Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common malignancy in southern China and Southeast Asia. Genetic susceptibility is a major factor in determining the individual risk of NPC in these areas. To test the association between NPC and variants in Toll-like receptor 10 (TLR10), we conducted a hospital-based case-control study in a Cantonese-speaking population in Guangdong province. Seven single nucleotide polymorphisms in TLR10, selected with a tagging algorithm, were genotyped. When assessing each unique haplotype compared with the most common haplotype, “GAGTGAA,” with the expectation-maximization algorithm in Haplo.stats, the risk of developing NPC was significantly elevated among men who carried the haplotype “GCGTGGC” (P = 0.005). After adjusting for age, gender, and VCA-IgA antibody titers, this association was more significant (P = 0.0007). To further assess the overall differences of haplotype frequency profiles between cases and healthy controls, the global score test, considering all haplotypes and adjusting for age, gender, and VCA-IgA antibody titers, gave a haplo score of 27.52 with P = 0.002. The haplotype specific odds ratio was 2.66 (confidence interval, 1.34-3.82) for GCGTGGC. We concluded that in this Cantonese population–based study, haplotype GCGTGGC with frequency of 11.4% in TLR10 was found to be associated with NPC and this association was statistically significant after adjusting for age, gender, and VCA-IgA antibody titers. It is possible that this is not a causal haplotype for NPC; rather, it is in strong linkage disequilibrium with a causal single nucleotide polymorphism in close proximity. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(5):862–6)

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) occurs sporadically in Western countries, but is endemic in southern China and Southeast Asia, with incidence rates from 15 to 50 per 100,000 (1, 2). Etiologic studies have shown that NPC is a complex disease involving genetic, EBV infection and environmental factors, and potential interactions between these factors (3-6). NPC is more prevalent in Cantonese-speaking Guangdong regions than in other regions of China. Evidence from family, twin, and segregation studies has indicated that genetic susceptibility is a major factor in determining the individual risk of NPC in areas with the highest incidences (7).

Both genetic and environmental factors have been implicated in the etiology of NPC. EBV, a member of the herpes virus family that plays a role in cancers such as Burkitt's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma, has been consistently identified as an important risk factor for NPC, with a dose-response relationship between EBV antibodies and NPC risk (8, 9). Cantonese-style salted fish that contains high levels of nitrosamines have been long been thought to be a risk factor for NPC (10, 11). A recent IARC monograph (2004) has established cigarette smoking as a risk factor for NPC based on consistent findings of increased risk in both high- and low-risk geographic regions for NPC (12). However, in recent years, great progress has been made in genetic research of familial and nonfamilial NPC cases. HLA Bw46 has been shown to be associated with increased risk of NPC (13, 14). Hildesheim et al. (15) reported an association between HLA class I and II alleles (HLA-A*0207 and HLA-B*4601) and extended haplotypes with NPC in a case-control study conducted in Taiwan. Further, a meta-analysis of 13 HLA association studies in southern China done by Goldsmith et al. (16) reported evidence for positive associations between NPC and the HLA alleles A2, B14, and B46 and negative associations for the alleles A11, B13, and B22. Other studies revealed associations between a few metabolic enzyme genes and NPC risk. These genes include Glutathione S-Transferase M1 (17), cytochrome P450 2E1 enzyme (18), and DNA repair genes hOGG1 (codon 326) and XRCC1 (codon 280; ref. 19). Apart from case-control studies, genetic linkage studies are also one of the most common approaches for identification of cancer susceptibility genes (20). A genome-wide search was conducted by our research group on high-risk NPC families from Cantonese-speaking populations in the Pearl River area, Guangdong Province. Both multipoint parametric and nonparametric linkage analyses supported evidence for linkage (21). We mapped a NPC susceptibility locus to chromosome 4p15.1-q12, and this region was further narrowed down from 14.21 to 8.29 cM using linkage disequilibrium mapping with newly collected trio families (22). Since then, we have taken a candidate gene approach for further fine mapping and to identify potentially causal genetic variants in this region.

