Background:

Previous studies have suggested anthocyanidins or anthocyanidin-rich foods and extracts exhibit protective effects against various cancers. However, the relationship between dietary anthocyanidins and the risk of biliary cancer remains uncertain.

Methods:

This study used data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial to investigate the relationship between total anthocyanidins intake and biliary cancer incidence. Cox regression analysis was conducted to estimate HRs and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the incidence of biliary cancer, with adjustments made for confounding factors. A restricted cubic spline model was employed to examine the dose–response relationship. In addition, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate potential interactions and test the model's robustness.

Results:

During 8.9 years and 872,645.3 person-years of follow-up, 95 cases of biliary cancer were observed. The incidence rate of biliary cancer in this study was 11 cases per 100,000 person-years. Using the fully adjusted Cox regression model, the inverse association was observed between total anthocyanidins intake and the risk of biliary cancer (HR Q4 vs..Q1: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29–0.91; Ptrend = 0.043). This association remained significant in sensitivity analyses. A linear dose–response relationship (Pnonlinearity = 0.118) and potential interaction with drinking status (Pinteraction = 0.033) were identified.

Conclusions:

This study provides evidence of an inverse association between total anthocyanidins intake and biliary cancer incidence.

Impact:

Our study found a total anthocyanidin-rich diet was associated with a reduced risk of biliary cancer in Americans ages 55 to 74 years.

Biliary cancer refers to a diverse range of tumors that occur in the biliary system, and these tumors are further categorized according to their specific sites of origin (1). A well-known risk factor of gallbladder cancer is gallstones. Although biliary cancer is relatively rare, its prognosis is extremely poor. A previous study has indicated that the survival rate for all subtypes of biliary cancer is notably low, with a reported 5-year survival rate of merely 15.2% for individuals diagnosed with this condition (2). In cases of locally advanced or metastatic biliary cancer, the median survival of patients is less than 1 year (3). The etiology and risk factors of biliary cancer remain poorly understood, highlighting the need for extensive research in this area.

In recent times, there has been a significant focus on diet-based approaches for the prevention and treatment of cancer (4). Anthocyanidins, which are water-soluble flavonoids, have found widespread use as natural food colorants (5). Anthocyanidins possess biological functions, including health-promoting effects and a potential association with reducing the risk of cancer (6, 7). A previous in vitro study showed that anthocyanidins exhibit free radical scavenging and antioxidant properties, along with inhibitory effects on the proliferation of cancer cells (8). Many studies tried to explore the relationship between dietary anthocyanidins and different cancers. For instance, Zhang and colleagues conducted a study and reported a reduced risk of lung cancer associated with dietary anthocyanidins (9). In a study involving 469,008 participants, Sun and colleagues reported a significant association between dietary anthocyanidins and a 28% reduction in the risk of head and neck cancer (10). Cui and colleagues similarly found an association between dietary anthocyanidins and a reduced risk of esophageal cancer (11). Intriguingly, a study by Xu and colleagues also found that dietary anthocyanidins can reduce the risk of kidney cancer (12). However, limited research has been conducted on the correlation between an anthocyanidin-rich diet and biliary cancer. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to examine the potential correlation between the consumption of dietary anthocyanidins and the occurrence of biliary cancer in a substantial cohort of participants.

Study population

The data used in this study were collected from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, which was sponsored by the NCI. The PLCO Cancer Screening Trial was a multicenter randomized clinical trial specifically designed to evaluate the potential reduction in cancer mortality through screening exams (13). Between 1993 and 2001, the PLCO trial was conducted at 10 different centers located throughout the United States, encompassing a large cohort of 154,887 individuals ages between 55 and 74 years. This trial employed a randomized allocation process, assigning participants to either an intervention group or a control group. In the intervention group, specific screening tests were administered, while the control group received standard or routine care. To collect comprehensive data, participants in the PLCO trial were required to complete two questionnaires: the baseline questionnaire (BQ) and the dietary history questionnaire (DHQ). The BQ aimed to gather relevant baseline information, including general participant characteristics. The questionnaire aimed to capture essential demographic data and other relevant factors at the start of the trial. The DHQ is a self-administered food frequency questionnaire consisting of 137 items. It is designed to assess the participants’ intake of food items and nutrients. Several studies have evaluated the validity of the DHQ and have suggested that it is a reliable tool for nutritional assessment (9, 12). This study received approval from the NCI under Project ID: PLCO-1257.

The exclusion criteria for participants in this study were as follows: Participants were excluded if they failed to return the BQ (n = 4,918). Invalid DHQ were also excluded, which included participants with insufficient frequency responses (less than eight) or extreme energy intake (above the 99th percentile or below the 1st percentile) and with a completion date prior to the date of death (n = 38,462). In addition, participants who were diagnosed with any cancer before completing the DHQ (n = 9,684) were excluded. Participants between randomization and DHQ completion, who either developed biliary cancer, died, or were lost to follow-up, were also excluded (n = 69). Furthermore, participants with extreme dietary intake, characterized by very low or very high caloric intake (below 600 or above 3,500 kcal/day for women and below 800 or above 4,200 kcal/day for men; ref. 14), were excluded (n = 3,296). Ultimately, a total of 98,458 participants were included in the study.

Data collection

Participants’ information regarding age, gender (male or female), race/ethnicity (White or non-White), education level (college below, college graduate, or postgraduate), baseline body mass index (BMI), family history of biliary cancer (yes, no, or possible), smoking status (never, current, or former), drinking status (no, yes), history of gallbladder stones or inflammation (no, yes), history of diabetes (no, yes), trial arm (intervention or control), alcohol consumption, physical activity level, and energy intake from the diet were collected from the PLCO trial.

Assessment of dietary intake of anthocyanidins

The six common anthocyanidins are cyanidin, delphinidin, malvidin, peonidin, petunidin, and pelargonidin (5, 15). The combined intake of cyanidin, delphinidin, malvidin, peonidin, petunidin, and pelargonidin represented the total daily intake of anthocyanidins (15). The participants’ daily intake of the six common anthocyanidins was collected through the aforementioned DHQ questionnaire. To account for losses during processing, it was assumed that the amounts of nutrients in processed foods were 50% of those in raw foods (9). The DietCalc software was used to calculate the DHQ nutrient variables based on questionnaire responses, taking into consideration various factors of food. The software utilized in this study combines the data from the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals with the questionnaire responses to assess the daily intake of various nutrients (16). Previous studies have established the reliability and accuracy of the DHQ (17).

