Purpose: The ultimate purpose of these studies and the proposed study is to use community-based interventions to increase overall use of mammographic services and to increase adherence with tribes' screening guidelines. Our immediate purposes by study: For Study 1, the purpose was to understand the risk and screening adherence profiles of women from four Bemidji Area tribes; for Study 2, the purpose was to ascertain whether non-adherent screeners and adherent screeners could be differentiated on any of six theoretical mediators of health behavior; in the proposed Study 3, the purpose is to use theoretical mediators that distinguish adherent and non-adherent screeners to design and test interventions to increase screening participation and adherence with tribes' screening guidelines.

Experimental Procedures: All studies were designed to reflect principles of community-based participatory research. Study 1 was a chart review study that involved four tribes. Each tribe desired different levels of involvement that ranged from close control of all elements of the chart review to assigning the investigators to do the retrieval, review, and replacement of the medical records, and all elements of the analysis. All tribes managed the unique identifiers book which was a list of all women who were 40 years and older who had no prior history of breast cancer. Investigators retained only the unique identifiers and each individual's associated screening history and risk factors. Tribes received aggregated results from the study, but did not receive information on individual women's screening adherence or risk factors. Study 2, is guided by a community advisory committee that meets quarterly and involves one tribe. The study employs one tribal member and one tribal subcontractor, and has supported one student participant. The study team interviewed 55 women and used the results to develop a survey that is being administered to approximately 1400 women who are age 40 and older. Both the interviews and the survey are designed to examine the influence of six theoretical mediators (social norms, social networks, social support, health literacy, health beliefs, and theory of planned behavior) and demographic features on the behaviors of adherent and non-adherent mammographic screeners. Study 3 will involve four tribes and is designed to use the findings from Study 2 to develop and test interventions based on influential screening mediators. Each tribe has identified members who will serve on tribal research and advising units that will determine the specific interventions and receive training and mentoring to design and administer the interventions. The proposed interventions will be based on a case-control intervention design.

Unpublished Data to Date: STUDY 1 showed that there were few significant differences (p = 0.05) based between adherent and non-adherent screeners based on risk factors. STUDY 2 interview results have shown some significant differences (p= 0.05) between adherent and non-adherent screeners related to self-efficacy (health beliefs model), perceived community support for annual mammograms (social norms), presence of 3rd degree relatives in social networks. There were no significant differences associated with health literacy, social support, and the theory of planned behavior.

Conclusions: Findings in Study 2 show that potential differences between adherent and non-adherent screeners justify continuation to the survey phase. Should results of the survey demonstrate significant differences in the influential mediators of adherent compared to non-adherent screeners, follow-up with the intervention study (Study 3) will be an important next step.

Citation Format: Wesley Petersen, Ann Nicometo, Robert Vierkant. Advancing toward interventions: Summary of two projects and a proposed intervention to improve mammography participation in Bemidji area native women. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AACR Conference: The Science of Cancer Health Disparities; Dec 6–9, 2013; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B91. doi:10.1158/1538-7755.DISP13-B91