Local temperature elevation may be used for tumor ablation, gene expression, drug activation, and gene and/or drug delivery. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is the only clinically viable technology that can be used to achieve a local temperature increase deep inside the human body in a noninvasive way. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance of the procedure allows in situ target definition and identification of nearby healthy tissue to be spared. In addition, MRI can be used to provide continuous temperature mapping during HIFU for spatial and temporal control of the heating procedure and prediction of the final lesion based on the received thermal dose. The primary purpose of the development of MRI-guided HIFU was to achieve safe noninvasive tissue ablation. The technique has been tested extensively in preclinical studies and is now accepted in the clinic for ablation of uterine fibroids. MRI-guided HIFU for ablation shows conceptual similarities with radiation therapy. However, thermal damage generally shows threshold-like behavior, with necrosis above the critical thermal dose and full recovery below. MRI-guided HIFU is being clinically evaluated in the cancer field. The technology also shows great promise for a variety of advanced therapeutic methods, such as gene therapy. MR-guided HIFU, together with the use of a temperature-sensitive promoter, provides local, physical, and spatio-temporal control of transgene expression. Specially designed contrast agents, together with the combined use of MRI and ultrasound, may be used for local gene and drug delivery.

It has long been recognized that regional temperature elevation can be used for therapeutic purposes. Minimally invasive thermal therapies are increasingly used in the clinic for ablation of tumors using radiofrequency, microwave, or laser techniques (1). These heat sources have to be positioned at or near the target region. It is also possible to achieve local heating in a completely noninvasive way. Such local heating of tissues deep inside the body requires the use of a radiation beam with the following characteristics: (a) deep penetration in living tissue, (b) energy absorption by tissue transformed in heat, (c) absence of harm for tissues in the beam path, and (d) ability to focus on a small region. Within the full spectrum of electromagnetic radiation and sound waves, only ultrasound and radiofrequency waves are capable of noninvasively depositing energy deep inside the human body without harming tissue in the beam path. Because of its short wavelength, ultrasound can be focused into a small, well-defined area of interest with dimensions of ∼1 mm. In contrast, radiofrequency waves have a much larger wavelength and cannot be focused into a small region. Focused ultrasound is thus the only clinically viable technology that can be used to generate local hyperthermia noninvasively. The local temperature increase may serve a wide variety of medical interventions, such as ablation of tumoral tissue (2).

In addition, local hyperthermia has been suggested in gene therapy for control of transgene expression using heat-sensitive promoters (3). Together with the method of gene delivery, the spatial and temporal control of therapeutic transgene expression is among the key challenges in gene therapy. Furthermore, ultrasound has long been considered as a way to alter tissue permeability, to increase DNA uptake, and to affect gene expression (4, 5). The concept of sonoporation has been introduced in which the presence of ultrasound contrast agent and ultrasound tissue exposure is combined to create small holes in the cell membrane, allowing penetration of DNA carriers into the cell. Local hyperthermia has also been suggested for gene and/or drug delivery with thermosensitive microcarriers (6) and for heat-activated chemotherapy (7).

The potential of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for tissue ablation was realized as early as 1942 (8). Technological developments (911) have led to successful experimental research (12, 13) and clinical trials in the field of oncology (e.g., ref. 14). The most advanced clinical application is the treatment of prostate cancer where the HIFU beam is delivered via a transrectal transducer. A recent study (15) reviewed the treatment efficacy in six HIFU clinical trials for the treatment of prostate cancer in a total of ∼1,000 patients. The results challenge those obtained with classic radiation therapy. The role of imaging was limited to the preparation phase and the posttreatment evaluation in these studies. However, no real-time image guidance of the therapy was realized. In this respect, it is especially important that thermal damage shows threshold-like behavior, with necrosis above and full recovery below the critical thermal dose (see below), unlike radiation therapy where the cumulative dose in nearby healthy tissue is often a limiting factor. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focused ultrasound was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of uterine fibroids (16), which has accelerated interest in this technology for cancer treatment.

