Monoclonal antibody (mAb) 806 is a novel epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody with significant antitumor activity that recognizes a mutant EGFR commonly expressed in glioma known as delta2-7 EGFR (de2-7 EGFR or EGFRvIII) and a subset of the wild-type (wt) EGFR found in cells that overexpress the receptor. We have used two human xenograft mouse models to examine the efficacy of mAb 806 in combination with mAb 528, a prototypical anti-EGFR antibody with similar specificity to cetuximab. Treatment of nude mice, bearing s.c. or i.c. tumor human xenografts expressing the wt or de2-7 EGFR, with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination resulted in additive and in some cases synergistic, antitumor activity. Interestingly, mAb 528 was also effective against xenografts expressing the ligand independent de2-7 EGFR when used as a single agent, showing that its antitumor activity is not merely mediated through inhibition of ligand binding. When used as single agents, neither mAbs 806 or 528 induced down-regulation of the de2-7 EGFR either in vitro or in vivo. In contrast, the combination of antibodies produced a rapid and dramatic decrease in the total cell surface de2-7 EGFR both in vitro and in xenografts. Consistent with this decrease in total cell surface de2-7 EGFR, we observed up-regulation of the cell cycle inhibitor p27KIP1 and a decrease in tumor cell proliferation as measured by Ki-67 immunostaining when the antibodies were used in combination in vivo. Thus, mAb 806 can synergize with other EGFR-specific antibodies thereby providing a rationale for its translation into the clinic.

Overexpression of the EGFR has been observed in many epithelial tumors, with increased EGFR expression levels often correlating with a poorer clinical prognosis (13). This overexpression of the receptor is often caused by amplification of the EGFR gene (4). EGFR gene amplification and subsequent overexpression of the EGFR protein is particularly prevalent in gliomas, the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system (4). Indeed, the highly malignant glioblastoma multiforme exhibits EGFR gene amplification at a frequency of 40% to 50%, with many tumors also displaying structural rearrangements of the EGFR gene (4). The most common of these variant EGFR genes contains an in-frame 801-bp deletion that removes exons 2 to 7 (5, 6). This resulting receptor, known as the de2-7 EGFR, does not bind ligand but displays a low level of constitutive activity and imparts a significant in vivo growth advantage to a number of cell types including glioma (79). Glioma cells usually coexpress both the de2-7 and wild-type (wt) EGFR, with de2-7 EGFR expression generally associated with EGFR gene amplification (10).

Inhibition of the EGFR is a rational strategy for the development of new cancer therapeutics (11). Potential therapeutics include anti-EGFR antibodies (12) and small molecular weight tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the EGFR (13). A number of antibodies directed to the extracellular domain of the EGFR have now been tested in the clinic including EMD 55900 (14), ABX-EGF (15), and IMC-C225 (16), all of which have displayed some antitumor activity in patients (12). The most clinically advanced of these is IMC-C225, which is currently being tested in phase II/III clinical trials for the treatment of head and neck, colorectal, and non–small cell lung carcinomas (17) and was recently approved for use in Europe. It has been presumed that the antitumor activity of these antibodies is primarily related to their ability to block ligand binding, but further antitumor mechanisms such as immune effector function, receptor down-regulation, induction of inappropriate signaling, and interference with receptor dimerization and/or oligomerization need to be considered in more detail. One limitation of antibodies targeting the wt EGFR is that they show significant uptake in normal tissue such as the liver and skin (1820). Whereas targeting of normal tissues seems to cause manageable side effects such as skin rash (20), it does mean that these antibodies would generate significant side effects if coupled to cytotoxic agents or radioisotopes for antitumor therapy.

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) 806 is a novel anti-EGFR specific antibody that was generated from mice immunized with de2-7 EGFR-transfected NR6 fibroblasts (21, 22). Interestingly, whereas mAb 806 clearly binds the de2-7 EGFR, it also binds to a subset of the wt EGFR (∼10%) expressed on the surface of A431 cells (a vulval carcinoma cell line that overexpresses the EGFR; ref. 22). Recent analysis shows that mAb 806 recognizes a transitional form of the EGFR before it becomes activated (23, 24). Binding of mAb 806 to this transitional form of the EGFR prevents receptor activation and subsequent signaling. Unlike the wt EGFR, the de2-7 EGFR is constitutively in this transitional conformation and thus available for mAb 806 binding. Our previous studies have shown that treatment of glioma xenografts that express the de2-7 EGFR with mAb 806 causes significant inhibition of tumor growth (25). Significantly, established A431 tumor xenografts were also inhibited by mAb 806 despite the antibody only recognizing a small proportion of the EGFR expressed in these cells (25).

Given the unique properties of mAb 806, we decided to investigate its efficacy in combination with mAb 528, a prototypical anti-EGFR antibody. The 528 antibody was produced and isolated at the same time as the murine version of the C225 antibody and displays very similar properties (26). mAb 528 acts as a ligand antagonist and inhibits the growth of EGFR expressing cells both in vitro and in vivo when grown as xenografts (27). In this report, we examine the efficacy of mAbs 806 and 528 against xenografts expressing the de2-7 EGFR or overexpressing the wt EGFR in both s.c. and i.c. models.

Cell lines and monoclonal antibodies. The de2-7 EGFR transfected cell line, U87MG.Δ2-7 and the U87MG.DK cell line expressing a kinase inactive variant of the de2-7 EGFR, have been described previously (7, 28). The A431 cell line has also been described previously (22). The mAbs 806 and 528 have been described previously and were produced in the Biological Production Facility (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne, Australia). The anti-EGFR antibody, EGFR1, was purchased from DAKO Corp. (Carpinteria, CA) and the monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD34 from Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom).

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of receptor expression. The level of de2-7 EGFR and wt EGFR expression in cultured cells was analyzed using mAb 806 (IgG2b), mAb 528 (IgG2a), EGFR1 (IgG1) antibodies. Cells were incubated with primary antibody or a negative control antibody (IgG2b) and detected using a secondary anti-mouse FITC-conjugated antibody (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Analysis was done using an Epics Elite ESP (Beckman Coulter, Hialeah, FL) by observing a minimum of 20,000 events and data analyzed using EXPO (version 2) for Windows.

Subcutaneous xenograft model. Tumor cells (3 × 106) in 100 μL of PBS were inoculated s.c. into both flanks of 4- to 6-week-old, female nude mice (Animal Research Centre, Perth, Australia). All studies were conducted using established tumor models as previously reported (25). Treatment commenced once tumors had reached a mean volume indicated in the appropriate figure legend. Tumor volume in mm3 was determined using the formula (length × width2) / 2, where length was the longest axis and width being the measurement at right angles to the length. Data are expressed as mean tumor volume ± SE for each treatment group. In some experiments, survival was evaluated using the technique of Kaplan-Meier with comparisons between groups analyzed by log-rank test. This research project was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Austin Hospital.

Intracranial tumor model. U87MG.Δ2-7 (1 × 105) or U87MG.DK cells (5 × 105) in 5 μL of PBS were implanted into the right corpus striatum of nude mice brains as described previously (29). Mice were then treated systemically with normal saline, 0.5 mg of mAb 806, 0.5 mg of mAb 528 as single agents or both antibodies in combination, every other day from post-implantation days 0 to 14.

