Background: Hypertension potentiates cardiovascular risk in survivors of childhood cancer previously exposed to cardiotoxic therapies, so it is important to determine the prevalence and risk factors for hypertensive blood pressure in this high-risk group.

Methods: Participants included 3,016 adult 10-year survivors of childhood cancer who had resting blood pressure measurements performed at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (Memphis, TN). We characterized the blood pressure status of participants, calculated standardized prevalence ratios based on U.S. population rates, and examined demographic and treatment factors associated with hypertensive blood pressure using logistic regression.

Results: The age-specific cumulative prevalence of hypertension in survivors increased sharply with age, exceeding 70% by age 50, and was substantially higher in all diagnosis groups than expected on the basis of age-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and BMI-specific population rates. Specific cancer treatments were not significantly associated with hypertension, with the exception of nephrectomy (OR, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–2.53). Previously undiagnosed hypertensive blood pressure was identified in 8% of survivors, and uncontrolled hypertension in 22% of those with a previous hypertension diagnosis. In a subset (n = 1,185) with longitudinal blood pressure measurements (mean interval, 3.6 years), 5% and 21% of participants with previously normal blood pressure developed hypertensive and prehypertensive blood pressure, respectively.

Conclusions: Survivors of childhood cancer have a higher prevalence of hypertension compared with the general population, and many have uncontrolled hypertension that may exacerbate treatment-related cardiovascular risks.

Impact: Our results suggest enhanced clinical attention to blood pressure status is warranted in all survivors, regardless of diagnosis or cancer treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(12); 1705–13. ©2017 AACR.

Improvements in treatment and supportive care have dramatically increased survival after pediatric malignancies, with more than 83% of children now surviving at least 5 years and most becoming long-term survivors (1). Unfortunately, the growing population of childhood cancer survivors, currently exceeding 420,000 in the United States, experiences a wide range of adverse late health effects (2). Prominent among these late effects is cardiovascular disease, the leading noncancer cause of mortality and morbidity in survivors (3–8). Cardiovascular disease–related deaths are eight times more likely in childhood cancer survivors compared with the general population (9), and serious cardiac events are more than five times more likely in survivors compared with siblings (6).

Much of the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in survivors can be attributed to childhood exposure to chest-directed radiation and/or high-dose anthracyclines. However, aging survivors are increasingly susceptible to the same risk factors that impact the general population, including hypertension, obesity, and dyslipidemia (10). Cancer therapies, including exposure to specific chemotherapeutic agents (alkylating agents, antimetabolites, and heavy metals) and abdominal radiation, are considered risk factors for hypertension and indicators for active surveillance (11). Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease in the general population (12), with recent evidence indicating it is particularly harmful in survivors of childhood cancer previously exposed to cardiotoxic treatments. A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) found that although both cardiotoxic treatments and hypertension were independently associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease or heart failure, the combination of these factors resulted in a greater than additive increase in risk that yielded an 86-fold increased risk of heart failure in survivors exposed to both anthracyclines and hypertension compared with neither factor (10). This suggests that development of hypertension can exacerbate the damage caused by cardiotoxic cancer treatments (13, 14).

Given the importance of hypertension as an adverse modifying factor for cardiac disease in childhood cancer survivors, there is a clear need to better understand the blood pressure status of this unique population. Limitations of previous studies such as reliance on self-reported hypertension, small samples, inclusion of only specific diagnosis groups, and lack of age-specific rates have precluded a comprehensive understanding of blood pressure abnormalities in adult survivors of childhood cancer (15–27). The goal of this analysis was to examine clinically assessed blood pressures in a large cohort of well-characterized childhood cancer survivors with longitudinal follow-up.

Participants

Survivors of childhood cancer treated at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJCRH, Memphis, TN) who were at least 18 years of age and at least 10 years from diagnosis were eligible to enroll in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE). The goal of SJLIFE is to provide ongoing medical assessments of survivors to advance knowledge of long-term health outcomes; details regarding recruitment and study design have been presented previously (28, 29). In brief, the SJLIFE study is a retrospective cohort with prospective follow-up in which participants returned to SJCRH to undergo comprehensive risk-based medical evaluations based on the Children's Oncology Group's Long Term Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers (30). Data collection included abstraction of medical records, completion of health questionnaires, neuromuscular functional assessment, and collection of biological samples. Additional retrospective clinical and diagnostic records were obtained from community providers and the After Completion of Therapy (ACT) Clinic at SJCRH and validated for presence of a prior hypertension diagnosis and treatment (28). The protocol was approved by the SJCRH Institutional Review Board, and all participants provided informed consent. Of 5,067 eligible survivors, 3,016 enrolled in SJLIFE and completed a baseline on-campus evaluation as of June 30, 2015, that included a standardized measurement of resting blood pressure in the St. Jude Human Performance Laboratory. Participants are brought back to SJCRH for follow-up assessments at least once every 5 years according to a research-driven schedule; at the time of this analysis, 1,185 participants had multiple visits resulting in longitudinal blood pressure measurements (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Diagram showing flow of participation in this analysis.

Figure 1.

Diagram showing flow of participation in this analysis.

Close modal

Outcome measures

Blood pressures were obtained by trained clinical staff following a 5-minute rest in a seated position. Three consecutive measurements, separated by a 1-minute rest, were obtained using a calibrated sphygmomanometer. At least two consecutive valid measurements were required for inclusion in this analysis, and blood pressure status was determined on the basis of the average of these measurements. Use of antihypertensive medications was determined by survivor report and review of medical records.

Blood pressure status was defined on the basis of the highest category of systolic or diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) as normal (SBP <120 and DBP <80 mm Hg), prehypertension (SBP 120–139 or DBP 80–89) or hypertension (SBP ≥140 or DBP ≥90 mm Hg; ref. 31). Participants were considered to have hypertension if they had measured blood pressure in the hypertensive range or had been previously diagnosed and were taking antihypertensive medications. Date of onset was the start date for medications according to medical records or the date of hypertensive blood pressure measurement. Undiagnosed hypertensive blood pressure was defined as a measured blood pressure in the hypertensive range in a participant with no previously identified hypertension. Similarly, uncontrolled hypertension was defined as a measurement in the hypertensive range among participants with previously identified hypertension.

Treatment exposures and covariates

Details regarding childhood cancer diagnosis and treatment were obtained from medical records, including site and dose of radiotherapy received, as well as specific chemotherapeutic agents and cumulative doses administered. Alkylating agents were collectively characterized according to the cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED; ref. 32). Participant characteristics were obtained from structured questionnaires in conjunction with medical/social history obtained during SJLIFE clinic visits. These included annual household income (≤$20,000, $20,000–$59,999, or ≥$60,000) and smoking status (never, former, or current). Height and weight were measured and used to categorize participants into body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) categories per the World Health Organization (underweight <18.5, normal 18.5–24.9, overweight 25.0–29.9, or obese ≥30.0 kg/m2; ref. 33).

Statistical analysis

Demographic, diagnosis, and treatment characteristics were compared using χ2 tests for participants and nonparticipants in SJLIFE, as well as for participants with a single baseline SJLIFE assessment and those with at least one subsequent follow-up assessment. We incorporated age at first identification of hypertension to plot age-specific Kaplan–Meier cumulative prevalence curves along with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) among SJLIFE participants, both overall and stratified by sex or race. Time at risk for each individual ended at the earliest of hypertension identification or most recent SJLIFE assessment. In addition, participants were categorized according to blood pressure status at their first SJLIFE assessment, and characteristics associated with prevalence of hypertension were identified using multivariable logistic regression models to estimate ORs and 95% CIs. The observed prevalence of hypertension in survivors was compared with the prevalence that would be expected based on age-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and BMI category–specific rates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011–2012 NHANES), which used similar methods to identify and classify hypertension (34).