Because the primary effect of HIFU is thermal, it is important to evaluate and even control temperature evolution during the treatment. Temperature evolution is a function of heat deposition and heat dissipation and may be modeled with the bioheat transfer equation (17). Both variables (deposition and dissipation) can be spatially heterogeneous and may be affected by temperature increases. Heat deposition by HIFU depends on the local absorption of ultrasound waves. Pure water and blood hardly absorb ultrasound energy. The absorption of ultrasound by soft tissue depends on composition and on the wavelength of the transmitted ultrasound energy. Therefore, accurate quantification of energy deposition by focused ultrasound and absorption by tissue is difficult to predict. Heat conduction and dissipation also depend on tissue composition, diffusion, and perfusion processes that may vary locally as a function of tissue architecture and tissue composition. Physiologic events, such as temperature-dependent perfusion increases, may play a role (18). In the case of ablation procedures, tissue coagulation may significantly modify heat conduction as well as energy absorption. As a consequence, heat losses and energy absorption are difficult to predict in advance of the procedure. Therefore, the performance of HIFU therapeutic heating can be expected to be improved significantly with real-time evaluation of the temperature distribution profile by providing real-time feedback to assure adequate heating throughout the area of interest. Of the different imaging modalities, MRI is an excellent tool for guiding the noninvasive treatment by hyperthermia. Particular advantages of MRI are that the technique provides temperature mapping (19) as well as target definition and may even provide an early evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. Based on such considerations, Cline et al. (20) realized early on that the combination of MRI and HIFU would be a very promising tool. Subsequently, the technology was further developed, with prototype HIFU systems integrated with a whole-body MRI system (2123).

This article describes an overview of the principles of MRgHIFU, the important advances made since the beginning of the technology, the translational aspects, and novel applications in gene expression and gene delivery.

Ultrasound is a form of mechanical energy that is propagated as a vibrational wave of particles within the medium at a frequency between about 20 kHz and 20 MHz. The oscillatory displacement of particles is associated with a pressure wave. The behavior of ultrasound waves in a medium may be described in a similar way to that in optics. At tissue interfaces, reflection of the wave occurs according to Snell's law and depends on the wave velocity and the incident angle. The speed of ultrasound is ∼1,550 ms−1 for soft tissue, independent of the ultrasound frequency. In fatty tissue, the average speed is only slightly lower (1,480 ms−1), whereas in air spaces a value of 600 ms−1 is found. In bone, the speed is much higher (between 1,800 and 3,700 ms−1; ref. 24). Ultrasound beams are usually generated electrically using piezoceramic plates outside the body and propagate inwards either longitudinally (as is the case for hyperthermia purposes) or transversely (called shear waves). Focusing of the longitudinal waves can be achieved using a spherical curvature of the plates, with a suitably designed lens system, or with a multielement transducer with independent phase control for each element (phased array transducer, see below). The interference of the multiple waves leads to an interference pattern. In a homogeneous medium, the phase of all waves is identical at the focal point, whereas outside the focal point the differences in phase lead to destructive interference and thus attenuation of the pressure wave. The minimum diameter of the focal area is thus given by half the wavelength λ, which is equal to the speed divided by the frequency. For example, when using 1.5 MHz ultrasound, the wavelength is ∼1 mm in soft tissue.

Ultrasound energy is attenuated in tissue due to processes of absorption and scattering. The mechanisms of ultrasound absorption in tissue have been reviewed previously (25, 26). The efficient energy absorption in soft tissue may be related to friction between and in structures with dimensions of the order of the wavelength used. Overall, the attenuation of a plane wave may be described by an exponentially decaying function. For 1.5 MHz ultrasound waves, the intensity in muscle will drop to ∼50% at 50-mm penetration. The smallest volume that may be treated by HIFU has dimensions of half the wavelength, which is typically ∼1 mm. In homogeneous medium (ultrasound propagation speed does not vary), high-precision treatment with margins of 1 mm may be reached (muscle). In inhomogeneous medium (e.g., for bone structures and air in the beam path), the multiple wave reflections make it difficult to focus ultrasound waves in the area of interest because the wave phase and attenuation will be different according to their pathway from transducer to target. The focal point may be less well defined in such cases. When using a multiple-element transducer, individual amplitude and phase modification is feasible for each element and, in principle, high precision can be realized. The problem remains how to adjust each transducer element to accomplish focusing. Modeling the tissue composition and interfaces based on high-resolution imaging may provide sufficient data for beam focusing (2729). An alternative solution is based on the so-called principle of temporal return of waves (30). The technique relies on using first a short duration ultrasound burst from the area of interest (using either a small transmitter or an echogenic particle) and measuring the reflected waves at several locations outside the body. A temporal return of the received wave pattern, corrected for attenuation effects, leads in turn to exact focusing in the area of interest. The need to first use a transmitter in the area of interest may limit its practical use. Recently, phased array transducer technology was used to focus ultrasound through the skull into brain tissue (29). Therefore, neurologic applications of focused ultrasound seem technologically feasible, although further developments are still necessary to accomplish focusing in a noninvasive way and to avoid any risk of heating at or near the skull. A detailed recent review on focused ultrasound technology can be found elsewhere (31).

Ideally, a thermotherapeutic treatment is preceded by precise three-dimensional target definition and localization of nearby tissue that must be spared. The treatment should be done with continuous temperature monitoring of target tissue and nearby tissue to be spared. The therapy will be continued until the appropriate thermal dose (32) is delivered to the entire target volume. Then, a first assessment of efficacy and possible complications should be carried out.

