Purpose: Ovarian epithelial carcinomas, including the predominant serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC) type, are heterogeneous malignancies. Even though invasive SOCs of low and high grade can be distinguished by morphology and molecular or immunohistochemical profiles, age-specific risks relevant to their separate carcinogenic pathways and clinical features have not been fully explored.

Methods: In search of further clues to the etiology/pathogenesis of low-grade and high-grade SOCs, we analyzed incidence rate patterns. Case and age-adjusted population data were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program for years 1990 through 2005. Descriptive epidemiology for n = 19,899 cases was supplemented with age-period-cohort models fitted by grade.

Results: SOC age-adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) of high to low grade (IRRH/L) were <1.0 before age 40, and >1.0 thereafter. Accordingly, SOC age-specific incidence rates were also greater for low grade before age 40 years, and then greater for high grade. The reversals of IRRH/L, with crossings of the age-specific incidence rate near age 40 years occurred irrespective of early or late SOC stage. These results were reproducible and reliable in age-period-cohort models that were adjusted for period and cohort effects (P ≈ 0 for age interactions by grade).

Conclusions: Robust qualitative age interactions between low-grade and high-grade SOC showed that grade is an age-specific effect modifier in these malignancies. With increasing research interest in identifying the genomic determinants of SOC risk, therapeutic response, and outcome, future analytic studies and clinical trials should be powered to account for age-dependent grade interactions. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(8):2256–61)

The heterogeneity of ovarian epithelial cancers, including the predominant histologic type of serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC), is well-recognized (1-5). Indeed, contemporary molecular-based models implicate two major carcinogenic pathways (2, 6-8). High-grade SOCs represent the majority of invasive ovarian cancers (9-11), and typically show molecular signatures or DNA amplification associated with genetic instability (12-16). Low-grade SOCs, which can also spread progressively (17, 18), have been associated with stable oncogenic mutations (KRAS or BRAF) that influence cell proliferation (2, 19).

There is growing interest in defining the molecular determinants of ovarian cancer risk, including cancer genomic patterns, epigenetic modifications, and molecular signatures (3, 13, 15, 16, 20-23). Although a major grade-based dichotomy in SOC molecular biology is now widely acknowledged, the age-specific risks relevant to heterogeneity in the carcinogenic pathways have not been fully explored. A number of recent population studies have shown that robust analyses of cancer incidence rate patterns can unmask qualitative (crossing or reversing) age interactions relevant to pathogenesis, histogenesis (grade), progression (stage), or outcome (24-26). Such findings can influence the design of clinical trials and guide subgroup analyses (27).

We aimed to gain further information relevant to ovarian cancer pathobiology by analysis of age-adjusted and age-specific incidence rate patterns of SOC using comprehensive data available through the internet from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. We supplemented standard descriptive epidemiology with a structured mathematical framework for rigorous analysis of age interactions by cancer grade.

Data Source

All cases with a primary diagnosis of invasive ovarian cancer during the years 1990 to 2005, and related population data, including all identified racial groups, were obtained from the SEER program. Incidence and mortality data were merged from three major registry groupings encompassing 17 regional tumor registries.6

Specifically, the registries included 10% (SEER 9; 1990-1991), 14% (SEER 13; 1992-1999), and 26% (SEER 17; 2000-2005) of the U.S. population.

Tumor Characterization

Histologic types of ovarian cancer specified in the SEER Program Coding and Staging Manual7

are designated by the WHO International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3); and relevant morphologic criteria for diagnosis have been amply described (see refs. 5, 10, 28). Microscopic patterns of SOC recognized in SEER include serous cystadenocarcinoma (ICD-O-3, code 8441), papillary serous cystadenocarcinoma (code 8460), and serous surface papillary carcinoma (code 8461). In pilot testing, each of these SOC subtypes showed comparable age-adjusted stage and grade distributions and parallel patterns of age-specific incidence rates. As designated by the WHO (29), SOC was thus analyzed as a single entity. The staging of ovarian cancer recorded in SEER accords to standards developed by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (11) or equivalent standards of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. For the present study, data were collapsed into sets of early stage (stage I or II) and late stage (stage III or IV). The diagnostic grades transcribed in SEER accord with American Joint Committee on Cancer and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics guidelines: G1, well differentiated; G2, moderately differentiated; G3, poorly differentiated, and G4, undifferentiated. The American Joint Committee on Cancer pairs G3-G4. For the present study, we tested each grade individually or in collapsed sets of low grade (G1, G2) and high grade (G3, G4). This “two-tiered” division followed expert recommendations for diagnostic practice (5, 30) and matched to reports of molecular and immunohistochemical profiling (2, 14).

