Background: A potential link between breast implants and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) has been suggested.

Methods: We examined lymphoma occurrence in a nationwide cohort of 19,885 Danish women who underwent breast implant surgery during 1973–2010. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), for ALCL and lymphoma overall associated with breast implantation were calculated.

Results: During 179,246 person-years of follow-up, we observed 31 cases of lymphoma among cohort members. No cases of ALCL were identified. SIRs for ALCL and lymphoma overall were zero (95% CI, 0–10.3) and 1.20 (95% CI, 0.82–1.70), respectively.

Conclusions: In our nationwide cohort study, we did not find an increased risk of lymphoma in general, or ALCL in particular, among Danish women who underwent breast implantation. However, our evaluation of ALCL risk was limited by the rarity of the disease.

Impact: Our results do not support an association between breast implants and ALCL and are consistent with other studies on cancer risk and breast implants. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(11); 2126–9. ©2013 AACR.

A potential link between breast implants and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) of the breast has been suggested on the basis of several case reports (1), and a Dutch case–control study reported an OR of 18.2 for ALCL among women with silicone breast implants (2).

On the basis of the data from Danish population-based registries and private clinics, we evaluated the occurrence of ALCL and other lymphomas in a large cohort of Danish women who underwent breast implantation.

Study population

We established a nationwide cohort of Danish women who underwent breast implantation for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes during 1973–2010 (Fig. 1). The women were identified from the Danish National Registry of Patients, which contains data on all admissions to public hospitals since 1978 (3); The Danish Registry for Plastic Surgery of the Breast, which contains detailed information on 70% to 80% of all cosmetic or reconstructive breast implant procedures carried out during 1999–2009 (4), and a previously established cohort of 1,653 women who underwent breast implantation in private clinics during 1973–1995 (5). The vast majority of the breast implants were silicone-gel filled (4, 5).

Figure 1.

Characteristics of study population.

Figure 1.

Characteristics of study population.

Close modal

Study subjects were followed for a lymphoma diagnosis from the date of first breast implant surgery (left-censored to 1978) until death, emigration, or end of study (December 31, 2010). Lymphoma diagnoses were ascertained from the Danish Cancer Registry and The Danish Lymphoma Group Registry (4, 5). Cancer diagnoses from 1978 onward are registered according to the International Classification of Diseases, version 10 (ICD-10) and the ICD for Oncology (ICD-O-1-3) for topography and morphology codes (6), thus, explaining the choice of 1978 as start of follow-up. A morphologic code for ALCL (ICD-O-3, 97143) was introduced in 1994 based on the Revised European-American Lymphoma Classification.

All cases of lymphoma following breast implant surgery were reviewed by an expert hematopathologist (coauthor K. Bendix) using World Health Organization 2008 criteria.

All data sources were linked using the civil registration number, which encodes gender and date of birth and permits unambiguous linkage between registries and databases in Denmark.

Statistical analyses

We computed standardized incidence ratios (SIR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI), for ALCL and lymphoma overall. For ALCL, the SIR analysis was left truncated to 1994 in accordance with the introduction of the specific histologic code for ALCL. For lymphoma overall, the complete study period (1978–2010) was applied. The expected numbers were estimated by multiplying the number of person-years among cohort members with the corresponding 5-year age- and calendar period-specific incidence rates among women in the general population.

The study population consisted of 19,885 women. Left truncation to 1978 reduced the cohort to 19,639 women. During 1978–2010, we identified 31 cases (Fig. 1 and Table 1) of Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma versus 26.6 expected, yielding a SIR for lymphoma overall of 1.20 (95% CI, 0.82–1.70). No cases of ALCL were identified, with 0.36 expected, yielding a SIR of 0 (95% CI, 0–10.3).

Table 1.

Pathoanatomic characteristics of lymphoma cases (n = 31)

