Purpose: Gastric and intestinal phenotypic cell markers are expressed in gastric carcinomas, irrespective of their histologic type. In the present study, we determined the clinicopathologic significance of phenotypic marker expression in early-stage gastric differentiated-type tumors and the association between marker expression and genetic alterations.

Experimental Design: Phenotypic marker expression was determined by examining the expressions of human gastric mucin (HGM), MUC6, MUC2, and CD10 in 63 gastric adenomas, 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas, and 24 follow-up cases with gastric adenoma. Tumors were classified into gastric, gastric and intestinal mixed, or intestinal phenotypes according to the immunopositivity of the above markers. The presence of mutations in APC, K-ras, and p53 and the microsatellite instability status were also determined in all tumors.

Results: The expressions of HGM and MUC6, representing gastric or gastric and intestinal mixed phenotypes, were significantly associated with high-grade atypia in the 63 gastric adenomas. Among the 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas, HGM expression was significantly associated with mixed-type (with an undifferentiated-type component) tumors and lymph node metastasis. MUC2 expression was inversely associated with submucosal invasion. A multivariate analysis revealed that gastric adenomas were significantly associated with the intestinal phenotype and were inversely associated with p53 mutation compared with early differentiated-type carcinomas. Among all 196 tumors, APC mutation was significantly associated with CD10 expression and the intestinal phenotype and was inversely associated with the expressions of HGM and MUC6. The microsatellite instability status was significantly associated with MUC6 expression. Malignant transformation from gastric adenoma to carcinoma was shown in 5 of the 24 follow-up cases of gastric adenoma. The malignant transformation was significantly associated with the gastric and intestinal mixed phenotype and was inversely associated with APC mutation. No malignant transformation was found in intestinal phenotype gastric adenomas with APC mutation.

Conclusions: Our present findings show that phenotypic marker expression is associated with tumor aggressiveness during the early stage of gastric differentiated-type tumors. Differences in the biological behavior of tumors with different phenotypes may result from differences in the genetic backgrounds during the incipient phase of gastric tumorigenesis.

Gastric carcinoma is histologically classified into two types, differentiated and undifferentiated or intestinal and diffuse type, based on the gland formation tendency (1, 2). With respect to the histogenesis of these two types of gastric carcinoma, differentiated-type tumors have generally been considered to arise from gastric mucosa with intestinal metaplasia and undifferentiated-type tumors from ordinary gastric mucosa without intestinal metaplasia; these two tumor types are believed to follow different genetic pathways during carcinogenesis (3). However, both gastric and intestinal phenotypic cell markers are expressed in gastric carcinomas, irrespective of their histologic type. We and other investigators have reported that gastric carcinomas are classified as having either a gastric, gastric and intestinal mixed, or intestinal phenotype depending on the expressions of human gastric mucin (HGM; a marker of the gastric foveolar epithelium), MUC6 (a marker of gastric pyloric gland cells), MUC2 (a marker of intestinal goblet cells), and CD10 (a marker of intestinal absorptive cells; refs. 420). Gastric phenotype tumors account for 27.7% of differentiated tumors, often referred to as intestinal-type tumors according to Lauren (2), whereas intestinal phenotype tumors accounted for 10.1% of undifferentiated tumors (13). The phenotypic marker expression of tumors is conventionally thought to imitate that of the tissue of origin. Thus, the above data suggest that gastric carcinomas can occur in various types of gastric mucosa.

Recently, the phenotypic marker expression of tumors has also been associated with tumor aggressiveness in gastric carcinomas (Table 1). We previously reported that patients with gastric phenotype tumors were significantly associated with a high risk of peritoneal recurrence and a poorer outcome after surgical resection compared with those with intestinal phenotype tumors among patients with advanced gastric carcinoma (13, 16). We also previously reported that the intratumoral expression of thymidylate synthase, the target enzyme of 5-fluorouracil, was significantly low in gastric phenotype tumors and that postoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil was effective for patients with gastric phenotype tumors (15). Therefore, phenotypic marker expression is closely related to both gastric tumorigenesis and the biological behavior of gastric carcinomas. Furthermore, appropriate therapeutic approaches for patients with gastric carcinomas might differ according to the phenotypic marker expression of the tumor.

Table 1.

Literature series of phenotypic marker expression in gastric tumors

Author, yNo. tumors analyzedClinicopathologic findings correlated with phenotypic marker expressionOther findings correlated with phenotypic marker expression
Yamachika (18), 1997 203 signet ring cell carcinomas Tumor intestinalization — 
Yoshikawa (19), 1998 301 differentiated-type carcinomas Tumor intestinalization — 
Endoh (10), 1999 10 differentiated-type carcinomas — E-cadherin mutation 
 9 precancerous lesions  — 
Endoh (11), 2000 differentiated-type carcinomas — p53 mutation 
 precancerous lesions (52 cases)  MSI 
Koseki (12), 2000 120 submucosal carcinomas Papillary-type carcinoma E-cadherin expression 
  Lymph node metastasis  
Saito (7), 2001 351 early carcinomas Histologic transformation — 
Tajima (13), 2001 136 advanced carcinomas Patients prognosis — 
Tsukashita (14), 2001 80 intramucosal neoplastic lesions Grade of atypia — 
Kabashima (8), 2002 114 intramucosal carcinomas — Matrix metalloproteinase-9 
Shibata (9), 2003 43 early carcinomas — Apoptotic index/proliferative index 
Tajima (15), 2003 137 advanced carcinomas Chemosensitivity Thymidylate synthase expression 
Tajima (16), 2004 213 advanced carcinomas Recurrence pattern — 
Yamazaki (17), 2006 48 adenomas, 171 carcinomas Tumor invasion APC mutation, MSI 
Morohara (20), 2006 34 advanced carcinomas — Chromosomal changes, E-cadherin expression 
This series 63 adenomas, 133 early carcinomas, Histologic type APC mutation 
 24 follow-up cases with adenoma Histologic transformation p53 mutation 
  Submucosal invasion MSI 
  Lymph node metastasis  
Author, yNo. tumors analyzedClinicopathologic findings correlated with phenotypic marker expressionOther findings correlated with phenotypic marker expression
Yamachika (18), 1997 203 signet ring cell carcinomas Tumor intestinalization — 
Yoshikawa (19), 1998 301 differentiated-type carcinomas Tumor intestinalization — 
Endoh (10), 1999 10 differentiated-type carcinomas — E-cadherin mutation 
 9 precancerous lesions  — 
Endoh (11), 2000 differentiated-type carcinomas — p53 mutation 
 precancerous lesions (52 cases)  MSI 
Koseki (12), 2000 120 submucosal carcinomas Papillary-type carcinoma E-cadherin expression 
  Lymph node metastasis  
Saito (7), 2001 351 early carcinomas Histologic transformation — 
Tajima (13), 2001 136 advanced carcinomas Patients prognosis — 
Tsukashita (14), 2001 80 intramucosal neoplastic lesions Grade of atypia — 
Kabashima (8), 2002 114 intramucosal carcinomas — Matrix metalloproteinase-9 
Shibata (9), 2003 43 early carcinomas — Apoptotic index/proliferative index 
Tajima (15), 2003 137 advanced carcinomas Chemosensitivity Thymidylate synthase expression 
Tajima (16), 2004 213 advanced carcinomas Recurrence pattern — 
Yamazaki (17), 2006 48 adenomas, 171 carcinomas Tumor invasion APC mutation, MSI 
Morohara (20), 2006 34 advanced carcinomas — Chromosomal changes, E-cadherin expression 
This series 63 adenomas, 133 early carcinomas, Histologic type APC mutation 
 24 follow-up cases with adenoma Histologic transformation p53 mutation 
  Submucosal invasion MSI 
  Lymph node metastasis  

The phenotypic marker expression in gastric carcinomas has been suggested to be dependent on genetic changes (10, 11, 20). Previous molecular genetic studies have shown that gastric tumorigenesis is a multistep process involving the accumulation of genetic alterations (3, 21). Therefore, to clarify gastric tumorigenesis, it is essential to investigate phenotypic marker expression and genetic alterations in early gastric tumors. However, the association between the phenotypic marker expression and genetic alterations in gastric adenomas and early differentiated-type carcinomas remains unclear (Table 1). Even early-stage gastric differentiated-type tumors may have different characteristics in terms of biological behavior and related genetic alterations according to the phenotypic marker expression of the tumors.

In the present study, the phenotypic marker expressions and related genetic alterations, such as mutations in APC, K-ras, and p53 and the microsatellite instability (MSI) status, were examined in 63 gastric adenomas, 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas, and 24 follow-up cases with gastric adenoma. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the clinicopathologic significance of the phenotypic marker expression of gastric adenomas and early differentiated-type carcinomas and the genetic background during the incipient phase of gastric tumorigenesis.

Patients. Our series consisted of 63 patients with gastric adenoma who had undergone endoscopic mucosal resections or biopsies, 133 patients with early differentiated-type adenocarcinoma who had undergone surgical resections, and 24 follow-up patients who had undergone endoscopic mucosal resections or biopsies between 2001 and 2003 at Showa University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients before they were included in the present study.

