Family caregivers provide uncompensated care and assistance to a family member who has cancer. When patients move through the care trajectory into the survivorship phase, roles and demands of caregivers change and caregivers assume responsibility to assist with coordination of ongoing care. The goal of this article is to describe aspects of caregiver experiences and the roles of caregivers as patients transition from active cancer treatment into the first and early phase of cancer care. Residual problems for patients and caregivers remain for some period of time. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(10); 2015–21. ©2011 AACR.

Family caregivers are individuals who provide uncompensated care or assistance to a family member who has cancer. This care goes beyond the usual family activities, such as household chores. Research has documented the negative effects of providing care to someone who has cancer. Family caregivers are at risk for developing side effects such as fatigue and sleep disturbances (1), lower immune functioning, slower wound healing, higher blood pressure, and altered lipid profiles (2, 3). Positive effects of providing care have also been reported such as rewards, self-esteem, support, uplifts, and satisfaction, which may provide a buffer to the residual negative effects of caregiving (4–6). Caregivers report life changes, appreciation of life, acceptance, reprioritization of values, increased self-confidence, stronger interpersonal relationships, and strengthened spirituality (7–9). Most research, in oncology, has focused on caregivers' reactions to providing care during active treatment or at the patient's end of life. However, care activities, and thus the negative effects of providing care, do not end with the completion of the patient's active treatment.

Although more than 65% of cancer patients now survive for more than 5 years, quality-of-life issues for patients and their families continue even after active treatment ends (10, 11). When patients move through the care trajectory into the survivorship phase, roles and demands of caregivers change and caregivers assume responsibility to assist with coordination of ongoing care, but, as research shows, care needs remain for a large number of patients (12–14). Preparing the family member for the transition into survivorship is a vital part of the provider's role. Access to the health care system for assistance decreases after active treatment. Issues such as slow or nonresolving symptoms and side effects, residual limitation in physical function, and adherence to ongoing medication and follow-up care remain The patient's adjustment to the survivorship phase can affect the role (15). On the basis of assessments of the patient's posttreatment needs, information and support can be provided and appropriate referrals for continuing care may be made. Return to primary care providers for ongoing care may be the posttreatment expectation or there may be a shared care approach with both primary care and oncology providers involved with the posttreatment care.

The goal of this article is to describe aspects of caregiver experiences and the roles of caregivers as patients transition from active cancer treatment into the early survivorship phase of cancer care, which may be the first year or two. The focus is on the group of patients who have care needs and prior to any return to active treatment. The team for effective transition cancer care for patients and their caregivers involves not only physicians and nurses but may also include dieticians, nutritionists, physical therapists, case workers, social workers, and psychologists (16, 17). Family caregivers continue to be concerned about patients but have their own transitions as well. Finally, dyads should be aware that the end of active treatment does not signal return to precancer existence (18).

When active treatment ends, caregivers are often responsible for coordinating care with a new set of care activities and with differing resources, as patients shift from the oncology team as their primary source of support back to their primary care providers. New information and skills are vital for the transition to early survivorship, yet caregivers often receive little help and guidance to maximize patients' recovery and reintegration into their previous roles and patterns. Unfortunately, transition care is often fragmented, uncoordinated, and without an analysis of services based on needs of the patient, their recovery, and the sequela and posttreatment toxicities or the late effects of cancer treatment.

The need for caregiver involvement following active patient treatment may continue for several years, as patients have residual symptoms, late effects, and disability (13, 14, 19). Caregiver activities, roles, and demands during posttreatment depend on the residual impact and the treatment the patient has received as well as the long-term expectation of survival and outcome of treatment (13, 14, 20–22). From our work, we have found that 60% of 143 patients who were from 2 to 6 weeks posttreatment reported substantial problems (23). These problems included depression scores above 16 on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, 3 symptoms with a severity score above a threshold of 4 on a 10-point scale, 2 or more comorbid conditions, and a physical function score of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey in the mid to high 60s. For the most part, these characteristics persisted 6 weeks later. Together, the data indicate that the proportion of patients leaving treatment with residual problems is substantial and poses a challenge for their family caregivers. This transition period causes caregivers to adapt to an ongoing or new set of patient care needs with uncertainty about the patient's future (13, 14, 24, 25). For some patients, there is disease progression or recurrence, or a second cancer that further complicates the disease trajectory. For others, treatment continues for the duration of the patient's life, with treatment-related side effects left to the patient and family to manage. Unfortunately, there has been little research examining family caregivers in the early transition/survivorship period (20, 22, 26, 27).

