Few modifiable factors are known to reduce ovarian cancer risk. Ecologic studies and experimental data suggest that vitamin D may reduce ovarian cancer risk. Therefore, we examined whether plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (a measure of overall vitamin D status) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (biologically active form) were associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in a nested-case control study using data from three prospective cohorts: the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHSII, and the Women's Health Study (WHS). The analysis had 224 cases (161 from NHS/NHSII and 63 from WHS) and 603 controls (matching ratio, 1:3 for NHS/NHSII and 1:2 for WHS). Women ranged in age from 34 to 73 years (mean, 56 years). We did not observe significant associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [top versus bottom quartile: relative risk (RR), 0.83; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.49-1.39; Ptrend = 0.57] or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.70-1.85, Ptrend = 0.93) and ovarian cancer risk. Study-specific associations were not statistically significant and no statistical heterogeneity existed between studies (P = 0.66, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; P = 0.40, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D). However, there was a significant inverse association among overweight and obese women for 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-0.93; Ptrend = 0.04). Further, those with adequate (≥32 ng/mL) versus inadequate 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels had a modestly decreased risk of serous ovarian cancer (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.39-1.05). Overall, our results do not suggest that plasma vitamin D levels are associated with risk of ovarian cancer. However, we observed significant associations in some subgroups, which should be evaluated further in other studies because increasing vitamin D intake is an easy preventive measure to adopt. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(4):783–8)

Increasing evidence suggests a role for vitamin D in reducing cancer risk by decreasing proliferation and increasing apoptosis (1). Experimental and epidemiologic studies have suggested that vitamin D may be specifically associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer. For example, animal data suggest that vitamin D is involved in ovarian development and fertility (2, 3). Further, the vitamin D receptor is weakly to moderately expressed in normal ovarian cells, with stronger expression in ovarian cancer cell lines and tumor tissue (4-8). In normal Chinese hamster ovarian cells and in normal human mammary cells, vitamin D administration in vitro inhibited cell growth in a dose-dependent manner (9, 10); there are no similar studies of normal human ovarian cells. Additional in vitro and in vivo evidence indicates that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D can inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in ovarian cancer cell lines by reducing the number of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle (5, 6, 11-16).

Several ecological studies reported that ovarian cancer mortality was inversely associated with UV-B exposure, which initiates vitamin D production in the skin, based on location of residence or occupation (17-21). In addition, some studies of dietary intake of vitamin D observed an inverse association with ovarian cancer risk (22, 23), but others did not (24, 25). It is difficult to study dietary intake of vitamin D because it is strongly correlated with lactose intake, which may increase risk of ovarian cancer (24, 26). Thus, plasma vitamin D levels may be more useful in investigating a potential relationship with ovarian cancer. However, to our knowledge, no study has examined the association between circulating vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer. Therefore, we examined whether plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (a measure of overall vitamin D status) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (the biologically active form) were associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in a prospective, nested-case control study among three cohort studies: the Nurses' Health Study (NHS), NHSII, and the Women's Health Study (WHS). The three cohorts were combined to provide sufficient sample size to evaluate these associations.

Study Population

NHS/NHSII. The NHS cohort was established in 1976 among 121,700 U.S. female registered nurses, ages 30 to 55 years, and the NHSII was established in 1989 among 116,609 female registered nurses, ages 25 to 42 years. Women in both cohorts completed an initial questionnaire and have been followed biennially by questionnaire to update exposure status and disease diagnoses. The racial/ethnic breakdown of the NHS is 96% Caucasian, 2% African American, 1% Asian, and 1% Hispanic, and of NHSII is 94% Caucasian, 2% Asian, 2% African American, and 2% Hispanic.

In 1989 to 1990, 32,826 NHS participants (ages 43-69 years) provided blood samples and completed a short questionnaire (27). Briefly, women arranged to have their blood drawn and shipped with an icepack via overnight courier to our laboratory where it was processed and separated into plasma (heparin), RBC, and WBC components. Follow-up of the NHS blood study cohort was 98% in 2004.

Between 1996 and 1999, 29,611 NHSII participants (ages 32-54 years) provided blood samples and completed a short questionnaire (28). Briefly, premenopausal women (n = 18,521) who had not taken hormones, been pregnant, or lactated within 6 months provided blood samples drawn on the 3rd to 5th day of their menstrual cycle (follicular draw) and 7 to 9 days before the anticipated start of their next cycle (luteal draw, called timed samples). Follicular plasma was aliquoted by the participant and frozen. Other women (n = 11,090) provided a single 30-mL untimed blood sample. Luteal and untimed samples were shipped and processed identically to the NHS samples. Follow-up of the NHSII blood study cohort was 98% in 2003.

All samples have been stored in liquid nitrogen freezers since collection. These studies were approved by the Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research at the Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Cases were diagnosed with ovarian cancer after blood collection but before June 1, 2004 (NHS) or June 1, 2003 (NHSII). Overall, 161 epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer cases were confirmed by medical record review (141 from NHS and 20 from NHSII). Mean time from blood draw to diagnosis was 80 months (range, 1-174 months). Cases were matched to three controls, who had intact ovaries at the time of the case diagnosis, on menopausal status at baseline and diagnosis, age (±1 year), month of blood collection (±1 month), time of day of blood draw (±2 h), fasting status, and postmenopausal hormone use at blood draw. For NHSII cases with timed samples, we additionally matched on day of the luteal blood draw (date of next menstrual cycle − date of blood draw, ±1 day). Cases and controls had no previous history of cancer, except nonmelanoma skin cancer, before blood collection. Two controls that subsequently developed ovarian cancer were each matched to three controls and included only as cases in the analysis.