MRI offers specific advantages for each part of this procedure. It is well known that MRI offers superb soft tissue contrast, either without or with MR contrast agents. Tissue boundaries can be identified with high precision. The known coordinates can thus be used directly for image-guided therapeutic procedures.

During the thermal procedure, continuous temperature imaging can be done with MRI using specific pulse sequences and data processing. Noninvasive, three-dimensional mapping of temperature changes is feasible with MR and is based on either the relaxation time T1 (19), the diffusion coefficient (33), or proton resonance frequency (PRF; ref. 34) of tissue water. The use of temperature-sensitive contrast agents can provide absolute temperature measurements (35). The principles and performance of these methods have been reviewed recently (36, 37). The excellent linearity and near independence with respect to tissue type (38), together with good temperature sensitivity, make PRF-based temperature MRI the preferred choice for many applications at mid to high field strength (≥1 T). The PRF methods use RF-spoiled gradient echo imaging methods (39). A SD of less than 1°C, for a temporal resolution below 1 s and a spatial resolution of ∼2 mm, is feasible for a single slice for immobile tissues. Corrections should be made for temperature-induced susceptibility effects in the PRF method (40). Fat suppression is necessary as well as excellent registration to correct for displacements between scans because changes with respect to a reference are mapped. Motion artifacts can severely degrade the accuracy of MR temperature maps and must be carefully corrected (37).

MRI may also assess therapeutic efficacy and possible complications. For example, a hemorrhage can be shown based on T2* changes. Edema formation can be described by T2 changes. In addition, diffusion and perfusion changes can be identified with specific MR methods. Therefore, MRI will play a large role for in situ assessment of tissue changes. However, it should be noted that many apoptotic processes may take up to 24 h to become clearly detectable. Therefore, efficacy assessment immediately following therapy may be of rather limited use.

For guidance by MRI, the transducer is placed on or inside the patient bed. Because of the very high magnetic field, the use of nonferromagnetic materials is mandatory. The confined space within the bore of the magnet makes it difficult to design a system that provides comfort to the patient as well an uninterrupted pathway for the ultrasound waves from transducer to target. Recently, a complete system has been described for ablation of uterine fibroids (16, 41) as well as adaptations for treatment of breast tumors (4244). Figure 1 shows a clinical example of the MRgHIFU treatment of uterine fibroids.

Fig. 1.

MRgHIFU for ablation of uterine fibroids. MRgHIFU treatment planning of uterine fibroids, monitoring, progression, and posttreatment follow-up. A, coronal T2-weighted MR image was used for treatment planning. Sonication locations and sizes (green lines) were determined with the system planning software and were displayed on top of the treatment plan. During treatment, the accumulated thermal dose (yellow area) was displayed on top of the treatment planning images. B, sagittal T2-weighted MR image shows treatment plan and area that achieved threshold thermal dose. C and D, temperature-sensitive PRF-based MR images were acquired at the peak temperature increase during two sonications. Coronal view (C) was acquired perpendicular to the direction of the ultrasound beam, whereas sagittal view (D) was acquired parallel to the direction of the beam. (C) and (D) were used to estimate the thermal dose (blue line) for each sonication. E and F, images that depict the results of treatment. E, sagittal contrast-enhanced gradient-recalled echo MR image was acquired 2 days after ultrasound surgery. Nonenhancing area (arrow) is seen clearly in (F), which is a gross pathologic cut specimen that shows the central area of hemorrhagic necrosis. Reproduced with permission from the Radiological Society of North America from Tempany CM, Stewart EA, McDonnald N, et al. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. Radiology 2003;226(3):897–905.

Fig. 1.

MRgHIFU for ablation of uterine fibroids. MRgHIFU treatment planning of uterine fibroids, monitoring, progression, and posttreatment follow-up. A, coronal T2-weighted MR image was used for treatment planning. Sonication locations and sizes (green lines) were determined with the system planning software and were displayed on top of the treatment plan. During treatment, the accumulated thermal dose (yellow area) was displayed on top of the treatment planning images. B, sagittal T2-weighted MR image shows treatment plan and area that achieved threshold thermal dose. C and D, temperature-sensitive PRF-based MR images were acquired at the peak temperature increase during two sonications. Coronal view (C) was acquired perpendicular to the direction of the ultrasound beam, whereas sagittal view (D) was acquired parallel to the direction of the beam. (C) and (D) were used to estimate the thermal dose (blue line) for each sonication. E and F, images that depict the results of treatment. E, sagittal contrast-enhanced gradient-recalled echo MR image was acquired 2 days after ultrasound surgery. Nonenhancing area (arrow) is seen clearly in (F), which is a gross pathologic cut specimen that shows the central area of hemorrhagic necrosis. Reproduced with permission from the Radiological Society of North America from Tempany CM, Stewart EA, McDonnald N, et al. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. Radiology 2003;226(3):897–905.

