Abstract
Patients with recurrent or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) were referred for pretargeted immunoscintigraphy (Affinity Enhancement System; AES) and radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS). Data collected from 13 patients establish that whole-body AES immunoscintigraphy revealed metastases <360 mg and RIGS detected micrometastases (5–15 mg). All tissue samples removed by the surgeon were diagnosed by histology and immunohistochemistry of calcitonin to check the accuracy of IS and RIGS results. AES immunoscintigraphy is very sensitive. Of 34 metastases or recurrences detected, 22 had escaped physical examination or conventional imaging. The accuracy of RIGS was 86%, its sensitivity 75%, and its specificity was 90% (n = 208). IS and RIGS detected occult tumors that would have escaped surgery,clearly demonstrating clinical benefit. Serum calcitonin (normal, 10 pg/ml) and carcinoembryonic antigen (normal, 5 ng/ml) of two patients were restored to normal. In patients whose tumors were discovered,progression of their disease was slowed, as evidenced by the large decrease in serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen, an important prognostic factor. Surgery was canceled in one case where IS detected distant metastases out of surgical reach. Thus, AES immunoscintigraphy and RIGS might be of valuable help for the surgical management of medullary thyroid carcinoma.
INTRODUCTION
MTC3 is treated by total thyroidectomy and bilateral lymph node ablation (1, 2, 3, 4). The most important factor influencing prognosis is the stage of the disease recognized at diagnosis and the completeness of initial tumor resection (1, 5). Because of late diagnosis, particularly for sporadic MTC, recurrences occur in a number of cases (6, 7). Under basal conditions and after pentagastrin stimulation,circulating plasma calcitonin is the marker of MTC (8, 9). It roughly reflects tumor mass and allows an accurate assessment of the surgical treatment and an early diagnosis of relapse (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). The management of patients with metastatic MTC is primarily surgical, and patients with occult metastatic MTC (high plasma calcitonin without detected tumor) pose an unsolved problem (3). Thus, improved metastasis detection could advance the fight against residual disease.
Circulating CEA fails to correlate with tumor burden and is often within normal range. Rising CEA, however, has been associated with poor prognosis (3, 14). In most cases, MTC cells express high levels of CEA at their surface and technetium-99m- or indium-111-labeled monoclonal antibody or antibody fragments specific for CEA have been used in clinical studies for radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy (15, 16). We used indium-111-labeled bivalent haptens targeted to cancer cells by means of bispecific antibodies, a technique referred to as the AES, which has been shown to be very effective in the detection of CEA-expressing tumors and particularly MTC (17, 18, 19). The present study establishes the usefulness of AES immunoscintigraphy and RIGS in the surgical removal of very small tumor metastases in patients with suspected occult metastases. Accuracy of immunoscintigraphy and RIGS results was checked by histology and immunostaining of tissue samples removed by the surgeon.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients.
The protocol was approved by the local ethical committee,established by French Clinical Trial legislation. Thirteen MTC patients with elevated circulating calcitonin (range, 59–36073 pg/ml; normal,<10 pg/ml) were included in the study (Table 1). CEA level was elevated for each patient (range, 7–131 ng/ml; normal, <5 ng/ml), except for patient 5. The selection criterion was the suspicion of occult metastases of MTC. Patients were considered eligible when no tumor site was found by preoperative check-up, which included: physical examination; chest X-ray; cervical and hepatic ultrasonography; cervical, thoracic, and hepatic CT scan; or when the tumor sites known before immunoscintigraphy were too small to account for the calcitonin level. Patients had had different previous treatment at various hospitals in France and Italy as indicated in Table 1. They were included because of a suspicion of occult metastases (high plasma calcitonin). Circulating calcitonin and serum CEA levels were measured by immunoradiometric assays (ELSA HCT and ELSA2 ACE, respectively; Cis Biointernational, Gif s/Yvette, France). Because the ELSA-HCT test detects picogram amounts of basal calcitonin, the pentagastrin-stimulated calcitonin level was determined for patients with normal CT levels only. Stimulated calcitonin was measured 5 min before and 0, 3, and 5 min after an infusion of pentagastrin (0.5 μg/kg; normal, peak <30 pg/ml). Circulating calcitonin and CEA follow-up after immunoscintigraphy and RIGS was terminated after any additional treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) was performed. Preexisting circulating HAMA was undetectable in all patients, as assessed by a specific immunoradiometric assay (Ref. 19; sensitivity, 0.06μg/ml).
