Purpose: Previous studies in our laboratory have shown the progressive methylation and suppression of the gene encoding protein tyrosine phosphatase, PTPRO, in the livers of rats fed a methyl-deficient diet that induces hepatocarcinogenesis. Subsequently, we observed the methylation of PTPRO in primary human lung tumors and also showed its potential tumor suppressor characteristics. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether the truncated form of PTPRO (PTPROt), specifically expressed in naïve B lymphocytes, was also methylated and suppressed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), a disease generally affecting B lymphocytes.
Experimental Design and Results: Initial screening showed that 60% of the 52 CLL samples analyzed using methylation-specific PCR assay were methylated compared with B lymphocytes from normal individuals, which were not methylated. The expression of PTPROt, as measured by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR, inversely correlated with methylation in the few samples tested. Analysis of additional samples (n = 50) by combined bisulfite restriction analysis showed that the PTPRO CpG island was methylated in 82% of patients with CLL compared with B lymphocytes from normal individuals. Furthermore, overall expression of PTPRO was reduced in CLL relative to normal lymphocytes. The PTPRO gene was also suppressed by methylation in the CLL cell line WaC3CD5, where it could be reactivated upon treatment with the DNA hypomethylating agent 5-AzaC. Ectopic expression of PTPROt in a nonexpressing cell line increased growth inhibition with fludarabine treatment, a therapy commonly used for CLL.
Conclusion: This study reveals the potential role of PTPRO methylation and silencing in CLL tumorigenesis and also provides a novel molecular target in the epigenetic therapy.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common form of adult leukemia in the Western hemisphere, with an incidence of 17,000 new cases per year. The median age of patients with CLL is 68 years, although 10% of patients were under the age of 50 at diagnosis. CLL is characterized by the expansion of a single monoclonal B cell population expressing surface membrane CD19, CD20, CD23, dim surface immunoglobulin, and CD5. CLL can be divided into two subsets based on IgVH mutational status, which clinically predicts indolent or more aggressive disease. Until recently, B-CLL was thought to be a static disease characterized by clonal excess of B cells resulting from decreased apoptosis rather than increased proliferation (1, 2). With the recognition of the importance of IgVH mutational status, it has also become apparent that the highly aggressive unmutated subset has a more dynamic disorder. Patients with IgVH unmutated disease are characterized by having shortened telomere lengths (3, 4), repetitive B cell receptor signaling, and a high risk of chromosomal abnormalities (reviewed in ref. 5). The subset of patients with IgVH unmutated CLL showed faster than anticipated turnover rates resulting in fastidious and aggressive clones of disease. In vivo evidence of such rapid CLL turnover associated with rapid disease progression was recently shown in studies using heavy water (6).
Although several studies have shown a variety of genetic abnormalities in CLL including deletions of 11q, 13q, 17p, and trisomy 12, the epigenetic mechanism of gene regulation has only recently been appreciated. Epigenetic silencing of genes is a common mechanism by which tumor suppressor genes are silenced in cancer. In a genome-wide scan for methylation, we recently identified several genes that are differentially and tumor-specifically methylated in CLL (7). As part of a follow-up to this work, both our group and others showed differential methylation of TWIST2, a gene that potentially silences p53 and ZAP-70, between IgVH-mutated and IgVH-unmutated CLL (8). These studies, along with others characterizing the hypomethylation of tcl-1 (9) and bcl-2 (10, 11), suggest that altered expression of genes by methylation probably plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of CLL.
Given the critical role of tumor suppressor genes, including a subset of phosphatases, our laboratory has actively pursued the silencing of such genes in several tumor types. Indeed, we have shown that protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O (PTPRO) is suppressed by methylation in rat hepatocellular carcinoma (12) and human primary lung cancer (13). In these solid tumors, in vitro and in vivo data suggest that PTPRO acts as a tumor suppressor gene to inhibit the growth of transformed cells. A truncated isoform of PTPRO (PTPROt) that is specifically expressed in B lymphocytes was recently implicated in large cell lymphoma and exhibited a similar growth inhibition behavior (14). Previous studies have shown that several members of the protein tyrosine phosphatase family, including PTPRZ1 and PTPRN2, were methylated in CLL (7). Additionally, signal transduction through a variety of tyrosine kinases contributes significantly to B cell and CLL cell survival. Therefore, we hypothesized that PTPROt may be silenced in CLL through methylation, and that reexpression of this gene may enhance apoptosis and B cell signaling. Here, we show that PTPROt is indeed methylated in a variety of patients with CLL and its expression may promote growth inhibition.
