorter overall survival times of patients with high CENP-H expression was revealed in early clinical stage subgroups (stage I and II) or small T (T1 and T2) subgroups, but there were no significant differences (data not shown). However, patients with tumors exhibiting high CENP-H expression had significantly shorter overall survival compared with patients with low expression of CENP-H in the N0-N1 subgroup (n = 106; log-rank, P = 0.0047; Fig. 4A). A similar analysis of the N2-N3 subgroups (n = 54; log-rank, P = 0.3740; Fig. 4B) did not show statistically significant differences between patients with low or high levels of CENP-H expression. Thus, CENP-H seems to be a valuable prognostic marker for early-stage NPC patients.

Fig. 4.

Kaplan-Meier analysis showing the overall survival of NPC patients categorized according to the N classification and status of CENP-H expression. The statistical significance of the difference between curves of CENP-H high-expressing and low-expressing patients was compared in N0-N1 (A) and N2-N3 (B) patient subgroups. P values were calculated by the log-rank test.

Fig. 4.

Kaplan-Meier analysis showing the overall survival of NPC patients categorized according to the N classification and status of CENP-H expression. The statistical significance of the difference between curves of CENP-H high-expressing and low-expressing patients was compared in N0-N1 (A) and N2-N3 (B) patient subgroups. P values were calculated by the log-rank test.

Close modal

In this report, we present the first evidence that a kinetochore protein, CENP-H, is overexpressed at both transcriptional and translational levels in NPC cell lines. CENP-H protein was observed in 95.6% of NPC specimens, and the expression level of CENP-H protein was found to be significantly correlated with the invasion of NPC primary tumor and the prognosis of NPC patients.

Our study suggests an important role for centromere proteins in the development and progression of NPC. In this study, we have shown that the expression level of CENP-H is much higher in NPC cell lines than in a normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cell line at both transcriptional and translational levels. It is interesting to note that all the three immortalized cell lines have a high level of CENP-H expression at both transcriptional and translational levels, although the cell lines were induced to immortalize by different genes. We then investigated the status of CENP-H expression in NPC tissue specimens. As determined by immunohistochemical analysis, 153 of 160 (95.6%) paraffin-embedded archival NPC biopsies showed moderate to strong nuclear staining of CENP-H in tumor cells, scattered infiltrated lymphocytes, and areas of squamous metaplasia. No positive nuclear staining of CENP-H was detected in the adjacent noncancerous epithelial cells.

We further analyzed the relationship between the expression of CENP-H and clinical characteristics of the patients. There was no significant correlation between the expression of CENP-H and age, gender, histologic classification, N classification, or M classification of NPC patients. However, there was a significant relationship of CENP-H expression in patients categorized according to clinical stage (P = 0.024) and T classification (P = 0.027), strongly suggesting that CENP-H can be used as a marker to identify subsets of NPC cancer patients with more aggressive disease. In addition, these results indicate that CENP-H might play an important role in the progression and invasion of NPC.

These observations provide new insight for understanding chromosome instability in NPC and highlight the important role of centromere proteins in the development and progression of NPC. Chromosomal abnormalities, including abnormal chromosome numbers, chromosome deletion, and amplification, are commonly found in NPC (14, 34, 35). Recently, it was reported that defects in mitotic checkpoints occur frequently (∼40%) in NPC cells (36). Evidence has shown that chromosomal instability plays an important role in the development and progression of cancer because aneuploidy is frequently found in the earliest stages of tumorigenesis (37). More and more kinetochore proteins were proved to be associated with carcinogenesis. CENP-F and INCENP are up-regulated in human cancer cells (38, 39). CENP-A has been shown to be overexpressed in colorectal cancer cells and is mistargeted to noncentromeric regions (22). CENP-F has been implicated in malignancy (40, 41), and its expression is correlated with tumor size in node-negative breast cancer (42). The CENP-F gene is amplified and overexpressed in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (38). A recent study has shown that increased CENP-F protein levels influence tumorigenesis at early stages of tumor development (43). The CENP-H protein is expressed at high levels in human colorectal cancer and is overexpressed in tumor epithelium and not in the surrounding mesenchymal cells (26). This evidence suggests that kinetochore proteins may play an important role in carcinogenesis and that CENP-H may be a valuable diagnostic marker for tumor development and progression.