Evaluation of confounding variables

In this study, demographic, lifestyle, and medical information were assessed using the BQ questionnaire. This included variables such as sex, race, trial arm (intervention or control group), BMI, smoking status, and family history of biliary cancer. BMI was calculated by dividing weight (in kilograms) by the square of height (in square meters). Age at the completion of the DHQ questionnaire, drinking status, history of gallbladder stones or inflammation, history of diabetes, alcohol consumption, and intake of the six common anthocyanidins were assessed using the DHQ.

Assessment of biliary cancer

The PLCO trial obtained confirmation of biliary cancer diagnosis through study update forms, which were annually mailed to participants to inquire about cancer diagnoses. The primary outcome assessed in this study was the incidence of biliary cancer, encompassing various subtypes including gallbladder cancer (ICD-O-2, C239), extrahepatic bile duct cancer (ICD-O-2, C240), ampulla of Vater cancer (ICD-O-2, C241), overlapping lesions of biliary tract cancer (ICD-O-2, C248), and biliary tract cancer, not otherwise specified (ICD-O-2, C249).

Statistical analysis

Categorical and continuous covariates with less than 5% missing values were imputed using the mode and median values, respectively. Detailed information regarding the imputation data can be found in Supplementary Table S1.

The relationship between dietary intake of anthocyanidins and the risk of biliary cancer was investigated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. HRs and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, with the duration of follow-up serving as the time metric. The follow-up period was defined as the time from the completion of the DHQ to the occurrence of biliary cancer, death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the specified follow-up period (Supplementary Fig. S1). To test for a trend between biliary cancer incidence and quartiles of total anthocyanidin intake, each participant was assigned the median value within their designated quartile, which was subsequently treated as a continuous variable in the regression model, using the lowest quartile as the reference group. Potential confounding variables were identified through a comprehensive review of relevant literature and utilizing the clinical expertise of researchers (18–22). The selected covariates were then incorporated into the Cox regression model to mitigate their potential influence on the outcomes. In the multivariate analyses, Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, and race. Model 2 included additional adjustments for trial arm, BMI, family history of biliary cancer, smoking status, drinking status, and history of diabetes. Model 3 was further adjusted for history of gallbladder stones or inflammation as well as alcohol intake. To aid model convergence, total anthocyanidins were also standardized by subtracting their mean value and dividing it by their SD in Supplementary Table S2. Similar methods were utilized to analyze the associations between intake of anthocyanidin and flavonone subclasses and biliary cancer risk.

To better characterize the dose–response relationship between total anthocyanidin intake and biliary cancer risk, a restricted cubic spline curve with three knots was employed to model the association across the full range of anthocyanidin intake using the “rcssci” R package. The number of knots was chosen to minimize the Akaike information criterion. The reference value (HR = 1) was set at the 10th percentile of anthocyanidin intake. Knots were placed at the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of total anthocyanidin intake. Intake values below the 5th and above the 95th percentiles were excluded.

After stratifying for age (>65 vs. ≤65 years), sex (male vs. female), BMI (≤25 vs. >25 to ≤30 vs. >30 kg/m2), smoking status (never vs. current/former), drinking status (no vs. yes), history of gallbladder stones or inflammation (no, yes), and history of diabetes (no vs. yes), a series of subgroup analyses was conducted. To mitigate the possibility of spurious subgroup effects, a Pinteraction was assessed by comparing models with and without multiplicative interaction terms prior to conducting the aforementioned subgroup analyses. To test the robustness of the findings, several sensitivity analyses were performed. (I) participants with a history of diabetes or a history of gallbladder stones or inflammation were excluded; (II) To address concerns regarding reverse causality, cases observed within the first 2 and 4 years of follow-up were excluded from the analysis; (III) the primary analysis was repeated in participants nonmissing data; (IV) Further adjusted for energy intake from diet, physical activity level, and educational level.

The statistical analyses were performed using R 4.2.0 software. A two-tailed P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Data availability

The raw data used in this article are not available because of the NCI's data policy. Access to the dataset should contact the NCI by mail.

Participant characteristics

In this study, 98,458 participants were included, and the mean (SD) for total anthocyanidins diet was 15.97 mg/day (13.91 mg/day). Participants in the study were divided into quartiles based on their total anthocyanidins diet. Participants in the highest quartile of total anthocyanidins diet were more likely to be female and have a higher educational level. Moreover, they exhibited a higher prevalence of drinkers and had higher energy intake from their diet. Conversely, they had a lower BMI and a higher likelihood of being smokers. The comprehensive baseline characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study population according to quartiles of dietary anthocyanidin intakes.

