Background: Achieving a healthy weight is recommended for all breast cancer survivors. Previous research on postdiagnosis weight change and mortality had conflicting results.

Methods: We examined whether change in body weight in the 18 months following diagnosis is associated with overall and breast cancer–specific mortality in a cohort of n = 12,590 stage I–III breast cancer patients at Kaiser Permanente using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. Follow-up was from the date of the postdiagnosis weight at 18 months until death or June 2015 [median follow-up (range): 3 (0–9) years]. We divided follow-up into earlier (18–54 months) and later (>54 months) postdiagnosis periods.

Results: Mean (SD) age-at-diagnosis was 59 (11) years. A total of 980 women died, 503 from breast cancer. Most women maintained weight within 5% of diagnosis body weight; weight loss and gain were equally common at 19% each. Compared with weight maintenance, large losses (≥10%) were associated with worse survival, with HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause death of 2.63 (2.12–3.26) earlier and 1.60 (1.14–2.25) later in follow-up. Modest losses (>5%–<10%) were associated with worse survival earlier [1.39 (1.11–1.74)] but not later in follow-up [0.77 (0.54–1.11)]. Weight gain was not related to survival. Results were similar for breast cancer–specific death.

Conclusion: Large postdiagnosis weight loss is associated with worse survival in both earlier and later postdiagnosis periods, independent of treatment and prognostic factors.

Impact: Weight loss and gain are equally common after breast cancer, and weight loss is a consistent marker of mortality risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 44–50. ©2016 AACR.

See all the articles in this CEBP Focus section, “The Obesity Paradox in Cancer: Evidence and New Directions.”

As the breast cancer survivor population grows (1), strategies to promote health and prolong life become increasingly important (2). With obesity an established risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer, research has turned to the potential benefits of weight loss among survivors (3–5). In observational studies, breast cancer patients with stable weight following diagnosis consistently have the best survival, but results for postdiagnosis weight gain or loss are heterogeneous. In almost all studies, postdiagnosis weight loss predicts worse survival (6–11), although not without exception (12). Similarly, postdiagnosis weight gain predicts worse survival in some (7, 10, 11), but not all (8, 9), studies. Differences in timing of exposure and duration of follow-up may contribute to inconsistencies (8, 9, 11). Furthermore, the influence of weight change on survival may differ depending on how much time has elapsed since diagnosis (7). Methodologic limitations to existing studies include self-reported or recalled weights (7, 8, 11, 12); inadequate control for tumor characteristics (11); recruiting survivors substantially after diagnosis (8); only examining weight gain (13); or combining gains and losses as a single exposure (14). Rarely are sample sizes large enough to stratify by stage or characteristics that might clarify differences across subgroups of patients.

This study examines weight change in the 18 months after diagnosis and subsequent survival in a large, population-based cohort of women with early stage (I–III) invasive breast cancer within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), an integrated health system. We selected 18 months postdiagnosis for comparability with other studies and to avoid active treatment and potential alterations in physical activity and diet habits during the first year after diagnosis. Our large sample provides statistical power to stratify by stage, comorbidities, chemotherapy treatment, and breast cancer subtype. In addition, we evaluated whether the influence of postdiagnostic weight change on survival varies over the course of follow-up, examining separate associations earlier (18–54 months) and later (>54 months) postdiagnosis.

Study population

We included all women ages 18 to 80 years at KPNC diagnosed with a first primary stage I–III invasive breast cancer between 2005 [when the electronic medical record (EMR) was implemented] and 2013 (n = 14,572). Women with a prior history of other invasive cancers were excluded. We required weight and height within 3 months of diagnosis and 18 months postdiagnosis (n = 12,671) and information on smoking and hormone receptor status, leaving 12,590 women for analysis. The KPNC institutional review board approved the study.

Weight change exposures

Medical assistants measured height and weight at each visit. Body mass index (BMI) was computed in kilograms per squared height in meters (kg/m2). When patients had multiple weights, we defined “at-diagnosis” as the weight closest to diagnosis but prior to any treatment [mean 0 months, SD 2 weeks from diagnosis]. We defined as “postdiagnosis” the weight closest to 18 months postdiagnosis [mean (SD) 18 (1) months]. “Postdiagnosis weight change” was the difference of the postdiagnosis and at-diagnosis weights. From weights measured approximately 12 months prediagnosis [range 6–30 months, mean (SD) 11 (5) months prediagnosis)], we calculated prediagnosis BMI.

Our main exposure was percent weight change after diagnosis computed as “postdiagnosis weight change” divided by “at-diagnosis weight” multiplied by 100. As in prior studies (7, 9, 13), we created five categories: large losses (≥10% of body weight); modest losses (>5%–<10%); stable weight (within 5%); modest gains (>5%–<10%); and large gains (≥10%).

Mortality outcomes

For mortality outcomes, we used data from the KPNC mortality file, composed of data from the California State Department of Vital Statistics, U.S. Social Security Administration, and KPNC healthcare utilization. We designated death as “breast cancer–specific” when breast cancer was a primary or contributing cause. We verified deaths (including cause) and searched for persons lost to follow-up using death certificates from each state through June 30, 2015 (15).

