Background: Elevated serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I have been associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer. Previously, we reported a similar association in samples obtained during pregnancy. This study was conducted to further characterize the association of IGF-I during pregnancy with maternal breast cancer risk.

Methods: A case–control study was nested within the Finnish Maternity Cohort. The study was limited to primiparous women younger than 40 years, who donated blood samples during early (median, 12 weeks) pregnancy and delivered a single child at term. Seven hundred nineteen women with invasive breast cancer were eligible. Two controls (n = 1,434) were matched with each case on age and date at blood donation. Serum IGF-I concentration was measured using an Immulite 2000 analyzer. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate ORs and 95% CIs.

Results: No significant associations were observed between serum IGF-I concentrations and breast cancer risk in both the overall analysis (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.80–1.47) and in analyses stratified by histologic subtype, lag time to cancer diagnosis, age at pregnancy, or age at diagnosis.

Conclusion: There was no association between IGF-I and maternal breast cancer risk during early pregnancy in this large nested case–control study.

Impact: Serum IGF-I concentrations during early pregnancy may not be related to maternal risk of developing breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(8); 1798–801. ©2011 AACR.

Previously, in a study nested within the Northern Sweden Maternity Cohort (NSMC), we observed that insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I measured mostly during the first trimester of a primiparous pregnancy were positively associated with maternal risk of breast cancer (1), consistent with observations in nonpregnant women (2). To confirm our initial findings and explore the association in greater detail, we conducted a study with a very similar design, nested in the Finnish Maternity Cohort (FMC), the world's largest biorepository of serum samples from pregnant women.

Selection of cases and controls

Study design has been described in detail previously (3). In brief, FMC members who donated serum samples between the 6th and 14th gestational weeks of a primiparous, singleton, full-term pregnancy, younger than 40 years of age, and with no history of in situ breast or any other cancer (except nonmelanoma of the skin) were eligible. Case subjects were 535 women with breast cancer identified through linkage with the Finnish Cancer Registry. Because IGF-I concentration does not vary with gestational age during early pregnancy, 184 cases with no data on exact gestational age were also included. For each case, 2 controls were matched on age at sampling (±6 months) and date of sampling (±3 months), for a total of 1,434 controls. Ninety-two percent of the cases were younger than 50 years at the time of diagnosis; thus, the vast majority of cases were likely had a diagnosis during fertile.

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the National Institute for Health and Welfare (Oulu, Finland).

Laboratory analyses

IGF-I assay was quantified by immunometric assays on an Immulite 2000 Siemens analyzer. The inter-run coefficients of variation (CV) of the laboratory quality controls were 9.3% and 3.2% at concentrations of 81.5 and 229 ng/mL, respectively. The inter- and intrarun CVs for a blinded pool of controls (mean concentration of 177 ng/mL) were 3.9% and 8.3%, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Prior to analysis, IGF-I values were log2-transformed to normalize their distributions. The correlation of IGF-I with gestational age was assessed by Pearson's partial correlation (r = −0.03). Subjects were categorized into quintiles on the basis of IGF-I distribution among the controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate the OR and corresponding 95% CI of breast cancer across quintiles of IGF-I. The associations were also explored by histologic subtypes, median ages at first full-term pregnancy (29 years), diagnosis (41 years), and lag time to cancer diagnosis (11 years), as well as in finer subgroups of the latter 3 variables. Analyses limited to women with information on gestational age and by tertiles of time in storage were also conducted. Adjustment for potential confounders (gravidity, parity by index date, family history of breast cancer, smoking, and gestational day) sporadically changed risk estimates, but with less than 5%, and were not retained in the final model. Similarly, adjustment for estradiol (available for 534 case–control sets) had negligible effect on risk estimates. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Selected characteristics of the study population and IGF-I concentrations are presented in Table 1. Cases and controls were comparable in all characteristics except for family history of breast cancer.

Table 1.