WHS. The WHS is a completed randomized trial examining low-dose aspirin and vitamin E supplementation for the primary prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease (29-31). Beginning in 1992, 39,876 female professionals in the United States were enrolled in the trial and completed a baseline health questionnaire. Women were >45 years of age and free of cancer (apart from nonmelanoma skin cancer) and cardiovascular disease at baseline. Blood samples were collected in EDTA and citrate tubes from 28,345 women before randomization. All samples were stored in continuously monitored liquid nitrogen freezers. We included women from the treatment and placebo groups and used citrate plasma for the assays. The effect of the intervention on vitamin D levels has not been specifically evaluated. The randomized trial was completed on March 31, 2004; at that time, morbidity and mortality follow-up were 97% and 99% complete, respectively. Participants are currently being followed in an observational study. The study is approved by the Committee on the Use of Human Subjects in Research at the Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Women reported ovarian cancer on their follow-up questionnaires, and medical records were obtained to confirm the self-reports and to document the histology of the tumor. Cases were diagnosed with invasive ovarian cancer after blood collection but before December 1, 2004. Overall, 63 eligible epithelial ovarian cancer cases were identified; the mean time from blood draw to diagnosis was 54 months (range, 6-120 months). Each case was matched to two controls (except for four cases for whom only one control match was identified) who had intact ovaries at the time of the case diagnosis, on menopausal status at baseline and at case diagnosis, age (±1 year), month of blood collection (±3 months), time since randomization (±6 months), and fasting status.

Menopausal Status. We considered a woman to be premenopausal if (a) she gave timed samples (NHSII only), (b) her periods had not ceased, or (c) she had a hysterectomy with at least one ovary remaining and was ≤47 (nonsmokers) or ≤45 (smokers) years old (32). Regardless of postmenopausal hormone use status, we considered a woman to be postmenopausal if (a) her natural menstrual periods had ceased permanently or (b) she had a hysterectomy with at least one ovary remaining and was ≥56 (nonsmokers) or ≥54 (smokers) years old (for the NHS and NHSII) or ≥60 years old (for the WHS). The remaining women, most of whom had a simple hysterectomy or were unsure of their menopausal status, were considered to be of unknown menopausal status.

Laboratory Assays

Vitamin D analytes (25-hydroxy and 1,25-dihydroxy) were assayed by RIA, as previously described (33), in four batches (two for NHS, one for NHSII, and one for WHS) at the laboratory of one of the authors (B.W.H.). Briefly, the RIA used radioiodinated tracers, with a prior acetonitrile extraction. Case-control sets and samples from the same study were assayed together, ordered randomly, and labeled to mask case-control status and quality control status. The intra-assay coefficient of variation from blinded, replicate, quality control samples (10% of the total sample number) ranged from 8.0% to 9.6% for 25-hydroxyvitamin D and from 8.6% to 14.1% for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. The correlation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in whole blood processed immediately versus processed 24 or 48 h after collection was 0.97 and 0.95, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Outliers (34) were identified separately by sample type because samples collected in citrate tend to have lower values due to dilution by the preservative (35). For heparin plasma, those with 25-hydroxyvitamin D >60 ng/mL were set to missing (n = 1); there were no outliers for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. For citrate plasma, those with 25-hydroxyvitamin D <5.0 ng/mL (n = 2) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D <10.1 pg/mL (n = 3) were set to missing. Overall, 224 cases and 606 controls were available for analysis. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined using conditional logistic regression comparing quartiles of vitamin D concentrations, with cutoff points based on the control distribution within each plasma type (36). We also considered season-specific quartiles for three seasons: winter to early spring (January, February, March, April); summer to early fall (July, August, September, October); and late-spring/late fall (May, June, November, December). However, results did not differ from using overall cutoff points and thus only the latter are presented. Further, we examined whether having inadequate 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (<32 ng/mL; ref. 37) was associated with ovarian cancer risk; individuals with levels below this cutoff point have secondary hyperparathyroidism, impaired calcium absorption, and low bone mineral density (37). To correct for the dilution factor in citrate samples, we multiplied 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels by 1.163 (35) before classification of having inadequate levels.

Because vitamin D levels differed by sample type, we included probit scores of vitamin D levels as a continuous variable for all trend tests (using the Wald test) to standardize for between-sample variability (38); probit scores, unlike z scores, have a normal distribution even if the original data are skewed. We considered multiple a priori potential confounders including ever use of postmenopausal hormone, body mass index (BMI) at blood draw, parity, lactose intake, duration of oral contraceptive use, season of blood draw, age at menopause, tubal ligation, family history of ovarian cancer, physical activity, and duration of multivitamin use. The following confounders were included in the final model: ever use of postmenopausal hormone (yes, no), BMI (continuous), parity (continuous), lactose intake (quintiles, missing), duration of oral contraceptive use (never, <3, 3-<5, 5+ years), and season of blood draw (as noted above). Because there was some difference in the confounding by duration of oral contraceptive use and BMI at blood draw between studies, we included an interaction term between study and these two variables in models including these variables.