Covariates

We gathered information from the KPNC Cancer Registry and EMR on prognostic factors, including disease stage, tumor characteristics, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, race/ethnicity, and age at diagnosis. Smoking and alcohol history (current, former or never) are routinely available in the EMR; we chose the values closest to date of diagnosis ± 3 months. We calculated the Charlson Comorbidity Index (16) in the prediagnosis year ± 3 months and dichotomized as any versus none.

Statistical analysis

We used Cox regression models to examine associations between weight change and all-cause and breast cancer–specific death. We calculated person-time from the second weight measurement (∼18 months postdiagnosis) until death or June 30, 2015. In analyses of breast cancer–specific mortality, we censored subjects who died from other causes at date of death. We tested for violations of proportional hazards with variable × time interactions. We detected a violation for our main exposure; thus, overall results are the average association of postdiagnostic weight change during the entire subsequent period of follow-up. We additionally report associations separately by duration of follow-up, evaluating interactions of weight change with follow-up time (dichotomized before/after the median follow-up of 3 years, i.e., 54 months postdiagnosis, determined empirically and through inspection of Kaplan–Meier curves to be a meaningful cutpoint).

We included confounding variables in our final models a priori, based on previous literature, and compared models controlling for age at diagnosis and race/ethnicity to those additionally adjusted for prediagnostic BMI, comorbidities at diagnosis, alcohol, smoking, adjuvant cancer treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiation), and tumor characteristics [stage (I, II, or III), grade (well, moderately, or poorly/undifferentiated), and hormone receptor and HER2 status]. Type of surgery (mastectomy or lumpectomy) did not alter HR estimates and was not included in the final multivariable model.

To assess nonlinearity, we used the likelihood ratio test to compare models with linear terms for percent weight change to models with linear and cubic spline terms. These restricted cubic splines (17) had four knots at the weight change values of 10% and 20% loss and gain; stable weight (<5% change from at-diagnosis weight) was the reference.

To examine heterogeneity by patient characteristics (race/ethnicity, age, comorbidities, BMI, and stage, all recorded at diagnosis) as well as by adjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer subtype, we introduced product terms for weight change categories and stratification variables into regression models. We evaluated statistical significance with likelihood ratio tests. For breast cancer subtypes, we used categories adapted by Prat and colleagues (18) from the 3-marker IHC and substituted grade for Ki67 as proposed at the St. Gallen's Consensus Conference (19). Subtypes were defined as: (i) surrogate Luminal A (well/moderately differentiated, ER+/PR+ and Her2); (ii) surrogate Luminal B (poorly/undifferentiated, ER+ or PR+ and PR or Her2+); (iii) HER2+, endocrine negative (ER/PR and Her2+); and (iv) triple-negative breast cancer, TNBC (ER/PR, and Her2).

To address confounding by severe illness leading to large weight loss or large weight gain and to death, we stratified by stage, comorbidity, and smoking. Since follow-up began 18 months postdiagnosis, our design excluded early deaths. We additionally reported results for earlier and later periods of follow-up to examine whether the influence of weight changes on mortality varies over time. We also considered whether adjustment for at-diagnosis instead of prediagnosis BMI influenced findings. Finally, as the effects of weight loss later in the postdiagnosis period may differ, we evaluated weight changes between 12 and 24 months postdiagnosis with subsequent death. We used SAS software version 9.3 (SAS, Inc.) for all statistical analyses.

Baseline characteristics

Of the 12,590 early-stage breast cancer survivors in our study, 980 died, 503 due to breast cancer. In the 18 months after diagnosis, 19% of women lost >5% of body weight [mean (SD) weight loss: 18 (12) pounds]; 19% gained >5% of body weight [mean (SD) weight gain: 15 (9) pounds]; and 62% maintained a stable weight [mean (SD) weight change: 0 (5) pounds]. Table 1 shows participant characteristics by weight change category. Compared with women who maintained or gained weight, women who lost weight were slightly older at diagnosis, more likely to have stage II or III than stage I cancer, be overweight/obese, and have comorbidities. Women who gained large amounts of weight were younger with lower at-diagnosis BMI.

Table 1.

Characteristics by category of weight change in the KPNC population of breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 (N = 12,590)