Recently, we have investigated a few candidate genes on chromosome 4 related to immune response, with a strong focus on the variants in Toll-like receptor (TLR) genes. TLRs play an essential role in initiating the immune response against pathogens and can recognize a wide variety of pathogen-associated molecular patterns from bacteria, viruses, and fungi (23-25). Chronic infection and inflammatory processes related to carcinogenesis are also mediated, in part, through recognition of various stimuli by TLRs (26). Our previous research has detected associations between two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in coding regions (TLR1 130T/C, P = 0.044; TLR6 359T/C, P = 0.024) and NPC,4

4

Submitted for publication.

separately. Because phylogenetic analysis indicates the amino acid sequence of TLR10 is similar to that of TLR1 and TLR6 (27), and TLR1, TLR6, TLR10 are actually in the same chromosome 4p15.1-q12 we have identified, it is important to investigate TLR10 in the same study population. Interestingly, a recent report has shown associations between sequence variants in TLR6, TLR1, and TLR10 and prostate cancer risk and this finding suggested a role of the TLR6-TRL1-TLR10 gene cluster in the development of cancer via inflammation process (28, 29), thus further justifying testing our hypothesis. In this study, we hypothesize that sequence variants in TLR10 that regulate inflammation may modify individual risk to NPC.

Study Population

All subjects were unrelated ethnic Han Chinese from the Cantonese-speaking population in Guangdong Province, China. Cases were recruited consecutively from December 2003 to October 2004 with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of NPC at the Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Of 487 recruited cases, 111 cases (22.79%) had been diagnosed before 2003 and returned to the NPC clinic during the period of December 2003 to October 2004. The remaining 376 cases were incident cases (77.21%). The average age at diagnosis of NPC for all patients was <50 years. Population controls were cancer-free individuals, randomly selected from individuals who attend annual community-based physical examinations during the same time period. The selection criteria for control subjects included no individual history of cancer and matched to NPC cases by age (±5 years), residential region, and the time period for blood sample collection. This study was approved by the Human Ethics Approval Committee, Cancer Center, Sat Yat-sen University.

Variation Screening

We first obtained the TLR10 genetic sequence from the published database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. We located all known exons and untranslated regions of the TLR10 gene, located on chromosome 4p14 using the National Center for Biotechnology Information database. The full-length transcripts are 3,270 bases. The TLR10 gene contains three exons. A standard PCR method routinely used in our laboratory was used for various exons and exon-intron boundary regions of TLR10. The primers for the target region were designed with the web-based software, Primer 3.0. In preliminary tests, we amplified and purified the DNA samples from 24 sporadic NPC cases. These samples included 48 chromosomes, providing a 95% confidence level to detect alleles with frequencies >5% (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Schematic of SNPs discovered in TLR10. Dark gray bar, coding region. The location of 18 SNPs with nucleotide substitutions were shown (seven nonsynonymous SNPs are shown in bracket). TLR10 is located in a single haplotype block. ▴, seven tagging SNPs selected to represent at least 95% of the haplotype information.

Figure 1.

Schematic of SNPs discovered in TLR10. Dark gray bar, coding region. The location of 18 SNPs with nucleotide substitutions were shown (seven nonsynonymous SNPs are shown in bracket). TLR10 is located in a single haplotype block. ▴, seven tagging SNPs selected to represent at least 95% of the haplotype information.

Close modal

Then, the PCR products were sequenced using ABI PRISM Dye Terminator Sequencing kits and loading the samples onto an ABI 377 Automatic Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). We used the Polyphred/phredphrap/consed software package to identified SNP candidates that were confirmed by two independent observers. These SNP positions and individual genotypes were further confirmed by reamplifying and sequencing from the 5′ or 3′ end.

Selection of Haplotype Tagging SNPs

The linkage disequilibrium structure of 18 SNPs in TLR10 was estimated and haplotype tagging SNPs (htSNP) were then defined using the Dynamic Programming Algorithm (30). Twenty-four unrelated individuals were resequenced for screening variants in TLR10, and then HapBlock 3.0 program was done on the genotype data set for Tag SNPs selection. We used one of the dynamic programming algorithms to minimize the total number of tagging SNPs in a region of interest. Haplotype blocks were defined by the empirical linkage disequilibrium measure D′. The threshold for strong linkage disequilibrium was set to be 0.8. The minimum set of SNPs that can distinguish 95% common haplotypes within a block is defined as a set of tagging SNPs (the threshold for common haplotypes frequency is 0.05). Nonsynonymous SNPs located in exon 3 of TLR10 were preselected as tagging SNPs for their potential important biological function. All seven htSNPs were then genotyped in 487 cases and 580 healthy controls (Table 2).

