In this article (1), which was published in the March 2010 issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, the last sentence of the Results section of the abstract incorrectly reported the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval as “(OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.70)” for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. The correct sentence should read “Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11-2.79), lower social support (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95), and anxiety (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.47) were more likely to overestimate their risk.”
Skip Nav Destination
Corrections| June 07 2010
Correction: Accuracy of Perceived Risk of Recurrence among Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Online Issn: 1538-7755
Print Issn: 1055-9965
©2010 American Association for Cancer Research.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2010) 19 (6): 1661.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Article Versions Icon
- Version of Record June 7 2010
Correction: Accuracy of Perceived Risk of Recurrence among Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1 June 2010; 19 (6): 1661. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0403
Download citation file: