Sunscreens are an adjunct to clothing and other physical means of solar UV radiation protection. Earlier sunscreens filtered mostly the high-energy UVB wavelengths (290-320 nm), but more recent broad-spectrum products can effectively absorb the longer UVA wavelengths (320-400 nm) as well (1-3). Acute UVB exposure is responsible for erythema (redness of the skin) and sunburn, but both UVA and UVB are responsible for suppression of skin immunity and for skin carcinogenesis in the long term so that broad-spectrum sunscreen use is required for skin cancer prevention (2-4).

The sun protection factor is the measure of protection of a sunscreen (weighted for UVB wavelengths) when it is applied uniformly to the skin at a thickness of 2 mg/cm2. The sun protection factor is a ratio of the protected to unprotected minimal erythemal dose and is nonlinear, such that sun protection factors SPF-15 and SPF-45 sunscreens filter 93% and 98% of UVB radiation, respectively (5). In a recent review of the safety of current UV filters and sunscreen products, Nash (6) pointed out that nearly all UV filters in currently marketed sunscreens have been evaluated for safety and efficacy in some capacity. Indeed most concerns about safety, such as photoactivation of sunscreen components, endocrine disruption, vitamin D deficiency, or increased risk of melanoma among sunscreen users remain unsupported by human evidence and more often relate to the way sunscreens are used than to concerns about their chemical components or spectral coverage (2, 6-9). For instance, sunscreens can be used by sunbathers as a means to intentionally increase their sun exposure (10), thus removing the context for standard safety assurance (as with the “misuse” of any product).

To properly evaluate long-term sunscreen effectiveness in humans, evidence from randomized controlled trials is required, principally because observational studies of sunscreen use and skin cancer suffer from intractable confounding: the determinants of sunscreen use and of skin cancer, e.g., susceptibility to sunburn, high sun exposure (occupational/recreational), past history of skin cancer, are inseparable. Case control studies also lack the ability to relate timing of past sunscreen use to the development of skin cancers, whether melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), or squamous cell carcinomas. Moreover, sunscreens used by adults in 20th century observational studies have been superseded many times over so results of such studies will be largely irrelevant to 21st century skin cancer experiences (11). Likely, heterogeneity in the causal pathways of melanoma (12) and BCC (13) and the importance of childhood versus adult sun exposure in their development (14, 15) may further obscure observed relationships between these skin cancers and sunscreen use.

Thus, the strongest available evidence that sunscreen use is a safe and effective approach to prevention of skin cancer comes from the results of a 4.5-year community-based randomized controlled trial among 1,621 adult residents of Nambour, a subtropical Australian township. In comparison with people randomized to using sunscreen at their discretion if at all, people randomized to daily use of a broad-spectrum SPF15+ sunscreen showed a 40% reduction in squamous cell carcinoma tumors at the conclusion of the trial (16). During the trial, 75% of participants assigned to daily sunscreen use applied sunscreen to their head, neck, arms, and hands at least 3 or 4 d/wk, and a similar percentage of those not assigned to the sunscreen group either did not apply sunscreen or applied it no more than 1 or 2 d/wk. Although there was no effect on BCC incidence during the trial period, there was a trend of increasing intervals between BCCs among daily compared with discretionary sunscreen users who developed multiple BCCs (17). Eight years after cessation of the 4.5-year sunscreen intervention, participants who had been randomized to daily sunscreen use continued to show a 40% decrease in squamous cell carcinoma incidence (18). Their BCC incidence was also 25% lower in the last 4 years of posttrial follow-up, although not significantly so. Although most of the prolonged effectiveness could be attributed to the allocated daily sunscreen application during the trial, the prolongation of effect was enhanced by a more frequent use of sunscreen persisting in the intervention group more than in the control group in the follow-up period (25% versus 18%; ref. 19).

Currently, there is no such evidence to answer the question of the relationship between sunscreen use and the incidence of cutaneous melanoma. Trial data have shown however that incidence of benign melanocytic nevi, the strongest markers of melanoma risk, is reduced in children by sunscreen use (20). Furthermore in several short-term trials (21-23), regular sunscreen use has been shown to reduce the occurrence of solar keratoses, the benign squamous cell tumors that strongly determine not only risk of squamous cell carcinoma but also of BCC (24) and melanoma (12).

Adverse effects observed in the above trials included development of allergic contact dermatitis, photoallergic and phototoxic effects, stinging of the eyes, and interference with perspiration (16, 25). Again, there is no convincing evidence that long-term use of sunscreen causes either unsafe reduction in vitamin D levels or increased risk of melanoma (11, 26-29).

In conclusion, broad-spectrum sunscreens are an important part of skin cancer prevention, but not the whole solution. When used as an adjunct to protect skin from harmful UV exposure, broad-spectrum sunscreen can prevent occurrence of squamous cell skin cancers safely and effectively. Existing data from randomized controlled trials evaluating sunscreen use that show reduction in solar keratoses (markers of increased risk of melanoma and BCC), a suggestion of long-term BCC reduction in adults and in children, decreases in melanocytic nevi (melanoma risk-markers/precursors) are not inconsistent with the ultimate preventability of BCC and melanoma by sunscreen as well. Currently, however, evidence of effective prevention of BCC and melanoma by broad-spectrum sunscreen use remains insufficient.

Conflict of Interest: Adele C. Green currently receives funds from L'Oreal to run a research project and has research staff paid for by that company. She is also the co-author of several papers referred to in this article.