Histologic review. The specimens were fixed with 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. The 4-μm consecutive sections were used for histopathologic examination by H&E staining and immunohistochemical stainings. The intramucosal neoplastic lesions were classified histologically according to the general rules established by the Vienna classification (22).

Analysis of phenotypic marker expression. The following mouse monoclonal antibodies were used: 45M1, diluted 1:50, to detect HGM; CLH5, diluted 1:50, to detect MUC6 glycoprotein; Ccp58, diluted 1:100, to detect MUC2 glycoprotein; and 56C6, diluted 1:40, to detect CD10 glycoprotein expression (all from Novocastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom). 45M1 and CLH5 were examined as gastric phenotype markers and Ccp58 and 56C6 were examined as intestinal phenotype markers. HGM is synonymous with MUC5AC, and the antibody is known to react with surface foveolar cells in the stomach (23, 24). MUC6 glycoprotein is expressed in mucous cells of the neck zone of oxyntic mucosa and in antral glands (25, 26). MUC2 glycoprotein is an intestinal apomucin and is also expressed in the supranuclear area of the goblet cells in regions showing intestinal metaplasia in the stomach (26, 27). CD10 glycoprotein is expressed on the brush border of intestinal epithelial cells (28, 29). The avidin-biotinyl-peroxidase complex immunohistochemical method was used for all immunohistochemical studies according to a previously described protocol (30).

With regard to the evaluations of HGM, MUC6, MUC2, and CD10 staining, distinct staining in >5% of the tumor cells was recorded as positive immunoreactivity for the relevant marker (Fig. 1). These immunohistochemical methods were used to classify the tumors into three different phenotypes: tumors with gastric phenotypic cells accounting for >5% of their cell population were classified as gastric phenotype tumors; those with intestinal phenotypic cells accounting for >5% of their cell population were classified as intestinal phenotype tumors; and those with both gastric and intestinal phenotypic cells accounting for >5% of their cell population were classified as gastric and intestinal mixed phenotype tumors (14, 16, 20).

Fig. 1.

Immunohistochemical analysis of phenotypic marker expressions in gastric tumor. A, HGM is expressed in the cancer cell cytoplasm (45M1). Original magnification, ×200. B, MUC6 glycoprotein is expressed in the cancer cell cytoplasm (CLH5). Original magnification, ×100. C, MUC2 glycoprotein is expressed in the cancer cell cytoplasm (Ccp58). Original magnification, ×100. D, CD10 glycoprotein is expressed on the luminal surfaces of cancerous glands (56C6). Original magnification, ×200.

Fig. 1.

Immunohistochemical analysis of phenotypic marker expressions in gastric tumor. A, HGM is expressed in the cancer cell cytoplasm (45M1). Original magnification, ×200. B, MUC6 glycoprotein is expressed in the cancer cell cytoplasm (CLH5). Original magnification, ×100. C, MUC2 glycoprotein is expressed in the cancer cell cytoplasm (Ccp58). Original magnification, ×100. D, CD10 glycoprotein is expressed on the luminal surfaces of cancerous glands (56C6). Original magnification, ×200.

Close modal

DNA extraction. Microdissection from 10-μm-thick formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded serial section was done on H&E-stained slides for both tumor and normal mucosa. Tissues were precisely microdissected under microscopic visualization using a PixCell laser capture microdissection system (Arcus Engineering, Mountain View, CA) to avoid the DNA contamination of inflammatory or stromal cell nuclei and DNA of cancerous cells without overt differentiation phenotype of the tumor. Genomic DNA was extracted from microdissected tissue as described previously (31).

Gene mutation analysis. Mutations of APC in exon 15, codon 1,260 to 1,596 region, and K-ras in codon 12 to 13 regions were detected by fluorescence-based PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis with previously described primers (17, 32, 33). After amplification, the PCR products from each sample were used to detect APC or K-ras mutations by fluorescence-based single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis using the ALFexpress DNA sequencer (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) with a cooling bath. Peak patterns were analyzed with the ALFwin Fragment Analyzer Program (Amersham Biosciences), and shift peaks were defined as mutations in DNA fragments. The nucleotide sequences of the DNA fragments with shifted peaks were previously determined. All mutations were reconfirmed by independent PCRs and sequencing.

Mutations of p53 in the exons 5 to 8 region were detected by fluorescence-based PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism using capillary electrophoresis (17). The nucleotide sequences of the primers were described previously. Mutations were detected by electrophoresis with an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The peak pattern was analyzed with QUISCA software, established by Higasa et al. and kindly provided by Dr. K. Hayashi (Division of Genome Analysis, Research Center for Genetic Information, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan) (17, 31, 34, 35). The nucleotide sequences of DNA fragments with shifted peaks were determined using a Genetic Analyzer 310 with a BigDye Terminator (Applied Biosystems). All mutations were reconfirmed by independent PCRs and sequencing (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Mutation analysis of APC in gastric tumor. A, PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis shows shift peak (arrowhead) compared with the control normal DNA. B, DNA sequence analysis reveals frameshift mutation (AG, 2 bp deletion) at codon 1,511 of APC. T, tumor DNA; N, normal DNA.

Fig. 2.

Mutation analysis of APC in gastric tumor. A, PCR single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis shows shift peak (arrowhead) compared with the control normal DNA. B, DNA sequence analysis reveals frameshift mutation (AG, 2 bp deletion) at codon 1,511 of APC. T, tumor DNA; N, normal DNA.

Close modal

MSI analysis. MSI was detected with five microsatellite markers: BAT-25, BAT-26, D2S123, D5S346, and D17S250. The primers and PCR conditions have been described elsewhere (17, 31). The samples were capillary electrophoresed on an ABI 3100 Genetic Analyzer using Genescan Analysis software (Applied Biosystems). An allelic shift (MSI) in a microsatellite marker was identified by the presence of at least one additional band in the tumor DNA that was not present in the control DNA. A specimen was considered to be MSI positive when at least one marker showed an allelic shift. A tumor sample was considered to contain high-frequency MSI (MSI-H) if two or more of the five informative markers showed instability and was considered to have low-frequency MSI (MSI-L) when only one marker was unstable. All PCRs were repeated on the same sample, and only consistent changes in the duplicate reactions were scored as abnormalities (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

MSI analysis in gastric tumor. MSI analysis using marker BAT-26 shows a different allelic shift peak (arrowhead) compared with the control normal DNA.

Fig. 3.

MSI analysis in gastric tumor. MSI analysis using marker BAT-26 shows a different allelic shift peak (arrowhead) compared with the control normal DNA.

Close modal

Statistical analysis. Statistical comparisons were done with the Student's t test or the Mann-Whitney U test between two independent groups and with the χ2 test or the Fisher's exact test between two proportions. Univariate and multivariate analyses to assess differences in the clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations between gastric adenomas and early differentiated-type carcinomas were done using logistic regression analysis. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Phenotypic marker expressions and genetic alterations in 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas. The expression of HGM, MUC6, MUC2, and CD10 was shown in 91 (46.4%), 107 (54.6%), 154 (78.6%), and 74 (37.8%) of the 196 early gastric differentiated-type tumors, respectively. Based on the expressions of these four markers, 32 (16.3%) tumors were classified as gastric phenotype tumors, 106 (54.1%) as gastric and intestinal mixed phenotype tumors, and 58 (29.6%) as intestinal phenotype tumors. Mutations in APC, K-ras, and p53 were detected in 47 (24.0%), 7 (3.6%), and 36 (18.4%) of the 196 tumors. MSI for at least one marker (MSI-L and MSI-H) was detected in 37 (18.9%) of the 196 tumors. Among these 37 tumors, MSI for two or more markers (MSI-H) was detected in 13 (35.1%) tumors.

Relationships between clinicopathologic findings and phenotypic marker expressions in 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas. The relationships between the clinicopathologic findings and the phenotypic marker expression in 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas are shown in Table 2A and B. Among the 63 gastric adenomas, HGM-positive tumors, MUC6-positive tumors, and gastric or gastric and intestinal mixed phenotype tumors were significantly associated with a higher incidence of high-grade atypia compared with HGM-negative tumors, MUC6-negative tumors, and intestinal phenotype tumors [66.7% versus 19.3% (P = 0.0249), 45.5% versus 12.2% (P = 0.0051), and 50.0% and 39.1% versus 13.2% (P = 0.0319), respectively]. No significant differences in clinicopathologic findings according to the expressions of MUC2 and CD10 were observed.

Table 2.