Quartiles of total anthocyanidin (g/day)
Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4
CharacteristicsOverall(<7.10)(≥7.10 to <12.32)(≥12.32 to <20.34)(≥20.34)
Number of participants 98,458 24,630 24,613 24,606 24,609 
Age 65.52 ± 5.73 64.87 ± 5.59 65.60 ± 5.76 65.81 ± 5.76 65.79 ± 5.75 
Sex 
 Male 47,217 (47.96%) 13,903 (56.40%) 12,399 (50.40%) 11,301 (45.93%) 9,613 (39.07%) 
 Female 51,241 (52.04%) 10,746 (43.60%) 12,201 (49.60%) 13,302 (54.07%) 14,992 (60.93%) 
Race 
 White 91,220 (92.65%) 22,492 (91.25%) 22,942 (93.26%) 23,071 (93.77%) 22,715 (92.31%) 
 Non-White 7,238 (7.35%) 2,157 (8.75%) 1,658 (6.74%) 1,532 (6.23%) 1,891 (7.69%) 
Education level 
 College below 62,599 (63.58%) 17,315 (70.25%) 15,928 (64.75%) 14,775 (60.05%) 14,580 (59.25%) 
 College graduate 17,353 (17.62%) 3,877 (15.73%) 4,290 (17.44%) 4,678 (19.01%) 4,508 (18.32%) 
 Postgraduate 18,507 (18.80%) 3,457 (14.02%) 4,382 (17.81%) 5,150 (20.93%) 5,518 (22.43%) 
Body mass index (kg/m227.20 ± 4.79 27.58 ± 4.77 27.40 ± 4.77 27.04 ± 4.71 26.78 ± 4.85 
Family history of biliary cancer 
 No 95,621 (97.12%) 23,808 (96.59%) 23,907 (97.18%) 23,924 (97.24%) 23,982 (97.46%) 
 Yes 281 (0.29%) 51 (0.21%) 70 (0.28%) 80 (0.33%) 80 (0.33%) 
 Possibly 2,556 (2.60%) 790 (3.20%) 623 (2.53%) 599 (2.43%) 544 (2.21%) 
Smoker 
 Never 47,233 (47.97%) 9,821 (39.84%) 11,817 (48.04%) 12,584 (51.15%) 13,011 (52.88%) 
 Current or former 51,225 (52.03%) 14,828 (60.16%) 12,783 (51.96%) 12,019 (48.85%) 11,595 (47.12%) 
Drinker 
 No 26,681 (27.10%) 7,279 (29.53%) 6,760 (27.48%) 6,243 (25.37%) 6,399 (26.01%) 
 Yes 71,777 (72.90%) 17,370 (70.47%) 17,840 (72.52%) 18,360 (74.63%) 18,207 (73.99%) 
Alcohol consumption (g/day) 8.79 ± 19.25 9.47 ± 23.19 7.68 ± 17.65 8.28 ± 16.34 9.72 ± 19.07 
History of gallbladder stones or inflammation 
 No 87,195 (88.56%) 21,865 (88.71%) 21,754 (88.43%) 21,821 (88.69%) 21,755 (88.41%) 
 Yes 11,263 (11.44%) 11,385 (46.19%) 11,676 (47.46%) 11,525 (46.84%) 11,630 (47.26%) 
History of diabetes 
 No 91,989 (93.43%) 23,084 (93.65%) 22,918 (93.16%) 22,988 (93.44%) 22,999 (93.47%) 
 Yes 6,469 (6.57%) 1,565 (6.35%) 1,682 (6.84%) 1,615 (6.56%) 1,607 (6.53%) 
Trial arm 
 Intervention 50,151 (50.94%) 12,475 (50.61%) 12,466 (50.67%) 12,632 (51.34%) 12,578 (51.12%) 
 Control 48,307 (49.06%) 12,174 (49.39%) 12,134 (49.33%) 11,971 (48.66%) 12,028 (48.88%) 
Energy intake from diet (kcal/day) 1,728.70 ± 658.04 1,543.97 ± 627.88 1,652.23 ± 630.55 1,758.42 ± 634.51 1,960.49 ± 665.65 
Physical activity level (minutes/week) 123.22 ± 108.69 101.09 ± 98.96 116.32 ± 103.86 128.14 ± 108.29 147.37 ± 117.50 
Total anthocyanidins (mg/day) 15.97 ± 13.91 4.46 ± 1.66 9.63 ± 1.50 15.88 ± 2.27 33.93 ± 16.41 
Cyanidin (mg/day) 3.60 ± 3.87 1.13 ± 0.69 2.17 ± 1.17 3.46 ± 1.86 7.65 ± 5.47 
Delphinidin (mg/day) 4.53 ± 3.67 1.36 ± 1.02 3.50 ± 1.96 5.12 ± 2.54 8.13 ± 4.25 
Malvidin (mg/day) 4.07 ± 5.91 0.88 ± 0.60 1.86 ± 1.25 3.67 ± 2.44 9.88 ± 9.09 
Pelargonidin (mg/day) 2.58 ± 3.86 0.79 ± 0.65 1.52 ± 1.28 2.55 ± 2.26 5.45 ± 6.31 
Peonidin (mg/day) 0.50 ± 0.65 0.12 ± 0.07 0.24 ± 0.14 0.45 ± 0.26 1.20 ± 0.94 
Petunidin (mg/day) 0.70 ± 0.84 0.19 ± 0.11 0.36 ± 0.20 0.63 ± 0.34 1.61 ± 1.19 
Quartiles of total anthocyanidin (g/day)
Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4
CharacteristicsOverall(<7.10)(≥7.10 to <12.32)(≥12.32 to <20.34)(≥20.34)
Number of participants 98,458 24,630 24,613 24,606 24,609 
Age 65.52 ± 5.73 64.87 ± 5.59 65.60 ± 5.76 65.81 ± 5.76 65.79 ± 5.75 
Sex 
 Male 47,217 (47.96%) 13,903 (56.40%) 12,399 (50.40%) 11,301 (45.93%) 9,613 (39.07%) 
 Female 51,241 (52.04%) 10,746 (43.60%) 12,201 (49.60%) 13,302 (54.07%) 14,992 (60.93%) 
Race 
 White 91,220 (92.65%) 22,492 (91.25%) 22,942 (93.26%) 23,071 (93.77%) 22,715 (92.31%) 
 Non-White 7,238 (7.35%) 2,157 (8.75%) 1,658 (6.74%) 1,532 (6.23%) 1,891 (7.69%) 
Education level 
 College below 62,599 (63.58%) 17,315 (70.25%) 15,928 (64.75%) 14,775 (60.05%) 14,580 (59.25%) 
 College graduate 17,353 (17.62%) 3,877 (15.73%) 4,290 (17.44%) 4,678 (19.01%) 4,508 (18.32%) 
 Postgraduate 18,507 (18.80%) 3,457 (14.02%) 4,382 (17.81%) 5,150 (20.93%) 5,518 (22.43%) 
Body mass index (kg/m227.20 ± 4.79 27.58 ± 4.77 27.40 ± 4.77 27.04 ± 4.71 26.78 ± 4.85 
Family history of biliary cancer 
 No 95,621 (97.12%) 23,808 (96.59%) 23,907 (97.18%) 23,924 (97.24%) 23,982 (97.46%) 
 Yes 281 (0.29%) 51 (0.21%) 70 (0.28%) 80 (0.33%) 80 (0.33%) 
 Possibly 2,556 (2.60%) 790 (3.20%) 623 (2.53%) 599 (2.43%) 544 (2.21%) 
Smoker 
 Never 47,233 (47.97%) 9,821 (39.84%) 11,817 (48.04%) 12,584 (51.15%) 13,011 (52.88%) 
 Current or former 51,225 (52.03%) 14,828 (60.16%) 12,783 (51.96%) 12,019 (48.85%) 11,595 (47.12%) 
Drinker 
 No 26,681 (27.10%) 7,279 (29.53%) 6,760 (27.48%) 6,243 (25.37%) 6,399 (26.01%) 
 Yes 71,777 (72.90%) 17,370 (70.47%) 17,840 (72.52%) 18,360 (74.63%) 18,207 (73.99%) 
Alcohol consumption (g/day) 8.79 ± 19.25 9.47 ± 23.19 7.68 ± 17.65 8.28 ± 16.34 9.72 ± 19.07 
History of gallbladder stones or inflammation 
 No 87,195 (88.56%) 21,865 (88.71%) 21,754 (88.43%) 21,821 (88.69%) 21,755 (88.41%) 
 Yes 11,263 (11.44%) 11,385 (46.19%) 11,676 (47.46%) 11,525 (46.84%) 11,630 (47.26%) 
History of diabetes 
 No 91,989 (93.43%) 23,084 (93.65%) 22,918 (93.16%) 22,988 (93.44%) 22,999 (93.47%) 
 Yes 6,469 (6.57%) 1,565 (6.35%) 1,682 (6.84%) 1,615 (6.56%) 1,607 (6.53%) 
Trial arm 
 Intervention 50,151 (50.94%) 12,475 (50.61%) 12,466 (50.67%) 12,632 (51.34%) 12,578 (51.12%) 
 Control 48,307 (49.06%) 12,174 (49.39%) 12,134 (49.33%) 11,971 (48.66%) 12,028 (48.88%) 
Energy intake from diet (kcal/day) 1,728.70 ± 658.04 1,543.97 ± 627.88 1,652.23 ± 630.55 1,758.42 ± 634.51 1,960.49 ± 665.65 
Physical activity level (minutes/week) 123.22 ± 108.69 101.09 ± 98.96 116.32 ± 103.86 128.14 ± 108.29 147.37 ± 117.50 
Total anthocyanidins (mg/day) 15.97 ± 13.91 4.46 ± 1.66 9.63 ± 1.50 15.88 ± 2.27 33.93 ± 16.41 
Cyanidin (mg/day) 3.60 ± 3.87 1.13 ± 0.69 2.17 ± 1.17 3.46 ± 1.86 7.65 ± 5.47 
Delphinidin (mg/day) 4.53 ± 3.67 1.36 ± 1.02 3.50 ± 1.96 5.12 ± 2.54 8.13 ± 4.25 
Malvidin (mg/day) 4.07 ± 5.91 0.88 ± 0.60 1.86 ± 1.25 3.67 ± 2.44 9.88 ± 9.09 
Pelargonidin (mg/day) 2.58 ± 3.86 0.79 ± 0.65 1.52 ± 1.28 2.55 ± 2.26 5.45 ± 6.31 
Peonidin (mg/day) 0.50 ± 0.65 0.12 ± 0.07 0.24 ± 0.14 0.45 ± 0.26 1.20 ± 0.94 
Petunidin (mg/day) 0.70 ± 0.84 0.19 ± 0.11 0.36 ± 0.20 0.63 ± 0.34 1.61 ± 1.19 

