Background:

Epidemiologic studies have reported associations between weight fluctuations and postmenopausal breast cancer risk; however, the biological markers involved in this association are unknown. This study aimed to explore the associations between breast cancer–related biomarkers and weight regain following exercise-induced weight loss.

Methods:

From the 400 participants included in the Breast Cancer and Exercise Trial in Alberta, a total of 214 lost weight during the intervention and had follow-up blood samples, body composition, and covariate measurements. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 12 months (end of the study), and 24 months (follow-up).

Results:

During follow-up, weight regain was 1.80 kg [95% confidence interval (CI): –0.40–3.90], and was significantly associated with increases in estradiol [treatment effect ratio (TER) = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04], estrone (TER = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03), free estradiol (TER = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02–1.05), the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (TER = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02–1.05), and insulin (TER = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04), and decreases in sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG; TER = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99) levels. Nonstatistically significant associations were found for glucose and C-reactive protein. Furthermore, a statistically significant linear trend of increasing levels for all biomarkers, and decreasing SHBG, across weight regain categories was found.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that weight regain following exercise-induced weight loss is associated with breast cancer–related biomarker changes in postmenopausal women.

Impact:

These findings provide evidence to support the importance of developing effective strategies to prevent weight regain and, consequently, decrease postmenopausal breast cancer risk via changes in adiposity-related biomarkers.

Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in women worldwide (1). Obesity is associated with postmenopausal breast cancer risk (2, 3) because increases in body fat are related with a 1.5- to 2.0-fold increased risk (4). Multiple interrelated biologic pathways have been proposed to explain the associations between obesity and postmenopausal breast cancer risk (5), including increased circulating levels of sex-steroid hormones coupled with lower levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), as well as insulin resistance and inflammation (6).

Lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions with the aim of promoting weight loss and decreasing breast cancer–related biomarkers have been assessed in clinical trials for the primary prevention of postmenopausal breast cancer (7–11). Sustained weight loss is associated with a reduction in breast cancer risk for women over 50 years (12). Unfortunately, the data available suggest that approximately 80% of participants who achieve weight loss will experience approximately 50% weight regain within one year following the end of the intervention (13–16). Regular physical activity participation and reduced energy and fat intake are important for long-term weight maintenance, influencing the relationship between postintervention weight regain and adverse health outcomes (17–19). The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study reported associations between weight gain and weight cycling (intentional weight loss and subsequent weight regain) with an increase in postmenopausal breast and endometrial cancer risk (20). However, the potential associations between changes in biologic markers associated with breast cancer risk and weight regain have yet to be fully explored. Given the associations between weight fluctuations and breast cancer risk, there is a need to clarify the biological markers involved in this relationship (20).

The Breast Cancer and Exercise Trial in Alberta (BETA) was designed to assess the effects of 12-month aerobic exercise interventions differing in prescribed exercise volume (150 vs. 300 minutes/week of aerobic exercise) on biomarkers of postmenopausal breast cancer risk with 24-month follow-up measurements (21, 22). During the follow-up period, no exercise intervention was prescribed. We have previously reported that 72% of participants regained weight during the follow-up period and some of the leading behavioral predictors of this weight regain were reductions in moderate-vigorous intensity physical activity time, increases in energy intake, fat intake, and sedentary time, as well as a delay in sleep timing midpoint (19). The present secondary analysis aims to complement these initial analyses by exploring the associations between breast cancer-related biomarkers (estradiol, free estradiol, estrone, SHBG, insulin, glucose, HOMA-IR and CRP) and weight regain following exercise-induced weight loss in postmenopausal women from BETA. We hypothesized that weight regain during 12-month follow-up would be associated with negative changes in these biomarkers.

Study design and participants

The methods and study design for BETA are described in more detail elsewhere (23). This study was approved by the Alberta Cancer Research Ethics Committee, the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Calgary and the Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Alberta. BETA was a two-arm, two-center, 12-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 12-month follow-up assessments, conducted in Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. A total of 400 postmenopausal women were recruited and randomized to either 150 minutes/week (MODERATE volume) or 300 minutes/week (HIGH volume) of aerobic exercise. Women were postmenopausal, aged 50–74 years, had a body mass index (BMI) between 22–40 kg/m2, were English speaking, did not have diabetes, recreationally inactive (<90 minutes/week of physical activity), nonsmokers or excessive alcohol drinkers (no more than two alcoholic drinks/day), not taking hormone therapy, had normal levels of cholesterol, fasting blood glucose (<7 mmol/L), thyroid-stimulating hormone and alanine aminotransferase, were not previously diagnosed with cancer, not planning to participate in any weight loss program or taking weight loss medications, and had received medical approval for participation in an exercise intervention. Written consent was obtained from each participant after a full explanation of the purpose and nature of all procedures used.

Intervention

The duration of the intervention was 12 months. Exercise prescription included moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic exercise at 65% to 75% of heart rate reserve on five days/week for either 30 minutes/session (MODERATE volume) or 60 minutes/session (HIGH volume). The exercise sessions were supervised on at least three days/week by certified exercise trainers during the entire 12-month intervention. Exercise prescription was gradually increased with a 12-week ramp-up period and adjusted during the intervention (23). Study participants were asked to maintain their usual diet during the intervention. During the 12-month follow-up period, participants did not receive an exercise prescription or regular follow-up/feedback from the certified exercise trainers. However, they were aware that a follow-up assessment of outcomes would be conducted.

Body composition measurements

Body composition measurements were assessed at baseline, 12-months (end of the intervention), and one year later (end of follow-up). Body weight was measured using a conventional balance beam scale with standardized methods. Measurements were taken in duplicate by research staff and if differences between the two measurements were noted, a third measure was taken, and the average was calculated. A whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan was used to measure fat-free mass (kg), fat mass (kg) and body fat percentage (%) to describe participants' body composition and to be used in sensitivity analyses. DXA scans were taken using a Hologic Discovery A DXA system in Calgary and a General Electric Lunar iDXA in Edmonton. Research staff calibrated DXA scanners every day before use, and staff members were blinded to the randomization group. All scans were done following a standardized procedure in Calgary and Edmonton.

Blood data and assays

The blood collection and processing protocol used in BETA have been published elsewhere (23). Briefly, blood samples were collected from all participants at baseline, 12 months and 24 months after at least a 10-hour fast. No exercise or alcohol intake was allowed for 24 hours before the blood sample was taken. Estrone and total estradiol levels were measured by radioimmunoassay after extraction by organic solvent and Celite column partition chromatography steps. The sensitivity of the assays was 2 and 4 pg/mL, respectively. Inter-assay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 11% to 16% and 8% to 10%, respectively. SHBG, insulin and high sensitivity CRP were measured by solid-phase, two-site chemiluminescent immunometric assays on the Immulite analyzer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics). The sensitivity of the assays was 1 nmol/L, 2 μIU/mL, and 0.2 mg/dL, respectively, and the inter-assay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were <10% for all outcomes. Glucose was quantified by a standard analytical procedure using the Vitros Chemistry System. Inter-assay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 2% and 1%, respectively. HOMA-IR was calculated as fasting glucose (nmol/L) × fasting insulin (μIU/mL)/22.5, and free estradiol levels were calculated using a validated formula with a constant for albumin concentrations of 43 g/L, total estradiol and SHBG concentrations (24). To monitor assay reliability, appropriate quality control samples were used. Participants' baseline and 12-month blood samples were analyzed in the same batch with an equal number of participants from each randomization group. All assays were repeated for the 24-month blood samples at a later time. Blind duplicates were included within and between batches to estimate coefficients of variation. All lab personnel were blinded to the intervention assignment.

Covariate measures

Baseline characteristics were measured with a Baseline Health Questionnaire, which included information on age, marital status (married/common-law versus not married or common-law), education (high school or less versus beyond high school), employment (full-time versus not employed or part-time work), and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White versus other). The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and statins was also included in the model as possible confounders. Other covariates included in all analyses were the use study site (Calgary vs. Edmonton), randomization group (150 minutes/week of aerobic exercise - MODERATE volume vs. 300 minutes/week of aerobic exercise - HIGH volume) and weight loss during the exercise intervention (kg).

Energy intake was assessed using the Canadian Diet History Questionnaire-II and analyzed with the Diet*Calc Analysis Program (Version 1.4.3; National Cancer Institute Applied Research Program, Bethesda, MD). Total physical activity time was assessed with the validated Past Year Total Physical Activity Questionnaire (25). Changes in total energy and fat intake (kcal), as well as changes in total physical activity time (MET-hours/week) during the follow-up period, were included as covariates in the models.