Multiple factors can affect how family caregivers respond emotionally and physically to changes in the patient's treatment and thus changes in care demands. The relationships depicted in this article as well as the cyclical nature of the care situation are supported within the Adapted Pittsburgh Mind Body Center Model (28). In this model, both patient characteristics (e.g., the patient's functional ability) and caregiver characteristics (e.g., the availability of social support and gender) affect caregivers' emotional responses to providing care (e.g., depressive symptoms, anxiety, and burden). These emotional responses, in turn, may alter biological responses (initiating and prolonging the physiologic stress response), which ultimately lead to poor overall health. The cyclical nature of the model is vital to understanding caregiver demands and health as patients transition out of active treatment into the survivorship phase. During this transition, patient characteristics will change (e.g., changes in symptom severity) and new care demands may arise (e.g., surveillance for symptom recurrence).

The caregiver's “new normal” or reintegration following the cancer experience will vary depending on the patient's disease trajectory. One patient may have a well-controlled disease with maintenance therapy, whereas others experience progressive, residual symptoms such as fatigue or pain (29), or the risk for late treatment effects. In each of these scenarios, both patients and family caregivers must adapt to this new phase often with less direct care from oncology health care professionals.

For caregivers, tasks during the patient's transition from active treatment turn to monitoring and surveillance of late effects, recurrence, and/or disease progression. In addition, caregivers coordinate care by making and keeping medical appointments and continue to maintain insurance and billing paperwork. When the active treatment ends, patients may be transferred from cancer specialists to primary care providers. Often there is a disconnect between providers, and fragmented care may ensue. Frequently, family caregivers become responsible for the coordination of care during this period. Primary care providers prefer not to manage ongoing cancer-related issues but instead prefer to focus on issues such as routine screenings and treating comorbid conditions (30).

Caregivers often have fears about recurrence and the future, a sense of loss of control, and anxiety about lack of contact with oncology practitioners. Caregivers centered their life activities around providing care, adjusting their schedules and relinquishing valued personal activities. When the treatment is over, they may have a difficult time restoring these activities, as the relationships may no longer exist; friends, social support, and opportunities may have moved on (4, 31). Both patients and caregivers may have reintegration problems in resuming social relationships, establishing communication patterns, dealing with problems involving family and children, and financial and employment difficulties (32, 33). Caregivers' routines must be reorganized and reprioritized to compensate for the long-term impact that cancer and treatment have had on the family (33, 34). Caregivers want to return to “normal” and resume their lives but must often establish a new normal. Reintegration to “normal life” may be difficult, as both patients and family caregivers try to move forward with their lives. Caregivers may have neglected their own health problems and need to resume screening for age/sex-appropriate conditions, management of their own chronic conditions, or resume healthily lifestyle activities such as exercise regimens or better diets. For employed caregivers, renewing attention to jobs and reestablishing relationships with co-workers may be important. Evidence from the caregiving literature indicates that family members may have difficulty withdrawing from caregiving roles, particularly for those who have become enmeshed in caring (17).

Caregiver/patient needs during transition

It is important to assess the care at the transition phase and then find strategies to support caregivers who remain involved. Caregivers' needs, resources, and capabilities will be influenced by multiple factors such as gender, age, culture, education, economics, and geographic location. Residual effects from disease and treatment, late effects, altered household and family roles, along with altered communication patterns adopted during treatment, remain a source of anxiety for caregivers as they seek to reinstate work and secondary roles (5, 35). Caregivers assist patients with persistent symptoms, emotional distress (anxiety, fears, worry, and depression), medical problems, social needs, need for information, and coordination of care services (14, 21, 36). In addition, economic and financial stressors are common after active treatment due to the high cost of cancer care or loss of employment for either the patient or the caregiver (20, 24, 37, 38). Some targeted therapies and biological agents may costs more than $60,000 to $100,000 per year, and insurance coverage varies for these agents. Caregivers report using financial resources, selling homes, taking out loans, and even declaring bankruptcy as a result of expensive care (39).

