Decades of investigation have sought the identification of melanoma antigens associated with immune-mediated tumor destruction. These efforts arose from a need for effective therapies as limited options for patients with advanced disease exist. Compelling evidence showed that melanoma stimulates endogenous immune responses that play a critical role in combating this disease and such can be manipulated in some individuals to result in clinically significant effects. The progression of melanoma from in situ to metastatic disease has been well described in clinical as well as pathologic terms. The molecular mechanisms responsible for this development, however, are only beginning to be appreciated. Technological advances in profiling cancer have brought attention to new genetic alterations involved with melanoma. These occur and are influenced by complex interactions with the host. As the result of these interactions, the changes that result with melanoma progression are likely selected, with the immune system playing a prominent role in this process.

In the current issue of Clinical Cancer Research, Barrow et al. (1) examined the expression pattern of two categories of melanoma antigens, the differentiation antigens represented by gp100, Melan-A, and tyrosinase and the cancer-testis antigens MAGE-A1, MAGE A4, and NY-ESO-1 in a large series of primary and metastatic samples. They discovered that the differentiation antigens were strongly expressed in the vast majority of both primary and metastatic melanomas. In comparison, two of three of the cancer-testis antigens revealed greater expression in metastatic deposits. Specifically, MAGE-A1 was more prevalent in ulcerated primaries, a significant adverse prognostic sign as exemplified by its important addition to the 2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system.

Previous attempts to correlate antigen expression patterns and tumor progression in melanoma have resulted in varying conclusions (25). Consistently reported is higher expression of the cancer-testis antigens in metastatic deposits compared with primary lesions. Expression patterns, however, were previously determined by differing methods that included both PCR and immunohistochemical staining. The significance of the current report is the large numbers of samples analyzed for protein expression by immunohistochemical staining and the ability to contrast expression patterns with disease progression in the same individual. These results may now be applied within the context of our current understanding to improve critical insights involving melanoma progression.

Most primary melanoma begins with a radial growth phase represented by the horizontal extension of abnormal cells along the epidermis with minimal invasion of the papillary dermis (Fig. 1). During the radial growth phase, a dermal lymphocytic infiltrate resulting in partial tumor destruction is commonly seen on histologic examination (6) and is one criterion used to distinguish melanoma from a benign nevus. Following this initial radial growth phase, the vertical growth phase proceeds with penetration of malignant cells to deeper levels of skin accompanied by further potential to metastasize (Fig. 1). In contrast to the radial growth phase, a brisk lymphocytic infiltrate during the vertical growth phase occurs relatively infrequently (10-20% of cases), but when present is tightly correlated with prolonged survival and a reduced incidence of developing metastatic disease (7, 8). Furthermore, the presence of CD4, CD8, CD68 macrophage, and HLA-DR cells independently offers a favorable outcome. Even when melanoma metastasizes to local regional lymph nodes, a lymphocytic infiltrate may occasionally be witnessed that is also highly associated with improved survival (9). In rare cases of disseminated melanoma undergoing spontaneous regression, pathologic examination strongly implicates immunomediated tumor destruction with disease sites diffusely infiltrated by lymphocytes, plasma cells, and macrophages (10).

Fig. 1.

Pathologic progression of a primary superficial spreading melanoma. A majority of primary melanomas begin with a radial growth phase involving the spread of melanoma cells horizontally along the surface of the skin within the epidermis (left). A reactive lymphocytic response during the radial growth phase is common. With subsequent progression to the vertical growth phase, malignant cells gain additional metastatic potential and invade into deeper layers of the skin (right). During the vertical growth phase, the presence of a brisk lymphocytic infiltrate within the nests of tumor cells is uncommon but when present offers a prognostic benefit.

Fig. 1.

Pathologic progression of a primary superficial spreading melanoma. A majority of primary melanomas begin with a radial growth phase involving the spread of melanoma cells horizontally along the surface of the skin within the epidermis (left). A reactive lymphocytic response during the radial growth phase is common. With subsequent progression to the vertical growth phase, malignant cells gain additional metastatic potential and invade into deeper layers of the skin (right). During the vertical growth phase, the presence of a brisk lymphocytic infiltrate within the nests of tumor cells is uncommon but when present offers a prognostic benefit.