Statistical Methods

The rate data extracted from SEER were all age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. Standard Population. Relative risks were expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRR), in which a given characteristic was compared with a reference characteristic with an assigned IRR = 1.0. Incidence rate trends were plotted by a succession of four 4-year calendar periods (years 1990-1993, 1994-1997, 1998-2001, and 2002-2005). Cross-sectional age-specific incidence rates were stratified by high or low grade and plotted by 17 4-year age groups (ages 17-20, 21-24, …, and 81-84). Poisson regression models were used to examine trend and age interactions between low and high grade (31). Quantitative interactions exhibit changes in magnitude but not direction; i.e., IRR of high versus low grade (IRRH/L) remain either <1.0 or >1.0. Qualitative interactions showed changes in magnitude and direction with a relative rate reversal and age line “crossover”; i.e., corresponding to an IRRH/L reversal between <1.0 and >1.0.

Age-Period-Cohort Analysis

Our 17 4-year age groups and 4 4-year calendar periods spanned 20 4-year birth cohorts (i.e., 1909 to 1985, designated by mid-year of birth). As previously detailed, we used the age-period-cohort (APC) “fitted” age-at-onset curve to provide an estimate of the age-specific incidence rate, coordinately adjusted for both calendar-period and birth cohort effects (26, 31). We fitted the age-at-onset curves separately by grade because high-grade and low-grade SOC subgroups could be subject to different calendar period or birth cohort effects. For example, period effects such as case ascertainment or grade classification might vary by grade, and cohort or generational effects such as risk factor prevalence and/or exposures might also vary by grade.

Survival Analysis

Cumulative survival by grade and stage for the present data set of SOC was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator (32), and curves were drawn with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The log rank test (33) was used to assess actuarial survival differences. The survival function defined the cumulative percentage of survival from the date of SOC diagnosis to the date of ovarian cancer death; all other events were censored.

Descriptive Statistics

The merged SEER data sets yielded n = 19,899 cases of invasive SOCs among women ages 17 to 84 years (mean age, 61.5 years) with more than 299 × 106 woman-years follow-up (Table 1). Low-grade cases (mean age, 59.4 years) accounted for 23% of the total SOC; high-grade cases (mean age, 62.2 years) accounted for 58%; the remaining 19% (3,848 SOC) had not been graded. The overall age-adjusted incidence rate for SOC was 6.65 per 100,000 woman-years; the age-adjusted IRRH/L was 2.50 (95% CI, 2.42-2.59). Prior to age 40 years, the IRRH/L was <1.0 (0.68; 95% CI, 0.25-1.82) after which the IRRH/L was >1.0 (range, 2.10-2.56). For SOC detected at early stage onset (stages I-II), the IRRH/L was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.23). At late stage onset (stages III-IV), it was 3.05 (95% CI, 2.92-3.17); i.e., the IRRH/L increased 2.6-fold.

Table 1.

