Recent studies suggest that Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States may underuse cancer screening tests. We examined the breast and cervical cancer screening practices of 6048 Asian and Pacific Islander women in 49 states from 1994 through 1997 using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. About 71.7%[95% confidence interval (CI), 66.3–77.0%] of women in this sample aged ≥50 years had a mammogram in the past 2 years, and 69.5% (95%CI, 63.9–75.1%) had a clinical breast exam in the past 2 years. About 73.7% (95% CI, 71.3–76.0%) of women aged ≥18 years who had not undergone a hysterectomy had a Papanicolaou test in the past 3 years. Women with health insurance and those who had seen a physician in the past year were more likely to have been screened. These results underscore the need for continued efforts to ensure that Asian and Pacific Islander women who are medically underserved, including those without health insurance, have access to cancer screening services.

In 1990, Asians and Pacific Islanders (people whose ancestors are the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands) represented about 3% of the United States population (1, 2). This percentage is expected to increase to 4.5% by 2000 (1).

Chinese, Japanese, and Filipino women in the United States have lower age-adjusted breast cancer incidence and mortality rates than do white women (1, 2, 3). Breast cancer incidence rates are also relatively low for Korean and Vietnamese women. Nevertheless, breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer among Chinese, Japanese,Filipino, Korean, and Hawaiian women in the United States, and it is the second most frequent cancer after cervical cancer among Vietnamese women (1, 3). Asian women whose families have lived in the United States longer are at higher risk for breast cancer than are new immigrants (4, 5). Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates vary widely among Asian and Pacific Islander women. Korean, and especially Vietnamese, women in the United States have higher age-adjusted cervical cancer incidence rates than do white women (1, 3). Native Hawaiian women have higher age-adjusted breast cancer incidence and mortality rates than do Asian women; breast cancer rates among Hawaiian women are close to those of white women (3).

Previous surveys have shown that Asian and Pacific Islander women may underuse cancer screening tests (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). For example, the 1994 Behavioral Risk Factor Survey in California found that only 61%of Asian women aged ≥50 years had received a mammogram in the previous 2 years, compared with 76% of white women (19). A study of 218 Filipino women in Los Angeles aged ≥50 years found that only 66% had ever had a screening mammogram and 54% had had one in the previous 2 years (6). A 1994 survey of 676 Korean Americans in Alameda County, California found that only 60% of those aged ≥18 years had ever had a Pap2test, and 55% of those aged ≥50 years had ever had a mammogram (7). Surveys of Vietnamese women in the San Francisco Bay area suggested that 17–66% of those aged ≥40 years had ever had a mammogram and that 46–68% of those aged ≥18 years had ever had a Pap test (12, 13). Surveys have often been carried out in local communities, and few national data on Asian and Pacific Islander women are available for evaluating progress toward year 2000 objectives that promote cancer prevention and control (20, 21, 22).

This paper extends on the work of previous authors by examining the breast and cervical cancer screening practices of Asian and Pacific Islander women in 49 states, using data obtained by population-based probability samples from 1994 through 1997. The preventive practices examined included screening mammography, clinical breast examinations,Pap tests, and other health behaviors.

The data used were gathered from 6048 self-identified Asian and Pacific Islander women who were interviewed as part of the BRFSS from 1994 through 1997. The ages of 33 women were unknown, which left data on a sample of 6015 women available for analysis. Data from this 4-year period were pooled to create a sample sufficient for this analysis.

The BRFSS is a state-based telephone survey of adults ≥18 years (23, 24). The BRFSS uses a random-digit dialing technique and multistage cluster sampling in each participating state to sample noninstitutionalized adults who have telephones (25). A computer-assisted interview is administered by trained interviewers. The interviews include questions about general health status, tobacco use, alcohol consumption, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, screening mammography, clinical breast examinations,and Pap tests. During the period of interest (1994 through 1997), each adult female respondent was asked whether she had ever had a mammogram;those who responded positively were asked how long it had been since their last mammogram. Similar questions were asked about clinical breast examinations and Pap tests. Women were also asked whether they had undergone a hysterectomy.

The study population (n = 6015) was drawn from Asian and Pacific Islander women aged ≥18 years who responded to BRFSS surveys in each state. Rhode Island, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia were excluded because data were not available for the entire period of interest. Analyses of screening mammogram and clinical breast examination use were limited to Asian and Pacific Islander women who were ≥40 years of age (n = 2873). Analyses of Pap test use were limited to women who were ≥18 years of age who had not had a hysterectomy (n = 5254).

Age-specific and crude rates of screening test use were calculated for the 4-year period of interest. In examining bivariate associations,levels of statistical significance were obtained using Pearsonχ 2 tests. χ2 tests for trend were also used. With the exception of screening rates stratified by age categories, significance testing for bivariate associations was limited to age-adjusted rates. All analyses used SAS and SUDAAN to calculate the 95% CIs and to allow for weighting of the estimates (26). Telephone surveys tend to undersample certain subpopulations, such as young persons. To better represent the overall population (of all races) and to enable the different samples to be combined and compared, the samples were weighted to compensate for the unequal sampling probability resulting from the unique number of phones per household; number of unique phone numbers per primary sampling unit; and poststratification by age, sex, and race. Estimates of the proportion of women screened for cancer were adjusted to the age distribution for Asian and Pacific Islander women in the overall sample. Data on women who reported that they had had a hysterectomy and who therefore did not have an intact uterine cervix were excluded from analyses of Pap test use.

A multivariate analysis of predictors of screening test use was carried out using logistic regression techniques and SUDAAN (26). Variables found to be significantly associated with screening at the P < 0.20 level in univariate analysis were selected for multivariate analysis. A stepwise, backwards elimination procedure was then used to identify variables independently associated with screening test use at the P < 0.05 level. Covariates for age categories were included in all models to adjust for age differences.

Among the Asian and Pacific Islander women in this sample of women who had not had a hysterectomy, about 63.2% were 18–39 years old,18.8% were 40–49 years, 12.4% were 50–64 years, and 5.6% were ≥65 years, all on the basis of weighted estimates (results not shown). Six% of the women (421 of 5243) reported having less than a high school education. About 15.7% (691 of 4408) reported having an annual household income of ≤$15,000. Almost 70.5% (3854 of 5096) reported that they had seen a physician within the past year.

