Skip Nav Destination
Issues
1 July 2024
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
The cover image is adapted from Fig. 2 in the article, “Optimization and Local Cost-Effectiveness of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Screening Strategies in Southern China,” by Miller and colleagues. There is currently no consensus nasopharyngeal carcinoma screening algorithm due to differences in screening performance, referral rates, cost, complexity, and local economic factors. In Southern China, the local cost-effectiveness of serology-based screening remains uncertain, and it would be desirable to elucidate the optimal balance between screening sensitivity, resource utilization, and cost. In addition, it is unclear whether ancillary triage tests may improve cost-effectiveness. The authors conducted a secondary analysis of the Guangdong cluster-randomized trial and hypothesized that population-level serology-based screening is cost-effective in Guangdong and Guangxi. They sought to define the preferred screening ages, interval, duration, and the added value of screening MRIs, nasopharyngeal endoscopies, and nasopharyngeal swabs. Figure 2 shows the relative performance and optimization of screening strategies. In the intent-to-screen population, screening with serology and endoscopy was costeffective (¥42,366/life-year, 0.52 GDP per-capita). Screening for 5 to 15 years between ages 35 and 59 met a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1.5 GDP/QALY in all modeled populations. Despite doubling costs, adding MRI could be cost-effective via improved sensitivity. Nasopharyngeal swab PCR triage reduced endoscopy/MRI referrals by 37%. One lifetime screen could reduce nasopharyngeal carcinoma mortality by approximately 20%. Results showed that EBV-based serologic screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma is likely to be cost-effective in Southern China. Among seropositive subjects, the preferred strategies use endoscopy alone or selective endoscopy triaged by MRI with or without nasopharyngeal swab PCR. These data may aid the design of screening programs in this region. For more information, see the article beginning on page 884. - PDF Icon PDF LinkTable of Contents
- PDF Icon PDF LinkEditorial Board
ISSN 1055-9965
EISSN 1538-7755
Highlights
In the Spotlight
Commentary
Review
Research Article
Evidence of Decreased Long-term Risk of Cervical Precancer after Negative Primary HPV Screens Compared with Negative Cytology Screens in a Longitudinal Cohort Study
Anna Gottschlich; Quan Hong; Lovedeep Gondara; Md S. Alam; Darrel A. Cook; Ruth E. Martin; Marette Lee; Joy Melnikow; Stuart Peacock; Lily Proctor; Gavin Stuart; Eduardo L. Franco; Mel Krajden; Laurie W. Smith; Gina S. Ogilvie
Assessing Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results and Concordance with Guideline Recommendations in Three US Healthcare Settings
David Cheng; Meghan L. Rieu-Werden; Jacquelyn M. Lykken; Claudia L. Werner; Sarah Feldman; Michelle I. Silver; Steven J. Atlas; Jasmin A. Tiro; Jennifer S. Haas; Aruna Kamineni
Association of Ideal Cardiovascular Health in Youth with Cancer Risk in Adulthood: A Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study
Jussi Niemelä; Joel Nuotio; Tomi T. Laitinen; Mika Kähönen; Nina Hutri; Terho Lehtimäki; Eero Jokinen; Päivi Tossavainen; Tomi P. Laitinen; Olli J. Heinonen; Terence Dwyer; Katja Pahkala; Suvi P. Rovio; Jorma Viikari; Olli Raitakari; Markus Juonala
Null Results in Brief
Letters to the Editor
Advertisement
Email alerts
NOTICE: This notice serves to inform the reader that, in 2023, AACR received a donation by Pfizer of the rights to royalties from the sale within the United States of Bavencio® (avelumab), a pharmaceutical owned by Merck. If any resulting funds are received, they would not be used to directly support any specific publication or author. If an individual article is published that deals with this particular drug, such article will include standard financial disclosures per AACR journal policy. For more detail regarding AACR’s established policies for authors, please go to https://aacrjournals.org/pages/editorial-policies#coi.