Advances in cancer prevention, early detection, and treatments have led to unprecedented progress against cancer. However, these advances have not benefited everyone equally. Because of a long history of structural inequities and systemic injustices in the United States, many segments of the US population continue to shoulder a disproportionate burden of cancer. The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Cancer Disparities Progress Report 2024 (CancerDisparitiesProgressReport.org) outlines the recent progress against cancer disparities, the ongoing challenges faced by medically underserved populations, and emphasizes the vital need for further advances in cancer research and patient care to benefit all populations.

Remarkable progress made against cancer in the United States is reflected by a 33% decline in the overall cancer mortality rate between 1991 and 2020 (1). Despite this reduction, 2,001,140 new cases of and 611,720 deaths from cancer are projected in 2024 in the United States (1). Furthermore, the burden of cancer is higher among certain segments of the US population that include racial and ethnic minority groups, individuals living in rural areas, those under persistent poverty, and those belonging to the sexual and gender minority (SGM) communities (2). It is encouraging that disparities for some cancer types are narrowing. For example, mortality from lung cancer among non-Hispanic Black men has significantly reduced in the past two decades when compared with non-Hispanic White men (3). Despite narrowing trends, cancer disparities remain a serious challenge to public health and a significant barrier to achieving health equity.

Black and Indigenous individuals have the highest overall cancer death rates of all US racial or ethnic groups (2). Black men are twice more likely to die from prostate cancer compared with White men (3). Black women are 40% more likely to die from breast cancer compared with White women (3). Black individuals are twice as likely to be diagnosed with and die from multiple myeloma (3). Compared to White people, incidence rates for cervical cancers are higher among American Indian, Alaska Native, and Hispanic women (2). Lung cancer incidence is rising among Asian women, especially in those who are younger and have never smoked (4).

Similarly, individuals who live in rural counties are 38% more likely to be diagnosed and die from lung cancer compared with those who lived in urban, metropolitan areas (2). Individuals who identify as transgender are at a 76% higher risk of being diagnosed with advanced-stage lung cancer compared with cisgender individuals (5). Breast cancer risk is higher among SGM women compared with heterosexual women. Transgender women have a 60% lower risk of developing prostate cancer compared with cisgender men but are twice as likely to die from it (6). Research has identified multiple interconnected drivers of health that contribute to well-being and health outcomes of people (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Complex and interrelated structural and social contextual factors, stemming from a long history of racism and discrimination against marginalized populations, drive cancer disparities. These factors include social drivers of health (SDOH) as well as biological factors, mental health, and modifiable risk factors. The NCI defines SDOH, sometimes also known as social determinants of health, as conditions in the environments in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. SDOH have a major influence on people’s health, well-being, and quality of life. In the United States, historical racism and contemporary injustices have perpetuated and exacerbated systemic inequities, resulting in adverse differences in SDOH for racial and ethnic minorities and medically underserved populations. The circle in the figure depicts key drivers of health and how they interconnect and intersect, both at societal and community levels and at the individual level. Selected examples of multilevel factors that make up SDOH are highlighted. Collectively, these factors impact every stage of the cancer continuum, leading to worse health outcomes for racial and ethnic minorities and other underserved populations (shown at the bottom). Adapted from the AACR Cancer Disparities Progress Report 2024.

Figure 1.

Complex and interrelated structural and social contextual factors, stemming from a long history of racism and discrimination against marginalized populations, drive cancer disparities. These factors include social drivers of health (SDOH) as well as biological factors, mental health, and modifiable risk factors. The NCI defines SDOH, sometimes also known as social determinants of health, as conditions in the environments in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age. SDOH have a major influence on people’s health, well-being, and quality of life. In the United States, historical racism and contemporary injustices have perpetuated and exacerbated systemic inequities, resulting in adverse differences in SDOH for racial and ethnic minorities and medically underserved populations. The circle in the figure depicts key drivers of health and how they interconnect and intersect, both at societal and community levels and at the individual level. Selected examples of multilevel factors that make up SDOH are highlighted. Collectively, these factors impact every stage of the cancer continuum, leading to worse health outcomes for racial and ethnic minorities and other underserved populations (shown at the bottom). Adapted from the AACR Cancer Disparities Progress Report 2024.