Close modal

Optimal control of the temperature-based treatment requires regulation of the temperature. Recent developments have shown that rapid MRI followed by online data processing, and real-time feedback to the focused ultrasound output (45), combined with new temperature regulation algorithms, may provide such control. The regulation of temperature evolution at the focal point has been described and is based on temperature mapping and a physical model of local energy deposition and heat conduction. The temperature regulator was based on a classic proportional, integral, and derivative type of temperature control. Thus, temperature evolution at the focal point can be regulated automatically with a precision that is close to that of the precision of the temperature measurements at the focal point.

Spatial control of temperature evolution during HIFU hyperthermia is necessary to guarantee the desired thermal dose achieved within the complete volume of interest. Treatment of large volumes using a fixed focal point transducer was initially based on MR guidance of the heat treatment at a single point followed by displacement of the HIFU focal point and repeating the procedure until the target volume was covered (46). Such a procedure necessitates long treatment times and may leave “gaps” between treated locations. Recently, an approach was presented where the focal point was moved along multiple inside-out spiral trajectories covering the target region under continuous HIFU power to achieve a minimal treatment time (47). A complete proportional, integral, and derivative control in the spiral plane provided stability and temperature uniformity within a large target region. Figure 2 shows a preclinical application of regional MRgHIFU treatment of VX2 tumors in a rabbit. Such methods will be even more useful when combined with phased array transducers that allow very fast, electronically controlled, motion of a focal point. It should be kept in mind that simultaneous treatment of the large area of interest may lead to excessive near-field and/or far-field heating and accumulation of undesired thermal dose in anterior and posterior areas with respect to the target region. In addition, any motion of the transducer will lead to small modifications of the magnetic field even with the use of nonferromagnetic material. These motion-related factors need to be corrected for, particularly when using the PRF method for temperature mapping.

Fig. 2.

Temperature evolution during MRgHIFU treatment of a VX2 tumor implanted in the thigh muscle of a rabbit. A, T2-weighted coronal image of the tumor acquired before heating with the tumor showing bright (just below the center of the image). The tumor was heated in two successive periods with the HIFU focal point covering the tumor in a spiral sequence. The temperature map at the end of the first spiral sequence coverage of the tumor (B) and at 50% (C) and 100% (D) of the second spiral sequence, respectively. Color level range: blue, 4°C to 8°C; green, 8°C to 12°C; red, above 12°C temperature rise. From Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2003, 89–98. Copyright © 2003, Wiley-Liss. Reprinted with permission of Wiley-Liss, Inc. a subsidiary of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fig. 2.

Temperature evolution during MRgHIFU treatment of a VX2 tumor implanted in the thigh muscle of a rabbit. A, T2-weighted coronal image of the tumor acquired before heating with the tumor showing bright (just below the center of the image). The tumor was heated in two successive periods with the HIFU focal point covering the tumor in a spiral sequence. The temperature map at the end of the first spiral sequence coverage of the tumor (B) and at 50% (C) and 100% (D) of the second spiral sequence, respectively. Color level range: blue, 4°C to 8°C; green, 8°C to 12°C; red, above 12°C temperature rise. From Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2003, 89–98. Copyright © 2003, Wiley-Liss. Reprinted with permission of Wiley-Liss, Inc. a subsidiary of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Close modal

The automated MRI feedback coupling to the HIFU heating unit relies on high-speed temperature imaging. It has been shown that motion can severely degrade MR temperature mapping. Correction of motion artifacts and the acceleration of temperature mapping are current topics of much interest in the further development of MRI-guided HIFU. Recently, several approaches have been proposed to address these issues, ranging from the use of respiratory and/or cardiac triggering (49), the use of navigator echoes, and advanced postprocessing methods (37).

Among the key challenges in gene therapy are the method of gene delivery and the spatial and temporal control of therapeutic (trans)gene expression in the targeted tissue. The ability of HIFU to heat tissue deep inside the body can be used to control transgene expression when the gene is placed under the control of a heat-sensitive promoter. Such promoters exist widely in nature. For example, all mammals use such promoters when they have a fever to produce stabilizing proteins, the so-called heat shock proteins. The use of heat-sensitive promoters to control the expression of therapeutic genes requires tight temperature regulation in the region of interest. The heat shock promoters, especially the hsp70 promoters, have been used often in gene therapy strategies because they are both heat inducible and efficient in initiating and regulating transcription of therapeutic genes (50). The promoter of one of the inducible heat shock protein systems, HSP70, can activate gene expression several thousand-fold in response to hyperthermia (51). The minimal hsp70 promoter is almost exclusively sensitive to temperature, and it was suggested several years ago to use the hsp70 promoter and local hyperthermia could be used to control transgene expression (3). The feasibility of the approach has been shown both in vitro and in vivo (5255), including the expression of suicide genes in a transduced mammary cancer cell line (56) and the expression of a reporter gene in transfected muscle (57) or in transduced C6 cells (58). It has been shown that local overexpression of a marker gene in a modified glioma cell line is feasible using this technology. Local control of transgenic expression has recently been applied to modified stem cells. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) obtained from bone marrow of rats were transfected with hsp-luc expression of the luciferase gene under the control of an hsp70 promoter. The transformed MSCs were injected in the left renal artery and transgenic expression was induced by MRI-controlled HIFU hyperthermia (59). Figure 3 shows a summary of the histologic findings.

