The aim of this study was to confirm the existence of volatile organic compounds (VOC) specifically released or consumed by the lung cancer cell line A549, which could be used in future screens as biomarkers for the early detection of lung cancer. For comparison, primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEpC) and human fibroblasts (hFB) were included. VOCs were detected in the headspace of cell cultures or medium controls following adsorption on solid sorbents, thermodesorption, and analysis by gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Using this approach, we identified VOCs that behaved similarly in normal and transformed cells. Thus, concentrations of 2-pentanone and 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene were found to increase in the headspace of A549, HBEpC, and hFB cell cultures. In addition, the ethers methyl tert-butyl ether and ethyl tert-butyl ether could be detected at elevated levels in the case of A549 cells and one of the untransformed cell lines. However, especially branched hydrocarbons and alcohols were seen increased more frequently in untransformed than A549 cells. A big variety of predominantly aldehydes and the ester n-butyl acetate were found at decreased concentrations in the headspace of all cell lines tested compared with medium controls. Again, more different aldehydes were found to be decreased in hFB and HBEpC cells compared with A549 cells and 2-butenal was metabolized exclusively by both control cell lines. These data suggest that certain groups of VOCs may be preferentially associated with the transformed phenotype. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(1); 182–95

Analysis of exhaled breath is a noninvasive method for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring (1-3). Paradigmatic examples are the 13C-urea breath test for detection of Helicobacter pylori (4, 5) and the hydrogen-based breath test for carbohydrate malabsorption (6). Promising investigations included critically ill persons (7, 8), patients suffering from renal and liver diseases (9-13), and cancer patients (14-21). Typical compounds in exhaled breath comprised hydrocarbons, ketones, aldehydes, alcohols, amides, sulfides, and ethers (21).

Because the field of breath analysis is relatively new, and the advances in analytic technology occur so fast, many compounds in exhaled breath have been detected; compounds whose biochemical origin has not yet been studied. In addition, little is known about their relationship to cellular processes such as malignant transformation. Investigations of exhaled breath from cancer patients showed that concentrations of specific compounds may be increased or decreased in comparison with healthy age-matched controls. This also applies to compounds in the headspace of cell cultures. Tumors are complex systems with a high degree of heterogeneity. Apart from the transformed cells, nontumorous components may also contribute to volatile organic compounds (VOC) present in the exhaled air of a lung cancer patient. Such potential sources of VOCs, which have not been studied here, are the activated immune system (22-25) and, possibly, microorganisms (26-28). The aim of the present work was to test for the existence of cancer-derived VOCs through the analysis of established cell lines (29-32). In previous experiments, we investigated three lung cancer cell lines, NCI-H2087 (32), CALU-1 (31), and NCI-H1666.5

5Sponring A., Filipiak W., Mikoviny T., et al. Release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the lung cancer cell line NCI-H1666 in vitro. 2009:submitted.

In NCI-H2087 cells, the release of the alcohol 2-ethyl-1-hexanol and the branched alkane 2-methylpentane was observed as well as a decline of acetaldehyde, 2-methylpropanal, 3-methylbutanal, 2-methylbutanal, and n-butyl acetate (32). The cell line CALU-1 showed a significant release of branched hydrocarbons such as 2,3,3-trimethylpentane, 2,3,5-trimethylhexane, and 2,4-dimethylheptane and 4-methyloctane, whereas decreased concentrations were found for acetaldehyde, 3-methylbutanal, n-butyl acetate, acetonitrile, acrolein, methacrolein, 2-methylpropanal, 2-butanone, methyl tert-butyl ether, ethyl tert-butyl ether, and hexanal (31). However, no significantly increased release of VOCs could be shown for NCI-H1666 cells,5 whereas a decrease in methacrolein, 3-methylbutanal, hexanal, and n-butyl acetate was observed. Thus, in our studies, compounds especially belonging to the class of branched hydrocarbons were released from lung cancer cells in vitro, whereas, in particular, aldehydes and n-butyl acetate decreased in concentration.

In the work presented here, we studied an additional lung cancer cell line, A549, to obtain a better defined spectrum of potential tumor cell–derived VOCs, as well as two nontransformed cell lines to filter out substances potentially restricted to transformed cells.

Cell Culture

A549 cells, which carry a mutated K-Ras but a wild-type B-Raf gene, have been obtained from American Type Culture Collection. They have been isolated originally from a lung carcinoma of a 58-y-old man and showed epithelial morphology and grew adherent (33-36). Human fibroblasts (hFB) derived from the dermis are a generous gift of Prof. Gabriele Werner-Felmayer, Section of Biological Chemistry, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria. A549 and hFB cells were grown in DMEM high-glucose culture medium containing sodium pyruvate (110 mg/L) supplemented with 10% FCS, penicillin (100,000 units/L), streptomycin (100 mg/L), and l-glutamine (293 mg/L).

Human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEpC) are primary cells (PromoCell GmbH) isolated from the mucosa of the main bronchi of a 42-y-old male Caucasian. The cells were cultivated in Airway Epithelial Cell Growth Medium (PromoCell GmbH) supplemented with the Airway Epithelial Cell Growth Medium Supplement Pack (PromoCell GmbH) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

For all experiments, cells were cultivated under standard conditions at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 92.5% air/7.5% CO2. For VOC measurements, 25, 75, or 100 million A549 cells and 50 million HBEpC or hFB cells, respectively, were inoculated in 100 mL phenol red–free DMEM high-glucose medium (supplements: 5% FCS, 100,000 units/L penicillin, 100 mg/L streptomycin, 293 mg/L l-glutamine, and 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate) or standard tissue culture medium (HBEpC cells). The concentration of FCS in DMEM during the experiment was lowered to 5% to reduce the high background of VOCs in the analyzed headspace. Culture vessels were then flushed with clean, synthetic air from a gas cylinder (defined gas mixture, Linde) containing 5% CO2 to reduce background contamination. The rinsing was done for 10 min at a flow of 100 mL/min. Subsequently the fermenters were sealed for 21 h. At the end of the incubation time, 200 mL of air from the headspace was sampled and analyzed by gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Sampling

Glass tubes (Gerstel) filled with the following sorbents were used as traps for sample collection with simultaneous preconcentration: 25 mg Tenax TA (60/80 mesh), 35 mg Carboxen 569 (20/45 mesh), and 250 mg Carboxen 1000 (80/100 mesh; each from Supelco). Sorbents were separated by glass wool. To decrease the relative humidity, the gaseous samples were diluted 1:6 (5 mL/min sample:25 mL/min air) with dry, additionally purified air taken from a gas cylinder (Linde). This procedure prevents the excessive adsorption of water on carbon molecular sieves and thereby avoids problems during sample preconcentration, cryofocusing during desorption, and finally chromatographic separation. The volume of collected sample originating from the fermenter was 200 mL with a total flow through sorption trap of 30 mL/min.

Thermal Desorption

The sampled analytes were released from sorbents by thermal desorption in a TDS3 unit equipped with a TDSA2 auto sampler (both from Gerstel). The flow rate of carrier gas through the sorption trap during desorption was 90 mL/min. The initial temperature of 30°C was increased to 300°C with a heating rate of 100°C/min (held for 10 min). Liquid nitrogen was used for cryofocusing the desorbed analytes at −90°C. For subsequent sample injection into the capillary column, the CIS-4 injector, which contained a glass liner filled with Carbotrap B (Gerstel), was heated at a rate of 12°C/s up to 320°C (than hold 2 min in splitless mode).