Materials and Methods
Patient sample processing and cell culture. All the patients enrolled in this study had immunophenotypically defined B-CLL as outlined by the modified 1996 National Cancer Institute criteria. Two sets of samples were used for this study: the first set of 52 samples lacked detailed molecular characterization and were used as a pilot set to test the occurrence of PTPRO methylation in CLL. The second set of 50 samples were obtained from patients enrolled on the intergroup phase III trial, E2997. These samples were obtained at study entry and was restricted to patients that had CLL which met the 1996 National Cancer Institute criteria for initiating treatment, and who had not previously received chemotherapy for CLL. Blood was obtained from patients following informed consent under a protocol approved by the Ohio State University Cancer Institutional Review Board. B-CLL cells were isolated immediately following donation using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll-Paque Plus, Amersham Biosciences). Isolated mononuclear cells were incubated in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone Laboratories), 2 mmol/L of l-glutamine (Invitrogen), and penicillin (100 units/mL)/streptomycin (100 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Samples used were >90% B cells as determined by CD19 surface staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analyses. For those samples with <90% B cells, negative selection was applied to deplete non–B cells using B cell Isolation Kit II (Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.) according to the manufacturer-suggested protocol. Briefly, isolated mononuclear cells were counted, and centrifuged to get the pellet. Cells (108) were resuspended in 400 μL of cold MACS buffer (pH 7.2; PBS, supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 2 mmol/L EDTA). Biotin-antibody cocktail (100 μL) was added and mixed with the cell suspension before incubating at 4°C for 10 min. Buffer (300 μL) and antibiotin microbeads (200 μL) were then added and the cell suspension was mixed well and incubated for an additional 15 min at 4°C. Cells were then washed with 10× volume of MACS buffer and pelleted off at 300 × g for 10 min. Cells were resuspended in 500 μL of MACS buffer and separated by MS magnetic column.
Normal B lymphocytes were separated using positive selection. Briefly, leukocyte filters were obtained from the Red Cross and back-flushed with sterile PBS to obtain the cells. The cells were then separated by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll. The leukocyte fraction was washed twice with PBS and resuspended. B cells were depleted with CD19 antibody–labeled beads (Miltenyi Biotec), which uses a direct magnetic labeling system for the isolation of B cells from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Because these cells were derived from the peripheral blood of normal volunteers, they were predominantly CD19+ memory B cells. The T cells used in this study were obtained by incubating mononuclear cell isolates from healthy volunteers with CD3 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Magnetically labeled cells were isolated by passing the cell suspension over an LS column (Miltenyi Biotec) with a purity of >80% in pilot experiments done by our laboratory.
The previously characterized CLL cell line, WaC3CD5 (15), was maintained in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Invitrogen), 2 mmol/L of l-glutamine (Invitrogen), penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
RNA isolation and reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA was isolated using the guanidinium isothiocyanate-acid phenol method (16). The RNA was treated with DNase I using standard protocols. DNase-treated RNA (3 μg) was reverse-transcribed using random hexamers and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase according to the instructions in the Gene-Amp RNA PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer). An aliquot of the cDNA was used for reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) with primers specific for PTPRO (PTPROt-F: GGGGATGCTTCACCTGCTTA and PTPRO-R: ACCATTGTTGAGACGGCTATGAACG) or the internal control 18S rRNA (18S-F: TCAAGAACGAAAGTCGGAGG and 18S-R: GGACATCTAAGGGCATCACA). The qualitative PCR (cell lines) was done by using cDNA equivalent to 150 ng (for 18S rRNA) and 300 ng (for PTPRO) of RNA. Each 25 μL reaction mix consisted of 1× ThermoPol buffer (New England Biolabs), 0.2 mmol/L of deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 10 pmol of each primer, and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). The cycling conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 54.5°C (for PTPRO) or 65°C (for 18S rRNA) and extension at 72°C with a total of 32 cycles (for PTPRO) and 25 cycles (for 18S rRNA). The PCR products were separated on 1.5% agarose stained with ethidium bromide and imaged under UV light using Kodak Digital Science 1D software. The SYBR Green real-time PCR was done using cDNA equivalent to 12 ng (for 18S rRNA) and 150 ng (for PTPRO) of RNA. The 10 μL reaction done using SYBR Green Master mix (Applied Biosystems) was run on Mx3000P (Stratagene). The data, represented as copies of PTPRO normalized to copies of 18S rRNA, were calculated using standard curves generated by serial dilutions of cloned PTPRO or 18S rRNA cDNA.
