Low-grade systemic inflammation is suggested to play a role in the development of several chronic diseases including cancer. Higher levels of physical activity and lower adiposity have been associated with reduced levels of markers of systemic inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP); however, reductions in CRP have not been consistently observed in randomized controlled trials of exercise.

Purpose: To examine the effect of a 12-month aerobic exercise intervention on CRP levels in men and women.

Methods: One hundred two men and 100 women, sedentary and of ages 40 to 75 years, with mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.9 and 28.7 kg/m2, respectively, were randomly assigned to a 12-month moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise intervention (6 d/wk, 60 min/d, 60-85% maximum heart rate) or control group. Fasting blood samples were collected at baseline and at 12 months. CRP levels were measured by high-sensitivity latex-enhanced nephelometry.

Results: At baseline, CRP was 1.16 and 2.11 mg/L for men and women, respectively, and CRP was correlated with percent body fat (r = 0.48, P ≤0.001), BMI (r = 0.37, P ≤ 0.001), and aerobic fitness (r = −0.49, P ≤ 0.001). No intervention effects were observed for CRP in men or women, or when stratified by baseline BMI (<30 versus ≥30 kg/m2), baseline CRP (<3 versus ≥3 mg/L), or change in body weight, body composition, or aerobic fitness.

Conclusion: A 12-month moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise intervention did not affect CRP levels in previously sedentary men or women with average-risk CRP values at baseline. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(7):1714–8)

Systemic inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several chronic diseases, including cancer (1-3). In relation to cancer, systemic inflammation is suggested to play a role in both tumor development and promotion (4). C-reactive protein (CRP) is a nonspecific acute-phase protein secreted by the liver that is considered a surrogate marker of chronic low-grade systemic inflammation. Systemic inflammation has been suggested to be an important mechanistic link between physical activity and cancer risk (5).

CRP is positively associated with body fat (6, 7) and negatively associated with physical activity (8-11) and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max; refs. 12-16) in observational studies. It is not clear whether improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness reduce CRP and whether such an effect is mediated entirely by a reduction in body fat. The results of previous randomized controlled trials of exercise effects on CRP levels have been mixed (17-25).

This study investigated the effects of a 12-month aerobic exercise intervention on CRP, a proposed biomarker of cancer risk, in 202 previously sedentary adults. We hypothesized that those in the exercise group would have a significant improvement in aerobic fitness (VO2max) and a subsequent reduction in CRP at 12 months compared with controls.

Design Overview

This study was a 12-mo randomized controlled trial that compared the effect of a moderate-intensity exercise intervention to a usual lifestyle control program on biomarkers of colon cancer risk. Participants were men and women, 40 to 75 y old, who were sedentary (i.e., <90 min/wk of moderate-to-vigorous exercise in the past 3 mo), had a normal exercise tolerance test, and had no serious medical conditions. Participants were recruited to a trial examining biomarkers of colon cancer risk through media placements, flyers, a study web site, and referrals (2001-2004). One hundred two men and 100 women were enrolled. The study was approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Institutional Review Board.

Laboratory Analysis

Blood samples were obtained following a 12-h fast and stored at −70°C. Plasma CRP was measured by latex-enhanced nephelometry by high-sensitivity assays on the Behring Nephelometer II analyzer (Dade-Behring Diagnostics) at the University of Washington Clinical Immunology Laboratory, by staff blinded to group assignment. The lower detection limit for CRP was 0.2 mg/L. The interassay and intraassay coefficients of variations were 0.3% and 0.3%, respectively.

Demographics, Anthropometrics, and Fitness

At baseline and 12 mo, participants were evaluated for demographics, medical history, weight, height, body composition as measured by DEXA whole-body scanner (GE Lunar), and cardiopulmonary fitness (VO2max) as measured by oxygen update during a maximal graded treadmill test (Medgraphics).

Intervention

The intervention was an aerobic exercise program (12 mo, 6 d/wk, 60 min/d, at 60-85% of maximal heart rate, determined by the graded treadmill test) with both supervised facility (at least 3 d/wk) and home-based sessions. Exercisers and controls were asked during the trial not to change their dietary habits and controls were asked not to change their exercise habits.