In our study, we found that CENP-H was overexpressed in NPC cell lines as well as in NPC tissues both at transcriptional and translational levels. The overexpression of CENP-H might deplete other centromere-kinetochore components and disrupt the kinetochore complex, or prevent normal kinetochore assembly and consequently cause aneuploidy and induce the development of cancer. CENP-H is a component of active centromere-kinetochore complexes in mammals, colocalizing with both CENP-A and CENP-C, which are found in the inner kinetochore plate throughout the cell cycle (19, 23). Inappropriate expression of CENP-H could induce abnormal kinetochore function and chromosome missegregation. In addition, CENP-H is necessary for localization of CENP-C to the centromere (24). A study in colorectal cancer cell lines showed that aneuploidy occurred most frequently in cells that overexpress CENP-H, and in these cells CENP-H was absent from the centromeres of metaphase chromosomes (26). Other reports show that deletion of CENP-H results in an accumulation of cells in metaphase and subsequent cell death as a result of chromosome aberrations and missegregation (24). Research in yeast has shown that the up-regulation of kinetochore protein MIF2, the yeast homologue of CENP-C, increased the frequency of missegregation of chromosomes during mitosis (44). These results suggest that the relationship among kinetochore proteins may be crucial for the appropriate localization and the proper function of the kinetochore. Further investigation is required to clarify the mechanism of CENP-H-induced chromosome instability in nasopharyngeal epithelial cells and its role in the development of NPC.

The development and progression of NPC stages, including single hyperplasia and single squamous metaplasia, atypical hyperplasia and allotype squamous metaplasia, in situ carcinoma, infiltrating carcinoma, and metastatic carcinoma, may involve the accumulation of multiple genetic alterations over a long period of time (45). In the present study, we have found that CENP-H was overexpressed in some areas of squamous metaplasia, which occurs at the early stages of NPC development. These results suggest that the dysfunction of CENP-H may play an important role in early-stage NPC carcinogenesis. Cell immortalization is the ability of normal cells to grow through an in definite number of divisions in culture. Because immortalized cells are capable of unlimited proliferation and represent the early stage of transformation before malignant transformation, we examined CENP-H expression in immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines. We found that CENP-H protein was up-regulated in NP69 cells, as well as in two immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines induced by the telomerase gene hTERT and oncogene Bmi-1 (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that CENP-H may be an early transformation factor of nasopharyngeal epithelial cells.

Furthermore, we have shown in univariate and multivariate analyses that high expression of CENP-H is a significant predictor of poor prognosis for NPC patients. Importantly, we found that CENP-H might function as a new prognostic marker in NPC for the N0-N1 patient subgroups. There is also a trend toward shorter overall survival times of patients with high expression of CENP-H, as revealed in early clinical stage subgroups (stage I and II) or small T (T1 and T2) subgroups, but these differences were not significant (data not shown). This trend also suggests that CENP-H may be an important prognostic marker for early-stage NPC patients. Further studies are clearly needed to verify these findings to establish CENP-H as a prognostic marker in NPC and to clarify its role in carcinogenesis by functional analysis.

In conclusion, this is the first study showing the expression of CENP-H in NPC cell lines as well as tissues, highlighting the clinical significance of CENP-H in NPC. Higher CENP-H expression is associated with advanced tumor staging and T classification, and high CENP-H expression is also a significant prognostic marker of poor survival in NPC patients. CENP-H may serve as a useful molecular marker for NPC and an indicator for tumor progression and invasion. In combination with other biomarkers of NPC, CENP-H expression status may be useful to stratify patients for novel therapeutic strategies, such as those of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiosensitization, or the establishment of rational treatment selection criteria for patients with this disease. However, these findings still need to be replicated, and further investigation in another patient population is required to verify these hypotheses. Additionally, further studies are needed to clarify the mechanism by which CENP-H is involved in the development and progression of NPC and its exact role in the regulation of chromosome instability in NPC.

Grant support: National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 30440001, 30470666, and 30570701, the Ministry of Science and Technology of China grant 2004CB518708, the National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China, grants 04009427 and 5001749, and a key grant from 985-II project.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: W-T. Liao and L-B. Song contributed equally to this work.