Genotyping Methods

Genotype variations were determined by PCR-based DNA direct sequencing. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of all case and control subjects using the DNAzol kit following the protocol of the manufacturer (Life Technologies, Shanghai, China). A two-step strategy of sequence screening was used in this study. The first step was to find htSNPs in 24 NPC cases, as described above. Second, we genotyped these htSNPs in all 487 NPC cases and 580 Cantonese-speaking controls. PCR amplification was done on the GeneAmp 9700 PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The PCR for amplification refractory mutation system was accomplished with a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 20 ng DNA, 0.2 μmol/L of each primer, 200 μmol/L of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.4 units Hot-Star Taq DNA polymerase with 1× buffer, and 1× Q-solution (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). The reaction was carried out under the following conditions: an initial melting step of 15 minutes at 95°C; followed by 30 cycles at which each one consisted of 30 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 60°C, and 45 seconds at 72°C, respectively; and a final elongation step of 5 minutes at 72°C. Automatic DNA sequencing was conducted on the ABI 377 Automatic Sequencer (Applied Biosystems) using direct PCR products of the samples according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The raw data was collected using ABI PrismTM 377-96 Collection software and analyzed with the Sequencing Analysis software V3.3 on a MAC operating system V9.1, Polyphred/phredphrap/consed software package, DNAStar/Taqman software package and CHROMAS. All genotyping was done blind to case/control status, and blind quality control samples were inserted to validate genotyping. A random sample of 10% of the cases and controls were sequenced twice by different investigators to confirm genotyping and reproducibility was 100%.

Statistical Analysis

For each polymorphism, deviation of genotype frequencies in control subjects from those expected under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using the Pearson χ2 test (Table 2) and pairwise linkage disequilibrium tests for all pairs of sequence variants were done with the Fisher probability test statistic (data not shown). For each SNP polymorphism, genotype frequency differences between cases and controls were tested by conditional logistic regression. All analyses were done using Statistical Analysis System software (version 8.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All statistical tests were two-sided, and a probability level below 0.05 was used as the criterion for a significant difference. Haplotype analyses were conducted using Haplo.stats.5

Haplo.stats is a score test from generalized linear models that tests for associations between haplotypes and disease under the null hypothesis of no haplotype effect without any assumption about mode of inheritance. The algorithm implemented in Haplo.stats is an iterative process of regression substitution by which the posterior probabilities of subject-specific haplotype pairs (generated from the expectation-maximization algorithm) are used as weights to update the regression coefficients whereas the regression coefficients are simultaneously used to update the posterior probabilities. This software provides several different global and haplotype-specific tests for association and allows the possibility to include several nongenetic covariates. More importantly, it also allows computation of permutation P values, which helps resolve potential problems in dealing with sparse data.

A summary of selected characteristics of cases and controls is shown in Table 1. No statistical differences were observed between cases and controls in the distribution of age (P = 0.83) and gender (P = 0.69). Table 1 also described the distribution of titer category of the cases and controls. In this study, the positive rates detected by VCA-IgA antibody titer are 18.79% in controls and 94.46% in cases.

Table 1.

Distribution of characteristics of study subjects

CharacteristicCases (n = 487)Controls (n = 580)P*log P
Gender, n (%)     
    Male 358 (73.5%) 420 (72.4%)   
    Female 129 (26.5%) 160 (27.6%) 0.69 6.9e−1 
Age, y, n (%)     
    ≤30 104 (21.4%) 131 (22.6%)   
    30-40 188 (38.6%) 208 (35.9%)   
    40-50 137 (28.1%) 171 (29.5%)   
    ≥50 58 (11.9%) 70 (12.1%) 0.81 8.1e−1 
VCA-IgA(%)     
    0 (<1:10) 27 (5.54%) 471 (81.21%)   
    1 (1:10-1:20) 66 (13.55%) 87 (15%)   
    2 (1:40) 89 (18.28%) 18 (3.1%)   
    3 (≥1:80) 305 (62.63%) 4 (0.69%) 0.000 5.03e−161 
CharacteristicCases (n = 487)Controls (n = 580)P*log P
Gender, n (%)     
    Male 358 (73.5%) 420 (72.4%)   
    Female 129 (26.5%) 160 (27.6%) 0.69 6.9e−1 
Age, y, n (%)     
    ≤30 104 (21.4%) 131 (22.6%)   
    30-40 188 (38.6%) 208 (35.9%)   
    40-50 137 (28.1%) 171 (29.5%)   
    ≥50 58 (11.9%) 70 (12.1%) 0.81 8.1e−1 
VCA-IgA(%)     
    0 (<1:10) 27 (5.54%) 471 (81.21%)   
    1 (1:10-1:20) 66 (13.55%) 87 (15%)   
    2 (1:40) 89 (18.28%) 18 (3.1%)   
    3 (≥1:80) 305 (62.63%) 4 (0.69%) 0.000 5.03e−161 
*