Note: Values are means (SD) for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables.

Dietary anthocyanidins intake and biliary cancer risk

During a total of 872,645.3 person-years of follow-up, 95 cases of biliary cancer were documented, resulting in an overall incidence rate of 11 cases per 100,000 person-years. The mean (SD) duration of follow-up was 8.869 (1.899) years. As shown in Table 2, the unadjusted model revealed that participants in the highest quartile of total anthocyanidins intake had a significantly lower risk of biliary cancer compared with those in the lowest quartile (HR Q4 vs. Q1: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.30–0.92; Ptrend = 0.044). Even after fully adjusting for potential confounding variables, a similar association remained (Model 3: HR Q4 vs. Q1: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29–0.91; Ptrend = 0.043). As is shown in Supplementary Table S2, the same results were observed when the total anthocyanidins diet was standardized. In the subclass anthocyanidins class analysis, no association was found with biliary cancer, except for Malvidin (Ptrend = 0.045) and Peonidin (Ptrend = 0.050) in the fully adjusted model (Supplementary Table S3). In addition, as shown in Supplementary Table S4, the subclasses of flavonones were usually not statistically significantly associated with biliary cancer risk [except for Apigenin (Ptrend = 0.029)]. It should be noted that we did not find any association between the intake of total anthocyanidins and various anatomic sites of biliary cancer (Supplementary Table S5).

Table 2.

Association of total anthocyanidins with the risk of biliary cancer.

HR (95% confidence interval)
Quartiles of total anthocyanidins (g/day)No. of participantsNo. of casesPerson-yearsUnadjustedModel 1aModel 2bModel 3c
Quartile 1 (<7.10) 24,649 35 215,306.6 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.000 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 
Quartile 2 (≥7.10 to <12.32) 24,600 21 218,181.4 0.59 (0.34–1.01) 0.57 (0.33–0.98) 0.58 (0.34–1.00) 0.58 (0.34–1.00) 
Quartile 3 (≥12.32 to <20.34) 24,603 20 219,262.5 0.56 (0.32–0.96) 0.54 (0.31–0.94) 0.55 (0.32–0.96) 0.55 (0.32–0.96) 
Quartile 4 (≥20.34) 24,606 19 219,894.8 0.53 (0.30–0.92) 0.50 (0.29–0.89) 0.52 (0.30–0.92) 0.52 (0.29–0.91) 
Ptrend    0.044 0.034 0.045 0.043 
HR (95% confidence interval)
Quartiles of total anthocyanidins (g/day)No. of participantsNo. of casesPerson-yearsUnadjustedModel 1aModel 2bModel 3c
Quartile 1 (<7.10) 24,649 35 215,306.6 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.000 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 
Quartile 2 (≥7.10 to <12.32) 24,600 21 218,181.4 0.59 (0.34–1.01) 0.57 (0.33–0.98) 0.58 (0.34–1.00) 0.58 (0.34–1.00) 
Quartile 3 (≥12.32 to <20.34) 24,603 20 219,262.5 0.56 (0.32–0.96) 0.54 (0.31–0.94) 0.55 (0.32–0.96) 0.55 (0.32–0.96) 
Quartile 4 (≥20.34) 24,606 19 219,894.8 0.53 (0.30–0.92) 0.50 (0.29–0.89) 0.52 (0.30–0.92) 0.52 (0.29–0.91) 
Ptrend    0.044 0.034 0.045 0.043 

aAdjusted for age (years), sex (male, female), and race (White, non-White).

bAdjusted for model 1 plus trial arm (intervention or control), BMI (kg/m2), family history of biliary cancer (no, yes, possibly), smoker (never, current, or former), drinker (no, yes), history of diabetes (no, yes).

cAdjusted for model 2 plus history of gallbladder stones or inflammation (no, yes), alcohol consumption (g/day).