Continued involvement of caregivers following transition

Although caregivers report unmet needs decreasing after active treatment, they also cite that some needs remain even at 5 years (14). One study reported that 60% of caregivers had at least one unmet psychosocial need at 2 years after active treatment and 36% still claimed unmet needs at 5 years. The prevalence of medical support needs was 49% at 2 years and 28% at 5 years (14). On average caregivers provided 8.3 hours per day of care for 13.7 months after “active treatment,” which varied by cancer diagnosis and caregiver education. Caregivers whose financial needs were not met reported poorer mental health at 2 years and the prevalence of financial unmet needs was 27% at 2 years and 19% at 5 years (14, 21).

Unmet needs often take the form of assisting patients with residual symptoms such as pain, fatigue, cognitive issues, sleep disturbance, and depression. Late effects such as lymphedema, cardiac changes, pulmonary fibrosis, constipation, diarrhea, incontinence, and/or anorexia also occur (4, 11, 29, 40, 41). The severity of patients' functional impairment or disability can increase care demands and restrict caregiver activities (7). As the number and/or severity of long-term late effects increase and the patient becomes more dependent, the caregiver's level of distress may increase (4, 42). Family members continue to be patient advocates, interacting with the health care system to obtain information and support services, as well as to negotiate with the system.

Health promotion

Caregivers may forego their own health needs to focus on providing care during active treatment (11). Health care professionals need to encourage caregivers to return to usual activities and maintain their own physical and mental health. Healthy living and lifestyle recommendations for nutrition, exercise, and stress management should be provided. Health-promoting behaviors and how current distress affects both the long-term health and well-being of caregivers need to be examined. The prevalence of the unhealthy behaviors such as limited physical activity, poor nutrition, obesity, alcohol consumption, and smoking among family caregivers in the survivorship phase is not well established (11). Both patients and caregivers should be guided to return to a healthy lifestyle.

In one of the few studies in this area, Beesley and colleagues (11) followed caregivers of ovarian cancer patients over approximately 3 years following their cancer diagnosis to examine current health patterns and weight changes. More than half of the caregivers did not meet physical activity guidelines, and 71% were overweight; 40% ate less than 2 servings of fruit, and 80% less than 5 servings of vegetables. Beesley and colleagues also reported that 37% consumed alcoholic drinks and 10% were smokers. Fifty-six percent reported more than one negative change in lifestyle, 42% decreased physical activity, and 35% gained weight since the patient's diagnosis. Caregivers reported more unhealthy behaviors when they had fewer years of education, were limited in daily activities, or reported high levels of depressive symptoms (11). Beesley and colleagues did not have a comparison group, but they argue that in their study, changes occurred to a greater extent in subgroups with increased physical and emotional demands (11), suggesting that the change in behaviors were not normal changes of aging.

Consideration of the caregiver's health maintenance, physical activity, nutrition, stress management, smoking cessation, chronic disease management, and comorbid conditions is important during the transition phase. Caregivers may experience changes in physical health, which can be complicated by their own comorbid conditions (4, 14), particularly if they are physically inactive (43). Follow-up care by primary care providers is vital.

Difficulty in family relationships may add to the distress of caregivers during the posttreatment phase. Preexisting discordance in family relationships may be aggravated and manifest after active treatment (33, 38, 43). Among caregivers in less mutually satisfying relationships, any residual or late effects may cause negative responses (31, 44). Caregivers may need guidance and counseling, enabling them to return to effective relationships. There is some evidence that benefit finding evolves from the family care role and may contribute to positive relationships (7, 9).

Communication

Caregivers often need assistance to know “how” to communicate with their loved ones after active treatment. Changes in patients' personalities, priorities, and attitudes caused by the diagnosis and treatment may increase caregivers' need to be assertive and find new communication patterns. There are supportive groups or educational sessions that might be helpful to caregivers. A family conference may benefit the patient, the caregiver, and the professional's ability to communicate (45). Web-based toolkits may become useful to improve communication among patients, caregivers, and professionals. These can be used to foster understanding, provide education, and facilitate care management through communication (46, 47).