GC-MS Analyses

The TD-GC-MS analysis (thermal desorption coupled with gass chromatography mass spectrometry) were done on a 6890N gas chromatograph equipped with a mass selective detector 5973N (both from Agilent Technologies) with sample injection by means of thermal desorption (described in the previous sections). The PoraBond Q capillary column 25 m × 0.32 mm × 5 μm (Varian) was used. The oven temperature program was as follows: initial 50°C held for 5 min, then ramped 5°C/min up to 140°C, held for 5 min, again ramped 5°C/min to 280°C, and held for 4 min. The constant flow rate of helium carrier gas was 2 mL/min. The MS analyses were done in a full scan mode (TIC mode), with a scan range of 20 to 200 amu. Ionization of the separated compounds was done by electron impact ionization at 70 eV. The chromatographic data was acquired using the Agilent Chemstation Software (GC-MS Data Analysis from Agilent). The mass spectrum library NIST 2005 was applied for the identification of detected compounds.

Reagents and Standards

2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene, 2,3,5-trimethylhexane and 2,3,3-trimethylpentane were purchased from ChemSampCo, and 2-pentanone was from Acros Organics. All other compounds were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.

Calibration

For the quantification of compounds detected in the headspace of cells and of the medium, an external standard calibration was done. The preparation of gaseous standards was done by evaporating liquid substances in glass bulbs. Each bulb (Supelco) was cleaned with methanol (Sigma-Aldrich), dried at 85°C for at least 20 h, purged with clean nitrogen for minimally 20 min, and subsequently evacuated using a vacuum pump (Vacuubrand) for 30 min. Liquid standards (1-3 μL, according to the desired concentration) were injected through a septum by using a GC syringe. After the evaporation of standards, the glass bulb was filled with nitrogen of purity 6.0 (i.e., 99.9999%, Linde) to equalize the pressure to ambient pressure. Then, the appropriate volume (μL) of vapor mixture was transferred by a gas tight syringe (Hamilton) into Tedlar bags (SKC 232 Series), which were previously filled with 1.5 liters of nitrogen (99,9999%, additionally purified by means of carbon molecular sieves Carboxen 1000).

Statistical Analyses

Putative statistical significance was calculated by the Kruskal-Wallis test, which is a test to compare samples from two or more groups of independent observations (37). It is a one-way ANOVA and does not assume a normal population, unlike the analogous one-way ANOVA. The Kruskal-Wallis test is a nonparametric version of the classic one-way ANOVA, and an extension of the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to more than two groups (37). Additionally, results are presented as mean values with SDs.

Our study with CALU-1 cells had shown that only longer incubation times (18 hours) allowed for the reproducible detection of significant differences in VOC concentrations (31). Here, we consistently kept the incubation time at 21 hours and observed that after this time, the average viability was 97.7 ± 1.1% for 25 million, 95.3 ± 2.9% for 75 million, and 96.4 ± 6.2% for 100 million A549 cells. Thus, cell culture conditions did not cause substantial cell death, which ensured that the release of potential VOCs was mostly due to living cells. Under the same conditions, the average viability was 95.4 ± 2.29% for hFB and 77.9 ± 9.90 for HBEpC cells, which proved more fragile under the experimental setting used. The considerable cell death observed in the case of the HBEpC cells may additionally contribute to differences in VOC profiles in ways, which will be addressed in future studies.

Identification and Quantification of VOCs Released by Cells In vitro

Among all compounds detected, 132 compounds were identified not only by spectral library match using the NIST 2005 library but also by determination of their retention time based on calibration mixtures of the respective pure standards. The peaks, for which proper identification was not possible (too low library match and no confirmation by retention time), are not discussed. Generally, the applied TD-GC-MS method is characterized by good linearity (even for the lowest concentrations detected) with correlation coefficients R2 being predominantly higher than 0.99 in calibration measurements. The limits of detection (LOD) for almost all compounds of interest were at the pptv level, being lowest for hydrocarbons such as 2,4-dimethylhexane (0.044 ppbv) or 3-methylheptane (0.048 ppbv). The applied method was also very sensitive for polar analytes such as propyl acetate (0.078 ppbv), methyl acetate (0.106 ppbv), or 2-methylbutanal (0.134 ppbv). The compounds with LOD at the single ppbv level were alcohols, such as 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (9.885 ppbv), ethanol (2.723 ppbv), or acetaldehyde (1.517 ppbv). The use of Tedlar bags for the preparation of standard mixtures for TD-GC-MS calibration could be the reason of relatively high LODs (single ppbv level), especially for alcohols that are partly absorbed in Tedlar material. It should also be noted that the selected ion-monitoring mode, which improves the sensitivity of MS analyses, was not applied. Instead, full scan mode (Total Ion Chromatogram, TIC mode) was chosen to be adequate for the correct identification of a wide range of VOCs detected in the samples. Thus, the measured low LOD with simultaneous low errors (expressed by correlation coefficients) testify very good precision and sensitivity of the applied TD-GC-MS method.

TD-GC-MS Analyses of VOCs in the Headspace of A549 Cells

Our experiments with A549 cells included the analyses of medium controls (n = 4) and 25 (n = 5), 75 (n = 4), or 100 million cells (n = 5). Eight compounds were found to be increased and seven compounds to be decreased in the headspace of A549 cells compared with medium control (Table 1). The concentrations of methyl tert-butyl ether and 2-pentanone were found to be increased in all A549 cancer cell samples (Fig. 1). Besides that, the unsaturated branched hydrocarbons 2-methyl-1-pentene and 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene were found to be significantly elevated in the headspace of 75 and 100 million A549 cells. No significant differences to medium controls were found for these two compounds in experiments with 25 million cells although concentrations were increased. Furthermore, isobutene and octane showed significantly increased concentrations in experiments with 100 million cells (P = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively) but not with lower cell amounts. In general, relatively low concentrations of VOCs released by cells and high background levels originating from medium controls resulted in big SDs. Therefore, a considerable amount of cells is required to detect statistically significant differences in the level of VOCs released by A549 cancer cells and other tested cell lines. Moreover, ethyl tert-butyl ether, acetone, and ethanol were present at significantly higher concentrations in the headspace of 25 million and 100 million cancer cells compared with medium controls. No statistically significant difference in the amounts of these three VOCs compared with medium controls was found in experiments with 75 million A549 cells (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Quantification of VOCs released or taken up (consumed or degraded) by A549 cancer cells