Invasive SOCs registered in SEER, newly diagnosed during the years 1990 to 2005

Mean age (SE)All casesLow gradeHigh gradeHigh/low grade ratio
61.5 (0.09) y59.4 (0.20) y62.2 (0.11) y
Variablesn*RateSEIRRnRateSEIRRnRateSEIRRIRRH/L (95% CI)
 19,899 6.65 0.05 — 4,580 1.53 0.02 — 11,471 3.83 0.04 — 2.50 (2.42-2.59) 
Age group 
    <40 905 0.67 0.02 1.00 382 0.28 0.14 1.00 259 0.19 0.01 1.00 0.68 (0.25-1.82) 
    40-49 2,803 4.69 0.09 7.00 738 1.24 0.05 4.41 1,556 2.60 0.07 13.68 2.10 (1.91-2.31) 
    50-59 4,785 11.1 0.16 16.61 1,102 2.56 0.08 9.11 2,939 6.84 0.13 36.00 2.67 (2.49-2.87) 
    60-69 5,332 18.3 0.25 27.24 1,135 3.89 0.12 13.84 3,192 10.9 0.19 57.53 2.81 (2.62-3.01) 
    70-79 4,767 20.4 0.30 30.45 947 4.05 0.13 14.41 2,820 12.1 0.23 63.68 2.99 (2.77-3.21) 
    80+ 1,307 16.3 0.45 24.39 276 3.45 0.21 12.28 705 8.82 0.33 46.42 2.56 (2.22-2.94) 
Race 
    White 17,607 7.56 0.06 1.00 4,081 1.75 0.03 1.00 10,149 4.36 0.04 1.00 2.49 (2.40-2.59) 
    Black 1,066 3.24 0.10 0.43 235 0.71 0.05 0.41 572 1.74 0.07 0.40 2.45 (2.09-2.87) 
    Other or unknown 1,226 3.65 0.10 0.48 264 0.79 0.05 0.45 750 2.23 0.08 0.51 2.82 (2.45-3.26) 
Laterality 
    Not paired 7,721 2.58 0.03 1.00 1,967 0.66 0.01 1.00 4,281 1.43 0.02 1.00 2.17 (2.08-2.26) 
    Bilateral 10,954 3.66 0.03 1.42 2,456 0.82 0.02 1.24 6,751 2.26 0.03 1.58 2.76 (2.61-2.91) 
    Other or unknown 1,224 0.41 0.01 0.16 157 0.05 0.00 0.08 439 0.15 0.01 0.10 3.00 (2.48-3.62) 
Stages combined 
    Early (I-II) 3,579 1.20 0.02 1.00 1,279 0.43 0.01 1.00 1,505 0.50 0.01 1.00 1.16 (1.09-1.23) 
    Late (III-IV) 15,807 5.28 0.04 4.40 3,208 1.07 0.02 2.49 9,762 3.26 0.03 6.52 3.05 (2.92-3.17) 
    Unknown 513 0.17 0.01 0.14 93 0.03 0.00 0.07 204 0.07 0.00 0.14 2.33 (2.82-2.99) 
Mean age (SE)All casesLow gradeHigh gradeHigh/low grade ratio
61.5 (0.09) y59.4 (0.20) y62.2 (0.11) y
Variablesn*RateSEIRRnRateSEIRRnRateSEIRRIRRH/L (95% CI)
 19,899 6.65 0.05 — 4,580 1.53 0.02 — 11,471 3.83 0.04 — 2.50 (2.42-2.59) 
Age group 
    <40 905 0.67 0.02 1.00 382 0.28 0.14 1.00 259 0.19 0.01 1.00 0.68 (0.25-1.82) 
    40-49 2,803 4.69 0.09 7.00 738 1.24 0.05 4.41 1,556 2.60 0.07 13.68 2.10 (1.91-2.31) 
    50-59 4,785 11.1 0.16 16.61 1,102 2.56 0.08 9.11 2,939 6.84 0.13 36.00 2.67 (2.49-2.87) 
    60-69 5,332 18.3 0.25 27.24 1,135 3.89 0.12 13.84 3,192 10.9 0.19 57.53 2.81 (2.62-3.01) 
    70-79 4,767 20.4 0.30 30.45 947 4.05 0.13 14.41 2,820 12.1 0.23 63.68 2.99 (2.77-3.21) 
    80+ 1,307 16.3 0.45 24.39 276 3.45 0.21 12.28 705 8.82 0.33 46.42 2.56 (2.22-2.94) 
Race 
    White 17,607 7.56 0.06 1.00 4,081 1.75 0.03 1.00 10,149 4.36 0.04 1.00 2.49 (2.40-2.59) 
    Black 1,066 3.24 0.10 0.43 235 0.71 0.05 0.41 572 1.74 0.07 0.40 2.45 (2.09-2.87) 
    Other or unknown 1,226 3.65 0.10 0.48 264 0.79 0.05 0.45 750 2.23 0.08 0.51 2.82 (2.45-3.26) 
Laterality 
    Not paired 7,721 2.58 0.03 1.00 1,967 0.66 0.01 1.00 4,281 1.43 0.02 1.00 2.17 (2.08-2.26) 
    Bilateral 10,954 3.66 0.03 1.42 2,456 0.82 0.02 1.24 6,751 2.26 0.03 1.58 2.76 (2.61-2.91) 
    Other or unknown 1,224 0.41 0.01 0.16 157 0.05 0.00 0.08 439 0.15 0.01 0.10 3.00 (2.48-3.62) 
Stages combined 
    Early (I-II) 3,579 1.20 0.02 1.00 1,279 0.43 0.01 1.00 1,505 0.50 0.01 1.00 1.16 (1.09-1.23) 
    Late (III-IV) 15,807 5.28 0.04 4.40 3,208 1.07 0.02 2.49 9,762 3.26 0.03 6.52 3.05 (2.92-3.17) 
    Unknown 513 0.17 0.01 0.14 93 0.03 0.00 0.07 204 0.07 0.00 0.14 2.33 (2.82-2.99) 