Statistical analysis

For our primary analysis, linear regression models were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted beta coefficients (β) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) between changes in breast cancer–related blood biomarkers (glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, estradiol, free estradiol, estrone, SHBG, and CRP) with changes in body weight during the follow-up period. Because the aim of these analyses was to explore associations between breast cancer–related biomarkers and weight regain following exercise-induced weight loss, only participants who had any degree of weight loss during the intervention were included in the present analysis. Participants from both randomization groups (HIGH and MODERATE) were combined for these analyses to maximize statistical power; however, these analyses did control for covariates related to the intervention that could influence our results, including the randomization group (MODERATE vs. HIGH), the study site (Edmonton versus Calgary) and the amount of exercise-induced weight loss during the intervention, given the strong association between weight loss and weight regain (r = 1.00, P < 0.001). Furthermore, analyses were adjusted by changes in total energy and fat intake (kcal), as well as changes in total physical activity, during the follow-up period. The model was also adjusted for the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or statins, and other sociodemographic characteristics that could influence weight management (26), such as age at menopause, ethnicity, education level, employment and marital status. Sensitivity analyses were conducted including fat mass changes in the model instead of weight changes. Another sensitivity analysis was conducted including only women who lost ≥2 kg during the intervention period. Finally, we ran the model excluding women who were normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m2) at baseline and, finally, adjusted the model for body mass index at baseline. Assumptions of normality and homogeneity were assessed by visual examination of quantile-quantile plots and histograms of the residuals and plots of the residuals versus the fitted values. Because all biomarker data were non-normally distributed, log-transformations were used in the analyses. Treatment effect ratios (TER) were estimated from these models using anti-log. A treatment effect ratio <1.0 indicated lower biomarker concentrations with increases in body weight during follow-up; a ratio >1.0 indicated higher biomarker concentrations with increases in body weight during follow-up; and a ratio equal to 1.0 indicated no change in biomarker concentrations with increases in body weight. The presence of influential observations was assessed using Cook's distance. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine if the results were robust to the removal of influential observations if present. After log-transformation, all results were robust to the removal of potentially influential points.

As a secondary aim, weight change during follow-up was categorized to explore mean differences in biomarker concentrations between participants who continued to lose weight or maintained weight loss during follow-up as the reference group with participants who regained between 0.1–2.5 kg (category 1), 2.6–4.9 kg (category 2) or ≥5 kg (category 3) of weight during follow-up. Trend analyses to explore the linear trend of biomarker levels across the weight regain categories were conducted. TERs were estimated from these models and represent the ratio of geometric mean biomarker levels during follow-up (reflecting changes from 12 months to 24 months) between the reference group with each category. A TER <1.0 indicated lower biomarker concentrations in the weight regain category versus the reference group during follow-up; a ratio >1.0 indicated higher biomarker concentrations in the weight regain categories versus the reference group during follow-up; and a ratio equal to 1.0 indicated no change in biomarker concentrations between weight categories.

Analyses were conducted using STATA (version 14.0: StataCorp LLC). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

The flow chart of all participants from BETA has been reported in previous studies (22, 27). A total of 214 participants were included in this analyses (Fig. 1). Participant characteristics for the complete sample and by weight regain categories are described in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of participants included in the present analysis from BETA, Alberta, Canada, 2010–2014.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of participants included in the present analysis from BETA, Alberta, Canada, 2010–2014.

Close modal
Table 1.

Characteristics for participants who lost weight during the 12-month exercise interventionsa from the BETA, Alberta, Canada, 2010–2014.