GroupClassCompoundCASR2LOD [ppbv]Mean medium (ppbv)SD medium (ppbv)Mean cells (ppbv)SD cells (ppbv)PRatio cell/medium
INCREASED Hydrocarbons 2-Methyl-1-pentene 763-29-1 0.996 0.133 1.741 1.357 4.247 2.130 0.086 3.13 
5.295 2.500 0.043 3.90 
6.996 1.873 0.014 5.16 
n-Octane 111-65-9 0.999 0.827 1.659 0.636 2.566 0.734 0.142 4.03 
2.567 0.563 0.149 4.03 
2.902 0.522 0.027 4.56 
2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 19549-87-2 0.998 0.199 3.089 1.777 6.001 3.107 0.142 3.38 
6.999 2.527 0.021 3.94 
9.927 3.282 0.014 5.59 
Alcohols Ethanol 64-17-5 0.921 2.723 63.23 50.51 186.5 75.21 0.050 3.69 
229.4 112.7 0.083 4.54 
211.0 120.7 0.040 3.34 
Ethers Methyl tert-butyl ether 1634-04-4 0.999 0.508 0.949 0.240 2.306 0.771 0.014 9.60 
1.949 0.497 0.021 8.11 
2.050 0.383 0.014 8.54 
Ethyl tert-butyl ether 637-92-3 0.999 0.372 4.726 0.767 8.574 2.399 0.014 11.18 
7.657 2.973 0.149 9.98 
9.258 2.251 0.014 12.07 
Ketones Acetone 67-64-1 0.999 0.382 193.4 44.80 303.9 81.42 0.050 6.78 
296.7 87.47 0.083 6.62 
357.8 74.30 0.014 7.99 
2-Pentanone 107-87-9 0.997 0.164 0.551 0.139 1.809 0.485 0,014 13.01 
2.071 0.722 0.021 14.89 
2.333 0.732 0.014 16.77 
DECREASED Esters n-Butyl acetate 123-86-4 0.999 0.140 52.67 9.555 31.34 6.906 0.027 3.28 
8.096 2.838 0.021 0.85 
5.303 1.828 0.014 0.55 
Aldehydes Methacrolein 78-85-3 0.999 0.806 7.931 5.713 0.832 0.469 0.014 0.15 
<LOD — 0.018 — 
<LOD — 0.013 — 
2-Methyl-propanal 78-84-2 0.996 0.180 59.79 9.019 0.197 0.270 0.013 0.02 
0.000 — 0.014 — 
2.501 5.591 0.011 0.28 
2-Ethylacrolein 922-63-4 0.993 0.391 0.802 0.332 0.000 — 0.007 — 
0.000 — 0.014 — 
0.000 — 0.007 — 
2-Methyl-2-butenal 1115-11-3 0.985 0.745 1.833 1.534 0.000 — 0.007 — 
0.000 — 0.014 — 
0.000 — 0.007 — 
3-Methyl-butanal 590-86-3 0.994 0.406 191.8 24.33 2.249 1.477 0.014 0.09 
2.215 0.510 0.021 0.09 
2.589 0.829 0.014 0.11 
Aromatic amines Pyrrole 109-97-7 0.979 0.716 1.009 0.620 <LOD — 0.007 — 
<LOD — 0.014 — 
<LOD — 0.007 — 
GroupClassCompoundCASR2LOD [ppbv]Mean medium (ppbv)SD medium (ppbv)Mean cells (ppbv)SD cells (ppbv)PRatio cell/medium
INCREASED Hydrocarbons 2-Methyl-1-pentene 763-29-1 0.996 0.133 1.741 1.357 4.247 2.130 0.086 3.13 
5.295 2.500 0.043 3.90 
6.996 1.873 0.014 5.16 
n-Octane 111-65-9 0.999 0.827 1.659 0.636 2.566 0.734 0.142 4.03 
2.567 0.563 0.149 4.03 
2.902 0.522 0.027 4.56 
2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 19549-87-2 0.998 0.199 3.089 1.777 6.001 3.107 0.142 3.38 
6.999 2.527 0.021 3.94 
9.927 3.282 0.014 5.59 
Alcohols Ethanol 64-17-5 0.921 2.723 63.23 50.51 186.5 75.21 0.050 3.69 
229.4 112.7 0.083 4.54 
211.0 120.7 0.040 3.34 
Ethers Methyl tert-butyl ether 1634-04-4 0.999 0.508 0.949 0.240 2.306 0.771 0.014 9.60 
1.949 0.497 0.021 8.11 
2.050 0.383 0.014 8.54 
Ethyl tert-butyl ether 637-92-3 0.999 0.372 4.726 0.767 8.574 2.399 0.014 11.18 
7.657 2.973 0.149 9.98 
9.258 2.251 0.014 12.07 
Ketones Acetone 67-64-1 0.999 0.382 193.4 44.80 303.9 81.42 0.050 6.78 
296.7 87.47 0.083 6.62 
357.8 74.30 0.014 7.99 
2-Pentanone 107-87-9 0.997 0.164 0.551 0.139 1.809 0.485 0,014 13.01 
2.071 0.722 0.021 14.89 
2.333 0.732 0.014 16.77 
DECREASED Esters n-Butyl acetate 123-86-4 0.999 0.140 52.67 9.555 31.34 6.906 0.027 3.28 
8.096 2.838 0.021 0.85 
5.303 1.828 0.014 0.55 
Aldehydes Methacrolein 78-85-3 0.999 0.806 7.931 5.713 0.832 0.469 0.014 0.15 
<LOD — 0.018 — 
<LOD — 0.013 — 
2-Methyl-propanal 78-84-2 0.996 0.180 59.79 9.019 0.197 0.270 0.013 0.02 
0.000 — 0.014 — 
2.501 5.591 0.011 0.28 
2-Ethylacrolein 922-63-4 0.993 0.391 0.802 0.332 0.000 — 0.007 — 
0.000 — 0.014 — 
0.000 — 0.007 — 
2-Methyl-2-butenal 1115-11-3 0.985 0.745 1.833 1.534 0.000 — 0.007 — 
0.000 — 0.014 — 
0.000 — 0.007 — 
3-Methyl-butanal 590-86-3 0.994 0.406 191.8 24.33 2.249 1.477 0.014 0.09 
2.215 0.510 0.021 0.09 
2.589 0.829 0.014 0.11 
Aromatic amines Pyrrole 109-97-7 0.979 0.716 1.009 0.620 <LOD — 0.007 — 
<LOD — 0.014 — 
<LOD — 0.007 — 

NOTE: CAS numbers, correlation coefficients (R2), and LODs are presented. Average concentrations (ppbv) are given with SDs. The ratio of the average concentrations of the target analyte compared with medium control and the P values of Kruskal-Wallis tests have been calculated for each cell density.

Figure 1.

VOCs present at higher or lower concentrations in the headspace of A549 cells than in the medium control. Shown are average concentrations (ppbv) in logarithmic scaling with SD for 25 million cells (n = 5; dashed columns), 75 million cells (n = 4; squared columns), and 100 million cells (n = 5; crossdashed columns) compared with medium (n = 4; empty columns). *, significant differences.

Figure 1.

VOCs present at higher or lower concentrations in the headspace of A549 cells than in the medium control. Shown are average concentrations (ppbv) in logarithmic scaling with SD for 25 million cells (n = 5; dashed columns), 75 million cells (n = 4; squared columns), and 100 million cells (n = 5; crossdashed columns) compared with medium (n = 4; empty columns). *, significant differences.