Among those women who were at least 40 years of age regardless of hysterectomy status, 44.9% were 40–49 years old, 34.8% were 50–64 years, and 20.2% were ≥65 years, all on the basis of weighted estimates (results not shown). About 10.1% (408 of 2860) reported having less than a high school education. About 14.6% (380 of 2344)reported having an annual household income of ≤$15,000. Almost 74.7%(2292 of 2810) reported that they had seen a physician within the past year.

Almost 82.0% (95% CI, 79.0–85.0%) of the Asian and Pacific Islander women aged ≥40 years reported they had ever had a mammogram, and 71.7% (95% CI, 66.3–77.0%) of those aged ≥50 years had a mammogram in the past 2 years (results not shown). Stratified analyses (Table 1) showed that the lowest screening rates were for women aged 40–49 years and for women aged ≥65 years. Having had a mammogram in the past 2 years was associated with having seen a physician in the past year and having health insurance (Table 1).

About 69.5% (95% CI, 63.9–75.1%) of women in this sample aged ≥50 years had a clinical breast exam in the past 2 years. Having had a clinical breast examination in the past 2 years was associated with having seen a physician in the past year, having health insurance, and being able to work (Table 2).

Among Asian and Pacific Islander women who were ≥18 years who had not had a hysterectomy, 78.5% (95% CI, 76.2–80.8%) had ever had a Pap test and 73.7% (95% CI, 71.3–76.0%) had a Pap test in the past 3 years (results not shown). Having had a Pap test in the past 3 years was associated with higher education, higher household income, being unable to work, having seen a physician in the past year, and having health insurance (Table 3).

In multivariate analysis (Table 4), factors found to be positively associated with having had a mammogram in the past 2 years included having health insurance and having seen a physician in the past year (P < 0.01 in each instance). Factors found to be positively associated with having had a clinical breast exam in the past 2 years in multivariate analysis included being unable to work, having health insurance, and having seen a physician in the past year (P < 0.05 in each instance; Table 5). The association with marital status was of borderline significance(P < 0.10). Factors found to be positively associated with having had a Pap test in the past 3 years in multivariate analysis included marital status, higher income, having seen a physician in the past year, and alcohol consumption (P < 0.01 in each instance; Table 6). The association between health insurance and receipt of a Pap test in the past 3 years was of borderline significance (P ≤0.10) after adjustment for other variables in the model.

Tests for trend were carried out to verify that it was reasonable to pool data over the period 1994–1997. During this period, there were no significant trends in the percentage of Asian and Pacific Islander women who had ever had a mammogram or clinical breast examination or who had these screening tests in the past 2 years(χ2 test for trend P > 0.05 for all). Similarly, there were no significant trends in the percentage of women who had ever had a Pap test or who had a Pap test in the past 3 years (χ2 test for trend P >0.05 for both).

Analyses of national data on the breast and cervical cancer screening practices of Asian and Pacific Islander women are useful for evaluating progress toward year 2000 objectives (20). These objectives include increasing to at least 80% the percentage of women aged ≥40 years who have ever had a clinical breast examination and a mammogram and to at least 60% those aged ≥50 years who have had these tests within the preceding 1–2 years. Year 2000 objectives for the nation also include increasing to at least 95% the percentage of women aged ≥18 years with a uterine cervix who have ever received a Pap test and to at least 85% the percentage who had a Pap test within the preceding 1–3 years. The results of the present survey suggest that Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States are approaching these objectives and highlight the need for continued efforts to ensure that Asian and Pacific Islander women have access to breast and cervical cancer screening services.

The results of this survey provide information about the frequency of breast and cervical cancer screening practices among a diverse sample of Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States. More than 30 distinct languages or dialects are spoken by Asians and Pacific Islanders in the United States, representing 24 or more ethnic populations each with their own distinct culture (1, 2). Previous studies have suggested that some communities of Asian and Pacific Islander women may have substantial barriers to cancer screening because of poverty, language barriers, lack of access to health care services, and cultural and attitudinal factors (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). Median incomes in Asian and Pacific Islander communities in the United States vary widely (4). Poverty is often widespread among recent immigrants such as Vietnamese and Cambodians (4). Health insurance coverage, access to regular health care, and utilization rates of preventive services, such as cancer screening tests, also vary widely in these communities (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). In the present study, women with health insurance were much more likely than women without health insurance to have had a recent mammogram or Pap test.

Because prior studies have shown that there are specific groups of Asians and Pacific Islanders, such as Southeast Asians and new immigrants who may have important barriers to cancer screening, there is a need for cancer screening programs to reach these subgroups of Asians and Pacific Islanders. Variations in the frequency of cancer screening practices among subgroups of Asian and Pacific Islander women are not apparent in overall estimates based upon analyses of national data such as the present report.

Blackman et al.(22) examined trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989–1997) and Pap tests (1991–1997)among women of different racial groups who had participated in BRFSS surveys conducted in 38 states. The percentage of Asian and Pacific Islander women aged ≥40 years who reported their most recent mammogram occurred within the past 2 years increased from 38.8% in 1989 to 72.5% in 1997, and the percentage of such women aged ≥18 years who reported their most recent Pap test occurred within the past 2 years increased from 59.7% in 1991 to 72.9% in 1997. In the 38 states for which data were available, the percentage of white women aged ≥40 years who reported their most recent mammogram occurred within the past 2 years increased from 54.7% in 1989 to 71.4% in 1997, and the percentage of white women aged ≥18 years who reported their most recent Pap test occurred within the past 2 years was roughly unchanged from 78.9% in 1991 to 80.1% in 1997 (22). In contrast to the present report, Blackman et al.(22) did not examine factors associated with screening practices. The present report also differs from the paper by Blackman et al. in that data for Asian and Pacific Islander women were pooled for a recent 4-year period (during which there were no statistically significant trends in the percentage of women who had received the screening tests of interest) to have a sample sufficient for examining factors associated with screening practices.

The present study was limited by a number of factors. The results may not be generalizable to all Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States because of language barriers and other sources of response bias. The telephone survey excluded women living in households without a telephone. However, telephones were in the homes of about 98% of Asians and Pacific Islanders in 1990 (27). About 15–20% of contacted households of all races did not respond to the surveys. Race-specific nonresponse rates are unavailable for BRFSS;hence the response rates for Asian and Pacific Islanders are unknown. Finally, self-reported information about cancer screening practices may differ from information obtained from the records of health-care providers. Validation studies involving women of other races have suggested that patients tend to overreport their use of screening and underreport the time since their last screening (28, 29, 30). Studies of the reliability of cancer screening information collected as part of BRFSS have shown the reliability of self-reported information about screening mammography and Pap tests to be excellent, but information from nonwhite respondents may be less reproducible (31, 32). Finally, the multivariate analysis carried out is limited by incomplete information about some factors that have been associated with breast and cervical cancer screening practices in previous studies, such as knowledge of cancer and the importance of early detection. Such information is not routinely collected as part of BRFSS surveys.