Randomization and Statistical Analyses

Participants were randomly assigned to the exercise or control groups, blocked on sex and, among women, on menopausal status (premenopausal or perimenopausal versus postmenopausal) and current use of postmenopausal hormones (yes/no).

Intervention effects were determined by generalized estimating equations for linear regression. Baseline CRP data were available for 195 participants. Participants with missing end-of-study CRP data (n = 7) were not included in the analysis. Means and SDs are reported, except for the main outcome, CRP, where geometric means are reported to reduce the effect of outliers. Associations between CRP and baseline participant characteristics were examined using Spearman correlations. Secondary analyses examined intervention effects stratified by baseline body mass index (BMI; <30 and >30.0 kg/m2), baseline CRP levels (<3 versus ≥3 mg/L), change in body weight (control, exercise: no change, ≤3 kg, or >3 kg), change in body fat (control, exercise: no change, ≤2%, >2%), or change in aerobic fitness (control, exercise: ≤5%, 5-15%, >15%). Statistical analyses were done using SAS software (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Inc.).

No differences between groups were noted at baseline (Table 1). Male and female exercisers averaged 370 min (103% of goal) and 295 min (82% of goal) per week, respectively. Aerobic fitness (VO2max) increased by 11% (3.3 mg/kg/min) and 10.5% (2.5 mL/kg/min) among male and female exercisers, respectively, and decreased in both female and male controls (−6.3% and −1.8%, respectively; P < 0.001, comparing exercise to control for both genders). The effect of the intervention on body composition has been reported in detail (26). In brief, exercisers lost weight and body fat compared with controls both among men [−1.8 versus −0.1 kg (P = 0.03) and −2.7% versus +0.2% (P < 0.001), respectively] and women [−1.4 versus +0.7 kg (P = 0.008) and −1.8% versus −0.1% (P = 0.002), respectively]. No differences were noted for dietary intake throughout the study.

Table 1.

Participant characteristics at baseline

Women
Men
Exercisers, n = 49
Controls, n = 51
Exercisers, n = 51
Controls, n = 51
Mean (SD) or n (%)Mean (SD) or n (%)Mean (SD) or n (%)Mean (SD) or n (%)
Age (y) 54.4 (7.1) 53.7 (5.6) 56.2 (6.7) 56.6 (7.6) 
Race     
    White 42 (86) 47 (92) 48 (94) 48 (94) 
    Non-White 7 (14) 4 (8) 3 (6) 3 (6) 
Menopausal status     
    HRT user 23 (47) 22 (43) NA NA 
    No HRT 10 (20) 11 (22)   
    Premenopausal 16 (33) 18 (35)   
Height (cm) 164.0 (6.9) 165.5 (6.4) 178.4 (6.3) 179.8 (8.0) 
Weight (kg) 78.0 (17.8) 77.9 (12.8) 94.8 (14.9) 97.4 (18.2) 
BMI (kg/m228.9 (5.5) 28.5 (4.8) 29.7 (3.7) 30.1 (4.8) 
Body fat (%)* 43.3 (7.2) 43.0 (6.8) 31.5 (6.4) 29.7 (6.0) 
Total fat mass (kg)* 34.4 (13.6) 33.9 (10.4) 30.3 (9.5) 29.0 (9.5) 
VO2max (mL/kg/d) 23.8 (5.1) 24.8 (4.3) 30.1 (5.9) 30.3 (6.7) 
Cigarette use     
    Smoker 2 (4) 1 (2) 5 (10) 4 (8) 
    Nonsmoker 47 (96) 50 (98) 46 (90) 47 (92) 
Women
Men
Exercisers, n = 49
Controls, n = 51
Exercisers, n = 51
Controls, n = 51
Mean (SD) or n (%)Mean (SD) or n (%)Mean (SD) or n (%)Mean (SD) or n (%)
Age (y) 54.4 (7.1) 53.7 (5.6) 56.2 (6.7) 56.6 (7.6) 
Race     
    White 42 (86) 47 (92) 48 (94) 48 (94) 
    Non-White 7 (14) 4 (8) 3 (6) 3 (6) 
Menopausal status     
    HRT user 23 (47) 22 (43) NA NA 
    No HRT 10 (20) 11 (22)   
    Premenopausal 16 (33) 18 (35)   
Height (cm) 164.0 (6.9) 165.5 (6.4) 178.4 (6.3) 179.8 (8.0) 
Weight (kg) 78.0 (17.8) 77.9 (12.8) 94.8 (14.9) 97.4 (18.2) 
BMI (kg/m228.9 (5.5) 28.5 (4.8) 29.7 (3.7) 30.1 (4.8) 
Body fat (%)* 43.3 (7.2) 43.0 (6.8) 31.5 (6.4) 29.7 (6.0) 
Total fat mass (kg)* 34.4 (13.6) 33.9 (10.4) 30.3 (9.5) 29.0 (9.5) 
VO2max (mL/kg/d) 23.8 (5.1) 24.8 (4.3) 30.1 (5.9) 30.3 (6.7) 
Cigarette use     
    Smoker 2 (4) 1 (2) 5 (10) 4 (8) 
    Nonsmoker 47 (96) 50 (98) 46 (90) 47 (92) 

