Background: Population-level research on the implications of retail pharmacy policies to end the sale of tobacco products is scant, and the impact of such policies on racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities across neighborhoods in access to tobacco products remains unexplored.

Methods: We investigated the association between neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco retail density in Rhode Island (RI; N = 240 census tracts). We also investigated whether the CVS Health (N = 60) policy to end the sale of tobacco products reduces the disparity in the density of tobacco retail across neighborhoods, and we conducted a prospective policy analysis to determine whether a similar policy change in all pharmacies in RI (N = 135) would reduce the disparity in tobacco retail density.

Results: The results revealed statistically significant associations between neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco retail outlet density across RI neighborhoods. The results when excluding the CVS Health locations, as well as all pharmacies as tobacco retailers, revealed no change in the pattern for this association.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that while a commendable tobacco control policy, the CVS Health policy appears to have no impact on the neighborhood racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the density of tobacco retailers in RI. Prospective policy analyses showed no impact on this disparity even if all other pharmacies in the state adopted a similar policy.

Impact: Policy efforts aimed at reducing the disparity in access to tobacco products should focus on reducing the density of tobacco outlets in poor and racial/ethnic neighborhoods. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(9); 1305–10. ©2016 AACR.

This article is featured in Highlights of This Issue, p. 1279

The implementation of “supply-side” tobacco control policy (e.g., restricting supply and availability) through pharmacies has been gaining traction recently in the United States (1, 2). In 2010, the American Pharmacy Association issued a policy statement urging all pharmacies to discontinue the sale of tobacco products (3). The announcement by Rhode Island-based CVS Health (formerly CVS Caremark) that it will no longer sell cigarettes or tobacco-related products at its approximately 7,600 pharmacy stores nationwide (4) starting in September 2014 sparked considerable discussion (5–9). Yet, the potential impact of the CVS Health policy action on smoking behavior as well as what this action means for other pharmacy retailers selling tobacco products remains unclear (10). In addition, the potential impact of this policy on racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in access to tobacco products remains unexplored.

Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable deaths in the United States and imposes a high morbidity burden (11, 12). While studies have found that African Americans and Hispanics smoke less than Whites and multiracial groups (13), research shows efforts by tobacco companies target low-income and minority neighborhoods (14–16). The neighborhood retail environment has been shown to impact food- (17–19), alcohol- (20–22), and tobacco- (23–25) related behaviors of residents, and low-income and racial/ethnic minority neighborhoods contain fewer healthy food choices (26–28) and have a higher density of alcohol (29–31) and tobacco (14, 32–35) outlets than higher-income neighborhoods. Recent studies have found a positive association between retail tobacco outlet density and smoking initiation (36) and prevalence (37), as well as the reduced likelihood of cessation (38). A recent report from The Institute of Medicine (IOM) suggests that the retail environment “be designed to effectuate the public health goals of discouraging tobacco use and reducing the numbers of people with tobacco-related diseases” (39) and that state governments and public health agencies address the density of tobacco retailers by focusing on where such retailers are located (40).

Given that supply-side tobacco control policies focused on the retail environment are only recently being implemented, little data exist on the impact of such policies on tobacco access and smoking behavior. Preliminary data from a CVS Health study in two cities with policies that eliminated the sale of tobacco products in retail pharmacies (Boston and San Francisco) revealed a statistically significant reduction in the mean number of tobacco purchasers following the policy change (41). In addition, evidence from alcohol research suggests that a reduction in the density of alcohol outlets in an area reduces consumption (39, 42, 43).

The positive association between tobacco retail density and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics such as low socioeconomic status (SES) and percentage of African American/Black and Hispanic residents has been reported for the entire United States (44) and at the state level [New York (45), New Jersey (46), and Iowa (34, 47)]. These studies suggest that policies aimed at reducing the availability of and access to cigarettes (i.e., the density of tobacco retailers) across neighborhoods might also reduce racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in cigarette access across neighborhoods. However, it is unknown if the policy of pharmacies to end the sale of tobacco products would reduce tobacco retail density across neighborhoods. To our knowledge, no study has been conducted evaluating the potential impact on the socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in the density of tobacco retail outlets across neighborhoods when pharmacy retailers end the sale of tobacco products.