In secondary analyses, we excluded cases diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection and evaluated associations among only invasive or serous cases because etiologic factors may vary by histologic type; we only had enough serous cases to evaluate separately. We also stratified by season (summer, other), age at diagnosis (<55, ≥55 years), menopausal status at blood draw or diagnosis (premenopausal, postmenopausal), BMI (<25, ≥25 kg/m2), and multivitamin use (ever, never) because these factors may alter vitamin D levels. Interaction terms using the above cutoff points crossed with continuous vitamin D probit scores were used to determine the Pheterogeneity. These analyses used unconditional logistic regression adjusting for matching factors, including age at blood draw (continuous), fasting status (yes, no), time of blood draw (1-8 am, 9 am-noon, 1 pm-midnight), month of blood draw (continuous), menopausal status at blood and diagnosis (premenopausal, postmenopausal, unknown), and study (NHS, NHSII, WHS).

Women in the NHS/NHSII ranged in age from 34 to 69 years (mean, 56 years) and women in the WHS ranged from 45 to 73 years (mean, 56 years) at blood collection (Table 1). With the exception of family history of ovarian cancer, tubal ligation, postmenopausal hormone/oral contraceptive use, and multivitamin use, characteristics of the participants were similar between the studies. In the NHS/NHSII, cases were more likely to have a family history of ovarian cancer (9.3%) than controls (3.5%); the opposite trend was observed in the WHS based on only two cases and seven controls. In general, controls were less likely to have used postmenopausal hormones and more likely to have used oral contraceptives than cases. Vitamin D levels were lower for the WHS participants, likely because citrate plasma tubes dilute the sample (35). Neither 25-hydroxyvitamin D nor 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels differed between cases and controls within each study (P ≥ 0.22, NHS/NHSII or WHS).

Table 1.

Characteristics at blood collection of cases and their matched controls from NHS/NHSII and WHS

NHS/NHSII
WHS
CasesControlsCasesControls
Sample size 161 481 63 122 
Age [mean (SD)], y 55.9 (7.8) 55.9 (7.8) 55.7 (7.2) 55.5 (7.0) 
Age at menarche [mean (SD)], y 12.5 (1.4) 12.6 (1.4) 12.6 (1.1) 12.5 (1.4) 
Parity* [mean (SD)] 3.2 (1.7) 3.3 (1.5) 2.9 (1.2) 3.0 (1.3) 
BMI at blood draw [mean (SD)], kg/m2 25.4 (5.5) 25.1 (4.4) 24.6 (3.9) 25.0 (4.4) 
Physical activity [mean (SD)], MET-h/wk 16.9 (17.0) 16.2 (18.1) 14.5 (15.0) 16.7 (16.7) 
Premenopausal at blood draw, % 28.6 29.1 25.4 30.0 
Family history of ovarian cancer, % 9.3 3.5 3.2 5.7 
Tubal ligation, % 14.9 17.1 19.1 27.1 
Ever used postmenopausal hormones,59.6 56.3 82.9 82.6 
Ever used oral contraceptives, % 46.0 49.9 65.1 71.3 
Ever used multivitamins, % 70.8 65.7 87.3 89.3 
Median 25-hydroxyvitamin D,§ (10th-90th percentile), ng/mL 25.9 (13.8-36.9) 26.5 (16.2-37.2) 23.2 (13.9-29.7) 22.0 (12.1-32.7) 
Median 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D,§ (10th-90th percentile), pg/mL 36.1 (25.6-49.5) 36.1 (27.0-47.5) 31.6 (20.4-39.5) 30.8 (20.6-43.4) 
NHS/NHSII
WHS
CasesControlsCasesControls
Sample size 161 481 63 122 
Age [mean (SD)], y 55.9 (7.8) 55.9 (7.8) 55.7 (7.2) 55.5 (7.0) 
Age at menarche [mean (SD)], y 12.5 (1.4) 12.6 (1.4) 12.6 (1.1) 12.5 (1.4) 
Parity* [mean (SD)] 3.2 (1.7) 3.3 (1.5) 2.9 (1.2) 3.0 (1.3) 
BMI at blood draw [mean (SD)], kg/m2 25.4 (5.5) 25.1 (4.4) 24.6 (3.9) 25.0 (4.4) 
Physical activity [mean (SD)], MET-h/wk 16.9 (17.0) 16.2 (18.1) 14.5 (15.0) 16.7 (16.7) 
Premenopausal at blood draw, % 28.6 29.1 25.4 30.0 
Family history of ovarian cancer, % 9.3 3.5 3.2 5.7 
Tubal ligation, % 14.9 17.1 19.1 27.1 
Ever used postmenopausal hormones,59.6 56.3 82.9 82.6 
Ever used oral contraceptives, % 46.0 49.9 65.1 71.3 
Ever used multivitamins, % 70.8 65.7 87.3 89.3 
Median 25-hydroxyvitamin D,§ (10th-90th percentile), ng/mL 25.9 (13.8-36.9) 26.5 (16.2-37.2) 23.2 (13.9-29.7) 22.0 (12.1-32.7) 
Median 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D,§ (10th-90th percentile), pg/mL 36.1 (25.6-49.5) 36.1 (27.0-47.5) 31.6 (20.4-39.5) 30.8 (20.6-43.4) 
*

Among parous women only.

Among postmenopausal women.

In the NHS and NHSII, vitamin D levels were measured in heparin plasma; in the WHS, levels were measured in citrate plasma.

§

P values comparing levels between cases and controls in the NHS/NHSII were 0.22 for 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 0.69 for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. The corresponding P values for WHS were 0.90 and 0.52, respectively.