Tracer Synthesis and Radiolabeling.
The bivalent hapten di-DTPA-TL was synthesized as described (17, 20). di-DTPA-TL (0.1 mg per kg of body weight) in solution in 0.1 m sodium acetate, 10 mm citrate buffer (pH 5.0) was added to 111InCl3(Mallinkrodt, France). For six patients, 370 MBq were used, and 185 MBq were used for seven patients. Chelation proceeded overnight at room temperature. Then, 300 μl of nonradioactive InCl3 (22 μg/ml in the same acetate, citrate buffer) were added and allowed to saturate free DTPA groups for 1 h at room temperature.
The immunoreactivity of the tracer was determined by incubating trace amounts of 111In-labeled di-DTPA-TL in anti-DTPA-indium antibody-coated tubes. Consistently high immunoreactivity (96.5 ± 2.8%) permitted us to use the labeled hapten without purification.
Antibodies and Bispecific Antibody.
The anti-CEA × anti-DTPA-indium bispecific antibody was prepared by chemical coupling of the Fab fragment of the 734.19.22 antibody (a monoclonal IgG1,λ with specificity to the DTPA-indium complex) to the reduced Fab′ of the F6 antibody (a mouse IgG1,κ, specific for human CEA; Ref. 20). This antibody is not cross-reactive with NCA.4
Injection Protocol.
di-DTPA-TL and bispecific antibody were provided by Immunotech Pharma S.A. (Marseille, France). The bispecific antibody dose (0.1 mg/kg of body weight) was administered to patients as a 30-min i.v. infusion at 4 ± 1 days before tracer injection. At day 0, the 111In-labeled di-DTPA-TL tracer (118–370 MBq)was delivered i.v.
Serum samples were collected before bispecific antibody injection and 0.08, 0.5, 1, 5, 24, and 48 h after tracer injection. Urine was collected from 0 to 5, 5 to 24, and 24 to 48 h.
Imaging Protocol.
Whole-body scan and anterior, posterior, and lateral neck and thorax imaging were performed at 5 and 24 h after tracer injection (late images were recorded when necessary) using a large field of view tomographic camera (ADAC; Genesys) tuned to the 173 and 247 keV γ ray peaks of 111In with a 20% window on each peak. The scanning speed was 12 cm·mn−1 for whole-body scans, and a preset count of 400,000 counts was used for views of the neck and thorax. If necessary, single photon emission computed tomography was performed with the same camera in stepwise mode(64 frames of 45 s over 360°). For three patients, control images were recorded after surgery.
Scan interpretation was performed by two independent experienced observers unaware of conventional imaging results. Interpretations were then compared with pathological results on surgical or biopsy specimens or for one patient (no. 7) to circulating calcitonin determination in samples obtained by selective venous catheterization.
Radioimmunoguided Surgery.
Surgery was performed 3 ± 1 days after tracer injection. The surgeon explored the operative field with a sterile hand-held gamma probe (Scintiflex, Novelec, France; Refs. 21 and 22). For each measurement, normal tissue was counted (five times, 5–10 s) in the vicinity as a reference. The signal was considered positive when the mean radioactivity counts(n = 5) were greater than mean reference counts plus twice the SD (i.e., the square root of the reference counts). The location of positive signals originating from small lymph nodes embedded in large negative tissue areas was marked with a thread to correlate precisely the pathological results with the radioactive signals. Each lymph node and surrounding tissue were removed and analyzed by the pathologist as described below. The hand-held gamma probe counts were recorded and compared with the results of pathological examination. Ex vivo gamma probe counts were performed on 37 locations.