Participants without previously diagnosed hypertension were considered to be at risk for undiagnosed hypertensive blood pressure, and we calculated the proportion of those participants who were identified as having hypertensive blood pressure at their initial SJLIFE assessment. Conversely, participants with a prior hypertension diagnosis were considered to be at risk for uncontrolled hypertension and served as the denominator for calculating the proportion of participants with uncontrolled hypertension at their initial SJLIFE assessment. Univariate associations between demographic and treatment characteristics and prevalence of undiagnosed or uncontrolled hypertension were estimated by logistic regression, and only characteristics associated with P < 0.10 were included in multivariable models. Finally, within the subgroup with multiple SJLIFE assessments, we examined longitudinal changes in blood pressure status and associations between participant characteristics and changes in blood pressure category.

Of the 3,016 participants in this analysis, a slightly higher proportion were male (52%), the majority were non-Hispanic white (83%), and the mean age at initial SJLIFE assessment was 32 years (Table 1). Participants were more likely to be female compared with nonparticipants, and modest differences in the distribution of primary cancer diagnoses were reflected in higher proportions of participants being exposed to radiation or chemotherapy. Participants who returned for multiple SJLIFE assessments were older and more likely to be non-Hispanic white, and they had higher rates of exposure to radiation, alkylating agents, and epipodophyllotoxins compared with those who had not yet returned for a second assessment.

Table 1.