Relationships between clinicopathologic findings and phenotypic marker expression in early gastric tumors

A. Relationships between clinicopathologic findings and phenotypic marker expressions in 63 gastric adenomas
HGM expression
MUC6 expression
MUC2 expression
CD10 expression
PMEP
Negative (n = 57)Positive (n = 6)Negative (n = 41)Positive (n = 22)Negative (n = 7)Positive (n = 56)Negative (n = 22)Positive (n = 41)G (n = 2)GI (n = 23)I (n = 38)
Macroscopic type            
    Elevated 55 (96.5) 4 (66.7) 39 (95.1) 20 (90.9) 6 (85.7) 53 (94.6) 20 (90.9) 39 (95.1) 2 (100) 21 (91.3) 36 (94.7) 
    Flat, depressed 2 (3.5) 2 (33.3) 2 (9.1) 2 (9.1) 1 (14.3) 3 (5.4) 2 (9.1) 2 (4.9) 0 (0) 2 (8.7) 2 (5.3) 
Tumor size            
    Mean (mm) 9.3 10.8 8.0 11.5 8.3 9.6 9.8 9.2 98.0 11.3 8.2 
Histologic type*            
    Low grade 46 (80.7) 2 (33.3) 36 (87.8) 12 (54.5) 4 (57.1) 44 (78.6) 15 (68.2) 33 (80.5) 1 (50.0) 14 (60.9) 33 (86.8) 
    High grade 11 (19.3) 4 (66.7) 5 (12.2) 10 (45.5) 3 (42.9) 12 (21.4) 7 (31.8) 8 (19.5) 1 (50.0) 9 (39.1) 5 (13.2) 
            
B. Relationships between clinicopathologic findings and phenotypic marker expressions in 63 gastric adenomas
 
           
 HGM expression
 
 MUC6 expression
 
 MUC2 expression
 
 CD10 expression
 
 PMEP
 
  

 
Negative (n = 48)
 
Positive (n = 85)
 
Negative (n = 48)
 
Positive (n = 85)
 
Negative (n = 35)
 
Positive (n = 98)
 
Negative (n = 100)
 
Positive (n = 33)
 
G (n = 30)
 
GI (n = 83)
 
I (n = 20)
 
Macroscopic type            
    Elevated 19 (39.6) 29 (34.1) 17 (35.4) 31 (36.5) 10 (28.6) 38 (38.8) 38 (38.0) 10 (30.3) 9 (30.0) 31 (37.3) 8 (40.0) 
    Flat, depressed 29 (60.4) 56 (65.9) 31 (64.6) 54 (63.5) 25 (71.4) 60 (61.2) 62 (62.0) 23 (69.7) 21 (70.0) 52 (62.7) 12 (60.0) 
Tumor size            
    Mean (mm) 26.2 27.1 26.8 26.9 27 26.2 27.6 23.0 29.7 25.4 27.0 
Histologic type            
    Pure differentiated 48 (100) 75 (88.2) 45 (93.8) 78 (91.8) 31 (88.6) 92 (93.9) 91 (91.0) 32 (97.0) 26 (86.7) 77 (92.8) 20 (100) 
    Mixed with undifferentiated 0 (0) 10 (11.8) 3 (6.3) 7 (8.1) 4 (11.4) 6 (6.1) 9 (9.0) 1 (3.0) 4 (13.3) 6 (7.2) 0 (0) 
Depth of invasion            
    M 34 (70.8) 46 (54.1) 25 (52.1) 55 (64.7) 15 (42.9) 65 (66.3) 57 (57.0) 23 (69.7) 14 (46.7) 52 (62.7) 14 (70.0) 
    SM 14 (29.2) 39 (45.9) 23 (47.9) 30 (35.3) 20 (57.1) 33 (33.7) 43 (43.0) 10 (30.3) 16 (53.3) 31 (37.3) 6 (30.0) 
Lymphatic permeation            
    Negative 42 (87.5) 66 (77.6) 39 (81.3) 69 (81.2) 27 (77.1) 81 (82.7) 77 (77.0) 31 (93.9) 24 (80.0) 67 (80.7) 17 (85.0) 
    Positive 6 (12.5) 19 (22.4) 9 (18.8) 16 (18.8) 8 (22.9) 17 (17.3) 23 (23.0) 2 (6.1) 6 (20.0) 16 (19.3) 3 (15.0) 
Blood vessel permeation            
    Negative 43 (89.6) 70 (82.4) 39 (81.3) 74 (87.1) 30 (85.7) 83 (84.7) 83 (83.0) 30 (90.9) 24 (80.0) 71 (85.5) 18 (90.0) 
    Positive 5 (10.4) 15 (17.6) 9 (18.8) 11 (12.9) 5 (14.3) 15 (15.3) 17 (17.0) 3 (9.1) 6 (20.0) 12 (14.4) 2 (10.0) 
Lymph node metastasis§            
    Negative 48 (100) 78 (91.8) 46 (95.8) 80 (94.1) 33 (94.3) 93 (94.9) 94 (94.0) 32 (97.0) 29 (96.7) 77 (92.8) 20 (100) 
    Positive 0 (0) 7 (8.2) 2 (4.2) 5 (5.9) 2 (5.7) 5 (5.1) 6 (6.0) 1 (3.0) 1 (3.3) 6 (7.2) 0 (0) 
A. Relationships between clinicopathologic findings and phenotypic marker expressions in 63 gastric adenomas
HGM expression
MUC6 expression
MUC2 expression
CD10 expression
PMEP
Negative (n = 57)Positive (n = 6)Negative (n = 41)Positive (n = 22)Negative (n = 7)Positive (n = 56)Negative (n = 22)Positive (n = 41)G (n = 2)GI (n = 23)I (n = 38)
Macroscopic type            
    Elevated 55 (96.5) 4 (66.7) 39 (95.1) 20 (90.9) 6 (85.7) 53 (94.6) 20 (90.9) 39 (95.1) 2 (100) 21 (91.3) 36 (94.7) 
    Flat, depressed 2 (3.5) 2 (33.3) 2 (9.1) 2 (9.1) 1 (14.3) 3 (5.4) 2 (9.1) 2 (4.9) 0 (0) 2 (8.7) 2 (5.3) 
Tumor size            
    Mean (mm) 9.3 10.8 8.0 11.5 8.3 9.6 9.8 9.2 98.0 11.3 8.2 
Histologic type*            
    Low grade 46 (80.7) 2 (33.3) 36 (87.8) 12 (54.5) 4 (57.1) 44 (78.6) 15 (68.2) 33 (80.5) 1 (50.0) 14 (60.9) 33 (86.8) 
    High grade 11 (19.3) 4 (66.7) 5 (12.2) 10 (45.5) 3 (42.9) 12 (21.4) 7 (31.8) 8 (19.5) 1 (50.0) 9 (39.1) 5 (13.2) 
            
B. Relationships between clinicopathologic findings and phenotypic marker expressions in 63 gastric adenomas
 
           
 HGM expression
 
 MUC6 expression
 
 MUC2 expression
 
 CD10 expression
 
 PMEP
 
  

 
Negative (n = 48)
 
Positive (n = 85)
 
Negative (n = 48)
 
Positive (n = 85)
 
Negative (n = 35)
 
Positive (n = 98)
 
Negative (n = 100)
 
Positive (n = 33)
 
G (n = 30)
 
GI (n = 83)
 
I (n = 20)
 
Macroscopic type            
    Elevated 19 (39.6) 29 (34.1) 17 (35.4) 31 (36.5) 10 (28.6) 38 (38.8) 38 (38.0) 10 (30.3) 9 (30.0) 31 (37.3) 8 (40.0) 
    Flat, depressed 29 (60.4) 56 (65.9) 31 (64.6) 54 (63.5) 25 (71.4) 60 (61.2) 62 (62.0) 23 (69.7) 21 (70.0) 52 (62.7) 12 (60.0) 
Tumor size            
    Mean (mm) 26.2 27.1 26.8 26.9 27 26.2 27.6 23.0 29.7 25.4 27.0 
Histologic type            
    Pure differentiated 48 (100) 75 (88.2) 45 (93.8) 78 (91.8) 31 (88.6) 92 (93.9) 91 (91.0) 32 (97.0) 26 (86.7) 77 (92.8) 20 (100) 
    Mixed with undifferentiated 0 (0) 10 (11.8) 3 (6.3) 7 (8.1) 4 (11.4) 6 (6.1) 9 (9.0) 1 (3.0) 4 (13.3) 6 (7.2) 0 (0) 
Depth of invasion            
    M 34 (70.8) 46 (54.1) 25 (52.1) 55 (64.7) 15 (42.9) 65 (66.3) 57 (57.0) 23 (69.7) 14 (46.7) 52 (62.7) 14 (70.0) 
    SM 14 (29.2) 39 (45.9) 23 (47.9) 30 (35.3) 20 (57.1) 33 (33.7) 43 (43.0) 10 (30.3) 16 (53.3) 31 (37.3) 6 (30.0) 
Lymphatic permeation            
    Negative 42 (87.5) 66 (77.6) 39 (81.3) 69 (81.2) 27 (77.1) 81 (82.7) 77 (77.0) 31 (93.9) 24 (80.0) 67 (80.7) 17 (85.0) 
    Positive 6 (12.5) 19 (22.4) 9 (18.8) 16 (18.8) 8 (22.9) 17 (17.3) 23 (23.0) 2 (6.1) 6 (20.0) 16 (19.3) 3 (15.0) 
Blood vessel permeation            
    Negative 43 (89.6) 70 (82.4) 39 (81.3) 74 (87.1) 30 (85.7) 83 (84.7) 83 (83.0) 30 (90.9) 24 (80.0) 71 (85.5) 18 (90.0) 
    Positive 5 (10.4) 15 (17.6) 9 (18.8) 11 (12.9) 5 (14.3) 15 (15.3) 17 (17.0) 3 (9.1) 6 (20.0) 12 (14.4) 2 (10.0) 
Lymph node metastasis§            
    Negative 48 (100) 78 (91.8) 46 (95.8) 80 (94.1) 33 (94.3) 93 (94.9) 94 (94.0) 32 (97.0) 29 (96.7) 77 (92.8) 20 (100) 
    Positive 0 (0) 7 (8.2) 2 (4.2) 5 (5.9) 2 (5.7) 5 (5.1) 6 (6.0) 1 (3.0) 1 (3.3) 6 (7.2) 0 (0) 

Abbreviations: PMEP, phenotypic marker expression pattern; G, gastric phenotype; GI, gastric and intestinal mixed phenotype; I, intestinal phenotype; M, mucosa; SM, submucosa.