Bisulfite conversion and methylation-specific PCR. Isolation of genomic DNA and treatment with sodium bisulfite were done according to protocols optimized in our laboratory (17–19). The methylation-specific PCR (MSP) was done as described earlier (13). Briefly, bisulfite-converted DNA was used for PCR amplification with nonmethylation-specific primers (hPTP-UF: 5′-ATGTTTTTGGAGGATTTTGGGT-3′ and hPTP-UR: 5′-ATACCCCATCACTACACAAACA-3′) and methylation-specific primers (hPTP-MF: 5′-CGTTTTTGGAGGATTTCGGGC and hPTP-MR: 5′-AAAACACGACTACGCTAACG-3′). An aliquot of the PCR product was separated on 2.5% agarose. The ethidium bromide–stained DNA was visualized under UV light and captured using a Kodak 1D imaging system.
Combined bisulfite restriction analysis and bisulfite sequencing. Nested PCR (as described earlier; ref. 13) was done on bisulfite-converted DNA to amplify the PTPRO CpG island from −208 to +236 bp with respect to the transcription start site. The PCR product was purified using a gel extraction kit (Qiagen). The purified PCR product was used either for combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA) or bisulfite sequencing. For COBRA, an aliquot of the PCR product was incubated at 65°C in the presence or absence of TaqI for 1 h in a reaction containing 1× React 2 (Invitrogen). The entire digestion mix was loaded onto 2.5% agarose and the ethidium bromide–stained DNA visualized under UV light was captured by using a Kodak 1D imaging system. For semiquantitative COBRA, bisulfite-converted DNA from a completely methylated sample (CpGenome; Chemicon, Int.) and another from an unmethylated sample (a cell line in which the PTPRO CpG island was not methylated) were used. These DNA were mixed in different proportions so as to obtain a series of samples with a known percentage of methylation at the PTPRO CpG island (used as standards). COBRA was done on these standards as well as the primary cells using TaqI as the restriction enzyme (as described above). A plot of percentage methylation (known) versus the fraction of PCR product digested by TaqI (M / U + M) was then used to compute the percentage of methylation in the normal/CLL sample. For bisulfite sequencing, the purified PCR product was cloned into pDrive vector according to the PCR cloning kit (Qiagen). A few randomly selected clones were subjected to automated sequencing. Direct sequencing was done using the Thermo Sequenase Radiolabeled terminator cycle sequencing kit with the primer hGlepp1-BS-F3 (5′-TAGGGGGATTGGAAAGGTAG-3′) following the protocol of the manufacturer.
Construction of Flag-tagged PTPROt expression vector. The wild-type (WT) and catalytic site (CS) mutant of the PTPU2L gene was used as a template to PCR-amplify PTPROt using the primers PTPt-EcoRI (5′-ATGAATTCCAATGGTTACAGAGATGA-3′) and PTP-R-Bam (5′-CTGGATCCCTTGCTAACATTCTCG-3′). The PCR product digested with EcoRI and BamHI was cloned into the same site of p3XFLAG-CMV-14 expression vector (Sigma). The PTPROt gene along with the Flag epitope at the 3′-end, excised from the recombinant plasmid by digestion with NotI and SphI, was subcloned into the NotI and BamHI sites of pRetro-On plasmid.