The present study did not examine whether screening prevalence is higher among Asian and Pacific Islander women who live in areas where they represent a sizeable minority group as compared with those who live in areas where they are more isolated from persons of similar backgrounds. Future studies might conduct stratified analyses based on the density of the Asian and Pacific Islander population and examine the extent to which a sense of community and social support relate to screening behaviors. Small-area analyses of BRFSS data require special statistical assumptions because of the sampling procedures used for this state-based survey, however.

These results underscore the need for continued efforts to ensure that Asian and Pacific Islander women who are medically underserved,including those without health insurance, have access to cancer screening services. Present efforts under way in the United States include the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which provides support to states for breast and cervical screening services for medically underserved women (33). Results of studies completed to date indicate there is a continuing need for multilingual,culturally sensitive educational efforts to provide factual information and increase cancer screening test use among Asian and Pacific Islander women.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

                
2

The abbreviations used are: Pap,Papanicolaou; BRFSS, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; CI,confidence interval.

Table 1

Percentage of Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States,aged ≥40 years, who had a mammogram in the past 2 years, according to selected demographic characteristics, medical history, and cancer screening practices, BRFSS, 1994–1997

nUnadjusteda % (95% CI)Adjustedb % (95% CI)
Age    
40–49 yr 1239 64.6 (59.8–69.5)  
50–64 yr 814 72.1 (65.3–78.9)  
≥65 yr 783 71.0 (62.4–79.6)  
Marital status    
Presently married 1811 68.5 (64.1–73.0) 67.8 (63.4–72.2) 
Divorced or separated 382 69.2 (59.5–78.9) 69.1 (59.8–78.4) 
Widowed 459 67.0 (55.6–78.3) 64.4 (52.8–76.0) 
Never married 168 68.5 (55.8–81.2) 65.4 (51.7–79.1) 
Living as unmarried couple 13 84.5 (55.8–100.0) 81.0 (48.7–100.) 
Educational attainment    
<High school graduate 396 62.3 (51.9–72.6) 64.4 (54.3–74.6) 
High school graduate/GEDc 770 72.4 (65.2–79.7) 70.7 (63.2–78.1) 
Some college/technical school 656 74.1 (66.6–81.6) 71.2 (63.4–79.0) 
College graduate 1003 65.7 (60.0–71.4) 65.4 (59.8–71.0) 
Household income    
<$15,000 378 68.8 (57.5–80.1) 66.2 (53.8–78.5) 
$15,000–34,999 786 65.2 (57.3–73.2) 64.9 (57.3–72.6) 
$35,000–49,999 432 71.9 (63.3–80.5) 70.8 (62.5–79.1) 
≥$50,000 731 68.2 (61.9–74.5) 67.3 (61.0–73.5) 
Employment status    
Presently employed 1625 66.8 (62.1–71.5) 65.9 (61.4–70.5) 
Homemaker or retired 1076 69.8 (63.4–76.2) 68.9 (62.2–75.6) 
Unemployed 79 82.4 (68.1–96.7) 80.9 (64.5–97.3) 
Unable to work 50 68.2 (40.1–96.2) 64.6 (36.9–92.2) 
General health status    
Good to excellent 2332 69.0 (65.1–72.9) 68.0 (64.1–71.9) 
Fair or poor 490 65.8 (55.7–75.9) 65.3 (55.2–75.5) 
Saw physician within past year    