In vitro receptor down-regulation assay. Parallel flasks of U87MG.Δ2-7 cells were treated with 100 μg/mL of mAbs 806 and 528 either alone or in combination for 30 minutes at 37°C in the presence of 10 μg/mL of fibronectin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), following serum starvation for 36 hours. Cells were washed in ice-cold PBS before lysis in cold lysis buffer [30 mmol/L HEPES, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L NaF, 1% Triton X-100, 200 μmol/L NaO3V, 0.4% H2O2 and the protease inhibitor cocktail set 1 (Calbiochem) containing 500 μmol/L AEBSF, 150 nmol/L aprotinin, 1 μmol/L E-64 protease inhibitor, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, and 1 μmol/L leupeptin (pH 7.4)]. Equal volumes of each sample were mixed with SDS sample buffer and loaded onto 4% to 12% NuPage gels (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Mulgrave, Australia). Each lysis experiment and immunoblot was repeated at least thrice.

Preparation of xenograft homogenates. Xenograft homogenates of tumors excised from three different mice per treatment group were prepared by homogenization in immunoprecipitation assay buffer [50 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 200 mmol/L NaO3V, 0.4% H2O2, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.005% SDS, 10 mmol/L NaF, and the protease inhibitor cocktail set 1]. Homogenization was conducted in a Dounce Homogeniser before incubation for 1 hour at 4°C. Preparations were subsequently clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 30 minutes at 4°C. The protein content of the resultant supernatants was determined using the detergent-compatible protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) according to manufacturer's instructions. Samples were equalized for total protein, mixed in an equal volume of SDS sample buffer and loaded onto 4% to 12% NuPage Bis-Tris gels.

Immunoblotting. After transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, separated proteins were detected by immunoblotting with anti-EGFR (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), anti-phospho-EGFR-1173 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and anti-p27KIP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibodies. To ensure equal loading, immunoblots were probed with anti-α-tubulin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and separate gels stained with Coomassie.

Ki-67 immunostaining. Xenografts were removed, embedded in Tissue Tek ornithine carbamyl transferase compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C. Ten-micrometer sections were cut, fixed in acetone, and stained with sheep anti-human Ki-67 polyclonal antibody (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) for 1 hour. After rinsing, a rabbit anti-sheep-horseradish peroxidase antibody (Chemicon International) was applied and bound antibody detected with AEC substrate solution (0.1 mol/l acetic acid, 0.1 mol/L sodium acetate, 0.02 mol/L AEC, and 0.03% H2O2). Slides were then counterstained in hematoxylin (BDH Laboratory, Poole, United Kingdom) and mounted. The percentage of reactive tumor nuclei to the Ki-67 antibody was estimated by examining an average of 17 representative high-power fields per treatment group containing a total of ∼8,000 cells. Data were expressed as proliferation index (PI) using the formula: (cells positive for Ki-67 staining / total cells) × 100.

Immunohistochemical analysis of microvessel density. Xenografts were removed and fixed in 10% buffered formalin and used for microvessel density detection. Sections of 4-μm thickness were cut, mounted onto Superfrost Plus slides (Menzel-Glaser, Germany), and deparaffinized in a 60°C oven for 30 minutes followed by 2 × 5 minutes xylene rinses and 2 × 5 minutes 100% ethanol rinses. Sections were then rehydrated in distilled water and microwaved for 15 minutes in EDTA buffer (pH 8.0; Lab Vision Co., Fremont, CA) for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase was quenched before blocking with 1 × Protein Blocking Solution (Immunon Thermo Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA). Sections were stained with rat anti-mouse CD34 (Abcam) for 1 hour followed by goat anti-rat IgG-Biotin-labeled secondary antibody. Sections were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated Streptavidin (Chemicon Australia, Melbourne, Australia). Slides were then incubated with AEC, counterstained with hematoxylin (BDH Laboratory), and mounted. As a measurement of angiogenesis, the microvessel density (i.e., the number of positive vessels in a given area) was determined. Quantification of microvessel density involved counting the number of CD34-positive vessels in four to six random 390-μm2 fields at ×200 magnification for each tumor (n = 3) per treatment group.

Statistical analysis. All data was analyzed for significance by Student's t test, except for the in vivo survival data, which was analyzed by log-rank Mantel-Cox test. Data from the microvessel density detection was analyzed for difference between treatment groups by a one-way ANOVA, where P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Binding of monoclonal antibodies 806 and 528 and EGFR1 to cell lines. We examined whether U87MG.Δ2-7 (which expresses the de2-7 EGFR) and U87MG.DK (which express a dead kinase form of the de2-7 EGFR) cells express similar levels of the various EGFR proteins. The EGFR1 antibody only recognizes the extracellular domain of the wt EGFR and does not bind to the de2-7 EGFR or the kinase dead form of de2-7 EGFR (7). EGFR1 bound both U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK cells with similar intensity, confirming that these cell lines express comparable amounts of endogenous wt EGFR (Fig. 1). The mAb 528, which recognizes all of the EGFR subtypes, also stained both the U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK cell lines to a comparable degree, showing that they express similar levels of total EGFR (Fig. 1). Finally, mAb 806, which in these cells only recognizes the de2-7 EGFR or its dead kinase equivalent (29), bound to each cell line with similar intensity indicating that both express comparable levels of either the de2-7 EGFR or dead kinase receptor (Fig. 1). Thus, the level of EGFR expression is similar in U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK cell lines and therefore should not influence subsequent therapy studies.

Fig. 1.

Flow cytometric analysis of U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK cell lines. A, cells were stained with either an irrelevant IgG2b antibody or the EGFR1 antibody, mAb 806 or 528 as indicated. B, A431 cells were stained with an irrelevant isotype control (dark gray), mAb 528 (light gray), and mAb 806 (white) and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The dotted line is cells with secondary antibody alone. C, as for (B) except U87MG.Δ2-7 cells were used.

Fig. 1.

Flow cytometric analysis of U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK cell lines. A, cells were stained with either an irrelevant IgG2b antibody or the EGFR1 antibody, mAb 806 or 528 as indicated. B, A431 cells were stained with an irrelevant isotype control (dark gray), mAb 528 (light gray), and mAb 806 (white) and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. The dotted line is cells with secondary antibody alone. C, as for (B) except U87MG.Δ2-7 cells were used.

Close modal

We directly compared the relative binding of mAbs 806 and 528 in the two cell lines used in this study (i.e., U87MG.Δ2-7 and A431). Using a competitive ELISA, we have previously shown that mAbs 806 and 528 do not compete and can bind the EGFR simultaneously (30). However, we have previously shown by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (22) and immunoprecipitation (31) that whereas mAb 806 binds a high proportion of de2-7 EGFR (∼50%), it only binds a small proportion of the wt EGFR only in cells overexpressing the receptor. Consistent with these previous observations, mAb 806 bound A431 cells, which overexpress the wt EGFR, at a lower level than mAb 528 (Fig. 1B). Likewise, mAb 528 bound more receptors on U87MG.Δ2-7 cells compared with mAb 806 (Fig. 1C). Again, this was expected as mAb 528 not only binds the de2-7 EGFR expressed in theses cells but also the coexpressed wt EGFR, whereas mAb 806 can only bind the de2-7 EGFR in these cells.