Participant characteristicsAll participants who had exercise-induced weight loss during the 12-month interventiona (n = 214)Participants who lost/maintained weight loss during follow-up (n = 61)Participants who regained 0.1–2.5 kg during follow-up (n = 66)Participants who regained 2.6–4.9 kg during follow-up (n = 51)Participants who regained ≥5 kg during follow-up (n = 36)
Baseline age (years) 59.1 (56.5–63) 60.0 (56.6–62.0) 59.4 (56.5–64.0) 58.2 (56.7–63.7) 58.6 (55.3–63.1) 
Age at menopause (years) 50 (48–52) 51 (49–52) 50 (47–52) 50 (48–53) 50 (48–52) 
Ethnicity      
 White, n (%) 190 (88.8) 55 (90) 56 (85) 46 (90) 33 (92) 
 Other, n (%) 24 (11.2) 6 (10) 10 (15) 5 (10) 3 (8) 
Employment at baseline      
 Employed full time, n (%) 66 (31.0) 22 (36.0) 18 (27) 16 (31) 10 (28) 
 Not employed full time, n (%) 148 (69.0) 39 (64) 48 (73) 35 (69) 26 (72) 
Education      
 High school or less, n (%) 45 (21.0) 15 (25) 10 (15) 10 (20) 10 (28) 
 Beyond high school, n (%) 169 (79.0) 46 (75) 56 (85) 41 (80) 26 (72) 
Married or common-law at baseline      
 No, n (%) 59 (27.6) 22 (36) 20 (30) 8 (16) 9 (25) 
 Yes, n (%) 155 (72.4) 39 (64) 46 (70) 43 (84) 27 (75) 
Study site      
 Calgary, n (%) 166 (77.6) 47 (77) 46 (70) 43 (84) 30 (83) 
 Edmonton, n (%) 48 (22.4) 14 (23) 20 (30) 8 (16) 6 (17) 
Intervention group      
  High exercise volume 109 (51) 28 (46) 39 (59) 23 (45) 19 (53) 
  Moderate exercise volume 105 (49) 33 (54) 27 (41) 28 (55) 17 (47) 
Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) at baseline 
  User 13 (6) 4 (7) 5 (8) 1 (2) 3 (8) 
  Nonuser 201 (94) 57 (93) 61 (92) 50 (98) 33 (92) 
Use of statin drugs at baseline      
  User 27 (13) 5 (8) 10 (15) 8 (16) 4 (11) 
  Nonuser 187 (87) 56 (92) 56 (85) 43 (84) 32 (89) 
Baseline anthropometrics and body composition     
 Body weight (kg) 75 (67.2–85.9) 73.9 (66–88.3) 73.2 (66.3–80.9) 74.2 (67.1–82.1) 82.8 (74.2–89.3) 
 Fat mass (kg) 29.1 (23.9–36.1) 29.4 (23.7–39.9) 27.8 (22.9–32.8) 28.5 (23.9–34.7) 34.1 (27.0–39.2) 
 Fat-free mass (kg) 43.8 (39.9–47.9) 43.8 (39.9–47.2) 43.3 (38.3–48.3) 42.8 (40.4–47.9) 46.2 (40.7–48.9) 
12-month anthropometrics and body composition     
 Body weight (kg) 69.8 (63.6–8) 70.7 (64.5–85.8) 69.2 (63.2–78.1) 69.1 (63.2–76.9) 73.4 (66.6–81.9) 
 Fat mass (kg) 25.8 (21.1–31.5) 26.2 (21.4–36.2) 24.4 (19.7–29.3) 24.9 (20.4–30.2) 27.3 (22.3–32.1) 
 Fat-free mass (kg) 43.4 (39.8–47.0) 43.4 (39.7–46.1) 43.3 (38.5–46.5) 42.7 (39.8–46.6) 44.4 (41.6–48.4) 
Follow-up anthropometrics and body composition     
 Body weight (kg) 72.4 (65.3–82.5) 68.4 (62.2–80.6) 71 (64.1–80.2) 72.3 (66.7–80.5) 82.5 (74.2–89.1) 
 Fat mass (kg) 27.5 (22.0–33.8) 25.3 (20.6–34.9) 26.1 (21.2–31.4) 28.1 (23.6–32.6) 34.1 (26.8–37.7) 
 Fat-free (kg) 43.6 (39.8–47.1) 42.6 (39.6–45.6) 43.0 (38.3–47.1) 43.3 (40.5–46.9) 46.8 (42.4–48.8) 
Baseline biomarker concentrations      
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 9.45 (7.29–12.62) 9.91 (7.64–12.61) 8.60 (6.55–11.47) 8.88 (7.08–11.59) 11.67 (9.09–13.62) 
 Estrone (pg/mL) 37.91 (30.71–46.27) 40.3 (29.7–47.8) 35.2 (29.9–44.7) 35.6 (27.4–45.3) 39.1 (31.8–48.9) 
 SHBG (nmol/L) 45 (34–60.7) 45.5 (37.3–58) 44.25 (32–64.2) 46.1 (32.6–61.5) 37.25 (30–63.4) 
 Free estradiol (pg/mL) 0.21 (0.15–0.31) 0.23 (0.17–0.31) 0.19 (0.15–0.30) 0.21 (0.15–0.29) 0.28 (0.20–0.35) 
 Insulin (μIU/mL) 8.73 (5.74–12.90) 8.74 (5.77–13.5) 8.37 (5.74–13.2) 8.67 (4.61–13.7) 9.60 (5.97–12.2) 
 Glucose (mM) 91 (85–96) 92 (85–96) 90 (87–96) 92 (85–96) 90 (85–97) 
 HOMA-IR 2.01 (1.23–3.02) 2.11 (1.22–3.03) 1.87 (1.23–2.89) 1.95 (0.99–3.24) 2.24 (1.45–2.65) 
 CRP (mg/L) 1.82 (0.93–3.88) 2.3 (0.96–4) 1.97 (0.93–3.88) 1.5 (0.88–2.9) 1.78 (1.12–4.38) 
12-month biomarker concentrations      
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 8.6 (6.7–11.4) 10.36 (7.2–12.2) 8.1 (6.3–10.9) 8.8 (6.7–10.6) 8.58 (7.1–11.96) 
 Estrone (pg/mL) 35.1 (28.4–45.0) 39.9 (31.05–45.2) 32.9 (27.7–44.8) 34.4 (26.4–44.4) 36.3 (28.4–45.01) 
 SHBG (nmol/L) 49.1 (38–67.3) 46.9 (37.9–60.4) 49.6 (37.7–71) 54.6 (38.1–67.5) 49.2 (39.3–76.5) 
 Free estradiol (pg/mL) 0.20 (0.14–0.28) 0.23 (0.15–0.30) 0.18 (0.13–0.26) 0.19 (0.14–0.25) 0.19 (0.15–0.30) 
 Insulin (μIU/mL) 6.92 (4.74–9.93) 7.68 (5.65–12.2) 6.95 (4.69–11.6) 6.5 (3.92–8.93) 6.41 (5.21–8.30) 
 Glucose (mM) 88.0 (82.9–95) 89 (83.9–95) 89 (82.9–98) 88 (83.9–95) 85.9 (82.9–91.5) 
 HOMA-IR 1.51 (0.99–2.29) 1.68 (1.19–2.60) 1.51 (0.90–2.48) 1.33 (0.81–2.13) 1.41 (0.97–1.86) 
 CRP (mg/L) 1.38 (0.73–2.75) 1.74 (0.82–3.4) 1.37 (0.78–2.89) 1.22 (0.70–2.68) 1.21 (0.68–2.3) 
Follow-up biomarker concentrations      
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 9.40 (7.3–12.5) 9 (7.2–12.1) 9.25 (7.1–13) 9.6 (7.1–12.3) 9.85 (7.59–14.3) 
 Estrone (pg/mL) 34.15 (26.7–42.5) 35 (25.7–40.4) 31.65 (26.7–42.5) 34 (26–43.4) 35 (28.6–43.4) 
 SHBG (nmol/L) 43.9 (32.7–59.9) 45.8 (36.6–61.8) 45.8 (35.2–60.7) 43.2 (28.2–59.9) 37.4 (31.8–55.9) 
 Free estradiol (pg/mL) 0.23 (0.17–0.33) 0.23 (0.16–0.29) 0.22 (0.17–0.34) 0.24 (0.18–0.32) 0.27 (0.20–0.36) 
 Insulin (μIU/mL) 7.43 (4.81–11.1) 7.37 (4.32–10.7) 7.13 (4.63–12) 7.77 (4.49–11.6) 8.35 (5.55. 10.15) 
 Glucose (mM) 83.9 (78.4–89.2) 83.84 (78.38–88.22) 83.77 (79.74–89.06) 83.31 (77.5–90.74) 84.59 (78.12–89.59) 
 HOMA-IR 1.59 (0.99–2.37) 1.55 (0.81–2.17) 1.53 (1.07–2.53) 1.62 (0.82–2.54) 1.72 (1.19–2.15) 
 CRP (mg/L) 1.74 (0.88–3.72) 1.44 (0.85–2.88) 2.15 (1.07–4.09) 1.59 (0.85–8.34) 1.72 (1.00–3.82) 
Total physical activity at baseline (MET-h/week) 88.89 (60.64–117.88) 81.79 (51.99–131.13) 88.05 (62.27–110.28) 98.11 (73.46–131.77) 91.44 (60.99–113.01) 
Total physical activity at 12 months (MET-h/week) 114.40 (91.30–141.92) 117.07 (91.46–149.98) 114.15 (91.30–128.44) 117.51 (98.59–143.50) 107.15 (86.61–138.89) 
Total physical activity at follow-up (MET-h/week) 96.75 (71.93–127.02) 104.25 (71.35–142.12) 97.06 (78.77–135.32) 96.08 (71.94–112.31) 87.76 (68.06–114.47) 
Total energy intake at baseline (kcal) 1,361 (1,086–1,756) 1,462 (1121–1,890) 1,323 (963–1,707) 1,322 (1,103–1,838) 1,360 (1,101–1,645) 
Total energy intake at 12 months (kcal) 1,325 (1,030–1,682) 1,331 (1076–1,842) 1,268 (944–1,745) 1,393 (1,130–1,680) 1,299 (960–1,538) 
Total energy intake at follow-up (kcal) 1,309 (1,000–1,734) 1,287 (948–1,699) 1,267 (917–1,722) 1,310 (1,049–1,833) 1,338 (1,159–1,777) 
Participant characteristicsAll participants who had exercise-induced weight loss during the 12-month interventiona (n = 214)Participants who lost/maintained weight loss during follow-up (n = 61)Participants who regained 0.1–2.5 kg during follow-up (n = 66)Participants who regained 2.6–4.9 kg during follow-up (n = 51)Participants who regained ≥5 kg during follow-up (n = 36)
Baseline age (years) 59.1 (56.5–63) 60.0 (56.6–62.0) 59.4 (56.5–64.0) 58.2 (56.7–63.7) 58.6 (55.3–63.1) 
Age at menopause (years) 50 (48–52) 51 (49–52) 50 (47–52) 50 (48–53) 50 (48–52) 
Ethnicity      
 White, n (%) 190 (88.8) 55 (90) 56 (85) 46 (90) 33 (92) 
 Other, n (%) 24 (11.2) 6 (10) 10 (15) 5 (10) 3 (8) 
Employment at baseline      
 Employed full time, n (%) 66 (31.0) 22 (36.0) 18 (27) 16 (31) 10 (28) 
 Not employed full time, n (%) 148 (69.0) 39 (64) 48 (73) 35 (69) 26 (72) 
Education      
 High school or less, n (%) 45 (21.0) 15 (25) 10 (15) 10 (20) 10 (28) 
 Beyond high school, n (%) 169 (79.0) 46 (75) 56 (85) 41 (80) 26 (72) 
Married or common-law at baseline      
 No, n (%) 59 (27.6) 22 (36) 20 (30) 8 (16) 9 (25) 
 Yes, n (%) 155 (72.4) 39 (64) 46 (70) 43 (84) 27 (75) 
Study site      
 Calgary, n (%) 166 (77.6) 47 (77) 46 (70) 43 (84) 30 (83) 
 Edmonton, n (%) 48 (22.4) 14 (23) 20 (30) 8 (16) 6 (17) 
Intervention group      
  High exercise volume 109 (51) 28 (46) 39 (59) 23 (45) 19 (53) 
  Moderate exercise volume 105 (49) 33 (54) 27 (41) 28 (55) 17 (47) 
Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) at baseline 
  User 13 (6) 4 (7) 5 (8) 1 (2) 3 (8) 
  Nonuser 201 (94) 57 (93) 61 (92) 50 (98) 33 (92) 
Use of statin drugs at baseline      
  User 27 (13) 5 (8) 10 (15) 8 (16) 4 (11) 
  Nonuser 187 (87) 56 (92) 56 (85) 43 (84) 32 (89) 
Baseline anthropometrics and body composition     
 Body weight (kg) 75 (67.2–85.9) 73.9 (66–88.3) 73.2 (66.3–80.9) 74.2 (67.1–82.1) 82.8 (74.2–89.3) 
 Fat mass (kg) 29.1 (23.9–36.1) 29.4 (23.7–39.9) 27.8 (22.9–32.8) 28.5 (23.9–34.7) 34.1 (27.0–39.2) 
 Fat-free mass (kg) 43.8 (39.9–47.9) 43.8 (39.9–47.2) 43.3 (38.3–48.3) 42.8 (40.4–47.9) 46.2 (40.7–48.9) 
12-month anthropometrics and body composition     
 Body weight (kg) 69.8 (63.6–8) 70.7 (64.5–85.8) 69.2 (63.2–78.1) 69.1 (63.2–76.9) 73.4 (66.6–81.9) 
 Fat mass (kg) 25.8 (21.1–31.5) 26.2 (21.4–36.2) 24.4 (19.7–29.3) 24.9 (20.4–30.2) 27.3 (22.3–32.1) 
 Fat-free mass (kg) 43.4 (39.8–47.0) 43.4 (39.7–46.1) 43.3 (38.5–46.5) 42.7 (39.8–46.6) 44.4 (41.6–48.4) 
Follow-up anthropometrics and body composition     
 Body weight (kg) 72.4 (65.3–82.5) 68.4 (62.2–80.6) 71 (64.1–80.2) 72.3 (66.7–80.5) 82.5 (74.2–89.1) 
 Fat mass (kg) 27.5 (22.0–33.8) 25.3 (20.6–34.9) 26.1 (21.2–31.4) 28.1 (23.6–32.6) 34.1 (26.8–37.7) 
 Fat-free (kg) 43.6 (39.8–47.1) 42.6 (39.6–45.6) 43.0 (38.3–47.1) 43.3 (40.5–46.9) 46.8 (42.4–48.8) 
Baseline biomarker concentrations      
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 9.45 (7.29–12.62) 9.91 (7.64–12.61) 8.60 (6.55–11.47) 8.88 (7.08–11.59) 11.67 (9.09–13.62) 
 Estrone (pg/mL) 37.91 (30.71–46.27) 40.3 (29.7–47.8) 35.2 (29.9–44.7) 35.6 (27.4–45.3) 39.1 (31.8–48.9) 
 SHBG (nmol/L) 45 (34–60.7) 45.5 (37.3–58) 44.25 (32–64.2) 46.1 (32.6–61.5) 37.25 (30–63.4) 
 Free estradiol (pg/mL) 0.21 (0.15–0.31) 0.23 (0.17–0.31) 0.19 (0.15–0.30) 0.21 (0.15–0.29) 0.28 (0.20–0.35) 
 Insulin (μIU/mL) 8.73 (5.74–12.90) 8.74 (5.77–13.5) 8.37 (5.74–13.2) 8.67 (4.61–13.7) 9.60 (5.97–12.2) 
 Glucose (mM) 91 (85–96) 92 (85–96) 90 (87–96) 92 (85–96) 90 (85–97) 
 HOMA-IR 2.01 (1.23–3.02) 2.11 (1.22–3.03) 1.87 (1.23–2.89) 1.95 (0.99–3.24) 2.24 (1.45–2.65) 
 CRP (mg/L) 1.82 (0.93–3.88) 2.3 (0.96–4) 1.97 (0.93–3.88) 1.5 (0.88–2.9) 1.78 (1.12–4.38) 
12-month biomarker concentrations      
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 8.6 (6.7–11.4) 10.36 (7.2–12.2) 8.1 (6.3–10.9) 8.8 (6.7–10.6) 8.58 (7.1–11.96) 
 Estrone (pg/mL) 35.1 (28.4–45.0) 39.9 (31.05–45.2) 32.9 (27.7–44.8) 34.4 (26.4–44.4) 36.3 (28.4–45.01) 
 SHBG (nmol/L) 49.1 (38–67.3) 46.9 (37.9–60.4) 49.6 (37.7–71) 54.6 (38.1–67.5) 49.2 (39.3–76.5) 
 Free estradiol (pg/mL) 0.20 (0.14–0.28) 0.23 (0.15–0.30) 0.18 (0.13–0.26) 0.19 (0.14–0.25) 0.19 (0.15–0.30) 
 Insulin (μIU/mL) 6.92 (4.74–9.93) 7.68 (5.65–12.2) 6.95 (4.69–11.6) 6.5 (3.92–8.93) 6.41 (5.21–8.30) 
 Glucose (mM) 88.0 (82.9–95) 89 (83.9–95) 89 (82.9–98) 88 (83.9–95) 85.9 (82.9–91.5) 
 HOMA-IR 1.51 (0.99–2.29) 1.68 (1.19–2.60) 1.51 (0.90–2.48) 1.33 (0.81–2.13) 1.41 (0.97–1.86) 
 CRP (mg/L) 1.38 (0.73–2.75) 1.74 (0.82–3.4) 1.37 (0.78–2.89) 1.22 (0.70–2.68) 1.21 (0.68–2.3) 
Follow-up biomarker concentrations      
 Estradiol (pg/mL) 9.40 (7.3–12.5) 9 (7.2–12.1) 9.25 (7.1–13) 9.6 (7.1–12.3) 9.85 (7.59–14.3) 
 Estrone (pg/mL) 34.15 (26.7–42.5) 35 (25.7–40.4) 31.65 (26.7–42.5) 34 (26–43.4) 35 (28.6–43.4) 
 SHBG (nmol/L) 43.9 (32.7–59.9) 45.8 (36.6–61.8) 45.8 (35.2–60.7) 43.2 (28.2–59.9) 37.4 (31.8–55.9) 
 Free estradiol (pg/mL) 0.23 (0.17–0.33) 0.23 (0.16–0.29) 0.22 (0.17–0.34) 0.24 (0.18–0.32) 0.27 (0.20–0.36) 
 Insulin (μIU/mL) 7.43 (4.81–11.1) 7.37 (4.32–10.7) 7.13 (4.63–12) 7.77 (4.49–11.6) 8.35 (5.55. 10.15) 
 Glucose (mM) 83.9 (78.4–89.2) 83.84 (78.38–88.22) 83.77 (79.74–89.06) 83.31 (77.5–90.74) 84.59 (78.12–89.59) 
 HOMA-IR 1.59 (0.99–2.37) 1.55 (0.81–2.17) 1.53 (1.07–2.53) 1.62 (0.82–2.54) 1.72 (1.19–2.15) 
 CRP (mg/L) 1.74 (0.88–3.72) 1.44 (0.85–2.88) 2.15 (1.07–4.09) 1.59 (0.85–8.34) 1.72 (1.00–3.82) 
Total physical activity at baseline (MET-h/week) 88.89 (60.64–117.88) 81.79 (51.99–131.13) 88.05 (62.27–110.28) 98.11 (73.46–131.77) 91.44 (60.99–113.01) 
Total physical activity at 12 months (MET-h/week) 114.40 (91.30–141.92) 117.07 (91.46–149.98) 114.15 (91.30–128.44) 117.51 (98.59–143.50) 107.15 (86.61–138.89) 
Total physical activity at follow-up (MET-h/week) 96.75 (71.93–127.02) 104.25 (71.35–142.12) 97.06 (78.77–135.32) 96.08 (71.94–112.31) 87.76 (68.06–114.47) 
Total energy intake at baseline (kcal) 1,361 (1,086–1,756) 1,462 (1121–1,890) 1,323 (963–1,707) 1,322 (1,103–1,838) 1,360 (1,101–1,645) 
Total energy intake at 12 months (kcal) 1,325 (1,030–1,682) 1,331 (1076–1,842) 1,268 (944–1,745) 1,393 (1,130–1,680) 1,299 (960–1,538) 
Total energy intake at follow-up (kcal) 1,309 (1,000–1,734) 1,287 (948–1,699) 1,267 (917–1,722) 1,310 (1,049–1,833) 1,338 (1,159–1,777) 