Large loss (≥10%)Modest loss (>5%–<10%)Stable (within 5%)Modest gain (>5%–<10%)Large gain (≥10%)Total
N 827 1,536 7,836 1,645 746 12,590 
 Mean or median 
Median (range) of follow-up, years 3 (0–9) 3 (0–9) 3 (0–9) 3 (0–9) 4 (0–8) 3.4 (0–9) 
Median age at diagnosis, years 61 60 60 56 54 59 
Median change (pounds) −28 −12 0.10 11 24 
 Percent 
History of alcohol drinking 
 Never 47 49 45 42 46 45 
 Former 
 Current 50 49 52 56 51 52 
History of smoking 
 Never 55 57 59 54 61 60 
 Former 35 33 30 30 30 31 
 Current 10 10 11 16 
Diagnosis BMI category 
 Obese 54 47 35 28 22 37 
 Overweight 28 29 31 33 34 31 
 Normal weight 18 24 33 38 40 32 
 Underweight 0.1 
Race/Ethnicity 
 White 71 68 64 68 68 66 
 Black 11 10 
 Hispanic 11 10 11 10 
 Asian 11 14 18 15 10 16 
 Other 
Comorbidities, yes/no 18 16 12 11 13 
Tumor stage 
 I 45 50 58 57 58 55 
 II 39 37 33 35 33 35 
 III 16 13 10 
Breast cancer subtypea 
 Surrogate Luminal A 43 48 48 47 43 47 
 Surrogate Luminal B 37 34 36 36 38 36 
 Her2+, endocrine negative 
 Triple negative 14 13 11 12 14 12 
Chemotherapy 54 52 43 47 55 46 
Radiotherapy 34 40 43 42 34 42 
Large loss (≥10%)Modest loss (>5%–<10%)Stable (within 5%)Modest gain (>5%–<10%)Large gain (≥10%)Total
N 827 1,536 7,836 1,645 746 12,590 
 Mean or median 
Median (range) of follow-up, years 3 (0–9) 3 (0–9) 3 (0–9) 3 (0–9) 4 (0–8) 3.4 (0–9) 
Median age at diagnosis, years 61 60 60 56 54 59 
Median change (pounds) −28 −12 0.10 11 24 
 Percent 
History of alcohol drinking 
 Never 47 49 45 42 46 45 
 Former 
 Current 50 49 52 56 51 52 
History of smoking 
 Never 55 57 59 54 61 60 
 Former 35 33 30 30 30 31 
 Current 10 10 11 16 
Diagnosis BMI category 
 Obese 54 47 35 28 22 37 
 Overweight 28 29 31 33 34 31 
 Normal weight 18 24 33 38 40 32 
 Underweight 0.1 
Race/Ethnicity 
 White 71 68 64 68 68 66 
 Black 11 10 
 Hispanic 11 10 11 10 
 Asian 11 14 18 15 10 16 
 Other 
Comorbidities, yes/no 18 16 12 11 13 
Tumor stage 
 I 45 50 58 57 58 55 
 II 39 37 33 35 33 35 
 III 16 13 10 
Breast cancer subtypea 
 Surrogate Luminal A 43 48 48 47 43 47 
 Surrogate Luminal B 37 34 36 36 38 36 
 Her2+, endocrine negative 
 Triple negative 14 13 11 12 14 12 
Chemotherapy 54 52 43 47 55 46 
Radiotherapy 34 40 43 42 34 42 

aDefinitions adapted by Prat and colleagues (18) from the 3-marker IHC plus grade subtypes in the St. Gallen's Consensus Conference; we separated breast cancer into subtypes as follows: (i) surrogate Luminal A (well or moderately differentiated and ER+ and PR+ and Her2); (ii) surrogate Luminal B (poorly or undifferentiated ER+ or PR+ and any of PR, Her2+); (iii) HER2-positive, endocrine negative (ER, PR, and Her2+); and (iv) triple negative (ER, PR, and Her2).

Overall weight change and outcomes

Table 2 shows the association of weight change over the entire follow-up period with mortality. In age and race/ethnicity–adjusted models, compared with stable weight, large (≥10%) and modest (>5%–<10%) losses were associated with increased risk of all-cause death [HR, 2.95 (95% CI, 2.47–3.52) and HR, 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04–1.53)] and breast cancer–specific death [HR, 3.01 (95% CI, 2.34–3.87) and HR, 1.42 (95% CI, 1.09–1.83)]. After multivariable adjustment, the adverse association of large losses persisted for breast cancer–specific [HR, 2.13 (95% CI, 1.65–2.76)] and all-cause death [HR, 2.24 (95% CI, 1.87–2.69)], but associations attenuated for modest losses for breast cancer–specific [HR, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.95–1.61)] and all cause death [HR, 1.15 (95% CI, 0.95–1.39)]. Overall, there was no increased risk of death for large or modest weight gain.

Table 2.

Association of postdiagnosis weight change with breast cancer–specific and all-cause mortality