P values obtained from χ2 tests.

Subjects were divided into four titer categories: 0, subjects with VCA-IgA antibody titers <1:10; 1, subjects with VCA-IgA antibody titers equal to 1:10 or 1:20; 2, subjects with VCA-IgA antibody titers equal to 1:40; 3, subjects with VCA-IgA antibody titers >1:80.

We genotyped 487 NPC case and 580 control subjects for these seven htSNPs in TLR10 (Table 2). We would like to note that some genotypes were missing for both cases and controls for all seven SNPs due to insufficient amount of DNAs in some samples and the details are given in Table 2. Genotype distributions in the control subjects did not differ significantly from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Table 2).

Table 2.

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium tests and minor allele frequencies

GenotypePosition*AccidHW-pval%GenotypedMAF
720A/C 5925134 rs10856837 98.6 0.473 
891G/A 5924963 rs11466651 0.285 98.8 0.095 
908A/G 5924946 rs11466652 0.793 98.6 0.137 
976T/C 5924878 rs11466653 0.791 99 0.095 
1031G/T 5924823 rs11096956 0.805 95.7 0.341 
1104A/C 5924750 rs11096955 0.708 96.7 0.471 
1141G/A 5924713 rs11466655 0.795 96.5 0.253 
GenotypePosition*AccidHW-pval%GenotypedMAF
720A/C 5925134 rs10856837 98.6 0.473 
891G/A 5924963 rs11466651 0.285 98.8 0.095 
908A/G 5924946 rs11466652 0.793 98.6 0.137 
976T/C 5924878 rs11466653 0.791 99 0.095 
1031G/T 5924823 rs11096956 0.805 95.7 0.341 
1104A/C 5924750 rs11096955 0.708 96.7 0.471 
1141G/A 5924713 rs11466655 0.795 96.5 0.253 

Abbreviations: Accid, accession ID; HW-pval, P value of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium tests for control subjects; MAF, minor allele frequency.

*

Contig position.

Percentage of samples successfully genotyped.

Single SNP Association

When analyzed separately using conditional logistic regression, no statistically significant associations between NPC and any of the seven htSNPs in TLR10 were found. Detailed odds ratios (OR) are given in Table 3.

Table 3.