Close modal

Identified through autologous T cell– and antibody-based approaches, human melanoma antigens can be grouped into several classes (Table 1). The melanocyte lineage proteins, or normal differentiation antigens, function to produce melanin pigment present in both melanoma and normal melanocytes (1114). Those antigens pose important questions regarding immune tolerance and cancer, specifically whether the epidermis where normal melanocytes are found provides a site of immune privilege. The cancer-testis antigens are highly expressed in normal tissues during development, but in adults expression is limited to the testis and placenta (1519). Interestingly, they are also found aberrantly expressed in a variety of cancers. Because they are principally expressed in the testis, the cancer-testis antigens may also exist in a site of immune privilege further supported by the blood-testis barrier. Other antigen classes comprise subtle mutations of normal proteins (20, 21) or intronic sequences expressed as a result of cellular transformation (2224). Finally, antibody-based strategies identified a variety of antigens, including the melanoma gangliosides (2531). Patient sera used to screen melanoma cDNA expression libraries initially identified a novel 37 kDa protein D-1, MAGE-1, tyrosinase, and SSX-2 (3235). This serologic-based cloning strategy has identified hundreds of antigens, representing a wide array of targets.

Table 1.

Human melanoma antigens

• Melanocyte lineage/differentiation antigens: abundant proteins function in melanin production 
    Tyrosinase: human homologue of the mouse albino locus 
    gp 75: tyrosinase related protein-1 (TRP-1); human homologue of the mouse brown locus 
    gp100: Pmel17; target for monoclonal antibody HMB45; the human homologue of the mouse silver locus 
    Melan A/MART-1 
    TRP-2 
• Oncofetal/cancer-testis antigens: normally expressed testis and placenta 
    MAGE family 
    BAGE family 
    GAGE family 
    NY-ESO-1 
• Tumor-specific antigens: subtle mutations of normal cellular proteins, examples of coding region mutations 
    CDK4 
    β-catenin 
• Other mutated peptides: activated as a result of cellular transformation 
    Mutated introns 
    N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V gene product 
    MUM-1 
    p15 
• Antigens identified by monoclonal antibodies 
    Gangliosides (GM2, GD2, GM3, and GD3) 
    High molecular weight chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 
    p97 melanotransferrin 
• SEREX antigens 
    D-1 
    SSX-2 
• Melanocyte lineage/differentiation antigens: abundant proteins function in melanin production 
    Tyrosinase: human homologue of the mouse albino locus 
    gp 75: tyrosinase related protein-1 (TRP-1); human homologue of the mouse brown locus 
    gp100: Pmel17; target for monoclonal antibody HMB45; the human homologue of the mouse silver locus 
    Melan A/MART-1 
    TRP-2 
• Oncofetal/cancer-testis antigens: normally expressed testis and placenta 
    MAGE family 
    BAGE family 
    GAGE family 
    NY-ESO-1 
• Tumor-specific antigens: subtle mutations of normal cellular proteins, examples of coding region mutations 
    CDK4 
    β-catenin 
• Other mutated peptides: activated as a result of cellular transformation 
    Mutated introns 
    N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V gene product 
    MUM-1 
    p15 
• Antigens identified by monoclonal antibodies 
    Gangliosides (GM2, GD2, GM3, and GD3) 
    High molecular weight chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 
    p97 melanotransferrin 
• SEREX antigens 
    D-1 
    SSX-2 

Although melanoma cells express multiple antigenic targets that result in innate immune responses, this is insufficient to prevent disease progression in patients that develop clinically significant disease. With the cloning of MAGE-1, the first gene product identified to be the target of T cells, antigen-specific immunization has been investigated (36). The most common antigens tested are MAGE 1, MAGE 3, MART-1, tyrosinase, gp100, and NY-ESO-1. Vaccination with MAGE-1 and MAGE-3 HLA-A1-restricted peptides (37) resulted in ∼30% responses, but MAGE-3-specific T cells were not detected in patients. NY-ESO-1 peptides with binding affinity for HLA-A2 have also been tested (38), revealing T-cell responses associated with disease stabilization or regression in a subset of patients. Newly defined class I and class II peptide epitopes for NY-ESO-1 have led to additional clinical trials using a variety of vaccination strategies.