Generation of WaC3CD5 cells stably expressing PTPROt. Exponentially growing Phoenix amphotropic cells were transfected with either pRetro-On (vector control) or PTPRO (WT and CS) cloned in pRetro-On using calcium phosphate coprecipitation (20, 21). Forty-eight hours after transfection, 1.0 mL of the viral supernatant was mixed with 1.0 mL of WaC3CD5 cells (3 × 105 cells/mL) and 16 μg of polybrene in each well of a six-well plate. The plate was centrifuged at 2,300 rpm for 90 min at room temperature in a Beckman GPH rotor 3.7. Following centrifugation, 2.0 mL of growth media (RPMI 1640, 2 mmol/L glutamine, 10% FBS, and penicillin-streptomycin) was added to each well and cells were incubated for 24 h. The viral particles were then washed and cells were allowed to grow in growth media for 48 h followed by selection in media containing 2 μg/mL of puromycin. During the selection process, viable cells were separated from cell debris using Histopaque-1077 (Sigma) according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The selected cells were subjected to doxycycline induction for 24 and 48 h. Expression of the flag-tagged protein was monitored by Western blot analysis using anti-Flag M2 antibody (Sigma). There was, however, no difference between basal and induced expression (data not shown). Individual clones were then selected by limited dilution and used in the absence of doxycycline.
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay to assess the effect of fludarabine on the growth of WaC3CD5 cells. Wac3CD5 cells (vector control and PTPROt expressing) were seeded in 96-well plate at 3 × 105 cells/100 μL in each well. The cells were either left untreated or were treated with 1, 2, and 5 μmol/L of F-Ara-A (obtained commercially from Berlex Oncology) for 48 h. The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay–based Cell Proliferation kit II (Roche) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol to measure the metabolic activity of the cells as an indicator of cell growth. The difference in growth of F-Ara-A–treated cells (as measured by the change in absorbance of the solubilized tetrazolium salt) is represented in arbitrary units relative to the respective untreated cells.
Statistical methods. Descriptive statistics are presented for the proportions of methylated samples, with exact binomial confidence intervals.
T. Ghoshal K, Majumder S, Datta J, Kuttay H, Frankel W, Jacob ST, unpublished data.
Methylation and expression of PTPRO in human primary CLL. Several groups have noted relatively high levels of methylation in cell lines as compared with primary tumor cells. Therefore, we determined if methylation of PTPROt occurred in primary CLL cells. We initially analyzed 52 CLL samples for PTPRO methylation by MSP. Genomic DNA from these samples was treated with a bisulfite reagent to convert all unmethylated cytosines to thymines. Primers specific for unmethylated and methylated DNA were then used to amplify the respective DNA populations. The results showed that 59.6% of the CLL samples (n = 52) were methylated whereas the normal B lymphocytes (n = 9) were essentially methylation-free (Fig. 2A). To establish the methylation status of PTPRO gene, we did bisulfite genomic sequencing on two samples from each group (normal B lymphocytes, unmethylated CLL, and methylated CLL). Patient samples (nos. 11 and 33) that were methylated by MSP showed high level of methylation between CpG sites +105 and +172, the region that was also densely methylated in WaC3CD5 cells (see Fig. 2B). As anticipated, the normal B lymphocytes (N-16 and N-51) and CLL samples that were unmethylated as shown by MSP (CLL-2 and CLL-21) showed no or very little methylation throughout the region analyzed (Fig. 2B). To rule out the possibility that methylation observed in the peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of patients with CLL was contributed exclusively by the T cell population, we did bisulfite genomic sequencing of T cells (T cell 2 and T cell 6). The results (Fig. 2B) showed that the PTPRO CpG island is methylation-free in these cells, confirming that it is indeed methylated in the B cell population of a subset of patients with CLL.