Close modal

Among the decreased compounds, the aldehydes 2-ethylacrolein and 2-methyl-2-butenal were found exclusively in the headspace of medium controls and not in the headspace of cell samples. 2-Methylpropanal was not detected in measurements with 75 million cells (n = 4) but occasionally in measurements of 25 million (2 of 5) and 100 million cells (1 of 5; see Table 1). Similarly, pyrrole was found in several but not all measurements. For a few other significantly decreased compounds, the levels detected were below their LOD (pyrrole and methacrolein). Only n-butyl acetate and 3-methylbutanal were present in all samples at concentrations above their LODs and at significantly lower concentrations in the headspace of cancer cells (Fig. 1). n-Butyl acetate showed p values below 0.05 in all experiments and, in the case of 100 million cells, a p value of 0.01. More detailed information can be found in Table 1.

TD-GC-MS Analyses of VOCs in the Headspace of HBEpC and hFB Cells

In the case of the HBEpC, four independent measurements were done for medium controls (n = 4) and three for 50 million HBEpC cells (n = 3). The concentrations of 10 compounds were increased and of 8 compounds decreased in the headspace of HBEpC cells compared with medium control (Table 2). As already observed in A549 cells, acetone, ethyl tert-butyl ether, 2-pentanone, and 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene were released by HBEpC cells in significant amounts (Fig. 2). The remaining six VOCs with increased concentrations in the headspace of HBEpC included the three branched hydrocarbons 2,3,3-trimethylpentane, 4-methylheptane, and 3-methylheptane. The concentration of 2,3,3-trimethylpentane was below the LOD in the headspace of medium controls and the other two were not detected in the controls at all. In addition, the alcohol 2-methyl-2-propanol and the esters methyl acetate and n-propyl acetate (not detected in the medium control headspace) had increased concentrations in HFB cells.

Table 2.

Quantification of VOCs released or taken up (consumed or degraded) by nontransformed cells—hFB and HFB

Cell typeGroupClassCompoundCASR2LOD [ppbv]Mean medium (ppbv)SD medium (ppbv)Mean cells (ppbv)SD cells (ppbv)PRatio cell/medium
hFBs Increased Hydrocarbons Benzene 71-43-2 0.999 0.201 5.291 1.264 6.914 0.689 0.025 130.68 
2,3,3-Trimethylpentane 560-21-4 0.998 0.127 1.389 0.616 4.688 0.155 0.025 337,46 
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane 565-75-3 0.995 0.137 0.147 0.251 1.106 0.140 0.022 752.78 
2,4-Dimethylhexane 589-43-5 0.999 0.044 — 0.396 0.216 0.010 — 
4-Methylheptane 589-53-7 0.993 0.202 0.831 0.387 2.866 0.057 0.025 344.68 
3-Methylheptane 589-81-1 0.998 0.048 2.463 0.528 4.059 0.706 0.025 164.80 
n-Octane 111-65-9 0.998 0.064 7.996 2.248 12.28 1.731 0.025 153.59 
2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 19549-87-2 0.998 0.199 6.105 2.413 16.22 2.723 0.025 265.75 
2,3,5-Trimethylhexane 1069-53-0 0.997 0.267 — 7.213 4.925 0.010 — 
Alcohols 2-Methyl-1-propanol 78-83-1 0.995 1.283 0.803 1.124 6.242 3.401 0.022 776.91 
3-Methyl-1-butanol 123-51-3 0.996 1.141 — 11.38 1.225 0.010 — 
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 104-76-7 0.918 4.199 488.7 161.5 1,082.5 98.009 0.025 221.49 
Ethers Methyl tert-butyl ether 1634-04-4 0.999 0.293 0.346 0.489 1.692 0.933 0.047 488.57 
Ketones 2-Pentanone 107-87-9 0.997 0.164 1.059 0.681 9.450 10.218 0.025 892.39 
2-Hexanone 591-78-6 0.997 0.152 0.596 0.375 2.322 0.995 0.025 389.70 
Decreased Esters n-Butyl acetate 123-86-4 0.999 0.134 55.51 28.83 11.22 2.904 0.025 20.20 
Aldehydes Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 0.993 1.517 883.1 462.2 167.7 52.968 0.025 18.99 
(E)-2-Butenal 123-73-9 0.997 0.254 4.289 0.844 — 0.022 
2-Methylpropanal 78-84-2 0.996 0.180 98.41 40.43 0.644 0.287 0.025 0.65 
2-Methylbutanal 96-17-3 0.996 0.134 214.8 117.4 1.620 0.119 0.025 0.75 
3-Methylbutanal 590-86-3 0.994 0.406 158.9 60.19 3.800 0.624 0.025 2.39 
Benzaldehyde 100-52-7 0.990 0,320 36.26 11.39 2.798 2.170 0.025 7.71 
Ketones 3-Penten-2-one 3102-33-8 0.995 0.160 1.611 0.704 — 0.022 
HFB primary cells Increased Hydrocarbons 3-Methylheptane 589-81-1 0.999 0.048 — 1.400 0.910 0.006 — 
2,3,3-Trimethylpentane 560-21-4 0.998 0.127 <LOD — 1.988 0.943 0.011 — 
4-Methylheptane 589-53-7 0.993 0.202 — 0.604 0.562 0.006 — 
2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 19549-87-2 0.998 0.169 1.077 1.239 4.636 2.004 0.039 430.55 
Alcohols 2-Methyl-2-propanol 75-65-0 0.997 0.525 0.740 0.815 9.624 6.539 0.018 1,300.67 
Esters Methyl acetate 79-20-9 0.999 0.106 0.883 0.355 5.169 1.611 0.020 585.21 
n-Propyl acetate 109-60-4 0.998 0.078 — 0.555 0.448 0.006 — 
Ethers Ethyl tert-butyl ether 637-92-3 0.998 0.369 — 1.754 1.644 0.006 — 
Ketones Acetone 67-64-1 0.999 0.382 13.88 7.901 39.53 19.18 0.039 284.89 
2-Pentanone 107-87-9 0.997 0.164 <LOD — 1.337 0.765 0.020 — 
Decreased Esters n-Butyl acetate 123-86-4 0.999 0.134 13.90 8.014 2.651 4.591 0.038 19.07 
Aldehydes Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 0.993 1.517 741.8 198.7 365.7 250.7 0.020 49.30 
Methacrolein 78-85-3 0.998 0.798 4.281 1.699 — 0.018 0.00 
(E)-2-Butenal 123-73-9 0.999 0.254 3.430 0.771 <LOD — 0.020 3.19 
2-Methylpropanal 78-84-2 0.995 0.182 18.71 5.538 0.216 0.374 0.020 1.15 
3-Methylbutanal 590-86-3 0.994 0.406 54.08 18.25 0.604 1.046 0.020 1.12 
Hexanal 66-25-1 0.981 0.936 1,093.2 305.6 192.0 211.7 0.020 17.56 
Octanal 124-13-0 0.914 1.020 6.457 1.856 1.219 2.112 0.038 18.88 
Cell typeGroupClassCompoundCASR2LOD [ppbv]Mean medium (ppbv)SD medium (ppbv)Mean cells (ppbv)SD cells (ppbv)PRatio cell/medium
hFBs Increased Hydrocarbons Benzene 71-43-2 0.999 0.201 5.291 1.264 6.914 0.689 0.025 130.68 
2,3,3-Trimethylpentane 560-21-4 0.998 0.127 1.389 0.616 4.688 0.155 0.025 337,46 
2,3,4-Trimethylpentane 565-75-3 0.995 0.137 0.147 0.251 1.106 0.140 0.022 752.78 
2,4-Dimethylhexane 589-43-5 0.999 0.044 — 0.396 0.216 0.010 — 
4-Methylheptane 589-53-7 0.993 0.202 0.831 0.387 2.866 0.057 0.025 344.68 
3-Methylheptane 589-81-1 0.998 0.048 2.463 0.528 4.059 0.706 0.025 164.80 
n-Octane 111-65-9 0.998 0.064 7.996 2.248 12.28 1.731 0.025 153.59 
2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 19549-87-2 0.998 0.199 6.105 2.413 16.22 2.723 0.025 265.75 
2,3,5-Trimethylhexane 1069-53-0 0.997 0.267 — 7.213 4.925 0.010 — 
Alcohols 2-Methyl-1-propanol 78-83-1 0.995 1.283 0.803 1.124 6.242 3.401 0.022 776.91 
3-Methyl-1-butanol 123-51-3 0.996 1.141 — 11.38 1.225 0.010 — 
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol 104-76-7 0.918 4.199 488.7 161.5 1,082.5 98.009 0.025 221.49 
Ethers Methyl tert-butyl ether 1634-04-4 0.999 0.293 0.346 0.489 1.692 0.933 0.047 488.57 
Ketones 2-Pentanone 107-87-9 0.997 0.164 1.059 0.681 9.450 10.218 0.025 892.39 
2-Hexanone 591-78-6 0.997 0.152 0.596 0.375 2.322 0.995 0.025 389.70 
Decreased Esters n-Butyl acetate 123-86-4 0.999 0.134 55.51 28.83 11.22 2.904 0.025 20.20 
Aldehydes Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 0.993 1.517 883.1 462.2 167.7 52.968 0.025 18.99 
(E)-2-Butenal 123-73-9 0.997 0.254 4.289 0.844 — 0.022 
2-Methylpropanal 78-84-2 0.996 0.180 98.41 40.43 0.644 0.287 0.025 0.65 
2-Methylbutanal 96-17-3 0.996 0.134 214.8 117.4 1.620 0.119 0.025 0.75 
3-Methylbutanal 590-86-3 0.994 0.406 158.9 60.19 3.800 0.624 0.025 2.39 
Benzaldehyde 100-52-7 0.990 0,320 36.26 11.39 2.798 2.170 0.025 7.71 
Ketones 3-Penten-2-one 3102-33-8 0.995 0.160 1.611 0.704 — 0.022 
HFB primary cells Increased Hydrocarbons 3-Methylheptane 589-81-1 0.999 0.048 — 1.400 0.910 0.006 — 
2,3,3-Trimethylpentane 560-21-4 0.998 0.127 <LOD — 1.988 0.943 0.011 — 
4-Methylheptane 589-53-7 0.993 0.202 — 0.604 0.562 0.006 — 
2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 19549-87-2 0.998 0.169 1.077 1.239 4.636 2.004 0.039 430.55 
Alcohols 2-Methyl-2-propanol 75-65-0 0.997 0.525 0.740 0.815 9.624 6.539 0.018 1,300.67 
Esters Methyl acetate 79-20-9 0.999 0.106 0.883 0.355 5.169 1.611 0.020 585.21 
n-Propyl acetate 109-60-4 0.998 0.078 — 0.555 0.448 0.006 — 
Ethers Ethyl tert-butyl ether 637-92-3 0.998 0.369 — 1.754 1.644 0.006 — 
Ketones Acetone 67-64-1 0.999 0.382 13.88 7.901 39.53 19.18 0.039 284.89 
2-Pentanone 107-87-9 0.997 0.164 <LOD — 1.337 0.765 0.020 — 
Decreased Esters n-Butyl acetate 123-86-4 0.999 0.134 13.90 8.014 2.651 4.591 0.038 19.07 
Aldehydes Acetaldehyde 75-07-0 0.993 1.517 741.8 198.7 365.7 250.7 0.020 49.30 
Methacrolein 78-85-3 0.998 0.798 4.281 1.699 — 0.018 0.00 
(E)-2-Butenal 123-73-9 0.999 0.254 3.430 0.771 <LOD — 0.020 3.19 
2-Methylpropanal 78-84-2 0.995 0.182 18.71 5.538 0.216 0.374 0.020 1.15 
3-Methylbutanal 590-86-3 0.994 0.406 54.08 18.25 0.604 1.046 0.020 1.12 
Hexanal 66-25-1 0.981 0.936 1,093.2 305.6 192.0 211.7 0.020 17.56 
Octanal 124-13-0 0.914 1.020 6.457 1.856 1.219 2.112 0.038 18.88 