The aims of the current study were to investigate the association between neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco retail outlet density in the state of Rhode Island (RI) to determine whether racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in tobacco retail density are present across RI neighborhoods. We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between the percentage of racial/ethnic minorities in a neighborhood and the density of tobacco retail outlets, as well as a positive association between neighborhood poverty and the density of tobacco retail outlets. Given the announcement by RI-based CVS Health to end the sale of tobacco products in its CVS stores, we also investigated whether this policy change would attenuate disparities in the density of tobacco retailers across neighborhoods. Finally, we conducted a prospective policy analysis to determine whether a policy change in which all pharmacies in RI ended the sale of tobacco products would reduce the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in tobacco retail density across RI neighborhoods.

Data

The unit of analysis in our study was the census tract based on the 2010 U.S. Census for the dependent variable (density of tobacco retailers) and independent variables (sociodemographic characteristics of the census tract). There are 241 census tracts in the state of RI; however, one tract with no residents but three tobacco outlets was dropped from the analysis. For the analysis presented here, 240 census tracts were used.

Dependent variable

Density of tobacco retailers.

Rhode Island General Law 44-20-8.1 directs the tax administrator to create and maintain an online listing of all entities holding a cigarette license in the state. This listing must be updated no fewer than six times a year. We used the list of retailers holding a cigarette license in the state that was last updated on May 18, 2015, to obtain names and addresses of tobacco retailers. Addresses were then geocoded using the commercial geocoding service TomTom Global Geocoder (http://www.programmableweb.com/api/tomtom-geocoding). There were 1,338 addresses obtained, of which 1,334 were successfully geocoded (99.7%). Of the four locations not geocoded, three were assigned to out-of-state addresses and the fourth did not provide a valid address.

The density of tobacco retailers was measured as the number of licensed tobacco retailers per 10 km of roadway in the census tract (33, 34, 46). The selection of 10 km of roadway in the calculation of the density variable was based on previous tobacco density studies using the census tract as the level of analysis (33,34). Two additional density variables were calculated in the same manner: the first was density of tobacco outlets per 10 km of roadway in the census tract after removing CVS Health store locations, and the second was density of tobacco retailers per 10 km of roadway in the census tract after removing all pharmacies and drug stores (defined as any retailer whose name contained “drug,” “pharmacy,” or the name of a major drug store chain). All three of the density variables were non-normal, so a constant of one was added to all values (since some densities were 0), and they were then log-transformed for inclusion in regression models.

Independent variables

Census tract sociodemographic data.

Population data for the 240 census tracts in RI were obtained from the 2010 U.S. Census and the 2007–2011 American Community Survey (ACS) averages available from the U.S. Census Bureau. The Census and ACS variables used in this study included five variables: three socioeconomic variables: (i) median household income, (ii) percent of adults with a high school diploma or greater, and (iii) percent of families in poverty, and two demographic variables, (iv) percent Hispanic residents, and (v) percent African American/Black residents. All independent variables were included in models as continuous variables.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics (mean, SD, minimum, and maximum) were calculated for each dependent and independent variable. We then constructed five ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models with the log-transformed tobacco retailer density regressed on each of the census tract sociodemographic variables. Next, we constructed five OLS models using the density dependent variable with CVS Health locations removed, regressing the log-transformed tobacco retail outlet density variable on each of the census tract sociodemographic variables. Finally, the prospective policy analysis included the construction of five OLS models with the removal of all pharmacies in the calculation of the density of tobacco retailers dependent variable; as in the previous models, the log-transformed tobacco retail outlet density variable (with all pharmacies removed) was regressed on each of the census tract sociodemographic variables.

We used Moran's I to determine whether there was spatial clustering of tobacco density retailers beyond what would be expected at random. A Moran's I value close to 1 suggests spatial autocorrelation and that a spatial pattern should be considered in subsequent analyses (48, 49). We then used geographically weighted regression (GWR) to account for any spatial clustering. The GWR models used the same log-transformed outcomes and the five separate demographic predictors as the OLS models.

The number of tobacco outlets per 10 km of roadway within RI census tracts ranged from 0 to 11.83 (see Table 1; see density map in Fig. 1). The average km of roadway within the census tracts in RI was 45.13 km, and there was a negative statistically significant association between population density per square km and roadway length (r = −0.56; P < 0.001). The percent of African American/Black or Hispanic residents in the census tracts ranged from zero to 74.6% African American/Black and from zero to 48.4% Hispanic (see Table 1). There were 60 CVS stores with a license to sell tobacco in RI (4.5% of the total number of tobacco retailers in the state), and a total of 135 pharmacies in RI were tobacco retailers (10% of all tobacco retailers; see Table 2). We also found a positive statistically significant association between population densities per square km and the count of tobacco retailers per 10 km of roadway within the census tract (r = 0.26; P < 0.001), but a negative non-statistically significant association between population density per square km and the count of pharmacies per 10 km of roadway within the census tract (r = −0.04; P = 0.651).