To determine if the methylation observed in CLL samples inversely correlates with the expression of PTPROt as observed in the WaC3CD5 CLL cell line, we studied its expression by semiquantitative radioactive RT-PCR in CD19-selected B lymphocytes from five methylated and five unmethylated samples. The results showed differential expression among these samples (Fig. 2C). The expression in the methylated samples was lower than that in the unmethylated samples. The aberrant PTPRO methylation in CLL, which inversely correlated with its expression, prompted more detailed examination of 50 additional CLL samples. Characterization of these samples from patients enrolled on the intergroup phase III trial (E2997) is detailed in Table 1. Here, we used quantitative COBRA to study the methylation of each sample to facilitate the quantification of methylation using a standard curve as described in Materials and Methods. As observed earlier, a large number of patients with CLL (41 of 50, 82%; 90% confidence interval, 71–90%) showed >40% methylation (cutoff was selected based on the linear range of the standard curve above the sensitive detection level of the assay; Fig. 3A and B). The discrepancy in the incidence of methylation between the two sets of samples (59.6% versus 82%) could be due to differences in the sensitivities of the assays or clinical features of the samples analyzed (see Discussion). We next determined whether PTPROt was also down-regulated in a majority of the CLL samples. For this purpose, we used SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR to measure the expression of PTPROt (normalized to 18S rRNA) in primary CLL samples (n = 37), which gave high quality RNA for the assay. CD19+ selected B lymphocytes (n = 3) and PBLs from normal individuals (n = 7) were used as control samples. The data (Fig. 4) showed an overall down-regulation of PTPROt. Twenty-nine methylated CLL samples exhibited drastically reduced expression of PTPROt. It is not known whether the two PTPRO-expressing samples exhibit distinct pathologic characteristics. PTPROt was also suppressed in six unmethylated samples. The latter samples could represent early stages of CLL in which PTPROt may be suppressed due to transcriptional repression prior to promoter methylation. It is interesting that five of these samples were indeed early stage disease, i.e., either Rai stage 1 or 2. These observations are consistent with the general down-regulation of expression of other tumor suppressor genes in tumors relative to matching normal cells/tissues, and suggest the functional significance of PTPROt methylation and suppression in CLL.
|Mutated (<98% homology with germ line)||9|
|Unmutated (≥98% homology with germ line)||37|
|CD38 < 30%||21|
|CD38 ≥ 30%||28|
|Median CD38 (range)||36% (0-99%)|
|Median immunoblot ZAP-70 (range)||0.291 (0.000-2.215)|
|Median flow ZAP-70 (range)||0.31 (0.09-0.80)|
|Mutated (<98% homology with germ line)||9|
|Unmutated (≥98% homology with germ line)||37|
|CD38 < 30%||21|
|CD38 ≥ 30%||28|
|Median CD38 (range)||36% (0-99%)|
|Median immunoblot ZAP-70 (range)||0.291 (0.000-2.215)|
|Median flow ZAP-70 (range)||0.31 (0.09-0.80)|
Ectopic expression of PTPROt in a CLL cell line increases its susceptibility to fludarabine. The function of PTPROt in CLL and other B cell diseases has not been characterized. Mechanistic interrogation of PTPROt in the WaC3CD5 cell line was pursued by ectopic expression of flag-tagged PTPROt. We also expressed the catalytically inactive C → S mutant (CS mutant) to determine whether phosphatase activity was necessary for the function of PTPROt. It is noteworthy that the expression of WT protein was low in all clones compared with the CS clones, some of which showed high level of expression (data not shown). Only clones with a comparable expression of WT and CS mutant PTPROt were used for further studies (Fig. 5A). Comparable growth kinetics of the parent cell line, wild-type and mutant PTPROt–transfected cell lines suggested limited influence of PTPROt (when expressed at low levels) on the proliferation rate of CLL cells. We hypothesized that the presence of PTPRO may positively influence drug-induced growth inhibition. To test this possibility, the vector-transfected and PTPROt-expressing cells were treated with different doses of fludarabine, a purine analogue commonly used in CLL therapy. The proliferation of cells was assessed by a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, which was used as an index of active cellular metabolism. The data (Fig. 5B) shows the growth inhibition of the PTPROt WT–expressing cells (relative to the vector transfected controls) with increasing fludarabine dose. Furthermore, the mutant-expressing cells were not significantly affected by the treatment. This study shows that expression of PTPROt (as observed in normal B lymphocytes) may enhance growth inhibition promoted by fludarabine.