Additional analyses

The results from the restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis demonstrated a linear dose–response relationship between total anthocyanidins diet and the risk of biliary cancer (P = 0.027 for overall association and Pnonlinearity = 0.118), as depicted in Fig. 1. Subgroup analyses revealed that the inverse associations between total anthocyanidins diet and biliary cancer risk were more pronounced in participants who were drinkers compared with those who were nondrinkers (Pinteraction = 0.033; Table 3). In sensitivity analyses (Supplementary Table S6), the associations remained consistent even after excluding participants with a history of diabetes, gallbladder stones or inflammation. In addition, when excluding cases observed within the first 2 or 4 years of follow-up, and conducting the analysis using nonmissing data, the associations remained similar. However, it should be noted that when we further adjusted for energy intake from diet, physical activity level, and educational level, the inverse association no longer existed.

Figure 1.

Restricted cubic spline. Restricted cubic spline for the association between total anthocyanidins intake and the risk of biliary cancer. HRs were adjusted for age (years), sex (male, female) and race (White, non-White), trial arm (intervention or control), BMI (kg/m2), family history of biliary cancer (no, yes, possibly), smoker (never, current, or former), drinker (no, yes), history of diabetes (no, yes), history of gallbladder stones or inflammation (no, yes), alcohol consumption (g/day).

Figure 1.

Restricted cubic spline. Restricted cubic spline for the association between total anthocyanidins intake and the risk of biliary cancer. HRs were adjusted for age (years), sex (male, female) and race (White, non-White), trial arm (intervention or control), BMI (kg/m2), family history of biliary cancer (no, yes, possibly), smoker (never, current, or former), drinker (no, yes), history of diabetes (no, yes), history of gallbladder stones or inflammation (no, yes), alcohol consumption (g/day).

Close modal
Table 3.

Subgroup analyses on the association of total anthocyanidins with the risk of biliary cancer.

HR (95% confidence interval) by total anthocyanidins
Subgroup variableNo. of casesPerson-yearsQuartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4PtrendPinteraction
Age (years)        0.844 
 ≤65 35 455,825.9 1.00 (reference) 0.77 (0.33–1.82) 0.61 (0.24–1.54) 0.50 (0.19–1.33) 0.154  
 >65 60 416,819.4 1.00 (reference) 0.50 (0.25–1.01) 0.54 (0.27–1.07) 0.54 (0.27–1.08) 0.167  
Sex        0.111 
 Male 50 413,964.6 1.00 (reference) 0.33 (0.14–0.77) 0.45 (0.21–0.98) 0.62 (0.30–1.29) 0.335  
 Female 45 458,680.6 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (0.46–2.16) 0.72 (0.32–1.64) 0.46 (0.19–1.14) 0.057  
BMI (kg/m2)        0.927 
 ≤25 29 300,547.9 1.00 (reference) 0.91 (0.32–2.61) 0.96 (0.34–2.67) 0.76 (0.26–2.19) 0.607  
 >25 to ≤30 39 378,515.8 1.00 (reference) 0.60 (0.26–1.34) 0.48 (0.20–1.18) 0.49 (0.20–1.20) 0.130  
 >30 27 193,581.5 1.00 (reference) 0.41 (0.14–1.15) 0.42 (0.15–1.19) 0.45 (0.16–1.29) 0.189  
Drinker        0.033 
 No 24 234,566.7 1.00 (reference) 1.61 (0.57–4.54) 0.39 (0.08–1.93) 1.28 (0.43–3.86) 0.955  
 Yes 71 638,078.5 1.00 (reference) 0.39 (0.20–0.77) 0.57 (0.31–1.03) 0.38 (0.19–0.75) 0.020  
Smoker        0.853 
 Never 36 424,725.2 1.00 (reference) 0.63 (0.25–1.59) 0.71 (0.29–1.72) 0.54 (0.21–1.38) 0.289  
 Current or former 59 447,920.1 1.00 (reference) 0.57 (0.29–1.11) 0.46 (0.22–0.96) 0.52 (0.25–1.06) 0.083  
History of gallbladder stones or inflammation        0.005 
 No 85 773,333.5 1.00 (reference) 0.47 (0.26–0.84) 0.41 (0.22–0.76) 0.49 (0.28–0.88) 0.037  
 Yes 10 99,311.7 1.00 (reference) >1.00 (0.00–inf) >1.00 (0.00, inf) >1.00 (0.00–inf) 0.879  
History of diabetes        0.196 
 No 88 819,150.2 1.00 (reference) 0.67 (0.38–1.17) 0.60 (0.34–1.07) 0.53 (0.29–0.97) 0.053  
 Yes 53,495.0 1.00 (reference) 0.00 (0.00–Inf) 0.20 (0.02–1.82) 0.42 (0.07–2.34) 0.589  
HR (95% confidence interval) by total anthocyanidins
Subgroup variableNo. of casesPerson-yearsQuartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4PtrendPinteraction
Age (years)        0.844 
 ≤65 35 455,825.9 1.00 (reference) 0.77 (0.33–1.82) 0.61 (0.24–1.54) 0.50 (0.19–1.33) 0.154  
 >65 60 416,819.4 1.00 (reference) 0.50 (0.25–1.01) 0.54 (0.27–1.07) 0.54 (0.27–1.08) 0.167  
Sex        0.111 
 Male 50 413,964.6 1.00 (reference) 0.33 (0.14–0.77) 0.45 (0.21–0.98) 0.62 (0.30–1.29) 0.335  
 Female 45 458,680.6 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (0.46–2.16) 0.72 (0.32–1.64) 0.46 (0.19–1.14) 0.057  
BMI (kg/m2)        0.927 
 ≤25 29 300,547.9 1.00 (reference) 0.91 (0.32–2.61) 0.96 (0.34–2.67) 0.76 (0.26–2.19) 0.607  
 >25 to ≤30 39 378,515.8 1.00 (reference) 0.60 (0.26–1.34) 0.48 (0.20–1.18) 0.49 (0.20–1.20) 0.130  
 >30 27 193,581.5 1.00 (reference) 0.41 (0.14–1.15) 0.42 (0.15–1.19) 0.45 (0.16–1.29) 0.189  
Drinker        0.033 
 No 24 234,566.7 1.00 (reference) 1.61 (0.57–4.54) 0.39 (0.08–1.93) 1.28 (0.43–3.86) 0.955  
 Yes 71 638,078.5 1.00 (reference) 0.39 (0.20–0.77) 0.57 (0.31–1.03) 0.38 (0.19–0.75) 0.020  
Smoker        0.853 
 Never 36 424,725.2 1.00 (reference) 0.63 (0.25–1.59) 0.71 (0.29–1.72) 0.54 (0.21–1.38) 0.289  
 Current or former 59 447,920.1 1.00 (reference) 0.57 (0.29–1.11) 0.46 (0.22–0.96) 0.52 (0.25–1.06) 0.083  
History of gallbladder stones or inflammation        0.005 
 No 85 773,333.5 1.00 (reference) 0.47 (0.26–0.84) 0.41 (0.22–0.76) 0.49 (0.28–0.88) 0.037  
 Yes 10 99,311.7 1.00 (reference) >1.00 (0.00–inf) >1.00 (0.00, inf) >1.00 (0.00–inf) 0.879  
History of diabetes        0.196 
 No 88 819,150.2 1.00 (reference) 0.67 (0.38–1.17) 0.60 (0.34–1.07) 0.53 (0.29–0.97) 0.053  
 Yes 53,495.0 1.00 (reference) 0.00 (0.00–Inf) 0.20 (0.02–1.82) 0.42 (0.07–2.34) 0.589  