Selected characteristics of breast cancer cases and controls, median (10th, 90th), or number (percentage) from the FMC, 1983–2006

CharacteristicCases (n = 719)Controls (n = 1,434)Pa
Maternal age during index pregnancy, y 29.2 (22.9–37.0) 29.1 (22.8–37.0)  
Grouped age, y    
 <25 189 (26%) 372 (26%)  
 25–29 194 (27%) 396 (28%)  
 30–34 176 (24%) 358 (25%)  
 ≥35 160 (22%) 308 (21%)  
Gestational age,b73 (57–89) 73 (57–90) 0.48 
Gravidity 534 (79%) 1,088 (81%) 0.33 
Parity by index date   0.10 
 1 257 (36%) 463 (32%)  
 2 312 (43%) 652 (45%)  
 ≥3 150 (21%) 319 (22%)  
Age at diagnosis, y 40.9 (32.1–49.3)   
Lag time, y 11.3 (4.4–17.9)   
Histology    
 Ductal carcinoma 574 (80%)   
 Lobular carcinoma 98 (14%)   
 Medullary carcinoma 19 (3%)   
 Others 28 (4%)   
Family history of breast cancer 74 (11%) 62 (5%) <0.0001 
Family history of ovarian cancer 4 (1%) 13 (1%) 0.40 
Smoking   0.23 
 No 443 (84%) 910 (86%)  
 Yes 87 (16%) 149 (14%)  
Child sex   0.74 
 Male 360 (50%) 729 (51%)  
 Female 359 (50%) 705 (49%)  
Child birth weight,c3,500 (2,970–4,100) 3,510 (2,930–4,140) 0.99 
Child birth length,d cm 50 (48–53) 50 (48–53) 0.55 
IGF-I,e ng/mL 133.7 (94.9–198.0) 134.7 (94.5–195.0) 0.53 
CharacteristicCases (n = 719)Controls (n = 1,434)Pa
Maternal age during index pregnancy, y 29.2 (22.9–37.0) 29.1 (22.8–37.0)  
Grouped age, y    
 <25 189 (26%) 372 (26%)  
 25–29 194 (27%) 396 (28%)  
 30–34 176 (24%) 358 (25%)  
 ≥35 160 (22%) 308 (21%)  
Gestational age,b73 (57–89) 73 (57–90) 0.48 
Gravidity 534 (79%) 1,088 (81%) 0.33 
Parity by index date   0.10 
 1 257 (36%) 463 (32%)  
 2 312 (43%) 652 (45%)  
 ≥3 150 (21%) 319 (22%)  
Age at diagnosis, y 40.9 (32.1–49.3)   
Lag time, y 11.3 (4.4–17.9)   
Histology    
 Ductal carcinoma 574 (80%)   
 Lobular carcinoma 98 (14%)   
 Medullary carcinoma 19 (3%)   
 Others 28 (4%)   
Family history of breast cancer 74 (11%) 62 (5%) <0.0001 
Family history of ovarian cancer 4 (1%) 13 (1%) 0.40 
Smoking   0.23 
 No 443 (84%) 910 (86%)  
 Yes 87 (16%) 149 (14%)  
Child sex   0.74 
 Male 360 (50%) 729 (51%)  
 Female 359 (50%) 705 (49%)  
Child birth weight,c3,500 (2,970–4,100) 3,510 (2,930–4,140) 0.99 
Child birth length,d cm 50 (48–53) 50 (48–53) 0.55 
IGF-I,e ng/mL 133.7 (94.9–198.0) 134.7 (94.5–195.0) 0.53 

aComparison between cases and controls: conditional logistic regression models.

bGestational age available for 535 cases and 1,044 controls.

cData on child's birth weight are available for 537 cases and 1,077 controls.

dData on child's birth length are available for 535 cases and 1,076 controls.

eGeometric mean and (10th, 90th) percentile of hormone.

There was no association of breast cancer with IGF-I concentrations overall and in all the subgroup analyses (by histology, age at sampling, age at diagnosis, lag time to diagnosis, storage time; Table 2). Similarly, in analysis limited to case–control sets with information on gestational age (n = 535), there was no association between breast cancer and IGF-I, and adjustment for gestational age did not alter the risk estimates.

