Extending research on the protective effect of flavonoids in cell culture and animal studies, we examined the association between consumption of flavonoids and flavonoid-rich foods and development of exocrine pancreatic cancer within the α-Tocopherol, β-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study cohort. Of the 27,111 healthy male smokers (50-69 years) who completed a self-administered dietary questionnaire at baseline, 306 developed exocrine pancreatic cancer during follow-up (1985-2004; median, 16.1 years). Intakes of total flavonoids, three flavonoid subgroups, seven individual flavonoids, and flavonoid-rich foods were estimated from a validated food frequency questionnaire. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Overall, flavonoid intake was not significantly associated with pancreatic cancer. However, in stratified analysis, greater total flavonoid intake was associated with decreased pancreatic cancer risk in participants randomized during the trial to placebo (fourth versus first quartile: hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.78; Ptrend = 0.009) and not to supplemental α-tocopherol (50 mg/d) and/or β-carotene (20 mg/d; Pinteraction = 0.002). Similar patterns and significant interactions were observed for flavonols, flavan-3-ols, kaempferol, quercetin, catechin, and epicatechin. Our data suggest that a flavonoid-rich diet may decrease pancreatic cancer risk in male smokers not consuming supplemental α-tocopherol and/or β-carotene. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):553–62)

In the United States, pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality (∼33,400 deaths annually) among men and women (1). There is no effective screening test for pancreatic cancer, which contributes to its high fatality and 5-year survival rate of <5.0% (2). Successful treatment options for pancreatic cancer are limited because of its late stage of diagnosis, resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and the challenges involved with surgical resection (3). Therefore, prevention offers the greatest promise to decrease mortality rates of pancreatic cancer.

Smoking is estimated to be the strongest modifiable risk factor for pancreatic cancer accounting for ∼25% to 30% of all cases (4). The association between diet and pancreatic cancer is less conclusive (5). A recent meta-analysis of case-control studies estimated that high fruit and vegetable consumption decreased the risk of pancreatic cancer by 28% and 20%, respectively (6). However, most prospective cohort studies have not shown a protective influence for fruits and vegetables on pancreatic cancer (7-17).

Flavonoids are a group of bioactive polyphenols distributed widely in the plant kingdom that are especially enriched in certain fruits and vegetables (18, 19). Three major flavonoid subgroups are flavonols, flavan-3-ols (also called catechins), and flavones. Kaempferol, myricetin, and quercetin are major individual flavonols and are consumed primarily from apples, beans, broccoli, and onions. Two major flavan-3-ols are catechin and epicatechin, whose primary dietary sources are tea, apples, and red wine. Parsley, thyme, and celery are the primary dietary sources of the two major flavones apigenin and luteolin. Based on the protective effect of flavonoids against pancreatic carcinogenesis in most cell culture (20-23) and animal studies (24, 25), we hypothesized that high dietary intake of flavonols, flavan-3-ols, and flavones may inhibit development of exocrine pancreatic cancer in humans. The association between flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer development has been evaluated in three prospective cohorts. In a Finnish cohort study of 10,000 men and women, less pancreatic cancer cases were observed at higher intakes of flavonols and flavones combined; however, the study included only 29 pancreatic cancer cases and had limited power to observe associations (26). In the Iowa Women’s Health Study cohort (n = 130 cases), intermediate (second or third versus first quartile) but not high flavan-3-ol intakes (fourth versus first quartile) were associated with ∼45% reduced pancreatic cancer risk in postmenopausal women (27). A limitation of the study was that the association was examined in only the flavan-3-ol subgroup (27). In the Multiethnic Cohort Study, high flavonol intakes were associated with a 59% reduced exocrine pancreatic risk in current smokers (n = 112 cases) and not in former or never smokers during 8 years of follow-up (28). A limitation of the study was that the association was examined in only the flavonol subgroup (28). Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine the association between dietary intakes of total flavonoids, three flavonoid subgroups (flavonols, flavan-3-ols, and flavones), seven individual flavonoids (kaempferol, myricetin, quercetin, catechin, epicatechin, apigenin, and luteolin), and flavonoid-rich foods and development of exocrine pancreatic cancer in a prospective cohort of male smokers in Finland.

Study Design and Population

The α-Tocopherol, β-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, primary prevention trial designed to determine whether α-tocopherol (50 mg/d) and β-carotene (20 mg/d) alone or in combination reduced the incidence of lung cancer in male smokers (29). Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, 29,133 eligible men, ages 50 to 69 years, in southwestern Finland, who smoked at least five cigarettes per day, were randomized to one of four intervention groups. Persons with a cancer history other than nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ, severe angina, chronic renal insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, chronic alcoholism, receiving anticoagulant therapy, other medical problems that might limit long-term participation, or current use of supplements containing vitamin E (>20 mg/d), vitamin A (>20,000 IU/d), or β-carotene (>6 mg/d) were excluded from the study. Participants were randomized between April 1985 and June 1988. The trial ended on April 30, 1993 (median, 6.1 years). Follow-up for the present cohort analysis was through April 30, 2004, representing follow-up for up to 19.4 years (median, 16.1 years) and a total of 371,663 person-years of observation. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of both the U.S. National Cancer Institute and the National Public Health Institute in Finland. All study participants provided written informed consent before the initiation of the study. Details of the study rationale, design, and methods have been described previously (28).

Lifestyle and Dietary Data

The participating men completed a questionnaire providing sociodemographic and health information. Height, weight, and blood pressure were measured by trained nurses. In addition, participants filled out a diet history questionnaire that included 276 food items and mixed dishes and came with a portion size picture booklet that included 122 pictures of foods with three to five portion sizes. It was specifically developed for the ATBC Study participants (30). Participants were queried the frequency and the usual portion size of consumption during the previous 12 months. The diet questionnaire with the picture booklet was given to participants at the first baseline visit to be filled out at home. Two weeks later, participants returned for the second baseline visit and reviewed and completed it with a study nurse. Nutrient intake values were computed from the food consumption data of the dietary questionnaire using the food composition database at the National Public Health Institute in Finland (1998). Our study includes the 27,111 (93%) participants who satisfactorily completed the dietary questionnaire (31).

Flavonoid Data

Intakes of individual flavonoids (kaempferol, myricetin, quercetin, apigenin, luteolin, catechin, and epicatechin) were calculated using the food flavonoid database from Hertog et al. (32-34), with the exception of the flavonol intakes from berries, which were based on Finnish analyses (35). The flavonoid-rich foods presented in this report were based on their contribution to flavonoid intake in the ATBC cohort and the Dutch population (34). Wine was estimated to be half each from white and red wine and based on Finnish alcohol consumption (31). Onion intake was estimated from mixed foods recipes used for the ATBC questionnaire. Total flavonoid intake was calculated as the sum of intakes of flavonols (sum of kaempferol, myricetin, and quercetin), flavan-3-ols (sum of catechin and epicatechin), and flavones (sum of apigenin and luteolin).

We used data from the original validity and reliability study for the ATBC Study dietary questionnaire that was conducted before the beginning of the trial (30) to determine the validity and reliability for the dietary flavonoids in the present study. The relative validity estimates for flavonoids were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients between log-transformed, energy-adjusted intake values from food records, which had been kept for 24 days spread randomly over 6 months, and from the average of two food frequency questionnaires, which had been filled out at the beginning and end of the 6-month period by 133 men. The validity estimates were 0.77 (total flavonoids), 0.73 (flavonols), 0.75 (kaempferol), 0.66 (myricetin), 0.68 (quercetin), 0.77 (flavan-3-ols), 0.76 (catechin), 0.76 (epicatechin), 0.30 (flavones), 0.08 (apigenin), and 0.43 (luteolin). The reliability estimates for flavonoids were determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients between log-transformed, energy-adjusted intake values from three food frequency questionnaires that were filled out every 3 months by 190 men. The reliability estimates were 0.69 (total flavonoids), 0.69 (flavonols), 0.67 (kaempferol), 0.57 (myricetin), 0.68 (quercetin), 0.25 (flavan-3-ols), 0.26 (catechin), 0.26 (epicatechin), 0.08 (flavones), 0.31 (apigenin), and 0.11 (luteolin).