TLR10 genotypes and NPC risk

GenotypeCases (n = 487)Controls (n = 580)OR* (95% CI*)
720A/C    
    AA 136 (28.51) 154 (27.16)  
    AC 235 (49.27) 286 (50.44) 0.930 (0.698-1.241) 
    CC 106 (22.22) 127 (22.40) 0.945 (0.669-1.336) 
    Missing 10 13  
891G/A    
    GG 395 (82.81) 457 (80.18)  
    GA 81 (16.98) 108 (18.95) 0.868 (0.631-1.193) 
    AA 1 (0.21) 5 (0.88) 0.231 (0.027-1.989) 
    Missing 10 10  
908A/G    
    AA 345 (72.48) 431 (75.88)  
    AG 121 (25.42) 129 (22.71) 1.172 (0.881-1.559) 
    GG 10 (2.10) 8 (1.41) 1.562 (0.610-4.000) 
    Missing 11 12  
976T/C    
    TT 396 (82.67) 461 (81.02)  
    TC 81 (16.91) 102 (17.93) 0.924 (0.671-1.275) 
    CC 2 (0.42) 6 (1.05) 0.388 (0.078-1.933) 
    Missing 11  
1031G/T    
    GG 214 (45.44) 223 (41.30)  
    GT 210 (44.59) 249 (46.11) 0.879 (0.676-1.143) 
    TT 47 (9.98) 68 (12.59) 0.720 (0.475-1.092) 
    Missing 16 40  
1104A/C    
    AA 137 (28.84) 145 (26.51)  
    AC 230 (48.42) 287 (52.47) 0.848 (0.634-1.135) 
    CC 108 (22.74) 115 (21.02) 0.994 (0.699-1.413) 
    Missing 12 33  
1141G/A    
    GG 269 (57.23) 303 (55.09)  
    GA 163 (34.68) 218 (39.64) 0.842 (0.649-1.093) 
    AA 38 (8.09) 29 (8.09) 1.476 (0.886-2.459) 
    Missing 17 30  
GenotypeCases (n = 487)Controls (n = 580)OR* (95% CI*)
720A/C    
    AA 136 (28.51) 154 (27.16)  
    AC 235 (49.27) 286 (50.44) 0.930 (0.698-1.241) 
    CC 106 (22.22) 127 (22.40) 0.945 (0.669-1.336) 
    Missing 10 13  
891G/A    
    GG 395 (82.81) 457 (80.18)  
    GA 81 (16.98) 108 (18.95) 0.868 (0.631-1.193) 
    AA 1 (0.21) 5 (0.88) 0.231 (0.027-1.989) 
    Missing 10 10  
908A/G    
    AA 345 (72.48) 431 (75.88)  
    AG 121 (25.42) 129 (22.71) 1.172 (0.881-1.559) 
    GG 10 (2.10) 8 (1.41) 1.562 (0.610-4.000) 
    Missing 11 12  
976T/C    
    TT 396 (82.67) 461 (81.02)  
    TC 81 (16.91) 102 (17.93) 0.924 (0.671-1.275) 
    CC 2 (0.42) 6 (1.05) 0.388 (0.078-1.933) 
    Missing 11  
1031G/T    
    GG 214 (45.44) 223 (41.30)  
    GT 210 (44.59) 249 (46.11) 0.879 (0.676-1.143) 
    TT 47 (9.98) 68 (12.59) 0.720 (0.475-1.092) 
    Missing 16 40  
1104A/C    
    AA 137 (28.84) 145 (26.51)  
    AC 230 (48.42) 287 (52.47) 0.848 (0.634-1.135) 
    CC 108 (22.74) 115 (21.02) 0.994 (0.699-1.413) 
    Missing 12 33  
1141G/A    
    GG 269 (57.23) 303 (55.09)  
    GA 163 (34.68) 218 (39.64) 0.842 (0.649-1.093) 
    AA 38 (8.09) 29 (8.09) 1.476 (0.886-2.459) 
    Missing 17 30  
*

ORs and 95% CIs estimated by conditional logistic regression.

Association with Haplotypes

We omitted haplotypes with a frequency <0.006. The remaining seven haplotypes were analyzed with Haplo.stats. The risk of developing NPC was significantly elevated among men who carried the haplotype “GCGTGGC” [P = 0.005; OR, 1.415; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.02-1.94], compared with men who carried the most common haplotype “GAGTGAA.” This significant association between this haplotype and NPC was consistent even when adjusting for age, gender, and VCA-IgA antibody titers (P = 0.002). However, when adjusting for age and gender separately, the results were similar to the results without any covariates (data not shown). Further, global score tests were also done using Haplo.stats. When no covariates were included, the global haplo score was 26.58 (df = 7) with an asymptotic P value of 0.008 and a simulation-based P value of 0.0008 (10,000 permutations). When adjusting for VCA-IgA, age, and gender, the global haplo score was 23.78 with an asymptotic P value of 0.003 and a simulation-based P value of 0.006 (10,000 permutations). In addition, we did Haplo.GLM to evaluate the effect for each haplotype. Results are displayed in Table 4. The haplotype-specific P value for GCGTGGC was 0.002 (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.34-3.82), when adjusted for age, gender, and VCA-IgA antibody titers.

Table 4.