HR (95% CI)
Large loss (≥10%)Modest loss (>5%–<10%)Stable (within 5%)Modest gain (>5%–<10%)Large gain (≥10%)
 HR (95% CI) 
Breast cancer-related death 
 # Events, at risk 503/12,950 Events N Events N Events N Events N Events N 
 79 827 73 1,536 264 7,836 57 1,645 30 746 
Age/race-adjusteda 3.01 (2.34–3.87) 1.42 (1.09–1.83) Ref.  1.01 (0.76–1.34) 1.14 (0.78–1.67) 
Multivariableb 2.13 (1.65–2.76) 1.24 (0.95–1.61) Ref.  1.06 (0.79–1.41) 0.98 (0.67–1.44) 
All-cause death 
 # Events, at risk 980/12,950 Events N Events N Events N Events N Events N 
 159 827 133 1,536 534 7,836 102 1,645 52 746 
Age/race-adjusteda 2.95 (2.47–3.52) 1.26 (1.04–1.53) Ref.  0.94 (0.76–1.17) 1.11 (0.84–1.48) 
Multivariableb 2.24 (1.87–2.69) 1.15 (0.95–1.39) Ref.  0.96 (0.78–1.19) 0.98 (0.74–1.31) 
HR (95% CI)
Large loss (≥10%)Modest loss (>5%–<10%)Stable (within 5%)Modest gain (>5%–<10%)Large gain (≥10%)
 HR (95% CI) 
Breast cancer-related death 
 # Events, at risk 503/12,950 Events N Events N Events N Events N Events N 
 79 827 73 1,536 264 7,836 57 1,645 30 746 
Age/race-adjusteda 3.01 (2.34–3.87) 1.42 (1.09–1.83) Ref.  1.01 (0.76–1.34) 1.14 (0.78–1.67) 
Multivariableb 2.13 (1.65–2.76) 1.24 (0.95–1.61) Ref.  1.06 (0.79–1.41) 0.98 (0.67–1.44) 
All-cause death 
 # Events, at risk 980/12,950 Events N Events N Events N Events N Events N 
 159 827 133 1,536 534 7,836 102 1,645 52 746 
Age/race-adjusteda 2.95 (2.47–3.52) 1.26 (1.04–1.53) Ref.  0.94 (0.76–1.17) 1.11 (0.84–1.48) 
Multivariableb 2.24 (1.87–2.69) 1.15 (0.95–1.39) Ref.  0.96 (0.78–1.19) 0.98 (0.74–1.31) 

aAdjusted for age at diagnosis (categorical) and race.

bAdditionally adjusted for alcohol, smoking status, comorbidities, prediagnosis body mass index (categorical), stage, grade, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no), receipt of radiotherapy (yes/no), and tumor characteristics (ER, PR, and HER2 status).

Weight change in earlier and later follow-up periods

The association of weight change with mortality varied over follow-up (P < 0.05 for time × weight change interaction). Figure 1 reports separate associations in earlier (between 18 and 54 months postdiagnosis) and later (>54 months postdiagnosis) periods of follow-up. Postdiagnosis weight loss ≥10% was associated with worse survival earlier [HR, 2.63 (95% CI, 2.12–3.26)] and later in follow-up, although HRs attenuated later [HR, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.14–2.25)]. Modest losses (>5%–<10%) were associated with worse survival earlier [HR, 1.39 (95% CI, 1.11–1.74)], but not later in follow-up [HR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.54–1.11)]. Weight gain was not associated with death in the full study population. Among overweight women who gained >5%–<10% of body weight, a significant adverse association emerged 54 months after diagnosis (Supplementary Table S1).

Figure 1.

Postdiagnosis weight change category and all-cause mortality by period of follow-up. Model adjusted for age at diagnosis (continuous), race, smoking status, alcohol intake, stage (in BMI subgroup), grade, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, receipt of chemotherapy (yes/no), receipt of radiotherapy (yes/no), and prediagnosis BMI.

Figure 1.

Postdiagnosis weight change category and all-cause mortality by period of follow-up. Model adjusted for age at diagnosis (continuous), race, smoking status, alcohol intake, stage (in BMI subgroup), grade, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, receipt of chemotherapy (yes/no), receipt of radiotherapy (yes/no), and prediagnosis BMI.

Close modal

In cubic spline analyses treating percent weight change as a continuous exposure, we found a significant, nonlinear relationship of weight change to mortality. Any degree of weight loss was strongly associated with all-cause (Fig. 2) and breast cancer–specific death (Supplementary Fig. S1), while large weight gain had an adverse association only in the upper exposure range. For example, the spline estimates suggested gaining 10% of diagnosis body weight was not associated with breast cancer–specific [HR, 1.09 (95% CI, 0.81–1.45)] or all-cause mortality [HR, 1.06 (95% CI, 0.85–1.31)], while gaining 25% of diagnosis body weight was marginally associated with breast cancer–specific [HR, 1.62 (95% CI, 1.00–2.63] and all-cause mortality [HR, 1.45 (95% CI, 0.98–2.15)].

Figure 2.

Postdiagnosis weight change and all-cause mortality (n = 12,590; deaths = 980). Model adjusted for age at diagnosis (continuous), race, smoking status, alcohol intake, stage (in BMI subgroup), grade, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, receipt of chemotherapy (yes/no), receipt of radiotherapy (yes/no), and at-diagnosis BMI.

Figure 2.

Postdiagnosis weight change and all-cause mortality (n = 12,590; deaths = 980). Model adjusted for age at diagnosis (continuous), race, smoking status, alcohol intake, stage (in BMI subgroup), grade, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, receipt of chemotherapy (yes/no), receipt of radiotherapy (yes/no), and at-diagnosis BMI.

Close modal

Analyses by subgroup

We stratified analyses by subgroups, including age, stage, BMI, and race/ethnicity measured at diagnosis, as well as receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. We observed stronger associations of large weight loss among younger women (<55 years) for breast cancer–specific (Pinteraction = 0.04) and all-cause death (Pinteraction = 0.02) and women with stage III cancer for all-cause death (Pinteraction = 0.01; Table 3). Large losses had consistently adverse associations with survival and weight gain had no association (Supplementary Table S2). We did not find any significant interactions by breast cancer subtype, but it should be noted that power was limited for the less common subtypes, particularly HER2+ (Supplementary Table S3).