Overall, we did not observe significant associations between quartiles of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (top versus bottom quartile: RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.49-1.39; Ptrend = 0.57) or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels (corresponding RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.70-1.85; Ptrend = 0.93) and ovarian cancer risk (Table 2). Study-specific associations were not statistically significant and there was no statistical heterogeneity between studies (P = 0.66, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; P = 0.40, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D); therefore, data were combined for the remaining analyses. Inclusion of both 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in the model simultaneously did not alter the observed associations (data not shown). Results were similar when excluding cases diagnosed within 2 years of blood draw (25-hydroxyvitamin D: corresponding RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.43-1.29; Ptrend = 0.43; 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D: RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.69-1.97; Ptrend = 0.91) and when including only invasive or serous cases (data not shown).

Table 2.

RRs (95% CIs) of ovarian cancer by quartile of plasma vitamin D concentrations among women in NHS/NHSII and WHS

25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, ng/mL
Ptrend*
Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4
NHS/NHSII      
    Quartile values <20.6 20.6-<26.5 26.5-<32.5 ≥32.5  
    n, case/control 47/117 39/120 39/119 34/120  
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.83 (0.51-1.35) 0.79 (0.48-1.32) 0.69 (0.40-1.18) 0.17 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.93 (0.56-1.55) 0.93 (0.53-1.62) 0.84 (0.47-1.52) 0.55 
WHS      
    Quartile values <17.4 17.4-<22.0 22.0-<27.7 ≥27.7  
    n, case/control 11/30 13/31 27/30 10/31  
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.37 (0.53-3.53) 2.79 (1.04-7.51) 1.02 (0.36-2.90) 0.97 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.45 (0.52-4.05) 3.04 (1.06-8.78) 0.88 (0.28-2.82) 0.98 
Combined      
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.89 (0.58-1.37) 1.06 (0.68-1.66) 0.73 (0.45-1.17) 0.23 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.97 (0.61-1.52) 1.20 (0.75-1.93) 0.83 (0.49-1.39) 0.57 
      

 
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations, pg/mL
 
   Ptrend*
 

 
Quartile 1
 
Quartile 2
 
Quartile 3
 
Quartile 4
 

 
NHS/NHSII      
    Quartile values <31.2 31.2-<36.1 36.1-<42.3 ≥42.3  
    n, case/control 36/118 42/119 38/119 44/120  
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.17 (0.70-1.96) 1.05 (0.62-1.77) 1.20 (0.72-2.02) 0.91 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.26 (0.73-2.19) 1.16 (0.67-2.01) 1.33 (0.77-2.29) 0.75 
WHS      
    Quartile values <24.8 24.8-<30.8 30.8-<37.5 ≥37.5  
    n, case/control 16/29 14/31 22/29 10/31  
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.84 (0.34-2.05) 1.32 (0.59-2.96) 0.50 (0.18-1.38) 0.32 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.84 (0.31-2.27) 1.47 (0.60-3.59) 0.50 (0.15-1.67) 0.41 
Combined      
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.06 (0.68-1.66) 1.13 (0.73-1.74) 1.02 (0.65-1.60) 0.55 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.15 (0.71-1.85) 1.25 (0.79-1.97) 1.14 (0.70-1.85) 0.93 
25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, ng/mL
Ptrend*
Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4
NHS/NHSII      
    Quartile values <20.6 20.6-<26.5 26.5-<32.5 ≥32.5  
    n, case/control 47/117 39/120 39/119 34/120  
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.83 (0.51-1.35) 0.79 (0.48-1.32) 0.69 (0.40-1.18) 0.17 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.93 (0.56-1.55) 0.93 (0.53-1.62) 0.84 (0.47-1.52) 0.55 
WHS      
    Quartile values <17.4 17.4-<22.0 22.0-<27.7 ≥27.7  
    n, case/control 11/30 13/31 27/30 10/31  
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.37 (0.53-3.53) 2.79 (1.04-7.51) 1.02 (0.36-2.90) 0.97 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.45 (0.52-4.05) 3.04 (1.06-8.78) 0.88 (0.28-2.82) 0.98 
Combined      
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.89 (0.58-1.37) 1.06 (0.68-1.66) 0.73 (0.45-1.17) 0.23 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.97 (0.61-1.52) 1.20 (0.75-1.93) 0.83 (0.49-1.39) 0.57 
      

 
1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations, pg/mL
 
   Ptrend*
 

 
Quartile 1
 
Quartile 2
 
Quartile 3
 
Quartile 4
 

 
NHS/NHSII      
    Quartile values <31.2 31.2-<36.1 36.1-<42.3 ≥42.3  
    n, case/control 36/118 42/119 38/119 44/120  
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.17 (0.70-1.96) 1.05 (0.62-1.77) 1.20 (0.72-2.02) 0.91 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.26 (0.73-2.19) 1.16 (0.67-2.01) 1.33 (0.77-2.29) 0.75 
WHS      
    Quartile values <24.8 24.8-<30.8 30.8-<37.5 ≥37.5  
    n, case/control 16/29 14/31 22/29 10/31  
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.84 (0.34-2.05) 1.32 (0.59-2.96) 0.50 (0.18-1.38) 0.32 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 0.84 (0.31-2.27) 1.47 (0.60-3.59) 0.50 (0.15-1.67) 0.41 
Combined      
    Unadjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.06 (0.68-1.66) 1.13 (0.73-1.74) 1.02 (0.65-1.60) 0.55 
    Adjusted 1.0 (reference) 1.15 (0.71-1.85) 1.25 (0.79-1.97) 1.14 (0.70-1.85) 0.93 
*

Determined using study-specific probit rankings of vitamin D concentrations.

Adjusted for ever use of postmenopausal hormones, BMI at blood draw, parity, lactose intake, duration of oral contraceptive use, season of blood draw, and the interaction between study with both duration of oral contraceptive use and BMI at blood draw.