*

P = 0.0249 (HGM expression), 0.0051 (MUC6 expression), and 0.0319 (PMEPT).

P = 0.0137 (HGM expression).

P = 0.0149 (MUC2 expression).

§

P = 0.0487 (HGM expression).

Among the 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas, HGM-positive tumors were significantly associated with higher incidences of mixed-type tumors (differentiated-type carcinoma with an undifferentiated-type carcinoma component) and lymph node metastasis compared with HGM-negative tumors [11.8% versus 0% (P = 0.0137) and 8.2% versus 0% (P = 0.0487), respectively]. MUC2-positive tumors were significantly associated with a higher incidence of mucosal carcinomas compared with MUC2-negative tumors (66.3% versus 42.9%; P = 0.0149). No significant differences in clinicopathologic findings according to the expressions of MUC6 and CD10 or the phenotypic marker expression patterns were observed.

Differences in clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations between 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas. The differences in the clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations between 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas are shown in Table 3. A univariate analysis revealed that the gastric adenomas were significantly correlated with a higher incidence of elevated-type tumors, a smaller tumor size, and higher incidences of HGM-negative tumors, MUC6-negative tumors, MUC2-positive tumors, CD10-positive tumors, intestinal phenotype tumors, tumors with APC mutations, and tumors without p53 mutations compared with early differentiated-type carcinomas (P < 0.0001, 0.0001, 0.0001, 0.0002, 0.0187, 0.0001, 0.0001, 0.0006, and 0.0025, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in macroscopic type, tumor size, HGM expression, and p53 mutation between gastric adenomas and early differentiated-type carcinomas (P = 0.0001, P < 0.0001, P < 0.0005, and P < 0.0239, respectively; multivariate analysis A). When data from the same tumors were analyzed based on the independent phenotypic marker expression patterns, significant differences in macroscopic type, tumor size, phenotypic marker expression pattern, and p53 mutation were observed between gastric adenomas and early carcinomas (P < 0.0001, 0.0001, 0.0044, and 0.0256, respectively; multivariate analysis B).

Table 3.

Differences in clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations between 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas

Adenoma
Early carcinoma
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis A
Multivariate analysis B
LG (n = 48)HG (n = 15)Total (n = 63)MC (n = 80)SMC (n = 53)Total (n = 133)POR (95% CI)POR (95% CI)P
Macroscopic type            
    Elevated 48 (100) 11 (73.3) 59 (93.7) 31 (38.8) 17 (32.1) 48 (36.1) <0.0001 34.3 (5.5-213.4) 0.0001 36.5 (8.1-164.4) <0.0001 
    Flat, depressed 0 (0) 4 (26.7) 4 (6.3) 49 (61.3) 36 (67.9) 85 (63.9)      
Tumor size            
    Mean (mm) 8.9 11.2 9.4 24.5 27.8 26.5 <0.0001 1.2 (1.1-1.3) <0.0001 1.2 (1.1-1.3) <0.0001 
HGM expression            
    Negative 46 (95.8) 11 (73.3) 57 (90.5) 34 (42.5) 14 (26.4) 48 (36.1) <0.0001 25.3 (4.1-155.8) 0.0005  NA 
    Positive 2 (4.2) 4 (26.7) 6 (9.5) 46 (57.5) 39 (73.6) 85 (63.9)      
MUC6 expression            
    Negative 36 (75.0) 5 (33.3) 41 (65.1) 25 (31.3) 23 (43.4) 48 (36.1) 0.0002  NS  NA 
    Positive 12 (25.0) 10 (66.7) 22 (34.9) 55 (68.8) 30 (56.6) 85 (63.9)      
MUC2 expression            
    Negative 4 (8.3) 3 (20.0) 7 (11.1) 15 (18.8) 20 (37.7) 35 (26.3) 0.0187  NS  NA 
    Positive 44 (91.7) 12 (80.0) 56 (88.9) 65 (81.3) 33 (62.3) 98 (73.7)      
CD10 expression            
    Negative 15 (31.3) 7 (46.7) 22 (34.9) 57 (71.3) 43 (81.1) 100 (75.2) <0.0001  NS  NA 
    Positive 33 (68.8) 8 (53.3) 41 (65.1) 23 (28.8) 10 (18.9) 33 (24.8)      
PMEP            
    G phenotype 1 (2.1) 1 (6.7) 2 (3.2) 14 (17.5) 16 (30.2) 30 (22.6) <0.0001  NA 5.1 (1.7-15.5) 0.0044 
    GI phenotype 14 (29.2) 9 (60.0) 23 (36.5) 52 (65.0) 31 (58.5) 83 (62.4)      
    I phenotype 33 (68.8) 5 (33.3) 38 (60.3) 14 (17.5) 6 (11.3) 20 (15.0)      
APC mutation            
    Negative 25 (52.1) 13 (86.7) 38 (60.3) 64 (80.0) 47 (88.7) 111 (83.5) 0.0006  NS  NS 
    Positive 23 (47.9) 2 (13.3) 25 (39.7) 16 (20.0) 6 (11.3) 22 (16.5)      
K-ras mutation            
    Negative 48 (100) 15 (100) 63 (100) 75 (93.8) 51 (96.2) 126 (94.7) NS  NS  NS 
    Positive 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (6.3) 2 (3.8) 7 (5.3)      
p53 mutation            
    Negative 47 (97.9) 13 (86.7) 60 (95.2) 57 (71.3) 43 (81.1) 100 (75.2) 0.0025 18.1 (1.5-223.4) 0.0239 13.3 (1.4-129.3) 0.0256 
    Positive 1 (2.1) 2 (13.3) 3 (4.8) 23 (28.8) 10 (18.9) 33 (24.8)      
MSI            
    MSS 39 (81.3) 12 (80.0) 51 (81.0) 65 (81.3) 43 (81.1) 108 (81.2) NS  NS  NS 
    MSI-L 5 (10.4) 1 (6.7) 6 (9.5) 11 (13.8) 7 (13.2) 18 (13.5)      
    MSI-H 4 (8.3) 2 (13.3) 6 (9.5) 4 (5.0) 3 (5.7) 7 (5.3)      
Adenoma
Early carcinoma
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis A
Multivariate analysis B
LG (n = 48)HG (n = 15)Total (n = 63)MC (n = 80)SMC (n = 53)Total (n = 133)POR (95% CI)POR (95% CI)P
Macroscopic type            
    Elevated 48 (100) 11 (73.3) 59 (93.7) 31 (38.8) 17 (32.1) 48 (36.1) <0.0001 34.3 (5.5-213.4) 0.0001 36.5 (8.1-164.4) <0.0001 
    Flat, depressed 0 (0) 4 (26.7) 4 (6.3) 49 (61.3) 36 (67.9) 85 (63.9)      
Tumor size            
    Mean (mm) 8.9 11.2 9.4 24.5 27.8 26.5 <0.0001 1.2 (1.1-1.3) <0.0001 1.2 (1.1-1.3) <0.0001 
HGM expression            
    Negative 46 (95.8) 11 (73.3) 57 (90.5) 34 (42.5) 14 (26.4) 48 (36.1) <0.0001 25.3 (4.1-155.8) 0.0005  NA 
    Positive 2 (4.2) 4 (26.7) 6 (9.5) 46 (57.5) 39 (73.6) 85 (63.9)      
MUC6 expression            
    Negative 36 (75.0) 5 (33.3) 41 (65.1) 25 (31.3) 23 (43.4) 48 (36.1) 0.0002  NS  NA 
    Positive 12 (25.0) 10 (66.7) 22 (34.9) 55 (68.8) 30 (56.6) 85 (63.9)      
MUC2 expression            
    Negative 4 (8.3) 3 (20.0) 7 (11.1) 15 (18.8) 20 (37.7) 35 (26.3) 0.0187  NS  NA 
    Positive 44 (91.7) 12 (80.0) 56 (88.9) 65 (81.3) 33 (62.3) 98 (73.7)      
CD10 expression            
    Negative 15 (31.3) 7 (46.7) 22 (34.9) 57 (71.3) 43 (81.1) 100 (75.2) <0.0001  NS  NA 
    Positive 33 (68.8) 8 (53.3) 41 (65.1) 23 (28.8) 10 (18.9) 33 (24.8)      
PMEP            
    G phenotype 1 (2.1) 1 (6.7) 2 (3.2) 14 (17.5) 16 (30.2) 30 (22.6) <0.0001  NA 5.1 (1.7-15.5) 0.0044 
    GI phenotype 14 (29.2) 9 (60.0) 23 (36.5) 52 (65.0) 31 (58.5) 83 (62.4)      
    I phenotype 33 (68.8) 5 (33.3) 38 (60.3) 14 (17.5) 6 (11.3) 20 (15.0)      
APC mutation            
    Negative 25 (52.1) 13 (86.7) 38 (60.3) 64 (80.0) 47 (88.7) 111 (83.5) 0.0006  NS  NS 
    Positive 23 (47.9) 2 (13.3) 25 (39.7) 16 (20.0) 6 (11.3) 22 (16.5)      
K-ras mutation            
    Negative 48 (100) 15 (100) 63 (100) 75 (93.8) 51 (96.2) 126 (94.7) NS  NS  NS 
    Positive 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5 (6.3) 2 (3.8) 7 (5.3)      
p53 mutation            
    Negative 47 (97.9) 13 (86.7) 60 (95.2) 57 (71.3) 43 (81.1) 100 (75.2) 0.0025 18.1 (1.5-223.4) 0.0239 13.3 (1.4-129.3) 0.0256 
    Positive 1 (2.1) 2 (13.3) 3 (4.8) 23 (28.8) 10 (18.9) 33 (24.8)      
MSI            
    MSS 39 (81.3) 12 (80.0) 51 (81.0) 65 (81.3) 43 (81.1) 108 (81.2) NS  NS  NS 
    MSI-L 5 (10.4) 1 (6.7) 6 (9.5) 11 (13.8) 7 (13.2) 18 (13.5)      
    MSI-H 4 (8.3) 2 (13.3) 6 (9.5) 4 (5.0) 3 (5.7) 7 (5.3)      