NOTE: National Cancer Institute's SEER Registry groups 9 + 13 + 17.

Rate, age-adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 woman-years (2000 U.S. standard population).

*Number (includes grade unknown).

The reference rate is assigned an IRR = 1.0, and nonstatistically significant IRR (α = 0.05) is in boldface.

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics and American Joint Committee on Cancer equivalent.

Incidence Rates

The cross-sectional, age-specific incidence rate of SOC increased earlier in life (after age 15 years), and at a slower rate for low grade than for high grade (Fig. 1A). In contrast, age-specific incidence rate increased later in life, and at a faster rate for high grade than low grade. Slower increasing rates for low grade and faster increasing rates for high grade eventually crossed near age 40 years. Exclusion of well differentiated SOC (G1 = 22% of low-grade cases) and/or undifferentiated SOC (G4 = 19% of high-grade cases) did not obscure the relative slope differences and incidence rate crossings. A quantitative (non-crossover) interaction became evident when the age-adjusted rates of high-grade versus low-grade SOC were followed at periodic intervals of 4 calendar years between 1990 and 2005 (Fig. 1B; P < 0.001 for trend interaction between low and high grade). At corresponding intervals, the age-adjusted incidence rate for high-grade SOC increased from 3.16 per 100,000 woman-years during 1990 to 1993 to 4.06 per 100,000 woman-years in the latest calendar period of 2002 to 2005. During this same interval, the incidence rate for low-grade SOC decreased from 1.60 to 1.32 per 100,000 woman-years.

Figure 1.

A. age-specific incidence rates for SOCs stratified by grade and stage (SEER, 1990-2005). Log rates (at 17 4-year intervals) per 100,000 woman-years are plotted on the Y-axis, age-at-diagnosis on the X-axis; 95% CI (dotted lines). P < 0.001 (α = 0.05) for age-interaction by grade. B. age-adjusted (standardized) incidence rates of SOCs stratified by grade and calendar year (SEER, 1990-2005). Rates per 100,000 woman-years (at 4-year intervals) are plotted on the Y-axis, age-at-diagnosis on the X-axis; 95% CI (dotted lines).

Figure 1.

A. age-specific incidence rates for SOCs stratified by grade and stage (SEER, 1990-2005). Log rates (at 17 4-year intervals) per 100,000 woman-years are plotted on the Y-axis, age-at-diagnosis on the X-axis; 95% CI (dotted lines). P < 0.001 (α = 0.05) for age-interaction by grade. B. age-adjusted (standardized) incidence rates of SOCs stratified by grade and calendar year (SEER, 1990-2005). Rates per 100,000 woman-years (at 4-year intervals) are plotted on the Y-axis, age-at-diagnosis on the X-axis; 95% CI (dotted lines).

Close modal

APC Models

Given the age and trend interactions shown in Fig. 1, we examined APC fitted age-at-onset curves that were adjusted for period and cohort effects (Fig. 2). As in Fig. 1, the APC fitted age-specific incidence rate for low and high grade crossed near age 40 years; and this crossing occurred irrespective of stage (Fig. 2B and C; P ≈ 0 for age interaction by grade). For all stages combined, the APC fitted IRRH/L reversed from 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12-0.56) in women ages 25 to 28 to 3.08 (95% CI, 2.47-3.84) in women ages 77 to 80.

Figure 2.