Pheterogeneity comparing NHS/NHSII versus WHS is 0.66 for 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 0.40 for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D.

We observed a significant inverse association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of ovarian cancer among women with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (Ptrend = 0.04 and Pheterogeneity = 0.06, versus BMI <25 kg/m2; Table 3). Among overweight and obese women, the RR comparing the top versus bottom quartile of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.16-0.93), whereas among lean women, no association was observed (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.61-2.23). The association with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D did not differ by BMI (>25 kg/m2: RR, 0.95; ≤25 kg/m2: RR, 1.08). The associations for 25-hydroxy and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D did not differ by age at diagnosis, multivitamin use, menopausal status at blood collection or diagnosis, or season of blood collection (data not shown).

Table 3.

RRs (95% CIs) of ovarian cancer stratified by BMI at blood, age at diagnosis, and multivitamin use for plasma vitamin D concentrations among women in NHS/NHSII and WHS combined

n, case/control25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, ng/mL
Ptrend*Pheterogeneity
Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4
BMI at blood, kg/m2        
    <25 136/356 1.0 (reference) 1.23 (0.64-2.39) 1.60 (0.86-2.97) 1.17 (0.61-2.23) 0.71 0.06 
    ≥25 84/242 1.0 (reference) 0.71 (0.36-1.38) 0.76 (0.37-1.54) 0.39 (0.16-0.93) 0.04  
Age at diagnosis/reference date, y        
    <55 56/150 1.0 (reference) 1.07 (0.44-2.62) 1.33 (0.54-3.30) 0.98 (0.38-2.54) 0.93 0.69 
    ≥55 164/448 1.0 (reference) 0.85 (0.49-1.45) 1.06 (0.63-1.78) 0.70 (0.40-1.24) 0.36  
Multivitamin use        
    Never user 55/178 1.0 (reference) 1.13 (0.48-2.66) 1.14 (0.50-2.58) 0.48 (0.18-1.27) 0.34 0.61 
    Current/past user 165/420 1.0 (reference) 0.82 (0.47-1.42) 1.09 (0.63-1.87) 0.86 (0.48-1.53) 0.63  
        

 
n, case/control 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations, ng/mL
 
   Ptrend*
 
Pheterogeneity
 

 

 
Quartile 1
 
Quartile 2
 
Quartile 3
 
Quartile 4
 

 

 
BMI at blood, kg/m2        
    <25 136/356 1.0 (reference) 0.89 (0.48-1.66) 1.33 (0.72-2.47) 1.08 (0.59-1.99) 0.78 0.89 
    ≥25 86/240 1.0 (reference) 1.40 (0.70-2.81) 1.00 (0.50-1.98) 0.95 (0.45-2.04) 0.69  
Age at diagnosis/reference date, y        
    <55 58/149 1.0 (reference) 0.53 (0.21-1.33) 1.21 (0.52-2.83) 0.92 (0.37-2.26) >0.99 0.80 
    ≥55 164/447 1.0 (reference) 1.36 (0.79-2.35) 1.21 (0.70-2.10) 1.13 (0.64-1.97) 0.63  
Multivitamin use        
    Never user 55/178 1.0 (reference) 2.16 (0.84-5.57) 1.85 (0.73-4.70) 1.22 (0.44-3.39) 0.95 0.78 
    Current/past user 167/418 1.0 (reference) 0.85 (0.50-1.45) 1.07 (0.63-1.81) 1.01 (0.59-1.72) 0.64  
n, case/control25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, ng/mL
Ptrend*Pheterogeneity
Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4
BMI at blood, kg/m2        
    <25 136/356 1.0 (reference) 1.23 (0.64-2.39) 1.60 (0.86-2.97) 1.17 (0.61-2.23) 0.71 0.06 
    ≥25 84/242 1.0 (reference) 0.71 (0.36-1.38) 0.76 (0.37-1.54) 0.39 (0.16-0.93) 0.04  
Age at diagnosis/reference date, y        
    <55 56/150 1.0 (reference) 1.07 (0.44-2.62) 1.33 (0.54-3.30) 0.98 (0.38-2.54) 0.93 0.69 
    ≥55 164/448 1.0 (reference) 0.85 (0.49-1.45) 1.06 (0.63-1.78) 0.70 (0.40-1.24) 0.36  
Multivitamin use        
    Never user 55/178 1.0 (reference) 1.13 (0.48-2.66) 1.14 (0.50-2.58) 0.48 (0.18-1.27) 0.34 0.61 
    Current/past user 165/420 1.0 (reference) 0.82 (0.47-1.42) 1.09 (0.63-1.87) 0.86 (0.48-1.53) 0.63  
        

 
n, case/control 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations, ng/mL
 
   Ptrend*
 
Pheterogeneity
 

 

 
Quartile 1
 
Quartile 2
 
Quartile 3
 
Quartile 4
 

 

 
BMI at blood, kg/m2        
    <25 136/356 1.0 (reference) 0.89 (0.48-1.66) 1.33 (0.72-2.47) 1.08 (0.59-1.99) 0.78 0.89 
    ≥25 86/240 1.0 (reference) 1.40 (0.70-2.81) 1.00 (0.50-1.98) 0.95 (0.45-2.04) 0.69  
Age at diagnosis/reference date, y        
    <55 58/149 1.0 (reference) 0.53 (0.21-1.33) 1.21 (0.52-2.83) 0.92 (0.37-2.26) >0.99 0.80 
    ≥55 164/447 1.0 (reference) 1.36 (0.79-2.35) 1.21 (0.70-2.10) 1.13 (0.64-1.97) 0.63  
Multivitamin use        
    Never user 55/178 1.0 (reference) 2.16 (0.84-5.57) 1.85 (0.73-4.70) 1.22 (0.44-3.39) 0.95 0.78 
    Current/past user 167/418 1.0 (reference) 0.85 (0.50-1.45) 1.07 (0.63-1.81) 1.01 (0.59-1.72) 0.64  

NOTE: Data were adjusted for ever use of postmenopausal hormones, BMI at blood draw, parity, lactose intake, duration of oral contraceptive use, season of blood draw, the interaction between study with both duration of oral contraceptive use and BMI at blood draw, and matching factors, including age at blood draw, fasting status, time of blood draw, month of blood draw, menopausal status at baseline and diagnosis, recent postmenopausal hormone use before blood draw, and study.