Close modal

Cancer disparities are in part driven by differences in biological factors that stem from ancestral variations between populations. For instance, somatic mutations of the EGFR gene are commonly observed in patients with lung cancer. The frequency of EGFR mutations follows patterns resulting from the human diaspora out of Africa as well as more recent migration (forced or otherwise) of population groups to new geographic locations (Fig. 2; ref. 7). Understanding differences in the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, microbiome, and immune system can help researchers and clinicians better tailor treatment plans with the use of personalized medicines. Unfortunately, the majority of available data on cancer etiology are based on studies of individuals with European ancestry (8). As highlighted in the report, various institutions, organizations, and government entities are encouragingly taking steps to increase the diversity of study populations and tumor databases. Another major challenge is that currently available cancer models, such as cell lines, animal models, and patient-derived xenografts, lack inclusion of racial and ethnic minority groups (8, 9).

Figure 2.

Somatic mutations of the EGFR gene are commonly observed in patients with lung cancer and represent a key target for molecularly targeted therapeutics. The overall mutational frequency of the EGFR gene differs based on the ancestry of the patient with cancer, with the highest rates of mutation in East Asian groups (up to 50%) and the lowest rates observed in African (10%) and European (10%) populations. The frequency of this mutation follows patterns that are a result of the human diaspora out of Africa as well as more recent migration (forced or otherwise) of population groups to new geographic locations. For example, Peru has a high genetic admixture (i.e., inferring someone’s geographic origins based on an analysis of their genetic ancestry) of Native American ancestry, whereas Argentina has more admixture of European ancestry (7). Adapted from the AACR Cancer Disparities Progress Report 2024.

Figure 2.

Somatic mutations of the EGFR gene are commonly observed in patients with lung cancer and represent a key target for molecularly targeted therapeutics. The overall mutational frequency of the EGFR gene differs based on the ancestry of the patient with cancer, with the highest rates of mutation in East Asian groups (up to 50%) and the lowest rates observed in African (10%) and European (10%) populations. The frequency of this mutation follows patterns that are a result of the human diaspora out of Africa as well as more recent migration (forced or otherwise) of population groups to new geographic locations. For example, Peru has a high genetic admixture (i.e., inferring someone’s geographic origins based on an analysis of their genetic ancestry) of Native American ancestry, whereas Argentina has more admixture of European ancestry (7). Adapted from the AACR Cancer Disparities Progress Report 2024.

Close modal

Modifiable risk factors, such as tobacco use, physical inactivity, UV exposure, alcohol consumption, pathogenic infections, poor diet, and obesity, contribute to 40% of all new cancer cases. Long-standing inequities in drivers of health (Fig. 1) contribute to significant disparities in the prevalence of risk factors among socially, economically, and geographically disadvantaged populations. Studies show that exposure to or lived experiences with racism, micro-aggressive behavior, and stress leads to increased levels of alcohol consumption and smoking (10). Built environments determine exposures to sunlight, chemical pollutants, social interactions, ability to exercise in physically safe environments, and/or stress, which can impact health (1113). Disadvantaged populations frequently experience higher levels of exposure to pollutants such as radon as well as occupational exposure to chemical pollutants such as pesticides, which can increase the development of cancers (1416).