Abbreviation: HRT, hormone replacement therapy.

*

One female control, 1 male control, and 2 male exercisers were missing baseline DEXA.

At baseline, CRP was correlated with percent body fat (r = 0.48, P ≤ 0.001), BMI (r = 0.37, P ≤ 0.001), and aerobic fitness (r = −0.49, P ≤ 0.001), with similar results for analysis limited to either men or women (data not shown). No intervention effects were observed for CRP in men or women overall (Table 2) or when stratified by baseline BMI (Table 3), baseline CRP (data not shown), change in aerobic fitness, or change in body composition (data not shown).

Table 2.

Geometric means (95% confidence intervals) for the effect of exercise on CRP: differences at baseline and after 12 mo of exercise intervention

Baseline
P*Follow-up
P
Exercisers
Controls
Exercisers
Controls
nGeometric mean (95% CI)nGeometric mean (95% CI)nGeometric mean (95% CI)nGeometric mean (95% CI)
Men 49 1.16 (0.92-1.46) 49 1.16 (0.87-1.55) 0.99 46 1.23 (0.95-1.60) 49 1.01 (0.77-1.33) 0.29 
Women 48 2.08 (1.48-2.91) 49 2.16 (1.57-2.97) 0.87 45 1.87 (1.35-2.59) 48 2.16 (1.57-2.98) 0.65 
Baseline
P*Follow-up
P
Exercisers
Controls
Exercisers
Controls
nGeometric mean (95% CI)nGeometric mean (95% CI)nGeometric mean (95% CI)nGeometric mean (95% CI)
Men 49 1.16 (0.92-1.46) 49 1.16 (0.87-1.55) 0.99 46 1.23 (0.95-1.60) 49 1.01 (0.77-1.33) 0.29 
Women 48 2.08 (1.48-2.91) 49 2.16 (1.57-2.97) 0.87 45 1.87 (1.35-2.59) 48 2.16 (1.57-2.98) 0.65 

Abbreviation: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

*

P value for exercisers vs controls at baseline.

P value for changes from baseline to 12 mo, among exercisers vs controls, with adjustment for baseline values.

Table 3.

CRP levels at baseline and 12 mo in exercise intervention and control participants, stratified by baseline BMI