Case Ascertainment

Pancreatic cancer cases were ascertained from the Finnish Cancer Registry, which received their information through short forms from hospitals, physicians, pathological, cytologic and hematologic laboratories, dentists, and death certificates from Statistics Finland. Korhonen et al. (36) reported that the Finnish Cancer Registry provides nearly 100% case ascertainment in Finland and accurately reports 89% of primary pancreatic cancer cases. The diagnosis for cases through April 1999 was based on a review of all relevant medical records and tumor specimens by an ATBC Study committee composed of physicians, oncologists, and pathologists. Pancreatic cancer cases diagnosed after April 1999 were based solely on Finnish Cancer Registry data. Only cases confirmed as incident primary exocrine adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition code 157 and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition code C25) were used for this report. Endocrine cancers (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition code 157.4 and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition code C254) were excluded as their etiology differs from that of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The final data set contained 319 incident exocrine pancreatic cancer cases among cohort members of which 306 had complete dietary data. Of the 306 cases, 161 of 205 (79%) cases diagnosed through April 1999 and 67 of 101 (66%) cases diagnosed after April 1999 had microscopic diagnosis.

Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were done using Statistical Analysis Systems software. Follow-up time for each participant was calculated from the date of randomization until diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, death, or April 30, 2004. Intakes of flavonoids, nutrients, and dietary variables were energy adjusted by the regression residual method (37). Participants were grouped into quintiles or quartiles of energy-adjusted intakes of flavonoids and flavonoid-rich foods based on distributions from the entire cohort. For foods that were not consumed by more than a quartile of the cohort, categories for zero intakes were created.

Baseline variables examined as potential confounders in our analyses included age; height, weight, and body mass index; education; place of living; self-reported history of diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, gallstones, or peptic or duodenal ulcers; measured blood pressure; serum cholesterol; smoking habits (years smoked, cigarettes smoked per day, pack-years); occupational and leisure physical activity; energy and alcohol intake; and energy-adjusted fat, saturated fat, carbohydrate, free sugar, fiber, β-carotene, calcium, folic acid, vitamin C, and vitamin E intake. The distributions of differing characteristics of the case and noncase participants were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and χ2 tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Generalized linear models adjusted for age at randomization were used to estimate means for continuous population characteristics and frequency proportions for categorical population characteristics within energy-adjusted total flavonoids intake quintile (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the ATBC Study according to quintiles of energy-adjusted total flavonoid consumption (n = 27,111, means or proportions)

Characteristic*Quintiles of energy-adjusted total flavonoid consumption (mg/d)
≤6.45>6.45-9.14>9.14-12.8>12.8-22.9>22.9
Demographics      
    Age at randomization (y) 57.1 57.4 57.1 57.1 57.1 
    Secondary school education (%) 13.1 16.9 20.7 26.8 31.1 
Lifestyle behaviors      
    Years smoked 37.0 36.3 35.9 35.2 35.2 
    Cigarettes smoked per day 22.3 20.9 20.1 19.6 19.2 
    History of diabetes mellitus (%) 3.3 3.8 4.7 4.8 4.5 
    Family history of pancreatic cancer (%) 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.3 
Mean duration of follow-up (y) 13.3 13.5 13.8 14.0 14.0 
Mean daily nutrient intake      
    Calories (kcal) 2,937 2,518 2,587 2,683 2,717 
    Total fat (g) 127 125 123 121 120 
    Saturated fat (g) 57.3 54.0 52.0 50.3 49.2 
Mean daily flavonoid intake      
    Flavonols (mg) 3.94 6.22 8.07 10.9 19.4 
    Kaempferol (mg) 0.145 0.315 0.501 1.04 4.79 
    Myricetin (mg) 0.358 0.570 0.740 1.03 1.72 
    Quercetin (mg) 3.44 5.34 6.83 8.83 12.9 
    Flavan-3-ol (mg) 0.441 1.43 2.61 5.59 22.8 
    Catechin (mg) 0.208 0.580 0.99 2.06 8.25 
    Epicatechin (mg) 0.234 0.855 1.62 3.53 14.6 
    Flavones (mg) 0.077 0.110 0.137 0.160 0.154 
    Apigenin (mg) 0.052 0.072 0.089 0.101 0.097 
    Luteolin (mg) 0.025 0.038 0.048 0.059 0.057 
Mean daily flavonoid-rich food intake      
    Fruits (g) 55.4 98.1 138 183 170 
    Apples (g) 5.92 17.2 31.1 48.3 42.9 
    Berries (g) 14.8 28.5 39.9 51.8 46.2 
    Citrus fruits (g) 19.3 28.5 37.1 43.8 42.2 
    Fruit juices (g) 32.4 75.6 97.9 123 116 
    Wine (g) 4.21 6.11 10.0 17.5 17.4 
    Vegetables (g) 235 282 309 326 314 
    Beans (g) 0.16 0.33 0.53 0.80 0.90 
    Cabbage (g) 0.78 1.37 2.11 2.88 2.92 
    Onions (g) 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.30 1.02 
    Tea (g) −1.06 3.40 9.76 41.1 314 
Characteristic*Quintiles of energy-adjusted total flavonoid consumption (mg/d)
≤6.45>6.45-9.14>9.14-12.8>12.8-22.9>22.9
Demographics      
    Age at randomization (y) 57.1 57.4 57.1 57.1 57.1 
    Secondary school education (%) 13.1 16.9 20.7 26.8 31.1 
Lifestyle behaviors      
    Years smoked 37.0 36.3 35.9 35.2 35.2 
    Cigarettes smoked per day 22.3 20.9 20.1 19.6 19.2 
    History of diabetes mellitus (%) 3.3 3.8 4.7 4.8 4.5 
    Family history of pancreatic cancer (%) 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.3 
Mean duration of follow-up (y) 13.3 13.5 13.8 14.0 14.0 
Mean daily nutrient intake      
    Calories (kcal) 2,937 2,518 2,587 2,683 2,717 
    Total fat (g) 127 125 123 121 120 
    Saturated fat (g) 57.3 54.0 52.0 50.3 49.2 
Mean daily flavonoid intake      
    Flavonols (mg) 3.94 6.22 8.07 10.9 19.4 
    Kaempferol (mg) 0.145 0.315 0.501 1.04 4.79 
    Myricetin (mg) 0.358 0.570 0.740 1.03 1.72 
    Quercetin (mg) 3.44 5.34 6.83 8.83 12.9 
    Flavan-3-ol (mg) 0.441 1.43 2.61 5.59 22.8 
    Catechin (mg) 0.208 0.580 0.99 2.06 8.25 
    Epicatechin (mg) 0.234 0.855 1.62 3.53 14.6 
    Flavones (mg) 0.077 0.110 0.137 0.160 0.154 
    Apigenin (mg) 0.052 0.072 0.089 0.101 0.097 
    Luteolin (mg) 0.025 0.038 0.048 0.059 0.057 
Mean daily flavonoid-rich food intake      
    Fruits (g) 55.4 98.1 138 183 170 
    Apples (g) 5.92 17.2 31.1 48.3 42.9 
    Berries (g) 14.8 28.5 39.9 51.8 46.2 
    Citrus fruits (g) 19.3 28.5 37.1 43.8 42.2 
    Fruit juices (g) 32.4 75.6 97.9 123 116 
    Wine (g) 4.21 6.11 10.0 17.5 17.4 
    Vegetables (g) 235 282 309 326 314 
    Beans (g) 0.16 0.33 0.53 0.80 0.90 
    Cabbage (g) 0.78 1.37 2.11 2.88 2.92 
    Onions (g) 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.30 1.02 
    Tea (g) −1.06 3.40 9.76 41.1 314 
*

Generalized linear models adjusted for age at randomization were used to estimate the means within each total flavonoid intake quintile for the continuous population characteristics and the frequency proportions for categorical population characteristics.

Ninth grade or higher.

Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were computed using Cox proportional hazards for flavonoids or flavonoid-rich foods compared with the lowest intake quantile. For trend testing, we assigned the median value of each quantile and used these values as a continuous score variable. Potential confounders were added to individual models in a stepwise fashion and were considered a confounder if they were associated with both development of pancreatic cancer and intake of total flavonoids, had a χ2P ≤ 0.20, and changed the HR by <10%. To evaluate confounding by nutrients, we calculated a median trend score variable for each nutrient based on the median value of each intake quintile of a nutrient, which then was added to individual models.