Screening for precancerous or early-stage cancers can help intercept cancers when they are easier to treat. Medically underserved communities experience substantial disparities in receiving the recommended cancer screening and follow-up care if a screening test shows an abnormality. In 2021, in the United States, only 52.8% of American Indian and Alaska Native and 66.6% of Asian women were up to date with breast cancer screening compared with 75.7% of non-Hispanic White women (17). Only about 64% of eligible Asian, American Indian, and Alaska Native individuals were up to date with the recommended cervical cancer screening compared with 78% of White individuals (17). Furthermore, those living 138% below the federal poverty level, as well as those with less than a high school education, were less likely to be up to date with colorectal cancer screening (18). Mistrust of medical providers, lack of knowledge about screening, and barriers to follow-up care also contribute to screening disparities. Utilization of culturally tailored, evidence-based information, education, and screening resources delivered through community health educators can help to increase participation in screening programs among racially and ethnically diverse communities and in rural areas (19, 20).

Developing novel cancer treatments rely on clinical trials, which establish whether a new treatment is safe and efficacious. Patients from racial and ethnic minority groups and medically underserved populations experience multilevel barriers to participating in cancer clinical trials. Some of these barriers operate at an individual level for patients as well as health care providers but many operate at the systemic or institutional levels (21). For example, of the pivotal clinical trials that supported the approval of 82 novel anticancer therapeutics by the FDA between 2015 and 2021, 90% and 73% lacked adequate representation of Black and Hispanic/Latino patients, respectively (21). Despite remarkable advances in surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, medically underserved populations experience more frequent and higher severity of multilevel barriers to quality cancer treatment. These include treatment delays, lack of access to guideline-adherent treatment, undertreatment, refusal or early termination of treatment, treatment receipt at low-volume hospitals and community settings rather than comprehensive cancer centers, and higher rates of treatment-related and/or financial toxicities (22, 23). Patients from disadvantaged population groups may also experience overt discrimination and/or implicit bias during the receipt of care (24). Community outreach and engagement efforts and patient navigation programs that build trust and improve communication with historically underserved patients and provide financial, housing, food, transportation, language, health literacy, social, and clinical support can increase participation of minoritized groups in clinical trials and reduce disparities in cancer treatment (25). Research shows that racial and ethnic disparities in cancer outcomes can be eliminated if every patient has equitable access to guideline-adherent care (26).

In 2022, there were 18.1 million cancer survivors in the United States (27). The number of cancer survivors who belong to racially and ethnically minoritized groups is projected to grow over the coming decades. Survivors who belong to medically underserved populations are at an elevated risk of worse health-related quality of life, which has been shown to increase the likelihood of cancer recurrence and mortality (27, 28). Without more equitable cancer control efforts, disparities in survivorship will widen, potentially increasing the future cancer burden. In this regard, one of the evidence-based strategies discussed in the report is the use of community-based, tailored solutions that meet the specific needs of every patient and include patient advocates and patient navigators as key partners. Such approaches can help address the specific social, psychological, medical, and physical needs of the patient, increase the quality of life, bolster adherence to follow-up care, and identify financial concerns, thus providing equitable health care and reducing the overall cost of cancer care (29).

A diverse cancer research and patient care workforce is vital to achieving health equity. The underrepresentation of minority populations in cancer science and medicine remains a significant concern and may contribute to cancer disparities. People from minority groups often face systemic barriers to attaining leadership positions in health care. According to a recent survey, among 82 cancer centers, including 64 NCI–designated and 18 emerging centers, 79% of director positions were held by non-Hispanic White individuals (30). This underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority individuals may result in a lack of diverse perspectives when major decisions are made about cancer research priorities and resource allocation. The Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities at the NCI plays a pivotal role in enhancing workforce diversity by leading the NCI's efforts to train students and investigators from diverse backgrounds, thereby fostering a pathway that can elevate diverse voices into leadership roles in cancer research.

The AACR Cancer Disparities Progress Report 2024 ends with a call to action urging policy makers and other stakeholders committed to eliminating cancer disparities to provide robust, sustained, and predictable funding increases for US federal agencies and programs tasked with reducing cancer disparities; support data collection initiatives; prioritize cancer control initiatives and increase appropriate screening for early detection and prevention; increase the diversity of the cancer care workforce; and enact comprehensive legislation to eliminate health inequities

No disclosures were reported.