1
Bissonnette R, Allas S, Moyal D, Provost N. Comparison of UVA protection afforded by high sun protection factor sunscreens.
J Am Acad Dermatol
2000
;
43
:
1036
.
2
Moloney FJ, Collins S, Murphy GM. Sunscreens: safety, efficacy and appropriate use.
Am J Clin Dermatol
2002
;
3
:
185
.
3
Lowe NJ. An overview of ultraviolet radiation, sunscreens, and photo-induced dermatoses.
Dermatol Clin
2006
;
24
:
9
.
4
Fourtanier A, Bernerd F, Bouillon L, Marrot L, MoyalD, Seité S. Protection of skin biological targets by different types of sunscreens.
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed
2006
;
22
:
22
–32.
5
Stern RS. Clinical practice. Treatment of photoaging.
N Engl J Med
2004
;
350
:
1526
.
6
Nash JF. Human safety and efficacy of ultraviolet filters and sunscreen products.
Dermatol Clin
2006
;
24
:
35
–51.
7
McLean DI, Gallagher R. Sunscreens. Use and misuse.
Dermatol Clin
1998
;
16
:
219
.
8
Diffey BL. Sunscreens and UVA protection: a major issue of minor importance.
Photochem Photobiol
2001
;
74
:
61
–3.
9
Dupuy A, Dunant A, Grob J-J. Réseau d'Epidémiologie en Dermatologie. Randomized controlled trial testing the impact of high-protection sunscreens on sun-exposure behavior.
Arch Dermatol
2005
;
141
:
950
–6.
10
Autier P, Boniol M, Dore JF. Sunscreen use and increased duration of intentional sun exposure: Still a burning issue.
Int J Cancer
2007
;
121
:
1
–5.
11
Diffey BL. Sunscreens and melanoma: the future looks bright.
Br J Dermatol
2005
;
153
:
378
–81.
12
Whiteman DC, Stickley M, Watt P, Hughes MC, Green AC. Melanomas of the head and trunk have different associations with chronic and intermittent patterns of sun exposure.
J Clin Oncol
2006
;
24
:
3172
–7.
13
Bastiaens MT, Hoefnagel JJ, Bruijn JA,Westendorp RG, Vermeer BJ, Bouwes Bavinck JN. Differences in age, site distribution, and sex between nodular and superficial basal cell carcinoma indicate different types of tumours.
J Invest Dermatol
1998
;
110
:
880
–4.
14
Whiteman DC, Whiteman CA, Green AC. Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies.
Cancer Causes Control
2001
;
12
:
69
–82.
15
Rosenstein BS, Phelps RG, Weinstock MA, Bernstein JL, Gordon ML, Rudikoff D. p53 mutations in basal cell carcinomas arising in routine users of sunscreens.
Photochem Photobiol
1999
;
70
:
798
–806.
16
Green A, Williams G, Neale R, et al. Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet
1999
;
354
:
723
–9. Erratum in: Lancet 1999;354:1038.
17
Pandeya N, Purdie D, Green AC, Williams G. Repeated occurrences of basal cell carcinoma of the skin and multi-failure survival analysis: follow-up data from the Nambour Skin Cancer Prevention Trial.
Am J Epidemiol
2005
;
161
:
748
–54.
18
van der Pols JC, Williams GM, Pandeya N, Logan V, Green AC. Prolonged prevention of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin with regular sunscreen use.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2006
;
15
:
2546
–8.
19
van der Pols JC, Williams GM, Neale RE, Clavarino A, Green AC. Long-term increase in sunscreen use in an Australian community after a skin cancer prevention trial.
Prev Med
2006
;
42
:
171
–6.
20
Gallagher RP, Rivers JK, Lee TK, Bajdik CD, McLean DI, Coldman AJ. Broad-spectrum sunscreen use and the development of new nevi in white children: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA
2000
;
283
:
2955
–60.
21
Thompson SC, Jolley D, Marks R. Reduction of solar keratoses by regular sunscreen use.
N Engl J Med
1993
;
329
:
1147
–51.
22
Naylor MF, Boyd FA, Smith DW, Cameron GS, Hubbard D, Neldner KH. High sun protection factor sunscreens in the suppression of actinic neoplasia.
Arch Dermatol
1995
;
131
:
170
–5.
23
Darlington S, Williams G, Neale R, Frost C, Green A. A randomised controlled trial to assess sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in the prevention of solar keratoses.
Arch Dermatol
2003
;
139
:
451
–5.
24
Green A, Battistutta D, Hart V, Leslie D, Weedon D. Nambour Study Group. Skin cancer in a subtropical Australian population: incidence and lack of association with occupation.
Am J Epidemiol
1996
;
144
:
1034
–40.
25
Foley P, Nixon R, Marks R, Frowen K, Thompson S. The frequency of reactions to sunscreens: results of a longitudinal population-based study on the regular use of sunscreens in Australia.
Br J Dermatol
1993
;
128
:
512
–8.
26
Marks R, Foley PA, Jolley D, Knight KR, Harrison J, Thompson SC. The effect of regular sunscreen use on vitamin D levels in an Australian population. Results of a randomized controlled trial.
Arch Dermatol
1995
;
131
:
415
–21.
27
Farrerons J, Barnadas M, Rodriguez J, et al. Clinically prescribed sunscreen (sun protection factor 15) does not decrease serum vitamin D concentration sufficiently either to induce changes in parathyroid function or in metabolic markers.
Br J Dermatol
1998
;
139
:
422
–7.
28
Eide MJ, Weinstock MA. Public health challenges in sun protection.
Dermatol Clin
2006
;
24
:
119
–24.
29
Francis SO, Mahlberg MJ, Johnson KR, Ming ME, Dellavalle RP. Melanoma chemoprevention.
J Am Acad Dermatol
2006
;
55
:
849
–61.