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics by census tracts in RI

Range
Total # of census tracts: 240MeanSDMinMax
Dependent variable 
 Tobacco outlets per 10 km of roadway 2.25 2.42 11.83 
Independent variables 
 % African American/Black (of total pop) 11.97 17.2 74.6 
 % Hispanic (of total pop) 7.52 9.2 48.4 
 % HS grad or higher 83.73 11.64 48.2 100 
 % Families in poverty 10.02 11.59 70 
Median household income ($) 58,453 22,733 1,148 144,792 
Range
Total # of census tracts: 240MeanSDMinMax
Dependent variable 
 Tobacco outlets per 10 km of roadway 2.25 2.42 11.83 
Independent variables 
 % African American/Black (of total pop) 11.97 17.2 74.6 
 % Hispanic (of total pop) 7.52 9.2 48.4 
 % HS grad or higher 83.73 11.64 48.2 100 
 % Families in poverty 10.02 11.59 70 
Median household income ($) 58,453 22,733 1,148 144,792 
Figure 1.

Tobacco retailer outlet density (stores per 10 km of roadway).

Figure 1.

Tobacco retailer outlet density (stores per 10 km of roadway).

Close modal
Table 2.

Tobacco retailers in RI

N (%)
CVS stores 60 (4.5%) 
All pharmacies (including CVS stores) 135 (10.1%) 
All other tobacco retailers 1,199 
Total tobacco retailers 1,334 (100%) 
N (%)
CVS stores 60 (4.5%) 
All pharmacies (including CVS stores) 135 (10.1%) 
All other tobacco retailers 1,199 
Total tobacco retailers 1,334 (100%) 

The results of the first set of OLS regression models revealed a statistically significant association between neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco retail outlet density (see Table 3). In particular, as the tobacco retail outlet density of a neighborhood increases the household income and educational attainment of the neighborhood decreases; in addition, as the percentages of African Americans/Blacks, Hispanics, and families living in poverty increases in neighborhoods, so did the tobacco retail outlet density (see Table 3). The results of the five OLS regression models excluding the CVS Health locations as well as the models excluding all pharmacies as tobacco retailers revealed the same pattern for the association between neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics and tobacco retail outlet density as the first set of OLS models (see Tables 4 and 5), with regression coefficients similar to the original models. The Moran's I value for census tract density of tobacco retailers was 0.26, with a P value <0.0001, suggesting some spatial patterning in the outcome. The GWR models revealed similar results to the OLS regression models (data not shown).

Table 3.

OLS regression analysis of tobacco retailer density on sociodemographic characteristics of census tracts in RI, including all pharmacies

Individual predictor modelsDensity of tobacco outlets
N = 240 tractsBeta estimate95% CIR-squared
Median household income (per $10,000 increase) −0.198 (−0.222 to −0.173) 0.51 
% High school education or greater −0.038 (−0.043 to −0.033) 0.49 
% Hispanic 0.036 (0.029–0.044) 0.28 
% African American/Black 0.023 (0.020–0.027) 0.41 
% Families in poverty 0.033 (0.028–0.039) 0.38 
Individual predictor modelsDensity of tobacco outlets
N = 240 tractsBeta estimate95% CIR-squared
Median household income (per $10,000 increase) −0.198 (−0.222 to −0.173) 0.51 
% High school education or greater −0.038 (−0.043 to −0.033) 0.49 
% Hispanic 0.036 (0.029–0.044) 0.28 
% African American/Black 0.023 (0.020–0.027) 0.41 
% Families in poverty 0.033 (0.028–0.039) 0.38 
Table 4.