NOTE: Multivariate analysis B was done using data from the same tumors as multivariate analysis A based on the phenotypic marker expression pattern independently instead of the expressions of HGM, MUC6, MUC2, and CD10.

Abbreviations: LG, low grade; HG, high grade; MC, mucosal carcinoma; SMC, carcinoma with submucosal invasion; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NA, not available; NS, not significant.

Relationships between phenotype marker expressions and genetic alterations in 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas. The relationships between the phenotypic marker expressions and genetic alterations in 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas are shown in Table 4. HGM-positive tumors were significantly associated with a lower frequency of APC mutation compared with HGM-negative tumors in 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas and in all 196 tumors [7.1% versus 33.3% (P < 0.0001) and 8.8% versus 37.1% (P < 0.0001), respectively]. MUC6-positive tumors were significantly associated with a lower frequency of APC mutation compared with MUC6-negative tumors in all 196 tumors (15.9% versus 33.7%; P = 0.0036) and with a higher incidence of tumors with MSI-L and MSI-H in 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas and in all 196 tumors [24.7% versus 8.3% (P = 0.0217) and 25.2% versus 11.2% (P = 0.0127), respectively]. No significant differences in the incidence of each genetic alteration were observed between MUC2-positive tumors and MUC2-negative tumors. CD10-positive tumors were significantly associated with a higher frequency of APC mutation compared with CD10-negative tumors in 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas and in all 196 tumors [36.4% versus 10.0% (P = 0.0004) and 41.9% versus 13.1% (P < 0.0001), respectively], with a higher frequency of p53 mutation in 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas (42.4% versus 19.0%; P = 0.0135), and with a lower incidence of tumors with MSI-L and MSI-H in 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas (6.1% versus 23.0%; P = 0.0384). With respect to the relationship between the phenotypic marker expression pattern and genetic alterations, gastric phenotype tumors and gastric and intestinal mixed phenotype tumors were significantly associated with a lower incidence of APC mutation compared with intestinal phenotype tumors in all 196 tumors (9.4% and 17.9% versus 41.4%; P = 0.0016 and 0.0011, respectively).

Table 4.

Relationships between phenotype marker expressions and genetic alterations in 63 gastric adenomas and 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas

HGM expression
MUC6 expression
MUC2 expression
CD10 expression
PMEP
NegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveGGII
APC mutation            
    Adenoma 23/57 (40.4) 2/6 (33.3) 20/41 (48.8) 5/22 (22.7) 3/7 (42.9) 22/56 (39.3) 6/22 (27.1) 19/41 (46.3) 0/2 (0) 6/23 (26.1) 19/38 (50.0) 
    Carcinoma* 16/48 (33.3) 6/85 (7.1) 10/48 (20.8) 12/85 (14.1) 5/35 (14.3) 17/98 (17.3) 10/100 (10.0) 12/33 (36.4) 3/30 (10.0) 13/83 (15.7) 5/20 (25.0) 
    Total 39/105 (37.1) 8/91 (8.8) 30/89 (33.7) 17/107 (15.9) 8/42 (19.0) 39/154 (25.3) 16/122 (13.1) 31/74 (41.9) 3/32 (9.4) 19/106 (17.9) 24/58 (41.4) 
K-ras mutation            
    Adenoma 0/57 (0) 0/6 (0) 0/41 (0) 0/22 (0) 0/7 (0) 0/56 (0) 0/22 (0) 0/41 (0) 0/2 (0) 0/23 (0) 0/38 (0) 
    Carcinoma 4/48 (8.3) 3/85 (3.5) 1/48 (2.1) 6/85 (7.1) 1/35 (2.9) 6/98 (6.1) 5/100 (5.0) 2/33 (6.1) 1/30 (3.3) 5/83 (6.0) 1/20 (5.0) 
    Total 4/105 (3.9) 3/91 (3.3) 1/89 (1.1) 6/107 (5.6) 1/42 (2.4) 6/154 (3.9) 5/122 (4.1) 2/74 (2.7) 1/32 (3.1) 5/106 (4.7) 1/58 (1.7) 
p53 mutation            
    Adenoma 3/57 (5.3) 0/6 (0) 3/41 (7.3) 0/22 (0) 0/7 (0) 3/56 (5.4) 1/22 (4.5) 2/41 (4.9) 0/2 (0) 0/23 (0) 3/38 (7.9) 
    Carcinoma 15/48 (31.3) 18/85 (21.2) 13/48 (27.1) 20/85 (23.5) 7/35 (20.0) 26/98 (26.5) 19/100 (19.0) 14/33 (42.4) 6/30 (20.0) 19/83 (22.9) 8/20 (40.0) 
    Total 18/105 (17.1) 18/91 (19.8) 16/89 (18.0) 20/107 (18.7) 7/42 (16.7) 29/154 (18.8) 20/122 (16.4) 16/74 (21.6) 6/32 (18.8) 19/106 (17.9) 11/58 (19.0) 
MSI (MSI-L or MSI-H)            
    Adenoma 11/57 (19.3) 1/6 (16.7) 6/41 (14.6) 6/22 (27.3) 1/7 (14.3) 11/56 (19.6) 5/22 (22.7) 7/41 (17.1) 1/2 (50.0) 5/23 (21.7) 6/38 (15.8) 
    Carcinoma§ 11/48 (22.9) 14/85 (16.5) 4/48 (8.3) 21/85 (24.7) 10/35 (28.6) 15/98 (15.3) 23/100 (23.0) 2/33 (6.1) 9/30 (30.0) 13/83 (15.7) 3/20 (15.0) 
    Total 22/105 (21.0) 15/91 (16.5) 10/89 (11.2) 27/107 (25.2) 11/42 (26.2) 26/154 (16.9) 28/122 (12.2) 9/74 (12.2) 10/32 (31.3) 18/106 (17.0) 9/58 (15.5) 
HGM expression
MUC6 expression
MUC2 expression
CD10 expression
PMEP
NegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveNegativePositiveGGII
APC mutation            
    Adenoma 23/57 (40.4) 2/6 (33.3) 20/41 (48.8) 5/22 (22.7) 3/7 (42.9) 22/56 (39.3) 6/22 (27.1) 19/41 (46.3) 0/2 (0) 6/23 (26.1) 19/38 (50.0) 
    Carcinoma* 16/48 (33.3) 6/85 (7.1) 10/48 (20.8) 12/85 (14.1) 5/35 (14.3) 17/98 (17.3) 10/100 (10.0) 12/33 (36.4) 3/30 (10.0) 13/83 (15.7) 5/20 (25.0) 
    Total 39/105 (37.1) 8/91 (8.8) 30/89 (33.7) 17/107 (15.9) 8/42 (19.0) 39/154 (25.3) 16/122 (13.1) 31/74 (41.9) 3/32 (9.4) 19/106 (17.9) 24/58 (41.4) 
K-ras mutation            
    Adenoma 0/57 (0) 0/6 (0) 0/41 (0) 0/22 (0) 0/7 (0) 0/56 (0) 0/22 (0) 0/41 (0) 0/2 (0) 0/23 (0) 0/38 (0) 
    Carcinoma 4/48 (8.3) 3/85 (3.5) 1/48 (2.1) 6/85 (7.1) 1/35 (2.9) 6/98 (6.1) 5/100 (5.0) 2/33 (6.1) 1/30 (3.3) 5/83 (6.0) 1/20 (5.0) 
    Total 4/105 (3.9) 3/91 (3.3) 1/89 (1.1) 6/107 (5.6) 1/42 (2.4) 6/154 (3.9) 5/122 (4.1) 2/74 (2.7) 1/32 (3.1) 5/106 (4.7) 1/58 (1.7) 
p53 mutation            
    Adenoma 3/57 (5.3) 0/6 (0) 3/41 (7.3) 0/22 (0) 0/7 (0) 3/56 (5.4) 1/22 (4.5) 2/41 (4.9) 0/2 (0) 0/23 (0) 3/38 (7.9) 
    Carcinoma 15/48 (31.3) 18/85 (21.2) 13/48 (27.1) 20/85 (23.5) 7/35 (20.0) 26/98 (26.5) 19/100 (19.0) 14/33 (42.4) 6/30 (20.0) 19/83 (22.9) 8/20 (40.0) 
    Total 18/105 (17.1) 18/91 (19.8) 16/89 (18.0) 20/107 (18.7) 7/42 (16.7) 29/154 (18.8) 20/122 (16.4) 16/74 (21.6) 6/32 (18.8) 19/106 (17.9) 11/58 (19.0) 
MSI (MSI-L or MSI-H)            
    Adenoma 11/57 (19.3) 1/6 (16.7) 6/41 (14.6) 6/22 (27.3) 1/7 (14.3) 11/56 (19.6) 5/22 (22.7) 7/41 (17.1) 1/2 (50.0) 5/23 (21.7) 6/38 (15.8) 
    Carcinoma§ 11/48 (22.9) 14/85 (16.5) 4/48 (8.3) 21/85 (24.7) 10/35 (28.6) 15/98 (15.3) 23/100 (23.0) 2/33 (6.1) 9/30 (30.0) 13/83 (15.7) 3/20 (15.0) 
    Total 22/105 (21.0) 15/91 (16.5) 10/89 (11.2) 27/107 (25.2) 11/42 (26.2) 26/154 (16.9) 28/122 (12.2) 9/74 (12.2) 10/32 (31.3) 18/106 (17.0) 9/58 (15.5) 
*