Haplotype frequencies of the TLR10 and effect of environmental factors revealed by Haplo.GLM

ModelFrequencies
P*OR (95% CI)*
CasesControls
Covariates     
    Sex   0.193 0.71 (0.42-1.19) 
    Age   0.595 0.99 (0.97-1.01) 
    VCA-IgA   0.000 10.60 (8.00-14.05) 
Haplotypes     
    GCGTAGA 0.004 0.017 0.0376 0.52 (0.28-0.96) 
    GCTTAAA 0.214 0.229 0.522 0.86 (0.54-1.36) 
    GCTCGAA 0.075 0.079 0.763 0.90 (0.46-1.76) 
    GAGTGAA 0.269 0.267 Not applicable Reference 
    GCGTAAA 0.010 0.007 0.302 1.91 (0.56-6.49) 
    AAGTGAA 0.237 0.217 0.134 1.40 (0.90-2.19) 
    GCGTGGC 0.138 0.092 0.002 2.66 (1.34-3.82) 
ModelFrequencies
P*OR (95% CI)*
CasesControls
Covariates     
    Sex   0.193 0.71 (0.42-1.19) 
    Age   0.595 0.99 (0.97-1.01) 
    VCA-IgA   0.000 10.60 (8.00-14.05) 
Haplotypes     
    GCGTAGA 0.004 0.017 0.0376 0.52 (0.28-0.96) 
    GCTTAAA 0.214 0.229 0.522 0.86 (0.54-1.36) 
    GCTCGAA 0.075 0.079 0.763 0.90 (0.46-1.76) 
    GAGTGAA 0.269 0.267 Not applicable Reference 
    GCGTAAA 0.010 0.007 0.302 1.91 (0.56-6.49) 
    AAGTGAA 0.237 0.217 0.134 1.40 (0.90-2.19) 
    GCGTGGC 0.138 0.092 0.002 2.66 (1.34-3.82) 
*

P values and ORs for haplotypes were adjusted by sex, age, and VCA-IgA.

P values and OR for VCA-IgA was based on “per titer category” as indicated in Table 1.

NPC constitutes an endemic multifactorial genetic disease (31). Whereas the disease is rare in the Western world, it occurs with high frequencies in Southern China, Southeast Asia, and among the Greenland Inuit. The highest age-adjusted incidence has been reported in southern China to be 30 to 50 per 100,000 (2). Epidemiologic investigation shows that NPC has a striking geographic and ethnic distribution, with particularly high rates observed among southeast Chinese and other individuals of Chinese descent (32). Genetic susceptibility plays a role in determining the individual risk of NPC (7). Although we have identified a susceptibility locus in an 8.29 cM segment on 4p11-1p14 with genome-wide scan and haplotype analyses (21, 22), no major susceptibility locus has been identified for NPC.

EBV is a ubiquitous herpes virus that infects >90% of the human population and establishes a lifelong viral persistence in the host. It has been consistently identified as an important risk factor for NPC, with a dose-response relationship between EBV antibodies and NPC risk. The single clonally derived viral genome can be found in all endemic NPC cells (33-35). The first contact of an individual with EBV typically happens in the first decade of life and results in an asymptomatic latent infection. The virus establishes a persistent infection in healthy virus carriers characterized by expression of EBV-encoded genes, such as EBERs, EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2A, which can be detected by PCR after reverse transcription of RNA (reverse transcription-PCR) in infected cells (36). High EBV antibody titers indicate reactivation of EBV and lytic infection, which could be detected by serologic method. High VCA-IgA antibody titer (≥1:10) is an index of reactivated status of EBV, and the level of VCA-IgA antibody titer represents the replicating level of the virus. In this study, the positive rates detected by VCA-IgA antibody titer are 18.79% in control subjects and 94.46% in case subjects (Table 1).

An association between NPC and a risk haplotype in TLR10 may indicate that a mutation in a causal SNP or haplotype modifies immune response to EBV and thus increases the individual risk for NPC, although this speculation is not warranted. The fact that all seven individual SNPs gave negative results may also suggest that none of these particular SNPs are causal variants but they may be in linkage disequilibrium with a causal SNP that is physically close. Further research is needed to verify this finding.

The other limitations of this study includes the following: (a) Limited power: Although we conducted statistical tests to examine interaction between the haplotype GCGTGGC and VCA-IgA and obtained negative results (data not show), we need to point out that the power to detect gene-EBV interaction is limited. (b) Lack of epidemiologic investigation: We have not obtained information on other environmental exposure, such as consumption of salted fish and preserved vegetables, and fruits, smoking/drinking status, and occupational history. This may bias our results and reduce the precision of the estimated effect size of the putative risk haplotype. (c) Only TLR10 was examined using tagging SNPs, whereas we have not studied other TLRs in a similar manner. Because TLR6-TRL1-TLR10 gene cluster locates in the linkage region of NPC discovered earlier, we plan to continue this study by including tagging SNPs in TLR 1 and TLR6 in future analysis. (d) Multiple testing was not adjusted.