Fig. 3.

Expression of luciferase under control of the hsp70B promoter in modified MSCs located in the rat kidney of a rat that was heated by MRgHIFU during 5 min at 45°C. The left kidney of the rats was injected via one of the renal artery branches. Cells (300,000) were injected. Red, luciferase activity was detected on frozen tissue sections with anti-luciferase antibody. Smooth muscle actin staining (brown) was used for MSC detection (but is also positive for vascular smooth muscle cells). Top row, control kidney sections that received MSCs but were not heated. Left, smooth muscle actin–positive MSCs in glomeruli as well as basal smooth muscle actin in recipient vascular smooth muscle cells; right, no detectable luciferase. Bottom row, kidney sections that received MSCs and were heated. Right, luciferase activity; left, smooth muscle actin expression in vascular smooth muscle cells (bottom left).

Fig. 3.

Expression of luciferase under control of the hsp70B promoter in modified MSCs located in the rat kidney of a rat that was heated by MRgHIFU during 5 min at 45°C. The left kidney of the rats was injected via one of the renal artery branches. Cells (300,000) were injected. Red, luciferase activity was detected on frozen tissue sections with anti-luciferase antibody. Smooth muscle actin staining (brown) was used for MSC detection (but is also positive for vascular smooth muscle cells). Top row, control kidney sections that received MSCs but were not heated. Left, smooth muscle actin–positive MSCs in glomeruli as well as basal smooth muscle actin in recipient vascular smooth muscle cells; right, no detectable luciferase. Bottom row, kidney sections that received MSCs and were heated. Right, luciferase activity; left, smooth muscle actin expression in vascular smooth muscle cells (bottom left).

Close modal

The use of MRI for monitoring ultrasound to induce gene expression has been shown in other organs. The feasibility of using ultrasonic heating to control transgene expression spatially using a minimally invasive approach was investigated in the prostate. Ultrasound imaging was used to guide the injection of an adenoviral vector containing a transgene encoding firefly luciferase under the control of the human hsp70B promoter into both lobes of the prostate gland in three beagle dogs. After injection, the left lobe of the prostate was heated using an ultrasound transducer and using a MRI guidance system. The hsp promoter allows induction of the associated transgene only in areas that are subsequently heated after transfection. High levels of luciferase expression were observed only in areas exposed to ultrasonic heating (60).

The feasibility of the use of focused ultrasound to induce hyperthermia in the liver of a rat model to focally induce the expression of green fluorescent protein gene under the control of an hsp70 promoter was examined in a preliminary study (61). Temperature was noninvasively monitored by temperature-sensitive MRI. The study showed localized gene induction within the liver parenchyma. There was a good correlation with MRI and histology, which showed that the variables introduced to spatially control gene induction within a parenchymal organ, such as the liver in rats using focused ultrasound under control of MRI, are feasible.

The interaction of ultrasound with tissue also leads to radiation pressure and cavitation. These phenomena have been used for local gene delivery and transfection (see ref. 62 for review). Focused ultrasound exposure may lead to permeabilization of plasma membranes, also known as sonoporation. The effect is generally attributed to cavitation phenomena and may be enhanced with the use of ultrasound contrast agents. It has been shown that sonoporation leads to increased DNA uptake by the cells (63). Because cavitation activity is highly localized, the combination of ultrasound and microbubble contrast agents provides a means for noninvasive, site-specific gene therapy. Many efforts to develop more efficient nonviral and viral particles for gene delivery have been reported where ultrasound exposure has been shown to enhance transgene expression (6468). Because microbubble cavitation effects primarily originate in the vasculature, vascular therapy will be an important field for these applications. Similar principles can be applied to achieve local drug delivery using microcarriers containing drugs. The field has recently attracted much attention because it represents a strategy to increase the drug concentration at the target location and decrease systemic toxicity effects. Ultrasound can be used in different ways to trigger regional drug delivery (69). It can cause the local drug release from a carrier vehicle and the local increase of cell membrane permeability either by a mechanical action or by a temperature increase.