Characteristics of SJLIFE participants and nonparticipants

Nonparticipants (n = 1,673)Participants (n = 3,016)Only one SJLIFE visit (n = 1,831)Multiple SJLIFE visits (n = 1,185)
n (%)n (%)Pan (%)n (%)Pb
Sex 
 Male 977 (58.4) 1,576 (52.3) <0.0001 981 (53.6) 595 (50.2) 0.07 
 Female 696 (41.6) 1,440 (47.8)  850 (46.4) 590 (49.8)  
Race 
 Non-Hispanic white 1,361 (81.4) 2,491 (82.6) 0.66 1,485 (81.1) 1,006 (84.9) <0.0001 
 Non-Hispanic black 261 (15.6) 432 (14.3)  270 (14.8) 162 (13.7)  
 Non-Hispanic other 20 (1.2) 33 (1.1)  23 (1.3) 10 (0.8)  
 Hispanic 31 (1.9) 60 (2.0)  53 (2.9) 7 (0.6)  
Age at assessment, y 
 18–29 — 1,386 (46.0) — 971 (53.0) 415 (35.0) <0.0001 
 30–39 — 1,093 (36.2)  610 (33.3) 483 (40.8)  
 40–49 — 453 (15.0)  206 (11.3) 247 (20.8)  
 ≥50 — 84 (2.8)  44 (2.4) 40 (3.4)  
 Mean (SD) age at assessment, y — 31.93 (8.44) — 30.58 (8.28) 34.03 (8.26) <0.0001 
Age at diagnosis, y 
 0—4 628 (37.5) 1,131 (37.5) 0.91 726 (39.7) 405 (34.2) <0.0001 
 5—9 401 (24.0) 710 (23.5)  441 (24.1) 269 (22.7)  
 10—14 366 (21.9) 686 (22.8)  411 (22.5) 275 (23.2)  
 ≥15 278 (16.6) 489 (16.2)  253 (13.8) 236 (19.9)  
Time since diagnosis, y 
 10—19 — 1,160 (38.5) — 809 (44.2) 351 (29.6) <0.0001 
 20—29 — 1,163 (38.6)  674 (36.8) 489 (41.3)  
 30–39 — 590 (19.6)  293 (16.0) 297 (25.1)  
 ≥40 — 103 (3.4)  55 (3.0) 48 (4.1)  
Primary diagnosis 
 Leukemia 585 (35.0) 1,123 (37.2) 0.02 695 (38.0) 428 (36.1) <0.0001 
 CNS tumor 171 (10.2) 308 (10.2)  185 (10.1) 123 (10.4)  
 Hodgkin lymphoma 180 (10.8) 361 (12.0)  147 (8.0) 214 (18.1)  
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 149 (8.9) 221 (7.3)  158 (8.6) 63 (5.2)  
 Neuroblastoma 71 (4.2) 138 (4.6)  84 (4.6) 54 (4.6)  
 Wilms tumor 117 (7.0) 198 (6.6)  121 (6.6) 77 (6.5)  
 Soft tissue sarcoma 56 (3.4) 82 (2.7)  63 (3.4) 19 (1.6)  
 Bone tumor 154 (9.2) 312 (10.3)  170 (9.3) 142 (12.0)  
 Retinoblastoma 43 (2.6) 90 (3.0)  55 (3.0) 35 (3.0)  
 Germ cell tumors 57 (3.4) 67 (2.2)  51 (2.8) 16 (1.4)  
 Other solid tumor 90 (5.4) 116 (3.9)  102 (5.6) 14 (1.2)  
Treatment exposure 
 Any radiation 876 (52.4) 1,768 (58.6) <0.0001 945 (51.6) 823 (69.5) <0.0001 
 Chest radiation 459 (27.4) 882 (29.2) 0.19 412 (22.5) 470 (39.7) <0.0001 
 Cranial radiation 520 (31.1) 1,053 (34.9) 0.01 594 (32.4) 459 (38.7) 0.0004 
 Abdominal/pelvic radiation 398 (23.8) 739 (24.5) 0.59 361 (19.7) 378 (31.9) <0.0001 
 Any chemotherapy 1,388 (83.0) 2,587 (85.8) 0.01 1,555 (84.9) 1,032 (87.1) 0.10 
 Anthracyclines 932 (55.7) 1,768 (58.6) 0.05 1,083 (59.2) 685 (57.8) 0.46 
 Alkylating agents 1,011 (60.4) 1,903 (63.1) 0.07 1,109 (60.6) 794 (67.0) 0.0003 
 Platinum 210 (12.6) 373 (12.4) 0.85 231 (12.6) 142 (12.0) 0.61 
 Glucocorticoids 751 (44.9) 1,431 (47.5) 0.09 869 (47.5) 562 (47.4) 0.99 
 Epipodophyllotoxins 564 (33.7) 1,128 (37.4) 0.01 735 (40.1) 393 (33.2) 0.0001 
 Antimetabolites 844 (50.5) 1,586 (52.6) 0.16 982 (53.6) 604 (51.0) 0.15 
 Nephrectomy 120 (7.2) 226 (7.5) 0.69 138 (7.5) 88 (7.4) 0.91 
BMI, kg/m2 
 <18.5 — 111 (3.7) — 67 (3.7) 44 (3.7) 0.56 
 18.5–24.9 — 1,001 (33.2)  627 (34.2) 374 (31.6)  
 25.0–29.9 — 845 (28.0)  505 (27.6) 340 (28.7)  
 30.0–39.9 — 829 (27.5)  499 (27.3) 330 (27.9)  
 ≥40.0 — 228 (7.6)  131 (7.2) 97 (8.2)  
 Unable to determine — 2 (0.1)  2 (0.1) —  
Smoking status 
 Never smoked — 1,930 (64.0) — 1,153 (63.0) 777 (65.6) 0.006 
 Former smoker — 338 (11.2)  184 (10.1) 154 (13.0)  
 Current smoker — 704 (23.3)  454 (24.8) 250 (21.1)  
 Unknown — 44 (1.5)  40 (2.2) 4 (0.3)  
Nonparticipants (n = 1,673)Participants (n = 3,016)Only one SJLIFE visit (n = 1,831)Multiple SJLIFE visits (n = 1,185)
n (%)n (%)Pan (%)n (%)Pb
Sex 
 Male 977 (58.4) 1,576 (52.3) <0.0001 981 (53.6) 595 (50.2) 0.07 
 Female 696 (41.6) 1,440 (47.8)  850 (46.4) 590 (49.8)  
Race 
 Non-Hispanic white 1,361 (81.4) 2,491 (82.6) 0.66 1,485 (81.1) 1,006 (84.9) <0.0001 
 Non-Hispanic black 261 (15.6) 432 (14.3)  270 (14.8) 162 (13.7)  
 Non-Hispanic other 20 (1.2) 33 (1.1)  23 (1.3) 10 (0.8)  
 Hispanic 31 (1.9) 60 (2.0)  53 (2.9) 7 (0.6)  
Age at assessment, y 
 18–29 — 1,386 (46.0) — 971 (53.0) 415 (35.0) <0.0001 
 30–39 — 1,093 (36.2)  610 (33.3) 483 (40.8)  
 40–49 — 453 (15.0)  206 (11.3) 247 (20.8)  
 ≥50 — 84 (2.8)  44 (2.4) 40 (3.4)  
 Mean (SD) age at assessment, y — 31.93 (8.44) — 30.58 (8.28) 34.03 (8.26) <0.0001 
Age at diagnosis, y 