*

Determined using study-specific probit rankings of vitamin D concentrations.

Pheterogeneity between stratification groups compares the slope of the probit rankings of vitamin D levels.

After excluding cases diagnosed within 2 years of blood collection, women with adequate (≥32 ng/mL; ref. 37) versus inadequate 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels had a modestly decreased risk of ovarian cancer (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43-1.05); adequate vitamin D levels also were associated with a reduced risk of serous tumors (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.39-1.05; Table 4). The association seemed to be stronger for women who were overweight or obese (RR, 0.47).

Table 4.

RRs (95% CIs) of ovarian cancer for women with adequate versus inadequate plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations among women in NHS/NHSII and WHS combined

Inadequate levels (<32 ng/mL)
Adequate levels (≥32 ng/mL)
n, cases/controlRRn, cases/controlRR (95% CI)
All women 177/438 1.0 (reference) 45/160 0.75 (0.49-1.13) 
Excluding cases diagnosed <2 y after blood 143/438 1.0 (reference) 35/160 0.67 (0.43-1.05) 
Invasive cases 159/438 1.0 (reference) 40/160 0.71 (0.47-1.08) 
Serous cases 112/438 1.0 (reference) 27/160 0.64 (0.39-1.05) 
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m* 77/192 1.0 (reference) 9/50 0.47 (0.22-1.03) 
Inadequate levels (<32 ng/mL)
Adequate levels (≥32 ng/mL)
n, cases/controlRRn, cases/controlRR (95% CI)
All women 177/438 1.0 (reference) 45/160 0.75 (0.49-1.13) 
Excluding cases diagnosed <2 y after blood 143/438 1.0 (reference) 35/160 0.67 (0.43-1.05) 
Invasive cases 159/438 1.0 (reference) 40/160 0.71 (0.47-1.08) 
Serous cases 112/438 1.0 (reference) 27/160 0.64 (0.39-1.05) 
BMI ≥ 25 kg/m* 77/192 1.0 (reference) 9/50 0.47 (0.22-1.03) 

NOTE: Data were adjusted for ever use of postmenopausal hormones, BMI at blood draw, parity, lactose intake, duration of oral contraceptive use, season of blood draw, the interaction between study with both duration of oral contraceptive use and BMI at blood draw, and matching factors, including age at blood draw, fasting status, time of blood draw, month of blood draw, menopausal status at baseline and diagnosis, recent postmenopausal hormone use before blood draw, and study.

*

Pinteraction for BMI is 0.21 compared with BMI <25 kg/m2.

To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study of the association between plasma 25-hydroxy and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer. Our overall results suggest that increasing plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are not associated with ovarian cancer risk, although we observed an inverse association among the subgroup of overweight/obese women. Women with inadequate 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may have a modestly increased risk of serous ovarian cancer, but the results were not significant. We did not observe any clear association between 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer in this population.

Our results generally are consistent with those observed in ecologic studies of UV-B exposure and ovarian cancer mortality (17-21), as well as with similar prospective studies of breast (39) and colon (40) cancers. For both of these cancer types and in our data, only 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were suggestively associated with a decreased risk, whereas no association was observed for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. This pattern suggests that 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may be a better reflection of overall vitamin D exposure than 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels (39), although 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D is the active metabolite that binds to the vitamin D receptor (41). Interestingly, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations are tightly regulated, whereas 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are more responsive to sun exposure or intake of vitamin D rich foods or supplements (41). Recent data suggest that 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels may have independent effects at various target tissues due to extrarenal conversion to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, including in ovarian tissue (6, 7). Ovarian cancer cells and tissue contain measurable levels of 1α-hydroxylase and 24-hydroxlase (4, 7, 15), which can convert 25-hydroxyvitamin D to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. It is possible that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D formed through this process only acts intracellularly or as an autocrine/paracrine factor, and therefore is not measured in circulating levels (42). If the proportion of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D from this latter mechanism is high, it is reasonable to then assume that circulating levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D may better reflect exposure at the tissue level. Given that the correlation between the two analytes was relatively low in our study (Spearman r = 0.29), it is possible that only 25-hydroxyvitamin D may have an effect on ovarian cancer risk. However, this hypothesis should be explored in more detail in other studies.

Experimental data support a role of vitamin D analytes in ovarian cancer risk. A number of studies have observed that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth (5, 6, 11, 13-16) and increases apoptosis (12). High 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels also can increase vitamin D receptor expression in ovarian cancer cell lines (12). One study reported that 25-hydroxyvitamin D slightly increased cell growth of ovarian cancer cells; however, this effect was reduced on exposure to higher concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (15).