Yes 2269 79.2 (75.8–82.6) 78.2 (74.8–81.7) 
No 511 39.6 (31.4–47.9) 39.4d (31.2–47.5) 
Any health insurance coverage    
Yes 2684 70.7 (67.0–74.4) 69.6 (65.9–73.3) 
No 151 45.5 (31.4–59.6) 44.7e (30.9–58.4) 
Clinical breast exam    
Ever 2377 75.0 (71.5–78.6) 74.1 (70.5–77.6) 
Never 439 43.8 (34.1–53.5) 43.0d (33.6–52.4) 
Clinical breast exam in past 2 yr    
Yes 2038 83.1 (79.8–86.5) 82.6 (79.3–85.8) 
No 756 37.5 (30.1–45.0) 36.2d (29.0–43.4) 
Pap testf    
Ever 1989 72.0 (67.9–76.0) 71.2 (67.2–75.1) 
Never 164 24.8 (11.5–38.1) 25.9d (11.8–40.1) 
Pap test in past 3 yearsf    
Yes 1746 77.4 (73.4–81.3) 76.6 (72.7–80.5) 
No 384 22.8 (14.3–31.4) 23.4d (14.4–32.5) 
Present cigarette smoker    
Yes 314 74.6 (65.7–83.6) 71.0 (60.9–81.2) 
No 2518 67.9 (64.0–71.8) 67.2 (63.3–71.1) 
Present alcohol use    
Yes 428 69.9 (61.8–77.9) 68.5 (60.5–76.6) 
No 1222 68.1 (62.5–73.7) 67.3 (61.7–72.8) 
nUnadjusteda % (95% CI)Adjustedb % (95% CI)
Age    
40–49 yr 1239 64.6 (59.8–69.5)  
50–64 yr 814 72.1 (65.3–78.9)  
≥65 yr 783 71.0 (62.4–79.6)  
Marital status    
Presently married 1811 68.5 (64.1–73.0) 67.8 (63.4–72.2) 
Divorced or separated 382 69.2 (59.5–78.9) 69.1 (59.8–78.4) 
Widowed 459 67.0 (55.6–78.3) 64.4 (52.8–76.0) 
Never married 168 68.5 (55.8–81.2) 65.4 (51.7–79.1) 
Living as unmarried couple 13 84.5 (55.8–100.0) 81.0 (48.7–100.) 
Educational attainment    
<High school graduate 396 62.3 (51.9–72.6) 64.4 (54.3–74.6) 
High school graduate/GEDc 770 72.4 (65.2–79.7) 70.7 (63.2–78.1) 
Some college/technical school 656 74.1 (66.6–81.6) 71.2 (63.4–79.0) 
College graduate 1003 65.7 (60.0–71.4) 65.4 (59.8–71.0) 
Household income    
<$15,000 378 68.8 (57.5–80.1) 66.2 (53.8–78.5) 
$15,000–34,999 786 65.2 (57.3–73.2) 64.9 (57.3–72.6) 
$35,000–49,999 432 71.9 (63.3–80.5) 70.8 (62.5–79.1) 
≥$50,000 731 68.2 (61.9–74.5) 67.3 (61.0–73.5) 
Employment status    
Presently employed 1625 66.8 (62.1–71.5) 65.9 (61.4–70.5) 
Homemaker or retired 1076 69.8 (63.4–76.2) 68.9 (62.2–75.6) 
Unemployed 79 82.4 (68.1–96.7) 80.9 (64.5–97.3) 
Unable to work 50 68.2 (40.1–96.2) 64.6 (36.9–92.2) 
General health status    
Good to excellent 2332 69.0 (65.1–72.9) 68.0 (64.1–71.9) 
Fair or poor 490 65.8 (55.7–75.9) 65.3 (55.2–75.5) 
Saw physician within past year    
Yes 2269 79.2 (75.8–82.6) 78.2 (74.8–81.7) 
No 511 39.6 (31.4–47.9) 39.4d (31.2–47.5) 
Any health insurance coverage    
Yes 2684 70.7 (67.0–74.4) 69.6 (65.9–73.3) 
No 151 45.5 (31.4–59.6) 44.7e (30.9–58.4) 
Clinical breast exam    
Ever 2377 75.0 (71.5–78.6) 74.1 (70.5–77.6) 
Never 439 43.8 (34.1–53.5) 43.0d (33.6–52.4) 
Clinical breast exam in past 2 yr    
Yes 2038 83.1 (79.8–86.5) 82.6 (79.3–85.8) 
No 756 37.5 (30.1–45.0) 36.2d (29.0–43.4) 
Pap testf    
Ever 1989 72.0 (67.9–76.0) 71.2 (67.2–75.1) 
Never 164 24.8 (11.5–38.1) 25.9d (11.8–40.1) 
Pap test in past 3 yearsf    
Yes 1746 77.4 (73.4–81.3) 76.6 (72.7–80.5) 
No 384 22.8 (14.3–31.4) 23.4d (14.4–32.5) 
Present cigarette smoker    
Yes 314 74.6 (65.7–83.6) 71.0 (60.9–81.2) 
No 2518 67.9 (64.0–71.8) 67.2 (63.3–71.1) 
Present alcohol use    
Yes 428 69.9 (61.8–77.9) 68.5 (60.5–76.6) 
No 1222 68.1 (62.5–73.7) 67.3 (61.7–72.8) 
a