Baseline
Follow-up
nExercisers geometric mean (95% CI)nControls geometric mean (95% CI)nExercisers geometric mean (95% CI)nControls geometric mean (95% CI)
Men         
    BMI <30 kg/m2 26 0.85 (0.63-1.14) 26 0.89 (0.61-1.30) 22 0.82 (0.62-1.08) 26 0.74 (0.54-1.01) 
        P = 0.61* 
    BMI ≥30 kg/m2 23 1.67 (1.24-2.25) 23 1.57 (1.03-2.39) 24 1.80 (1.25-2.59) 25 1.40 (0.92-2.15) 
        P = 0.38* 
Women         
    BMI <30 kg/m2 29 1.32 (0.88-1.99) 30 1.60 (1.07-2.38) 28 1.27 (0.86-1.89) 29 1.59 (1.04-2.45) 
        P = 0.82* 
    BMI ≥30 kg/m2 19 4.14 (2.68-6.39) 19 3.47 (2.20-5.47) 17 3.54 (2.33-5.38) 19 3.44 (2.29-5.16) 
        P = 0.73* 
Baseline
Follow-up
nExercisers geometric mean (95% CI)nControls geometric mean (95% CI)nExercisers geometric mean (95% CI)nControls geometric mean (95% CI)
Men         
    BMI <30 kg/m2 26 0.85 (0.63-1.14) 26 0.89 (0.61-1.30) 22 0.82 (0.62-1.08) 26 0.74 (0.54-1.01) 
        P = 0.61* 
    BMI ≥30 kg/m2 23 1.67 (1.24-2.25) 23 1.57 (1.03-2.39) 24 1.80 (1.25-2.59) 25 1.40 (0.92-2.15) 
        P = 0.38* 
Women         
    BMI <30 kg/m2 29 1.32 (0.88-1.99) 30 1.60 (1.07-2.38) 28 1.27 (0.86-1.89) 29 1.59 (1.04-2.45) 
        P = 0.82* 
    BMI ≥30 kg/m2 19 4.14 (2.68-6.39) 19 3.47 (2.20-5.47) 17 3.54 (2.33-5.38) 19 3.44 (2.29-5.16) 
        P = 0.73* 
*

P value for difference in CRP changes from baseline to 12 mo in exercise intervention vs control stratified by BMI group, controlling for baseline CRP values.

A 12-month randomized controlled aerobic exercise intervention resulted in improved cardiorespiratory fitness in both men and women. However, this improvement did not translate into a reduction in CRP. These findings are consistent with other randomized controlled trials of exercise alone (17-25) and a recent meta-analysis (27), which included five of these studies and reported that a 12% improvement in VO2max resulted in a nonsignificant 3% decrease in CRP. However, previous trials have been hampered by small sample size, use of a clinical population, which may have altered CRP levels due to the underlying medical condition (23, 24), and type and duration of aerobic exercise intervention. The current study adds to the literature by examining this question in a large number (n = 202) of healthy, sedentary middle-aged adults, using a year-long exercise trial that achieved excellent adherence.

In our study, the exercisers lost weight and had a reduction in total body fat (26). A reduction in CRP has been reported with weight loss in randomized controlled trials of very low calorie diet interventions (28, 29), gastric bypass surgery (30), and lifestyle interventions (i.e., combined diet and exercise; refs. 31, 32). However, the change in CRP may be contingent on the associated change in body weight with the interventions. In our study, the exercise groups did not experience significant weight loss (<2.0 kg over 12 months).

Nevertheless, exercise is suggested to play an important role in reducing systemic inflammation beyond simply inducing weight loss. Lower cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) is associated with higher CRP levels in cross-sectional studies (12-16). Therefore, examining the effect of a change in VO2max on CRP would provide insight into the effect of aerobic exercise on CRP levels. You et al. (33) reported a 6% improvement in absolute VO2max and a reduction in CRP in a 6-month randomized controlled trial of combined hypocaloric diet and exercise versus no change with hypocaloric diet alone in 34 obese, postmenopausal women with similar reductions in body weight and body fat in both groups. However, in our study, female and male exercisers had statistically significant improvements in VO2max, 10.5% and 11%, respectively, but no intervention effect on CRP was noted.

The baseline characteristics of participants may impact the effect of lifestyle interventions on CRP. Our participants fell in the “average’ risk category (1-3 mg/L, based on criteria from the American Heart Association). Reductions in CRP level with lifestyle interventions have been successful in studies of individuals with much higher baseline CRP values (i.e., >5 mg/L; refs. 32-35) or in more obese participants (i.e., BMI >30-35 kg/m2; refs. 31, 32, 34, 35). We found no change in CRP when stratified by baseline CRP level (i.e., <3 or ≥3 mg/L) and BMI (i.e., <30 or ≥30 kg/m2). However, we have some unpublished data to support this, inasmuch as, in another study, women with a higher BMI (>30 kg/m2) particularly showed a reduction in CRP over 12 months following a similar intervention regimen.5

5

Campbell PT, Campbell KL, Wener M, Wood B, Sorensen BE, Potter JD, McTiernan A, Ulrich CM. The effect of a year-long exercise intervention compared with stretching control on inflammatory markers among obese postmenopausal women. Submitted for review.