Pathological Examination.
For each tissue specimen, the tumor size was measured by the pathologist, enabling us to calculate the volume and to estimate tumor weight. Every specimen was evaluated histologically by multiple sections. Histological stains used included H&E. Immunohistochemical analysis included use of monoclonal antibodies to cytokeratin (KL1;Immunotech), to calcitonin (Dako), to CEA (Dako; CEA specific), and to CD68 (Kp1; Dako) to detect histiocytes-macrophages.
Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution.
Plasma and surgical sample radioactivity was measured and corrected for the physical decay of the isotope. Biexponential curves of the general formula [(1/V1 −1/V2)2−t/Tα+(1/V2)2−t/Tβ]were fitted to individual plasma radioactivity data by nonlinear least-square regression. After weighing the surgical samples, the fraction of injected dose accumulated per gram of tissue was determined.
RESULTS
Tolerance to Hapten and Antibody Injection
No adverse effect was recorded during or after the injection of the bispecific antibody or of the hapten. Six patients of 13 developed antibodies directed to the murine bispecific antibody (HAMA).
Pharmacokinetics
For all patients who underwent a first immunoscintigraphy, 111In-labeled di-DTPA-TL serum pharmacokinetics fitted a biexponential curve. The first half-life Tα was 0.48 ± 0.16 h, and the second half-life Tβ was 21.4 ± 6.3 h (n = 10). Distribution volumes were, respectively: V1, 4.3 ± 1.0 liters; and V2, 8.8 ± 2.0 liters (n = 10). The excretion of excess activity was fast; the fraction of injected dose recovered in the urine amounted to 32 ± 7% within 5 h,51 ± 6% within 24 h (n = 11), and 57 ± 3% within 48 h (n = 5).
Biodistribution
The amount of radioactivity targeted to tumors was assessed in samples containing 66–100% tumor cells and expressed as a percentage of the injected dose/kg (% ID/kg) of tumor after correction for radioactive decay. The mean value for 16 samples from six patients was 28 ± 16% ID/kg; individual values ranged from 9 to 70% ID/kg. Tumor:normal tissue contrast ratios at the time of surgery were 13 ± 7 (tumor:blood), 31 ± 13 (tumor:muscle), and 28 ± 15(tumor:normal lymph node).
Comparison between Classical Preoperative Check-Up and Immunoscintigraphy Results
The 13 patients were referred for AES immunoscintigraphy with a delay of 4 ± 1 days between bispecific antibody and tracer injection. Whole-body scan and anterior, posterior, and lateral neck and thorax planar imaging were performed at 5 and 24 h after tracer injection (late images were recorded when necessary). The sites of activity uptake and the sites detected by the preoperative check-up are summarized in Table 2. All sites but two (as indicated in Table 2) were checked by histology and immunostaining of calcitonin (as described in “Patients and Methods”). A typical whole-body scan (patient 3) is shown on Fig. 1. Each detected site was visualized on planar images; when necessary, the spatial location was assessed by single photon emission computed tomography.
Tumors Detected by Conventional Imaging.
In nine patients, physical examination or conventional imaging detected 12 true-positive tumors, all of which were visualized by AES immunoscintigraphy (patients 1, 2, and 6–12; Table 2). In patient 13,echography and CT scan detected one false-positive site in the thyroid area, as assessed by the pathological examination. It was a true-negative site with AES immunoscinti-graphy.
Occult Tumors Revealed by AES Immunoscintigraphy.