Weighted population estimates unadjusted for age; women who responded don’t know or not sure or who refused to answer are excluded.

b

Weighted population estimates adjusted to the 1994–1997 age distribution for Asian and Pacific Islander women in this sample.

c

GED, General Education Development.

d

P < 0.001.

e

P < 0.01.

f

Excludes women who had a hysterectomy.

Table 2

Percentage of Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States,aged ≥40 years, who had a clinical breast exam in the past 2 years,according to selected demographic characteristics, medical history, and cancer screening practices, BRFSS, 1994–1997

nUnadjusteda % (95% CI)Adjustedb % (95% CI)
Age    
40–49 yr 1232 67.2 (62.3–72.1)  
50–64 yr 805 74.2 (67.4–81.0)  
≥65 yr 774 61.5 (51.9–71.1)  
Marital status    
Presently married 1796 68.0 (63.5–72.6) 67.7 (63.1–72.3) 
Divorced or separated 382 76.7 (68.4–85.1) 74.9 (65.8–83.9) 
Widowed 451 58.9 (46.0–71.7) 57.3 (45.3–69.4) 
Never married 165 77.6 (66.5–88.7) 75.5 (63.3–87.7) 
Living as unmarried couple 13 81.5 (49.4–100.) 77.0 (40.9–100.) 
Educational attainment    
<High school graduate 385 62.5 (52.2–72.9) 65.2 (54.9–75.4) 
High school graduate/GEDc 763 68.8 (60.9–76.7) 67.4 (59.4–75.4) 
Some college/technical school 653 68.9 (60.0–77.8) 69.1 (60.7–77.5) 
College graduate 1002 69.6 (64.0–75.3) 68.3 (62.6–74.0) 
Household income    
<$15,000 372 62.7 (50.6–74.7) 59.0 (46.2–71.9) 
$15,000–34,999 776 63.7 (55.2–72.2) 65.9 (58.2–73.7) 
$35,000–49,999 435 73.3 (65.1–81.4) 72.3 (63.9–80.7) 
≥$50,000 730 74.2 (68.2–80.1) 72.6 (66.5–78.8) 
Employment status    
Presently employed 1616 72.3 (67.9–76.7) 71.8 (67.4–76.1) 
Homemaker or retired 1062 61.8 (54.8–68.7) 60.5 (53.3–67.8) 
Unemployed 78 53.4 (29.2–77.6) 58.6 (35.6–81.6) 
Unable to work 49 88.8 (78.2–99.5) 87.2d (76.2–98.2) 
General health status    
Good to excellent 2320 68.7 (64.6–72.9) 68.0 (63.9–72.1) 
Fair or poor 478 67.2 (57.3–77.1) 67.2 (57.3–77.2) 
Saw physician within past year    
Yes 2249 77.0 (73.0–80.9) 76.7 (72.8–80.6) 
No 506 45.5 (36.9–54.0) 44.5e (36.2–52.8) 
Any health insurance coverage    
Yes 2661 70.8 (66.9–74.7) 70.3 (66.4–74.2) 
No 149 43.8 (29.5–58.0) 40.4e (26.9–53.9) 
Mammogram    
Ever 2350 76.5 (72.6–80.4) 76.4 (72.6–80.3) 
Never 457 32.1 (24.2–39.9) 32.2e (24.5–40.0) 
Mammogram in past 2 yr    
Yes 1992 82.8 (78.8–86.7) 82.8 (78.9–86.6) 
No 802 36.9 (30.3–43.5) 36.5e (30.2–42.8) 
Pap testf    
Ever 1971 73.9 (69.6–78.1) 73.8 (69.8–77.9) 
Never 166 21.8 (11.6–31.9) 22.2e (11.7–32.8) 
Pap test in past 3 yrf    
Yes 1738 79.8 (75.5–84.0) 79.9 (76.0–83.9) 
No 380 18.9 (12.3–25.5) 19.1e (12.3–26.0) 
Present cigarette smoker    
Yes 311 68.2 (57.9–78.6) 68.5 (58.1–79.0) 
No 2496 68.5 (64.5–72.6) 67.8 (63.8–71.8) 
Present alcohol use    
Yes 422 73.4 (65.6–81.2) 72.2 (64.2–80.3) 
No 1212 66.1 (60.1–72.1) 65.9 (60.0–71.7) 
nUnadjusteda % (95% CI)Adjustedb % (95% CI)
Age    
40–49 yr 1232 67.2 (62.3–72.1)  
50–64 yr 805 74.2 (67.4–81.0)  
≥65 yr 774 61.5 (51.9–71.1)  
Marital status    
Presently married 1796 68.0 (63.5–72.6) 67.7 (63.1–72.3) 
Divorced or separated 382 76.7 (68.4–85.1) 74.9 (65.8–83.9) 
Widowed 451 58.9 (46.0–71.7) 57.3 (45.3–69.4) 
Never married 165 77.6 (66.5–88.7) 75.5 (63.3–87.7) 
Living as unmarried couple 13 81.5 (49.4–100.) 77.0 (40.9–100.) 
Educational attainment    
<High school graduate 385 62.5 (52.2–72.9) 65.2 (54.9–75.4) 
High school graduate/GEDc 763 68.8 (60.9–76.7) 67.4 (59.4–75.4) 
Some college/technical school 653 68.9 (60.0–77.8) 69.1 (60.7–77.5) 
College graduate 1002 69.6 (64.0–75.3) 68.3 (62.6–74.0) 
Household income    
<$15,000 372 62.7 (50.6–74.7) 59.0 (46.2–71.9) 
$15,000–34,999 776 63.7 (55.2–72.2) 65.9 (58.2–73.7) 
$35,000–49,999 435 73.3 (65.1–81.4) 72.3 (63.9–80.7) 
≥$50,000 730 74.2 (68.2–80.1) 72.6 (66.5–78.8) 
Employment status    
Presently employed 1616 72.3 (67.9–76.7) 71.8 (67.4–76.1) 
Homemaker or retired 1062 61.8 (54.8–68.7) 60.5 (53.3–67.8) 
Unemployed 78 53.4 (29.2–77.6) 58.6 (35.6–81.6) 
Unable to work 49 88.8 (78.2–99.5) 87.2d (76.2–98.2) 
General health status    
Good to excellent 2320 68.7 (64.6–72.9) 68.0 (63.9–72.1) 
Fair or poor 478 67.2 (57.3–77.1) 67.2 (57.3–77.2) 
Saw physician within past year    
Yes 2249 77.0 (73.0–80.9) 76.7 (72.8–80.6) 
No 506 45.5 (36.9–54.0) 44.5e (36.2–52.8) 
Any health insurance coverage    
Yes 2661 70.8 (66.9–74.7) 70.3 (66.4–74.2) 
No 149 43.8 (29.5–58.0) 40.4e (26.9–53.9) 
Mammogram    
Ever 2350 76.5 (72.6–80.4) 76.4 (72.6–80.3) 
Never 457 32.1 (24.2–39.9) 32.2e (24.5–40.0) 
Mammogram in past 2 yr    
Yes 1992 82.8 (78.8–86.7) 82.8 (78.9–86.6) 
No 802 36.9 (30.3–43.5) 36.5e (30.2–42.8) 
Pap testf    
Ever 1971 73.9 (69.6–78.1) 73.8 (69.8–77.9) 
Never 166 21.8 (11.6–31.9) 22.2e (11.7–32.8) 
Pap test in past 3 yrf    
Yes 1738 79.8 (75.5–84.0) 79.9 (76.0–83.9) 
No 380 18.9 (12.3–25.5) 19.1e (12.3–26.0) 
Present cigarette smoker    
Yes 311 68.2 (57.9–78.6) 68.5 (58.1–79.0) 
No 2496 68.5 (64.5–72.6) 67.8 (63.8–71.8) 
Present alcohol use    
Yes 422 73.4 (65.6–81.2) 72.2 (64.2–80.3) 
No 1212 66.1 (60.1–72.1) 65.9 (60.0–71.7) 
a

Weighted population estimates unadjusted for age; women who responded don’t know or not sure or who refused to answer are excluded.

b

Weighted population estimates adjusted to the 1994–1997 age distribution for Asian and Pacific Islander women in this sample.

c

GED, General Education Development.

d

P < 0.05.

e

P < 0.001.

f

Excludes women who had a hysterectomy.

Table 3

Percentage of Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States,aged ≥18 years, who had a Pap test in the last 3 years, according to selected demographic characteristics, medical history, and cancer screening practices, BRFSS,1994–1997a