 0—4 628 (37.5) 1,131 (37.5) 0.91 726 (39.7) 405 (34.2) <0.0001 
 5—9 401 (24.0) 710 (23.5)  441 (24.1) 269 (22.7)  
 10—14 366 (21.9) 686 (22.8)  411 (22.5) 275 (23.2)  
 ≥15 278 (16.6) 489 (16.2)  253 (13.8) 236 (19.9)  
Time since diagnosis, y 
 10—19 — 1,160 (38.5) — 809 (44.2) 351 (29.6) <0.0001 
 20—29 — 1,163 (38.6)  674 (36.8) 489 (41.3)  
 30–39 — 590 (19.6)  293 (16.0) 297 (25.1)  
 ≥40 — 103 (3.4)  55 (3.0) 48 (4.1)  
Primary diagnosis 
 Leukemia 585 (35.0) 1,123 (37.2) 0.02 695 (38.0) 428 (36.1) <0.0001 
 CNS tumor 171 (10.2) 308 (10.2)  185 (10.1) 123 (10.4)  
 Hodgkin lymphoma 180 (10.8) 361 (12.0)  147 (8.0) 214 (18.1)  
 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 149 (8.9) 221 (7.3)  158 (8.6) 63 (5.2)  
 Neuroblastoma 71 (4.2) 138 (4.6)  84 (4.6) 54 (4.6)  
 Wilms tumor 117 (7.0) 198 (6.6)  121 (6.6) 77 (6.5)  
 Soft tissue sarcoma 56 (3.4) 82 (2.7)  63 (3.4) 19 (1.6)  
 Bone tumor 154 (9.2) 312 (10.3)  170 (9.3) 142 (12.0)  
 Retinoblastoma 43 (2.6) 90 (3.0)  55 (3.0) 35 (3.0)  
 Germ cell tumors 57 (3.4) 67 (2.2)  51 (2.8) 16 (1.4)  
 Other solid tumor 90 (5.4) 116 (3.9)  102 (5.6) 14 (1.2)  
Treatment exposure 
 Any radiation 876 (52.4) 1,768 (58.6) <0.0001 945 (51.6) 823 (69.5) <0.0001 
 Chest radiation 459 (27.4) 882 (29.2) 0.19 412 (22.5) 470 (39.7) <0.0001 
 Cranial radiation 520 (31.1) 1,053 (34.9) 0.01 594 (32.4) 459 (38.7) 0.0004 
 Abdominal/pelvic radiation 398 (23.8) 739 (24.5) 0.59 361 (19.7) 378 (31.9) <0.0001 
 Any chemotherapy 1,388 (83.0) 2,587 (85.8) 0.01 1,555 (84.9) 1,032 (87.1) 0.10 
 Anthracyclines 932 (55.7) 1,768 (58.6) 0.05 1,083 (59.2) 685 (57.8) 0.46 
 Alkylating agents 1,011 (60.4) 1,903 (63.1) 0.07 1,109 (60.6) 794 (67.0) 0.0003 
 Platinum 210 (12.6) 373 (12.4) 0.85 231 (12.6) 142 (12.0) 0.61 
 Glucocorticoids 751 (44.9) 1,431 (47.5) 0.09 869 (47.5) 562 (47.4) 0.99 
 Epipodophyllotoxins 564 (33.7) 1,128 (37.4) 0.01 735 (40.1) 393 (33.2) 0.0001 
 Antimetabolites 844 (50.5) 1,586 (52.6) 0.16 982 (53.6) 604 (51.0) 0.15 
 Nephrectomy 120 (7.2) 226 (7.5) 0.69 138 (7.5) 88 (7.4) 0.91 
BMI, kg/m2 
 <18.5 — 111 (3.7) — 67 (3.7) 44 (3.7) 0.56 
 18.5–24.9 — 1,001 (33.2)  627 (34.2) 374 (31.6)  
 25.0–29.9 — 845 (28.0)  505 (27.6) 340 (28.7)  
 30.0–39.9 — 829 (27.5)  499 (27.3) 330 (27.9)  
 ≥40.0 — 228 (7.6)  131 (7.2) 97 (8.2)  
 Unable to determine — 2 (0.1)  2 (0.1) —  
Smoking status 
 Never smoked — 1,930 (64.0) — 1,153 (63.0) 777 (65.6) 0.006 
 Former smoker — 338 (11.2)  184 (10.1) 154 (13.0)  
 Current smoker — 704 (23.3)  454 (24.8) 250 (21.1)  
 Unknown — 44 (1.5)  40 (2.2) 4 (0.3)  

Abbreviation: CNS, central nervous system.

aCompare participants to nonparticipants.

bCompare participants with multiple visits to participants with only one visit.

The age-specific cumulative prevalence of hypertension in childhood cancer survivors increased sharply with age; 13% had hypertension identified by age 30 years, with this proportion reaching 37% by age 40 and exceeding 70% by age 50 (Fig. 2). Although relatively few participants completed a SJLIFE assessment after the age of 55 (n = 20), our results suggest that as many as 80% of survivors may have hypertension by this age. The age-specific cumulative prevalence increased more steeply with age compared with what would be expected based on rates in the general population, with survivors generally having a prevalence similar to that expected in people about 10 years older. The prevalence of hypertension varied by childhood cancer diagnosis, with survivors of Wilms tumor generally having the highest age-specific prevalence, but survivors of all diagnosis groups developed hypertension substantially more often than would be expected in the general population (Fig. 3).

Figure 2.

Age-specific cumulative prevalence of hypertension by attained age at first event or most recent SJLIFE assessment for all participants (A), male participants only (B), and female participants only (C). Curves labeled “SJLIFE” show the prevalence for SJLIFE participants, with dashed lines representing the 95% CI. Curves labeled “Expected based on NHANES” show the prevalence expected on the basis of age-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and BMI category–specific hypertension rates in the general population (NHANES 2011–2012). The table beneath A shows the number of participants at risk by 5-year age intervals.

Figure 2.