Table 3.

Association of postdiagnosis weight change and all-cause and breast cancer–specific mortality by age and stage

# Events/NLarge loss (≥10%)Modest loss (>5%–<10%)Stable (within 5%)Modest gain (>5%–<10%)Large gain (≥10%)Pinteraction
 HR (95% CI)  
Breast cancer–related death 
 Age at diagnosis 
  <55 years 181/4,856 2.43 (1.51–3.09) 1.69 (1.10–2.57) Ref. 0.78 (0.49–1.24) 1.10 (0.66–1.84) 0.04 
  >55 years 322/7,734 2.10 (1.54–2.86) 1.04 (0.75–1.46) Ref. 1.40 (0.97–2.02) 0.84 (0.46–1.51)  
 Stage 
  III 187/1,258 2.22 (1.47–3.37) 1.68 (1.13–2.49) Ref. 0.90 (0.50–1.60) 1.39 (0.78–2.47) 0.24 
  II 229/4,378 2.42 (1.65–3.54) 1.21 (0.82–1.81) Ref. 1.10 (0.73–1.65) 0.84 (0.47–1.50)  
  I 87/6,954 1.37 (0.67–2.84) 0.41 (0.16–1.03) Ref. 1.12 (0.61–2.05) 0.61 (0.19–1.99)  
All-cause death 
 Age at diagnosis 
  <55 years 243/4,856 2.95 (2.01–4.34) 1.57 (1.08–2.28) Ref. 0.69 (0.45–1.05) 1.12 (0.72–1.75) 0.02 
  >55 years 737/7,734 2.21 (1.80–2.72) 1.05 (0.84–1.31) Ref. 1.10 (0.86–1.40) 0.88 (0.60–1.29)  
 Stage 
  III 240/1,258 2.16 (1.49–3.14) 1.65 (1.16–2.35) Ref. 0.91 (0.55–1.50) 1.42 (0.87–2.34) 0.01 
  II 401/4,378 2.45 (1.86–3.25) 1.13 (0.83–1.52) Ref. 0.84 (0.60–1.17) 0.78 (0.50–1.23)  
  I 339/6,954 2.48 (1.80–3.42) 0.80 (0.55–1.15) Ref. 1.07 (0.77–1.50) 0.86 (0.48–1.55)  
# Events/NLarge loss (≥10%)Modest loss (>5%–<10%)Stable (within 5%)Modest gain (>5%–<10%)Large gain (≥10%)Pinteraction
 HR (95% CI)  
Breast cancer–related death 
 Age at diagnosis 
  <55 years 181/4,856 2.43 (1.51–3.09) 1.69 (1.10–2.57) Ref. 0.78 (0.49–1.24) 1.10 (0.66–1.84) 0.04 
  >55 years 322/7,734 2.10 (1.54–2.86) 1.04 (0.75–1.46) Ref. 1.40 (0.97–2.02) 0.84 (0.46–1.51)  
 Stage 
  III 187/1,258 2.22 (1.47–3.37) 1.68 (1.13–2.49) Ref. 0.90 (0.50–1.60) 1.39 (0.78–2.47) 0.24 
  II 229/4,378 2.42 (1.65–3.54) 1.21 (0.82–1.81) Ref. 1.10 (0.73–1.65) 0.84 (0.47–1.50)  
  I 87/6,954 1.37 (0.67–2.84) 0.41 (0.16–1.03) Ref. 1.12 (0.61–2.05) 0.61 (0.19–1.99)  
All-cause death 
 Age at diagnosis 
  <55 years 243/4,856 2.95 (2.01–4.34) 1.57 (1.08–2.28) Ref. 0.69 (0.45–1.05) 1.12 (0.72–1.75) 0.02 
  >55 years 737/7,734 2.21 (1.80–2.72) 1.05 (0.84–1.31) Ref. 1.10 (0.86–1.40) 0.88 (0.60–1.29)  
 Stage 
  III 240/1,258 2.16 (1.49–3.14) 1.65 (1.16–2.35) Ref. 0.91 (0.55–1.50) 1.42 (0.87–2.34) 0.01 
  II 401/4,378 2.45 (1.86–3.25) 1.13 (0.83–1.52) Ref. 0.84 (0.60–1.17) 0.78 (0.50–1.23)  
  I 339/6,954 2.48 (1.80–3.42) 0.80 (0.55–1.15) Ref. 1.07 (0.77–1.50) 0.86 (0.48–1.55)  

NOTE: Adjusted for age at diagnosis (continuous), race, smoking status, alcohol intake, stage (in BMI subgroup), grade, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no), receipt of radiotherapy (yes/no), and prediagnosis BMI. Pinteraction from likelihood ratio test comparing models with and without interaction terms of weight change category and each subgroup variable.

In sensitivity analyses, we found stronger associations with weight loss among never-smokers. Controlling for at-diagnosis BMI or defining exposure as weight change from 12 to 24 months postdiagnosis produced similar associations (data not shown).