Caregiver role activities

Caregivers may be at risk for increased distress in the transition period (13). Spouses have adapted to new roles during active treatment, and now there is a need for another set of role changes or adaptation that call for changes in the demands of social, work, and other relationships (4, 48). Spousal caregivers may have had to assume other role responsibilities for financial and household activities vacated by the individual with cancer and may not be willing to give them up. Adult children and other nonspousal younger caregivers often need to adjust their lifestyle to meet more competing demands, and, in return, exhibit lower levels of well-being (14). van Ryn and colleagues (13) found that 67% of caregivers had at least one competing demand that interfered with their care role.

The loss of employment of the caregiver and/or the patient and restrictions on health insurance due to involvement with cancer care pose a problem that continues into the early survivorship phase. There are the economic ramifications for the family members who have used savings or lost their jobs during treatment. A recent report finds higher bankruptcy roles in survival phase (49). How families at the end of active treatment deal with employment decisions made during active treatment may be problematic, and continuing insurance into survivorship is often a major challenge. Caregivers may find it necessary to find a job with health benefits. Medical insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, and Veteran's benefits all have restrictions to coverage that pose problems that continue into the transition phase. In addition, if providing care affected the caregiver's productivity, loss of promotions and job advancement opportunities may ensue. Caregivers (20%–30%) adapt employment obligations to manage care demands during treatment, and there may be residual effects into survivorship (50–52). These are usually described as missed days, interruptions at work, numerous phone calls, leaves of absence, reduced presenteeism, and reduced productivity (14).

Care plans should include family caregivers and should summarize residual symptoms, potential late effects, and future expectations needed for care coordination appropriate to the patient's health and treatment status. Recommendations for follow-up care, cancer screening (recurrence or new primary), psychosocial effects, and financial issues (work, insurance, and employment) should be a part of the plan. In addition, recommendations for a healthy lifestyle (for both the patient and the caregiver), referrals for follow-up care, and a list of needed support and community resources should be discussed. Referrals to primary care providers for both are important. The LIVESTRONG Care Plan or the Survivorship Care Plan as identified in the Institute of Medicine's publication Lost in Transition can be the basis for the plan (16, 53). The plan includes topics such as physical activities, nutrition, effective communication, prevention of substance abuse, staying informed, and stress management for both members of the dyad as appropriate and based on the assessment. Health care professionals need to assess caregivers in particular to identify those at risk for negative outcomes (burden or depression) in the transition phase.

Care plans should also highlight needed resources to assist in this phase. Some caregivers have ample personal, social, and economic resources, whereas others have few. Many caregivers have competing demands with employment, dependent care, and their own health issues. Care demands in this phase may differ from the active treatment phase and include limited physical care, encouragement of physical activity, nutrition, emotional and social support, symptom management, and financial assistance. van Ryn and colleagues (13) found more than 54% of patients in survivorship in high need and thus their caregivers were involved with clinical tasks. More than 68% focused on side effects, 47% spent time managing or controlling symptoms, and 30% assisted with decisions to call physicians. Unfortunately, 44% of caregivers indicated that they were not trained to administer medications and 49% were not trained to manage symptoms and side effects, thus indicating a need for preparation (13).

Interventions that have been successful in other phases such as cognitive behavior, problem solving, and psychoeducational could be adapted for this phase. Few dyadic assessments exist and provide little guidance for intervention. Care plans should include all care tasks that will be needed during the posttreatment phase. Interventions may be needed to support caregiver problem solving, decision making, and priority setting. Most cancer caregiver intervention studies have used a psychoeducational intervention that emphasizes the provision of information, problem-solving skills, and a psychologic/counseling approach to decrease caregiver distress (22). Interventions to increase support for family caregivers have lagged behind those for patients. There is a dearth of literature regarding intervention design and effectiveness for those who have moved past active treatment but are facing the threat of disease progression or recurrence or for some residual or late effects (17, 54). Although there are not clear interventions tested, consideration of caregiver interventions for other phases can be adapted for the needs identified.

With the advent of health care technology, consideration of technology use may be of benefit to support caregivers during this phase. Family caregivers use technology to help themselves with caregiving. Among the two-thirds who use the Internet, the most frequent source was for needed information or support. Caregivers indicate that technology would be of benefit to them for personal health record tracking, monitoring symptoms and events, tracking or coordinating care (appointments), and reminding to take prescription medications (55, 56).