Further, we would like to ask the question of whether the increase in OR (1.41-2.66) for GCGTGGC when adjusting for VCA-IgA was caused by a possible role of VCA-IgA as a negative confounder if TLR10 allelic variants happen to determine infectivity of EBV status. For this reason, we also evaluated whether there is association between EBV status (positive versus negative) and halotypes constructed by seven SNPs. No positive associations were detected using Haplo.stat (data not shown). Therefore, no evidence indicated VCA-IgA as a negative confounder in the current study.

In light of our findings, we will continue to investigate the role of sequence variants in a variety of TLRs. We suspect we will detect more associations between variances in TLRs and NPC via either haplotype-based or gene-gene interaction–based approaches. Malfunction or improper regulation of TLRs may lead to an unbalanced ratio of proinflammatory to anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the host, contributing to the onset of a number of inflammatory diseases and cancer (37, 38).

We recognize that results from association studies of candidate genes can sometimes be false-positive findings due to population stratification. Although the Cantonese population is considered ethnically homogeneous, the existence of population admixture needs more scrutiny. We plan to genotype 500 previously collected trio families to validate this finding by performing transmission disequilibrium test analysis. To conclude, in this Cantonese population-based case-control study, a relatively common variant in TLR10 was likely associated with NPC and this association was significant even after adjusting for age, gender, and VCA-IgA antibody titers. Although we cannot conclude with confidence that this variant is a causal SNP for NPC, the significant global and haplotype-specific P values support the potential role of TLR10 in the genetic etiology of NPC.

Grant support: China Medical Board and the 863 and 973 projects of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China; Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China; and National Cancer Institute grants R03 CA113240 and Johns Hopkins University (Y.Y. Shugart).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: X-X. Zhou and W-H. Jia contributed equally to this work.

We thank Lina Chen for technical assistance.