All multivariate-adjusted models were adjusted for age at randomization, years of smoking, total number of cigarettes smoked per day, self-reported history of diabetes mellitus, and energy-adjusted saturated fat intake as continuous variables. Effect modification of each flavonoid by antioxidant intake (β-carotene from food, vitamin C from food, vitamin E from food, food plus supplemental β-carotene, vitamin E from food plus supplemental α-tocopherol), study intervention group, and smoking (intensity and duration) were evaluated using stratified analyses. Interactions were additionally evaluated by including cross-product terms in multivariable models for each flavonoid quantile trend and dichotomized variables (median split for antioxidant intakes, study intervention placebo and any supplement, and smoking intensity and duration) or all four study intervention groups (placebo, α-tocopherol, β-carotene, and α-tocopherol plus β-carotene). We also evaluated effect modification by length of follow-up by testing for statistical significance using a time-dependent interaction term (<10 and >10 years) and analyses stratified by follow-up time. All P values correspond to two-sided tests.

Compared with noncases, participants who developed pancreatic cancer were older (58.4 versus 57.2 years; P < 0.0001), had a longer smoking duration (37.1 versus 35.9 years; P = 0.01) and greater daily intake of energy-adjusted saturated fat (54.4 versus 52.5 g; P = 0.01) and carbohydrates (266 versus 262 g; P = 0.05), and were more likely to have a history of diabetes mellitus (7.2% versus 4.2%; P = 0.009) and a family history of pancreatic cancer (6.9% versus 3.0%; P = 0.003) but did not significantly differ (P < 0.05) in other baseline characteristics (data not shown).

Table 1 provides the means and proportions of baseline characteristics of study participants by quintile of energy-adjusted total flavonoid intake. Across increasing energy-adjusted total flavonoid intake quintile, the proportion of participants with secondary education, self-reported diabetes, family history of pancreatic cancer, and intake of individual flavonoids and flavonoid-rich foods increased while participants smoked less and for fewer years, and intake of energy-adjusted fat and saturated fat decreased.

Overall, energy-adjusted intakes of total flavonoids, flavonols, flavan-3-ols, flavones, and individual flavonoids were not associated with pancreatic cancer (Table 2). Similar nonsignificant results were observed for the consumption of total fruits, apples, berries, citrus fruits, total vegetables, beans, cabbage, onions, total fruit juices, tea, and wine, although fruit juice and onions tended to display inverse associations (Table 3).

Table 2.

HR (95% CI) for exocrine pancreatic cancer according to energy-adjusted baseline daily intake of flavonoids in the ATBC Study (n = 27,111), 1985-2004

FlavonoidQuintiles of energy-adjusted intake (1 = lowest, 5 = highest)
Ptrend
1*2
3
4
5
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Total flavonoids       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤6.45 >6.45-9.14 >9.14-12.82 >12.82-22.88 >22.88  
    No. cases/person-years 71/72,244 62/72,910 51/74,825 59/75,823 63/75,860  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.88 (0.62-1.24) 0.72 (0.50-1.03) 0.84 (0.59-1.19) 0.90 (0.64-1.28) 0.98 
Flavonols       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤5.24 >5.24-6.98 >6.98-9.09 >9.09-13.00 >13.00  
    No. cases/person-years 71/71,585 67/72,895 48/74,710 57/76,184 63/76,289  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.96 (0.68-1.34) 0.68 (0.47-0.98) 0.81 (0.57-1.16) 0.91 (0.64-1.30) 0.77 
Kaempferol       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.20 >0.20-0.34 >0.34-0.61 >0.61-1.94 >1.94  
    No. cases/person-years 65/72,853 61/72,602 64/74,865 55/75,721 61/75,622  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.93 (0.66-1.33) 0.94 (0.66-1.34) 0.82 (0.57-1.19) 0.93 (0.65-1.33) 0.84 
Myricetin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.35 >0.35-0.54 >0.54-0.80 >0.80-1.28 >1.28  
    No. cases/person-years 63/72,627 70/72,765 51/74,653 59/75,617 63/76,001  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.10 (0.78-1.55) 0.81 (0.56-1.17) 0.93 (0.65-1.34) 1.04 (0.73-1.49) 0.88 
Quercetin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤4.44 >4.44-5.86 >5.86-7.44 >7.44-9.87 >9.87  
    No. cases/person-years 66/71,639 65/72,656 51/74,874 57/75,771 67/76,723  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.02 (0.72-1.43) 0.78 (0.54-1.14) 0.89 (0.62-1.28) 1.07 (0.75-1.53) 0.69 
Flavan-3-ols       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.90 >0.90-1.82 >1.82-3.51 >3.51-9.75 >9.75  
    No. cases/person-years 66/73,718 64/72,600 64/74,296 51/75,403 61/75,646  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.96 (0.68-1.35) 0.94 (0.66-1.34) 0.76 (0.52-1.10) 0.92 (0.64-1.31) 0.72 
Catechin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.35 >0.35-0.68 >0.68-1.30 >1.30-3.65 >3.65  
    No. cases/person-years 61/73,571 72/73,026 60/74,623 54/74,799 59/75,644  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.15 (0.81-1.62) 0.94 (0.65-1.34) 0.86 (0.59-1.25) 0.95 (0.66-1.36) 0.56 
Epicatechin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.49 >0.49-1.10 >1.10-2.24 >2.24-6.19 >6.19  
    No. cases/person-years 68/73,826 62/72,199 59/74,674 56/75,377 61/75,587  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.91 (0.65-1.29) 0.85 (0.60-1.21) 0.82 (0.57-1.18) 0.90 (0.63-1.28) 0.83 
Flavones       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.035 >0.035-0.056 >0.056-0.087 >0.087-0.197 >0.197  
    No. cases/person-years 63/73,854 58/73,367 69/73,330 54/74,959 62/76,152  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.91 (0.64-1.30) 1.08 (0.76-1.52) 0.82 (0.57-1.18) 0.99 (0.70-1.42) 0.99 
Apigenin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.016 >0.016-0.029 >0.029-0.046 >0.046-0.121 >0.121  
    No. cases/person-years 60/75,641 68/74,379 53/73,477 61/72,451 64/75,714  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.11 (0.78-1.57) 0.84 (0.58-1.21) 0.96 (0.67-1.37) 1.06 (0.74-1.51) 0.68 
Luteolin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.012 >0.012-0.020 >0.020-0.036 >0.036-0.067 >0.067  
    No. cases/person-years 61/72,760 70/71,750 57/73,794 52/75,936 66/77,422  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.14 (0.81-1.61) 0.93 (0.64-1.33) 0.86 (0.59-1.25) 1.09 (0.77-1.56) 0.82 
FlavonoidQuintiles of energy-adjusted intake (1 = lowest, 5 = highest)
Ptrend
1*2
3
4
5
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Total flavonoids       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤6.45 >6.45-9.14 >9.14-12.82 >12.82-22.88 >22.88  
    No. cases/person-years 71/72,244 62/72,910 51/74,825 59/75,823 63/75,860  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.88 (0.62-1.24) 0.72 (0.50-1.03) 0.84 (0.59-1.19) 0.90 (0.64-1.28) 0.98 
Flavonols       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤5.24 >5.24-6.98 >6.98-9.09 >9.09-13.00 >13.00  
    No. cases/person-years 71/71,585 67/72,895 48/74,710 57/76,184 63/76,289  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.96 (0.68-1.34) 0.68 (0.47-0.98) 0.81 (0.57-1.16) 0.91 (0.64-1.30) 0.77 
Kaempferol       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.20 >0.20-0.34 >0.34-0.61 >0.61-1.94 >1.94  
    No. cases/person-years 65/72,853 61/72,602 64/74,865 55/75,721 61/75,622  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.93 (0.66-1.33) 0.94 (0.66-1.34) 0.82 (0.57-1.19) 0.93 (0.65-1.33) 0.84 
Myricetin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.35 >0.35-0.54 >0.54-0.80 >0.80-1.28 >1.28  
    No. cases/person-years 63/72,627 70/72,765 51/74,653 59/75,617 63/76,001  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.10 (0.78-1.55) 0.81 (0.56-1.17) 0.93 (0.65-1.34) 1.04 (0.73-1.49) 0.88 
Quercetin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤4.44 >4.44-5.86 >5.86-7.44 >7.44-9.87 >9.87  
    No. cases/person-years 66/71,639 65/72,656 51/74,874 57/75,771 67/76,723  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.02 (0.72-1.43) 0.78 (0.54-1.14) 0.89 (0.62-1.28) 1.07 (0.75-1.53) 0.69 
Flavan-3-ols       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.90 >0.90-1.82 >1.82-3.51 >3.51-9.75 >9.75  
    No. cases/person-years 66/73,718 64/72,600 64/74,296 51/75,403 61/75,646  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.96 (0.68-1.35) 0.94 (0.66-1.34) 0.76 (0.52-1.10) 0.92 (0.64-1.31) 0.72 
Catechin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.35 >0.35-0.68 >0.68-1.30 >1.30-3.65 >3.65  
    No. cases/person-years 61/73,571 72/73,026 60/74,623 54/74,799 59/75,644  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.15 (0.81-1.62) 0.94 (0.65-1.34) 0.86 (0.59-1.25) 0.95 (0.66-1.36) 0.56 
Epicatechin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.49 >0.49-1.10 >1.10-2.24 >2.24-6.19 >6.19  
    No. cases/person-years 68/73,826 62/72,199 59/74,674 56/75,377 61/75,587  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.91 (0.65-1.29) 0.85 (0.60-1.21) 0.82 (0.57-1.18) 0.90 (0.63-1.28) 0.83 
Flavones       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.035 >0.035-0.056 >0.056-0.087 >0.087-0.197 >0.197  
    No. cases/person-years 63/73,854 58/73,367 69/73,330 54/74,959 62/76,152  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.91 (0.64-1.30) 1.08 (0.76-1.52) 0.82 (0.57-1.18) 0.99 (0.70-1.42) 0.99 
Apigenin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.016 >0.016-0.029 >0.029-0.046 >0.046-0.121 >0.121  
    No. cases/person-years 60/75,641 68/74,379 53/73,477 61/72,451 64/75,714  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.11 (0.78-1.57) 0.84 (0.58-1.21) 0.96 (0.67-1.37) 1.06 (0.74-1.51) 0.68 
Luteolin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.012 >0.012-0.020 >0.020-0.036 >0.036-0.067 >0.067  
    No. cases/person-years 61/72,760 70/71,750 57/73,794 52/75,936 66/77,422  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.14 (0.81-1.61) 0.93 (0.64-1.33) 0.86 (0.59-1.25) 1.09 (0.77-1.56) 0.82 
*