PatientYear of breast implant surgeryYear of lymphoma diagnosisLymphoma subtypeLocalizationCD30 and ALK status
1977 1993 Follicular lymphoma, grade 2 Neck and mediastinum CD30, ALK 
1978 1998 Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, NOS Vulva, labia minor, larynx, skin lower back, and bone marrow CD30, ALK 
1981, 2001 2007 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1 Lymph node neck CD30, ALK 
1983 2010 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Mediastinum CD30, ALK 
1985 1996 Follicular lymphoma, grade 3a Lymph node neck Partially CD30+, ALK 
1985 1994 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Retroperitoneum Insufficient amount of tissue for CD30 and ALK staining. 
1986 2006 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Neck, tonsils, and skin of front-side thorax CD30, ALK 
1987 2010 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Gluteal region Partially CD30+, ALK 
1988 1996 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1 Lymph node neck, right side CD30, ALK 
10 1988 1996 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Skin right arm and lower back CD30, ALK 
11 1989 2000 Splenic marginal zone lymphoma Retroperitoneum CD30, ALK 
12 1989 2000 Hodgkin lymphoma, NS Left inguinal lymph node CD30+, ALK 
13 1989 2000 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Mediastinum Partially CD30+, ALK 
14 1990 1993 Follicular lymphoma Skin of leg NA 
15 1991 2005 Follicular lymphoma, grade 2 Ovaries, cervix uteri, small bowel, and uterus CD30, ALK 
16 1994 1999 Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma Lymph node and skin, neck left side NA 
17 1994 1998 B-cell lymphoma Lymph node neck NA 
18 1995 2003 Hodgkin lymphoma, NS Lymph node neck, left side CD30+, ALK 
19 1995 1997 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1 Lymph node neck, right side CD30, ALK 
20 1998 2004 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1 Lymph node neck CD30, ALK 
21 1999 2001 Follicular lymphoma, grade 2 Lymph node, right axillary and neck CD30, ALK 
22 2000 2005 Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma Lymph node anterior mediastinum Partially CD30+, ALK 
23 2000 2008 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Cervix uteri Partially CD30+, ALK 
24 2000 (left breast) 2004 Follicular lymphoma, grade 2 Right breast and axillary lymph node CD30, ALK 
25 2001 2008 Small lymphocytic lymphoma Lymph node neck, left side CD30, ALK 
26 2001 2007 Hodgkin lymphoma, NS Right axillary lymph node CD30+, ALK 
27 2002 2010 Splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia, unclassifiable Spleen and bone marrow CD30, ALK 
28 2003 2007 Small lymphocytic lymphoma Lymph node neck, left side CD30+, ALK 
29 2003 2008 Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma Ventricle CD30, ALK 
30 2003 2005 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Right tonsil CD30, ALK 
31 2004 2010 Follicular lymphoma, grade 3A Retroperitoneum CD30, ALK 
PatientYear of breast implant surgeryYear of lymphoma diagnosisLymphoma subtypeLocalizationCD30 and ALK status
1977 1993 Follicular lymphoma, grade 2 Neck and mediastinum CD30, ALK 
1978 1998 Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, NOS Vulva, labia minor, larynx, skin lower back, and bone marrow CD30, ALK 
1981, 2001 2007 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1 Lymph node neck CD30, ALK 
1983 2010 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Mediastinum CD30, ALK 
1985 1996 Follicular lymphoma, grade 3a Lymph node neck Partially CD30+, ALK 
1985 1994 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Retroperitoneum Insufficient amount of tissue for CD30 and ALK staining. 
1986 2006 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Neck, tonsils, and skin of front-side thorax CD30, ALK 
1987 2010 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Gluteal region Partially CD30+, ALK 
1988 1996 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1 Lymph node neck, right side CD30, ALK 
10 1988 1996 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Skin right arm and lower back CD30, ALK 
11 1989 2000 Splenic marginal zone lymphoma Retroperitoneum CD30, ALK 
12 1989 2000 Hodgkin lymphoma, NS Left inguinal lymph node CD30+, ALK 
13 1989 2000 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Mediastinum Partially CD30+, ALK 
14 1990 1993 Follicular lymphoma Skin of leg NA 
15 1991 2005 Follicular lymphoma, grade 2 Ovaries, cervix uteri, small bowel, and uterus CD30, ALK 
16 1994 1999 Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma Lymph node and skin, neck left side NA 
17 1994 1998 B-cell lymphoma Lymph node neck NA 
18 1995 2003 Hodgkin lymphoma, NS Lymph node neck, left side CD30+, ALK 
19 1995 1997 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1 Lymph node neck, right side CD30, ALK 
20 1998 2004 Follicular lymphoma, grade 1 Lymph node neck CD30, ALK 
21 1999 2001 Follicular lymphoma, grade 2 Lymph node, right axillary and neck CD30, ALK 
22 2000 2005 Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma Lymph node anterior mediastinum Partially CD30+, ALK 
23 2000 2008 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Cervix uteri Partially CD30+, ALK 
24 2000 (left breast) 2004 Follicular lymphoma, grade 2 Right breast and axillary lymph node CD30, ALK 
25 2001 2008 Small lymphocytic lymphoma Lymph node neck, left side CD30, ALK 
26 2001 2007 Hodgkin lymphoma, NS Right axillary lymph node CD30+, ALK 
27 2002 2010 Splenic B-cell lymphoma/leukemia, unclassifiable Spleen and bone marrow CD30, ALK 
28 2003 2007 Small lymphocytic lymphoma Lymph node neck, left side CD30+, ALK 
29 2003 2008 Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma Ventricle CD30, ALK 
30 2003 2005 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Right tonsil CD30, ALK 
31 2004 2010 Follicular lymphoma, grade 3A Retroperitoneum CD30, ALK 

Abbreviations: NA, tissue sample not available for review; NOS, not otherwise specified; NS, nodular sclerosis.