Interestingly, we observed that the association between vitamin D and ovarian cancer risk was stronger among overweight and obese women. The amount of adipose tissue in humans is inversely related to circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, likely due to uptake of vitamin D by fat cells (43-46). It is possible that this may lead to more bioavailable vitamin D at the tissue level or that circulating levels are better reflective of long-term tissue exposure in this subpopulation. A study of rats fed vitamin D indicated that adipose tissue levels of vitamin D increased significantly and that vitamin D was slowly released from adipose tissue, particularly during fasting (47). This suggests that adipose tissue may be an important factor in determining long-term vitamin D status (47). More research is needed to better understand these potential interrelationships.

Our study has several limitations and strengths. One limitation is that the NHS/NHSII and WHS collected different sample types (heparin and citrate plasma, respectively). In addition, citrate plasma can dilute specimens, thus lowering the measured concentrations (35), although the levels were similar between the two studies when adjusting for the dilution factor. Vitamin D levels also vary across the year; therefore, we matched cases and controls on date of the blood draw and also examined season-specific quartile cutoff points. Although there may be some general measurement error in our assay of vitamin D levels, using plasma levels provides an integrated measure of dietary intake, sunlight exposure, and genetic variability for vitamin D exposure. In addition, we only had one blood sample per person, which may not reflect exposure over the 14 years of follow-up. However, the intraclass correlation over 3 years was 0.70 for 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 0.50 for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (48), suggesting that one sample is fairly representative at least over a 3-year period. The strength of this study was its prospective nature, with blood samples being collected before disease diagnosis. We also had >200 ovarian cancer cases, thus providing reasonable power to detect an association among all women and for serous tumors, but not for other ovarian cancer subtypes.

Overall, we observed no clear association of plasma vitamin D levels and ovarian cancer risk; however, our study is suggestive that inadequate levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D may be associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer of the serous subtype in overweight/obese women. These findings should be evaluated in future prospective studies because, if an association exists, increasing vitamin D intake/production could provide a simple and important mechanism for preventing ovarian cancer.

Grant support: NIH grants P01 CA87969, CA49449, CA67262, CA50385, P50 CA105009, HL-43851, and CA-47988.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank the women in the NHS, NHSII, and WHS studies for their valuable participation; Marilyn Chown and Jeanne Sparrow for data management support; and Dr. Walter C. Willett for helpful comments on the manuscript.