Reference category.

Multivariate-adjusted HRs are adjusted for age at randomization, years of smoking, total number of cigarettes per day, self-reported history of diabetes mellitus, and energy-adjusted saturated fat intake.

Table 3.

HR (95% CI) for exocrine pancreatic cancer according to energy-adjusted baseline daily intake of flavonoid-rich foods in the ATBC Study (n = 27,111), 1985-2004

FoodQuintiles of energy-adjusted intake (1 = lowest, 5 = highest)
Ptrend
1*2
3
4
5
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Fruits       
    Range of intake (g) ≤52.33 52.34-89.90 >89.90-131.9 >131.9-191.3 >191.3  
    No. cases/person-years 69/72,839 60/73,379 57/74,143 54/75,566 66/75,736  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.86 (0.61-1.22) 0.80 (0.56-1.15) 0.76 (0.53-1.10) 0.95 (0.67-1.34) 0.82 
Apples       
    Range of intake (g) 0.25-10.68 >10.71-25.62 25.64-49.83 >49.95  
    No. cases/person-years 77/79,783 57/74,044 49/71,290 66/72,606 57/73,940  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.85 (0.60-1.20) 0.77 (0.54-1.19) 1.01 (0.72-1.40) 0.87 (0.61-1.23) 0.88 
Berries       
    Range of intake (g) ≤11.53 >11.53-21.76 >21.76-34.41 >34.41-55.48 >55.48  
    No. cases/person-years 71/72,894 49/73,215 63/74,209 54/75,641 69/75,704  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.66 (0.46-0.95) 0.85 (0.60-1.19) 0.70 (0.49-1.01) 0.88 (0.63-1.24) 0.94 
Citrus fruits       
    Range of intake (g) ≤4.43 >4.43-13.99 14.00-27.72 >27.72-58.79 >58.80  
    No. cases/person-years 65/73,301 68/72,748 54/74,620 53/75,973 66/75,020  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.05 (0.75-1.48) 0.85 (0.59-1.22) 0.84 (0.58-1.20) 1.05 (0.74-1.49) 0.84 
Fruit juices       
    Range of intake (g) 0.002-32.86 32.94-121.5 >121.5   
    No. cases/person-years 88/97,529 84/90,693 74/92,057 60/91,384   
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 1.08 (0.80-1.46) 0.96 (0.71-1.31) 0.84 (0.60-1.17)  0.16 
Wine       
    Range of intake (g) 0.10-23.7 >24.3    
    No. cases/person-years 228/286,708 47/42,295 31/42,659    
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 1.48 (1.08-2.03) 1.02 (0.70-1.49)   0.86 
Vegetables       
    Range of intake (g) ≤208.3 >208.3-258.2 >258.2-307.2 >307.2-373.0 >373.0  
    No. cases/person-years 70/70,018 58/72,837 58/74,554 66/75,646 54/78,608  
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.81 (0.57-1.15) 0.81 (0.57-1.16) 0.95 (0.67-1.33) 0.78 (0.54-1.12) 0.37 
Beans       
    Range of intake (g) >0     
    No. cases/person-years 263/315,846 43/55,816     
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.99 (0.72-1.37)    0.95 
Cabbage       
    Range of intake (g) >0.16-4.3 >4.3    
    No. cases/person-years 241/273,860 31/52,294 34/45,508    
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.74 (0.51-1.07) 0.98 (0.68-1.40)   0.76 
Onions       
    Range of intake (g) >0     
    No. cases/person-years 303/365,588 3/6,074     
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.59 (0.19-1.83)    0.36 
Tea       
    Range of intake (g) 3.93-157.1 >157.1    
    No. cases/person-years 209/235,489 41/68,171 56/68,003    
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.70 (0.50-0.98) 0.96 (0.71-1.29)   0.78 
FoodQuintiles of energy-adjusted intake (1 = lowest, 5 = highest)
Ptrend
1*2
3
4
5
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Fruits       
    Range of intake (g) ≤52.33 52.34-89.90 >89.90-131.9 >131.9-191.3 >191.3  
    No. cases/person-years 69/72,839 60/73,379 57/74,143 54/75,566 66/75,736  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.86 (0.61-1.22) 0.80 (0.56-1.15) 0.76 (0.53-1.10) 0.95 (0.67-1.34) 0.82 
Apples       
    Range of intake (g) 0.25-10.68 >10.71-25.62 25.64-49.83 >49.95  
    No. cases/person-years 77/79,783 57/74,044 49/71,290 66/72,606 57/73,940  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.85 (0.60-1.20) 0.77 (0.54-1.19) 1.01 (0.72-1.40) 0.87 (0.61-1.23) 0.88 
Berries       
    Range of intake (g) ≤11.53 >11.53-21.76 >21.76-34.41 >34.41-55.48 >55.48  
    No. cases/person-years 71/72,894 49/73,215 63/74,209 54/75,641 69/75,704  
    Multivariate adjusted 0.66 (0.46-0.95) 0.85 (0.60-1.19) 0.70 (0.49-1.01) 0.88 (0.63-1.24) 0.94 
Citrus fruits       
    Range of intake (g) ≤4.43 >4.43-13.99 14.00-27.72 >27.72-58.79 >58.80  
    No. cases/person-years 65/73,301 68/72,748 54/74,620 53/75,973 66/75,020  
    Multivariate adjusted 1.05 (0.75-1.48) 0.85 (0.59-1.22) 0.84 (0.58-1.20) 1.05 (0.74-1.49) 0.84 
Fruit juices       
    Range of intake (g) 0.002-32.86 32.94-121.5 >121.5   
    No. cases/person-years 88/97,529 84/90,693 74/92,057 60/91,384   
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 1.08 (0.80-1.46) 0.96 (0.71-1.31) 0.84 (0.60-1.17)  0.16 
Wine       
    Range of intake (g) 0.10-23.7 >24.3    
    No. cases/person-years 228/286,708 47/42,295 31/42,659    
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 1.48 (1.08-2.03) 1.02 (0.70-1.49)   0.86 
Vegetables       
    Range of intake (g) ≤208.3 >208.3-258.2 >258.2-307.2 >307.2-373.0 >373.0  
    No. cases/person-years 70/70,018 58/72,837 58/74,554 66/75,646 54/78,608  
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.81 (0.57-1.15) 0.81 (0.57-1.16) 0.95 (0.67-1.33) 0.78 (0.54-1.12) 0.37 
Beans       
    Range of intake (g) >0     
    No. cases/person-years 263/315,846 43/55,816     
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.99 (0.72-1.37)    0.95 
Cabbage       
    Range of intake (g) >0.16-4.3 >4.3    
    No. cases/person-years 241/273,860 31/52,294 34/45,508    
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.74 (0.51-1.07) 0.98 (0.68-1.40)   0.76 
Onions       
    Range of intake (g) >0     
    No. cases/person-years 303/365,588 3/6,074     
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.59 (0.19-1.83)    0.36 
Tea       
    Range of intake (g) 3.93-157.1 >157.1    
    No. cases/person-years 209/235,489 41/68,171 56/68,003    
    Multivariate adjusted Reference 0.70 (0.50-0.98) 0.96 (0.71-1.29)   0.78 
*

Reference category.