Note: Values are reported as median (IQR) and N (%) for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

Abbreviations: Kcal, kilocalories; MET-h/week, metabolic equivalent of task hours per week.

aParticipants who lost weight during the intervention and have complete DXA scans, anthropometry data, blood samples, and covariate measurements.

During the intervention, changes in weight for this sample were −3.60 kg (95% CI, −5.80 to −1.80), and during follow-up, weight regain was 1.80 kg (95% CI, −0.40–3.90). Furthermore, participants who regained more weight during follow-up had more weight loss during the intervention (Table 1). Results for changes in biomarkers, body composition and exercise adherence during the intervention period are described elsewhere (22, 27). For this sample of participants who lost weight during the intervention, a decrease in estradiol, estrone, free estradiol, insulin, HOMA-IR, glucose and CRP, and an increase in SHBG, were observed after the 12-month exercise intervention, which is consistent with lower breast cancer risk (Table 1).

Weight regain during follow-up was significantly associated with increases in estradiol (TER = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04; P < 0.001), estrone (TER = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; P < 0.001), free estradiol (TER = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02–1.05; P < 0.001), and decreases in SHBG (TER = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99; P < 0.001) levels (Fig. 2). Furthermore, weight regain during follow-up was significantly associated with increases in HOMA-IR (TER = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02–1.05; P < 0.001) and insulin (TER = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04; P < 0.001). Nonstatistically significant associations were found for glucose (TER = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99–1.01; P = 0.08) and CRP (TER = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99–1.05; P = 0.08; Fig. 3). Similar results were found when fat mass change, instead of weight change, was used in the model (Supplementary Fig. S1 and S2). When restricting the analyses to women who lost ≥2 kg during the intervention period and had body composition, blood samples and covariate measurements at follow-up (n = 155), results did not change to those noted for the primary analyses. Furthermore, only including women with a BMI >25 kg/m2 at baseline (n = 175) in the statistical model lead to the same results for all biomarkers except for CRP (TER = 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.06; P = 0.02). Finally, our models were adjusted by BMI at baseline and results did not change to our main results.

Figure 2.

Strength of the associations between changes in body weight during follow-up (24 months–12 months) and changes in estradiol (A), estrone (B), free estradiol (C), and SHBG (D) for 214 participants in BETA, Alberta, Canada, 2010–2014. Note: The changes in body weight were calculated for each participant and plotted in the graphs, whereas changes in biomarkers during follow-up are presented by the line of best fit with 95% CIs, and were calculated as individual participant β values derived from the multivariable-adjusted linear regression model and transformed to represent the treatment effect ratio showing the ratio of geometric mean biomarker levels during follow-up (reflecting changes from 12 months to 24 months). A TER <1.0 indicated lower biomarker concentrations with changes in body weight during follow-up and a ratio >1.0 indicated higher biomarker concentrations. Multivariable-adjusted β and 95% CIs were adjusted for the following covariates: age, age at menopause, employment, marital status, education, ethnicity, study site, randomization group, weight loss during the exercise intervention, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and statins, changes in energy intake, fat intake, and total physical activity during follow-up. Abbreviations: upper 95% CI, upper limit of 95% confidence interval; lower 95% CI, lower limit of 95% confidence interval.

Figure 2.