1.
American Association for Cancer Research
.
AACR Cancer Progress Report
;
2023
.
[updated 2024 Feb]. Available from
: cancerprogressreport.org.
2.
Islami
F
,
Baeker Bispo
J
,
Lee
H
,
Wiese
D
,
Yabroff
KR
,
Bandi
P
, et al
.
American Cancer Society’s report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2023
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2024
;
74
:
136
66
.
3.
National Cancer Institute
.
SEERExplorer: An interactive website for SEER cancer statistics
[Internet]
.
Surveillance Research Program
,
National Cancer Institute
;
2024 Apr 17
.
[cited 2024 May 8]. Available from:
https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/explorer/.
4.
Pinheiro
PS
,
Callahan
KE
,
Medina
HN
,
Koru-Sengul
T
,
Kobetz
EN
,
Gomez
SL
, et al
.
Lung cancer in never smokers: distinct population-based patterns by age, sex, and race/ethnicity
.
Lung Cancer
2022
;
174
:
50
6
.
5.
Jackson
SS
,
Han
X
,
Mao
Z
,
Nogueira
L
,
Suneja
G
,
Jemal
A
, et al
.
Cancer stage, treatment, and survival among transgender patients in the United States
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2021
;
113
:
1221
7
.
6.
Manfredi
C
,
Ditonno
F
,
Franco
A
,
Bologna
E
,
Licari
LC
,
Arcaniolo
D
, et al
.
Prostate cancer in transgender women: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management challenges
.
Curr Oncol Rep
2023
;
25
:
1431
43
.
7.
Carrot-Zhang
J
,
Chambwe
N
,
Damrauer
JS
,
Knijnenburg
TA
,
Robertson
AG
,
Yau
C
, et al
.
Comprehensive analysis of genetic ancestry and its molecular correlates in cancer
.
Cancer Cell
2020
;
37
:
639
54.e6
.
8.
Halmai
NB
,
Carvajal-Carmona
LG
.
Diversifying preclinical research tools: expanding patient-derived models to address cancer health disparities
.
Trends Cancer
2022
;
8
:
291
4
.
9.
Leon
C
,
Manley
E
Jr
,
Neely
AM
,
Castillo
J
,
Ramos Correa
M
,
Velarde
DA
, et al
.
Lack of racial and ethnic diversity in lung cancer cell lines contributes to lung cancer health disparities
.
Front Oncol
2023
;
13
:
1187585
.
10.
Woodard
N
,
Butler
J
,
Ghosh
D
,
Green
KM
,
Knott
CL
.
The association between state-level structural racism and alcohol and tobacco use behaviors among a national probability sample of Black Americans
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2024
;
33
:
261
9
.
11.
Liu
H
,
Sun
Y
,
Ran
L
,
Li
J
,
Shi
Y
,
Mu
C
, et al
.
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and breast cancer: a meta-analysis
.
Front Oncol
2023
;
13
:
1282651
.
12.
Cheng
I
,
Yang
J
,
Tseng
C
,
Wu
J
,
Shariff-Marco
S
,
Park
SL
, et al
.
Traffic-related air pollution and lung cancer incidence: the California Multiethnic Cohort Study
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2022
;
206
:
1008
18
.
13.
Parker
HW
,
Abreu
AM
,
Sullivan
MC
,
Vadiveloo
MK
.
Allostatic load and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Am J Prev Med
2022
;
63
:
131
40
.
14.
Yazzie
SA
,
Davis
S
,
Seixas
N
,
Yost
MG
.
Assessing the impact of housing features and environmental factors on home indoor radon concentration levels on the Navajo Nation
.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
2020
;
17
:
2813
.
15.
Liddie
JM
,
Schaider
LA
,
Sunderland
EM
.
Sociodemographic factors are associated with the abundance of PFAS sources and detection in U.S. community water systems
.
Environ Sci Technol
2023
;
57
:
7902
12
.
16.
Goodrich
JM
,
Furlong
MA
,