Several epitopes of the melanocyte differentiation antigens found to be CTL targets were initially tested in vaccination trials and resulted in objective tumor responses in some patients (39). The most frequent differentiation antigens targeted in HLA-A2-specific vaccination strategies have been MART-1, tyrosinase, and gp100 (40). These efforts included the use of both native peptide motifs as well as peptide sequences modified for high-affinity binding to HLA-A2. These melanoma antigens have been loaded directly onto dendritic cells ex vivo from hematogenous progenitors followed by inoculation into skin, blood, or lymph node of melanoma patients (3941). A final antigen-specific treatment approach involves the generation and expansion of tumor-reactive T cells ex vivo followed by their infusion into unmanipulated of lymphopenic hosts. This showed disease stabilization or responses in a number of patients, but limited ability to assess antitumor T-cell responses. Recently, HLA-A2-specific peptides have been combined with an antibody antagonist to cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) to augment specific T-cell effector activity and impede regulatory T-cell function.

The transformation from benign melanocytes to metastatic melanoma is the result of a compilation of genetic alterations crucial to cell division, differentiation, antiapoptosis, invasion, angiogenesis, and sustenance in a microenvironment distant from the point of origin of the cell. The complexity of genetic alterations involved in melanoma development is just beginning to be appreciated. Analyses of family kindreds via loss of heterozygosity (42) discovered tumor suppressor genes involving the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) locus, encoding the proteins p16INK4A and p14ARF by alternative reading frames. This is believed to be one of the earliest events in melanoma development. Other familial genetic alterations include xeroderma pigmentosa, retinoblastoma, RECQL2, BRCA2, and TP53 (43).

In addition to mutations in relevant tumor suppressor genes, activation of members of cell signaling pathways have also proved important (44). Activating NRAS mutations believed to drive the progression from radial growth phase to vertical growth phase lead to activation of both the RAF and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways (Fig. 2). Subsequent identification of genetic alterations in members of both of these pathways further confirms their importance. BRAF mutations are found in a significant proportion of both primary melanomas and benign nevi, ranging in incidence from 30% to 70%, strongly suggesting that BRAF plays a key role in the process of melanocyte transformation. In the PI3K pathway, the frequent loss of function of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) is believed to be involved in late phases of melanoma progression (Fig. 2; ref. 43), whereas Akt is constitutively activated in >50% of melanomas, with expression directly related to progression and inversely to survival. These signaling pathways converge on the microphthalamia-associated transcription factor (MITF) promotor that leads to transcription of a number of genes under its control, including the melanosomal differentiation antigens and INK4A (45). MITF recently has been found to be amplified in metastatic melanoma and seems to work in conjunction with BRAF and p16 in melanoma progression (46).

Fig. 2.

Signaling pathways implicated in melanoma development. NRAS activation can lead to effects of both the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and PI3K pathways resulting in cellular proliferation and antiapoptosis. Several members of these pathways are strongly implicated in melanoma development and progression (see text). Mutations involving key regulators of CDKs contribute to progression through the cell cycle via effects on the retinoblastoma gene product (Rb). MEK, mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.

Fig. 2.

Signaling pathways implicated in melanoma development. NRAS activation can lead to effects of both the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and PI3K pathways resulting in cellular proliferation and antiapoptosis. Several members of these pathways are strongly implicated in melanoma development and progression (see text). Mutations involving key regulators of CDKs contribute to progression through the cell cycle via effects on the retinoblastoma gene product (Rb). MEK, mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin.

Close modal

Progression markers reveal preferential expression in defined stages of melanoma development. As a result, they are useful to distinguish benign and malignant stages as well as offer prognostic value. Examples of prognostic markers include growth factors, signaling molecules, adhesion molecules, proteases, and immunomodulatory factors (Table 2).

Table 2.

Melanoma progression markers

Increased expression with progressionDecreased expression with progression
Tumor suppressors  p16INK4A 
  p53 
  PTEN 
  pRb 
   
Signal transducers BRAF c-kit 
 Akt  
 EGFR receptor  
   
Oncogenes MITF MITF 
 NRAS AP-2 transcription factor 
   
Cell cycle MIB-1 p27kip1 
 Cyclin A, B, D, E  
 CDK2  
   
Growth factors VEGF  
 bFGF  
 TGF-β  
 Transferrin receptor  
   
Cell adhesion and motility N-cadherin E-cadherin 
 Integrin αvβ3 APAF-1 
 MMPs β-catenin 
   
Antiapoptosis Survivin Bcl-2 
 ML-IAP  
 Bcl-2  
Immunoregulators Cancer-testis antigens HLA class I molecules 
 HMB-45 HMB-45 
   
Others Telomerase Melastatin 
Increased expression with progressionDecreased expression with progression
Tumor suppressors  p16INK4A 
  p53 
  PTEN 
  pRb 
   
Signal transducers BRAF c-kit 
 Akt  
 EGFR receptor  
   
Oncogenes MITF MITF 
 NRAS AP-2 transcription factor 
   
Cell cycle MIB-1 p27kip1 
 Cyclin A, B, D, E  
 CDK2  
   
Growth factors VEGF  
 bFGF  
 TGF-β  
 Transferrin receptor  
   
Cell adhesion and motility N-cadherin E-cadherin 
 Integrin αvβ3 APAF-1 
 MMPs β-catenin 
   
Antiapoptosis Survivin Bcl-2 
 ML-IAP  
 Bcl-2  
Immunoregulators Cancer-testis antigens HLA class I molecules 
 HMB-45 HMB-45 
   
Others Telomerase Melastatin 

Recent efforts to identify genes associated with aggressive melanoma phenotypes used differential cDNA display. First identified in the murine B16 melanoma model, melastatin, a putative calcium channel protein, is expressed at high levels in melanoma with low risk for metastases, whereas it is expressed at reduced levels in variants with high risk for metastases (47). In human pigmented lesions, benign nevi express high levels of melastatin, primary melanomas have variable expression, whereas melastatin mRNA expression is down-regulated in melanoma metastases. Within primary melanomas, melastatin expression correlates inversely with tumor thickness, suggesting that loss of melastatin expression augments the aggressiveness of primary melanoma. Evaluation of melastatin expression by in situ hybridization in stage I and II primary melanomas revealed that down-regulation of melastatin mRNA was an independent prognostic marker for the development of metastases (48). Melastatin expression as a prognostic marker in primary melanomas is currently being examined prospectively in a Cancer and Leukemia Group B trial correlating expression in stage I and II primary melanomas with metastases to local regional lymph nodes.

A variety of other molecules are also implicated in prognostic expression patterns. Microtubule-associated protein 2, present in primary melanomas, is absent in metastatic deposits. Activating transcription factor-2 (ATF-2) is important for melanoma progression as reduction of ATF-2 inhibits proliferation and invasive potential while making melanoma cells more susceptible to chemotherapy and radiation (49). Nuclear expression of ATF-2 is associated with the development of metastatic disease and a poor prognosis (50). Relevant to cell cycle progression, increase of S-phase kinase-associated protein-2 (Skp-2) and reduction of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor p27kip1 are associated with progressive melanoma, further linking important pathways of altering cell cycle regulation.

Progression of melanoma from an early pigmented lesion to metastatic deposit requires the orchestrated modifications of molecules responsible for cell adhesion, migration, and invasion. Early lymph node and vascular access are important pathways to melanoma progression. Strong associations between the transcription factor nuclear factor-κB and melanoma vascularity have been made (51). Both vascular endothelial growth factor and lymphatic endothelial hyaluron receptor-1 are implicated in melanoma progression (52). Differential expression of pleitrophin, a growth factor for many tissue types and angiogenic factor, revealed expression in primary melanomas at risk for developing metastases (53). Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule is critical for melanoma progression, being induced at progression to vertical growth phase (54). In murine models, c-kit expression is lost during melanoma transformation whereas endothelin receptor B is strongly enhanced, suggesting a marker for melanoma progression (55). Expression of the CXCR4 receptor, implicated in the metastatic potential for a number of cancers, provides an unfavorable prognosis in primary melanomas (56) as does the expression of αvβ3 integrin (57). Recently, dysadherin, a novel cell membrane glycoprotein that down regulates E-cadherin and inhibits cell adhesion, was found overexpressed in poor-prognosis melanomas (58). Finally, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) are proteolytic enzymes that play important roles in cellular invasion of the extracellular matrix. MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-13 have been associated with different phases of melanoma progression, with MMP-2 specifically implicated with progressive invasiveness of melanoma (59, 60).