An inception cohort of caregivers is needed to examine variations in care demands that extend from diagnosis into the transition to survivorship, to determine if there is a logical progression in the depth of complexity and judgment required for tasks of caregiving. There should be a special focus on transition points. In addition, how care responsibilities, decision making, and knowledge and skill change over time should be addressed. Intervention studies are needed that target caregivers at risk for negative outcomes during the transition into survivorship and provide needed support. A cumulative set of risk factors should be developed to identify levels of risk and problems for caregivers and then determine how negative caregiver responses relate to patient outcomes. Risk assessments should include physical and emotional status of patient and caregiver relationships, home assessment, social, spiritual, and legal dimensions (17). Future research should explore how including caregivers in Survivorship Care Plan explicitly maximizes both patient and caregiver outcomes at 1, 3, and 5 years posttreatment.

Research is needed to better describe the impact on caregiver health that result from residual or persistent patient symptoms (loss of voice, pain, lymphedema, sexual dysfunction, or neuropathy) or the late effects, or the types and level of care needed. Little is known about what areas cause the greatest degree of distress or the most lasting effect for caregivers during the care transitions and posttreatment period. More systematic and longitudinal follow-up of healthy patients and health promotion practice studies are needed to examine variations and changes that occur in caregivers as they assume and relinquish the care role. Finally, research should explore differences in problems and perceptions of caregiver experience from different cultural, ethnic, or socioeconomic backgrounds. There is a noticeable absence in inclusion of diverse populations in any of the caregiver studies of the survivorship phase.

In conclusion, there have been studies describing the negative responses of family members to caring for persons with cancer (such as burden and depression) during the treatment and palliative phases of care. However, as caregivers go through transitions into survivorship, research is limited and we know little about the nature of the knowledge and skills caregivers need at transition phases. Unfortunately, there has been little examination of potential variables such as prior family relationships, cultural variation, caregiver health status, residual effects from the cancer, comorbid conditions, late effects, second cancers, ongoing hours of care, or competing caregiver role demands. There is also little evidence of how the unmet needs of caregivers during transition phases vary by previous diagnosis, treatment modality, stage of disease, or as the patient's condition deteriorates. Knowledge of outcomes and effects of caregivers is limited to few studies (8, 13, 19, 40). Fragmentation and discordant expectations posttreatment between patients and their caregivers with respect to who is responsible for survivorship care (primary care provider or oncologist) can lead to challenges for caregivers. Including the caregiver and supporting a clear survivorship plan for both the patient and the caregiver should be a standard component of quality cancer care.

Health policy changes with regard to family caregiving need to be evidence based and linked to the continuing problems faced by patients. Cancer patients with evidence of depression need to be appropriately treated. Family members may need to be screened for depression as well. Patients with residual losses in physical function may benefit from rehabilitation. Family members can be informed about to their roles in engaging patients in these programs and assisted, if need be to schedule, and ensure their patients participate in these programs. At this point, we believe that performance incentives to primary care providers to teach and monitor family caregivers effective engagement will lead to improved long-term outcomes for patients, benefit caregivers by focusing their efforts on aspects of patient assistance with clearly demarcated outcomes, and benefit the health care system through lowering costs for extended care and use.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