Treatment of established glioma xenografts with monoclonal antibodies 806 and 528. We examined whether two mAbs with differing specificity for the EGFR displayed increased antitumor activity against glioma tumor xenografts when used together. Treatment of established U87MG.Δ2-7 glioma xenografts with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination displayed significantly higher antitumor activity than either antibody alone (Fig. 2A). Whereas treatment with mAb 806 or 528 as single agents at day 20 after inoculation resulted in a reduction in overall tumor growth rate compared with treatment with vehicle (P < 0.005 and P < 0.003, respectively), combined treatment with both antibodies resulted in at least additive tumor inhibition that was significantly higher than mAb 528 (P < 0.001) and mAb 806 (P < 0.001) alone. The average tumor volume on the final day of therapy (day 20 after inoculation) was 1,850, 880, 800, and 30 mm3 for the vehicle, mAb 806, mAb 528, and combination treatment groups, respectively. Furthermore, 30% of U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts underwent complete regression in the combination therapy group and had not recurred at day 30 after inoculation. No complete regressions were seen in any of the other treatment groups (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2.

Treatment of established U87MG. Δ2-7 or U87MG.DK xenografts with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination. A, mice (n = 5) bearing U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were injected i.p. with PBS (□), 0.5 mg of mAb 806 (▾), or mAb 528 (▴) as single agents or 0.5 mg of each antibody in combination (○), thrice weekly for 2 weeks on days 9, 11, 13, 16, 18, and 20 when the starting tumor volume was 115 mm3. B, mice (n = 5) bearing U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were injected i.p. with PBS, 1 mg of mAb 806 or 528 as single agents, or 0.5 mg of both mAbs 806 and 528 in combination on days 9, 11, 13, 16, 18, and 20 when the starting tumor volume was 92 mm3. C, mice (n = 5) bearing U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were injected i.p. as in (A), once tumors had reached 550 mm3, on days 17 to 25 inclusive. D, mice (n = 5) bearing U87MG.DK xenografts were treated as in (A), once tumors had reached 107 mm3, on days 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, and 29. E, the mice described in (A) were analyzed for survival by Kaplan-Meier. In this experiment, mice had to be sacrificed once both xenografts had reached 1,000 mm3, which was therefore considered the end point for each individual xenograft. Ethical considerations also only allowed this analysis until day 31. PBS (), mAb 528 (), mAb 806 (), both antibodies (). F, the mice described in (C) were analyzed for survival by Kaplan-Meier. In this experiment, mice had to be sacrificed once both xenografts had reached 1,500 mm3, which was therefore considered the end point for each individual xenograft. Ethical considerations also only allowed this analysis until day 26.

Fig. 2.

Treatment of established U87MG. Δ2-7 or U87MG.DK xenografts with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination. A, mice (n = 5) bearing U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were injected i.p. with PBS (□), 0.5 mg of mAb 806 (▾), or mAb 528 (▴) as single agents or 0.5 mg of each antibody in combination (○), thrice weekly for 2 weeks on days 9, 11, 13, 16, 18, and 20 when the starting tumor volume was 115 mm3. B, mice (n = 5) bearing U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were injected i.p. with PBS, 1 mg of mAb 806 or 528 as single agents, or 0.5 mg of both mAbs 806 and 528 in combination on days 9, 11, 13, 16, 18, and 20 when the starting tumor volume was 92 mm3. C, mice (n = 5) bearing U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were injected i.p. as in (A), once tumors had reached 550 mm3, on days 17 to 25 inclusive. D, mice (n = 5) bearing U87MG.DK xenografts were treated as in (A), once tumors had reached 107 mm3, on days 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, and 29. E, the mice described in (A) were analyzed for survival by Kaplan-Meier. In this experiment, mice had to be sacrificed once both xenografts had reached 1,000 mm3, which was therefore considered the end point for each individual xenograft. Ethical considerations also only allowed this analysis until day 31. PBS (), mAb 528 (), mAb 806 (), both antibodies (). F, the mice described in (C) were analyzed for survival by Kaplan-Meier. In this experiment, mice had to be sacrificed once both xenografts had reached 1,500 mm3, which was therefore considered the end point for each individual xenograft. Ethical considerations also only allowed this analysis until day 26.

Close modal

In the above experiment, the total amount of antibody given in the combination group was twice as much as the groups receiving only one mAb. Whereas it is typical to use this type of dose schedule in combination studies, we wanted to ensure that our observations were not simply due to the higher antibody dose. Combination therapy using 0.5 mg per injection of each antibody (1 mg of total antibody) displayed significantly higher antitumor activity than 1 mg per injection of mAb 806 (P < 0.01) or mAb 528 (P < 0.001) used as single agents when assessed on day 23 after inoculation (Fig. 2B). Thus, the enhanced activity of combination antibody therapy is not simply due to higher levels of antibody at the xenograft site.

Previous reports have shown that the efficacy of EGFR-specific antibodies is reduced when used to treat large xenografts (32). Therefore, the efficacy of mAbs 806 and 528 combination therapy was examined against large established U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts with a mean volume of 550 mm3 (Fig. 2C). Only xenografts treated with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination displayed a significant reduction in xenograft growth when compared with tumors treated with vehicle (P < 0.01; Fig. 2C). No significant difference in tumor growth rate was observed following treatment with mAb 806 (P = 0.40) or mAb 528 (P = 0.30). Indeed, the average tumor volume on day 26 after inoculation was 2,140, 2,080, 1,990, and 1,210 mm3 for the vehicle, mAb 806, mAb 528, and combination treatment groups, respectively (Fig. 2C). These results suggest that the combination of mAbs 806 and 528 results in greater than additive antitumor activity.

Mice bearing established U87MG.DK xenografts were also treated with mAbs 806 and 528 as single agents or in combination to ascertain whether the antibodies mediated the antitumor activity through immune effector function or signaling effects. On day 32 after inoculation, the growth rate of tumors treated with mAbs 806 and 528 as single agents or in combination did not differ from that of vehicle-treated xenografts. The average tumor volume was 1,170, 1,110, 1,260, and 1,220 mm3 for vehicle, mAb 806, mAb 528, and combination therapy groups, respectively (Fig. 2D). Because both antibodies bind U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK cells equivalently (Fig. 1), this result indicates that both mAbs 806 and 528 initiate their antitumor activity independent of immune effector function in this model.

Survival analysis for mice treated with antibodies. We also analyzed the data from the combination antibody therapy studies (Fig. 2A and C) with respect to survival. When used as single agents (three 0.5 mg injections per week for 2 weeks) to treat small established U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts (i.e., mice shown in Fig. 2A), both mAbs 806 and 528 had a small benefit on survival (P < 0.004 and 0.01, respectively) with median survival being days 23 and 22, respectively, compared with day 20 for the control group (Fig. 2E). All mice receiving a combination antibody treatment survived to day 31 (P < 0.0001 versus control, P < 0.0003 versus mAb 528 alone, and P < 0.001 versus mAb 806 alone; Fig. 2E), at which point the experiment was terminated for ethical reasons. Thus, combination therapy significantly improved survival in all mice with small established tumors compared with either antibody alone.