Table 2.

ORs with 95% CIs of breast cancer associated with quintiles of IGF-I concentrations among women from the FMC, 1983–2006

Quintiles
q1q2q3q4q5PtrendPheterogeneity
All women ref. 1.20 (0.91–1.59) 1.05 (0.78–1.42) 0.92 (0.68–1.23) 1.08 (0.80–1.47) 0.68  
 140/294 170/295 142/283 123/283 144/279   
Women with information on gestational agea ref. 1.04 (0.75–1.44) 0.88 (0.62–1.23) 0.73 (0.51–1.05) 1.01 (0.71–1.42) 0.46  
 116/214 118/207 107/221 79/197 115/205 
Ductal carcinoma ref. 1.31 (0.96–1.78) 1.18 (0.84–1.64) 0.96 (0.68–1.35) 1.10 (0.78–1.56) 0.70  
 106/235 142/240 119/225 96/223 111/223   
Lobular carcinoma ref. 0.89 (0.43–1.82) 0.63 (0.28–1.40) 0.70 (0.33–1.49) 0.88 (0.39–2.01) 0.59  
 24/39 22/41 15/39 17/40 20/35   
Age at pregnancy        
 <29.2 y ref. 0.99 (0.65–1.51) 1.03 (0.67–1.57) 0.77 (0.50–1.19) 0.83 (0.54–1.27) 0.19 0.07 
 63/116 71/132 75/133 63/148 84/182  
 ≥29.2 y ref. 1.40 (0.97–2.02) 1.06 (0.70–1.60) 1.05 (0.69–1.59) 1.46 (0.94–2.28) 0.46 
 77/178 99/163 67/150 60/135 60/97  
Age at diagnosis        
 <40.9 y ref. 1.01 (0.65–1.56) 1.03 (0.66–1.62) 0.81 (0.52–1.27) 0.84 (0.53–1.31) 0.21 0.09 
 56/104 72/133 80/142 66/151 84/183  
 ≥40.9 y ref. 1.36 (0.95–1.94) 1.01 (0.67–1.51) 0.99 (0.65–1.49) 1.44 (0.93–2.22) 0.50 
 84/190 98/162 62/141 57/132 60/96  
Lag time        
 <11.3 y ref. 1.24 (0.81–1.91) 1.15 (0.73–1.81) 0.83 (0.53–1.31) 1.10 (0.69–1.74) 0.51 0.96 
 55/116 89/152 77/141 59/153 77/149  
 ≥11.3 y ref. 1.17 (0.81–1.69) 0.96 (0.65–1.43) 1.03 (0.69–1.54) 1.08 (0.71–1.64) 0.96 
 85/178 81/143 65/142 64/130 67/130  
Quintiles
q1q2q3q4q5PtrendPheterogeneity
All women ref. 1.20 (0.91–1.59) 1.05 (0.78–1.42) 0.92 (0.68–1.23) 1.08 (0.80–1.47) 0.68  
 140/294 170/295 142/283 123/283 144/279   
Women with information on gestational agea ref. 1.04 (0.75–1.44) 0.88 (0.62–1.23) 0.73 (0.51–1.05) 1.01 (0.71–1.42) 0.46  
 116/214 118/207 107/221 79/197 115/205 
Ductal carcinoma ref. 1.31 (0.96–1.78) 1.18 (0.84–1.64) 0.96 (0.68–1.35) 1.10 (0.78–1.56) 0.70  
 106/235 142/240 119/225 96/223 111/223   
Lobular carcinoma ref. 0.89 (0.43–1.82) 0.63 (0.28–1.40) 0.70 (0.33–1.49) 0.88 (0.39–2.01) 0.59  
 24/39 22/41 15/39 17/40 20/35   
Age at pregnancy        
 <29.2 y ref. 0.99 (0.65–1.51) 1.03 (0.67–1.57) 0.77 (0.50–1.19) 0.83 (0.54–1.27) 0.19 0.07 
 63/116 71/132 75/133 63/148 84/182  
 ≥29.2 y ref. 1.40 (0.97–2.02) 1.06 (0.70–1.60) 1.05 (0.69–1.59) 1.46 (0.94–2.28) 0.46 
 77/178 99/163 67/150 60/135 60/97  
Age at diagnosis        
 <40.9 y ref. 1.01 (0.65–1.56) 1.03 (0.66–1.62) 0.81 (0.52–1.27) 0.84 (0.53–1.31) 0.21 0.09 
 56/104 72/133 80/142 66/151 84/183  
 ≥40.9 y ref. 1.36 (0.95–1.94) 1.01 (0.67–1.51) 0.99 (0.65–1.49) 1.44 (0.93–2.22) 0.50 
 84/190 98/162 62/141 57/132 60/96  
Lag time        
 <11.3 y ref. 1.24 (0.81–1.91) 1.15 (0.73–1.81) 0.83 (0.53–1.31) 1.10 (0.69–1.74) 0.51 0.96 
 55/116 89/152 77/141 59/153 77/149  
 ≥11.3 y ref. 1.17 (0.81–1.69) 0.96 (0.65–1.43) 1.03 (0.69–1.54) 1.08 (0.71–1.64) 0.96 
 85/178 81/143 65/142 64/130 67/130  