Strength of the associations between changes in body weight during follow-up (24 months–12 months) and changes in estradiol (A), estrone (B), free estradiol (C), and SHBG (D) for 214 participants in BETA, Alberta, Canada, 2010–2014. Note: The changes in body weight were calculated for each participant and plotted in the graphs, whereas changes in biomarkers during follow-up are presented by the line of best fit with 95% CIs, and were calculated as individual participant β values derived from the multivariable-adjusted linear regression model and transformed to represent the treatment effect ratio showing the ratio of geometric mean biomarker levels during follow-up (reflecting changes from 12 months to 24 months). A TER <1.0 indicated lower biomarker concentrations with changes in body weight during follow-up and a ratio >1.0 indicated higher biomarker concentrations. Multivariable-adjusted β and 95% CIs were adjusted for the following covariates: age, age at menopause, employment, marital status, education, ethnicity, study site, randomization group, weight loss during the exercise intervention, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and statins, changes in energy intake, fat intake, and total physical activity during follow-up. Abbreviations: upper 95% CI, upper limit of 95% confidence interval; lower 95% CI, lower limit of 95% confidence interval.

Close modal
Figure 3.

Strength of the associations between changes in body weight during follow-up (24 months–12 months) and changes in insulin (A), glucose (B), HOMA-IR (C), and CRP (D) for 214 participants in BETA, Alberta, Canada, 2010–2014. Note: The changes in body weight were calculated for each participant and plotted in the graphs, whereas changes in biomarkers during follow-up are presented by the line of best fit with 95% CIs, and were calculated as individual participant β values derived from the multivariable-adjusted linear regression model and transformed to represent the treatment effect ratio showing the ratio of geometric mean biomarker levels during follow-up (reflecting changes from 12 months to 24 months). A TER <1.0 indicated lower biomarker concentrations with changes in body weight during follow-up and a ratio >1.0 indicated higher biomarker concentrations. Multivariable-adjusted β and 95% CIs were adjusted for the following covariates: age, age at menopause, employment, marital status, education, ethnicity, study site, randomization group, weight loss during the exercise intervention, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and statins, changes in energy intake, fat intake, and total physical activity during follow-up. Upper 95% CI, upper limit of 95% CI; lower 95% CI, lower limit of 95% CI.

Figure 3.

Strength of the associations between changes in body weight during follow-up (24 months–12 months) and changes in insulin (A), glucose (B), HOMA-IR (C), and CRP (D) for 214 participants in BETA, Alberta, Canada, 2010–2014. Note: The changes in body weight were calculated for each participant and plotted in the graphs, whereas changes in biomarkers during follow-up are presented by the line of best fit with 95% CIs, and were calculated as individual participant β values derived from the multivariable-adjusted linear regression model and transformed to represent the treatment effect ratio showing the ratio of geometric mean biomarker levels during follow-up (reflecting changes from 12 months to 24 months). A TER <1.0 indicated lower biomarker concentrations with changes in body weight during follow-up and a ratio >1.0 indicated higher biomarker concentrations. Multivariable-adjusted β and 95% CIs were adjusted for the following covariates: age, age at menopause, employment, marital status, education, ethnicity, study site, randomization group, weight loss during the exercise intervention, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and statins, changes in energy intake, fat intake, and total physical activity during follow-up. Upper 95% CI, upper limit of 95% CI; lower 95% CI, lower limit of 95% CI.

Close modal

Results from our categorized weight regain analyses revealed increases in all breast cancer–related biomarkers and decreases in SHBG in all weight regain groups compared with those who continued to lose or maintained weight loss during follow-up, with larger associations being noted in participants who regained ≥5 kg during follow-up (Table 2). Furthermore, a statistically significant linear trend of increasing biomarker levels across weight regain categories was found for all biomarkers (Table 2).

Table 2.

Change in biomarker levels from 12 to 24 months between participants who continued to lose weight/maintained weight loss (reference group) compared with participants who regained weight during follow-up from the BETA, Alberta, Canada, 2010–2014.

BiomarkerN12-month unadjusted geometric means (95% CI)a24-month unadjusted geometric means (95% CI)a% Unadjusted changeTER (95% CI)b,cPdPtrende
Estradiol (pg/mL) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 9.99 (8.92–11.19) 9.51 (8.57–10.56) Reference Reference  0.02 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 8.24 (7.43–9.13) 9.56 (8.53–10.71) +23 1.23 (1.07–1.41) 0.003  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 8.29 (7.54–9.13) 9.54 (8.54–10.65) +23 1.23 (1.06–1.41) 0.007  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 9.10 (7.71–10.74) 10.71 (9.21–12.46) +24 1.24 (1.04–1.48) 0.02  
Estrone (pg/mL) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 38.55 (34.89–42.59) 33.74 (30.73–37.04) Reference Reference  0.01 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 35.91 (32.85–39.26) 33.71 (30.90–36.77) +8 1.08 (0.99–1.18) 0.07  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 33.70 (30.47–37.28) 33.13 (30.29–36.24) +13 1.13 (1.03–1.23) 0.01  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 37.84 (33.99–42.13) 36.08 (31.47–41.36) +15 1.15 (1.03–1.28) 0.01  
SHBG (nmol/L) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 49.23 (44.54–54.41) 46.76 (42.13–51.89) Reference Reference  <0.001 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 50.26 (44.62–56.63) 45.05 (40.19–50.51) −7 0.93 (0.86–1.01) 0.09  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 50.56 (44.81–57.05) 42.15 (36.93–48.11) −12 0.88 (0.81–0.96) 0.004  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 52.30 (45.06–60.71) 40.12 (34.78–46.28) −17 0.83 (0.75–0.92) 0.001  
Free estradiol (pg/mL) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 0.23 (0.20–0.26) 0.23 (0.20–0.26) Reference Reference  0.01 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 0.18 (0.16. 0.21) 0.23 (0.21–0.27) +27 1.27 (1.11–1.46) 0.001  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 0.18 (0.16–0.21) 0.24 (0.21–0.27) +28 1.28 (1.10–1.49) 0.002  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 0.20 (0.16–0.24) 0.27 (0.21–0.29) +32 1.32 (1.10–1.59) 0.003  
Insulin (μIU/mL) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 7.56 (6.52–8.78) 6.88 (5.86–8.07) Reference Reference  0.001 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 6.98 (5.98–8.16) 7.34 (6.24–8.64) +18 1.18 (1.03–1.35) 0.02  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 6.15 (5.22–7.26) 7.29 (6.13–8.65) +30 1.30 (1.12–1.51) 0.001  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 6.39 (5.54–7.39) 7.64 (6.45–9.04) +34 1.34 (1.12–1.60) 0.002  
Glucose (mmol/L) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 89.42 (87.46–91.43) 83.17 (81.04–85.35) Reference Reference  0.02 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 89.56 (87.10–92.09) 84.17 (82.39–85.98) +2 1.02 (0.98–1.05) 0.48  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 88.95 (86.52–91.44) 85.91 (82.31–89.66) +3 1.03 (0.99–1.08) 0.09  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 86.33 (84.09–88.63) 84.34 (81.72–87.06) +5 1.05 (1.00–1.10) 0.03  
HOMA-IR 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 1.67 (1.42–1.96) 1.41 (1.19–1.67) Reference Reference  <0.001 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 1.54 (1.30–1.83) 1.53 (1.28–1.81) +20 1.20 (1.03–1.39) 0.02  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 1.35 (1.13–1.61) 1.54 (1.27–1.88) +35 1.35 (1.15–1.58) <0.001  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 1.36 (1.17–1.58) 1.59 (1.33–1.90) +41 1.41 (1.17–1.70) <0.001  
CRP (mg/L) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 1.61 (1.28–2.03) 1.60 (1.26–2.04) Reference Reference  0.05 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 1.39 (1.08–1.80) 1.94 (1.48–2.56) +37 1.37 (1.08–1.74) 0.01  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 1.39 (1.08–1.79) 1.88 (1.37–2.57) +29 1.29 (1.00–1.67) 0.05  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 1.32 (0.98–1.76) 1.87 (1.36–2.55) +42 1.42 (1.04–1.93) 0.03  
BiomarkerN12-month unadjusted geometric means (95% CI)a24-month unadjusted geometric means (95% CI)a% Unadjusted changeTER (95% CI)b,cPdPtrende
Estradiol (pg/mL) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 9.99 (8.92–11.19) 9.51 (8.57–10.56) Reference Reference  0.02 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 8.24 (7.43–9.13) 9.56 (8.53–10.71) +23 1.23 (1.07–1.41) 0.003  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 8.29 (7.54–9.13) 9.54 (8.54–10.65) +23 1.23 (1.06–1.41) 0.007  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 9.10 (7.71–10.74) 10.71 (9.21–12.46) +24 1.24 (1.04–1.48) 0.02  
Estrone (pg/mL) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 38.55 (34.89–42.59) 33.74 (30.73–37.04) Reference Reference  0.01 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 35.91 (32.85–39.26) 33.71 (30.90–36.77) +8 1.08 (0.99–1.18) 0.07  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 33.70 (30.47–37.28) 33.13 (30.29–36.24) +13 1.13 (1.03–1.23) 0.01  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 37.84 (33.99–42.13) 36.08 (31.47–41.36) +15 1.15 (1.03–1.28) 0.01  
SHBG (nmol/L) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 49.23 (44.54–54.41) 46.76 (42.13–51.89) Reference Reference  <0.001 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 50.26 (44.62–56.63) 45.05 (40.19–50.51) −7 0.93 (0.86–1.01) 0.09  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 50.56 (44.81–57.05) 42.15 (36.93–48.11) −12 0.88 (0.81–0.96) 0.004  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 52.30 (45.06–60.71) 40.12 (34.78–46.28) −17 0.83 (0.75–0.92) 0.001  
Free estradiol (pg/mL) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 0.23 (0.20–0.26) 0.23 (0.20–0.26) Reference Reference  0.01 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 0.18 (0.16. 0.21) 0.23 (0.21–0.27) +27 1.27 (1.11–1.46) 0.001  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 0.18 (0.16–0.21) 0.24 (0.21–0.27) +28 1.28 (1.10–1.49) 0.002  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 0.20 (0.16–0.24) 0.27 (0.21–0.29) +32 1.32 (1.10–1.59) 0.003  
Insulin (μIU/mL) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 7.56 (6.52–8.78) 6.88 (5.86–8.07) Reference Reference  0.001 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 6.98 (5.98–8.16) 7.34 (6.24–8.64) +18 1.18 (1.03–1.35) 0.02  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 6.15 (5.22–7.26) 7.29 (6.13–8.65) +30 1.30 (1.12–1.51) 0.001  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 6.39 (5.54–7.39) 7.64 (6.45–9.04) +34 1.34 (1.12–1.60) 0.002  
Glucose (mmol/L) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 89.42 (87.46–91.43) 83.17 (81.04–85.35) Reference Reference  0.02 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 89.56 (87.10–92.09) 84.17 (82.39–85.98) +2 1.02 (0.98–1.05) 0.48  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 88.95 (86.52–91.44) 85.91 (82.31–89.66) +3 1.03 (0.99–1.08) 0.09  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 86.33 (84.09–88.63) 84.34 (81.72–87.06) +5 1.05 (1.00–1.10) 0.03  
HOMA-IR 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 1.67 (1.42–1.96) 1.41 (1.19–1.67) Reference Reference  <0.001 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 1.54 (1.30–1.83) 1.53 (1.28–1.81) +20 1.20 (1.03–1.39) 0.02  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 1.35 (1.13–1.61) 1.54 (1.27–1.88) +35 1.35 (1.15–1.58) <0.001  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 1.36 (1.17–1.58) 1.59 (1.33–1.90) +41 1.41 (1.17–1.70) <0.001  
CRP (mg/L) 
 Weight loss/maintenance 61 1.61 (1.28–2.03) 1.60 (1.26–2.04) Reference Reference  0.05 
 Regained 0.1–2.5 kg 66 1.39 (1.08–1.80) 1.94 (1.48–2.56) +37 1.37 (1.08–1.74) 0.01  
 Regained 2.6–4.9 kg 51 1.39 (1.08–1.79) 1.88 (1.37–2.57) +29 1.29 (1.00–1.67) 0.05  
 Regained ≥5 kg 36 1.32 (0.98–1.76) 1.87 (1.36–2.55) +42 1.42 (1.04–1.93) 0.03  