We also analyzed survival in the cohort of mice that were treated with antibody once their U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts had reached an average of 500 mm3 (i.e., mice shown in Fig. 2C). Consistent with the growth curves (Fig. 2C), neither mAb 806 nor mAb 528 used alone had any effect on survival (Fig. 2F) with median survival being day 22 for all three groups. In contrast at day 26, when the experiment with large xenografts had to be terminated for ethical reasons, 90% of mice had survived in the combination group. Therefore, combination antibody treatment greatly enhanced survival even in mice with large established xenografts providing further evidence of the synergistic nature of these two antibodies.

Mechanism of synergistic antitumor activity. To determine a mechanism for the synergistic antitumor activity of mAbs 806 and 528 in combination, we examined whether either antibody alone or in combination down-regulated the expression of de2-7 EGFR on the cell surface. U87MG.Δ2-7 cells were incubated at 37°C with antibodies for 30 minutes, lysed, and analyzed for de2-7 EGFR levels by immunoblotting. Whereas mAbs 806 and 528 alone had no effect on de2-7 EGFR expression, when used in combination, there was a dramatic decrease in the total de2-7 EGFR (Fig. 3A, top), suggesting that in combination the antibodies induce rapid down-regulation of the receptor. Whereas no decrease in the level of phosphorylation at Tyr1173, the major activation site for the EGFR, was detected following treatment with mAb 806, a noticeable decrease was observed following mAb 528 treatment (Fig. 3A, second). However, the level of phosphorylation at Tyr1173 was greatly reduced in the presence of both antibodies (Fig. 3A, second), compared with treatment with either antibody alone, which correlates with the decrease in total de2-7 EGFR. Consistent with the lack of synergistic antitumor activity seen when mAbs 806 and 528 were used together against U87MG.DK xenografts, this combination of antibodies did not induce down-regulation of the dead kinase de2-7 EGFR (Fig. 3A, third). As expected, there was virtually no phosphorylation of Tyr1173 with the dead kinase receptor (Fig. 3A, bottom). Thus, the synergistic activity of mAbs 806 and 528 in combination seems related to their ability to cause extensive down-regulation of the de2-7 EGFR.

Fig. 3.

Mechanism of synergistic antitumor activity following treatment with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination. A, serum-starved U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK cells were treated with 100 μg/ml of mAbs 806 and 528 alone or in combination for 30 minutes at 37°C in the presence of 10 μg/mL fibronectin. Equal amounts of protein from cell lysates were run on 4% to 12% NuPage gels and immunoblotted for total EGFR or phospho-EGFR Tyr1173 as indicated. B, established 100 mm3 U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts treated with three i.p. injections of PBS, mAb 806 (1 mg), or mAb 528 (1 mg) as single agents or in combination (0.5 mg of each antibody) were excised and homogenates prepared with RIPA buffer as described in Materials and Methods. Equal amounts of protein from each sample were loaded onto 4% to 12% NuPage gels and immunoblotted for total EGFR, phospho-EGFR Tyr1173, and p27KIP1 as indicated. C, established 100 mm3 U87MG.DK xenografts treated as in (B) were excised and homogenates prepared with immunoprecipitation assay buffer. Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto 4% to 12% NuPage gels and immunobloted as in (B). Individual xenograft homogenates were prepared from at least three different U87MG.Δ2-7 or U87MG.DK tumors per treatment group and a representative immunoblot is shown.

Fig. 3.

Mechanism of synergistic antitumor activity following treatment with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination. A, serum-starved U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK cells were treated with 100 μg/ml of mAbs 806 and 528 alone or in combination for 30 minutes at 37°C in the presence of 10 μg/mL fibronectin. Equal amounts of protein from cell lysates were run on 4% to 12% NuPage gels and immunoblotted for total EGFR or phospho-EGFR Tyr1173 as indicated. B, established 100 mm3 U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts treated with three i.p. injections of PBS, mAb 806 (1 mg), or mAb 528 (1 mg) as single agents or in combination (0.5 mg of each antibody) were excised and homogenates prepared with RIPA buffer as described in Materials and Methods. Equal amounts of protein from each sample were loaded onto 4% to 12% NuPage gels and immunoblotted for total EGFR, phospho-EGFR Tyr1173, and p27KIP1 as indicated. C, established 100 mm3 U87MG.DK xenografts treated as in (B) were excised and homogenates prepared with immunoprecipitation assay buffer. Equal amounts of protein were loaded onto 4% to 12% NuPage gels and immunobloted as in (B). Individual xenograft homogenates were prepared from at least three different U87MG.Δ2-7 or U87MG.DK tumors per treatment group and a representative immunoblot is shown.

Close modal

To determine whether these in vitro observations are mimicked in vivo, we examined the level of de2-7 EGFR in established U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK xenografts 1 day after the third administration of mAbs 806 and 528. These experiments were done as described for Fig. 2B, where the total amount of antibody given was identical in all groups. The down-regulation of total de2-7 EGFR and decreased phosphorylation of Tyr1173 following treatment with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination was observed in antibody-treated U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts (Fig. 3B, top and second). In contrast to the in vitro assay, mAb 806 alone did block the phosphorylation of Tyr1173 in treated xenografts, suggesting that its effects on signaling inhibition maybe more pronounced in vivo.

p27KIP1 is a negative regulator of G1-S phase transition that functions by inhibiting cyclin-Cdk kinase activity (33). Treatment of U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts with mAb 806 or 528 alone produced a measurable increase in p27KIP1 expression compared with tumors treated with PBS (Fig. 3B, third). Treatment with both antibodies in combination caused an additive increase in the level of p27KIP1, consistent with the down-regulation of total de2-7 EGFR. As expected, U87MG.DK xenografts (Fig. 3C) treated with the combination of antibodies did not show down-regulation of de2-7 EGFR (Fig. 3C, top) or changes in the level of p27KIP1 (Fig. 3C, third) compared with xenografts treated with PBS or either antibody alone.

To determine if antibody mediated down-regulation of the de2-7 EGFR combined with the up-regulation of p27KIP1 has an antiproliferative effect on xenografts, we analyzed the percentage of Ki67-positive cells from treated mice. These experiments were also done as described for Fig. 2B, where the total amount of antibody given was identical in all groups. U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts treated with vehicle had a PI of 34.6% (Fig. 4A). In contrast, U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts treated with either mAb 806 or 528 had lower PI of 20.1% and 19.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts treated with both mAbs 806 and 528 in combination had a PI of 11.3%, which was significantly lower than the vehicle, mAb 806 or 528 treatments (P < 0.001 for all groups; Fig. 4A). Consistent with its slower growth rate, the PI of U87MG.DK xenografts treated with vehicle was 18.7% (Fig. 4A). Treatment with mAb 806 (PI = 18.8%) or 528 (PI = 18.3%) had no effect on the proliferation of U87MG.DK xenografts. Significantly, the combination treatment did not have any effect (PI = 19.1%) on the U87MG.DK xenografts (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, analysis of the apoptotic index through terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase–mediated nick-end labeling staining (28) showed an extremely low level of apoptosis that did not differ between treatment and control groups at this early time point (data not shown).