P < 0.0001 (HGM expression) and 0.0004 (CD10 expression).

P < 0.0001 (HGM and CD10 expressions), P = 0.0036 (MUC6 expression), P < 0.0001 (CD10 expression), and P = 0.0001 (PMEP).

P = 0.0069 (CD10 expression).

§

P = 0.0217 (MUC6 expression) and 0.0384 (CD10 expression).

P = 0.0127 (MUC6 expression).

Clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations in 24 follow-up cases of gastric adenoma. We next examined the clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations in 24 follow-up cases of gastric adenoma. All 24 tumors were diagnosed as gastric adenoma by histologic examination of the initial biopsy specimen obtained by endoscopic examination. In 5 of these 24 cases, a histologic examination of the final biopsy specimens, endoscopically resected lesions, or surgical specimens revealed a malignant transformation of gastric adenoma at the end of the follow-up period; in 19 cases, no evidence of adenocarcinoma was found based on a histologic examination of the final biopsy specimens at the end of the follow-up period. The clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations of the 24 gastric adenomas at the initial diagnosis are shown in Table 5A, whereas those of the 16 tumors in which phenotypic marker expressions and genetic alterations were determined at the final diagnosis are shown in Table 5B. The phenotypic marker expressions and genetic alterations in the eight other cases could not be analyzed because adequate tissue samples were not available.

Table 5.

Clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations in 24 follow-up cases with gastric adenoma

A. Clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations at the initial diagnosis in 24 follow-up cases with gastric adenoma
CasesInitial diagnosisFinal diagnosisFollow-up time (mo)Macroscopic typeTumor size (mm)HGM expressionMUC6 expressionMUC2 expressionCD10 expressionPMEPAPC mutationK-ras mutationp53 mutationMSI status
High Carcinoma Flat 10 − − GI − − − MSS 
High Carcinoma Elevated 18 − GI − − − MSS 
High Carcinoma Elevated 15 − − − − − MSS 
High Carcinoma depressed 15 − − GI − − − MSI-L 
High Carcinoma 10 Elevated 15 − − GI − − − MSI-H 
Low High Elevated 15 − − − − MSS 
Low Low Elevated − − − − − MSS 
Low Low Elevated 10 − − − − − MSS 
Low Low Elevated GI − − − MSS 
10 High High Elevated 18 − − − − − MSI-L 
11 High High Depressed − − GI − − MSS 
12 Low Low Elevated − − − − MSS 
13 Low Low Elevated 14 − − − GI − − − MSS 
14 Low Low 11 Elevated − − − − MSS 
15 Low Low 11 Elevated − − − − − MSS 
16 Low Low 12 Elevated − − − − MSS 
17 Low High 14 Elevated 10 − − − − − MSS 
18 Low Low 20 Elevated − − − − − − MSS 
19 Low Low 24 Elevated − − − − − − MSS 
20 Low Low 24 Elevated − − − − MSS 
21 Low Low 25 Elevated − − − − − MSS 
22 Low Low 32 Elevated − − − − MSS 
23 Low Low 54 Elevated 11 − − GI − − − MSS 
24 Low Low 55 Elevated − − − − MSS 
               
B. Clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations at the final diagnosis in 24 follow-up cases with gastric adenoma
 
              
Cases
 
Macroscopic type
 
Tumor size (mm)
 
HGM expression
 
MUC6 expression
 
MUC2 expression
 
CD10 expression
 
PMEP
 
APC mutation
 
K-ras mutation
 
p53 mutation
 
MSI status
 

 

 

 
Flat 10 − GI − − MSS    
Elevated 18 − GI − − − MSS    
Elevated 15 − − − − − MSS    
Depressed 15 − − GI − − − MSI-L    
Elevated 15 − − GI − − − MSI-H    
Elevated 15 − − − − MSS    
Elevated 10 − − − − − MSS    
Elevated GI − − − MSS    
11 Depressed 12 − GI − − MSI-L    
14 Elevated − − −  MSI-L    
16 Elevated − − − − MSS    
18 Elevated − − GI − − MSI-L    
21 Elevated − − − − − MSS    
22 Elevated − − − − MSS    
23 Elevated 11 − GI − − − MSS    
24 Elevated − − − − MSS    
A. Clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations at the initial diagnosis in 24 follow-up cases with gastric adenoma
CasesInitial diagnosisFinal diagnosisFollow-up time (mo)Macroscopic typeTumor size (mm)HGM expressionMUC6 expressionMUC2 expressionCD10 expressionPMEPAPC mutationK-ras mutationp53 mutationMSI status
High Carcinoma Flat 10 − − GI − − − MSS 
High Carcinoma Elevated 18 − GI − − − MSS 
High Carcinoma Elevated 15 − − − − − MSS 
High Carcinoma depressed 15 − − GI − − − MSI-L 
High Carcinoma 10 Elevated 15 − − GI − − − MSI-H 
Low High Elevated 15 − − − − MSS 
Low Low Elevated − − − − − MSS 
Low Low Elevated 10 − − − − − MSS 
Low Low Elevated GI − − − MSS 
10 High High Elevated 18 − − − − − MSI-L 
11 High High Depressed − − GI − − MSS 
12 Low Low Elevated − − − − MSS 
13 Low Low Elevated 14 − − − GI − − − MSS 
14 Low Low 11 Elevated − − − − MSS 
15 Low Low 11 Elevated − − − − − MSS 
16 Low Low 12 Elevated − − − − MSS 
17 Low High 14 Elevated 10 − − − − − MSS 
18 Low Low 20 Elevated − − − − − − MSS 
19 Low Low 24 Elevated − − − − − − MSS 
20 Low Low 24 Elevated − − − − MSS 
21 Low Low 25 Elevated − − − − − MSS 
22 Low Low 32 Elevated − − − − MSS 
23 Low Low 54 Elevated 11 − − GI − − − MSS 
24 Low Low 55 Elevated − − − − MSS 
               
B. Clinicopathologic findings, phenotypic marker expressions, and genetic alterations at the final diagnosis in 24 follow-up cases with gastric adenoma
 