A limitation of this study was that it was designed to look at a number of proposed biomarkers of colon cancer risk. Therefore, individuals were recruited based on a number of baseline characteristics that did not include CRP levels. As a result, participants had low CRP levels at baseline. From the literature, it would suggest that exercise and/or weight loss may be more effective in those with higher initial CRP values. In addition, oral hormone replacement therapy has also been shown to elevate CRP levels (36). Our sample included both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, as well as hormone replacement therapy users and nonusers, with approximately half of the women in the trial using hormone replacement therapy. The use of hormone replacement therapy may have counteracted reductions in CRP level due to a lifestyle intervention.

In conclusion, a 12-month randomized controlled trial of aerobic exercise in previously sedentary adults did not alter CRP, a marker of systemic inflammation, despite resulting in a significant improvement in aerobic fitness (VO2max) and a decrease in body weight and body fat. This suggests that exercise may have a greater role to play in those with higher initial levels of systemic inflammation, such as obese individuals.

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants R01 CA77572-01 and U54 CA116847, Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer Pilot Project. K.L. Campbell is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship. P.T. Campbell is supported by a Research Fellowship from the National Cancer Institute of Canada, with funds from the Canadian Cancer Society. R.E. Rudolph was supported in part by the Health Services Research and Development Program of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Clare Abbenhardt for her assistance with sample preparation, and the study participants for their time and dedication to the project.