This study of 12,590 breast cancer survivors is the largest U.S.-based cohort to examine the association of postdiagnosis weight change and mortality. We found the association of postdiagnosis weight change varied over follow-up. For women who lost weight, the HRs were highest in the earlier postdiagnosis period, from 18 to 54 months. However, large weight loss (≥10%) remained associated with worse survival even in the later period of follow-up (>54 months postdiagnosis). For moderate weight loss (>5%–10%), risk of death was significantly increased in the earlier postdiagnosis period, but not later. Weight gain was not associated with death in the earlier postdiagnosis period; later in follow-up an adverse association emerged, but only for overweight women. Results were similar for death due to breast cancer.

The increased risk of death with large weight loss and the lack of a decreased risk with modest weight loss are consistent with previous observational studies (8–12). It is possible that large weight loss reflects treatment and disease burden rather than voluntary improvement in lifestyle behaviors. Indeed, with few exceptions (11), observational studies have not assessed the intentionality of weight loss. Ongoing trials in Europe (5, 20) and the United States (3) should help to determine whether intentional weight loss improves breast cancer survival.

Although we did not have information on intentionality, we found large weight loss was consistently harmful across all subgroups. This suggests that even among overweight/obese women, there may be patients for whom weight loss has an adverse rather than protective influence on survival after breast cancer. One reason for this could be that during the cancer trajectory, alterations in nutrient intake and absorption impact energy metabolism and mobilization. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy may lead to reduced physical activity, reduced appetite, nausea, diarrhea, and other symptoms that could produce weight loss, or, even in the absence of weight loss, loss of muscle (21, 22). Weight loss during treatment is associated with chemotherapy-related toxicity and decreased survival (23, 24). Patients may need some degree of metabolic reserve to withstand active treatment, and weight loss in the early postdiagnosis period, intentional or not, may combine with the metabolic burden of treatment and recovery to adversely impact the transition into survivorship. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found large weight loss in the 18 months after diagnosis was most strongly associated with mortality in the earlier period of follow-up (18–54 months postdiagnosis); however, the association of large weight loss with worse survival persisted even into the later follow-up period (>54 months postdiagnosis).

With regards to postdiagnosis weight gain, associations with survival have been inconsistent. For example, a recent meta-analysis concluded postdiagnosis weight gain ≥10% of bodyweight was associated with higher all-cause mortality only for women whose BMI at diagnosis was <25 kg/m2. There was no association with breast cancer–specific mortality or among women with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 at diagnosis (13). This meta-analysis did not address weight loss. Our study also found an adverse association of weight gain, but only later in follow-up and only among women with at-diagnosis BMI 25–<30 kg/m2. In our analysis, power was limited to evaluate large weight gain as few (6%) breast cancer survivors gain ≥10% of diagnosis body weight.

We found no evidence of variation by breast cancer subtype, although power was limited in less common subgroups (i.e., HER2+). Contrary to our finding that weight gain was not associated with survival, a pooled analysis of 6,295 5-year survivors of early-stage ER+ cancer found that weight gain ≥10% was associated with late recurrence (25). Consistent with our results, the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study found women with TNBC who lost ≥5% of body weight by 18 or 36 months postdiagnosis had higher mortality compared with women with stable body weight; weight gain was not associated with mortality.

A key limitation of ours and other studies of weight change is the lack of information on body composition (26). Even for a patient with stable weight, there may be considerable loss/gain of skeletal muscle and/or fat. At-diagnosis sarcopenia (loss of muscle mass, strength, and function) predicts worse survival (27). Sarcopenia combined with subsequent muscle loss may explain the adverse associations with weight loss: skeletal muscle is a key tissue for insulin-mediated glucose uptake and muscle loss may contribute to systemic inflammation and insulin resistance, which are associated with poor breast cancer outcomes (28–31). Furthermore, the type of fat loss (e.g., subcutaneous versus visceral) may differentially influence survival. The relation of changes in weight and body composition to survival is an ongoing area of research that furthers our understanding of mechanisms and how to target interventions.

As noted earlier, the association of large weight loss with worse survival was more pronounced earlier in follow-up. One prior study examined temporal patterns of mortality in breast cancer survivors: the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP) found a stronger influence of weight change on survival earlier in follow-up (within 2 years postdiagnosis) than later (7). The LIBCSP data also suggest that excess cardiovascular (CVD) mortality among breast cancer survivors (compared with women without a breast cancer history) only becomes evident 7 years postdiagnosis (32), providing further evidence that mortality associations vary over time. Later in follow-up, overweight women in our study who gained weight experienced higher all-cause and breast cancer–specific mortality; we speculate that with additional follow-up all women gaining substantial weight might experience worse survival due to CVD (already a contributing cause for 30% of deaths) and perhaps late recurrence as weight gain increases circulating estrogen, hyperinsulinemia, and inflammatory cytokine production (28). However, there were few overweight women who gained >5% of diagnosis body weight.

An important strength of our study was frequent weighing by medical assistants, allowing us to match prospectively collected weights to index dates and harmonize exposure timing across participants. In contrast, other studies used self-reported or recalled weight. We addressed some limitations of prior studies by controlling for adjuvant chemotherapy and tumor characteristics and identifying patients at diagnosis (8). We also had sufficient statistical power to examine separate weight gain and loss categories. Our large sample was racially and ethnically diverse, enhancing generalizability.