Note: HRs were adjusted for age (years), sex (male, female) and race (White, non-White), trial arm (intervention or control), BMI (kg/m2), family history of biliary cancer (no, yes, possibly), smoker (never, current or former), drinker (no, yes), history of diabetes (no, yes), history of gallbladder stones or inflammation (no, yes), alcohol consumption (g/day). HRs were not adjusted for the stratification factor.

Abbreviation: Inf, infinite.

This study aimed to explore the relationship between dietary anthocyanidins and the risk of biliary cancer in a prospective analysis of 98,458 American adults. The results revealed a significant inverse association between total anthocyanidins intake and the occurrence of biliary cancer. This association remained consistent even after adjusting for confounding factors and standardizing the total anthocyanidins diet. Subgroup analysis showed a stronger inverse association between anthocyanidins intake and the risk of biliary cancer among participants who reported drinking alcohol compared with nondrinkers. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the inverse association, as it persisted when excluding participants with a history of diabetes, gallbladder stones or inflammation and when considering different follow-up durations. Overall, these findings provide evidence supporting a potential protective effect of higher dietary anthocyanidins intake against biliary cancer, with a potential interaction between anthocyanidins intake and drinking status.

Previous research has suggested that dietary anthocyanidins or anthocyanidin-rich fruits and extracts may have protective effects against various chronic diseases (23). Anthocyanidins are known for their strong antioxidant capacity and their ability to inhibit cancer cell growth (24), and have also been shown to inhibit tumor cell invasion and migration (25). Previous study has demonstrated the potential protective effect of anthocyanidins against colorectal cancer (26). In breast cancer, anthocyanidins inhibit phosphorylation of HER2, induce apoptosis, inhibit migration and invasion, and suppress tumor cell growth (27). Bunea and colleagues found that anthocyanidins inhibited the proliferation and induced apoptosis in B16-F10 melanoma mice cells (28). Similarly, in a rat liver cancer model, Bishayee and colleagues found that anthocyanidin-rich black currant has the ability to inhibit abnormal cell proliferation and induce apoptosis (29). However, the association between dietary anthocyanidins and biliary cancer remains understudied, with a limited number of published studies available on this topic. Further research is needed to better understand and establish the potential relationship between dietary anthocyanidins and the risk of biliary cancer.

Hence, this study represents the first analysis examining the association between dietary anthocyanidins and biliary cancer in the U.S. population. Utilizing prospective data from the PLCO cancer screening trial, a total of 98,458 participants were followed for an average of 8.9 years. The study findings revealed that individuals in the highest quartile of total anthocyanidins intake had a 48% lower incidence of biliary cancer compared with those in the lowest quartile. Moreover, the RCS model employed in this study revealed a linear relationship between total anthocyanidins intake and the risk of biliary cancer (Pnonlinear = 0.118). It is worth noting that anthocyanidins have poor bioavailability and the metabolites that can be found in tissues are different from anthocyanidins in foods (30). Further research is needed to characterize the complex effects and biological mechanisms between anthocyanidins and biliary cancer development. In addition, the subgroup analysis results indicated that the inverse association between total anthocyanidins intake and biliary cancer risk was more pronounced in participants who consumed alcohol compared with nondrinkers. A potential explanation is that anthocyanidins may help mitigate the procarcinogenic effects of alcohol on the biliary tract. Alcohol has a carcinogenic effect by producing metabolites such as acetaldehyde (31). Anthocyanidins has potential antioxidant protection effects (32), and it may offset more additional carcinogenic factors of alcoholics. It can also produce effects among nondrinking people, but the results of the subgroup analysis show that the role in the drinker may be more significant. It is worth noting that due to the limited number of biliary cancer cases within each subgroup, we were unable to analyze significant interactions between total anthocyanidins intake and other potentially influential factors on the incidence of biliary cancer.

We tried to explain this inverse correlation between total anthocyanidins diet and biliary cancer by the following mechanism. Dietary intake has been found to have a profound impact on the structure and activity of the vast number of microorganisms that reside in the human gut (33). Previous studies have shown that anthocyanidins have significantly enhanced the growth of Bifidobacterium spp (34), and anthocyanidins and metabolites may play a positive regulatory effect on the intestinal bacterial flora (34, 35). Anatomically, the biliary system is connected to the intestine and therefore the intestinal flora may function in this way (36). However, it is necessary to further research to determine whether the anthocyanidins directly affect the intestinal flora. Previous study have shown that anthocyanidins prevent normal cell transformation by acting on PI3K/Akt and NFκB pathways, inhibit COX-2 and iNOS expression, and achieve antioxidation by regulating the expression of second-stage antioxidant enzymes through the Nrf2/ARE signaling system (37). Then, by targeting the MAPK pathway and AP-1, anthocyanidins regulate the expression of cancer-related genes by inhibiting RTK activity and it signaling cascade pathway, leading to cell-cycle arrest and DNA repair, thereby preventing cancer (37).