OLS regression analysis of tobacco retailer density on sociodemographic characteristics of census tracts in RI, excluding CVS pharmacies

Individual predictor modelsDensity without CVS
N = 240 tractsBeta estimate95% CIR-squared
Median household income (per $10,000 increase) −0.200 (−0.221 to −0.171) 0.50 
% High school education or greater −0.038 (−0.043 to −0.033) 0.50 
% Hispanic 0.037 (0.029–0.044) 0.29 
% African American/Black 0.024 (0.020–0.027) 0.42 
% Families in poverty 0.034 (0.028–0.039) 0.39 
Individual predictor modelsDensity without CVS
N = 240 tractsBeta estimate95% CIR-squared
Median household income (per $10,000 increase) −0.200 (−0.221 to −0.171) 0.50 
% High school education or greater −0.038 (−0.043 to −0.033) 0.50 
% Hispanic 0.037 (0.029–0.044) 0.29 
% African American/Black 0.024 (0.020–0.027) 0.42 
% Families in poverty 0.034 (0.028–0.039) 0.39 
Table 5.

OLS regression analysis of tobacco retailer density on sociodemographic characteristics of census tracts in RI, excluding all pharmacies

Individual predictor modelsDensity without all pharmacies
N = 240 tractsBeta estimate95% CIR-squared
Median household income (per $10,000 increase) −0.195 (−0.219 to −0.170) 0.51 
% High school education or greater −0.038 (−0.042 to −0.033) 0.51 
% Hispanic 0.037 (0.029–0.043) 0.29 
% African American/Black 0.024 (0.020–0.027) 0.43 
% Families in poverty 0.034 (0.029–0.039) 0.40 
Individual predictor modelsDensity without all pharmacies
N = 240 tractsBeta estimate95% CIR-squared
Median household income (per $10,000 increase) −0.195 (−0.219 to −0.170) 0.51 
% High school education or greater −0.038 (−0.042 to −0.033) 0.51 
% Hispanic 0.037 (0.029–0.043) 0.29 
% African American/Black 0.024 (0.020–0.027) 0.43 
% Families in poverty 0.034 (0.029–0.039) 0.40 

To better align its health-promoting business activities with the products it sells (4), RI-based CVS Health implemented a supply-side tobacco control policy by banning tobacco sales in its stores. The current study sought to examine the potential impact of this policy on racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the density of tobacco outlets across neighborhoods in RI. Similar to previous studies in New Jersey (47), New York (46), and Iowa (48) investigating the association between the sociodemographic characteristics of neighborhoods and tobacco retail outlet density, our results showed that as the density of tobacco retail outlets increases in neighborhoods, so did the percentage of African American/Black and Hispanic residents, as well as the percentage of residents living in poverty; we also found that as the number of tobacco retail outlets increases the neighborhood socioeconomic status (median income and educational attainment in the census tract) decreases. Our results suggest a racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparity in tobacco access across neighborhoods in the state of RI, with a greater density of tobacco retailers in neighborhoods with more African American/Black and Hispanic residents and in neighborhoods with lower household incomes and more families in poverty. While studies at the state level have observed a similar trend, one study at the city level found no association between tobacco outlet density and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics for neighborhoods in Boston (50).

Tobacco control policies have been shown to be important contributors to changing the social profile of cigarette smoking (51). Thus, not surprisingly, the CVS Health policy to end tobacco sales was supported by more than 25 public health and medical organizations (10). While the CVS policy to end the sale of all tobacco products is a commendable population health policy, our results highlight the distinction between population health policy and population health disparities policy. Specifically, our results show that the CVS Health policy to end the sale of tobacco products appears to have no impact on the racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the density of tobacco retail outlets across neighborhoods, and our results suggest that even if all other pharmacies in RI adopted a similar policy, these disparities would persist. These findings are likely due to both the locations of CVS Health stores and other pharmacies and their relatively small number in RI (CVS Health locations make up less than 5% of all tobacco retailers in the state). The negative association between population density per square km and the count of pharmacies suggests that in Rhode Island, the small numbers of pharmacies are more likely to be located in less dense neighborhoods.

From a health equity perspective, it is important to be explicit when a policy is aimed to reduce the burden of a disease (or reduce a risk factor for a disease) for the entire population and when a policy is aimed at reducing the disparity in that disease or risk factor (52). The CVS Health policy to end the sale of tobacco products is a monumental supply-side tobacco control policy. Importantly, it should be noted that the CVS Health policy has not been put forth explicitly as an effort to eliminate disparities in access to tobacco products; but rather as an attempt to address the incongruence between pharmacies primarily selling products intended to benefit health and also participating in the sale of products that are unquestionably known to be detrimental to health. Nevertheless, Graham suggests that tobacco control policies should be situated within their social context and warns that policy implementation will likely not yield uniform impacts across social groups (51). Therefore, although the CVS Health policy may reduce the number of overall tobacco outlets, in RI that reduction is not evenly distributed throughout the state and appears to have less of an impact on tobacco retail density at the neighborhood level as the percentages of African American/Black, Hispanic, and low-socioeconomic residents increases.