NOTE: CAS numbers, correlation coefficients (R2), and the respective LODs are presented. Average concentrations (ppbv) are given with SDs. The ratio of the average concentrations of the target analyte compared with medium control and the P values of Kruskal-Wallis tests have been calculated for each cell density.

Figure 2.

VOCs present at higher or lower concentrations in the headspace of the HBEpC cell line than in medium controls. Presented are average concentrations (ppbv) in logarithmic scaling with SD for 50 million cells (n = 3; gray columns) compared with medium (n = 4; empty columns). *, significant differences.

Figure 2.

VOCs present at higher or lower concentrations in the headspace of the HBEpC cell line than in medium controls. Presented are average concentrations (ppbv) in logarithmic scaling with SD for 50 million cells (n = 3; gray columns) compared with medium (n = 4; empty columns). *, significant differences.

Close modal

Like in A549 cells, methacrolein, 2-methylpropanal, 3-methylbutanal, and n-butyl acetate showed diminished concentrations in the headspace of HBEpC cells. Methacrolein was not detected at all in the headspace of cell cultures, and n-butyl acetate was reduced to 19.1% of medium control concentration. The aldehyde 2-methylpropanal was found only in one of three cell samples, whereas 3-methylbutanal, which was detected in all samples measured, was reduced to 1.1% of medium control concentration (Fig. 2). Moreover, acetaldehyde and 2-butenal (below LOD in the headspace of cells) showed decreased concentrations. Exclusively decreased in HBEpC cells were the aldehydes hexanal and octanal.

In the case of the second control cell line hFB, the concentrations of 15 compounds were increased and of 8 were decreased (Table 2). Altogether, three independent experiments with 50 million cells and four independent measurements with medium control were done. Like in A549 cancer cells, the concentrations of methyl tert-butyl ether, 2-pentanone, and 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene were found to be significantly increased for hFB cells (Table 2; Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

VOCs present at higher or lower concentrations in the headspace of the hFB cell line than in medium controls. Presented are average concentrations (ppbv) in logarithmic scaling with SD for 50 million cells (n = 3; gray columns) compared with medium (n = 4; empty columns). *, significant differences.

Figure 3.

VOCs present at higher or lower concentrations in the headspace of the hFB cell line than in medium controls. Presented are average concentrations (ppbv) in logarithmic scaling with SD for 50 million cells (n = 3; gray columns) compared with medium (n = 4; empty columns). *, significant differences.