nUnadjustedb % (95% CI)Adjustedc % (95% CI)
Age    
18–29 yr 1497 62.7 (58.4–67.1)  
30–39 yr 1536 78.7 (74.4–82.9)  
40–49 yr 1079 80.7 (76.3–85.1)  
50–64 yr 567 82.1 (75.5–88.7)  
≥65 yr 497 74.0e (62.5–85.6)  
Marital status    
Presently married 2955 80.4 (77.7–83.1) 80.7 (78.0–83.3) 
Divorced or separated 553 81.8 (75.1–88.5) 80.8 (73.5–88.1) 
Widowed 308 78.6 (67.3–89.9) 77.7 (65.9–89.5) 
Never married 1250 55.3 (50.2–60.4) 53.2 (48.0–58.5) 
Living as unmarried couple 100 87.9 (79.4–96.4) 86.7e (77.1–96.3) 
Educational attainment    
< High school graduate 407 61.5 (50.1–72.8) 61.7 (49.3–74.0) 
High school graduate/GEDd 1228 77.1 (72.4–81.8) 73.5 (68.2–78.9) 
Some college/technical school 1398 67.8 (62.4–73.2) 63.8 (57.8–69.7) 
College graduate 2133 76.9 (73.8–80.0) 75.8f (72.6–78.9) 
Household income    
<$15,000 675 63.8 (55.8–71.7) 60.9 (52.2–69.7) 
$15,000–34,999 1534 71.0 (66.5–75.5) 68.9 (64.1–73.7) 
$35,000–49,999 847 75.8 (70.4–81.3) 73.6 (67.5–79.6) 
≥$50,000 1296 83.7 (80.3–87.0) 82.6e (78.9–86.2) 
Employment status    
Presently employed 3767 72.7 (69.9–75.5) 69.8 (66.7–72.9) 
Homemaker or retired 1142 77.5 (72.5–82.5) 78.2 (73.4–83.0) 
Unemployed 203 71.6 (60.3–83.3) 68.8 (57.1–80.5) 
Unable to work 55 82.5 (65.0–99.9) 81.1g (62.1–100.0) 
General health status    
Good to excellent 4624 73.7 (71.2–76.2) 71.2 (68.4–73.9) 
Fair or poor 539 75.0 (67.8–82.2) 73.2 (65.2–81.2) 
Saw physician within past year    
Yes 3810 81.4 (78.9–83.8) 78.6 (75.7–81.6) 
No 1219 60.1 (55.1–65.1) 59.1e (53.9–64.2) 
Any health insurance coverage    
Yes 4642 77.5 (75.2–79.9) 75.3 (72.7–78.0) 
No 522 50.9 (43.8–57.9) 49.0e (41.9–56.1) 
Mammogram    
Ever 2352 88.9 (86.4–91.4) 88.2 (85.4–91.0) 
Never 2813 63.7 (60.4–67.0) 63.8e (60.4–67.2) 
Mammogram in past 2 yr    
Yes 1912 92.2 (89.7–94.7) 91.5 (88.7–94.2) 
No 3240 65.2 (62.1–68.2) 64.9e (61.7–68.1) 
Clinical breast exam    
Ever 4026 87.3 (85.4–89.2) 87.0 (85.0–89.1) 
Never 1113 37.1 (32.0–42.3) 33.2e (28.4–38.0) 
Clinical breast exam in past 2 yr    
Yes 3531 91.8 (90.1–93.5) 91.0 (89.0–93.0) 
No 1586 41.0 (36.5–45.6) 37.7e (33.2–42.2) 
Present cigarette smoker    
Yes 681 77.9 (71.9–84.0) 76.6 (70.1–83.2) 
No 4490 73.2 (70.7–75.8) 70.6 (67.9–73.4) 
Present alcohol use    
Yes 1097 78.4 (74.2–82.5) 75.9 (71.2–80.5) 
No 2004 70.6 (66.5–74.7) 67.5g (63.0–72.0) 
nUnadjustedb % (95% CI)Adjustedc % (95% CI)
Age    
18–29 yr 1497 62.7 (58.4–67.1)  
30–39 yr 1536 78.7 (74.4–82.9)  
40–49 yr 1079 80.7 (76.3–85.1)  
50–64 yr 567 82.1 (75.5–88.7)  
≥65 yr 497 74.0e (62.5–85.6)  
Marital status    
Presently married 2955 80.4 (77.7–83.1) 80.7 (78.0–83.3) 
Divorced or separated 553 81.8 (75.1–88.5) 80.8 (73.5–88.1) 
Widowed 308 78.6 (67.3–89.9) 77.7 (65.9–89.5) 
Never married 1250 55.3 (50.2–60.4) 53.2 (48.0–58.5) 
Living as unmarried couple 100 87.9 (79.4–96.4) 86.7e (77.1–96.3) 
Educational attainment    
< High school graduate 407 61.5 (50.1–72.8) 61.7 (49.3–74.0) 
High school graduate/GEDd 1228 77.1 (72.4–81.8) 73.5 (68.2–78.9) 
Some college/technical school 1398 67.8 (62.4–73.2) 63.8 (57.8–69.7) 
College graduate 2133 76.9 (73.8–80.0) 75.8f (72.6–78.9) 
Household income    
<$15,000 675 63.8 (55.8–71.7) 60.9 (52.2–69.7) 
$15,000–34,999 1534 71.0 (66.5–75.5) 68.9 (64.1–73.7) 
$35,000–49,999 847 75.8 (70.4–81.3) 73.6 (67.5–79.6) 
≥$50,000 1296 83.7 (80.3–87.0) 82.6e (78.9–86.2) 
Employment status    
Presently employed 3767 72.7 (69.9–75.5) 69.8 (66.7–72.9) 
Homemaker or retired 1142 77.5 (72.5–82.5) 78.2 (73.4–83.0) 
Unemployed 203 71.6 (60.3–83.3) 68.8 (57.1–80.5) 
Unable to work 55 82.5 (65.0–99.9) 81.1g (62.1–100.0) 
General health status    
Good to excellent 4624 73.7 (71.2–76.2) 71.2 (68.4–73.9) 
Fair or poor 539 75.0 (67.8–82.2) 73.2 (65.2–81.2) 
Saw physician within past year    
Yes 3810 81.4 (78.9–83.8) 78.6 (75.7–81.6) 
No 1219 60.1 (55.1–65.1) 59.1e (53.9–64.2) 
Any health insurance coverage    
Yes 4642 77.5 (75.2–79.9) 75.3 (72.7–78.0) 
No 522 50.9 (43.8–57.9) 49.0e (41.9–56.1) 
Mammogram    
Ever 2352 88.9 (86.4–91.4) 88.2 (85.4–91.0) 
Never 2813 63.7 (60.4–67.0) 63.8e (60.4–67.2) 
Mammogram in past 2 yr    
Yes 1912 92.2 (89.7–94.7) 91.5 (88.7–94.2) 
No 3240 65.2 (62.1–68.2) 64.9e (61.7–68.1) 
Clinical breast exam    
Ever 4026 87.3 (85.4–89.2) 87.0 (85.0–89.1) 
Never 1113 37.1 (32.0–42.3) 33.2e (28.4–38.0) 
Clinical breast exam in past 2 yr    
Yes 3531 91.8 (90.1–93.5) 91.0 (89.0–93.0) 
No 1586 41.0 (36.5–45.6) 37.7e (33.2–42.2) 
Present cigarette smoker    
Yes 681 77.9 (71.9–84.0) 76.6 (70.1–83.2) 
No 4490 73.2 (70.7–75.8) 70.6 (67.9–73.4) 
Present alcohol use    
Yes 1097 78.4 (74.2–82.5) 75.9 (71.2–80.5) 
No 2004 70.6 (66.5–74.7) 67.5g (63.0–72.0) 
a

Excludes women who had a hysterectomy.

b

Weighted population estimates unadjusted for age; women who responded don’t know or not sure or who refused to answer are excluded.

c

Weighted population estimates adjusted to the 1994–1997 age distribution for Asian and Pacific Islander women in this sample.

d

GED, General Education Development.

e

P < 0.001.

f

P < 0.01.

g

P < 0.05.