There are a few weaknesses related to our study. First, our analysis strategy investigating the potential impact of the CVS Health policy and the prospective policy analysis for all pharmacies in RI assumed removal without substitution. That is, we assumed the removal of CVS Health and all other pharmacies as tobacco retailers would not be replaced by other tobacco retailers. Second, census tracts might not be the physical configuration that best captures the pathway between neighborhood composition and access to tobacco products because consumers might travel outside the census tract of residence to purchase tobacco products. This problem highlights the uncertain geographic context problem (UGCP) in this type of ecological analysis, where UGCP refers to the inability to determine the precise geographic configuration of the physical factors that impact the phenomenon of interest (53). Therefore, future tobacco control research and policy should continue to explore the pathway between the presence of tobacco retail outlets and tobacco acquisition and use behaviors so that the factors that truly impact tobacco use decision-making can be explicated and more targeted interventions developed. Finally, given that in Rhode Island only 10% of the tobacco retailers are pharmacies, the generalization of our results to other states might be limited, and the impact of retail pharmacies ending the sale of tobacco products might have a different impact on disparities in other states, especially if those pharmacies are located in racial/ethnic minority and low SES neighborhoods. There are also several strengths to be noted in our study. First, to our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the impact of the CVS Health policy to remove tobacco products from its stores across an entire state. Second, we not only investigated the impact of the CVS policy but also the potential impact of all pharmacies adopting such a policy on disparities in density at the state level.

RI is the smallest state in the United States, with a population of 1.05 million and land covering approximately 1,033 square miles (54). In RI, tobacco retail policy is developed at the local level, and each municipality determines the number and location of tobacco retailers to which it issues a tobacco retailer license. Potential policy solutions to reduce the density of tobacco outlets across neighborhoods include the following: (i) restrict the types of businesses that can sell tobacco, and (ii) regulate where tobacco retailers can locate within a city (55). In our evaluation of the density of all tobacco retailer types across the highest and lowest quintile for each of our independent variables (percent African American/Black residents, percent Hispanic residents, percent families living in poverty, and percent of adults with less than a high school diploma), food stores, including grocery and convenience stores, had the highest density (data not shown). Not surprisingly, convenience store density and distance have been found to be positively associated with smoking behavior of neighborhood residents (56). Data from the Association for Convenience & Petroleum Retailing in 2010 suggest that across the United States, cigarettes accounted for the largest share of sales inside convenience stores, at 35.9% of total sales (57). On the basis of these national data and the results of our study, possible policy actions to address disparities in the density of tobacco retail outlets across neighborhoods in RI might require a “retail agnostic” approach that focuses on reducing tobacco retail density regardless of retail type. Our results suggest that the density of tobacco retail outlets in racial/ethnic and low-socioeconomic neighborhoods is not necessarily because of pharmacies as tobacco retailers. Therefore, in addition to eliminating pharmacies as tobacco retail outlets in a population tobacco control policy, policy efforts in RI aimed at reducing the disparity in access to tobacco products should focus on reducing the overall density of tobacco outlets in poor and racial/ethnic neighborhoods by limiting the number of tobacco retailers in those neighborhoods.

R.D. Tucker-Seeley is a member of the Rhode Island Commission for Health Advocacy and Equity. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Conception and design:R.D. Tucker-Seeley

Development of methodology: R.D. Tucker-Seeley, P. James

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.):R.D. Tucker-Seeley, C.P. Bezold, P. James

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis):R.D. Tucker-Seeley, C.P. Bezold, P. James

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: R.D. Tucker-Seeley, C.P. Bezold, P. James, M. Miller, S.F. Wallington

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases):R.D. Tucker-Seeley, C.P. Bezold

Study supervision: R.D. Tucker-Seeley

The authors thank Dr. Vaughan Rees for helpful comments on policy strategies and Dr. Glorian Sorensen for helpful comments on an early draft of the manuscript.

R.D. Tucker-Seeley was supported by an NCI K01 Career Development Grant (K01 CA169041). C.P. Bezold was supported by an NIH training grant (T32ES007069). P. James was supported by the Harvard NHLBI Cardiovascular Epidemiology Training Grant (T32 HL098048). S.F. Wallington was supported by an NCI K01 Career Development Grant (K01 CA155417).