Our study has several salient strengths. First, it utilizes data from a large prospective cohort of over 150,000 participants recruited from 10 screening centers nationwide in the United States, with ample follow-up time for ascertainment of outcome events. Second, this represents the first analysis leveraging the PLCO trial to investigate associations between anthocyanidin intake and biliary cancer risk. Third, our findings were corroborated through a series of sensitivity analyses, underscoring the robustness of the results. Finally, we revealed an intriguing inverse association between total anthocyanidin intake and biliary cancer risk that was more pronounced among alcohol consumers compared with nondrinkers.

Several limitations should be acknowledged in our study. First, the assessment of anthocyanidins diet based on a one-time questionnaire may introduce nondifferential bias as participants’ dietary habits could change over the course of follow-up. Second, although subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential effect modifiers such as age, sex, BMI, smoking status, and history of diabetes mellitus, it is important to note that the limited number of biliary cancer cases might have resulted in insufficient power to detect significant interactions between total anthocyanidins diet and these factors. Third, our study population consisted of individuals ages 55 to 74 years from the United States, who may have different dietary habits and lifestyles compared with other age groups or populations with diverse dietary patterns. Therefore, caution should be exercised when generalizing our findings to other populations or age groups. Fourth, in light of the absence of a statistically significant association between the consumption of total anthocyanidins and various anatomic sites of biliary cancer in this analysis, it is essential to acknowledge that this lack of significance could potentially be due to limitations in sample size, resulting in insufficient statistical power. Therefore, a cautious and judicious approach is advisable when investigating the risk factors associated with different types of biliary cancer. Finally, it seems unlikely that the influence of residual confounders on observed events can be completely avoided. Although we comprehensively adjusted for numerous direct risk factors affecting gallbladder cancer in Model 3, the model lost statistical significance after further incorporating total energy intake, physical activity, and education level in a sensitivity analysis.

In conclusion, the findings from the PLCO trial indicate an inverse association between a diet rich in total anthocyanidins and the risk of biliary cancer. This suggests that increasing the consumption of total anthocyanidins through dietary sources may have a beneficial effect in reducing the risk of biliary cancer. Notably, examining specific food sources high in anthocyanidins could provide insights into the consistent associations observed across different anthocyanidins. Further studies should prioritize analyses of anthocyanidin-rich foods in relation to biliary cancer risk.

No disclosures were reported.

L. Xiang: Conceptualization, resources, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. D. Wu: Conceptualization, resources, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. Z. Xu: Data curation, software. Y. Tang: Software, formal analysis. H. He: Formal analysis. Y. Wang: Investigation, visualization. H. Gu: Supervision, methodology, writing–review and editing. L. Peng: Conceptualization, resources, writing–original draft, project administration, writing–review and editing.

We thank the NIH PLCO study group and the NCI for access to NCI's data collected by the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial.

This work was supported by The General Project of Chongqing Natural Science Foundation, Chongqing Science and Technology Commission, China [cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0153 (L. Peng)], [cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0112 (Y. Wang)], and [CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX1005 (H. Gu)], and Kuanren Talents Project of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University in China [kryc-yq-2110 (H. Gu)].

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of publication fees. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Online (http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/).