aGeometric means (lower 95% confidence limit to upper 95% confidence limit) unadjusted at 12 and 24 months.

bTER was estimated from general linear models (24–12 months) for each biomarker, estimating a parameter with anti-logarithm corresponding to the ratio of the adjusted geometric means among each weight regain category versus the reference group. A ratio greater than 1.0 indicates higher levels of biomarkers relative to the reference group; a ratio less than 1.0 indicates a lower biomarker level compared with the reference group; and a ratio equal to 1.0 indicates no differences between comparison groups.

cThese results are adjusted for the following covariates: age, years since menopause, marital status, employment, education, ethnicity, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and statins, study site, randomization group, weight loss during the exercise intervention, changes in energy intake, fat intake, and total physical activity during follow-up.

dP values derived from the model correspond to the differences among each weight regain category with the reference group.

eP trend for testing the linear association between biomarker levels across the weight regain categories.

In this secondary analysis of data collected from a previously conducted exercise intervention trial in postmenopausal women, we found strong associations between breast cancer–related biomarkers and weight regain during the follow-up period in participants who had exercise-induced weight loss. Specifically, during the 12-month follow-up, weight regain was significantly associated with increases in estradiol, estrone, free estradiol, insulin, and HOMA-IR, as well as decreases in SHBG in postmenopausal women, with no associations noted for glucose and CRP. It is important to note that 71% of participants who experienced weight loss during the intervention regained weight during the follow-up period, and this weight regain was mostly attributed to fat mass gains. Furthermore, participants with a higher amount of weight loss during the intervention had larger decreases in biomarkers; however, during the follow-up period, these same participants experienced larger amounts of weight regain, in addition to larger increases in breast cancer–related biomarkers and decreases in SHBG. Finally, our categorical analyses found a linear trend of increasing biomarker levels across weight regain categories, with larger changes found in participants who regained ≥5 kg during follow-up.

There is evidence for an association between weight regain and postmenopausal breast cancer risk; however, the biological mechanisms involved in this relationship need to be further explored (20). Sex hormone concentrations are a plausible mechanism for this relationship (6). Adipose tissue is the main source of estrogen production during menopause via androgen aromatization (28). Increases in fat mass may contribute to circulating sex hormone upregulation, increasing estrogen production, and decreasing SHBG (29). This hormone profile has been associated with increased postmenopausal breast cancer risk (30, 31). Our results found that postmenopausal women who experienced weight regain following exercise-induced weight loss had a 3% increase in estradiol, a 4% increase in free estradiol concentrations, a 2% increase in estrone, and a 2% decrease in SHBG, for every 1 kg increase in body weight. Furthermore, those who regained ≥5 kg during follow-up had a 24% increase in estradiol, 15% in estrone, 32% in free estradiol, and a 17% decrease in SHBG compared with those who lost or maintained weight. It is important to note that, in this study, weight regain was mostly attributed to increases in fat mass. Consistent with our results, a similar lifestyle intervention trial conducted in premenopausal women with obesity and metabolic syndrome found decreased SHBG with a controlled and supervised intentional weight regain phase after an intervention that combined diet and exercise (32). However, to our knowledge, there are no previous trials that have analysed associations between estrogen levels and weight regain. Most previous trials have focused on comparing different approaches to weight loss (e.g., diet, exercise or surgery), and how these approaches may restore sex hormone homeostasis in postmenopausal women with obesity directly or through adiposity reduction, and have found evidence that these interventions can reduce estrogens and increase SHBG in postmenopausal women (33, 34). Future trials assessing sex hormone responses to weight regain in postmenopausal women are needed to corroborate our findings. It is a challenge to estimate the clinical impact of these changes in breast cancer risk since there are no established cut-off points identified to estimated breast cancer risk yet (35). However, existing data support the inclusion of circulating estradiol concentrations in prediction models of breast cancer risk as a future goal (36).

Insulin resistance has been directly and indirectly related to postmenopausal breast cancer risk (37, 38). Insulin has been shown to regulate cancer cell growth and proliferation (39). Indirectly, insulin can inhibit SHBG synthesis in the liver (40), therefore, increasing estrogen bioavailability (41). We found that every 1 kg increase in body weight was significantly associated with a 3% increase in insulin and HOMA-IR, and no statistically significant associations were found for glucose. Furthermore, those who regained ≥5 kg during follow-up had a 34% increase in insulin, 5% increase in glucose, 41% increase in HOMA-IR compared with those who lost or maintained weight. These results are consistent with previous studies that found increases in insulin and HOMA-IR during weight regain after a weight loss program in postmenopausal women (42), as well as other populations, such as breast cancer survivors and pre-diabetic adults (43, 44). Furthermore, another study that included participants with obesity or overweight in a 4- to 6-month weight loss program with diet and exercise, followed by a second phase where participants were randomly assigned into two groups, partial weight regain with exercise or partial weight regain without exercise (45). This study reported that those participants who regained weight without exercise had an increase in insulin and HOMA-IR; however, the decrease in these markers induced by weight loss was maintained in the exercise group regardless of the amount of weight regained (45). Hence, promoting exercise during follow-up may counteract some of the detrimental effects of possible weight regain following the end of a weight loss intervention. Future trials are needed to corroborate these findings and explore the use of different weight maintenance strategies to counteract the negative changes in biologic markers that may occur with weight regain.

Chronic low-grade inflammation is also a hypothesized mechanism related to postmenopausal breast cancer risk (46). Adipose tissue plays an important role in the regulation of inflammation (47) and can release proinflammatory cytokines (5). CRP is produced by the liver and is regulated by two cytokines (IL6 and TNFα; ref. 48). Increased levels of CRP have been associated with several chronic diseases; however, findings are inconsistent in the literature for the association between CRP and breast cancer risk, with some, but not all (49), studies finding a positive association (50). In our results, we noted that every 1 kg increase in body weight was associated with a 2% increase in CRP concentrations, which was nonstatistically significant. Moreover, those who regained ≥5 kg during follow-up had a 42% increase in CRP compared with those who lost/maintained weight. The Diet, Obesity and Genes (DIOGENES) Dietary study was a multicentre, randomized dietary intervention examining the role of different diets on preventing weight regain (51). Results from this trial also found that CRP was associated with weight regain (51). Other studies have also reported an increase in other biomarkers for breast cancer risk, such as IL6 and leptin, with weight regain (43, 52). However, a five-year follow-up study reported that weight cycling after a weight loss program has little influence on systemic inflammation (53). Additional studies are needed to explore associations between CRP and weight regain, as well as other inflammatory markers related to breast cancer risk.