Fitted age-specific incidence rate curves (adjusted for period-cohort effects), and corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRR) for SOCs stratified by grade and stage (based on SEER, 1990-2005). Log rates per 100,000 woman-years are plotted on the Y-axis, age-at-diagnosis on the X-axis; 95% CI (dotted lines). A. all stages. B. early stage (III). C. late stage (III-IV).

Figure 2.

Fitted age-specific incidence rate curves (adjusted for period-cohort effects), and corresponding incidence rate ratios (IRR) for SOCs stratified by grade and stage (based on SEER, 1990-2005). Log rates per 100,000 woman-years are plotted on the Y-axis, age-at-diagnosis on the X-axis; 95% CI (dotted lines). A. all stages. B. early stage (III). C. late stage (III-IV).

Close modal

Cancer-Specific Survival

Cumulative ovarian cancer–specific survival for women with SOC showed a dissociation that accorded with the diagnostic grades assigned in SEER (Fig. 3), irrespective of stage. Estimated cumulative survival was optimal for women with early stage diagnosis of invasive low-grade SOC (Fig. 3B). The survival advantage of low grade diminished in late stages (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.

Estimated cumulative survival (Kaplan-Meier) for women with SOC stratified by grade and stage (SEER, 1990-2005). Percentage of ovarian cancer–specific survival is plotted on the Y-axis, time up to 15 years after diagnosis on the X-axis; 95% CI (shaded), with a separation of high/low grades (P < 0.0001). A. All stages. B. Early stage (I-II). C. Late stage (III-IV).

Figure 3.

Estimated cumulative survival (Kaplan-Meier) for women with SOC stratified by grade and stage (SEER, 1990-2005). Percentage of ovarian cancer–specific survival is plotted on the Y-axis, time up to 15 years after diagnosis on the X-axis; 95% CI (shaded), with a separation of high/low grades (P < 0.0001). A. All stages. B. Early stage (I-II). C. Late stage (III-IV).

Close modal

Essential differences in the incidence rate patterns (qualitative interactions), and estimated cumulative survival of low-grade and high-grade SOC emerged from SEER data representing a substantial fraction of women from the United States. The general SEER catchment offered an advantageous distribution of ovarian cancers across a broad swath of the U.S. population with socioeconomic diversity. Stratification of the age-specific incidence rate, both by grade and stage, thus was powered by exceptionally large numbers of SOC cases with pertinent descriptive data. Overall results showed a qualitative age interaction by low and high grade. This population evidence of SOC heterogeneity was concordant with respective molecular constructs of type I and type II oncogenic pathways (2, 6); and further showed that age had a nonuniform biological effect on the incidence rates. Crossings of the age-specific incidence rates occurred near age 40 years, and fitting of data in recently improved APC models (26, 31) was crucial in demonstrating that the age-dependent rate differences by grade were not driven solely by secular cohort or calendar period factors during the 16-year span examined (1990-2005).

Compared with the age of incidence rate crossovers shown here for SOCs near age 40, low-grade and high-grade incidence rate crossovers for breast cancers were reported to occur nearly 10 years of age later (34); and this data has lately been confirmed by fitting for APC effects.8

8Matsuno RK, Grimley PM, Anderson WK. Unpublished data analysis.

Because ovarian and breast cancers develop within a common context of reproductive risk factors, one explanation for the crossing age variances might be a difference in sensitivities or exposures to hormonal influences on carcinogenesis (see refs. 23, 35, 36). Of possible relevance is an apparent discordance in the effect of racial-ethnic background on the crossovers of age-specific incidence rate for the ovarian and breast cancers. In an initial study of Black and White women with SOC, no difference in the ages for incidence rate crossovers of low and high grade was detected.9

9AACR Meeting Abstracts Online; 2007.A18. Grimley P, Henson D, Patel A, Patierno S, Anderson W. Similar pathobiology of ovarian epithelial cancers in diverse populations with differing incidence rates. First AACR International Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; Atlanta, GA. November 27-30, 2007.

In contrast, recent studies of breast cancer identified crossovers of incidence rate for Black and White women when tumors were stratified by hormone receptor status or grade (31, 37).