1.
Jensen
S
,
Given
B
. 
Fatigue affecting family caregivers of cancer patients
.
Support Care in Cancer
1993
;
1
:
321
5
.
2.
Kiecolt-Glaser
JK
,
Preacher
KJ
,
MacCallum
RC
,
Atkinson
C
,
Malarkey
WB
,
Glaser
R
. 
Chronic stress and age-related increases in the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2003
;
100
:
9090
5
.
3.
Vitaliano
P
,
Zhang
J
,
Scanlan
J
. 
Is caregiving hazardous to one's physical health? A meta-analysis
.
Psychol Bull
2003
;
129
:
946
72
.
4.
Kurtz
M
,
Kurtz
J
,
Given
C
,
Given
B
. 
Depression and physical health among family caregivers of geriatric patients with cancer—a longitudinal view
.
Med Sci Monit
2004
;
10
:
CR447
56
.
5.
Pinquart
M
,
Sörensen
S
. 
Associations of caregiver stressors and uplifts with subjective well-being and depressive mood: a meta-analytic comparison
.
Aging Ment Health
2004
;
8
:
438
49
.
6.
Nijboer
C
,
Tempelaar
R
,
Triemstra
M
,
van den Bos
G
,
Sanderman
R
. 
The role of social and psychological resources in caregivers of cancer patients
.
Cancer
2001
;
89
:
1029
39
.
7.
Pinquart
M
,
Sörensen
S
. 
Associations of stressors and uplifts of caregiving with caregiver burden and depressed mood: a meta-analysis
.
J Gerontol
2003
;
58B
:
112
28
.
8.
Kim
Y
,
Carver
CS
,
Deci
EL
,
Kasser
T
. 
Adult attachment and psychological well-being in cancer caregivers: the mediational role of spouses' motives for caregiving
.
Health Psychol
2008
;
27
Suppl 2
:
S144
54
.
9.
Kim
Y
,
Schulz
R
,
Carver
CS
. 
Benefit-finding in the cancer caregiving experience
.
Psychosom Med
2007
;
69
:
283
91
.
10.
American Cancer Society [Internet]
. 
Cancer facts & figures 2010
.
Atlanta, GA
:
American Cancer Society
; 
2010
[cited 2011 Mar 15]. Available from:
http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-and-figures-2010.
11.
Beesley
VL
,
Price
MA
,
Webb
PM
, 
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study-Quality of Life Study Investigators. Loss of lifestyle: health behaviour and weight changes after becoming a caregiver of a family member diagnosed with ovarian cancer
.
Support Care in Cancer
2010 Dec 2
.
[Epub ahead of print]
.
12.
Sherwood
P
,
Given
C
,
Given
B
,
von Eye
A
. 
Caregiver burden and depression: analysis of common caregiver outcomes
.
J Aging Health
2005
;
17
:
125
47
.
13.
van Ryn
M
,
Sanders
S
,
Kahn
K
,
van Houtven
C
,
Griffin
JM
,
Atienza
AA
, et al
Objective burden, resources, and other stressors among informal cancer caregivers: a hidden quality issue?
Psychooncology
2011
;
20
:
44
52
.
14.
Yabroff
KR
,
Kim
Y
. 
Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors
.
Cancer
2009
;
115
Suppl 18
:
4362
73
.
15.
Mellon
S
,
Kershaw
TS
,
Northouse
LL
,
Freeman-Gibb
L
. 
A family-based model to predict fear of recurrence for cancer survivors and their caregivers
.
Psychooncology
2007
;
16
:
214
23
.
16.
Hewitt
M
,
Ganz
PA
,
editors
. 
From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition
.
Washington, DC
:
The National Academies Press
; 
2006
.
[cited 2011 May 10]. Available from:
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11613&page=R1.
17.
National Cancer Institute [Internet]
. 
Transitional Care Planning (PDQ)
.
Bethesda, MD
:
National Cancer Institute
[updated 2010 Aug 31; cited 2011 May 10]. Available from:
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/supportivecare/transitionalcare/Patient/AllPages.
18.
Hill-Kayser
CE
,
Vachani
C
,
Hampshire
MK
,
Jacobs
LA
,
Metz
JM
. 
An Internet tool for creation of cancer survivorship care plans for survivors and health care providers: design, implementation, use and user satisfaction
.
J Med Internet Res