Multivariate-adjusted HRs are adjusted for age at randomization, years of smoking, total number of cigarettes per day, self-reported history of diabetes mellitus, and energy-adjusted saturated fat intake.

Reference category was an intake of zero. Intake values are not energy adjusted.

Significant interactions were observed in the multivariate-adjusted models between development of pancreatic cancer and energy-adjusted intakes of total flavonoids, two flavonoid subgroups (flavonols and flavan-3-ols), and five individual flavonoids (kaempferol, myricetin, quercetin, catechin, and epicatechin) by intervention group (placebo versus any supplement: α-tocopherol, β-carotene, or both) at P < 0.05 (Table 4). Participants in the three study intervention groups (that is, α-tocopherol, β-carotene, or both) were combined in one strata because we did not observe significant associations in separate strata or interactions between the three groups at P > 0.10 for the flavonoids (data not shown).

Table 4.

Multivariate adjusted HR (95% CI) for exocrine pancreatic cancer according to energy-adjusted baseline intake of flavonoids by intervention group (placebo versus α-tocopherol, β-carotene, or both) in the ATBC Study (n = 27,111), 1985-2004

FlavonoidQuartiles of intake (1: lowest, 4: highest)
PtrendPinteraction
1*2
3
4
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Total flavonoids       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤7.10 >7.11-10.74 >10.74-18.69 >18.69   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 27/22,521 21/23,168 22/23,965 9/24,802   
    Multivariate adjusted 0.83 (0.46-1.48) 0.88 (0.49-1.57) 0.36 (0.17-0.78) 0.009  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 65/67,622 47/68,926 49/70,453 66/70,207   
    Multivariate adjusted 0.70 (0.48-1.02) 0.73 (0.50-1.06) 0.98 (0.69-1.39) 0.39 0.002 
Flavonols       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤5.69 >5.69-7.95 >7.95-11.70 >11.70   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 27/22,099 24/23,161 15/24,572 13/24,623   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.94 (0.54-1.64) 0.58 (0.30-1.10) 0.54 (0.27-1.07) 0.04  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 58/67,503 53/68,922 44/70,067 72/70,715   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.91 (0.62-1.32) 0.75 (0.51-1.12) 1.24 (0.87-1.78) 0.11 0.004 
Kaempferol       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.24 >0.24-0.44 >0.44-1.29 >1.29   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 26/22,785 20/23,291 24/23,608 9/24,770   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.82 (0.45-1.50) 1.00 (0.56-1.77) 0.37 (0.17-0.79) 0.009  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 60/68,092 50/68,572 57/70,623 60/69,920   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.79 (0.54-1.15) 0.89 (0.61-1.28) 0.95 (0.66-1.38) 0.67 0.006 
Myricetin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.40 >0.40-0.66 >0.66-1.12 >1.12   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 26/23,051 24/23,194 15/23,987 14/24,224   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.95 (0.54-1.66) 0.60 (0.32-1.14) 0.61 (0.31-1.18) 0.10  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 54/67,738 52/68,423 56/70,335 65/70,712   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.96 (0.65-1.40) 1.02 (0.70-1.48) 1.21 (0.83-1.75) 0.21 0.02 
Quercetin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤4.82 >4.82-6.61 >6.61-9.10 >9.10   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 23/22,043 28/23,420 16/24,225 12/24,767   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.27 (0.72-2.22) 0.74 (0.38-1.41) 0.59 (0.29-1.23) 0.06  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 58/67,664 48/68,432 52/70,255 69/70,856   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.84 (0.57-1.23) 0.90 (0.61-1.31) 1.20 (0.84-1.73) 0.16 0.007 
Flavan-3-ols       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤1.12 >1.12-2.51 >2.51-6.76 >6.76   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 23/23,138 24/22,802 23/23,920 9/24,596   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.12 (0.63-2.00) 1.06 (0.59-1.91) 0.42 (0.19-0.92) 0.01  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 60/68,694 53/68,699 52/69,845 62/69,970   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.85 (0.58-1.23) 0.82 (0.56-1.20) 1.00 (0.69-1.44) 0.54 0.005 
Catechin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.43 >0.43-0.92 >0.92-2.53 >2.53   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 22/22,882 26/23,061 22/23,837 9/24,676   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.27 (0.71-2.27) 1.05 (0.57-1.92) 0.43 (0.20-0.95) 0.009  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 61/68,999 53/68,649 51/69,780 62/69,779   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.83 (0.57-1.20) 0.79 (0.54-1.15) 0.97 (0.68-1.40) 0.60 0.005 
Epicatechin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.63 >0.63-1.56 >1.56-4.35 >4.35   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 22/23,335 25/22,716 22/23,731 10/24,674   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.25 (0.70-2.23) 1.10 (0.60-2.01) 0.50 (0.23-1.06) 0.02  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 65/68,449 48/68,579 53/70,313 61/69,866   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.71 (0.49-1.04) 0.77 (0.53-1.11) 0.91 (0.63-1.30) 0.68 0.01 
Flavones       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.041 >0.041-0.069 >0.069-0.148 >0.148   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 21/23,565 16/22,621 25/23,729 17/24,540   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.80 (0.42-1.53) 1.24 (0.69-2.23) 0.89 (0.46-1.69) 0.80  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 56/68,623 58/68,586 50/69,600 63/70,398   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.00 (0.69-1.45) 0.83 (0.57-1.22) 1.09 (0.75-1.56) 0.50 0.42 
Apigenin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.020 >0.020-0.036 >0.036-0.082 >0.082   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 20/23,760 19/23,359 20/23,129 20/24,208   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.94 (0.50-1.77) 0.96 (0.52-1.79) 1.04 (0.56-1.95) 0.79  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 55/70,471 59/69,268 54/67,612 59/69,856   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.04 (0.72-1.51) 0.93 (0.64-1.36) 1.03 (0.71-1.49) 0.87 0.98 
Luteolin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.014 >0.014-0.027 >0.027-0.057 >0.057   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 17/22,899 24/22,527 18/23,940 20/25,089   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.51 (0.81-2.81) 1.15 (0.59-2.24) 1.35 (0.70-2.61) 0.67  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 63/67,787 54/67,743 50/70,016 60/71,662   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.83 (0.58-1.19) 0.77 (0.53-1.12) 0.91 (0.63-1.30) 0.91 0.99 
FlavonoidQuartiles of intake (1: lowest, 4: highest)
PtrendPinteraction
1*2
3
4
HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)HR (95% CI)
Total flavonoids       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤7.10 >7.11-10.74 >10.74-18.69 >18.69   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 27/22,521 21/23,168 22/23,965 9/24,802   
    Multivariate adjusted 0.83 (0.46-1.48) 0.88 (0.49-1.57) 0.36 (0.17-0.78) 0.009  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 65/67,622 47/68,926 49/70,453 66/70,207   
    Multivariate adjusted 0.70 (0.48-1.02) 0.73 (0.50-1.06) 0.98 (0.69-1.39) 0.39 0.002 
Flavonols       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤5.69 >5.69-7.95 >7.95-11.70 >11.70   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 27/22,099 24/23,161 15/24,572 13/24,623   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.94 (0.54-1.64) 0.58 (0.30-1.10) 0.54 (0.27-1.07) 0.04  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 58/67,503 53/68,922 44/70,067 72/70,715   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.91 (0.62-1.32) 0.75 (0.51-1.12) 1.24 (0.87-1.78) 0.11 0.004 
Kaempferol       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.24 >0.24-0.44 >0.44-1.29 >1.29   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 26/22,785 20/23,291 24/23,608 9/24,770   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.82 (0.45-1.50) 1.00 (0.56-1.77) 0.37 (0.17-0.79) 0.009  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 60/68,092 50/68,572 57/70,623 60/69,920   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.79 (0.54-1.15) 0.89 (0.61-1.28) 0.95 (0.66-1.38) 0.67 0.006 
Myricetin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.40 >0.40-0.66 >0.66-1.12 >1.12   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 26/23,051 24/23,194 15/23,987 14/24,224   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.95 (0.54-1.66) 0.60 (0.32-1.14) 0.61 (0.31-1.18) 0.10  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 54/67,738 52/68,423 56/70,335 65/70,712   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.96 (0.65-1.40) 1.02 (0.70-1.48) 1.21 (0.83-1.75) 0.21 0.02 
Quercetin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤4.82 >4.82-6.61 >6.61-9.10 >9.10   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 23/22,043 28/23,420 16/24,225 12/24,767   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.27 (0.72-2.22) 0.74 (0.38-1.41) 0.59 (0.29-1.23) 0.06  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 58/67,664 48/68,432 52/70,255 69/70,856   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.84 (0.57-1.23) 0.90 (0.61-1.31) 1.20 (0.84-1.73) 0.16 0.007 
Flavan-3-ols       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤1.12 >1.12-2.51 >2.51-6.76 >6.76   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 23/23,138 24/22,802 23/23,920 9/24,596   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.12 (0.63-2.00) 1.06 (0.59-1.91) 0.42 (0.19-0.92) 0.01  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 60/68,694 53/68,699 52/69,845 62/69,970   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.85 (0.58-1.23) 0.82 (0.56-1.20) 1.00 (0.69-1.44) 0.54 0.005 
Catechin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.43 >0.43-0.92 >0.92-2.53 >2.53   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 22/22,882 26/23,061 22/23,837 9/24,676   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.27 (0.71-2.27) 1.05 (0.57-1.92) 0.43 (0.20-0.95) 0.009  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 61/68,999 53/68,649 51/69,780 62/69,779   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.83 (0.57-1.20) 0.79 (0.54-1.15) 0.97 (0.68-1.40) 0.60 0.005 
Epicatechin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.63 >0.63-1.56 >1.56-4.35 >4.35   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 22/23,335 25/22,716 22/23,731 10/24,674   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.25 (0.70-2.23) 1.10 (0.60-2.01) 0.50 (0.23-1.06) 0.02  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 65/68,449 48/68,579 53/70,313 61/69,866   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.71 (0.49-1.04) 0.77 (0.53-1.11) 0.91 (0.63-1.30) 0.68 0.01 
Flavones       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.041 >0.041-0.069 >0.069-0.148 >0.148   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 21/23,565 16/22,621 25/23,729 17/24,540   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.80 (0.42-1.53) 1.24 (0.69-2.23) 0.89 (0.46-1.69) 0.80  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 56/68,623 58/68,586 50/69,600 63/70,398   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.00 (0.69-1.45) 0.83 (0.57-1.22) 1.09 (0.75-1.56) 0.50 0.42 
Apigenin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.020 >0.020-0.036 >0.036-0.082 >0.082   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 20/23,760 19/23,359 20/23,129 20/24,208   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.94 (0.50-1.77) 0.96 (0.52-1.79) 1.04 (0.56-1.95) 0.79  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 55/70,471 59/69,268 54/67,612 59/69,856   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.04 (0.72-1.51) 0.93 (0.64-1.36) 1.03 (0.71-1.49) 0.87 0.98 
Luteolin       
    Range of intake (mg) ≤0.014 >0.014-0.027 >0.027-0.057 >0.057   
    Placebo       
        No. cases/person-years 17/22,899 24/22,527 18/23,940 20/25,089   
        Multivariate adjusted 1.51 (0.81-2.81) 1.15 (0.59-2.24) 1.35 (0.70-2.61) 0.67  
    Supplement       
        No. cases/person-years 63/67,787 54/67,743 50/70,016 60/71,662   
        Multivariate adjusted 0.83 (0.58-1.19) 0.77 (0.53-1.12) 0.91 (0.63-1.30) 0.91 0.99 
*