Additional important determinants of melanoma progression are regulated by DNA methylation and are implicated specifically in the transition of a primary melanoma from radial growth phase to vertical growth phase (61). The role of DNA methylation in melanoma progression, however, is complex. Hypermethylation at CpG islands correlates with silencing tumor suppressor genes while also resulting in the overexpression of a number of gene products, including the cancer-testis antigens. Demethylation studies confirm the effects of cancer-testis antigen expression, suggesting a clustering phenomenon based on a common genetic mechanism (62).

Finally, the decision point of apoptosis is critical in cellular transformation. Increased expression of bcl-2 and inhibitors of apoptosis, such as survivin (63), a key responder to UV radiation–induced apoptosis, as well as the melanoma-associated inhibitor of apoptosis, have been implicated in melanoma progression. Furthermore, immune responses to these antiapoptotic proteins have been discovered, with specific antibody and T-cell responses against melanoma witnessed (64). This provides additional evidence for a host's immune response to key components of malignant progression.

Besides endogenous host immune responses, melanoma cells express stress-related genes as they gain functional capacity to metastasize. MICA and MICB, for example, are ligands for NKG2D receptors found on natural killer (NK) cells, phagocytes, and other cytotoxic lymphocytes (65). NK cells react to loss of MHC class I molecules on the surface of melanoma cells, which frequently occurs with disease progression (66). Further surveillance by the host immune response involves subsequent phagocytosis of apoptotic melanoma cells. Antigen presentation is further enhanced by heat shock proteins released from necrotic melanoma cells that chaperone peptides for dendritic cell and macrophage processing (67).

Additional correlations between pathologic and genetic changes associated with melanoma progression and host immune response already exist. CDK4 is not only a prevalent mutated locus but its mutated protein is recognized by T cells. In addition, BRAF-specific antibody responses have been found in melanoma patients (68) with mutant-specific T-cell responses to BRAF found in HLA-B*2705 individuals (69). In this context, the differential expression of the melanocyte differentiation and cancer-testis antigens greatly influence our future study of endogenous host immune responses via better understanding of mechanisms involved with melanoma progression.

Each stage in the development of melanoma has genetic alterations with corresponding pathologic features. Comprehending these steps in malignant transformation and changes in protein expression are critical to the future development of effective therapies. Genetic and biochemical techniques to characterize melanoma antigens revealed the surprising innate antigen-specific recognition of melanoma cells by its host. The correlation of immune responses to clinical outcome and improved understanding of the molecular targets involved in melanoma progression provide the foundation to define mechanisms of immune escape and novel therapeutic options.

The fundamentals outlined in the current article by Barrow et al. (1) offer important insight into this process. It suggests a need to target appropriately relevant gene products that are dependent on stage and pattern of antigen expression. From this principle, much work still needs to be done. Current technologies permit further correlation of the host immune response with genetic alterations that occur, for example, between the radial growth phase and vertical growth phase. Differential display analyses of genetic and protein expression continue to delineate the complex interactions between host and cancer. Rational therapeutics based on understanding changes in the cancer cell and host responses during development will permit rigorous evaluation of melanoma treatments and maximize the potential for their success.