In this nationwide cohort study, we found no cases of ALCL among Danish women who underwent breast implant surgery. Our cohort approach based on virtually complete data basically eliminated selection and information bias. Furthermore, the pathologic review precluded misclassification of ALCL. Still, although our cohort was large, the risk estimate for ALCL suffered from limited statistical precision because of the rarity of the disease.

Previous epidemiologic studies (7) did not indicate an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma associated with silicone breast implants (7, 8). An important contribution of our study has been to supplement these results with information on lymphoma subtype.

The Dutch study reporting a strong association between silicone breast implants and ALCL had some important limitations (2). First, for 3 of 5 cases of ALCL observed among women with breast implants, the latency period was short, for example, 1 patient developed ALCL within 1 year after implantation, a time frame most likely too short to induce malignant transformation. Second, whereas all cases (n = 11) in the study had ALCL of the breast, all controls (n = 35) had breast lymphomas other than ALCL, thus hampering identification of the underlying study base. Third, 3 patients had disseminated disease, questioning that they were primary breast lymphomas. Finally, all 3 women with ALCL and breast implants had saline-filled implants. In our opinion, no valid conclusion can be drawn from the Dutch study with regard to a potential excess risk of ALCL among women with silicone breast implants.

In conclusion, in this first study addressing the suggested association between silicone breast implants and ALCL in a well-defined study population, we found no evidence of an association between breast implantation and risk of ALCL or lymphoma overall. On the basis of the available evidence, it seems reasonable to conclude that a potential association between silicone breast implants and ALCL is not a major safety issue. Because of the rarity of ALCL, a small to moderate excess risk is difficult to show. Therefore, additional studies with even larger sample size, longer follow-up and attention to possible host-related risk factors may be warranted.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Conception and design: M.Ø. Vase, S. Friis, H.T. Sørensen, F. d'Amore

Development of methodology: S. Friis, H.T. Sørensen

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): M.Ø. Vase, S. Friis

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): M.Ø. Vase, S. Friis, A. Bautz, K. Bendix, H.T. Sørensen

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: M.Ø. Vase, S. Friis, K. Bendix, H.T. Sørensen, F. d'Amore

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): S. Friis, A. Bautz

Study supervision: S. Friis, H.T. Sørensen, F. d'Amore

1.
Aladily
TN
,
Medeiros
LJ
,
Amin
MB
,
Haideri
N
,
Ye
D
,
Azevedo
SJ
, et al
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma associated with breast implants: a report of 13 cases
.
Am J Surg Pathol
2012
;
36
:
1000
8
.
2.
De Jong
D
,
Vasmel
WLE
,
de Boer
JP
,
Verhave
G
,
Barbé
E
,
Casparie
MK
, et al
Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in women with breast implants
.
JAMA
2008
;
300
:
2030
5
.
3.
Lynge
E
,
Sandegaard
JL
,
Rebolj
M
. 
The Danish National Patient Register
.
Scand J Public Health
2011
;
39
:
30
3
.
4.
Henriksen
TF
,
Hölmich
LR
,
Friis
S
,
McLaughlin
JK
,
Fryzek
JP
,
Pernille
Høyer A
, et al
The Danish Registry for Plastic Surgery of the Breast: establishment of a nationwide registry for prospective follow-up, quality assessment, and investigation of breast surgery
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
2003
;
111
:
2182
9
.
5.
Friis
S
,
Hölmich
LR
,
McLaughlin
JK
,
Kjøller
K
,
Fryzek
JP
,
Henriksen
TF
, et al
Cancer risk among Danish women with cosmetic breast implants
.
Int J Cancer
2006
;
118
:
998
1003
.
6.
Gjerstorff
ML
. 
The Danish cancer registry
.
Scand J Public Health
2011
;
39
:
42
5
.
7.
Lipworth
L
,
Tarone
RE
,
McLaughlin
JK
. 
Breast implants and lymphoma risk: a review of the epidemiologic evidence through 2008
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
2009
;
123
:
790
3
.
8.
Brinton
LA
. 
The relationship of silicone breast implants and cancer at other sites
.
Plast Reconstr Surg
2007
;
120
:
94
102
.