2009
;
11
:
e39
.
19.
Kim
Y
,
Spillers
RL
. 
Quality of life of family caregivers at 2 years after a relative's cancer diagnosis
.
Psychooncology
2010
;
19
:
431
40
.
20.
Northouse
L
,
Mood
D
,
Templin
T
,
Mellon
S
,
George
T
. 
Couples' patterns of adjustment to colon cancer
.
Soc Sci Med
2000
;
50
:
271
84
.
21.
Osse
BHP
,
Vernooij-Dassen
MJFJ
,
Schade
E
,
Grol
RPTM
. 
Problems experienced by the informal caregivers of cancer patients and their needs for support
.
Cancer Nurs
2006
;
29
:
378
88
.
22.
Pasacreta
J
,
McCorkle
R
. 
Cancer care: impact of interventions on caregiver outcomes
.
In:
Fitzpatrick
J
,
Goeppinger
J
,
editors
. 
Annual review of nursing research
.
Vol. 19
.
New York
:
Springer
; 
2000
. p.
127
48
23.
Given
CW
,
Given
B
. 
Transition to recovery: a post-cancer treatment intervention
.
Grant proposal submitted to National Institute of Health
. 
2010
.
24.
Alfano
CM
,
Rowland
JH
. 
Recovery issues in cancer survivorship: a new challenge for supportive care
.
Cancer
2006
;
12
:
432
43
.
25.
Hagedoorn
M
,
Buunk
BP
,
Kuijer
RG
,
Wobbes
T
,
Sanderman
R
. 
Couples dealing with cancer: role and gender differences regarding psychological distress and quality of life
.
Psychooncology
2000
;
9
:
232
42
.
26.
Jepson
C
,
McCorkle
R
,
Adler
D
,
Nuamah
I
,
Lusk
E
. 
Effects of home care on caregivers' psychosocial status
.
Image J Nurs Sch
1999
;
31
:
115
20
.
27.
Given
B
,
Given
CW
,
Sikorskii
A
,
You
M
,
McCorkle
R
,
Champion
V
. 
Analyzing symptom management trials: the value of both intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches
.
Oncol Nurs Forum
2009
;
36
:
E293
302
.
28.
Sherwood
P
,
Given
B
,
Donovan
H
,
Given
CW
,
Baum
A
,
Bender
CM
, et al
Guiding research in family care: a new approach to oncology caregiving
.
Psychooncology
2009
;
17
:
986
96
.
29.
Shi
Q
,
Smith
TG
,
Michonski
JD
,
Stein
KD
,
Kaw
C
,
Cleeland
CS
. 
Symptom burden in cancer survivors 1 year after diagnosis: a Report From the American Cancer Society's Studies of Cancer Survivors
.
Cancer
2011
;
117
:
2779
90
.
30.
Nissen
MJ
,
Beran
MS
,
Lee
MW
,
Mehta
SR
,
Pine
DA
,
Swenson
KK
. 
Views of primary care providers on follow-up care of cancer patients
.
Fam Med
2007
;
39
:
477
82
.
31.
Given
B
,
Wyatt
G
,
Given
C
,
Sherwood
P
,
Gift
A
,
DeVoss
D
. 
Burden and depression among caregivers of patients with cancer at the end-of-life
.
Oncol Nurs Forum
2004
;
31
:
1105
17
.
32.
Baker
F
,
Zabora
J
,
Polland
A
,
Wingard
J
. 
Reintegration after bone marrow transplantation
.
Cancer Pract
1999
;
7
:
190
7
.
33.
Morris
ME
,
Grant
M
,
Lynch
JC
. 
Patient-reported family distress among long-term cancer survivors
.
Cancer Nurs
2007
;
30
:
1
8
.
34.
Stephens
M
,
Townsend
A
,
Martire
L
,
Druley
J
. 
Balancing parent care with other roles: interrole conflict of adult daughter caregivers
.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci
2001
;
56
:
24
34
.
35.
Kurtz
M
,
Kurtz
J
,
Given
C
,
Given
B
. 
A randomized, controlled trial of a patient/caregiver symptom control intervention: effects on depressive symtomatology of caregivers of cancer patients
.
J Pain Symptom Manage
2005
;
30
:
112
22
.
36.
Girgis
A
,
Lambert
S
,
Lecathelinais
C
. 
The supportive care needs survey for partners and caregivers of cancer survivors: development and psychometric evaluation
.
Psychooncology
2011
;
20
:
387
93
.
37.
Short
PF
,
Moran
JR
,
Punekar
R
. 
Medical expenditures of adult cancer survivors aged <65 years in the United States
.
Cancer
2011
;
117
:
2791
800
.
38.
Northouse
L
,
Templin
T
,
Mood
D
. 
Couples' adjustment to breast disease during the first year following diagnosis