1.
Lee
TY
,
Bates
SE
,
Abou-Alfa
GK
.
Equipoise, drug development, and biliary cancer
.
Cancer
2022
;
128
:
944
9
.
2.
Koshiol
J
,
Yu
B
,
Kabadi
SM
,
Baria
K
,
Shroff
RT
.
Epidemiologic patterns of biliary tract cancer in the United States: 2001–2015
.
BMC Cancer
2022
;
22
:
1178
.
3.
Lowery
MA
,
Goff
LW
,
Keenan
BP
,
Jordan
E
,
Wang
R
,
Bocobo
AG
, et al
.
Second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancers: a retrospective, multicenter analysis of outcomes
.
Cancer
2019
;
125
:
4426
34
.
4.
Zhao
J
,
Blayney
A
,
Liu
X
,
Gandy
L
,
Jin
W
,
Yan
L
, et al
.
EGCG binds intrinsically disordered N-terminal domain of p53 and disrupts p53-MDM2 interaction
.
Nat Commun
2021
;
12
:
986
.
5.
Mattioli
R
,
Francioso
A
,
Mosca
L
,
Silva
P
.
Anthocyanins: a comprehensive review of their chemical properties and health effects on cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases
.
Molecules
2020
;
25
:
3809
.
6.
Guo
X
,
Yang
B
,
Tan
J
,
Jiang
J
,
Li
D
.
Associations of dietary intakes of anthocyanins and berry fruits with risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
.
Eur J Clin Nutr
2016
;
70
:
1360
7
.
7.
Gonzali
S
,
Perata
P
.
Anthocyanins from purple tomatoes as novel antioxidants to promote human health
.
Antioxidants
2020
;
9
:
1017
.
8.
Sun
W
,
Zhang
ND
,
Zhang
T
,
Li
YN
,
Xue
H
,
Cao
JL
, et al
.
Cyanidin-3-O-glucoside induces the apoptosis of human gastric cancer MKN-45 cells through ROS-mediated signaling pathways
.
Molecules
2023
;
28
:
652
.
9.
Zhang
Y
,
Zhu
M
,
Wan
H
,
Chen
L
,
Luo
F
.
Association between dietary anthocyanidins and risk of lung cancer
.
Nutrients
2022
;
14
:
2643
.
10.
Sun
L
,
Subar
AF
,
Bosire
C
,
Dawsey
SM
,
Kahle
LL
,
Zimmerman
TP
, et al
.
Dietary flavonoid intake reduces the risk of head and neck but not esophageal or gastric cancer in US men and women
.
J Nutr
2017
;
147
:
1729
38
.
11.
Cui
L
,
Liu
X
,
Tian
Y
,
Xie
C
,
Li
Q
,
Cui
H
, et al
.
Flavonoids, flavonoid subclasses, and esophageal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies
.
Nutrients
2016
;
8
:
350
.
12.
Xu
X
,
Zhu
Y
,
Li
S
,
Xia
D
.
Dietary intake of anthocyanidins and renal cancer risk: a prospective study
.
Cancers
2023
;
15
:
1406
.
13.
Prorok
PC
,
Andriole
GL
,
Bresalier
RS
,
Buys
SS
,
Chia
D
,
Crawford
ED
, et al
.
Design of the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial
.
Control Clin Trials
2000
;
21
:
273S
309S
.
14.
Shan
Z
,
Guo
Y
,
Hu
FB
,
Liu
L
,
Qi
Q
.
Association of low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets with mortality among US adults
.
JAMA Intern Med
2020
;
180
:
513
23
.
15.
Khoo
HE
,
Azlan
A
,
Tang
ST
,
Lim
SM
.
Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients, and the potential health benefits
.
Food Nutr Res
2017
;
61
:
1361779
.
16.
Dwyer
J
,
Picciano
MF
,
Raiten
DJ
;
Continuing Survery of Food Intakes by Individuals, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survery
.
Future directions for the integrated CSFII-NHANES: what we eat in America-NHANES
.
J Nutr
2003
;
133
:
576S
81S
.
17.
Csizmadi
I
,
Boucher
BA
,
Lo Siou
G
,
Massarelli
I
,
Rondeau
I
,
Garriguet
D
, et al
.
Using national dietary intake data to evaluate and adapt the US diet history questionnaire: the stepwise tailoring of an FFQ for Canadian use
.
Public Health Nutr
2016
;
19
:
3247
55
.
18.
Bhaskaran
K
,
Douglas
I
,
Forbes
H
,
dos-Santos-Silva
I
,
Leon
DA
,
Smeeth
L
.
Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5·24 million UK adults
.
Lancet
2014
;
384
:
755
65
.
19.
Li
C
,
Balluz
LS
,
Ford
ES
,
Okoro
CA
,
Tsai
J
,
Zhao
G
.
Association between diagnosed diabetes and self-reported cancer among U.S. adults
.
Diabetes Care
2011
;
34
:
1365
8
.
20.
Lugo
A
,
Peveri
G
,
Gallus
S
.
Should we consider gallbladder cancer a new smoking-related cancer? A comprehensive meta-analysis focused on dose-response relationships
.
Int J Cancer
2020
;
146
:
3304
11
.
21.
Tao
LY
,
He
XD
,
Qu
Q
,
Cai
L
,
Liu
W
,
Zhou
L
, et al
.
Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case-control study in China
.
Liver Int
2010
;
30
:
215
21
.
22.
Yagyu
K
,
Kikuchi
S
,
Obata
Y
,
Lin
Y
,
Ishibashi
T
,
Kurosawa
M
, et al
.
Cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking and the risk of gallbladder cancer death: a prospective cohort study in Japan
.
Int J Cancer
2008
;
122
:
924
9
.
23.
Kwon
JY
,
Lee
KW
,
Kim
JE
,
Jung
SK
,
Kang
NJ
,
Hwang
MK
, et al
.
Delphinidin suppresses ultraviolet B-induced cyclooxygenases-2 expression through inhibition of MAPKK4 and PI-3 kinase
.
Carcinogenesis
2009
;
30
:
1932
40
.
24.
Zhang
Y
,
Vareed
SK
,
Nair
MG
.
Human tumor cell growth inhibition by nontoxic anthocyanidins, the pigments in fruits and vegetables
.
Life Sci
2005
;
76
:
1465
72
.
25.
Chen
PN
,
Kuo
WH
,
Chiang
CL
,
Chiou
HL
,
Hsieh
YS
,
Chu
SC
.
Black rice anthocyanins inhibit cancer cells invasion via repressions of MMPs and u-PA expression
.
Chem Biol Interact
2006
;
163
:
218
29
.
26.
Nascimento
RPD
,
Machado
APDF
.
The preventive and therapeutic effects of anthocyanins on colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review based on up-to-date experimental studies
.
Food Res Int
2023
;
170
:
113028
.
27.
Li
X
,
Xu
J
,
Tang
X
,
Liu
Y
,
Yu
X
,
Wang
Z
, et al
.
Anthocyanins inhibit trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer in vitro and in vivo
.
Mol Med Rep
2016
;
13
:
4007
13
.
28.
Bunea
A
,
Rugină
D
,
Sconţa
Z
,
Pop
RM
,
Pintea
A
,
Socaciu
C
, et al
.
Anthocyanin determination in blueberry extracts from various cultivars and their antiproliferative and apoptotic properties in B16-F10 metastatic murine melanoma cells
.
Phytochemistry
2013
;
95
:
436
44
.
29.
Bishayee
A
,
Mbimba
T
,
Thoppil
RJ
,
Háznagy-Radnai
E
,
Sipos
P
,
Darvesh
AS
, et al
.
Anthocyanin-rich black currant (Ribes nigrum L.) extract affords chemoprevention against diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocellular carcinogenesis in rats
.
J Nutr Biochem
2011
;
22
:
1035
46
.
30.
Mostafa
H
,
Meroño
T
,
Miñarro
A
,
Sánchez-Pla
A
,
Lanuza
F
,
Zamora-Ros
R
, et al
.
Dietary sources of anthocyanins and their association with metabolome biomarkers and cardiometabolic risk factors in an observational study
.
Nutrients
2023
;
15
:
1208
.
31.
Seitz
HK
,
Stickel
F
.
Molecular mechanisms of alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2007
;
7
:
599
612
.
32.
Lila
MA
,
Burton-Freeman
B
,
Grace
M
,
Kalt
W
.
Unraveling anthocyanin bioavailability for human health
.
Annu Rev Food Sci Technol
2016
;
7
:
375
93
.
33.
David
LA
,
Maurice
CF
,
Carmody
RN
,
Gootenberg
DB
,
Button
JE
,
Wolfe
BE
, et al
.
Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome
.
Nature
2014
;
505
:
559
63
.
34.
Hidalgo
M
,
Oruna-Concha
MJ
,
Kolida
S
,
Walton
GE
,
Kallithraka
S
,
Spencer
JPE
, et al
.
Metabolism of anthocyanins by human gut microflora and their influence on gut bacterial growth
.
J Agric Food Chem
2012
;
60
:
3882
90
.
35.
Overall
J
,
Bonney
SA
,
Wilson
M
,
Beermann
A
,
Grace
MH
,
Esposito
D
, et al
.
Metabolic effects of berries with structurally diverse anthocyanins
.
Int J Mol Sci
2017
;
18
:
422
.
36.
Huang
X
,
Yang
Y
,
Li
X
,
Zhu
X
,
Lin
D
,
Ma
Y
, et al
.
The gut microbiota: a new perspective for tertiary prevention of hepatobiliary and gallbladder diseases
.
Front Nutr
2023
;
10
:
1089909
.
37.
Lin
BW
,
Gong
CC
,
Song
HF
,
Cui
YY
.
Effects of anthocyanins on the prevention and treatment of cancer
.
Br J Pharmacol
2017
;
174
:
1226
43
.