1
Thompson MP, Kurzrock R. Epstein-Barr virus and cancer.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
803
–21.
2
Yu MC, Yuan JM. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Semin Cancer Biol
2002
;
12
:
421
–9.
3
Sen S. Aneuploidy and cancer.
Curr Opin Oncol
2000
;
12
:
82
–8.
4
Pihan GA, Doxsey SJ. The mitotic machinery as a source of genetic instability in cancer.
Semin Cancer Biol
1999
;
9
:
289
–302.
5
Namba M, Mihara K, Fushimi K. Immortalization of human cells and its mechanisms.
Crit Rev Oncog
1996
;
7
:
19
–31.
6
Li R, Yerganian G, Duesberg P, et al. Aneuploidy correlated 100% with chemical transformation of Chinese hamster cells.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1997
;
94
:
14506
–11.
7
Zhou H, Kuang J, Zhong L, et al. Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation.
Nat Genet
1998
;
20
:
189
–93.
8
Bischoff JR, Anderson L, Zhu Y, et al. A homologue of Drosophila aurora kinase is oncogenic and amplified in human colorectal cancers.
EMBO J
1998
;
17
:
3052
–65.
9
Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, et al. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers.
Nature
1998
;
392
:
300
–3.
10
Spruck CH III, Tsai YC, Huang DP, et al. Absence of p53 gene mutations in primary nasopharyngeal carcinomas.
Cancer Res
1992
;
52
:
4787
–90.
11
Sun Y, Hegamyer G, Colburn NH. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma shows no detectable retinoblastoma susceptibility gene alterations.
Oncogene
1993
;
8
:
791
–5.
12
Fang Y, Guan X, Guo Y, et al. Analysis of genetic alterations in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
2001
;
30
:
254
–60.
13
Chen YJ, Ko JY, Chen PJ, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in nasopharyngeal carcinoma analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
1999
;
25
:
169
–75.
14
Hui AB, Lo KW, Leung SF, et al. Detection of recurrent chromosomal gains and losses in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridisation.
Int J Cancer
1999
;
82
:
498
–503.
15
Hui AB, Lo KW, Teo PM, To KF, Huang DP. Genome wide detection of oncogene amplifications in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by array based comparative genomic hybridization.
Int J Oncol
2002
;
20
:
467
–73.
16
Hui AB, Or YY, Takano H, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis identified cyclin D1 as a target oncogene at 11q13.3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
8125
–33.
17
Fukagawa T. Assembly of kinetochores in vertebrate cells.
Exp Cell Res
2004
;
296
:
21
–7.
18
Yuen KW, Montpetit B, Hieter P. The kinetochore and cancer: what's the connection?
Curr Opin Cell Biol
2005
;
17
:
576
–82.
19
Sugata N, Munekata E, Todokoro K. Characterization of a novel kinetochore protein, CENP-H.
J Biol Chem
1999
;
274
:
27343
–6.
20
Saitoh H, Tomkiel J, Cooke CA, et al. CENP-C, an autoantigen in scleroderma, is a component of the human inner kinetochore plate.
Cell
1992
;
70
:
115
–25.
21
Sullivan KF, Hechenberger M, Masri K. Human CENP-A contains a histone H3 related histone fold domain that is required for targeting to the centromere.
J Cell Biol
1994
;
127
:
581
–92.
22
Tomonaga T, Matsushita K, Yamaguchi S, et al. Overexpression and mistargeting of centromere protein-A in human primary colorectal cancer.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
3511
–6.
23
Sugata N, Li S, Earnshaw WC, et al. Human CENP-H multimers colocalize with CENP-A and CENP-C at active centromere-kinetochore complexes.
Hum Mol Genet
2000
;
9
:
2919
–26.
24
Fukagawa T, Mikami Y, Nishihashi A, et al. CENP-H, a constitutive centromere component, is required for centromere targeting of CENP-C in vertebrate cells.
EMBO J
2001
;
20
:
4603
–17.
25
Westermann S, Cheeseman IM, Anderson S, Yates JR, Drubin DG, Barnes G. Architecture of the budding yeast kinetochore reveals a conserved molecular core.