AES immunoscintigraphy revealed 22 occult metastases that had escaped conventional imaging (seven patients, nos. 3, 4, 6, 7, and 9–11). For patients 3 and 4, no tumor had been in evidence in any site by the preoperative conventional imaging evaluation; AES immunoscintigraphy detected two metastases in patient 3 and four in patient 4 (because images of the thorax at 24 h were doubtful for patient 4,additional images were recorded at 72 h, which confirmed one of the four radioactivity accumulation sites corresponding to a metastasis). The recurrence detected by conventional imaging in patient 6 (right neck) corresponded to five distinct metastases detected by immunoscintigraphy: four were true positives, and one could not be found by the surgeon. Because circulating calcitonin was not restored to normal after surgery for this patient, we were unable to determine whether this location was a true or a false positive. Immunoscintigraphy disclosed two occult iliac bone metastases in patient 7, one mediastinal metastasis in patient 9, and in patient 10,there were two metastases at the right neck site: 1 pretracheal and 1 in the thorax. In the liver of patient 11, ultrasonography detected two metastases, and AES immunoscintigraphy disclosed more than eight foci accumulating activity; coelioscopy revealed the presence of numerous small metastatic nodules. Weak signals recorded in patients 6(inflammatory site) and 12 corresponded to false-positive results.
Weight of the Detected Metastases.
The smallest radioactive site detected by AES immunoscintigraphy corresponded to a tissue sample, weighing 360 mg. This sample contained a small tumor lymph node surrounded by connective tissue partially infiltrated with tumor cells.
RIGS
RIGS was performed at 3 ± 1 days after tracer injection, as described in “Patients and Methods.” For each measurement, normal vicinal tissue was counted as a reference. The results of in situ gamma probe exploration for 208 locations (11 patients) are summarized in Table 3: 22.1% true positive, 64.4% true negative, 7.2% false negative, and 6.2% false positive. The accuracy was 86%, the sensitivity was 75%, and the specificity was 90%. Taking into account only the results concerning the lymph nodes >0.5 mm in diameter (n = 45), the accuracy was 98%, the sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 94%.
Of the 13 specimens giving false-positive results with in situ gamma probe detection, 9 were counted ex vivo. In four of nine cases of false-positive RIGS results (44%), no significant activity uptake was observed ex vivo; the false radioactive signal measured in vivo was attributable to blood vessels in the vicinity. In the five other cases, radioactivity accumulation was confirmed ex vivo and corresponded to non-tumor tissue with histiocytosis or fibrous reactions (56%). These specimens containing no tumor cells were of two kinds: two contained no CEA-expressing cells, but three contained histiocytes-macrophages that stained for CEA with a specific antibody, in agreement with the observations of Nabi et al. (23) for colorectal carcinoma (histiocytes-macrophages in other specimens were not stained for CEA).
The smallest detected metastatic lymph nodes were 0.2–0.3 cm in diameter (5–15 mg). Some were only partially infiltrated with tumor cells. A 0.1-mm-diameter metastasis located in a blood vessel was detected by RIGS (Fig. 2). In the surrounding tissue, an inflammatory reaction with numerous giant cells around a foreign body was detected by the pathologist. The giant cell macrophages present in the specimen were negative for CEA (in contrast to histiocytes-macrophages present in the three inflammatory false-positive lymph nodes described above). Because the tumor cells were located in a blood vessel, their accessibility to the bispecific antibody and the labeled hapten was high, and their radioactivity uptake might have been much higher than in less accessible tumor cells. We nevertheless cannot exclude that the observed accumulation of the radioactivity, allowing the detection of this very tiny tumor, was due to nonspecific uptake by macrophages.
The largest false-negatives were of the same mass as the smallest true-positives, 5–15 mg, except for two samples of 450 and 600 mg of conjunctivo-adipose tissue infiltrated with tumor cells. Both were attached to the jugular artery, and the circulating radioactivity was shielding the counts recorded by the hand-held gamma probe.
Influence of HAMA on Immunoscintigraphy and RIGS in a Repeated Investigation
In one patient (no. 10), the control image obtained after the first surgery indicated the persistence of some radioactive sites. Two months later, another surgery was planned, and a second immunoscintigraphy was performed, although this patient had developed HAMA. No adverse effect was experienced by the patient. No site of activity uptake was imaged; nevertheless, RIGS detected six tumor lymph nodes of eight (tumor:muscle ratio, ≥1.7).