Although protein tyrosine kinases have long been recognized as key players in oncogenesis, the potential role of protein tyrosine phosphatases in the initiation and progression of cancer is gaining increasing recognition (see refs. 23–25 for recent reviews). We have shown, for the first time, the methylation-mediated suppression of PTPROt in CLL. This is the first detailed report analyzing the methylation and suppression of a protein tyrosine phosphatase in a large cohort of patients. Using MSP, COBRA, and bisulfite sequencing we have shown that this gene is methylated in a large subset of patients with CLL but not in normal B or T lymphocytes. It is worth mentioning that the clinically unselected series of patients (first set of 52 samples) showed a lower frequency of methylation compared with the clinically selected series of patients (second set of 50 patients) meeting the National Cancer Institute criteria to initiate therapy. Therefore, it is possible that PTPRO methylation is associated with clinically aggressive disease. A detailed analysis of samples from consecutive and clinically unselected CLL series would be required to address this issue, which is beyond the scope of this article. It is noteworthy that PTPROt expression is also suppressed in a large population of CLL samples. Expression of PTPROt, which is predominantly expressed in B lymphocytes, is known to be developmentally regulated with the highest expression observed in naïve B cells (14). It is interesting that leukemia clones from about half of the patients represent an expansion of postgerminal center memory B cells (26, 27), in which expression of PTPROt is reduced (14). These observations suggest the importance of PTPROt silencing in the pathogenesis of CLL.
The PTPRO gene also encodes a larger isoform (PTP-U2/Glepp1) that is primarily expressed in the brain and kidney in which it plays a role in neuronal axon growth/guidance and glomerular filtration, respectively (28–30). An earlier report from our laboratory has shown the growth-suppressive and proapoptotic potential of this isoform in lung cancer in which it was also methylated and suppressed (13). It is noteworthy that ectopic expression of PTPROt in a nonexpressing CLL cell line leads to increased growth inhibition when cells are exposed to fludarabine. This observation probably accounts for the reduced sensitivity of proliferating clonal CLL cell lines to fludarabine-based therapy in CLL. Examination of PTPROt expression in a large subset of uniformly treated patients with CLL will, however, be required to confirm the importance of this gene in predicting the response to therapy.
In addition to its significance as a diagnostic and prognostic marker, PTPROt may be used as a therapeutic target to increase the sensitivity of cytotoxic drugs in clinical use. Because the gene is suppressed by methylation in a majority of patients, use of epigenetic drugs that are rapidly gaining importance and application in the clinic for a variety of cancers can be used to induce its expression. The present study has shown that the gene can be reactivated by demethylation in the CLL cell line WaC3CD5. Furthermore, the effect of PTPROt expression on the action of fludarabine also opens up a new avenue to explore combination therapy with epigenetic drugs, especially in resilient cases in which PTPROt is suppressed. It is interesting that most classical protein tyrosine phosphatases harbor a CpG island (31). Although methylation of only a few protein tyrosine phosphatases has been reported in human cancer (see refs. 24, 31 for reviews), the presence of a CpG island in the regulatory regions of other protein tyrosine phosphatases suggests that the expression of at least some of these genes may also be regulated by an epigenetic mechanism and could be potential targets for cancer therapy.
The altered methylation profile of PTPRO and its expression in some primary CLL has other important functional implications. Constitutively active signaling pathways and a relationship between low apoptotic index and up-regulated tyrosine phosphorylated proteins have been reported in CLL (26, 32, 33). These studies, therefore, point towards the role of deregulated tyrosine phosphorylation and subsequent signal transduction pathways in the etiology of B-CLL. In this context, there are several reports on aberrant up-regulation of ZAP-70, a T lymphocyte tyrosine kinase (34), in a subset of patients with CLL with unmutated IgVH status (35) as well as the up-regulation and constitutive activation of the Src kinase Lyn (36) in CLL. Such up-regulation and/or activation could be a result of the altered tyrosine phosphorylation of these enzymes. The identification of these or other CLL-specific phosphoproteins that are potential substrates of PTPROt could thus provide additional downstream targets for drug development. Indeed, a recent report has revealed that the protein tyrosine kinase SYK, a mediator of signaling through the B cell receptor, is one such substrate (37). It would be of considerable interest to delineate the role of altered phosphorylation of the PTPROt substrates in CLL tumorigenesis.
Grant support: Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America, R21CA110496 (J.C. Byrd), CA 86978 and CA101956 (S.T. Jacob), and the D. Warren Brown Foundation.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.