Reference category.

Multivariate-adjusted HRs are adjusted for age at randomization, years of smoking, total number of cigarettes per day, self-reported history of diabetes mellitus, and energy-adjusted saturated fat intake.

Among participants randomized to the placebo group, energy-adjusted intakes of total flavonoids (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.78; Ptrend = 0.009) and of two flavonoid subgroups, flavonols (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.27-1.07; Ptrend = 0.04), and flavan-3-ols (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.92; Ptrend = 0.01), were or tended to be associated with decreased pancreatic cancer risk when comparing the highest versus lowest intake quartiles in the multivariate-adjusted model (Table 4). Of the individual flavonoids, high intakes of kaempferol (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.79; Ptrend = 0.009), myricetin (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30-1.18; Ptrend = 0.10), quercetin (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29-1.23; Ptrend = 0.06), catechin (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.95; Ptrend = 0.009), and epicatechin (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.23-1.06; Ptrend = 0.02) were or tended to be inversely associated with development of pancreatic cancer in the placebo group (Table 4). Similar trends and patterns of interactions were not observed for flavonoid-rich foods, except for tea consumption (placebo: HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-1.04; Ptrend = 0.06 and intervention: HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.82-1.58; Ptrend = 0.43; Pinteraction = 0.03).

There were no significant interactions of the flavonoid associations by follow-up time overall; however, among participants in the placebo group, the association between flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer risk was somewhat attenuated with increasing time to cancer diagnosis (<10 years follow-up time: HR for total flavonoids, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.61; Ptrend = 0.006 and ≥10 years follow-up time: HR for total flavonoids, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.25-1.85; Ptrend = 0.43). Excluding the first two years of follow-up resulted in minimal changes in risk estimates and changes in patterns; however, due to the lower number of cases (n = 75), the length of 95% CI increased (HR for total flavonoids, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.80; Ptrend = 0.02). The association between flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer risk was not significantly modified by antioxidant intake (β-carotene from food, vitamin C from food, vitamin E from food, food plus supplemental β-carotene, or vitamin E from food plus supplemental α-tocopherol) or smoking intensity and duration.

Overall, there was no association between flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer risk in the ATBC Study (Table 2). However, we observed statistically significant interactions between flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer risk by α-tocopherol and/or β-carotene trial intervention on pancreatic cancer risk (Table 4), such that among participants who received placebo, there was a statistically significant 64% reduced pancreatic cancer risk with high total flavonoid intake, relative to low intake, particularly for the flavonol kaempferol and the flavan-3-ol catechin (Table 4). Inverse trends were also observed for intakes of two flavonoid subgroups (flavonols and flavan-3-ols) and three individual flavonoids (myricetin, quercetin, and epicatechin) and pancreatic cancer among subjects in the placebo group. No associations were observed for intakes of flavones (apigenin and luteolin; Table 4). The magnitude of our flavan-3-ol and flavonol associations is similar to that observed in previous pancreatic cancer studies (27, 28). Consistent with other prospective studies, no significant associations were observed for intakes of most flavonoid-rich foods, such as fruits and vegetables (Table 3; refs. 7-17).

A major strength of the current study was its large prospective nature with long follow-up (up to 19.4 years). Dietary data were collected before diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, which eliminates recall bias and reduces reverse causation due to dietary changes as a consequence of nondiagnosed pancreatic cancer. Our study is internally valid as the cases arose from the cohort that includes the noncases and therefore does not have control selection bias. It also has a large number of cases, providing power to detect differences in food components, such as flavonoids, if they exist. The food frequency questionnaire was developed specifically for the ATBC Study population (30) and provided detailed dietary and flavonoid data that are based on Finnish nutrient databases. In particular, flavonol content of berries were analyzed from berries available in Finland (35).