Calcitonin and CEA Serum Level Follow-Up
Postsurgical calcitonin levels were normal (<10 pg/ml) or restored to normal for four patients (nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5) and remained normal for 30–42 months, whereas their serum calcitonin levels had ranged from 59 to 1135 pg/ml before surgery (Table 4). In two patients, the pentagastrin stimulation tests were normal 30 months after surgery (patients 1 and 3; test refused by patient 2). For one patient (no. 5), the calcitonin level was 33 pg/ml at t = 3 min, in agreement with the presence of a few residual tumor cells. CEA serum levels remained normal (<5 ng/ml) for these patients during the follow-up.
In five other patients (nos. 4, 6, 9, 10, and 12), calcitonin serum levels were lowered by 50% or more but not restored to normal,indicating the existence of residual disease (Table 4). For five of these patients, circulating calcitonin levels after 22–58 months of follow-up were lower than before surgery (nos. 4, 6, and 9) or similar(nos. 10 and 12). Follow-up of CEA serum level was performed for its elevation is indicative of poor prognosis (3, 14); it was restored to normal after surgery for patients 4, 6, and 10 (presurgery levels, 10.3, 6.9, and 26.4, respectively; Table 5). It remained normal for patient 6 and became slightly elevated for patients 4 and 10 at 38–58 months of follow-up. Patient 9’s CEA level was considerably lowered after 22 months of follow-up (17.7 ng/ml, whereas the presurgery level was 131 ng/ml). Patient 13 had a tumor resection judged adequate by the surgeon but without significant decrease of calcitonin serum level. For patient 7, surgery was not performed because of the impossibility of removing the iliac bone metastases. For two patients (nos. 8 and 11), a total resection of the known metastases was not feasible.
Influence of AES Immunoscintigraphy and RIGS on Surgical Management
Immunoscintigraphy results altered the surgical approach for seven patients, with benefits for 5 of them (Table 6). The detection of occult metastases by immunoscintigraphy had the following consequences: decision to operate(no. 10) or to perform bilateral instead of monolateral surgery (no. 3), or to perform sternotomy (nos. 4 and 9). For one patient (no. 7),repeatedly operated before, whole-body immunoscintigraphy showed two unknown metastases on the iliac bone, confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and histology on biopsy samples. Because the resection was not possible, the surgery planned to remove a neck metastasis was canceled. For two patients (nos. 6 and 12), AES immunoscintigraphy visualized every metastases, but an additional signal was a false positive.
RIGS allowed the resection of additional pathological lymph nodes in six patients (Table 6). For four of these patients (nos. 4, 6, 9, and 10), surgery was considered complete according to RIGS, but the calcitonin serum levels were not restored to normal, indicating the persistence of residual disease.
For two patients (nos. 3 and 5), CEA and basal CT levels were normalized. Immunoscintigraphy detected two occult metastases in patient no. 3 (Fig. 1); one, which escaped bilateral lymphadenectomy,was removed thanks to RIGS. The pentagastrin test was still negative 30 months after surgery. In patient 5, the RIGS signal led to the removal of a 2-mm tumor lymph node. Basal serum calcitonin of this patient remained normal 42 months after surgery.
DISCUSSION
Efficacy of classical immunoscintigraphy and RIGS is frequently limited by low tumor:normal tissue ratios. Preliminary clinical studies have shown the feasibility of AES for detecting colorectal carcinoma (24, 25), MTC (18, 19, 26), and non-small cell lung cancer (27) and have demonstrated that AES improves tumor:normal tissue ratios (17, 24) compared with classical immunoscintigraphy with directly labeled antibody fragments or pretargeted monovalent haptens (28).
Although the hapten circulated as a complex with the bispecific antibody, its initial decline in the circulation was fast because of the rapid clearance of the unbound fraction in the urine. As a consequence, tumor:normal tissue ratios increased rapidly, 24 h after hapten administration being the optimal time for immunoscintigraphy. Tumor uptake was stable, and thus tumor:nontumor contrast ratios kept increasing over time, and this has been useful in a few cases where imaging at later times has allowed us to detect additional tumor sites. It also made RIGS possible up to 7 days after hapten administration.