1
Barrow C, Browning J, MacGregor D, et al. Tumor antigen expression in melanoma varies according to antigen and stage: 1a.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
12
:
764
–71.
2
Gajjar NA, Cochran AJ, Binder SW. Is MAGE-1 expression in metastatic malignant melanomas really helpful?
Am J Surg Pathol
2004
;
28
:
883
–8.
3
Brasseur F, Rimoldi D, Lienard D, et al. Expression of MAGE genes in primary and metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Int J Cancer
1995
;
63
:
375
–80.
4
Busam KJ, Iversen K, Berwick M, Spagnoli GC, Old LJ, Jungbluth AA. Immunoreactivity with the anti-MAGE antibody 57B in malignant melanoma: frequency of expression and correlation with prognostic parameters.
Mod Pathol
2000
;
13
:
459
–65.
5
Bolli M, Schultz-Thater E, Zajac P, et al. NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1 coexpression with MAGE-A cancer/testis antigens: a tissue microarray study.
Int J Cancer
2005
;
115
:
960
–6.
6
Clark WH, Jr., From L, Bernardino EA, Mihm MC. The histogenesis and biologic behavior of primary human malignant melanomas of the skin.
Cancer Res
1969
;
29
:
705
–27.
7
Clark WH, Jr., Elder DE, Guerry DT, et al. Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1989
;
81
:
1893
–904.
8
Clemente CG, Mihm MC, Jr., Bufalino R, Zurrida S, Collini P, Cascinelli N. Prognostic value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in the vertical growth phase of primary cutaneous melanoma.
Cancer
1996
;
77
:
1303
–10.
9
Mihm MC, Jr., Clemente CG, Cascinelli N. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in lymph node melanoma metastases: a histopathologic prognostic indicator and an expression of local immune response.
Lab Invest
1996
;
74
:
43
–7.
10
Bulkley GB, Cohen MH, Banks PM, Char DH, Ketcham AS. Long-term spontaneous regression of malignant melanoma with visceral metastases. Report of a case with immunologic profile.
Cancer
1975
;
36
:
485
–94.
11
Kawakami Y, Eliyahu S, Delgado CH, et al. Identification of a human melanoma antigen recognized by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes associated with in vivo tumor rejection.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1994
;
91
:
6458
–62.
12
Kawakami Y, Eliyahu S, Delgado CH, et al. Cloning of the gene coding for a shared human melanoma antigen recognized by autologous T cells infiltrating into tumor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1994
;
91
:
3515
–9.
13
Brichard V, Van Pel A, Wolfel T, et al. The tyrosinase gene codes for an antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLA-A2 melanomas.
J Exp Med
1993
;
178
:
489
–95.
14
Coulie PG, Brichard V, Van Pel A, et al. A new gene coding for a differentiation antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLA-A2 melanomas.
J Exp Med
1994
;
180
:
35
–42.
15
Gaugler B, Van den Eynde B, van der Bruggen P, et al. Human gene MAGE-3 codes for an antigen recognized on a melanoma by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes.
J Exp Med
1994
;
179
:
921
–30.
16
Boel P, Wildmann C, Sensi ML, et al. BAGE: a new gene encoding an antigen recognized on human melanomas by cytolytic T lymphocytes.
Immunity
1995
;
2
:
167
–75.
17
Van den Eynde B, Peeters O, De Backer O, Gaugler B, Lucas S, Boon T. A new family of genes coding for an antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma.
J Exp Med
1995
;
182
:
689
–98.
18
Van den Eynde B, Brichard VG. New tumor antigens recognized by T cells.
Curr Opin Immunol
1995
;
7
:
674
–81.
19
van der Bruggen P, Traversari C, Chomez P, et al. A gene encoding an antigen recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma.
Science
1991
;
254
:
1643
–7.
20
Robbins PF, El-Gamil M, Li YF, et al. A mutated β-catenin gene encodes a melanoma-specific antigen recognized by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes.
J Exp Med
1996
;
183
:
1185
–92.
21
Wolfel T, Hauer M, Schneider J, et al. A p16INK4a-insensitive CDK4 mutant targeted by cytolytic T lymphocytes in a human melanoma.
Science
1995
;
269
:
1281
–4.
22
Guilloux Y, Lucas S, Brichard VG, et al. A peptide recognized by human cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLA-A2 melanomas is encoded by an intron sequence of the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V gene.