Age-specific cumulative prevalence of hypertension by attained age at first event or most recent SJLIFE assessment for all participants (A), male participants only (B), and female participants only (C). Curves labeled “SJLIFE” show the prevalence for SJLIFE participants, with dashed lines representing the 95% CI. Curves labeled “Expected based on NHANES” show the prevalence expected on the basis of age-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and BMI category–specific hypertension rates in the general population (NHANES 2011–2012). The table beneath A shows the number of participants at risk by 5-year age intervals.

Close modal
Figure 3.

Age-specific cumulative prevalence of hypertension by attained age at first event or most recent SJLIFE assessment, stratified by diagnosis group. The dashed line represents the prevalence expected on the basis of age-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and BMI category–specific hypertension rates in the general population (NHANES 2011–2012). ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; bone, tumors of bone; CNS, central nervous system tumors; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma; NB, neuroblastoma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Wilms, Wilms tumor; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2012.

Figure 3.

Age-specific cumulative prevalence of hypertension by attained age at first event or most recent SJLIFE assessment, stratified by diagnosis group. The dashed line represents the prevalence expected on the basis of age-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and BMI category–specific hypertension rates in the general population (NHANES 2011–2012). ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; bone, tumors of bone; CNS, central nervous system tumors; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma; NB, neuroblastoma; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; Wilms, Wilms tumor; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011–2012.

Close modal

At the time of their initial SJLIFE assessment, 44.0%, 33.6%, and 22.4% of survivors had a blood pressure status of normal, prehypertension, and hypertension, respectively (Table 2). The prevalence of hypertension was 2.6-fold (95% CI, 1.6–4.7) higher among childhood cancer survivors than expected, based on age-, sex-, race, and BMI-specific rates in the general population. Factors significantly associated with higher odds of having prevalent hypertension included male sex (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14–1.67), non-Hispanic black race (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.28–2.16), older age at assessment (OR per one year of age, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08–1.11), and being overweight (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21–2.07) or obese (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.34–3.88). Exposures to radiotherapy or chemotherapy were not significantly associated with hypertension, with the exception of a CED >0 to ≤8,000 mg/m2 (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.10–1.93). Notably, higher doses of alkylating agents were not significantly associated with hypertension (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89–1.49). Survivors who underwent nephrectomy as part of their childhood cancer treatment were more likely to have developed hypertension (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11–2.53), but no significant association was found for exposure to abdominal or pelvic radiation (OR for ≥20 Gy compared with none, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.85–1.79).

Table 2.

Participant characteristics and childhood cancer treatment exposures by blood pressure status at the first SJLIFE visit, and multivariable associations with prevalence of hypertension

NormalPrehypertensionHypertension
Overall, N (%)1,328 (44.0)1,013 (33.6)675 (22.4)OR (95% CI)a
Participant characteristics 
 Sex, n (%) 
  Female 778 (58.6) 383 (37.8) 279 (41.3) 1.00 (ref) 
  Male 550 (41.4) 630 (62.2) 396 (58.7) 1.38 (1.14–1.67) 
 Race/ethnicity, n (%) 
  Non-Hispanic white 1,102 (83.0) 845 (83.4) 544 (80.6) 1.00 (ref) 
  Non-Hispanic black 168 (12.7) 142 (14.0) 122 (18.1) 1.66 (1.28–2.16) 
  Non-Hispanic other 17 (1.3) 12 (1.2) 4 (0.6) 0.66 (0.19–2.26) 
  Hispanic 41 (3.1) 14 (1.4) 5 (0.7) 0.66 (0.23–1.90) 
 Age (y), mean (SD) 29.49 (7.4) 31.70 (7.8) 37.28 (8.9) 1.10 (1.08–1.11) 
 Age at diagnosis (y), mean (SD) 8.15 (5.5) 7.96 (5.4) 9.15 (6.0) 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 
 BMI (kg/m2), n (%) 
  18.5–24.9 589 (44.4) 278 (27.4) 134 (19.9) 1.00 (ref) 
  <18.5 82 (6.2) 18 (1.8) 11 (1.6) 0.68 (0.34–1.36) 
  25.0–29.9 378 (28.5) 283 (27.9) 184 (27.3) 1.58 (1.21–2.07) 
  ≥30.0 279 (21.0) 433 (42.7) 345 (51.1) 3.02 (2.34–3.88) 
 Unable to determine 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.2) — 
 Smoking status, n (%) 
  Never 876 (66.0) 649 (64.1) 405 (60.0) 1.00 (ref) 
  Former 128 (9.6) 109 (10.8) 101 (15.0) 1.18 (0.88–1.57) 
  Current 302 (22.7) 239 (23.6) 163 (24.2) 1.11 (0.88–1.40) 
  Unknown 22 (1.7) 16 (1.6) 6 (0.9) — 
Treatment exposures 
 Cranial radiation, n (%) 
  No 888 (66.9) 658 (65.0) 417 (61.8) 1.00 (ref) 
  <20 Gy 171 (12.9) 127 (12.5) 78 (11.6) 0.94 (0.68–1.29) 
  ≥20 Gy 268 (20.2) 228 (22.5) 180 (26.7) 0.98 (0.76–1.25) 
  Received, dose unknown 1 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) — 
 Chest radiation, n (%)  
  No 959 (72.2) 745 (73.5) 430 (63.7) 1.00 (ref) 
  <20 Gy 138 (10.4) 95 (9.4) 104 (15.4) 1.36 (0.81–2.27) 
  ≥20 Gy 230 (17.3) 173 (17.1) 141 (20.9) 0.91 (0.64–1.30) 
  Received, dose unknown 1 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) — 
 Abdominal/pelvic radiation, n (%)  
  No 1,025 (77.2) 795 (78.5) 457 (67.7) 1.00 (ref) 
  <20 Gy 111 (8.4) 66 (6.5) 70 (10.4) 1.58 (0.91–2.75) 
  ≥20 Gy 191 (14.4) 152 (15.0) 148 (21.9) 1.23 (0.85–1.79) 
  Received, dose unknown 1 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) — 
 Anthracyclines  
  No 510 (38.4) 416 (41.1) 322 (47.7) 1.00 (ref) 
  <250 mg/m2 628 (47.3) 443 (43.7) 242 (35.9) 0.82 (0.65–1.04) 
  ≥250 mg/m2 184 (13.9) 153 (15.1) 109 (16.2) 0.87 (0.65–1.18) 
  Received, dose unknown 6 (0.5) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.3) — 
 Alkylating agents (CED) 
  No 505 (38.0) 394 (38.9) 214 (31.7) 1.00 (ref) 
  ≤8,000 mg/m2 389 (29.3) 290 (28.6) 212 (31.4) 1.46 (1.10–1.93) 
  >8,000 mg/m2 424 (31.9) 324 (32.0) 245 (36.3) 1.26 (0.96–1.65) 
  Received, dose unknown 10 (0.8) 5 (0.5) 4 (0.6) — 
 Platinum compounds 
  No 1,135 (85.5) 904 (89.2) 604 (89.5) 1.00 (ref) 
  Yes 193 (14.5) 109 (10.8) 71 (10.5) 1.22 (0.87–1.71) 
 Nephrectomy 
  No 1,242 (93.5) 941 (92.9) 607 (89.9) 1.00 (ref) 
  Yes 86 (6.5) 72 (7.1) 68 (10.1) 1.68 (1.11–2.53) 
NormalPrehypertensionHypertension
Overall, N (%)1,328 (44.0)1,013 (33.6)675 (22.4)OR (95% CI)a
Participant characteristics 
 Sex, n (%) 
  Female 778 (58.6) 383 (37.8) 279 (41.3) 1.00 (ref) 
  Male 550 (41.4) 630 (62.2) 396 (58.7) 1.38 (1.14–1.67) 
 Race/ethnicity, n (%) 
  Non-Hispanic white 1,102 (83.0) 845 (83.4) 544 (80.6) 1.00 (ref) 
  Non-Hispanic black 168 (12.7) 142 (14.0) 122 (18.1) 1.66 (1.28–2.16) 
  Non-Hispanic other 17 (1.3) 12 (1.2) 4 (0.6) 0.66 (0.19–2.26) 
  Hispanic 41 (3.1) 14 (1.4) 5 (0.7) 0.66 (0.23–1.90) 
 Age (y), mean (SD) 29.49 (7.4) 31.70 (7.8) 37.28 (8.9) 1.10 (1.08–1.11) 
 Age at diagnosis (y), mean (SD) 8.15 (5.5) 7.96 (5.4) 9.15 (6.0) 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 
 BMI (kg/m2), n (%) 
  18.5–24.9 589 (44.4) 278 (27.4) 134 (19.9) 1.00 (ref) 
  <18.5 82 (6.2) 18 (1.8) 11 (1.6) 0.68 (0.34–1.36) 
  25.0–29.9 378 (28.5) 283 (27.9) 184 (27.3) 1.58 (1.21–2.07) 
  ≥30.0 279 (21.0) 433 (42.7) 345 (51.1) 3.02 (2.34–3.88) 
 Unable to determine 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 1 (0.2) — 
 Smoking status, n (%) 
  Never 876 (66.0) 649 (64.1) 405 (60.0) 1.00 (ref) 
  Former 128 (9.6) 109 (10.8) 101 (15.0) 1.18 (0.88–1.57) 
  Current 302 (22.7) 239 (23.6) 163 (24.2) 1.11 (0.88–1.40) 
  Unknown 22 (1.7) 16 (1.6) 6 (0.9) — 
Treatment exposures 
 Cranial radiation, n (%) 
  No 888 (66.9) 658 (65.0) 417 (61.8) 1.00 (ref) 
  <20 Gy 171 (12.9) 127 (12.5) 78 (11.6) 0.94 (0.68–1.29) 
  ≥20 Gy 268 (20.2) 228 (22.5) 180 (26.7) 0.98 (0.76–1.25) 
  Received, dose unknown 1 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) — 
 Chest radiation, n (%)  
  No 959 (72.2) 745 (73.5) 430 (63.7) 1.00 (ref) 
  <20 Gy 138 (10.4) 95 (9.4) 104 (15.4) 1.36 (0.81–2.27) 
  ≥20 Gy 230 (17.3) 173 (17.1) 141 (20.9) 0.91 (0.64–1.30) 
  Received, dose unknown 1 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) — 
 Abdominal/pelvic radiation, n (%)  
  No 1,025 (77.2) 795 (78.5) 457 (67.7) 1.00 (ref) 
  <20 Gy 111 (8.4) 66 (6.5) 70 (10.4) 1.58 (0.91–2.75) 
  ≥20 Gy 191 (14.4) 152 (15.0) 148 (21.9) 1.23 (0.85–1.79) 
  Received, dose unknown 1 (0.1) 0 (0) 0 (0) — 
 Anthracyclines  
  No 510 (38.4) 416 (41.1) 322 (47.7) 1.00 (ref) 
  <250 mg/m2 628 (47.3) 443 (43.7) 242 (35.9) 0.82 (0.65–1.04) 
  ≥250 mg/m2 184 (13.9) 153 (15.1) 109 (16.2) 0.87 (0.65–1.18) 
  Received, dose unknown 6 (0.5) 1 (0.1) 2 (0.3) — 
 Alkylating agents (CED) 
  No 505 (38.0) 394 (38.9) 214 (31.7) 1.00 (ref) 
  ≤8,000 mg/m2 389 (29.3) 290 (28.6) 212 (31.4) 1.46 (1.10–1.93) 
  >8,000 mg/m2 424 (31.9) 324 (32.0) 245 (36.3) 1.26 (0.96–1.65) 
  Received, dose unknown 10 (0.8) 5 (0.5) 4 (0.6) — 
 Platinum compounds 
  No 1,135 (85.5) 904 (89.2) 604 (89.5) 1.00 (ref) 
  Yes 193 (14.5) 109 (10.8) 71 (10.5) 1.22 (0.87–1.71) 
 Nephrectomy 
  No 1,242 (93.5) 941 (92.9) 607 (89.9) 1.00 (ref) 
  Yes 86 (6.5) 72 (7.1) 68 (10.1) 1.68 (1.11–2.53) 