The results presented here have been confirmed by pathological examination of surgical or biopsy samples or selective venous catheterization. The technique is very sensitive given that, of 34 metastases detected by AES immunoscintigraphy, 22 escaped classical preoperative imaging. High-contrast images were obtained in most cases and indicated that two successive injections 4 days apart (one of the bispecific antibody, the other of the labeled bivalent hapten) greatly enhanced diagnostic reliability. One patient received a second administration of the AES reagents while she was HAMA positive. The presence of HAMA did not cause any clinical problem but definitely decreased targeting efficiency (25).
The benefit of AES immunoscintigraphy for the patients was illustrated by the influence of immunoscintigraphy on the efficacy of surgery. It was clearly demonstrated in one of the four patients (nos. 3, 4, 9, and 10), operated on because immunoscintigraphy detected occult tumors;patient 3 had his serum calcitonin and CEA restored to normal. In addition, the time to progression may have been delayed in the other cases (nos. 4, 9, and 10), in which a large decrease in circulating CEA, an important prognostic factor (3, 14), was achieved. CEA was restored to normal for two of these patients after surgery and remained below presurgery level 22–58 months later for the three(Table 5). Finally, whole-body scanning allowed the detection of distant metastases, which represents a major advantage of the present approach. In one patient, two occult iliac bone foci, out of surgical reach, were visualized by immunoscintigraphy. Cancellation of a useless surgery was an appreciated benefit for this patient, in agreement with the earlier observation of Juweid et al. (29).
Improved sensitivity and specificity of tumor imaging translated into better clinical management. Surgery may often be only palliative in MTC recurrences, when tumor resection is not complete, as shown by the absence of normalization of serum calcitonin (4, 6). This explains the decision to operate, even with marginally significant immunoscintigraphy indications. False-positive immunoscintigraphy interpretation could probably be minimized with a longer practice of the technique. In addition, we cannot exclude that some of these marginally significant images were attributable to very small positive lymph nodes not found by the surgeon.
Localization of tumors by their activity uptake provided a major surgical opportunity. RIGS allowed us to detect very small tumors,including those too small to be detected by immunoscintigraphy. The efficacy of the present technique was established because 16 detected pathological lymph nodes were 0.2–0.3 cm in diameter. In six cases,RIGS allowed resection of tumor sites that otherwise would have escaped surgery, and serum calcitonin was restored to normal (≤10 pg/ml) in two patients (patients 3 and 5).
MTC is a rare disease; the number of patients investigated thus far ruled out statistical treatment. AES immunoscintigraphy, followed by RIGS, enabled us to remove occult metastases with a benefit for six patients, including two patients in which basal calcitonin was restored to normal (follow-up, 30 and 52 months), and for one of these, the normalization of the pentagastrin-stimulated calcitonin. In the absence of RIGS, only very extensive surgery (“microsurgery”) achieves calcitonin normalization in a significant number of occult metastatic MTC (2, 30, 31, 32), but the surgical technique is more difficult, and complications are greater than conventional surgery (3). Therefore, the approach of most experienced centers is a more conservative palliative treatment for recurrent MTC (3).
In conclusion, AES immunoscintigraphy and RIGS allow the resection of very small unanticipated tumors. They are new and powerful tools for the conventional surgical management of patients in recurrent MTC,primarily for occult recurrent MTC. In addition they might be of valuable help for the “microdissection” surgical approach. Only very small lesions may escape both. In such cases, AES radioimmunotherapy after RIGS may become the treatment of choice.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported in part by Grant 6073 from the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer.
The abbreviations used are: MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; AES, Affinity Enhancement System; RIGS, radioimmunoguided surgery; CT, computed tomography; HAMA, human antimouse antibody; di-DTPA-TL, N-α-DTPA-tyrosyl-N-ε-DTPA-lysine; %ID, percentage of injected dose.
Unpublished results.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the help and suggestions of Professor A. A. Benson (University of California San Diego) during the revision of the manuscript.