aAdjustment for gestational age resulted in identical risk estimates with the exception of a minor change in the top quintile risk [1.00 (0.71–1.41), P = 0.44].

In contrast to our previous findings in the NSMC (1), in the FMC, IGF-I during early pregnancy was not associated with maternal risk of developing breast cancer. Both studies had very similar design and were nested in population-based maternity cohorts in neighboring countries. The samples were stored at comparative temperature (−25°C), and the mean IGF-I concentrations in the FMC controls (134.7 ng/mL) were comparable with those from the NSMC (133.6 ng/mL). IGF-I was analyzed in the same laboratory with the same assay kits. The current study is 3 times larger and had 87% statistical power to detect an OR of 1.50. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that some analyte degradation has occurred and reduced our ability to find an existing association.

Another limitation of our study is the lack of information on estrogen receptor (ER) status of the tumors, as this is not collected centrally in Finland. Most of the cases (92%) had a diagnosis before 50 years of age and thus were more likely to be ER negative (4). The analysis by the Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group suggested that the association of IGF-I with breast cancer is confined to hormone receptor–positive tumors (2). Thus, a relatively large proportion of receptor-negative tumors in our data could have obscured an association with hormone receptor–positive disease.

In summary, no association between IGF-I concentrations during early pregnancy and maternal breast cancer risk was observed in the FMC.

The funding source had no role in the study design, interpretation of data, and publication of results.

We appreciate the excellent technical assistance provided by Pirjo Kontiokari, Annika Uimonen, and Sara Kuusiniemi in the conduct of the study.

This work was supported by research grants from the U.S. National Cancer Institute (CA114329 and CA120061). A.T Toriola was supported by a European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) Travel Fellowship Award to visit the Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg.

1.
Chen
T
,
Lukanova
A
,
Grankvist
K
,
Zeleniuch-Jacquotte
A
,
Wulff
M
,
Johansson
R
, et al
IGF-I during primiparous pregnancy and maternal risk of breast cancer
.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
2010
;
121
:
169
75
.
2.
Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group
Key
TJ
,
Appleby
PN
,
Reeves
GK
,
Roddam
AW
. 
Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies
.
Lancet Oncol
2010
;
11
:
530
42
.
3.
Lukanova
A
,
Surcel
HM
,
Lundin
E
,
Kaasila
M
,
Lakso
HA
,
Schock
H
, et al
Circulating estrogens and progesterone during primiparous pregnancies and risk of maternal breast cancer
.
Int J Cancer
2011 Mar 16
.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.26070
.
4.
Dunnwald
LK
,
Rossing
MA
,
Li
CI
. 
Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients
.
Breast Cancer Res
2007
;
9
:
R6
.