Close modal

Among the remaining 12 VOCs with increased concentrations in hFB cells, 6 were branched saturated hydrocarbons including 2,4-dimethylhexane, which was not detected in the medium control, 2,3,4-trimethylpentane, 2,3,3-trimethylpentane, 4-methylheptane, 3-methylheptane, and 2,3,5-trimethylhexane (not detected in the medium control headspace). Increased concentrations were also found for octane and several alcohols, such as 2-methyl-1-propanol (below LOD in medium control), 3-methyl-1-butanol (not detected in medium control), and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (221.5% of medium control concentration). Two unique analytes released by hFB cells were 2-hexanone and benzene.

As in A549 cells, n-butyl acetate, 2-methylpropanal, and 3-methylbutanal were significantly decreased in the headspace of hFB cells. Other aldehydes with decreased concentrations were acetaldehyde, 2-methylbutanal, 2-butenal (not detected in the headspace of cells), and benzaldehyde. The only compound that was significantly decreased (consumed or degraded) exclusively by hFBs was the ketone (E)-3-penten-2-one (not detected in the headspace of cells; Table 2; Fig. 3).

VOCs belonging to various classes of chemical compounds have been linked previously to lung cancer by different authors (14, 17-21). For most of these compounds, the cellular and biochemical origin has not been determined and some of them might be of exogenous origin. For the production or consumption of the compounds found, different types of cells could be responsible including nontumorous cells, i.e., normal surrounding tissue, immune cells, or even infectious agents. In the study presented here, we attempted not only to provide further insight into VOCs specifically released by cancer cells (31, 32),5 but also to look for the presence of VOCs, which may help to discriminate normal from transformed cells. This knowledge will be essential to introduce VOCs into routine screening procedures. A common feature of the cell lines we have studied thus far (31, 32),5 with the exemption of NCI-H1666, is the fact that similar hydrocarbons are released at significant level. In contrast, several aldehydes and n-butyl acetate were consumed by these cell lines. In addition, no hydrocarbon was taken up (consumed or degraded) and no aldehydes or n-butyl acetate were ever released by these cells.

Merely a few compounds found with the tested lung cancer cell lines A549, NCI-H2087, and CALU-1 are unique and not found in the control cells tested here. Particularly interesting among them is 2-methylpentane (released by NCI-H2087), which has been detected at higher concentrations in the breath of patients suffering from non–small cell lung cancer (20). 4-Methyloctane, exclusively found in CALU-1 cells, has been reported by Phillips et al. (14-16, 38) and has been used to differentiate between lung cancer patients and healthy volunteers. Similarly, in our work with lung cancer patients (21), we have obtained evidence that some branched hydrocarbons are important VOCs, but also alcohols and ketones are found to be increased in concentration in the breath of cancer patients. Nevertheless, it should be noted that no hydrocarbon was significantly released by at least two of the different cancer cell lines studied here. This may be due to the fact that every tumor cell line is only a limited representation of the human primary tumor it has been derived from, and only the comparison on many more such lines and the inclusion of primary material will allow to pinpoint VOCs, which can serve as biomarkers.

Interestingly, more compounds with significant differences in their concentration to medium controls were released by healthy than tumor cells. This can be seen for the release of the branched hydrocarbons 2,3,4-trimethylpentane, 2,4-dimethylhexane, 4-methylheptane, and 3-methylheptane, where no differences to the medium control were found in the cancer cell line studies (Table 3). Furthermore, the differences in the concentration of four hydrocarbons, 2,3,3-trimethylpentane, n-octane, 2,3,5-trimethylhexane, and 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene, between cancer cells and medium controls were higher for nontransformed than A549 cells.

Table 3.

Overview over VOCs released or taken for HFB, hFB, A549, NCI-H2087 (32), CALU-1 (31), and NCI-H1666 cells

GroupClassNormal cellsLung cancer cell lines
BronchiaDermis
HFBhFBA549NCI-H2087NCI-H1666CALU-1
Increased Hydrocarbons    2-Methylpentane   
    2-Methyl-1-pentene    
   2,4-Dimethylhexane     
   2,3,4-Trimethylpentane     
 2,3,3-Trimethylpentane 2,3,3-Trimethylpentane    2,3,3-Trimethylpentane 
 4-Methylheptane 4-Methylheptane     
   Octane Octane    
 3-Methylheptane 3-Methylheptane     
   2,3,5-Trimethylhexane    2,3,5-Trimethylhexane 
       2,4-Dimethylheptane 
 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene    
       4-Methyloctane 
Ketones Acetone  Acetone    
 2-Pentanone 2-Pentanone 2-Pentanone    
   2-Hexanone     
Alcohols    Ethanol    
 2-Methyl-2-propanol      
   2-Methyl-1-propanol     
   3-Methyl-1-Butanol     
   2-Ethyl-1-hexanol  2-Ethyl-1-hexanol   
Esters Methyl acetate      
 n-Propyl acetate      
Ethers   Methyl tert-butyl ether Methyl tert-butyl ether    
 Ethyl tert-butyl ether  Ethyl tert-butyl ether     
Aromatics   Benzene    
Decreased Aldehydes Acetaldehyde Acetaldehyde  Acetaldehyde  Acetaldehyde 
       Acrolein 
Methacrolein   Methacrolein  Methacrolein Methacrolein 
2-Methylpropanal 2-Methylpropanal 2-Methylpropanal 2-Methylpropanal  2-Methylpropanal 
    Butanal    
2-Butenal 2-Butenal     
    2-Ethylacrolein   2-Ethylacrolein 
3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 
   2-Methylbutanal  2-Methylbutanal   
    2-Methyl-2-butenal   2-Methyl-2-butenal 
Hexanal     Hexanal Hexanal 
   Benzaldehyde    Benzaldehyde 
Octanal      
Esters n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate 
Ketones       2-Butanone 
   (E)-3-Penten-2-one    
Ethers       Methyl tert butyl ether 
       Ethyl tert butyl ether 
Furans       Tetrahydrofuran 
N containing    Pyrrole    
       Acetonitrile 
GroupClassNormal cellsLung cancer cell lines
BronchiaDermis
HFBhFBA549NCI-H2087NCI-H1666CALU-1
Increased Hydrocarbons    2-Methylpentane   
    2-Methyl-1-pentene    
   2,4-Dimethylhexane     
   2,3,4-Trimethylpentane     
 2,3,3-Trimethylpentane 2,3,3-Trimethylpentane    2,3,3-Trimethylpentane 
 4-Methylheptane 4-Methylheptane     
   Octane Octane    
 3-Methylheptane 3-Methylheptane     
   2,3,5-Trimethylhexane    2,3,5-Trimethylhexane 
       2,4-Dimethylheptane 
 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene 2,4-Dimethyl-1-heptene    
       4-Methyloctane 
Ketones Acetone  Acetone    
 2-Pentanone 2-Pentanone 2-Pentanone    
   2-Hexanone     
Alcohols    Ethanol    
 2-Methyl-2-propanol      
   2-Methyl-1-propanol     
   3-Methyl-1-Butanol     
   2-Ethyl-1-hexanol  2-Ethyl-1-hexanol   
Esters Methyl acetate      
 n-Propyl acetate      
Ethers   Methyl tert-butyl ether Methyl tert-butyl ether    
 Ethyl tert-butyl ether  Ethyl tert-butyl ether     
Aromatics   Benzene    
Decreased Aldehydes Acetaldehyde Acetaldehyde  Acetaldehyde  Acetaldehyde 
       Acrolein 
Methacrolein   Methacrolein  Methacrolein Methacrolein 
2-Methylpropanal 2-Methylpropanal 2-Methylpropanal 2-Methylpropanal  2-Methylpropanal 
    Butanal    
2-Butenal 2-Butenal     
    2-Ethylacrolein   2-Ethylacrolein 
3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 3-Methylbutanal 
   2-Methylbutanal  2-Methylbutanal   
    2-Methyl-2-butenal   2-Methyl-2-butenal 
Hexanal     Hexanal Hexanal 
   Benzaldehyde    Benzaldehyde 
Octanal      
Esters n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate n-Butyl acetate 
Ketones       2-Butanone 
   (E)-3-Penten-2-one    
Ethers       Methyl tert butyl ether 
       Ethyl tert butyl ether 
Furans       Tetrahydrofuran 
N containing    Pyrrole    
       Acetonitrile 

