Huang and colleagues (1) reported on the relationship between papillary thyroid cancer risk and prediagnostic levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and lent support to our previous findings (2) on the existence of an inverse association. The two studies were case–control studies nested in very different populations, that is, U.S. military staff mainly below age 50 years (400 male and 341 female cases; ref. 1) and healthy volunteers from the European Prospective Investigation in Cancer and Nutrition cohort (300 and 57, respectively, median age 51; ref. 2). The strength of the inverse association among the vast majority of women and men who had TSH levels within the reference limits was similar, that is, ORs of approximately 0.60 in the highest versus the lowest tertile in Huang and colleagues (1) or gender-specific quartile in our study (2). However, gender-specific analyses of individuals with TSH levels outside the reference limits led Huang and colleagues (1) to a different conclusion, that is, that increased thyroid cancer risk was associated with TSH below the reference limits among women but above the reference limits among men (1). We caution against overinterpreting differences by gender in these subgroups that are small (1) and potentially attributable to different thyroid problems (3, 4). Of note, the reference limits of TSH are controversial (3), and calls have been made to define them on the basis of age, sex, race, and amount of iodine intake (3, 4) and, notably, to lower or increase the current upper limit of approximately 4.0 mU/l (3). Small numbers in gender-specific analyses may also blur, in our view, the overall appreciation of the influence of TSH level on thyroid cancer risk depending on tumor size (≤/>10 mm) or papillary subtype (classical or the rare follicular subtype; ref. 1). Although the attempt to show data on TSH in an unprecedented granular form must be commended, we think that subgroup findings should be considered hypothesis generating and do not eclipse the substantial agreement between the U.S. (1) and European (2) study. The counterintuitive inverse association between TSH level and differentiated thyroid cancer risk has needed large cohort studies to emerge and deserves to be studied again in different populations. However, as stated by Huang and colleagues (1), a better understanding of the implications of TSH levels in the onset and management of an increasingly common cancer (5) may have important consequences, including the avoidance of unnecessary and even harmful treatments in people with and without differentiated thyroid cancer.

See the Response, p. 228

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

1.
Huang
H
,
Rusiecki
J
,
Zhao
N
,
Chen
Y
,
Ma
S
,
Yu
H
, et al
Thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroid hormones, and risk of papillary thyroid cancer: a nested case-control study
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2017
;
26
:
1209
18
.
2.
Rinaldi
S
,
Plummer
M
,
Biessy
C
,
Tsilidis
KK
,
Ostergaard
JN
,
Overvad
K
, et al
Thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroglobulin, and thyroid hormones and risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: the EPIC study
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2014
;
106
:
dju097
.
3.
Laurberg
P
,
Andersen
S
,
Carle
A
,
Karmisholt
J
,
Knudsen
N
,
Pedersen
IB
. 
The TSH upper reference limit: where are we at?
Nat Rev Endocrinol
2011
;
7
:
232
9
.
4.
Kussmaul
T
,
Greiser
KH
,
Haerting
J
,
Werdan
K
,
Thiery
J
,
Kratzsch
J
. 
Thyroid analytes TSH, FT3 and FT4 in serum of healthy elderly subjects as measured by the Roche modular system: do we need age and gender dependent reference levels?
Clin Lab
2014
;
60
:
1551
9
.
5.
Vaccarella
S
,
Franceschi
S
,
Bray
F
,
Wild
CP
,
Plummer
M
,
Dal Maso
L
. 
Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic? The increasing impact of overdiagnosis
.
N Engl J Med
2016
;
375
:
614
7
.