1
Yu MC, Yuan JM. Epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Semin Cancer Biol
2002
;
12
:
421
–9.
2
McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Watkinson JC. The aetiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Clin Otolaryngol
2001
;
26
:
82
–92.
3
Jia WH, Collins A, Zeng YX, et al. Complex segregation analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Guangdong, China: evidence for a multifactorial mode of inheritance (complex segregation analysis of NPC in China).
Eur J Hum Genet
2005
;
13
:
248
–52.
4
Zeng YX, Jia WH. Familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Semin Cancer Biol
2002
;
12
:
443
–50.
5
Young LS, Rickinson AB. Epstein-Barr virus: 40 years on.
Nat Rev Cancer
2004
;
4
:
757
–68.
6
Yang XR, Diehl S, Pfeiffer R, et al. Chinese and American Genetic Epidemiology of NPC Study Team. Evaluation of risk factors for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma families in Taiwan.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
;
14
:
900
–5.
7
Ng WT, Yau TK, Yung RW, et al. Screening for family members of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Int J Cancer
2005
;
113
:
998
–1001.
8
Rickinson AB, Kieff E. Epstein-Barr virus. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields virology. 3rd ed. vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 2397–446.
9
Raab-Traub N. Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of NPC [review].
Semin Cancer Biol
2002
;
12
:
431
–41.
10
Yu MC, Henderson BE. Intake of Cantonese-style salted fish as a cause of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
IARC Sci Publ
1987
;
84
:
547
–9.
11
IARC. Some naturally occurring substances. Food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. IARC Monograph. Vol. 56. Lyon: IARC Press; 1993.
12
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking.
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum
2004
;
83
:
1
–1438.
13
Lu CC, Chen JC, Jin YT, Yang HB, Chan SH, Tsai ST. Genetic susceptibility to nasopharyngeal carcinoma within the HLA-A locus in Taiwanese.
Int J Cancer
2003
;
103
:
745
–51.
14
Ooi EE, Ren EC, Chan SH. Association between microsatellites within the human MHC and nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Int J Cancer
1997
;
74
:
229
–32.
15
Hildesheim A, Apple RJ, Chen CJ, et al. Association of HLA class I and II alleles and extended haplotypes with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2002
;
94
:
1780
–9.
16
Goldsmith DB, West TM, Morton R. HLA associations with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Southern Chinese: a meta-analysis.
Clin Otolaryngol
2002
;
27
:
61
–7.
17
Nazar-Stewart V, Vaughan TL, Burt RD, Chen C, Berwick M, Swanson GM. Glutathione S-transferase M1 and susceptibility to nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
1999
;
8
:
547
–51.
18
Hildesheim A, Anderson LM, Chen CJ, et al. CYP2E1 genetic polymorphisms and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Taiwan.
J Natl Cancer Inst
1997
;
89
:
1207
–12.
19
Cho EY, Hildesheim A, Chen CJ, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma and genetic polymorphisms of DNA repair enzymes XRCC1 and hOGG1.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2003
;
12
:
1100
–4.
20
Brancolini V, Devoto M. Genetic linkage studies for the identification of cancer-related genes.
Ann Ist Super Sanita
1996
;
32
:
173
–80.
21
Feng BJ, Huang W, Shugart YY, et al. Genome-wide scan for familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma reveals evidence of linkage to chromosome 4.
Nat Genet
2002
;
31
:
395
–9.
22
Chen HK, Zhang RH, Feng BJ, Liang H, Zeng YX. The susceptibility gene for familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma is mapped on chromosome 4p11-14 by haplotype analyses.
Chin Sci Bull
2003
;
48
:
2327
–30.
23
Nau GJ, Schlesinger A, Richmond JF, Young RA. Cumulative Toll-like receptor activation in human macrophages treated with whole bacteria.
J Immunol
2003
;
170
:
5203
–9.
24
Roeder A, Kirschning CJ, Rupec RA, Schaller M, Weindl G, Korting HC. Toll-like receptors as key mediators in innate antifungal immunity [review].
Med Mycol
2004
;
42
:
485
–98.
25
Heil F, Hemmi H, Hochrein H, et al. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8.
Science
2004
;
303
:
1526
–9.
26
Huang B, Zhao J, Li H, et al. Toll-like receptors on tumor cells facilitate evasion of immune surveillance.
Cancer Res
2005
;
65
:
5009
–14.
27
Chuang T, Ulevitch RJ. Identification of hTLR10: a novel human Toll-like receptor preferentially expressed in immune cells.
Biochim Biophys Acta
2001
;
1518
:
157
–61.
28
Zheng SL, Augustsson-Balter K, Chang B, et al. Sequence variants of toll-like receptor 4 are associated with prostate cancer risk: results from the Cancer Prostate in Sweden Study.
Cancer Res
2004
;
64
:
2918
–22.
29
Sun J, Wiklund F, Zheng SL, et al. Sequence variants in Toll-like receptor gene cluster (TLR6-1-TLR10) and prostate cancer risk.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2005
;
97
:
525
–32.
30
Zhang K, Qin Z, Chen T, Liu JS, Waterman MS, Sun F. HapBlock: haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection software using a set of dynamic programming algorithms.
Bioinformatics
2005
;
21
:
131
–4.
31
Mutirangura A. Molecular mechanisms of nasopharyngeal carcinoma development.
Res Adv Res Updat Med
2000
;
1
:
18
–27.
32
Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas D. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. VIII. IARC scientific publication no. 155. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003.
33
Cheung F, Pang SW, Hioe F, Cheung KN, Lee A, Yau TK. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in situ: two cases of an emerging diagnostic entity.
Cancer
1998
;
83
:
1069
–73.
34
Mutirangura A, Tanunyutthawongese C, Pornthanakasem W, et al. Genomic alterations in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: loss of heterozygosity and Epstein-Barr virus infection.
Br J Cancer
1997
;
76
:
770
–6.
35
Pathmanathan R, Prasad U, Sadler R, Flynn K, Raab-Traub N. Clonal proliferations of cells infected with Epstein-Barr virus in preinvasive lesions related to nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
N Engl J Med
1995
;
333
:
693
–8.
36
Kuppers R. B cells under influence: transformation of B cells by Epstein-Barr virus [review].
Nat Rev Immunol
2003
;
3
:
801
–12.
37
Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses [review].
Nat Immunol
2004
;
5
:
987
–95.
38
Rifkin IR, Leadbetter EA, Busconi L, Viglianti G, Marshak-Rothstein A. Toll-like receptors, endogenous ligands, and systemic autoimmune disease.
Immunol Rev
2005
;
204
:
27
–42.