NOTE: Model includes all variables in Table 2.

aMultivariable logistic regression model comparing odds of hypertension versus normal or prehypertension.

Among 2,459 participants who attended their first SJLIFE assessment with no prior hypertension diagnosis, 207 (8.4%) were identified as having unrecognized hypertensive blood pressure (Table 3). Similar to prevalent hypertension overall, undiagnosed hypertensive blood pressure was more likely in males (OR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.09–4.08), other race/ethnicity compared with non-Hispanic white (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.34–2.78), older age at assessment (OR per one year of age, 1.08; 1.06–1.10), and overweight/obese compared with normal BMI (OR for overweight, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.16–2.81; OR for obese, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.31–5.18). A total of 675 participants were identified with hypertension based on our study criteria either before or during the first SJLIFE visit, but only 52% reported via questionnaire that they were aware of their hypertension.

Table 3.

Prevalence and associated participant characteristics for (i) undiagnosed hypertension among participants without prior hypertension at the first SJLIFE visit, and (ii) uncontrolled hypertension at the first SJLIFE visit among participants with prior hypertension

Undiagnosed hypertensionUncontrolled hypertension
n at riskHypertensionn at riskHypertension
Overall, N (%)2,459207 (8.4)ORa (95% CI)557124 (22.3)ORb (95% CI)
Participant characteristics 
 Sex, n (%) 
  Female 1,173 53 (4.5) 1.00 (ref) 267 43 (16.1) 1.00 (ref) 
  Male 1,286 154 (12.0) 2.92 (2.09–4.08) 290 81 (27.9) 2.01 (1.26–3.21) 
 Race/ethnicity, n (%) 
  Non-Hispanic white 2,030 160 (7.9) 1.00 (ref) 461 85 (18.4) 1.00 (ref) 
  Other 429 47 (11.0) 1.93 (1.34–2.78) 96 39 (40.6) 3.80 (2.18–6.60) 
 Age (y), mean (SD) 30.8 (7.8) 35.12 (8.6) 1.08 (1.06–1.10) 37.4 (9.0) 39.4 (9.2) 1.05 (1.02–1.08) 
 Age at diagnosis (y), mean (SD) 8.1 (5.5) 8.88 (5.9) 0.99 (0.96–1.02) — — — 
 BMI (kg/m2), n (%) 
  18.5–24.9 884 35 (4.0) 1.00 (ref) — — — 
  <18.5 101 4 (4.0) 1.03 (0.35–3.07) — — — 
  25.0–29.9 697 60 (8.6) 1.81 (1.16–2.81) — — — 
  ≥30.0 776 108 (13.9) 3.46 (2.31–5.18) — — — 
  Unable to determine 0 (0) — — — — 
 Household income ($/y), n (%) 
  ≥60,000 — — — 164 28 (17.1) 1.00 (ref) 
  20,000-<60,000 — — — 206 49 (23.8) 1.57 (0.91–2.72) 
  ≤20,000 — — — 112 31 (27.7) 1.77 (0.93–3.34) 
  Unknown — — — 75 16 (21.3) — 
Undiagnosed hypertensionUncontrolled hypertension
n at riskHypertensionn at riskHypertension
Overall, N (%)2,459207 (8.4)ORa (95% CI)557124 (22.3)ORb (95% CI)
Participant characteristics 
 Sex, n (%) 
  Female 1,173 53 (4.5) 1.00 (ref) 267 43 (16.1) 1.00 (ref) 
  Male 1,286 154 (12.0) 2.92 (2.09–4.08) 290 81 (27.9) 2.01 (1.26–3.21) 
 Race/ethnicity, n (%) 
  Non-Hispanic white 2,030 160 (7.9) 1.00 (ref) 461 85 (18.4) 1.00 (ref) 
  Other 429 47 (11.0) 1.93 (1.34–2.78) 96 39 (40.6) 3.80 (2.18–6.60) 
 Age (y), mean (SD) 30.8 (7.8) 35.12 (8.6) 1.08 (1.06–1.10) 37.4 (9.0) 39.4 (9.2) 1.05 (1.02–1.08) 
 Age at diagnosis (y), mean (SD) 8.1 (5.5) 8.88 (5.9) 0.99 (0.96–1.02) — — — 
 BMI (kg/m2), n (%) 
  18.5–24.9 884 35 (4.0) 1.00 (ref) — — — 
  <18.5 101 4 (4.0) 1.03 (0.35–3.07) — — — 
  25.0–29.9 697 60 (8.6) 1.81 (1.16–2.81) — — — 
  ≥30.0 776 108 (13.9) 3.46 (2.31–5.18) — — — 
  Unable to determine 0 (0) — — — — 
 Household income ($/y), n (%) 
  ≥60,000 — — — 164 28 (17.1) 1.00 (ref) 
  20,000-<60,000 — — — 206 49 (23.8) 1.57 (0.91–2.72) 
  ≤20,000 — — — 112 31 (27.7) 1.77 (0.93–3.34) 
  Unknown — — — 75 16 (21.3) — 

aMultivariable logistic regression model included sex, race/ethnicity, age, age at diagnosis, and BMI.

bMultivariable logistic regression model included sex, race/ethnicity, and household income.

Among the 557 participants who were diagnosed with hypertension prior to their first SJLIFE assessment, 124 (22.3%) were identified as having uncontrolled hypertensive blood pressure (Table 3). Significant risk factors included male sex (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.26–3.21), race other than non-Hispanic white (OR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.18–6.60), and older age (OR per year of age, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02–1.08).

Among participants with normal or prehypertensive blood pressure status at the initial assessment, 4.5% or 21.2%, respectively, were identified as having hypertensive blood pressure at a subsequent assessment (mean time interval, 3.6 years; Table 4). Factors associated with subsequent development of hypertensive blood pressure included male sex (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.02–2.38), older age at initial assessment (OR per year of age, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03–1.09), and obesity (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.77–4.97; Supplementary Table S1). Only 19.0% of participants with hypertension at the first assessment were found to have normal blood pressure at their subsequent visit, and most of those (65%) were on antihypertensive medications; 35.0% of those with hypertension at the first visit continued to have uncontrolled hypertensive blood pressure at the subsequent visit.

Table 4.

Changes in blood pressure category over time among participants with multiple SJLIFE visits

Highest blood pressure category at subsequent SJLIFE visits
Blood pressure category at first SJLIFE visitParticipants with multiple SJLIFE visitsNormalPrehypertensionHypertensionTime interval between visits (years)
nn (%)n (%)n (%)Mean (range)
Normal 488 349 (71.5) 117 (24.0) 22 (4.5) 3.51 (0.57–7.02) 
Prehypertension 397 135 (34.0) 178 (44.8) 84 (21.2) 3.63 (0.99–7.09) 
Hypertensiona 300 57 (19.0) 138 (46.0) 105 (35.0) 3.80 (1.03–6.63) 
Highest blood pressure category at subsequent SJLIFE visits
Blood pressure category at first SJLIFE visitParticipants with multiple SJLIFE visitsNormalPrehypertensionHypertensionTime interval between visits (years)
nn (%)n (%)n (%)Mean (range)
Normal 488 349 (71.5) 117 (24.0) 22 (4.5) 3.51 (0.57–7.02) 
Prehypertension 397 135 (34.0) 178 (44.8) 84 (21.2) 3.63 (0.99–7.09) 
Hypertensiona 300 57 (19.0) 138 (46.0) 105 (35.0) 3.80 (1.03–6.63) 

aFor those with hypertension at the first SJLIFE visit, highest blood pressure category at a subsequent SJLIFE visit was determined only by measured blood pressure at subsequent visits, regardless of medication use.

Hypertension is a leading contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population (35, 36) and is even more deleterious among survivors of childhood cancer due to potentiation of cardiovascular damage caused by cancer treatments, including chest-directed radiotherapy and anthracycline chemotherapy. More than one in five survivors in SJLIFE were found to have this modifiable cardiovascular risk factor and 33% were identified with prehypertensive blood pressure, a risk factor for future hypertension (37). This study is the largest to date to examine measured blood pressure among survivors from different diagnosis groups, and the first to report prevalence by age and compare it with general population rates. Our results demonstrate that survivors have a higher prevalence of hypertension compared with individuals in the general population that is evident throughout the life course. Moreover, one in 12 survivors had undiagnosed hypertensive blood pressure, and more than 20% of those previously diagnosed with hypertension had persistent uncontrolled high blood pressure.

We used age-, sex-, race/ethnicity-, and BMI category–specific NHANES rates to calculate the expected prevalence of hypertensive blood pressure in the general population, so the increased prevalence in survivors is not readily explained by established hypertension risk factors. Childhood cancer treatments likely play a role, as supported by our findings that age-specific cumulative prevalence varied across diagnoses. However, it is notable that in a clinically assessed cohort of over 3,000 survivors with detailed treatment data, including radiation dosimetry and chemotherapy dosages, we identified only nephrectomy as a significant risk factor. Low-dose alkylating agents were also significantly associated with hypertension in the multivariable model, but the lack of any association at higher doses suggests this may not be a meaningful risk factor. We did not find a significant association between abdominal or pelvic radiation and hypertension, although the OR of 1.5 may be suggestive of a modest association. Previous findings regarding treatment factors and hypertension in childhood cancer survivors have been inconsistent, but the large CCSS (n = 8,599) and Dutch AMC/LATER (n = 1,442) studies reported significant associations between abdominal radiation and hypertension (OR, 1.9 and 2.5, respectively; refs. 21, 38). Survivors of Wilms tumor had the highest prevalence of hypertension in SJLIFE, supporting a role for renal etiology in a subgroup of survivors. However, our findings suggest that exposure to specific nephrotoxic treatments does not fully explain survivors' increased risk of hypertension.

Further research is needed to fully elucidate the multifactorial mechanisms underlying the increased risk of hypertension in childhood cancer survivors. In addition to direct tissue damage by radiation and specific chemotherapeutic agents, more general mechanisms related to cancer and its treatment may also contribute, such as chronic inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, altered immune function, and factors related to the accelerated aging phenotype that has been observed in some survivors (39–43). Therefore, our results support enhanced clinical attention to blood pressure in all survivors of childhood cancer.