Strengths of BETA include a randomized controlled trial design with a 12-month supervised exercise intervention and a 12-month follow-up period. In addition, gold-standard methods for measuring anthropometry, excellent adherence to the intervention and a highly reputable laboratory for the assessment of the biomarkers all contributed to the success of the trial. A limitation of the study is that the laboratory assays were measured on two different occasions, the first batch of analyses included blood biomarkers for baseline and 12 months and the second included the follow-up assays, and this could potentially influence our results. Despite this limitation, the assays were conducted in a reputable laboratory following standardized protocols with established and excellent performance metrics (21). Furthermore, the use of self-reported measurements of dietary intake and physical activity has inherent limitations. BETA was not designed to be a weight loss trial or to assess the effectiveness of exercise volume on weight loss and subsequent weight maintenance. Finally, our sample included previously inactive postmenopausal women, mostly with overweight or obesity, and therefore our results may be not generalizable to other subgroups of women.

In conclusion, these results suggest that weight regain is associated with changes in several biomarkers related to breast cancer risk. Specifically, weight regain was associated with increases in estradiol, estrone, free estradiol, insulin, HOMA-IR, and decreases in SHBG in postmenopausal women following exercise-induced weight loss. Our results also showed that even a small amount of weight regain was strongly associated with worsened estradiol, free estradiol, insulin, HOMA-IR, and CRP levels. These findings have important clinical implications. Clinical trials that focus on lifestyle interventions need to develop and assess the effectiveness of strategies to prevent negative changes in biomarkers associated with weight regain following successful weight loss. These findings also highlight the importance of weight regain and associated biomarker changes for postmenopausal breast cancer risk, which should be further explored in future randomized controlled trials targeting weight loss. Future studies should also analyse other circulating and tissue-specific markers of breast cancer risk and their association with weight regain after an exercise intervention.

No disclosures were reported.

P. Gonzalo-Encabo: Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing–original draft. J. McNeil: Conceptualization, supervision, methodology, writing–review and editing. A. Pérez-López: Conceptualization, supervision, methodology, writing–review and editing. D. Valades: Conceptualization, supervision, methodology, writing–review and editing. K.S. Courneya: Conceptualization, resources, supervision, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, writing–review and editing. C.M. Friedenreich: Conceptualization, resources, supervision, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, writing–review and editing.