Most cell culture (20-23, 38) and animal studies (24, 25, 39) in pancreatic cancer models support our results that high dietary intake of flavonols and flavan-3-ols might inhibit human pancreatic carcinogenesis. The exception is one Argentinean research group, which showed that dietary quercetin increases the incidence of pancreatic dysplastic foci in rats treated with the carcinogen nitrosomethylurea (40, 41). Potential biological mechanisms by which flavonols and flavan-3-ols inhibit pancreatic carcinogenesis are inhibition of proliferation, cell cycle arrest, induction of apoptosis, promotion of differentiation, antioxidative activity, and inhibition of angiogenesis (42). Most pertinent, flavonoids can inhibit the activity of phase I enzymes and increase the activity of phase II enzymes, thereby decreasing the metabolic activation of procarcinogens and increasing detoxification of carcinogens, including those from tobacco (43-45). In support of this biological mechanism, flavonol intake has shown the greatest protective association for lung cancer (18, 46, 47). Similar to our results, Hirvonen et al. (31) reported that flavonol intake was protective against lung cancer among the ATBC male smokers, and Nöthlings et al. (28) showed that flavonol intake was protective only against pancreatic cancer in current smokers. We did not observe significant interactions between flavonoid intake and smoking intensity or duration in the ATBC Study. The number of hydroxyl groups in the B ring of flavonols might explain differences in their protective effects against pancreatic carcinogenesis as myricetin (three hydroxyl groups) had the least protective effect and kaempferol (one hydroxyl group) had the strongest protective effect in current smokers in this cohort as well as in the Multiethnic Cohort Study (28). In support of our hypothesis, cell culture studies suggest that individual flavonols differ depending on the number of hydroxyl groups in biological mechanisms important for pancreatic carcinogenesis, such as proliferation, antioxidant activity, and inhibition of angiogenesis (48-50).

The association between flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer risk was limited to the participants that received placebo only during the trial phase of the ATBC Study, which suggests that daily α-tocopherol and/or β-carotene supplements may interfere with the protective effect of flavonoids (Table 4). Although neither trial intervention significantly altered the pancreatic cancer incidence during the trial, the pancreatic cancer incident rate was 25% lower for the men who received β-carotene supplements compared with those who did not receive β-carotene and men that received α-tocopherol had a 34% increased pancreatic cancer incident rate compared with the rate for those who did not receive α-tocopherol (51). We did not observe similar effects for antioxidants from foods such as dietary β-carotene, vitamin C, or vitamin E. Average intakes of vitamin E (10.7 mg/d) and β-carotene (1.7 mg/d) were much smaller than those consumed from supplemental α-tocopherol (50 mg/d) and β-carotene (20 mg/d). Other supplement use was too low in the ATBC Study to examine associations. We are not aware of any reported interactions between high flavonoid intake and daily α-tocopherol and/or β-carotene supplements in large prospective cohorts. There is some evidence that increased flavonoid intake improves α-tocopherol concentrations and antioxidant capacity in humans (52). The lack of a protective effect of flavonoids in the supplement group might be linked to the fact that α-tocopherol, β-carotene, and flavonoids exert antioxidant as well as prooxidant activities with greater prooxidative properties at high concentrations in the presence of metal ions and endogenous reducing agents (53, 54).

There are several limitations to our study. As with all dietary intake studies, measurement error related to both the dietary assessment techniques and the nutrient database is likely present and could cause inaccurate risk estimates. However, the monotonic decreasing HR across flavonoid intake quartiles and the consistency of the reduced pancreatic cancer risk across individual flavonols and flavan-3-ols among participants in the placebo group would support that subjects were ranked robustly enough to observe associations (Table 4). The flavonoid intake data are primarily based on flavonoid analysis of Dutch foods (32-34). It is possible that Finnish foods differ from Dutch foods in flavonoid contents. The dietary questionnaire was not specifically designed to estimate flavonoid intake, which can explain the low reliability and validity coefficients for flavones. Intakes of flavone-rich foods were based primarily on recipes because these foods are mostly used as garnishes and spices. Given further the low intake values, the lack of an association between flavones and pancreatic cancer is not wholly unexpected.

Associations between flavonoids and pancreatic cancer could be different in nonsmokers, women, and populations with high consumption of dietary supplements and therefore may not be generalizable to such populations. In the Multiethnic Cohort Study, smoking and not gender modified the association between flavonol intake and smoking status; high flavonol intake was associated with decreased risk of exocrine pancreatic cancer in current smokers and not in former and never smokers (28). Our study may have limited power to evaluate the association of flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer and the number of pancreatic cancer cases in the placebo group was low (n = 79). However, our results are consistent with those reported from the Multiethnic Cohort Study that observed inverse flavonoid associations only among smokers (n = 112 cases; ref. 28).

Furthermore, the inverse association between flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer risk in the placebo group is similar and statistically significant across most flavonoid categories (Table 4), which would argue against the possibility that this is a chance finding. Flavonoid intake is invariably linked to a healthful diet (that is, low total fat and saturated fat intake) because flavonoids are found only in plants, most of which are high in carbohydrates and vitamins. Although residual confounding cannot be completely excluded, our results are independent of saturated fat intake and other potential pancreatic cancer confounders that we adjusted for in the multivariate model; therefore, the protection observed with a flavonoid-rich diet may be related to the specific biological actions of flavonoids. Lastly, as data were ascertained only at baseline, those dietary intakes, smoking habits, and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus may have changed during follow-up, which could contribute to misclassification of exposure leading to attenuated risk estimates or spurious associations because of incomplete adjustment of confounders.

In conclusion, our results from the ATBC Study suggest that there is no overall association between flavonoid intake and pancreatic cancer risk (Table 2). However, the reduced risk of pancreatic in male smokers who were not randomized to the α-tocopherol and/or β-carotene intervention suggests that population subgroups might benefit from a flavonoid-rich diet. Our results should be considered with caution given the relative small number of cases in the placebo group and the lack of an established biological mechanism for the interaction that we observed. Confirmation of our results in populations that have an adequate proportion of supplement users to evaluate interactions as well as nonsmokers and women are needed before conclusions can be made about the role of flavonoid intake in pancreatic cancer development in humans.