MRI-guided HIFU is a promising new technology for gene therapy and cancer treatment. The benefits of focused ultrasound and associated bioeffects, such as local temperature elevation and cavitation effects, are well known. The recent guidance by MRI offers enhanced control, safety, and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. The application of MRgHIFU in gene therapy is very promising. Temperature-mediated control of gene expression is feasible by combining MRgHIFU with the use of a thermosensitive promoter to regulate gene transcription and expression. Enhanced gene delivery is possible by increasing cell membrane permeability using HIFU cavitation effects. Although MRgHIFU is a fairly complicated technology, it is currently under very active development. The installed base is still small, and it may therefore take several years to realize the full potential of MRgHIFU in the cancer field. Regulatory hurdles for widespread application of MRgHIFU in cancer are significant. However, the method has received Food and Drug Administration approval for uterine fibroid ablation, which is expected to accelerate clinical use in the cancer field. Because treatment of the complete tumor tissue has to be assured (unlike in the case of uterine fibroids), further technical requirements of the MRgHIFU technique may be necessary, such as the use of more advanced phased array transducers, accelerated temperature mapping and feedback coupling to the HIFU device, as well as volumetric heating approaches.

Grant support: Ligue National Contre le Cancer, Conseil Régional d'Aquitaine, Diagnostic Molecular Imaging EC-FP6-project LSHB-CT-2005-512146 Ministère de la Recherche, CDTU Canceropole Project, and Philips Medical Systems.