BETA was funded by a research grant from the Alberta Cancer Foundation (#24404) and by the Canadian Cancer Society (#2011–701000). We thank Dr. Frank Stanczyk and his research team in the Reproductive Endocrinology Laboratory in the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California for conducting the assays of the biomarkers presented in this study. We acknowledge Qinggang Wang and Yibing Ruan for their statistical assistance. P. Gonzalo-Encabo is supported by a Predoctoral Fellowship by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports. J. McNeil was supported by Postdoctoral Fellowship Awards from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions. K.S. Courneya holds a Tier I Canada Research Chair. C. Friedenreich held a Health Senior Scholar Award from Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions and the Alberta Cancer Foundation Weekend to End Women's Cancers Breast Cancer Chair during the conduct of the BETA study.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Bray
F
,
Ferlay
J
,
Soerjomataram
I
,
Siegel
RL
,
Torre
LA
,
Jemal
A
. 
Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2018
;
68
:
394
424
.
2.
Neuhouser
ML
,
Aragaki
AK
,
Prentice
RL
,
Manson
JE
,
Chlebowski
R
,
Carty
CL
, et al
Overweight, obesity, and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer risk: A secondary analysis of the women's health initiative randomized clinical trials
.
JAMA Oncol
2015
;
1
:
611
21
.
3.
Suzuki
R
,
Rylander-Rudqvist
T
,
Ye
W
,
Saji
S
,
Wolk
A
. 
Body weight and postmenopausal breast cancer risk defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status among swedish women: A prospective cohort study
.
Int J Cancer
2006
;
119
:
1683
9
.
4.
Rohan
TE
,
Heo
M
,
Choi
L
,
Datta
M
,
Freudenheim
JL
,
Kamensky
V
, et al
Body fat and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: A longitudinal study
.
J Cancer Epidemiol
2013
;
2013
:
754815
.
5.
Simone
V
,
D'Avenia
M
,
Argentiero
A
,
Felici
C
,
Rizzo
FM
,
De Pergola
G
, et al
Obesity and breast cancer: molecular interconnections and potential clinical applications
.
Oncologist
2016
;
21
:
404
17
.
6.
Neilson
HK
,
Conroy
SM
,
Friedenreich
CM
. 
The influence of energetic factors on biomarkers of postmenopausal breast cancer risk
.
Curr Nutr Rep
2014
;
3
:
22
34
.
7.
van Gemert
WA
,
Schuit
AJ
,
van der Palen
J
,
May
AM
,
Iestra
JA
,
Wittink
H
, et al
Effect of weight loss, with or without exercise, on body composition and sex hormones in postmenopausal women: The shape-2 trial
.
Breast Cancer Res
2015
;
17
:
120
.
8.
Gonzalo-Encabo
P
,
Valades
D
,
Garcia-Honduvilla
N
,
de
Cos
,
Blanco
A
,
Friedenreich
CM
, et al
Exercise type and fat mass loss regulate breast cancer-related sex hormones in obese and overweight postmenopausal women
.
Eur J Appl Physiol
2020
;
120
:
1277
87
.
9.
Friedenreich
CM
,
Woolcott
CG
,
McTiernan
A
,
Ballard-Barbash
R
,
Brant
RF
,
Stanczyk
FZ
, et al
Alberta physical activity and breast cancer prevention trial: Sex hormone changes in a year-long exercise intervention among postmenopausal women
.
J Clin Oncol
2010
;
28
:
1458
66
.
10.
McTiernan
A
,
Tworoger
SS
,
Ulrich
CM
,
Yasui
Y
,
Irwin
ML
,
Rajan
KB
, et al
Effect of exercise on serum estrogens in postmenopausal women: A 12-month randomized clinical trial
.
Cancer Res
2004
;
64
:
2923
8
.
11.
Campagnoli
C
,
Berrino
F
,
Venturelli
E
,
Abba
C
,
Biglia
N
,
Brucato
T
, et al
Metformin decreases circulating androgen and estrogen levels in nondiabetic women with breast cancer
.
Clin Breast Cancer
2013
;
13
:
433
8
.
12.
Teras
LR
,
Patel
AV
,
Wang
M
,
Yaun
SS
,
Anderson
K
,
Brathwaite
R
, et al
Sustained weight loss and risk of breast cancer in women >/=50 years: A pooled analysis of prospective data
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2020
;
112
:
929
37
.
13.
Wing
RR
,
Hill
JO
. 
Successful weight loss maintenance
.
Annu Rev Nutr
2001
;
21
:
323
41
.
14.
Funk
MD
,
Lee
M
,
Vidoni
ML
,
Reininger
BM
. 
Weight loss and weight gain among participants in a community-based weight loss challenge
.
BMC Obes
2019
;
6
:
2
.
15.
Anderson
JW
,
Konz
EC
,
Frederich
RC
,
Wood
CL
. 
Long-term weight-loss maintenance: A meta-analysis of us studies
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2001
;
74
:
579
84
.
16.
Martins
C
,
Gower
BA
,
Hill
JO
,
Hunter
GR
. 
Metabolic adaptation is not a major barrier to weight-loss maintenance
.
Am J Clin Nutr
2020
;
112
:
558
65
.
17.
Tannir
H
,
Itani
L
,
El Masri
D
,
Kreidieh
D
,
El Ghoch
M
. 
Lifetime weight cycling and central fat distribution in females with obesity: a brief report
.
Diseases
2020
;
8
:
8
.
18.
Zou
H
,
Yin
P
,
Liu
L
,
Duan
W
,
Li
P
,
Yang
Y
, et al
Association between weight cycling and risk of developing diabetes in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
.
J Diabetes Investig
2020
;
12
:
625
32
.
19.
McNeil
J
,
Liepert
M
,
Brenner
DR
,
Courneya
KS
,
Friedenreich
CM
. 
Behavioral predictors of weight regain in postmenopausal women: Exploratory results from the breast cancer and exercise trial in alberta
.
Obesity
2019
;
27
:
1451
63
.
20.
Welti
LM
,
Beavers
DP
,
Caan
BJ
,
Sangi-Haghpeykar
H
,
Vitolins
MZ
,
Beavers
KM.
Weight fluctuation and cancer risk in postmenopausal women: The women's health initiative
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2017
;
26
:
779
86
.
21.
Friedenreich
CM
,
Wang
Q
,
Yasui
Y
,
Stanczyk
FZ
,
Duha
A
,
Brenner
DR
, et al
Long-term effects of moderate versus high durations of aerobic exercise on biomarkers of breast cancer risk: Follow-up to a randomized controlled trial
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2019
;
28
:
1725
34
.
22.
Friedenreich
CM
,
Neilson
HK
,
Wang
Q
,
Stanczyk
FZ
,
Yasui
Y
,
Duha
A
, et al
Effects of exercise dose on endogenous estrogens in postmenopausal women: A randomized trial
.
Endocr Relat Cancer
2015
;
22
:
863
76
.
23.
Friedenreich
CM
,
MacLaughlin
S
,
Neilson
HK
,
Stanczyk
FZ
,
Yasui
Y
,
Duha
A
, et al
Study design and methods for the breast cancer and exercise trial in alberta (beta)
.
BMC Cancer
2014
;
14
:
919
.
24.
Rinaldi
S
,
Geay
A
,
Dechaud
H
,
Biessy
C
,
Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
A
,
Akhmedkhanov
A
, et al
Validity of free testosterone and free estradiol determinations in serum samples from postmenopausal women by theoretical calculations
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2002
;
11
(
10 Pt 1
):
1065
71
.
25.
Friedenreich
CM
,
Courneya
KS
,
Neilson
HK
,
Matthews
CE
,
Willis
G
,
Irwin
M
, et al
Reliability and validity of the past year total physical activity questionnaire
.
Am J Epidemiol
2006
;
163
:
959
70
.
26.
Lynn
C
,
Cameron
C
,
Bauman
A
.
Socio-demographic and lifestyle correlates of obesity. Technical report on the secondary analyses using the 2000–2001 Canadian community health survey
. 
2005
.
Available from:
https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/Sociodemographic_Lifestyle_e.pdf.
27.
Friedenreich
CM
,
Neilson
HK
,
O'Reilly
R
,
Duha
A
,
Yasui
Y
,
Morielli
AR
, et al
Effects of a high vs moderate volume of aerobic exercise on adiposity outcomes in postmenopausal women: A randomized clinical trial
.
JAMA Oncol
2015
;
1
:
766
76
.
28.
Nelson
LR
,
Bulun
SE
. 
Estrogen production and action
.
J Am Acad Dermatol
2001
;
45
:
S116
24
.
29.
Cleary
MP
,
Grossmann
ME
. 
Minireview: obesity and breast cancer: the estrogen connection
.
Endocrinology
2009
;
150
:
2537
42
.
30.
Key
T
,
Appleby
P
,
Barnes
I
,
Reeves
G
,
Endogenous
H
. 
Breast Cancer Collaborative G. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: Reanalysis of nine prospective studies
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2002
;
94
:
606
16
.
31.
Bhardwaj
P
,
Au
CC
,
Benito-Martin
A
,
Ladumor
H
,
Oshchepkova
S
,
Moges
R
, et al
Estrogens and breast cancer: Mechanisms involved in obesity-related development, growth and progression
.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol
2019
;
189
:
161
70
.
32.
Aubuchon
M
,
Liu
Y
,
Petroski
GF
,
Thomas
TR
,
Polotsky
AJ
. 
The impact of supervised weight loss and intentional weight regain on sex hormone binding globulin and testosterone in premenopausal women
.
Syst Biol Reprod Med
2016
;
62
:
283
9
.
33.
Ernst
B
,
Wilms
B
,
Thurnheer
M
,
Schultes
B
. 
Reduced circulating androgen levels after gastric bypass surgery in severely obese women
.
Obes Surg
2013
;
23
:
602
7
.
34.
de Roon
M
,
May
AM
,
McTiernan
A
,
Scholten
R
,
Peeters
PHM
,
Friedenreich
CM
, et al
Effect of exercise and/or reduced calorie dietary interventions on breast cancer-related endogenous sex hormones in healthy postmenopausal women
.
Breast Cancer Res
2018
;
20
:
81
.
35.
Santen
RJ
,
Pinkerton
JV
,
Liu
JH
,
Matsumoto
AM
,
Lobo
RA
,
Davis
SR
, et al
Workshop on normal reference ranges for estradiol in postmenopausal women, september 2019, chicago, illinois
.
Menopause
2020
;
27
:
614
24
.
36.
Tworoger
SS
,
Zhang
X
,
Eliassen
AH
,
Qian
J
,
Colditz
GA
,
Willett
WC
, et al
Inclusion of endogenous hormone levels in risk prediction models of postmenopausal breast cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
2014
;
32
:
3111
7
.
37.
Kang
C
,
LeRoith
D
,
Gallagher
EJ
. 
Diabetes, obesity, and breast cancer
.
Endocrinology
2018
;
159
:
3801
12
.
38.
Schmidt
S
,
Monk
JM
,
Robinson
LE
,
Mourtzakis
M
. 
The integrative role of leptin, oestrogen and the insulin family in obesity-associated breast cancer: Potential effects of exercise
.
Obes Rev
2015
;
16
:
473
87
.
39.
Gallagher
EJ
,
LeRoith
D
. 
The proliferating role of insulin and insulin-like growth factors in cancer
.
Trends Endocrinol Metab
2010
;
21
:
610
8
.
40.
Le
TN
,
Nestler
JE
,
Strauss
JF
 3rd
,
Wickham
EP
 3rd
. 
Sex hormone-binding globulin and type 2 diabetes mellitus
.
Trends Endocrinol Metab
2012
;
23
:
32
40
.
41.
Fortunati
N
,
Catalano
MG
,
Boccuzzi
G
,
Frairia
R
. 
Sex hormone-binding globulin (shbg), estradiol and breast cancer
.
Mol Cell Endocrinol
2010
;
316
:
86
92
.
42.
Beavers
DP
,
Beavers
KM
,
Lyles
MF
,
Nicklas
BJ
. 
Cardiometabolic risk after weight loss and subsequent weight regain in overweight and obese postmenopausal women
.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
2013
;
68
:
691
8
.
43.
Befort
CA
,
Kimler
BF
,
Bantis
LE
,
Phillips
TA
,
Fabian
CJ
. 
Effects of weight loss and weight regain on circulating biomarkers in overweight/obese breast cancer survivors enrolled in a weight loss trial in the rural midwest
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2020
;
29
:
1321
8
.
44.
Beavers
KM
,
Case
LD
,
Blackwell
CS
,
Katula
JA
,
Goff
DC
 Jr
,
Vitolins
MZ
. 
Effects of weight regain following intentional weight loss on glucoregulatory function in overweight and obese adults with pre-diabetes
.
Obes Res Clin Pract
2015
;
9
:
266
73
.
45.
Thomas
TR
,
Warner
SO
,
Dellsperger
KC
,
Hinton
PS
,
Whaley-Connell
AT
,
Rector
RS
, et al
Exercise and the metabolic syndrome with weight regain
.
J Appl Physiol 1985
, 
2010
;
109
:
3
10
.
46.
Crespi
E
,
Bottai
G
,
Santarpia
L
. 
Role of inflammation in obesity-related breast cancer
.
Curr Opin Pharmacol
2016
;
31
:
114
22
.
47.
Rose
DP
,
Vona-Davis
L
. 
Biochemical and molecular mechanisms for the association between obesity, chronic inflammation, and breast cancer
.
Biofactors
2014
;
40
:
1
12
.
48.
Chan
DS
,
Bandera
EV
,
Greenwood
DC
,
Norat
T
. 
Circulating c-reactive protein and breast cancer risk-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2015
;
24
:
1439
49
.
49.
Nelson
SH
,
Brasky
TM
,
Patterson
RE
,
Laughlin
GA
,
Kritz-Silverstein
D
,
Edwards
BJ
, et al
The association of the c-reactive protein inflammatory biomarker with breast cancer incidence and mortality in the women's health initiative
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2017
;
26
:
1100
6
.
50.
Kehm
RD
,
McDonald
JA
,
Fenton
SE
,
Kavanaugh-Lynch
M
,
Leung
KA
,
McKenzie
KE
, et al
Inflammatory biomarkers and breast cancer risk: A systematic review of the evidence and future potential for intervention research
.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
2020
;
17
:
5445
.
51.
Wang
P
,
Holst
C
,
Astrup
A
,
Bouwman
FG
,
van Otterdijk
S
,
Wodzig
WK
, et al
Blood profiling of proteins and steroids during weight maintenance with manipulation of dietary protein level and glycaemic index
.
Br J Nutr
2012
;
107
:
106
19
.
52.
Ambeba
EJ
,
Styn
MA
,
Kuller
LH
,
Brooks
MM
,
Evans
RW
,
Burke
LE
. 
Longitudinal effects of weight loss and regain on cytokine concentration of obese adults
.
Metabolism
2013
;
62
:
1218
22
.
53.
Olszanecka-Glinianowicz
M
,
Chudek
J
,
Szromek
A
,
Zahorska-Markiewicz
B
. 
Changes of systemic microinflammation after weight loss and regain - a five-year follow up study
.
Endokrynol Pol
2012
;
63
:
432
8
.

Supplementary data