Fig. 4.

PI of U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK xenografts treated with mAbs 806 and 528. A, mice with established 100 mm3 s.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were treated with PBS, 1 mg of mAb 806 or 528 as single agents, or 0.5 mg of each antibody in combination on days 7, 9, and 11 and tumors resected on day 12. Mice bearing U87MG.DK tumors were identically injected i.p. with antibody on days 9, 11, and 13 and tumors were resected on day 14. Frozen sections of individual tumors from each treatment group were stained for the proliferative marker Ki-67 and the percentage positivity calculated. Mean Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) ± SD. B, mice bearing U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were treated as in (A) and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded xenograft sections were stained with anti-CD34 antibody for microvessel detection. Representative images from each treatment group. Mean microvessel count ± SE (P < 0.0001).

Fig. 4.

PI of U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK xenografts treated with mAbs 806 and 528. A, mice with established 100 mm3 s.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were treated with PBS, 1 mg of mAb 806 or 528 as single agents, or 0.5 mg of each antibody in combination on days 7, 9, and 11 and tumors resected on day 12. Mice bearing U87MG.DK tumors were identically injected i.p. with antibody on days 9, 11, and 13 and tumors were resected on day 14. Frozen sections of individual tumors from each treatment group were stained for the proliferative marker Ki-67 and the percentage positivity calculated. Mean Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) ± SD. B, mice bearing U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were treated as in (A) and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded xenograft sections were stained with anti-CD34 antibody for microvessel detection. Representative images from each treatment group. Mean microvessel count ± SE (P < 0.0001).

Close modal

To further assess the in vivo mechanisms underlying the antitumor activity of mAbs 806 and 528 when used in combination, the extent of intratumoral microvessel density of U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts treated as in Fig. 2B, was assessed by immunostaining xenograft sections for CD34 (Fig. 4B). The number of CD34-positive micovessels in xenografts treated with PBS was 34.2 ± 10.8. Following treatment with mAbs 806 or 528 as single agents, the number of mean CD34-positive microvessels was 35.2 ± 4.8 and 37.6 ± 8.5, respectively (Fig. 4B). These values were not statistically different to that observed for PBS-treated tumors. However, following combined mAbs 806 and 528 therapy, there was a statistically significant reduction of 46% in the number of CD34-positive vessels compared with PBS-treated tumors (18.4 ± 5.8; P < 0.0001; Fig. 4B), indicating that the inhibition of U87MG.Δ2-7 tumors in vivo following combination antibody therapy is partly the result of the blockade of angiogenic progression. Both the subclass control sections and the negative control sections did not stain positive for CD34.

Treatment of established A431 xenografts with monoclonal antibodies 806 and 528. Given the efficacy of antibody combination therapy against U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts, we elected to examine its efficacy against A431 tumors. A431 cells contain an amplification of the wt EGFR gene and overexpress the receptor on the cell surface. Combination therapy with mAbs 806 and 528 displayed at least additive antitumor activity against established A431 xenografts. At day 20 after tumor inoculation, the A431 xenografts treated with both antibodies had a mean tumor volume of 15 mm3 which was significantly lower than vehicle (1,016 mm3, P < 0.001), mAb 806 alone (473 mm3, P < 0.001), and mAb 528 alone (372 mm3, P < 0.001) treatment groups (Fig. 5A and B). Furthermore, combined treatment with mAbs 806 and 528 caused complete regression in 60% of the tumors, which again is indicative of a synergistic antitumor effect (Fig. 5B). Histologic examination at day 28 after inoculation revealed the complete absence of tumor cells in the majority of regressed xenografts (data not shown). No complete regressions were seen in any of the other treatment groups.

Fig. 5.

Combination treatment of A431 xenografts with mAbs 806 and 528 in an established model. A, mice (n = 5) bearing A431 xenografts were treated with four i.p. injections of PBS (□), 0.5 mg of mAb 806 (▾), 0.5 mg of mAb 528 (▴) as single agents, or 0.5 mg of each antibody in combination (○) on days 8, 10, 12, and 14 once tumors had reached 70 mm3. B, representative mice from the PBS and combination antibody treatment groups in (A) 1 day after the final therapy injection (day 15). C, treatment of mice bearing A431 xenografts as in (A) on days 13, 14, 15, and 16 once tumors had reached 515 mm3.

Fig. 5.

Combination treatment of A431 xenografts with mAbs 806 and 528 in an established model. A, mice (n = 5) bearing A431 xenografts were treated with four i.p. injections of PBS (□), 0.5 mg of mAb 806 (▾), 0.5 mg of mAb 528 (▴) as single agents, or 0.5 mg of each antibody in combination (○) on days 8, 10, 12, and 14 once tumors had reached 70 mm3. B, representative mice from the PBS and combination antibody treatment groups in (A) 1 day after the final therapy injection (day 15). C, treatment of mice bearing A431 xenografts as in (A) on days 13, 14, 15, and 16 once tumors had reached 515 mm3.

Close modal

We also treated large A431 xenografts with the combination of mAbs 806 and 528 (Fig. 5C). A431 xenografts were allowed to grow to ∼515 mm3 at which time antibody therapy commenced. Treatment with mAb 806 alone did not inhibit A431 tumor growth rate when compared with vehicle-treated controls at day 26 after inoculation (P = 0.19), whereas treatment with mAb 528 alone did have an antitumor effect (P < 0.001). However, treatment with both antibodies in combination resulted in a greater than additive reduction in A431 xenograft growth rate compared with vehicle (P < 0.001), mAb 806 alone (P < 0.001), and mAb 528 alone (P < 0.01) treatment groups. At day 26, when vehicle-treated animals were sacrificed, the mean tumor volume was 1,810, 2,150, 850, and 360 mm3 in the vehicle, mAb 806, mAb 528, and combination treatment groups, respectively (Fig. 5C).

Systemic treatment of intracranial glioma xenografts with monoclonal antibodies 806 and 528. To further test the efficacy of mAbs 806 and 528 in combination, we treated mice bearing i.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 glioma xenografts with i.p. injection of antibody (Fig. 6A). Animals treated with vehicle had a median survival of 14.8 days, whereas systemic treatment with either 0.5 mg mAb 806 or 528 increased the median survival to 19.2 (P < 0.003) and 17.6 (P < 0.009) days, respectively (Fig. 6A). Treatment of animals with 0.5 mg of mAbs 806 and 528 in combination significantly prolonged survival to a median of 25.7 days (P < 0.001 compared with all groups). Animals bearing i.c. U87MG.DK xenografts treated with vehicle had a median survival of 24.2 days, whereas those treated with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination as above had a median survival of 23.8 days (P = 0.76; Fig. 6B). Thus, as in the s.c. xenograft models, the combination antibody therapy was ineffective against xenografts expressing the dead kinase de2-7 EGFR.