1.
Kroon
LA
,
Corelli
RL
,
Roth
AP
,
Hudmon
KS
. 
Public perceptions of the ban on tobacco sales in San Francisco pharmacies
.
Tob Control
2013
;
22
:
369
71
.
2.
Hudmon
KS
,
Fenlon
CM
,
Corelli
RL
,
Prokhorov
AV
,
Schroeder
SA
. 
Tobacco sales in pharmacies: time to quit
.
Tob Control
2006
;
15
:
35
8
.
3.
American Pharmacists Association
. 
Report of the 2010 APhA House of Delegates: actions of the legislative body of the American Pharmacists Association
.
J Am Pharm Assoc
2010
;
50
:
471
2
.
4.
Brennan
TA
,
Schroeder
SA
. 
Ending sales of tobacco products in pharmacies
.
JAMA
2014
;
311
:
1105
6
.
5.
Brennan
TA
,
Schroeder
S
. 
Ending the sale of cigarettes at US pharmacies–reply
.
JAMA
2014
;
312
:
560
.
6.
Printz
C
. 
CVS, FDA aim to reduce tobacco use: the drugstore chain and the FDA step up antismoking efforts
.
Cancer
2014
;
120
:
1597
8
.
7.
Johnson
SR
. 
CVS decision to quit tobacco highlights its growing role as healthcare provider
.
Mod Healthc
2014
;
44
:
11
.
8.
Kolade
VO
. 
Ending the sale of cigarettes at US pharmacies
.
JAMA
2014
;
312
:
559
60
.
9.
van der Deen
FS
,
Pearson
AL
,
Wilson
N
. 
Ending the sale of cigarettes at US pharmacies
.
JAMA
2014
;
312
:
559
.
10.
American Lung Association
. 
Open letter to America's retailers, especially those with pharmacies from leading public health and medical organizations
.
Available from
: http://www.lung.org/get-involved/advocate/advocacy-documents/letter-to-retailers-tobacco-sales-02262014.pdf.
11.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
. 
The Health Consequences of Smoking–50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General
; 
2014
.
Atlanta, GA
,
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prvention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health
.
12.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses–United States, 2000–2004
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2008
;
57
:
1226
8
.
13.
Jamal
A
,
Homa
DM
,
O'Connor
E
,
Babb
SD
,
Caraballo
RS
,
Singh
T
, et al
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005–2014
.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2015
;
64
:
1233
40
.
14.
Laws
MB
,
Whitman
J
,
Bowser
DM
,
Krech
L
. 
Tobacco availability and point of sale marketing in demographically contrasting districts of Massachusetts
.
Tob Control
2002
;
11
Suppl 2
:
ii71-3
.:
ii71
ii73
.
15.
Brown-Johnson
CG
,
England
LJ
,
Glantz
SA
,
Ling
PM
. 
Tobacco industry marketing to low socioeconomic status women in the U.S.A
.
Tob Control
2014
;
23
:
e139
46
.
16.
Henriksen
L
. 
Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place
.
Tob Control
2012
;
21
:
147
53
.
17.
Cannuscio
CC
,
Tappe
K
,
Hillier
A
,
Buttenheim
A
,
Karpyn
A
,
Glanz
K
. 
Urban food environments and residents' shopping behaviors
.
Am J Prev Med
2013
;
45
:
606
14
.
18.
Liese
AD
,
Weis
KE
,
Pluto
D
,
Smith
E
,
Lawson
A
. 
Food store types, availability, and cost of foods in a rural environment
.
J Am Diet Assoc
2007
;
107
:
1916
23
.
19.
D'Angelo
H
,
Suratkar
S
,
Song
HJ
,
Stauffer
E
,
Gittelsohn
J
. 
Access to food source and food source use are associated with healthy and unhealthy food-purchasing behaviours among low-income African-American adults in Baltimore City
.
Public Health Nutr
2011
;
14
:
1632
9
.
20.
Weitzman
ER
,
Folkman
A
,
Folkman
MP
,
Wechsler
H
. 
The relationship of alcohol outlet density to heavy and frequent drinking and drinking-related problems among college students at eight universities
.
Health Place
2003
;
9
:
1
6
.
21.
Bryden
A
,
Roberts
B
,
McKee
M
,
Petticrew
M
. 