Among limitations, we lacked information on adjuvant endocrine therapy, disease recurrence, or intentionality of weight loss. However, sensitivity analyses examining weight changes between 12 months (when treatment is typically complete and disease-induced weight loss less likely) and 24 months postdiagnosis revealed similarly adverse associations of large weight loss. Our follow-up began 18 months after diagnosis, thereby excluding early deaths and partially mitigating confounding by severe disease. Also, stratified analyses showed similar associations of large weight loss with mortality regardless of stage. Large weight loss was significantly associated with worse survival in both earlier and later periods of follow-up; however, associations were stronger closer to diagnosis. One interpretation is that the harms of weight loss wane over time; another is that patients susceptible to harm are depleted from the risk set later in follow-up.

In conclusion, large weight loss among breast cancer survivors was associated with worse survival, even later in follow-up. While upcoming trials will provide information about the effect of intentional weight loss in overweight/obese breast cancer survivors, many patients may also experience large weight loss regardless of intervention. Research should examine the changes in body composition that accompany weight loss among breast cancer survivors and how changes in body composition influence long-term prognosis after a diagnosis of breast cancer.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: E.M. Cespedes Feliciano, W.Y. Chen, C.M. Prado, B.J. Caan

Development of methodology: E.M. Cespedes Feliciano, W.Y. Chen, B.J. Caan

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): C.M. Prado, A.L. Castillo, B.J. Caan

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): E.M. Cespedes Feliciano, C.H. Kroenke, P.T. Bradshaw, E.K. Weltzien, B.J. Caan

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: E.M. Cespedes Feliciano, C.H. Kroenke, P.T. Bradshaw, W.Y. Chen, C.M. Prado, A.L. Castillo, B.J. Caan

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): E.M. Cespedes Feliciano, E.K. Weltzien, A.L. Castillo