The clinicopathologic stage and tumor burden at presentation, or after surgical cytoreduction, are especially reliable indicators of ovarian cancer clinical behavior (11, 38, 39). The present distinction of fitted age-specific rates for low-grade and high-grade SOCs, irrespective of early and late clinicopathologic stages (see Fig. 2), substantiates morphologic grade as an age-specific effect modifier. The results also affirm clinical impressions that invasive low-grade SOC typically are detected at a younger age than high-grade SOC (17, 18). Even so, comparisons of Fig. 2B and C and Table 1 showed an absolute increase in the detection of low-grade SOC during late stage versus early stage. As noted by other investigators (2, 13, 17, 40), this epidemiologic observation would not conform to the classic paradigm of a linear age-grade-stage progression. Indeed, present survival estimates (see Fig. 3) indicate that the prognosis for low-grade SOC detected in late stage was only marginally better than for high-grade SOC. This could reflect observations that low-grade SOC are less responsive to conventional genotoxic therapies than high-grade SOC (18). The interactions between aging and oncogenetic factors driving low-grade versus high-grade cancer cell migration and stage progression probably deserve further investigation (40).

Despite the apparent parallel of our descriptive findings and the molecular heterogeneity of SOC, we recognized that SEER data has potential shortcomings based on primary diagnoses from multiple contributors without independent slide reviews. Misclassifications, diagnostic bias, or random error could blunt evidence of real differences within the cancer population. Bias in diagnostic classification of noninvasive SOC (borderline tumors), which are typically well differentiated (G1), was excluded in a sensitivity test which censored all of the G1 cases. In fact, the observed qualitative age interactions occurred even when only G2 and G3 case data were tested.10

10Matsuno RK, Grimley PM, Rosenberg PS, Anderson WK. Unpublished data.

Bias in grading due to inconsistent weightings of cytologic atypia and mitotic index by individual observers could not be directly excluded. Nevertheless, the reliability of study comparisons can be increased with the use of two-tier grading (30, 41), so that the collapse of the SEER grades into two tiers for the present study convincingly partitioned the age-specific incidence rates. Robust age-specific differences were evident between the cross-sectional incidence rates of low and high grades (compared in Figs. 1 and 2), as well as between the cumulative ovarian cancer–specific survival of SOC estimated by grade and by stage (compared in Fig. 3). Grade/stage proportions determined from SEER and the sensitivities of the survival estimates were comparable to findings reported in expertly refereed case series (4, 7, 30); whereas the statistical power was magnified by the extraordinary n = 19,899 compared with most previously reported SOC case series with n at least 10-fold lower.

In summary, qualitative age interactions between low-grade and high-grade SOCs, irrespective of stage, showed that grade is an age-specific effect modifier in this predominant histologic type of ovarian malignancy. Our results offer an age dimension of SOC risk that supplements the molecular-genetic and immunohistochemical tissue analyses which have implicated two grade-based pathways of carcinogenesis (type I and type II; refs. 2, 7, 14, 19). Considering the burgeoning interest in identifying genomic determinants or markers of ovarian cancer risks, progression, therapeutic response, and outcome (6-8, 20-23, 42-44), future analytic studies and clinical trials of SOC should be powered to anticipate the nonuniform age-dependent interaction (effect modification) delineated by low and high grade.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Leslie Sobin MD, John Koett MD, and Jorge Albores-Saavedra MD for helpful advice, and Zulema Villegas for technical assistance.