Table 4

Multivariate predictors of having had a mammogram in the last 2 years among Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States aged ≥40 years, BRFSS, 1994–1997a

nMultivariate adjusted odds ratio(95% CI)
Age    
40–49 yr 1212 1.0  
50–64 yr 801 1.4 (0.9–2.0) 
≥65 yr 766 1.0 (0.6–1.8) 
Saw physician within past yrb    
Yes 2268 5.6 (3.7–8.4) 
No 511 1.0  
Any health insurance coveragec    
Yes 2637 2.1 (1.2–3.7) 
No 142 1.0  
nMultivariate adjusted odds ratio(95% CI)
Age    
40–49 yr 1212 1.0  
50–64 yr 801 1.4 (0.9–2.0) 
≥65 yr 766 1.0 (0.6–1.8) 
Saw physician within past yrb    
Yes 2268 5.6 (3.7–8.4) 
No 511 1.0  
Any health insurance coveragec    
Yes 2637 2.1 (1.2–3.7) 
No 142 1.0  
a

Women who responded don’t know or not sure or who refused to answer are excluded.

b

P < 0.001 from Wald F test.

c

P < 0.01 from Wald F test.

Table 5

Multivariate predictors of having had a clinical breast exam in the last 2 years among Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States aged ≥40 years, BRFSS,1994–1997a

nMultivariate adjusted odds ratio(95% CI)
Age    
40–49 yr 1198 1.0  
50–64 yr 792 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 
≥65 yr 755 0.7 (0.4–1.3) 
Marital status    
Presently married 1762 1.0  
Divorced or separated 374 1.9 (1.0–3.5) 
Widowed 436 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 
Never married 161 1.5 (0.8–2.7) 
Living as unmarried couple 12 4.4 (0.6–32.4) 
Employment statusb    
Presently employed 1587 1.0  
Homemaker or retired 1036 0.9 (0.6–1.4) 
Unemployed 75 0.5 (0.1–1.6) 
Unable to work 47 4.8 (1.4–15.9) 
Saw physician within past yrc    
Yes 2241 4.3 (2.8–6.5) 
No 504 1.0  
Any health insurance coveragec    
Yes 2604 2.8 (1.5–5.0) 
No 141 1.0  
nMultivariate adjusted odds ratio(95% CI)
Age    
40–49 yr 1198 1.0  
50–64 yr 792 1.3 (0.8–2.1) 
≥65 yr 755 0.7 (0.4–1.3) 
Marital status    
Presently married 1762 1.0  
Divorced or separated 374 1.9 (1.0–3.5) 
Widowed 436 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 
Never married 161 1.5 (0.8–2.7) 
Living as unmarried couple 12 4.4 (0.6–32.4) 
Employment statusb    
Presently employed 1587 1.0  
Homemaker or retired 1036 0.9 (0.6–1.4) 
Unemployed 75 0.5 (0.1–1.6) 
Unable to work 47 4.8 (1.4–15.9) 
Saw physician within past yrc    
Yes 2241 4.3 (2.8–6.5) 
No 504 1.0  
Any health insurance coveragec    
Yes 2604 2.8 (1.5–5.0) 
No 141 1.0  
a

Women who responded don’t know or not sure or who refused to answer are excluded.

b

P < 0.05 from Wald F test.

c

P < 0.001 from Wald F test.

Table 6

Multivariate predictors of having had a Pap test in the last 3 years among Asian and Pacific Islander women in the United States aged ≥18 years or older, BRFSS, 1994–1997a

nMultivariate adjusted odds ratio(95% CI)
Age    
18–29 yr 708 1.0  
30–39 yr 802 1.4 (0.9–2.2) 
40–49 yr 564 1.3 (0.8–2.3) 
50–64 yr 244 1.6 (0.8–3.3) 
≥65 yr 201 1.9 (0.8–4.2) 
Marital statusb    
Presently married 1459 1.0  
Divorced or separated 273 1.8 (0.7–4.4) 
Widowed 131 2.1 (0.9–5.3) 
Never married 599 0.5 (0.3–0.7) 
Living as unmarried couple 57 4.5 (1.4–14.3) 
Educational attainment    
< High school graduate 170 1.0  
High school graduate/GEDc 553 2.3 (1.1–4.7) 
Some college/technical school 647 1.5 (0.7–3.0) 
College graduate 1149 1.6 (0.8–3.2) 
Household incomed    
<$15,000 357 1.0  
$15,000–34,999 869 1.9 (1.1–3.4) 
$35,000–49,999 495 2.1 (1.1–3.9) 
≥$50,000 798 3.2 (1.7–6.3) 
Saw physician within past yrb    
Yes 1895 4.2 (2.8–6.3) 
No 624 1.0  
Any health insurance coverage    
Yes 2289 1.5 (0.9–2.4) 
No 230 1.0  
Present alcohol useb    
Yes 922 2.2 (1.4–3.3) 
No 1597 1.0  
nMultivariate adjusted odds ratio(95% CI)
Age    
18–29 yr 708 1.0  
30–39 yr 802 1.4 (0.9–2.2) 
40–49 yr 564 1.3 (0.8–2.3) 
50–64 yr 244 1.6 (0.8–3.3) 
≥65 yr 201 1.9 (0.8–4.2) 
Marital statusb    
Presently married 1459 1.0  
Divorced or separated 273 1.8 (0.7–4.4) 
Widowed 131 2.1 (0.9–5.3) 
Never married 599 0.5 (0.3–0.7) 
Living as unmarried couple 57 4.5 (1.4–14.3) 
Educational attainment    
< High school graduate 170 1.0  
High school graduate/GEDc 553 2.3 (1.1–4.7) 
Some college/technical school 647 1.5 (0.7–3.0) 
College graduate 1149 1.6 (0.8–3.2) 
Household incomed    
<$15,000 357 1.0  
$15,000–34,999 869 1.9 (1.1–3.4) 
$35,000–49,999 495 2.1 (1.1–3.9) 
≥$50,000 798 3.2 (1.7–6.3) 
Saw physician within past yrb    
Yes 1895 4.2 (2.8–6.3) 
No 624 1.0  
Any health insurance coverage    
Yes 2289 1.5 (0.9–2.4) 
No 230 1.0  
Present alcohol useb    
Yes 922 2.2 (1.4–3.3) 
No 1597 1.0  
a

Women who responded don’t know or not sure or who refused to answer are excluded; also excludes women who had a hysterectomy.

b

P < 0.001 from Wald F test.

c

GED, General Education Development.

d

P < 0.01 from Wald F test.