Despite most SJLIFE participants having received ongoing survivorship care through the St. Jude After Completion of Therapy Clinic, 12.8% of those attending their first SJLIFE assessment were identified with undiagnosed hypertensive blood pressure. This underscores the importance of frequent blood pressure monitoring in this population, as rates of undiagnosed high blood pressure are likely higher in survivors not receiving routine follow-up. Data from NHANES during the same time period showed that 82% of adults with hypertensive blood pressure at examination reported being aware of their hypertension, which compares with 52% in SJLIFE (based on an identical questionnaire item). Although the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertensive blood pressure was lower in SJLIFE (22%) compared with NHANES (48% in 2011–2012), it remains unacceptably high for a population known to be at increased risk of cardiovascular complications. Even after the initial SJLIFE visit, at which hypertensive participants were informed of their increased risks and the need for medical management, 35% of those who returned for a subsequent assessment had uncontrolled high blood pressure. These data underscore the importance of improving awareness of the consequences of hypertension among childhood cancer survivors and their community providers.

Strengths of this analysis included the large sample size, direct clinical assessments, and the ability to examine a range of ages, diagnoses, treatments, and lifestyle factors. We used blood pressures measured during a single 3- to 4-day visit for determination of an individual's blood pressure status at that time, rather than separate measures over the course of multiple office visits (31), potentially resulting in misclassification of blood pressure status. Notably, NHANES estimates of U.S. hypertension rates are based on the same methodology. Blood pressure was measured in a relaxed nonoffice setting, potentially reducing the impact of a “white coat effect,” but measured blood pressures may not be representative of usual blood pressure in some participants (44, 45). Because our results are based on a selected population with frequent clinical follow-up, our estimates of undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension may be underestimates with respect to the larger population of childhood cancer survivors. Finally, our results could differ slightly using a different classification system to categorize blood pressure status, and existing guidelines do not address childhood cancer survivors (46).

Optimal blood pressure targets for childhood cancer survivors exposed to cardiotoxic therapies have not been established. Recently, the SPRINT trial demonstrated that among hypertensive adults ≥50 years of age with elevated cardiovascular risk, intensive treatment targeting a SBP <120 mm Hg reduced cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality compared with standard treatment with an SBP target <140 mm Hg (47). It is reasonable to suspect that more aggressive targets could benefit childhood cancer survivors as well. Adoption of lower blood pressure targets would further increase the proportion of childhood cancer survivors potentially requiring intervention. Given that hypertension can potentiate the already increased risk of cardiovascular disease associated with cancer treatment, our study demonstrates the need for effective interventions targeting both prevention and control of hypertension in survivors exposed to cardiotoxic therapies.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: T.M. Gibson, G.T. Armstrong, D.A. Mulrooney, D. Srivastava, K.K. Ness, M.M. Hudson, L.L. Robison

Development of methodology: K.K. Ness, M.M. Hudson, L.L. Robison

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): D.M. Green, D.A. Mulrooney, N. Bhakta, K.K. Ness, M.M. Hudson, L.L. Robison

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): T.M. Gibson, Z. Li, G.T. Armstrong, D. Srivastava, K.K. Ness, M.M. Hudson, L.L. Robison

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: T.M. Gibson, D.M. Green, G.T. Armstrong, D.A. Mulrooney, D. Srivastava, N. Bhakta, K.K. Ness, M.M. Hudson, L.L. Robison