Grant support: Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services and National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services USPHS contracts N01-CN-45165, N01-RC-45035, and N01-RC-37004.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2007. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
2
Brand R, Mahr CO. Risk factors for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: are we ready for screening and surveillance?
Curr Gastroenterol Rep
2005
;
7
:
122
–7.
3
Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Risk factors for pancreatic cancer.
J Cell Biochem
2005
;
95
:
649
–56.
4
Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Epidemiology and prevention of pancreatic cancer.
Jpn J Clin Oncol
2004
;
34
:
238
–44.
5
van den Brandt PA, Goldbohm RA. Nutrition in the prevention of gastrointestinal cancer.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol
2006
;
20
:
589
–603.
6
IARC. IARC handbooks of cancer prevention. Vol. 8. Fruit and vegetables. Lyon (France): IARC Press; 2003.
7
Coughlin SS, Calle EE, Patel AV, Thun MJ. Predictors of pancreatic cancer mortality among a large cohort of United States adults.
Cancer Causes Control
2000
;
11
:
915
–23.
8
Inoue M, Tajima K, Nobuyuki N, et al. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in Japan: a nested case-control study from the Hospital-based Epidemiologic Research Program at Aichi Cancer Center (HERPACC).
Int J Epidemiol
2003
;
32
:
257
–62.
9
Khan MM, Goto T, Kobayashi K, et al. Dietary habits and cancer mortality among middle aged and older Japanese living in Hokkaido, Japan by cancer site and sex.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
2004
;
5
:
58
–65.
10
Larsson SC, Håkansson N, Näslund I. Fruit and vegetable consumption in relation to pancreatic cancer risk: a prospective study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2006
;
15
:
301
–5.
11
Michaud DS, Skinner HG, Wu K, et al. Dietary patterns and pancreatic cancer risk in men and women.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2005
;
97
:
518
–24.
12
Mills PK, Beeson, WL, Abbey DE, Fraser GE, Phillips RL. Dietary habits and past medical history as related to fatal pancreas cancer risk among Adventists.
Cancer
1988
;
61
:
2578
–85.
13
Nöthlings U, Wilkens LR, Murphy SP, Hanking JH, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN. Vegetable intake and pancreatic cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort Study.
Am J Epidemiol
2007
;
165
:
138
–47.
14
Sauvaget C, Nagano J, Hayashi M, Spencer E, Shimizu Y, Allen N. Vegetables and fruit intake and cancer mortality in the Hiroshima/Nagasaki Life Span Study.
Br J Cancer
2003
;
88
:
689
–94.
15
Shibata A, Mack TM, Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK, Henderson BE. A prospective study of pancreatic cancer in the elderly.
Int J Cancer
1994
;
58
:
46
–9.
16
Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Pietinen P, Taylor PR. Prospective study of diet and pancreatic cancer in male smokers.
Am J Epidemiol
2002
;
155
:
783
–92.
17
Zheng W, McLaughlin JK, Gridley G, et al. A cohort study of smoking, alcohol consumption, and dietary factors for pancreatic cancer (United States).
Cancer Causes Control
1993
;
4
:
477
–82.
18
Graf BA, Milbury PE, Blumberg JB. Flavonols, flavones, flavanones, and human health: epidemiological evidence.
J Med Food
2005
;
8
:
281
–90.
19
Ross JA, Kasum CM. Dietary flavonoids: bioavailability, metabolic effects, and safety.
Annu Rev Nutr
2002
;
22
:
19
–34.
20
Lee LT, Huang YT, Hwang JJ, et al. Blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity by quercetin and luteolin leads to growth inhibition and apoptosis of pancreatic tumor cells.
Anticancer Res
2002
;
22
:
1615
–27.
21
Roginsky AB, Ujiki MB, Ding XZ, Adrian TE. On the potential use of flavonoids in the treatment and prevention of pancreatic cancer.
In Vivo
2005
;
19
:
61
–7.
22
Takada M, Nakamura Y, Koizumi T, et al. Suppression of human pancreatic carcinoma cell growth and invasion by epigallocatechin-3-gallate.
Pancreas
2002
;
25
:
45
–8.
23
Tan M, Norwood A, May M, Tun M, Benghuzzi H. Effects of (-)epigallocatechin gallate and thymoquinone on proliferations of a PANC-1 cell line in culture.
Biomed Sci Instrum
2006
;
42
:
363
–71.
24
Majima T, Tsutsumi M, Nishino H, Tsunoda T, Konichi Y. Inhibitory effect of β-carotene, palm carotene, and green tea polyphenols on pancreatic carcinogenesis initiated by N-nitrosobis(2-oxopropyl)amine in Syrian golden hamsters.
Pancreas
1998
;
16
:
13
–8.
25
Mouria M, Gukovskaya AS, Jung Y, et al. Food-derived polyphenols inhibit pancreatic cancer growth through mitochondrial cytochrome c release and apoptosis.
Int J Cancer
2002
;
98
:
761
–9.
26
Knekt P, Järvinen R, Seppänen R, et al. Dietary flavonoids and the risk of lung cancer and other malignant neoplasms.
Am J Epidemiol
1997
;
146
:
223
–30.
27
Arts ICW, Jacobs Dr. Jr., Gross M, Harnack LJ, Folsom AR. Dietary catechins and cancer incidence among postmenopausal women: the Iowa Women’s Health Study (United States).
Cancer Causes Control
2002
;
13
:
373
–82.
28
Nöthlings U, Murphy SP, Wilkens LR, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN. Flavonols and pancreatic cancer risk.
Am J Epidemiol
2007
;
166
:
924
–31.
29
ATBC Cancer Prevention Study Group. The α-Tocopherol-β-Carotene Lung Cancer Prevention Study: design, methods, participant characteristics, and compliance.
Ann Epidemiol
1994
;
4
:
1
–10.
30
Pietinen L, Hartman AM, Haapa E. Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. I. A self-administered food use questionnaire with a portion size picture booklet.
Am J Epidemiol
1988
;
128
:
655
–66.
31
Hirvonen T, Virtamo J, Korhonen P, Albanes D, Pietinen P. Flavonol and flavone intake and the risk of cancer in male smokers (Finland).
Cancer Causes Control
2001
;
12
:
789
–96.
32
Hertog MGL, Hollman PCH, Katan MB. Content of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids of 28 vegetables and fruits.
J Agric Food Chem
1992
;
40
:
2379
–83.
33
Hertog MGL, Hollman PCH, Katan MB, Kromhout D. Intake of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids and their determinants in adults in The Netherlands.
Nutr Cancer
1993
;
20
:
21
–9.
34
Hertog MGL, Hollman PCH, van de Putte B. Content of potentially anticarcinogenic flavonoids of tea infusions, wines, and fruit juices.
J Agric Food Chem
1993
;
41
:
1242
–6.
35
Häkkinen SH, Kärenlampi SO, Heinonen IM, Mykkänen HM, Törrönen AR. Content of the flavonols quercetin, myricetin, and kaempferol in 25 edible berries.
J Agric Food Chem
1999
;
47
:
2274
–9.
36
Korhonen P, Malila N, Pukkala E, Teppo L, Albanes D, Virtamo J. The Finnish cancer registry as follow-up source of a large trial cohort.
Acta Oncol
2002
;
41
:
381
–8.
37
Willett W, Stampfer MJ. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses.
Am J Epidemiol
1986
;
124
:
17
–27.
38
Lyn-Cook BD, Rogers T, Yan Y, Blann EB, Kadlubar FF, Hammons GJ. Chemopreventive effects of tea extracts and various components on human pancreatic and prostate tumor cells in vitro.
Nutr Cancer
1999
;
35
:
80
–6.
39
Hiura A, Tsutumi M, Satake K. Inhibitory effect of green tea extract on the process of pancreatic carcinogenesis induced by N-nitrosobis-(2-oxypropyl)amine (BOP) and on tumor promotion after transplantation of N-nitrosobis-(2-hydroxypropyl)amine (BHP)-induced pancreatic cancer in Syrian hamsters.
Pancreas
1997
;
15
:
272
–7.
40
Barotto NN, López CP, Eynard AR, Fernández Zapico ME, Valentich MA. Quercetin enhances pretumorous lesions in the NMU model of rat pancreatic carcinogenesis.
Cancer Lett
1998
;
129
:
1
–6.
41
Valentich MA, Eynard AR, Barotto NN, Díaz MP, Biongiovanni GA. Effect of the co-administration of phenobarbital, quercetin and mancozeb on nitrosomethylurea-induced pancreatic tumors in rats.
Food Chem Toxicol
2006
;
44
:
2101
–5.
42
Kanadaswami C, Lee LT, Lee PPH, et al. The antitumor activities of flavonoids.
In Vivo
2005
;
19
:
895
–910.
43
Chung FL, Schwartz J, Herzog CR, Yang YM. Tea and cancer prevention: studies in animals and humans.
J Nutr
2003
;
133
:
3268
–74S.
44
Moon YJ, Wang X, Morris ME. Dietary flavonoids: effects on xenobiotic and carcinogen metabolism.
Toxicol In Vitro
2006
;
20
:
187
–210.
45
Weisburger JH, Chung FL. Mechanisms of chronic disease causation by nutritional factors and tobacco products and their prevention by tea polyphenols.
Food Chem Toxicol
2002
;
40
:
1145
–54.
46
Arts ICW, Hollman PCH. Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiologic studies.
Am J Clin Nutr
2005
;
81
:
317
–25S.
47
Neuhouser ML. Dietary flavonoids and cancer risk: evidence from human population studies.
Nutr Cancer
2004
;
50
:
1
–7.
48
Agullo G, Gamet-Parastre L, Fernandez Y, Anciaux N, Demigné C, Rémésy C. Comparative effects of flavonoids on the growth, viability and metabolism of a colonic adenocarcinoma cell line (HT29 cells).
Cancer Lett
1996
;
105
:
61
–70.
49
Kim JD, Liu L, Guo W, Meydani M. Chemical structure of flavonols in relation to modulation of angiogenesis and immune-endothelial cell adhesion.
J Nutr Biochem
2006
;
17
:
165
–76.
50
Sim, GS, Lee BC, Cho HS, et al. Structure activity relationship of antioxidative property of flavonoids and inhibitory effect on matrix metalloproteinase activity in UVA-irradiated human dermal fibroblast.
Arch Pharm Res
2007
;
30
:
290
–8.
51
Rautalahti MT, Virtamo JR, Taylor PR, et al. The effects of supplementation with α-tocopherol and β-carotene on the incidence and mortality of carcinoma of the pancreas in a randomized, controlled trial.
Cancer
1999
;
86
:
37
–42.
52
Castilla P, Echarri R, Davalos A, et al. Concentrated red grape juice exerts antioxidant, hypolipidemic, and anti-inflammatory effects in both hemodialysis patients and healthy subjects.
Am J Clin Nutr
2006
;
84
:
252
–62.
53
Cao G, Sofic E, Prior R. Antioxidant and prooxidant behavior of flavonoids: structure-activity relationships.
Free Radic Biol Med
1997
;
22
:
749
–60.
54
Kawanishi S, Oikawa S, Murata M. Evaluation for safety of antioxidant chemopreventive agents.
Antioxid Redox Signal
2005
;
7
:
1728
–39.