.
J Behav Med
2001
;
24
:
115
36
.
39.
Bradley
S
,
Sherwood
PR
,
Donovan
HS
,
Hamilton
R
,
Rosenzweig
M
,
Hricik
A
, et al
I could lose everything: understanding the cost of a brain tumor
.
J Neurooncol
2007
;
85
:
329
38
.
40.
Kim
Y
,
Kashy
DA
,
Spillers
RL
,
Evans
TV
. 
Needs assessment of family caregivers of cancer survivors: three cohorts comparison
.
Psychooncology
2010
;
19
:
573
82
.
41.
Given
B
,
Sherwood
P
. 
Family care for the older person with cancer
.
Semin Oncol Nurs
2006
;
22
:
43
50
.
42.
Andrews
S
. 
Caregiver burden and symptom distress in people with cancer receiving hospice care
.
Oncol Nurs Forum
2002
;
28
:
1469
74
.
43.
Mellon
S
,
Northouse
LL
,
Weiss
LK
. 
A population-based study of the quality of life of cancer survivors and their family caregivers
.
Cancer Nurs
2006
;
29
:
120
31
;
quiz 132
3
.
44.
Nijboer
C
,
Triemstra
M
,
Tempelaar
R
,
Mulder
M
,
Sanderman
R
,
van den Bos
G
. 
Patterns of caregiver experiences among partners of cancer patients
.
Gerontologist
2000
;
40
:
738
46
.
45.
Powazki
RD
. 
The family conference in oncology: benefits for the patient, family, and physician
.
Semin Oncol
2011
;
38
:
407
12
.
46.
DuBenske
LL
,
Gustafson
DH
,
Shaw
BR
,
Cleary
JF
. 
Web-based cancer communication and decision making systems: connecting patients, caregivers, and clinicians for improved health outcomes
.
Med Decis Making
2010
;
30
:
732
44
.
47.
Dy
SM
,
Roy
J
,
Ott
GE
,
McHale
M
,
Kennedy
C
,
Kutner
JS
, et al
Tell Us™: a web-based tool for improving communication among patients, families, and providers in hospice and palliative care through systematic data specification, collection, and use
.
J Pain Symptom Manage
2011 Mar 30
.
[Epub ahead of print]
.
48.
Given
B
,
Given
C
,
Kozachik
S
. 
Family support in advanced cancer
.
CA Cancer J Clin
2001
;
51
:
213
31
.
49.
Ramsey
SD
,
Fedorenko
CR
,
Snell
KS
,
Kirchhoff
AC
,
Hollingworth
W
,
Blough
DK
. 
Cancer diagnosis as a risk factor for personal bankruptcy
.
J Clin Oncol
2011
;
29
Suppl:abstr 6007
.
50.
Bradley
CJ
,
Given
BA
,
Given
CW
,
Kozachik
S
. 
Physical, economic, and social issues confronting patients and families
.
In:
Yarbro
CH
,
Frogge
MH
,
Goodman
M
,
editors
. 
Cancer nursing: principles and practice
. 6th ed.
Sudbury, MA
:
Jones & Bartlett
; 
2005
p.
1694
711
.
51.
Cameron
J
,
Franche
R
,
Cheung
A
,
Stewart
D
. 
Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients
.
Cancer
2002
;
94
:
521
7
.
52.
Sherwood
P
,
Donovan
H
,
Given
C
,
Lu
X
,
Given
B
,
Hricik
A
, et al
Predictors of employment and lost hours from work in cancer caregivers
.
Psychooncology
2008
;
17
:
598
605
.
53.
LIVESTRONG Care Plan [Internet]
.
Philadelphia
:
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania
;
c1994-2011 [cited 2011 May 30]. Available from:
http://www.livestrongcareplan.org/.
54.
Schumacher
KL
,
Stewart
BJ
,
Archbold
PG
,
Dodd
MJ
,
Dibble
SL
. 
Family caregiving skill: development of the concept
.
Res Nurs Health
2000
;
23
:
191
203
.
55.
American Society of Clinical Oncology [Internet]
. 
Mobile applications
.
Alexandria, VA
:
American Society of Clinical Oncology
; 
2011
.
[cited 2011 May 23]. Available from:
http://www.cancer.net/patient/Publications+and+Resources/Support+and+Resource+Links/General+ Cancer+Organizations+and+Resources/Mobile+Applications.
56.
Alwan
M
,
Orlov
L
,
Schulz
R
,
Vuckovic
N
. 
E-connected family caregiver: bringing caregiving into the 21st century
.
Bethesda, MD
:
National Alliance for Caregiving, United Healthcare
; 
2011
.
[cited 2011 May 23]. Available from:
http://www.caregiving.org/research/latest-research.