              
Cases
 
Macroscopic type
 
Tumor size (mm)
 
HGM expression
 
MUC6 expression
 
MUC2 expression
 
CD10 expression
 
PMEP
 
APC mutation
 
K-ras mutation
 
p53 mutation
 
MSI status
 

 

 

 
Flat 10 − GI − − MSS    
Elevated 18 − GI − − − MSS    
Elevated 15 − − − − − MSS    
Depressed 15 − − GI − − − MSI-L    
Elevated 15 − − GI − − − MSI-H    
Elevated 15 − − − − MSS    
Elevated 10 − − − − − MSS    
Elevated GI − − − MSS    
11 Depressed 12 − GI − − MSI-L    
14 Elevated − − −  MSI-L    
16 Elevated − − − − MSS    
18 Elevated − − GI − − MSI-L    
21 Elevated − − − − − MSS    
22 Elevated − − − − MSS    
23 Elevated 11 − GI − − − MSS    
24 Elevated − − − − MSS    

Based on the analysis of the 24 gastric adenoma specimens obtained at the initial diagnosis, the gastric adenomas that progressed to adenocarcinomas were significantly associated with a higher incidence of gastric adenoma with severe atypia in histologic grade (P = 0.0065), a larger tumor size (P = 0.0073), and lower incidences of intestinal phenotype tumor (P = 0.0474) and tumors with APC mutation (P = 0.0411) compared with gastric adenomas that did not progress to carcinomas. Among the five gastric adenomas that progressed to differentiated-type carcinoma, four tumors were gastric and intestinal mixed phenotype tumors and none of the tumors carried an APC mutation. No malignant transformation was found in intestinal phenotype adenomas with APC mutation among the 24 follow-up cases of gastric adenoma.

With respect to the transformation in phenotypic marker expression, mutations in APC, K-ras, and p53, and the MSI status between specimens at the initial diagnosis and those at the final diagnosis among the seven tumors without CD10 expression at the initial diagnosis, CD10 expression was shown in four tumor specimens at the final diagnosis (cases 1, 11, 18, and 23). Among the nine tumors without APC mutation at the initial diagnosis, APC mutation was detected in two tumor specimens at the final diagnosis (cases 1 and 18). These two tumors were accompanied by a phenotypic shift (from CD10 negative to CD10 positive) during the follow-up period. Among the 14 tumors without MSI at the initial diagnosis, MSI was detected in three tumor specimens at the final diagnosis (cases 11, 14, and 18). No differences in the expressions of HGM, MUC6, and MUC2, the phenotypic marker expression pattern, K-ras mutation, and p53 mutation were observed between specimens obtained at the initial diagnosis and those obtained at the final diagnosis.

Our present results revealed that the expressions of HGM and MUC6 and the gastric phenotype were associated with high-grade atypia in 63 gastric adenomas. In 133 early differentiated-type carcinomas, HGM expression was associated with mixed-type tumors and lymph node metastasis. MUC2 expression was inversely associated with invasion to the submucosa. These findings show distinct differences in tumor aggressiveness according to the phenotypic marker expressions of early-stage gastric differentiated-type tumors. Differentiated-type gastric carcinomas with a gastric phenotype have been suggested to be more likely to transform into undifferentiated-type carcinoma and to show infiltrative growth to deeper layers of the invasion of the surrounding structures through the loss of E-cadherin function compared with those with an intestinal phenotype (7, 10, 12, 13, 20). Mixed-type tumors have been considered to represent a progressive loss of glandular structure and a histologic transformation from differentiated-type to undifferentiated-type carcinoma during the progression of the tumor. Therefore, our present results support previous findings showing that phenotypic marker expression is associated with histologic transformation during the early stage of gastric tumorigenesis. Koseki et al. (12) reported that the gastric phenotype is an independent factor associated with lymph node metastasis among early gastric carcinomas. Among advanced gastric carcinomas, gastric phenotype tumors have been also associated with a greater malignant potential during invasion and metastasis compared with tumors of other phenotypes (10, 12). Therefore, phenotypic marker expression could reflect tumor aggressiveness in gastric adenomas and carcinomas.

In previous reports on differences in phenotypic marker expressions and genetic alterations among gastric adenomas and differentiated-type carcinomas, the majority of gastric adenomas were reported to be intestinal phenotype, whereas gastric carcinomas were reported to mainly express gastric phenotypic markers (14). APC mutation was reported in up to 40% of gastric adenomas but only rarely in carcinoma. p53 mutation was reported in 30% of gastric carcinomas but only rarely in gastric adenomas (11, 32, 36). However, as far as we are aware, no studies involving a large number of cases have been published in which gastric adenomas and early differentiated-type carcinomas were compared in multivariate analyses examining clinicopathologic features, phenotypic marker expression, and genetic alterations (Table 1). In the present study, a multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in macroscopic type, tumor size, HGM expression (or the phenotypic marker expression pattern), and p53 mutation between gastric adenomas and early carcinomas. These findings show that macroscopic type, tumor size, the phenotypic marker expression, and p53 mutation are the most important factors for differentiating between gastric adenoma and differentiated-type carcinoma.

There have been several reports on the genetic alterations in gastric adenomas and differentiated-type carcinomas. However, genetic alterations according to phenotypic marker expression patterns have been examined in only a few studies on gastric adenoma and early differentiated-type carcinoma, and the results of these studies remain to be clarified (9, 11, 17). Our present results revealed significant associations between phenotypic marker expression patterns and genetic alterations in early gastric differentiated-type tumors. APC mutation was significantly associated with CD10 expression and the intestinal phenotype and inversely associated with the expressions of HGM and MUC6. p53 mutation was significantly associated with CD10 expression. MSI status was significantly associated with MUC6 expression. These findings suggest that phenotypic marker expression is closely related to genetic alterations in the incipient phase of gastric tumorigenesis. Differentiation to gastric pyloric gland cells is thought to be related to MSI, whereas differentiation to intestinal epithelial cells, especially absorptive cells, is thought to be related to mutations in APC or p53.

The adenoma-carcinoma sequence has been analyzed in colorectal cancer, and this theory is generally accepted (37). Nevertheless, only 11% to 40% of gastric adenomas progress to differentiated-type carcinomas. Previous studies have reported that the risk of malignant transformation in gastric adenomas was related to clinicopathologic characteristics, such as a large tumor size and high-grade atypia (38). However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has examined phenotypic marker expression and genetic alterations in follow-up cases with gastric adenoma. In the present study, the gastric adenomas that progressed to carcinomas were significantly associated with a larger tumor size and severe atypia and were inversely associated with an intestinal phenotype and APC mutation compared with tumors that did not progress to carcinomas. Among our follow-up cases, malignant transformation did not occur in any of the intestinal phenotype adenomas with APC mutation, which are characteristics of gastric adenoma. These findings suggest that not only clinicopathologic findings, such as tumor size and degree of atypia, but also phenotypic marker expression and APC mutation are important risk factors predicting malignant transformation in gastric adenomas. For patients with a high risk of malignant transformation, such as gastric adenomas with gastric phenotype and without APC mutation, endoscopic mucosal resection may be recommended.

Among our follow-up cases, CD10 expression was shown at the final diagnosis in four of seven gastric adenomas without CD10 expression at the initial diagnosis, reflecting a phenotypic shift from a gastric phenotype to an intestinal phenotype with time. The phenotypic shift from a gastric to an intestinal phenotype with progression in gastric tumors, which is seen in gastric nonneoplastic mucosa with intestinal metaplasia, has also been previously shown (14, 18, 19, 39). Tsukashita et al. (14) speculated that the phenotypic shift from a gastric to an intestinal phenotype might represent the natural course of both gastric nonneoplastic mucosa and differentiated-type tumors. Furthermore, in our follow-up cases, two tumors in which APC mutations were not detected at the initial diagnosis but were detected at the final diagnosis were accompanied by a phenotypic shift from a gastric to an intestinal phenotype during the follow-up period. Therefore, the differentiation to intestinal absorptive cells, which might be associated with APC mutation, was thought to have occurred over time in these cases. These findings support an association between APC mutation and CD10 expression or the intestinal phenotype in early gastric differentiated-type tumors.

Our present findings show distinct differences in the biological behaviors of tumors with different phenotypic marker expression patterns in early gastric differentiated-type tumors. We previously reported that patients with gastric phenotype tumors have a poorer prognosis than those with intestinal phenotype tumors among patients with advanced gastric carcinoma (13). We also reported that the majority of peritoneal recurrences after a curative resection for gastric carcinoma occurred in gastric phenotype tumors, especially HGM-positive tumors, whereas hematogenous recurrence occurred more frequently in MUC2-negative and CD10-positive tumors (16). These differences in the biological behaviors of tumors with different phenotypic marker expression patterns suggest the actions of different genetic alterations. We recently reported that chromosomal changes detected using a comparative genomic hybridization technique differ considerably according to the phenotypic marker expression patterns of gastric differentiated-type carcinomas (20). As described above, our present findings show different patterns of genetic alterations according to the phenotypic marker expression pattern of the tumor in early gastric differentiated-type tumors. Previous molecular genetic studies have shown that gastric tumorigenesis is a multistep process involving the accumulation of genetic alterations (3, 21). Therefore, the present study suggests that different genetic pathways, which are related to phenotypic marker expression patterns, may exist during the incipient phase of gastric tumorigenesis, leading to different biological behaviors.