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): L.L. Robison

Study supervision: M.M. Hudson

This project was funded by the NCI (U01 CA195547, P30 CA021765) and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
Howlader
N
,
Noone
AM
,
Krapcho
M
,
Garshell
J
,
Miller
D
,
Altekruse
SF
, et al
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2012
.
Bethesda, MD
:
NCI
.
2.
Robison
LL
,
Hudson
MM
. 
Survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: life-long risks and responsibilities
.
Nat Rev Cancer
2014
;
14
:
61
70
.
3.
Armstrong
GT
,
Chen
Y
,
Yasui
Y
,
Leisenring
W
,
Gibson
TM
,
Mertens
AC
, et al
Reduction in late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer
.
N Engl J Med
2016
;
374
:
833
42
.
4.
Lipshultz
SE
,
Franco
VI
,
Miller
TL
,
Colan
SD
,
Sallan
SE
. 
Cardiovascular disease in adult survivors of childhood cancer
.
Annu Rev Med
2015
;
66
:
161
76
.
5.
Mertens
AC
,
Liu
Q
,
Neglia
JP
,
Wasilewski
K
,
Leisenring
W
,
Armstrong
GT
, et al
Cause-specific late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2008
;
100
:
1368
79
.
6.
Mulrooney
DA
,
Yeazel
MW
,
Kawashima
T
,
Mertens
AC
,
Mitby
P
,
Stovall
M
, et al
Cardiac outcomes in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: retrospective analysis of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort
.
BMJ
2009
;
339
:
b4606
.
7.
Oeffinger
KC
,
Mertens
AC
,
Sklar
CA
,
Kawashima
T
,
Hudson
MM
,
Meadows
AT
, et al
Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer
.
N Engl J Med
2006
;
355
:
1572
82
.
8.
Tukenova
M
,
Guibout
C
,
Oberlin
O
,
Doyon
F
,
Mousannif
A
,
Haddy
N
, et al
Role of cancer treatment in long-term overall and cardiovascular mortality after childhood cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
2010
;
28
:
1308
15
.
9.
Mertens
AC
,
Yasui
Y
,
Neglia
JP
,
Potter
JD
,
Nesbit
ME
 Jr
,
Ruccione
K
, et al
Late mortality experience in five-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
.
J Clin Oncol
2001
;
19
:
3163
72
.
10.
Armstrong
GT
,
Oeffinger
KC
,
Chen
Y
,
Kawashima
T
,
Yasui
Y
,
Leisenring
W
, et al
Modifiable risk factors and major cardiac events among adult survivors of childhood cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
2013
;
31
:
3673
80
.
11.
Children's Oncology Group
.
Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent and Young Adult Cancers, Version 4.0
.
Monrovia, CA
:
Children's Oncology Group
; 
2013
.
12.
Kannel
WB
. 
Blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor: prevention and treatment
.
JAMA
1996
;
275
:
1571
6
.
13.
Armenian
SH
,
Xu
L
,
Ky
B
,
Sun
C
,
Farol
LT
,
Pal
SK
, et al
Cardiovascular disease among survivors of adult-onset cancer: a community-based retrospective cohort study
.
J Clin Oncol
2016
;
34
:
1122
30
.
14.
Chow
EJ
,
Baker
KS
,
Lee
SJ
,
Flowers
ME
,
Cushing-Haugen
KL
,
Inamoto
Y
, et al
Influence of conventional cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle characteristics on cardiovascular disease after hematopoietic cell transplantation
.
J Clin Oncol
2014
;
32
:
191
8
.
15.
Cardous-Ubbink
MC
,
Geenen
MM
,
Schade
KJ
,
Heinen
RC
,
Caron
HN
,
Kremer
LC
, et al
Hypertension in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a nested case-control study
.
Eur J Cancer
2010
;
46
:
782
90
.
16.
Chow
EJ
,
Pihoker
C
,
Hunt
K
,
Wilkinson
K
,
Friedman
DL
. 
Obesity and hypertension among children after treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia
.
Cancer
2007
;
110
:
2313
20
.
17.
Finklestein
JZ
,
Norkool
P
,
Green
DM
,
Breslow
N
,
D'Angio
GJ
. 
Diastolic hypertension in Wilms' tumor survivors: a late effect of treatment? A report from the National Wilms' Tumor Study Group
.
Am J Clin Oncol
1993
;
16
:
201
5
.
18.
Geenen
MM
,
Bakker
PJ
,
Kremer
LC
,
Kastelein
JJ
,
van Leeuwen
FE
. 
Increased prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease in long-term survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Wilms tumor treated with radiotherapy
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2010
;
55
:
690
7
.
19.
Haddy
TB
,
Mosher
RB
,
Reaman
GH
. 
Hypertension and prehypertension in long-term survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2007
;
49
:
79
83
.
20.
Kantor
AF
,
Li
FP
,
Janov
AJ
,
Tarbell
NJ
,
Sallan
SE
. 
Hypertension in long-term survivors of childhood renal cancers
.
J Clin Oncol
1989
;
7
:
912
5
.
21.
Meacham
LR
,
Chow
EJ
,
Ness
KK
,
Kamdar
KY
,
Chen
Y
,
Yasui
Y
, et al
Cardiovascular risk factors in adult survivors of pediatric cancer–a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2010
;
19
:
170
81
.
22.
Novakova
Z
,
Stastna
J
,
Honzikova
K
,
Hrstková
H
,
Honzíková
N
,
Závodná
E
, et al
Anthracycline therapy and 24-hour blood-pressure profile in long-term survivors of childhood cancer
.
Physiol Res
2010
;
59
Suppl 1
:
S97
102
.
23.
Oeffinger
KC
,
Adams-Huet
B
,
Victor
RG
,
Church
TS
,
Snell
PG
,
Dunn
AL
, et al
Insulin resistance and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in young adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
.
J Clin Oncol
2009
;
27
:
3698
704
.
24.
Oudin
C
,
Simeoni
MC
,
Sirvent
N
,
Contet
A
,
Begu-Le Coroller
A
,
Bordigoni
P
, et al
Prevalence and risk factors of the metabolic syndrome in adult survivors of childhood leukemia
.
Blood
2011
;
117
:
4442
8
.
25.
Scholz-Kreisel
P
,
Spix
C
,
Blettner
M
,
Eckerle
S
,
Faber
J
,
Wild
P
, et al
Prevalence of cardiovascular late sequelae in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2017
;
64
:
e26428
.
26.
van Waas
M
,
Neggers
SJ
,
Pieters
R
,
van den Heuvel-Eibrink
MM
. 
Components of the metabolic syndrome in 500 adult long-term survivors of childhood cancer
.
Ann Oncol
2010
;
21
:
1121
6
.
27.
Veringa
SJ
,
van Dulmen-den Broeder
E
,
Kaspers
GJ
,
Veening
MA
. 
Blood pressure and body composition in long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2012
;
58
:
278
82
.
28.
Hudson
MM
,
Ehrhardt
MJ
,
Bhakta
N
,
Baassiri
M
,
Eissa
H
,
Chemaitilly
W
, et al
Approach for classification and severity-grading of long-term and late-onset health events among childhood cancer survivors in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2017
;
26
:
666
74
.
29.
Hudson
MM
,
Ness
KK
,
Nolan
VG
,
Armstrong
GT
,
Green
DM
,
Morris
EB
, et al
Prospective medical assessment of adults surviving childhood cancer: study design, cohort characteristics, and feasibility of the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort study
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2011
;
56
:
825
36
.
30.
Landier
W
,
Bhatia
S
,
Eshelman
DA
,
Forte
KJ
,
Sweeney
T
,
Hester
AL
, et al
Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines from the Children's Oncology Group Late Effects Committee and Nursing Discipline
.
J Clin Oncol
2004
;
22
:
4979
90
.
31.
Chobanian
AV
,
Bakris
GL
,
Black
HR
,
Cushman
WC
,
Green
LA
,
Izzo
JL
 Jr
, et al
The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report
.
JAMA
2003
;
289
:
2560
72
.
32.
Green
DM
,
Nolan
VG
,
Goodman
PJ
,
Whitton
JA
,
Srivastava
D
,
Leisenring
WM
, et al
The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
2014
;
61
:
53
67
.
33.
WHO Consultation on Obesity
.
Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic: Report of a WHO Consultation
.
Geneva, Switzerland
:
World Health Organization
; 
2000
.
34.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data
.
Hyattsville, MD
:
National Center for Health Statistics
; 
2011–2012
.
35.
Bromfield
S
,
Muntner
P
. 
High blood pressure: the leading global burden of disease risk factor and the need for worldwide prevention programs
.
Curr Hypertens Rep
2013
;
15
:
134
6
.
36.
Lim
SS
,
Vos
T
,
Flaxman
AD
,
Danaei
G
,
Shibuya
K
,
Adair-Rohani
H
, et al
A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010
.
Lancet
2012
;
380
:
2224
60
.
37.
Vasan
RS
,
Larson
MG
,
Leip
EP
,
Kannel
WB
,
Levy
D
. 
Assessment of frequency of progression to hypertension in non-hypertensive participants in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study
.
Lancet
2001
;
358
:
1682
6
.
38.
Knijnenburg
SL
,
Jaspers
MW
,
van der Pal
HJ
,
Schouten-van Meeteren
AY
,
Bouts
AH
,
Lieverst
JA
, et al
Renal dysfunction and elevated blood pressure in long-term childhood cancer survivors
.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol
2012
;
7
:
1416
27
.
39.
Azanan
MS
,
Abdullah
NK
,
Chua
LL
,
Lum
SH
,
Abdul Ghafar
SS
,
Kamarulzaman
A
, et al
Immunity in young adult survivors of childhood leukemia is similar to the elderly rather than age-matched controls: role of cytomegalovirus
.
Eur J Immunol
2016
;
46
:
1715
26
.
40.
Caillon
A
,
Schiffrin
EL
. 
Role of inflammation and immunity in hypertension: recent epidemiological, laboratory, and clinical evidence
.
Curr Hypertens Rep
2016
;
18
:
21
.
41.
De Miguel
C
,
Rudemiller
NP
,
Abais
JM
,
Mattson
DL
. 
Inflammation and hypertension: new understandings and potential therapeutic targets
.
Curr Hypertens Rep
2015
;
17
:
507
.
42.
Ness
KK
,
Armstrong
GT
,
Kundu
M
,
Wilson
CL
,
Tchkonia
T
,
Kirkland
JL
. 
Frailty in childhood cancer survivors
.
Cancer
2015
;
121
:
1540
7
.
43.
Sulicka
J
,
Surdacki
A
,
Mikolajczyk
T
,
Strach
M
,
Gryglewska
B
,
Ćwiklińska
M
, et al
Elevated markers of inflammation and endothelial activation and increased counts of intermediate monocytes in adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
.
Immunobiology
2013
;
218
:
810
6
.
44.
Mancia
G
,
Bertinieri
G
,
Grassi
G
,
Parati
G
,
Pomidossi
G
,
Ferrari
A
, et al
Effects of blood-pressure measurement by the doctor on patient's blood pressure and heart rate
.
Lancet
1983
;
2
:
695
8
.
45.
Pickering
TG
,
James
GD
,
Boddie
C
,
Harshfield
GA
,
Blank
S
,
Laragh
JH
. 
How common is white coat hypertension?
JAMA
1988
;
259
:
225
8
.
46.
James
PA
,
Oparil
S
,
Carter
BL
,
Cushman
WC
,
Dennison-Himmelfarb
C
,
Handler
J
, et al
2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8)
.
JAMA
2014
;
311
:
507
20
.
47.
SPRINT Research Group
,
Wright
JT
 Jr
,
Williamson
JD
,
Whelton
PK
,
Snyder
JK
,
Sink
KM
, et al
A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control
.
N Engl J Med
2015
;
373
:
2103
16
.