1
Dodd GD III, Soulen MC, Kane RA, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of malignant hepatic tumors: at the threshold of a major breakthrough.
Radiographics
2000
;
20
:
9
–27.
2
Fry FJ, Johnson LK. Tumor irradiation with intense ultrasound.
Ultrasound Med Biol
1978
;
4
:
337
–41.
3
Madio DP, van Gelderen P, DesPres D, et al. On the feasibility of MRI-guided focused ultrasound for local induction of gene expression.
J Magn Reson Imaging
1998
;
8
:
101
–4.
4
Evans EA, Waugh R, Melnik L. Elastic area compressibility modulus of red cell membrane.
Biophys J
1976
;
16
:
585
–95.
5
Dalecki D, Child SZ, Raeman CH, Cox C, Carstensen EL. Ultrasonically induced lung hemorrhage in young swine.
Ultrasound Med Biol
1997
;
23
:
777
–81.
6
Weinstein JN, Magin RL, Yatvin MB, et al. Liposomes and local hyperthermia: selective delivery of methotrexate to heated tumors.
Science
1979
;
204
:
188
–91.
7
Urano M, Kuroda M, Nishimura Y. For the clinical application of thermochemotherapy given at mild temperatures.
Int J Hyperthermia
1999
;
15
:
79
–107.
8
Lynn JG, Zwemer RL, Chick AJ, et al. A new method for the generation and use of focused ultrasound in experimental biology.
J Gen Physiol
1942
;
26
:
179
–93.
9
Fry FJ. Precision high intensity focusing ultrasonic machines for surgery.
Am J Phys Med
1958
;
37
:
152
–6.
10
Ebbini ES, Cain CA. A spherical-section ultrasound phased array applicator for deep localized hyperthermia.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
1991
;
38
:
634
–43.
11
Chapelon JY, Cathignol D, Cain C, et al. New piezoelectric transducers for therapeutic ultrasound.
Ultrasound Med Biol
2000
;
26
:
153
–9.
12
Chapelon JY, Margonari J, Vernier F, et al. In vivo effects of high-intensity ultrasound on prostatic adenocarcinoma Dunning R3327.
Cancer Res
1992
;
52
:
6353
–7.
13
Foster RS, Bihrle R, Sanghvi NT, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of prostatic disease.
Eur Urol
1993
;
23
:
29
–33.
14
Gelet A, Chapelon JY, Bouvier R, et al. Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound: minimally invasive therapy of localized prostate cancer.
J Endourol
2000
;
14
:
519
–28.
15
Chaussy C, Thuroff S, Rebillard X, Gelet A. High-intensity focused ultrasound for urologic cancers.
Nat Clin Pract Urol
2005
;
2
:
191
–8.
16
Tempany CM, Stewart EA, McDannold N, Quade BJ, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study.
Radiology
2003
;
226
:
897
–905.
17
Pennes M. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperature in the resting human forearm.
J Appl Physiol
1948
;
1
:
93
–122.
18
Dudar TE, Jain RK. Differential response of normal and tumor microcirculation to hyperthermia.
Cancer Res
1984
;
44
:
605
–12.
19
Parker DL, Smith V, Sheldon P, et al. Temperature distribution measurements in two-dimensional NMR imaging.
Med Phys
1983
;
10
:
321
–5.
20
Cline HE, Schenck JF, Hynynen K, et al. MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery.
J Comput Assist Tomogr
1992
;
16
:
956
–65.
21
Cline HE, Hynynen K, Watkins RD, et al. Focused US system for MR imaging-guided tumor ablation.
Radiology
1995
;
194
:
731
–7.
22
Hynynen K, Vykhodtseva NI, Chung AH, et al. Thermal effects of focused ultrasound on the brain: determination with MR imaging.
Radiology
1997
;
204
:
247
–53.
23
Jolesz FA, Hynynen K. Magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound surgery.
Cancer J
2002
;
8
:
S100
–12.
24
Goss SA, Johnston RL, Dunn F. Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues.
J Acoust Soc Am
1978
;
64
:
423
–57.
25
Hunt JW. Principles of ultrasound used for hyperthermia. NATO ASI Series E:127. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1987.
26
Dunn F. Ultrasonic attenuation, absorption, and velocity in tissues and organs, vol. 453. Washington: NBS Special Publication; 1976.
27
Clement GT, White J, Hynynen K. Investigation of a large-area phased array for focused ultrasound surgery through the skull.
Phys Med Biol
2000
;
45
:
1071
–83.
28
Hynynen K, Clement GT, McDannold N, et al. 500-element ultrasound phased array system for noninvasive focal surgery of the brain: a preliminary rabbit study with ex vivo human skulls.
Magn Reson Med
2004
;
52
:
100
–7.
29
Hynynen K, McDannold N, Clement G, et al. Pre-clinical testing of a phased array ultrasound system for MRI-guided noninvasive surgery of the brain—a primate study.
Eur J Radiol
2006
;
59
:
149
–56.
30
Thomas JL, Wu F, Fink M. Time reversal focusing applied to lithotripsy.
Ultrason Imaging
1996
;
18
:
106
–21.
31
Malcolm AL, ter Haar GR. Ablation of tissue volumes using high intensity focused ultrasound.
Ultrasound Med Biol
1996
;
22
:
659
–69.
32
Sapareto SA, Dewey WC. Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
1984
;
10
:
787
–800.
33
Le Bihan D, Delannoy J, Levin RL. Temperature mapping with MR imaging of molecular diffusion: application to hyperthermia.
Radiology
1989
;
171
:
853
–7.
34
Ishihara Y, Calderon A, Watanabe H, et al. A precise and fast temperature mapping method using water proton chemical shift. Proc Soc Magn Reson Med 1992;4803.
35
Fossheim S, Il'yasov K, Wiggen U, et al. Paramagnetic liposomes as thermosensitive probes for MRI in vitro feasibility studies. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 1999;725.
36
Quesson B, de Zwart JA, Moonen CT. Magnetic resonance temperature imaging for guidance of thermotherapy.
J Magn Reson Imaging
2000
;
12
:
525
–33.
37
Denis de Senneville B, Quesson B, Moonen CTW. Magnetic resonance temperature imaging.
Int J Hyperthermia
2005
;
21
:
515
–31.
38
Peters RD, Hinks RS, Henkelman RM. Ex vivo tissue-type independence in proton-resonance frequency shift MR thermometry.
Magn Reson Med
1998
;
40
:
454
–9.
39
De Poorter J, De Wagter C, De Deene Y, et al. Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency (PRF) method: in vivo results in human muscle.