1
Wang
V
,
Li
C
,
Lin
M
, et al
. 
Ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease
.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet
2005
;
161
:
170
3
.
2
Kurman
RJ
,
Shih Ie
M
. 
Pathogenesis of ovarian cancer: lessons from morphology and molecular biology and their clinical implications
.
Int J Gynecol Pathol
2008
;
27
:
151
60
.
3
Kobel
M
,
Kalloger
SE
,
Boyd
N
, et al
. 
Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies
.
PLoS Med
2008
;
5
:
e232
.
4
Gilks
CB
,
Ionescu
DN
,
Kalloger
SE
, et al
. 
Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma
.
Hum Pathol
2008
;
39
:
1239
51
.
5
Malpica
A
. 
Grading of ovarian cancer: a histotype-specific approach
.
Int J Gynecol Pathol
2008
;
27
:
175
81
.
6
Cho
KR
,
Shih
IM
. 
Ovarian cancer
.
Annu Rev Pathol
2008
;
4
:
287
313
.
7
Landen
CN
 Jr.
,
Birrer
MJ
,
Sood
AK
. 
Early events in the pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
2008
;
26
:
995
1005
.
8
Levanon
K
,
Crum
C
,
Drapkin
R
. 
New insights into the pathogenesis of serous ovarian cancer and its clinical impact
.
J Clin Oncol
2008
;
26
:
5284
93
.
9
Shimizu
Y
,
Kamoi
S
,
Amada
S
,
Akiyama
F
,
Silverberg
SG
. 
Toward the development of a universal grading system for ovarian epithelial carcinoma: testing of a proposed system in a series of 461 patients with uniform treatment and follow-up
.
Cancer
1998
;
82
:
893
901
.
10
Seidman
JD
,
Young
RH
,
Kurman
RJ
. 
Surface epithelial tumors of the ovary
. In:
Kurman
RJ
, editor.
Blaustein's pathology of the female genital tract
. 5th ed.
Berlin
:
Springer
; 
2002
, p.
791
887
.
11
Heintz
AP
,
Odicino
F
,
Maisonneuve
P
, et al
. 
Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 6th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer
.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
2006
;
95 Suppl 1
:
S161
92
.
12
Singer
G
,
Stohr
R
,
Cope
L
, et al
. 
Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation
.
Am J Surg Pathol
2005
;
29
:
218
24
.
13
Meinhold-Heerlein
I
,
Bauerschlag
D
,
Hilpert
F
, et al
. 
Molecular and prognostic distinction between serous ovarian carcinomas of varying grade and malignant potential
.
Oncogene
2005
;
24
:
1053
65
.
14
O'Neill
CJ
,
Deavers
MT
,
Malpica
A
,
Foster
H
,
McCluggage
WG
. 
An immunohistochemical comparison between low-grade and high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas: significantly higher expression of p53, MIB1, BCL2, HER-2/neu, and C-KIT in high-grade neoplasms
.
Am J Surg Pathol
2005
;
29
:
1034
41
.
15
Nakayama
K
,
Nakayama
N
,
Jinawath
N
, et al
. 
Amplicon profiles in ovarian serous carcinomas
.
Int J Cancer
2007
;
120
:
2613
7
.
16
Darcy
KM
,
Brady
WE
,
McBroom
JW
, et al
. 
Associations between p53 overexpression and multiple measures of clinical outcome in high-risk, early stage or suboptimally-resected, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancers. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
.
Gynecol Oncol
2008
;
111
:
487
95
.
17
Gershenson
DM
,
Sun
CC
,
Lu
KH
, et al
. 
Clinical behavior of stage II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary
.
Obstet Gynecol
2006
;
108
:
361
8
.
18
Schmeler
KM
,
Gershenson
DM
. 
Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a unique disease
.
Curr Oncol Rep
2008
;
10
:
519
23
.
19
Singer
G
,
Oldt
R
 III
,
Cohen
Y
, et al
. 
Mutations in BRAF and KRAS characterize the development of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2003
;
95
:
484
6
.
20
Dressman
HK
,
Berchuck
A
,
Chan
G
, et al
. 
An integrated genomic-based approach to individualized treatment of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer
.
J Clin Oncol
2007
;
25
:
517
25
.
21
Barton
CA
,
Hacker
NF
,
Clark
SJ
,
O'Brien
PM
. 
DNA methylation changes in ovarian cancer: implications for early diagnosis, prognosis and treatment
.
Gynecol Oncol
2008
;
109
:
129
39
.
22
Tothill
RW
,
Tinker
AV
,
George
J
, et al
. 
Novel molecular subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome
.
Clin Cancer Res
2008
;
14
:
5198
208
.
23
Lurie
G
,
Wilkens
LR
,
Thompson
PJ
, et al
. 
Genetic polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor β (ESR2) gene and the risk of epithelial ovarian carcinoma