Fig. 6.

Systemic treatment of mice bearing i.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK xenografts with mAbs 806 and 528. A, U87MG.Δ2-7 cells were implanted into the brains of nude mice as described in Materials and Methods and treated with PBS (), 0.5 mg of mAb 806 (), 0.5 mg of mAb 528 () as single agents, or 0.5 mg of each antibody in combination () on alternative days from days 0 to 14 inclusive as indicated. B, treatment of U87MG.DK xenografts with PBS or 0.5 mg of mAbs 806 and 528 in combination. Antibody was given as in (A). Animals were observed after discontinuation of therapy until moribund. C, growth inhibition of i.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 tumors treated with mAbs 806 and 528. Brains from mice in each treatment group were harvested on day 14 post-implantation, fixed, sectioned, and stained with H&E. Arrows indicate extent of tumor growth. D, i.c. U87MG.DK tumors stained with H&E as in (C).

Fig. 6.

Systemic treatment of mice bearing i.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 and U87MG.DK xenografts with mAbs 806 and 528. A, U87MG.Δ2-7 cells were implanted into the brains of nude mice as described in Materials and Methods and treated with PBS (), 0.5 mg of mAb 806 (), 0.5 mg of mAb 528 () as single agents, or 0.5 mg of each antibody in combination () on alternative days from days 0 to 14 inclusive as indicated. B, treatment of U87MG.DK xenografts with PBS or 0.5 mg of mAbs 806 and 528 in combination. Antibody was given as in (A). Animals were observed after discontinuation of therapy until moribund. C, growth inhibition of i.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 tumors treated with mAbs 806 and 528. Brains from mice in each treatment group were harvested on day 14 post-implantation, fixed, sectioned, and stained with H&E. Arrows indicate extent of tumor growth. D, i.c. U87MG.DK tumors stained with H&E as in (C).

Close modal

Whole brain sections from mice with i.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts were histologically analyzed at the completion of antibody therapy (i.e day 14 after inoculation). Consistent with the survival data, combined treatment with mAbs 806 and 528 dramatically reduced the volume of i.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 tumors in comparison to those treated with vehicle, mAb 806 alone, or mAb 528 alone (Fig. 6C). Combination antibody treatment of U87MG.DK i.c. tumors did not produce a reduction in tumor volume compared with treatment with vehicle (Fig. 6D).

Previous reports have shown the in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of mAb 528 against a variety of malignant epithelial cell lines overexpressing the wt EGFR (27, 34, 35). Because mAb 528 and similar antibodies such as IMC-C225 are potent EGFR ligand antagonists, it has been presumed that their antitumor activity is predominantly mediated by blocking the ligand activation of the EGFR (36, 37). Our data showing that mAb 528 has significant antitumor activity against xenografts expressing the ligand-independent but constitutively active de2-7 EGFR shows that this antibody mediates its inhibitory effects through multiple mechanisms and not simply ligand blockade. The antitumor activity of mAb 528 against U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts was not directly mediated through its effect on the endogenous wt EGFR coexpressed in these cells, as mAb 528 did not inhibit the growth of parental U87MG5

5

Unpublished data.

or U87MG.DK xenografts both of which express similar levels of the wt EGFR. Furthermore, the lack of mAb 528 activity against U87MG.DK xenografts suggests that antibody effector function does not have a significant role in initiating the antitumor activity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that an antibody to the wt EGFR also has direct antitumor activity against de2-7 EGFR–expressing xenografts and partially addresses the concern that expression of de2-7 EGFR may cause resistance to EGFR antibody therapy.

Treatment of established U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts with a combination of mAbs 806 and 528 resulted in additive, and in some cases synergistic, tumor inhibition leading to complete regression of some of these aggressive tumors. Furthermore, the almost complete resistance of large U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts to either antibody alone was overcome by using the antibodies in combination. Significantly, this increased efficacy seen with combination antibody therapy was also observed in our i.c. model. Whereas the increase in survival was relatively modest (i.e., 11 days), it should be noted that i.c. U87MG.Δ2-7 tumors grow extremely rapidly with control animals dying just 15 days after inoculation with 100,000 cells. Indeed, combination therapy should be more effective against less aggressive tumors, as was the case when we evaluated mAb 806 as a single agent (29). Importantly, the antitumor effect of both antibodies was seen following systemic administration, extending our previous data with mAb 806 alone (29). This observation suggests it maybe possible to use systemic antibody therapy in glioma patients with advanced disease as there is usually localized disruption of the blood/brain barrier in these patients.

The in vivo consequences of EGFR blockade by mAbs such as 528 has not been fully elucidated, although recent reports suggest that these antibodies switch off key EGFR signaling pathways leading to decreased proliferation, increased apoptosis, and the inhibition of proangiogenic growth factors, all of which can contribute to the antitumor effects seen (38). Analysis of mAb 806– and mAb 528–treated U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts showed that these antibodies caused a significant reduction in tumor cell proliferation compared with PBS-treated tumors which correlates with the in vivo growth rate of tumors treated with both antibodies in combination. This is most probably due to the significant down-regulation and degradation of de2-7 EGFR, which was observed following combination antibody therapy both in vitro and in vivo. This observation is in line with a recent report showing similar effects following treatment of ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer cells with a combination of the anti-ErbB2 antibodies Herceptin and 2C4 (39). Combination Herceptin-2C4 treatment reduced ErbB2 levels within 24 hours to a greater degree than either agent alone (39). As both the ErbB2 and de2-7 EGFR do not bind ligand and are internalized respectively at a slower rate (4042) or not at all (43) compared with wt EGFR, down-regulation of these receptors may contribute to signal attenuation and subsequent growth inhibition. Indeed, our data shows that combination therapy with both antibodies leads to down-regulation and degradation of de2-7 EGFR, which would lead to attenuation of the constitutive de2-7 EGFR signal.

A reduction in the level of receptor signaling would in turn have consequences on the proliferative capability of cells. Indeed, previous reports, investigating the ability of anti-EGFR agents to block EGFR signaling through blockade of ligand binding or kinase activation, have shown that these agents reversibly arrest cells in G1 phase of the cell cycle by modifying the expression of key proliferative/antiproliferative signaling molecules such as p27KIP1, leading to blockade of proliferation (4448). In particular, the expression of p27KIP1 is thought to be required for growth inhibition when the EGFR pathway is blocked in cell lines dependent on the EGFR for their viability (48). Similarly, the enhanced tumorigenicity of U87MG.Δ2-7 cells was directly related to de2-7 EGFR-mediated down-regulation of p27KIP1, through activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway (49), identifying a potential pathway for therapeutic intervention. Indeed, U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts treated with either mAb 528 or 806 showed specific increase in p27KIP1 expression compared with PBS-treated xenografts. Combination antibody therapy also led to enhanced up-regulation of p27KIP1, which was greater than that observed following single-agent therapy. Furthermore, as mAb 806 does not bind to the endogenous wt EGFR expressed in these cells, increased p27KIP1 expression following mAb 806 therapy would be directly attributable to the interaction between this antibody and the de2-7 EGFR. Therefore, the additive up-regulation of p27KIP1 following combination antibody therapy would not occur simply through dual targeting of the wt EGFR but rather from specific targeting of both subsets of receptor.