Study supervision: C.M. Prado, B.J. Caan

This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grant 5R01CA184953-02 (to B.J. Caan, C.H. Kroenke, W.Y. Chen, C.M. Prado, E.M. Cespedes Feliciano, E.K. Weltzien, and A.L. Castillo).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1.
American Cancer Society
.
Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts & Figures 2014–2015
; 
2014
[cited 2015 Dec 23]. Available from
: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/documents/document/acspc-042801.pdf.
2.
Runowicz
CD
,
Leach
CR
,
Henry
NL
,
Henry
KS
,
Mackey
HT
,
Cowens-Alvarado
RL
, et al
American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline
.
J Clin Oncol
2015
;
34
:
611
35
.
3.
NCIC Clinical Trials Group
. 
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
.
MAC20 (ALLIANCE A011401) randomized phase III trial evaluating the role of weight loss in adjuvant treatment of overweight and obese women with early breast cancer
; 
2015
. Available from
: https://www.ctg.queensu.ca/public/all-disease-sites.
4.
Reeves
MM
,
Terranova
CO
,
Eakin
EG
,
Demark-Wahnefried
W
. 
Weight loss intervention trials in women with breast cancer: a systematic review
.
Obes Rev
2014
;
15
:
749
68
.
5.
Villarini
A
,
Pasanisi
P
,
Traina
A
,
Mano
MP
,
Bonanni
B
,
Panico
S
, et al
Lifestyle and breast cancer recurrences: the DIANA-5 trial
.
Tumori
2012
;
98
:
1
18
.
6.
Bao
J
,
Borja
N
,
Rao
M
,
Huth
J
,
Leitch
AM
,
Rivers
A
, et al
Impact of weight change during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic response in triple-negative breast cancer
.
Cancer Med
2015
;
4
:
500
6
.
7.
Bradshaw
PT
,
Ibrahim
JG
,
Stevens
J
,
Cleveland
R
,
Abrahamson
PE
,
Satia
JA
, et al
Postdiagnosis change in bodyweight and survival after breast cancer diagnosis
.
Epidemiology
2012
;
23
:
320
7
.
8.
Caan
BJ
,
Kwan
ML
,
Hartzell
G
,
Castillo
A
,
Slattery
ML
,
Sternfeld
B
, et al
Pre-diagnosis body mass index, post-diagnosis weight change, and prognosis among women with early stage breast cancer
.
Cancer Causes Control
2008
;
19
:
1319
28
.
9.
Caan
BJ
,
Kwan
ML
,
Shu
XO
,
Pierce
JP
,
Patterson
RE
,
Nechuta
SJ
, et al
Weight change and survival after breast cancer in the after breast cancer pooling project
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2012
;
21
:
1260
71
.
10.
Chen
X
,
Lu
W
,
Zheng
W
,
Gu
K
,
Chen
Z
,
Zheng
Y
, et al
Obesity and weight change in relation to breast cancer survival
.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
2010
;
122
:
823
33
.
11.
Nichols
HB
,
Trentham-Dietz
A
,
Egan
KM
,
Titus-Ernstoff
L
,
Holmes
MD
,
Bersch
AJ
, et al
Body mass index before and after breast cancer diagnosis: associations with all-cause, breast cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2009
;
18
:
1403
9
.
12.
Kroenke
CH
,
Chen
WY
,
Rosner
B
,
Holmes
MD
. 
Weight, weight gain, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis
.
J Clin Oncol
2005
;
23
:
1370
8
.
13.
Playdon
MC
,
Bracken
MB
,
Sanft
TB
,
Ligibel
JA
,
Harrigan
M
,
Irwin
ML
. 
Weight gain after breast cancer diagnosis and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2015
;
107
:
djv275
.
14.
Thivat
E
,
Thérondel
S
,
Lapirot
O
,
Abrial
C
,
Gimbergues
P
,
Gadéa
E
, et al
Weight change during chemotherapy changes the prognosis in non metastatic breast cancer for the worse
.
BMC Cancer
2010
;
10
:
648
.
15.
Cowper
DC
,
Kubal
JD
,
Maynard
C
,
Hynes
DM
. 
A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases
.
Ann Epidemiol
2002
;
12
:
462
8
.
16.
Charlson
ME
,
Pompei
P
,
Ales
KL
,
MacKenzie
CR
. 
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation
.
J Chronic Dis
1987
;
40
:
373
83
.
17.
Greenland
S
. 
Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis
.
Epidemiology
1995
;
6
:
356
65
.
18.
Prat
A
,
Cheang
MCU
,
Martín
M
,
Parker
JS
,
Carrasco
E
,
Caballero
R
, et al
Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor–positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
2013
;
31
:
203
9
.
19.
Goldhirsch
A
,
Wood
W
,
Coates
A
,
Gelber
R
,
Thürlimann
B
,
Senn
H-J
. 
Strategies for subtypes—dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011
.
Ann Oncol
2011
:
22
:
1736
47
.
20.
Rack
B
,
Andergassen
U
,
Neugebauer
J
,
Salmen
J
,
Hepp
P
,
Sommer
H
, et al
The German SUCCESS C study–the first European lifestyle study on breast cancer
.
Breast Care
2010
;
5
:
395
400
.
21.
Muss
HB
,
Berry
DA
,
Cirrincione
C
,
Budman
DR
,
Henderson
IC
,
Citron
ML
, et al
Toxicity of older and younger patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience
.
J Clin Oncol
2007
;
25
:
3699
704
.
22.
Vera-Badillo
FE
,
Al-Mubarak
M
,
Templeton
AJ
,
Amir
E
. 
Benefit and harms of new anti-cancer drugs
.
Curr Oncol Rep
2013
;
15
:
270
5
.
23.
Marian
M
. 
Oncology nutrition for clinical practice
.
In:
Leser
M. LN
,
Bergerson
S
,
Trujillo
E
,
editors
.
Energetics, exercise and cancer
.
Chicago, IL
:
Oncology Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
; 
2013
.
p.
41
6
.
24.
Prado
CM
. 
Body composition in chemotherapy: the promising role of CT scans
.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care
2013
;
16
:
525
33
.
25.
Nechuta
S
,
Chen
WY
,
Cai
H
,
Poole
EM
,
Kwan
ML
,
Flatt
SW
, et al
A pooled analysis of post-diagnosis lifestyle factors in association with late estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer prognosis
.
Int J Cancer
2016
;
138
:
2088
97
.
26.
Prado
CM
,
Gonzalez
MC
,
Heymsfield
SB
. 
Body composition phenotypes and obesity paradox
.
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care
2015
;
18
:
535
51
.
27.
Villasenor
A
,
Ballard-Barbash
R
,
Baumgartner
K
,
Baumgartner
R
,
Bernstein
L
,
McTiernan
A
, et al
Prevalence and prognostic effect of sarcopenia in breast cancer survivors: the HEAL Study
.
J Cancer Surviv
2012
;
6
:
398
406
.
28.
Coughlin
SS
,
Smith
SA
. 
The insulin-like growth factor axis, adipokines, physical activity, and obesity in relation to breast cancer incidence and recurrence
.
Cancer Clin Oncol
2015
;
4
:
24
.
29.
Goh
J
,
Niksirat
N
,
Campbell
KL
. 
Exercise training and immune crosstalk in breast cancer microenvironment: exploring the paradigms of exercise-induced immune modulation and exercise-induced myokines
.
Am J Transl Res
2014
;
6
:
422
.
30.
Hauner
D
,
Hauner
H
. 
Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer: is there a link?
Breast Care
2014
;
9
:
277
81
.
31.
Iyengar
NM
,
Zhou
XK
,
Gucalp
A
,
Morris
PG
,
Howe
LR
,
Giri
D
, et al
Systemic correlates of white adipose tissue inflammation in early-stage breast cancer
.
Clin Cancer Res
2016
;
22
:
2283
9
.
32.
Bradshaw
PT
,
Stevens
J
,
Khankari
N
,
Teitelbaum
SL
,
Neugut
AI
,
Gammon
MD
. 
Cardiovascular disease mortality among breast cancer survivors
.
Epidemiology
2016
;
27
:
6
13
.