1
Erlinger TP, Platz EA, Rifai N, Helzlsouer KJ. C-reactive protein and the risk of incident colorectal cancer.
JAMA
2004
;
291
:
585
–90.
2
Helzlsouer KJ, Erlinger TP, Platz EA. C-reactive protein levels and subsequent cancer outcomes: results from a prospective cohort study.
Eur J Cancer
 ;
42
:
704
–707.
3
Gunter MJ, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Cross AJ, et al. A prospective study of serum C-reactive protein and colorectal cancer risk in men.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
2483
–7.
4
Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer.
Nature
2002
;
420
:
860
–7.
5
McTiernan A, Ulrich C, Slate S, Potter J. Physical activity and cancer etiology: associations and mechanisms.
Cancer Causes Control
1998
;
9
:
487
–509.
6
Rawson ES, Freedson PS, Osganian SK, et al. Body mass index, but not physical activity, is associated with C-reactive protein.
Med Sci Sports Exerc
2003
;
35
:
1160
–6.
7
Mora S, Lee IM, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Association of physical activity and body mass index with novel and traditional cardiovascular biomarkers in women.
JAMA
2006
;
295
:
1412
–9.
8
Abramson JL, Vaccarino V. Relationship between physical activity and inflammation among apparently healthy middle-aged and older US adults.
Arch Intern Med
2002
;
162
:
1286
–92.
9
Pischon T, Hankinson SE, Hotamisligil GS, Rifai N, Rimm EB. Leisure-time physical activity and reduced plasma levels of obesity-related inflammatory markers.
Obes Res
2003
;
11
:
1055
–64.
10
Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Panagiotakos DB, et al. Association of leisure-time physical activity on inflammation markers (C-reactive protein, white cell blood count, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen) in healthy subjects (from the ATTICA study).
Am J Cardiol
2003
;
91
:
368
–70.
11
Reuben DB, Judd-Hamilton L, Harris TB, Seeman TE. The associations between physical activity and inflammatory markers in high-functioning older persons: MacArthur Studies of Successful Aging.
J Am Geriatr Soc
2003
;
51
:
1125
–30.
12
Kullo IJ, Khaleghi M, Hensrud DD. Markers of inflammation are inversely associated with VO2 max in asymptomatic men.
J Appl Physiol
2007
;
102
:
1374
–9.
13
McGavock JM, Mandic S, Vonder Muhll I, et al. Low cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with elevated C-reactive protein levels in women with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care
2004
;
27
:
320
–5.
14
Church TS, Barlow CE, Earnest CP, et al. Associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and C-reactive protein in men.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
2002
;
22
:
1869
–76.
15
LaMonte MJ, Durstine JL, Yanowitz FG, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and C-reactive protein among a tri-ethnic sample of women.
Circulation
2002
;
106
:
403
–6.
16
Kuo HK, Yen CJ, Chen JH, Yu YH, Bean JF. Association of cardiorespiratory fitness and levels of C-reactive protein: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002.
Int J Cardiol
2007
;
114
:
28
–33.
17
Duncan GE, Perri MG, Anton SD, et al. Effects of exercise on emerging and traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
Prev Med
2004
;
39
:
894
–902.
18
Marcell TJ, McAuley KA, Traustadottir T, Reaven PD. Exercise training is not associated with improved levels of C-reactive protein or adiponectin.
Metabolism
2005
;
54
:
533
–41.
19
Murphy MH, Murtagh EM, Boreham CA, Hare LG, Nevill AM. The effect of a worksite based walking programme on cardiovascular risk in previously sedentary civil servants [NCT00284479].
BMC Public Health
2006
;
6
:
136
.
20
Huffman KM, Samsa GP, Slentz CA, et al. Response of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to exercise training in an at-risk population.
Am Heart J
2006
;
152
:
793
–800.
21
Hammett CJ, Prapavessis H, Baldi JC, et al. Effects of exercise training on 5 inflammatory markers associated with cardiovascular risk.
Am Heart J
2006
;
151
:
367.e7
–367.e16.
22
Hammett CJ, Oxenham HC, Baldi JC, et al. Effect of six months' exercise training on C-reactive protein levels in healthy elderly subjects.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2004
;
44
:
2411
–3.
23
Baslund B, Lyngberg K, Andersen V, et al. Effect of 8 wk of bicycle training on the immune system of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
J Appl Physiol
1993
;
75
:
1691
–5.
24
Fairey AS, Courneya KS, Field CJ, Mackey JR. Physical exercise and immune system function in cancer survivors.
Cancer
2002
;
94
:
539
–51.
25
Rauramaa R, Halonen P, Vaisanen SB, et al. Effects of aerobic physical exercise on inflammation and atherosclerosis in men: the DNASCO Study: a six-year randomized, controlled trial.
Ann Intern Med
2004
;
140
:
1007
–14.
26
McTiernan A, Sorensen B, Irwin ML, et al. Exercise effect on weight and body fat in men and women.
Obesity
2007
;
15
:
1496
–1512.
27
Kelley GA, Kelley KS. Effects of aerobic exercise on C-reactive protein, body composition, and maximum oxygen consumption in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Metabolism
2006
;
55
:
1500
–7.
28
Tchernof A, Nolan A, Sites CK, Ades PA, Poehlman ET. Weight loss reduces C-reactive protein levels in obese postmenopausal women.
Circulation
2002
;
105
:
564
–9.
29
Heilbronn LK, Noakes M, Clifton PM. Energy restriction and weight loss on very-low-fat diets reduce C-reactive protein concentrations in obese, healthy women.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol
2001
;
21
:
968
–70.
30
Hanusch-Enserer U, Cauza E, Spak M, et al. Acute-phase response and immunological markers in morbid obese patients and patients following adjustable gastric banding.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord
2003
;
27
:
355
–61.
31
Esposito K, Pontillo A, Di Palo C, et al. Effect of weight loss and lifestyle changes on vascular inflammatory markers in obese women: a randomized trial.
JAMA
2003
;
289
:
1799
–804.
32
Villareal DT, Miller BV III, Banks M, et al. Effect of lifestyle intervention on metabolic coronary heart disease risk factors in obese older adults.
Am J Clin Nutr
2006
;
84
:
1317
–23.
33
You T, Berman DM, Ryan AS, Nicklas BJ. Effects of hypocaloric diet and exercise training on inflammation and adipocyte lipolysis in obese postmenopausal women.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2004
;
89
:
1739
–46.
34
Giannopoulou I, Fernhall B, Carhart R, et al. Effects of diet and/or exercise on the adipocytokine and inflammatory cytokine levels of postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes.
Metabolism
2005
;
54
:
866
–75.
35
Nicklas BJ, Ambrosius W, Messier SP, et al. Diet-induced weight loss, exercise, and chronic inflammation in older, obese adults: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Am J Clin Nutr
2004
;
79
:
544
–51.
36
Salpeter SR, Walsh JM, Ormiston TM, et al. Meta-analysis: effect of hormone-replacement therapy on components of the metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women.
Diabetes Obes Metab
2006
;
8
:
538
–54.