.
Cancer Causes Control
2009
;
20
:
47
55
.
24
Anderson
WF
,
Chen
BE
,
Brinton
LA
,
Devesa
SS
. 
Qualitative age interactions (or effect modification) suggest different cancer pathways for early-onset and late-onset breast cancers
.
Cancer Causes Control
2007
;
18
:
1187
98
.
25
Lachiewicz
AM
,
Berwick
M
,
Wiggins
CL
,
Thomas
NE
. 
Epidemiologic support for melanoma heterogeneity using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program
.
J Invest Dermatol
2008
;
128
:
243
5
.
26
Reimers
LL
,
Anderson
WF
,
Rosenberg
PS
,
Henson
DE
,
Castle
PE
. 
Etiologic heterogeneity for cervical carcinoma by histopathologic type, using comparative age-period-cohort models
.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2009
;
18
:
792
800
.
27
Wang
R
,
Lagakos
SW
,
Ware
JH
,
Hunter
DJ
,
Drazen
JM
. 
Statistics in medicine-reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials
.
N Engl J Med
2007
;
357
:
2189
94
.
28
Scully
RE
,
Young
RH
,
Clement
PB
. 
Tumors of the ovary, maldeveloped gonads, fallopian tube and broad ligament
. In:
Rosai
J
,
Sobin
LH
, editors.
Atlas of tumor pathology
. 3rd ed.
Washington, D.C.
:
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
; 
1998
, p.
512
.
29
Tavassoli
F
,
Stratton
M
.
World Health Organization: tumours of the breast and female genital organs
.
Lyon
:
IARC Press
; 
2003
.
30
Seidman
JD
,
Horkayne-Szakaly
I
,
Cosin
JA
, et al
. 
Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum
.
Gynecol Oncol
2006
;
103
:
703
8
.
31
Anderson
WF
,
Rosenberg
PS
,
Menashe
I
,
Mitani
A
,
Pfeiffer
RM
. 
Age-related crossover in breast cancer incidence rates between black and white ethnic groups
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2008
;
100
:
1804
14
.
32
Kaplan
EL
,
Meier
P
. 
Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations
.
J Am Stat Assoc
1958
;
53
:
457
81
.
33
Peto
R
,
Peto
J
. 
Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures
.
J R Stat Soc Ser A
1972
;
135
:
185
207
.
34
Anderson
WF
,
Jatoi
I
,
Devesa
SS
. 
Distinct breast cancer incidence and prognostic patterns in the NCI's SEER program: suggesting a possible link between etiology and outcome
.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
2005
;
90
:
127
37
.
35
Franceschi
S
. 
Reproductive factors and cancers of the breast, ovary and endometrium
.
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol
1989
;
25
:
1933
43
.
36
Leung
PC
,
Choi
JH
. 
Endocrine signaling in ovarian surface epithelium and cancer
.
Hum Reprod Update
2007
;
13
:
143
62
.
37
Brinton
LA
,
Sherman
ME
,
Carreon
JD
,
Anderson
WF
. 
Recent trends in breast cancer among younger women in the United States
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2008
;
100
:
1643
8
.
38
Tingulstad
S
,
Skjeldestad
FE
,
Halvorsen
TB
,
Hagen
B
. 
Survival and prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer
.
Obstet Gynecol
2003
;
101
:
885
91
.
39
Kurman
RJ
,
Visvanathan
K
,
Roden
R
,
Wu
TC
,
Shih Ie
M
. 
Early detection and treatment of ovarian cancer: shifting from early stage to minimal volume of disease based on a new model of carcinogenesis
.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
2008
;
198
:
351
6
.
40
Yemelyanova
AV
,
Cosin
JA
,
Bidus
MA
,
Boice
CR
,
Seidman
JD
. 
Pathology of stage I versus stage III ovarian carcinoma with implications for pathogenesis and screening
.
Int J Gynecol Cancer
2007
;
18
:
465
9
.
41
Malpica
A
,
Deavers
MT
,
Tornos
C
, et al
. 
Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma
.
Am J Surg Pathol
2007
;
31
:
1168
74
.
42
Yang
H
,
Kong
W
,
He
L
, et al
. 
MicroRNA expression profiling in human ovarian cancer: miR-214 induces cell survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting PTEN
.
Cancer Res
2008
;
68
:
425
33
.
43
Reibenwein
J
,
Krainer
M
. 
Targeting signaling pathways in ovarian cancer
.
Expert Opin Ther Targets
2008
;
12
:
353
65
.
44
Tan
DS
,
Rothermundt
C
,
Thomas
K
, et al
. 
“BRCAness” syndrome in ovarian cancer: a case-control study describing the clinical features and outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations
.
J Clin Oncol
2008
;
26
:
5530
6
.