NOTE: For NCI-H1666: Sponring A, Filipiak W, Mikoviny T, et al. Release of VOCs from the lung cancer cell line NCI-H1666 in vitro. 2009: submitted.

Higher activity of nontransformed cells in production of VOCs could also be suspected because of the more abundant release of alcohols. In particular, 2-methyl-1-propanol, 2-methyl-2-propanol, and 3-methyl-1-butanol were found to be significantly released only by healthy cell lines and not by any of cancer cell lines tested in this or earlier studies (Table 3). These data suggest that the metabolic pathways, which have lead to the generation of these compounds, have been more active in normal than in transformed cells and point to a possible tumor suppressive function. Interestingly, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, which was released at nearly the same level by hFB and NCI-H2087 cells, was also released from cells of the dermis as described previously (39). The only alcohol produced exclusively by cancer cells was ethanol (Table 1; Fig. 1). Restricted to primary bronchial cells was the release of the esters methyl acetate and n-propyl acetate. No esters at all were found to be significantly released by any cancer cell line investigated in this and previous studies (31, 32).5 However, this difference between carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic cells, suggested by our studies, needs to be confirmed by additional investigations.

The only two ethers significantly released by cancer cells are methyl tert-butyl ether and ethyl tert-butyl ether (released by A549 cells). Interestingly, the highest concentration of methyl tert-butyl ether was observed for 25 million A549 cells, perhaps reflecting better growth conditions at lower cell numbers. However, because the concentration of methyl tert-butyl ether released is very similar among cells, the concentration profile of this analyte is most likely within the range of random error and the sensitivity of the applied methods is insufficient to detect any increase. Both ethers were also significantly released by one of the nontransformed cell types, methyl tert-butyl ether by hFB and ethyl tert-butyl ether by HBEpC. In contrast, these ethers were found to be significantly decreased (degraded) by CALU-1 cancer cells.

For ketones, a representative analyte was acetone. In the experiments discussed here, acetone was released by nontransformed (HBEpC) and cancer (A549) cell lines. Among other ketones, 2-pentanone was secreted by all three currently tested cell lines (hFB, HBEpC, and A549), whereas 2-hexanone was only released by hFB cells. It should be noted that as for some of previously mentioned metabolites, hFB cells released the highest amounts of 2-pentanone. On the other hand, two other ketones were taken up (consumed or degraded), namely 3-penten-2-one by hFBs and 2-butanone, by previously investigated CALU-1 cancer cells.

A significant observation in this study is the strong decrease in the concentration of numerous aldehydes and n-butyl acetate in the headspace of A549 cell cultures and control cells (Tables 1 and 2; Figs. 1-3). Among the decreased VOCs, the ester n-butyl acetate and the aldehyde 3-methylbutanal were found to be lowered in all tested cell lines. Previous work on NCI-H2087 (32), NCI-H1666,5 and CALU-1 (31) lung cancer cell lines showed that both 3-methylbutanal and n-butyl acetate were decreased in all cells investigated in vitro. Typically, but not always, the aldehydes acetaldehyde, 2-methylpropanal, and methacrolein were also found to be decreased (Table 3). This decrease could be observed either in the lung cancer cell lines A549, NCI-H2087, or CALU-1, or in one of the tested control cell lines (Table 3; Figs. 1-3). 2-Ethylacrolein and 2-ethyl-2-butenal were only degraded by lung cancer cell lines. A HBEpC-specific feature not found in any of the other investigated cell lines was the degradation of n-octanal, whereas only hFB cells showed a decrease in 3-penten-2-one. It should be noticed that besides the ester n-butyl acetate (and 3-penten-2-one for hFB), nontransformed cells only degrade aldehydes, whereas cancer cells could also degrade nitrogen-containing compounds (pyrrole by A549 and acetonitrile by CALU-1), ketone, and ethers (acetone, methyl tert-butyl ether, and ethyl tert-butyl ether, respectively, all degraded by the CALU-1 line).

Overall, the reasons for differences in VOC release or consumption among the investigated cell lines are currently unknown, but may result from phenotypic or genotypic differences. Clarification of this issue will require an understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms for VOC production, which is currently lacking for the mentioned compounds.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

We thank the Member of the Tyrolean regional government Dr. Erwin Koler and the Director of the University Clinic of Innsbruck (TILAK) Mag. Andreas Steiner for their generous support.