Taken as a whole, the down-regulation of de2-7 EGFR and concurrent up-regulation of p27KIP1 following combination antibody therapy led to an additive antiproliferative effect and decreased intratumoral microvessel formation. Furthermore, the lack of down-regulation of the dead kinase variant of the de2-7 EGFR following combination antibody therapy, together with no changes in p27KIP1 expression or proliferative index correlate with the lack of therapeutic efficacy in vivo and highlight the importance of de2-7 EGFR kinase activity in mediating the inhibitory effects of these antibodies.

Finally given the significant decrease in proliferation and inhibition of blood vessel formation in U87MG.Δ2-7 xenografts treated with mAbs 806 and 528 in combination, together with the up-regulation of p27 that inhibits G1-to-S phase transition, it is interesting that we do not see significant differences in apoptosis between treatment groups. However, given that these observations represent mechanisms of tumor cell inhibition early in the therapy cycle (1 day after the third injection of antibody), it is likely that changes in apoptotic level may become evident following prolonged therapy. Indeed, our unpublished data show that continued antibody therapy is able to cause a significant increase in apoptosis compared with control-treated tumors.6

6

Unpublished data.

Similarly, although our data do not show a difference in microvessel density between xenografts treated with mAb 806 or 528 as single agents compared with PBS, it is possible that such observations would be more likely following prolonged antibody therapy. A previous report by Mishima et al. reported a 30% decrease in tumor vascularity in mAb 806–treated tumors compared with control tumors (29). However, this occurred after prolonged therapy, where antibody was given for 14 consecutive days again highlighting the possibility that such events may become more evident following sustained therapy over longer time frames.

Greater than additive antitumor activity was also observed following treatment of established A431 xenografts with a combination of mAbs 806 and 528. This observation is somewhat remarkable given that mAb 528 recognizes the majority of EGFR expressed on A431 cells and mAb 806 binds <10% of the receptors (22). Recently, we have shown that mAb 806 recognizes a transitional form of the EGFR and prevents the formation of signaling-capable EGFR dimers (23, 24). Thus, whereas mAb 806 only binds a low percentage of the EGFR at any given time, over an extended period of time, it would be capable of inhibiting a substantial proportion of EGFR signaling which in turn generates an antitumor effect in vivo. Thus, the antitumor mechanism mediated by mAb 806 is clearly distinct to the ligand-inhibiting activity of mAb 528. Therefore, these antibodies inhibit wt EGFR signaling by different modes of action, which in the case of A431 xenografts, results in greater than additive tumor inhibition.

The most important outcome of our experiments is that single EGFR therapeutics do not inhibit all the functions associated with the de2-7 or the overexpressed wt EGFR; thus, it may be necessary to target the EGFR with multiple therapeutics. Indeed, our data suggests that the development of novel therapeutics to the EGFR should continue to identify new agents with unique properties. Given that we and others recently determined the crystal structure of the extracellular domain of the EGFR, it should be possible to identify regions of the receptor that represent potential targets (50, 51). Finally, if there are some aspects of EGFR function that are not inhibited by antibodies such as mAb 528, it may explain why some EGFR therapeutics have had less clinical success than anticipated (52). Therefore, combination therapy with mAb 806 and agents such as IMC-C225 or Iressa may increase the response rate seen in patients. Consequently, we are currently developing a chimeric version of mAb 806 for use in clinical trials.

