In this article (1), which was published in the March 2010 issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, the last sentence of the Results section of the abstract incorrectly reported the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval as “(OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.70)” for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. The correct sentence should read “Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11-2.79), lower social support (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95), and anxiety (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.47) were more likely to overestimate their risk.”
References
1
Liu
Y
, Pérez
M
, Aft
RL
, Massman
KL
, Robinson
E
, Myles
SL
, Schootman
M
, Gillanders
WE
, Yan
Y
, Jeffe
DB
. Accuracy of perceived risk of recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer
. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2010
;19
:675
–80
.©2010 American Association for Cancer Research.
2010