J Exp Med
1996
;
183
:
1173
–83.
23
Robbins PF, el-Gamil M, Li YF, et al. Cloning of a new gene encoding an antigen recognized by melanoma-specific HLA-A24-restricted tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
J Immunol
1995
;
154
:
5944
–50.
24
Coulie PG, Lehmann F, Lethe B, et al. A mutated intron sequence codes for an antigenic peptide recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1995
;
92
:
7976
–80.
25
Houghton AN, Mintzer D, Cordon-Cardo C, et al. Mouse monoclonal IgG3 antibody detecting GD3 ganglioside: a phase I trial in patients with malignant melanoma.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1985
;
82
:
1242
–6.
26
Houghton AN, Larson S. Monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer: therapeutic strategies.
Curr Opin Oncol
1989
;
1
:
258
–65.
27
Livingston PO, Natoli EJ, Calves MJ, Stockert E, Oettgen HF, Old LJ. Vaccines containing purified GM2 ganglioside elicit GM2 antibodies in melanoma patients.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1987
;
84
:
2911
–5.
28
Irie RF, Morton DL. Regression of cutaneous metastatic melanoma by intralesional injection with human monoclonal antibody to ganglioside GD2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1986
;
83
:
8694
–8.
29
Mittelman A, Chen ZJ, Yang H, Wong GY, Ferrone S. Human high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen (HMW-MAA) mimicry by mouse anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody MK2-23: induction of humoral anti-HMW-MAA immunity and prolongation of survival in patients with stage IV melanoma.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1992
;
89
:
466
–70.
30
Mittelman A, Puccio C, Chun H, Ahmed T. Humoral antimelanoma immunity: induction by mouse antiidiotypic mAb, MK2–23 and association with survival of patients with advanced melanoma.
Mt Sinai J Med
1992
;
59
:
234
–7.
31
Pluschke G, Vanek M, Evans A, et al. Molecular cloning of a human melanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1996
;
93
:
9710
–5.
32
Sahin U, Tureci O, Schmitt H, et al. Human neoplasms elicit multiple specific immune responses in the autologous host.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1995
;
92
:
11810
–3.
33
Tureci O, Sahin U, Schobert I, et al. The SSX-2 gene, which is involved in the t(X;18) translocation of synovial sarcomas, codes for the human tumor antigen HOM-MEL-40.
Cancer Res
1996
;
56
:
4766
–72.
34
Hayashibe K, Mishima Y, Ferrone S. Cloning and in vitro expression of a melanoma-associated antigen immunogenic in patients with melanoma.
J Immunol
1991
;
147
:
1098
–104.
35
Hayashibe K, Nagai H, Kako S, Tsukamoto H, Ichihashi M. Tissue distribution of an immunogenic melanoma associated antigen, D-1.
Pigment Cell Res
1994
;
7
:
458
–60.
36
Scanlan MJ, Gure AO, Jungbluth AA, Old LJ, Chen YT. Cancer/testis antigens: an expanding family of targets for cancer immunotherapy.
Immunol Rev
2002
;
188
:
22
–32.
37
Finn OJ. Cancer vaccines: between the idea and the reality.
Nat Rev Immunol
2003
;
3
:
630
–41.
38
Jager E, Gnjatic S, Nagata Y, et al. Induction of primary NY-ESO-1 immunity: CD8+ T lymphocyte and antibody responses in peptide-vaccinated patients with NY-ESO-1+ cancers.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2000
;
97
:
12198
–203.
39
Talebi T, Weber JS. Peptide vaccine trials for melanoma: preclinical background and clinical results.
Semin Cancer Biol
2003
;
13
:
431
–8.
40
Pardoll DM. Spinning molecular immunology into successful immunotherapy.
Nat Rev Immunol
2002
;
2
:
227
–38.
41
Antonia S, Mule JJ, Weber JS. Current developments of immunotherapy in the clinic.
Curr Opin Immunol
2004
;
16
:
130
–6.
42
Haluska FG, Hodi FS. Molecular genetics of familial cutaneous melanoma.
J Clin Oncol
1998
;
16
:
670
–82.
43
Chudnovsky Y, Khavari PA, Adams AE. Melanoma genetics and the development of rational therapeutics.
J Clin Invest
2005
;
115
:
813
–24.
44
Rodolfo M, Daniotti M, Vallacchi V. Genetic progression of metastatic melanoma.
Cancer Lett
2004
;
214
:
133
–47.
45
Widlund HR, Fisher DE. Microphthalamia-associated transcription factor: a critical regulator of pigment cell development and survival.