Grant support: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Mendelsohn J. Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor for cancer therapy.
J Clin Oncol
2002
;
20
:
1
–13S.
2
Arteaga CL. Overview of epidermal growth factor receptor biology and its role as a therapeutic target in human neoplasia.
Semin Oncol
2002
;
29
:
3
–9.
3
Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME. EGFR and cancer prognosis.
Eur J Cancer
2001
;
37
:
S9
–15.
4
Frederick L, Wang XY, Eley G, James CD. Diversity and frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in human glioblastomas.
Cancer Res
2000
;
60
:
1383
–7.
5
Wong AJ, Ruppert JM, Bigner SH, et al. Structural alterations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in human gliomas.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1992
;
89
:
2965
–9.
6
Sugawa N, Ekstrand AJ, James CD, Collins VP. Identical splicing of aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor transcripts from amplified rearranged genes in human glioblastomas.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1990
;
87
:
8602
–6.
7
Nishikawa R, Ji XD, Harmon RC, et al. A mutant epidermal growth factor receptor common in human glioma confers enhanced tumorigenicity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1994
;
91
:
7727
–31.
8
Tang CK, Gong XQ, Moscatello DK, Wong AJ, Lippman ME. Epidermal growth factor receptor vIII enhances tumorigenicity in human breast cancer.
Cancer Res
2000
;
60
:
3081
–7.
9
Wikstrand CJ, Reist CJ, Archer GE, Zalutsky MR, Bigner DD. The class III variant of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII): characterization and utilization as an immunotherapeutic target.
J Neurovirol
1998
;
4
:
148
–58.
10
Ge H, Gong X, Tang CK. Evidence of high incidence of EGFRvIII expression and coexpression with EGFR in human invasive breast cancer by laser capture microdissection and immunohistochemical analysis.
Int J Cancer
2002
;
98
:
357
–61.
11
de Bono JS, Rowinsky EK. The ErbB receptor family: a therapeutic target for cancer.
Trends Mol Med
2002
;
8
:
S19
–26.
12
Herbst RS, Shin DM. Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor-positive tumors: a new paradigm for cancer therapy.
Cancer
2002
;
94
:
1593
–611.
13
Wakeling AE. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Curr Opin Pharmacol
2002
;
2
:
382
–7.
14
Stragliotto G, Vega F, Stasiecki P, Gropp P, Poisson M, Delattre JY. Multiple infusions of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (EMD 55,900) in patients with recurrent malignant gliomas.
Eur J Cancer
1996
;
32A
:
636
–40.
15
Lynch DH, Yang XD. Therapeutic potential of ABX-EGF: a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody for cancer treatment.
Semin Oncol
2002
;
29
:
47
–50.
16
Herbst RS, Kim ES, Harari PM. IMC-C225, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, for treatment of head and neck cancer.
Expert Opin Biol Ther
2001
;
1
:
719
–32.
17
Herbst RS, Langer CJ. Epidermal growth factor receptors as a target for cancer treatment: the emerging role of IMC-C225 in the treatment of lung and head and neck cancers.
Semin Oncol
2002
;
29
:
27
–36.
18
Divgi CR, Welt S, Kris M, et al. Phase I and imaging trial of indium 111-labeled anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody 225 in patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1991
;
83
:
97
–104.
19
Van Doorn R, Kirtschig G, Scheffer E, Stoof TJ, Giaccone G. Follicular and epidermal alterations in patients treated with ZD1839 (Iressa), an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor.
Br J Dermatol
2002
;
147
:
598
–601.
20
Busam KJ, Capodieci P, Motzer R, Kiehn T, Phelan D, Halpern AC. Cutaneous side-effects in cancer patients treated with the antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody C225.
Br J Dermatol
2001
;
144
:
1169
–76.
21
Jungbluth AA, Stockert E, Huang HJ, et al. A monoclonal antibody recognizing human cancers with amplification/overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003
;
100
:
639
–44.
22
Johns TG, Stockert E, Ritter G, et al. Novel monoclonal antibody specific for the de2–7 epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that also recognizes the EGFR expressed in cells containing amplification of the EGFR gene.
Int J Cancer
2002
;
98
:
398
–408.
23
Walker F, Orchard SG, Jorissen RN, et al. CR1/CR2 interactions modulate the functions of the cell surface epidermal growth factor receptor.
J Biol Chem
2004
;
279
:
22387
–98.
24
Johns TG, Adams TE, Cochran JR, et al. Identification of the epitope for the epidermal growth factor receptor-specific monoclonal antibody 806 reveals that It preferentially recognizes an untethered form of the receptor.
J Biol Chem
2004
;
279
:
30375
–84.
25
Luwor RB, Johns TG, Murone C, et al. Monoclonal antibody 806 inhibits the growth of tumor xenografts expressing either the de2-7 or amplified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) but not wild-type EGFR.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
5355
–61.
26
Sato JD, Kawamoto T, Le AD, Mendelsohn J, Polikoff J, Sato GH. Biological effects in vitro of monoclonal antibodies to human epidermal growth factor receptors.
Mol Biol Med
1983
;
1
:
511
–29.
27
Masui H, Kawamoto T, Sato JD, Wolf B, Sato G, Mendelsohn J. Growth inhibition of human tumor cells in athymic mice by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies.
Cancer Res
1984
;
44
:
1002
–7.
28
Nagane M, Coufal F, Lin H, Bogler O, Cavenee WK, Huang HJ. A common mutant epidermal growth factor receptor confers enhanced tumorigenicity on human glioblastoma cells by increasing proliferation and reducing apoptosis.
Cancer Res
1996
;
56
:
5079
–86.
29
Mishima K, Johns TG, Luwor RB, et al. Growth suppression of intracranial xenografted glioblastomas overexpressing mutant epidermal growth factor receptors by systemic administration of monoclonal antibody (mAb) 806, a novel monoclonal antibody directed to the receptor.
Cancer Res
2001
;
61
:
5349
–54.
30
Johns TG, Luwor RB, Murone C, et al. Antitumor efficacy of cytotoxic drugs and the monoclonal antibody 806 is enhanced by the EGF receptor inhibitor AG1478.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003
;
100
:
15871
–6.
31
Johns TG, Mellman I, Cartwright GA, et al. The antitumor monoclonal antibody 806 recognizes a high-mannose form of the EGF receptor that reaches the cell surface when cells over-express the receptor.
FASEB J
2005
;
19
:
780
–2.
32
Fan Z, Baselga J, Masui H, Mendelsohn J. Antitumor effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies plus cis-diamminedichloroplatinum on well established A431 cell xenografts.
Cancer Res
1993
;
53
:
4637
–42.
33
Toyoshima H, Hunter T. p27, a novel inhibitor of G1 cyclin-Cdk protein kinase activity, is related to p21.
Cell
1994
;
78
:
67
–74.
34
Baselga J, Norton L, Masui H, et al. Antitumor effects of doxorubicin in combination with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1993
;
85
:
1327
–33.
35
Sturgis EM, Sacks PG, Masui H, Mendelsohn J, Schantz SP. Effects of antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody 528 on the proliferation and differentiation of head and neck cancer.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
1994
;
111
:
633
–43.
36
Goldstein NI, Prewett M, Zuklys K, Rockwell P, Mendelsohn J. Biological efficacy of a chimeric antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor in a human tumor xenograft model.
Clin Cancer Res
1995
;
1
:
1311
–8.
37
Overholser JP, Prewett MC, Hooper AT, Waksal HW, Hicklin DJ. Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade by antibody IMC-C225 inhibits growth of a human pancreatic carcinoma xenograft in nude mice.
Cancer
2000
;
89
:
74
–82.
38
Eller JL, Longo SL, Hicklin DJ, Canute GW. Activity of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody C225 against glioblastoma multiforme.
Neurosurgery
2002
;
51
:
1005
–13.
39
Nahta R, Hung MC, Esteva FJ. The HER-2-targeting antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab synergistically inhibit the survival of breast cancer cells.
Cancer Res
2004
;
64
:
2343
–6.
40
Waterman H, Sabanai I, Geiger B, Yarden Y. Alternative intracellular routing of ErbB receptors may determine signaling potency.
J Biol Chem
1998
;
273
:
13819
–27.
41
Wang Z, Zhang L, Yeung TK, Chen X. Endocytosis deficiency of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor-ErbB2 heterodimers in response to EGF stimulation.
Mol Biol Cell
1999
;
10
:
1621
–36.
42
Hommelgaard AM, Lerdrup M, van Deurs B. Association with membrane protrusions makes ErbB2 an internalization-resistant receptor.
Mol Biol Cell
2004
;
15
:
1557
–67.
43
Schmidt MH, Furnari FB, Cavenee WK, Bogler O. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling intensity determines intracellular protein interactions, ubiquitination, and internalization.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003
;
100
:
6505
–10.
44
Fan Z, Shang BY, Lu Y, Chou JL, Mendelsohn J. Reciprocal changes in p27(Kip1) and p21(Cip1) in growth inhibition mediated by blockade or overstimulation of epidermal growth factor receptors.
Clin Cancer Res
1997
;
3
:
1943
–8.
45
Shintani S, Li C, Mihara M, et al. Gefitinib (‘Iressa’, ZD1839), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, up-regulates p27KIP1 and induces G1 arrest in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.
Oral Oncol
2004
;
40
:
43
–51.
46
Moyer JD, Barbacci EG, Iwata KK, et al. Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by CP-358,774, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase.
Cancer Res
1997
;
57
:
4838
–48.
47
Kiyota A, Shintani S, Mihara M, et al. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody 225 upregulates p27(KIP1) and p15(INK4B) and induces G1 arrest in oral squamous carcinoma cell lines.
Oncology
2002
;
63
:
92
–8.
48
Busse D, Doughty RS, Ramsey TT, et al. Reversible G(1) arrest induced by inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase requires up-regulation of p27(KIP1) independent of MAPK activity.
J Biol Chem
2000
;
275
:
6987
–95.
49
Narita Y, Nagane M, Mishima K, Huang HJ, Furnari FB, Cavenee WK. Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor signaling down-regulates p27 through activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in glioblastomas.
Cancer Res
2002
;
62
:
6764
–9.
50
Garrett TP, McKern NM, Lou M, et al. Crystal structure of a truncated epidermal growth factor receptor extracellular domain bound to transforming growth factor α.
Cell
2002
;
110
:
763
–73.
51
Ogiso H, Ishitani R, Nureki O, et al. Crystal structure of the complex of human epidermal growth factor and receptor extracellular domains.
Cell
2002
;
110
:
775
–87.
52
Burton A. What went wrong with Iressa?
Lancet Oncol
2002
;
3
:
708
.