In conclusion, our present findings show that phenotypic marker expression patterns reflect the biological behaviors of early gastric differentiated-type tumors. Differences in the biological behaviors of tumors with different phenotypes may result from differences in the genetic background during the incipient phase of gastric tumorigenesis.

Grant support: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Nakamura K, Sugano H, Takagi K. Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histologenesis and histological appearances.
Jpn J Cancer Res
1968
;
59
:
251
–8.
2
Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma. Diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma.
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand
1965
;
64
:
31
–49.
3
Tahara E, Semba S, Tahara H. Molecular biological observations in gastric cancer.
Semin Oncol
1996
;
23
:
307
–15.
4
Tatematsu M, Ichinose N, Miki K, Hasegawa R, Kato T, Ito N. Gastric and intestinal phenotypic expression of human stomach cancers as revealed by pepsinogen immunohistochemistry and mucin histochemistry.
Acta Pathol Jpn
1990
;
40
:
494
–504.
5
Egashira Y, Shimoda T, Ikegami M. Muchin histochemical analysis of minute gastric differentiated adenocarcinoma.
Pathol Int
1999
;
49
:
55
–61.
6
Sasaki I, Yao T, Nawata H, Tsuneyoshi M. Minute gastric carcinoma of differentiated type with special reference to the significance of intestinal metaplasia, proliferative zone, and p53 protein during tumor development.
Cancer
1999
;
85
:
1719
–29.
7
Saito A, Shimoda T, Nakanishi Y, Ochiai A, Toda G. Histologic heterogeneity and phenotypic expression in early gastric cancer.
Pathol Int
2001
;
51
:
165
–71.
8
Kabashima A, Yao T, Sugimachi K, Tsuneyoshi M. Relationship between biological behavior and phenotypic expression in intramucosal gastric carcinoma.
Hum Pathol
2002
;
33
:
80
–6.
9
Shibata N, Watari J, Fujiya M, Tanno S, Saitoh Y, Kohgo Y. Cell kinetics and genetic instabilities in differentiated type early gastric cancers with different mucin phenotype.
Hum Pathol
2003
;
34
:
32
–40.
10
Endoh Y, Tamura G, Watanabe H, Ajioka Y, Motoyama T. The common 18-base pair deletion at codons 418-423 of the E-cadherin gene in differentiated-type adenocarcinomas and intramucosal precancerous lesions of the stomach with the features of gastric foveolar epithelium.
J Pathol
1999
;
189
:
201
–6.
11
Endoh Y, Sakata K, Tamura G, et al. Cellular phenotypes of differentiated-type adenocarcinomas and precancerous lesions of the stomach are dependent on the genetic pathways.
J Pathol
2000
;
191
:
257
–63.
12
Koseki K, Takizawa T, Koike M, Ito M, Nihei Z, Sugihara K. Distinction of differentiated type early gastric carcinoma with gastric type mucin expression.
Cancer
2000
;
89
:
724
–32.
13
Tajima Y, Shimoda T, Nakanishi Y, et al. Gastric and intestinal phenotypic marker expression in gastric carcinomas and its prognostic significance: immunohistochemical analysis of 136 lesions.
Oncology
2001
;
61
:
212
–20.
14
Tsukashita S, Kushima R, Bamba M, Sugihara H, Hattori T. MUC gene expression and histogenesis of adenocarcinoma of the stomach.
Int J Cancer
2001
;
94
:
166
–70.
15
Tajima Y, Shimoda T, Nakanishi Y, et al. Association of gastric and intestinal phenotypic marker expression of gastric carcinomas with tumor thymidylate synthase expression and response to postoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
2003
;
129
:
683
–90.
16
Tajima Y, Yamazaki K, Nishino N, et al. Gastric and intestinal phenotypic marker expression in gastric carcinoma and recurrence pattern after surgery: immunohistochemical analysis of 213 lesions.
Br J Cancer
2004
;
91
:
1342
–8.
17
Yamazaki K, Tajima Y, Makino R, et al. Tumor differentiation phenotype in gastric differentiated-type tumors and its relation to tumor invasion and genetic alterations.
World J Gastroenterol
2006
;
12
:
3803
–9.
18
Yamachika T, Inada K, Fijimitsu Y, et al. Intestinalization of gastric signet ring cell carcinomas with progression.
Virchows Arch
1997
;
431
:
103
–10.
19
Yoshikawa A, Inada K, Yamachika T, Shimizu N, Kaminishi M, Tatematsu M. Phenotypic shift in human differentiated gastric cancers from gastric to intestinal epithelial cell type during disease progression.
Gastric Cancer
1998
;
1
:
134
–41.
20
Morohara K, Tajima Y, Nakao K, et al. Gastric and intestinal phenotypic cell marker expressions in gastric differentiated-type carcinomas: association with E-cadherin expression and chromosomal changes.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
2006
;
132
:
363
–75.
21
Stadtlander CT, Waterbor JW. Molecular epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention of gastric cancer.
Carcinogenesis
1999
;
20
:
2195
–208.
22
Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.
Gut
2000
;
47
:
251
–5.
23
Bara J, Chastre E, Mahiou J, et al. Gastric M1 mucin, an early oncofetal marker of colon carcinogenesis, is encoded by the MUC5AC gene.
Int J Cancer
1998
;
75
:
767
–73.
24
Nollet S, Forgue-Lafitte ME, Kirkham P, Bara J. Mapping of two new epitopes on the apomucin encoded by MUC5AC gene: expression in normal GI tract and colon tumors.
Int J Cancer
2002
;
99
:
336
–43.
25
De Bolos C, Garrido M, Real FX. MUC6 apomucin shows a distinct normal tissue distribution that correlates with Lewis antigen expression in the human stomach.
Gastroenterology
1995
;
109
:
723
–34.
26
Reis CA, David L, Correa P, et al. Intestinal metaplasia of human stomach displays distinct pattern of mucin (MUIC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, and MUC6) expression.
Cancer Res
1999
;
59
:
1003
–7.
27
Kim YS, Gum JR. Diversity of mucin genes, structure, function, and expression.
Gastroenterology
1995
;
109
:
999
–1013.
28
Ronco P, Allegri L, Melcion C, et al. A monoclonal antibody to brush border and passive nephritis.
Clin Exp Immunol
1984
;
55
:
319
–32.
29
Trejdosiewicz LK, Malizia G, Oakes J, Losowsky MS, Janossy G. Expression of common acute lymphoblastic leukaemia antigen (CALLA gp100) in the brush border of normal jejunum and jejunum of patients with coeliac disease.
J Clin Pathol
1985
;
38
:
1002
–6.
30
Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H. Use of avidin-biotin peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.
J Histochem Cytochem
1981
;
29
:
577
–80.
31
Konishi K, Yamochi T, Makino R, et al. Molecular differences between sporadic serrated and conventional colorectal adenomas.
Clin Cancer Res
2004
;
10
:
3082
–90.
32
Lee JH, Abraham SC, Kim HS, et al. Inverse relationship between APC gene mutation in gastric adenomas and development of adenocarcinoma.
Am J Pathol
2002
;
161
:
611
–8.
33
Hiyama T, Haruma K, Kitadai Y, et al. K-ras mutation in helicobacter pylori-associated chronic gastritis in patients with and without gastric cancer.
Int J Cancer
2002
;
91
:
562
–6.
34
Makino R, Kaneko K, Kurahashi T, Matsumura T, Mitamura K. Detection of mutation p53 gene with high sensitivity by fluorescence-based PCR-SSCP analysis using low-pH buffer and an automated DNA sequencer in a large number of DNA samples.
Mutat Res
2000
;
452
:
83
–90.
35
Baba S, Kukita Y, Higasa K, Tahira T, Hayashi K. Single-stranded conformational polymorphism analysis using automated capillary array electrophoresis apparatus.
Biotechniques
2003
;
34
:
746
–50.
36
Tamura G, Maesawa C, Suzuki Y, et al. Mutations of the APC gene occur during early stages of gastric adenoma development.
Cancer Res
1994
;
54
:
1149
–51.
37
Vogelstein B, Fearon FR, Hamilton SR, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development.
N Engl J Med
1998
;
319
:
525
–32.
38
Rugge M, Cassaro M, Di Mario F, et al. Interdisciplinary Group on Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia (IGGED). The long term outcome of gastric non-invasive neoplasia.
Gut
2003
;
52
:
1111
–6.
39
Inada K, Nakanishi H, Fujimitsu Y, et al. Gastric and intestinal mixed and solely intestinal types of intestinal metaplasia in the human stomach.
Pathol Int
1997
;
47
:
831
–41.