Oncogene
2003
;
22
:
3035
–41.
46
Garraway LA, Widlund HR, Rubin MA, et al. Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma.
Nature
2005
;
436
:
117
–22.
47
Duncan LM, Deeds J, Hunter J, et al. Down-regulation of the novel gene melastatin correlates with potential for melanoma metastasis.
Cancer Res
1998
;
58
:
1515
–20.
48
Deeds J, Cronin F, Duncan LM. Patterns of melastatin mRNA expression in melanocytic tumors.
Hum Pathol
2000
;
31
:
1346
–56.
49
Bhoumik A, Huang TG, Ivanov V, et al. An ATF2-derived peptide sensitizes melanomas to apoptosis and inhibits their growth and metastasis.
J Clin Invest
2002
;
110
:
643
–50.
50
Berger AJ, Kluger HM, Li N, et al. Subcellular localization of activating transcription factor 2 in melanoma specimens predicts patient survival.
Cancer Res
2003
;
63
:
8103
–7.
51
Torabian S, Kashani-Sabet M. Biomarkers for melanoma.
Curr Opin Oncol
2005
;
17
:
167
–71.
52
Dadras SS, Paul T, Bertoncini J, et al. Tumor lymphangiogenesis: a novel prognostic indicator for cutaneous melanoma metastasis and survival.
Am J Pathol
2003
;
162
:
1951
–60.
53
Wu H, Barusevicius A, Babb J, et al. Pleiotrophin expression correlates with melanocytic tumor progression and metastatic potential.
J Cutan Pathol
2005
;
32
:
125
–30.
54
Swart GW, Lunter PC, Kilsdonk JW, Kempen LC. Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM/CD166): signaling at the divide of melanoma cell clustering and cell migration?
Cancer Metastasis Rev
2005
;
24
:
223
–36.
55
Lahav R. Endothelin receptor B is required for the expansion of melanocyte precursors and malignant melanoma.
Int J Dev Biol
2005
;
49
:
173
–80.
56
Scala S, Ottaiano A, Ascierto PA, et al. Expression of CXCR4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with malignant melanoma.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
1835
–41.
57
Saalbach A, Wetzel A, Haustein UF, Sticherling M, Simon JC, Anderegg U. Interaction of human Thy-1 (CD 90) with the integrin αvβ3 (CD51/CD61): an important mechanism mediating melanoma cell adhesion to activated endothelium.
Oncogene
2005
;
24
:
4710
–20.
58
Nishizawa A, Nakanishi Y, Yoshimura K, et al. Clinicopathologic significance of dysadherin expression in cutaneous malignant melanoma: immunohistochemical analysis of 115 patients.
Cancer
2005
;
103
:
1693
–700.
59
Redondo P, Lloret P, Idoate M, Inoges S. Expression and serum levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 during human melanoma progression.
Clin Exp Dermatol
2005
;
30
:
541
–5.
60
Nikkola J, Vihinen P, Vuoristo MS, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Kahari VM, Pyrhonen S. High serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and matrix metalloproteinase-1 are associated with rapid progression in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
5158
–66.
61
Gallagher WM, Bergin OE, Rafferty M, et al. Multiple markers for melanoma progression regulated by DNA methylation: insights from transcriptomic studies.
Carcinogenesis
2005
;
26
:
1856
–67.
62
Xiao J, Chen HS. Biological functions of melanoma-associated antigens.
World J Gastroenterol
2004
;
10
:
1849
–53.
63
Tas F, Duranyildiz D, Argon A, et al. Serum bcl-2 and survivin levels in melanoma.
Melanoma Res
2004
;
14
:
543
–6.
64
Schmollinger JC, Vonderheide RH, Hoar KM, et al. Melanoma inhibitor of apoptosis protein (ML-IAP) is a target for immune-mediated tumor destruction.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003
;
100
:
3398
–403.
65
Diefenbach A, Raulet DH. The innate immune response to tumors and its role in the induction of T-cell immunity.
Immunol Rev
2002
;
188
:
9
–21.
66
Karre K. NK cells, MHC class I molecules and the missing self.
Scand J Immunol
2002
;
55
:
221
–8.
67
Basu S, Binder RJ, Ramalingam T, Srivastava PK. CD91 is a common receptor for heat shock proteins gp96, hsp90, hsp70, and calreticulin.
Immunity
2001
;
14
:
303
–13.
68
Fensterle J, Becker JC, Potapenko T, et al. B-Raf specific antibody responses in melanoma patients.
BMC Cancer
2004
;
4
:
62
.
69
Andersen MH, Fensterle J, Ugurel S, et al. Immunogenicity of constitutively active V599EBRaf.
Cancer Res
2004
;
64
:
5456
–60.