1
Giovannucci E. The epidemiology of vitamin D and cancer incidence and mortality: a review (United States).
Cancer Causes Control
2005
;
16
:
83
–95.
2
Panda DK, Miao D, Tremblay ML, et al. Targeted ablation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D 1α-hydroxylase enzyme: evidence for skeletal, reproductive, and immune dysfunction.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2001
;
98
:
7498
–503.
3
Yoshizawa T, Handa Y, Uematsu Y, et al. Mice lacking the vitamin D receptor exhibit impaired bone formation, uterine hypoplasia and growth retardation after weaning.
Nat Genet
1997
;
16
:
391
–6.
4
Anderson MG, Nakane M, Ruan X, Kroeger PE, Wu-Wong JR. Expression of VDR and CYP24A1 mRNA in human tumors.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol
2006
;
57
:
234
–40.
5
Saunders DE, Christensen C, Lawrence WD, et al. Receptors for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in gynecologic neoplasms.
Gynecol Oncol
1992
;
44
:
131
–6.
6
Ahonen MH, Zhuang YH, Aine R, Ylikomi T, Tuohimaa P. Androgen receptor and vitamin D receptor in human ovarian cancer: growth stimulation and inhibition by ligands.
Int J Cancer
2000
;
86
:
40
–6.
7
Friedrich M, Rafi L, Mitschele T, Tilgen W, Schmidt W, Reichrath J. Analysis of the vitamin D system in cervical carcinomas, breast cancer and ovarian cancer.
Recent Results Cancer Res
2003
;
164
:
239
–46.
8
Villena-Heinsen C, Meyberg R, Axt-Fliedner R, Reitnauer K, Reichrath J, Friedrich M. Immunohistochemical analysis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D3-receptors, estrogen and progesterone receptors and Ki-67 in ovarian carcinoma.
Anticancer Res
2002
;
22
:
2261
–7.
9
Dokoh S, Donaldson CA, Marion SL, Pike JW, Haussler MR. The ovary: a target organ for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.
Endocrinology
1983
;
112
:
200
–6.
10
Kemmis CM, Salvador SM, Smith KM, Welsh J. Human mammary epithelial cells express CYP27B1 and are growth inhibited by 25-hydroxyvitamin D-3, the major circulating form of vitamin D-3.
J Nutr
2006
;
136
:
887
–92.
11
Saunders DE, Christensen C, Williams JR, et al. Inhibition of breast and ovarian carcinoma cell growth by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 combined with retinoic acid or dexamethasone.
Anticancer Drugs
1995
;
6
:
562
–9.
12
Jiang F, Bao J, Li P, Nicosia SV, Bai W. Induction of ovarian cancer cell apoptosis by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 through the down-regulation of telomerase.
J Biol Chem
2004
;
279
:
53213
–21.
13
Jiang F, Li P, Fornace AJ, Jr., Nicosia SV, Bai W. G2/M arrest by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in ovarian cancer cells mediated through the induction of GADD45 via an exonic enhancer.
J Biol Chem
2003
;
278
:
48030
–40.
14
Li P, Li C, Zhao X, Zhang X, Nicosia SV, Bai W. p27(Kip1) stabilization and G(1) arrest by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) in ovarian cancer cells mediated through down-regulation of cyclin E/cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and Skp1-Cullin-F-box protein/Skp2 ubiquitin ligase.
J Biol Chem
2004
;
279
:
25260
–7.
15
Miettinen S, Ahonen MH, Lou YR, et al. Role of 24-hydroxylase in vitamin D3 growth response of OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cells.
Int J Cancer
2004
;
108
:
367
–73.
16
Zhang X, Jiang F, Li P, et al. Growth suppression of ovarian cancer xenografts in nude mice by vitamin D analogue EB1089.
Clin Cancer Res
2005
;
11
:
323
–8.
17
Freedman DM, Dosemeci M, McGlynn K. Sunlight and mortality from breast, ovarian, colon, prostate, and non-melanoma skin cancer: a composite death certificate based case-control study.
Occup Environ Med
2002
;
59
:
257
–62.
18
Garland CF, Garland FC, Gorham ED, et al. The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention.
Am J Public Health
2006
;
96
:
252
–61.
19
Grant WB. An estimate of premature cancer mortality in the U.S. due to inadequate doses of solar ultraviolet-B radiation.
Cancer
2002
;
94
:
1867
–75.
20
Grant WB. Ecologic studies of solar UV-B radiation and cancer mortality rates.
Recent Results Cancer Res
2003
;
164
:
371
–7.
21
Lefkowitz ES, Garland CF. Sunlight, vitamin D, and ovarian cancer mortality rates in US women.
Int J Epidemiol
1994
;
23
:
1133
–6.
22
Bidoli E, La Vecchia C, Talamini R, et al. Micronutrients and ovarian cancer: a case-control study in Italy.
Ann Oncol
2001
;
12
:
1589
–93.
23
Salazar-Martinez E, Lazcano-Ponce EC, Gonzalez Lira-Lira G, Escudero-De los Rios P, Hernandez-Avila M. Nutritional determinants of epithelial ovarian cancer risk: a case-control study in Mexico.
Oncology
2002
;
63
:
151
–7.
24
Genkinger JM, Hunter DJ, Spiegelman D, et al. Dairy products and ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2006
;
15
:
364
–72.
25
Goodman MT, Wu AH, Tung KH, et al. Association of dairy products, lactose, and calcium with the risk of ovarian cancer.
Am J Epidemiol
2002
;
156
:
148
–57.
26
Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A. Milk, milk products and lactose intake and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.
Int J Cancer
2006
;
118
:
431
–41.
27
Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Manson JE, et al. Plasma sex steroid hormone levels and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1998
;
90
:
1292
–9.
28
Tworoger SS, Sluss P, Hankinson SE. Association between plasma prolactin concentrations and risk of breast cancer among predominately premenopausal women.
Cancer Res
2006
;
66
:
2476
–82.
29
Cook NR, Lee IM, Gaziano JM, et al. Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer. The Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA
2005
;
294
:
47
–55.
30
Lee IM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, et al. Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. The Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA
2005
;
294
:
56
–65.
31
Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women.
N Engl J Med
2005
;
352
:
1293
–304.
32
Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Michaud DS, et al. Plasma prolactin levels and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1999
;
91
:
629
–34.
33
Hollis BW. Quantitation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D by radioimmunoassay using radioiodinated tracers.
Methods Enzymol
1997
;
282
:
174
–86.
34
Rosner B. Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure.
Technometrics
1983
;
25
:
165
–72.
35
Palmer-Toy DE, Szczepiorkowski ZM, Shih V, Van Cott EM. Compatibility of the Abbott IMx homocysteine assay with citrate-anticoagulated plasma and stability of homocysteine in citrated whole blood.
Clin Chem
2001
;
47
:
1704
–7.
36
Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. Belmont: Wadsworth; 1993.
37
Hollis BW. Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels indicative of vitamin D sufficiency: implications for establishing a new effective dietary intake recommendation for vitamin D.
J Nutr
2005
;
135
:
317
–22.
38
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
39
Bertone-Johnson ER, Chen WY, Holick MF, et al. Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and risk of breast cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
;
14
:
1991
–7.
40
Feskanich D, Ma J, Fuchs CS, et al. Plasma vitamin D metabolites and risk of colorectal cancer in women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2004
;
13
:
1502
–8.
41
Reichel H, Koeffler HP, Norman AW. The role of the vitamin D endocrine system in health and disease.
N Engl J Med
1989
;
320
:
980
–91.
42
Welsh J, Wietzke JA, Zinser GM, Byrne B, Smith K, Narvaez CJ. Vitamin D-3 receptor as a target for breast cancer prevention.
J Nutr
2003
;
133
:
2425
–33S.
43
Arunabh S, Pollack S, Yeh J, Aloia JF. Body fat content and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in healthy women.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2003
;
88
:
157
–61.
44
Gomez JM, Maravall FJ, Gomez N, Navarro MA, Casamitjana R, Soler J. Relationship between 25-(OH) D3, the IGF-I system, leptin, anthropometric and body composition variables in a healthy, randomly selected population.
Horm Metab Res
2004
;
36
:
48
–53.
45
Lucas JA, Bolland MJ, Grey AB, et al. Determinants of vitamin D status in older women living in a subtropical climate.
Osteoporos Int
2005
;
16
:
1641
–8.
46
Snijder MB, van Dam RM, Visser M, et al. Adiposity in relation to vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone levels: a population-based study in older men and women.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2005
;
90
:
4119
–23.
47
Brouwer DA, van Beek J, Ferwerda H, et al. Rat adipose tissue rapidly accumulates and slowly releases an orally-administered high vitamin D dose.
Br J Nutr
1998
;
79
:
527
–32.
48
Holick MF. Vitamin D: importance in the prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis.
Am J Clin Nutr
2004
;
79
:
362
–71.