1
Parker S. L., Johnston Davis K., Wingo P. A., Ries L. A. G., Heath C. W., Jr. Cancer statistics by race and ethnicity.
CA Cancer J. Clin.
,
48
:
31
-48,  
1998
.
2
Baquet C. R., Hunter C. P. Patterns in minorities and special populations Greenwald P. Kramer B. S. Weed D. L. eds. .
Cancer Prevention and Control
,
25
-36, Marcel Dekker New York  
1995
.
3
Miller B. A. Kolonel L. N. Bernstein L. Young J. L., Jr. Swanson G. M. West D. Key C. R. Liff J. M. Glover C. S. Alexander G. A. eds. .
Racial/Ethnic Patterns of Cancer in the United States 1988–1992
, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD NIH Publication No. 96-4104 
1996
.
4
Saphir A. Asian Americans and cancer: discarding the myth of the “model minority.
” J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
,
89
:
1572
-1574,  
1997
.
5
Ziegler R. G., Hoover R. N., Pike M. C., Hildesheim A., Nomura A. M., West D. W., Wu-Williams A. H., Kolonel L. N., Horn-Ross P. L., Rosenthal J. F. Migration patterns and breast cancer risk in Asian-American women.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
,
85
:
1819
-1827,  
1993
.
6
Maxwell A. E., Bastani R., Warda U. S. Breast cancer screening and related attitudes among Filipino-American women.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
,
6
:
719
-726,  
1997
.
7
Kang S. H., Chen A. M., Lew R., Min K., Moskowitz J. M., Wismer B. A., Tager I. B. Behavioral risk factor survey of Korean Americans, Alameda County, California, 1994.
MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep.
,
46
:
774
-777,  
1997
.
8
Chen A. M., Wismer B. A., Lew R., Kang S. H., Min K., Moskowitz J. M., Tager I. B. “Health is strength”: a research collaboration involving Korean Americans in Alameda County.
Am. J. Prev. Med.
,
13
:
93
-100,  
1997
.
9
Wismer B. A., Moskowitz J. M., Chen A. M., Kang S. H., Novotny T. E., Min K., Lew R., Tager I. B. Mammography and clinical breast examination among Korean American women in two California counties.
Prev. Med.
,
27
:
144
-151,  
1998
.
10
Lovejoy N. C., Jenkins C., Wu T., Shankland S., Wilson C. Developing a breast cancer screening program for Chinese-American women.
Oncol. Nurs. Forum
,
16
:
181
-187,  
1989
.
11
Lew, R., and Chen, A. M. A community survey of health risk behavior among Chinese-Americans. Abstract presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association, New York, October 1990.
12
Pham C. T., McPhee S. J. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese women.
J. Cancer Educ.
,
7
:
305
-310,  
1992
.
13
Jenkins C. N. H., McPhee S. J., Bird J. A., Bonilla N. T. Cancer risks and prevention practices among Vietnamese refugees.
West. J. Med.
,
153
:
34
-39,  
1990
.
14
Yi J. K. Factors associated with cervical cancer screening behavior among Vietnamese women.
J. Community Health
,
19
:
189
-200,  
1994
.
15
Pham C. T., McPhee S. J. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of breast and cervical cancer screening among Vietnamese women.
J. Cancer Educ.
,
7
:
305
-310,  
1992
.
16
Kelly A. W., Del Mar Fores Chacori M., Wollan P. C., Trapp M. A., Weaver A. L., Barrier P. A., Franz W. B., III, Kottke T. E. A program to increase breast and cervical cancer screening for Cambodian women in a midwestern community.
Mayo Clin. Proc.
,
71
:
437
-444,  
1996
.
17
Serxner S., Chung C. S. Trend analysis of social and economic indicators of mammography use in Hawaii.
Am. J. Prev. Med.
,
8
:
303
-308,  
1992
.
18
Pinhey T. K., Iverson T. J., Workman R. L. The influence of ethnicity and socioeconomic status on the use of mammography by Asian and Pacific Island women on Guam.
Women Health
,
21
:
57
-69,  
1994
.
19
California Cancer Facts, and Figures. American Cancer Society, 1996.
20
United States Public Health Service .
Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives
, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Washington, DC Publication No. PHS91–50212 
1991
.
21
Hahn R. A., Teutsch S. M., Franks A. L., Chang M. H., Lloyd E. E. The prevalence of risk factors among women in the United States by race and age, 1992–1994: opportunities for primary and secondary prevention.
J. Am. Med. Womens Assoc.
,
53
:
96
-104,  
1998
.
22
Blackman D. K., Bennet E. M., Miller D. S. Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989–1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991–1997)—United States.
MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep.
,
48
:
1
-22,  
1999
.
23
Centers for Disease Control, and Prevention CDC Surveillance Summaries.
MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep.
,
46
:
SS-3
1997
.
24
Frazier E. L., Franks A. I., Sanderson L. M. Behavioral risk factor data.
Using Chronic Disease Data: A Handbook for Public Health Practitioners
,
4-1
-4-17, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA  
1992
.
25
Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing.
J. Am. Stat. Assoc.
,
73
:
40
-46,  
1978
.
26
Shah B. V., Barnwell B. G., Bieler G. S. .
SUDAAN User’s Manual. Software for Analysis of Correlated Data, Release 6.40.
, Research Triangle Institute Research Triangle Park, NC  
1995
.
27
Bureau of the Census .
Statistical Brief: Phoneless in America
, United States Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census Washington, DC  
1994
.
28
Suarez L., Goldman D. A., Weiss N. S. Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population.
Am. J. Prev. Med.
,
11
:
94
-98,  
1995
.
29
Zapka J. G., Bigelow C., Hurley T., Ford L. D., Egelhofer J., Cloud W. M., Sachsse E. Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: the accuracy of self-report.
Am. J. Public Health
,
86
:
1016
-1021,  
1996
.
30
Paskett E. D., Tatum C. M., Mack D. W., Hoen H., Case L. D., Velez R. Validation of self-reported breast and cervical cancer screening tests among low-income minority women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomark. Prev.
,
5
:
721
-726,  
1996
.
31
Stein A. D., Lederman R. I., Shea S. Reproducibility of the Women’s Module of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Questionnaire.
Ann. Epidemiol.
,
6
:
47
-52,  
1996
.
32
Brownson R. C., Jackson-Thompson J., Wilkerson J. C., Kiani F. Reliability of information on chronic disease risk factors collected in the Missouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Epidemiology
,
5
:
545
-549,  
1994
.
33
Henson R. M., Wyatt S. W., Lee N. C. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: a comprehensive public health response to two major health issues for women.
J. Public Health Management Pract.
,
2
:
36
-47,  
1996
.