Grant Support: European Commission (project BAMOD, project No LSHC-CT-2005-019031) and the Austrian Ministry for Science and Research (BMWF, Vienna, Austria, grants GZ 651.019/1-VI/2/2006, GZ 651.019/3-VI/2/2006).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
Amann
A
,
Smith
D
, editors.
Breath Analysis for Clinical Diagnosis and Therapeutic Monitoring
.
Singapore
:
World Scientific
; 
2005
.
2
Amann
A
,
Spanel
P
,
Smith
D
. 
Breath analysis: the approach towards clinical applications
.
Mini Rev Med Chem
2007
;
7
:
115
29
.
3
Risby
T
. 
Current status of clinical breath analysis
. In:
Amann
A
,
Smith
D
, editors.
Breath Analysis for Clinical Diagnosis and Therapeutic Monitoring
.
Singapore
:
World Scientific
; 
2005
, p.
251
65
.
4
Chen
CP
,
Chen
CY
,
Lu
CL
, et al
. 
Infrared spectrometry based 13C-octanoic acid breath test in measuring human solid gastric emptying
.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2003
;
18
:
41
6
.
5
Liao
CC
,
Lee
CL
,
Chiang
TC
, et al
. 
The 13C-urea breath test to detect Helicobacter pylori infection: a validated simple methodology with 50 mg 13C-urea
.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
2002
;
16
:
787
92
.
6
Eisenmann
A
,
Amann
A
,
Said
M
,
Datta
B
,
Ledochowski
M
. 
Implementation and interpretation of hydrogen breath test
.
J Breath Res
2 (2008)
046002 (9pp)
.
7
Schubert
J
,
Miekisch
W
,
Nöldge-Schomburg
G
. 
VOC breath markers in critically ill patients: potentials and limitations
. In:
Amann
A
,
Smith
D
, editors.
Breath Analysis for Clinical Diagnosis and Therapeutic Monitoring
.
Singapore
:
World Scientific
; 
2005
, p.
267
92
.
8
Miekisch
W
,
Schubert
JK
,
Noeldge-Schomburg
GF
. 
Diagnostic potential of breath analysis-focus on volatile organic compounds
.
Clin Chim Acta
2004
;
347
:
25
39
.
9
Davies
S
,
Spanel
P
,
Smith
D
. 
A new ‘online’ method to measure increased exhaled isoprene in end-stage renal failure
.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
2001
;
16
:
836
9
.
10
Davies
S
,
Spanel
P
,
Smith
D
. 
Quantitative analysis of ammonia on the breath of patients in end-stage renal failure
.
Kidney Int
1997
;
52
:
223
8
.
11
Davies
SJ
,
Spanel
P
,
Smith
D
. 
Quantitative analysis of metabolites on the breath of patients in renal failure
.
J Am Soc Nephrol
1996
;
7
:
A0352
A
.
12
Perri
F
,
Marras
RM
,
Ricciardi
R
,
Quitadamo
M
,
Andriulli
A
. 
13C-breath tests in hepatology (cytosolic liver function)
.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
2004
;
8
:
47
9
.
13
Candelli
M
,
Armuzzi
A
,
Nista
EC
,
Fini
L
,
Gasbarrini
G
,
Gasbarrini
A
. 
13C-methacetin breath test for monitoring hepatic function in cirrhotic patients before and after liver transplantation
.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
2004
;
19
:
243
.
14
Phillips
M
,
Altorki
N
,
Austin
JH
, et al
. 
Prediction of lung cancer using volatile biomarkers in breath
.
Cancer Biomark
2007
;
3
:
95
109
.
15
Phillips
M
,
Cataneo
RN
,
Cummin
AR
, et al
. 
Detection of lung cancer with volatile markers in the breath
.
Chest
2003
;
123
:
2115
23
.
16
Phillips
M
,
Cataneo
RN
,
Ditkoff
BA
, et al
. 
Volatile markers of breast cancer in the breath
.
Breast J
2003
;
9
:
184
91
.
17
Wehinger
A
,
Schmid
A
,
Mechtcheriakov
S
, et al
. 
Lung cancer detection by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometric analysis of human breath gas
.
Int J Mass Spec
2007
;
265
:
49
59
.
18
Machado
RF
,
Laskowski
D
,
Deffenderfer
O
, et al
. 
Detection of lung cancer by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2005
;
171
:
1286
91
.
19
Di Natale
C
,
Macagnano
A
,
Martinelli
E
, et al
. 
Lung cancer identification by the analysis of breath by means of an array of non-selective gas sensors
.
Biosens Bioelectron
2003
;
18
:
1209
18
.
20
Poli
D
,
Carbognani
P
,
Corradi
M
, et al
. 
Exhaled volatile organic compounds in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: cross sectional and nested short-term follow-up study
.
Respir Res
2005
;
6
:
71
.
21
Ligor
M
,
Ligor
T
,
Bajtarevic
A
, et al
. 
Determination of volatile organic compounds appearing in exhaled breath of lung cancer patients by solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography mass spectrometry
.
Clin Chem Lab Med
2009
;
47
:
550
60
.
22
Brandacher
G
,
Cakar
F
,
Winkler
C
, et al
. 
Non-invasive monitoring of kidney allograft rejection through IDO metabolism evaluation
.
Kidney Int
2007
;
71
:
60
7
.
23
Bonatti
H
,
Brandacher
G
,
Boesmueller
C
, et al
. 
Hemolytic uremic syndrome following Campath-1H induction
.
Transpl Int
2007
;
20
:
386
9
.
24
Brandacher
G
,
Winkler
C
,
Schroecksnadel
K
,
Margreiter
R
,
Fuchs
D
. 
Antitumoral activity of interferon-γ involved in impaired immune function in cancer patients
.
Curr Drug Metab
2006
;
7
:
599
612
.
25
Josting
A
,
Rudolph
C
,
Mapara
M
, et al
. 
Cologne high-dose sequential chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a large multicenter study of the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG)
.
Ann Oncol
2005
;
16
:
116
23
.
26
Bunge
M
,
Araghipour
N
,
Mikoviny
T
, et al
. 
On-line monitoring of microbial volatile metabolites by proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry
.
Appl Environ Microbiol
2008
;
74
:
2179
86
.
27
Syhre
M
,
Scotter
JM
,
Chambers
ST
. 
Investigation into the production of 2-Pentylfuran by Aspergillus fumigatus and other respiratory pathogens in vitro and human breath samples
.
Med Mycol
2008
;
46
:
209
15
.
28
Syhre
M
,
Chambers
ST
. 
The scent of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
.
Tuberculosis (Edinb)
2008
;
88
:
317
23
.
29
Smith
D
,
Wang
TS
,
Sule-Suso
J
,
Spanel
P
,
El Haj
A
. 
Quantification of acetaldehyde released by lung cancer cells in vitro using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry
.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom
2003
;
17
:
845
50
.
30
Chen
X
,
Xu
F
,
Wang
Y
, et al
. 
A study of the volatile organic compounds exhaled by lung cancer cells in vitro for breath diagnosis
.
Cancer
2007
;
110
:
835
44
.
31
Filipiak
W
,
Sponring
A
,
Mikoviny
T
, et al
. 
Release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the lung cancer cell line CALU-1 in vitro
.
Cancer Cell Int
2008
;
8
:
17
.
32
Sponring
A
,
Filipiak
W
,
Mikoviny
T
, et al
. 
Release of volatile organic compounds from the lung cancer cell line NCI-H2087 in vitro
.
Anticancer Res
2009
;
29
:
419
26
.
33
Davies
H
,
Bignell
GR
,
Cox
C
, et al
. 
Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer
.
Nature
2002
;
417
:
949
54
.
34
Lieber
M
,
Smith
B
,
Szakal
A
,
Nelson-Rees
W
,
Todaro
G
. 
A continuous tumor-cell line from a human lung carcinoma with properties of type II alveolar epithelial cells
.
Int J Cancer
1976
;
17
:
62
70
.
35
Giard
DJ
,
Aaronson
SA
,
Todaro
GJ
, et al
. 
In vitro cultivation of human tumors: establishment of cell lines derived from a series of solid tumors
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1973
;
51
:
1417
23
.
36
Hay
RJ
,
Caputo
CJ
,
Macy
ML
.
ATCC Quality Control Methods for Cell Lines
. 2nd Edition.
Published by ATTC
; 
1992
.
37
Kleinbaum
D
,
Kupper
L
,
Muller
A
,
Nizam
K
.
Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods
.
Pacific Grove (CA)
:
Brooks/Cole Publishing Company
; 
1998
.
38
Phillips
M
,
Altorki
N
,
Austin
JH
, et al
. 
Detection of lung cancer using weighted digital analysis of breath biomarkers
.
Clin Chim Acta
2008
;
393
:
76
84
.
39
Acevedo
CA
,
Sanchez
EY
,
Reyes
JG
,
Young
ME
. 
Volatile organic compounds produced by human skin cells
.
Biol Res
2007
;
40
:
347
55
.