A systematic review of the influence on alcohol use of community level availability and marketing of alcohol
.
Health Place
2012
;
18
:
349
57
.
22.
Campbell
CA
,
Hahn
RA
,
Elder
R
,
Brewer
R
,
Chattopadhyay
S
,
Fielding
J
, et al
The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms
.
Am J Prev Med
2009
;
37
:
556
69
.
23.
Cantrell
J
,
Anesetti-Rothermel
A
,
Pearson
JL
,
Xiao
H
,
Vallone
D
,
Kirchner
TR
. 
The impact of the tobacco retail outlet environment on adult cessation and differences by neighborhood poverty
.
Addiction
2015
;
110
:
152
61
.
24.
Scully
M
,
McCarthy
M
,
Zacher
M
,
Warne
C
,
Wakefield
M
,
White
V
. 
Density of tobacco retail outlets near schools and smoking behaviour among secondary school students
.
Aust N Z J Public Health
2013
;
37
:
574
8
.
25.
Johns
M
,
Sacks
R
,
Rane
M
,
Kansagra
SM
. 
Exposure to tobacco retail outlets and smoking initiation among New York City adolescents
.
J Urban Health
2013
;
90
:
1091
101
.
26.
Darmon
N
,
Drewnowski
A
. 
Does social class predict diet quality?
Am J Clin Nutr
2008
;
87
:
1107
17
.
27.
Cubbin
C
,
Winkleby
MA
. 
Food availability, personal constraints, and community resources
.
J Epidemiol Community Health
2007
;
61
:
932
.
28.
James
P
,
Arcaya
MC
,
Parker
DM
,
Tucker-Seeley
RD
,
Subramanian
SV
. 
Do minority and poor neighborhoods have higher access to fast-food restaurants in the United States?
Health Place
2014
;
29
:
10
7
.
29.
Romley
JA
,
Cohen
D
,
Ringel
J
,
Sturm
R
. 
Alcohol and environmental justice: the density of liquor stores and bars in urban neighborhoods in the United States
.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs
2007
;
68
:
48
55
.
30.
LaVeist
TA
,
Wallace
JM
 Jr
. 
Health risk and inequitable distribution of liquor stores in African American neighborhood
.
Soc Sci Med
2000
;
51
:
613
7
.
31.
Bluthenthal
RN
,
Cohen
DA
,
Farley
TA
,
Scribner
R
,
Beighley
C
,
Schonlau
M
, et al
Alcohol availability and neighborhood characteristics in Los Angeles, California and southern Louisiana
.
J Urban Health
2008
;
85
:
191
205
.
32.
Novak
SP
,
Reardon
SF
,
Raudenbush
SW
,
Buka
SL
. 
Retail tobacco outlet density and youth cigarette smoking: a propensity-modeling approach
.
Am J Public Health
2006
;
96
:
670
6
.
33.
Hyland
A
,
Travers
MJ
,
Cummings
KM
,
Bauer
J
,
Alford
T
,
Wieczorek
WF
. 
Tobacco outlet density and demographics in Erie County, New York
.
Am J Public Health
2003
;
93
:
1075
6
.
34.
Schneider
JE
,
Reid
RJ
,
Peterson
NA
,
Lowe
JB
,
Hughey
J
. 
Tobacco outlet density and demographics at the tract level of analysis in Iowa: implications for environmentally based prevention initiatives
.
Prev Sci
2005
;
6
:
319
25
.
35.
Reid
RJ
,
Morton
CM
,
Garcia-Reid
P
,
Peterson
NA
,
Yu
D
. 
Examining tobacco outlet concentration in New Jersey: does income and ethnicity matter?
J Ethn Subst Abuse
2013
;
12
:
197
209
.
36.
McCarthy
WJ
,
Mistry
R
,
Lu
Y
,
Patel
M
,
Zheng
H
,
Dietsch
B
. 
Density of tobacco retailers near schools: effects on tobacco use among students
.
Am J Public Health
2009
;
99
:
2006
2013
.
37.
Henriksen
L
,
Feighery
EC
,
Schleicher
NC
,
Cowling
DW
,
Kline
RS
,
Fortmann
SP
. 
Is adolescent smoking related to the density and proximity of tobacco outlets and retail cigarette advertising near schools?
Prev Med
2008
;
47
:
210
214
.
38.
Reitzel
LR
,
Cromley
EK
,
Li
Y
,
Cao
Y
,
Dela
MR
,
Mazas
CA
, et al
The effect of tobacco outlet density and proximity on smoking cessation
.
Am J Public Health
2011
;
101
:
315
20
.
39.
Committee on Reducing Tobacco Use
. 
Strategies BaC, Institue of Medicine: Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation
.
Washington, DC
:
National Academy of Sciences
; 
2007
.
40.
Center for Public Health Systems
. 
Regulating pharmacy sales: Massachusetts
.
Innovative Point of Sale Policies: Case Study #2
; 
2014
.
St. Louis, MO
:
Washington University in St. Louis.
41.
Brennan
TA
,
Shrank
WH
,
Sussman
A
,
Purvis
MC
,
Hartman
T
,
Kymes
SM
, et al
The effect of a policy to eliminate sales of tobacco in pharmacies on the number of smokers in the region
.
CVS Health
[serial online] 2014
. Available from: http://www.cvshealth.com/sites/default/files/styles/TobaccoPolicyResearchLetter_Final.pdf.
42.
Gruenewald
PJ
,
Ponicki
WR
,
Holder
HD
. 
The relationship of outlet densities to alcohol consumption: a time series cross-sectional analysis
.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res
1993
;
17
:
38
47
.
43.
Treno
AJ
,
Marzell
M
,
Gruenewald
PJ
,
Holder
H
. 
A review of alcohol and other drug control policy research.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs Suppl
2014
;
75
Suppl 17
:
98
107
.
44.
Rodriguez
D
,
Carlos
HA
,
Adachi-Mejia
AM
,
Berke
EM
,
Sargent
JD
. 
Predictors of tobacco outlet density nationwide: a geographic analysis
.
Tob Control
2013
;
22
:
349
55
.
45.
Loomis
BR
,
Kim
AE
,
Goetz
JL
,
Juster
HR
. 
Density of tobacco retailers and its association with sociodemographic characteristics of communities across New York
.
Public Health
2013
;
127
:
333
8
.
46.
Yu
D
,
Peterson
NA
,
Sheffer
MA
,
Reid
RJ
,
Schnieder
JE
. 
Tobacco outlet density and demographics: analysing the relationships with a spatial regression approach
.
Public Health
2010
;
124
:
412
6
.
47.
Peterson
NA
,
Lowe
JB
,
Reid
RJ
. 
Tobacco outlet density, cigarette smoking prevalence, and demographics at the county level of analysis
.
Subst Use Misuse
2005
;
40
:
1627
35
.
48.
Mayers
RS
,
Wiggins
LL
,
Fulghum
FH
,
Peterson
NA
. 
Tobacco outlet density and demographics: a geographically weighted regression analysis
.
Prev Sci
2012
;
13
:
462
71
.
49.
Fotheringham
AS
,
Brunsdon
C
,
Charlton
M
. 
Quantitative geography
.
London, United Kingdom
:
Sage Publications
; 
2000
.
50.
Duncan
DT
,
Kawachi
I
,
Melly
SJ
,
Blossom
J
,
Sorensen
G
,
Williams
DR
. 
Demographic disparities in the tobacco retail environment in Boston: a citywide spatial analysis
.
Public Health Rep
2014
;
129
:
209
15
.
51.
Graham
H
. 
Why social disparities matter for tobacco-control policy
.
Am J Prev Med
2009
;
37
:
S183
4
.
52.
Graham
H
. 
Social determinants and their unequal distribution: clarifying policy understandings
.
Milbank Q
2004
;
82
:
101
24
.
53.
Chen
X
,
Kwan
MP
. 
Contextual uncertainties, human mobility, and perceived food environment: the uncertain geographic context problem in food access research
.
Am J Public Health
2015
;
105
:
1734
7
.
54.
United States Census Bureau
. 
U.S. Census Bureau
.
State and County QuickFacts; 2015
. Available from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/44000.html
55.
Tocacco Control Legal Consortium
. 
Location, location, location: regulating tobacco retailer locations for public health
.
St. Paul, MN
:
Public Health Law Center at Mitchell Hamline School of Law
.
56.
Chuang
YC
,
Cubbin
C
,
Ahn
D
,
Winkleby
MA
. 
Effects of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and convenience store concentration on individual level smoking
.
J Epidemiol Community Health
2005
;
59
:
568
73
.
57.
The Center for Tobacco Policy and Organizing, American Lung Association of California.
Cigarettes generate big revenue for convenience stores: analysis of 2010 state of the industry report
; 
2012
.
Sacramento, CA
:
The Center for Tobacco Policy and Organizing
.