J Cell Biol
2003
;
163
:
215
–22.
26
Tomonaga T, Matsushita K, Ishibashi M, et al. Centromere protein H is up-regulated in primary human colorectal cancer and its overexpression induces aneuploidy.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
4683
–9.
27
Tsao SW, Wang X, Liu Y, et al. Establishment of two immortalized nasopharyngeal epithelial cell lines using SV40 large T and HPV16E6/E7 viral oncogenes.
Biochim Biophys Acta
2002
;
1590
:
150
–8.
28
Song LB, Zeng MS, Liao WT, et al. Bmi-1 is a novel molecular marker of nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression and immortalizes primary human nasopharyngeal epithelial cells.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
6225
–32.
29
Wu YT, Wang HM, Yang XP, et al. Establishment and characterization of a xenografted nasopharyngeal carcinoma and corresponding epithelial cell line.
Ai Zheng
1995
;
14
:
83
–6.
30
Song LB, Liao WT, Mai HQ, et al. The clinical significance of twist expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Cancer Lett
2006
;
242
:
257
–64.
31
Ma J, Mai HQ, Hong MH, et al. Results of a prospective randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
J Clin Oncol
2001
;
19
:
1350
–7.
32
Allred DC, Clark GM, Elledge R, et al. Association of p53 protein expression with tumor cell proliferation rate and clinical outcome in node-negative breast cancer.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1993
;
85
:
200
–6.
33
Coppola D, Szabo M, Boulware D, et al. Correlation of osteopontin protein expression and pathological stage across a wide variety of tumor histologies.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
184
–90.
34
Huang DP, Ho JH, Chan WK, Lau WH, Lui M. Cytogenetics of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma xenografts from southern Chinese.
Int J Cancer
1989
;
43
:
936
–9.
35
Huang DP, Ho JH, Poon YF, et al. Establishment of a cell line (NPC/HK1) from a differentiated squamous carcinoma of the nasopharynx.
Int J Cancer
1980
;
26
:
127
–32.
36
Wang X, Jin DY, Wong YC, et al. Correlation of defective mitotic checkpoint with aberrantly reduced expression of MAD2 protein in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.
Carcinogenesis
2000
;
21
:
2293
–7.
37
Rajagopalan H, Nowak MA, Vogelstein B, Lengauer C. The significance of unstable chromosomes in colorectal cancer.
Nat Rev Cancer
2003
;
3
:
695
–701.
38
de la Guardia C, Casiano CA, Trinidad-Pinedo J, Baez A. CENP-F gene amplification and overexpression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.
Head Neck
2001
;
23
:
104
–12.
39
Adams RR, Eckley DM, Vagnarelli P, et al. Human INCENP colocalizes with the Aurora-B/AIRK2 kinase on chromosomes and is overexpressed in tumour cells.
Chromosoma
2001
;
110
:
65
–74.
40
Casiano CA, Humbel RL, Peebles C, Covini G, Tan EM. Autoimmunity to the cell cycle-dependent centromere protein p330d/CENP-F in disorders associated with cell proliferation.
J Autoimmun
1995
;
8
:
575
–86.
41
Casiano CA, Landberg G, Ochs RL, Tan EM. Autoantibodies to a novel cell cycle-regulated protein that accumulates in the nuclear matrix during S phase and is localized in the kinetochores and spindle midzone during mitosis.
J Cell Sci
1993
;
106
:
1045
–56.
42
Clark GM, Allred DC, Hilsenbeck SG, et al. Mitosin (a new proliferation marker) correlates with clinical outcome in node-negative breast cancer.
Cancer Res
1997
;
57
:
5505
–8.
43
Varis A, Salmela AL, Kallio MJ. Cenp-F (mitosin) is more than a mitotic marker.
Chromosoma
2006
;
115
:
288
–95.
44
Brown MT, Goetsch L, Hartwell LH. MIF2 is required for mitotic spindle integrity during anaphase spindle elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
J Cell Biol
1993
;
123
:
387
–403.
45
Lo KW, Huang DP. Genetic and epigenetic changes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Semin Cancer Biol
2002
;
12
:
451
–62.