Magn Reson Med
1995
;
33
:
74
–81.
40
Peters RD, Hinks RS, Henkelman RM. Heat-source orientation and geometry dependence in proton-resonance frequency shift magnetic resonance thermometry.
Magn Reson Med
1999
;
41
:
909
–18.
41
Hindley J, Gedroyc WM, Regan L et al. MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
2004
;
183
:
1713
–9.
42
Gianfelice D, Khiat A, Amara M, Belblidia A, Boulanger Y. MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of breast cancer: correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with histopathologic findings.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
2003
;
82
:
93
–101.
43
Gianfelice D, Khiat A, Boulanger Y, Amara M, Belblidia A. Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery as an adjunct to tamoxifen therapy in high-risk surgical patients with breast carcinoma.
J Vasc Interv Radiol
2003
;
14
:
1275
–82.
44
Zippel DB, Papa MZ. The use of MR imaging guided focused ultrasound in breast cancer patients; a preliminary phase one study and review.
Breast Cancer
2005
;
12
:
32
–8.
45
Salomir R, Vimeux FC, de Zwart JA, et al. Hyperthermia by MR-guided focused ultrasound: accurate temperature control based on fast MRI and a physical model of local energy deposition and heat conduction.
Magn Reson Med
2000
;
43
:
342
–7.
46
McDannold NJ, Jolesz FA, Hynynen KH. Determination of the optimal delay between sonications during focused ultrasound surgery in rabbits by using MR imaging to monitor thermal buildup in vivo.
Radiology
1999
;
211
:
419
–26.
47
Mougenot C, Salomir R, Palussiere J, Grenier N, Moonen CT. Automatic spatial and temporal temperature control for MR-guided focused ultrasound using fast 3D MR thermometry and multispiral trajectory of the focal point.
Magn Reson Med
2004
;
52
:
1005
–15.
48
Palussière J, Salomir R, Le Bail B, et al. Feasibility of MR-guided focused ultrasound with real-time temperature mapping and continuous sonication for ablation of VX2 carcinoma in rabbit thigh.
Magn Reson Med
2003
;
49
:
89
–98.
49
Weidensteiner C, Kerioui N, Quesson B, de Senneville BD, Trillaud H, Moonen CT. Stability of real-time MR temperature mapping in healthy and diseased human liver.
J Magn Reson Imaging
2004
;
19
:
438
–46.
50
Rome C, Couillaud F, Moonen CT. Spatial and temporal control of expression of therapeutic genes using heat shock protein promoters.
Methods
2005
;
35
:
188
–98.
51
Dreano M, Brochot J, Myers A, et al. High-level, heat-regulated synthesis of proteins in eukaryotic cells.
Gene
1986
;
49
:
1
–8.
52
Arai Y, Kubo T, Kobayashi K, et al. Control of delivered gene expression in chondrocytes using heat shock protein 70B promoter.
J Rheumatol
1999
;
26
:
1769
–74.
53
Blackburn RV, Galoforo SS, Corry PM, Lee YJ. Adenoviral-mediated transfer of a heat-inducible double suicide gene into prostate carcinoma cells.
Cancer Res
1998
;
58
:
1358
–62.
54
Huang Q, Hu JK, Lohr F, et al. Heat-induced gene expression as a novel targeted cancer gene therapy strategy.
Cancer Res
2000
;
60
:
3435
–9.
55
Smith RC, Machluf M, Bromley P, Atala A, Walsh K. Spatial and temporal control of transgene expression through ultrasound-mediated induction of the heat shock protein 70B promoter in vivo.
Hum Gene Ther
2002
;
13
:
697
–706.
56
Braiden V, Ohtsuru A, Kawashita Y, et al. Eradication of breast cancer xenografts by hyperthermic suicide gene therapy under the control of the heat shock protein promoter.
Hum Gene Ther
2000
;
11
:
2453
–63.
57
Xu L, Zhao Y, Zhang Q, Li Y, Xu Y. Regulation of transgene expression in muscles by ultrasound-mediated hyperthermia.
Gene Ther
2004
;
11
:
894
–900.
58
Guilhon E, Voisin P, de Zwart JA, et al. Spatial and temporal control of transgene expression in vivo using a heat-sensitive promoter and MRI-guided focused ultrasound.
J Gene Med
2003
;
5
:
333
–42.
59
Letavernier B, Salomir R, Delmas Y, et al. Ultrasound induced expression of a heat shock promoter-driven transgene delivered in the kidney by genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells. A feasibility study. Hynynen K, Jolesz F, editors. Taylor & Francis. In press.
60
Silcox CE, Smith RC, King R, et al. MRI-guided ultrasonic heating allows spatial control of exogenous luciferase in canine prostate.
Ultrasound Med Biol
2005
;
31
:
965
–70.
61
Plathow C, Lohr F, Divkovic G, et al. Focal gene induction in the liver of rats by a heat-inducible promoter using focused ultrasound hyperthermia: preliminary results.
Invest Radiol
2005
;
40
:
729
–35.
62
Frenkel V, Li KC. Potential role of pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound in gene therapy.
Future Oncol
2006
;
2
:
111
–9.
63
Bekeredjian R, Grayburn PA, Shohet RV. Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2005
;
45
:
329
–35.
64
Lee JM, Takahashi M, Mon H, Koga K, Kawaguchi Y, Kusakabe T. Efficient gene transfer into silkworm larval tissues by a combination of sonoporation and lipofection.
Cell Biol Int
2005
;
29
:
976
–9.
65
Lee YH, Peng CA. Enhanced retroviral gene delivery in ultrasonic standing wave fields.
Gene Ther
2005
;
12
:
625
–33.
66
Lawrie A, Brisken AF, Francis SE, et al. Ultrasound enhances reporter gene expression after transfection of vascular cells in vitro.
Circulation
1999
;
99
:
2617
–20.
67
Hou CC, Wang W, Huang XR, et al. Ultrasound-microbubble-mediated gene transfer of inducible Smad7 blocks transforming growth factor-β signaling and fibrosis in rat remnant kidney.
Am J Pathol
2005
;
166
:
761
–71.
68
Schratzberger P, Krainin JG, Schratzberger G, et al. Transcutaneous ultrasound augments naked DNA transfection of skeletal muscle.
Mol Ther
2002
;
6
:
576
–83.
69
Mehier-Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery.
J Control Release
2005
;
104
:
213
–22.