Caban-Martinez
AJ
,
Jung
AM
,
Batai
K
,
Jenkins
T
, et al
.
Differential DNA methylation by Hispanic ethnicity among firefighters in the United States
.
Epigenet Insights
2021
;
14
:
25168657211006159
.
17.
Sabatino
SA
,
Thompson
TD
,
White
MC
,
Villarroel
MA
,
Shapiro
JA
,
Croswell
JM
, et al
.
Up-to-date breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening test use in the United States, 2021
.
Prev Chronic Dis
2023
;
20
:
E94
.
18.
Henderson
LM
,
Su
IH
,
Rivera
MP
,
Pak
J
,
Chen
X
,
Reuland
DS
, et al
.
Prevalence of lung cancer screening in the US, 2022
.
JAMA Netw Open
2024
;
7
:
e243190
.
19.
Korn
AR
,
Walsh-Bailey
C
,
Correa-Mendez
M
,
DelNero
P
,
Pilar
M
,
Sandler
B
, et al
.
Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: a systematic review
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2023
;
73
:
461
79
.
20.
Maybee
W
,
Henry
WA
,
Lazore-Swan
D
,
Abrams
C
,
Attwood
K
,
Vincent
P
, et al
.
Indigenizing and ruralizing NCI screen to save program: Resources, Optimizing Outreach, Teaching, Science (ROOTS)
.
J Cancer Educ
2024
;
39
:
65
9
.
21.
Wong
AK
,
Miller
JE
,
Mooghali
M
,
Ramachandran
R
,
Ross
JS
,
Wallach
JD
.
Pivotal trial demographic representation and clinical development times for oncology therapeutics
.
JAMA
2023
;
330
:
2392
4
.
22.
Winn
R
,
Winkfield
K
,
Mitchell
E
.
Addressing disparities in cancer care and incorporating precision medicine for minority populations
.
J Natl Med Assoc
2023
;
115
:
S2
7
.
23.
Sheni
R
,
Qin
J
,
Viswanathan
S
,
Castellucci
E
,
Kalnicki
S
,
Mehta
V
.
Predictive factors for cancer treatment delay in a racially diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged urban population
.
JCO Oncol Pract
2023
;
19
:
e904
15
.
24.
Schatz
AA
,
Brooks-Coley
K
,
Harrington
E
,
Murray
MS
,
Carlson
RW
.
Patient, caregiver, and oncologist experiences with and perceptions of racial bias and discrimination in cancer care delivery
.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw
2022
;
20
:
1092
8.e2
.
25.
Chan
RJ
,
Milch
VE
,
Crawford-Williams
F
,
Agbejule
OA
,
Joseph
R
,
Johal
J
, et al
.
Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: an overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2023
;
73
:
565
89
.
26.
Newman
H
,
Li
Y
,
Liu
H
,
Myers
RM
,
Tam
V
,
DiNofia
A
, et al
.
Impact of poverty and neighborhood opportunity on outcomes for children treated with CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy
.
Blood
2023
;
141
:
609
19
.
27.
Haque
AT
,
Berrington de Gonzalez
A
,
Chen
Y
,
Haozous
EA
,
Inoue-Choi
M
,
Lawrence
WR
, et al
.
Cancer mortality rates by racial and ethnic groups in the United States, 2018–2020
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2023
;
115
:
822
30
.
28.
Sitlinger
A
,
Zafar
SY
.
Health-related quality of life: the impact on morbidity and mortality
.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am
2018
;
27
:
675
84
.
29.
Smith
GL
,
Banegas
MP
,
Acquati
C
,
Chang
S
,
Chino
F
,
Conti
RM
, et al
.
Navigating financial toxicity in patients with cancer: a multidisciplinary management approach
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2022
;
72
:
437
53
.
30.
Lerman
C
,
Hughes-Halbert
C
,
Falcone
M
,
Gosky
DM
,
Jensen
RA
,
Lee
KP
, et al
.
Leadership diversity and development in the nation’s cancer centers
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2022
;
114
:
1214
21
.