In this article (1), which was published in the March 2010 issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, the last sentence of the Results section of the abstract incorrectly reported the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval as “(OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.70)” for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. The correct sentence should read “Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11-2.79), lower social support (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95), and anxiety (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.47) were more likely to overestimate their risk.”

1
Liu
Y
,
Pérez
M
,
Aft
RL
,
Massman
KL
,
Robinson
E
,
Myles
SL
,
Schootman
M
,
Gillanders
WE
,
Yan
Y
,
Jeffe
DB
. 
Accuracy of perceived risk of recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2010
;
19
:
675
80
.